Fisheries of the Caribbean, Gulf of Mexico, and South Atlantic; Snapper-Grouper Fishery Off the Southern Atlantic States; Red Snapper Management Measures, 23728-23731 [2011-10326]
Download as PDF
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with RULES
23728
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 82 / Thursday, April 28, 2011 / Rules and Regulations
§ 231.33. The petition for modification
shall include each of the elements
identified in § 231.33(b).
(b) Service. (1) Each petition for
modification of an approved industry
standard under paragraph (a) of this
section shall be submitted to the FRA
Docket Clerk, West Building Third
Floor, Office of Chief Counsel, 1200
New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington,
DC 20590.
(2) Service of each petition for
modification of an existing industry
safety appliance standard under
paragraph (a) of this section shall be
made on the following:
(i) Designated representatives of the
employees responsible for the
equipment’s operation, inspection,
testing, and maintenance under this
part;
(ii) Any organizations or bodies that
either issued the standard incorporated
in the section(s) of the rule to which the
modification pertains or issued the
industry standard that is proposed in
the petition for modification; and
(iii) Any other person who has filed
with FRA a current statement of interest
in reviewing special approvals under
the particular requirement of this part at
least 30 days but not more than 5 years
prior to the filing of the petition. If filed,
a statement of interest shall be filed
with FRA’s Associate Administrator for
Safety and shall reference the specific
section(s) of this part in which the
person has an interest.
(c) Federal Register document. Upon
receipt of a petition for modification,
FRA will publish a document in the
Federal Register announcing the receipt
of each petition received under
paragraph (a) of this section. The
document will identify the public
docket number in the Federal
eRulemaking Portal (FeP) where the
contents of each petition can be
accessed and reviewed. The FeP can be
accessed 24 hours a day, seven days a
week, via the Internet at the docket’s
Web site at https://www.regulations.gov.
All documents in the FeP are available
for inspection and copying on the Web
site or are available for examination at
the DOT Docket Management Facility,
West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE.,
Washington, DC 20590, during regular
business hours (9 a.m.–5 p.m.).
(d) Comment. Not later than 60 days
from the date of publication in the
Federal Register concerning a petition
for modification under paragraph (a) of
this section, any person may comment
on the petition. Any such comment
shall:
(1) Set forth specifically the basis
upon which it is made, and contain a
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:21 Apr 27, 2011
Jkt 223001
concise statement of the interest of the
commenter in the proceeding; and
(2) Be submitted by mail or handdelivery to the Docket Clerk, DOT
Docket Management Facility, West
Building Ground Floor, Room W12–140,
1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE.,
Washington, DC 20590, or electronically
via the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov. Any comments or
information sent directly to FRA will be
immediately provided to the DOT FeP
for inclusion in the public docket
related to the petition. All comments
should identify the appropriate docket
number for the petition to which they
are commenting.
(e) FRA Review. During the 60 days
provided for public comment, FRA will
review the petition. If FRA objects to the
requested modification, written
notification will be provided within this
60-day period to the party requesting
the modification detailing FRA’s
objection.
(f) Disposition of petitions for
modification. (1) If no comment
objecting to the requested modification
is received during the 60-day comment
period, provided by paragraph (d) of
this section, or if FRA does not issue a
written objection to the requested
modification, the modification will
become effective fifteen (15) days after
the close of the 60-day comment period.
(2) If an objection is raised by an
interested party, during the 60-day
comment period, or if FRA issues a
written objection to the requested
modification, the requested
modification will be treated as a petition
for special approval of an existing
industry safety appliance standard and
handled in accordance with the
procedures provided in § 231.33(f).
(3) A petition for modification, once
approved, may be re-opened upon good
cause shown. Good cause exists where
subsequent evidence demonstrates that
an approved petition does not comply
with the an applicable Federal statute,
that an approved petition does not
comply with the requirements of this
section; that the existing industry safety
appliance standard does not provide at
least an equivalent level of safety as the
corresponding FRA regulation for the
nearest railcar type(s); or that further
information is required to make such a
determination. When a petition is reopened for good cause shown, it shall
return to pending status and shall not be
considered approved or denied.
(g) Enforcement. Any modification of
an industry standard approved pursuant
to this section will be enforced against
any person, as defined at 49 CFR 209.3,
who violates any provision of the
approved standard or causes the
PO 00000
Frm 00042
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
violation of any such provision. Civil
penalties will be assessed under this
part by using the applicable defect code
contained in appendix A to this part.
Issued in Washington, DC, on April 20,
2011.
Joseph C. Szabo,
Administrator, Federal Railroad
Administration.
[FR Doc. 2011–10015 Filed 4–27–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–06–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
50 CFR Part 622
[Docket No. 101124579–1236–02]
RIN 0648–BA51
Fisheries of the Caribbean, Gulf of
Mexico, and South Atlantic; SnapperGrouper Fishery Off the Southern
Atlantic States; Red Snapper
Management Measures
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
NMFS issues this final rule to
implement a regulatory amendment
(Regulatory Amendment 10) to the
Fishery Management Plan for the
Snapper-Grouper Fishery of the South
Atlantic Region (FMP), as prepared by
the South Atlantic Fishery Management
Council (Council). This final rule
removes the snapper-grouper area
closure implemented through
Amendment 17A to the FMP. The
intended effect of this final rule is to
minimize socio-economic impacts to
snapper-grouper fishermen, without
subjecting the red snapper resource to
overfishing.
SUMMARY:
This final rule is effective May
31, 2011.
ADDRESSES: Copies of the regulatory
amendment, which includes an
environmental assessment and a
regulatory impact review, may be
obtained from the South Atlantic
Fishery Management Council, 4055
Faber Place Drive, Suite 201, North
Charleston, SC 29405; telephone 843–
571–4366; fax 843–769–4520; e-mail
safmc@safmc.net; or may be
downloaded from the Council’s Web
site at https://www.safmc.net/.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Rick
DeVictor, 727–824–5305.
DATES:
E:\FR\FM\28APR1.SGM
28APR1
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 82 / Thursday, April 28, 2011 / Rules and Regulations
The
snapper-grouper fishery of the South
Atlantic is managed under the FMP. The
FMP was prepared by the Council and
is implemented through regulations at
50 CFR part 622 under the authority of
the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery
Conservation and Management Act
(Magnuson-Stevens Act).
On February 18, 2011, NMFS
published a proposed rule in the
Federal Register for Regulatory
Amendment 10 and requested public
comment (76 FR 9530). The proposed
rule and Regulatory Amendment 10
explained the rationale for the action
contained in this final rule. A summary
of the rationale and the action
implemented by this final rule is
provided below.
In the South Atlantic, the red snapper
stock is currently overfished and
undergoing overfishing. The stock status
was determined through a Southeast
Data Assessment and Review (SEDAR)
benchmark stock assessment for red
snapper, SEDAR 15, which was
completed in February 2008. Based on
this stock assessment, Amendment 17A
to the FMP was developed to end the
overfishing of red snapper and rebuild
the stock. The final rule to implement
Amendment 17A was published in the
Federal Register on December 9, 2010
(75 FR 76874). The final rule to
implement Amendment 17A included
an area closure for South Atlantic
snapper-grouper of 4,827 square miles
(7,768 square km), consisting of the area
encompassed by commercial logbook
grids (cells) 2880, 2980, and 3080 for
depths from 98 ft (30 m) to 240 ft (73
m), in order to minimize the bycatch of
red snapper. Harvest and possession of
snapper-grouper species would be
prohibited in this area which is off the
coasts of southern Georgia and northeast
Florida, except when fishing with black
sea bass pot gear or spearfishing gear for
species other than red snapper.
Through the SEDAR 24 benchmark
stock assessment, updated information
on the status of the red snapper stock
became available in late October 2010.
The SEDAR 24 assessment determined,
similar to the SEDAR 15 benchmark,
that the red snapper stock is overfished
and undergoing overfishing. However,
the rate of overfishing found in SEDAR
24 is less than the rate of overfishing
found in the previous SEDAR 15 stock
assessment.
Given the information in the new
stock assessment, an emergency rule to
delay the effective date of the snappergrouper area closure was published on
December 9, 2010 (75 FR 76890). The
emergency rule delayed the effective
date of the area closure from January 3,
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with RULES
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:21 Apr 27, 2011
Jkt 223001
2011, until June 1, 2011, with a possible
186-day extension, unless superseded
by subsequent rulemaking. The delayed
effective date provided the Council time
to respond to the new scientific
information from the SEDAR 24
benchmark stock assessment.
When recent reductions in fishing
effort are considered, the red snapper
moratorium, implemented through
Amendment 17A to the FMP, is
projected to end overfishing and rebuild
the stock without the additional
implementation of the snapper-grouper
area closure. Therefore, the proposed
action in Regulatory Amendment 10 to
remove the snapper-grouper area
closure approved in Amendment 17A to
the FMP seeks to prevent significant
direct economic loss to snapper-grouper
fishermen without subjecting the red
snapper resource to overfishing.
Comments and Responses
During the comment period on the
proposed rule and Regulatory
Amendment 10, NMFS received 21
submissions from individuals and
fishing associations on the proposed
rule. NMFS received 17 comments that
expressed general support of the action
in Regulatory Amendment 10. The
additional four comments are not
addressed in this final rule because they
addressed issues outside the scope of
the action contained in the proposed
rule and Regulatory Amendment 10.
Specifically, they asserted that red
snapper release mortality estimates,
overall abundance, data sources, and
recreational bag limits should be
considered by the Council.
Classification
The NMFS Regional Administrator,
Southeast Region, has determined that
Regulatory Amendment 10 is necessary
for the management of South Atlantic
snapper-grouper and is consistent with
the Magnuson-Stevens Act and other
applicable laws.
This final rule has been determined to
be not significant for purposes of
Executive Order 12866.
A final regulatory flexibility analysis
(FRFA) was prepared. The FRFA
incorporates the initial regulatory
flexibility analysis (IRFA), a summary of
the significant economic issues raised
by public comments, NMFS’ responses
to those comments, and a summary of
the analyses completed to support the
action. The FRFA follows.
No public comments specific to the
IRFA or concerning the economic
impacts of the rule more generally were
received and therefore no comments are
addressed in this FRFA. No changes in
PO 00000
Frm 00043
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
23729
the final rule were made in response to
public comments.
NMFS agrees that the Council’s
choice of preferred alternative would
best achieve the Council’s objectives
while minimizing, to the extent
practicable, the adverse effects on
fishers, support industries, and
associated communities. The preamble
to the final rule provides a statement
and need for and objectives of this rule,
and it is not repeated here.
The Magnuson-Stevens Act provides
the statutory basis for the final rule. No
duplicative, overlapping, or conflicting
Federal rules have been identified. The
final rule would not establish any new
reporting, record-keeping, or other
compliance requirements.
This final rule is expected to directly
affect commercial harvesting and forhire fishing operations. The Small
Business Administration has established
size criteria for all major industry
sectors in the U.S. including fish
harvesters and for-hire operations. A
business involved in fish harvesting is
classified as a small business if it is
independently owned and operated, is
not dominant in its field of operation
(including its affiliates), and has
combined annual receipts not in excess
of $4.0 million (NAICS code 114111,
finfish fishing) for all its affiliated
operations worldwide. For for-hire
vessels, the other qualifiers apply and
the annual receipts threshold is $7.0
million (NAICS code 713990,
recreational industries).
From 2007–2009, an average of 895
vessels-per-year had valid permits to
operate in the commercial snappergrouper fishery. Of these vessels, 751
held transferable permits and 144 held
non-transferable permits. On average,
797 vessels landed snapper-grouper
species, generating dockside revenues of
approximately $14.514 million (2008
dollars). Each vessel, therefore,
generated an average of approximately
$18,000 annually in gross revenues from
snapper-grouper. Gross dockside
revenues by state are distributed as
follows: $4.054 million in North
Carolina, $2.563 million in South
Carolina, $1.738 million in Georgia/
Northeast Florida, $3.461 million in
central and southeast Florida, and
$2.695 million in the Florida Keys.
Vessels that operate in the snappergrouper fishery may also operate in
other fisheries; the revenues of which
cannot be determined with available
data and are not reflected in these totals.
Based on revenue information, all
commercial vessels affected by the final
rule can be considered small entities.
From 2007–2009, an average of 1,797
vessels had valid permits to operate in
E:\FR\FM\28APR1.SGM
28APR1
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with RULES
23730
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 82 / Thursday, April 28, 2011 / Rules and Regulations
the snapper-grouper for-hire sector, of
which 82 are estimated to have operated
as headboats. The for-hire fleet is
comprised of charterboats, which charge
a fee on a vessel basis, and headboats,
which charge a fee on an individual
angler (head) basis. The charterboat
annual average gross revenue is
estimated to range from approximately
$62,000–$84,000 for Florida vessels,
$73,000–$89,000 for North Carolina
vessels, $68,000–$83,000 for Georgia
vessels, and $32,000–$39,000 for South
Carolina vessels. For headboats, the
corresponding estimates are $170,000–
$362,000 for Florida vessels, and
$149,000–$317,000 for vessels in the
other states.
Based on these average revenue
figures, all for-hire operations that
would be affected by the final rule can
be considered small entities.
Some fleet activity, i.e., multiple
vessels owned by a single entity, may
exist in both the commercial and forhire snapper-grouper sectors but its
extent is unknown, and all vessels are
treated as independent entities in this
analysis.
The final rule is expected to directly
affect all Federally permitted
commercial vessels that operate in the
South Atlantic snapper-grouper fishery
as well as for-hire vessels operating out
of northeast Florida and Georgia. All
directly affected entities have been
determined, for the purpose of this
analysis, to be small entities. Therefore,
it is determined that the final rule will
affect a substantial number of small
entities.
Because all entities that are expected
to be affected by the final rule are
considered small entities, the issue of
disproportional effects on small versus
large entities does not arise in the
present case.
The economic analysis for the final
rule estimated the changes in net
operating revenues to commercial and
for-hire vessels. These changes were
estimated assuming the area closure
provision of Amendment 17A
commenced on June 1, 2011, which
differs from the proposed rule which
assumed a January 1, 2011,
implementation of the area closure. For
the current analysis, net operating
revenue is equated to profit.
The final rule to eliminate the area
closure that was implemented in
Amendment 17A is estimated to have a
non-uniform change in the short-term
profits of commercial vessels operating
in the South Atlantic snapper-grouper
fishery. Annual profits would increase
approximately by $261,000 for vessels
in northeast Florida and Georgia and by
$84,000 for vessels in southeast Florida.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:21 Apr 27, 2011
Jkt 223001
Conversely, annual profits would
decrease by approximately $187,000 for
vessels in North Carolina, by $99,000 in
South Carolina, and by $2,000 for
vessels in the Florida Keys. The net
effect of the action on commercial
vessels as a whole would be an average
increase in annual profits of
approximately $57,000. Vessels fishing
with vertical-line gear are most affected
by the action.
The differential effects of the final
rule on commercial vessels in various
geographic areas in the South Atlantic
are mainly determined by the manner in
which quotas for certain snappergrouper species, such as gag, red
grouper, black grouper, and vermilion
snapper, would be met. Although the
rule would open up very specific areas
off the coasts of Georgia and northeast
Florida, commercial vessels operating in
other areas would also be affected by
possible quota closures of some
snapper-grouper species as their quotas
are reached. Eliminating the area
closure from Amendment 17A would
allow commercial vessels from
southeast Florida, northeast Florida, and
Georgia to harvest more snappergrouper species, such as vermilion
snapper, gag, and red grouper, and this
would tend to increase their profits.
Such a harvest increase, however,
would lead to reaching certain snappergrouper quotas earlier in the fishing
year, resulting in lower harvest by
vessels in North Carolina, South
Carolina, and the Florida Keys. These
vessels would then experience
reductions in their profits. The more
restrictive quotas are those in place for
vermilion snapper and gag. The quota
for gag is especially critical, because it
also serves as a trigger mechanism for
closing the harvest of all shallow-water
grouper when its quota is reached.
For-hire vessels operating in northeast
Florida and Georgia are expected to be
the only for-hire vessels affected by the
final rule. This is based on the extent of
for-hire vessel fishing activities in the
subject three statistical areas
implemented for closure under
Amendment 17A. As a result of the
action, annual profits are expected to
increase by $227,000 for charterboats
and $815,000 for headboats.
Eleven alternatives, including the
preferred alternative implemented
through this final rule, were considered
for alternatives to the area closure of
Amendment 17A. The first alternative is
the no action alternative. The no action
alternative would retain the area closure
of Amendment 17A. Among the
alternatives, this would result in the
largest negative economic effects on
small entities.
PO 00000
Frm 00044
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
The second alternative is a MayOctober closure of cells 2880 and 2980
in depths from 98 ft (30 m) to 240 ft (73
m). This alternative would result in
lower profit increases for both the
commercial and for-hire vessels than the
action in this final rule.
The third alternative is a May-August
closure of cells 2880, 2980, and 3080 in
depths from 98 ft (30 m) to 240 ft (73
m). This alternative would result in a
lower profit increase to the for-hire
vessels and a slightly higher profit
increase to commercial vessels. The
overall net effect of this alternative
would be a lower profit increase than
that implemented through this action.
The fourth alternative is a JulyDecember closure of cells 2880, 2980,
and 3080 in depths from 98 ft (30 m) to
240 ft (73 m). This alternative would
result in lower profit increases to the
for-hire and commercial vessels.
The fifth alternative for Regulatory
Amendment 10 is a May-December
closure of cells 2880, 2980, and 3080 in
depths from 98 ft (30 m) to 240 ft (73
m). This alternative would result in
lower profit increases to the for-hire and
commercial vessels.
The sixth alternative is a MayDecember closure of cells 2880, 2980,
and 3080 in depths from 66 ft (20 m) to
240 ft (73 m) for the first year and a
May-October closure of cells 2880 and
2980 in depths from 98 ft (30 m) to 240
ft (73 m) for the second and consecutive
years. This alternative would result in
lower profit increases to the for-hire and
commercial vessels.
The seventh alternative is a MayOctober closure of cells 2880 and 2980
in depths from 98 ft (30 m) to 240 ft (73
m) for the first year and a June-July
closure of cell 2980 in depths from 98
ft (30 m) to 240 ft (73 m) for the second
and consecutive years. This alternative
would result in lower profit increases to
the for-hire and commercial vessels.
The eighth alternative is a MayOctober closure of cells 2880 and 2980
in depths from 98 ft (30 m) to 240 ft (73
m) for the first year and a July closure
of cells 2880 and 2980 in depths from
98 ft (30 m) to 240 ft (73 m) for the
second and consecutive years. This
alternative would result in lower profit
increases to the for-hire and commercial
vessels.
The ninth alternative is a JulyDecember closure of cells 2880, 2980,
and 3080 in depths from 98 ft (30 m) to
240 ft (73 m) for the first year and a
January-April closure of cells 2880 and
2980 in depths from 98 ft (30 m) to 240
ft (73 m) for the second and consecutive
years. This alternative would result in
lower profit increases to the for-hire and
commercial vessels.
E:\FR\FM\28APR1.SGM
28APR1
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 82 / Thursday, April 28, 2011 / Rules and Regulations
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with RULES
The tenth alternative is a MayDecember closure of cells 2880, 2980,
and 3080 in depths from 98 ft (30 m) to
240 ft (73 m) for the first year and a
January-April closure of cells 2880 and
2980 in depths from 98 ft (30 m) to 240
ft (73 m) for the second and consecutive
years. This alternative would result in
lower profit increases to the for-hire and
commercial vessels.
Section 212 of the Small Business
Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of
1996 states that, for each rule or group
of related rules for which an agency is
required to prepare a FRFA, the agency
shall publish one or more guides to
assist small entities in complying with
the rule, and shall designate such
publications as small entity compliance
guides. As part of the rulemaking
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:21 Apr 27, 2011
Jkt 223001
process, NMFS prepared a fishery
bulletin, which also serves as a small
entity compliance guide. The fishery
bulletin will be sent to all vessel permit
holders for the South Atlantic snappergrouper fishery as well as other
interested parties.
List of Subjects in 50 CFR Part 622
Fisheries, Fishing, Puerto Rico,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Virgin Islands.
Dated: April 25, 2011.
Samuel D. Rauch III,
Deputy Assistant Administrator for
Regulatory Programs, National Marine
Fisheries Service.
PART 622—FISHERIES OF THE
CARIBBEAN, GULF, AND SOUTH
ATLANTIC
1. The authority citation for part 622
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.
§ 622.35
[Amended]
2. In § 622.35, the suspension on
paragraph (l) is lifted and paragraph (l)
is removed and reserved.
■
[FR Doc. 2011–10326 Filed 4–27–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–22–P
For the reasons set out in the
preamble, 50 CFR part 622 is amended
as follows:
PO 00000
Frm 00045
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 9990
23731
E:\FR\FM\28APR1.SGM
28APR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 82 (Thursday, April 28, 2011)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 23728-23731]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-10326]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
50 CFR Part 622
[Docket No. 101124579-1236-02]
RIN 0648-BA51
Fisheries of the Caribbean, Gulf of Mexico, and South Atlantic;
Snapper-Grouper Fishery Off the Southern Atlantic States; Red Snapper
Management Measures
AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: NMFS issues this final rule to implement a regulatory
amendment (Regulatory Amendment 10) to the Fishery Management Plan for
the Snapper-Grouper Fishery of the South Atlantic Region (FMP), as
prepared by the South Atlantic Fishery Management Council (Council).
This final rule removes the snapper-grouper area closure implemented
through Amendment 17A to the FMP. The intended effect of this final
rule is to minimize socio-economic impacts to snapper-grouper
fishermen, without subjecting the red snapper resource to overfishing.
DATES: This final rule is effective May 31, 2011.
ADDRESSES: Copies of the regulatory amendment, which includes an
environmental assessment and a regulatory impact review, may be
obtained from the South Atlantic Fishery Management Council, 4055 Faber
Place Drive, Suite 201, North Charleston, SC 29405; telephone 843-571-
4366; fax 843-769-4520; e-mail safmc@safmc.net; or may be downloaded
from the Council's Web site at https://www.safmc.net/.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Rick DeVictor, 727-824-5305.
[[Page 23729]]
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The snapper-grouper fishery of the South
Atlantic is managed under the FMP. The FMP was prepared by the Council
and is implemented through regulations at 50 CFR part 622 under the
authority of the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management
Act (Magnuson-Stevens Act).
On February 18, 2011, NMFS published a proposed rule in the Federal
Register for Regulatory Amendment 10 and requested public comment (76
FR 9530). The proposed rule and Regulatory Amendment 10 explained the
rationale for the action contained in this final rule. A summary of the
rationale and the action implemented by this final rule is provided
below.
In the South Atlantic, the red snapper stock is currently
overfished and undergoing overfishing. The stock status was determined
through a Southeast Data Assessment and Review (SEDAR) benchmark stock
assessment for red snapper, SEDAR 15, which was completed in February
2008. Based on this stock assessment, Amendment 17A to the FMP was
developed to end the overfishing of red snapper and rebuild the stock.
The final rule to implement Amendment 17A was published in the Federal
Register on December 9, 2010 (75 FR 76874). The final rule to implement
Amendment 17A included an area closure for South Atlantic snapper-
grouper of 4,827 square miles (7,768 square km), consisting of the area
encompassed by commercial logbook grids (cells) 2880, 2980, and 3080
for depths from 98 ft (30 m) to 240 ft (73 m), in order to minimize the
bycatch of red snapper. Harvest and possession of snapper-grouper
species would be prohibited in this area which is off the coasts of
southern Georgia and northeast Florida, except when fishing with black
sea bass pot gear or spearfishing gear for species other than red
snapper.
Through the SEDAR 24 benchmark stock assessment, updated
information on the status of the red snapper stock became available in
late October 2010. The SEDAR 24 assessment determined, similar to the
SEDAR 15 benchmark, that the red snapper stock is overfished and
undergoing overfishing. However, the rate of overfishing found in SEDAR
24 is less than the rate of overfishing found in the previous SEDAR 15
stock assessment.
Given the information in the new stock assessment, an emergency
rule to delay the effective date of the snapper-grouper area closure
was published on December 9, 2010 (75 FR 76890). The emergency rule
delayed the effective date of the area closure from January 3, 2011,
until June 1, 2011, with a possible 186-day extension, unless
superseded by subsequent rulemaking. The delayed effective date
provided the Council time to respond to the new scientific information
from the SEDAR 24 benchmark stock assessment.
When recent reductions in fishing effort are considered, the red
snapper moratorium, implemented through Amendment 17A to the FMP, is
projected to end overfishing and rebuild the stock without the
additional implementation of the snapper-grouper area closure.
Therefore, the proposed action in Regulatory Amendment 10 to remove the
snapper-grouper area closure approved in Amendment 17A to the FMP seeks
to prevent significant direct economic loss to snapper-grouper
fishermen without subjecting the red snapper resource to overfishing.
Comments and Responses
During the comment period on the proposed rule and Regulatory
Amendment 10, NMFS received 21 submissions from individuals and fishing
associations on the proposed rule. NMFS received 17 comments that
expressed general support of the action in Regulatory Amendment 10. The
additional four comments are not addressed in this final rule because
they addressed issues outside the scope of the action contained in the
proposed rule and Regulatory Amendment 10. Specifically, they asserted
that red snapper release mortality estimates, overall abundance, data
sources, and recreational bag limits should be considered by the
Council.
Classification
The NMFS Regional Administrator, Southeast Region, has determined
that Regulatory Amendment 10 is necessary for the management of South
Atlantic snapper-grouper and is consistent with the Magnuson-Stevens
Act and other applicable laws.
This final rule has been determined to be not significant for
purposes of Executive Order 12866.
A final regulatory flexibility analysis (FRFA) was prepared. The
FRFA incorporates the initial regulatory flexibility analysis (IRFA), a
summary of the significant economic issues raised by public comments,
NMFS' responses to those comments, and a summary of the analyses
completed to support the action. The FRFA follows.
No public comments specific to the IRFA or concerning the economic
impacts of the rule more generally were received and therefore no
comments are addressed in this FRFA. No changes in the final rule were
made in response to public comments.
NMFS agrees that the Council's choice of preferred alternative
would best achieve the Council's objectives while minimizing, to the
extent practicable, the adverse effects on fishers, support industries,
and associated communities. The preamble to the final rule provides a
statement and need for and objectives of this rule, and it is not
repeated here.
The Magnuson-Stevens Act provides the statutory basis for the final
rule. No duplicative, overlapping, or conflicting Federal rules have
been identified. The final rule would not establish any new reporting,
record-keeping, or other compliance requirements.
This final rule is expected to directly affect commercial
harvesting and for-hire fishing operations. The Small Business
Administration has established size criteria for all major industry
sectors in the U.S. including fish harvesters and for-hire operations.
A business involved in fish harvesting is classified as a small
business if it is independently owned and operated, is not dominant in
its field of operation (including its affiliates), and has combined
annual receipts not in excess of $4.0 million (NAICS code 114111,
finfish fishing) for all its affiliated operations worldwide. For for-
hire vessels, the other qualifiers apply and the annual receipts
threshold is $7.0 million (NAICS code 713990, recreational industries).
From 2007-2009, an average of 895 vessels-per-year had valid
permits to operate in the commercial snapper-grouper fishery. Of these
vessels, 751 held transferable permits and 144 held non-transferable
permits. On average, 797 vessels landed snapper-grouper species,
generating dockside revenues of approximately $14.514 million (2008
dollars). Each vessel, therefore, generated an average of approximately
$18,000 annually in gross revenues from snapper-grouper. Gross dockside
revenues by state are distributed as follows: $4.054 million in North
Carolina, $2.563 million in South Carolina, $1.738 million in Georgia/
Northeast Florida, $3.461 million in central and southeast Florida, and
$2.695 million in the Florida Keys. Vessels that operate in the
snapper-grouper fishery may also operate in other fisheries; the
revenues of which cannot be determined with available data and are not
reflected in these totals.
Based on revenue information, all commercial vessels affected by
the final rule can be considered small entities.
From 2007-2009, an average of 1,797 vessels had valid permits to
operate in
[[Page 23730]]
the snapper-grouper for-hire sector, of which 82 are estimated to have
operated as headboats. The for-hire fleet is comprised of charterboats,
which charge a fee on a vessel basis, and headboats, which charge a fee
on an individual angler (head) basis. The charterboat annual average
gross revenue is estimated to range from approximately $62,000-$84,000
for Florida vessels, $73,000-$89,000 for North Carolina vessels,
$68,000-$83,000 for Georgia vessels, and $32,000-$39,000 for South
Carolina vessels. For headboats, the corresponding estimates are
$170,000-$362,000 for Florida vessels, and $149,000-$317,000 for
vessels in the other states.
Based on these average revenue figures, all for-hire operations
that would be affected by the final rule can be considered small
entities.
Some fleet activity, i.e., multiple vessels owned by a single
entity, may exist in both the commercial and for-hire snapper-grouper
sectors but its extent is unknown, and all vessels are treated as
independent entities in this analysis.
The final rule is expected to directly affect all Federally
permitted commercial vessels that operate in the South Atlantic
snapper-grouper fishery as well as for-hire vessels operating out of
northeast Florida and Georgia. All directly affected entities have been
determined, for the purpose of this analysis, to be small entities.
Therefore, it is determined that the final rule will affect a
substantial number of small entities.
Because all entities that are expected to be affected by the final
rule are considered small entities, the issue of disproportional
effects on small versus large entities does not arise in the present
case.
The economic analysis for the final rule estimated the changes in
net operating revenues to commercial and for-hire vessels. These
changes were estimated assuming the area closure provision of Amendment
17A commenced on June 1, 2011, which differs from the proposed rule
which assumed a January 1, 2011, implementation of the area closure.
For the current analysis, net operating revenue is equated to profit.
The final rule to eliminate the area closure that was implemented
in Amendment 17A is estimated to have a non-uniform change in the
short-term profits of commercial vessels operating in the South
Atlantic snapper-grouper fishery. Annual profits would increase
approximately by $261,000 for vessels in northeast Florida and Georgia
and by $84,000 for vessels in southeast Florida. Conversely, annual
profits would decrease by approximately $187,000 for vessels in North
Carolina, by $99,000 in South Carolina, and by $2,000 for vessels in
the Florida Keys. The net effect of the action on commercial vessels as
a whole would be an average increase in annual profits of approximately
$57,000. Vessels fishing with vertical-line gear are most affected by
the action.
The differential effects of the final rule on commercial vessels in
various geographic areas in the South Atlantic are mainly determined by
the manner in which quotas for certain snapper-grouper species, such as
gag, red grouper, black grouper, and vermilion snapper, would be met.
Although the rule would open up very specific areas off the coasts of
Georgia and northeast Florida, commercial vessels operating in other
areas would also be affected by possible quota closures of some
snapper-grouper species as their quotas are reached. Eliminating the
area closure from Amendment 17A would allow commercial vessels from
southeast Florida, northeast Florida, and Georgia to harvest more
snapper-grouper species, such as vermilion snapper, gag, and red
grouper, and this would tend to increase their profits. Such a harvest
increase, however, would lead to reaching certain snapper-grouper
quotas earlier in the fishing year, resulting in lower harvest by
vessels in North Carolina, South Carolina, and the Florida Keys. These
vessels would then experience reductions in their profits. The more
restrictive quotas are those in place for vermilion snapper and gag.
The quota for gag is especially critical, because it also serves as a
trigger mechanism for closing the harvest of all shallow-water grouper
when its quota is reached.
For-hire vessels operating in northeast Florida and Georgia are
expected to be the only for-hire vessels affected by the final rule.
This is based on the extent of for-hire vessel fishing activities in
the subject three statistical areas implemented for closure under
Amendment 17A. As a result of the action, annual profits are expected
to increase by $227,000 for charterboats and $815,000 for headboats.
Eleven alternatives, including the preferred alternative
implemented through this final rule, were considered for alternatives
to the area closure of Amendment 17A. The first alternative is the no
action alternative. The no action alternative would retain the area
closure of Amendment 17A. Among the alternatives, this would result in
the largest negative economic effects on small entities.
The second alternative is a May-October closure of cells 2880 and
2980 in depths from 98 ft (30 m) to 240 ft (73 m). This alternative
would result in lower profit increases for both the commercial and for-
hire vessels than the action in this final rule.
The third alternative is a May-August closure of cells 2880, 2980,
and 3080 in depths from 98 ft (30 m) to 240 ft (73 m). This alternative
would result in a lower profit increase to the for-hire vessels and a
slightly higher profit increase to commercial vessels. The overall net
effect of this alternative would be a lower profit increase than that
implemented through this action.
The fourth alternative is a July-December closure of cells 2880,
2980, and 3080 in depths from 98 ft (30 m) to 240 ft (73 m). This
alternative would result in lower profit increases to the for-hire and
commercial vessels.
The fifth alternative for Regulatory Amendment 10 is a May-December
closure of cells 2880, 2980, and 3080 in depths from 98 ft (30 m) to
240 ft (73 m). This alternative would result in lower profit increases
to the for-hire and commercial vessels.
The sixth alternative is a May-December closure of cells 2880,
2980, and 3080 in depths from 66 ft (20 m) to 240 ft (73 m) for the
first year and a May-October closure of cells 2880 and 2980 in depths
from 98 ft (30 m) to 240 ft (73 m) for the second and consecutive
years. This alternative would result in lower profit increases to the
for-hire and commercial vessels.
The seventh alternative is a May-October closure of cells 2880 and
2980 in depths from 98 ft (30 m) to 240 ft (73 m) for the first year
and a June-July closure of cell 2980 in depths from 98 ft (30 m) to 240
ft (73 m) for the second and consecutive years. This alternative would
result in lower profit increases to the for-hire and commercial
vessels.
The eighth alternative is a May-October closure of cells 2880 and
2980 in depths from 98 ft (30 m) to 240 ft (73 m) for the first year
and a July closure of cells 2880 and 2980 in depths from 98 ft (30 m)
to 240 ft (73 m) for the second and consecutive years. This alternative
would result in lower profit increases to the for-hire and commercial
vessels.
The ninth alternative is a July-December closure of cells 2880,
2980, and 3080 in depths from 98 ft (30 m) to 240 ft (73 m) for the
first year and a January-April closure of cells 2880 and 2980 in depths
from 98 ft (30 m) to 240 ft (73 m) for the second and consecutive
years. This alternative would result in lower profit increases to the
for-hire and commercial vessels.
[[Page 23731]]
The tenth alternative is a May-December closure of cells 2880,
2980, and 3080 in depths from 98 ft (30 m) to 240 ft (73 m) for the
first year and a January-April closure of cells 2880 and 2980 in depths
from 98 ft (30 m) to 240 ft (73 m) for the second and consecutive
years. This alternative would result in lower profit increases to the
for-hire and commercial vessels.
Section 212 of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness
Act of 1996 states that, for each rule or group of related rules for
which an agency is required to prepare a FRFA, the agency shall publish
one or more guides to assist small entities in complying with the rule,
and shall designate such publications as small entity compliance
guides. As part of the rulemaking process, NMFS prepared a fishery
bulletin, which also serves as a small entity compliance guide. The
fishery bulletin will be sent to all vessel permit holders for the
South Atlantic snapper-grouper fishery as well as other interested
parties.
List of Subjects in 50 CFR Part 622
Fisheries, Fishing, Puerto Rico, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Virgin Islands.
Dated: April 25, 2011.
Samuel D. Rauch III,
Deputy Assistant Administrator for Regulatory Programs, National Marine
Fisheries Service.
For the reasons set out in the preamble, 50 CFR part 622 is amended
as follows:
PART 622--FISHERIES OF THE CARIBBEAN, GULF, AND SOUTH ATLANTIC
0
1. The authority citation for part 622 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.
Sec. 622.35 [Amended]
0
2. In Sec. 622.35, the suspension on paragraph (l) is lifted and
paragraph (l) is removed and reserved.
[FR Doc. 2011-10326 Filed 4-27-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-P