Magnuson-Stevens Act Provisions; Fisheries of the Northeastern United States; Northeast Multispecies Fishery; Amendment 16 and Framework Adjustment 44, 24444-24456 [2011-10442]
Download as PDF
emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS
24444
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 84 / Monday, May 2, 2011 / Proposed Rules
issue of April 20, 2011, make the
following correction, in the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION, I.
Background section. On page 22071 in
the second column, add after the first
full paragraph the following:
‘‘Specifically, the proposed FAR
section 4.1603 establishes service
contractor reporting requirements based
on type of contract and dollar amount
as stated below:
• Contract types (e.g., costreimbursement, time-and-materials, and
labor-hour contracts) that already
require contractors to track labor hours
closely in order to invoice the
Government will have lower dollar
thresholds than fixed-price contracts,
where this information has not been
required historically. Contractors will be
required to report on all costreimbursement, time-and-materials, and
labor-hour contracts at or above the
simplified acquisition threshold (SAT).
• Contractors will be required to
report on new fixed-price contracts at or
above the President’s Fiscal Year 2011
Budget’s proposed phase-in
thresholds—
Æ $5 million in Fiscal Year 2011;
Æ $2.5 million in Fiscal Year 2012;
Æ $1 million in Fiscal Year 2013; and
Æ $500,000 from Fiscal Year 2014
onwards.
• For indefinite-delivery contracts,
including but not limited to, indefinitedelivery indefinite-quantity (IDIQ)
contracts, Federal Supply Schedule
(FSS) contracts, Governmentwide
Acquisition contracts (GWACs), and
multi-agency contracts, reporting
requirements will be determined based
on the expected dollar amount and type
of the orders issued under the contracts.
• Existing indefinite-delivery
contracts will be bilaterally modified
within six months of the effective date
of the final rule if sufficient time and
value remain on the base contract,
which is defined as—
1. A performance period that extends
beyond October 1, 2011; and
2. $5 million or more remaining to be
obligated to the indefinite-delivery
contract.
The threshold for existing indefinitedelivery contracts is consistent with the
threshold for new fixed-price contracts.’’
Dated: April 27, 2011.
Millisa Gary,
Acting Director, Office of Governmentwide
Acquisition Policy.
[FR Doc. 2011–10590 Filed 4–29–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6820–EP–P
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:43 Apr 29, 2011
Jkt 223001
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
50 CFR Part 648
[Docket No. 100526226–0229–01]
RIN 0648–AY95
Magnuson-Stevens Act Provisions;
Fisheries of the Northeastern United
States; Northeast Multispecies
Fishery; Amendment 16 and
Framework Adjustment 44
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Proposed rule; correcting
amendment; request for comments.
AGENCY:
This rule proposes to make
corrections and clarifications to existing
regulations to ensure consistency with
measures adopted by the New England
Fishery Management Council (Council)
to regulate the Northeast (NE)
multispecies fishery and to provide
additional flexibility for some of the
reporting regulatory requirements. The
current regulations governing the NE
multispecies fishery contain a number
of inadvertent errors, omissions, and
potential inconsistencies with measures
adopted by the Council and approved
by the Secretary of Commerce
(Secretary) in recent actions regarding
the NE Multispecies Fishery
Management Plan (FMP). NMFS takes
this action under the authority of
section 305(d) of the Magnuson-Stevens
Fishery Conservation and Management
Act (Magnuson-Stevens Act) and solicits
public comments on the proposed
corrections and clarifications to these
regulations.
DATES: Written comments must be
received on or before May 17, 2011.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments,
identified by 0648–AY95, by any of the
following methods:
• Electronic submissions: Submit all
electronic public comments via the
Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov.
• Fax: (978) 281–9135.
• Mail: Paper, disk, or CD–ROM
comments should be sent to Patricia A.
Kurkul, Regional Administrator,
National Marine Fisheries Service, 55
Great Republic Drive, Gloucester, MA
01930. Mark the outside of the
envelope, ‘‘Comments on the Proposed
Rule to Correct/Clarify the NE
Multispecies Regulations.’’
Instructions: All comments received
are a part of the public record and will
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00039
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
generally be posted to https://
regulations.gov without change. All
personal identifying information (for
example, name, address, etc.)
voluntarily submitted by the commenter
may be publicly accessible. Do not
submit confidential business
information or otherwise sensitive or
protected information.
NMFS will accept anonymous
comments (enter N/A in the required
fields, if you wish to remain
anonymous). You may submit
attachments to electronic comments in
Microsoft Word, Excel, WordPerfect, or
Adobe PDF file formats only.
Copies of the Regulatory Impact
Review (RIR) prepared for this action
are available from the Regional
Administrator at the above address.
Copies of previous management actions,
including Amendment 16 and
Framework Adjustment (FW 44) and the
respective Final Environmental Impact
Statements (FEISs) and Environmental
Assessments (EAs) prepared for each
action are available from Paul J.
Howard, Executive Director, New
England Fishery Management Council,
50 Water Street, Mill 2, Newburyport,
MA 01950. These documents are also
accessible via the Internet at https://
www.nefmc.org/nemulti/.
Written comments regarding the
burden-hour estimates or other aspects
of the collection-of-information
requirements contained in this rule
should be submitted to the Regional
Administrator at the address above and
to the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) by e-mail at
OIRA_Submission@omb.eop.gov, or fax
to (202) 395–7285.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Brett Alger, Fishery Management
Specialist, phone: 978–675–2153, fax:
978–281–9135.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
The most recent management actions
in the NE multispecies fishery
(Amendment 16 and FW 44) were both
implemented by final rules that
published in the Federal Register on
April 9, 2010 (75 FR 18262 and 75 FR
18356, respectively), and became
effective on May 1, 2010. Amendment
16 and FW 44 implemented measures
necessary to end overfishing and rebuild
overfished stocks based on new or
existing rebuilding programs and to
comply with annual catch limit (ACL)
and accountability measure (AM)
requirements of the Magnuson-Stevens
Act. Amendment 16 also substantially
revised existing sector management
measures and established new sectors.
E:\FR\FM\02MYP1.SGM
02MYP1
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 84 / Monday, May 2, 2011 / Proposed Rules
Amendment 16 superseded measures
implemented by an emergency final rule
(74 FR 17030, April 13, 2009) which
was promulgated to immediately reduce
overfishing on certain groundfish stocks
managed by the FMP until long-term
measures could be implemented by the
Amendment 16 final rule.
The final rules implementing
Amendment 16 and FW 44, as well as
other previous actions, contained
several inadvertent errors, omissions,
and items inconsistent with the intent of
these actions, as identified below. This
action proposes to correct these errors,
and clarify or modify the current
regulations to ensure consistency with
their original intent. Also, changes are
made to some of the regulations to
provide additional flexibility for some
of the administrative requirements, such
as allowing sector managers more time
to complete their weekly reports or
exempting vessels from sending a vessel
trip report (VTR) on a set-only trip.
NMFS proposes this action under
section 305(d) of the Magnuson-Stevens
Act which provides that the Secretary of
Commerce may, on its own, promulgate
regulations necessary to ensure that an
FMP or its amendments are carried out
in accordance with the provisions of
this Act. The following proposed
corrections are listed in the order in
which they appear in the regulations;
the last section of proposed corrections
is found throughout the regulations.
emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS
Proposed Measures
1. VTR Requirements
The current VTR regulations require
that a VTR be submitted by a vessel
operator upon entering port with fish.
This suggests that vessels that may have
conducted fishing activity, but that did
not catch any fish, do not have to
submit a VTR for that trip. This is
inconsistent with VTR instructions
provided to vessels by NMFS, with
industry practice, and the purpose of
VTRs. Information for trips on which
fishing occurred, but no fish were
caught, provides important and
necessary fishing data necessary to help
evaluate the status of stocks and
provides fishing effort information used
for future management decisions. To
ensure that vessels submit a VTR for all
trips that conduct fishing activity, this
action proposes to revise the VTR
submission regulations to remove the
language that states that only trips that
land fish must submit a VTR, with an
exception for vessels on a set-only trip.
Set-only trips would be defined as a
fishing trip on which a federally
permitted vessel deploys gear with the
intention of retrieving it on a separate
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:43 Apr 29, 2011
Jkt 223001
trip and does not haul-back or retrieve
any gear capable of catching fish on that
trip. While set-only trips fall under the
definition of fishing in the MagnusonStevens Act, VTRs from trips that only
set gear and do not intend to land fish,
do not contain information pertinent to
management decisions and should
therefore not be required in this
instance. Since these trips would have
zero catch and there are limited
resources for dockside and at-sea
monitoring (DSM and ASM,
respectively) coverage requirements
implemented by Amendment 16,
prioritization of coverage is necessary to
ensure trips intending to possess or land
fish receive DSM and ASM coverage.
Because exempting set-only trips from
VTR, DSM, and ASM requirements
could create an incentive for a vessel
operator to participate in fishing after
declaring a set-only trip, and avoid the
VTR, DSM, and ASM requirements, as
well as avoid any financial costs
associated with these programs, this
action proposes to include regulations
in § 648.14 that would prohibit vessels
on a set-only trip from possessing or
landing any fish species on that trip.
Based on an industry request, NMFS has
recently made accommodations for
vessels that leave port exclusively to set
fixed gear by exempting them from
submitting a VTR for such trips, to
reduce unnecessary reporting and
monitoring requirements when no fish
are landed.
2. Dealer Prohibitions
Current regulations at § 648.14(k)(3)(i)
are not explicit as to whether they apply
to the importation of foreign-caught NE
multispecies. Amendment 16 added
Atlantic wolffish to the FMP, and
included it as a zero-retention species,
along with Southern New England
(SNE)/Mid-Atlantic (MA) winter
flounder, ocean pout, and windowpane
flounder. The current dealer provisions
in this section could allow the
importation of the zero-retention species
specified in Amendment 16 that would
otherwise be prohibited. This creates an
unnecessary enforcement burden for
NMFS in cases where a dealer lawfully
may be in possession of prohibited
species that were obtained from sources
other than U.S. fishing vessels. In
addition, the regulations do not
currently prohibit the export of these
zero-retention species. This action
proposes to revise the regulatory text to
read that it is unlawful for any dealer or
person acting in the capacity of a dealer
to ‘‘possess, import, export, transfer,
land, or receive as a dealer, regulated
species pursuant to §§ 648.82, 648.85,
648.86, or 648.87’’ for the purposes of
PO 00000
Frm 00040
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
24445
eliminating any uncertainty whether
zero-retention species can be imported
or exported.
3. Regulated Mesh Area (RMA)
The regulations at § 648.80(a)(3)(vi)
state that a vessel may not fish in either
the Gulf of Maine (GOM) or Georges
Bank (GB) Exemption Area unless
fishing under certain restrictions,
including the provisions of an exempted
fishery. This paragraph references some,
but inadvertently, not all of the
exempted fisheries, specifically the
exempted fisheries outlined at
§ 648.80(a)(15), (a)(16), and (a)(18).
Therefore, this action would revise the
regulations at § 648.80(a)(3)(vi) to
reference all applicable exempted
fisheries through § 648.80(a)(18) and
update other references within § 648.80
to be more consistent with current
regulations.
4. Applicability of Restricted Gear Areas
(RGA)
Amendment 16 adopted RGAs that
require a common pool vessel, fishing
any part of a trip within a RGA under
a NE multispecies day-at-sea (DAS), to
use selective gear (i.e., a haddock
separator trawl, a Ruhle trawl, a rope
separator trawl, hook gear, or flatfish or
roundfish gillnets with mesh size
greater than or equal to 10 inches (25.4
cm)) to reduce the catch of species
requiring substantial reductions in
fishing mortality. The current
regulations implementing this provision
at § 648.81(n) require that these gear
restrictions apply to all NE multispecies
limited access vessels fishing any part of
a trip within a RGA. This proposed rule
would revise this paragraph to clarify
that the RGAs only apply to vessels
fishing under a NE multispecies DAS, to
maintain consistency with the original
intent of Amendment 16.
5. Small Vessel Category Possession
Limits
The Amendment 7 final rule,
published May 31, 1996 (61 FR 27709),
exempted vessels with a NE
multispecies Small Vessel category
permit from using NE multispecies DAS
when fishing for groundfish. In
addition, Amendment 7 exempted the
Small Vessel category from specific trip
limits for specific species. Regulations
at § 648.82(b)(5)(i) specify that a vessel
electing to fish under the Small Vessel
category may retain up to 300 lb (136.1
kg) of cod, haddock, and yellowtail
flounder, combined, and one Atlantic
halibut per trip, without being subject to
DAS restrictions, provided the vessel
does not exceed the yellowtail flounder
trip limit restrictions specified under
E:\FR\FM\02MYP1.SGM
02MYP1
24446
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 84 / Monday, May 2, 2011 / Proposed Rules
emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS
§ 648.86(g). Additionally, this paragraph
currently states that vessels with a
Small Vessel category permit are not
subject to trip limits for other NE
multispecies. Since that time,
Amendment 16 prohibited the
possession of four species in any fishery
(windowpane flounder, ocean pout,
Atlantic wolffish, and SNE/MA winter
flounder). The current Small Vessel
category regulations could be
interpreted to mean that Small Vessel
category permits may possess these
prohibited species, which would
undermine the purpose of the
prohibition on possessing these species.
Therefore, this proposed rule would
change the reference to ‘‘§ 648.86(g)’’ in
§ 648.82(b)(5)(i) to read ‘‘§ 648.86,’’ and
remove the sentence ‘‘Such vessel is not
subject to a possession limit for other
NE multispecies’’ to more accurately
reflect the trip limits revised by
Amendment 16 and FW 44.
6. Default AM for Stocks Not Allocated
to Sectors
The recent reauthorization of the
Magnuson-Stevens Act required fishery
management councils to establish a
mechanism to specify ACLs for each
managed stock such that overfishing
does not occur in the fishery, and AMs
that would prevent these ACLs from
being exceeded in the future and to
address any overages of these ACLs that
may occur. Amendment 16 was
developed to affect these changes in the
NE Multispecies FMP. The Amendment
16 final rule established a process to
specify and distribute ACLs among
various segments of the fishery that
catch NE multispecies stocks, along
with AMs that apply only to a subset of
these segments of the fishery,
specifically the directed commercial
and recreational NE multispecies
fisheries, and the Atlantic herring
fishery. To ensure that overfishing does
not occur on each NE multispecies stock
as a whole due to excessive catch by
fisheries not subject to AMs, Section
4.2.1.3 of the Amendment 16 document
states that ‘‘controls on the portion of
the fishery that is subject to AMs must
be sufficient to prevent overfishing on
the stock as a whole,’’ consistent with
the National Standard 1 Guidelines
(January 16, 2009; 74 FR 3178).
The Amendment 16 final rule
indicated that the groundfish fishery
would be responsible for any excessive
catch of regulated NE multispecies and
ocean pout stocks by vessels that are not
subject to AMs and fishing outside of
the FMP as specified under
§ 648.90(a)(5)(ii). This includes vessels
fishing for regulated NE multispecies
and ocean pout in state waters outside
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:43 Apr 29, 2011
Jkt 223001
the FMP, catching regulated NE
multispecies and ocean pout as part of
an exempted fishery, or catching
yellowtail flounder when participating
in the Atlantic sea scallop fishery.
Because Amendment 16 did not provide
a specific allocation of Atlantic halibut,
SNE/MA winter flounder, ocean pout,
windowpane flounder, and Atlantic
wolffish to sectors, these stocks are not
subject to any sector-specific AMs.
Therefore, the ACL available to the
commercial NE multispecies fishery for
each of these stocks is allocated entirely
to common pool vessels, and the only
AMs established for these stocks are
those specified for common pool
vessels. Thus, to maintain consistency
with Amendment 16, the common pool
AMs must consider the catch of these
stocks by all vessels, including common
pool vessels, sector vessels, and vessels
fishing outside of the NE multispecies
fishery.
The regulation at § 648.90(a)(4)
implemented by the Amendment 16
final rule indicated that common pool
AMs would be triggered by excessive
catch of vessels fishing outside of the
NE Multispecies FMP, it did not
specifically incorporate reference to
excessive catch of stocks not allocated
to sectors, as described above. Further,
although the common pool differential
DAS counting AM applies to all
regulated NE multispecies and ocean
pout stocks caught during fishing years
(FYs) 2010 and 2011, the hard total
allowable catch (TAC) AM specified to
begin in FY 2012 for common pool
vessels does not provide effective AMs
for several of these stocks, including
ocean pout, windowpane flounder, and
Atlantic halibut. However, the final rule
implementing Amendment 16 did not
specifically address these deficiencies.
This proposed rule would revise the
common pool differential DAS counting
AM regulations at § 648.82(n)(1), the
ACL distribution regulations at
§ 648.90(a)(4)(iii)(E)(2), and the overall
AM regulations at § 648.90(a)(5) to
clarify that sector vessel catch of stocks
not allocated to sectors (i.e., Atlantic
halibut, SNE/MA winter flounder, ocean
pout, windowpane flounder, and
Atlantic wolffish) during FYs 2010 and
2011 will be added to the catch of such
stocks by common pool vessels during
those FYs to determine if the common
pool differential DAS counting AM will
be triggered. This would ensure that the
regulations implementing Amendment
16 correctly reflect the Council’s intent
and NMFS’s understanding that the
AMs applicable to the NE multispecies
fishery must be sufficient to prevent
overfishing on the stock as a whole for
FYs 2010 and 2011. However, because
PO 00000
Frm 00041
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
the Council adopted specific measures
as part of the FY 2012 common pool
hard-TAC AM that explicitly do not
apply to all stocks, NMFS does not have
the authority to revise the regulations in
a correction rule to ensure that AMs are
sufficient to prevent overfishing of the
stock as a whole beginning in FY 2012.
NMFS has communicated this
deficiency to the Council in a letter
dated January 21, 2010. Measures to
address deficient AMs for these stocks
are currently being developed by the
Council and are expected to be
implemented in a separate action by the
start of FY 2012 on May 1, 2012.
7. Multispecies Minimum Fish Sizes and
Fillet Provisions
On August 10, 2007, a temporary
emergency rule (72 FR 44979) reduced
the haddock minimum size. That action
suspended paragraph § 648.83(a)(1), and
inserted paragraph § 648.83(a)(3). The
rule was extended through August 10,
2008, by a temporary emergency rule
(72 FR 64000) that published on
November 14, 2007 and became
effective on February 10, 2008. When
this latter action expired, paragraph
§ 648.83(a)(1) was once again effective,
but inadvertently, paragraph § 648(a)(3)
remained in the regulations. As a result,
the current regulations at § 648.83(a)
now include two lists specifying
minimum fish sizes. This rule proposes
to correct this by removing paragraph
§ 684.83(a)(3) in its entirety. This
proposed rule will have no effect on
legal fish sizes apart from what is in the
current regulations and analyzed in
Amendment 16.
On March 1, 1994, Amendment 5 (59
FR 9872) created an exemption to allow
crew members aboard a vessel issued a
commercial NE multispecies permit to
possess up to 25 lb (11.3 kg) of fillets
that measure less than the minimum
size, if such fillets are from legal-sized
fish and were not sold, bartered or
traded. At the time, DAS was the only
effort control for the FMP, and the
associated regulations applied this
provision only to those vessels issued a
limited access NE multispecies permit
and fishing under a NE multispecies
DAS. Amendment 16 substantially
revised sector measures to exempt
sector vessels from DAS measures,
provided they comply with hard quotas
and area closures based on an allocation
of most stocks managed by the FMP;
however, it did not extend the 25-lb
(11.3-kg) fillet exemption to vessels
fishing under the sector provisions.
NMFS believes that this exemption was
meant to apply to all limited access NE
multispecies DAS vessels, whether or
not a vessel elects to fish under a DAS
E:\FR\FM\02MYP1.SGM
02MYP1
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 84 / Monday, May 2, 2011 / Proposed Rules
emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS
or sector provisions in a given FY.
Therefore, this action would expand the
existing fillet exemption to all vessels
issued a limited access NE multispecies
DAS permit, including those that are
fishing in a sector and exempt from
fishing under a DAS. Consistent with
the intent of Amendment 16 and the
associated regulation at
§ 648.87(b)(1)(v), all catch by a sector
vessel, including fillets retained by crew
for personal use, count against the
applicable annual catch entitlement
(ACE) for the sector in which that vessel
participates.
Currently, fillets and parts of fish as
referenced at § 648.83(b) are counted at
a rate of 3:1 solely for compliance
purposes with DAS possession limits.
That is, law enforcement multiplies the
weight of fillets or parts of fish by 3 and
adds that to the weight of whole fish on
board. The total weight of whole fish
and fillets combined, must comply with
trip limits. When landing such fillets for
personal consumption, the amount of
fish taken home must be recorded in a
vessel’s VTR for that trip, under the
code ‘‘999998’’ for ‘‘home consumption.’’
Because the current system does not
accurately account for the disposition of
fish landed under the ‘‘home
consumption’’ field in VTRs, these fish
are not currently counted against the
common pool sub-ACL. Replacing the
current 1:1 counting method with 3:1
counting for quota monitoring purposes
would ensure that all fish being retained
would be accounted for. This proposed
correction would be consistent with the
intentions of the FMP that all catch by
common pool and sector vessels be
accounted for, and would prevent a
sector from unknowingly fishing over its
respective ACE. Accordingly, fish
retained for at-home consumption
would be counted at the 3:1 rate.
8. Adjustments to U.S./Canada
Management Area TAC
Regulations at § 648.85(a)(2)(ii)
provide that any overages of GB cod and
GB haddock TACs specified for either
the common pool or an individual
sector, and any overage of GB yellowtail
flounder TAC specified for the common
pool, an individual sector, or the scallop
fishery in a given FY will be subtracted
from the respective TAC in the
following FY. However, Amendment 16
incorrectly states that the catch of stocks
of yellowtail flounder by the scallop
fishery will be treated as an ‘‘other subcomponent’’ of the ACL until AMs for
the catch of yellowtail flounder in the
scallop fishery can be developed in an
amendment to the Atlantic Sea Scallop
FMP (i.e., Amendment 15). Therefore,
this rule would remove the regulatory
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:43 Apr 29, 2011
Jkt 223001
reference to the scallop fishery in
§ 648.85(a)(2)(ii) and replace it with a
reference to the overall groundfish AM
provisions in § 648.90(a)(5)(ii). Since it
is likely that the final rule implementing
Scallop Amendment 15, if approved,
will not be published by the start of the
NE multispecies 2011 FY on May 1,
2011, this correction is necessary to
ensure that any overage of the overall
GB yellowtail flounder ACL caused by
another fishery would be divided
between the common pool and sector
sub-components to determine if the
respective AMs will be triggered.
9. Eastern U.S./Canada Landing Limit
Restrictions
Amendment 16 revised the existing
closure provisions for the Eastern U.S./
Canada Area when 100 percent of the
TAC is reached for GB cod. Amendment
16 revised the regulation at
§ 648.85(a)(3)(iv)(A)(2) to require that
when 100 percent of the TAC is reached
for GB cod, the Eastern U.S./Canada
Area will be closed to all NE
multispecies DAS vessels. This
regulation maintains outdated language
that fails to recognize the specific
allocation of a portion of the Eastern
U.S./Canada TACs for this stock to
sectors. To maintain consistency with
Amendment 16 and ensure that NMFS
has the authority to close the Eastern
U.S./Canada Area to each component of
the NE multispecies commercial fishery
that exceeded its allocation of the
Eastern U.S./Canada Area GB cod TAC,
this proposed rule would clarify the
regulations at § 648.85(a)(3)(iv)(A)(2) by
closing the area to all limited access NE
multispecies vessels subject to a
particular TAC allocation, once that
segment’s allocation of the Eastern U.S./
Canada Area GB cod TAC is projected
to be caught.
10. Special Management Programs
The current regulations at
§ 648.85(b)(3)(x)(A) restrict the gear that
may be used in the Closed Area II
Yellowtail Flounder/Haddock Special
Access Program (SAP) to only trawl gear
when the SAP is open to targeting
yellowtail flounder. This is not
consistent with the measure originally
implemented in the Amendment 13
final rule (69 FR 22906, April 27, 2004).
This action would revise these
regulations to clarify that vessels also
may use hook gear or gillnet gear in this
SAP when it is open to the targeting of
yellowtail flounder by revising the text
to state that NE multispecies vessels
‘‘fishing with trawl gear’’ must use a
haddock separator trawl, flounder net,
or Ruhle trawl.
PO 00000
Frm 00042
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
24447
The FW 40A final rule, published
November 14, 2004 (69 FR 67780),
adopted the Regular B DAS Program.
The program allows any eligible
common pool vessel to harvest certain
healthy groundfish stocks when fishing
under a NE multispecies Regular B DAS,
while minimizing bycatch of less
healthy NE multispecies stocks through
the use of selective gear types.
Amendment 16 further revised the
program, with updated stock status
information, to focus the effort of the
program on three stocks, including GB
haddock. Amendment 16 required
vessels fishing under the Regular B DAS
Program in the GB cod stock area with
trawl gear to use a haddock separator
trawl, a Ruhle trawl, or other approved
trawl gear with a codend composed of
at least 6-inch (15.24-cm) diamond or
square mesh. However, the regulations
implementing Amendment 16 did not
specify an area where the 6-inch (15.24cm) mesh codends could be used.
Therefore, this proposed rule would
clarify the regulations at
§ 648.85(b)(6)(iv)(J)(4) by specifying that
the use of a 6-inch (15.24-cm) codend is
only permitted within the GB cod stock
area.
In 2005, FW 41 revised the Closed
Area I Hook Gear Haddock SAP
measures affecting common pool vessels
to address concerns identified by NMFS
in the original submission of this SAP
as part of FW 40–A. The final rule
implementing FW 41 inadvertently did
not include a provision restricting the
bait that may be used by common pool
vessels. The final rule implementing
Amendment 16 rectified this oversight,
but inadvertently, imposed the bait
requirements on sector vessels. This
action would revise the bait restrictions
for this SAP specified at
§ 648.85(b)(7)(iv)(E) and (vi) to only
apply to common pool vessels.
11. Daily Landing Restrictions
Current landing limit regulations at
§ 648.86(m) prohibit NE multispecies
permitted vessels from landing
regulated NE multispecies or ocean pout
more than once in any 24-hr period.
These regulations provide an example
that indicates that this period of time
begins when a vessel departs port,
rather than when the vessel returns to
port and lands groundfish. Amendment
16 states that the intent was to be based
upon time of landing. Therefore, this
proposed rule would change the
regulations at § 648.86(m) by modifying
the example to reflect the current
regulations, which are correctly based
upon time of landing. Additionally, the
intent of Amendment 16 is to restrict NE
multispecies permitted vessels from
E:\FR\FM\02MYP1.SGM
02MYP1
24448
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 84 / Monday, May 2, 2011 / Proposed Rules
landing NE multispecies or ocean pout
more than once in any 24-hr period,
rather than all fish species.
emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS
12. Sector ACE allocation
The current regulations at
§ 648.87(b)(1)(ii) state that a sector may
only fish in a particular stock area if it
has been allocated or acquires ACE for
all stocks caught in that stock area. As
written, this text could be interpreted to
mean that a sector would have to be
allocated or acquire ACE for a stock that
sectors are not allocated, such as SNE/
MA winter flounder, to be able to fish,
for example, in the SNE/MA yellowtail
flounder stock area. To clarify that
sectors have the ability to fish in a
particular stock area for a stock
allocated to sectors, the text at
§ 648.87(b)(1)(ii) would be revised to
state that sectors may fish in each stock
area provided it has been allocated or
acquires ACE for those stocks
‘‘allocated’’ to sectors that are caught
within that stock area.
13. Sector Monitoring
As part of a DSM program, a sector is
required to contract with an
independent third-party DSM service
provider to observe offloads by sector
vessels to verify that landings are
accurately reported. The DSM program
requires all NE multispecies sector
vessels on a sector trip in which the NE
multispecies catch applies against the
sector ACE to submit a trip-start hail
(TSH) report to the DSM provider,
which provides the information
necessary to facilitate the deployment of
a DSM. If the vessel operator does not
receive a confirmation that the TSH
report has been received within 10 min
of sending the report, the current
regulations at § 648.87(b)(5)(i)(A)(1)
require the vessel operator to contact the
DSM service provider to confirm the
receipt of the TSH report via a back-up
system specified by the DSM service
provider. While the regulations do not
specify by what means a TSH must be
transmitted, many sectors are using
their existing VMS to transmit such
reports. The delivery of such reports via
VMS are often taking more than 10 min
because the 10-min response
requirement has proven to be
impractical. Therefore, this action
proposes to eliminate the 10-min
requirement currently specified in
§ 648.87(b)(5)(i)(A)(1), but still require
the vessel operator to contact the DSM
service provider via a back-up system,
after a time determined by the DSM
provider, to confirm the receipt of the
TSH report.
The DSM provisions require that, for
a trip that is selected to be monitored,
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:43 Apr 29, 2011
Jkt 223001
all offload events must be monitored,
including offloads occurring at more
than one location, offloads to a truck,
and offloads at remote locations. The
regulations at § 648.87(b)(5)(ii)(B)(2)
specify that the roving monitor (RM)
must ‘‘record all offloaded catch by
species and market class’’ for offloads to
a truck. Based upon input from the
fishing industry, NMFS has determined
that the regulation requiring that species
be sorted by market class is impractical,
as sorting does not generally occur at
offloads to trucks and in remote
locations. Additionally, NMFS has
determined that this information is
unnecessary to accurately monitor
landings data, as catch is monitored at
the species/stock level and not at the
level of market class. This proposed rule
would change the data collection
requirement for offloads to a truck by a
RM to not require the species be sorted
by market class, by removing the
language ‘‘and market class’’ from
regulations at § 648.87(b)(5)(ii)(B)(2).
The regulations at
§ 648.87(b)(5)(ii)(B)(2) also require
offloads to trucks to specify the number
of totes of each species offloaded, the
weight of fish in each tote, and that each
tote is properly labeled with
information that identifies the trip to
which the tote is associated. The totetagging requirement is intended to
ensure that all catch offloaded from a
vessel to a truck can be tracked from the
offload site to the dealer, where it will
be accurately weighed and reported.
Based on information provided by
sector participants, some offloads to
trucks occur within sight of a dealer due
to limited capacity of a vessel to land
directly to a dealer. To minimize the
burden on RMs and the cost associated
with such monitoring activities, this
proposed rule would exempt the totetagging requirement only if the
following three conditions are met: (1)
The RM that observed the offload at the
dock will also serve as the DSM when
the truck is offloaded at the dealer; (2)
the RM will follow the truck, in line of
sight, from the remote offload location
to the dealer where the actual weighing
of the fish occurs; and (3) the truck is
loaded with only the catch from the one
trip being monitored.
14. Sector Reporting Requirements
Amendment 16 implemented a
number of sector reporting
requirements, including weekly catch
reports to be submitted to NMFS by
each sector. The regulations at
§ 648.87(b)(1)(vi)(B) specify that each
sector must submit a weekly catch
report by 2359 hr on Thursday of the
week following the reporting week.
PO 00000
Frm 00043
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Such reports contain detailed
information, including: Week ending
date, species, stock area, gear, number of
trips, reported landings, discards, total
catch, status of the sector’s ACE,
whether this is a new or updated record
of sector catch for each NE multispecies
stock allocated to that particular sector,
sector enforcement issues, any
discrepancies noted by dockside/roving
monitors between dealers and offloads,
summary of offloads witnessed by
dockside/roving monitors for that
reporting week, and a list of vessels
landing for that reporting week. Dealer
reports for the same reporting period are
utilized by sectors to accurately
complete the weekly sector catch
reports and for apportionment purposes.
However, dealer data are not available
until Wednesday. Based on sector
manager input, one day has not been a
sufficient amount of time to accurately
complete the weekly sector catch
reports. This proposed rule would
provide additional flexibility
§ 648.87(b)(1)(vi)(B) by extending the
sector deadline submission for the
weekly catch report from 2359 hr on
Thursday, to 0700 hr on the second
Monday for the same reporting week in
question.
15. Recreational and Charter/Party
Vessel Restrictions
The April 24, 2000, final rule
implementing measures approved under
FW 33 (65 CFR 21658) created an
exemption to allow NE multispecies
charter/party permitted vessels to fish in
the GOM Closed Areas provided such
vessels obtained a letter of authorization
(LOA) from NMFS. The regulations at
§ 648.89(e)(3)(iv) implementing this
provision state that a vessel may not use
any NE multispecies DAS during the
period of participation to ensure that
vessels operating under the charter/
party provisions cannot fish
commercially within these closed areas.
However, not all commercial NE
multispecies vessels fish under a DAS.
For example, vessels fishing under NE
multispecies Small Vessel, Handgear A,
and Handgear B categories are not
required to use NE multispecies DAS to
fish commercially. The Council’s intent
when developing this exemption was to
provide the greatest flexibility for
limited access vessels to engage in both
party/charter and commercial fishing on
a seasonal basis, while restricting
limited access vessels carrying
passengers for hire from selling their
catch when fishing as a charter/party
vessel within closed areas. This action
would clarify the regulations by
including language that states that
vessels possessing an LOA to fish as a
E:\FR\FM\02MYP1.SGM
02MYP1
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 84 / Monday, May 2, 2011 / Proposed Rules
charter/party vessel in the GOM Closed
Areas cannot fish on a sector trip, under
a NE multispecies DAS, or under the
provisions of the Small Vessel,
Handgear A, and Handgear B categories
during the period of participation.
The regulations at § 648.89(d) would
also be corrected to state that charter/
party vessels could not sell, barter,
trade, or otherwise transfer for a
commercial purpose, or attempt to sell,
barter, trade, or otherwise transfer for a
commercial purpose, NE multispecies
caught or landed while fishing in the
U.S. Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ)
unless they are fishing under a NE
multispecies ‘‘sector trip,’’ or fishing
under a NE multispecies Handgear A,
Handgear B, or Small Vessel Category C
permit.
emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS
16. Applicability of Possession
Prohibition for Certain Stocks
While Amendment 16 clearly lists
windowpane flounder and ocean pout
as zero-retention species for all
commercial NE multispecies vessels, it
is less clear in defining whether vessels
in other fisheries could possess such
species. Section 4.3.2.1 of Amendment
16 indicates that possession of these
stocks is prohibited by all fisheries.
However, this section is specific to the
effort control measures adopted for NE
multispecies common pool vessels.
Therefore, the final rule implementing
Amendment 16 measures did not
prohibit recreational and charter/party
vessels or vessels fishing in other
fisheries from possessing ocean pout
and windowpane flounder. Based on
further consultation with Council staff,
it was determined that the intent of
Amendment 16 was to prohibit the
retention of these species by all vessels.
Therefore, this action proposes to
restrict the possession of windowpane
flounder and ocean pout in all fisheries,
including catch by recreational anglers,
charter/party vessels, and other fisheries
such as the scallop fishery. The
possession of Atlantic wolfish and SNE
winter flounder is already correctly
prohibited by recreational anglers and
charter/party vessels as specified at
§ 648.89(c)(6) and (7) respectively.
17. Monkfish Declarations
The regulations at § 648.92(b)(1)(iii)
allow a vessel fishing in the NE
multispecies fishery to change its
fishing activity declaration after leaving
port to reflect the vessel operator’s
intention to also fish in the monkfish
fishery on the same trip. These
regulations were first implemented as
part of FW 4 to the Monkfish FMP on
September 21, 2007 (72 FR 53942), and
pre-dated the development of
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:43 Apr 29, 2011
Jkt 223001
Amendment 16. The applicability of the
monkfish option is for a vessel fishing
under a NE multispecies Category A
DAS, which was the universal effort
control in the NE multispecies fishing
prior to the implementation of
substantial revisions to sector measures
under Amendment 16. However, NMFS
believes that the Council’s intent in
Amendment 16 was not to exclude
vessels from this option when fishing on
a sector trip. Therefore, this action
proposes to insert reference to vessels
fishing on a NE multispecies sector trip
to enable such vessels to also take
advantage of the monkfish option.
18. Additional Corrections
In addition to the changes specified
above, the following changes to the
regulations are proposed to correct
inaccurate references and to further
clarify the intent of the Council.
In § 648.10(k)(3)(ii), N. latitude, Point
G9 would be corrected to read ‘‘The
intersection of the Cape Cod, MA,
coastline and 70°00″ W. long.’’ This
current point incorrectly references the
‘‘South-facing shoreline of Cape Cod,
MA.’’
Section § 648.14(k)(6)(ii)(B) would be
corrected to reference the special
management programs at
‘‘§ 648.85(b)(7)(iv)(E)’’ to replace the
current inaccurate reference to
‘‘§ 648.85(b)(7)(iv)(F).’’
In § 648.80(a)(2)(ii) and (a)(17)(ii), the
‘‘Approximate loran C bearings’’ portion
of the table would be removed. The U.S.
Coast Guard ceased operations of LoranC, on February 10, 2010, which renders
these coordinates useless. This will
have minimum impact, as the same
information is displayed in the
regulations using latitude and longitude
coordinates.
In § 648.80(a)(3)(v), a reference to
‘‘§ 648.87(c)’’ would be added to the
beginning of the section, to include
sector vessels.
In § 648.80(b)(3)(i), the phrase ‘‘unless
otherwise restricted in § 648.86’’ would
be added. This paragraph includes
ocean pout as one of the list of species
exemptions for the SNE RMA; however,
Amendment 16 listed ocean pout as a
zero-retention species. The Amendment
16 final rule inadvertently failed to
cross-reference this prohibition in
§ 648.86.
In § 648.80(c)(2)(i), the reference to
§ 648.104(a) would be revised to read
‘‘shall be that specified by § 648.104(a).’’
This was the original regulatory text
used to cite the regulations and was
inadvertently changed in the final rule
implementing Amendment 16.
In § 648.85(a)(1)(ii), this action would
correct the Eastern U.S./Canada Area, N.
PO 00000
Frm 00044
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
24449
latitude coordinates for Points USCA 7
and USCA 6 to 40° 50″ N. latitude, and
Points USCA 5 and 4 to 40° 40″ N.
latitude. Amendment 13 defined the
Eastern U.S./Canada Area as being
composed of statistical areas 561 and
562. The coordinates for statistical area
562 used to define the Eastern U.S./
Canada Area were incorrectly
transposed in the Amendment 13 final
rule and would be rectified by this
action.
Section § 648.87(b)(1)(ix) would be
corrected to reference the prohibited
species regulations at ‘‘§ 648.86(l),’’
instead of the inaccurate reference to
‘‘§ 648.87(1).’’ In addition, a reference to
‘‘§ 648.86(c)’’ would be inserted at
§ 648.87(b)(1)(ix) to clarify that sector
vessels are held to the one-fish per trip
possession limit of Atlantic halibut, as
intended in Amendment 16.
In § 648.87(c)(2), a reference to
‘‘fishing regulations within the
groundfish Fishery Management Plan
(FMP)’’ would be inserted to clarify that
a NE multispecies sector operations
plan can only include exemptions from
regulations within the groundfish FMP,
as intended in Amendment 16.
In § 648.89(c)(2)(i), the reference to
‘‘private recreational vessel’’ would be
corrected to read ‘‘charter/party vessel.’’
In § 648.90(a)(4), the reference to
‘‘(a)(5)’’ would be corrected to read
‘‘(a)(6).’’
Section 648.90(a)(4)(iii)(E) would be
revised to include a reference to the
recreational fishery. A reference to the
recreational fishery was made in the
title of this paragraph, but was not
included in the regulations.
Classification
Pursuant to sections 304(b)(1)(A) and
305(d) of the Magnuson-Stevens Act, I
have determined that this proposed rule
is consistent with the NE Multispecies
FMP, other provisions of the MagnusonStevens Act, and other applicable law,
subject to further consideration after
public comment.
This proposed rule has been
determined to be not significant for
purposes of Executive Order 12866.
The Chief Counsel for Regulation of
the Department of Commerce certified
to the Chief Counsel for Advocacy of the
Small Business Administration that this
proposed rule, if adopted, would not
have a significant economic impact on
a substantial number of small entities.
The factual basis for this determination
is as follows:
The Small Business Administration
size standard for small commercial
fishing entities is $4 million in gross
sales, while the size standard for small
charter/party operators is $7 million.
E:\FR\FM\02MYP1.SGM
02MYP1
emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS
24450
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 84 / Monday, May 2, 2011 / Proposed Rules
Due to the nature of some of the
measures proposed in this action,
entities affected by the proposed action
include those vessels that have
currently been issued any Federal
permit to fish any species within the
Northeast. However, most of the entities
affected by this proposed action are
limited to vessels issued a limited
access NE multispecies DAS permit (i.e.,
Category A, D, E, or F), a limited access
NE multispecies Small Vessel or
Handgear A permit (i.e., Category C or
HA, respectively), an open access NE
multispecies Category K or Handgear B
(Category HB) permit, or an open access
NE multispecies Charter/Party (Category
I) permit. In addition, this proposed
action would also affect any entity
issued a Federal permit to purchase NE
multispecies, a company providing
dockside and roving monitoring
services, and individuals acting in the
capacity of a sector manager. All entities
affected by this proposed rule would fall
under the SBA size standard for small
commercial fishing entities or charter/
party operators, and therefore, there is
no disproportionate impact between
large and small entities and would not
place small entities at a competitive
disadvantage to large entities. A full
description of the fishery, including the
entities affected by the proposed action,
is contained in Section 6.2 of the
Amendment 16 FEIS.
The proposed allocation would
correct/clarify the existing regulations to
ensure that the current regulations
accurately reflect measures adopted by
the Council and approved by the
Secretary of Commerce. This action
would ensure that the economic benefits
analyzed in previous actions would be
realized, including preventing
unnecessary and unintended costs
associated with measures corrected by
this action, and would only impose a
negligible increase in the mailing and
postage costs associated with
compliance with VTR requirements that
reflect current industry practices. For
example, by revising the timing
requirements of VMS declarations, this
action would avoid $1,900 in
unnecessary yearly VMS messaging
costs that were not expected during the
development of Amendment 16. In
addition, this action would clarify that
all trips must submit a VTR, regardless
of whether fish are landed, with the
exception of trips that only set fishing
gear and do not fish on that trip,
resulting in increasing yearly mailing
costs of $5.88–$25.48 per vessel. Other
measures corrected or clarified by this
action would ensure that vessels are not
subject to measures beyond those
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:43 Apr 29, 2011
Jkt 223001
originally adopted in recent
management actions. For example, this
action would ensure that Category C and
HA vessels would not be subject to
RGAs and are not required to purchase
selective gear to fish in particular areas,
and that sector vessels are not subject to
bait restrictions while fishing in the
Closed Area I Hook Gear Haddock SAP.
As a result, an initial regulatory
flexibility analysis is not required and
none has been prepared.
This proposed rule contains reporting
and recordkeeping requirements and
associated information collections
subject to the Paperwork Reduction Act
(PRA), which have been previously
approved by OMB under control
numbers 0648–0202, 0648–0212, and
0648–0229. Measures in this proposed
rule include provisions that require
revised collection-of-information
requirements. Public reporting burden
for these collections of information are
estimated to average as follows:
1. VMS area and DAS declaration,
OMB# 0648–0202, (5 min/response);
2. VMS trip-level catch reports, OMB#
0648–0212, (15 min/response);
3. Request for a LOA to fish in a NE
multispecies RGA, OMB# 0648–0202, (5
min/response);
4. VMS declaration to fish in a NE
multispecies RGA, OMB# 0648–0202, (5
min/response);
5. Pre-trip hail report to a dockside
monitoring service provider, OMB#
0648–0202, (2 min/response);
6. Trip-end hail report to a dockside
monitoring service provider, OMB#
0648–0202, (15 min/response);
7. Confirmation of dockside
monitoring trip-end hail report, OMB#
0648–0202, (2 min/response);
8. Dockside/roving service provider
data entry, OMB# 0648–0202, (3 min/
response);
9. Daily VMS catch reports when
fishing in the U.S./Canada Management
Area and Closed Area II SAPs, OMB#
0648–0212, (15 min/response);
10. Daily VMS catch reports when
fishing in the Closed Area I Hook Gear
Haddock SAP, OMB# 0648–0212, (15
min/response);
11. Daily VMS catch reports when
fishing in the Regular B DAS Program,
OMB# 0648–0212, (15 min/response);
and
12. Copy of the dealer weigh-out slip
or dealer signature of the dockside
monitor report, OMB# 0648–0212 (2
min/response).
13. Letter of authorization for charter/
party vessels to access the Western
GOM Closure Area and the GOM
Rolling Closure Areas, OMB# 0648–
0202, (5 min/response);
PO 00000
Frm 00045
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
14. Declaration of the monkfish DAS
option via VMS, OMB# 0648–0202, (5
min/response);
15. Sector weekly catch report, OMB#
0648–0212, (4 hr/response);
16. VTR requirement, OMB# 0648–
0212, (5 min/response); and
17. Dealer report, OMB# 0648–0229,
(4 min/response).
These estimates include the time
required for reviewing instructions,
searching existing data sources,
gathering and maintaining the data
needed, and completing and reviewing
the collection of information. Send
comments regarding this burden
estimate, or any other aspect of this data
collection, including suggestions for
reducing the burden, to NMFS (see
ADDRESSES) and by e-mail to
OIRA_Submission@omb.eop.gov, or fax
to (202) 395–7285.
Notwithstanding any other provision
of the law, no person is required to
respond to, and no person shall be
subject to penalty for failure to comply
with, a collection of information subject
to the requirements of the PRA, unless
that collection of information displays a
currently valid OMB Control Number.
List of Subjects in 50 CFR Part 648
Fisheries, Fishing, Reporting and
recordkeeping.
Dated: April 26, 2011.
John Oliver,
Deputy Assistant Administrator For
Operations, National Marine Fisheries
Service.
For the reason set out in the preamble,
50 CFR part 648 is proposed to be
amended as follows:
PART 648—FISHERIES OF THE
NORTHEASTERN UNITED STATES
1. The authority citation for part 648
continues to read as follows:
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.
2. In § 648.2, add a definition of setonly trip to read as follows:
§ 648.2
Definitions.
*
*
*
*
*
Set-only trip means a fishing trip on
which any federally permitted vessel
deploys gear with the intention of
retrieving it on a separate trip and does
not haul-back or retrieve any gear
capable of catching fish on the set-only
trip.
*
*
*
*
*
3. In § 648.7, revise paragraph (c) to
read as follows:
§ 648.7 Recordkeeping and reporting
requirements.
*
E:\FR\FM\02MYP1.SGM
*
*
02MYP1
*
*
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 84 / Monday, May 2, 2011 / Proposed Rules
(c) When to fill out a log report.
Except for vessels on a set-only trip, as
declared through the pre-trip
notification system specified in
§ 648.11(k), log reports required by
paragraph (b)(1)(i) of this section must
be filled out with all required
information, except for information not
yet ascertainable, prior to entering port.
Information that may be considered
unascertainable prior to entering port
includes dealer name, dealer permit
number, and date sold. Log reports must
be completed as soon as the information
becomes available. Log reports required
by paragraph (b)(1)(ii) of this section
must be filled out before landing any
surfclams or ocean quahogs.
*
*
*
*
*
4. In § 648.10, revise paragraph
(k)(3)(ii) to read as follows:
§ 648.10 VMS and DAS requirements for
vessel owners/operators.
*
*
*
*
*
(k) * * *
(3) * * *
(ii) Inshore GB Stock Area 2. The
inshore GB Stock Area is defined by
straight lines connecting the following
points in the order stated:
INSHORE GB STOCK AREA 2
Point
N. latitude
G9 ..................
G10 ................
IGB1 ..............
IGB2 ..............
IGB3 ..............
IGB4 ..............
IGB5 ..............
IGB6 ..............
IGB7 ..............
G12 ................
(1)
42°20′
42°20′
41°00′
41°00′
41°10′
41°10′
41°20′
41°20′
(2)
W. longitude
70°00′
70°00′
68°50′
68°50′
69°30′
69°30′
69°50′
69°50′
70°00′
70°00′
emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS
42°22′
40°24′
W. long.
67°20′ 1
65°43′ 2
U.S.-Canada Maritime Boundary.
U.S.-Canada Maritime Boundary as it
intersects with the EEZ.
2 The
Prohibitions.
Jkt 223001
N. lat.
1 The
*
*
*
*
(k) * * *
(2) * * *
(iv) Possess or land fish while setting
fixed gear on a set-only trip as declared
through the pre-trip notification system
pursuant to § 648.11(k).
(3) * * *
(i) It is unlawful to purchase, possess,
import, export, or receive as a dealer, or
in the capacity of a dealer, regulated
species or ocean pout in excess of the
possession limits specified in § 648.82,
§ 648.85, § 648.86, or § 648.87
applicable to a vessel issued a NE
17:43 Apr 29, 2011
*
*
*
*
(a) * * *
(2) * * *
(ii) Bounded on the east by straight
lines connecting the following points in
the order stated:
CII3 ..............................
SNE1 ............................
*
*
*
*
5. In § 648.14, add paragraph
(k)(2)(iv); and revise paragraphs (k)(3)(i)
and (k)(6)(ii)(B) to read as follows:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
*
Point
*
*
§ 648.80 NE Multispecies regulated mesh
areas and restrictions on gear and methods
of fishing.
GB REGULATED MESH AREA
1 The intersection of the Cape Cod, MA,
coastline and 70°00′ W. long.
2 South-facing shoreline of Cape Cod, MA.
§ 648.14
multispecies permit, unless otherwise
specified in § 648.17, or unless the
regulated species or ocean pout are
purchased or received from a vessel that
caught them on a sector trip and such
species are exempt from such
possession limits in accordance with an
approved sector operations plan, as
specified in § 648.87(c).
*
*
*
*
*
(6) * * *
(ii) * * *
(B) Hook gear. Fail to comply with the
restrictions on fishing and gear specified
in § 648.80(a)(3)(v), (a)(4)(v), (b)(2)(v),
and (c)(2)(iv) if the vessel has been
issued a limited access NE multispecies
permit and fishes with hook gear in
areas specified in § 648.80(a), (b), or (c),
unless allowed under
§ 648.85(b)(7)(iv)(E).
*
*
*
*
*
6. In § 648.80, revise paragraphs
(a)(2)(ii), (a)(3)(v), (a)(3)(vi), (a)(17)(ii),
(b)(3)(i), and (c)(2)(i) to read as follows:
*
*
*
*
*
(3) * * *
(v) Hook gear restrictions. Unless
otherwise specified in this paragraph
(a)(3)(v) or § 648.87(c), vessels fishing
with a valid NE multispecies limited
access permit and fishing under a NE
multispecies DAS or on a sector trip,
and vessels fishing with a valid NE
multispecies limited access SmallVessel permit in the GOM Regulated
Mesh Area, and persons on such
vessels, are prohibited from fishing,
setting, or hauling back, per day, or
possessing on board the vessel, more
than 2,000 rigged hooks. All longline
gear hooks must be circle hooks, of a
minimum size of 12/0. An unbaited
hook and gangion that has not been
secured to the ground line of the trawl
on board a vessel is deemed to be a
replacement hook and is not counted
toward the 2,000-hook limit. A ‘‘snapon’’ hook is deemed to be a replacement
PO 00000
Frm 00046
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
24451
hook if it is not rigged or baited. The use
of de-hookers (‘‘crucifer’’) with less than
6-inch (15.2-cm) spacing between the
fairlead rollers is prohibited. Vessels
fishing with a valid NE multispecies
limited access Hook Gear permit and
fishing under a multispecies DAS or on
a sector trip in the GOM Regulated
Mesh Area, and persons on such
vessels, are prohibited from possessing
gear other than hook gear on board the
vessel. Vessels fishing with a valid NE
multispecies limited access Handgear A
permit are prohibited from fishing, or
possessing on board the vessel, gear
other than handgear. Vessels fishing
with tub-trawl gear are prohibited from
fishing, setting, or hauling back, per
day, or possessing on board the vessel
more than 250 hooks.
(vi) Other restrictions and
exemptions. A vessel is prohibited from
fishing in the GOM or GB Exemption
Area as defined in paragraph (a)(17) of
this section, except if fishing with
exempted gear (as defined under this
part) or under the exemptions specified
in paragraphs (a)(5) through (7), (a)(9)
through (a)(16) and (a)(18), (d), (e), (h),
and (i) of this section; or if fishing under
a NE multispecies DAS; or if fishing on
a sector trip; or if fishing under the
Small Vessel or Handgear A permit
specified in § 648.82(b)(5) and (6),
respectively; or if fishing under a
Handgear B permit specified in
§ 648.88(a); or if fishing under the
scallop state waters exemptions
specified in § 648.54 and paragraph
(a)(11) of this section; or if fishing under
a scallop DAS in accordance with
paragraph (h) of this section; or if
fishing pursuant to a NE multispecies
open access Charter/Party or Handgear
permit specified in § 648.88; or if fishing
as a charter/party or private recreational
vessel in compliance with § 648.89. Any
gear used by a vessel in this area must
be authorized under one of these
exemptions. Any gear on a vessel that is
not authorized under one of these
exemptions must be stowed as specified
in § 648.23(b).
*
*
*
*
*
(17) * * *
(ii) Bounded on the south by straight
lines connecting the following points in
the order stated:
GULF OF MAINE/GEORGES BANK
EXEMPTION AREA
Point
G6 ..................
G7 ..................
G8 ..................
G9 ..................
NL3 ................
E:\FR\FM\02MYP1.SGM
02MYP1
N. latitude
40°55.5
40°45′
40°37′
40°30′
40°22.7′
W. longitude
66°38′
68°00′
68°00′
69°00′
69°00′
24452
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 84 / Monday, May 2, 2011 / Proposed Rules
GULF OF MAINE/GEORGES BANK
EXEMPTION AREA—Continued
Point
NL2
NL1
G11
G12
N. latitude
................
................
................
................
40°18.7′
40°50′
40°50′
(1)
W. longitude
69°40′
69°40′
70°00′
70°00′
1 Northward to its intersection with the
shoreline of mainland Massachusetts.
emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS
*
*
*
*
*
(b) * * *
(3) * * *
(i) Species exemption. Unless
otherwise restricted in § 648.86, owners
and operators of vessels subject to the
minimum mesh size restrictions
specified in paragraphs (a)(4) and (b)(2)
of this section may fish for, harvest,
possess, or land butterfish, dogfish
(caught by trawl only), herring, Atlantic
mackerel, ocean pout, scup, shrimp,
squid, summer flounder, silver hake and
offshore hake, and weakfish with nets of
a mesh size smaller than the minimum
size specified in the GB and SNE
Regulated Mesh Areas when fishing in
the SNE Exemption Area defined in
paragraph (b)(10) of this section,
provided such vessels comply with
requirements specified in paragraph
(b)(3)(ii) of this section and with the
mesh size and possession limit
restrictions specified under § 648.86(d).
*
*
*
*
*
(c) * * *
(2) * * *
(i) Vessels using trawls. Except as
provided in paragraph (c)(2)(iii) of this
section, and § 648.85(b)(6), the
minimum mesh size for any trawl net
not stowed and not available for
immediate use in accordance with
§ 648.23(b), on a vessel or used by a
vessel fishing under the NE
multispecies DAS program or on a
sector trip in the MA Regulated Mesh
Area, shall be that specified by
§ 648.104(a), applied throughout the
body and extension of the net, or any
combination thereof, and 6.5-inch (16.5cm) diamond or square mesh applied to
the codend of the net, as defined in
paragraph (a)(3)(i) of this section. This
restriction does not apply to nets or
pieces of nets smaller than 3 ft (0.9 m)
× 3 ft (0.9 m), (9 sq ft (0.81 sq m)), or
to vessels that have not been issued a
NE multispecies permit and that are
fishing exclusively in state waters.
*
*
*
*
*
7. In § 648.81, revise the introductory
text of paragraph (n) to read as follows:
§ 648.81 NE multispecies closed areas and
measures to protect EFH.
*
*
*
VerDate Mar<15>2010
*
*
17:43 Apr 29, 2011
Jkt 223001
(n) NE Multispecies Restricted Gear
Areas. With the exception of a vessel on
a sector trip, any vessel issued a limited
access NE multispecies permit fishing
under a NE multispecies DAS that is
fishing any part of a trip in one or both
of the NE Multispecies Restricted Gear
Areas specified in paragraphs (n)(1) and
(2) of this section must comply with all
applicable restrictions specified in this
paragraph (n). If such a vessel fishes
inside/outside of these areas on the
same trip, the most restrictive measures
for the areas fished apply, including, but
not limited to, gear restrictions and trip
limits.
*
*
*
*
*
8. In § 648.82, revise the introductory
text of paragraph (b)(5)(i), and the
introductory text of paragraph (n)(1) to
read as follows:
§ 648.82 Effort-control program for NE
multispecies limited access vessels.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) * * *
(5) * * *
(i) DAS allocation. A vessel qualified
and electing to fish under the Small
Vessel category may retain up to 300 lb
(136.1 kg) of cod, haddock, and
yellowtail flounder, combined, and one
Atlantic halibut per trip, without being
subject to DAS restrictions, provided the
vessel does not exceed the yellowtail
flounder possession restrictions
specified at § 648.86(g). Such a vessel is
subject to the possession limits
specified for other regulated species and
ocean pout, as specified at § 648.86. Any
vessel may elect to switch into this
category, as provided in
§ 648.4(a)(1)(i)(I)(2), if the vessel meets
or complies with the following:
*
*
*
*
*
(n) * * *
(1) Differential DAS counting AM for
fishing years 2010 and 2011. Unless
otherwise specified pursuant to
§ 648.90(a)(5), based upon catch and
other information available to NMFS by
February of each year, the Regional
Administrator shall project the catch of
regulated species or ocean pout by
common pool vessels for the fishing
year ending on April 30 to determine
whether such catch will exceed any of
the sub-ACLs specified for common
pool vessels pursuant to
§ 648.90(a)(4)(iii). This initial projection
of common pool catch shall be updated
shortly after the end of each fishing year
once information becomes available
regarding the catch of regulated species
and ocean pout by vessels fishing for
groundfish in state waters outside of the
FMP, vessels fishing in exempted
fisheries, and vessels fishing in the
Atlantic sea scallop fishery; and the
PO 00000
Frm 00047
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
catch of Atlantic halibut, SNE/MA
winter flounder, ocean pout,
windowpane flounder, and Atlantic
wolffish by sector vessels to determine
if excessive catch by such vessels
resulted in the overall ACL for a
particular stock to be exceeded. If such
catch resulted in the overall ACL for a
particular stock being exceeded, the
common pool’s catch of that stock shall
be increased by an amount equal to the
amount of the overage of the overall
ACL for that stock multiplied by the
common pool’s share of the overall ACL
for that stock calculated pursuant to
§ 648.90(a)(4)(iii)(E)(2). For example, if
the 2010 overall ACL for GOM cod was
exceeded by 10,000 lb (4,536 kg) due to
excessive catch of that stock by vessels
fishing in state waters outside the FMP,
and the common pool’s share of the
2010 overall GOM cod ACL was 5
percent, then the common pool’s 2010
catch of GOM cod shall be increased by
500 lb (226.8 kg) (10,000 lb (4,536 kg)
× 0.05 of the overall GOM cod ACL). If
based on the initial projection
completed in February, the Regional
Administrator projects that any of the
sub-ACLs specified for common pool
vessels will be exceeded or
underharvested, the Regional
Administrator shall implement a
differential DAS counting factor to all
Category A DAS used within the stock
area in which the sub-ACL was
exceeded or underharvested, as
specified in paragraph (n)(1)(i) of this
section, during the following fishing
year, in a manner consistent with the
Administrative Procedure Act. Any
differential DAS counting implemented
at the start of the fishing year will be
reevaluated and recalculated, if
necessary, once updated information is
obtained. The differential DAS counting
factor shall be based upon the projected
proportion of the sub-ACL of each NE
multispecies stock caught by common
pool vessels, rounded to the nearest
even tenth, as specified in paragraph
(n)(1)(ii) of this section, unless
otherwise specified pursuant to
§ 648.90(a)(5). For example, if the
Regional Administrator projects that
common pool vessels will catch 1.18
times the sub-ACL for GOM cod during
fishing year 2010, the Regional
Administrator shall implement a
differential DAS counting factor of 1.2
to all Category A DAS used by common
pool vessels only within the Inshore
GOM Differential DAS Area during
fishing year 2011 (i.e., Category A DAS
will be charged at a rate of 28.8 hr for
every 24 hr fished—1.2 times 24-hr DAS
counting). If it is projected that catch in
a particular fishing year will exceed or
E:\FR\FM\02MYP1.SGM
02MYP1
24453
emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 84 / Monday, May 2, 2011 / Proposed Rules
underharvest the sub-ACLs for several
regulated species stocks within a
particular stock area, including both
exceeding and underharvesting several
sub-ACLs within a particular stock area,
the Regional Administrator shall
implement the most restrictive
differential DAS counting factor derived
from paragraph (n)(1)(ii) of this section
for the sub-ACLs exceeded or
underharvested to any Category A DAS
used by common pool vessels within
that particular stock area. For example,
if it is projected that common pool
vessels will be responsible for 1.2 times
the GOM cod sub-ACL and 1.1 times the
CC/GOM yellowtail flounder sub-ACL,
the Regional Administrator shall
implement a differential DAS counting
factor of 1.2 to any Category A DAS
fished by common pool vessels only
within the Inshore GOM Differential
DAS Area during the following fishing
year. For any differential DAS counting
factor implemented in fishing year 2011,
the differential DAS counting factor
shall be applied against the DAS accrual
provisions specified in paragraph
(e)(1)(i) of this section for the time spent
fishing in the applicable differential
DAS counting area based upon the first
VMS position into the applicable
differential DAS counting area and the
first VMS position outside of the
applicable differential DAS counting
area, pursuant to § 648.10. For example,
if a vessel fished 12 hr inside a
differential DAS counting area where a
differential DAS counting factor of 1.2
would be applied, and 12 hr outside of
the differential DAS counting area, the
vessel would be charged 48 hr of DAS
use because DAS would be charged in
24-hr increments ((12 hr inside the area
× 1.2 = 14.4 hr) + 12 hr outside the area,
rounded to the next 24-hr increment to
determine DAS charged). For any
differential DAS counting factor
implemented in fishing year 2012, the
differential DAS counting factor shall be
applied against the DAS accrual
provisions in paragraph (e)(1)(i) of this
section, or if a differential DAS counting
factor was implemented for that stock
area during fishing year 2011, against
the DAS accrual rate applied in fishing
year 2011. For example, if a differential
DAS counting factor of 1.2 was applied
to the Inshore GOM Differential DAS
Area during fishing year 2011 due to a
20-percent overage of the GOM cod subACL, yet the GOM cod sub-ACL was
exceeded again, but by 50 percent
during fishing year 2011, an additional
differential DAS factor of 1.5 would be
applied to the DAS accrual rate applied
during fishing year 2012 (i.e., the DAS
accrual rate in the Inshore GOM
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:43 Apr 29, 2011
Jkt 223001
Differential DAS Counting Area during
fishing year 2012 would be 43.2 hr
charged for every 24-hr fished—1.2 × 1.5
× 24-hr DAS charge). If the Regional
Administrator determines that similar
DAS adjustments are necessary in all
stock areas, the Regional Administrator
will adjust the ratio of Category A:
Category B DAS specified in paragraph
(d)(1) of this section to reduce the
number of available Category A DAS
available based upon the amount of the
overage, rather than apply a differential
DAS counting factor to all Category A
DAS used in all stock areas.
*
*
*
*
*
9. In § 648.83, remove paragraph
(a)(3), and revise paragraph (b)(1) to
read as follows:
§ 648.83
Multispecies minimum fish sizes.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) * * *
(1) Each person aboard a vessel issued
a NE multispecies limited access permit
and fishing under the NE multispecies
DAS program or on a sector trip may
possess up to 25 lb (11.3 kg) of fillets
that measure less than the minimum
size, if such fillets are from legal-sized
fish and are not offered or intended for
sale, trade, or barter. The weight of
fillets and parts of fish, other than
whole-gutted or gilled fish, shall be
multiplied by 3. For the purposes of
accounting for all catch by sector vessels
as specified at § 648.87(b)(1)(v), the
weight of all fillets and parts of fish,
other than whole-gutted or gilled fish
reported for at-home consumption shall
be multiplied by a factor of 3.
*
*
*
*
*
10. In § 648.85, revise paragraphs
(a)(1)(ii), (a)(2)(ii), (a)(3)(iv)(A)(2),
(b)(3)(x)(A), (b)(6)(iv)(J)(4), (b)(7)(iv)(E),
and (b)(7)(vi)(B) to read as follows:
§ 648.85
Special management programs.
(a) * * *
(1) * * *
(ii) Eastern U.S./Canada Area. The
Eastern U.S./Canada Area is the area
defined by straight lines connecting the
following points in the order stated (a
chart depicting this area is available
from the Regional Administrator upon
request):
EASTERN U.S./CANADA AREA
Point
USCA
USCA
USCA
USCA
USCA
USCA
USCA
USCA
PO 00000
N. lat.
12 ......................
11 ......................
10 ......................
9 ........................
8 ........................
7 ........................
6 ........................
5 ........................
Frm 00048
Fmt 4702
42°20′
41°10′
41°10′
41°00′
41°00′
40°50′
40°50′
40°40′
Sfmt 4702
W. long.
67°40′
67°40′
67°20′
67°20′
67°00′
67°00′
66°50′
66°50′
EASTERN U.S./CANADA AREA—
Continued
Point
USCA
USCA
USCA
USCA
USCA
4 ........................
15 ......................
14 ......................
13 ......................
12 ......................
*
N. lat.
40°40′
40°30′
40°30′
42°20′
42°20′
W. long.
66°40′
66°40′
65°44.3′
67°18.4′
67°40′
*
*
*
*
(2) * * *
(ii) Adjustments to TACs. Any
overages of the GB cod, GB haddock,
and GB yellowtail flounder TACs
specified for either the common pool or
individual sectors pursuant to this
paragraph (a)(2) that occur in a given
fishing year shall be subtracted from the
respective TAC in the following fishing
year and may be subject to the overall
groundfish AM provisions as specified
in § 648.90(a)(5)(ii) if the overall ACL
for a particular stock in a given fishing
year, specified pursuant to
§ 648.90(a)(4), is exceeded.
*
*
*
*
*
(3) * * *
(iv) * * *
(A) * * *
(2) Possession restriction when 100
percent of TAC is harvested. When the
Regional Administrator projects that 100
percent of the TAC allocation for cod
specified in paragraph (a)(2) of this
section will be harvested, NMFS shall,
in a manner consistent with the
Administrative Procedure Act, close the
Eastern U.S./Canada Area to all limited
access NE multispecies DAS and sector
vessels subject to that particular TAC
allocation, as specified in paragraph
(a)(3)(iv)(E) of this section, by
prohibiting such vessels and all other
vessels not issued a limited access NE
multispecies permit from entering or
being in this area and from harvesting,
possessing, or landing cod in or from
the Eastern U.S./Canada Area during the
closure period.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) * * *
(3) * * *
(x) * * *
(A) Approved gear. When the CA II
Yellowtail Flounder/Haddock SAP is
open to target yellowtail flounder, as
specified in paragraph (b)(3)(vii) of this
section, NE multispecies vessels fishing
with trawl gear must use a haddock
separator trawl or a flounder trawl net,
as described in paragraph (a)(3)(iii) of
this section, or the Ruhle trawl, as
described in paragraph (b)(6)(iv)(J)(3) of
this section (all three nets may be on
board the fishing vessel
simultaneously). When this SAP is only
open to target haddock, NE multispecies
E:\FR\FM\02MYP1.SGM
02MYP1
24454
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 84 / Monday, May 2, 2011 / Proposed Rules
vessels must use a haddock separator
trawl, a Ruhle trawl, or hook gear. Gear
other than the haddock separator trawl,
the flounder trawl, or the Ruhle trawl
may be on board the vessel during a trip
to the Eastern U.S./Canada Area outside
of the CA II Yellowtail Flounder/
Haddock SAP, provided the gear is
stowed according to the regulations at
§ 648.23(b).
*
*
*
*
*
(6) * * *
(iv) * * *
(J) * * *
(4) Mesh size. An eligible vessel
fishing in the Regular B DAS Program
within the GB Cod Stock Area as
defined in paragraph (b)(6)(v)(B) of this
section pursuant to paragraph (b)(6) of
this section must use trawl gear
described in this paragraph (b)(6)(iv)(J)
with a minimum codend mesh size of 6inch (15.24-cm) square or diamond
mesh.
*
*
*
*
*
(7) * * *
(iv) * * *
(E) Gear restrictions. A vessel
declared into, and fishing in, the CA I
Hook Gear Haddock SAP may fish with
and possess on board demersal longline
gear or tub trawl gear only, unless
further restricted as specified in
paragraphs (b)(7)(v)(A) and (vi)(B) of
this section.
*
*
*
*
*
(vi) * * *
(B) Gear restrictions. A common pool
vessel is exempt from the maximum
number of hooks restriction specified in
§ 648.80(a)(4)(v), but must comply with
the gear restrictions in paragraph
(b)(7)(iv)(E) of this section. Such vessels
are prohibited from using as bait, or
possessing on board, squid or mackerel
during a trip into the CA I Hook Gear
Haddock SAP.
*
*
*
*
*
11. In § 648.86, revise paragraph
(m)(1) to read as follows:
§ 648.86 NE Multispecies possession
restrictions.
emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS
*
*
*
*
*
(m) * * *
(1) Daily landing restriction. A vessel
issued a limited access NE multispecies
permit, an open access NE multispecies
Handgear B permit, or a limited access
monkfish permit and fishing under the
monkfish Category C or D permit
provisions may only land regulated
species or ocean pout once in any 24hr period, based upon the time the
vessel lands following the end of the
previous trip. For example, if a vessel
lands 1,600 lb (725.7 kg) of GOM cod at
6 p.m. on Tuesday, that vessel cannot
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:43 Apr 29, 2011
Jkt 223001
land any more regulated species or
ocean pout until at least 6 p.m. on the
following Wednesday.
*
*
*
*
*
12. In § 648.87, revise the
introductory text to paragraph (c)(2),
and revise paragraphs (b)(1)(ii),
(b)(1)(vi)(B), (b)(1)(ix), (b)(5)(i)(A)(1),
and (b)(5)(ii)(B)(2) to read as follows:
§ 648.87
Sector allocation.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) * * *
(1) * * *
(ii) Areas that can be fished. Vessels
in a sector may only fish in a particular
stock area, as specified in paragraphs
(b)(1)(ii)(A) through (F) of this section,
and § 648.85(b)(6)(v), or the Eastern
U.S./Canada Area, as specified in
§ 648.85(a)(1), if the sector has been
allocated, or acquires, pursuant to
paragraph (b)(1)(viii) of this section,
ACE for all stocks allocated to sectors
pursuant to paragraph (b)(1)(i)(A) of this
section that are caught in that stock
area. A sector must project when its
ACE for each stock will be exceeded and
must ensure that all vessels in the sector
cease fishing operations prior to
exceeding it. Once a sector has
harvested its ACE for a stock, all vessels
in that sector must cease fishing
operations in that stock area on a sector
trip unless and until it acquires
additional ACE from another sector
pursuant to paragraph (b)(1)(viii) of this
section, or as otherwise specified in an
approved operations plan pursuant to
paragraph (b)(2)(xiv) of this section. For
the purposes of this paragraph (b)(1)(ii),
an ACE overage means catch of
regulated species or ocean pout by
vessels participating in a particular
sector that exceeds the ACE allocated to
that sector, as of the date received or
purchased by the dealer, whichever
occurs first, after considering all ACE
transfer requests ultimately approved by
NMFS during the current fishing year,
pursuant to paragraph (b)(1)(viii) of this
section, unless otherwise specified
pursuant to § 648.90(a)(5).
*
*
*
*
*
(vi) * * *
(B) Weekly catch report. Each sector
must submit weekly reports to NMFS
stating the remaining balance of ACE
allocated to each sector based upon
regulated species and ocean pout
landings and discards of vessels
participating in that sector and any
compliance/enforcement concerns.
These reports must include at least the
following information, as instructed by
the Regional Administrator: Week
ending date; species, stock area, gear,
number of trips, reported landings
PO 00000
Frm 00049
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
(landed pounds and live pounds),
discards (live pounds), total catch (live
pounds), status of the sector’s ACE
(pounds remaining and percent
remaining), and whether this is a new
or updated record of sector catch for
each NE multispecies stock allocated to
that particular sector; sector
enforcement issues, including any
discrepancies noted by dockside/roving
monitors between dealers and offloads;
summary of offloads witnessed by
dockside/roving monitors for that
reporting week; and a list of vessels
landing for that reporting week. These
weekly catch reports must be submitted
no later than 0700 hr on the second
Monday after the reporting week, as
defined in this part. The frequency of
these reports must be increased to more
than a weekly submission when the
balance of remaining ACE is low, as
specified in the sector operations plan
and approved by NMFS. If requested,
sectors must provide detailed trip-bytrip catch data to NMFS for the
purposes of auditing sector catch
monitoring data based upon guidance
provided by the Regional Administrator.
*
*
*
*
*
(ix) Trip limits. With the exception of
stocks listed in § 648.86(1) and the
Atlantic halibut trip limit at § 648.86(c),
a sector vessel is not limited in the
amount of allocated NE multispecies
stocks that can be harvested on a
particular fishing trip, unless otherwise
specified in the operations plan.
*
*
*
*
*
(5) * * *
(i) * * *
(A) * * *
(1) Trip-start hail report. The vessel
operator must submit a trip-start hail
report prior to departing port at the
beginning of each trip notifying the
sector manager and/or dockside/roving
monitor service provider of the vessel
permit number; trip ID number in the
form of the VTR serial number of the
first VTR page for that trip, or another
trip identifier specified by NMFS; and
an estimate of the date and time of
arrival to port. Trip-start hail reports by
vessels operating less than 6 hr or
within 6 hr of port must also include
estimated date and time of offload. If the
vessel operator does not receive
confirmation of the receipt of the tripstart hail report from the dockside/
roving monitor provider, the operator
must contact the service provider to
confirm the trip-start hail report via an
independent back-up system developed
by the service provider.
*
*
*
*
*
(ii) * * *
(B) * * *
E:\FR\FM\02MYP1.SGM
02MYP1
emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 84 / Monday, May 2, 2011 / Proposed Rules
(2) Offloads to a truck. A roving
monitor observing offloads into a truck
shall retain copies of all VTRs filled out
for that trip with all information
submitted (i.e., no blocked cells)
provided by the sector vessel; if there
are no scales at the offload site, record
the number of totes of each species and
the captain’s estimate of the weight in
each tote; if there are scales at the
offload site, record whether the scales
were certified by an appropriate state
agency and observe and record whether
ice and box weights are tared before
catch is added, or record the estimated
weight of ice and the box; determine
and record whether all fish have been
offloaded, including an estimate of the
weight of fish being retained by captain
and crew for personal consumption or
other use and the reason for retention of
such catch; record all offloaded catch by
species in a report, unless the driver
creates such a report that the roving
monitor may use which shall be signed
by the roving monitor; document that
each tote is labeled with the appropriate
identifying information including, but
not limited to, the serial number of the
first VTR page filled out for that trip or
another trip ID specified by NMFS, the
roving monitor’s name, tote number,
and species; provide data summarizing
the offloads of each trip, including
copies of the VTR(s) and roving monitor
report to the sector manager or
designated third party contractor, as
appropriate, within 24 hr of offloading;
and retain a copy of such information to
document that the offload was
monitored, as instructed by the Regional
Administrator. The roving monitor must
submit copies of the VTR(s); driver
manifest(s), if separate from the roving
monitor’s report; and the roving
monitor’s report to the sector manager
or third-party service provider, as
appropriate. The tote tagging
requirements specified in this paragraph
(b)(5)(ii)(B)(2), are not required,
provided the following three
requirements are met:
(i) The roving monitor that observed
the offload at the dock will also be the
dockside monitor at the truck offload to
the dealer;
(ii) The roving monitor will follow the
truck, in line of sight, from the remote
offload to the dealer offload where the
weighing occurs; and,
(iii) The truck is loaded with only the
catch from the one trip being monitored.
*
*
*
*
*
(c) * * *
(2) If a sector is approved, the
Regional Administrator shall issue a
letter of authorization to each vessel
operator and/or vessel owner
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:43 Apr 29, 2011
Jkt 223001
participating in the sector. The letter of
authorization shall authorize
participation in the sector operations
and may exempt participating vessels
from any Federal fishing regulation
applicable to NE multispecies vessels,
except those specified in paragraphs
(c)(2)(i) and (ii) of this section, in order
to allow vessels to fish in accordance
with an approved operations plan,
provided such exemptions are
consistent with the goals and objectives
of the FMP. The letter of authorization
may also include requirements and
conditions deemed necessary to ensure
effective administration of, and
compliance with, the operations plan
and the sector allocation. Solicitation of
public comment on, and NMFS final
determination on such exemptions shall
be consistent with paragraphs (c)(1) and
(2) of this section.
*
*
*
*
*
13. In § 648.89, add paragraphs (c)(8)
and (c)(9), and revise paragraphs
(c)(2)(i), (c)(6), (c)(7), (d), and (e)(3)(iv),
to read as follows:
§ 648.89 Recreational and charter/party
vessel restrictions.
*
*
*
*
*
(c) * * *
(2) * * *
(i) Unless further restricted by the
Seasonal GOM Cod Possession
Prohibition, specified in paragraph
(c)(2)(v) of this section, each person on
a charter/party vessel may possess no
more than 10 cod per day.
*
*
*
*
*
(c) * * *
(6) Atlantic wolffish. Persons aboard
charter/party vessels permitted under
this part and not fishing under the NE
multispecies DAS program, on a sector
trip, under a Handgear A permit, under
a Handgear B permit, or under a Small
Vessel Category C permit, and private
recreational fishing vessels in or
possessing fish from the EEZ may not
possess Atlantic wolffish.
(7) SNE/MA winter flounder. Persons
aboard charter/party vessels permitted
under this part and not fishing under
the NE multispecies DAS program, on a
sector trip, under a Handgear A permit,
under a Handgear B permit, or under a
Small Vessel Category C permit, and
private recreational fishing vessels
fishing in the SNE/MA winter flounder
stock area, as defined in
§ 648.85(b)(6)(v)(F), may not fish for,
possess, or land winter flounder. Private
recreational vessels in possession of
winter flounder caught outside of the
SNE/MA winter flounder may transit
this area, provided all bait and hooks
are removed from all fishing rods, and
PO 00000
Frm 00050
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
24455
any winter flounder on board has been
stored.
(8) Windowpane flounder. Persons
aboard charter/party vessels permitted
under this part and not fishing under
the NE multispecies DAS program, on a
sector trip, under a Handgear A permit,
under a Handgear B permit, or under a
Small Vessel Category C permit, and
private recreational fishing vessels in or
possessing fish from the EEZ, may not
possess windowpane flounder.
(9) Ocean pout. Persons aboard
charter/party vessels permitted under
this part and not fishing under the NE
multispecies DAS program, on a sector
trip, under a Handgear A permit, under
a Handgear B permit, or under a Small
Vessel Category C permit, and private
recreational fishing vessels in or
possessing fish from the EEZ may not
possess ocean pout.
*
*
*
*
*
(d) Restrictions on sale. It is unlawful
to sell, barter, trade, or otherwise
transfer for a commercial purpose, or to
attempt to sell, barter, trade, or
otherwise transfer for a commercial
purpose, NE multispecies caught or
landed by recreational, charter, or party
vessels permitted under this part not
fishing under a DAS, on a sector trip, or
under a Handgear A permit, Handgear B
permit, or Small Vessel Category C
permit while fishing in the EEZ.
*
*
*
*
*
(e) * * *
(3) * * *
(iv) For the GOM charter/party closed
area exemption only, the vessel may not
fish on a sector trip, under a NE
multispecies DAS, or under the
provisions of the NE multispecies Small
Vessel Category or Handgear A or
Handgear B permit categories, as
specified at § 648.82, during the period
of participation.
*
*
*
*
*
14. In § 648.90, revise the
introductory text to paragraph
(a)(4)(iii)(E), and revise paragraphs
(a)(4)(i), (a)(4)(iii)(E)(2), (a)(5)(i)(A) and
(a)(5)(ii) to read as follows:
§ 648.90 NE multispecies assessment,
framework procedures and specifications,
and flexible area action system.
*
*
*
*
*
(a) * * *
(4) * * *
(i) ABC/ACL recommendations. As
described in this paragraph (a)(4), with
the exception of stocks managed by the
Understanding, the PDT shall develop
recommendations for setting an ABC,
ACL, and OFL for each NE multispecies
stock for each of the next 3 years as part
of the biennial review process specified
E:\FR\FM\02MYP1.SGM
02MYP1
emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS
24456
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 84 / Monday, May 2, 2011 / Proposed Rules
in paragraph (a)(2) of this section. ACLs
can also be specified based upon
updated information in the annual
SAFE report, as described in paragraph
(a)(1) of this section, and other available
information as part of a specification
package, as described in paragraph (a)(6)
of this section. For NE multispecies
stocks or stock components managed
under both the NE Multispecies FMP
and the Understanding, the PDT shall
develop recommendations for ABCs,
ACLs, and OFLs for the pertinent stock
or stock components annually, as
described in this paragraph (a)(4) and
§ 648.85(a)(2).
*
*
*
*
*
(iii) * * *
(E) Regulated species or ocean pout
catch by the NE multispecies
commercial and recreational fisheries.
Unless otherwise specified in the ACL
recommendations developed pursuant
to paragraph (a)(4)(i)(B) of this section,
after all of the deductions and
considerations specified in paragraphs
(a)(4)(iii)(A) through (D) of this section,
the remaining ABC/ACL for each
regulated species or ocean pout stock
shall be allocated to the NE multispecies
commercial and recreational fisheries,
pursuant to this paragraph (a)(4)(iii)(E).
*
*
*
*
*
(2) Commercial allocation. Unless
otherwise specified in this paragraph
(a)(4)(iii)(E)(2), the ABC/ACL for
regulated species or ocean pout stocks
available to the commercial NE
multispecies fishery, after consideration
of the recreational allocation pursuant
to paragraph (a)(4)(iii)(E)(1) of this
section, shall be divided between
vessels operating under approved sector
operations plans, as described at
§ 648.87(c), and vessels operating under
the provisions of the common pool, as
defined in this part, based upon the
cumulative PSCs of vessels participating
in sectors calculated pursuant to
§ 648.87(b)(1)(i)(E). For fishing years
2010 and 2011, the ABC/ACL of each
regulated species or ocean pout stocks
not allocated to sectors pursuant to
§ 648.87(b)(1)(i)(E) (i.e., Atlantic halibut,
SNE/MA winter flounder, ocean pout,
windowpane flounder, and Atlantic
wolffish) that is available to the
commercial NE multispecies fishery
shall be allocated entirely to the
common pool. Unless otherwise
specified in paragraph (a)(5) of this
section, regulated species or ocean pout
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:43 Apr 29, 2011
Jkt 223001
catch by common pool and sector
vessels shall be deducted from the subACL/ACE allocated pursuant to this
paragraph (a)(4)(iii)(E)(2) for the
purposes of determining whether
adjustments to common pool measures
are necessary, pursuant to the common
pool AMs specified in § 648.82(n), or
whether sector ACE overages must be
deducted, pursuant to § 648.87(b)(1)(iii).
*
*
*
*
*
(5) * * *
(i) * * *
(A) Excessive catch by common pool
vessels. If the catch of regulated species
and ocean pout by common pool vessels
exceeds the amount of the ACL
specified for common pool vessels
pursuant to paragraph (a)(4)(iii)(E)(2) of
this section, then the AMs described in
§ 648.82(n) shall take effect. Pursuant to
the distribution of ABCs/ACLs specified
in paragraph (a)(4)(iii)(E)(2) of this
section, for the purposes of this
paragraph (a)(5)(i)(A), the catch of each
regulated species or ocean pout stock
not allocated to sectors pursuant to
§ 648.87(b)(1)(i)(E) (i.e., Atlantic halibut,
SNE/MA winter flounder, ocean pout,
windowpane flounder, and Atlantic
wolffish) during fishing years 2010 and
2011 shall be added to the catch of such
stocks by common pool vessels to
determine whether the differential DAS
counting AM described in § 648.82(n)(1)
shall take effect. If such catch does not
exceed the portion of the ACL specified
for common pool vessels pursuant to
paragraph (a)(4)(iii)(E)(2) of this section,
then no AMs shall take effect for
common pool vessels.
*
*
*
*
*
(ii) AMs if the overall ACL for a
regulated species or ocean pout stock is
exceeded. If the catch of any stock of
regulated species or ocean pout by
vessels fishing outside of the NE
multispecies fishery; vessels fishing in
state waters outside of the FMP; or
vessels fishing in exempted fisheries, as
defined in this part; or the catch of
yellowtail flounder by the Atlantic sea
scallop fishery exceeds the subcomponent of the ACL for that stock
specified for such fisheries pursuant to
paragraphs (a)(4)(iii)(A) through (C) of
this section, and the overall ACL for that
stock is exceeded, then the amount of
the overage of the overall ACL for that
stock due to catch from vessels fishing
outside of the NE multispecies fishery
shall be distributed among components
PO 00000
Frm 00051
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 9990
of the NE multispecies fishery based
upon each component’s share of that
stock’s ACL available to the NE
multispecies fishery pursuant to
paragraph (a)(4)(iii)(E) of this section.
Each component’s share of the ACL
overage for a particular stock would be
then added to the catch of that stock by
each component of the NE multispecies
fishery to determine if the resulting sum
of catch of that stock for each
component of the fishery exceeds that
individual component’s share of that
stock’s ACL available to the NE
multispecies fishery. If the total catch of
that stock by any component of the NE
multispecies fishery exceeds the amount
of the ACL specified for that component
of the NE multispecies fishery pursuant
to paragraph (a)(4)(iii)(E) of this section,
then the AMs specified in paragraphs
(a)(5)(i)(A) through (C) of this section
shall take effect, as applicable. If the
catch of any stock of regulated species
or ocean pout by vessels outside of the
FMP exceeds the sub-component of the
ACL for that stock specified pursuant to
paragraphs (a)(4)(iii)(A) through (C) of
this section, but the overall ACL for that
stock is not exceeded, even after
consideration of the catch of that stock
by other sub-components of the fishery,
then the AMs specified in this
paragraph (a)(5)(ii) shall not take effect.
*
*
*
*
*
15. In § 648.92, revise paragraph
(b)(1)(iii) to read as follows:
§ 648.92 Effort-control program for
monkfish limited access vessels.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) * * *
(1) * * *
(iii) DAS declaration provision for
vessels fishing in the NFMA with a VMS
unit. Any limited access NE
multispecies vessel fishing on a sector
trip or under a NE multispecies
Category A DAS in the NFMA, and
issued an LOA as specified in
§ 648.94(f), may change its DAS
declaration to a monkfish DAS through
the vessel’s VMS unit during the course
of the trip after leaving port, but prior
to crossing the VMS demarcation line
upon its return to port or leaving the
NFMA, if the vessel exceeds the
incidental catch limit specified under
§ 648.94(c).
*
*
*
*
*
[FR Doc. 2011–10442 Filed 4–29–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–22–P
E:\FR\FM\02MYP1.SGM
02MYP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 84 (Monday, May 2, 2011)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 24444-24456]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-10442]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
50 CFR Part 648
[Docket No. 100526226-0229-01]
RIN 0648-AY95
Magnuson-Stevens Act Provisions; Fisheries of the Northeastern
United States; Northeast Multispecies Fishery; Amendment 16 and
Framework Adjustment 44
AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.
ACTION: Proposed rule; correcting amendment; request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This rule proposes to make corrections and clarifications to
existing regulations to ensure consistency with measures adopted by the
New England Fishery Management Council (Council) to regulate the
Northeast (NE) multispecies fishery and to provide additional
flexibility for some of the reporting regulatory requirements. The
current regulations governing the NE multispecies fishery contain a
number of inadvertent errors, omissions, and potential inconsistencies
with measures adopted by the Council and approved by the Secretary of
Commerce (Secretary) in recent actions regarding the NE Multispecies
Fishery Management Plan (FMP). NMFS takes this action under the
authority of section 305(d) of the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery
Conservation and Management Act (Magnuson-Stevens Act) and solicits
public comments on the proposed corrections and clarifications to these
regulations.
DATES: Written comments must be received on or before May 17, 2011.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, identified by 0648-AY95, by any of
the following methods:
Electronic submissions: Submit all electronic public
comments via the Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
Fax: (978) 281-9135.
Mail: Paper, disk, or CD-ROM comments should be sent to
Patricia A. Kurkul, Regional Administrator, National Marine Fisheries
Service, 55 Great Republic Drive, Gloucester, MA 01930. Mark the
outside of the envelope, ``Comments on the Proposed Rule to Correct/
Clarify the NE Multispecies Regulations.''
Instructions: All comments received are a part of the public record
and will generally be posted to https://regulations.gov without change.
All personal identifying information (for example, name, address, etc.)
voluntarily submitted by the commenter may be publicly accessible. Do
not submit confidential business information or otherwise sensitive or
protected information.
NMFS will accept anonymous comments (enter N/A in the required
fields, if you wish to remain anonymous). You may submit attachments to
electronic comments in Microsoft Word, Excel, WordPerfect, or Adobe PDF
file formats only.
Copies of the Regulatory Impact Review (RIR) prepared for this
action are available from the Regional Administrator at the above
address. Copies of previous management actions, including Amendment 16
and Framework Adjustment (FW 44) and the respective Final Environmental
Impact Statements (FEISs) and Environmental Assessments (EAs) prepared
for each action are available from Paul J. Howard, Executive Director,
New England Fishery Management Council, 50 Water Street, Mill 2,
Newburyport, MA 01950. These documents are also accessible via the
Internet at https://www.nefmc.org/nemulti/.
Written comments regarding the burden-hour estimates or other
aspects of the collection-of-information requirements contained in this
rule should be submitted to the Regional Administrator at the address
above and to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) by e-mail at
OIRA_Submission@omb.eop.gov, or fax to (202) 395-7285.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Brett Alger, Fishery Management
Specialist, phone: 978-675-2153, fax: 978-281-9135.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
The most recent management actions in the NE multispecies fishery
(Amendment 16 and FW 44) were both implemented by final rules that
published in the Federal Register on April 9, 2010 (75 FR 18262 and 75
FR 18356, respectively), and became effective on May 1, 2010. Amendment
16 and FW 44 implemented measures necessary to end overfishing and
rebuild overfished stocks based on new or existing rebuilding programs
and to comply with annual catch limit (ACL) and accountability measure
(AM) requirements of the Magnuson-Stevens Act. Amendment 16 also
substantially revised existing sector management measures and
established new sectors.
[[Page 24445]]
Amendment 16 superseded measures implemented by an emergency final rule
(74 FR 17030, April 13, 2009) which was promulgated to immediately
reduce overfishing on certain groundfish stocks managed by the FMP
until long-term measures could be implemented by the Amendment 16 final
rule.
The final rules implementing Amendment 16 and FW 44, as well as
other previous actions, contained several inadvertent errors,
omissions, and items inconsistent with the intent of these actions, as
identified below. This action proposes to correct these errors, and
clarify or modify the current regulations to ensure consistency with
their original intent. Also, changes are made to some of the
regulations to provide additional flexibility for some of the
administrative requirements, such as allowing sector managers more time
to complete their weekly reports or exempting vessels from sending a
vessel trip report (VTR) on a set-only trip. NMFS proposes this action
under section 305(d) of the Magnuson-Stevens Act which provides that
the Secretary of Commerce may, on its own, promulgate regulations
necessary to ensure that an FMP or its amendments are carried out in
accordance with the provisions of this Act. The following proposed
corrections are listed in the order in which they appear in the
regulations; the last section of proposed corrections is found
throughout the regulations.
Proposed Measures
1. VTR Requirements
The current VTR regulations require that a VTR be submitted by a
vessel operator upon entering port with fish. This suggests that
vessels that may have conducted fishing activity, but that did not
catch any fish, do not have to submit a VTR for that trip. This is
inconsistent with VTR instructions provided to vessels by NMFS, with
industry practice, and the purpose of VTRs. Information for trips on
which fishing occurred, but no fish were caught, provides important and
necessary fishing data necessary to help evaluate the status of stocks
and provides fishing effort information used for future management
decisions. To ensure that vessels submit a VTR for all trips that
conduct fishing activity, this action proposes to revise the VTR
submission regulations to remove the language that states that only
trips that land fish must submit a VTR, with an exception for vessels
on a set-only trip.
Set-only trips would be defined as a fishing trip on which a
federally permitted vessel deploys gear with the intention of
retrieving it on a separate trip and does not haul-back or retrieve any
gear capable of catching fish on that trip. While set-only trips fall
under the definition of fishing in the Magnuson-Stevens Act, VTRs from
trips that only set gear and do not intend to land fish, do not contain
information pertinent to management decisions and should therefore not
be required in this instance. Since these trips would have zero catch
and there are limited resources for dockside and at-sea monitoring (DSM
and ASM, respectively) coverage requirements implemented by Amendment
16, prioritization of coverage is necessary to ensure trips intending
to possess or land fish receive DSM and ASM coverage. Because exempting
set-only trips from VTR, DSM, and ASM requirements could create an
incentive for a vessel operator to participate in fishing after
declaring a set-only trip, and avoid the VTR, DSM, and ASM
requirements, as well as avoid any financial costs associated with
these programs, this action proposes to include regulations in Sec.
648.14 that would prohibit vessels on a set-only trip from possessing
or landing any fish species on that trip. Based on an industry request,
NMFS has recently made accommodations for vessels that leave port
exclusively to set fixed gear by exempting them from submitting a VTR
for such trips, to reduce unnecessary reporting and monitoring
requirements when no fish are landed.
2. Dealer Prohibitions
Current regulations at Sec. 648.14(k)(3)(i) are not explicit as to
whether they apply to the importation of foreign-caught NE
multispecies. Amendment 16 added Atlantic wolffish to the FMP, and
included it as a zero-retention species, along with Southern New
England (SNE)/Mid-Atlantic (MA) winter flounder, ocean pout, and
windowpane flounder. The current dealer provisions in this section
could allow the importation of the zero-retention species specified in
Amendment 16 that would otherwise be prohibited. This creates an
unnecessary enforcement burden for NMFS in cases where a dealer
lawfully may be in possession of prohibited species that were obtained
from sources other than U.S. fishing vessels. In addition, the
regulations do not currently prohibit the export of these zero-
retention species. This action proposes to revise the regulatory text
to read that it is unlawful for any dealer or person acting in the
capacity of a dealer to ``possess, import, export, transfer, land, or
receive as a dealer, regulated species pursuant to Sec. Sec. 648.82,
648.85, 648.86, or 648.87'' for the purposes of eliminating any
uncertainty whether zero-retention species can be imported or exported.
3. Regulated Mesh Area (RMA)
The regulations at Sec. 648.80(a)(3)(vi) state that a vessel may
not fish in either the Gulf of Maine (GOM) or Georges Bank (GB)
Exemption Area unless fishing under certain restrictions, including the
provisions of an exempted fishery. This paragraph references some, but
inadvertently, not all of the exempted fisheries, specifically the
exempted fisheries outlined at Sec. 648.80(a)(15), (a)(16), and
(a)(18). Therefore, this action would revise the regulations at Sec.
648.80(a)(3)(vi) to reference all applicable exempted fisheries through
Sec. 648.80(a)(18) and update other references within Sec. 648.80 to
be more consistent with current regulations.
4. Applicability of Restricted Gear Areas (RGA)
Amendment 16 adopted RGAs that require a common pool vessel,
fishing any part of a trip within a RGA under a NE multispecies day-at-
sea (DAS), to use selective gear (i.e., a haddock separator trawl, a
Ruhle trawl, a rope separator trawl, hook gear, or flatfish or
roundfish gillnets with mesh size greater than or equal to 10 inches
(25.4 cm)) to reduce the catch of species requiring substantial
reductions in fishing mortality. The current regulations implementing
this provision at Sec. 648.81(n) require that these gear restrictions
apply to all NE multispecies limited access vessels fishing any part of
a trip within a RGA. This proposed rule would revise this paragraph to
clarify that the RGAs only apply to vessels fishing under a NE
multispecies DAS, to maintain consistency with the original intent of
Amendment 16.
5. Small Vessel Category Possession Limits
The Amendment 7 final rule, published May 31, 1996 (61 FR 27709),
exempted vessels with a NE multispecies Small Vessel category permit
from using NE multispecies DAS when fishing for groundfish. In
addition, Amendment 7 exempted the Small Vessel category from specific
trip limits for specific species. Regulations at Sec. 648.82(b)(5)(i)
specify that a vessel electing to fish under the Small Vessel category
may retain up to 300 lb (136.1 kg) of cod, haddock, and yellowtail
flounder, combined, and one Atlantic halibut per trip, without being
subject to DAS restrictions, provided the vessel does not exceed the
yellowtail flounder trip limit restrictions specified under
[[Page 24446]]
Sec. 648.86(g). Additionally, this paragraph currently states that
vessels with a Small Vessel category permit are not subject to trip
limits for other NE multispecies. Since that time, Amendment 16
prohibited the possession of four species in any fishery (windowpane
flounder, ocean pout, Atlantic wolffish, and SNE/MA winter flounder).
The current Small Vessel category regulations could be interpreted to
mean that Small Vessel category permits may possess these prohibited
species, which would undermine the purpose of the prohibition on
possessing these species. Therefore, this proposed rule would change
the reference to ``Sec. 648.86(g)'' in Sec. 648.82(b)(5)(i) to read
``Sec. 648.86,'' and remove the sentence ``Such vessel is not subject
to a possession limit for other NE multispecies'' to more accurately
reflect the trip limits revised by Amendment 16 and FW 44.
6. Default AM for Stocks Not Allocated to Sectors
The recent reauthorization of the Magnuson-Stevens Act required
fishery management councils to establish a mechanism to specify ACLs
for each managed stock such that overfishing does not occur in the
fishery, and AMs that would prevent these ACLs from being exceeded in
the future and to address any overages of these ACLs that may occur.
Amendment 16 was developed to affect these changes in the NE
Multispecies FMP. The Amendment 16 final rule established a process to
specify and distribute ACLs among various segments of the fishery that
catch NE multispecies stocks, along with AMs that apply only to a
subset of these segments of the fishery, specifically the directed
commercial and recreational NE multispecies fisheries, and the Atlantic
herring fishery. To ensure that overfishing does not occur on each NE
multispecies stock as a whole due to excessive catch by fisheries not
subject to AMs, Section 4.2.1.3 of the Amendment 16 document states
that ``controls on the portion of the fishery that is subject to AMs
must be sufficient to prevent overfishing on the stock as a whole,''
consistent with the National Standard 1 Guidelines (January 16, 2009;
74 FR 3178).
The Amendment 16 final rule indicated that the groundfish fishery
would be responsible for any excessive catch of regulated NE
multispecies and ocean pout stocks by vessels that are not subject to
AMs and fishing outside of the FMP as specified under Sec.
648.90(a)(5)(ii). This includes vessels fishing for regulated NE
multispecies and ocean pout in state waters outside the FMP, catching
regulated NE multispecies and ocean pout as part of an exempted
fishery, or catching yellowtail flounder when participating in the
Atlantic sea scallop fishery. Because Amendment 16 did not provide a
specific allocation of Atlantic halibut, SNE/MA winter flounder, ocean
pout, windowpane flounder, and Atlantic wolffish to sectors, these
stocks are not subject to any sector-specific AMs. Therefore, the ACL
available to the commercial NE multispecies fishery for each of these
stocks is allocated entirely to common pool vessels, and the only AMs
established for these stocks are those specified for common pool
vessels. Thus, to maintain consistency with Amendment 16, the common
pool AMs must consider the catch of these stocks by all vessels,
including common pool vessels, sector vessels, and vessels fishing
outside of the NE multispecies fishery.
The regulation at Sec. 648.90(a)(4) implemented by the Amendment
16 final rule indicated that common pool AMs would be triggered by
excessive catch of vessels fishing outside of the NE Multispecies FMP,
it did not specifically incorporate reference to excessive catch of
stocks not allocated to sectors, as described above. Further, although
the common pool differential DAS counting AM applies to all regulated
NE multispecies and ocean pout stocks caught during fishing years (FYs)
2010 and 2011, the hard total allowable catch (TAC) AM specified to
begin in FY 2012 for common pool vessels does not provide effective AMs
for several of these stocks, including ocean pout, windowpane flounder,
and Atlantic halibut. However, the final rule implementing Amendment 16
did not specifically address these deficiencies.
This proposed rule would revise the common pool differential DAS
counting AM regulations at Sec. 648.82(n)(1), the ACL distribution
regulations at Sec. 648.90(a)(4)(iii)(E)(2), and the overall AM
regulations at Sec. 648.90(a)(5) to clarify that sector vessel catch
of stocks not allocated to sectors (i.e., Atlantic halibut, SNE/MA
winter flounder, ocean pout, windowpane flounder, and Atlantic
wolffish) during FYs 2010 and 2011 will be added to the catch of such
stocks by common pool vessels during those FYs to determine if the
common pool differential DAS counting AM will be triggered. This would
ensure that the regulations implementing Amendment 16 correctly reflect
the Council's intent and NMFS's understanding that the AMs applicable
to the NE multispecies fishery must be sufficient to prevent
overfishing on the stock as a whole for FYs 2010 and 2011. However,
because the Council adopted specific measures as part of the FY 2012
common pool hard-TAC AM that explicitly do not apply to all stocks,
NMFS does not have the authority to revise the regulations in a
correction rule to ensure that AMs are sufficient to prevent
overfishing of the stock as a whole beginning in FY 2012. NMFS has
communicated this deficiency to the Council in a letter dated January
21, 2010. Measures to address deficient AMs for these stocks are
currently being developed by the Council and are expected to be
implemented in a separate action by the start of FY 2012 on May 1,
2012.
7. Multispecies Minimum Fish Sizes and Fillet Provisions
On August 10, 2007, a temporary emergency rule (72 FR 44979)
reduced the haddock minimum size. That action suspended paragraph Sec.
648.83(a)(1), and inserted paragraph Sec. 648.83(a)(3). The rule was
extended through August 10, 2008, by a temporary emergency rule (72 FR
64000) that published on November 14, 2007 and became effective on
February 10, 2008. When this latter action expired, paragraph Sec.
648.83(a)(1) was once again effective, but inadvertently, paragraph
Sec. 648(a)(3) remained in the regulations. As a result, the current
regulations at Sec. 648.83(a) now include two lists specifying minimum
fish sizes. This rule proposes to correct this by removing paragraph
Sec. 684.83(a)(3) in its entirety. This proposed rule will have no
effect on legal fish sizes apart from what is in the current
regulations and analyzed in Amendment 16.
On March 1, 1994, Amendment 5 (59 FR 9872) created an exemption to
allow crew members aboard a vessel issued a commercial NE multispecies
permit to possess up to 25 lb (11.3 kg) of fillets that measure less
than the minimum size, if such fillets are from legal-sized fish and
were not sold, bartered or traded. At the time, DAS was the only effort
control for the FMP, and the associated regulations applied this
provision only to those vessels issued a limited access NE multispecies
permit and fishing under a NE multispecies DAS. Amendment 16
substantially revised sector measures to exempt sector vessels from DAS
measures, provided they comply with hard quotas and area closures based
on an allocation of most stocks managed by the FMP; however, it did not
extend the 25-lb (11.3-kg) fillet exemption to vessels fishing under
the sector provisions. NMFS believes that this exemption was meant to
apply to all limited access NE multispecies DAS vessels, whether or not
a vessel elects to fish under a DAS
[[Page 24447]]
or sector provisions in a given FY. Therefore, this action would expand
the existing fillet exemption to all vessels issued a limited access NE
multispecies DAS permit, including those that are fishing in a sector
and exempt from fishing under a DAS. Consistent with the intent of
Amendment 16 and the associated regulation at Sec. 648.87(b)(1)(v),
all catch by a sector vessel, including fillets retained by crew for
personal use, count against the applicable annual catch entitlement
(ACE) for the sector in which that vessel participates.
Currently, fillets and parts of fish as referenced at Sec.
648.83(b) are counted at a rate of 3:1 solely for compliance purposes
with DAS possession limits. That is, law enforcement multiplies the
weight of fillets or parts of fish by 3 and adds that to the weight of
whole fish on board. The total weight of whole fish and fillets
combined, must comply with trip limits. When landing such fillets for
personal consumption, the amount of fish taken home must be recorded in
a vessel's VTR for that trip, under the code ``999998'' for ``home
consumption.'' Because the current system does not accurately account
for the disposition of fish landed under the ``home consumption'' field
in VTRs, these fish are not currently counted against the common pool
sub-ACL. Replacing the current 1:1 counting method with 3:1 counting
for quota monitoring purposes would ensure that all fish being retained
would be accounted for. This proposed correction would be consistent
with the intentions of the FMP that all catch by common pool and sector
vessels be accounted for, and would prevent a sector from unknowingly
fishing over its respective ACE. Accordingly, fish retained for at-home
consumption would be counted at the 3:1 rate.
8. Adjustments to U.S./Canada Management Area TAC
Regulations at Sec. 648.85(a)(2)(ii) provide that any overages of
GB cod and GB haddock TACs specified for either the common pool or an
individual sector, and any overage of GB yellowtail flounder TAC
specified for the common pool, an individual sector, or the scallop
fishery in a given FY will be subtracted from the respective TAC in the
following FY. However, Amendment 16 incorrectly states that the catch
of stocks of yellowtail flounder by the scallop fishery will be treated
as an ``other sub-component'' of the ACL until AMs for the catch of
yellowtail flounder in the scallop fishery can be developed in an
amendment to the Atlantic Sea Scallop FMP (i.e., Amendment 15).
Therefore, this rule would remove the regulatory reference to the
scallop fishery in Sec. 648.85(a)(2)(ii) and replace it with a
reference to the overall groundfish AM provisions in Sec.
648.90(a)(5)(ii). Since it is likely that the final rule implementing
Scallop Amendment 15, if approved, will not be published by the start
of the NE multispecies 2011 FY on May 1, 2011, this correction is
necessary to ensure that any overage of the overall GB yellowtail
flounder ACL caused by another fishery would be divided between the
common pool and sector sub-components to determine if the respective
AMs will be triggered.
9. Eastern U.S./Canada Landing Limit Restrictions
Amendment 16 revised the existing closure provisions for the
Eastern U.S./Canada Area when 100 percent of the TAC is reached for GB
cod. Amendment 16 revised the regulation at Sec.
648.85(a)(3)(iv)(A)(2) to require that when 100 percent of the TAC is
reached for GB cod, the Eastern U.S./Canada Area will be closed to all
NE multispecies DAS vessels. This regulation maintains outdated
language that fails to recognize the specific allocation of a portion
of the Eastern U.S./Canada TACs for this stock to sectors. To maintain
consistency with Amendment 16 and ensure that NMFS has the authority to
close the Eastern U.S./Canada Area to each component of the NE
multispecies commercial fishery that exceeded its allocation of the
Eastern U.S./Canada Area GB cod TAC, this proposed rule would clarify
the regulations at Sec. 648.85(a)(3)(iv)(A)(2) by closing the area to
all limited access NE multispecies vessels subject to a particular TAC
allocation, once that segment's allocation of the Eastern U.S./Canada
Area GB cod TAC is projected to be caught.
10. Special Management Programs
The current regulations at Sec. 648.85(b)(3)(x)(A) restrict the
gear that may be used in the Closed Area II Yellowtail Flounder/Haddock
Special Access Program (SAP) to only trawl gear when the SAP is open to
targeting yellowtail flounder. This is not consistent with the measure
originally implemented in the Amendment 13 final rule (69 FR 22906,
April 27, 2004). This action would revise these regulations to clarify
that vessels also may use hook gear or gillnet gear in this SAP when it
is open to the targeting of yellowtail flounder by revising the text to
state that NE multispecies vessels ``fishing with trawl gear'' must use
a haddock separator trawl, flounder net, or Ruhle trawl.
The FW 40A final rule, published November 14, 2004 (69 FR 67780),
adopted the Regular B DAS Program. The program allows any eligible
common pool vessel to harvest certain healthy groundfish stocks when
fishing under a NE multispecies Regular B DAS, while minimizing bycatch
of less healthy NE multispecies stocks through the use of selective
gear types. Amendment 16 further revised the program, with updated
stock status information, to focus the effort of the program on three
stocks, including GB haddock. Amendment 16 required vessels fishing
under the Regular B DAS Program in the GB cod stock area with trawl
gear to use a haddock separator trawl, a Ruhle trawl, or other approved
trawl gear with a codend composed of at least 6-inch (15.24-cm) diamond
or square mesh. However, the regulations implementing Amendment 16 did
not specify an area where the 6-inch (15.24-cm) mesh codends could be
used. Therefore, this proposed rule would clarify the regulations at
Sec. 648.85(b)(6)(iv)(J)(4) by specifying that the use of a 6-inch
(15.24-cm) codend is only permitted within the GB cod stock area.
In 2005, FW 41 revised the Closed Area I Hook Gear Haddock SAP
measures affecting common pool vessels to address concerns identified
by NMFS in the original submission of this SAP as part of FW 40-A. The
final rule implementing FW 41 inadvertently did not include a provision
restricting the bait that may be used by common pool vessels. The final
rule implementing Amendment 16 rectified this oversight, but
inadvertently, imposed the bait requirements on sector vessels. This
action would revise the bait restrictions for this SAP specified at
Sec. 648.85(b)(7)(iv)(E) and (vi) to only apply to common pool
vessels.
11. Daily Landing Restrictions
Current landing limit regulations at Sec. 648.86(m) prohibit NE
multispecies permitted vessels from landing regulated NE multispecies
or ocean pout more than once in any 24-hr period. These regulations
provide an example that indicates that this period of time begins when
a vessel departs port, rather than when the vessel returns to port and
lands groundfish. Amendment 16 states that the intent was to be based
upon time of landing. Therefore, this proposed rule would change the
regulations at Sec. 648.86(m) by modifying the example to reflect the
current regulations, which are correctly based upon time of landing.
Additionally, the intent of Amendment 16 is to restrict NE multispecies
permitted vessels from
[[Page 24448]]
landing NE multispecies or ocean pout more than once in any 24-hr
period, rather than all fish species.
12. Sector ACE allocation
The current regulations at Sec. 648.87(b)(1)(ii) state that a
sector may only fish in a particular stock area if it has been
allocated or acquires ACE for all stocks caught in that stock area. As
written, this text could be interpreted to mean that a sector would
have to be allocated or acquire ACE for a stock that sectors are not
allocated, such as SNE/MA winter flounder, to be able to fish, for
example, in the SNE/MA yellowtail flounder stock area. To clarify that
sectors have the ability to fish in a particular stock area for a stock
allocated to sectors, the text at Sec. 648.87(b)(1)(ii) would be
revised to state that sectors may fish in each stock area provided it
has been allocated or acquires ACE for those stocks ``allocated'' to
sectors that are caught within that stock area.
13. Sector Monitoring
As part of a DSM program, a sector is required to contract with an
independent third-party DSM service provider to observe offloads by
sector vessels to verify that landings are accurately reported. The DSM
program requires all NE multispecies sector vessels on a sector trip in
which the NE multispecies catch applies against the sector ACE to
submit a trip-start hail (TSH) report to the DSM provider, which
provides the information necessary to facilitate the deployment of a
DSM. If the vessel operator does not receive a confirmation that the
TSH report has been received within 10 min of sending the report, the
current regulations at Sec. 648.87(b)(5)(i)(A)(1) require the vessel
operator to contact the DSM service provider to confirm the receipt of
the TSH report via a back-up system specified by the DSM service
provider. While the regulations do not specify by what means a TSH must
be transmitted, many sectors are using their existing VMS to transmit
such reports. The delivery of such reports via VMS are often taking
more than 10 min because the 10-min response requirement has proven to
be impractical. Therefore, this action proposes to eliminate the 10-min
requirement currently specified in Sec. 648.87(b)(5)(i)(A)(1), but
still require the vessel operator to contact the DSM service provider
via a back-up system, after a time determined by the DSM provider, to
confirm the receipt of the TSH report.
The DSM provisions require that, for a trip that is selected to be
monitored, all offload events must be monitored, including offloads
occurring at more than one location, offloads to a truck, and offloads
at remote locations. The regulations at Sec. 648.87(b)(5)(ii)(B)(2)
specify that the roving monitor (RM) must ``record all offloaded catch
by species and market class'' for offloads to a truck. Based upon input
from the fishing industry, NMFS has determined that the regulation
requiring that species be sorted by market class is impractical, as
sorting does not generally occur at offloads to trucks and in remote
locations. Additionally, NMFS has determined that this information is
unnecessary to accurately monitor landings data, as catch is monitored
at the species/stock level and not at the level of market class. This
proposed rule would change the data collection requirement for offloads
to a truck by a RM to not require the species be sorted by market
class, by removing the language ``and market class'' from regulations
at Sec. 648.87(b)(5)(ii)(B)(2).
The regulations at Sec. 648.87(b)(5)(ii)(B)(2) also require
offloads to trucks to specify the number of totes of each species
offloaded, the weight of fish in each tote, and that each tote is
properly labeled with information that identifies the trip to which the
tote is associated. The tote-tagging requirement is intended to ensure
that all catch offloaded from a vessel to a truck can be tracked from
the offload site to the dealer, where it will be accurately weighed and
reported. Based on information provided by sector participants, some
offloads to trucks occur within sight of a dealer due to limited
capacity of a vessel to land directly to a dealer. To minimize the
burden on RMs and the cost associated with such monitoring activities,
this proposed rule would exempt the tote-tagging requirement only if
the following three conditions are met: (1) The RM that observed the
offload at the dock will also serve as the DSM when the truck is
offloaded at the dealer; (2) the RM will follow the truck, in line of
sight, from the remote offload location to the dealer where the actual
weighing of the fish occurs; and (3) the truck is loaded with only the
catch from the one trip being monitored.
14. Sector Reporting Requirements
Amendment 16 implemented a number of sector reporting requirements,
including weekly catch reports to be submitted to NMFS by each sector.
The regulations at Sec. 648.87(b)(1)(vi)(B) specify that each sector
must submit a weekly catch report by 2359 hr on Thursday of the week
following the reporting week. Such reports contain detailed
information, including: Week ending date, species, stock area, gear,
number of trips, reported landings, discards, total catch, status of
the sector's ACE, whether this is a new or updated record of sector
catch for each NE multispecies stock allocated to that particular
sector, sector enforcement issues, any discrepancies noted by dockside/
roving monitors between dealers and offloads, summary of offloads
witnessed by dockside/roving monitors for that reporting week, and a
list of vessels landing for that reporting week. Dealer reports for the
same reporting period are utilized by sectors to accurately complete
the weekly sector catch reports and for apportionment purposes.
However, dealer data are not available until Wednesday. Based on sector
manager input, one day has not been a sufficient amount of time to
accurately complete the weekly sector catch reports. This proposed rule
would provide additional flexibility Sec. 648.87(b)(1)(vi)(B) by
extending the sector deadline submission for the weekly catch report
from 2359 hr on Thursday, to 0700 hr on the second Monday for the same
reporting week in question.
15. Recreational and Charter/Party Vessel Restrictions
The April 24, 2000, final rule implementing measures approved under
FW 33 (65 CFR 21658) created an exemption to allow NE multispecies
charter/party permitted vessels to fish in the GOM Closed Areas
provided such vessels obtained a letter of authorization (LOA) from
NMFS. The regulations at Sec. 648.89(e)(3)(iv) implementing this
provision state that a vessel may not use any NE multispecies DAS
during the period of participation to ensure that vessels operating
under the charter/party provisions cannot fish commercially within
these closed areas. However, not all commercial NE multispecies vessels
fish under a DAS. For example, vessels fishing under NE multispecies
Small Vessel, Handgear A, and Handgear B categories are not required to
use NE multispecies DAS to fish commercially. The Council's intent when
developing this exemption was to provide the greatest flexibility for
limited access vessels to engage in both party/charter and commercial
fishing on a seasonal basis, while restricting limited access vessels
carrying passengers for hire from selling their catch when fishing as a
charter/party vessel within closed areas. This action would clarify the
regulations by including language that states that vessels possessing
an LOA to fish as a
[[Page 24449]]
charter/party vessel in the GOM Closed Areas cannot fish on a sector
trip, under a NE multispecies DAS, or under the provisions of the Small
Vessel, Handgear A, and Handgear B categories during the period of
participation.
The regulations at Sec. 648.89(d) would also be corrected to state
that charter/party vessels could not sell, barter, trade, or otherwise
transfer for a commercial purpose, or attempt to sell, barter, trade,
or otherwise transfer for a commercial purpose, NE multispecies caught
or landed while fishing in the U.S. Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ)
unless they are fishing under a NE multispecies ``sector trip,'' or
fishing under a NE multispecies Handgear A, Handgear B, or Small Vessel
Category C permit.
16. Applicability of Possession Prohibition for Certain Stocks
While Amendment 16 clearly lists windowpane flounder and ocean pout
as zero-retention species for all commercial NE multispecies vessels,
it is less clear in defining whether vessels in other fisheries could
possess such species. Section 4.3.2.1 of Amendment 16 indicates that
possession of these stocks is prohibited by all fisheries. However,
this section is specific to the effort control measures adopted for NE
multispecies common pool vessels. Therefore, the final rule
implementing Amendment 16 measures did not prohibit recreational and
charter/party vessels or vessels fishing in other fisheries from
possessing ocean pout and windowpane flounder. Based on further
consultation with Council staff, it was determined that the intent of
Amendment 16 was to prohibit the retention of these species by all
vessels. Therefore, this action proposes to restrict the possession of
windowpane flounder and ocean pout in all fisheries, including catch by
recreational anglers, charter/party vessels, and other fisheries such
as the scallop fishery. The possession of Atlantic wolfish and SNE
winter flounder is already correctly prohibited by recreational anglers
and charter/party vessels as specified at Sec. 648.89(c)(6) and (7)
respectively.
17. Monkfish Declarations
The regulations at Sec. 648.92(b)(1)(iii) allow a vessel fishing
in the NE multispecies fishery to change its fishing activity
declaration after leaving port to reflect the vessel operator's
intention to also fish in the monkfish fishery on the same trip. These
regulations were first implemented as part of FW 4 to the Monkfish FMP
on September 21, 2007 (72 FR 53942), and pre-dated the development of
Amendment 16. The applicability of the monkfish option is for a vessel
fishing under a NE multispecies Category A DAS, which was the universal
effort control in the NE multispecies fishing prior to the
implementation of substantial revisions to sector measures under
Amendment 16. However, NMFS believes that the Council's intent in
Amendment 16 was not to exclude vessels from this option when fishing
on a sector trip. Therefore, this action proposes to insert reference
to vessels fishing on a NE multispecies sector trip to enable such
vessels to also take advantage of the monkfish option.
18. Additional Corrections
In addition to the changes specified above, the following changes
to the regulations are proposed to correct inaccurate references and to
further clarify the intent of the Council.
In Sec. 648.10(k)(3)(ii), N. latitude, Point G9 would be corrected
to read ``The intersection of the Cape Cod, MA, coastline and
70[deg]00'' W. long.'' This current point incorrectly references the
``South-facing shoreline of Cape Cod, MA.''
Section Sec. 648.14(k)(6)(ii)(B) would be corrected to reference
the special management programs at ``Sec. 648.85(b)(7)(iv)(E)'' to
replace the current inaccurate reference to ``Sec.
648.85(b)(7)(iv)(F).''
In Sec. 648.80(a)(2)(ii) and (a)(17)(ii), the ``Approximate loran
C bearings'' portion of the table would be removed. The U.S. Coast
Guard ceased operations of Loran-C, on February 10, 2010, which renders
these coordinates useless. This will have minimum impact, as the same
information is displayed in the regulations using latitude and
longitude coordinates.
In Sec. 648.80(a)(3)(v), a reference to ``Sec. 648.87(c)'' would
be added to the beginning of the section, to include sector vessels.
In Sec. 648.80(b)(3)(i), the phrase ``unless otherwise restricted
in Sec. 648.86'' would be added. This paragraph includes ocean pout as
one of the list of species exemptions for the SNE RMA; however,
Amendment 16 listed ocean pout as a zero-retention species. The
Amendment 16 final rule inadvertently failed to cross-reference this
prohibition in Sec. 648.86.
In Sec. 648.80(c)(2)(i), the reference to Sec. 648.104(a) would
be revised to read ``shall be that specified by Sec. 648.104(a).''
This was the original regulatory text used to cite the regulations and
was inadvertently changed in the final rule implementing Amendment 16.
In Sec. 648.85(a)(1)(ii), this action would correct the Eastern
U.S./Canada Area, N. latitude coordinates for Points USCA 7 and USCA 6
to 40[deg] 50'' N. latitude, and Points USCA 5 and 4 to 40[deg] 40'' N.
latitude. Amendment 13 defined the Eastern U.S./Canada Area as being
composed of statistical areas 561 and 562. The coordinates for
statistical area 562 used to define the Eastern U.S./Canada Area were
incorrectly transposed in the Amendment 13 final rule and would be
rectified by this action.
Section Sec. 648.87(b)(1)(ix) would be corrected to reference the
prohibited species regulations at ``Sec. 648.86(l),'' instead of the
inaccurate reference to ``Sec. 648.87(1).'' In addition, a reference
to ``Sec. 648.86(c)'' would be inserted at Sec. 648.87(b)(1)(ix) to
clarify that sector vessels are held to the one-fish per trip
possession limit of Atlantic halibut, as intended in Amendment 16.
In Sec. 648.87(c)(2), a reference to ``fishing regulations within
the groundfish Fishery Management Plan (FMP)'' would be inserted to
clarify that a NE multispecies sector operations plan can only include
exemptions from regulations within the groundfish FMP, as intended in
Amendment 16.
In Sec. 648.89(c)(2)(i), the reference to ``private recreational
vessel'' would be corrected to read ``charter/party vessel.''
In Sec. 648.90(a)(4), the reference to ``(a)(5)'' would be
corrected to read ``(a)(6).''
Section 648.90(a)(4)(iii)(E) would be revised to include a
reference to the recreational fishery. A reference to the recreational
fishery was made in the title of this paragraph, but was not included
in the regulations.
Classification
Pursuant to sections 304(b)(1)(A) and 305(d) of the Magnuson-
Stevens Act, I have determined that this proposed rule is consistent
with the NE Multispecies FMP, other provisions of the Magnuson-Stevens
Act, and other applicable law, subject to further consideration after
public comment.
This proposed rule has been determined to be not significant for
purposes of Executive Order 12866.
The Chief Counsel for Regulation of the Department of Commerce
certified to the Chief Counsel for Advocacy of the Small Business
Administration that this proposed rule, if adopted, would not have a
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities.
The factual basis for this determination is as follows:
The Small Business Administration size standard for small
commercial fishing entities is $4 million in gross sales, while the
size standard for small charter/party operators is $7 million.
[[Page 24450]]
Due to the nature of some of the measures proposed in this action,
entities affected by the proposed action include those vessels that
have currently been issued any Federal permit to fish any species
within the Northeast. However, most of the entities affected by this
proposed action are limited to vessels issued a limited access NE
multispecies DAS permit (i.e., Category A, D, E, or F), a limited
access NE multispecies Small Vessel or Handgear A permit (i.e.,
Category C or HA, respectively), an open access NE multispecies
Category K or Handgear B (Category HB) permit, or an open access NE
multispecies Charter/Party (Category I) permit. In addition, this
proposed action would also affect any entity issued a Federal permit to
purchase NE multispecies, a company providing dockside and roving
monitoring services, and individuals acting in the capacity of a sector
manager. All entities affected by this proposed rule would fall under
the SBA size standard for small commercial fishing entities or charter/
party operators, and therefore, there is no disproportionate impact
between large and small entities and would not place small entities at
a competitive disadvantage to large entities. A full description of the
fishery, including the entities affected by the proposed action, is
contained in Section 6.2 of the Amendment 16 FEIS.
The proposed allocation would correct/clarify the existing
regulations to ensure that the current regulations accurately reflect
measures adopted by the Council and approved by the Secretary of
Commerce. This action would ensure that the economic benefits analyzed
in previous actions would be realized, including preventing unnecessary
and unintended costs associated with measures corrected by this action,
and would only impose a negligible increase in the mailing and postage
costs associated with compliance with VTR requirements that reflect
current industry practices. For example, by revising the timing
requirements of VMS declarations, this action would avoid $1,900 in
unnecessary yearly VMS messaging costs that were not expected during
the development of Amendment 16. In addition, this action would clarify
that all trips must submit a VTR, regardless of whether fish are
landed, with the exception of trips that only set fishing gear and do
not fish on that trip, resulting in increasing yearly mailing costs of
$5.88-$25.48 per vessel. Other measures corrected or clarified by this
action would ensure that vessels are not subject to measures beyond
those originally adopted in recent management actions. For example,
this action would ensure that Category C and HA vessels would not be
subject to RGAs and are not required to purchase selective gear to fish
in particular areas, and that sector vessels are not subject to bait
restrictions while fishing in the Closed Area I Hook Gear Haddock SAP.
As a result, an initial regulatory flexibility analysis is not
required and none has been prepared.
This proposed rule contains reporting and recordkeeping
requirements and associated information collections subject to the
Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA), which have been previously approved by
OMB under control numbers 0648-0202, 0648-0212, and 0648-0229. Measures
in this proposed rule include provisions that require revised
collection-of-information requirements. Public reporting burden for
these collections of information are estimated to average as follows:
1. VMS area and DAS declaration, OMB 0648-0202, (5 min/
response);
2. VMS trip-level catch reports, OMB 0648-0212, (15 min/
response);
3. Request for a LOA to fish in a NE multispecies RGA, OMB
0648-0202, (5 min/response);
4. VMS declaration to fish in a NE multispecies RGA, OMB
0648-0202, (5 min/response);
5. Pre-trip hail report to a dockside monitoring service provider,
OMB 0648-0202, (2 min/response);
6. Trip-end hail report to a dockside monitoring service provider,
OMB 0648-0202, (15 min/response);
7. Confirmation of dockside monitoring trip-end hail report,
OMB 0648-0202, (2 min/response);
8. Dockside/roving service provider data entry, OMB 0648-
0202, (3 min/response);
9. Daily VMS catch reports when fishing in the U.S./Canada
Management Area and Closed Area II SAPs, OMB 0648-0212, (15
min/response);
10. Daily VMS catch reports when fishing in the Closed Area I Hook
Gear Haddock SAP, OMB 0648-0212, (15 min/response);
11. Daily VMS catch reports when fishing in the Regular B DAS
Program, OMB 0648-0212, (15 min/response); and
12. Copy of the dealer weigh-out slip or dealer signature of the
dockside monitor report, OMB 0648-0212 (2 min/response).
13. Letter of authorization for charter/party vessels to access the
Western GOM Closure Area and the GOM Rolling Closure Areas,
OMB 0648-0202, (5 min/response);
14. Declaration of the monkfish DAS option via VMS, OMB
0648-0202, (5 min/response);
15. Sector weekly catch report, OMB 0648-0212, (4 hr/
response);
16. VTR requirement, OMB 0648-0212, (5 min/response); and
17. Dealer report, OMB 0648-0229, (4 min/response).
These estimates include the time required for reviewing
instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and
maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the
collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden
estimate, or any other aspect of this data collection, including
suggestions for reducing the burden, to NMFS (see ADDRESSES) and by e-
mail to OIRA_Submission@omb.eop.gov, or fax to (202) 395-7285.
Notwithstanding any other provision of the law, no person is
required to respond to, and no person shall be subject to penalty for
failure to comply with, a collection of information subject to the
requirements of the PRA, unless that collection of information displays
a currently valid OMB Control Number.
List of Subjects in 50 CFR Part 648
Fisheries, Fishing, Reporting and recordkeeping.
Dated: April 26, 2011.
John Oliver,
Deputy Assistant Administrator For Operations, National Marine
Fisheries Service.
For the reason set out in the preamble, 50 CFR part 648 is proposed
to be amended as follows:
PART 648--FISHERIES OF THE NORTHEASTERN UNITED STATES
1. The authority citation for part 648 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.
2. In Sec. 648.2, add a definition of set-only trip to read as
follows:
Sec. 648.2 Definitions.
* * * * *
Set-only trip means a fishing trip on which any federally permitted
vessel deploys gear with the intention of retrieving it on a separate
trip and does not haul-back or retrieve any gear capable of catching
fish on the set-only trip.
* * * * *
3. In Sec. 648.7, revise paragraph (c) to read as follows:
Sec. 648.7 Recordkeeping and reporting requirements.
* * * * *
[[Page 24451]]
(c) When to fill out a log report. Except for vessels on a set-only
trip, as declared through the pre-trip notification system specified in
Sec. 648.11(k), log reports required by paragraph (b)(1)(i) of this
section must be filled out with all required information, except for
information not yet ascertainable, prior to entering port. Information
that may be considered unascertainable prior to entering port includes
dealer name, dealer permit number, and date sold. Log reports must be
completed as soon as the information becomes available. Log reports
required by paragraph (b)(1)(ii) of this section must be filled out
before landing any surfclams or ocean quahogs.
* * * * *
4. In Sec. 648.10, revise paragraph (k)(3)(ii) to read as follows:
Sec. 648.10 VMS and DAS requirements for vessel owners/operators.
* * * * *
(k) * * *
(3) * * *
(ii) Inshore GB Stock Area 2. The inshore GB Stock Area is defined
by straight lines connecting the following points in the order stated:
Inshore GB Stock Area 2
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Point N. latitude W. longitude
------------------------------------------------------------------------
G9............................. (\1\) 70[deg]00'
G10............................ 42[deg]20' 70[deg]00'
IGB1........................... 42[deg]20' 68[deg]50'
IGB2........................... 41[deg]00' 68[deg]50'
IGB3........................... 41[deg]00' 69[deg]30'
IGB4........................... 41[deg]10' 69[deg]30'
IGB5........................... 41[deg]10' 69[deg]50'
IGB6........................... 41[deg]20' 69[deg]50'
IGB7........................... 41[deg]20' 70[deg]00'
G12............................ (\2\) 70[deg]00'
------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ The intersection of the Cape Cod, MA, coastline and 70[deg]00' W.
long.
\2\ South-facing shoreline of Cape Cod, MA.
* * * * *
5. In Sec. 648.14, add paragraph (k)(2)(iv); and revise paragraphs
(k)(3)(i) and (k)(6)(ii)(B) to read as follows:
Sec. 648.14 Prohibitions.
* * * * *
(k) * * *
(2) * * *
(iv) Possess or land fish while setting fixed gear on a set-only
trip as declared through the pre-trip notification system pursuant to
Sec. 648.11(k).
(3) * * *
(i) It is unlawful to purchase, possess, import, export, or receive
as a dealer, or in the capacity of a dealer, regulated species or ocean
pout in excess of the possession limits specified in Sec. 648.82,
Sec. 648.85, Sec. 648.86, or Sec. 648.87 applicable to a vessel
issued a NE multispecies permit, unless otherwise specified in Sec.
648.17, or unless the regulated species or ocean pout are purchased or
received from a vessel that caught them on a sector trip and such
species are exempt from such possession limits in accordance with an
approved sector operations plan, as specified in Sec. 648.87(c).
* * * * *
(6) * * *
(ii) * * *
(B) Hook gear. Fail to comply with the restrictions on fishing and
gear specified in Sec. 648.80(a)(3)(v), (a)(4)(v), (b)(2)(v), and
(c)(2)(iv) if the vessel has been issued a limited access NE
multispecies permit and fishes with hook gear in areas specified in
Sec. 648.80(a), (b), or (c), unless allowed under Sec.
648.85(b)(7)(iv)(E).
* * * * *
6. In Sec. 648.80, revise paragraphs (a)(2)(ii), (a)(3)(v),
(a)(3)(vi), (a)(17)(ii), (b)(3)(i), and (c)(2)(i) to read as follows:
Sec. 648.80 NE Multispecies regulated mesh areas and restrictions on
gear and methods of fishing.
* * * * *
(a) * * *
(2) * * *
(ii) Bounded on the east by straight lines connecting the following
points in the order stated:
GB Regulated Mesh Area
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Point N. lat. W. long.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
CII3............................... 42[deg]22' 67[deg]20' \1\
SNE1............................... 40[deg]24' 65[deg]43' \2\
------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ The U.S.-Canada Maritime Boundary.
\2\ The U.S.-Canada Maritime Boundary as it intersects with the EEZ.
* * * * *
(3) * * *
(v) Hook gear restrictions. Unless otherwise specified in this
paragraph (a)(3)(v) or Sec. 648.87(c), vessels fishing with a valid NE
multispecies limited access permit and fishing under a NE multispecies
DAS or on a sector trip, and vessels fishing with a valid NE
multispecies limited access Small-Vessel permit in the GOM Regulated
Mesh Area, and persons on such vessels, are prohibited from fishing,
setting, or hauling back, per day, or possessing on board the vessel,
more than 2,000 rigged hooks. All longline gear hooks must be circle
hooks, of a minimum size of 12/0. An unbaited hook and gangion that has
not been secured to the ground line of the trawl on board a vessel is
deemed to be a replacement hook and is not counted toward the 2,000-
hook limit. A ``snap-on'' hook is deemed to be a replacement hook if it
is not rigged or baited. The use of de-hookers (``crucifer'') with less
than 6-inch (15.2-cm) spacing between the fairlead rollers is
prohibited. Vessels fishing with a valid NE multispecies limited access
Hook Gear permit and fishing under a multispecies DAS or on a sector
trip in the GOM Regulated Mesh Area, and persons on such vessels, are
prohibited from possessing gear other than hook gear on board the
vessel. Vessels fishing with a valid NE multispecies limited access
Handgear A permit are prohibited from fishing, or possessing on board
the vessel, gear other than handgear. Vessels fishing with tub-trawl
gear are prohibited from fishing, setting, or hauling back, per day, or
possessing on board the vessel more than 250 hooks.
(vi) Other restrictions and exemptions. A vessel is prohibited from
fishing in the GOM or GB Exemption Area as defined in paragraph (a)(17)
of this section, except if fishing with exempted gear (as defined under
this part) or under the exemptions specified in paragraphs (a)(5)
through (7), (a)(9) through (a)(16) and (a)(18), (d), (e), (h), and (i)
of this section; or if fishing under a NE multispecies DAS; or if
fishing on a sector trip; or if fishing under the Small Vessel or
Handgear A permit specified in Sec. 648.82(b)(5) and (6),
respectively; or if fishing under a Handgear B permit specified in
Sec. 648.88(a); or if fishing under the scallop state waters
exemptions specified in Sec. 648.54 and paragraph (a)(11) of this
section; or if fishing under a scallop DAS in accordance with paragraph
(h) of this section; or if fishing pursuant to a NE multispecies open
access Charter/Party or Handgear permit specified in Sec. 648.88; or
if fishing as a charter/party or private recreational vessel in
compliance with Sec. 648.89. Any gear used by a vessel in this area
must be authorized under one of these exemptions. Any gear on a vessel
that is not authorized under one of these exemptions must be stowed as
specified in Sec. 648.23(b).
* * * * *
(17) * * *
(ii) Bounded on the south by straight lines connecting the
following points in the order stated:
Gulf of Maine/Georges Bank Exemption Area
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Point N. latitude W. longitude
------------------------------------------------------------------------
G6............................. 40[deg]55.5 66[deg]38'
G7............................. 40[deg]45' 68[deg]00'
G8............................. 40[deg]37' 68[deg]00'
G9............................. 40[deg]30' 69[deg]00'
NL3............................ 40[deg]22.7' 69[deg]00'
[[Page 24452]]
NL2............................ 40[deg]18.7' 69[deg]40'
NL1............................ 40[deg]50' 69[deg]40'
G11............................ 40[deg]50' 70[deg]00'
G12............................ (\1\) 70[deg]00'
------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Northward to its intersection with the shoreline of mainland
Massachusetts.
* * * * *
(b) * * *
(3) * * *
(i) Species exemption. Unless otherwise restricted in Sec. 648.86,
owners and operators of vessels subject to the minimum mesh size
restrictions specified in paragraphs (a)(4) and (b)(2) of this section
may fish for, harvest, possess, or land butterfish, dogfish (caught by
trawl only), herring, Atlantic mackerel, ocean pout, scup, shrimp,
squid, summer flounder, silver hake and offshore hake, and weakfish
with nets of a mesh size smaller than the minimum size specified in the
GB and SNE Regulated Mesh Areas when fishing in the SNE Exemption Area
defined in paragraph (b)(10) of this section, provided such vessels
comply with requirements specified in paragraph (b)(3)(ii) of this
section and with the mesh size and possession limit restrictions
specified under Sec. 648.86(d).
* * * * *
(c) * * *
(2) * * *
(i) Vessels using trawls. Except as provided in paragraph
(c)(2)(iii) of this section, and Sec. 648.85(b)(6), the minimum mesh
size for any trawl net not stowed and not available for immediate use
in accordance with Sec. 648.23(b), on a vessel or used by a vessel
fishing under the NE multispecies DAS program or on a sector trip in
the MA Regulated Mesh Area, shall be that specified by Sec.
648.104(a), applied throughout the body and extension of the net, or
any combination thereof, and 6.5-inch (16.5-cm) diamond or square mesh
applied to the codend of the net, as defined in paragraph (a)(3)(i) of
this section. This restriction does not apply to nets or pieces of nets
smaller than 3 ft (0.9 m) x 3 ft (0.9 m), (9 sq ft (0.81 sq m)), or to
vessels that have not been issued a NE multispecies permit and that are
fishing exclusively in state waters.
* * * * *
7. In Sec. 648.81, revise the introductory text of paragraph (n)
to read as follows:
Sec. 648.81 NE multispecies closed areas and measures to protect EFH.
* * * * *
(n) NE Multispecies Restricted Gear Areas. With the exception of a
vessel on a sector trip, any vessel issued a limited access NE
multispecies permit fishing under a NE multispecies DAS that is fishing
any part of a trip in one or both of the NE Multispecies Restricted
Gear Areas specified in paragraphs (n)(1) and (2) of this section must
comply with all applicable restrictions specified in this paragraph
(n). If such a vessel fishes inside/outside of these areas on the same
trip, the most restrictive measures for the areas fished apply,
including, but not limited to, gear restrictions and trip limits.
* * * * *
8. In Sec. 648.82, revise the introductory text of paragraph
(b)(5)(i), and the introductory text of paragraph (n)(1) to read as
follows:
Sec. 648.82 Effort-control program for NE multispecies limited access
vessels.
* * * * *
(b) * * *
(5) * * *
(i) DAS allocation. A vessel qualified and electing to fish under
the Small Vessel category may retain up to 300 lb (136.1 kg) of cod,
haddock, and yellowtail flounder, combined, and one Atlantic halibut
per trip, without being subject to DAS restrictions, provided the
vessel does not exceed the yellowtail flounder possession restrictions
specified at Sec. 648.86(g). Such a vessel is subject to the
possession limits specified for other regulated species and ocean pout,
as specified at Sec. 648.86. Any vessel may elect to switch into this
category, as provided in Sec. 648.4(a)(1)(i)(I)(2), if the vessel
meets or complies with the following:
* * * * *
(n) * * *
(1) Differential DAS counting AM for fishing years 2010 and 2011.
Unless otherwise specified pursuant to Sec. 648.90(a)(5), based upon
catch and other information available to NMFS by February of each year,
the Regional Administrator shall project the catch of regulated species
or ocean pout by common pool vessels for the fishing year ending on
April 30 to determine whether such catch will exceed any of the sub-
ACLs specified for common pool vessels pursuant to Sec.
648.90(a)(4)(iii). This initial projection of common pool catch shall
be updated shortly after the end of each fishing year once information
becomes available regarding the catch of regulated species and ocean
pout by vessels fishing for groundfish in state waters outside of the
FMP, vessels fishing in exempted fisheries, and vessels fishing in the
Atlantic sea scallop fishery; and the catch of Atlantic halibut, SNE/MA
winter flounder, ocean pout, windowpane flounder, and Atlantic wolffish
by sector vessels to determine if excessive catch by such vessels
resulted in the overall ACL for a particular stock to be exceeded. If
such catch resulted in the overall ACL for a particular stock being
exceeded, the common pool's catch of that stock shall be increased by
an amount equal to the amount of the overage of the overall ACL for
that stock multiplied by the common pool's share of the overall ACL for
that stock calculated pursuant to Sec. 648.90(a)(4)(iii)(E)(2). For
example, if the 2010 overall ACL for GOM cod was exceeded by 10,000 lb
(4,536 kg) due to excessive catch of that stock by vessels fishing in
state waters outside the FMP, and the common pool's share of the 2010
overall GOM cod ACL was 5 percent, then the common pool's 2010 catch of
GOM cod shall be increased by 500 lb (226.8 kg) (10,000 lb (4,536 kg) x
0.05 of the overall GOM cod ACL). If based on the initial projection
completed in February, the Regional Administrator projects that any of
the sub-ACLs specified for common pool vessels will be exceeded or
underharvested, the Regional Administrator shall implement a
differential DAS counting factor to all Category A DAS used within the
stock area in which the sub-ACL was exceeded or underharvested, as
specified in paragraph (n)(1)(i) of this section, during the following
fishing year, in a manner consistent with the Administrative Procedure
Act. Any differential DAS counting implemented at the start of the
fishing year will be reevaluated and recalculated, if necessary, once
updated information is obtained. The differential DAS counting factor
shall be based upon the projected proportion of the sub-ACL of each NE
multispecies stock caught by common pool vessels, rounded to the
nearest even tenth, as specified in paragraph (n)(1)(ii) of this
section, unless otherwise specified pursuant to Sec. 648.90(a)(5). For
example, if the Regional Administrator projects that common pool
vessels will catch 1.18 times the sub-ACL for GOM cod during fishing
year 2010, the Regional Administrator shall implement a differential
DAS