Lakeview-Reeder Fuels Reduction, Idaho Panhandle National Forests, Idaho, Bonner County, 22361-22362 [2011-9655]

Download as PDF Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 77 / Thursday, April 21, 2011 / Notices Notice of intent to prepare an environmental impact statement. ACTION: The Superior National Forest will prepare an environmental impact statement for the Boundary Waters Canoe Area Wilderness (BWCAW) Nonnative Invasive Plant (NNIP) Management Project. In order to maintain and improve aquatic and terrestrial wildlife habitat, to maintain healthy, resilient native plant communities, and to maintain the character and ecological integrity of the BWCAW, the Superior National Forest proposes to use an integrated pest management approach to treat NNIP, beginning with treatments on a total of approximately 13 acres of invasive plants at sites scattered across the wilderness and possibly expanding up to 20 acres over the next 10 years. The proposed activities would eradicate or control existing NNIP populations and respond rapidly to new infestations in order to prevent the further spread of NNIP. SUMMARY: Comments concerning the scope of the analysis must be received by May 23, 2011. The draft environmental impact statement is expected September 2011 and the final environmental impact statement is expected January 2012. DATES: Send written comments to Jim Sanders, Forest Supervisor, Attn: BWCAW NNIP Management Project, 318 Forestry Rd., Aurora, MN 55705. Comments may also be sent via e-mail to comments-eastern-superiorlaurentian@fs.fed.us, or via facsimile to (218) –229–8821. ADDRESSES: Jack Greenlee, Project Leader, at (218) 229– 8817, or jackgreenlee@fs.fed.us. Individuals who use telecommunication devices for the deaf (TDD) may call the Federal Information Relay Service (FIRS) at 1–800–877–8339 between 8 a.m. and 8 p.m., Eastern Time, Monday through Friday. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES Purpose and Need for Action The purpose of this project is to maintain and improve aquatic and terrestrial wildlife habitat, to maintain healthy, resilient native plant communities, and to maintain the character and ecological integrity of the BWCAW. To accomplish these objectives, there is a need to implement an integrated pest management approach that eradicates or controls existing NNIP infestations and provides for a rapid response to new infestations. VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:37 Apr 20, 2011 Jkt 223001 Proposed Action The proposed action would implement NNIP management activities, including manual and herbicide control methods, over a ten-year period in the BWCAW. A total of approximately 13 acres of NNIP infestations at approximately 1,000 known sites scattered across the BWCAW would be controlled or eradicated using either manual methods or herbicides. To allow for a rapid response to new infestations, up to 7 additional acres could be treated. To protect water resources, visitor safety, and the environment, spot application methods using low use-rate, low toxicity, short persistence herbicides would be employed. Most NNIP infestations occur on campsites, portages or trails, along shorelines, at old resort/cabin sites, or in burned areas. Manual treatments would be accomplished by pulling, digging, or cutting the plants. Treatments would generally occur during the growing season, from late May to mid-October. Responsible Official Superior National Forest Supervisor. Nature of Decision To Be Made The decision to be made is whether or not to implement an integrated pest management strategy to control nonnative invasive plants in the BWCAW. The decision will include: • What actions will be approved to address the purpose and need. • Where will those actions take place. • Are any mitigation measures needed to further limit effects of approved actions. Scoping Process This notice of intent initiates the scoping process, which guides the development of the environmental impact statement. Written comments will be solicited through a notice that will be sent to interested individuals and organizations. Further details about the project, including maps and appendices, are available on the Superior National Forest Web site. Visit the Web site at https://www.fs.usda.gov/ superior and see ‘‘Projects’’ under ‘‘Land and Resources Management’’. Look for ‘‘BWCAW Non-native Invasive Plant Management Project’’. It is important that reviewers provide their comments at such times and in such manner that they are useful to the agency’s preparation of the environmental impact statement. Therefore, comments should be provided prior to the close of the comment period and should clearly articulate the reviewer’s concerns and contentions. PO 00000 Frm 00003 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 22361 Comments received in response to this solicitation, including names and addresses of those who comment, will be part of the public record for this proposed action. Comments submitted anonymously will be accepted and considered, however anonymous comments will not provide the respondent with standing to participate in subsequent administrative review or judicial review. Dated: April 15, 2011. James W. Sanders, Forest Supervisor. [FR Doc. 2011–9675 Filed 4–20–11; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3410–11–P DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE Forest Service Lakeview-Reeder Fuels Reduction, Idaho Panhandle National Forests, Idaho, Bonner County Forest Service, USDA. Notice of intent to prepare a supplemental environmental impact statement. AGENCY: ACTION: The Priest Lake Ranger District of the Idaho Panhandle National Forests will prepare a Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) for the Lakeview-Reeder Fuel Reduction Project. The Notice of Availability of the draft EIS for the Lakeview-Reeder Fuels Reduction Project was published in the Federal Register (74 FR 5652) on January 30, 2009 and the notice of the final EIS (74 FR 28045) was published on June 12, 2009. Following the release of the final EIS, two pre-decisional objections were lodged against the project under 36 CFR part 218. Under administrative review, the project was found to be in compliance with existing laws, regulations and policy. Two separate records of decision were issued. The Roads Record of Decision (ROD) was signed on December 3, 2009. This authorized selected roadwork activities analyzed in Alternative 2 that needed to be accomplished before fuels reduction activities could be implemented. The Hazardous Fuels Reduction ROD was signed on May 10, 2010 and authorized the activities analyzed in Alternative 2 that were deferred in the Roads ROD. A complaint for injunctive and declaratory relief against the Fuels Reduction ROD was filed in the United States District Court for the District of Idaho on October 6, 2010. On December 3, 2010, the Fuels Reduction ROD was withdrawn to address issues raised by the decision in Native Ecosystems Council v. Tidwell, SUMMARY: E:\FR\FM\21APN1.SGM 21APN1 22362 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 77 / Thursday, April 21, 2011 / Notices 599 F.3d 926 (9th Cir. 2010). A supplemental EIS will be prepared to address management indicator species, recently designated critical habitat for bull trout, and newly designated Sensitive species. Treatment acres, harvest prescriptions and mitigation for grizzly bears are slightly changed from that presented in the proposed action of the final EIS due to ongoing collaborative efforts. DATES: Scoping is not required for supplements to environmental impact statements (40 CFR 1502.9(c)(4)). There was extensive public involvement in the development of the proposed action, the 2009 draft EIS, and the 2010 final EIS. The Forest Service is not inviting comments at this time. The draft supplemental EIS is expected to be available in July 2011 and the final supplemental EIS is expected September 2011. The comment period for the draft SEIS will be 45 days from the date the EPA publishes the notice of availability in the Federal Register. ADDRESSES: Priest Lake Ranger District, 32203 Hwy 57, Priest Lake, Idaho 83856. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Albert Helgenberg, IDT Leader, USDA Forest Service, Sandpoint Ranger District, 208–263–5111. Individuals who use telecommunication devices for the deaf (TDD) may call the Federal Information Relay Service (FIRS) at 1–800–877–8339 between 8 a.m. and 8 p.m., Eastern Time, Monday through Friday. The Forest Supervisor selected Alternative 2 with modifications as documented in the May 2010 Lakeview-Reeder Fuels Reduction Project Record of Decision (ROD). The ROD authorized approximately 3,559 acres of vegetation treatment. To improve access to fuel reduction treatment areas, the ROD authorized approximately 1.9 miles of road reconstruction, 19.5 miles of road maintenance, 2.4 miles of system road construction and 0.7 miles of temporary road construction. The supplemental EIS will contain additional information about management indicator species, recently designated critical habitat for bull trout, and newly designated Sensitive species. Any modifications that come out of the ongoing collaborative effort will also be incorporated into the supplemental EIS. The mailing list for this project will include those individuals, agencies and organizations on the mailing list for the 2009 Draft EIS. The comment period for the draft SEIS will be 45 days from the date the EPA publishes the notice of emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:37 Apr 20, 2011 Jkt 223001 availability in the Federal Register. The Idaho Panhandle National Forests Supervisor will make a decision on this project after considering comments, environmental consequences, and applicable laws, regulations, and policies. Purpose and Need for Action The project is needed to reduce hazardous forest fuels to decrease the risk of a wildfire negatively impacting the communities in the project area, public and firefighter safety, public infrastructure, private and National Forest System lands and resource values, and to restore, enhance and protect forest ecosystem components to improve forest health, increase biological diversity and to reduce threats from stand replacing wildfires and insect and disease infestations. Proposed Action The proposed action as described in the FEIS includes approximately 2,319 acres of fuel reduction treatment that involve commercial timber harvest and approximately 1,179 acres of ecosystem burn prescriptions that do not involve harvest. Road work includes approximately 19.5 miles of road maintenance, 1.9 miles of road reconstruction, 2.4 miles of new road construction, and 0.7 miles of temporary road construction. Responsible Official The Forest Supervisor of the Idaho Panhandle National Forests is the Responsible Official. Nature of Decision To Be Made The decison for the Lakeview-Reeder Fuels Reduction Project will identify the land management activities to be implemented in the project area including acres, types, and locations of vegetative treatments including timber harvest and fuel treatments, as well as miles and locations of road maintenance, construction, reconstruction and storage activities. The supplemental EIS is intended to provide additional evaluation of management indicator species, recently designated critical habitat for bull trout, and newly designated Sensitive species and provide that information to the public. Scoping Process Scoping is not required for supplements to environmental impact statements (40 CFR 1502.9(c)(4)). There was extensive public involvement in the development of the proposed action, the 2009 Draft EIS, and the 2010 Final EIS. PO 00000 Frm 00004 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 The Forest Service is not inviting comments at this time. Comment Requested The comment period on the draft environmental impact statement will be 45 days from the date the Environmental Protection Agency publishes the notice of availability in the Federal Register. The Forest Service believes, at this early state, it is important to give reviewers notice of several court rulings related to public participation in the environmental review process. First, reviewers of draft environmental impact statements must structure their participation in the environmental review of the proposal so that it is meaningful and alerts an agency to the reviewer’s positions and contentions. Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corp. v. NRDC, 435 U.S. 519, 553 (1978). Also, environmental objections that could be raised at the draft environmental impact statement stage but that are not raised until after completion the final environmental impact statement may be waived or dismissed by the courts. City of Angoon v. Hodel, 803 F.2d 1016, 1022 (9th Cir. 1986) and Wisconsin Heritages, Inc. v. Harris, 490 F. Supp. 1334, 1338 (E.D. Wis. 1980). Because of these court rulings, it is very important that those interested in this proposed action participate by the close of the 45day comment period so that substantive comments and objections are made available to the Forest Service at a time when it can meaningfully consider them and respond to them in the final environmental impact statement. To assist the Forest Service in identifying and considering issues and concerns on the proposed action, comments on the draft environmental impact statement should be as specific as possible. It is also helpful if comments refer to specific pages or chapters of the draft statement. Comments may also address the adequacy of the draft environmental impact statement or the merits of the alternatives formulated and discussed in the statement. Reviewers may wish to refer to the Council on Environmental Quality Regulations for implementing the procedural provisions of the National Environmental Policy Act at 40 CFR 1503.3 in addressing these points. Dated: April 15, 2011. Ranotta K. McNair, Forest Supervisor. [FR Doc. 2011–9655 Filed 4–20–11; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3410–11–P E:\FR\FM\21APN1.SGM 21APN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 77 (Thursday, April 21, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 22361-22362]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-9655]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Forest Service


Lakeview-Reeder Fuels Reduction, Idaho Panhandle National 
Forests, Idaho, Bonner County

AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA.

ACTION: Notice of intent to prepare a supplemental environmental impact 
statement.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Priest Lake Ranger District of the Idaho Panhandle 
National Forests will prepare a Supplemental Environmental Impact 
Statement (EIS) for the Lakeview-Reeder Fuel Reduction Project. The 
Notice of Availability of the draft EIS for the Lakeview-Reeder Fuels 
Reduction Project was published in the Federal Register (74 FR 5652) on 
January 30, 2009 and the notice of the final EIS (74 FR 28045) was 
published on June 12, 2009. Following the release of the final EIS, two 
pre-decisional objections were lodged against the project under 36 CFR 
part 218. Under administrative review, the project was found to be in 
compliance with existing laws, regulations and policy. Two separate 
records of decision were issued. The Roads Record of Decision (ROD) was 
signed on December 3, 2009. This authorized selected roadwork 
activities analyzed in Alternative 2 that needed to be accomplished 
before fuels reduction activities could be implemented. The Hazardous 
Fuels Reduction ROD was signed on May 10, 2010 and authorized the 
activities analyzed in Alternative 2 that were deferred in the Roads 
ROD. A complaint for injunctive and declaratory relief against the 
Fuels Reduction ROD was filed in the United States District Court for 
the District of Idaho on October 6, 2010. On December 3, 2010, the 
Fuels Reduction ROD was withdrawn to address issues raised by the 
decision in Native Ecosystems Council v. Tidwell,

[[Page 22362]]

599 F.3d 926 (9th Cir. 2010). A supplemental EIS will be prepared to 
address management indicator species, recently designated critical 
habitat for bull trout, and newly designated Sensitive species. 
Treatment acres, harvest prescriptions and mitigation for grizzly bears 
are slightly changed from that presented in the proposed action of the 
final EIS due to ongoing collaborative efforts.

DATES: Scoping is not required for supplements to environmental impact 
statements (40 CFR 1502.9(c)(4)). There was extensive public 
involvement in the development of the proposed action, the 2009 draft 
EIS, and the 2010 final EIS. The Forest Service is not inviting 
comments at this time. The draft supplemental EIS is expected to be 
available in July 2011 and the final supplemental EIS is expected 
September 2011. The comment period for the draft SEIS will be 45 days 
from the date the EPA publishes the notice of availability in the 
Federal Register.

ADDRESSES: Priest Lake Ranger District, 32203 Hwy 57, Priest Lake, 
Idaho 83856.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Albert Helgenberg, IDT Leader, USDA 
Forest Service, Sandpoint Ranger District, 208-263-5111. Individuals 
who use telecommunication devices for the deaf (TDD) may call the 
Federal Information Relay Service (FIRS) at 1-800-877-8339 between 8 
a.m. and 8 p.m., Eastern Time, Monday through Friday.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Forest Supervisor selected Alternative 2 
with modifications as documented in the May 2010 Lakeview-Reeder Fuels 
Reduction Project Record of Decision (ROD). The ROD authorized 
approximately 3,559 acres of vegetation treatment. To improve access to 
fuel reduction treatment areas, the ROD authorized approximately 1.9 
miles of road reconstruction, 19.5 miles of road maintenance, 2.4 miles 
of system road construction and 0.7 miles of temporary road 
construction. The supplemental EIS will contain additional information 
about management indicator species, recently designated critical 
habitat for bull trout, and newly designated Sensitive species. Any 
modifications that come out of the ongoing collaborative effort will 
also be incorporated into the supplemental EIS.
    The mailing list for this project will include those individuals, 
agencies and organizations on the mailing list for the 2009 Draft EIS. 
The comment period for the draft SEIS will be 45 days from the date the 
EPA publishes the notice of availability in the Federal Register. The 
Idaho Panhandle National Forests Supervisor will make a decision on 
this project after considering comments, environmental consequences, 
and applicable laws, regulations, and policies.

Purpose and Need for Action

    The project is needed to reduce hazardous forest fuels to decrease 
the risk of a wildfire negatively impacting the communities in the 
project area, public and firefighter safety, public infrastructure, 
private and National Forest System lands and resource values, and to 
restore, enhance and protect forest ecosystem components to improve 
forest health, increase biological diversity and to reduce threats from 
stand replacing wildfires and insect and disease infestations.

Proposed Action

    The proposed action as described in the FEIS includes approximately 
2,319 acres of fuel reduction treatment that involve commercial timber 
harvest and approximately 1,179 acres of ecosystem burn prescriptions 
that do not involve harvest. Road work includes approximately 19.5 
miles of road maintenance, 1.9 miles of road reconstruction, 2.4 miles 
of new road construction, and 0.7 miles of temporary road construction.

Responsible Official

    The Forest Supervisor of the Idaho Panhandle National Forests is 
the Responsible Official.

Nature of Decision To Be Made

    The decison for the Lakeview-Reeder Fuels Reduction Project will 
identify the land management activities to be implemented in the 
project area including acres, types, and locations of vegetative 
treatments including timber harvest and fuel treatments, as well as 
miles and locations of road maintenance, construction, reconstruction 
and storage activities. The supplemental EIS is intended to provide 
additional evaluation of management indicator species, recently 
designated critical habitat for bull trout, and newly designated 
Sensitive species and provide that information to the public.

Scoping Process

    Scoping is not required for supplements to environmental impact 
statements (40 CFR 1502.9(c)(4)). There was extensive public 
involvement in the development of the proposed action, the 2009 Draft 
EIS, and the 2010 Final EIS. The Forest Service is not inviting 
comments at this time.

Comment Requested

    The comment period on the draft environmental impact statement will 
be 45 days from the date the Environmental Protection Agency publishes 
the notice of availability in the Federal Register.
    The Forest Service believes, at this early state, it is important 
to give reviewers notice of several court rulings related to public 
participation in the environmental review process. First, reviewers of 
draft environmental impact statements must structure their 
participation in the environmental review of the proposal so that it is 
meaningful and alerts an agency to the reviewer's positions and 
contentions. Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corp. v. NRDC, 435 U.S. 519, 
553 (1978). Also, environmental objections that could be raised at the 
draft environmental impact statement stage but that are not raised 
until after completion the final environmental impact statement may be 
waived or dismissed by the courts. City of Angoon v. Hodel, 803 F.2d 
1016, 1022 (9th Cir. 1986) and Wisconsin Heritages, Inc. v. Harris, 490 
F. Supp. 1334, 1338 (E.D. Wis. 1980). Because of these court rulings, 
it is very important that those interested in this proposed action 
participate by the close of the 45-day comment period so that 
substantive comments and objections are made available to the Forest 
Service at a time when it can meaningfully consider them and respond to 
them in the final environmental impact statement.
    To assist the Forest Service in identifying and considering issues 
and concerns on the proposed action, comments on the draft 
environmental impact statement should be as specific as possible. It is 
also helpful if comments refer to specific pages or chapters of the 
draft statement. Comments may also address the adequacy of the draft 
environmental impact statement or the merits of the alternatives 
formulated and discussed in the statement. Reviewers may wish to refer 
to the Council on Environmental Quality Regulations for implementing 
the procedural provisions of the National Environmental Policy Act at 
40 CFR 1503.3 in addressing these points.

    Dated: April 15, 2011.
Ranotta K. McNair,
Forest Supervisor.
[FR Doc. 2011-9655 Filed 4-20-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-11-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.