Notice of Final Federal Agency Actions on Proposed Highway in Indiana, 21940-21943 [2011-9420]
Download as PDF
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES
21940
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 75 / Tuesday, April 19, 2011 / Notices
depicted on a noise exposure map
submitted under section 47503 of the
Act, it should be noted that the FAA is
not involved in any way in determining
the relative locations of specific
properties with regard to the depicted
noise contours, or in interpreting the
noise exposure maps to resolve
questions concerning, for example,
which properties should be covered by
the provisions of section 47506 of the
Act. These functions are inseparable
from the ultimate land use control and
planning responsibilities of local
government. These local responsibilities
are not changed in any way under Part
150 or through FAA’s review of noise
exposure maps. Therefore, the
responsibility for the detailed
overlaying of noise exposure contours
onto the map depicting properties on
the surface rests exclusively with the
airport operator that submitted those
maps, or with those public agencies and
planning agencies with which
consultation is required under section
47503 of the Act. The FAA has relied on
the certification by the airport operator,
under section 150.21 of Part 150, that
the statutorily required consultation has
been accomplished.
The FAA has formally received the
noise compatibility program for the
Lambert-St. Louis International Airport,
also effective on April 5, 2011.
Preliminary review of the submitted
material indicates that it conforms to the
requirements for the submittal of noise
compatibility programs, but that further
review will be necessary prior to
approval or disapproval of the program.
The formal review period, limited by
law to a maximum of 180 days, will be
completed on or before October 2, 2011.
The FAA’s detailed evaluation will be
conducted under the provisions of
section 150.33 of Part 150. The primary
considerations in the evaluation process
are whether the proposed measures may
reduce the level of aviation safety,
create an undue burden on interstate or
foreign commerce, or be reasonably
consistent with obtaining the goal of
reducing existing non-compatible land
uses and preventing the introduction of
additional non-compatible land uses.
Interested persons are invited to
comment on the proposed program with
specific reference to these factors. All
relevant comments, other than those
properly addressed to local land use
authorities, will be considered by the
FAA to the extent practicable. Copies of
the noise exposure maps, the FAA’s
evaluation of the maps, and the
proposed noise compatibility program
are available for examination at the
following locations:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:19 Apr 18, 2011
Jkt 223001
Federal Aviation Administration,
Central Region Airports Division, 901
Locust, Kansas City, Missouri 64106–
2325, from 7:30 a.m. to 4 p.m.
Jan Titus, St. Louis Airport Authority,
Lambert-St. Louis International
Airport, Airport Planning &
Development, 11495 Navaid Road,
Bridgeton, Missouri 63044, from
8 a.m. to 5 p.m.
Questions may be directed to the
individual named above under the
heading, FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT.
Louisville District, United States Army
Corps of Engineers, P.O. Box 59,
Louisville, KY 40201–0059; telephone:
(502) 315–6685; e-mail:
gregory.a.mckay@usace.army.mil.
Normal business hours are 8 a.m. to 5
p.m., e.t. You may also contact Mr.
Thomas Seeman, Project Manager,
Indiana Department of Transportation
(INDOT), 100 North Senate Avenue,
Indianapolis, IN 46204; telephone: (317)
232–5336; e-mail:
TSeeman@indot.IN.gov. Normal
business hours for the Indiana
Department of Transportation are: 8 a.m.
Issued in Kansas City, Missouri, April 5,
to 4:30 p.m., e.t.
2011.
Jim A. Johnson,
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is
hereby given that the FHWA and other
Manager, Central Region Airports Division.
Federal agencies have taken final agency
[FR Doc. 2011–9382 Filed 4–18–11; 8:45 am]
actions by issuing licenses, permits, and
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
approvals for the highway projects in
the State of Indiana that are listed
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION below. The actions by the Federal
agencies on a project, and the laws
Federal Highway Administration
under which such actions were taken,
are described in the Record of Decision
Notice of Final Federal Agency Actions (ROD), Reevaluation Documents to the
on Proposed Highway in Indiana
final environmental impact statements
(FEIS) issued in connection with the
AGENCY: Federal Highway
projects, Section 404 Discharge of
Administration (FHWA), DOT.
Dredged or Fill Material Permit and
ACTION: Notice of limitation on claims
Regional General Permit letters, and in
for judicial review of actions by FHWA
other documents in the FHWA
and United States Army Corps of
administrative record for the project.
Engineers (USACE), DoD.
The ROD and other documents from the
SUMMARY: This notice announces actions FHWA administrative record files for
taken by the FHWA and the USACE that the listed projects are available by
are final within the meaning of 23
contacting the FHWA or the Indiana
U.S.C. 139(l)(1). The actions relate to
Department of Transportation (INDOT)
proposed highway projects for a 28.7
at the addresses provided above. Project
mile segment of I–69 in the Counties of
information may also be available
Gibson, Pike and Daviess, State of
through the INDOT I–69 Project Web
Indiana, and grant licenses, permits, and site at https://www.i69indyevn.org/.
approvals for the project.
People unable to access the Web site
DATES: By this notice, the FHWA is
may contact FHWA or INDOT at the
advising the public of final agency
addresses listed above. This notice
actions subject to 23 U.S.C. 139(l)(1) and applies to all Federal agency decisions
are final within the meaning of that law. on the listed project as of the issuance
A claim seeking judicial review of those date of this notice and all laws under
Federal agency actions that are covered
which such actions were taken,
by this notice will be barred unless the
including but not limited to: 1. National
claim is filed on or before October 16,
Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) [42
2011. If the Federal law that authorizes
U.S.C. 4321–4351]. 2. Endangered
judicial review of a claim provides a
Species Act [16 U.S.C. 1531–1544]. 3.
time period of less than 180 days for
Federal-Aid Highway Act [23 U.S.C. 109
filing such claim, then the shorter time
and 23 U.S.C. 128]. 4. Clean Air Act, 42
period applies.
U.S.C. 7401–7671(q). 5. Section 4(f) of
the Department of Transportation Act of
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For
the FHWA: Ms. Michelle Allen, Federal 1966 [49 U.S.C. 303]. 6. Section 106 of
the National Historic Preservation Act of
Highway Administration, Indiana
1966, as amended [16 U.S.C. 470(f) et
Division, 575 North Pennsylvania
seq.]. 7. Bald and Golden Eagle
Street, Room 254, Indianapolis, IN
46204–1576; telephone: (317) 226–7344; Protection Act [16 U.S.C. 688–688d]. 8.
Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. 1251–1377
e-mail: Michelle.Allen@dot.gov. The
FHWA Indiana Division Office’s normal (Section 404, Section 402, Section 401,
Section 319). Previous actions taken by
business hours are 7:30 a.m. to 4 p.m.,
the USFWS for the Tier 1, I–69 project,
e.t. For the USACE: Mr. Greg McKay,
Chief, North Section Regulatory Branch, pursuant to the Endangered Species Act,
PO 00000
Frm 00087
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\19APN1.SGM
19APN1
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 75 / Tuesday, April 19, 2011 / Notices
16 U.S.C. 1531–1544, included its
concurrence with the FHWA’s
determination that the I–69 project was
not likely to adversely affect the eastern
fanshell mussel (Cyprogenia stegaria)
and that the project was likely to
adversely affect, but not jeopardize, the
bald eagle. The USFWS also concluded
that the project was not likely to
jeopardize the continued existence of
the Indiana bat and was not likely to
adversely modify the bat’s designated
Critical Habitat. These USFWS
decisions were described in the
Programmatic Biological Opinion issued
on December 3, 2003, the Revised
Programmatic Biological Opinion issued
on August 24, 2006, and other
documents in the Tier 1 project records.
A Notice of Limitation on Claims for
Judicial Review of these actions and
decisions by the USFWS, DOI, was
published in the Federal Register on
April 17, 2007. A claim seeking judicial
review of the Tier 1 decisions must have
been filed by October 15, 2007, to avoid
being barred under 23 U.S.C. 139(l).
The projects subject to this notice are:
1. Project: Section 1 of the I–69
highway project from Evansville to
Indianapolis. Location: I–64 just north
of Evansville to just north of SR 64 west
of Oakland City. Notice is hereby given
that, subsequent to the earlier FHWA
notice, the FHWA has taken final
agency actions within the meaning of 23
U.S.C. 139(l)(1) by approving three (3)
Reevaluations of the Tier 2, Section 1
Record of Decision issued on December
12, 2007. Section 1 of the I–69 project
extends from I–64 just north of
Evansville to just north of SR 64 west
of Oakland City. Section 1 is a new
alignment, fully access-controlled
highway. As approved in the Tier 1
ROD, the corridor is generally 2000-feet
wide. The ROD selected Preferred
Alternative 4 for Section 1, as described
in the I–69 Evansville to Indianapolis,
Indiana, Tier 2 Final Environmental
Impact Statement, Evansville to
Oakland City, Indiana (FEIS), available
at https://www.i69indyevn.org/
section1_FEIS.html. The ROD also
approved the locations of the
interchanges, grade separations, and
access roads (which include new roads,
road relocations, and realignments). On
February 1, 2008, the FHWA published
a ‘‘Notice of Limitation on Claims for
Judicial Review of Actions by FHWA
and United States Fish and Wildlife
Service (USFWS), DOI’’ in the Federal
Register at (73 FR 6241–01) for the
Section 1, 13.1 mile segment of I–69 in
the Counties of Warrick and Gibson. A
claim seeking judicial review of the Tier
2, Section 1 decisions must have been
filed by July 30, 2008, to avoid being
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:19 Apr 18, 2011
Jkt 223001
barred under 23 U.S.C. 139(l). The three
(3) Reevaluations of the Tier 2, Section
1 ROD include: (1) The March 20, 2009
Reevaluation, which was prepared to
evaluate the effects of additional rightof-way and improvements (including
right-of-way required for bank
stabilization, drainage improvements,
guard-rail, cul-de-sacs, and a potential
levee) made necessary based on final
design that were not analyzed in the
Tier 2 Section 1 ROD or FEIS (approved
December 12, 2007); (2) the December
13, 2010 Reevaluation, which was
prepared to evaluate the impacts of
additional right-of-way areas (including
right-of-way required to accommodate
cul-de-sac construction, right-of-way
shift to avoid a stream channel, stream
channel realignment and tree planting,
berm construction around existing oil
storage tanks, driveway construction,
interchange and grade modifications,
and flood easements) made necessary
based on final design that were not
analyzed in the Tier 2 Section 1 ROD or
FEIS (approved December 12, 2007);
and (3) the February 17, 2011
Reevaluation, which was prepared to
evaluate the impacts of additional rightof-way areas (including right-of-way
required to accommodate cul-de-sac
construction, building removal, cut
sections through hills, driveway
reconstruction, interchange
modifications, erosion control, fill-in
remainder portions of impacted ponds,
construction of a connector road,
drainage easements, and revised rightof-way to even station and offset) made
necessary based on final design that
were not analyzed in the Tier 2 Section
1 ROD or FEIS (approved December 12,
2007). The analysis in each of the
Reevaluations supports the FHWA’s
conclusions that none of the changes
examined will have impacts sufficient
to require preparation of a
Supplemental Environmental Impact
Statement (SEIS) or an additional Draft
Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS)
for Section 1, and therefore that the Tier
2 Section 1 FEIS and ROD remain valid.
The detailed analysis of the reevaluation
documents along with the Federal
decision of minimal impact can be
found on the project Web site at
https://www.i69indyevn.org/
reevaluation.html.
2. Project: Section 2 of the I–69
highway project from Evansville to
Indianapolis. Location: Oakland City,
Indiana to Washington, Indiana, Gibson,
Pike and Daviess Counties. On August
13, 2010, the FHWA published a ‘‘Notice
of Final Federal Agency Actions on
Proposed Highway in Indiana’’ in the
Federal Register at (75 FR 49547) for the
PO 00000
Frm 00088
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
21941
Section 2, 28.7 mile segment of I–69 in
the Counties of Gibson, Pike and
Daviess. Notice is hereby given that,
subsequent to the earlier FHWA notice,
the USACE has taken final agency
actions within the meaning of 23 U.S.C.
139(l)(1) by issuing permits and
approvals for the highway project. The
actions by the USACE, related final
actions by other Federal agencies, and
the laws under which such actions were
taken, are described in the USACE
decisions and its project records,
referenced as Department of the Army
(DA) Permit, Number LRL–2010–466.
That information is available by
contacting the USACE at the address
provided above.
On June 18, 2010, INDOT filed an
application with the USACE for
authorization under Section 404 of the
Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. 1344, to
construct the 28.7 mile Section 2 I–69
project. On April 1, 2011, the USACE
took final action in issuing the
Department of the Army (DA) Permit for
the Section 2 I–69 project, Number
LRL–2010–466, as described in the
USACE decision and its administrative
record for the project. As part of the
Section 2 project, which begins at the
northern terminus of the Section 1
project, there are 14 crossings of water
resources requiring individual permits
from the USACE, including streams,
open water and emergent, scrub-shrub
and forested wetlands. Subject to the
permit conditions, INDOT is permitted
to discharge 6,432 cubic yards of fill
material below the Ordinary Highway
Water Mark of 25,075 linear feet of
stream channels, and to discharge
638,370 cubic yards of fill material into
16.41 acres of open water and emergent,
scrub-shrub, and forested wetlands in
constructing these 14 crossings. In
addition, in two letters dated July 29,
2010 and September 29, 2010, the
USACE has authorized impacts at 48
other sites under their jurisdiction
within Section 2 of the I–69 project in
Gibson, Pike and Davies Counties via
the Regional General Permit No. 1
issued jointly by the Louisville and
Chicago Districts on December 15, 2009.
In the letter dated July 29, 2010 from
Ms. Deborah Duda Snyder of the
Indianapolis Regulatory Office of the
USACE to Mr. Nathan Saxe of INDOT,
the USACE verified that 10 individual
stream and wetland impacts are
authorized under the Regional General
Permit No. 1 issued jointly by the
Louisville and Chicago Districts on
December 15, 2009. In the letter dated
September 29, 2011 from Ms. Deborah
Duda Snyder of the Indianapolis
Regulatory Office of the USACE to Mr.
E:\FR\FM\19APN1.SGM
19APN1
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES
21942
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 75 / Tuesday, April 19, 2011 / Notices
Nathan Saxe of INDOT, the USACE
verified that an additional 38 individual
stream and wetland impacts are
authorized under the Regional General
Permit No. 1 issued jointly by the
Louisville and Chicago Districts on
December 15, 2009, subject to special
permit conditions requiring
compensatory wetland and stream
mitigation in accordance with approved
‘‘Mitigation and Monitoring Plans.’’
In addition, FHWA has approved five
(5) Reevaluations of the Tier 2, Section
2 Record of Decision issued on August
13, 2010. The five Reevaluations of the
Tier 2, Section 2 ROD include: (1) The
October 6, 2010 Reevaluation, which
was prepared to analyze the impacts of
additional right-of-way areas (including
right-of-way changes to accommodate
storm water detention, elimination and
additions of local service roads, cul-desac construction, existing bridge
upgrades, building removal, mitigation,
construction of access roads, spill
containment, and to tie into Section 1
right-of-way) made necessary based on
final design of segments 1 and 1A of
Section 2 that were not analyzed in the
Tier 2 Section 2 ROD or FEIS (approved
April 18, 2010); (2) the December 6,
2010 Reevaluation, which was prepared
to evaluate the impacts of permanent
flood easements required for the final
design of seventeen waterway bridge
crossings within Section 2 and
determine the changes in impacts to the
affected environment from what was
documented in the Tier 2 Section 2 ROD
(approved April 18, 2010); (3) the
December 8, 2010 Reevaluation, which
was prepared to evaluate the impacts of
additional right-of-way areas (including
right-of-way changes to accommodate
cul-de-sac construction, refined curve
alignments, construction of local service
roads to access landlocked parcels, and
right-of-way revisions to follow
surveyed parcel lines) in segments 2 and
3 of Section 2 made necessary based on
final design that were not analyzed in
the Tier 2 Section 2 ROD or FEIS; (4) the
January 6, 2011 Reevaluation, which
was prepared to analyze the impacts of
additional right-of-way areas (including
right-of-way changes to accommodate
transmission tower relocation,
connection highway right-of-way into
existing right-of-way, removal of
existing pavement, intersection
realignment for improved safety, cul-desac construction, access drive
construction, local service roads
modifications, and improvements in
sight distance) made necessary based on
final design of segments 4 and 5 of
Section 2 that were not analyzed in the
Tier 2 Section 2 ROD or FEIS (approved
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:19 Apr 18, 2011
Jkt 223001
April 18, 2010); and (5) the January 13,
2011 Reevaluation, which was prepared
to evaluate the impacts of minor rightof-way changes (including right-of-way
changes to accommodate cul-de-sac
construction, right-of-way shift to avoid
a stream channel, side slope and
ditching design to stay within right-ofway, construction of access drives and
roadway profile changes, filling in the
small remainder of an impacted pond,
building removal, Local Service road
modifications, right-of-way revisions to
follow surveyed parcel lines,
improvements to intersection sight
distance, and right-of-way revisions to
simplify acquisition and traffic
maintenance) made necessary as a result
of final design of segments 6 and 7 of
Section 2 that were not analyzed in the
Tier 2 Section 2 ROD or FEIS (approved
April 18, 2010). The analysis completed
in each of the five Reevaluations
supports the FHWA’s conclusions that
none of the changes examined will have
impacts sufficient to require preparation
of a Supplemental Environmental
Impact Statement (SEIS) or an
additional Draft Environmental Impact
Statement (DEIS) for Section 2, and
therefore that the Tier 2 Section 2 FEIS
and ROD remain valid. The detailed
analysis of the reevaluation documents
along with the federal decision of
minimal impact can be found on the
project Web site at https://
www.i69indyevn.org/reevaluation.html.
3. Project: Section 3 of the I–69
highway project from Evansville to
Indianapolis. Location: U.S. 50 east of
the city of Washington, Indiana to U.S.
231 near the Crane NSWC, Daviess and
Greene Counties. Notice is hereby given
that the FHWA has approved two (2)
Reevaluations of the Tier 2, Section 3
Record of Decision issued on January
28, 2010. Section 3 of the I–69 project
extends from U.S. 50 east of the city of
Washington, Indiana to U.S. 231 near
the Crane NSWC. Section 3 is a new
alignment, fully access-controlled
highway. As approved in the Tier 1
ROD, the corridor is generally 2000-feet
wide. The corridor width varies at two
locations within Section 3. It narrows to
1200-feet wide near First Creek and
expands to 6400-feet wide near the
Thousand Acre Woods. The ROD
selected Refined Preferred Alternative 1
for Section 3, as described in the I–69
Evansville to Indianapolis, Indiana, Tier
2 Final Environmental Impact
Statement, Washington to Crane NSWC,
Indiana (FEIS), available at https://
www.i69indyevn.org/
section3_FEIS.html. The ROD also
approved the locations of the
interchanges, grade separations, and
PO 00000
Frm 00089
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
access roads (which include new roads,
road relocations, and realignments). A
Notice of Limitation on Claims for
Judicial Review of Actions by FHWA
and United States Fish and Wildlife
Service (USFWS), DOI, was published
in the Federal Register on February 25,
2010 (75 FR 8786–01). A claim seeking
judicial review of the Tier 2, Section 3
decisions must have been filed by
August 24, 2010, to avoid being barred
under 23 U.S.C. 139(l). The two (2)
Reevaluations of the Tier 2, Section 3
ROD include: (1) The September 29,
2010 Reevaluation, which was prepared
to evaluate the impacts of additional
right-of-way areas (including right-ofway changes to accommodate
residential relocation, channel grading
as part of hydraulic design, natural
channel design, stream relocation of a
Doan’s Creek tributary, barn removal,
bridge upgrades, tie-in to existing rightof-way, and driveway reconstruction)
made necessary as a result of final
design of segments 10 through 13 of
Section 3 that were not analyzed in the
Tier 2 Section 3 ROD or FEIS (approved
January 28, 2010); and (2) the November
17, 2010 Reevaluation Addendum (to
the May 6, 2010 Reevaluation
concerning flood easements in Section
3), which was prepared to evaluate the
impacts of additional permanent flood
easements required for the final design
of Section 3 (including modification of
flood easement boundaries at North
Fork Prairie Creek and Epsom Lateral
and acquisition of flood easements
within the existing floodplain of North
Fork Prairie Creek) and determine the
changes in impacts to the affected
environment from what was
documented in the Tier 2 Section 3 ROD
(approved January 28, 2010). The
analysis completed in the Reevaluations
supports the FHWA’s conclusions that
none of the changes examined will have
impacts sufficient to require preparation
of a Supplemental Environmental
Impact Statement (SEIS) or an
additional Draft Environmental Impact
Statement (DEIS) for Section 3, and
therefore that the Tier 2 Section 3 FEIS
and ROD remain valid. The detailed
analysis of the reevaluation documents
along with the Federal decision of
minimal impact can be found on the
project Web site at https://
www.i69indyevn.org/reevaluation.html.
The actions by the Federal agencies
on the project, and the laws under
which such actions were taken, are
described in the Reevaluation
documents, the Department of the Army
(DA) Permit and Regional General
Permit letters (LRL–2010–466–djd), and
in other documents in the FHWA
E:\FR\FM\19APN1.SGM
19APN1
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 75 / Tuesday, April 19, 2011 / Notices
3. On the Roseburg Subdivision
between MP 507 and MP 509, near
Glendale, OR, the removal of ABS signal
numbers 5076/5077; 5082/5083 and
5089. Aspect changes would be made in
signals 5034 and 5060.
4. On the Roseburg Subdivision
between MP 559 and MP 563, near
Dillard, OR, the removal of ABS signal
numbers 5604/5605 and 5614/5615.
Aspect changes would be made in
(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance
signals 563.3; 565.5; 559.2 and 557.4.
Program Number 20.205, Highway Planning
Interested parties are invited to
and Construction. The regulations
implementing Executive Order 12372
participate in these proceedings by
regarding intergovernmental consultation on
submitting written views, data, or
Federal programs and activities apply to this
comments. FRA does not anticipate
program.)
scheduling a public hearing in
Authority: 23 U.S.C. 139(l)(1).
connection with these proceedings since
the facts do not appear to warrant a
Max Azizi,
hearing. If any interested party desires
Acting Division Administrator, Indianapolis,
an opportunity for oral comment, they
Indiana.
should notify FRA, in writing, before
[FR Doc. 2011–9420 Filed 4–18–11; 8:45 am]
the end of the comment period and
BILLING CODE P
specify the basis for their request.
All communications concerning these
proceedings should identify the
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
appropriate docket number (e.g., Waiver
Petition Docket Number FRA–2011–
Federal Railroad Administration
0022) and may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Notice of Application for Approval of
• Web site: https://
Discontinuance or Modification of a
www.regulations.gov. Follow the online
Railroad Signal System
instructions for submitting comments.
Pursuant to Title 49 Code of Federal
• Fax: 202–493–2251.
Regulations (CFR) Part 235 and 49
• Mail: Docket Operations Facility,
U.S.C. 20502(a), the following railroad
U.S. Department of Transportation, 1200
has petitioned the Federal Railroad
New Jersey Avenue, SE., W12–140,
Administration (FRA) seeking approval
Washington, DC 20590.
for the discontinuance or modification
• Hand Delivery: 1200 New Jersey
of the signal system, as detailed below.
Avenue, SE., Room W12–140,
Docket Number FRA–2011–0022
Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
Applicant: Central Oregon & Pacific
Railroad, Inc., Mr. Steve Hefley, General except Federal holidays.
Communications received within 45
Manager, 333 S.E. Mosher Avenue, P.O.
days of the date of this notice will be
Box 1083, Roseburg, Oregon 97470.
considered by FRA before final action is
The Central Oregon & Pacific
taken. Comments received after that
Railroad, Inc. (CORP) seeks approval of
date will be considered as far as
the proposed discontinuance and
practicable. All written communications
removal of the automatic block signal
concerning these proceedings are
system (ABS) on three sections of the
available for examination during regular
Roseburg Subdivision and on one
section of the Siskiyou Subdivision. The business hours (9 a.m.–5 p.m.) at the
above facility. All documents in the
proposal consists of:
public docket are also available for
1. On the Roseburg and Siskiyou
inspection and copying on the Internet
Subdivisions between milepost (MP)
at the docket facility’s Web site at
438.7 and MP 451, near Medford, OR,
https://www.regulations.gov.
the removal of ABS signal numbers
Anyone is able to search the
427.4D; 4284/4283; 4298/4297; 4328/
4327; 4358/4357; 4388/4389; 4406/4407; electronic form of any written
communications and comments
4424/4423; 4444/4443; 4456/4457 and
received into any of our dockets by the
4482/4483. An aspect change would be
name of the individual submitting the
made in signal 4505.
document (or signing the document, if
2. On the Roseburg Subdivision
submitted on behalf of an association,
between MP 471 and MP 475, near
business, labor union, etc.). You may
Grants Pass, OR, the removal of ABS
review DOT’s complete Privacy Act
signal numbers 4724/4725 and 4734/
4735. Aspect changes would be made in Statement in the Federal Register
published on April 11, 2000 (Volume
signals 4783; 4751; 4684 and 4712.
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES
administrative record for the project.
The ROD and other documents from the
FHWA administrative record files for
the Section 1, Section 2, and Section 3
projects are available by contacting
FHWA, USACE or INDOT at the
addresses provided above. Project
information may also be available
through the INDOT I–69 Project Web
site at https://www.i69indyevn.org/.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:19 Apr 18, 2011
Jkt 223001
PO 00000
Frm 00090
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
21943
65, Number 70; Page 19477) or at
https://www.dot.gov/privacy.html.
Issued in Washington, DC, on April 13,
2011.
Robert C. Lauby,
Deputy Associate Administrator for
Regulatory and Legislative Operations.
[FR Doc. 2011–9386 Filed 4–18–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–06–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Railroad Administration
Petition for Waiver of Compliance
In accordance with part 211 of title 49
Code of Federal Regulations (CFR),
notice is hereby given that the Federal
Railroad Administration (FRA) has
received a request for a waiver of
compliance from certain requirements
of its safety standards. The individual
petition is described below, including
the party seeking relief, the regulatory
provisions involved, the nature of the
relief being requested, and the
petitioner’s arguments in favor of relief.
Illinois Railway Museum
[Waiver Petition Docket Number FRA–2011–
0017]
The Illinois Railway Museum (IRYM)
seeks a waiver of compliance with the
Steam Locomotive Inspection and
Maintenance Standards, 49 CFR 230.17,
as they pertain to the requirement for
1,472 service day inspection for steam
locomotive number 1630. Locomotive
number 1630’s 1,472 day inspection is
due to expire in July, 2011, and IRYM
requests the locomotive be allowed to
continue in service until July, 2016, or
after 1,472 service days, whichever is
earlier. Alternately, IRYM requests an
extension through October, 2011. IRYM
is not requesting waiver of any other
inspection requirements, and is
specifically not requesting extension of
the requirement to conduct the § 230.17
inspection after 1,472 service days.
Interested parties are invited to
participate in these proceedings by
submitting written views, data, or
comments. FRA does not anticipate
scheduling a public hearing in
connection with these proceedings since
the facts do not appear to warrant a
hearing. If any interested party desires
an opportunity for oral comment, they
should notify FRA, in writing, before
the end of the comment period and
specify the basis for their request.
All communications concerning these
proceedings should identify the
appropriate docket number (e.g., Waiver
Petition Docket Number FRA–2011–
E:\FR\FM\19APN1.SGM
19APN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 75 (Tuesday, April 19, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 21940-21943]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-9420]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Highway Administration
Notice of Final Federal Agency Actions on Proposed Highway in
Indiana
AGENCY: Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of limitation on claims for judicial review of actions
by FHWA and United States Army Corps of Engineers (USACE), DoD.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This notice announces actions taken by the FHWA and the USACE
that are final within the meaning of 23 U.S.C. 139(l)(1). The actions
relate to proposed highway projects for a 28.7 mile segment of I-69 in
the Counties of Gibson, Pike and Daviess, State of Indiana, and grant
licenses, permits, and approvals for the project.
DATES: By this notice, the FHWA is advising the public of final agency
actions subject to 23 U.S.C. 139(l)(1) and are final within the meaning
of that law. A claim seeking judicial review of those Federal agency
actions that are covered by this notice will be barred unless the claim
is filed on or before October 16, 2011. If the Federal law that
authorizes judicial review of a claim provides a time period of less
than 180 days for filing such claim, then the shorter time period
applies.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For the FHWA: Ms. Michelle Allen,
Federal Highway Administration, Indiana Division, 575 North
Pennsylvania Street, Room 254, Indianapolis, IN 46204-1576; telephone:
(317) 226-7344; e-mail: Michelle.Allen@dot.gov. The FHWA Indiana
Division Office's normal business hours are 7:30 a.m. to 4 p.m., e.t.
For the USACE: Mr. Greg McKay, Chief, North Section Regulatory Branch,
Louisville District, United States Army Corps of Engineers, P.O. Box
59, Louisville, KY 40201-0059; telephone: (502) 315-6685; e-mail:
gregory.a.mckay@usace.army.mil. Normal business hours are 8 a.m. to 5
p.m., e.t. You may also contact Mr. Thomas Seeman, Project Manager,
Indiana Department of Transportation (INDOT), 100 North Senate Avenue,
Indianapolis, IN 46204; telephone: (317) 232-5336; e-mail:
TSeeman@indot.IN.gov. Normal business hours for the Indiana Department
of Transportation are: 8 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., e.t.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that the FHWA and
other Federal agencies have taken final agency actions by issuing
licenses, permits, and approvals for the highway projects in the State
of Indiana that are listed below. The actions by the Federal agencies
on a project, and the laws under which such actions were taken, are
described in the Record of Decision (ROD), Reevaluation Documents to
the final environmental impact statements (FEIS) issued in connection
with the projects, Section 404 Discharge of Dredged or Fill Material
Permit and Regional General Permit letters, and in other documents in
the FHWA administrative record for the project. The ROD and other
documents from the FHWA administrative record files for the listed
projects are available by contacting the FHWA or the Indiana Department
of Transportation (INDOT) at the addresses provided above. Project
information may also be available through the INDOT I-69 Project Web
site at https://www.i69indyevn.org/. People unable to access the Web
site may contact FHWA or INDOT at the addresses listed above. This
notice applies to all Federal agency decisions on the listed project as
of the issuance date of this notice and all laws under which such
actions were taken, including but not limited to: 1. National
Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) [42 U.S.C. 4321-4351]. 2. Endangered
Species Act [16 U.S.C. 1531-1544]. 3. Federal-Aid Highway Act [23
U.S.C. 109 and 23 U.S.C. 128]. 4. Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. 7401-
7671(q). 5. Section 4(f) of the Department of Transportation Act of
1966 [49 U.S.C. 303]. 6. Section 106 of the National Historic
Preservation Act of 1966, as amended [16 U.S.C. 470(f) et seq.]. 7.
Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act [16 U.S.C. 688-688d]. 8. Clean
Water Act, 33 U.S.C. 1251-1377 (Section 404, Section 402, Section 401,
Section 319). Previous actions taken by the USFWS for the Tier 1, I-69
project, pursuant to the Endangered Species Act,
[[Page 21941]]
16 U.S.C. 1531-1544, included its concurrence with the FHWA's
determination that the I-69 project was not likely to adversely affect
the eastern fanshell mussel (Cyprogenia stegaria) and that the project
was likely to adversely affect, but not jeopardize, the bald eagle. The
USFWS also concluded that the project was not likely to jeopardize the
continued existence of the Indiana bat and was not likely to adversely
modify the bat's designated Critical Habitat. These USFWS decisions
were described in the Programmatic Biological Opinion issued on
December 3, 2003, the Revised Programmatic Biological Opinion issued on
August 24, 2006, and other documents in the Tier 1 project records. A
Notice of Limitation on Claims for Judicial Review of these actions and
decisions by the USFWS, DOI, was published in the Federal Register on
April 17, 2007. A claim seeking judicial review of the Tier 1 decisions
must have been filed by October 15, 2007, to avoid being barred under
23 U.S.C. 139(l).
The projects subject to this notice are:
1. Project: Section 1 of the I-69 highway project from Evansville
to Indianapolis. Location: I-64 just north of Evansville to just north
of SR 64 west of Oakland City. Notice is hereby given that, subsequent
to the earlier FHWA notice, the FHWA has taken final agency actions
within the meaning of 23 U.S.C. 139(l)(1) by approving three (3)
Reevaluations of the Tier 2, Section 1 Record of Decision issued on
December 12, 2007. Section 1 of the I-69 project extends from I-64 just
north of Evansville to just north of SR 64 west of Oakland City.
Section 1 is a new alignment, fully access-controlled highway. As
approved in the Tier 1 ROD, the corridor is generally 2000-feet wide.
The ROD selected Preferred Alternative 4 for Section 1, as described in
the I-69 Evansville to Indianapolis, Indiana, Tier 2 Final
Environmental Impact Statement, Evansville to Oakland City, Indiana
(FEIS), available at https://www.i69indyevn.org/section1_FEIS.html. The
ROD also approved the locations of the interchanges, grade separations,
and access roads (which include new roads, road relocations, and
realignments). On February 1, 2008, the FHWA published a ``Notice of
Limitation on Claims for Judicial Review of Actions by FHWA and United
States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS), DOI'' in the Federal Register
at (73 FR 6241-01) for the Section 1, 13.1 mile segment of I-69 in the
Counties of Warrick and Gibson. A claim seeking judicial review of the
Tier 2, Section 1 decisions must have been filed by July 30, 2008, to
avoid being barred under 23 U.S.C. 139(l). The three (3) Reevaluations
of the Tier 2, Section 1 ROD include: (1) The March 20, 2009
Reevaluation, which was prepared to evaluate the effects of additional
right-of-way and improvements (including right-of-way required for bank
stabilization, drainage improvements, guard-rail, cul-de-sacs, and a
potential levee) made necessary based on final design that were not
analyzed in the Tier 2 Section 1 ROD or FEIS (approved December 12,
2007); (2) the December 13, 2010 Reevaluation, which was prepared to
evaluate the impacts of additional right-of-way areas (including right-
of-way required to accommodate cul-de-sac construction, right-of-way
shift to avoid a stream channel, stream channel realignment and tree
planting, berm construction around existing oil storage tanks, driveway
construction, interchange and grade modifications, and flood easements)
made necessary based on final design that were not analyzed in the Tier
2 Section 1 ROD or FEIS (approved December 12, 2007); and (3) the
February 17, 2011 Reevaluation, which was prepared to evaluate the
impacts of additional right-of-way areas (including right-of-way
required to accommodate cul-de-sac construction, building removal, cut
sections through hills, driveway reconstruction, interchange
modifications, erosion control, fill-in remainder portions of impacted
ponds, construction of a connector road, drainage easements, and
revised right-of-way to even station and offset) made necessary based
on final design that were not analyzed in the Tier 2 Section 1 ROD or
FEIS (approved December 12, 2007). The analysis in each of the
Reevaluations supports the FHWA's conclusions that none of the changes
examined will have impacts sufficient to require preparation of a
Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement (SEIS) or an additional
Draft Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS) for Section 1, and
therefore that the Tier 2 Section 1 FEIS and ROD remain valid. The
detailed analysis of the reevaluation documents along with the Federal
decision of minimal impact can be found on the project Web site at
https://www.i69indyevn.org/reevaluation.html.
2. Project: Section 2 of the I-69 highway project from Evansville
to Indianapolis. Location: Oakland City, Indiana to Washington,
Indiana, Gibson, Pike and Daviess Counties. On August 13, 2010, the
FHWA published a ``Notice of Final Federal Agency Actions on Proposed
Highway in Indiana'' in the Federal Register at (75 FR 49547) for the
Section 2, 28.7 mile segment of I-69 in the Counties of Gibson, Pike
and Daviess. Notice is hereby given that, subsequent to the earlier
FHWA notice, the USACE has taken final agency actions within the
meaning of 23 U.S.C. 139(l)(1) by issuing permits and approvals for the
highway project. The actions by the USACE, related final actions by
other Federal agencies, and the laws under which such actions were
taken, are described in the USACE decisions and its project records,
referenced as Department of the Army (DA) Permit, Number LRL-2010-466.
That information is available by contacting the USACE at the address
provided above.
On June 18, 2010, INDOT filed an application with the USACE for
authorization under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. 1344,
to construct the 28.7 mile Section 2 I-69 project. On April 1, 2011,
the USACE took final action in issuing the Department of the Army (DA)
Permit for the Section 2 I-69 project, Number LRL-2010-466, as
described in the USACE decision and its administrative record for the
project. As part of the Section 2 project, which begins at the northern
terminus of the Section 1 project, there are 14 crossings of water
resources requiring individual permits from the USACE, including
streams, open water and emergent, scrub-shrub and forested wetlands.
Subject to the permit conditions, INDOT is permitted to discharge 6,432
cubic yards of fill material below the Ordinary Highway Water Mark of
25,075 linear feet of stream channels, and to discharge 638,370 cubic
yards of fill material into 16.41 acres of open water and emergent,
scrub-shrub, and forested wetlands in constructing these 14 crossings.
In addition, in two letters dated July 29, 2010 and September 29, 2010,
the USACE has authorized impacts at 48 other sites under their
jurisdiction within Section 2 of the I-69 project in Gibson, Pike and
Davies Counties via the Regional General Permit No. 1 issued jointly by
the Louisville and Chicago Districts on December 15, 2009. In the
letter dated July 29, 2010 from Ms. Deborah Duda Snyder of the
Indianapolis Regulatory Office of the USACE to Mr. Nathan Saxe of
INDOT, the USACE verified that 10 individual stream and wetland impacts
are authorized under the Regional General Permit No. 1 issued jointly
by the Louisville and Chicago Districts on December 15, 2009. In the
letter dated September 29, 2011 from Ms. Deborah Duda Snyder of the
Indianapolis Regulatory Office of the USACE to Mr.
[[Page 21942]]
Nathan Saxe of INDOT, the USACE verified that an additional 38
individual stream and wetland impacts are authorized under the Regional
General Permit No. 1 issued jointly by the Louisville and Chicago
Districts on December 15, 2009, subject to special permit conditions
requiring compensatory wetland and stream mitigation in accordance with
approved ``Mitigation and Monitoring Plans.''
In addition, FHWA has approved five (5) Reevaluations of the Tier
2, Section 2 Record of Decision issued on August 13, 2010. The five
Reevaluations of the Tier 2, Section 2 ROD include: (1) The October 6,
2010 Reevaluation, which was prepared to analyze the impacts of
additional right-of-way areas (including right-of-way changes to
accommodate storm water detention, elimination and additions of local
service roads, cul-de-sac construction, existing bridge upgrades,
building removal, mitigation, construction of access roads, spill
containment, and to tie into Section 1 right-of-way) made necessary
based on final design of segments 1 and 1A of Section 2 that were not
analyzed in the Tier 2 Section 2 ROD or FEIS (approved April 18, 2010);
(2) the December 6, 2010 Reevaluation, which was prepared to evaluate
the impacts of permanent flood easements required for the final design
of seventeen waterway bridge crossings within Section 2 and determine
the changes in impacts to the affected environment from what was
documented in the Tier 2 Section 2 ROD (approved April 18, 2010); (3)
the December 8, 2010 Reevaluation, which was prepared to evaluate the
impacts of additional right-of-way areas (including right-of-way
changes to accommodate cul-de-sac construction, refined curve
alignments, construction of local service roads to access landlocked
parcels, and right-of-way revisions to follow surveyed parcel lines) in
segments 2 and 3 of Section 2 made necessary based on final design that
were not analyzed in the Tier 2 Section 2 ROD or FEIS; (4) the January
6, 2011 Reevaluation, which was prepared to analyze the impacts of
additional right-of-way areas (including right-of-way changes to
accommodate transmission tower relocation, connection highway right-of-
way into existing right-of-way, removal of existing pavement,
intersection realignment for improved safety, cul-de-sac construction,
access drive construction, local service roads modifications, and
improvements in sight distance) made necessary based on final design of
segments 4 and 5 of Section 2 that were not analyzed in the Tier 2
Section 2 ROD or FEIS (approved April 18, 2010); and (5) the January
13, 2011 Reevaluation, which was prepared to evaluate the impacts of
minor right-of-way changes (including right-of-way changes to
accommodate cul-de-sac construction, right-of-way shift to avoid a
stream channel, side slope and ditching design to stay within right-of-
way, construction of access drives and roadway profile changes, filling
in the small remainder of an impacted pond, building removal, Local
Service road modifications, right-of-way revisions to follow surveyed
parcel lines, improvements to intersection sight distance, and right-
of-way revisions to simplify acquisition and traffic maintenance) made
necessary as a result of final design of segments 6 and 7 of Section 2
that were not analyzed in the Tier 2 Section 2 ROD or FEIS (approved
April 18, 2010). The analysis completed in each of the five
Reevaluations supports the FHWA's conclusions that none of the changes
examined will have impacts sufficient to require preparation of a
Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement (SEIS) or an additional
Draft Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS) for Section 2, and
therefore that the Tier 2 Section 2 FEIS and ROD remain valid. The
detailed analysis of the reevaluation documents along with the federal
decision of minimal impact can be found on the project Web site at
https://www.i69indyevn.org/reevaluation.html.
3. Project: Section 3 of the I-69 highway project from Evansville
to Indianapolis. Location: U.S. 50 east of the city of Washington,
Indiana to U.S. 231 near the Crane NSWC, Daviess and Greene Counties.
Notice is hereby given that the FHWA has approved two (2) Reevaluations
of the Tier 2, Section 3 Record of Decision issued on January 28, 2010.
Section 3 of the I-69 project extends from U.S. 50 east of the city of
Washington, Indiana to U.S. 231 near the Crane NSWC. Section 3 is a new
alignment, fully access-controlled highway. As approved in the Tier 1
ROD, the corridor is generally 2000-feet wide. The corridor width
varies at two locations within Section 3. It narrows to 1200-feet wide
near First Creek and expands to 6400-feet wide near the Thousand Acre
Woods. The ROD selected Refined Preferred Alternative 1 for Section 3,
as described in the I-69 Evansville to Indianapolis, Indiana, Tier 2
Final Environmental Impact Statement, Washington to Crane NSWC, Indiana
(FEIS), available at https://www.i69indyevn.org/section3_FEIS.html. The
ROD also approved the locations of the interchanges, grade separations,
and access roads (which include new roads, road relocations, and
realignments). A Notice of Limitation on Claims for Judicial Review of
Actions by FHWA and United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS),
DOI, was published in the Federal Register on February 25, 2010 (75 FR
8786-01). A claim seeking judicial review of the Tier 2, Section 3
decisions must have been filed by August 24, 2010, to avoid being
barred under 23 U.S.C. 139(l). The two (2) Reevaluations of the Tier 2,
Section 3 ROD include: (1) The September 29, 2010 Reevaluation, which
was prepared to evaluate the impacts of additional right-of-way areas
(including right-of-way changes to accommodate residential relocation,
channel grading as part of hydraulic design, natural channel design,
stream relocation of a Doan's Creek tributary, barn removal, bridge
upgrades, tie-in to existing right-of-way, and driveway reconstruction)
made necessary as a result of final design of segments 10 through 13 of
Section 3 that were not analyzed in the Tier 2 Section 3 ROD or FEIS
(approved January 28, 2010); and (2) the November 17, 2010 Reevaluation
Addendum (to the May 6, 2010 Reevaluation concerning flood easements in
Section 3), which was prepared to evaluate the impacts of additional
permanent flood easements required for the final design of Section 3
(including modification of flood easement boundaries at North Fork
Prairie Creek and Epsom Lateral and acquisition of flood easements
within the existing floodplain of North Fork Prairie Creek) and
determine the changes in impacts to the affected environment from what
was documented in the Tier 2 Section 3 ROD (approved January 28, 2010).
The analysis completed in the Reevaluations supports the FHWA's
conclusions that none of the changes examined will have impacts
sufficient to require preparation of a Supplemental Environmental
Impact Statement (SEIS) or an additional Draft Environmental Impact
Statement (DEIS) for Section 3, and therefore that the Tier 2 Section 3
FEIS and ROD remain valid. The detailed analysis of the reevaluation
documents along with the Federal decision of minimal impact can be
found on the project Web site at https://www.i69indyevn.org/reevaluation.html.
The actions by the Federal agencies on the project, and the laws
under which such actions were taken, are described in the Reevaluation
documents, the Department of the Army (DA) Permit and Regional General
Permit letters (LRL-2010-466-djd), and in other documents in the FHWA
[[Page 21943]]
administrative record for the project. The ROD and other documents from
the FHWA administrative record files for the Section 1, Section 2, and
Section 3 projects are available by contacting FHWA, USACE or INDOT at
the addresses provided above. Project information may also be available
through the INDOT I-69 Project Web site at https://www.i69indyevn.org/.
(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Number 20.205,
Highway Planning and Construction. The regulations implementing
Executive Order 12372 regarding intergovernmental consultation on
Federal programs and activities apply to this program.)
Authority: 23 U.S.C. 139(l)(1).
Max Azizi,
Acting Division Administrator, Indianapolis, Indiana.
[FR Doc. 2011-9420 Filed 4-18-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P