Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans; Virginia; Adoption of the Revised Lead Standards and Related Reference Conditions and Update of Appendices, 22814-22817 [2011-9697]
Download as PDF
22814
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 79 / Monday, April 25, 2011 / Rules and Regulations
category of actions that do not
individually or cumulatively have a
significant effect on the human
environment. This rule is categorically
excluded, under figure 2–1, paragraph
(34)(g), of the Instruction. This rule
involves establishment of a temporary
safety zone. An environmental analysis
checklist and a categorical exclusion
determination are available in the
docket where indicated under
ADDRESSES.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation
(water), Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Security measures,
Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
CFR part 165 as follows:
PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION
AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
1. The authority citation for part 165
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1226, 1231; 46 U.S.C.
Chapter 701, 3306, 3703; 50 U.S.C. 191, 195;
33 CFR 1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6, and 160.5;
Pub. L. 107–295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department
of Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1.
2. Add § 165.T11–405 to read as
follows:
■
jdjones on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with RULES
Jkt 223001
[FR Doc. 2011–9893 Filed 4–22–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
40 CFR Part 52
(a) Location. The safety zone will
include the area within 600 feet of the
fireworks barge in approximate position
32°46′03″ N, 117°13′11″ W.
(b) Enforcement Period. This section
will only be enforced from 8:45 p.m. to
10:15 p.m. on evenings with a fireworks
show. Fireworks shows are currently
scheduled for the following dates in
2011: April 2, 9, 16 and 23, May 28, 29
and 30, June 4 and 5, 11 and 12, nightly
from June 16 through August 21, August
26, 27, and 28, September 3, 4, and 5,
November 18, December 9 and 31. If this
schedule changes the Coast Guard will
announce that fact via Broadcast Notice
to Mariners no less than 24 hours before
the event. If the event concludes prior
to the scheduled termination time, the
Captain of the Port will cease
enforcement of this safety zone and will
announce that fact via Broadcast Notice
to Mariners.
(c) Definitions. The following
definition applies to this section:
designated representative means any
commissioned, warrant, or petty officer
of the Coast Guard on board Coast
Guard, Coast Guard Auxiliary, local,
state, or federal law enforcement vessels
who have been authorized to act on the
behalf of the Captain of the Port.
15:12 Apr 22, 2011
Dated: April 1, 2011.
T.H. Farris,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the
Port San Diego.
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
§ 165.T11–405 Safety zone; Sea World
Fireworks; Mission Bay, San Diego, CA.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
(d) Regulations. (1) In accordance
with general regulations in 33 CFR Part
165, Subpart C, entry into, transit
through or anchoring within this safety
zone is prohibited unless authorized by
the Captain of the Port of San Diego or
his designated representative.
(2) Mariners requesting permission to
transit through the safety zone may
request authorization to do so from the
Sector San Diego Command Center. The
Command Center may be contacted on
VHF–FM Channel 16.
(3) All persons and vessels shall
comply with the instructions of the
Coast Guard Captain of the Port or his
designated representative.
(4) Upon being hailed by U.S. Coast
Guard patrol personnel by siren, radio,
flashing light, or other means, the
operator of a vessel shall proceed as
directed.
(5) The Coast Guard may be assisted
by other federal, state, or local agencies.
[EPA–R03–OAR–2010–0882; FRL–9298–1]
Approval and Promulgation of Air
Quality Implementation Plans; Virginia;
Adoption of the Revised Lead
Standards and Related Reference
Conditions and Update of Appendices
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
EPA is approving a State
Implementation Plan (SIP) revision
submitted by the Commonwealth of
Virginia. The revisions add the primary
and secondary lead standards of 0.15
micrograms per cubic meter (μg/m3),
related reference conditions, and update
the list of appendices under ‘‘Documents
Incorporated by Reference.’’ Virginia’s
SIP revisions for the National Ambient
Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) for lead
are consistent with the Federal lead
standards. This action is being taken
under the Clean Air Act (CAA).
DATES: Effective Date: This final rule is
effective on May 25, 2011.
ADDRESSES: EPA has established a
docket for this action under Docket ID
Number EPA–R03–OAR–2010–0882. All
documents in the docket are listed in
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00030
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
the https://www.regulations.gov Web
site. Although listed in the electronic
docket, some information is not publicly
available, i.e., confidential business
information (CBI) or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Certain other material, such as
copyrighted material, is not placed on
the Internet and will be publicly
available only in hard copy form.
Publicly available docket materials are
available either electronically through
https://www.regulations.gov or in hard
copy for public inspection during
normal business hours at the Air
Protection Division, U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, Region III, 1650
Arch Street, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
19103. Copies of the State submittal are
available at the Virginia Department of
Environmental Quality, 629 East Main
Street, Richmond, Virginia 23219.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Irene Shandruk, (215) 814–2166, or by
e-mail at shandruk.irene@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
On January 26, 2011 (76 FR 4579),
EPA published a notice of proposed
rulemaking (NPR) for the
Commonwealth of Virginia. The NPR
proposed approval of Virginia’s SIP
revision pertaining to the NAAQS for
lead and related reference conditions.
The CAA specifies that EPA must reevaluate the appropriateness of the
NAAQS every five years. As part of the
process, EPA reviewed the latest
research and determined that revised
standards for lead were necessary to
protect public health and welfare. EPA
revised the level of the primary lead
standard to a level of 0.15 μg/m3 to
provide increased protection for
children and other ‘‘at risk’’ populations.
The secondary standard was also
revised to a level of
0.15 μg/m3 to afford increased
protection for the environment. EPA
promulgated the more stringent primary
and secondary NAAQS for lead on
November 12, 2008 (73 FR 66964). One
adverse comment was submitted on
EPA’s January 26, 2011 NPR (76 FR
4579). A summary of the comment and
EPA’s response is provided in section IV
of this document.
II. Summary of SIP Revision
On September 27, 2010, the
Commonwealth of Virginia submitted a
formal revision to its SIP. The SIP
revision consists of an amendment
which includes the revised primary and
secondary NAAQS for lead and related
reference conditions. Virginia’s revision
incorporates the Federal lead standards
E:\FR\FM\25APR1.SGM
25APR1
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 79 / Monday, April 25, 2011 / Rules and Regulations
jdjones on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with RULES
into the Code of Virginia (9VAC5
Chapter 30). In addition, the list of
appendices to 40 CFR Part 51 was
updated under ‘‘Documents
Incorporated by Reference’’ (9VAC5–20–
21).
The following are the specific sections
that are being modified or amended:
• 9VAC5–20–21: Documents
Incorporated by Reference (modified)
• 9VAC5–30–15: Reference
Conditions (modified)
• 9VAC5–30–80: Lead (amended)
III. General Information Pertaining to
SIP Submittals From the
Commonwealth of Virginia
In 1995, Virginia adopted legislation
that provides, subject to certain
conditions, for an environmental
assessment (audit) ‘‘privilege’’ for
voluntary compliance evaluations
performed by a regulated entity. The
legislation further addresses the relative
burden of proof for parties either
asserting the privilege or seeking
disclosure of documents for which the
privilege is claimed. Virginia’s
legislation also provides, subject to
certain conditions, for a penalty waiver
for violations of environmental laws
when a regulated entity discovers such
violations pursuant to a voluntary
compliance evaluation and voluntarily
discloses such violations to the
Commonwealth and takes prompt and
appropriate measures to remedy the
violations. Virginia’s Voluntary
Environmental Assessment Privilege
Law, Va. Code Sec. 10.1–1198, provides
a privilege that protects from disclosure
documents and information about the
content of those documents that are the
product of a voluntary environmental
assessment. The Privilege Law does not
extend to documents or information (1)
That are generated or developed before
the commencement of a voluntary
environmental assessment; (2) that are
prepared independently of the
assessment process; (3) that demonstrate
a clear, imminent and substantial
danger to the public health or
environment; or (4) that are required by
law.
On January 12, 1998, the
Commonwealth of Virginia Office of the
Attorney General provided a legal
opinion that states that the Privilege
law, Va. Code Sec. 10.1–1198, precludes
granting a privilege to documents and
information ‘‘required by law,’’
including documents and information
‘‘required by Federal law to maintain
program delegation, authorization or
approval,’’ since Virginia must ‘‘enforce
Federally authorized environmental
programs in a manner that is no less
stringent than their Federal counterparts
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:12 Apr 22, 2011
Jkt 223001
* * *.’’ The opinion concludes that
‘‘[r]egarding § 10.1–1198, therefore,
documents or other information needed
for civil or criminal enforcement under
one of these programs could not be
privileged because such documents and
information are essential to pursuing
enforcement in a manner required by
Federal law to maintain program
delegation, authorization or approval.’’
Virginia’s Immunity law, Va. Code
Sec. 10.1–1199, provides that ‘‘[t]o the
extent consistent with requirements
imposed by Federal law,’’ any person
making a voluntary disclosure of
information to a state agency regarding
a violation of an environmental statute,
regulation, permit, or administrative
order is granted immunity from
administrative or civil penalty. The
Attorney General’s January 12, 1998
opinion states that the quoted language
renders this statute inapplicable to
enforcement of any Federally authorized
programs, since ‘‘no immunity could be
afforded from administrative, civil, or
criminal penalties because granting
such immunity would not be consistent
with Federal law, which is one of the
criteria for immunity.’’ Therefore, EPA
has determined that Virginia’s Privilege
and Immunity statutes will not preclude
the Commonwealth from enforcing its
program consistent with the Federal
requirements. In any event, because
EPA has also determined that a state
audit privilege and immunity law can
affect only state enforcement and cannot
have any impact on Federal
enforcement authorities, EPA may at
any time invoke its authority under the
CAA, including, for example, sections
113, 167, 205, 211 or 213, to enforce the
requirements or prohibitions of the state
plan, independently of any state
enforcement effort. In addition, citizen
enforcement under section 304 of the
CAA is likewise unaffected by this, or
any, state audit privilege or immunity
law. Other specific requirements and
the rationale for EPA’s proposed action
are explained in the NPR and will not
be restated here. As noted below, EPA
received one comment on the NPR and
it was not germane.
IV. Summary of Public Comments and
EPA Responses
Comment: A small business owner
expressed concern about having
additional costs imposed upon
individuals who work on lead paintcontaining homes built before 1978. The
commenter stated that the business
climate cannot support another
regulation and expressed concern about
being able to remain in business with
the adoption of this rule.
PO 00000
Frm 00031
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
22815
Response: This comment is not
relevant to this rulemaking action. The
commenter discusses lead as it relates to
lead-containing paints and the
requirement for its removal in homes
built prior to 1978. This action imposes
no requirements with respect to the
removal of lead-containing paint from
homes built prior to 1978. This action
is concerned with the adoption of the
2008 lead NAAQS by the
Commonwealth of Virginia into the
Commonwealth’s SIP.
V. Final Action
EPA is approving Virginia’s SIP
revision for the lead NAAQS and related
reference conditions, as well as the
updated list of appendices to 40 CFR
part 51 under documents incorporated
by reference.
VI. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
A. General Requirements
Under the CAA, the Administrator is
required to approve a SIP submission
that complies with the provisions of the
CAA and applicable Federal regulations.
42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a).
Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions,
EPA’s role is to approve state choices,
provided that they meet the criteria of
the CAA. Accordingly, this action
merely approves state law as meeting
Federal requirements and does not
impose additional requirements beyond
those imposed by state law. For that
reason, this action:
• Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ subject to review by the Office
of Management and Budget under
Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735,
October 4, 1993);
• Does not impose an information
collection burden under the provisions
of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
• Is certified as not having a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
• Does not contain any unfunded
mandate or significantly or uniquely
affect small governments, as described
in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4);
• Does not have Federalism
implications as specified in Executive
Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10,
1999);
• Is not an economically significant
regulatory action based on health or
safety risks subject to Executive Order
13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997);
• Is not a significant regulatory action
subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR
28355, May 22, 2001);
E:\FR\FM\25APR1.SGM
25APR1
22816
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 79 / Monday, April 25, 2011 / Rules and Regulations
• Is not subject to requirements of
Section 12(d) of the National
Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because
application of those requirements would
be inconsistent with the CAA; and
• Does not provide EPA with the
discretionary authority to address, as
appropriate, disproportionate human
health or environmental effects, using
practicable and legally permissible
methods, under Executive Order 12898
(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
In addition, this rule does not have
tribal implications as specified by
Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249,
November 9, 2000), because the SIP is
not approved to apply in Indian country
located in the state, and EPA notes that
it will not impose substantial direct
costs on tribal governments or preempt
tribal law.
B. Submission to Congress and the
Comptroller General
The Congressional Review Act, 5
U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides
that before a rule may take effect, the
agency promulgating the rule must
submit a rule report, which includes a
copy of the rule, to each House of the
Congress and to the Comptroller General
of the United States. EPA will submit a
report containing this action and other
required information to the U.S. Senate,
the U.S. House of Representatives, and
the Comptroller General of the United
States prior to publication of the rule in
the Federal Register. A major rule
cannot take effect until 60 days after it
is published in the Federal Register.
This action is not a ‘‘major rule’’ as
defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
C. Petitions for Judicial Review
Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA,
petitions for judicial review of this
action must be filed in the United States
Court of Appeals for the appropriate
circuit by June 24, 2011. Filing a
petition for reconsideration by the
Administrator of this final rule does not
affect the finality of this action for the
purposes of judicial review nor does it
extend the time within which a petition
for judicial review may be filed, and
shall not postpone the effectiveness of
such rule or action. This action
pertaining to Virginia’s adoption of the
revised lead standards of 0.15 μg/m3
and related reference conditions may
not be challenged later in proceedings to
enforce its requirements. (See section
307(b)(2).)
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Lead, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
Dated: April 6, 2011.
W.C. Early,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region III.
40 CFR Part 52 is amended as follows:
PART 52—[AMENDED]
1. The authority citation for 40 CFR
part 52 continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart VV—Virginia
2. In § 52.2420, the table in paragraph
(c) is amended by revising the entries
for Sections 5–30–15 and 5–30–80. The
table in paragraph (e) is amended by
adding an entry for ‘‘Documents
Incorporated by Reference’’ after the
ninth existing entry for ‘‘Documents
Incorporated by Reference.’’ The
amendments read as follows:
■
§ 52.2420
*
Identification of plan.
*
*
(c) * * *
*
*
EPA-APPROVED VIRGINIA REGULATIONS AND STATUTES
State citation
State
effective
date
Title/subject
*
*
*
*
Explanation [former
SIP citation]
EPA approval date
*
*
*
9 VAC 5, Chapter 30 Ambient Air Quality Standards [Part III]
*
*
*
*
5–30–15 ................................... Reference conditions ...............................
*
6/24/09 ....................
*
4/25/11 [Insert page
number where the
document begins].
*
Revised section.
*
*
*
*
5–30–80 ................................... Lead .........................................................
*
6/24/09 ....................
*
4/25/11 [Insert page
number where the
document begins].
*
Amended paragraphs
A. and B.; added
paragraph C.
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
State
submittal
date
jdjones on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with RULES
Applicable
geographic area
*
*
*
Documents Incorporated by Reference (9 VAC 5–20–21, Sections E.1.a.(1)(q) and E.1.a.(1)(r)).
*
Statewide ................
VerDate Mar<15>2010
*
(e) * * *
Name of non-regulatory SIP revision
*
*
*
15:12 Apr 22, 2011
*
Jkt 223001
PO 00000
*
Frm 00032
Fmt 4700
*
9/27/10
EPA approval date
Additional
explanation
*
4/25/11 [Insert page
number where the
document begins].
*
Revised sections.
*
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\25APR1.SGM
*
25APR1
*
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 79 / Monday, April 25, 2011 / Rules and Regulations
*
*
*
*
*
[FR Doc. 2011–9697 Filed 4–22–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[SC–200906; FRL–9286–2]
Approval and Promulgation of Air
Quality Implementation Plans; South
Carolina; Update to Materials
Incorporated by Reference
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule; notice of
administrative change.
AGENCY:
EPA is publishing this action
to provide the public with notice of the
update to the South Carolina State
Implementation Plan (SIP) compilation.
In particular, materials submitted by
South Carolina that are incorporated by
reference (IBR) into the South Carolina
SIP are being updated to reflect EPAapproved revisions to South Carolina’s
SIP that have occurred since the last
update. In this action, EPA is also
notifying the public of the correction of
certain typographical errors.
DATES: This action is effective April 25,
2011.
ADDRESSES: SIP materials which are
incorporated by reference into 40 Code
of Federal Regulations (CFR) part 52 are
available for inspection at the following
locations: Environmental Protection
Agency, Region 4, 61 Forsyth Street,
SW., Atlanta, GA 30303; the Air and
Radiation Docket and Information
Center, EPA Headquarters Library,
Infoterra Room (Room Number 3334),
EPA West Building, 1301 Constitution
Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20460, and
the National Archives and Records
Administration. If you wish to obtain
materials from a docket in the EPA
Headquarters Library, please call the
Office of Air and Radiation (OAR)
Docket/Telephone number: (202) 566–
1742. For information on the availability
of this material at NARA, call 202–741–
6030, or go to: https://www.archives.gov/
federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations.html.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms.
Nacosta C. Ward at the above Region 4
address or at (404) 562–9140. Ms. Ward
may also be contacted via electronic
mail at: ward.nacosta@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Each state
has a SIP containing the control
measures and strategies used to attain
and maintain the national ambient air
quality standards (NAAQS). The SIP is
jdjones on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with RULES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:12 Apr 22, 2011
Jkt 223001
extensive, containing such elements as
air pollution control regulations,
emission inventories, monitoring
networks, attainment demonstrations,
and enforcement mechanisms.
Each state must formally adopt the
control measures and strategies in the
SIP after the public has had an
opportunity to comment on them and
then submit the SIP to EPA. Once these
control measures and strategies are
approved by EPA, after notice and
comment, they are incorporated into the
federally approved SIP and are
identified in part 52 ‘‘Approval and
Promulgation of Implementation Plans,’’
Title 40 of the CFR (40 CFR part 52).
The full text of the state regulation
approved by EPA is not reproduced in
its entirety in 40 CFR part 52, but is
‘‘incorporated by reference.’’ This means
that EPA has approved a given state
regulation with a specific effective date.
The public is referred to the location of
the full text version should they want to
know which measures are contained in
a given SIP. The information provided
allows EPA and the public to monitor
the extent to which a state implements
a SIP to attain and maintain the NAAQS
and to take enforcement action if
necessary.
The SIP is a living document which
the state can revise as necessary to
address the unique air pollution
problems in the state. Therefore, EPA
from time to time must take action on
SIP revisions containing new and/or
revised regulations as being part of the
SIP. On May 22, 1997 (62 FR 27968),
EPA revised the procedures for
incorporating by reference, into the
CFR, materials submitted by states in
their EPA-approved SIP revisions. These
changes revised the format for the
identification of the SIP in 40 CFR part
52, streamlined the mechanisms for
announcing EPA approval of revisions
to a SIP, and streamlined the
mechanisms for EPA’s updating of the
IBR information contained for each SIP
in 40 CFR part 52. The revised
procedures also called for EPA to
maintain ‘‘SIP Compilations’’ that
contain the federally approved
regulations and source specific permits
submitted by each state agency. These
SIP Compilations are contained in
3-ring binders and are updated
primarily on an annual basis. Under the
revised procedures, EPA is to
periodically publish an informational
document in the rules section of the
Federal Register when updates are
made to a SIP Compilation for a
particular state. EPA’s 1997 revised
procedures were formally applied to
South Carolina on July 1, 1997 (62 FR
35441).
PO 00000
Frm 00033
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
22817
This action represents EPA’s
publication of the South Carolina SIP
Compilation update, appearing in 40
CFR part 52. In addition, notice is
provided for the following
typographical corrections to Tables (c),
(d), and (e) of paragraph 52.2120, as
described below:
1. Correcting typographical errors listed in
paragraphs 52.2120(c), (d), and (e) removing
all periods after the Federal Register notice
citation.
2. Revising the date format listed in
paragraphs 52.2120(c), (d), and (e). Revise the
date format in the ‘‘state effective date,’’ and
‘‘EPA approval date,’’ columns for
consistency. Dates are numerical month/day/
year without additional zeros.
3. Restoring all missing entries in table (e).
4. In paragraph (c), the following revisions:
a. Capitalizing the word ‘‘subject’’ in the
column header ‘‘Title/Subject;’’
b. Underlining the words ‘‘Federal’’ and
‘‘Register’’ and capitalizing the letter ‘‘r’’ in the
word ‘‘register’’ in the column entitled
‘‘Federal Register notice’’ for consistency
within the paragraph and the Federal
Register rulemakings.
c. Revising the format of paragraph (c) by
removing the second entry of ‘‘Regulation No.
62.1 Definitions and General Requirements’’
and creating rows for all Parts contained in
Regulation 62.5, Standard No. 5, Volatile
Organic Compounds, ‘‘Section I—General
Provisions’’ and ‘‘Section II—Provisions for
Specific Sources.’’
d. Inserting the ‘‘State effective date,’’ ‘‘EPA
approval date,’’ and ‘‘Federal Register notice’’
citation to read in the correct columns for
Regulation No. 62.2 ‘‘Prohibition of Open
Burning.’’
e. Correcting the ‘‘Title/Subject’’ under
Regulation 62.5 for:
i. Standard No. 1, ‘‘Section II—Particulate
Matter Emissions;’’
ii. Standard No. 5, ‘‘Section II—Provisions
for Specific Sources’’
1. Part C—Surface Coating of Paper, Vinyl,
and Fabric
2. Part D—Surface Coating of Metal
Furniture, and Large Appliances
3. Part F—Surface Coating of
Miscellaneous Metal Parts and Products;’’
f. correcting the ‘‘State effective date’’ for:
i. Regulation 62.3 ‘‘Section II—Emission
Reduction Requirements;’’
ii. Regulation 62.5, Standard No. 1—
Emissions from Fuel Burning Operations
1. ‘‘Section II—Particulate Matter
Emissions’’
2. ‘‘Section IV—Opacity Monitoring
Requirements’’
3. ‘‘Section V—Exemptions;’’
iii. Regulation 62.5, Standard No. 4—
Emissions from Process Industries
1. ‘‘Section I—General’’
2. ‘‘Section II—Sulfuric Acid
Manufacturing’’
3. ‘‘Section III—Kraft Pulp and Paper
Manufacturing Plants’’
4. ‘‘Section IV—Portland Cement
Manufacturing’’
5. ‘‘Section VI—Hot Mix Asphalt
Manufacturing’’
6. ‘‘Section VII—Metal Refining;’’
E:\FR\FM\25APR1.SGM
25APR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 79 (Monday, April 25, 2011)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 22814-22817]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-9697]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA-R03-OAR-2010-0882; FRL-9298-1]
Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans;
Virginia; Adoption of the Revised Lead Standards and Related Reference
Conditions and Update of Appendices
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: EPA is approving a State Implementation Plan (SIP) revision
submitted by the Commonwealth of Virginia. The revisions add the
primary and secondary lead standards of 0.15 micrograms per cubic meter
([mu]g/m\3\), related reference conditions, and update the list of
appendices under ``Documents Incorporated by Reference.'' Virginia's
SIP revisions for the National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS)
for lead are consistent with the Federal lead standards. This action is
being taken under the Clean Air Act (CAA).
DATES: Effective Date: This final rule is effective on May 25, 2011.
ADDRESSES: EPA has established a docket for this action under Docket ID
Number EPA-R03-OAR-2010-0882. All documents in the docket are listed in
the https://www.regulations.gov Web site. Although listed in the
electronic docket, some information is not publicly available, i.e.,
confidential business information (CBI) or other information whose
disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain other material, such as
copyrighted material, is not placed on the Internet and will be
publicly available only in hard copy form. Publicly available docket
materials are available either electronically through https://www.regulations.gov or in hard copy for public inspection during normal
business hours at the Air Protection Division, U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, Region III, 1650 Arch Street, Philadelphia,
Pennsylvania 19103. Copies of the State submittal are available at the
Virginia Department of Environmental Quality, 629 East Main Street,
Richmond, Virginia 23219.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Irene Shandruk, (215) 814-2166, or by
e-mail at shandruk.irene@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
On January 26, 2011 (76 FR 4579), EPA published a notice of
proposed rulemaking (NPR) for the Commonwealth of Virginia. The NPR
proposed approval of Virginia's SIP revision pertaining to the NAAQS
for lead and related reference conditions. The CAA specifies that EPA
must re-evaluate the appropriateness of the NAAQS every five years. As
part of the process, EPA reviewed the latest research and determined
that revised standards for lead were necessary to protect public health
and welfare. EPA revised the level of the primary lead standard to a
level of 0.15 [mu]g/m\3\ to provide increased protection for children
and other ``at risk'' populations. The secondary standard was also
revised to a level of 0.15 [mu]g/m\3\ to afford increased protection
for the environment. EPA promulgated the more stringent primary and
secondary NAAQS for lead on November 12, 2008 (73 FR 66964). One
adverse comment was submitted on EPA's January 26, 2011 NPR (76 FR
4579). A summary of the comment and EPA's response is provided in
section IV of this document.
II. Summary of SIP Revision
On September 27, 2010, the Commonwealth of Virginia submitted a
formal revision to its SIP. The SIP revision consists of an amendment
which includes the revised primary and secondary NAAQS for lead and
related reference conditions. Virginia's revision incorporates the
Federal lead standards
[[Page 22815]]
into the Code of Virginia (9VAC5 Chapter 30). In addition, the list of
appendices to 40 CFR Part 51 was updated under ``Documents Incorporated
by Reference'' (9VAC5-20-21).
The following are the specific sections that are being modified or
amended:
9VAC5-20-21: Documents Incorporated by Reference
(modified)
9VAC5-30-15: Reference Conditions (modified)
9VAC5-30-80: Lead (amended)
III. General Information Pertaining to SIP Submittals From the
Commonwealth of Virginia
In 1995, Virginia adopted legislation that provides, subject to
certain conditions, for an environmental assessment (audit)
``privilege'' for voluntary compliance evaluations performed by a
regulated entity. The legislation further addresses the relative burden
of proof for parties either asserting the privilege or seeking
disclosure of documents for which the privilege is claimed. Virginia's
legislation also provides, subject to certain conditions, for a penalty
waiver for violations of environmental laws when a regulated entity
discovers such violations pursuant to a voluntary compliance evaluation
and voluntarily discloses such violations to the Commonwealth and takes
prompt and appropriate measures to remedy the violations. Virginia's
Voluntary Environmental Assessment Privilege Law, Va. Code Sec. 10.1-
1198, provides a privilege that protects from disclosure documents and
information about the content of those documents that are the product
of a voluntary environmental assessment. The Privilege Law does not
extend to documents or information (1) That are generated or developed
before the commencement of a voluntary environmental assessment; (2)
that are prepared independently of the assessment process; (3) that
demonstrate a clear, imminent and substantial danger to the public
health or environment; or (4) that are required by law.
On January 12, 1998, the Commonwealth of Virginia Office of the
Attorney General provided a legal opinion that states that the
Privilege law, Va. Code Sec. 10.1-1198, precludes granting a privilege
to documents and information ``required by law,'' including documents
and information ``required by Federal law to maintain program
delegation, authorization or approval,'' since Virginia must ``enforce
Federally authorized environmental programs in a manner that is no less
stringent than their Federal counterparts * * *.'' The opinion
concludes that ``[r]egarding Sec. 10.1-1198, therefore, documents or
other information needed for civil or criminal enforcement under one of
these programs could not be privileged because such documents and
information are essential to pursuing enforcement in a manner required
by Federal law to maintain program delegation, authorization or
approval.''
Virginia's Immunity law, Va. Code Sec. 10.1-1199, provides that
``[t]o the extent consistent with requirements imposed by Federal
law,'' any person making a voluntary disclosure of information to a
state agency regarding a violation of an environmental statute,
regulation, permit, or administrative order is granted immunity from
administrative or civil penalty. The Attorney General's January 12,
1998 opinion states that the quoted language renders this statute
inapplicable to enforcement of any Federally authorized programs, since
``no immunity could be afforded from administrative, civil, or criminal
penalties because granting such immunity would not be consistent with
Federal law, which is one of the criteria for immunity.'' Therefore,
EPA has determined that Virginia's Privilege and Immunity statutes will
not preclude the Commonwealth from enforcing its program consistent
with the Federal requirements. In any event, because EPA has also
determined that a state audit privilege and immunity law can affect
only state enforcement and cannot have any impact on Federal
enforcement authorities, EPA may at any time invoke its authority under
the CAA, including, for example, sections 113, 167, 205, 211 or 213, to
enforce the requirements or prohibitions of the state plan,
independently of any state enforcement effort. In addition, citizen
enforcement under section 304 of the CAA is likewise unaffected by
this, or any, state audit privilege or immunity law. Other specific
requirements and the rationale for EPA's proposed action are explained
in the NPR and will not be restated here. As noted below, EPA received
one comment on the NPR and it was not germane.
IV. Summary of Public Comments and EPA Responses
Comment: A small business owner expressed concern about having
additional costs imposed upon individuals who work on lead paint-
containing homes built before 1978. The commenter stated that the
business climate cannot support another regulation and expressed
concern about being able to remain in business with the adoption of
this rule.
Response: This comment is not relevant to this rulemaking action.
The commenter discusses lead as it relates to lead-containing paints
and the requirement for its removal in homes built prior to 1978. This
action imposes no requirements with respect to the removal of lead-
containing paint from homes built prior to 1978. This action is
concerned with the adoption of the 2008 lead NAAQS by the Commonwealth
of Virginia into the Commonwealth's SIP.
V. Final Action
EPA is approving Virginia's SIP revision for the lead NAAQS and
related reference conditions, as well as the updated list of appendices
to 40 CFR part 51 under documents incorporated by reference.
VI. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
A. General Requirements
Under the CAA, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP
submission that complies with the provisions of the CAA and applicable
Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in
reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices,
provided that they meet the criteria of the CAA. Accordingly, this
action merely approves state law as meeting Federal requirements and
does not impose additional requirements beyond those imposed by state
law. For that reason, this action:
Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' subject to
review by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Order
12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993);
Does not impose an information collection burden under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
Is certified as not having a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
Does not have Federalism implications as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
Is not an economically significant regulatory action based
on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997);
Is not a significant regulatory action subject to
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
[[Page 22816]]
Is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272
note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent
with the CAA; and
Does not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to
address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental
effects, using practicable and legally permissible methods, under
Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
In addition, this rule does not have tribal implications as
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000),
because the SIP is not approved to apply in Indian country located in
the state, and EPA notes that it will not impose substantial direct
costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal law.
B. Submission to Congress and the Comptroller General
The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating
the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule,
to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the
United States. EPA will submit a report containing this action and
other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior
to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot
take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal
Register. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C.
804(2).
C. Petitions for Judicial Review
Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA, petitions for judicial review
of this action must be filed in the United States Court of Appeals for
the appropriate circuit by June 24, 2011. Filing a petition for
reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule does not affect
the finality of this action for the purposes of judicial review nor
does it extend the time within which a petition for judicial review may
be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such rule or
action. This action pertaining to Virginia's adoption of the revised
lead standards of 0.15 [mu]g/m\3\ and related reference conditions may
not be challenged later in proceedings to enforce its requirements.
(See section 307(b)(2).)
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Lead, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.
Dated: April 6, 2011.
W.C. Early,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region III.
40 CFR Part 52 is amended as follows:
PART 52--[AMENDED]
0
1. The authority citation for 40 CFR part 52 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart VV--Virginia
0
2. In Sec. 52.2420, the table in paragraph (c) is amended by revising
the entries for Sections 5-30-15 and 5-30-80. The table in paragraph
(e) is amended by adding an entry for ``Documents Incorporated by
Reference'' after the ninth existing entry for ``Documents Incorporated
by Reference.'' The amendments read as follows:
Sec. 52.2420 Identification of plan.
* * * * *
(c) * * *
EPA-Approved Virginia Regulations and Statutes
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
State EPA approval Explanation [former SIP
State citation Title/subject effective date date citation]
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
9 VAC 5, Chapter 30 Ambient Air Quality Standards [Part III]
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
5-30-15..................... Reference conditions 6/24/09........ 4/25/11 [Insert Revised section.
page number
where the
document
begins].
* * * * * * *
5-30-80..................... Lead................ 6/24/09........ 4/25/11 [Insert Amended paragraphs A. and
page number B.; added paragraph C.
where the
document
begins].
* * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * *
(e) * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
State
Name of non-regulatory SIP Applicable submittal EPA approval date Additional explanation
revision geographic area date
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
Documents Incorporated by Statewide......... 9/27/10 4/25/11 [Insert Revised sections.
Reference (9 VAC 5-20-21, page number where
Sections E.1.a.(1)(q) and the document
E.1.a.(1)(r)). begins].
* * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 22817]]
* * * * *
[FR Doc. 2011-9697 Filed 4-22-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P