Board Workshop: June 6-7, 2011-Arlington, Virginia; the U.S. Nuclear Waste Technical Review Board Will Hold a Workshop on Methods for Evaluating Nuclear Waste Streams, 24065-24066 [2011-10329]

Download as PDF srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICES Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 83 / Friday, April 29, 2011 / Notices thermal for all three units, in accordance with the provisions of the PVNGS renewed licenses and technical specifications. The notice also serves as the record of decision for Renewed Facility Operating License Nos. NPF–41, NPF–51, and NPF–74, consistent with Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR) 51.103, ‘‘Record of Decision—General.’’ NUREG–1437, ‘‘Generic Environmental Impact Statement for License Renewal of Nuclear Plants: Supplement 43, Regarding Palo Verde Nuclear Generating Station,’’ issued January 2011, discusses the Commission’s consideration of a range of reasonable alternatives, including generation of replacement power from new supercritical coal-fired generation; natural gas combined-cycle generation; new nuclear generation; a combination of alternatives that includes natural gas combined-cycle generation, energy conservation, and solar; and not renewing the license (the no-action alternative). The factors considered in the record of decision appear in the supplemental environmental impact statement for PVNGS. PVNGS units are pressurized water reactors located in Maricopa County, Arizona. The application for the renewed licenses complied with the standards and requirements of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended, and the Commission’s regulations. As required by the Atomic Energy Act and the Commission’s regulations in 10 CFR Chapter I, the Commission has made appropriate findings, which are set forth in the licenses. Prior public notice of the action involving the proposed issuance of the renewed licenses and of an opportunity for a hearing regarding the proposed issuance of the renewed licenses was published in the Federal Register on May 15, 2009 (74 FR 22978). For further details with respect to this action, see: (1) Arizona Public Service Company’s license renewal application for PVNGS dated December 11, 2008, as supplemented by letters dated through March 17, 2011; (2) the Commission’s safety evaluation report (NUREG–1961), issued April 2011; (3) the licensee’s updated final safety analysis report; and (4) the Commission’s final environmental impact statement (NUREG–1437, Supplement 43), issued January 2011. These documents are available at the NRC’s Public Document Room, One White Flint North, 11555 Rockville Pike, Rockville, Maryland 20852, and online in the NRC Library at https://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/ adams.html. Copies of Renewed Facility Operating License Nos. NPF–41, NPF–51, and VerDate Mar<15>2010 17:39 Apr 28, 2011 Jkt 223001 NPF–74, may be obtained by writing to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555– 0001, Attention: Director, Division of License Renewal. Copies of the PVNGS safety evaluation report (NUREG–1961) and the final environmental impact statement (NUREG–1437, Supplement 43) may be purchased from the National Technical Information Service, U.S. Department of Commerce, Springfield, Virginia 22161 (https://www.ntis.gov), 703–605–6000, or Attention: Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office, P.O. Box 371954, Pittsburgh, PA 15250–7954 (https://www.gpoaccess.gov), 202–512– 1800. All orders should clearly identify the NRC publication number and the requestor’s Government Printing Office deposit account number or VISA or MasterCard number and expiration date. Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 21st day of April, 2011. For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission. Andrew S. Imboden, Chief, Environmental Review and Guidance Update Branch, Division of License Renewal, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation. [FR Doc. 2011–10403 Filed 4–28–11; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7590–01–P NUCLEAR WASTE TECHNICAL REVIEW BOARD Board Workshop: June 6–7, 2011— Arlington, Virginia; the U.S. Nuclear Waste Technical Review Board Will Hold a Workshop on Methods for Evaluating Nuclear Waste Streams Pursuant to its authority under section 5051 of Public Law 100–203, Nuclear Waste Policy Amendments Act of 1987, the U.S. Nuclear Waste Technical Review Board will hold a workshop on Monday, June 6, and Tuesday, June 7, 2011, in Arlington, Virginia, on methods for evaluating waste streams associated with lightwater reactor (LWR) fuel-cycle options. The Board has developed a personalcomputer-based systems analysis tool, the Nuclear Waste Assessment System for Technical Evaluation (NUWASTE), to analyze the implications of various nuclear fuel-cycle scenarios being considered by the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) for managing spent nuclear fuel. The Board will discuss NUWASTE, its methodology, and some preliminary results from the analysis at the meeting. Other organizations with similar projects under way have been invited to discuss their analytical methods and results at the workshop. The overall objectives of the workshop PO 00000 Frm 00097 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 24065 are to benchmark each of the systems analysis tools against each other and to understand the basis for any differences among the results. The workshop will be held at the Hilton Arlington Hotel; 950 N. Stafford Street; Arlington, VA 22203; telephone: 703–528–6000. A block of rooms has been reserved at the hotel. To make a reservation, attendees may call 1–800– Hiltons. The group code for the meeting is ‘‘NUC.’’ Or, go to the hotel Web site, https://www.arlingtonva.hilton.com, and enter the arrival and departure dates and the group code. All reservations must be made by May 13 to receive the group rate. The workshop will begin on Monday, June 6, at 9 a.m. and will conclude by 4 p.m. on Tuesday, June 7. A detailed agenda will be available on the Board’s Web site at https://www.nwtrb.gov approximately one week before the workshop. The agenda also may be obtained by telephone request at that time. The workshop will be open to the public, and opportunities for public comment will be provided. Those wanting to speak are encouraged to sign the ‘‘Public Comment Register’’ at the check-in table. It may be necessary to set a time limit on individual remarks, but written comments of any length may be submitted for the record. Transcripts of the workshop discussions will be available on the Board’s Web site, by e-mail, on computer disk, and on library-loan in paper form from Davonya Barnes of the Board’s staff after June 27, 2011. The Board was established as an independent federal agency to provide ongoing, objective expert advice to Congress and the Secretary of Energy on technical issues related to the management and disposition of spent nuclear fuel and high-level radioactive waste and to review the technical validity of DOE activities related to implementing the Nuclear Waste Policy Act. Board members are experts in their fields and are appointed to the Board by the President from a list of candidates submitted by the National Academy of Sciences. The Board is required to report to Congress and the Secretary no fewer than two times each year. Board reports, correspondence, congressional testimony, and meeting transcripts and materials are posted on the Board’s Web site. For information on the meeting agenda, contact Karyn Severson. For information on lodging or logistics, contact Linda Coultry. They can be reached at 2300 Clarendon Boulevard, Suite 1300; Arlington, VA 22201–3367; (tel) 703–235–4473; (fax) 703–235–4495. E:\FR\FM\29APN1.SGM 29APN1 24066 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 83 / Friday, April 29, 2011 / Notices Dated: April 25, 2011. Nigel Mote, Executive Director, U.S. Nuclear Waste Technical Review Board. [FR Doc. 2011–10329 Filed 4–28–11; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6820–AM–M RAILROAD RETIREMENT BOARD Proposed Collection; Comment Request Summary: In accordance with the requirement of Section 3506 (c)(2)(A) of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 which provides opportunity for public comment on new or revised data collections, the Railroad Retirement Board (RRB) will publish periodic summaries of proposed data collections. Comments are invited on: (a) Whether the proposed information collection is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the agency, including whether the information has practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the RRB’s estimate of the burden of the collection of the information; (c) ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; and (d) ways to minimize the burden related to the collection of information on respondents, including the use of automated collection techniques or other forms of information technology. 1. Title and purpose of information collection: Certification of Termination of Service and Relinquishment of Rights; OMB 3220–0016. Under Section 2(e)(2) of the Railroad Retirement Act (RRA), an age and service annuity, spouse annuity, or divorced spouse annuity cannot be paid unless the Railroad Retirement Board (RRB) has evidence that the applicant has ceased railroad employment and relinquished rights to return to the service of a railroad employer. Under Section 2(f)(6) of the RRA, earnings deductions are required for each month an annuitant works in certain nonrailroad employment termed Last PreRetirement Non-Railroad Employment. Normally, the employee, spouse, or divorced spouse relinquishes rights and certifies that employment has ended as part of the annuity application process. However, this is not always the case. In limited circumstances, the RRB utilizes Form G–88, Certification of Termination of Service and Relinquishment of Rights, to obtain an applicant’s report of termination of employment and relinquishment of rights. One response is required of each respondent. Completion is required to obtain or retain benefits. The RRB proposes no changes to Form G–88. Estimate of Annual Respondent Burden The estimated annual respondent burden is as follows: Form No. Annual responses Time (minutes) Burden (hours) G–88 ............................................................................................................................................ 3,600 6 360 2. Title and purpose of information collection: Statement of Authority to Act for Employee; OMB 3220–0034. Under Section 5(a) of the Railroad Unemployment Insurance Act (RUIA), claims for benefits are to be made in accordance with such regulations as the Railroad Retirement Board (RRB) shall prescribe. The provisions for claiming sickness benefits as provided by Section 2 of the RUIA are prescribed in 20 CFR 335.2. Included in these provisions is the RRB’s acceptance of forms executed by someone else on behalf of an employee if the RRB is satisfied that the employee is sick or injured to the extent of being unable to sign forms. The RRB utilizes Form SI–10, Statement of Authority to Act for Employee, to provide the means for an individual to apply for authority to act on behalf of an incapacitated employee and also to obtain the information necessary to determine that the delegation should be made. Part I of the form is completed by the applicant for the authority and Part II is completed by the employee’s doctor. One response is requested of each respondent. Completion is required to obtain benefits. The RRB proposes no changes to Form SI–10. Estimate of Annual Respondent Burden The estimated annual respondent burden is as follows: Annual responses Time (minutes) Burden (hours) SI–10 ............................................................................................................................................ srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICES Form No. 400 6 40 3. Title and purpose of information collection: Statement Regarding Contributions and Support; OMB 3220– 0099. Under Section 2 of the Railroad Retirement Act, dependency on an employee for one-half support at the time of the employee’s death can affect (1) Entitlement to a survivor annuity when the survivor is a parent of the deceased employee; (2) the amount of spouse and survivor annuities; and (3) the Tier II restored amount payable to a widow(er) whose annuity was reduced for receipt of an employee annuity, and who was dependent on the railroad employee in the year prior to the employee’s death. One-half support may also negate the public service pension offset in Tier I for a spouse or widow(er). The Railroad Retirement Board (RRB) utilizes Form G–134, Statement Regarding Contributions and Support, to secure information needed to adequately determine if the applicant meets the one-half support requirement. One response is completed by each respondent. Completion is required to obtain benefits. The RRB proposes no changes to Form G–134. Estimate of Annual Respondent Burden The estimated annual respondent burden is as follows: Annual responses Form No. G–134: With assistance .................................................................................................................... VerDate Mar<15>2010 17:39 Apr 28, 2011 Jkt 223001 PO 00000 Frm 00098 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\29APN1.SGM 75 29APN1 Time (minutes) 147 Burden (hours) 184

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 83 (Friday, April 29, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 24065-24066]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-10329]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NUCLEAR WASTE TECHNICAL REVIEW BOARD


Board Workshop: June 6-7, 2011--Arlington, Virginia; the U.S. 
Nuclear Waste Technical Review Board Will Hold a Workshop on Methods 
for Evaluating Nuclear Waste Streams

    Pursuant to its authority under section 5051 of Public Law 100-203, 
Nuclear Waste Policy Amendments Act of 1987, the U.S. Nuclear Waste 
Technical Review Board will hold a workshop on Monday, June 6, and 
Tuesday, June 7, 2011, in Arlington, Virginia, on methods for 
evaluating waste streams associated with light-water reactor (LWR) 
fuel-cycle options. The Board has developed a personal-computer-based 
systems analysis tool, the Nuclear Waste Assessment System for 
Technical Evaluation (NUWASTE), to analyze the implications of various 
nuclear fuel-cycle scenarios being considered by the U.S. Department of 
Energy (DOE) for managing spent nuclear fuel. The Board will discuss 
NUWASTE, its methodology, and some preliminary results from the 
analysis at the meeting. Other organizations with similar projects 
under way have been invited to discuss their analytical methods and 
results at the workshop. The overall objectives of the workshop are to 
benchmark each of the systems analysis tools against each other and to 
understand the basis for any differences among the results.
    The workshop will be held at the Hilton Arlington Hotel; 950 N. 
Stafford Street; Arlington, VA 22203; telephone: 703-528-6000. A block 
of rooms has been reserved at the hotel. To make a reservation, 
attendees may call 1-800-Hiltons. The group code for the meeting is 
``NUC.'' Or, go to the hotel Web site, https://www.arlingtonva.hilton.com, and enter the arrival and departure dates 
and the group code. All reservations must be made by May 13 to receive 
the group rate.
    The workshop will begin on Monday, June 6, at 9 a.m. and will 
conclude by 4 p.m. on Tuesday, June 7. A detailed agenda will be 
available on the Board's Web site at https://www.nwtrb.gov approximately 
one week before the workshop. The agenda also may be obtained by 
telephone request at that time.
    The workshop will be open to the public, and opportunities for 
public comment will be provided. Those wanting to speak are encouraged 
to sign the ``Public Comment Register'' at the check-in table. It may 
be necessary to set a time limit on individual remarks, but written 
comments of any length may be submitted for the record.
    Transcripts of the workshop discussions will be available on the 
Board's Web site, by e-mail, on computer disk, and on library-loan in 
paper form from Davonya Barnes of the Board's staff after June 27, 
2011.
    The Board was established as an independent federal agency to 
provide ongoing, objective expert advice to Congress and the Secretary 
of Energy on technical issues related to the management and disposition 
of spent nuclear fuel and high-level radioactive waste and to review 
the technical validity of DOE activities related to implementing the 
Nuclear Waste Policy Act. Board members are experts in their fields and 
are appointed to the Board by the President from a list of candidates 
submitted by the National Academy of Sciences. The Board is required to 
report to Congress and the Secretary no fewer than two times each year. 
Board reports, correspondence, congressional testimony, and meeting 
transcripts and materials are posted on the Board's Web site.
    For information on the meeting agenda, contact Karyn Severson. For 
information on lodging or logistics, contact Linda Coultry. They can be 
reached at 2300 Clarendon Boulevard, Suite 1300; Arlington, VA 22201-
3367; (tel) 703-235-4473; (fax) 703-235-4495.


[[Page 24066]]


    Dated: April 25, 2011.
Nigel Mote,
Executive Director, U.S. Nuclear Waste Technical Review Board.
[FR Doc. 2011-10329 Filed 4-28-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6820-AM-M
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.