Controlled Groups; Deferral of Losses, 22336-22338 [2011-9606]
Download as PDF
22336
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 77 / Thursday, April 21, 2011 / Proposed Rules
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Internal Revenue Service
26 CFR Part 1
[REG–118761–09]
RIN 1545–BI92
Controlled Groups; Deferral of Losses
Internal Revenue Service (IRS),
Treasury.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
AGENCY:
This document contains
proposed regulations that provide
guidance concerning the time for taking
into account deferred losses on the sale
or exchange of property between
members of a controlled group. These
proposed regulations affect members of
a controlled group and their
shareholders.
SUMMARY:
Written and electronic comments
and requests for a public hearing must
be received by July 20, 2011.
ADDRESSES: Send submissions to: CC:
PA: LPD: PR (REG–118761–09), Internal
Revenue Service, PO Box 7604, Ben
Franklin Station, Washington, DC
20044. Submissions may be hand
delivered to: CC:PA:LPD:PR Monday
through Friday between the hours of
8 a.m. and 4 p.m. to CC:PA:LPD:PR
(REG–118761–09), Courier’s Desk,
Internal Revenue Service, 1111
Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington,
DC, or sent electronically via the
Federal eRulemaking Portal at https://
www.regulations.gov (IRS REG–118761–
09).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Concerning the proposed regulations,
Bruce A. Decker (202) 622–7790;
concerning submissions of comments
and/or requests for a public hearing,
Richard.A.Hurst@irscounsel.treas.gov,
or (202) 622–7180.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
DATES:
jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS
Background
This document provides guidance
concerning the Federal income tax
treatment of deferred losses on the sale
or exchange of property between
members of a controlled group,
including transactions in which the
member acquiring the property
subsequently recognizes a
corresponding gain with respect to the
property.
Section 267(a)(1) provides that no
deduction shall be allowed for any loss
on the sale or exchange of property
between certain related persons. Section
267(f)(2) contains an exception for a loss
on the sale or exchange of property
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:05 Apr 20, 2011
Jkt 223001
between members of a controlled group.
For this purpose, ‘‘controlled group’’ has
the meaning defined in section 1563(a)
except that ‘‘more than 50 percent’’ is
substituted for ‘‘at least 80 percent’’ each
place it appears. In the case of a sale or
exchange of loss property between
members of a controlled group, the loss
is deferred rather than disallowed.
Under section 267(f)(2)(B), the loss is
deferred until the property is transferred
outside of the controlled group and
there would be recognition of loss under
consolidated return principles or until
such other time as may be prescribed in
regulations.
The regulations under section 267(f)
provide that the timing principles for
intercompany sales or exchanges
between members of a consolidated
group (see generally § 1.1502–13(c)(2))
apply to sales or exchanges of property
at a loss between members of controlled
group. See § 1.267(f)–1(a)(2). The
attribute redetermination rules
applicable to transactions between
members of a consolidated group (see
§ 1.1502–13(c)(1)), however, do not
apply to sales or exchanges between
members of a controlled group. See
§ 1.267(f)–1(a)(2)(i)(B)). For example, if a
member of a consolidated group (S)
holds land for investment and sells the
land at a loss to another member of its
consolidated group (B), and B develops
the land and sells developed lots to
unrelated customers, S’s intercompany
loss will be taken into account when B
sells the property to the unrelated
person. Furthermore, S’s loss will be
recharacterized as an ordinary loss, even
though S’s loss would otherwise be a
capital loss given its separate-entity
status as holding the property for
investment. See § 1.1502–13(c)(4)(i),
(c)(7)(ii), Example 2. If B and S were
members of a controlled group but not
a consolidated group, S’s loss would
also be taken into account when B sells
the parcel to an unrelated person, but
S’s loss would retain its character as a
capital loss.
The attribute redetermination rule
applicable to intercompany transactions
between consolidated group members
may have the effect of eliminating an
intercompany loss with respect to a
corporation’s stock. For example,
assume that S, a subsidiary in a
consolidated group, owns 100 percent of
the stock of T, a solvent corporation. S
sells 30 percent of T’s stock at a loss to
B, the common parent of the
consolidated group that includes S. In a
subsequent, unrelated transaction (and
before any change in the value of the T
stock), T liquidates. The attribute
redetermination rule of § 1.1502–
13(c)(1) recharacterizes S’s
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
intercompany loss to produce the same
results to the consolidated group as a
whole as if S and B were divisions of
a single corporation. Under these facts,
the subsequent liquidation of T, tax-free
under section 332, would cause S’s
intercompany loss to be treated as a
noncapital nondeductible amount. See
§ 1.1502–13(f)(7), Example 5(c).
Although the attribute
redetermination rule generally does not
apply to sales or exchanges between
members of a controlled group,
§ 1.267(f)–1(c)(1)(iv) contains a special
rule with respect to losses that would
have been redetermined to be a
noncapital, nondeductible amount if the
consolidated return attribute
redetermination rule did apply. Under
§ 1.267(f)–1(c)(1)(iv), if an intercompany
loss between members of a consolidated
group would have been redetermined to
be a noncapital, nondeductible amount
as a result of the attribute
redetermination rule applicable to
consolidated groups, but is not
redetermined because the sale or
exchange occurred between members of
a controlled group (to which the
attribute redetermination rule does not
apply), then the loss will be deferred
until S and B are no longer in a
controlled group relationship. Thus, if
the facts in the example in the
preceding paragraph were the same,
except that B was the parent of a
controlled group that included S, rather
than a consolidated group, under the
principles of section 267(f), the IRS and
Treasury Department believe that S’s
loss on the sale or exchange of T stock
should be deferred until S and B (and
their successors) are no longer in a
controlled group relationship.
Furthermore, assume S1 and S2, both
members of a consolidated group, each
own 50 percent of the stock of T. If the
basis of the T stock is greater than its
value, a liquidation of T would
generally result in non-recognition of
the loss through the application of
§ 1.1502–34 and section 332. In an
attempt to avoid the non-recognition of
the loss, either S1 or S2 may sell more
than 20 percent of T’s stock to a
nonconsolidated, controlled group
member in a transaction that is treated
as a sale or exchange for Federal income
tax purposes. Thereafter, T is liquidated
in an attempt to recognize a loss on 100
percent of the subsidiary’s stock. The
IRS and Treasury Department believe
that in these situations, the loss should
similarly be deferred until the buying
and selling members are no longer in a
controlled group relationship.
In a controlled group setting,
taxpayers have noted that the current
regulations do not allow S to take into
E:\FR\FM\21APP1.SGM
21APP1
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 77 / Thursday, April 21, 2011 / Proposed Rules
is hereby certified that these proposed
regulations will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities. This
certification is based on the fact that
these regulations primarily affect
controlled groups of corporations which
tend to be larger businesses. Therefore,
a Regulatory Flexibility Analysis under
the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C.
chapter 6) is not required. Pursuant to
section 7805(f) of the Internal Revenue
Code, this regulation has been
submitted to the Small Business
Administration for comment on its
impact on small governmental
jurisdictions.
Explanation of Provisions
These proposed regulations provide
that, for purposes of determining
whether a loss would be determined to
be a noncapital, nondeductible amount
under the principles of § 1.1502–13,
stock held by the selling member, stock
held by the buying member, and stock
held by all members of the seller’s
consolidated group as well as stock held
by any member of a controlled group of
which the seller is a member that was
acquired from a member of the seller’s
consolidated group must be taken into
account. In addition, certain losses on
the sale or exchange of property
between members of a controlled group,
which have been deferred, are taken
into account upon the occurrence of
either of two events. The deferred loss
is taken into account to the extent of any
corresponding gain that the member
acquiring the property recognizes with
respect to the property. Alternatively,
the deferred loss is taken into account
when the parties to the transaction cease
to be in a controlled group relationship.
In the example, under the proposed
regulations, S’s loss will be recognized
to the extent of the amount of
corresponding gain recognized by B
upon the event that results in
recognition of that gain (that is T’s
liquidation).
jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS
account any amount of the
intercompany loss when B recognizes a
corresponding gain. For example, if S
sells 30 percent of T’s stock to B at a
loss (in a transaction that is treated as
a sale or exchange for federal income tax
purposes) and T’s stock appreciates
between the time of the intercompany
sale and a subsequent event that results
in B’s recognition of gain (that is T’s
liquidation), B would recognize a gain
under section 331 at that time, but S’s
loss would remain deferred in its
entirety. Accordingly, the IRS and the
Treasury Department propose to modify
the current regulations and allow S’s
intercompany loss to be taken into
account to the extent that B recognizes
a corresponding gain, in addition to the
other events that result in acceleration.
Before these proposed regulations are
adopted as final regulations,
consideration will be given to any
written (a signed original and eight (8)
copies) or electronic comments that are
submitted timely to the IRS. The IRS
and the Treasury Department request
comments on the clarity of the proposed
rules and how they can be made easier
to understand. All comments are
available at https://www.regulations.gov
or upon request. A public hearing will
be scheduled if requested in writing by
any person that timely submits written
comments. If a public hearing is
scheduled, notice of the date, time, and
place for the public hearing will be
published in the Federal Register.
Proposed Effective/Applicability Date
These proposed regulations will apply
to loss redetermination events that
occur after the date the regulations are
published as final regulations in the
Federal Register.
Special Analyses
It has been determined that this notice
of proposed rulemaking is not a
significant regulatory action as defined
in Executive Order 12866. Therefore, a
regulatory assessment is not required. It
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:05 Apr 20, 2011
Jkt 223001
Comments and Requests for Public
Hearing
Drafting Information
The principal author of these
regulations is Bruce A. Decker, Office of
Associate Chief Counsel (Corporate),
IRS. However, other personnel from the
Treasury Department and the IRS
participated in their development.
List of Subjects in 26 CFR Part 1
Income taxes, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
Proposed Amendments to the
Regulations
Accordingly, 26 CFR part 1 is
proposed to be amended as follows:
PART 1—INCOME TAXES
Paragraph 1. The authority citation
for part 1 continues to read in part as
follows:
Authority: 26 U.S.C. 7805 * * *
Par. 2. Section 1.267(f)–1 is amended
as follows:
1. Paragraph (c)(1)(iv) is revised.
2. Paragraph (l)(3) is redesignated as
paragraph (l)(4) and paragraph (l)(3) is
added.
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
22337
The addition and revision read as
follows:
§ 1.267(f)–1
*
Controlled groups.
*
*
*
*
(c) * * *
(1) * * *
(iv) B’s item is excluded from gross
income or noncapital and
nondeductible. To the extent S’s loss
would be redetermined to be a
noncapital, nondeductible amount
under the principles of § 1.1502–13, but
is not redetermined because of
paragraph (c)(2) of this section (which
generally renders the attribute
redetermination rule inapplicable to
sales between members of a controlled
group), S’s loss continues to be deferred.
The preceding sentence does not apply,
however, to the extent paragraph
(c)(1)(iii) of this section applies as a
result of a transfer of the property to
certain related persons. If the loss is
deferred, it is taken into account when
S and B (including their successors) are
no longer in a controlled group
relationship or to the extent of any
corresponding income or gain
recognized by B with respect to the
property, whichever occurs first. For
example, if S sells all of the stock of
corporation T to B at a loss (in a
transaction that is treated as a sale or
exchange for Federal income tax
purposes), and T subsequently
liquidates in an unrelated transaction
that qualifies under section 332, S’s loss
is deferred until S and B are no longer
in a controlled group relationship.
Similarly, if S owns all of the T stock,
sells 30 percent of T’s stock to B at a
loss (in a transaction that is treated as
a sale or exchange for Federal income
tax purposes), and T subsequently
liquidates into S and B, S’s loss on the
sale is deferred until S and B (including
their successors) are no longer in a
controlled group relationship. If B
recognizes any income or gain on
amounts received in a distribution in
complete liquidation of T, S will take
into account its deferred loss on its sale
of T stock to the extent of B’s gain. For
purposes of this paragraph, stock held
by S, stock held by B, and stock held by
all members of S’s consolidated group
as well as stock held by any member of
a controlled group of which S is a
member that was acquired from a
member of S’s consolidated group must
be taken into account in determining
whether a loss would be determined to
be a noncapital, nondeductible amount
under the principles of § 1.1502–13.
*
*
*
*
*
(l) * * *
*
*
*
*
*
E:\FR\FM\21APP1.SGM
21APP1
22338
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 77 / Thursday, April 21, 2011 / Proposed Rules
(3) Loss redetermination events.
Paragraph (c)(1)(iv) of this section
applies to loss redetermination events
occurring after the date these
regulations are published as final
regulations in the Federal Register.
Steven T. Miller,
Deputy Commissioner for Services and
Enforcement.
[FR Doc. 2011–9606 Filed 4–20–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade
Bureau
27 CFR Part 9
[Docket No. TTB–2011–0004; Notice No.
117; Re: Notice Nos. 34 and 42]
RIN 1513–AB44
Proposed Fort Ross-Seaview
Viticultural Area; Comment Period
Reopening
Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and
Trade Bureau, Treasury.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking;
comment period reopening.
AGENCY:
The Alcohol and Tobacco Tax
and Trade Bureau is reopening the
comment period for Notice No. 34,
which concerned the proposed
establishment of the Fort Ross-Seaview
viticultural area in western Sonoma
County, California. Through this notice,
TTB is soliciting comments on the
establishment of the Fort Ross-Seaview
viticultural area as proposed in Notice
No. 34 and the issues raised in the
public comments received in response
to that notice, including a request to
expand the proposed viticultural area.
Given the conflicting evidence provided
by the petitioner and by some
commenters with respect to the
distinguishing features and boundary of
the proposed viticultural area, and the
length of time that has passed since
Notice No. 34 was published in 2005,
TTB believes that the rulemaking record
regarding the proposed Fort RossSeaview viticultural area should be
reopened for public comment to ensure
full public participation prior to any
final regulatory action.
DATES: Written comments on the
proposed Fort Ross-Seaview viticultural
area are due on or before June 6, 2011.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments on
Notice No. 34 to one of the following
addresses:
• https://www.regulations.gov: Use the
comment form for Notice No. 34 as
jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:05 Apr 20, 2011
Jkt 223001
posted within Docket No. TTB–2011–
0004 on ‘‘Regulations.gov,’’ the Federal
e-rulemaking portal, to submit
comments via the Internet;
• Mail: Director, Regulations and
Rulings Division, Alcohol and Tobacco
Tax and Trade Bureau, P.O. Box 14412,
Washington, DC 20044–4412.
• Hand Delivery/Courier in Lieu of
Mail: Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and
Trade Bureau, 1310 G Street, NW., Suite
200–E, Washington, DC 20005.
See the Public Participation section of
this notice for specific instructions and
requirements for submitting comments,
and for information on how to request
a public hearing.
You may view copies of the petitions,
supporting materials, published notices,
and all public comments associated
with this proposal within Docket No.
TTB–2011–0004 at https://
www.regulations.gov. You also may
view copies of the petitions, supporting
materials, published notices, and all
public comments associated with this
proposal by appointment at the TTB
Information Resource Center, 1310 G
Street, NW., Washington, DC 20220.
Please call 202–453–2270 to make an
appointment.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Elisabeth C. Kann, Regulations and
Rulings Division, Alcohol and Tobacco
Tax and Trade Bureau, 1310 G Street,
NW., Suite 200E, Washington, DC
20220; phone 202–453–2002.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Fort Ross-Seaview Rulemaking History
Original 2003 Petition and Notice
No. 34
In 2003, Patrick Shabram, on his own
behalf and on behalf of David Hirsch of
Hirsch Vineyards, submitted a petition
to establish the 27,500-acre ‘‘Fort RossSeaview’’ American viticultural area in
western Sonoma County, California
(hereinafter the ‘‘2003 petition’’). The
proposed Fort Ross-Seaview viticultural
area is completely within the existing
North Coast (27 CFR 9.30) and Sonoma
Coast (27 CFR 9.116) viticultural areas.
At the time of the 2003 petition, the Fort
Ross-Seaview viticultural area
contained 18 commercial vineyards,
which covered approximately 506 acres.
In response to the 2003 petition, TTB
published Notice No. 34, a notice of
proposed rulemaking regarding the
establishment of the Fort Ross-Seaview
viticultural area, in the Federal Register
of March 8, 2005 (70 FR 11174). In that
notice, TTB requested comments by
May 9, 2005, from all interested
persons. In response to a request from
a local wine industry member, TTB
subsequently extended the comment
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
period for Notice No. 34 until June 8,
2005 (see Notice No. 42, 70 FR 25000,
May 12, 2005).
Comments Received in Response to
Notice No. 34; Proposed Expansion
Request
In response to Notice No. 34, TTB
received seven comments concerning
the proposed establishment of the Fort
Ross-Seaview viticultural area. Two
local wine industry members supported
the petition without qualification; a
third industry member supported the
viticultural area’s establishment while
expressing concern about the potential
effect of the proposed viticultural area
on his ‘‘Fort Ross’’ brand names if ‘‘Fort
Ross’’ alone were determined to be a
term of viticultural significance.
Four commenters, all owners or
operators of Sonoma County wineries
and vineyards, opposed the
establishment of the Fort Ross-Seaview
viticultural area as outlined in Notice
No. 34. Stating that their vineyards, all
located to the north of the proposed Fort
Ross-Seaview viticultural area, have the
same viticultural characteristics as those
found within the proposed area, these
four commenters requested that TTB
delay a final decision on the
establishment of the Fort Ross-Seaview
viticultural area so that they could
gather additional evidence to support
their contention that the proposed
viticultural area should be expanded to
include their properties.
In response, TTB advised the
opposing commenters that evidence in
support of a northern expansion of the
proposed Fort Ross-Seaview viticultural
area must be submitted to TTB in order
for the agency to consider their request.
Subsequently, three of the opposing
commenters submitted documentation
to TTB in support of a 15,726-acre
northern expansion of the Fort RossSeaview viticultural area proposed in
Notice No. 34.
After submission of the commenters’
documentation in support of a northern
addition, TTB shared the
documentation with the petitioner for
the Fort Ross-Seaview viticultural area.
In response, Patrick Shabram, the author
of the 2003 Fort Ross-Seaview
viticultural area petition and a
professional geographer specializing in
Sonoma County viticulture, submitted
additional documentation to support the
originally petitioned proposed Fort
Ross-Seaview viticultural area name and
boundary line.
Revision of Viticultural Area
Regulations
On January 20, 2011, TTB issued a
final rule revising certain sections of its
E:\FR\FM\21APP1.SGM
21APP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 77 (Thursday, April 21, 2011)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 22336-22338]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-9606]
[[Page 22336]]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Internal Revenue Service
26 CFR Part 1
[REG-118761-09]
RIN 1545-BI92
Controlled Groups; Deferral of Losses
AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This document contains proposed regulations that provide
guidance concerning the time for taking into account deferred losses on
the sale or exchange of property between members of a controlled group.
These proposed regulations affect members of a controlled group and
their shareholders.
DATES: Written and electronic comments and requests for a public
hearing must be received by July 20, 2011.
ADDRESSES: Send submissions to: CC: PA: LPD: PR (REG-118761-09),
Internal Revenue Service, PO Box 7604, Ben Franklin Station,
Washington, DC 20044. Submissions may be hand delivered to:
CC:PA:LPD:PR Monday through Friday between the hours of 8 a.m. and 4
p.m. to CC:PA:LPD:PR (REG-118761-09), Courier's Desk, Internal Revenue
Service, 1111 Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC, or sent
electronically via the Federal eRulemaking Portal at https://www.regulations.gov (IRS REG-118761-09).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Concerning the proposed regulations,
Bruce A. Decker (202) 622-7790; concerning submissions of comments and/
or requests for a public hearing, Richard.A.Hurst@irscounsel.treas.gov,
or (202) 622-7180.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
This document provides guidance concerning the Federal income tax
treatment of deferred losses on the sale or exchange of property
between members of a controlled group, including transactions in which
the member acquiring the property subsequently recognizes a
corresponding gain with respect to the property.
Section 267(a)(1) provides that no deduction shall be allowed for
any loss on the sale or exchange of property between certain related
persons. Section 267(f)(2) contains an exception for a loss on the sale
or exchange of property between members of a controlled group. For this
purpose, ``controlled group'' has the meaning defined in section
1563(a) except that ``more than 50 percent'' is substituted for ``at
least 80 percent'' each place it appears. In the case of a sale or
exchange of loss property between members of a controlled group, the
loss is deferred rather than disallowed. Under section 267(f)(2)(B),
the loss is deferred until the property is transferred outside of the
controlled group and there would be recognition of loss under
consolidated return principles or until such other time as may be
prescribed in regulations.
The regulations under section 267(f) provide that the timing
principles for intercompany sales or exchanges between members of a
consolidated group (see generally Sec. 1.1502-13(c)(2)) apply to sales
or exchanges of property at a loss between members of controlled group.
See Sec. 1.267(f)-1(a)(2). The attribute redetermination rules
applicable to transactions between members of a consolidated group (see
Sec. 1.1502-13(c)(1)), however, do not apply to sales or exchanges
between members of a controlled group. See Sec. 1.267(f)-
1(a)(2)(i)(B)). For example, if a member of a consolidated group (S)
holds land for investment and sells the land at a loss to another
member of its consolidated group (B), and B develops the land and sells
developed lots to unrelated customers, S's intercompany loss will be
taken into account when B sells the property to the unrelated person.
Furthermore, S's loss will be recharacterized as an ordinary loss, even
though S's loss would otherwise be a capital loss given its separate-
entity status as holding the property for investment. See Sec. 1.1502-
13(c)(4)(i), (c)(7)(ii), Example 2. If B and S were members of a
controlled group but not a consolidated group, S's loss would also be
taken into account when B sells the parcel to an unrelated person, but
S's loss would retain its character as a capital loss.
The attribute redetermination rule applicable to intercompany
transactions between consolidated group members may have the effect of
eliminating an intercompany loss with respect to a corporation's stock.
For example, assume that S, a subsidiary in a consolidated group, owns
100 percent of the stock of T, a solvent corporation. S sells 30
percent of T's stock at a loss to B, the common parent of the
consolidated group that includes S. In a subsequent, unrelated
transaction (and before any change in the value of the T stock), T
liquidates. The attribute redetermination rule of Sec. 1.1502-13(c)(1)
recharacterizes S's intercompany loss to produce the same results to
the consolidated group as a whole as if S and B were divisions of a
single corporation. Under these facts, the subsequent liquidation of T,
tax-free under section 332, would cause S's intercompany loss to be
treated as a noncapital nondeductible amount. See Sec. 1.1502-
13(f)(7), Example 5(c).
Although the attribute redetermination rule generally does not
apply to sales or exchanges between members of a controlled group,
Sec. 1.267(f)-1(c)(1)(iv) contains a special rule with respect to
losses that would have been redetermined to be a noncapital,
nondeductible amount if the consolidated return attribute
redetermination rule did apply. Under Sec. 1.267(f)-1(c)(1)(iv), if an
intercompany loss between members of a consolidated group would have
been redetermined to be a noncapital, nondeductible amount as a result
of the attribute redetermination rule applicable to consolidated
groups, but is not redetermined because the sale or exchange occurred
between members of a controlled group (to which the attribute
redetermination rule does not apply), then the loss will be deferred
until S and B are no longer in a controlled group relationship. Thus,
if the facts in the example in the preceding paragraph were the same,
except that B was the parent of a controlled group that included S,
rather than a consolidated group, under the principles of section
267(f), the IRS and Treasury Department believe that S's loss on the
sale or exchange of T stock should be deferred until S and B (and their
successors) are no longer in a controlled group relationship.
Furthermore, assume S1 and S2, both members of a consolidated
group, each own 50 percent of the stock of T. If the basis of the T
stock is greater than its value, a liquidation of T would generally
result in non-recognition of the loss through the application of Sec.
1.1502-34 and section 332. In an attempt to avoid the non-recognition
of the loss, either S1 or S2 may sell more than 20 percent of T's stock
to a nonconsolidated, controlled group member in a transaction that is
treated as a sale or exchange for Federal income tax purposes.
Thereafter, T is liquidated in an attempt to recognize a loss on 100
percent of the subsidiary's stock. The IRS and Treasury Department
believe that in these situations, the loss should similarly be deferred
until the buying and selling members are no longer in a controlled
group relationship.
In a controlled group setting, taxpayers have noted that the
current regulations do not allow S to take into
[[Page 22337]]
account any amount of the intercompany loss when B recognizes a
corresponding gain. For example, if S sells 30 percent of T's stock to
B at a loss (in a transaction that is treated as a sale or exchange for
federal income tax purposes) and T's stock appreciates between the time
of the intercompany sale and a subsequent event that results in B's
recognition of gain (that is T's liquidation), B would recognize a gain
under section 331 at that time, but S's loss would remain deferred in
its entirety. Accordingly, the IRS and the Treasury Department propose
to modify the current regulations and allow S's intercompany loss to be
taken into account to the extent that B recognizes a corresponding
gain, in addition to the other events that result in acceleration.
Explanation of Provisions
These proposed regulations provide that, for purposes of
determining whether a loss would be determined to be a noncapital,
nondeductible amount under the principles of Sec. 1.1502-13, stock
held by the selling member, stock held by the buying member, and stock
held by all members of the seller's consolidated group as well as stock
held by any member of a controlled group of which the seller is a
member that was acquired from a member of the seller's consolidated
group must be taken into account. In addition, certain losses on the
sale or exchange of property between members of a controlled group,
which have been deferred, are taken into account upon the occurrence of
either of two events. The deferred loss is taken into account to the
extent of any corresponding gain that the member acquiring the property
recognizes with respect to the property. Alternatively, the deferred
loss is taken into account when the parties to the transaction cease to
be in a controlled group relationship. In the example, under the
proposed regulations, S's loss will be recognized to the extent of the
amount of corresponding gain recognized by B upon the event that
results in recognition of that gain (that is T's liquidation).
Proposed Effective/Applicability Date
These proposed regulations will apply to loss redetermination
events that occur after the date the regulations are published as final
regulations in the Federal Register.
Special Analyses
It has been determined that this notice of proposed rulemaking is
not a significant regulatory action as defined in Executive Order
12866. Therefore, a regulatory assessment is not required. It is hereby
certified that these proposed regulations will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial number of small entities. This
certification is based on the fact that these regulations primarily
affect controlled groups of corporations which tend to be larger
businesses. Therefore, a Regulatory Flexibility Analysis under the
Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. chapter 6) is not required.
Pursuant to section 7805(f) of the Internal Revenue Code, this
regulation has been submitted to the Small Business Administration for
comment on its impact on small governmental jurisdictions.
Comments and Requests for Public Hearing
Before these proposed regulations are adopted as final regulations,
consideration will be given to any written (a signed original and eight
(8) copies) or electronic comments that are submitted timely to the
IRS. The IRS and the Treasury Department request comments on the
clarity of the proposed rules and how they can be made easier to
understand. All comments are available at https://www.regulations.gov or
upon request. A public hearing will be scheduled if requested in
writing by any person that timely submits written comments. If a public
hearing is scheduled, notice of the date, time, and place for the
public hearing will be published in the Federal Register.
Drafting Information
The principal author of these regulations is Bruce A. Decker,
Office of Associate Chief Counsel (Corporate), IRS. However, other
personnel from the Treasury Department and the IRS participated in
their development.
List of Subjects in 26 CFR Part 1
Income taxes, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.
Proposed Amendments to the Regulations
Accordingly, 26 CFR part 1 is proposed to be amended as follows:
PART 1--INCOME TAXES
Paragraph 1. The authority citation for part 1 continues to read in
part as follows:
Authority: 26 U.S.C. 7805 * * *
Par. 2. Section 1.267(f)-1 is amended as follows:
1. Paragraph (c)(1)(iv) is revised.
2. Paragraph (l)(3) is redesignated as paragraph (l)(4) and
paragraph (l)(3) is added.
The addition and revision read as follows:
Sec. 1.267(f)-1 Controlled groups.
* * * * *
(c) * * *
(1) * * *
(iv) B's item is excluded from gross income or noncapital and
nondeductible. To the extent S's loss would be redetermined to be a
noncapital, nondeductible amount under the principles of Sec. 1.1502-
13, but is not redetermined because of paragraph (c)(2) of this section
(which generally renders the attribute redetermination rule
inapplicable to sales between members of a controlled group), S's loss
continues to be deferred. The preceding sentence does not apply,
however, to the extent paragraph (c)(1)(iii) of this section applies as
a result of a transfer of the property to certain related persons. If
the loss is deferred, it is taken into account when S and B (including
their successors) are no longer in a controlled group relationship or
to the extent of any corresponding income or gain recognized by B with
respect to the property, whichever occurs first. For example, if S
sells all of the stock of corporation T to B at a loss (in a
transaction that is treated as a sale or exchange for Federal income
tax purposes), and T subsequently liquidates in an unrelated
transaction that qualifies under section 332, S's loss is deferred
until S and B are no longer in a controlled group relationship.
Similarly, if S owns all of the T stock, sells 30 percent of T's stock
to B at a loss (in a transaction that is treated as a sale or exchange
for Federal income tax purposes), and T subsequently liquidates into S
and B, S's loss on the sale is deferred until S and B (including their
successors) are no longer in a controlled group relationship. If B
recognizes any income or gain on amounts received in a distribution in
complete liquidation of T, S will take into account its deferred loss
on its sale of T stock to the extent of B's gain. For purposes of this
paragraph, stock held by S, stock held by B, and stock held by all
members of S's consolidated group as well as stock held by any member
of a controlled group of which S is a member that was acquired from a
member of S's consolidated group must be taken into account in
determining whether a loss would be determined to be a noncapital,
nondeductible amount under the principles of Sec. 1.1502-13.
* * * * *
(l) * * *
* * * * *
[[Page 22338]]
(3) Loss redetermination events. Paragraph (c)(1)(iv) of this
section applies to loss redetermination events occurring after the date
these regulations are published as final regulations in the Federal
Register.
Steven T. Miller,
Deputy Commissioner for Services and Enforcement.
[FR Doc. 2011-9606 Filed 4-20-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-P