Reducing Regulatory Burden; Retrospective Review Under Executive Order 13563, 22058-22059 [2011-9522]
Download as PDF
22058
Proposed Rules
Federal Register
Vol. 76, No. 76
Wednesday, April 20, 2011
www.regulations.gov. USDA strongly
encourages commenters to submit
comments electronically. Electronic
submission of comments allows the
commenter maximum time to prepare
and submit a comment, and ensures
timely receipt by USDA. Commenters
should follow the instructions provided
on that site to submit comments
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
electronically.
E-mail Submission of Comments.
2 CFR Chapter IX
Comments may be submitted by E-mail:
reg.review@obpa.usda.gov. E-mail
5 CFR Chapter LXXIII
submission of comments must include
7 CFR Subtitle A and Chapters I
the term ‘‘Retrospective Review’’ in the
Through VII, XIV Through XVIII, XX,
subject line of the message.
Submission of Comments by Mail.
XXVI Through XXXVIII, XLI, and XLII
Paper, disk, or CD–ROM submissions
should be submitted to Julie Hetrick,
9 CFR Chapters I Through III
Office of Budget and Program Analysis,
36 CFR Chapter II
USDA, Jamie L. Whitten Building, Room
101–A, 1400 Independence Ave., SW.,
48 CFR Chapter 4
Washington, DC 20250.
Submission of Comments by Hand
Reducing Regulatory Burden;
Delivery/Courier: Julie Hetrick, Office of
Retrospective Review Under Executive Budget and Program Analysis, USDA,
Order 13563
Jamie L. Whitten Building, Room 101–
A, 1400 Independence Ave., SW.,
AGENCY: Office of the Secretary, USDA.
Washington, DC 20250.
ACTION: Request for Information (RFI).
Background: To read background
information on Executive Order 13563,
SUMMARY: In accordance with Executive
Order 13563, ‘‘Improving Regulation and go to https://www.regulations.gov/
exchange/topic/eo-13563.
Regulatory Review,’’ the Department of
Agriculture (USDA) is reviewing its
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Julie
existing regulations to evaluate their
Hetrick, Office of Budget and Program
continued effectiveness in addressing
Analysis, Jamie L. Whitten Building,
the circumstances for which they were
Room 101–A, USDA, 1400
promulgated. As part of this review,
Independence Ave., SW., Washington,
USDA invites public comment to assist
DC 20250; Voice: (202) 720–1269.
in analyzing its existing significant
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
regulations to determine whether they
I. Executive Order 13563
should be modified, streamlined,
expanded, or repealed.
On January 18, 2011, the President
The focus of USDA’s initial review is
issued Executive Order 13563,
to identify areas where it can simplify
‘‘Improving Regulation and Regulatory
and reduce the reporting burden on the
Review,’’ to ensure that Federal
public for entry and access to USDA
regulations use the best available tools
programs, while simultaneously
to promote innovation that will reduce
reducing its administrative and
costs and burden while allowing public
operating costs by sharing similar data
participation and an open exchange of
across participating agencies.
ideas. These principles will enhance
DATES: Comments and information are
and strengthen Federal regulations to
requested on or before May 20, 2011.
allow them to achieve their regulatory
objectives, most important among them,
ADDRESSES: Interested persons are
protecting public health, welfare, safety,
invited to submit comments regarding
and the environment. In consideration
this notice. All submissions must refer
of these principles, and as directed by
to ‘‘Retrospective Review’’ to ensure
the Executive Order, Federal agencies
proper delivery.
and departments need to periodically
Electronic Submission of Comments.
review and consider existing regulations
Interested persons may submit
that may be outmoded, ineffective,
comments electronically through the
insufficient, or excessively burdensome
Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER
contains notices to the public of the proposed
issuance of rules and regulations. The
purpose of these notices is to give interested
persons an opportunity to participate in the
rule making prior to the adoption of the final
rules.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:26 Apr 19, 2011
Jkt 223001
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
and to modify, streamline, expand, or
repeal them in accordance with what
has been learned. As part of this
retrospective review of regulations, and
as USDA develops a preliminary plan to
periodically review the regulatory
programs of its mission areas, USDA is
seeking public comment on how best to
remove obstacles created by current
regulations and ways to improve them
to help USDA agencies advance the
mission of the Department.
II. Request for Information
USDA is contemplating focusing its
initial retrospective review under
Executive Order 13563 in the following
areas: Rural Development, Farm Service
Agency, Natural Resources Conservation
Service, and the Food Safety and
Inspection Service. Each area has
identified potential issues for review.
USDA is particularly interested in
public comments that speak to these
areas and the issues identified below.
A. Rural Development
To better serve its customers, Rural
Development (RD) is considering a
review of its regulations in order to
determine whether certain application
procedures can be streamlined. RD is
particularly interested in hearing from
the public on how best to streamline
certain application procedures to reflect
the size and risk of certain types of
loans and grants, including required
audits, paperwork, and forms, and other
ways to reduce excessive burdens.
B. Farm and Foreign Agricultural
Services
The Farm and Foreign Agricultural
Services (FFAS) mission area is
considering a review of process
improvements that could be achieved
through the consolidation of
information required to participate in
farm programs administered by the
Farm Service Agency and the Federal
Crop Insurance Program administered
by the Risk Management Agency. FFAS
is interested in hearing from the public
on how best to simplify and
standardize, to the extent practical,
acreage reporting processes, program
dates, and data definitions across the
various USDA programs and agencies.
FFAS also welcomes comments on how
best to develop procedures, processes,
and standards that will allow producers
to use information from their farmmanagement and precision-ag systems
E:\FR\FM\20APP1.SGM
20APP1
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 76 / Wednesday, April 20, 2011 / Proposed Rules
for reporting production, planted and
harvested acreage, and other key
information needed to participate in
USDA programs. These process changes
may allow for program data that is
common across agencies to be collected
once and utilized or redistributed to
agency programs in which the producer
chooses to participate. It also may
provide a single Web site for producers
to report commodity information if they
so choose, or access their previously
reported information.
jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS
C. Natural Resources Conservation
Service
The Natural Resources Conservation
Service (NRCS) is considering a review
of its regulations consistent with its
other ongoing streamlining efforts to
improve the processes that deliver
technical and financial assistance to
program users. To inform this process,
NRCS welcomes comments on
approaches that will allow NRCS to
enhance its delivery of technical
assistance and streamline the
application process and participation in
financial assistance programs. NRCS is
specifically interested in comments on
such approaches as allowing customers
to apply for programs or services online
24/7, reducing the number of office
visits required through the use of mobile
technologies, accelerating payments to
clients after a practice is applied, and
simplifying conservation plan
documents.
D. Food Safety and Inspection Service
The Food Safety and Inspection
Service (FSIS) is considering a review of
its regulations to identify potential
improvements in information collection
procedures to increase the quality of
data available to inform and support
regulatory decision making. For
example, FSIS is considering collecting
additional information about
establishment verification testing, such
as testing for pathogens. FSIS is also
considering potential means to decrease
the recordkeeping burden on industry,
by possibly reducing label submission
requirements. In addition, FSIS is also
considering how its new Public Health
Information System could potentially be
used to share data and reduce data
reporting requirements. To aid this
effort, FSIS invites the public to
comment on how best to improve data
quality and minimize the recordkeeping
burden on industry.
(1) Are there regulations or reporting
requirements that have become outdated
and, if so, how can they be modernized
to accomplish their regulatory objectives
better?
(2) Do agencies currently collect
information that they do not need or use
effectively to achieve regulatory
objectives?
(3) Is there information that agencies
should begin collecting to achieve
regulatory objectives?
(4) Are there regulations, reporting
requirements, or regulatory submission
or application processes that are
unnecessarily complicated, or that
could be streamlined to achieve
regulatory objectives in ways that are
more efficient?
(5) Are there regulations, submission
and application processes, or reporting
requirements that have been overtaken
by technological developments? Can
new technologies be used to modify,
streamline, or do away with existing
regulatory or reporting requirements?
This is a non-exhaustive list that is
meant to assist in the formulation of
comments and is not intended to limit
the issues that commenters may choose
to address. Although we are
contemplating on focusing our initial
review on the four areas identified
above, we welcome comments from the
public on any of USDA’s regulations
and ways to improve them to help
USDA agencies advance the mission of
the Department consistent with the
Executive Order. We encourage the
public to comment on those rules that
have been in effect for a sufficient
amount of time to warrant meaningful
evaluation. USDA notes that this RFI is
issued solely for information and
program-planning purposes. While
responses to this RFI do not bind USDA
to any further actions related to the
response, all submissions will be made
publicly available on https://
www.regulations.gov.
Signed in Washington, DC, on April 12,
2011.
Thomas J. Vilsack,
Secretary of Agriculture.
[FR Doc. 2011–9522 Filed 4–19–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–90–P
III. Questions for Commenters
In providing comments, the public is
encouraged to respond to the questions
as they pertain to the four areas
identified above:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:26 Apr 19, 2011
Jkt 223001
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
22059
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2011–0382; Directorate
Identifier 2010–NM–063–AD]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; The Boeing
Company Model 757 Airplanes, and
Model 767–200, 767–300, and 767–300F
Series Airplanes
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM).
AGENCY:
We propose to supersede an
existing airworthiness directive (AD)
that applies to the products listed above.
The existing AD currently requires
revising the Limitations section of the
airplane flight manual (AFM) to advise
the flight crew of procedures to follow
to ensure that a fuel filter impending
bypass condition due to gross fuel
contamination is detected in a timely
manner. Since we issued that AD, a new
design change has been developed that
will correct an error in the operating
program software (OPS) of the engine
indication and crew alerting system
(EICAS). This proposed AD would
require installing new OPS (Version 7)
of the EICAS in the EICAS computers.
This proposed AD would also require
various concurrent actions, depending
on the airplane configuration, including
installing a certain EICAS OPS version,
making wiring changes, replacing the
audio accessory unit, replacing certain
handsets and EICAS computers,
changing EICAS computer connector
keying, and loading Operational
Program Configuration (OPC) software.
This proposed AD also retains the
existing AD provision that relieves
certain airplanes (those equipped with
certain EICAS OPS versions) from the
proposed requirements.
Accomplishment of the new proposed
actions would terminate the
requirements of the existing AD. We are
proposing this AD to prevent
malfunction and thrust loss on both
engines, which could result in a forced
off-airport landing.
DATES: We must receive comments on
this proposed AD by June 6, 2011.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments by
any of the following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• Fax: 202–493–2251.
• Mail: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M–
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\20APP1.SGM
20APP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 76 (Wednesday, April 20, 2011)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 22058-22059]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-9522]
========================================================================
Proposed Rules
Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains notices to the public of
the proposed issuance of rules and regulations. The purpose of these
notices is to give interested persons an opportunity to participate in
the rule making prior to the adoption of the final rules.
========================================================================
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 76 / Wednesday, April 20, 2011 /
Proposed Rules
[[Page 22058]]
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
2 CFR Chapter IX
5 CFR Chapter LXXIII
7 CFR Subtitle A and Chapters I Through VII, XIV Through XVIII, XX,
XXVI Through XXXVIII, XLI, and XLII
9 CFR Chapters I Through III
36 CFR Chapter II
48 CFR Chapter 4
Reducing Regulatory Burden; Retrospective Review Under Executive
Order 13563
AGENCY: Office of the Secretary, USDA.
ACTION: Request for Information (RFI).
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: In accordance with Executive Order 13563, ``Improving
Regulation and Regulatory Review,'' the Department of Agriculture
(USDA) is reviewing its existing regulations to evaluate their
continued effectiveness in addressing the circumstances for which they
were promulgated. As part of this review, USDA invites public comment
to assist in analyzing its existing significant regulations to
determine whether they should be modified, streamlined, expanded, or
repealed.
The focus of USDA's initial review is to identify areas where it
can simplify and reduce the reporting burden on the public for entry
and access to USDA programs, while simultaneously reducing its
administrative and operating costs by sharing similar data across
participating agencies.
DATES: Comments and information are requested on or before May 20,
2011.
ADDRESSES: Interested persons are invited to submit comments regarding
this notice. All submissions must refer to ``Retrospective Review'' to
ensure proper delivery.
Electronic Submission of Comments. Interested persons may submit
comments electronically through the Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov. USDA strongly encourages commenters to submit
comments electronically. Electronic submission of comments allows the
commenter maximum time to prepare and submit a comment, and ensures
timely receipt by USDA. Commenters should follow the instructions
provided on that site to submit comments electronically.
E-mail Submission of Comments. Comments may be submitted by E-mail:
reg.review@obpa.usda.gov. E-mail submission of comments must include
the term ``Retrospective Review'' in the subject line of the message.
Submission of Comments by Mail. Paper, disk, or CD-ROM submissions
should be submitted to Julie Hetrick, Office of Budget and Program
Analysis, USDA, Jamie L. Whitten Building, Room 101-A, 1400
Independence Ave., SW., Washington, DC 20250.
Submission of Comments by Hand Delivery/Courier: Julie Hetrick,
Office of Budget and Program Analysis, USDA, Jamie L. Whitten Building,
Room 101-A, 1400 Independence Ave., SW., Washington, DC 20250.
Background: To read background information on Executive Order
13563, go to https://www.regulations.gov/exchange/topic/eo-13563.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Julie Hetrick, Office of Budget and
Program Analysis, Jamie L. Whitten Building, Room 101-A, USDA, 1400
Independence Ave., SW., Washington, DC 20250; Voice: (202) 720-1269.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Executive Order 13563
On January 18, 2011, the President issued Executive Order 13563,
``Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review,'' to ensure that Federal
regulations use the best available tools to promote innovation that
will reduce costs and burden while allowing public participation and an
open exchange of ideas. These principles will enhance and strengthen
Federal regulations to allow them to achieve their regulatory
objectives, most important among them, protecting public health,
welfare, safety, and the environment. In consideration of these
principles, and as directed by the Executive Order, Federal agencies
and departments need to periodically review and consider existing
regulations that may be outmoded, ineffective, insufficient, or
excessively burdensome and to modify, streamline, expand, or repeal
them in accordance with what has been learned. As part of this
retrospective review of regulations, and as USDA develops a preliminary
plan to periodically review the regulatory programs of its mission
areas, USDA is seeking public comment on how best to remove obstacles
created by current regulations and ways to improve them to help USDA
agencies advance the mission of the Department.
II. Request for Information
USDA is contemplating focusing its initial retrospective review
under Executive Order 13563 in the following areas: Rural Development,
Farm Service Agency, Natural Resources Conservation Service, and the
Food Safety and Inspection Service. Each area has identified potential
issues for review. USDA is particularly interested in public comments
that speak to these areas and the issues identified below.
A. Rural Development
To better serve its customers, Rural Development (RD) is
considering a review of its regulations in order to determine whether
certain application procedures can be streamlined. RD is particularly
interested in hearing from the public on how best to streamline certain
application procedures to reflect the size and risk of certain types of
loans and grants, including required audits, paperwork, and forms, and
other ways to reduce excessive burdens.
B. Farm and Foreign Agricultural Services
The Farm and Foreign Agricultural Services (FFAS) mission area is
considering a review of process improvements that could be achieved
through the consolidation of information required to participate in
farm programs administered by the Farm Service Agency and the Federal
Crop Insurance Program administered by the Risk Management Agency. FFAS
is interested in hearing from the public on how best to simplify and
standardize, to the extent practical, acreage reporting processes,
program dates, and data definitions across the various USDA programs
and agencies. FFAS also welcomes comments on how best to develop
procedures, processes, and standards that will allow producers to use
information from their farm-management and precision-ag systems
[[Page 22059]]
for reporting production, planted and harvested acreage, and other key
information needed to participate in USDA programs. These process
changes may allow for program data that is common across agencies to be
collected once and utilized or redistributed to agency programs in
which the producer chooses to participate. It also may provide a single
Web site for producers to report commodity information if they so
choose, or access their previously reported information.
C. Natural Resources Conservation Service
The Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) is considering a
review of its regulations consistent with its other ongoing
streamlining efforts to improve the processes that deliver technical
and financial assistance to program users. To inform this process, NRCS
welcomes comments on approaches that will allow NRCS to enhance its
delivery of technical assistance and streamline the application process
and participation in financial assistance programs. NRCS is
specifically interested in comments on such approaches as allowing
customers to apply for programs or services online 24/7, reducing the
number of office visits required through the use of mobile
technologies, accelerating payments to clients after a practice is
applied, and simplifying conservation plan documents.
D. Food Safety and Inspection Service
The Food Safety and Inspection Service (FSIS) is considering a
review of its regulations to identify potential improvements in
information collection procedures to increase the quality of data
available to inform and support regulatory decision making. For
example, FSIS is considering collecting additional information about
establishment verification testing, such as testing for pathogens. FSIS
is also considering potential means to decrease the recordkeeping
burden on industry, by possibly reducing label submission requirements.
In addition, FSIS is also considering how its new Public Health
Information System could potentially be used to share data and reduce
data reporting requirements. To aid this effort, FSIS invites the
public to comment on how best to improve data quality and minimize the
recordkeeping burden on industry.
III. Questions for Commenters
In providing comments, the public is encouraged to respond to the
questions as they pertain to the four areas identified above:
(1) Are there regulations or reporting requirements that have
become outdated and, if so, how can they be modernized to accomplish
their regulatory objectives better?
(2) Do agencies currently collect information that they do not need
or use effectively to achieve regulatory objectives?
(3) Is there information that agencies should begin collecting to
achieve regulatory objectives?
(4) Are there regulations, reporting requirements, or regulatory
submission or application processes that are unnecessarily complicated,
or that could be streamlined to achieve regulatory objectives in ways
that are more efficient?
(5) Are there regulations, submission and application processes, or
reporting requirements that have been overtaken by technological
developments? Can new technologies be used to modify, streamline, or do
away with existing regulatory or reporting requirements?
This is a non-exhaustive list that is meant to assist in the
formulation of comments and is not intended to limit the issues that
commenters may choose to address. Although we are contemplating on
focusing our initial review on the four areas identified above, we
welcome comments from the public on any of USDA's regulations and ways
to improve them to help USDA agencies advance the mission of the
Department consistent with the Executive Order. We encourage the public
to comment on those rules that have been in effect for a sufficient
amount of time to warrant meaningful evaluation. USDA notes that this
RFI is issued solely for information and program-planning purposes.
While responses to this RFI do not bind USDA to any further actions
related to the response, all submissions will be made publicly
available on https://www.regulations.gov.
Signed in Washington, DC, on April 12, 2011.
Thomas J. Vilsack,
Secretary of Agriculture.
[FR Doc. 2011-9522 Filed 4-19-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-90-P