Safety Zone; Pierce County Department of Emergency Management Regional Water Exercise, East Passage, Tacoma, WA, 23708-23710 [2011-10242]
Download as PDF
23708
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 82 / Thursday, April 28, 2011 / Rules and Regulations
entities. Accordingly, no regulatory
flexibility analysis is required.
VI. Document Availability
144. In addition to publishing the full
text of this document in the Federal
Register, the Commission provides all
interested persons an opportunity to
view and/or print the contents of this
document via the Internet through
FERC’s Home Page (https://www.ferc.gov)
and in FERC’s Public Reference Room
during normal business hours (8:30 a.m.
to 5 p.m. Eastern time) at 888 First
Street, NE., Room 2A, Washington, DC
20426.
145. From FERC’s Home Page on the
Internet, this information is available on
eLibrary. The full text of this document
is available on eLibrary in PDF and
Microsoft Word format for viewing,
printing, and/or downloading. To access
this document in eLibrary, type the
docket number excluding the last three
digits of this document in the docket
number field.
146. User assistance is available for
eLibrary and the FERC’s Web site during
normal business hours from FERC
Online Support at 202–502–6652 (toll
free at 1–866–208–3676) or e-mail at
ferconlinesupport@ferc.gov, or the
Public Reference Room at (202) 502–
8371, TTY (202) 502–8659. E-mail the
Public Reference Room at
public.referenceroom@ferc.gov.
VII. Effective Date and Congressional
Notification
147. This Final Rule shall become
effective June 27, 2011. The
Commission has determined, with the
concurrence of the Administrator of the
Office of Information and Regulatory
Affairs of OMB, that this rule is not a
‘‘major rule’’ as defined in section 351 of
the Small Business Regulatory
Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996.
148. The effective date of the Final
Rule is separate from the
implementation date of the Reliability
Standards approved herein. According
to a schedule developed by WECC,
FAC–501–WECC–1, VAR–002–WECC–1
and VAR–501–WECC–1 shall become
effective as of the first day of the first
quarter after Commission approval. In
addition, PRC–004–WECC–1 shall
become effective as of the first day of
the second quarter after approval by the
Commission.
Thus, if the Final Rule is published in
the Federal Register on or before May
2, 2011, the Final Rule would become
effective in 60 days, FAC–501–WECC–1,
VAR–002–WECC–1 and VAR–501–
WECC–1 would be implemented
beginning July 1, 2011, and PRC–004–
WECC–1 would be implemented
beginning October 1, 2011. If, however,
the Final Rule is published in the
Federal Register after May 2, 2011, the
Final Rule would become effective in 60
days, FAC–501–WECC–1, VAR–002–
WECC–1 and VAR–501–WECC–1 would
be implemented beginning October 1,
2011, and PRC–004–WECC–1 would be
implemented beginning January 1, 2012.
List of Subjects in 18 CFR Part 40
Electric power, Electric utilities,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
By the Commission.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
APPENDIX A—LIST OF COMMENTERS
Name
Abbreviation
Bonneville Power Administration ........................................................................................................................................
U.S. Bureau of Reclamation ...............................................................................................................................................
California Department of Water Resources State Water Project .......................................................................................
Electric Power Supply Association .....................................................................................................................................
Mariner Consulting Services, Inc ........................................................................................................................................
Melissa Kurtz .......................................................................................................................................................................
North American Electric Reliability Corp .............................................................................................................................
PacifiCorp ............................................................................................................................................................................
San Diego Gas & Electric Co .............................................................................................................................................
Transmission Agency of Northern California ......................................................................................................................
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers NNW ..................................................................................................................................
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Portland .............................................................................................................................
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Seattle ...............................................................................................................................
Western Electricity Coordinating Council ............................................................................................................................
Temporary final rule.
[FR Doc. 2011–10226 Filed 4–27–11; 8:45 am]
ACTION:
BILLING CODE 6717–01–P
SUMMARY:
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket No. USCG–2011–0251]
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with RULES
RIN 1625–AA00
Safety Zone; Pierce County
Department of Emergency
Management Regional Water Exercise,
East Passage, Tacoma, WA
AGENCY:
Coast Guard, DHS.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:21 Apr 27, 2011
Jkt 223001
The Coast Guard is
establishing a temporary safety zone in
East Passage, Tacoma, Washington for a
Regional Water Rescue Exercise near
Browns Point. A safety zone is
necessary to ensure the safety of
participating vessels and participants in
the water and will do so by prohibiting
any person or vessel from entering or
remaining in the safety zone unless
authorized by the Captain of the Port.
DATES: This rule is effective on June 9,
2011 from 7 a.m. until 5 p.m.
ADDRESSES: Documents indicated in this
preamble as being available in the
docket are part of docket USCG–2011–
0251 and are available online by going
to https://www.regulations.gov, inserting
PO 00000
Frm 00022
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Bonneville.
Bureau of Reclamation.
CDWR.
EPSA.
Mariner.
NERC.
PacifiCorp.
SDG&E.
TANC.
USACE NNW.
USACE Portland.
USACE Seattle.
WECC.
USCG–2011–0251 in the ‘‘Keyword’’
box, and then clicking ‘‘Search.’’ They
are also available for inspection or
copying at the Docket Management
Facility (M–30), U.S. Department of
Transportation, West Building Ground
Floor, Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590,
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
If
you have questions on this temporary
rule, call or e-mail ENS Anthony P.
LaBoy, Waterways Management
Division, Coast Guard Sector Puget
Sound; telephone 206–217–6323, e-mail
SectorPugetSoundWWM@uscg.mil. If
you have questions on viewing the
docket, call Renee V. Wright, Program
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
E:\FR\FM\28APR1.SGM
28APR1
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 82 / Thursday, April 28, 2011 / Rules and Regulations
Manager, Docket Operations, telephone
202–366–9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Regulatory Information
The Coast Guard is issuing this
temporary final rule without prior
notice and opportunity to comment
pursuant to authority under section 4(a)
of the Administrative Procedure Act
(APA) (5 U.S.C. 553(b)). This provision
authorizes an agency to issue a rule
without prior notice and opportunity to
comment when the agency for good
cause finds that those procedures are
‘‘impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary
to the public interest.’’ Under 5 U.S.C.
553(b)(B), the Coast Guard finds that
good cause exists for not publishing a
notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM)
with respect to this rule because it
would be contrary to the public interest,
since the event requiring the
establishment of this safety zone would
be over before a comment period would
end and a Final Rule could be
published. Immediate action is
necessary to ensure safety of
participants in the Regional Water
Rescue Exercise.
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with RULES
Basis and Purpose
The Pierce County, Washington,
Department of Emergency Management
is sponsoring a Regional Water Rescue
Exercise in the waters of East Passage
near Browns Point. The exercise will
involve nineteen various government
agencies with over two hundred
personnel. Personnel will practice water
rescues, search and rescue, dive rescues,
law enforcement searches, search
patterns, and dewatering exercises.
Some of these exercises involve persons
in the water. Smoke-producing devices
and flares will be used throughout the
exercise to simulate fires for training
purposes. Additionally, a temporary
boom and several buoys will be placed
throughout the safety zone. This
exercise takes places in an unsheltered
area where vessel traffic can pose a
hazard to participating vessels and
persons. The safety zone will mitigate
these hazards by prohibiting maritime
traffic from entering or remaining in the
safety zone without authorization of the
Captain of the Port.
Discussion of Rule
This rule establishes a safety zone
encompassing all waters within 900
yards of Browns Point, East Passage,
Tacoma, WA. Vessel operators are
prohibited from entering or remaining
in the zone unless authorized by the
Captain of the Port, Puget Sound, or
designated representative. The Captain
of the Port, Puget Sound will be assisted
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:21 Apr 27, 2011
Jkt 223001
in the enforcement of the zone by other
Federal, State, and local agencies. Any
vessel not participating in the Regional
Water Rescue Exercise wishing to transit
the area during the effective time of this
safety zone must coordinate with on
scene Patrol Commander, who will
ensure that vessels authorized to transit
the area do so at a speed that minimizes
wake in the exercise area.
Regulatory Analyses
We developed this rule after
considering numerous statutes and
executive orders related to rulemaking.
Below we summarize our analyses
based on 13 of these statutes or
executive orders.
Regulatory Planning and Review
This rule is not a significant
regulatory action under section 3(f) of
Executive Order 12866, Regulatory
Planning and Review, and does not
require an assessment of potential costs
and benefits under section 6(a)(3) of that
Order. The Office of Management and
Budget has not reviewed it under that
Order. The Coast Guard bases this
finding on the fact that the safety zone
will be in place for a limited period of
time and maritime traffic will still be
able to transit around the zone.
Maritime traffic may request permission
to transit through the zone from the
Captain of the Port, Puget Sound or
Designated Representative.
Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act
(5 U.S.C. 601–612), we have considered
whether this rule would have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
The term ‘‘small entities’’ comprises
small businesses, not-for-profit
organizations that are independently
owned and operated and are not
dominant in their fields, and
governmental jurisdictions with
populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5
U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule will not have
a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
This rule will affect the following
entities, some of which may be small
entities: The owners and operators of
vessels intending to operate near
Browns Point, WA on June 9, 2011. This
rule will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities, because the
safety zone is limited in duration and
maritime traffic will be able to transit
around the safety zone. Maritime traffic
may also request permission to transit
through the zone from the Captain of the
PO 00000
Frm 00023
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
23709
Port, Puget Sound or designated
representative.
Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121),
we offer to assist small entities in
understanding the rule so that they can
better evaluate its effects on them and
participate in the rulemaking process.
Small businesses may send comments
on the actions of Federal employees
who enforce, or otherwise determine
compliance with, Federal regulations to
the Small Business and Agriculture
Regulatory Enforcement Ombudsman
and the Regional Small Business
Regulatory Fairness Boards. The
Ombudsman evaluates these actions
annually and rates each agency’s
responsiveness to small business. If you
wish to comment on actions by
employees of the Coast Guard, call
1–888–REG–FAIR (1–888–734–3247).
The Coast Guard will not retaliate
against small entities that question or
complain about this rule or any policy
or action of the Coast Guard.
Collection of Information
This rule calls for no new collection
of information under the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501–
3520).
Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism
under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct
effect on State or local governments and
would either preempt State law or
impose a substantial direct cost of
compliance on them. We have analyzed
this rule under that Order and have
determined that it does not have
implications for federalism.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
Federal agencies to assess the effects of
their discretionary regulatory actions. In
particular, the Act addresses actions
that may result in the expenditure by a
State, local, or Tribal government, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector of
$100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or
more in any one year. Though this rule
will not result in such an expenditure,
we do discuss the effects of this rule
elsewhere in this preamble.
Taking of Private Property
This rule will not cause a taking of
private property or otherwise have
taking implications under Executive
Order 12630, Governmental Actions and
E:\FR\FM\28APR1.SGM
28APR1
23710
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 82 / Thursday, April 28, 2011 / Rules and Regulations
Interference with Constitutionally
Protected Property Rights.
Civil Justice Reform
This rule meets applicable standards
in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of Executive
Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to
minimize litigation, eliminate
ambiguity, and reduce burden.
Protection of Children
We have analyzed this rule under
Executive Order 13045, Protection of
Children from Environmental Health
Risks and Safety Risks. This rule is not
an economically significant rule and
does not create an environmental risk to
health or risk to safety that may
disproportionately affect children.
Indian Tribal Governments
This rule does not have Tribal
implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination
with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it does not have a substantial
direct effect on one or more Indian
Tribes, on the relationship between the
Federal Government and Indian Tribes,
or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian Tribes.
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with RULES
Energy Effects
We have analyzed this rule under
Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have
determined that it is not a ‘‘significant
energy action’’ under that order because
it is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’
under Executive Order 12866 and is not
likely to have a significant adverse effect
on the supply, distribution, or use of
energy. The Administrator of the Office
of Information and Regulatory Affairs
has not designated it as a significant
energy action. Therefore, it does not
require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.
Technical Standards
The National Technology Transfer
and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use
voluntary consensus standards in their
regulatory activities unless the agency
provides Congress, through the Office of
Management and Budget, with an
explanation of why using these
standards would be inconsistent with
applicable law or otherwise impractical.
Voluntary consensus standards are
technical standards (e.g., specifications
of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling
procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:21 Apr 27, 2011
Jkt 223001
adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
This rule does not use technical
standards. Therefore, we did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus
standards.
Environment
We have analyzed this rule under
Department of Homeland Security
Management Directive 023–01 and
Commandant Instruction M16475.lD,
which guide the Coast Guard in
complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and
have concluded this action is one of a
category of actions that do not
individually or cumulatively have a
significant effect on the human
environment. This rule is categorically
excluded, under figure 2–1, paragraph
(34)(g), of the Instruction. This rule
involves the establishment of a
temporary safety zone. An
environmental analysis checklist and a
categorical exclusion determination are
available in the docket where indicated
under ADDRESSES.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation
(water), Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Security measures,
Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
CFR part 165 as follows:
PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION
AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
1. The authority citation for part 165
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 33 U.S.C., 1231; 46 U.S.C
Chapter 701, 3306, 3703; 50 U.S.C. 191, 195;
33 CFR 1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6, 160.5; Pub. L.
107–295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department of
Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1.
2. Add § 165.T13–0251 to read as
follows:
■
§ 165.T13–0251 Safety Zone; Pierce
County Department of Emergency
Management Regional Water Exercise, East
Passage, Tacoma, WA.
(a) Location. All waters of East
Passage encompassed within 900 yards
of Browns Point, Washington at position
47°18′21″ N 122°26′39″ W.
(b) Regulations. In accordance with
the general regulations in 33 CFR Part
165, Subpart C, no vessel operator may
enter or remain in the safety zone
without the permission of the Captain of
the Port or designated representative.
The Captain of the Port may be assisted
by other Federal, State, or local agencies
with the enforcement of the safety zone.
PO 00000
Frm 00024
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
(c) Authorization. All vessel operators
who desire to enter the safety zone must
obtain permission from the Captain of
the Port or designated representative by
contacting the South Sound Water
Exercise Control on VHF Channel 22A
or via telephone at (253) 691–1313.
Vessel operators granted permission to
enter the zone will be escorted by the
on-scene patrol craft until they are
outside of the safety zone.
(d) Enforcement Period. This rule is
effective from 7 a.m. until 5 p.m. on
June 9, 2011 unless canceled sooner by
the Captain of the Port.
Dated: April 15, 2011.
S.J. Ferguson,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the
Port, Puget Sound.
[FR Doc. 2011–10242 Filed 4–27–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket No. USCG–2011–0250]
RIN 1625–AA00
Safety Zones: Bellingham Bay,
Bellingham, WA and Lake Union,
Seattle, WA
Coast Guard, DHS.
Final rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Coast Guard is removing
two redundant sections from its
regulations: Bellingham Bay,
Bellingham, WA, and Lake Union,
Seattle, WA. This action is necessary to
eliminate duplicate safety zones from
the regulations. These safety zones are
also codified under these regulations:
Safety Zones; annual firework displays
within the Captain of the Port, Puget
Sound Area of Responsibility.
DATES: This rule is effective May 31,
2011.
SUMMARY:
Documents indicated in this
preamble as being available in the
docket are part of docket USCG–2011–
0250 and are available online by going
to https://www.regulations.gov, inserting
USCG–2011–0250 in the ‘‘Keyword’’
box, and then clicking ‘‘Search.’’ They
are also available for inspection or
copying at the Docket Management
Facility (M–30), U.S. Department of
Transportation, West Building Ground
Floor, Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590,
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
ADDRESSES:
E:\FR\FM\28APR1.SGM
28APR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 82 (Thursday, April 28, 2011)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 23708-23710]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-10242]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket No. USCG-2011-0251]
RIN 1625-AA00
Safety Zone; Pierce County Department of Emergency Management
Regional Water Exercise, East Passage, Tacoma, WA
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Temporary final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is establishing a temporary safety zone in
East Passage, Tacoma, Washington for a Regional Water Rescue Exercise
near Browns Point. A safety zone is necessary to ensure the safety of
participating vessels and participants in the water and will do so by
prohibiting any person or vessel from entering or remaining in the
safety zone unless authorized by the Captain of the Port.
DATES: This rule is effective on June 9, 2011 from 7 a.m. until 5 p.m.
ADDRESSES: Documents indicated in this preamble as being available in
the docket are part of docket USCG-2011-0251 and are available online
by going to https://www.regulations.gov, inserting USCG-2011-0251 in the
``Keyword'' box, and then clicking ``Search.'' They are also available
for inspection or copying at the Docket Management Facility (M-30),
U.S. Department of Transportation, West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590, between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this
temporary rule, call or e-mail ENS Anthony P. LaBoy, Waterways
Management Division, Coast Guard Sector Puget Sound; telephone 206-217-
6323, e-mail SectorPugetSoundWWM@uscg.mil. If you have questions on
viewing the docket, call Renee V. Wright, Program
[[Page 23709]]
Manager, Docket Operations, telephone 202-366-9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Regulatory Information
The Coast Guard is issuing this temporary final rule without prior
notice and opportunity to comment pursuant to authority under section
4(a) of the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) (5 U.S.C. 553(b)). This
provision authorizes an agency to issue a rule without prior notice and
opportunity to comment when the agency for good cause finds that those
procedures are ``impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary to the public
interest.'' Under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B), the Coast Guard finds that good
cause exists for not publishing a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM)
with respect to this rule because it would be contrary to the public
interest, since the event requiring the establishment of this safety
zone would be over before a comment period would end and a Final Rule
could be published. Immediate action is necessary to ensure safety of
participants in the Regional Water Rescue Exercise.
Basis and Purpose
The Pierce County, Washington, Department of Emergency Management
is sponsoring a Regional Water Rescue Exercise in the waters of East
Passage near Browns Point. The exercise will involve nineteen various
government agencies with over two hundred personnel. Personnel will
practice water rescues, search and rescue, dive rescues, law
enforcement searches, search patterns, and dewatering exercises. Some
of these exercises involve persons in the water. Smoke-producing
devices and flares will be used throughout the exercise to simulate
fires for training purposes. Additionally, a temporary boom and several
buoys will be placed throughout the safety zone. This exercise takes
places in an unsheltered area where vessel traffic can pose a hazard to
participating vessels and persons. The safety zone will mitigate these
hazards by prohibiting maritime traffic from entering or remaining in
the safety zone without authorization of the Captain of the Port.
Discussion of Rule
This rule establishes a safety zone encompassing all waters within
900 yards of Browns Point, East Passage, Tacoma, WA. Vessel operators
are prohibited from entering or remaining in the zone unless authorized
by the Captain of the Port, Puget Sound, or designated representative.
The Captain of the Port, Puget Sound will be assisted in the
enforcement of the zone by other Federal, State, and local agencies.
Any vessel not participating in the Regional Water Rescue Exercise
wishing to transit the area during the effective time of this safety
zone must coordinate with on scene Patrol Commander, who will ensure
that vessels authorized to transit the area do so at a speed that
minimizes wake in the exercise area.
Regulatory Analyses
We developed this rule after considering numerous statutes and
executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our analyses
based on 13 of these statutes or executive orders.
Regulatory Planning and Review
This rule is not a significant regulatory action under section 3(f)
of Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review, and does not
require an assessment of potential costs and benefits under section
6(a)(3) of that Order. The Office of Management and Budget has not
reviewed it under that Order. The Coast Guard bases this finding on the
fact that the safety zone will be in place for a limited period of time
and maritime traffic will still be able to transit around the zone.
Maritime traffic may request permission to transit through the zone
from the Captain of the Port, Puget Sound or Designated Representative.
Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601-612), we have
considered whether this rule would have a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities. The term ``small entities''
comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations that are
independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their fields,
and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule will
not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
entities. This rule will affect the following entities, some of which
may be small entities: The owners and operators of vessels intending to
operate near Browns Point, WA on June 9, 2011. This rule will not have
a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
entities, because the safety zone is limited in duration and maritime
traffic will be able to transit around the safety zone. Maritime
traffic may also request permission to transit through the zone from
the Captain of the Port, Puget Sound or designated representative.
Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we offer to assist small
entities in understanding the rule so that they can better evaluate its
effects on them and participate in the rulemaking process.
Small businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal
employees who enforce, or otherwise determine compliance with, Federal
regulations to the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory
Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small Business Regulatory
Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these actions annually and
rates each agency's responsiveness to small business. If you wish to
comment on actions by employees of the Coast Guard, call 1-888-REG-FAIR
(1-888-734-3247). The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small
entities that question or complain about this rule or any policy or
action of the Coast Guard.
Collection of Information
This rule calls for no new collection of information under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).
Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on State or local
governments and would either preempt State law or impose a substantial
direct cost of compliance on them. We have analyzed this rule under
that Order and have determined that it does not have implications for
federalism.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or Tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this rule will not result in
such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere
in this preamble.
Taking of Private Property
This rule will not cause a taking of private property or otherwise
have taking implications under Executive Order 12630, Governmental
Actions and
[[Page 23710]]
Interference with Constitutionally Protected Property Rights.
Civil Justice Reform
This rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2)
of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize litigation,
eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.
Protection of Children
We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13045, Protection
of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks. This rule
is not an economically significant rule and does not create an
environmental risk to health or risk to safety that may
disproportionately affect children.
Indian Tribal Governments
This rule does not have Tribal implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it does not have a substantial direct effect on one or more
Indian Tribes, on the relationship between the Federal Government and
Indian Tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities
between the Federal Government and Indian Tribes.
Energy Effects
We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have determined that it is not a ``significant
energy action'' under that order because it is not a ``significant
regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866 and is not likely to
have a significant adverse effect on the supply, distribution, or use
of energy. The Administrator of the Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs has not designated it as a significant energy
action. Therefore, it does not require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.
Technical Standards
The National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use voluntary consensus standards
in their regulatory activities unless the agency provides Congress,
through the Office of Management and Budget, with an explanation of why
using these standards would be inconsistent with applicable law or
otherwise impractical. Voluntary consensus standards are technical
standards (e.g., specifications of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
This rule does not use technical standards. Therefore, we did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus standards.
Environment
We have analyzed this rule under Department of Homeland Security
Management Directive 023-01 and Commandant Instruction M16475.lD, which
guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National Environmental
Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have concluded
this action is one of a category of actions that do not individually or
cumulatively have a significant effect on the human environment. This
rule is categorically excluded, under figure 2-1, paragraph (34)(g), of
the Instruction. This rule involves the establishment of a temporary
safety zone. An environmental analysis checklist and a categorical
exclusion determination are available in the docket where indicated
under ADDRESSES.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends
33 CFR part 165 as follows:
PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
0
1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C., 1231; 46 U.S.C Chapter 701, 3306, 3703;
50 U.S.C. 191, 195; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-1, 6.04-6, 160.5; Pub. L.
107-295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department of Homeland Security Delegation
No. 0170.1.
0
2. Add Sec. 165.T13-0251 to read as follows:
Sec. 165.T13-0251 Safety Zone; Pierce County Department of Emergency
Management Regional Water Exercise, East Passage, Tacoma, WA.
(a) Location. All waters of East Passage encompassed within 900
yards of Browns Point, Washington at position 47[deg]18'21'' N
122[deg]26'39'' W.
(b) Regulations. In accordance with the general regulations in 33
CFR Part 165, Subpart C, no vessel operator may enter or remain in the
safety zone without the permission of the Captain of the Port or
designated representative. The Captain of the Port may be assisted by
other Federal, State, or local agencies with the enforcement of the
safety zone.
(c) Authorization. All vessel operators who desire to enter the
safety zone must obtain permission from the Captain of the Port or
designated representative by contacting the South Sound Water Exercise
Control on VHF Channel 22A or via telephone at (253) 691-1313. Vessel
operators granted permission to enter the zone will be escorted by the
on-scene patrol craft until they are outside of the safety zone.
(d) Enforcement Period. This rule is effective from 7 a.m. until 5
p.m. on June 9, 2011 unless canceled sooner by the Captain of the Port.
Dated: April 15, 2011.
S.J. Ferguson,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port, Puget Sound.
[FR Doc. 2011-10242 Filed 4-27-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P