Agency Information Collection Activities; Proposed Collection; Comment Request; Adverse Experience Reporting for Licensed Biological Products; and General Records, 22401-22404 [2011-9651]
Download as PDF
22401
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 77 / Thursday, April 21, 2011 / Notices
(NCEH), Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention (CDC).
Background and Brief Description
The CDC is requesting OMB approval
for the EHS–Net National Voluntary
Environmental Assessment Information
System (NVEAIS) to collect data from
foodborne illness outbreak
environmental assessments routinely
conducted by local, state, territorial, or
tribal food safety programs during
outbreak investigations. Environmental
assessment data are not currently
collected at the national level. The data
reported through this information
system will provide timely data on the
causes of outbreaks, including
environmental factors associated with
outbreaks, and are essential to
environmental public health regulators’
efforts to respond more effectively to
outbreaks and prevent future, similar
outbreaks. This information system is
specifically designed to link to CDC’s
existing disease outbreak surveillance
system (National Outbreak Reporting
System).
The information system was
developed by the Environmental Health
Specialists Network (EHS–Net), a
collaborative project of CDC, the U.S.
Food and Drug Administration (FDA),
the U.S. Department of Agriculture
(USDA), and nine states (California,
will occur in the future, nor where they
will occur. However, we can estimate,
based on existing data that a maximum
of 1,400 foodborne illness outbreaks
will occur annually. Only those
programs in the jurisdictions in which
these outbreaks occur would report to
NVEAIS. Thus, not every program will
respond every year. Consequently, the
respondent burden estimate is based on
the number of outbreaks likely to occur
each year. Assuming each outbreak
occurs in a different jurisdiction, there
will be one respondent per outbreak.
There are two activities associated
with NVEAIS that require a burden
estimate. The first is entering all
requested environmental assessment
data into NVEAIS. This will be done
once for each outbreak and will take
approximately 2 hours per outbreak.
The second activity is the manager
interview that will be conducted at each
establishment associated with an
outbreak. Most outbreaks are associated
with only one establishment; however,
some are associated with multiple
establishments. We estimate that a
maximum average of 4 manager
interviews will be conducted per
outbreak. Each interview will take about
20 minutes.
The total estimated annual burden is
4,667 hours. There is no cost to the
respondents other than their time.
Connecticut, Georgia, Iowa, New York,
Minnesota, Oregon, Rhode Island, and
Tennessee). The network consists of
environmental health specialists (EHSs),
epidemiologists, and laboratorians. The
EHS–Net has developed a standardized
protocol for identifying, reporting, and
analyzing data relevant to foodborne
illness outbreak environmental
assessments.
While conducting environmental
assessments during outbreak
investigations is routine for food safety
program officials, however, reporting
information from the environmental
assessments to CDC is not. State, Local,
Tribal, and Territorial food safety
program officials are the respondents for
this data collection—one official from
each participating program will report
environmental assessment data on
outbreaks. These programs are typically
located in public health or agriculture
agencies and there are approximately
3,000 such agencies in the United
States. Thus, although it is not possible
to determine how many programs will
choose to participate, as NVEAIS is
voluntary, the maximum potential
number of program respondents is
approximately 3,000.
These programs will be reporting data
on outbreaks, not their programs or
personnel. It is not possible to
determine exactly how many outbreaks
ESTIMATED ANNUALIZED BURDEN HOURS
Number of
respondents
Number of
responses per
respondent
Average
burden per
response
(in hours)
Total burden
(in hours)
Type of respondent
Form name
Food safety program personnel .......
1,400
1
2
2,800
Food safety program personnel .......
Reporting environmental assessment data into electronic system.
Manager interview ............................
1,400
4
20/60
1,867
Total ...........................................
...........................................................
........................
........................
........................
4,667
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
[FR Doc. 2011–9670 Filed 4–20–11; 8:45 am]
Food and Drug Administration
BILLING CODE 4163–18–P
emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES
Daniel Holcomb,
Reports Clearance Officer, Centers for Disease
Control and Prevention.
[Docket No. FDA–2011–N–0231]
Agency Information Collection
Activities; Proposed Collection;
Comment Request; Adverse
Experience Reporting for Licensed
Biological Products; and General
Records
AGENCY:
Food and Drug Administration,
HHS.
ACTION:
Notice.
The Food and Drug
Administration (FDA) is announcing an
opportunity for public comment on the
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:37 Apr 20, 2011
Jkt 223001
PO 00000
Frm 00043
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
proposed collection of certain
information by the agency. Under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (the
PRA), Federal Agencies are required to
publish notice in the Federal Register
concerning each proposed collection of
information, including each proposed
extension of an existing collection of
information, and to allow 60 days for
public comment in response to the
notice. This notice solicits comments on
the proposed extension of the collection
of information concerning requirements
relating to FDA’s adverse experience
reporting (AER) for licensed biological
products, and general records associated
with the manufacture and distribution
of biological products.
E:\FR\FM\21APN1.SGM
21APN1
22402
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 77 / Thursday, April 21, 2011 / Notices
Submit either written or
electronic comments on the collection
of information by June 20, 2011.
DATES:
Submit electronic
comments on the collection of
information to https://
www.regulations.gov. Submit written
comments on the collection of
information to the Division of Dockets
Management (HFA–305), Food and Drug
Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane, Rm.
1061, Rockville, MD 20852. All
comments should be identified with the
docket number found in brackets in the
heading of this document.
ADDRESSES:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Juanmanuel Vilela, Office of
Information Management, Food and
Drug Administration, 1350 Piccard Dr.,
PI50–400B, Rockville, MD 20850, 301–
796–7651, Juanmanuel.vilela@
fda.hhs.gov.
Under the
PRA (44 U.S.C. 3501–3520), Federal
Agencies must obtain approval from the
Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) for each collection of
information they conduct or sponsor.
‘‘Collection of information’’ is defined in
44 U.S.C. 3502(3) and 5 CFR 1320.3(c)
and includes Agency requests or
requirements that members of the public
submit reports, keep records, or provide
information to a third party. Section
3506(c)(2)(A) of the PRA (44 U.S.C.
3506(c)(2)(A)) requires Federal Agencies
to provide a 60-day notice in the
Federal Register concerning each
proposed collection of information,
including each proposed extension of an
existing collection of information,
before submitting the collection to OMB
for approval. To comply with this
requirement, FDA is publishing notice
of the proposed collection of
information set forth in this document.
With respect to the following
collection of information, FDA invites
comments on these topics: (1) Whether
the proposed collection of information
is necessary for the proper performance
of FDA’s functions, including whether
the information will have practical
utility; (2) the accuracy of FDA’s
estimate of the burden of the proposed
collection of information, including the
validity of the methodology and
assumptions used; (3) ways to enhance
the quality, utility, and clarity of the
information to be collected; and (4)
ways to minimize the burden of the
collection of information on
respondents, including through the use
of automated collection techniques
when appropriate, and other forms of
information technology.
emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:37 Apr 20, 2011
Jkt 223001
Adverse Experience Reporting for
Licensed Biological Products; and
General Records—21 CFR Part 600
(OMB Control Number 0910–0308)—
Extension
Under the Public Health Service Act
(42 U.S.C. 262), FDA may only approve
a biologics license application for a
biological product that is safe, pure, and
potent. When a biological product is
approved and enters the market, the
product is introduced to a larger patient
population in settings different from
clinical trials. New information
generated during the postmarketing
period offers further insight into the
benefits and risks of the product, and
evaluation of this information is
important to insure its safe use. FDA
issued the AER requirements in part 600
(21 CFR part 600) to enable FDA to take
actions necessary for the protection of
the public health in response to reports
of adverse experiences related to
licensed biological products. The
primary purpose of FDA’s AER system
is to identify potentially serious safety
problems with licensed biological
products. Although premarket testing
discloses a general safety profile of a
biological product’s comparatively
common adverse effects, the larger and
more diverse patient populations
exposed to the licensed biological
product provides the opportunity to
collect information on rare, latent, and
long-term effects. In addition,
production and/or distribution
problems have contaminated biological
products in the past. AER reports are
obtained from a variety of sources,
including manufacturers, patients,
physicians, foreign regulatory agencies,
and clinical investigators. Identification
of new and unexpected safety issues
through the analysis of the data in the
AERS system contributes directly to
increased public health protection. For
example, evaluation of these safety
issues enables FDA to take focused
regulatory action. Such action may
include, but is not limited to, important
changes to the product’s labeling (such
as adding a new warning), coordination
with manufacturers to ensure adequate
corrective action is taken, and removal
of a biological product from the market
when necessary.
Section 600.80(c)(1) requires licensed
manufacturers or any person whose
name appears on the label of a licensed
biological product to report each
adverse experience that is both serious
and unexpected, whether foreign or
domestic, as soon as possible but in no
case later than 15 calendar days of
initial receipt of the information by the
licensed manufacturer. These reports
PO 00000
Frm 00044
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
are known as postmarketing 15-day alert
reports. This section also requires
licensed manufacturers to submit any
followup reports within 15 calendar
days of receipt of new information or as
requested by FDA, and if additional
information is not obtainable to
maintain records of the unsuccessful
steps taken to seek additional
information. In addition, this section
requires a person who submits an
adverse action report to the licensed
manufacturer rather than FDA to
maintain a record of this action. Section
600.80(e) requires licensed
manufacturers to submit a 15-day alert
report for an adverse experience
obtained from a postmarketing clinical
study only if the licensed manufacturer
concludes that there is a reasonable
possibility that the product caused the
adverse experience. Section 600.80(c)(2)
requires licensed manufacturers to
report each adverse experience not
reported in a postmarketing 15-day alert
report at quarterly intervals, for 3 years
from the date of issuance of the
biologics license, and then at annual
intervals. The majority of these periodic
reports are submitted annually since a
large percentage of currently licensed
biological products have been licensed
longer than 3 years. Section 600.80(i)
requires licensed manufacturers to
maintain for a period of 10 years records
of all adverse experiences known to the
licensed manufacturer, including raw
data and any correspondence relating to
the adverse experiences. Section 600.81
requires licensed manufacturers to
submit, at an interval of every 6 months,
information about the quantity of the
product distributed under the biologics
license, including the quantity
distributed to distributors. These
distribution reports provide FDA with
important information about products
distributed under biologics licenses,
including the quantity, certain lot
numbers, labeled date of expiration, the
fill lot numbers for the total number of
dosage units of each strength or potency
distributed (e.g., fifty thousand per 10milliliter vials), and date of release. FDA
may require the licensed manufacturer
to submit distribution reports under this
section at times other than every 6
months. Under § 600.90, a licensed
manufacturer may submit a waiver
request for any requirements that apply
to the licensed manufacturer under
§§ 600.80 and 600.81. A waiver request
submitted under § 600.90 must include
supporting documentation.
Manufacturers of biological products
for human use must keep records of
each step in the manufacture and
distribution of a product including any
E:\FR\FM\21APN1.SGM
21APN1
22403
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 77 / Thursday, April 21, 2011 / Notices
recalls. These recordkeeping
requirements serve preventative and
remedial purposes by establishing
accountability and traceability in the
manufacture and distribution of
products. These requirements also
enable FDA to perform meaningful
inspections. Section 600.12 requires,
among other things, that records must
be made, concurrently with the
performance of each step in the
manufacture and distribution of
products. These records must be
retained for no less than 5 years after the
records of manufacture have been
completed or 6 months after the latest
expiration date for the individual
product, whichever represents a later
date. In addition, under § 600.12,
manufacturers must maintain records
relating to the sterilization of equipment
and supplies, animal necropsy records,
and records in cases of divided
manufacturing responsibility with
respect to a product. Under
§ 600.12(b)(2), manufacturers are also
required to maintain complete records
pertaining to the recall from distribution
of any product. Furthermore, § 610.18(b)
requires, in part, that the results of all
periodic tests for verification of cultures
and determination of freedom from
extraneous organisms be recorded and
maintained.
Respondents to this collection of
information include manufacturers of
biological products and any person
whose name appears on the label of a
licensed biological product. Under table
1 of this document, the number of
respondents is based on the estimated
number of manufacturers that are
subject to those regulations or that
submitted the required information to
the Center for Biologics Evaluation and
Research and Center for Drugs
Evaluation and Research, FDA, in fiscal
year (FY) 2010. Based on information
obtained from the FDA’s database
system, there were 108 licensed
biologics manufacturers. This number
excludes those manufacturers who
produce Whole Blood or components of
Whole Blood and in-vitro diagnostic
licensed products, because of the
exemption under § 600.80(k). The total
annual responses are based on the
number of submissions received by FDA
in FY 2010. There were an estimated
86,583 15-day Alert reports, 57,300
periodic reports, and 349 lot
distribution reports submitted to FDA.
The number of 15-day alert reports for
postmarketing studies under § 600.80(e)
is included in the total number of 15day alert reports. FDA received 21
requests for waivers under § 600.90, of
which 19 were granted. The hours per
response are based on FDA experience.
The burden hours required to complete
the MedWatch Form for § 600.80(c)(1),
(e), and (f) are reported under OMB
Control No. 0910–0291.
FDA estimates the burden of this
collection of information as follows:
TABLE 1—ESTIMATED ANNUAL REPORTING BURDEN 1
Number of
respondents
21 CFR section
Number of
responses per
respondent
Total annual
responses
Average
burden per
response
(in hours)
Total hours
600.80(c)(1) and 600.80(e) ..................................................
600.80(c)(2) ..........................................................................
600.81 ..................................................................................
600.90 ..................................................................................
108
108
108
21
801.69
530.55
3.23
1
86,583
57,300
349
21
1
28
1
1
86,583
1,604,400
349
21
Total ..............................................................................
........................
........................
........................
........................
1,691,353
1 There
are no capital costs or operating and maintenance costs associated with this collection of information.
Under table 2 of this document, the
number of respondents is based on the
number of manufacturers subject to
those regulations. Based on information
obtained from FDA’s database system,
there were 304 licensed manufacturers
of biological products in FY 2010.
However, the number of recordkeepers
listed for § 600.12(a) through (e)
excluding (b)(2) is estimated to be 131.
This number excludes manufacturers of
blood and blood components because
their burden hours for recordkeeping
have been reported under § 606.160 in
OMB Control No. 0910–0116. The total
annual records is based on the annual
average of lots released in FY 2010
(6,752), number of recalls made (1,881),
and total number of adverse experience
reports received (143,883) in FY 2010.
The hours per record are based on FDA
experience.
FDA estimates the burden of this
recordkeeping as follows:
TABLE 2—ESTIMATED ANNUAL RECORDKEEPING BURDEN 1
Number of
recordkeepers
21 CFR section
Number of
records per
recordkeeper
Total annual
records
Average burden per recordkeeping
(in hours)
Total hours
emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES
600.12 2 ................................................................................
600.12 (b)(2) ........................................................................
600.80(c)(1) and 600.80(i) ...................................................
131
304
108
51.54
6.19
1,332.25
6,752
1,881
143,883
32
24
1
216,064
45,144
143,883
Total ..............................................................................
........................
........................
........................
........................
405,091
1 There
2 The
are no capital costs or operating and maintenance costs associated with this collection of information.
recordkeeping requirements in § 610.18(b) are included in the estimate for § 600.12.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:37 Apr 20, 2011
Jkt 223001
PO 00000
Frm 00045
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\21APN1.SGM
21APN1
22404
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 77 / Thursday, April 21, 2011 / Notices
Dated: April 15, 2011.
Leslie Kux,
Acting Assistant Commissioner for Policy.
‘‘Request for Applications’’ link),
https://www.grants.gov/ (see ‘‘For
Applicants’’ section) and/or https://
www.fda.gov/AboutFDA/
PartnershipsCollaborations/
PublicPrivatePartnershipProgram/
ucm231130.htm.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
[FR Doc. 2011–9651 Filed 4–20–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
I. Funding Opportunity Description
Food and Drug Administration
RFA–FD–11–006
[Docket No. FDA–2011–N–0012]
93.103
Analgesic Clinical Trials Innovation,
Opportunities, and Networks (ACTION)
Initiative
A. Background
Despite the enormous advances in
drug development over the past 2 or 3
decades (e.g., drugs that cure cancer and
biologic drug products that halt the
progression of rheumatoid arthritis), the
development of novel analgesic drug
products has lagged behind. Indeed, to
this day, the only analgesic drug
products that are used widely and
successfully are opioids,
acetaminophen, and nonsteroidal antiinflammatory agents, all of which have
serious, potentially life-threatening
toxicities, even when used properly.
While there has been exploration at the
earliest stages of drug development,
there has been widespread reluctance
on the part of the pharmaceutical
industry to take novel products further
into development. This is in no small
part due to the often daunting task of
demonstrating the efficacy of analgesics
in clinical trials. Many experts in
analgesic drug development believe that
it is the design of the clinical trials that
is at fault in this situation and that
better trial designs will yield more
successful results. This hypothesis is
certainly supported by the frequent
failures of clinical efficacy trials of
opioid drug products, considering the
well established effectiveness of these
products from literally thousands of
years of clinical experience. For these
reasons, additional studies are needed
to assess the confounding nature of
analgesic clinical trials and analgesic
drug development.
AGENCY:
Food and Drug Administration,
HHS.
ACTION:
Notice.
The Food and Drug
Administration (FDA) is announcing the
availability of grant funds for the
support of the Analgesic Clinical Trials
Innovation, Opportunities, and
Networks (ACTION) Initiative. The goal
of the ACTION Initiative is to streamline
the discovery and development process
for new analgesic drug products for the
benefit of public health. The ACTION
Initiative is being developed, in large
part, through the establishment of a
cooperative agreement with one or more
organizations. The ACTION Initiative
will address major gaps in scientific
information, which can slow down
analgesic clinical trials and analgesic
drug development. FDA will support
the ACTION Initiative under the
authority of the Federal Food, Drug, and
Cosmetic Act.
DATES: Important dates are as follows:
1. The application due date is June 8,
2011.
2. The anticipated start date is July 14,
2011.
3. The opening date is April 22, 2011.
4. The expiration date is June 9, 2011.
SUMMARY:
emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION AND
ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS CONTACT:
Igor
Cerny, Center for Drug Evaluation and
Research, Food and Drug
Administration, 10903 New Hampshire
Ave., Bldg. 22, rm. 3124, Silver Spring,
MD 20993–0002, 301–796–4273, e-mail:
Igor.Cerny@fda.hhs.gov; Vieda Hubbard,
Office of Acquisitions and Grant
Services, Food and Drug
Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane
(HFA–500), Rockville, MD 20857, 301–
827–7177, e-mail:
vieda.hubbard@fda.hhs.gov.
For more information on this funding
opportunity announcement (FOA) and
to obtain detailed requirements, please
refer to the full FOA located at https://
grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/ (select the
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:37 Apr 20, 2011
Jkt 223001
B. Research Objectives
Based on collaboration with FDA, key
stakeholder input, best Government,
academic, and industry practices, and
knowledge gained through workshops,
the Grantee will be responsible for
developing, defining, and
recommending projects as described in
this section. Applicants should, at a
minimum, address the following three
overarching research domains in this
section. The overall study design
processes within each of these domains
should be aligned with established
strategic goals and provide results and
PO 00000
Frm 00046
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
recommendations in alignment with the
objectives of the ACTION Initiative.
1. Data analysis of primarily group
analgesic clinical trials data (databases)
for relationships between assay
sensitivity and metrics including, but
not limited to, specific research designs
and methodological features so as to
inform the future design of analgesic
clinical trials.
2. Scientific assessment of FDA’s
clinical trial databases and development
of novel and alternative means of
analyzing various pain scores in a
manner that effectively considers
variables, such as bias and
interindividual variance.
3. Development of methodologies for
the execution and transformation of
pooled trial data from multiple relevant
analgesic trials.
C. Eligibility Information
The following organizations/
institutions are eligible to apply:
• Higher education institutions as
defined in section 101 of the Higher
Education Act of 1965 (or a consortium
of such institutions).
The following types of higher
education institutions are always
encouraged to apply for National
Institutes of Health support as public or
private institutions of higher education:
• Hispanic serving institutions.
• Historically Black colleges and
universities.
• Tribally controlled colleges and
universities.
• Alaska Native and Native Hawaiian
serving institutions.
Nonprofits other than institutions of
higher education.
• A nonprofit organization described
in section 501(c)(3) of the Internal
Revenue Code of 1986, which is exempt
from tax under section 501(a) of that
code.
An eligible organization that wishes
to enter into a collaborative agreement
must provide an assurance that the
entity will not accept funding for a
Critical Path Public-Private Partnership
project from any organization that
manufactures or distributes products
regulated by FDA unless the entity
provides assurances in its agreement
with FDA that the results of the Critical
Path Public-Private Partnership project
will not be influenced by any source of
funding.
II. Award Information/Funds Available
A. Award Amount
It is anticipated that no more than
$1 million will be allocated to this
cooperative agreement. It is anticipated
that a single award will be made.
E:\FR\FM\21APN1.SGM
21APN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 77 (Thursday, April 21, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 22401-22404]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-9651]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
[Docket No. FDA-2011-N-0231]
Agency Information Collection Activities; Proposed Collection;
Comment Request; Adverse Experience Reporting for Licensed Biological
Products; and General Records
AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is announcing an
opportunity for public comment on the proposed collection of certain
information by the agency. Under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(the PRA), Federal Agencies are required to publish notice in the
Federal Register concerning each proposed collection of information,
including each proposed extension of an existing collection of
information, and to allow 60 days for public comment in response to the
notice. This notice solicits comments on the proposed extension of the
collection of information concerning requirements relating to FDA's
adverse experience reporting (AER) for licensed biological products,
and general records associated with the manufacture and distribution of
biological products.
[[Page 22402]]
DATES: Submit either written or electronic comments on the collection
of information by June 20, 2011.
ADDRESSES: Submit electronic comments on the collection of information
to https://www.regulations.gov. Submit written comments on the
collection of information to the Division of Dockets Management (HFA-
305), Food and Drug Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane, Rm. 1061,
Rockville, MD 20852. All comments should be identified with the docket
number found in brackets in the heading of this document.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Juanmanuel Vilela, Office of
Information Management, Food and Drug Administration, 1350 Piccard Dr.,
PI50-400B, Rockville, MD 20850, 301-796-7651, Juanmanuel.vilela@
fda.hhs.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Under the PRA (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520), Federal
Agencies must obtain approval from the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) for each collection of information they conduct or sponsor.
``Collection of information'' is defined in 44 U.S.C. 3502(3) and 5 CFR
1320.3(c) and includes Agency requests or requirements that members of
the public submit reports, keep records, or provide information to a
third party. Section 3506(c)(2)(A) of the PRA (44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(2)(A))
requires Federal Agencies to provide a 60-day notice in the Federal
Register concerning each proposed collection of information, including
each proposed extension of an existing collection of information,
before submitting the collection to OMB for approval. To comply with
this requirement, FDA is publishing notice of the proposed collection
of information set forth in this document.
With respect to the following collection of information, FDA
invites comments on these topics: (1) Whether the proposed collection
of information is necessary for the proper performance of FDA's
functions, including whether the information will have practical
utility; (2) the accuracy of FDA's estimate of the burden of the
proposed collection of information, including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used; (3) ways to enhance the quality,
utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; and (4) ways
to minimize the burden of the collection of information on respondents,
including through the use of automated collection techniques when
appropriate, and other forms of information technology.
Adverse Experience Reporting for Licensed Biological Products; and
General Records--21 CFR Part 600 (OMB Control Number 0910-0308)--
Extension
Under the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 262), FDA may only
approve a biologics license application for a biological product that
is safe, pure, and potent. When a biological product is approved and
enters the market, the product is introduced to a larger patient
population in settings different from clinical trials. New information
generated during the postmarketing period offers further insight into
the benefits and risks of the product, and evaluation of this
information is important to insure its safe use. FDA issued the AER
requirements in part 600 (21 CFR part 600) to enable FDA to take
actions necessary for the protection of the public health in response
to reports of adverse experiences related to licensed biological
products. The primary purpose of FDA's AER system is to identify
potentially serious safety problems with licensed biological products.
Although premarket testing discloses a general safety profile of a
biological product's comparatively common adverse effects, the larger
and more diverse patient populations exposed to the licensed biological
product provides the opportunity to collect information on rare,
latent, and long-term effects. In addition, production and/or
distribution problems have contaminated biological products in the
past. AER reports are obtained from a variety of sources, including
manufacturers, patients, physicians, foreign regulatory agencies, and
clinical investigators. Identification of new and unexpected safety
issues through the analysis of the data in the AERS system contributes
directly to increased public health protection. For example, evaluation
of these safety issues enables FDA to take focused regulatory action.
Such action may include, but is not limited to, important changes to
the product's labeling (such as adding a new warning), coordination
with manufacturers to ensure adequate corrective action is taken, and
removal of a biological product from the market when necessary.
Section 600.80(c)(1) requires licensed manufacturers or any person
whose name appears on the label of a licensed biological product to
report each adverse experience that is both serious and unexpected,
whether foreign or domestic, as soon as possible but in no case later
than 15 calendar days of initial receipt of the information by the
licensed manufacturer. These reports are known as postmarketing 15-day
alert reports. This section also requires licensed manufacturers to
submit any followup reports within 15 calendar days of receipt of new
information or as requested by FDA, and if additional information is
not obtainable to maintain records of the unsuccessful steps taken to
seek additional information. In addition, this section requires a
person who submits an adverse action report to the licensed
manufacturer rather than FDA to maintain a record of this action.
Section 600.80(e) requires licensed manufacturers to submit a 15-day
alert report for an adverse experience obtained from a postmarketing
clinical study only if the licensed manufacturer concludes that there
is a reasonable possibility that the product caused the adverse
experience. Section 600.80(c)(2) requires licensed manufacturers to
report each adverse experience not reported in a postmarketing 15-day
alert report at quarterly intervals, for 3 years from the date of
issuance of the biologics license, and then at annual intervals. The
majority of these periodic reports are submitted annually since a large
percentage of currently licensed biological products have been licensed
longer than 3 years. Section 600.80(i) requires licensed manufacturers
to maintain for a period of 10 years records of all adverse experiences
known to the licensed manufacturer, including raw data and any
correspondence relating to the adverse experiences. Section 600.81
requires licensed manufacturers to submit, at an interval of every 6
months, information about the quantity of the product distributed under
the biologics license, including the quantity distributed to
distributors. These distribution reports provide FDA with important
information about products distributed under biologics licenses,
including the quantity, certain lot numbers, labeled date of
expiration, the fill lot numbers for the total number of dosage units
of each strength or potency distributed (e.g., fifty thousand per 10-
milliliter vials), and date of release. FDA may require the licensed
manufacturer to submit distribution reports under this section at times
other than every 6 months. Under Sec. 600.90, a licensed manufacturer
may submit a waiver request for any requirements that apply to the
licensed manufacturer under Sec. Sec. 600.80 and 600.81. A waiver
request submitted under Sec. 600.90 must include supporting
documentation.
Manufacturers of biological products for human use must keep
records of each step in the manufacture and distribution of a product
including any
[[Page 22403]]
recalls. These recordkeeping requirements serve preventative and
remedial purposes by establishing accountability and traceability in
the manufacture and distribution of products. These requirements also
enable FDA to perform meaningful inspections. Section 600.12 requires,
among other things, that records must be made, concurrently with the
performance of each step in the manufacture and distribution of
products. These records must be retained for no less than 5 years after
the records of manufacture have been completed or 6 months after the
latest expiration date for the individual product, whichever represents
a later date. In addition, under Sec. 600.12, manufacturers must
maintain records relating to the sterilization of equipment and
supplies, animal necropsy records, and records in cases of divided
manufacturing responsibility with respect to a product. Under Sec.
600.12(b)(2), manufacturers are also required to maintain complete
records pertaining to the recall from distribution of any product.
Furthermore, Sec. 610.18(b) requires, in part, that the results of all
periodic tests for verification of cultures and determination of
freedom from extraneous organisms be recorded and maintained.
Respondents to this collection of information include manufacturers
of biological products and any person whose name appears on the label
of a licensed biological product. Under table 1 of this document, the
number of respondents is based on the estimated number of manufacturers
that are subject to those regulations or that submitted the required
information to the Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research and
Center for Drugs Evaluation and Research, FDA, in fiscal year (FY)
2010. Based on information obtained from the FDA's database system,
there were 108 licensed biologics manufacturers. This number excludes
those manufacturers who produce Whole Blood or components of Whole
Blood and in-vitro diagnostic licensed products, because of the
exemption under Sec. 600.80(k). The total annual responses are based
on the number of submissions received by FDA in FY 2010. There were an
estimated 86,583 15-day Alert reports, 57,300 periodic reports, and 349
lot distribution reports submitted to FDA. The number of 15-day alert
reports for postmarketing studies under Sec. 600.80(e) is included in
the total number of 15-day alert reports. FDA received 21 requests for
waivers under Sec. 600.90, of which 19 were granted. The hours per
response are based on FDA experience. The burden hours required to
complete the MedWatch Form for Sec. 600.80(c)(1), (e), and (f) are
reported under OMB Control No. 0910-0291.
FDA estimates the burden of this collection of information as
follows:
Table 1--Estimated Annual Reporting Burden \1\
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Number of Average burden
21 CFR section Number of responses per Total annual per response Total hours
respondents respondent responses (in hours)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
600.80(c)(1) and 600.80(e)...... 108 801.69 86,583 1 86,583
600.80(c)(2).................... 108 530.55 57,300 28 1,604,400
600.81.......................... 108 3.23 349 1 349
600.90.......................... 21 1 21 1 21
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total....................... .............. .............. .............. .............. 1,691,353
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ There are no capital costs or operating and maintenance costs associated with this collection of
information.
Under table 2 of this document, the number of respondents is based
on the number of manufacturers subject to those regulations. Based on
information obtained from FDA's database system, there were 304
licensed manufacturers of biological products in FY 2010. However, the
number of recordkeepers listed for Sec. 600.12(a) through (e)
excluding (b)(2) is estimated to be 131. This number excludes
manufacturers of blood and blood components because their burden hours
for recordkeeping have been reported under Sec. 606.160 in OMB Control
No. 0910-0116. The total annual records is based on the annual average
of lots released in FY 2010 (6,752), number of recalls made (1,881),
and total number of adverse experience reports received (143,883) in FY
2010. The hours per record are based on FDA experience.
FDA estimates the burden of this recordkeeping as follows:
Table 2--Estimated Annual Recordkeeping Burden \1\
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Average burden
Number of Number of Total annual per
21 CFR section recordkeepers records per records recordkeeping Total hours
recordkeeper (in hours)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
600.12 \2\...................... 131 51.54 6,752 32 216,064
600.12 (b)(2)................... 304 6.19 1,881 24 45,144
600.80(c)(1) and 600.80(i)...... 108 1,332.25 143,883 1 143,883
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total....................... .............. .............. .............. .............. 405,091
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ There are no capital costs or operating and maintenance costs associated with this collection of
information.
\2\ The recordkeeping requirements in Sec. 610.18(b) are included in the estimate for Sec. 600.12.
[[Page 22404]]
Dated: April 15, 2011.
Leslie Kux,
Acting Assistant Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2011-9651 Filed 4-20-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-01-P