Safety Zone; Red River Safety Zone, Red River, MN, 22033-22035 [2011-9582]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 76 / Wednesday, April 20, 2011 / Rules and Regulations
product was tested, even if the order did
not include the test methods specified
in this notice. If the third party
conformity assessment body has not
been accredited as a firewalled
conformity assessment body by a
Commission order, the Commission will
not accept a certificate of compliance
based on testing performed by the third
party conformity assessment body
before it is accredited, by Commission
order, as a firewalled conformity
assessment body;
2. The third party conformity
assessment body’s application is
accepted by the CPSC by October 20,
2011, as established by the Commission;
3. The test results show compliance
with 16 CFR part 1217;
4. The product was tested on or after
April 20, 2011 and before October 20,
2011; and
5. The third party conformity
assessment body’s accreditation remains
in effect through the effective date for
mandatory third party testing and
manufacturer/private labeler
certification for the subject product’s
respective regulation.
Dated: April 14, 2011.
Todd A. Stevenson,
Secretary, Consumer Product Safety
Commission.
[FR Doc. 2011–9422 Filed 4–19–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6355–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 100
[Docket No. USCG–2011–0258]
National Maritime Week Tugboat
Races, Seattle, WA
Coast Guard, DHS.
Notice of enforcement of
regulation.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Coast Guard will enforce
the Special Local Regulation for the
annual National Maritime Week
Tugboat Races in Elliott Bay, WA from
12 p.m. through 4:30 p.m. on May 14,
2011. This action is necessary to ensure
the safety of all participants and
spectators from the inherent dangers
associated with these types of races
which includes large wakes. During the
enforcement period, no person or vessel
may enter or remain in the regulated
area except for participants in the event,
supporting personnel, vessels registered
with the event organizer, and personnel
or vessels authorized by the Coast Guard
Patrol Commander.
jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with RULES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:06 Apr 19, 2011
Jkt 223001
The regulations in 33 CFR
100.1306 will be enforced from 12 p.m.
through 4:30 p.m. on May 14, 2011.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have questions on this notice, call
or e-mail Ensign Anthony P. LaBoy,
Sector Puget Sound Waterways
Management Division, Coast Guard;
telephone 206–217–6323, e-mail
SectorPugetSoundWWM@uscg.mil.
DATES:
The Coast
Guard will enforce the Special Local
Regulation for the annual National
Maritime Week Tugboat Races, Seattle,
WA in 33 CFR 100.1306 on May 14,
2011 from 12:00 p.m. through 4:30 p.m.
This regulation can be found in the
April 27, 1996 issue of the Federal
Register (61 FR 16710).
A regulated area is established on that
portion of Elliott Bay along the Seattle
waterfront in Puget Sound bounded by
a line beginning at: 47°37′36″ N,
122°22′42″ W; thence to 47°37′24.5″ N,
122°22′58.5″ W; thence to 47°36′08″ N,
122°20′53″ W; thence to 47°36′21″ N,
122°20′31″ W; thence returning to the
origin. This regulated area resembles a
rectangle measuring approximately
3,900 yards along the shoreline between
Pier 57 and Pier 89, and extending
approximately 650 yards into Elliott
Bay. Temporary floating markers will be
placed by the race sponsors to delineate
the regulated area. [Datum: NAD 1983]
No person or vessel may enter or
remain in the regulated area except for
participants in the event, supporting
personnel, vessels registered with the
event organizer, and personnel or
vessels authorized by the Coast Guard
Patrol Commander.
The Coast Guard will establish a
patrol consisting of active and auxiliary
Coast Guard vessels and personnel in
the regulated area described above. The
patrol shall be under the direction of a
Coast Guard officer or petty officer
designated by the Captain of the Port as
the Coast Guard Patrol Commander. The
Patrol Commander may forbid and
control the movement of vessels in this
regulated area.
A succession of sharp, short blasts
from whistle or horn from vessels
patrolling the area under the direction
of the Patrol Commander shall serve as
a signal to stop. Vessels signaled shall
stop and comply with the orders of the
patrol vessel. Failure to do so may result
in expulsion from the area, citation for
failure to comply, or both.
The Coast Guard may be assisted by
other Federal, State, or local law
enforcement agencies in enforcing this
regulation.
This notice is issued under authority
of 33 CFR 100.1306 and 5 U.S.C. 552(a).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
PO 00000
Frm 00029
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
22033
If the Captain of the Port determines
that the regulated area need not be
enforced for the full duration stated in
this notice, he or she may use a
Broadcast Notice to Mariners to grant
general permission to enter the
regulated area.
Dated: April 7, 2011.
S.J. Ferguson,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the
Port, Puget Sound.
[FR Doc. 2011–9532 Filed 4–19–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket No. USCG–2011–0263]
RIN 1625–AAOO
Safety Zone; Red River Safety Zone,
Red River, MN
Coast Guard, DHS.
Temporary final rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Coast Guard Captain of
the Port, Marine Safety Unit Duluth, MN
is establishing a temporary safety zone
on the Red River, MN. This safety zone
is being established to ensure the safety
of the public. The safety zone will
prevent individuals from entering all
navigable waters of the Red River in the
State of Minnesota north of a line drawn
across latitude 46°20′00″ N, including
those portions of the river in Wilkin,
Clay, Norman, Polk, Marshall and
Kittson counties, to the United StatesCanada international border.
DATES: This rule is effective in the CFR
from April 20, 2011 until July 15, 2011.
This rule is effective with actual notice
for purposes of enforcement from April
7, 2011 until 5 p.m. on July 15, 2011.
ADDRESSES: Documents indicated in this
preamble as being available in the
docket are part of docket USCG–2011–
0263 and are available online by going
to https://www.regulations.gov, inserting
USCG–2011–0263 in the ‘‘Keyword’’
box, and then clicking ‘‘Search.’’ They
are also available for inspection or
copying at the Docket Management
Facility (M–30), U.S. Department of
Transportation, West Building Ground
Floor, Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590,
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have questions on this temporary
rule, call or e-mail Aaron L. Gross, Chief
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\20APR1.SGM
20APR1
22034
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 76 / Wednesday, April 20, 2011 / Rules and Regulations
of Port Operations, Marine Safety Unit
Duluth, Coast Guard; telephone 218–
720–5286 ext 111, e-mail
Aaron.L.Gross@uscg.mil. If you have
questions on viewing the docket, call
Renee V. Wright, Program Manager,
Docket Operations, telephone 202–366–
9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Regulatory Information
The Coast Guard is issuing this
temporary final rule without prior
notice and opportunity to comment
pursuant to authority under section 4(a)
of the Administrative Procedure Act
(APA) (5 U.S.C. 553(b)). This provision
authorizes an agency to issue a rule
without prior notice and opportunity to
comment when the agency for good
cause finds that those procedures are
‘‘impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary
to the public interest.’’ Under 5 U.S.C.
553(b)(B), the Coast Guard finds that
good cause exists for not publishing a
notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM)
with respect to this rule because doing
so would be contrary to the public
interest due to the emergency nature
under which this safety zone is being
established and would hinder the
protection of the public.
Under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast
Guard finds that good cause exists for
making this rule effective less than 30
days after publication in the Federal
Register. Good cause for making this
rule effective less than 30 days after
publication exists because delaying the
execution of the rule would be contrary
to the public interest due to the
emergency nature under which this
safety zone is being established and
would hinder the protection of the
public.
jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with RULES
Background and Purpose
This temporary safety zone is
necessary to ensure the safety of the
public from hazards involved with the
flooding of the Red River. Restricted
access to the Red River by the public
will help ensure the safety of persons
and property along the Red River.
Discussion of Rule
Flooding conditions along the Red
River have created serious dangers to
the boating public. The strong currents
and floating debris associated with the
flooding of the Red River necessitate the
Coast Guard limiting access to the
portions of the river affected by this rule
in order to protect the public. This rule
is effective from 5 p.m. on April 7, 2011
until 5 p.m. on July 15, 2011. The
Captain of the Port Duluth may stop
enforcement of this safety zone before 5
p.m. on July 15, 2011 if river conditions
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:06 Apr 19, 2011
Jkt 223001
change such that enforcement of the
safety zone is no longer necessary for
the public’s safety. The Captain of the
Port Duluth will notify the public via a
Broadcast Notice to Mariners.
Regulatory Analyses
We developed this rule after
considering numerous statutes and
executive orders related to rulemaking.
Below we summarize our analyses
based on 13 of these statutes or
executive orders.
Regulatory Planning and Review
This rule is not a significant
regulatory action under section 3(f) of
Executive Order 12866, Regulatory
Planning and Review, and does not
require an assessment of potential costs
and benefits under section 6(a)(3) of that
Order. The Office of Management and
Budget has not reviewed it under that
Order.
Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act
(5 U.S.C. 601–612), we have considered
whether this rule would have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
The term ‘‘small entities’’ comprises
small businesses, not-for-profit
organizations that are independently
owned and operated and are not
dominant in their fields, and
governmental jurisdictions with
populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5
U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule will not have
a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
This rule will affect the following
entities, some of which may be small
entities: the owners or operators of
vessels intending to transit or anchor in
the portions of the Red River affected by
this safety zone. This safety zone will
not have a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities
for the following reasons because few
small business entities operate on the
affected portion of the river and because
this rule will be in effect only until the
Red River is deemed safe to transit.
Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121),
we offer to assist small entities in
understanding the rule so that they can
better evaluate its effects on them and
participate in the rulemaking process.
Small businesses may send comments
on the actions of Federal employees
who enforce, or otherwise determine
compliance with, Federal regulations to
the Small Business and Agriculture
PO 00000
Frm 00030
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Regulatory Enforcement Ombudsman
and the Regional Small Business
Regulatory Fairness Boards. The
Ombudsman evaluates these actions
annually and rates each agency’s
responsiveness to small business. If you
wish to comment on actions by
employees of the Coast Guard, call
1–888–REG–FAIR (1–888–734–3247).
The Coast Guard will not retaliate
against small entities that question or
complain about this rule or any policy
or action of the Coast Guard.
Collection of Information
This rule calls for no new collection
of information under the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501–
3520).
Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism
under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct
effect on State or local governments and
would either preempt State law or
impose a substantial direct cost of
compliance on them. We have analyzed
this rule under that Order and have
determined that it does not have
implications for federalism.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
Federal agencies to assess the effects of
their discretionary regulatory actions. In
particular, the Act addresses actions
that may result in the expenditure by a
State, local, or tribal government, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector of
$100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or
more in any one year. Though this rule
will not result in such an expenditure,
we do discuss the effects of this rule
elsewhere in this preamble.
Taking of Private Property
This rule will not cause a taking of
private property or otherwise have
taking implications under Executive
Order 12630, Governmental Actions and
Interference with Constitutionally
Protected Property Rights.
Civil Justice Reform
This rule meets applicable standards
in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of Executive
Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to
minimize litigation, eliminate
ambiguity, and reduce burden.
Protection of Children
We have analyzed this rule under
Executive Order 13045, Protection of
Children from Environmental Health
Risks and Safety Risks. This rule is not
an economically significant rule and
does not create an environmental risk to
E:\FR\FM\20APR1.SGM
20APR1
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 76 / Wednesday, April 20, 2011 / Rules and Regulations
health or risk to safety that may
disproportionately affect children.
Indian Tribal Governments
This rule does not have tribal
implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination
with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it does not have a substantial
direct effect on one or more Indian
tribes, on the relationship between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes,
or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes.
Energy Effects
We have analyzed this rule under
Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have
determined that it is not a ‘‘significant
energy action’’ under that order because
it is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’
under Executive Order 12866 and is not
likely to have a significant adverse effect
on the supply, distribution, or use of
energy. The Administrator of the Office
of Information and Regulatory Affairs
has not designated it as a significant
energy action. Therefore, it does not
require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.
jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with RULES
Technical Standards
The National Technology Transfer
and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use
voluntary consensus standards in their
regulatory activities unless the agency
provides Congress, through the Office of
Management and Budget, with an
explanation of why using these
standards would be inconsistent with
applicable law or otherwise impractical.
Voluntary consensus standards are
technical standards (e.g., specifications
of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling
procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or
adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
This rule does not use technical
standards. Therefore, we did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus
standards.
Environment
We have analyzed this rule under
Department of Homeland Security
Management Directive 023–01 and
Commandant Instruction M16475.lD,
which guide the Coast Guard in
complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and
have concluded this action is one of a
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:06 Apr 19, 2011
Jkt 223001
category of actions that do not
individually or cumulatively have a
significant effect on the human
environment. This rule is categorically
excluded, under figure 2–1, paragraph
(34)(g), of the Instruction. This rule
involves the establishment of a safety
zone. An environmental analysis
checklist and a categorical exclusion
determination are available in the
docket where indicated under
ADDRESSES.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation
(water), Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Security measures,
Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
CFR Part 165 as follows:
PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION
AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
1. The authority citation for part 165
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 46 U.S.C.
Chapter 701, 3306, 3703; 50 U.S.C. 191, 195;
33 CFR 1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6, and 160.5;
Pub. L. 107–295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department
of Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1.
22035
(3) The ‘‘on-scene representative’’ of
the Captain of the Port Duluth is any
Coast Guard commissioned, warrant or
petty officer who has been designated
by the Captain of the Port Duluth to act
on his behalf. The on-scene
representative of the Captain of the Port
Duluth will be aboard either a Coast
Guard or Coast Guard Auxiliary vessel.
The Captain of the Port Duluth or his
designated on-scene representative may
be contacted via VHF Channel 16.
(4) Vessel operators desiring to enter
or operate within the safety zone shall
contact the Captain of the Port Duluth
or his on-scene representative to obtain
permission to do so. Vessel operators
given permission to enter or operate in
the safety zone must comply with all
directions given to them by the Captain
of the Port Duluth or his on-scene
representative.
Dated: April 7, 2011.
K.R. Bryan,
Commander, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of
the Port Duluth.
[FR Doc. 2011–9582 Filed 4–19–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
2. Add § 165.T09–0263 to read as
follows:
Coast Guard
§ 165.T09–0263 Safety zone; Red River
Safety Zone, Red River, MN.
33 CFR Part 165
■
(a) Location. The following area is a
temporary safety zone: all navigable
waters of the Red River in the State of
Minnesota north of a line drawn across
latitude 46°20’00’’ N, including those
portions of the river in Wilkin, Clay,
Norman, Polk, Marshall and Kittson
counties, to the United States—Canada
international border.
(b) Effective period. This rule is
effective from 5 p.m. on April 7, 2011
until 5 p.m. on July 15, 2011. If the river
conditions change such that
enforcement of the Safety Zone is
unnecessary prior to 5 p.m. on July 15,
2011, the Captain of the Port Duluth
will notify the public via a Broadcast
Notice to Mariners.
(c) Regulations.
(1) In accordance with the general
regulations in § 165.23 of this part, entry
into, transiting, or anchoring within this
safety zone is prohibited unless
authorized by the Captain of the Port
Duluth, or his designated on-scene
representative.
(2) This safety zone is closed to all
vessel traffic, except as may be
permitted by the Captain of the Port
Duluth or his designated on-scene
representative.
PO 00000
Frm 00031
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
[Docket No. USCG–2011–0189]
RIN 1625–AA00
Safety Zone; Chicago Harbor, Navy
Pier Southeast, Chicago, IL
Coast Guard, DHS.
Notice of enforcement of
regulation.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Coast Guard will enforce
the Navy Pier Southeast Safety Zone in
Chicago Harbor during various periods
from May 28, 2011 until June 29, 2011.
This action is necessary and intended to
ensure safety of life on the navigable
waters of the United States immediately
prior to, during, and immediately after
various fireworks events. Enforcement
of this safety zone will establish
restrictions upon, and control
movement of, vessels in a specified area
immediately prior to, during, and
immediately after various fireworks
events. During the enforcement period,
no person or vessel may enter the safety
zone without permission of the Captain
of the Port, Sector Lake Michigan.
DATES: The regulations in 33 CFR
165.931 will be effective from 10 p.m.
on May 28, 2011 to 10:30 p.m. on June
29, 2011.
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\20APR1.SGM
20APR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 76 (Wednesday, April 20, 2011)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 22033-22035]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-9582]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket No. USCG-2011-0263]
RIN 1625-AAOO
Safety Zone; Red River Safety Zone, Red River, MN
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Temporary final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard Captain of the Port, Marine Safety Unit
Duluth, MN is establishing a temporary safety zone on the Red River,
MN. This safety zone is being established to ensure the safety of the
public. The safety zone will prevent individuals from entering all
navigable waters of the Red River in the State of Minnesota north of a
line drawn across latitude 46[deg]20'00'' N, including those portions
of the river in Wilkin, Clay, Norman, Polk, Marshall and Kittson
counties, to the United States-Canada international border.
DATES: This rule is effective in the CFR from April 20, 2011 until July
15, 2011. This rule is effective with actual notice for purposes of
enforcement from April 7, 2011 until 5 p.m. on July 15, 2011.
ADDRESSES: Documents indicated in this preamble as being available in
the docket are part of docket USCG-2011-0263 and are available online
by going to https://www.regulations.gov, inserting USCG-2011-0263 in the
``Keyword'' box, and then clicking ``Search.'' They are also available
for inspection or copying at the Docket Management Facility (M-30),
U.S. Department of Transportation, West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590, between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this
temporary rule, call or e-mail Aaron L. Gross, Chief
[[Page 22034]]
of Port Operations, Marine Safety Unit Duluth, Coast Guard; telephone
218-720-5286 ext 111, e-mail Aaron.L.Gross@uscg.mil. If you have
questions on viewing the docket, call Renee V. Wright, Program Manager,
Docket Operations, telephone 202-366-9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Regulatory Information
The Coast Guard is issuing this temporary final rule without prior
notice and opportunity to comment pursuant to authority under section
4(a) of the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) (5 U.S.C. 553(b)). This
provision authorizes an agency to issue a rule without prior notice and
opportunity to comment when the agency for good cause finds that those
procedures are ``impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary to the public
interest.'' Under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B), the Coast Guard finds that good
cause exists for not publishing a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM)
with respect to this rule because doing so would be contrary to the
public interest due to the emergency nature under which this safety
zone is being established and would hinder the protection of the
public.
Under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast Guard finds that good cause
exists for making this rule effective less than 30 days after
publication in the Federal Register. Good cause for making this rule
effective less than 30 days after publication exists because delaying
the execution of the rule would be contrary to the public interest due
to the emergency nature under which this safety zone is being
established and would hinder the protection of the public.
Background and Purpose
This temporary safety zone is necessary to ensure the safety of the
public from hazards involved with the flooding of the Red River.
Restricted access to the Red River by the public will help ensure the
safety of persons and property along the Red River.
Discussion of Rule
Flooding conditions along the Red River have created serious
dangers to the boating public. The strong currents and floating debris
associated with the flooding of the Red River necessitate the Coast
Guard limiting access to the portions of the river affected by this
rule in order to protect the public. This rule is effective from 5 p.m.
on April 7, 2011 until 5 p.m. on July 15, 2011. The Captain of the Port
Duluth may stop enforcement of this safety zone before 5 p.m. on July
15, 2011 if river conditions change such that enforcement of the safety
zone is no longer necessary for the public's safety. The Captain of the
Port Duluth will notify the public via a Broadcast Notice to Mariners.
Regulatory Analyses
We developed this rule after considering numerous statutes and
executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our analyses
based on 13 of these statutes or executive orders.
Regulatory Planning and Review
This rule is not a significant regulatory action under section 3(f)
of Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review, and does not
require an assessment of potential costs and benefits under section
6(a)(3) of that Order. The Office of Management and Budget has not
reviewed it under that Order.
Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601-612), we have
considered whether this rule would have a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities. The term ``small entities''
comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations that are
independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their fields,
and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule will
not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
entities. This rule will affect the following entities, some of which
may be small entities: the owners or operators of vessels intending to
transit or anchor in the portions of the Red River affected by this
safety zone. This safety zone will not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small entities for the following
reasons because few small business entities operate on the affected
portion of the river and because this rule will be in effect only until
the Red River is deemed safe to transit.
Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we offer to assist small
entities in understanding the rule so that they can better evaluate its
effects on them and participate in the rulemaking process.
Small businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal
employees who enforce, or otherwise determine compliance with, Federal
regulations to the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory
Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small Business Regulatory
Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these actions annually and
rates each agency's responsiveness to small business. If you wish to
comment on actions by employees of the Coast Guard, call 1-888-REG-FAIR
(1-888-734-3247). The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small
entities that question or complain about this rule or any policy or
action of the Coast Guard.
Collection of Information
This rule calls for no new collection of information under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).
Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on State or local
governments and would either preempt State law or impose a substantial
direct cost of compliance on them. We have analyzed this rule under
that Order and have determined that it does not have implications for
federalism.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this rule will not result in
such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere
in this preamble.
Taking of Private Property
This rule will not cause a taking of private property or otherwise
have taking implications under Executive Order 12630, Governmental
Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected Property
Rights.
Civil Justice Reform
This rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2)
of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize litigation,
eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.
Protection of Children
We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13045, Protection
of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks. This rule
is not an economically significant rule and does not create an
environmental risk to
[[Page 22035]]
health or risk to safety that may disproportionately affect children.
Indian Tribal Governments
This rule does not have tribal implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it does not have a substantial direct effect on one or more
Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal Government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities
between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.
Energy Effects
We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have determined that it is not a ``significant
energy action'' under that order because it is not a ``significant
regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866 and is not likely to
have a significant adverse effect on the supply, distribution, or use
of energy. The Administrator of the Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs has not designated it as a significant energy
action. Therefore, it does not require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.
Technical Standards
The National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use voluntary consensus standards
in their regulatory activities unless the agency provides Congress,
through the Office of Management and Budget, with an explanation of why
using these standards would be inconsistent with applicable law or
otherwise impractical. Voluntary consensus standards are technical
standards (e.g., specifications of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
This rule does not use technical standards. Therefore, we did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus standards.
Environment
We have analyzed this rule under Department of Homeland Security
Management Directive 023-01 and Commandant Instruction M16475.lD, which
guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National Environmental
Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have concluded
this action is one of a category of actions that do not individually or
cumulatively have a significant effect on the human environment. This
rule is categorically excluded, under figure 2-1, paragraph (34)(g), of
the Instruction. This rule involves the establishment of a safety zone.
An environmental analysis checklist and a categorical exclusion
determination are available in the docket where indicated under
ADDRESSES.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends
33 CFR Part 165 as follows:
PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
0
1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 46 U.S.C. Chapter 701, 3306, 3703;
50 U.S.C. 191, 195; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-1, 6.04-6, and 160.5; Pub.
L. 107-295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department of Homeland Security
Delegation No. 0170.1.
0
2. Add Sec. 165.T09-0263 to read as follows:
Sec. 165.T09-0263 Safety zone; Red River Safety Zone, Red River, MN.
(a) Location. The following area is a temporary safety zone: all
navigable waters of the Red River in the State of Minnesota north of a
line drawn across latitude 46[deg]20'00'' N, including those portions
of the river in Wilkin, Clay, Norman, Polk, Marshall and Kittson
counties, to the United States--Canada international border.
(b) Effective period. This rule is effective from 5 p.m. on April
7, 2011 until 5 p.m. on July 15, 2011. If the river conditions change
such that enforcement of the Safety Zone is unnecessary prior to 5 p.m.
on July 15, 2011, the Captain of the Port Duluth will notify the public
via a Broadcast Notice to Mariners.
(c) Regulations.
(1) In accordance with the general regulations in Sec. 165.23 of
this part, entry into, transiting, or anchoring within this safety zone
is prohibited unless authorized by the Captain of the Port Duluth, or
his designated on-scene representative.
(2) This safety zone is closed to all vessel traffic, except as may
be permitted by the Captain of the Port Duluth or his designated on-
scene representative.
(3) The ``on-scene representative'' of the Captain of the Port
Duluth is any Coast Guard commissioned, warrant or petty officer who
has been designated by the Captain of the Port Duluth to act on his
behalf. The on-scene representative of the Captain of the Port Duluth
will be aboard either a Coast Guard or Coast Guard Auxiliary vessel.
The Captain of the Port Duluth or his designated on-scene
representative may be contacted via VHF Channel 16.
(4) Vessel operators desiring to enter or operate within the safety
zone shall contact the Captain of the Port Duluth or his on-scene
representative to obtain permission to do so. Vessel operators given
permission to enter or operate in the safety zone must comply with all
directions given to them by the Captain of the Port Duluth or his on-
scene representative.
Dated: April 7, 2011.
K.R. Bryan,
Commander, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port Duluth.
[FR Doc. 2011-9582 Filed 4-19-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P