Safety Zone, Newport River; Morehead City, NC, 23227-23229 [2011-9984]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 80 / Tuesday, April 26, 2011 / Proposed Rules
Dated: April 20, 2011.
Ronald K. Lorentzen,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import
Administration.
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
For the reasons stated, 19 CFR part
351 is proposed to be amended as
follows:
33 CFR Part 165
PART 351—ANTIDUMPING AND
COUNTERVAILING DUTIES
RIN 1625–AA00
Coast Guard
[Docket No. USCG–2011–0230]
Safety Zone, Newport River; Morehead
City, NC
1. The authority citation for 19 CFR
part 351 continues to read as follows:
jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 301; 19 U.S.C 1202
note; 19 U.S.C. 1303 note; 19 U.S.C. 1671 et
seq.; and 19 U.S.C. 3538.
2. In § 351.205, revise paragraphs (a)
and (d) to read as follows:
(a) Introduction. A preliminary
determination in an antidumping or
countervailing duty investigation
constitutes the first point at which the
Secretary may provide a remedy
(sometimes referred to as ‘‘provisional
measures’’) if the Secretary preliminarily
finds that dumping or countervailable
subsidization has occurred. Whether the
Secretary’s preliminary determination is
affirmative or negative, the investigation
continues. This section contains rules
regarding deadlines for preliminary
determinations, postponement of
preliminary determinations, notices of
preliminary determinations, and the
effects of affirmative preliminary
determinations.
*
*
*
*
*
(d) Effect of affirmative preliminary
determination. If the preliminary
determination is affirmative, the
Secretary will take the actions described
in section 703(d) or section 733(d) of the
Act (whichever is applicable). With
respect to section 703(d)(1)(B) and
733(d)(1)(B) of the Act, the Secretary
will normally order the posting of cash
deposits to ensure payment if
antidumping or countervailing duties
ultimately are imposed. In making
information available to the
Commission under section 703(d)(3) or
section 733(d)(3) of the Act, the
Secretary will make available to the
Commission and to employees of the
Commission directly involved in the
proceeding the information upon which
the Secretary based the preliminary
determination and which the
Commission may consider relevant to
its injury determination.
[FR Doc. 2011–10045 Filed 4–25–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:08 Apr 25, 2011
Jkt 223001
Coast Guard, DHS.
Notice of proposed rulemaking.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Coast Guard proposes the
establishment of a safety zone on the
waters of the Newport River under the
main span US 70/Morehead City—
Newport River high rise bridge in
Carteret County, NC. This safety zone is
necessary to provide for safety of life on
navigable waters during the
disestablishment of staging for bridge
maintenance. This rule will enhance the
safety of the contractors performing
maintenance as well as the safety of the
vessels that plan to transit this area
between 10 a.m. and 4 p.m. on August
20, 2011.
DATES: Comments and related material
must be received by the Coast Guard on
or before May 26, 2011.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
identified by docket number USCG–
2011–0230 using any one of the
following methods:
(1) Federal eRulemaking Portal:
https://www.regulations.gov.
(2) Fax: 202–493–2251.
(3) Mail: Docket Management Facility
(M–30), U.S. Department of
Transportation, West Building Ground
Floor, Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590–
0001.
(4) Hand delivery: Same as mail
address above, between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays. The telephone number
is 202–366–9329.
To avoid duplication, please use only
one of these four methods. See the
‘‘Public Participation and Request for
Comments’’ portion of the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section
below for instructions on submitting
comments.
SUMMARY:
If
you have questions on this proposed
rule, call or e-mail BOSN3 Joseph M.
Edge, Coast Guard Sector North
Carolina, Coast Guard; telephone 252–
247–4525, e-mail
Joseph.M.Edge@uscg.mil. If you have
questions on viewing or submitting
material to the docket, call Renee V.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
PO 00000
Frm 00020
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
23227
Wright, Program Manager, Docket
Operations, telephone 202–366–9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Public Participation and Request for
Comments
We encourage you to participate in
this rulemaking by submitting
comments and related materials. All
comments received will be posted
without change to https://
www.regulations.gov and will include
any personal information you have
provided.
Submitting Comments
If you submit a comment, please
include the docket number for this
rulemaking (USCG–2011–0230),
indicate the specific section of this
document to which each comment
applies, and provide a reason for each
suggestion or recommendation. You
may submit your comments and
material online (via https://
www.regulations.gov) or by fax, mail, or
hand delivery, but please use only one
of these means. If you submit a
comment online via https://
www.regulations.gov, it will be
considered received by the Coast Guard
when you successfully transmit the
comment. If you fax, hand deliver, or
mail your comment, it will be
considered as having been received by
the Coast Guard when it is received at
the Docket Management Facility. We
recommend that you include your name
and a mailing address, an e-mail
address, or a telephone number in the
body of your document so that we can
contact you if we have questions
regarding your submission.
To submit your comment online, go to
https://www.regulations.gov, click on the
‘‘submit a comment’’ box, which will
then become highlighted in blue. In the
‘‘Document Type’’ drop down menu
select ‘‘Proposed Rule’’ and insert
‘‘USCG–2011–0230’’ in the ‘‘Keyword’’
box. Click ‘‘Search’’ then click on the
balloon shape in the ‘‘Actions’’ column.
If you submit your comments by mail or
hand delivery, submit them in an
unbound format, no larger than 81⁄2 by
11 inches, suitable for copying and
electronic filing. If you submit
comments by mail and would like to
know that they reached the Facility,
please enclose a stamped, self-addressed
postcard or envelope. We will consider
all comments and material received
during the comment period and may
change the rule based on your
comments.
Viewing Comments and Documents
To view comments, as well as
documents mentioned in this preamble
E:\FR\FM\26APP1.SGM
26APP1
23228
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 80 / Tuesday, April 26, 2011 / Proposed Rules
as being available in the docket, go to
https://www.regulations.gov, click on the
‘‘read comments’’ box, which will then
become highlighted in blue. In the
‘‘Keyword’’ box insert ‘‘USCG–2011–
0230’’ and click ‘‘Search.’’ Click the
‘‘Open Docket Folder’’ in the ‘‘Actions’’
column. You may also visit the Docket
Management Facility in Room W12–140
on the ground floor of the Department
of Transportation West Building, 1200
New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington,
DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. We have an agreement with
the Department of Transportation to use
the Docket Management Facility.
Privacy Act
Anyone can search the electronic
form of comments received into any of
our dockets by the name of the
individual submitting the comment (or
signing the comment, if submitted on
behalf of an association, business, labor
union, etc.). You may review a Privacy
Act notice regarding our public dockets
in the January 17, 2008, issue of the
Federal Register (73 FR 3316).
jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS
Public Meeting
We do not now plan to hold a public
meeting. But you may submit a request
for one using one of the four methods
specified under ADDRESSES. Please
explain why you believe a public
meeting would be beneficial. If we
determine that one would aid this
rulemaking, we will hold one at a time
and place announced by a later notice
in the Federal Register.
Basis and Purpose
The State of North Carolina
Department of Transportation awarded a
contract to Astron General Contracting
Company of Jacksonville, NC to perform
bridge maintenance on the US Highway
70 Fixed bridge crossing Newport River
at Morehead City, North Carolina. The
contract provides for cleaning, painting,
and steel repair to begin on June 1, 2011
and will be completed by August 20,
2011. The contractor requires the main
channel in the vicinity of the bridge to
remain closed during demobilization on
August 20, 2011 from 10 a.m. to 4 p.m.
The Coast Guard will temporarily
restrict access to this section of Newport
River during the demobilization of the
bridge maintenance equipment.
Discussion of Proposed Rule
The temporary safety zone will
encompass the waters of the Newport
River directly under the bridge, latitude
34°43′15″ North, longitude 076°41′39″
West, and 100 yards on either side of
the US Highway 70 Fixed bridge. All
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:08 Apr 25, 2011
Jkt 223001
vessels are prohibited from transiting
this section of the waterway while the
safety zone is in effect. Entry into the
safety zone will not be permitted except
as specifically authorized by the Captain
of the Port or a designated
representative. To seek permission to
transit the area, mariners may contact
Sector North Carolina at (252) 247–
4570. This zone will be enforced from
10 a.m. to 4 p.m. on August 20, 2011.
Regulatory Analyses
We developed this proposed rule after
considering numerous statutes and
executive orders related to rulemaking.
Below we summarize our analyses
based on 13 of these statutes or
executive orders.
Executive Order 12866 and Executive
Order 13563
This proposed rule is not a significant
regulatory action under section 3(f) of
Executive Order 12866, Regulatory
Planning and Review, as supplemented
by Executive Order 13563, and does not
require an assessment of potential costs
and benefits under section 6(a)(3) of that
Order. The Office of Management and
Budget has not reviewed it under that
Order.
Although this regulation will restrict
access to the area, the effect of this rule
will not be significant because: (i) The
safety zone will be in effect for a limited
time, from 10 a.m. to 4 p.m., on August
20, 2011, (ii) the Coast Guard will give
advance notification via maritime
advisories so mariners can adjust their
plans accordingly, and (iii) although the
safety zone will apply to the section of
the Newport River in the immediate
vicinity of the US Highway 70 Fixed
bridge, vessel traffic may use alternate
waterways to transit safely around the
safety zone. All Coast Guard vessels
enforcing this regulated area can be
contacted on marine band radio VHF–
FM channel 16 (156.8 MHz).
Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act
(5 U.S.C. 601–612), we have considered
whether this proposed rule would have
a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
The term ‘‘small entities’’ comprises
small businesses, not-for-profit
organizations that are independently
owned and operated and are not
dominant in their fields, and
governmental jurisdictions with
populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5
U.S.C. 605(b) that this proposed rule
would not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small
entities.
PO 00000
Frm 00021
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
This rule will affect the following
entities, some of which may be small
entities: the owners or operators of
recreational and fishing vessels
intending to transit the specified portion
of Newport River from 10 a.m. to 4 p.m.
on August 20, 2011.
This safety zone will not have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities for
the following reasons. This rule will
only be in effect for six hours from 10
a.m. to 4 p.m. Although the safety zone
will apply to the section of the Newport
River in the vicinity of the bridge, vessel
traffic may use alternate waterways to
transit safely around the safety zone.
Before the effective period, the Coast
Guard will issue maritime advisories
widely available to the users of the
waterway.
If you think that your business,
organization, or governmental
jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity
and that this rule would have a
significant economic impact on it,
please submit a comment (see
ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it
qualifies and how and to what degree
this rule would economically affect it.
Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121),
we want to assist small entities in
understanding this proposed rule so that
they can better evaluate its effects on
them and participate in the rulemaking.
If the rule would affect your small
business, organization, or governmental
jurisdiction and you have questions
concerning its provisions or options for
compliance, please contact CWO3
Joseph Edge, Waterways Management
Division Chief, Sector North Carolina, at
(252) 247–4525. The Coast Guard will
not retaliate against small entities that
question or complain about this
proposed rule or any policy or action of
the Coast Guard.
Collection of Information
This proposed rule would call for no
new collection of information under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3501–3520.).
Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism
under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct
effect on State or local governments and
would either preempt State law or
impose a substantial direct cost of
compliance on them. We have analyzed
this proposed rule under that Order and
have determined that it does not have
implications for federalism.
E:\FR\FM\26APP1.SGM
26APP1
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 80 / Tuesday, April 26, 2011 / Proposed Rules
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
Federal agencies to assess the effects of
their discretionary regulatory actions. In
particular, the Act addresses actions
that may result in the expenditure by a
State, local, or tribal government, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector of
$100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or
more in any one year. Though this
proposed rule would not result in such
an expenditure, we do discuss the
effects of this rule elsewhere in this
preamble.
Taking of Private Property
This proposed rule would not cause a
taking of private property or otherwise
have taking implications under
Executive Order 12630, Governmental
Actions and Interference with
Constitutionally Protected Property
Rights.
Civil Justice Reform
This proposed rule meets applicable
standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of
Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice
Reform, to minimize litigation,
eliminate ambiguity, and reduce
burden.
Protection of Children
We have analyzed this proposed rule
under Executive Order 13045,
Protection of Children from
Environmental Health Risks and Safety
Risks. This rule is not an economically
significant rule and would not create an
environmental risk to health or risk to
safety that might disproportionately
affect children.
jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS
Indian Tribal Governments
This proposed rule does not have
tribal implications under Executive
Order 13175, Consultation and
Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments, because it would not have
a substantial direct effect on one or
more Indian tribes, on the relationship
between the Federal Government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes.
Energy Effects
We have analyzed this proposed rule
under Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have
determined that it is not a ‘‘significant
energy action’’ under that order because
it is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’
under Executive Order 12866 and is not
likely to have a significant adverse effect
on the supply, distribution, or use of
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:08 Apr 25, 2011
Jkt 223001
energy. The Administrator of the Office
of Information and Regulatory Affairs
has not designated it as a significant
energy action. Therefore, it does not
require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.
Technical Standards
The National Technology Transfer
and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use
voluntary consensus standards in their
regulatory activities unless the agency
provides Congress, through the Office of
Management and Budget, with an
explanation of why using these
standards would be inconsistent with
applicable law or otherwise impractical.
Voluntary consensus standards are
technical standards (e.g., specifications
of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling
procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or
adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies. This proposed rule
does not use technical standards.
Therefore, we did not consider the use
of voluntary consensus standards.
Environment
We have analyzed this proposed rule
under Department of Homeland
Security Management Directive 023–01
and Commandant Instruction
M16475.lD, which guide the Coast
Guard in complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and
have made a preliminary determination
that this action is one of a category of
actions that do not individually or
cumulatively have a significant effect on
the human environment. A preliminary
environmental analysis checklist
supporting this determination is
available in the docket where indicated
under ADDRESSES. This proposed rule is
categorically excluded, under figure 2–
1, paragraph (34)(g), of this instruction.
This proposed rule involves the
establishment of a temporary safety
zone to protect the public from bridge
maintenance operations. We seek any
comments or information that may lead
to the discovery of a significant
environmental impact from this
proposed rule.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation
(water), Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Security measures,
Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard proposes to
amend 33 CFR part 165 as follows:
PO 00000
Frm 00022
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 9990
23229
PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION
AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
1. The authority citation for part 165
continues to read as follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 46 U.S.C.
Chapter 701, 3306, 3703; 50 U.S.C. 191, 195;
33 CFR 1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6, and 160.5;
Pub. L. 107–295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department
of Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1.
2. Add temporary § 165.T05–0230 to
read as follows:
§ 165.T05–0230 SAFETY ZONE; Newport
River, Morehead City, North Carolina.
(a) Definitions. For the purposes of
this section, Captain of the Port means
the Commander, Sector North Carolina.
Representative means any Coast Guard
commissioned, warrant, or petty officer
who has been authorized to act on the
behalf of the Captain of the Port.
(b) Location. The following area is a
safety zone: This zone includes the
waters of Newport River directly under
the main span of the U.S. Highway 70
fixed bridge at Morehead City, North
Carolina, located at latitude 34°43′15″
North, longitude 076°41′39″ West, and
100 yards on either side of that bridge.
(c) Regulations. (1) The general
regulations contained in § 165.23 of this
part apply to the area described in
paragraph (b) of this section.
(2) Persons or vessels requiring entry
into or passage through any portion of
the safety zone must first request
authorization from the Captain of the
Port, or a designated representative,
unless the Captain of the Port
previously announced via Marine Safety
Radio Broadcast on VHF Marine Band
Radio channel 22 (157.1 MHz) that this
regulation will not be enforced in that
portion of the safety zone. The Captain
of the Port can be contacted at telephone
number (252) 247–4570 or by radio on
VHF Marine Band Radio, channels 13
and 16.
(d) Enforcement. The U.S. Coast
Guard may be assisted in the patrol and
enforcement of the zone by Federal,
State, and local agencies.
(e) Enforcement period. This section
will be enforced from 10 a.m. to 4 p.m.
on August 20, 2011 unless cancelled
earlier by the Captain of the Port.
Dated: April 12, 2011.
A. Popiel,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the
Port North Carolina.
[FR Doc. 2011–9984 Filed 4–25–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
E:\FR\FM\26APP1.SGM
26APP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 80 (Tuesday, April 26, 2011)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 23227-23229]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-9984]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket No. USCG-2011-0230]
RIN 1625-AA00
Safety Zone, Newport River; Morehead City, NC
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard proposes the establishment of a safety zone on
the waters of the Newport River under the main span US 70/Morehead
City--Newport River high rise bridge in Carteret County, NC. This
safety zone is necessary to provide for safety of life on navigable
waters during the disestablishment of staging for bridge maintenance.
This rule will enhance the safety of the contractors performing
maintenance as well as the safety of the vessels that plan to transit
this area between 10 a.m. and 4 p.m. on August 20, 2011.
DATES: Comments and related material must be received by the Coast
Guard on or before May 26, 2011.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments identified by docket number USCG-
2011-0230 using any one of the following methods:
(1) Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
(2) Fax: 202-493-2251.
(3) Mail: Docket Management Facility (M-30), U.S. Department of
Transportation, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590-0001.
(4) Hand delivery: Same as mail address above, between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The telephone
number is 202-366-9329.
To avoid duplication, please use only one of these four methods.
See the ``Public Participation and Request for Comments'' portion of
the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section below for instructions on
submitting comments.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this proposed
rule, call or e-mail BOSN3 Joseph M. Edge, Coast Guard Sector North
Carolina, Coast Guard; telephone 252-247-4525, e-mail
Joseph.M.Edge@uscg.mil. If you have questions on viewing or submitting
material to the docket, call Renee V. Wright, Program Manager, Docket
Operations, telephone 202-366-9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Public Participation and Request for Comments
We encourage you to participate in this rulemaking by submitting
comments and related materials. All comments received will be posted
without change to https://www.regulations.gov and will include any
personal information you have provided.
Submitting Comments
If you submit a comment, please include the docket number for this
rulemaking (USCG-2011-0230), indicate the specific section of this
document to which each comment applies, and provide a reason for each
suggestion or recommendation. You may submit your comments and material
online (via https://www.regulations.gov) or by fax, mail, or hand
delivery, but please use only one of these means. If you submit a
comment online via https://www.regulations.gov, it will be considered
received by the Coast Guard when you successfully transmit the comment.
If you fax, hand deliver, or mail your comment, it will be considered
as having been received by the Coast Guard when it is received at the
Docket Management Facility. We recommend that you include your name and
a mailing address, an e-mail address, or a telephone number in the body
of your document so that we can contact you if we have questions
regarding your submission.
To submit your comment online, go to https://www.regulations.gov,
click on the ``submit a comment'' box, which will then become
highlighted in blue. In the ``Document Type'' drop down menu select
``Proposed Rule'' and insert ``USCG-2011-0230'' in the ``Keyword'' box.
Click ``Search'' then click on the balloon shape in the ``Actions''
column. If you submit your comments by mail or hand delivery, submit
them in an unbound format, no larger than 8\1/2\ by 11 inches, suitable
for copying and electronic filing. If you submit comments by mail and
would like to know that they reached the Facility, please enclose a
stamped, self-addressed postcard or envelope. We will consider all
comments and material received during the comment period and may change
the rule based on your comments.
Viewing Comments and Documents
To view comments, as well as documents mentioned in this preamble
[[Page 23228]]
as being available in the docket, go to https://www.regulations.gov,
click on the ``read comments'' box, which will then become highlighted
in blue. In the ``Keyword'' box insert ``USCG-2011-0230'' and click
``Search.'' Click the ``Open Docket Folder'' in the ``Actions'' column.
You may also visit the Docket Management Facility in Room W12-140 on
the ground floor of the Department of Transportation West Building,
1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. We have an
agreement with the Department of Transportation to use the Docket
Management Facility.
Privacy Act
Anyone can search the electronic form of comments received into any
of our dockets by the name of the individual submitting the comment (or
signing the comment, if submitted on behalf of an association,
business, labor union, etc.). You may review a Privacy Act notice
regarding our public dockets in the January 17, 2008, issue of the
Federal Register (73 FR 3316).
Public Meeting
We do not now plan to hold a public meeting. But you may submit a
request for one using one of the four methods specified under
ADDRESSES. Please explain why you believe a public meeting would be
beneficial. If we determine that one would aid this rulemaking, we will
hold one at a time and place announced by a later notice in the Federal
Register.
Basis and Purpose
The State of North Carolina Department of Transportation awarded a
contract to Astron General Contracting Company of Jacksonville, NC to
perform bridge maintenance on the US Highway 70 Fixed bridge crossing
Newport River at Morehead City, North Carolina. The contract provides
for cleaning, painting, and steel repair to begin on June 1, 2011 and
will be completed by August 20, 2011. The contractor requires the main
channel in the vicinity of the bridge to remain closed during
demobilization on August 20, 2011 from 10 a.m. to 4 p.m. The Coast
Guard will temporarily restrict access to this section of Newport River
during the demobilization of the bridge maintenance equipment.
Discussion of Proposed Rule
The temporary safety zone will encompass the waters of the Newport
River directly under the bridge, latitude 34[deg]43'15'' North,
longitude 076[deg]41'39'' West, and 100 yards on either side of the US
Highway 70 Fixed bridge. All vessels are prohibited from transiting
this section of the waterway while the safety zone is in effect. Entry
into the safety zone will not be permitted except as specifically
authorized by the Captain of the Port or a designated representative.
To seek permission to transit the area, mariners may contact Sector
North Carolina at (252) 247-4570. This zone will be enforced from 10
a.m. to 4 p.m. on August 20, 2011.
Regulatory Analyses
We developed this proposed rule after considering numerous statutes
and executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our
analyses based on 13 of these statutes or executive orders.
Executive Order 12866 and Executive Order 13563
This proposed rule is not a significant regulatory action under
section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review,
as supplemented by Executive Order 13563, and does not require an
assessment of potential costs and benefits under section 6(a)(3) of
that Order. The Office of Management and Budget has not reviewed it
under that Order.
Although this regulation will restrict access to the area, the
effect of this rule will not be significant because: (i) The safety
zone will be in effect for a limited time, from 10 a.m. to 4 p.m., on
August 20, 2011, (ii) the Coast Guard will give advance notification
via maritime advisories so mariners can adjust their plans accordingly,
and (iii) although the safety zone will apply to the section of the
Newport River in the immediate vicinity of the US Highway 70 Fixed
bridge, vessel traffic may use alternate waterways to transit safely
around the safety zone. All Coast Guard vessels enforcing this
regulated area can be contacted on marine band radio VHF-FM channel 16
(156.8 MHz).
Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601-612), we have
considered whether this proposed rule would have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small entities. The term ``small
entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than
50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this proposed
rule would not have a significant economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities.
This rule will affect the following entities, some of which may be
small entities: the owners or operators of recreational and fishing
vessels intending to transit the specified portion of Newport River
from 10 a.m. to 4 p.m. on August 20, 2011.
This safety zone will not have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities for the following reasons. This
rule will only be in effect for six hours from 10 a.m. to 4 p.m.
Although the safety zone will apply to the section of the Newport River
in the vicinity of the bridge, vessel traffic may use alternate
waterways to transit safely around the safety zone. Before the
effective period, the Coast Guard will issue maritime advisories widely
available to the users of the waterway.
If you think that your business, organization, or governmental
jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity and that this rule would have
a significant economic impact on it, please submit a comment (see
ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it qualifies and how and to what
degree this rule would economically affect it.
Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small
entities in understanding this proposed rule so that they can better
evaluate its effects on them and participate in the rulemaking. If the
rule would affect your small business, organization, or governmental
jurisdiction and you have questions concerning its provisions or
options for compliance, please contact CWO3 Joseph Edge, Waterways
Management Division Chief, Sector North Carolina, at (252) 247-4525.
The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small entities that question
or complain about this proposed rule or any policy or action of the
Coast Guard.
Collection of Information
This proposed rule would call for no new collection of information
under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520.).
Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on State or local
governments and would either preempt State law or impose a substantial
direct cost of compliance on them. We have analyzed this proposed rule
under that Order and have determined that it does not have implications
for federalism.
[[Page 23229]]
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this proposed rule would not
result in such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule
elsewhere in this preamble.
Taking of Private Property
This proposed rule would not cause a taking of private property or
otherwise have taking implications under Executive Order 12630,
Governmental Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected
Property Rights.
Civil Justice Reform
This proposed rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and
3(b)(2) of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize
litigation, eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.
Protection of Children
We have analyzed this proposed rule under Executive Order 13045,
Protection of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety
Risks. This rule is not an economically significant rule and would not
create an environmental risk to health or risk to safety that might
disproportionately affect children.
Indian Tribal Governments
This proposed rule does not have tribal implications under
Executive Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments, because it would not have a substantial direct effect on
one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.
Energy Effects
We have analyzed this proposed rule under Executive Order 13211,
Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have determined that it is not a ``significant
energy action'' under that order because it is not a ``significant
regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866 and is not likely to
have a significant adverse effect on the supply, distribution, or use
of energy. The Administrator of the Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs has not designated it as a significant energy
action. Therefore, it does not require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.
Technical Standards
The National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use voluntary consensus standards
in their regulatory activities unless the agency provides Congress,
through the Office of Management and Budget, with an explanation of why
using these standards would be inconsistent with applicable law or
otherwise impractical. Voluntary consensus standards are technical
standards (e.g., specifications of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies. This proposed rule does not use technical standards.
Therefore, we did not consider the use of voluntary consensus
standards.
Environment
We have analyzed this proposed rule under Department of Homeland
Security Management Directive 023-01 and Commandant Instruction
M16475.lD, which guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and
have made a preliminary determination that this action is one of a
category of actions that do not individually or cumulatively have a
significant effect on the human environment. A preliminary
environmental analysis checklist supporting this determination is
available in the docket where indicated under ADDRESSES. This proposed
rule is categorically excluded, under figure 2-1, paragraph (34)(g), of
this instruction. This proposed rule involves the establishment of a
temporary safety zone to protect the public from bridge maintenance
operations. We seek any comments or information that may lead to the
discovery of a significant environmental impact from this proposed
rule.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard proposes
to amend 33 CFR part 165 as follows:
PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 46 U.S.C. Chapter 701, 3306, 3703;
50 U.S.C. 191, 195; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-1, 6.04-6, and 160.5; Pub.
L. 107-295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department of Homeland Security
Delegation No. 0170.1.
2. Add temporary Sec. 165.T05-0230 to read as follows:
Sec. 165.T05-0230 SAFETY ZONE; Newport River, Morehead City, North
Carolina.
(a) Definitions. For the purposes of this section, Captain of the
Port means the Commander, Sector North Carolina. Representative means
any Coast Guard commissioned, warrant, or petty officer who has been
authorized to act on the behalf of the Captain of the Port.
(b) Location. The following area is a safety zone: This zone
includes the waters of Newport River directly under the main span of
the U.S. Highway 70 fixed bridge at Morehead City, North Carolina,
located at latitude 34[deg]43'15'' North, longitude 076[deg]41'39''
West, and 100 yards on either side of that bridge.
(c) Regulations. (1) The general regulations contained in Sec.
165.23 of this part apply to the area described in paragraph (b) of
this section.
(2) Persons or vessels requiring entry into or passage through any
portion of the safety zone must first request authorization from the
Captain of the Port, or a designated representative, unless the Captain
of the Port previously announced via Marine Safety Radio Broadcast on
VHF Marine Band Radio channel 22 (157.1 MHz) that this regulation will
not be enforced in that portion of the safety zone. The Captain of the
Port can be contacted at telephone number (252) 247-4570 or by radio on
VHF Marine Band Radio, channels 13 and 16.
(d) Enforcement. The U.S. Coast Guard may be assisted in the patrol
and enforcement of the zone by Federal, State, and local agencies.
(e) Enforcement period. This section will be enforced from 10 a.m.
to 4 p.m. on August 20, 2011 unless cancelled earlier by the Captain of
the Port.
Dated: April 12, 2011.
A. Popiel,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port North Carolina.
[FR Doc. 2011-9984 Filed 4-25-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P