Nectarines and Peaches Grown in California; Suspension of Handling Requirements, 21615-21618 [2011-9328]
Download as PDF
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 74 / Monday, April 18, 2011 / Rules and Regulations
Vineyard, Perkins, Phillips, Rangeley,
Rangeley Plantation, Redington, Salem,
Sandy River Plantation, Strong, Temple,
Township 6 North of Weld, Township
D, Township E, Washington, Weld,
Wilton, and Wyman.
*
*
*
*
*
Penobscot County. The townships of
Alton, Argyle, Bangor City, Bradford,
Bradley, Brewer City, Burlington,
Carmel, Carroll Plantation, Charleston,
Chester, Clifton, Corinna, Corinth,
Dexter, Dixmont, Drew Plantation, E.
Millinocket, Eddington, Edinburg,
Enfield, Etna, Exeter, Garland,
Glenburn, Grand Falls Plantation,
Greenbush, Greenfield, Grindstone,
Hampden, Hermon, Hersey Town,
Holden, Hopkins Academy Grant,
Howland, Hudson, Indian Purchase,
Kenduskeag, Kingman, Lagrange,
Lakeville, Lee, Levant, Lincoln, Long A,
Lowell, Mattamiscontis, Mattawamkeag,
Maxfield, Medway, Milford,
Millinocket, Mount Chase, Newburgh,
Newport, Old Town City, Orono,
Orrington, Passadumkeag, Patten,
Plymouth, Prentiss Plantation, Seboeis
Plantation, Soldiertown, Springfield,
Stacyville, Stetson, Summit, Veazie,
Veazie Gore, Webster Plantation, Winn,
Woodville, T1 ND, T1 R6 WELS, T1 R8
WELS, T2 R8 NWP, T2 R8 WELS, T2 R9
NWP, T3 R1 NBPP, T3 R9 NWP, T5 R1
NBPP, T5 R8 WELS, T6 R8 WELS, TA
R7, TA R8, TA R9, and the portion of
T3 R8 within the boundaries of Baxter
State Park.
Piscataquis County. The townships of
Abbot, Atkinson, Barnard, Blanchard
Plantation, Bowerbank, Brownville,
Dover-Foxcroft, Elliotsville, Greenville,
Guilford, Katahdin Iron Works,
Kingsbury Plantation, Lakeview
Plantation, Medford, Milo, Monson,
Mount Katahdin, Nesourdnahunk,
Orneville, Parkman, Sangerville, Sebec,
Shirley, Trout Brook, Wellington,
Williamsburg, Willimantic, T1 R9
WELS, T1 R10 WELS, T1 R11 WELS, T2
R10 WELS, T2 R9 WELS, T3 R10 WELS,
T4 R9 NWP, T4 R9 WELS, T5 R9 NWP,
T5 R9 WELS, T6 R10 WELS, T7 R9
NWP, TA R10 WELS, TA R11 WELS, TB
R10 WELS, TB R11 WELS, and the
portion of T4 R10 WELS within the
boundaries of Baxter State Park.
*
*
*
*
*
Somerset County. The townships of
Anson, Athens, Bald Mountain,
Bigelow, Bingham, Bowtown, Brighton
Plantation, Cambridge, Canaan,
Caratunk, Carrying Place, Carrying Place
Town, Concord Plantation, Cornville,
Dead River, Detroit, East Moxie,
Embden, Fairfield, Harmony, Hartland,
Highland Plantation, Lexington
Plantation, Lower Enchanted, Madison,
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:17 Apr 15, 2011
Jkt 223001
Mayfield, Mercer, Moscow, Moxie Gore,
New Portland, Norridgewock, Palmyra,
Pierce Pond, Pittsfield, Pleasant Ridge
Plantation, Ripley, Skowhegan,
Smithfield, Solon, St. Albans, Starks,
The Forks Plantation, West Forks
Plantation, and T3 R4 BKP WKR.
*
*
*
*
*
Ohio
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
Athens County. The entire county.
*
*
*
*
Crawford County. The entire county.
*
*
*
*
Marion County. The entire county.
*
*
*
*
Vinton County. The entire county.
*
*
*
*
Virginia
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
City of Covington. The entire city.
*
*
*
*
City of Radford. The entire city.
*
*
*
*
Bland County. The entire county.
*
*
*
*
Floyd County. The entire county.
*
*
*
*
Franklin County. The entire county.
*
*
*
*
Pulaski County. The entire county.
*
*
*
*
West Virginia
*
*
*
*
*
Fayette County. The entire county.
*
*
*
*
*
Wisconsin
*
*
*
*
*
Ashland County. Madeline Island area
and Apostle Islands National Lakeshore
(island units only).
*
*
*
*
*
Iron County. The entire county.
*
*
*
*
*
Monroe County. The entire county.
*
*
*
*
*
Done in Washington, DC, this 13th day of
April 2011.
Kevin Shea,
Acting Administrator, Animal and Plant
Health Inspection Service.
[FR Doc. 2011–9291 Filed 4–15–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–34–P
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
21615
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Agricultural Marketing Service
7 CFR Parts 916 and 917
[Doc. No. AMS–FV–11–0019; FV11–916/917–
5 IR]
Nectarines and Peaches Grown in
California; Suspension of Handling
Requirements
Agricultural Marketing Service,
USDA.
ACTION: Interim rule with request for
comments.
AGENCY:
This rule suspends the
quality, inspection, reporting, and
assessment requirements specified
under the California nectarine and
peach marketing orders (orders). The
orders regulate the handling of
nectarines and peaches grown in
California. During recent referenda, less
than the required two-thirds majority of
growers, by number and production
volume, favored continuation of the
orders. After consideration of the
referendum results and other factors, the
Department of Agriculture (USDA) has
decided to seek termination of the
orders. Suspension of the handling
regulations for the 2011 and subsequent
marketing seasons will relieve handlers
of all regulatory burden under the
orders while USDA processes the
terminations. Termination of the orders
must be delayed until after a 60-day
Congressional notification period
following issuance of a proposed rule,
which will be published in a future
issue of the Federal Register.
DATES: Effective April 19, 2011;
comments received by June 17, 2011
will be considered prior to issuance of
a final rule.
ADDRESSES: Interested persons are
invited to submit written comments
concerning this rule. Comments must be
sent to the Docket Clerk, Marketing
Order Administration Branch, Fruit and
Vegetable Programs, AMS, USDA, 1400
Independence Avenue, SW., STOP
0237, Washington, DC 20250–0237; Fax:
(202) 720–8938, or Internet: https://
www.regulations.gov. All comments
should reference the document number
and the date and page number of this
issue of the Federal Register and will be
made available for public inspection at
the Office of the Docket Clerk during
regular business hours, or can be viewed
at: https://www.regulations.gov. All
comments submitted in response to this
rule will be included in the record and
will be made available to the public.
Please be advised that the identity of the
individuals or entities submitting the
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\18APR1.SGM
18APR1
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with RULES
21616
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 74 / Monday, April 18, 2011 / Rules and Regulations
comments will be made public on the
Internet at the address provided above.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jerry
L. Simmons, Marketing Specialist, or
Kurt J. Kimmel, Regional Manager,
California Marketing Field Office,
Marketing Order Administration
Branch, Fruit and Vegetable Programs,
AMS, USDA; Telephone: (559) 487–
5901; Fax: (559) 487–5906; or E-mail:
Jerry.Simmons@ams.usda.gov or
Kurt.Kimmel@ams.usda.gov.
Small businesses may request
information on complying with this
regulation by contacting Antoinette
Carter, Marketing Order Administration
Branch, Fruit and Vegetable Programs,
AMS, USDA, 1400 Independence
Avenue, SW., STOP 0237, Washington,
DC 20250–0237; Telephone: (202) 720–
2491; Fax: (202) 720–8938; or E-mail:
Antoinette.Carter@ams.usda.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This rule
is issued under Marketing Order Nos.
916 and 917, both as amended (7 CFR
parts 916 and 917), regulating the
handling of nectarines and peaches
grown in California, respectively,
hereinafter referred to as the ‘‘orders.’’
The orders are effective under the
Agricultural Marketing Agreement Act
of 1937, as amended (7 U.S.C. 601–674),
hereinafter referred to as the ‘‘Act.’’
USDA is issuing this rule in
conformance with Executive Order
12866.
This rule has been reviewed under
Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice
Reform. Regulatory requirements for
nectarines and peaches grown in
California are suspended indefinitely
beginning with the 2011 marketing
season.
The Act provides that administrative
proceedings must be exhausted before
parties may file suit in court. Under
section 608c(15)(A) of the Act, any
handler subject to an order may file
with USDA a petition stating that the
order, any provision of the order, or any
obligation imposed in connection with
the order is not in accordance with law
and request a modification of the order
or to be exempted therefrom. A handler
is afforded the opportunity for a hearing
on the petition. After the hearing, USDA
would rule on the petition. The Act
provides that the district court of the
United States in any district in which
the handler is an inhabitant, or has his
or her principal place of business, has
jurisdiction to review USDA’s ruling on
the petition, provided an action is filed
not later than 20 days after the date of
the entry of the ruling.
This action suspends for the 2011 and
subsequent marketing seasons the
quality, inspection, reporting, and
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:17 Apr 15, 2011
Jkt 223001
assessment requirements for nectarines
and peaches specified under the orders.
Suspension of the handling
requirements will relieve handlers of all
regulatory burdens associated with the
programs while USDA seeks to
terminate the orders, which are no
longer favored by industry growers.
The nectarine order has been in effect
since 1958. The peach order, which
includes provisions for the handling of
fresh pears, has been in effect since
1939. The orders have been used over
the years to provide the California tree
fruit industries with authority for grade,
size, maturity, pack, and container
regulations, as well as authority for
inspection requirements. The orders
also authorize production research and
marketing research and development
projects, as well as the necessary
reporting and recordkeeping functions
required for operation. The programs are
funded by assessments imposed on
handlers.
Sections 916.64(e) and 917.61(e) of
the orders require continuance
referenda to be conducted every fourth
year between December 1 and February
15. During the period January 12
through February 2, 2011, USDA
conducted referenda among growers to
determine if they favored continuation
of their programs. The referendum order
published in the Federal Register on
December 13, 2010 (75 FR 77563),
explained that USDA would consider
terminating the orders if fewer than twothirds of the growers voting and growers
of less than two-thirds of the production
volume represented in the referenda
favored continuance.
Ballots were mailed to 447 known
nectarine and peach growers in
California. Ninety-nine valid nectarine
ballots and 102 valid peach ballots were
returned. Only 63 percent of
participating nectarine growers, who
produced 36 percent of the volume
represented in the referendum, favored
continuation of the nectarine order.
Only 62 percent of the peach growers,
who produced 36 percent of the volume
represented in the referendum, favored
continuing the peach order.
During the same period, referendum
ballots were mailed to 140 pear growers.
Thirty-four valid ballots were returned.
Ninety-four percent of participating pear
growers, who produced 99 percent of
the production volume represented in
the referendum, voted to continue the
fresh pear order. The provisions of
Marketing Order No. 917 (7 CFR part
917) pertaining to pears have been
suspended since 1994 (59 FR 10055;
March 5, 1994). However, because pear
growers support continuance of the
suspended provisions, USDA does not
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
intend to terminate the pear provisions
at this time. The remainder of this
document pertains to the suspension of
regulations under the nectarine and
peach orders only.
These are the second consecutive
referenda in which growers have failed
to support continuation of the nectarine
and peach orders. In 2003, growers did
not vote in favor of continuing the
programs. However, after conducting
listening sessions with the industry,
USDA determined that with certain
modifications the order programs could
continue to be beneficial. The orders
were amended (71 FR 41345; July 21,
2006) and regulatory changes were
made that were intended to make the
programs relevant to contemporary
industry needs (72 FR 18847; April 16,
2007). No continuance referenda were
conducted in 2007 because the orders
were being amended at the time.
Despite USDA efforts to help refine
the programs over the past several years,
growers have continued to express their
belief that the programs no longer meet
their needs. These referendum results
demonstrate a lack of grower support
needed to carry out the objectives of the
Act. Thus, it has been determined that
the provisions of the orders no longer
tend to effectuate the declared policy of
the Act. USDA intends to seek
termination of the orders through the
informal rulemaking process and will
publish a proposed rule regarding the
terminations in a future issue of the
Federal Register. Additionally, USDA is
required to notify Congress not later
than 60 days before the date the order
would be terminated.
The 2011–12 fiscal year for California
nectarines and peaches began March 1,
2011. The 2011 marketing season begins
on April 1. This action suspends the
nectarine and peach quality, inspection,
and assessment regulations in effect
under the orders for the 2011–12 and
subsequent marketing seasons. Also,
handler reports would not be required
beginning with the 2011 marketing
season. Suspending all regulatory
requirements relieves handlers of all
regulatory burden under the orders.
It is hereby determined that the
quality, inspection, reporting, and
assessment requirements specified in
Sections 916.110, 916.115, 916.234,
916.235, 916.350, and 916.356 for
nectarines do not effectuate the declared
policy of the Act and should not be
applied during the 2011–12 and
subsequent seasons. Further, it is hereby
determined that the quality, inspection,
reporting, and assessment requirements
specified in Sections 917.143, 917.150,
917.258, 917.259, 917.442, and 917.459
for peaches do not effectuate the
E:\FR\FM\18APR1.SGM
18APR1
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 74 / Monday, April 18, 2011 / Rules and Regulations
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with RULES
declared policy of the Act and should
not be applied during the 2011–12 and
subsequent seasons. Therefore, these
sections are suspended effective April
19, 2011. Upon termination of the order
provisions pertaining to nectarines and
peaches grown in California, these and
other regulations under the orders
would no longer be in effect.
Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Pursuant to requirements set forth in
the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA)
(5 U.S.C. 601–612), the Agricultural
Marketing Service (AMS) has
considered the economic impact of this
action on small entities. Accordingly,
AMS has prepared this initial regulatory
flexibility analysis.
The purpose of the RFA is to fit
regulatory actions to the scale of
business subject to such actions in order
that small businesses will not be unduly
or disproportionately burdened.
Marketing orders issued pursuant to the
Act, and the rules issued thereunder, are
unique in that they are brought about
through group action of essentially
small entities acting on their own
behalf.
There are approximately 97 California
nectarine and peach handlers subject to
regulation under the orders covering
nectarines and peaches grown in
California, and about 447 growers of
these fruits in California. Small
agricultural service firms, which
include handlers, are defined by the
Small Business Administration (SBA)
(13 CFR 121.201) as those having annual
receipts of less than $7,000,000, and
small agricultural growers are defined as
those having annual receipts of less than
$750,000. A majority of these handlers
and growers may be classified as small
entities.
For the 2010 marketing season, the
committees’ staff estimated that the
average handler price received was
$10.50 per container or container
equivalent of nectarines or peaches. A
handler would have to ship at least
666,667 containers to have annual
receipts of $7,000,000. Given data on
shipments maintained by the
committees’ staff and the average
handler price received during the 2010
season, the committees’ staff estimates
that approximately 46 percent of
handlers in the industry would be
considered small entities.
For the 2010 marketing season, the
committees’ staff estimated the average
grower price received was $5.50 per
container or container equivalent for
nectarines and peaches. A grower would
have to produce at least 136,364
containers of nectarines and peaches to
have annual receipts of $750,000. Given
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:17 Apr 15, 2011
Jkt 223001
data maintained by the committees’ staff
and the average grower price received
during the 2010 season, the committees’
staff estimates that more than 80 percent
of the growers within the industry
would be considered small entities.
This rule suspends the quality,
inspection, and assessment
requirements for nectarines and peaches
under the orders. Also, handler reports
would not be required beginning with
the 2011 marketing season. This action
is consistent with USDA’s decision to
seek termination of the nectarine and
peach order provisions. Growers
recently participated in continuance
referenda to determine current support
for the orders. Less than the required
two-thirds majority of voters, by number
and production volume, favored
continuance. As provided in the orders,
USDA is obligated to consider order
termination when growers fail to
support the order programs in sufficient
numbers. Following the 2003
continuance referenda, in which voters
did not support continuation of the
programs, USDA conducted listening
sessions in the industry. It was
determined at that time that the
programs might continue to benefit
growers and handlers if certain
modifications were made to the
programs. The orders were amended in
2006 (71 FR 41345; July 21, 2006).
Significant changes to the orders’ grade
and inspection regulations were
subsequently made to reduce costs to
handlers (72 FR 18847; April 16, 2007).
The industries then transferred the bulk
of their promotional activities to
California State marketing programs.
The California State marketing programs
were subsequently discontinued in
2010. Despite all these attempts to
modify the Federal programs, the
industry has continued to express its
belief that the benefits of the programs
no longer outweigh the costs. Therefore,
USDA has decided to seek termination
of the nectarine and peach marketing
order programs. Suspension of the
regulations would relieve handlers of
quality, inspection, and assessment
burdens during the termination process.
Also, handler reports would not be
required beginning with the 2011
marketing season. Additionally, growers
may be relieved of some costs, such as
assessment expenses, which are often
passed onto them by handlers.
Suspension of the requirements is
therefore expected to reduce the
regulatory burden on handlers and
growers of all sizes.
As an alternative to this rule, AMS
considered not suspending the stated
handler requirements. In that case,
handlers would have to comply with all
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
21617
quality, inspection, assessment, and
reporting requirements until the orders
were terminated. However, AMS does
not believe that it is appropriate to
require handlers to continue to be
regulated during the 2011 marketing
season when AMS intends to terminate
the orders as soon as practicable.
Therefore, this alternative was rejected
and handlers will be relieved of the
regulatory burdens under orders 916
and 917.
This rule will not impose any
additional reporting or recordkeeping
requirements on either small or large
California nectarine or peach handlers.
As with all Federal marketing order
programs, reports and forms are
periodically reviewed to reduce
information requirements and
duplication by industry and public
sector agencies. In addition, USDA has
not identified any relevant Federal rules
that duplicate, overlap, or conflict with
this rule.
AMS is committed to complying with
the E-Government Act, to promote the
use of the Internet and other
information technologies to provide
increased opportunities for citizen
access to Government information and
services, and for other purposes.
Finally, interested persons are invited
to submit comments on this interim
rule, including the regulatory and
informational impacts of this action on
small businesses.
A small business guide on complying
with fruit, vegetable, and specialty crop
marketing agreements and orders may
be viewed at: https://www.ams.usda.gov/
MarketingOrdersSmallBusinessGuide.
Any questions about the compliance
guide should be sent to Antoinette
Carter at the previously-mentioned
address in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section.
This rule invites comments on
suspension of the quality, inspection,
reporting, and assessment requirements
currently prescribed under the
marketing orders for California fresh
nectarines and peaches. Any comments
received will be considered prior to
finalization of this rule.
After consideration of all relevant
material presented, including the results
of recent grower continuance referenda,
it is found that the regulatory
requirements suspended by this interim
rule, as hereinafter set forth, do not tend
to effectuate the declared policy of the
Act.
Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 553, it is also
found and determined upon good cause
that it is impracticable, unnecessary,
and contrary to the public interest to
give preliminary notice prior to putting
this rule into effect, and that good cause
E:\FR\FM\18APR1.SGM
18APR1
21618
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 74 / Monday, April 18, 2011 / Rules and Regulations
exists for not postponing the effective
date of this rule until 30 days after
publication in the Federal Register
because: (1) This rule should be
implemented as soon as possible, since
shipments of California nectarines and
peaches are expected to begin in early
April; (2) less than the required twothirds majority of voters, by number or
production volume, favored
continuance of the nectarine and peach
orders in the recent referenda; (3)
handlers are aware of USDA’s intention
to suspend the regulations, which was
announced in a press release issued on
March 25, 2011; and (4) this rule
provides a 60-day comment period, and
any comments received will be
considered prior to finalization of this
rule.
List of Subjects
7 CFR Part 916
Marketing agreements, Nectarines,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
7 CFR Part 917
Marketing agreements, Peaches, Pears,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
For the reasons set forth in the
preamble, 7 CFR parts 916 and 917 are
amended as follows:
1. The authority citation for 7 CFR
parts 916 and 917 continues to read as
follows:
■
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 601–674.
PART 916—NECTARINES GROWN IN
CALIFORNIA
2. In part 916, §§ 916.110, 916.115,
916.234, 916.235, 916.350, and 916.356
are suspended indefinitely, effective
April 19, 2011.
■
PART 917—FRESH PEARS AND
PEACHES GROWN IN CALIFORNIA
3. In part 917, § 917.143, paragraph
(b), lift the suspensions of March 3,
1994 (59 FR 10056); and suspend
§§ 917.143, 917.150, 917.258, 917.259,
917.442, and 917.459 indefinitely,
effective April 19, 2011.
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with RULES
■
Dated: April 12, 2011.
David R. Shipman,
Associate Administrator, Agricultural
Marketing Service.
[FR Doc. 2011–9328 Filed 4–15–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–02–P
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:17 Apr 15, 2011
Jkt 223001
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Agricultural Marketing Service
7 CFR Part 924
[Docket No. AMS–FV–10–0053; FV10–924–
1 FR]
Fresh Prunes Grown in Designated
Counties in Washington and in
Umatilla County, OR; Termination of
Marketing Order 924
Agricultural Marketing Service,
USDA.
ACTION: Final rule, termination of order.
AGENCY:
This final rule terminates the
Federal marketing order regulating the
handling of fresh prunes grown in
designated counties in Washington and
in Umatilla County, Oregon, and the
rules and regulations issued thereunder.
The Department of Agriculture (USDA)
has determined that the marketing order
is no longer an effective marketing tool
for the fresh prune industry, and that
termination best serves the current
needs of the industry while also
eliminating the costs associated with the
operation of the marketing order.
DATES: Effective Date: April 19, 2011.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Martin Engeler, Marketing Order
Administration Branch, Fruit and
Vegetable Programs, AMS, USDA, 2202
Monterey Street, Suite 102–B, Fresno,
California 93721, telephone: (559) 487–
5110, Fax: (559) 487–5906, or E-mail:
Martin.Engeler@ams.usda.gov; or Robert
Curry, Marketing Order Administration
Branch, Fruit and Vegetable Programs,
AMS, USDA, 805 SW Broadway, Suite
930, Portland, Oregon 97205, telephone:
(503) 326–2724, Fax: (503) 326–7440, or
E-mail: Robert.Curry@ams.usda.gov.
Small businesses may request
information on complying with this
regulation by contacting Antoinette
Carter, Marketing Order Administration
Branch, Fruit and Vegetable Programs,
AMS, USDA, 1400 Independence
Avenue SW., STOP 0237, Washington,
DC 20250–0237; telephone: (202) 720–
2491, Fax: (202) 720–8938, or E-mail:
Antoinette.Carter@ams.usda.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This
action is governed by section
608c(16)(A) of the Agricultural
Marketing Agreement Act of 1937, as
amended (7 U.S.C. 601–674), hereinafter
referred to as the ‘‘Act’’, and § 924.64 of
Marketing Agreement and Order No.
924, both as amended (7 CFR part 924),
effective under the Act and hereinafter
referred to as the ‘‘order.’’
USDA is issuing this rule in
conformance with Executive Order
12866.
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
This final rule has been reviewed
under Executive Order 12988, Civil
Justice Reform. This rule is not intended
to have retroactive effect.
The Act provides that administrative
proceedings must be exhausted before
parties may file suit in court. Under
section 608c(15)(A) of the Act, any
handler subject to an order may file
with USDA a petition stating that the
order, any provision of the order, or any
obligation imposed in connection with
the order is not in accordance with law
and request a modification of the order
or to be exempted therefrom. A handler
is afforded the opportunity for a hearing
on the petition. After the hearing USDA
would rule on the petition. The Act
provides that the district court of the
United States in any district in which
the handler is an inhabitant, or has his
or her principal place of business, has
jurisdiction to review USDA’s ruling on
the petition, provided an action is filed
not later than 20 days after the date of
the entry of the ruling.
This rule terminates Federal
Marketing Order No. 924 and the rules
and regulations issued thereunder. The
order contains authority for regulation
of the handling of fresh prunes grown in
designated counties in Washington and
in Umatilla County, Oregon. At a
meeting held in Prosser, Washington, on
June 1, 2010, the Committee
unanimously recommended termination
of the order.
Section 924.64 of the order provides,
in pertinent part, that USDA terminate
or suspend any or all provisions of the
order when a finding is made that the
order does not tend to effectuate the
declared policy of the Act. Section
608c(16)(A) of the Act provides that
USDA terminate or suspend the
operation of any order whenever the
order or provision thereof obstructs or
does not tend to effectuate the declared
policy of the Act. Additionally, USDA is
required to notify Congress not later
than 60 days before the date the order
would be terminated.
The order, which was effectuated in
1960, provided the fresh prune industry
in Washington and Oregon with
authority for grade, size, quality,
maturity, pack, and container
regulations, as well as authority for
mandatory inspection. The order also
contained authorization for production
research and marketing research and
development projects, as well as the
necessary reporting, recordkeeping, and
assessment functions required for
operation.
Based on the Committee’s
recommendation, USDA suspended the
order’s handling regulations on May 9,
2006 (71 FR 26817). The suspended
E:\FR\FM\18APR1.SGM
18APR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 74 (Monday, April 18, 2011)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 21615-21618]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-9328]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Agricultural Marketing Service
7 CFR Parts 916 and 917
[Doc. No. AMS-FV-11-0019; FV11-916/917-5 IR]
Nectarines and Peaches Grown in California; Suspension of
Handling Requirements
AGENCY: Agricultural Marketing Service, USDA.
ACTION: Interim rule with request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This rule suspends the quality, inspection, reporting, and
assessment requirements specified under the California nectarine and
peach marketing orders (orders). The orders regulate the handling of
nectarines and peaches grown in California. During recent referenda,
less than the required two-thirds majority of growers, by number and
production volume, favored continuation of the orders. After
consideration of the referendum results and other factors, the
Department of Agriculture (USDA) has decided to seek termination of the
orders. Suspension of the handling regulations for the 2011 and
subsequent marketing seasons will relieve handlers of all regulatory
burden under the orders while USDA processes the terminations.
Termination of the orders must be delayed until after a 60-day
Congressional notification period following issuance of a proposed
rule, which will be published in a future issue of the Federal
Register.
DATES: Effective April 19, 2011; comments received by June 17, 2011
will be considered prior to issuance of a final rule.
ADDRESSES: Interested persons are invited to submit written comments
concerning this rule. Comments must be sent to the Docket Clerk,
Marketing Order Administration Branch, Fruit and Vegetable Programs,
AMS, USDA, 1400 Independence Avenue, SW., STOP 0237, Washington, DC
20250-0237; Fax: (202) 720-8938, or Internet: https://www.regulations.gov. All comments should reference the document number
and the date and page number of this issue of the Federal Register and
will be made available for public inspection at the Office of the
Docket Clerk during regular business hours, or can be viewed at: https://www.regulations.gov. All comments submitted in response to this rule
will be included in the record and will be made available to the
public. Please be advised that the identity of the individuals or
entities submitting the
[[Page 21616]]
comments will be made public on the Internet at the address provided
above.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jerry L. Simmons, Marketing
Specialist, or Kurt J. Kimmel, Regional Manager, California Marketing
Field Office, Marketing Order Administration Branch, Fruit and
Vegetable Programs, AMS, USDA; Telephone: (559) 487-5901; Fax: (559)
487-5906; or E-mail: Jerry.Simmons@ams.usda.gov or
Kurt.Kimmel@ams.usda.gov.
Small businesses may request information on complying with this
regulation by contacting Antoinette Carter, Marketing Order
Administration Branch, Fruit and Vegetable Programs, AMS, USDA, 1400
Independence Avenue, SW., STOP 0237, Washington, DC 20250-0237;
Telephone: (202) 720-2491; Fax: (202) 720-8938; or E-mail:
Antoinette.Carter@ams.usda.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This rule is issued under Marketing Order
Nos. 916 and 917, both as amended (7 CFR parts 916 and 917), regulating
the handling of nectarines and peaches grown in California,
respectively, hereinafter referred to as the ``orders.'' The orders are
effective under the Agricultural Marketing Agreement Act of 1937, as
amended (7 U.S.C. 601-674), hereinafter referred to as the ``Act.''
USDA is issuing this rule in conformance with Executive Order
12866.
This rule has been reviewed under Executive Order 12988, Civil
Justice Reform. Regulatory requirements for nectarines and peaches
grown in California are suspended indefinitely beginning with the 2011
marketing season.
The Act provides that administrative proceedings must be exhausted
before parties may file suit in court. Under section 608c(15)(A) of the
Act, any handler subject to an order may file with USDA a petition
stating that the order, any provision of the order, or any obligation
imposed in connection with the order is not in accordance with law and
request a modification of the order or to be exempted therefrom. A
handler is afforded the opportunity for a hearing on the petition.
After the hearing, USDA would rule on the petition. The Act provides
that the district court of the United States in any district in which
the handler is an inhabitant, or has his or her principal place of
business, has jurisdiction to review USDA's ruling on the petition,
provided an action is filed not later than 20 days after the date of
the entry of the ruling.
This action suspends for the 2011 and subsequent marketing seasons
the quality, inspection, reporting, and assessment requirements for
nectarines and peaches specified under the orders. Suspension of the
handling requirements will relieve handlers of all regulatory burdens
associated with the programs while USDA seeks to terminate the orders,
which are no longer favored by industry growers.
The nectarine order has been in effect since 1958. The peach order,
which includes provisions for the handling of fresh pears, has been in
effect since 1939. The orders have been used over the years to provide
the California tree fruit industries with authority for grade, size,
maturity, pack, and container regulations, as well as authority for
inspection requirements. The orders also authorize production research
and marketing research and development projects, as well as the
necessary reporting and recordkeeping functions required for operation.
The programs are funded by assessments imposed on handlers.
Sections 916.64(e) and 917.61(e) of the orders require continuance
referenda to be conducted every fourth year between December 1 and
February 15. During the period January 12 through February 2, 2011,
USDA conducted referenda among growers to determine if they favored
continuation of their programs. The referendum order published in the
Federal Register on December 13, 2010 (75 FR 77563), explained that
USDA would consider terminating the orders if fewer than two-thirds of
the growers voting and growers of less than two-thirds of the
production volume represented in the referenda favored continuance.
Ballots were mailed to 447 known nectarine and peach growers in
California. Ninety-nine valid nectarine ballots and 102 valid peach
ballots were returned. Only 63 percent of participating nectarine
growers, who produced 36 percent of the volume represented in the
referendum, favored continuation of the nectarine order. Only 62
percent of the peach growers, who produced 36 percent of the volume
represented in the referendum, favored continuing the peach order.
During the same period, referendum ballots were mailed to 140 pear
growers. Thirty-four valid ballots were returned. Ninety-four percent
of participating pear growers, who produced 99 percent of the
production volume represented in the referendum, voted to continue the
fresh pear order. The provisions of Marketing Order No. 917 (7 CFR part
917) pertaining to pears have been suspended since 1994 (59 FR 10055;
March 5, 1994). However, because pear growers support continuance of
the suspended provisions, USDA does not intend to terminate the pear
provisions at this time. The remainder of this document pertains to the
suspension of regulations under the nectarine and peach orders only.
These are the second consecutive referenda in which growers have
failed to support continuation of the nectarine and peach orders. In
2003, growers did not vote in favor of continuing the programs.
However, after conducting listening sessions with the industry, USDA
determined that with certain modifications the order programs could
continue to be beneficial. The orders were amended (71 FR 41345; July
21, 2006) and regulatory changes were made that were intended to make
the programs relevant to contemporary industry needs (72 FR 18847;
April 16, 2007). No continuance referenda were conducted in 2007
because the orders were being amended at the time.
Despite USDA efforts to help refine the programs over the past
several years, growers have continued to express their belief that the
programs no longer meet their needs. These referendum results
demonstrate a lack of grower support needed to carry out the objectives
of the Act. Thus, it has been determined that the provisions of the
orders no longer tend to effectuate the declared policy of the Act.
USDA intends to seek termination of the orders through the informal
rulemaking process and will publish a proposed rule regarding the
terminations in a future issue of the Federal Register. Additionally,
USDA is required to notify Congress not later than 60 days before the
date the order would be terminated.
The 2011-12 fiscal year for California nectarines and peaches began
March 1, 2011. The 2011 marketing season begins on April 1. This action
suspends the nectarine and peach quality, inspection, and assessment
regulations in effect under the orders for the 2011-12 and subsequent
marketing seasons. Also, handler reports would not be required
beginning with the 2011 marketing season. Suspending all regulatory
requirements relieves handlers of all regulatory burden under the
orders.
It is hereby determined that the quality, inspection, reporting,
and assessment requirements specified in Sections 916.110, 916.115,
916.234, 916.235, 916.350, and 916.356 for nectarines do not effectuate
the declared policy of the Act and should not be applied during the
2011-12 and subsequent seasons. Further, it is hereby determined that
the quality, inspection, reporting, and assessment requirements
specified in Sections 917.143, 917.150, 917.258, 917.259, 917.442, and
917.459 for peaches do not effectuate the
[[Page 21617]]
declared policy of the Act and should not be applied during the 2011-12
and subsequent seasons. Therefore, these sections are suspended
effective April 19, 2011. Upon termination of the order provisions
pertaining to nectarines and peaches grown in California, these and
other regulations under the orders would no longer be in effect.
Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Pursuant to requirements set forth in the Regulatory Flexibility
Act (RFA) (5 U.S.C. 601-612), the Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS)
has considered the economic impact of this action on small entities.
Accordingly, AMS has prepared this initial regulatory flexibility
analysis.
The purpose of the RFA is to fit regulatory actions to the scale of
business subject to such actions in order that small businesses will
not be unduly or disproportionately burdened. Marketing orders issued
pursuant to the Act, and the rules issued thereunder, are unique in
that they are brought about through group action of essentially small
entities acting on their own behalf.
There are approximately 97 California nectarine and peach handlers
subject to regulation under the orders covering nectarines and peaches
grown in California, and about 447 growers of these fruits in
California. Small agricultural service firms, which include handlers,
are defined by the Small Business Administration (SBA) (13 CFR 121.201)
as those having annual receipts of less than $7,000,000, and small
agricultural growers are defined as those having annual receipts of
less than $750,000. A majority of these handlers and growers may be
classified as small entities.
For the 2010 marketing season, the committees' staff estimated that
the average handler price received was $10.50 per container or
container equivalent of nectarines or peaches. A handler would have to
ship at least 666,667 containers to have annual receipts of $7,000,000.
Given data on shipments maintained by the committees' staff and the
average handler price received during the 2010 season, the committees'
staff estimates that approximately 46 percent of handlers in the
industry would be considered small entities.
For the 2010 marketing season, the committees' staff estimated the
average grower price received was $5.50 per container or container
equivalent for nectarines and peaches. A grower would have to produce
at least 136,364 containers of nectarines and peaches to have annual
receipts of $750,000. Given data maintained by the committees' staff
and the average grower price received during the 2010 season, the
committees' staff estimates that more than 80 percent of the growers
within the industry would be considered small entities.
This rule suspends the quality, inspection, and assessment
requirements for nectarines and peaches under the orders. Also, handler
reports would not be required beginning with the 2011 marketing season.
This action is consistent with USDA's decision to seek termination of
the nectarine and peach order provisions. Growers recently participated
in continuance referenda to determine current support for the orders.
Less than the required two-thirds majority of voters, by number and
production volume, favored continuance. As provided in the orders, USDA
is obligated to consider order termination when growers fail to support
the order programs in sufficient numbers. Following the 2003
continuance referenda, in which voters did not support continuation of
the programs, USDA conducted listening sessions in the industry. It was
determined at that time that the programs might continue to benefit
growers and handlers if certain modifications were made to the
programs. The orders were amended in 2006 (71 FR 41345; July 21, 2006).
Significant changes to the orders' grade and inspection regulations
were subsequently made to reduce costs to handlers (72 FR 18847; April
16, 2007). The industries then transferred the bulk of their
promotional activities to California State marketing programs. The
California State marketing programs were subsequently discontinued in
2010. Despite all these attempts to modify the Federal programs, the
industry has continued to express its belief that the benefits of the
programs no longer outweigh the costs. Therefore, USDA has decided to
seek termination of the nectarine and peach marketing order programs.
Suspension of the regulations would relieve handlers of quality,
inspection, and assessment burdens during the termination process.
Also, handler reports would not be required beginning with the 2011
marketing season. Additionally, growers may be relieved of some costs,
such as assessment expenses, which are often passed onto them by
handlers. Suspension of the requirements is therefore expected to
reduce the regulatory burden on handlers and growers of all sizes.
As an alternative to this rule, AMS considered not suspending the
stated handler requirements. In that case, handlers would have to
comply with all quality, inspection, assessment, and reporting
requirements until the orders were terminated. However, AMS does not
believe that it is appropriate to require handlers to continue to be
regulated during the 2011 marketing season when AMS intends to
terminate the orders as soon as practicable. Therefore, this
alternative was rejected and handlers will be relieved of the
regulatory burdens under orders 916 and 917.
This rule will not impose any additional reporting or recordkeeping
requirements on either small or large California nectarine or peach
handlers. As with all Federal marketing order programs, reports and
forms are periodically reviewed to reduce information requirements and
duplication by industry and public sector agencies. In addition, USDA
has not identified any relevant Federal rules that duplicate, overlap,
or conflict with this rule.
AMS is committed to complying with the E-Government Act, to promote
the use of the Internet and other information technologies to provide
increased opportunities for citizen access to Government information
and services, and for other purposes.
Finally, interested persons are invited to submit comments on this
interim rule, including the regulatory and informational impacts of
this action on small businesses.
A small business guide on complying with fruit, vegetable, and
specialty crop marketing agreements and orders may be viewed at: https://www.ams.usda.gov/MarketingOrdersSmallBusinessGuide. Any questions
about the compliance guide should be sent to Antoinette Carter at the
previously-mentioned address in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section.
This rule invites comments on suspension of the quality,
inspection, reporting, and assessment requirements currently prescribed
under the marketing orders for California fresh nectarines and peaches.
Any comments received will be considered prior to finalization of this
rule.
After consideration of all relevant material presented, including
the results of recent grower continuance referenda, it is found that
the regulatory requirements suspended by this interim rule, as
hereinafter set forth, do not tend to effectuate the declared policy of
the Act.
Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 553, it is also found and determined upon good
cause that it is impracticable, unnecessary, and contrary to the public
interest to give preliminary notice prior to putting this rule into
effect, and that good cause
[[Page 21618]]
exists for not postponing the effective date of this rule until 30 days
after publication in the Federal Register because: (1) This rule should
be implemented as soon as possible, since shipments of California
nectarines and peaches are expected to begin in early April; (2) less
than the required two-thirds majority of voters, by number or
production volume, favored continuance of the nectarine and peach
orders in the recent referenda; (3) handlers are aware of USDA's
intention to suspend the regulations, which was announced in a press
release issued on March 25, 2011; and (4) this rule provides a 60-day
comment period, and any comments received will be considered prior to
finalization of this rule.
List of Subjects
7 CFR Part 916
Marketing agreements, Nectarines, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
7 CFR Part 917
Marketing agreements, Peaches, Pears, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
For the reasons set forth in the preamble, 7 CFR parts 916 and 917
are amended as follows:
0
1. The authority citation for 7 CFR parts 916 and 917 continues to read
as follows:
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 601-674.
PART 916--NECTARINES GROWN IN CALIFORNIA
0
2. In part 916, Sec. Sec. 916.110, 916.115, 916.234, 916.235, 916.350,
and 916.356 are suspended indefinitely, effective April 19, 2011.
PART 917--FRESH PEARS AND PEACHES GROWN IN CALIFORNIA
0
3. In part 917, Sec. 917.143, paragraph (b), lift the suspensions of
March 3, 1994 (59 FR 10056); and suspend Sec. Sec. 917.143, 917.150,
917.258, 917.259, 917.442, and 917.459 indefinitely, effective April
19, 2011.
Dated: April 12, 2011.
David R. Shipman,
Associate Administrator, Agricultural Marketing Service.
[FR Doc. 2011-9328 Filed 4-15-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-02-P