Bussel 484, Idaho Panhandle National Forests, Idaho, Shoshone County, 22076-22077 [2011-9539]

Agencies

• DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
• Forest Service

[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 76 (Wednesday, April 20, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 22076-22077]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-9539]



[[Page 22076]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Forest Service


Bussel 484, Idaho Panhandle National Forests, Idaho, Shoshone 
County

AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA.

ACTION: Notice of intent to prepare a supplemental environmental impact 
statement.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The USDA Forest Service will prepare a supplemental 
environmental impact statement (SEIS) for the Bussel 484 Project. The 
Notice of Availability of the Draft EIS for the Bussel 484 Project was 
published in the Federal Register (73 FR 12413) on March 7, 2008, and 
the notice for the Final EIS (73 FR 24279) was published on May 2, 
2008. The Record of Decision (ROD) for this project was signed on May 
21, 2008. It was administratively appealed to the Regional Forester per 
36 CFR part 215. The Regional Forester affirmed the decision on July 
31, 2008. A complaint was filed in the United States District Court for 
the District of Idaho on April 9, 2009. On August 6, 2010 the United 
States District Court for the District of Idaho set aside the Bussel 
484 decision and remanded it to the Forest Service. The proposed action 
is unchanged from the final EIS. A supplemental EIS will be prepared to 
address analysis for wildlife, fire management direction, recently 
designated critical habitat for bull trout, and newly designated 
Sensitive species.

DATES: Scoping is not required for supplements to environmental impact 
statements (40 CFR 1502.9(c)(4)). There was extensive public 
involvement in the development of the proposed action, the 2008 Draft 
EIS, and the 2008 Final EIS. The Forest Service is not inviting 
comments at this time. The draft supplemental EIS is expected May 2011, 
and the final supplemental EIS is expected July 2011. The comment 
period for the draft SEIS will be 45 days from the date the EPA 
publishes the notice of availability in the Federal Register.

ADDRESSES: St. Joe Ranger District, 222 South 7th Street, Suite 1, St. 
Maries, Idaho 83861.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Wade Sims, District Ranger, USDA 
Forest Service, St. Joe Ranger District, 208-245-2531. Individuals who 
use telecommunication devices for the deaf (TDD) may call the Federal 
Information Relay Service (FIRS) at 1-800-877-8339 between 8 a.m. and 8 
p.m., Eastern Time, Monday through Friday.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Forest Supervisor selected Alternative B 
with modifications as documented in the May 2008 Bussel 484 Record of 
Decision (ROD). The ROD authorized approximately 2,137 acres of timber 
harvest, fuel treatment resulting from the timber harvest, tree 
planting in regeneration harvest units, pocket gopher control, 575 
acres of precommercial thinning which also included 309 acres of white 
pine pruning, approximately 4.5 miles of system road construction on 
National Forest System lands, 0.2 miles of road construction across 
lands owned by Potlatch Corporation as part of a cost-share agreement, 
0.5 miles of temporary road construction, 5.4 miles of road 
reconstruction, installing effective motorized vehicle restriction 
devices thorughout the project area, removing a gate, 0.2 miles of new 
trail construction for motorized vehicles less than 50 inches wide, the 
conversion of Bussel Creek Trail 258 to non-motorized use, designation 
of Lines Creek Historical Trail for motorized vehicles less than 50 
inches wide, repair and designation of 2.9 miles of the Norton Railroad 
Grade for motorized vehicles less than 50 inches wide, storage or 
decommissioning of approximately 32 miles of existing road, planting 
native trees and shrubs along riparian areas, large woody debris 
placement in stream channels, elimination of two human-created fish 
migration barriers, and reallocation of approximately 120 acres of 
Management Area 9 to Management Area 1. The supplemental EIS will 
contain additional information about wildlife, fire management 
direction, recently designated critical habitat for bull trout, and 
newly designated Sensitive species.
    The mailing list for this project will include those individuals, 
agencies and organizations on the mailing list for the March 2008 Draft 
EIS. The comment period for the draft SEIS will be 45 days from the 
date the EPA publishes the notice of availability in the Federal 
Register. The Idaho Panhandle National Forests Supervisor will make a 
decision on this project after considering comments, environmental 
consequences, and applicable laws, regulations, and policies.

Purpose and Need for Action

    The project is needed to maintain or improve resilience of the 
vegetative resources to disturbances such as insects, disease, and 
fire; provide wood products for local communities; work toward full 
support of designated beneficial uses in the Bussel Creek Watershed; 
and manage access to provide for multiple uses.

Proposed Action

    The proposed action as described in the FEIS includes timber 
harvest and associated fuels treatment on approximately 2,137 acres; 
approximately 5.1 miles of system road construction, 0.5 miles of 
temporary road construction, and 6.7 miles of road reconstruction to 
facilitate the timber harvest; repairing the Norton Creek Railroad 
Grade then designating it open to vehicles less than 50 inches wide; 29 
miles of road decommissioning and storage; 367 acres of planting after 
timber harvest; 367 acres of pocket gopher control; 821 acres of 
precommercial thinning and pruning; changes in access management 
including installing effective restrictive devices on some roads, 
removing a gate, constructing 0.2 miles of new trail for ATV use, 
converting Bussel Creek Trail 258 to non-motorized use, designating 
Lines Creek Historical Trail for motorized vehicles less than 50 inches 
wide; planting some portions of riparian areas; placing large woody 
debris in streams; and correcting two fish migration barriers.

Responsible Official

    The Forest Supervisor of the Idaho Panhandle National Forests is 
the Responsible Official.

Nature of Decision To Be Made

    The decison for the Bussel 484 Project will identify the land 
management activities to be implemented in the project area including 
acres, types, and locations of vegetative treatments including timber 
harvest, fuel treatments, planting, and precommercial thinning; acres 
of pocket gopher control to protect regeneration; miles and locations 
of road construction, reconstruction, storage, and decommissioning; 
changes for public motorized access; areas and locations to place large 
woody debris in streams, and methods to correct fish migration 
barriers. The SEIS is intended to provide additional evaluation of 
wildife, the Idaho Panhandle National Forests' fire management 
direction, recently designated critical habitat for bull trout, and 
newly designated Sensitive species and provide that information to the 
public.

Scoping Process

    Scoping is not required for supplements to environmental impact 
statements (40 CFR 1502.9(c)(4)). There was extensive public 
involvement in the development of the proposed action, the 2008 Draft 
EIS, and the 2008 Final EIS. The Forest Service is not inviting 
comments at this time.

[[Page 22077]]

Comment Requested

    The comment period on the draft environmental impact statement will 
be 45 days from the date the Environmental Protection Agency publishes 
the notice of availability in the Federal Register.
    The Forest Service believes, at this early state, it is important 
to give reviewers notice of several court rulings related to public 
participation in the environmental review process. First, reviewers of 
draft environmental impact statements must structure their 
participation in the environmental review of the proposal so that it is 
meaningful and alerts an agency to the reviewer's positions and 
contentions. Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corp. v. NRDC, 435 U.S. 519, 
553 (1978). Also, environmental objections that could be raised at the 
draft environmental impact statement stage but that are not raised 
until after completion the final environmental impact statement may be 
waived or dismissed by the courts. City of Angoon v. Hodel, 803 F.2d 
1016, 1022 (9th Cir. 1986) and Wisconsin Heritages, Inc. v. Harris, 490 
F. Supp. 1334, 1338 (E.D. Wis. 1980). Because of these court rulings, 
it is very important that those interested in this proposed action 
participate by the close of the 45-day comment period so that 
substantive comments and objections are made available to the Forest 
Service at a time when it can meaningfully consider them and respond to 
them in the final environmental impact statement.
    To assist the Forest Service in identifying and considering issues 
and concerns on the proposed action, comments on the draft 
environmental impact statement should be as specific as possible. It is 
also helpful if comments refer to specific pages or chapters of the 
draft statement. Comments may also address the adequacy of the draft 
environmental impact statement or the merits of the alternatives 
formulated and discussed in the statement. Reviewers may wish to refer 
to the Council on Environmental Quality Regulations for implementing 
the procedural provisions of the National Environmental Policy Act at 
40 CFR 1503.3 in addressing these points.

    Dated: April 13, 2011.
Ranotta K. McNair,
Forest Supervisor.
[FR Doc. 2011-9539 Filed 4-19-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-11-P