Privacy Act of 1974; Implementation, 22611-22613 [2011-9745]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 78 / Friday, April 22, 2011 / Rules and Regulations
years of marketing exclusivity beginning
on the date of approval.
The Agency has determined under 21
CFR 25.33 that this action is of a type
that does not individually or
cumulatively have a significant effect on
the human environment. Therefore,
neither an environmental assessment
nor an environmental impact statement
is required.
This rule does not meet the definition
of ‘‘rule’’ in 5 U.S.C. 804(3)(A) because
it is a rule of ‘‘particular applicability.’’
Therefore, it is not subject to the
congressional review requirements in
5 U.S.C. 801–808.
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
List of Subjects in 21 CFR Part 522
ACTION:
Animal drugs.
Therefore, under the Federal Food,
Drug, and Cosmetic Act and under
authority delegated to the Commissioner
of Food and Drugs and redelegated to
the Center for Veterinary Medicine, 21
CFR part 522 is amended as follows:
PART 522—IMPLANTATION OR
INJECTABLE DOSAGE FORM NEW
ANIMAL DRUGS
Internal Revenue Service
26 CFR Part 301
[TD 9518]
[FR Doc. 2011–9737 Filed 4–21–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830–01–P
RIN 1545–BJ52
Specified Tax Return Preparers
Required To File Individual Income Tax
Returns Using Magnetic Media;
Correction
Internal Revenue Service (IRS),
Treasury.
AGENCY:
Correction to final regulations.
This document describes a
correction to final regulations (TD 9518)
that were published in the Federal
Register on Wednesday, March 30, 2011
(76 FR 17521) providing guidance to
specified tax return preparers who
prepare and file individual income tax
returns using magnetic media pursuant
to section 6011(e)(3) of the Internal
Revenue Code.
SUMMARY:
This correction is effective on
April 22, 2011, and is applicable to
individual income tax returns filed after
December 31, 2010.
Authority: 21 U.S.C. 360b.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
2. In § 522.812, revise paragraph
(e)(2)(ii) to read as follows:
Keith L. Brau, (202) 622–4940 (not a
toll-free number).
§ 522.812
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
■
Enrofloxacin.
*
*
*
*
(e) * * *
(2) * * *
(ii) Indications for use—(A) Singledose therapy: For the treatment of
bovine respiratory disease (BRD)
associated with Mannheimia
haemolytica, Pasteurella multocida,
Histophilus somni, and Mycoplasma
bovis in beef and non-lactating dairy
cattle.
(B) Multiple-day therapy: For the
treatment of bovine respiratory disease
(BRD) associated with Mannheimia
haemolytica, Pasteurella multocida, and
Histophilus somni in beef and nonlactating dairy cattle.
*
*
*
*
*
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with RULES
*
Dated: April 15, 2011.
Steven D. Vaughn,
Director, Office of New Animal Drug
Evaluation, Center for Veterinary Medicine.
[FR Doc. 2011–9765 Filed 4–21–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160–01–P
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:51 Apr 21, 2011
Jkt 223001
amended by adding entries in numerical
order to read, in part, as follows:’’.
LaNita Van Dyke,
Chief, Publications and Regulations Branch,
Legal Processing Division, Associate Chief
Counsel (Procedure and Administration).
DATES:
1. The authority citation for 21 CFR
part 522 continues to read as follows:
■
22611
Background
The final regulations that are the
subject of this correction are under
section 6011 of the Internal Revenue
Code.
Need for Correction
As published, final regulations (TD
9518) contain an error that may prove to
be misleading and is in need of
clarification.
Correction of Publication
Accordingly, the publication of the
final regulations (TD 9518) which were
the subject of FR Doc. 2011–7571 is
corrected as follows:
On page 17528, column 2, under CFR
Part Heading ‘‘PART 301—PROCEDURE
AND ADMINISTRATION’’, the language
‘‘Par. 4. The authority citation for part
301 is amended by adding an entries in
numerical order to read, in part, as
follows:’’ is corrected to read ‘‘Par. 4.
The authority citation for part 301 is
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Office of the Secretary
32 CFR Part 311
[Docket ID: DoD–2011–OS–0004]
Privacy Act of 1974; Implementation
Office of the Secretary, DoD.
Direct final rule with request for
comments.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Office of the Secretary of
Defense is exempting those records
contained in DMDC 12 DoD, entitled
‘‘Joint Personnel Adjudication System
(JPAS)’’, when investigatory material is
compiled solely for the purpose of
determining suitability, eligibility, or
qualifications for Federal civilian
employment, military service, Federal
contracts, or access to classified
information, but only to the extent that
such material would reveal the identity
of a confidential source.
This direct final rule makes
nonsubstantive changes to the Office of
the Secretary Privacy Program rules.
These changes will allow the
Department to add an exemption rule to
the Office of the Secretary of Defense
Privacy Program rules that will exempt
applicable Department records and/or
material from certain portions of the
Privacy Act. This change will allow the
Department to move part of the
Department’s personnel security
program records from the Defense
Security Service Privacy Program to the
Office of the Secretary of Defense
Privacy Program. This direct final rule
is consistent with the rule previously
published at 32 CFR 321.13(h) and
another rule is being published to
remove and reserve 321.13(h). This will
improve the efficiency and effectiveness
of DoD’s program by preserving the
exempt status of the applicable records
and/or material when the purposes
underlying the exemption(s) are valid
and necessary.
This rule is being published as a
direct final rule as the Department of
Defense does not expect to receive any
adverse comments, and so a proposed
rule is unnecessary.
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\22APR1.SGM
22APR1
22612
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 78 / Friday, April 22, 2011 / Rules and Regulations
The rule will be effective on July
1, 2011 unless comments are received
that would result in a contrary
determination. Comments will be
accepted on or before June 21, 2011.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments,
identified by docket number and title,
by any of the following methods:
• Federal Rulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• Mail: Federal Docket Management
System Office, 1160 Defense Pentagon,
Washington, DC 20301–1160.
Instructions: All submissions received
must include the agency name and
docket number for this Federal Register
document. The general policy for
comments and other submissions from
members of the public is to make these
submissions available for public
viewing on the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov as they are
received without change, including any
personal identifiers or contact
information.
DATES:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Ms.
Cindy Allard at (703) 588–6830.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with RULES
Direct Final Rule and Significant
Adverse Comments
DoD has determined this rulemaking
meets the criteria for a direct final rule
because it involves nonsubstantive
changes dealing with DoD’s
management of its Privacy Progams.
DoD expects no opposition to the
changes and no significant adverse
comments. However, if DoD receives a
significant adverse comment, the
Department will withdraw this direct
final rule by publishing a notice in the
Federal Register. A significant adverse
comment is one that explains: (1) Why
the direct final rule is inappropriate,
including challenges to the rule’s
underlying premise or approach; or
(2) why the direct final rule will be
ineffective or unacceptable without a
change. In determining whether a
comment necessitates withdrawal of
this direct final rule, DoD will consider
whether it warrants a substantive
response in a notice and comment
process.
Executive Order 12866, ‘‘Regulatory
Planning and Review’’ and Executive
Order 13563, ‘‘Improving Regulation
and Regulatory Review’’
It has been determined that Privacy
Act rules for the Department of Defense
are not significant rules. The rules do
not (1) Have an annual effect on the
economy of $100 million or more or
adversely affect in a material way the
economy; a sector of the economy;
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:51 Apr 21, 2011
Jkt 223001
productivity; competition; jobs; the
environment; public health or safety; or
State, local, or Tribal governments or
communities; (2) Create a serious
inconsistency or otherwise interfere
with an action taken or planned by
another Agency; (3) Materially alter the
budgetary impact of entitlements,
grants, user fees, or loan programs, or
the rights and obligations of recipients
thereof; or (4) Raise novel legal or policy
issues arising out of legal mandates, the
President’s priorities, or the principles
set forth in these Executive orders.
Public Law 96–354, ‘‘Regulatory
Flexibility Act’’ (5 U.S.C. Chapter 6)
It has been determined that this
Privacy Act rule for the Department of
Defense does not have significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities because it is
concerned only with the administration
of Privacy Act systems of records within
the Department of Defense.
Public Law 95–511, ‘‘Paperwork
Reduction Act’’ (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35)
It has been determined that Privacy
Act rules for the Department of Defense
impose no additional information
collection requirements on the public
under the Paperwork Reduction Act of
1995.
Section 202, Public Law 104–4,
‘‘Unfunded Mandates Reform Act’’
It has been determined that this
Privacy Act rulemaking for the
Department of Defense does not involve
a Federal mandate that may result in the
expenditure by State, local and Tribal
governments, in the aggregate, or by the
private sector, of $100 million or more
and that such rulemaking will not
significantly or uniquely affect small
governments.
Executive Order 13132, ‘‘Federalism’’
It has been determined that the
Privacy Act rules for the Department of
Defense do not have federalism
implications. The rule does not have
substantial direct effects on the States,
on the relationship between the
National Government and the States, or
on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
List of Subjects in 32 CFR Part 311
Privacy.
Accordingly, 32 CFR part 311 is
amended as follows:
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
PART 311—OFFICE OF THE
SECRETARY OF DEFENSE AND JOINT
STAFF PRIVACY PROGRAM
1. The authority citation for 32 CFR
part 311 continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: Pub. L. 93–579, 88 Stat. 1986
(5 U.S.C. 522a).
2. Section 311.8 is amended by adding
paragraph (c)(18) as follows:
■
§ 311.8
Procedures for exemptions.
*
*
*
*
*
(c) * * *
(18) System identifier and name:
DMDC 12 DoD, Joint Personnel
Adjudication System (JPAS).
(i) Exemption: Investigatory material
compiled solely for the purpose of
determining suitability, eligibility, or
qualifications for Federal civilian
employment, military service, Federal
contracts, or access to classified
information may be exempt pursuant to
5 U.S.C. 552a(k)(5), but only to the
extent that such material would reveal
the identity of a confidential source.
(ii) Authority: 5 U.S.C. 552a(k)(5).
(iii) Reasons: (A) from subsections
(c)(3) and (d) when access to accounting
disclosure and access to or amendment
of records would cause the identity of
a confidential source to be revealed.
Disclosure of the source’s identity not
only will result in the Department
breaching the promise of confidentiality
made to the source but it will impair the
Department’s future ability to compile
investigatory material for the purpose of
determining suitability, eligibility, or
qualifications for Federal civilian
employment, Federal contracts, or
access to classified information. Unless
sources can be assured that a promise of
confidentiality will be honored, they
will be less likely to provide
information considered essential to the
Department in making the required
determinations.
(B) From subsection (e)(1) because in
the collection of information for
investigatory purposes, it is not always
possible to determine the relevance and
necessity of particular information in
the early stages of the investigation. It is
only after the information is evaluated
in light of other information that its
relevance and necessity becomes clear.
Such information permits more
informed decision-making by the
Department when making required
suitability, eligibility, and qualification
determinations.
*
*
*
*
*
E:\FR\FM\22APR1.SGM
22APR1
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 78 / Friday, April 22, 2011 / Rules and Regulations
Dated: April 8, 2011.
Patricia L. Toppings,
OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer,
Department of Defense.
comments and other submissions from
members of the public is to make these
submissions available for public
viewing on the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov as they are
received without change, including any
personal identifiers or contact
information.
[FR Doc. 2011–9745 Filed 4–21–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001–06–P
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Office of the Secretary
32 CFR Part 311
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
[Docket ID: DoD–2011–OS–0010]
Direct Final Rule and Significant
Adverse Comments
Privacy Act; Implementation
Office of the Secretary, DoD.
ACTION: Direct final rule with request for
comments.
AGENCY:
The Office of the Secretary of
Defense is proposing to exempt one (1)
new system of records, DA&M 01,
entitled, ‘‘Civil Liberties Program Case
Management System’’ from subsections
(c)(3); (d)(1), (2), (3), (4); (e)(1) and
(e)(4)(G), (H), (I); and (f) of the Privacy
Act, pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552a(k).
This direct final rule makes
nonsubstantive changes to the Office of
the Secretary Privacy Program rules.
These changes will allow the
Department to add an exemption rule to
the Office of the Secretary of Defense
Privacy Program rules that will exempt
applicable Department records and/or
material from certain portions of the
Privacy Act. This will improve the
efficiency and effectiveness of DoD’s
program by preserving the exempt status
of the applicable records and/or
material when the purposes underlying
the exemption(s) are valid and
necessary.
This rule is being published as a
direct final rule as the Department of
Defense does not expect to receive any
adverse comments, and so a proposed
rule is unnecessary.
DATES: The rule will be effective on July
1, 2011 unless comments are received
that would result in a contrary
determination. Comments will be
accepted on or before June 21, 2011.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments,
identified by docket number and title,
by any of the following methods:
• Federal Rulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• Mail: Federal Docket Management
System Office, Room 3C843, 1160
Defense Pentagon, Washington, DC
20301–1160.
Instructions: All submissions received
must include the agency name and
docket number for this Federal Register
document. The general policy for
SUMMARY:
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with RULES
Ms.
Cindy Allard at (703) 588–6830.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:51 Apr 21, 2011
Jkt 223001
DoD has determined this rulemaking
meets the criteria for a direct final rule
because it involves nonsubstantive
changes dealing with DoD’s
management of its Privacy Progams.
DoD expects no opposition to the
changes and no significant adverse
comments. However, if DoD receives a
significant adverse comment, the
Department will withdraw this direct
final rule by publishing a notice in the
Federal Register. A significant adverse
comment is one that explains: (1) Why
the direct final rule is inappropriate,
including challenges to the rule’s
underlying premise or approach; or (2)
why the direct final rule will be
ineffective or unacceptable without a
change. In determining whether a
comment necessitates withdrawal of
this direct final rule, DoD will consider
whether it warrants a substantive
response in a notice and comment
process.
Executive Order 12866, ‘‘Regulatory
Planning and Review’’ and Executive
Order 13563, ‘‘Improving Regulation
and Regulatory Review’’
It has been determined that Privacy
Act rules for the Department of Defense
are not significant rules. The rules do
not (1) Have an annual effect on the
economy of $100 million or more or
adversely affect in a material way the
economy; a sector of the economy;
productivity; competition; jobs; the
environment; public health or safety; or
State, local, or Tribal governments or
communities; (2) Create a serious
inconsistency or otherwise interfere
with an action taken or planned by
another Agency; (3) Materially alter the
budgetary impact of entitlements,
grants, user fees, or loan programs, or
the rights and obligations of recipients
thereof; or (4) Raise novel legal or policy
issues arising out of legal mandates, the
President’s priorities, or the principles
set forth in these Executive orders.
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
22613
Public Law 96–354, ‘‘Regulatory
Flexibility Act’’ (5 U.S.C. Chapter 6)
It has been determined that this
Privacy Act rule for the Department of
Defense does not have significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities because it is
concerned only with the administration
of Privacy Act systems of records within
the Department of Defense.
Public Law 96–511, ‘‘Paperwork
Reduction Act’’ (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35)
It has been determined that Privacy
Act rules for the Department of Defense
impose no additional information
collection requirements on the public
under the Paperwork Reduction Act of
1995.
Section 202, Public Law 104–4,
‘‘Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of
1995’’
It has been determined that this
Privacy Act rulemaking for the
Department of Defense does not involve
a Federal mandate that may result in the
expenditure by State, local and Tribal
governments, in the aggregate, or by the
private sector, of $100 million or more
and that such rulemaking will not
significantly or uniquely affect small
governments.
Executive Order 13132, ‘‘Federalism’’
It has been determined that the
Privacy Act rules for the Department of
Defense do not have federalism
implications. The rule does not have
substantial direct effects on the States,
on the relationship between the
National Government and the States, or
on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
List of Subjects in 32 CFR Part 311
Privacy.
Accordingly, 32 CFR part 311 is
amended as follows:
PART 311—[AMENDED]
1. The authority citation for 32 CFR
part 311 continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: Pub. L. 93–579, 88 Stat. 1986
(5 U.S.C. 522a).
2. Section 311.8 is amended by adding
paragraph (c)(19) as follows:
■
§ 311.8
Procedures for exemptions.
*
*
*
*
*
(c) * * *
(19) System identifier and name:
DA&M 01, Civil Liberties Program Case
Management System.
(i) Exemptions: Records contained in
this System of Records may be
E:\FR\FM\22APR1.SGM
22APR1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 78 (Friday, April 22, 2011)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 22611-22613]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-9745]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Office of the Secretary
32 CFR Part 311
[Docket ID: DoD-2011-OS-0004]
Privacy Act of 1974; Implementation
AGENCY: Office of the Secretary, DoD.
ACTION: Direct final rule with request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Office of the Secretary of Defense is exempting those
records contained in DMDC 12 DoD, entitled ``Joint Personnel
Adjudication System (JPAS)'', when investigatory material is compiled
solely for the purpose of determining suitability, eligibility, or
qualifications for Federal civilian employment, military service,
Federal contracts, or access to classified information, but only to the
extent that such material would reveal the identity of a confidential
source.
This direct final rule makes nonsubstantive changes to the Office
of the Secretary Privacy Program rules. These changes will allow the
Department to add an exemption rule to the Office of the Secretary of
Defense Privacy Program rules that will exempt applicable Department
records and/or material from certain portions of the Privacy Act. This
change will allow the Department to move part of the Department's
personnel security program records from the Defense Security Service
Privacy Program to the Office of the Secretary of Defense Privacy
Program. This direct final rule is consistent with the rule previously
published at 32 CFR 321.13(h) and another rule is being published to
remove and reserve 321.13(h). This will improve the efficiency and
effectiveness of DoD's program by preserving the exempt status of the
applicable records and/or material when the purposes underlying the
exemption(s) are valid and necessary.
This rule is being published as a direct final rule as the
Department of Defense does not expect to receive any adverse comments,
and so a proposed rule is unnecessary.
[[Page 22612]]
DATES: The rule will be effective on July 1, 2011 unless comments are
received that would result in a contrary determination. Comments will
be accepted on or before June 21, 2011.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, identified by docket number and
title, by any of the following methods:
Federal Rulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
Mail: Federal Docket Management System Office, 1160
Defense Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301-1160.
Instructions: All submissions received must include the agency name
and docket number for this Federal Register document. The general
policy for comments and other submissions from members of the public is
to make these submissions available for public viewing on the Internet
at https://www.regulations.gov as they are received without change,
including any personal identifiers or contact information.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Cindy Allard at (703) 588-6830.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Direct Final Rule and Significant Adverse Comments
DoD has determined this rulemaking meets the criteria for a direct
final rule because it involves nonsubstantive changes dealing with
DoD's management of its Privacy Progams. DoD expects no opposition to
the changes and no significant adverse comments. However, if DoD
receives a significant adverse comment, the Department will withdraw
this direct final rule by publishing a notice in the Federal Register.
A significant adverse comment is one that explains: (1) Why the direct
final rule is inappropriate, including challenges to the rule's
underlying premise or approach; or (2) why the direct final rule will
be ineffective or unacceptable without a change. In determining whether
a comment necessitates withdrawal of this direct final rule, DoD will
consider whether it warrants a substantive response in a notice and
comment process.
Executive Order 12866, ``Regulatory Planning and Review'' and Executive
Order 13563, ``Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review''
It has been determined that Privacy Act rules for the Department of
Defense are not significant rules. The rules do not (1) Have an annual
effect on the economy of $100 million or more or adversely affect in a
material way the economy; a sector of the economy; productivity;
competition; jobs; the environment; public health or safety; or State,
local, or Tribal governments or communities; (2) Create a serious
inconsistency or otherwise interfere with an action taken or planned by
another Agency; (3) Materially alter the budgetary impact of
entitlements, grants, user fees, or loan programs, or the rights and
obligations of recipients thereof; or (4) Raise novel legal or policy
issues arising out of legal mandates, the President's priorities, or
the principles set forth in these Executive orders.
Public Law 96-354, ``Regulatory Flexibility Act'' (5 U.S.C. Chapter 6)
It has been determined that this Privacy Act rule for the
Department of Defense does not have significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities because it is concerned only with
the administration of Privacy Act systems of records within the
Department of Defense.
Public Law 95-511, ``Paperwork Reduction Act'' (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35)
It has been determined that Privacy Act rules for the Department of
Defense impose no additional information collection requirements on the
public under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
Section 202, Public Law 104-4, ``Unfunded Mandates Reform Act''
It has been determined that this Privacy Act rulemaking for the
Department of Defense does not involve a Federal mandate that may
result in the expenditure by State, local and Tribal governments, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector, of $100 million or more and
that such rulemaking will not significantly or uniquely affect small
governments.
Executive Order 13132, ``Federalism''
It has been determined that the Privacy Act rules for the
Department of Defense do not have federalism implications. The rule
does not have substantial direct effects on the States, on the
relationship between the National Government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of
government.
List of Subjects in 32 CFR Part 311
Privacy.
Accordingly, 32 CFR part 311 is amended as follows:
PART 311--OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE AND JOINT STAFF
PRIVACY PROGRAM
0
1. The authority citation for 32 CFR part 311 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: Pub. L. 93-579, 88 Stat. 1986 (5 U.S.C. 522a).
0
2. Section 311.8 is amended by adding paragraph (c)(18) as follows:
Sec. 311.8 Procedures for exemptions.
* * * * *
(c) * * *
(18) System identifier and name: DMDC 12 DoD, Joint Personnel
Adjudication System (JPAS).
(i) Exemption: Investigatory material compiled solely for the
purpose of determining suitability, eligibility, or qualifications for
Federal civilian employment, military service, Federal contracts, or
access to classified information may be exempt pursuant to 5 U.S.C.
552a(k)(5), but only to the extent that such material would reveal the
identity of a confidential source.
(ii) Authority: 5 U.S.C. 552a(k)(5).
(iii) Reasons: (A) from subsections (c)(3) and (d) when access to
accounting disclosure and access to or amendment of records would cause
the identity of a confidential source to be revealed. Disclosure of the
source's identity not only will result in the Department breaching the
promise of confidentiality made to the source but it will impair the
Department's future ability to compile investigatory material for the
purpose of determining suitability, eligibility, or qualifications for
Federal civilian employment, Federal contracts, or access to classified
information. Unless sources can be assured that a promise of
confidentiality will be honored, they will be less likely to provide
information considered essential to the Department in making the
required determinations.
(B) From subsection (e)(1) because in the collection of information
for investigatory purposes, it is not always possible to determine the
relevance and necessity of particular information in the early stages
of the investigation. It is only after the information is evaluated in
light of other information that its relevance and necessity becomes
clear. Such information permits more informed decision-making by the
Department when making required suitability, eligibility, and
qualification determinations.
* * * * *
[[Page 22613]]
Dated: April 8, 2011.
Patricia L. Toppings,
OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 2011-9745 Filed 4-21-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-06-P
