Notice of Issuance of Final Determination Concerning Certain Office Workstations, 21775-21778 [2011-9327]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 74 / Monday, April 18, 2011 / Notices
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Federal Emergency Management
Agency
U.S. Customs and Border Protection
[Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA–1961–
DR; Docket ID FEMA–2011–0001]
Missouri; Amendment No. 1 to Notice
of a Major Disaster Declaration
Federal Emergency
Management Agency, DHS.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
Notice.
This notice amends the notice
of a major disaster declaration for the
State of Missouri (FEMA–1961–DR),
dated March 23, 2011, and related
determinations.
Effective Date: April 11, 2011.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Peggy Miller, Office of Response and
Recovery, Federal Emergency
Management Agency, 500 C Street, SW.,
Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646–3886.
The notice
of a major disaster declaration for the
State of Missouri is hereby amended to
include the following area among those
areas determined to have been adversely
affected by the event declared a major
disaster by the President in his
declaration of March 23, 2011.
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with NOTICES
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Camden County for Public Assistance.
Camden County for emergency protective
measures (Category B), including snow
assistance, under the Public Assistance
program for any continuous 48-hour period
during or proximate to the incident period.
The following Catalog of Federal Domestic
Assistance Numbers (CFDA) are to be used
for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030,
Community Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora
Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis Counseling;
97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034,
Disaster Unemployment Assistance (DUA);
97.046, Fire Management Assistance Grant;
97.048, Disaster Housing Assistance to
Individuals and Households In Presidentially
Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049,
Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance—
Disaster Housing Operations for Individuals
and Households; 97.050 Presidentially
Declared Disaster Assistance to Individuals
and Households—Other Needs; 97.036,
Disaster Grants—Public Assistance
(Presidentially Declared Disasters); 97.039,
Hazard Mitigation Grant.
W. Craig Fugate,
Administrator, Federal Emergency
Management Agency.
[FR Doc. 2011–9351 Filed 4–15–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111–23–P
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:25 Apr 15, 2011
U.S. Customs and Border
Protection, Department of Homeland
Security.
ACTION: Notice of final determination.
AGENCY:
This document provides
notice that U.S. Customs and Border
Protection (‘‘CBP’’) has issued a final
determination concerning the country of
origin of certain office workstations.
Based upon the facts presented, CBP has
concluded in the final determination
that the U.S. is the country of origin of
the office workstations for purposes of
U.S. government procurement.
DATES: The final determination was
issued on April 11, 2011. A copy of the
final determination is attached. Any
party-at-interest, as defined in 19 CFR
177.22(d), may seek judicial review of
this final determination on or before
May 18, 2011.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Elif
Eroglu, Valuation and Special Programs
Branch: (202) 325–0277.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is
hereby given that on April 11, 2011,
pursuant to subpart B of part 177,
Customs Regulations (19 CFR part 177,
subpart B), CBP issued a final
determination concerning the country of
origin of the Vivo and Ethospace office
workstations which may be offered to
the U.S. Government under an
undesignated government procurement
contract.
This final determination,
Headquarters Ruling Letter (‘‘HQ’’)
H134536, was issued at the request of
Herman Miller, Inc. under procedures
set forth at 19 CFR part 177, subpart B,
which implements Title III of the Trade
Agreements Act of 1979, as amended
(19 U.S.C. 2511–18). In the final
determination, CBP has concluded that,
based upon the facts presented, the
assembly of the Vivo and Ethospace
office workstations in the U.S., from
parts made in China, Mexico, and the
U.S., constitutes a substantial
transformation, such that the U.S. is the
country of origin of the finished article
for purposes of U.S. government
procurement.
Section 177.29, Customs Regulations
(19 CFR 177.29), provides that notice of
final determinations shall be published
in the Federal Register within 60 days
of the date the final determination is
issued. Section 177.30, CBP Regulations
SUMMARY:
SUMMARY:
DATES:
Notice of Issuance of Final
Determination Concerning Certain
Office Workstations
Jkt 223001
PO 00000
Frm 00076
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
21775
(19 CFR 177.30), provides that any
party-at-interest, as defined in 19 CFR
177.22(d), may seek judicial review of a
final determination within 30 days of
publication of such determination in the
Federal Register.
Dated: April 11, 2011.
Sandra L. Bell,
Executive Director, Regulations and Rulings,
Office of International Trade.
Attachment
HQ H134536
April 11, 2011
OT:RR:CTF:VS H134536 EE
CATEGORY: Marking
Lisa A. Crosby, Sidley Austin, LLP, 1501 K
Street, NW., Washington, D.C. 20005
RE: U.S. Government Procurement; Title III,
Trade Agreements Act of 1979 (19 U.S.C.
§ 2511); Subpart B, Part 177, CBP
Regulations; Office Workstations
Dear Ms. Crosby: This is in response to
your correspondence of November 15, 2010,
supplemented by your letter of March 10,
2011, requesting a final determination on
behalf of Herman Miller, Inc. (‘‘Herman
Miller’’), pursuant to subpart B of part 177,
U.S. Customs and Border Protection (‘‘CBP’’)
Regulations (19 C.F.R. § 177.21 et seq.).
Under the pertinent regulations, which
implement Title III of the Trade Agreements
Act of 1979, as amended (19 U.S.C. § 2511 et
seq.), CBP issues country of origin advisory
rulings and final determinations as to
whether an article is or would be a product
of a designated country or instrumentality for
the purpose of granting waivers of certain
‘‘Buy American’’ restrictions in U.S. law or
practice for products offered for sale to the
U.S. Government.
This final determination concerns the
country of origin of the Vivo and Ethospace
office workstations. We note that Herman
Miller is a party-at-interest within the
meaning of 19 C.F.R. § 177.22(d)(1) and is
entitled to request this final determination.
FACTS:
Herman Miller is a U.S. supplier of
furniture products and accessories for home,
office, healthcare and learning environments.
The merchandise at issue is Herman Miller’s
Vivo and Ethospace office workstations. You
state that Herman Miller engineered and
designed the office workstations wholly
within the U.S. The assembly and
installation of the office workstations, from
U.S. and imported components, occurs in the
U.S.
You state that the Vivo and Ethospace
office workstations both feature ‘‘frame-andtile’’ construction, which consists of a sturdy
steel frame on which a variety of components
can be hung, including shelving, storage
units, drawer units, work surfaces, lighting,
decorative tiles/panels, etc. The open frame
also has a large capacity to house wiring and
cable, permitting a workstation to
accommodate computers, printers and other
office equipment.
You state that the Vivo and Ethospace
office workstations can be assembled in a
E:\FR\FM\18APN1.SGM
18APN1
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with NOTICES
21776
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 74 / Monday, April 18, 2011 / Notices
variety of configurations, depending on the
needs and constraints of a given office space.
Herman Miller offers 90-, 120-, and 135degree connectors for its workstations which
permit its customers to shape their office
environment—enclosed, open, facing in,
facing out, shared, private, etc. The height of
a workstation can also vary from 30 to 118
inches, permitting different levels of privacy.
You state that Herman Miller’s sales
representatives, which are often independent
distributors, work directly with each
customer to design a workstation architecture
best suited to the specific office space. Once
a design decision has been made, Herman
Miller receives from its sales representative
a detailed order identifying each component
that will be used in the custom workstation.
Herman Miller operates on a make-to-order
manufacturing schedule; therefore, when an
order is received from a sales representative,
Herman Miller orders from its supply chain
the parts and components necessary to begin
the manufacturing process. Herman Miller
manufactures certain components as
necessary and palletizes all of the
components for shipment to a customer site
in the U.S. At the customer site, the
components are assembled together
according to the custom design. Herman
Miller does not permit its customers to
purchase workstations for self-installation.
Rather, trained furniture installers employed
by Herman Miller’s distributors/
representatives install the workstations.
You state that depending on the specific
configuration selected by a customer, a Vivo
and Ethospace office workstation can be
made up of hundreds of components,
including metal frames, laminated work
surfaces, painted or fabric tiles, cabinet
doors, electrical accessories and other
hardware. With respect to the two
representative configurations identified for
purposes of this ruling request, you state that
the Vivo office workstation has
approximately 40 components (excluding
fasteners and brackets) and the Ethospace
office workstation has approximately 14
components (excluding fasteners and
brackets). All of the materials are of U.S.,
Chinese, or Mexican origin.
You submitted the costed bills of materials
for the representative Vivo office workstation
and the Ethospace office workstation. The
Vivo workstation’s components from China
include: connectors, connection hardware,
and surface cantilevers. The components
from Mexico include: a power harness
extender, power harnesses, and receptacles.
Components originating in the U.S. include:
frames, connector covers, top cap connectors,
finished ends, tiles, work surfaces, open
supports, sliding door storage units, utility
task lights, v-pull freestanding pedestals, and
v-pull freestanding lateral files. The
Ethospace workstation’s components from
China are draw rods. The components from
the U.S. include: tiles, frames, connectors,
finished ends, work surfaces, a flipper door
unit, a shelf, task lights, and a w-pull support
pedestal. The installation times for the
representative Vivo and Ethospace
workstations are approximately seven and a
half hours and seven hours, respectively. Of
the total cost of production for the Vivo
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:25 Apr 15, 2011
Jkt 223001
workstation, 83 percent is attributable to U.S.
origin costs, including materials, labor, and
overhead. Of the total cost of production for
the Ethospace workstation, 98 percent is
attributable to U.S. origin costs.
You state that Herman Miller selfmanufactures many of the components used
in its workstations at its Michigan facility.
For example, with respect to the work
surfaces used in its workstations, Herman
Miller staff cut-to-size domestically-sourced
raw particle board and then bond to each
board a high pressure laminate top, a backer
and edge bands. With respect to the frames,
Herman Miller staff roll form rolled steel
(coils) from a domestic source into rails and
stiles, which are then welded together using
a special fixture to form the frames for its
workstations. Staff then apply an
autophoretic coating to the frames (requiring
five stages) and attach glides to the bottoms
of the frames. Herman Miller staff also
manufacture the tiles used in workstations,
using U.S.-origin raw materials.
You state that the installation procedures
for the Vivo and Ethospace office
workstations are substantially similar. The
first step in installing a workstation is to
mark the perimeter for the workstation based
on its layout. This is done by laying strips
of tape on the ground in the form of the
layout for the walls. Next, electrical and nonelectrical wall bases are laid along the tape
lines. The electrical bases are then wired,
which entails running wires along the bases
and connecting the wires to a power source
and the electrical outlets in the bases.
Once the bases are in place, the frames for
the wall panels, windows and other features
of the workstation are installed. The frames
are fitted on top of the bases and secured
with brackets and hand-driven screws. As the
frames are inserted, the electrical wiring is
run through the interior of the frame as
needed to accommodate the location of the
power source.
The wall panels, windows and other
special tiles are then installed in the bases
and frames. The bottom of a wall panel is
inserted into the slot of a base and the slots
of the surrounding frame. This step is
repeated until all of the wall panels are
joined to their corresponding bases and
frames. In some cases, a half-sized wall panel
is used so that a window or special tile may
be installed above it. A window/tile is
attached to a half-size wall panel and the
corresponding frame using brackets, handdriven screws and other fasteners. This step
is repeated until all wall panels and
windows/tiles are securely connected.
Next, the frame connectors of the
workstation are assembled. The connectors
are slid into the frames. They are then
secured with hand-driven screws and other
fasteners. This step is repeated until all of the
frames are connected.
The tops of the wall panels are then
finished. This involves fastening caps and
top plates to the top of each wall panel to
eliminate rough edges. These items are then
secured with hand-driven screws and other
fasteners.
With the structure of the office workstation
thus in place, the work surface is installed
next. Brackets are mounted on the relevant
PO 00000
Frm 00077
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
panels and secured with hand-driven screws
and other fasteners. The work surface is then
placed on the brackets, adjusted to ensure
that it is level, and secured with hand-driven
screws and other fasteners. Open supports
are added to either side of the work surface
to enhance stability. They are secured to the
work surface with hand-driven screws and
other fasteners.
Shelves, flipper units, and sliding door
storage units are then added to the office
workstation in a similar manner. Brackets are
first fitted and secured into place with handdriven screws and other fasteners. Then, the
shelves, flipper units and storage units are
placed onto the brackets, leveled, and
secured with hand-driven screws and other
fasteners.
The bookcase is installed next by sliding it
beside the relevant wall panels and ensuring
that it is level. The leg glides are adjusted as
necessary. A drawer handle also is added to
the bookcase and installed using hand-driven
screws.
You provided a copy of the product
datasheets for the Vivo and Ethospace office
workstations as well as photos of the
representative configurations for a Vivo office
workstation and an Ethospace office
workstation. Additionally, you provided a
copy of the design materials, the list of
patents applicable to the Vivo and Ethospace
office workstations, a video which depicts
the installation procedures for the Vivo and
Ethospace office workstations, the overview
of Herman Miller’s installation certification
program, the installation procedures, and a
breakdown of the time typically required to
install the representative Vivo and Ethospace
workstations.
ISSUES:
1) What is the country of origin of the Vivo
and Ethospace office workstations for the
purpose of U.S. government procurement?
2) Whether Herman Miller is the ultimate
purchaser of the imported components and
whether only their outermost container needs
to be marked.
LAW AND ANALYSIS:
Government Procurement
Pursuant to subpart B of part 177, 19 C.F.R.
§ 177.21 et seq., which implements Title III
of the Trade Agreements Act of 1979, as
amended (19 U.S.C. § 2511 et seq.), CBP
issues country of origin advisory rulings and
final determinations as to whether an article
is or would be a product of a designated
country or instrumentality for the purposes
of granting waivers of certain ‘‘Buy
American’’ restrictions in U.S. law or practice
for products offered for sale to the U.S.
Government.
Under the rule of origin set forth under 19
U.S.C. § 2518(4)(B):
An article is a product of a country or
instrumentality only if (i) it is wholly the
growth, product, or manufacture of that
country or instrumentality, or (ii) in the case
of an article which consists in whole or in
part of materials from another country or
instrumentality, it has been substantially
transformed into a new and different article
of commerce with a name, character, or use
E:\FR\FM\18APN1.SGM
18APN1
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 74 / Monday, April 18, 2011 / Notices
distinct from that of the article or articles
from which it was so transformed.
See also, 19 C.F.R. § 177.22(a).
In rendering advisory rulings and final
determinations for purposes of U.S.
government procurement, CBP applies the
provisions of subpart B of part 177 consistent
with the Federal Acquisition Regulations.
See 19 C.F.R. § 177.21. In this regard, CBP
recognizes that the Federal Acquisition
Regulations restrict the U.S. Government’s
purchase of products to U.S.-made or
designated country end products for
acquisitions subject to the TAA. See 48
C.F.R. § 25.403(c)(1). The Federal Acquisition
Regulations define ‘‘U.S.-made end product’’
as:
* * * an article that is mined, produced,
or manufactured in the United States or that
is substantially transformed in the United
States into a new and different article of
commerce with a name, character, or use
distinct from that of the article or articles
from which it was transformed.
48 C.F.R. § 25.003.
In order to determine whether a substantial
transformation occurs when components of
various origins are assembled into completed
products, CBP considers the totality of the
circumstances and makes such
determinations on a case-by-case basis. The
country of origin of the item’s components,
extent of the processing that occurs within a
country, and whether such processing
renders a product with a new name,
character, and use are primary considerations
in such cases. Additionally, factors such as
the resources expended on product design
and development, extent and nature of postassembly inspection and testing procedures,
and the degree of skill required during the
actual manufacturing process may be
relevant when determining whether a
substantial transformation has occurred. No
one factor is determinative.
In Carlson Furniture Industries v. United
States, 65 Cust. Ct. 474 (1970), the U.S.
Customs Court ruled that U.S. operations on
imported chair parts constituted a substantial
transformation, resulting in the creation of a
new article of commerce. After importation,
the importer assembled, fitted, and glued the
wooden parts together, inserted steel pins
into the key joints, cut the legs to length and
leveled them, and in some instances,
upholstered the chairs and fitted the legs
with glides and casters. The court
determined that the importer had to perform
additional work on the imported chair parts
and add materials to create a functional
article of commerce. The court found that the
operations were substantial in nature, and
more than the mere assembly of the parts
together.
In Headquarters Ruling Letter (‘‘HQ’’)
561258, dated April 15, 1999, CBP
determined that the assembly of numerous
imported workstation components with the
U.S.-origin work surface, the essential and
largest component of the workstation, into
finished workstations constituted a
substantial transformation. CBP found that
the imported components lost their identity
as leg brackets, drawer units, panels, etc.
when they were assembled together to form
a workstation.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:25 Apr 15, 2011
Jkt 223001
In the instant case, the Vivo office
workstation has approximately 40
components and the Ethospace office
workstation has approximately 14
components which are proposed to be
assembled in the U.S. Regarding both types
of workstations, we note that the major
components such as the work surfaces, the
frames, and the tiles are of U.S. origin.
Regarding the Vivo workstation, the U.S.sourced frames, connector covers, top cap
connectors, finished ends, tiles, work
surfaces, open supports, sliding door storage
units, utility task lights, v-pull freestanding
pedestals, and v-pull freestanding lateral files
will be assembled with the imported
components which will take approximately
seven and a half hours. Regarding the
Ethospace workstation, the U.S.-sourced
tiles, frames, connectors, finished ends, work
surfaces, flipper door unit, shelf, task lights,
and w-pull support pedestal will be
assembled with the imported components
which will take approximately seven hours.
Under the described assembly process, we
find that the foreign components lose their
individual identities and become an integral
part of a new article, the Vivo or the
Ethospace office workstation, possessing a
new name, character and use. Based upon the
information before us, we find that the
imported components that are used to
manufacture the Vivo and the Ethospace
office workstations, when combined with the
U.S. origin components, are substantially
transformed as a result of the assembly
operations performed in the U.S., and that
the country of origin of the Vivo and the
Ethospace office workstations for government
procurement purposes is the U.S.
Marking
Section 304 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended (19 U.S.C. § 1304), provides that
unless excepted, every article of foreign
origin imported into the United States shall
be marked in a conspicuous place as legibly,
indelibly, and permanently as the nature of
the article (or its container) will permit, in
such a manner as to indicate to the ultimate
purchaser in the United States, the English
name of the country of origin of the article.
Congressional intent in enacting 19 U.S.C.
§ 1304 was ‘‘that the ultimate purchaser
should be able to know by an inspection of
the marking on the imported goods the
country of which the goods is the product.
The evident purpose is to mark the goods so
that at the time of purchase the ultimate
purchaser may, by knowing where the goods
were produced, be able to buy or refuse to
buy them, if such marking should influence
his will.’’ States v. Friedlander & Co., 27
C.C.P.A. 297 at 302; C.A.D. 104 (1940). Part
134, U.S. Customs and Border Protection
(CBP) Regulations (19 C.F.R. § 134)
implement the country of origin marking
requirements and exceptions of 19 U.S.C.
§ 1304. Section 134.1(b), CBP Regulations (19
C.F.R. § 134.1(b)), defines ‘‘country of origin’’
as:
[T]he country of manufacture, production,
or growth of any article of foreign origin
entering the United States. Further work or
material added to an article in another
country must effect a substantial
PO 00000
Frm 00078
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
21777
transformation in order to render such other
country the ‘‘country of origin’’ within the
meaning of [the marking regulations] * * *
As previously noted, in HQ 561258, dated
April 15, 1999, CBP considered the country
of origin marking requirements for certain
workstation office furniture. In that case, the
importer manufactured office workstation
furniture in the U.S. using various
components that were manufactured by its
subsidiary in Italy. The Italian components
were combined with the work surfaces made
in the U.S., shipped to the customer’s site,
and assembled by the importer’s installers
into finished workstations. Additionally,
some of the Italian components were shipped
to the importer and kept in stock to replace
damaged or lost material. These replacement
parts were kept in their original individual
packing until they were required to be
shipped to a customer. CBP determined that
the assembly of the imported components
with the U.S.-origin work surface into the
finished workstations resulted in a
substantial transformation and that provided
the importer installed and assembled the
components together, the importer would be
the ultimate purchaser and it would be
acceptable to only mark the outer shipping
crate in which the foreign components were
imported.
Similarly in this case, we find that Herman
Miller is the ultimate purchaser since
Herman Miller (or its distributor/
representative) substantially transforms the
imported components as a result of
installation at the customer’s site.
Accordingly, it is acceptable only to mark the
outside shipping crate in which the goods are
imported and transported to Herman Miller.
With regard to the replacement parts,
provided they are also installed by Herman
Miller (or its distributor/representative), only
the outer original individual packing needs
to be marked. However, if the customer itself
is supplied with the replacement parts and
performs the installation, they must receive
these replacement parts in properly marked
packing.
HOLDING:
The imported components that are used to
manufacture the Vivo and Ethospace office
workstations are substantially transformed as
a result of the assembly operations performed
in the U.S. Therefore, we find that the
country of origin of the Vivo and Ethospace
office workstations for government
procurement purposes is the U.S. Provided
Herman Miller installs and assembles the
components together, Herman Miller is the
ultimate purchaser and it will be acceptable
to only mark the outer shipping crate in
which the foreign components are imported.
Notice of this final determination will be
given in the Federal Register, as required by
19 C.F.R. § 177.29. Any party-at-interest other
than the party which requested this final
determination may request, pursuant to 19
C.F.R. § 177.31, that CBP reexamine the
matter anew and issue a new final
determination. Pursuant to 19 C.F.R.
§ 177.30, any party-at-interest may, within 30
days after publication of the Federal Register
notice referenced above, seek judicial review
of this final determination before the Court
of International Trade.
E:\FR\FM\18APN1.SGM
18APN1
21778
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 74 / Monday, April 18, 2011 / Notices
Sincerely,
Sandra L. Bell
Executive Director
Regulations and Rulings
Office of International Trade
[FR Doc. 2011–9327 Filed 4–15–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Bureau of Indian Affairs
Renewal of Agency Information
Collection for the Bureau of Indian
Affairs Housing Improvement
Program; Request for Comments
Bureau of Indian Affairs,
Interior.
ACTION: Notice of request for comments.
AGENCY:
In compliance with the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, the
Bureau of Indian Affairs (BIA) is seeking
comments on renewal of Office of
Management and Budget (OMB)
approval for the collection of
information for the BIA Housing
Improvement Program, 25 CFR 256. The
information collection is currently
authorized by OMB Control Number
1076–0084, which expires August 31,
2011.
SUMMARY:
Interested persons are invited to
submit comments on or before June 17,
2011.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
on the information collection to Les
Jensen, Bureau of Indian Affairs, 1849 C
Street, NW., Washington, DC 20240,
Leslie.Jensen@bia.gov.
DATES:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Les
Jensen (907) 586–7397.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with NOTICES
I. Abstract
BIA is seeking renewal of the
approval for the information collection
conducted under 25 CFR 256, Housing
Improvement Program, to determine
applicant eligibility for housing
improvement program services and to
determine priority order in which
eligible applicants may receive the
program services. Approval for this
collection expires on August 31, 2011.
This information includes an
application form. No changes are being
made to the form or to the approved
burden hours for this information
collection.
II. Request for Comments
BIA requests that you send your
comments on this collection to the
location listed in the ADDRESSES section.
Your comments should address: (a) The
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:25 Apr 15, 2011
Jkt 223001
necessity of the information collection
for the proper performance of the
agencies, including whether the
information will have practical utility;
(b) the accuracy of our estimate of the
burden (hours and cost) of the collection
of information, including the validity of
the methodology and assumptions used;
(c) ways we could enhance the quality,
utility and clarity of the information to
be collected; and (d) ways we could
minimize the burden of the collection of
the information on the respondents,
such as through the use of automated
collection techniques or other forms of
information technology.
Please note that an agency may not
sponsor or conduct, and an individual
need not respond to, a collection of
information unless it has a valid OMB
Control Number.
It is our policy to make all comments
available to the public for review at the
location listed in the ADDRESSES section
during the hours of 9 a.m.–5 p.m.,
Eastern Time, Monday through Friday
except for legal holidays. Before
including your address, phone number,
e-mail address or other personally
identifiable information, be advised that
your entire comment—including your
personally identifiable information—
may be made public at any time. While
you may request that we withhold your
personally identifiable information, we
cannot guarantee that we will be able to
do so.
III. Data
OMB Control Number: 1076–0084.
Title: Bureau of Indian Affairs
Housing Improvement Program, 25 CFR
256.
Brief Description of Collection:
Submission of this information allows
BIA to determine applicant eligibility
for housing services based upon the
criteria referenced in 25 CFR 256.9
(repairs and renovation assistance) and
§ 256.10 (replacement assistance).
Enrolled members of Federally
recognized Tribes, who live within a
Tribe’s designated and approved service
area, submit information on an
application form. The information
includes:
A. Applicant Information including:
Name, current address, telephone
number, date of birth, social security
number, Tribe, roll number, reservation,
marital status, name of spouse, date of
birth of spouse, Tribe of spouse, and roll
number of spouse.
B. Family Information including:
Name, date of birth, relationship to
applicant, and Tribe/roll number.
C. Income Information: Earned and
unearned income.
PO 00000
Frm 00079
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
D. Housing Information including:
Location of the house to be repaired,
constructed, or purchased; description
of housing assistance for which
applying; knowledge of receipt of prior
Housing Improvement Program
assistance, amount to whom and when;
ownership or rental; availability of
electricity and name of electric
company; type of sewer system; water
source; number of bedrooms; size of
house, and bathroom facilities.
E. Land Information including:
Landowner; legal status of land; or type
of interest in land.
F. General Information including:
Prior receipt of services under the
Housing Improvement Program and
description of such; ownership of other
housing and description of such;
identification of Housing and Urban
Development-funded house and current
status of project; identification of other
sources of housing assistance for which
the applicant has applied and been
denied assistance, if applying for a new
housing unit or purchase of an existing
standard unit; and advisement and
description of any severe health
problem, handicap or permanent
disability.
G. Applicant Certification including:
Signature of applicant and date, and
signature of spouse and date.
Response is required to obtain a
benefit.
Type of Review: Extension without
change of a currently approved
collection.
Respondents: Individuals.
Number of Respondents: 8,000 per
year, on average.
Total Number of Responses: 8,000 per
year, on average.
Frequency of Response: Once.
Estimated Time per Response: 1 hour.
Estimated Total Annual Burden:
8,000 hours.
Dated: April 11, 2011.
Alvin Foster,
Acting Chief Information Officer—Indian
Affairs.
[FR Doc. 2011–9281 Filed 4–15–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–4J–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Bureau of Land Management
[LLMT926000–11–L19100000–BJ0000–
LRCME0R04658]
Notice of Filing of Plats of Survey;
Montana
Bureau of Land Management,
Interior.
ACTION: Notice of filing of plats of
survey.
AGENCY:
E:\FR\FM\18APN1.SGM
18APN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 74 (Monday, April 18, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 21775-21778]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-9327]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
U.S. Customs and Border Protection
Notice of Issuance of Final Determination Concerning Certain
Office Workstations
AGENCY: U.S. Customs and Border Protection, Department of Homeland
Security.
ACTION: Notice of final determination.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This document provides notice that U.S. Customs and Border
Protection (``CBP'') has issued a final determination concerning the
country of origin of certain office workstations. Based upon the facts
presented, CBP has concluded in the final determination that the U.S.
is the country of origin of the office workstations for purposes of
U.S. government procurement.
DATES: The final determination was issued on April 11, 2011. A copy of
the final determination is attached. Any party-at-interest, as defined
in 19 CFR 177.22(d), may seek judicial review of this final
determination on or before May 18, 2011.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Elif Eroglu, Valuation and Special
Programs Branch: (202) 325-0277.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that on April 11,
2011, pursuant to subpart B of part 177, Customs Regulations (19 CFR
part 177, subpart B), CBP issued a final determination concerning the
country of origin of the Vivo and Ethospace office workstations which
may be offered to the U.S. Government under an undesignated government
procurement contract.
This final determination, Headquarters Ruling Letter (``HQ'')
H134536, was issued at the request of Herman Miller, Inc. under
procedures set forth at 19 CFR part 177, subpart B, which implements
Title III of the Trade Agreements Act of 1979, as amended (19 U.S.C.
2511-18). In the final determination, CBP has concluded that, based
upon the facts presented, the assembly of the Vivo and Ethospace office
workstations in the U.S., from parts made in China, Mexico, and the
U.S., constitutes a substantial transformation, such that the U.S. is
the country of origin of the finished article for purposes of U.S.
government procurement.
Section 177.29, Customs Regulations (19 CFR 177.29), provides that
notice of final determinations shall be published in the Federal
Register within 60 days of the date the final determination is issued.
Section 177.30, CBP Regulations (19 CFR 177.30), provides that any
party-at-interest, as defined in 19 CFR 177.22(d), may seek judicial
review of a final determination within 30 days of publication of such
determination in the Federal Register.
Dated: April 11, 2011.
Sandra L. Bell,
Executive Director, Regulations and Rulings, Office of International
Trade.
Attachment
HQ H134536
April 11, 2011
OT:RR:CTF:VS H134536 EE
CATEGORY: Marking
Lisa A. Crosby, Sidley Austin, LLP, 1501 K Street, NW., Washington,
D.C. 20005
RE: U.S. Government Procurement; Title III, Trade Agreements Act of
1979 (19 U.S.C. Sec. 2511); Subpart B, Part 177, CBP Regulations;
Office Workstations
Dear Ms. Crosby: This is in response to your correspondence of
November 15, 2010, supplemented by your letter of March 10, 2011,
requesting a final determination on behalf of Herman Miller, Inc.
(``Herman Miller''), pursuant to subpart B of part 177, U.S. Customs
and Border Protection (``CBP'') Regulations (19 C.F.R. Sec. 177.21
et seq.). Under the pertinent regulations, which implement Title III
of the Trade Agreements Act of 1979, as amended (19 U.S.C. Sec.
2511 et seq.), CBP issues country of origin advisory rulings and
final determinations as to whether an article is or would be a
product of a designated country or instrumentality for the purpose
of granting waivers of certain ``Buy American'' restrictions in U.S.
law or practice for products offered for sale to the U.S.
Government.
This final determination concerns the country of origin of the
Vivo and Ethospace office workstations. We note that Herman Miller
is a party-at-interest within the meaning of 19 C.F.R. Sec.
177.22(d)(1) and is entitled to request this final determination.
FACTS:
Herman Miller is a U.S. supplier of furniture products and
accessories for home, office, healthcare and learning environments.
The merchandise at issue is Herman Miller's Vivo and Ethospace
office workstations. You state that Herman Miller engineered and
designed the office workstations wholly within the U.S. The assembly
and installation of the office workstations, from U.S. and imported
components, occurs in the U.S.
You state that the Vivo and Ethospace office workstations both
feature ``frame-and-tile'' construction, which consists of a sturdy
steel frame on which a variety of components can be hung, including
shelving, storage units, drawer units, work surfaces, lighting,
decorative tiles/panels, etc. The open frame also has a large
capacity to house wiring and cable, permitting a workstation to
accommodate computers, printers and other office equipment.
You state that the Vivo and Ethospace office workstations can be
assembled in a
[[Page 21776]]
variety of configurations, depending on the needs and constraints of
a given office space. Herman Miller offers 90-, 120-, and 135-degree
connectors for its workstations which permit its customers to shape
their office environment--enclosed, open, facing in, facing out,
shared, private, etc. The height of a workstation can also vary from
30 to 118 inches, permitting different levels of privacy.
You state that Herman Miller's sales representatives, which are
often independent distributors, work directly with each customer to
design a workstation architecture best suited to the specific office
space. Once a design decision has been made, Herman Miller receives
from its sales representative a detailed order identifying each
component that will be used in the custom workstation. Herman Miller
operates on a make-to-order manufacturing schedule; therefore, when
an order is received from a sales representative, Herman Miller
orders from its supply chain the parts and components necessary to
begin the manufacturing process. Herman Miller manufactures certain
components as necessary and palletizes all of the components for
shipment to a customer site in the U.S. At the customer site, the
components are assembled together according to the custom design.
Herman Miller does not permit its customers to purchase workstations
for self-installation. Rather, trained furniture installers employed
by Herman Miller's distributors/representatives install the
workstations.
You state that depending on the specific configuration selected
by a customer, a Vivo and Ethospace office workstation can be made
up of hundreds of components, including metal frames, laminated work
surfaces, painted or fabric tiles, cabinet doors, electrical
accessories and other hardware. With respect to the two
representative configurations identified for purposes of this ruling
request, you state that the Vivo office workstation has
approximately 40 components (excluding fasteners and brackets) and
the Ethospace office workstation has approximately 14 components
(excluding fasteners and brackets). All of the materials are of
U.S., Chinese, or Mexican origin.
You submitted the costed bills of materials for the
representative Vivo office workstation and the Ethospace office
workstation. The Vivo workstation's components from China include:
connectors, connection hardware, and surface cantilevers. The
components from Mexico include: a power harness extender, power
harnesses, and receptacles. Components originating in the U.S.
include: frames, connector covers, top cap connectors, finished
ends, tiles, work surfaces, open supports, sliding door storage
units, utility task lights, v-pull freestanding pedestals, and v-
pull freestanding lateral files. The Ethospace workstation's
components from China are draw rods. The components from the U.S.
include: tiles, frames, connectors, finished ends, work surfaces, a
flipper door unit, a shelf, task lights, and a w-pull support
pedestal. The installation times for the representative Vivo and
Ethospace workstations are approximately seven and a half hours and
seven hours, respectively. Of the total cost of production for the
Vivo workstation, 83 percent is attributable to U.S. origin costs,
including materials, labor, and overhead. Of the total cost of
production for the Ethospace workstation, 98 percent is attributable
to U.S. origin costs.
You state that Herman Miller self-manufactures many of the
components used in its workstations at its Michigan facility. For
example, with respect to the work surfaces used in its workstations,
Herman Miller staff cut-to-size domestically-sourced raw particle
board and then bond to each board a high pressure laminate top, a
backer and edge bands. With respect to the frames, Herman Miller
staff roll form rolled steel (coils) from a domestic source into
rails and stiles, which are then welded together using a special
fixture to form the frames for its workstations. Staff then apply an
autophoretic coating to the frames (requiring five stages) and
attach glides to the bottoms of the frames. Herman Miller staff also
manufacture the tiles used in workstations, using U.S.-origin raw
materials.
You state that the installation procedures for the Vivo and
Ethospace office workstations are substantially similar. The first
step in installing a workstation is to mark the perimeter for the
workstation based on its layout. This is done by laying strips of
tape on the ground in the form of the layout for the walls. Next,
electrical and non-electrical wall bases are laid along the tape
lines. The electrical bases are then wired, which entails running
wires along the bases and connecting the wires to a power source and
the electrical outlets in the bases.
Once the bases are in place, the frames for the wall panels,
windows and other features of the workstation are installed. The
frames are fitted on top of the bases and secured with brackets and
hand-driven screws. As the frames are inserted, the electrical
wiring is run through the interior of the frame as needed to
accommodate the location of the power source.
The wall panels, windows and other special tiles are then
installed in the bases and frames. The bottom of a wall panel is
inserted into the slot of a base and the slots of the surrounding
frame. This step is repeated until all of the wall panels are joined
to their corresponding bases and frames. In some cases, a half-sized
wall panel is used so that a window or special tile may be installed
above it. A window/tile is attached to a half-size wall panel and
the corresponding frame using brackets, hand-driven screws and other
fasteners. This step is repeated until all wall panels and windows/
tiles are securely connected.
Next, the frame connectors of the workstation are assembled. The
connectors are slid into the frames. They are then secured with
hand-driven screws and other fasteners. This step is repeated until
all of the frames are connected.
The tops of the wall panels are then finished. This involves
fastening caps and top plates to the top of each wall panel to
eliminate rough edges. These items are then secured with hand-driven
screws and other fasteners.
With the structure of the office workstation thus in place, the
work surface is installed next. Brackets are mounted on the relevant
panels and secured with hand-driven screws and other fasteners. The
work surface is then placed on the brackets, adjusted to ensure that
it is level, and secured with hand-driven screws and other
fasteners. Open supports are added to either side of the work
surface to enhance stability. They are secured to the work surface
with hand-driven screws and other fasteners.
Shelves, flipper units, and sliding door storage units are then
added to the office workstation in a similar manner. Brackets are
first fitted and secured into place with hand-driven screws and
other fasteners. Then, the shelves, flipper units and storage units
are placed onto the brackets, leveled, and secured with hand-driven
screws and other fasteners.
The bookcase is installed next by sliding it beside the relevant
wall panels and ensuring that it is level. The leg glides are
adjusted as necessary. A drawer handle also is added to the bookcase
and installed using hand-driven screws.
You provided a copy of the product datasheets for the Vivo and
Ethospace office workstations as well as photos of the
representative configurations for a Vivo office workstation and an
Ethospace office workstation. Additionally, you provided a copy of
the design materials, the list of patents applicable to the Vivo and
Ethospace office workstations, a video which depicts the
installation procedures for the Vivo and Ethospace office
workstations, the overview of Herman Miller's installation
certification program, the installation procedures, and a breakdown
of the time typically required to install the representative Vivo
and Ethospace workstations.
ISSUES:
1) What is the country of origin of the Vivo and Ethospace
office workstations for the purpose of U.S. government procurement?
2) Whether Herman Miller is the ultimate purchaser of the
imported components and whether only their outermost container needs
to be marked.
LAW AND ANALYSIS:
Government Procurement
Pursuant to subpart B of part 177, 19 C.F.R. Sec. 177.21 et
seq., which implements Title III of the Trade Agreements Act of
1979, as amended (19 U.S.C. Sec. 2511 et seq.), CBP issues country
of origin advisory rulings and final determinations as to whether an
article is or would be a product of a designated country or
instrumentality for the purposes of granting waivers of certain
``Buy American'' restrictions in U.S. law or practice for products
offered for sale to the U.S. Government.
Under the rule of origin set forth under 19 U.S.C. Sec.
2518(4)(B):
An article is a product of a country or instrumentality only if
(i) it is wholly the growth, product, or manufacture of that country
or instrumentality, or (ii) in the case of an article which consists
in whole or in part of materials from another country or
instrumentality, it has been substantially transformed into a new
and different article of commerce with a name, character, or use
[[Page 21777]]
distinct from that of the article or articles from which it was so
transformed.
See also, 19 C.F.R. Sec. 177.22(a).
In rendering advisory rulings and final determinations for
purposes of U.S. government procurement, CBP applies the provisions
of subpart B of part 177 consistent with the Federal Acquisition
Regulations. See 19 C.F.R. Sec. 177.21. In this regard, CBP
recognizes that the Federal Acquisition Regulations restrict the
U.S. Government's purchase of products to U.S.-made or designated
country end products for acquisitions subject to the TAA. See 48
C.F.R. Sec. 25.403(c)(1). The Federal Acquisition Regulations
define ``U.S.-made end product'' as:
* * * an article that is mined, produced, or manufactured in the
United States or that is substantially transformed in the United
States into a new and different article of commerce with a name,
character, or use distinct from that of the article or articles from
which it was transformed.
48 C.F.R. Sec. 25.003.
In order to determine whether a substantial transformation
occurs when components of various origins are assembled into
completed products, CBP considers the totality of the circumstances
and makes such determinations on a case-by-case basis. The country
of origin of the item's components, extent of the processing that
occurs within a country, and whether such processing renders a
product with a new name, character, and use are primary
considerations in such cases. Additionally, factors such as the
resources expended on product design and development, extent and
nature of post-assembly inspection and testing procedures, and the
degree of skill required during the actual manufacturing process may
be relevant when determining whether a substantial transformation
has occurred. No one factor is determinative.
In Carlson Furniture Industries v. United States, 65 Cust. Ct.
474 (1970), the U.S. Customs Court ruled that U.S. operations on
imported chair parts constituted a substantial transformation,
resulting in the creation of a new article of commerce. After
importation, the importer assembled, fitted, and glued the wooden
parts together, inserted steel pins into the key joints, cut the
legs to length and leveled them, and in some instances, upholstered
the chairs and fitted the legs with glides and casters. The court
determined that the importer had to perform additional work on the
imported chair parts and add materials to create a functional
article of commerce. The court found that the operations were
substantial in nature, and more than the mere assembly of the parts
together.
In Headquarters Ruling Letter (``HQ'') 561258, dated April 15,
1999, CBP determined that the assembly of numerous imported
workstation components with the U.S.-origin work surface, the
essential and largest component of the workstation, into finished
workstations constituted a substantial transformation. CBP found
that the imported components lost their identity as leg brackets,
drawer units, panels, etc. when they were assembled together to form
a workstation.
In the instant case, the Vivo office workstation has
approximately 40 components and the Ethospace office workstation has
approximately 14 components which are proposed to be assembled in
the U.S. Regarding both types of workstations, we note that the
major components such as the work surfaces, the frames, and the
tiles are of U.S. origin. Regarding the Vivo workstation, the U.S.-
sourced frames, connector covers, top cap connectors, finished ends,
tiles, work surfaces, open supports, sliding door storage units,
utility task lights, v-pull freestanding pedestals, and v-pull
freestanding lateral files will be assembled with the imported
components which will take approximately seven and a half hours.
Regarding the Ethospace workstation, the U.S.-sourced tiles, frames,
connectors, finished ends, work surfaces, flipper door unit, shelf,
task lights, and w-pull support pedestal will be assembled with the
imported components which will take approximately seven hours. Under
the described assembly process, we find that the foreign components
lose their individual identities and become an integral part of a
new article, the Vivo or the Ethospace office workstation,
possessing a new name, character and use. Based upon the information
before us, we find that the imported components that are used to
manufacture the Vivo and the Ethospace office workstations, when
combined with the U.S. origin components, are substantially
transformed as a result of the assembly operations performed in the
U.S., and that the country of origin of the Vivo and the Ethospace
office workstations for government procurement purposes is the U.S.
Marking
Section 304 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C.
Sec. 1304), provides that unless excepted, every article of foreign
origin imported into the United States shall be marked in a
conspicuous place as legibly, indelibly, and permanently as the
nature of the article (or its container) will permit, in such a
manner as to indicate to the ultimate purchaser in the United
States, the English name of the country of origin of the article.
Congressional intent in enacting 19 U.S.C. Sec. 1304 was ``that the
ultimate purchaser should be able to know by an inspection of the
marking on the imported goods the country of which the goods is the
product. The evident purpose is to mark the goods so that at the
time of purchase the ultimate purchaser may, by knowing where the
goods were produced, be able to buy or refuse to buy them, if such
marking should influence his will.'' States v. Friedlander & Co., 27
C.C.P.A. 297 at 302; C.A.D. 104 (1940). Part 134, U.S. Customs and
Border Protection (CBP) Regulations (19 C.F.R. Sec. 134) implement
the country of origin marking requirements and exceptions of 19
U.S.C. Sec. 1304. Section 134.1(b), CBP Regulations (19 C.F.R.
Sec. 134.1(b)), defines ``country of origin'' as:
[T]he country of manufacture, production, or growth of any
article of foreign origin entering the United States. Further work
or material added to an article in another country must effect a
substantial transformation in order to render such other country the
``country of origin'' within the meaning of [the marking
regulations] * * *
As previously noted, in HQ 561258, dated April 15, 1999, CBP
considered the country of origin marking requirements for certain
workstation office furniture. In that case, the importer
manufactured office workstation furniture in the U.S. using various
components that were manufactured by its subsidiary in Italy. The
Italian components were combined with the work surfaces made in the
U.S., shipped to the customer's site, and assembled by the
importer's installers into finished workstations. Additionally, some
of the Italian components were shipped to the importer and kept in
stock to replace damaged or lost material. These replacement parts
were kept in their original individual packing until they were
required to be shipped to a customer. CBP determined that the
assembly of the imported components with the U.S.-origin work
surface into the finished workstations resulted in a substantial
transformation and that provided the importer installed and
assembled the components together, the importer would be the
ultimate purchaser and it would be acceptable to only mark the outer
shipping crate in which the foreign components were imported.
Similarly in this case, we find that Herman Miller is the
ultimate purchaser since Herman Miller (or its distributor/
representative) substantially transforms the imported components as
a result of installation at the customer's site. Accordingly, it is
acceptable only to mark the outside shipping crate in which the
goods are imported and transported to Herman Miller. With regard to
the replacement parts, provided they are also installed by Herman
Miller (or its distributor/representative), only the outer original
individual packing needs to be marked. However, if the customer
itself is supplied with the replacement parts and performs the
installation, they must receive these replacement parts in properly
marked packing.
HOLDING:
The imported components that are used to manufacture the Vivo
and Ethospace office workstations are substantially transformed as a
result of the assembly operations performed in the U.S. Therefore,
we find that the country of origin of the Vivo and Ethospace office
workstations for government procurement purposes is the U.S.
Provided Herman Miller installs and assembles the components
together, Herman Miller is the ultimate purchaser and it will be
acceptable to only mark the outer shipping crate in which the
foreign components are imported.
Notice of this final determination will be given in the Federal
Register, as required by 19 C.F.R. Sec. 177.29. Any party-at-
interest other than the party which requested this final
determination may request, pursuant to 19 C.F.R. Sec. 177.31, that
CBP reexamine the matter anew and issue a new final determination.
Pursuant to 19 C.F.R. Sec. 177.30, any party-at-interest may,
within 30 days after publication of the Federal Register notice
referenced above, seek judicial review of this final determination
before the Court of International Trade.
[[Page 21778]]
Sincerely,
Sandra L. Bell
Executive Director
Regulations and Rulings
Office of International Trade
[FR Doc. 2011-9327 Filed 4-15-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P