Grapes Grown in Designated Area of Southeastern California; Increased Assessment Rate, 21620-21622 [2011-9307]
Download as PDF
21620
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 74 / Monday, April 18, 2011 / Rules and Regulations
Committee unanimously recommended
termination, and all handlers and
producers in the industry have been
notified and provided an opportunity to
comment; and (4) no useful purpose
would be served by delaying the
effective date.
List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 924
Prunes, Marketing agreements,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
PART 924—[REMOVED]
Dated: April 12, 2011.
David R. Shipman,
Associate Administrator, Agricultural
Marketing Service.
[FR Doc. 2011–9318 Filed 4–15–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Agricultural Marketing Service
7 CFR Part 925
[Doc. No. AMS–FV–10–0104; FV11–925–1
FR]
Grapes Grown in Designated Area of
Southeastern California; Increased
Assessment Rate
Agricultural Marketing Service,
USDA.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
This rule increases the
assessment rate established for the
California Desert Grape Administrative
Committee (Committee) for the 2011
and subsequent fiscal periods from
$0.01 to $0.0125 per 18-pound lug of
grapes handled. The Committee locally
administers the marketing order, which
regulates the handling of grapes grown
in a designated area of southeastern
California. Assessments upon grape
handlers are used by the Committee to
fund reasonable and necessary expenses
of the program. The fiscal period began
January 1 and ends December 31. The
assessment rate will remain in effect
indefinitely unless modified, suspended
or terminated.
DATES: Effective Date: April 19, 2011.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jerry
L. Simmons, Marketing Specialist, or
Kurt J. Kimmel, Regional Manager,
California Marketing Field Office,
Marketing Order Administration
Branch, Fruit and Vegetable Programs,
AMS, USDA; Telephone: (559) 487–
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with RULES
SUMMARY:
15:17 Apr 15, 2011
This rule
is issued under Marketing Order No.
925, as amended (7 CFR part 925),
regulating the handling of grapes grown
in a designated area of southeastern
California, hereinafter referred to as the
‘‘order.’’ The order is effective under the
Agricultural Marketing Agreement Act
of 1937, as amended (7 U.S.C. 601–674),
hereinafter referred to as the ‘‘Act.’’
The Department of Agriculture
(USDA) is issuing this rule in
conformance with Executive Order
12866.
This rule has been reviewed under
Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice
Reform. Under the marketing order now
in effect, grape handlers in a designated
area of southeastern California are
subject to assessments. Funds to
administer the order are derived from
such assessments. It is intended that the
assessment rate as issued herein will be
applicable to all assessable grapes
beginning on January 1, 2011, and
continue until amended, suspended, or
terminated.
The Act provides that administrative
proceedings must be exhausted before
parties may file suit in court. Under
section 608c(15)(A) of the Act, any
handler subject to an order may file
with USDA a petition stating that the
order, any provision of the order, or any
obligation imposed in connection with
the order is not in accordance with law
and request a modification of the order
or to be exempted therefrom. Such
handler is afforded the opportunity for
a hearing on the petition. After the
hearing, USDA would rule on the
petition. The Act provides that the
district court of the United States in any
district in which the handler is an
inhabitant, or has his or her principal
place of business, has jurisdiction to
review USDA’s ruling on the petition,
provided an action is filed not later than
20 days after the date of the entry of the
ruling.
This rule increases the assessment
rate established for the Committee for
the 2011 and subsequent fiscal periods
from $0.01 to $0.0125 per 18-pound lug
of grapes.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
For the reasons set forth in the
preamble, and under authority of 7
U.S.C. 601–674, 7 CFR part 924 is
removed.
■
VerDate Mar<15>2010
5901, Fax: (559) 487–5906, or E-mail:
Jerry.Simmons@ams.usda.gov or
Kurt.Kimmel@ams.usda.gov.
Small businesses may request
information on complying with this
regulation by contacting Antoinette
Carter, Marketing Order Administration
Branch, Fruit and Vegetable Programs,
AMS, USDA, 1400 Independence Ave.,
SW., STOP 0237, Washington, DC
20250–0237; Telephone: (202) 720–
2491, Fax: (202) 720–8938, or E-mail:
Antoinette.Carter@ams.usda.gov.
Jkt 223001
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
The grape order provides authority for
the Committee, with the approval of
USDA, to formulate an annual budget of
expenses and collect assessments from
handlers to administer the program. The
members of the Committee are
producers and handlers of grapes grown
in a designated area of southeastern
California. They are familiar with the
Committee’s needs and with the costs
for goods and services in their local area
and are thus in a position to formulate
an appropriate budget and assessment
rate. The assessment rate is formulated
and discussed in a public meeting.
Thus, all directly affected persons have
an opportunity to participate and
provide input.
For the 2009 and subsequent fiscal
periods, the Committee recommended,
and the USDA approved, an assessment
rate that would continue in effect from
fiscal period to fiscal period unless
modified, suspended, or terminated by
USDA upon recommendation and
information submitted by the
Committee or other information
available to USDA.
The Committee met on October 21,
2010, and unanimously recommended
2011 expenditures of $89,616 and an
assessment rate of $0.0125 per 18-pound
lug of grapes handled. In comparison,
last year’s budgeted expenditures were
$73,666. The assessment rate of $0.0125
is $0.0025 higher than the rate currently
in effect. The Committee recommended
a higher assessment rate to offset the
2011 budget increases in research,
general office expenses, management
and compliance expenses, as well as a
decreased crop estimate. The Committee
estimated a decreased 2011 crop of
6,000,000 18-pound lugs of grapes
handled, which is about 604,951 18pound lugs fewer than the 6,604,951 18pound lugs handled during the 2010
fiscal period. Based on increases in
expenses and a decreased crop estimate,
the Committee unanimously
recommended that the assessment rate
of $0.01 currently in effect be increased
by $0.0025. Income derived from
handler assessments, along with funds
from the Committee’s authorized
reserve, should be adequate to cover
budgeted expenses.
The major expenditures
recommended by the Committee for the
2011 fiscal period include $10,000 for
research, $15,616 for general office
expenses, and $64,000 for management
and compliance expenses. The $10,000
research project is a for a new vine
study proposed by the University of
California Riverside. In comparison,
major expenditures for the 2010 fiscal
period included no funds for research,
$13,666 for general office expenses, and
E:\FR\FM\18APR1.SGM
18APR1
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 74 / Monday, April 18, 2011 / Rules and Regulations
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with RULES
$60,000 management and compliance
expenses.
The assessment rate recommended by
the Committee was derived by the
following formula: Anticipated 2011
expenses ($89,616) plus the desired
2011 ending reserve ($88,384), minus
the 2011 beginning reserve ($103,000),
divided by the estimated 2011
shipments (6,000,000 18-pound lugs)
equals $0.0125 per lug.
Income generated through the $0.0125
assessment ($75,000) plus carry-in
reserve funds ($103,000) should be
sufficient to meet anticipated expenses
($89,616). Reserve funds by the end of
2011 are projected at $88,384 or about
one fiscal period’s expenses. Section
925.41 of the order permits the
Committee to maintain about one fiscal
period’s expenses in reserve.
The assessment rate established in
this rule will continue in effect
indefinitely unless modified,
suspended, or terminated by USDA
upon recommendation and information
submitted by the Committee or other
available information.
Although this assessment rate will be
in effect for an indefinite period, the
Committee will continue to meet prior
to or during each fiscal period to
recommend a budget of expenses and
consider recommendations for
modification of the assessment rate. The
dates and times of Committee meetings
are available from the Committee or
USDA. Committee meetings are open to
the public and interested persons may
express their views at these meetings.
USDA will evaluate the Committee
recommendations and other available
information to determine whether
modification of the assessment rate is
needed. Further rulemaking will be
undertaken as necessary. The
Committee’s 2011 budget and those for
subsequent fiscal periods would be
reviewed and, as appropriate, approved
by USDA.
Final Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Pursuant to requirements set forth in
the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA)
(5 U.S.C. 601–612), the Agricultural
Marketing Service (AMS) has
considered the economic impact of this
rule on small entities. Accordingly,
AMS has prepared this final regulatory
flexibility analysis.
The purpose of the RFA is to fit
regulatory actions to the scale of
business subject to such actions in order
that small businesses will not be unduly
or disproportionately burdened.
Marketing orders issued pursuant to the
Act, and the rules issued thereunder, are
unique in that they are brought about
through group action of essentially
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:17 Apr 15, 2011
Jkt 223001
small entities acting on their own
behalf.
There are approximately 14 handlers
of southeastern California grapes who
are subject to regulation under the order
and about 50 grape producers in the
production area. Small agricultural
service firms are defined by the Small
Business Administration (13 CFR
121.201) as those having annual receipts
of less than $7,000,000, and small
agricultural producers are defined as
those whose annual receipts are less
than $750,000. Nine of the 14 handlers
subject to regulation have annual grape
sales of less than $7 million. Based on
data from the National Agricultural
Statistics Service and the Committee,
the crop value for the 2010 season was
about $38,139,629. Dividing this figure
by the number of producers (50) yields
an average annual producer revenue
estimate of about $762,793. However,
according to the Committee, at least ten
of 50 producers would be considered
small businesses under the Small
Business Administration threshold of
$750,000. Based on the foregoing, it may
be concluded that a majority of grape
handlers and at least ten of the
producers could be classified as small
entities.
This rule increases the assessment
rate established for the Committee and
collected from handlers for the 2011 and
subsequent fiscal periods from $0.01 to
$0.0125 per 18-pound lug of grapes. The
Committee unanimously recommended
2011 expenditures of $89,616 and an
assessment rate of $0.0125 per 18-pound
lug of grapes handled. The assessment
rate of $0.0125 is $0.0025 higher than
the 2010 rate currently in effect. The
Committee recommended the higher
assessment rate of $0.0125 to offset the
2011 budget increases in research,
general office expenses, management
and compliance expenses, and a
decreased crop estimate. The number of
assessable grapes is estimated at 6
million 18-pound lugs of grapes. Thus,
income generated through the $0.0125
assessment ($75,000) plus reserve funds
($103,000) should be sufficient to meet
anticipated expenses ($89,616). Reserve
funds by the end of 2011 are projected
at $88,384 or about one fiscal period’s
expenses.
The major expenditures
recommended by the Committee for the
2011 fiscal period include $10,000 for
research, $15,616 for general office
expenses, and $64,000 for management
and compliance expenses. The $10,000
research project is for a new vine study
proposed by the University of California
Riverside. In comparison, major
expenditures for the 2010 fiscal period
included no funds for research, $13,666
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
21621
for general office expenses, and $60,000
management and compliance expenses.
The assessment rate recommended by
the Committee was derived based on the
Committee’s estimates of the available
beginning reserve ($103,000), projected
decreased crop size (6 million 18-pound
lugs), anticipated assessment income
($75,000), anticipated expenses
($89,616), and the ending 2011 reserve
($88,384).
The Committee reviewed and
unanimously recommended 2011
expenditures of $89,616, which
included increases in research, general
office expenses, and management and
compliance expenses. Prior to arriving
at this budget, the Committee
considered alternative expenditures and
assessment rates, to include not
increasing the $0.01 assessment rate
currently in effect. Based on a decreased
2011 estimate crop of 6 million 18pound lugs, the Committee ultimately
determined that increasing the
assessment rate to $0.0125 combined
with funds available from the reserve
would adequately cover increased
expenses and provide an adequate 2011
ending financial reserve.
A review of historical crop and price
information, as well as preliminary
information pertaining to the upcoming
fiscal period indicates that the 2011
producer price for California grapes
could average about $5.77 per 18-pound
lug. With an assessment rate of $0.0125
per 18-pound lug of grapes for the 2011
season, the assessment revenue as a
percentage of grower revenue would be
0.217 percent, or well below one
percent.
This action increases the assessment
obligation imposed on handlers. While
assessments impose some additional
costs on handlers, the costs are minimal
and uniform on all handlers. Some of
the additional costs may be passed on
to producers. However, these costs are
offset by the benefits derived by the
operation of the order. In addition, the
Committee’s meeting was widely
publicized throughout the grape
production area and all interested
persons were invited to attend and
participate in Committee deliberations
on all issues. Like all Committee
meetings, the October 21, 2010, meeting
was a public meeting and all entities,
both large and small, were able to
express views on this issue.
This rule imposes no additional
reporting or recordkeeping requirements
on either small or large California grape
handlers. As with all Federal marketing
order programs, reports and forms are
periodically reviewed to reduce
information requirements and
duplication by industry and public
E:\FR\FM\18APR1.SGM
18APR1
21622
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 74 / Monday, April 18, 2011 / Rules and Regulations
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with RULES
sector agencies. As noted in the initial
regulatory flexibility analysis, USDA
has not identified any relevant Federal
rules that duplicate, overlap, or conflict
with this final rule.
AMS is committed to complying with
the E-Government Act, to promote the
use of the Internet and other
information technologies to provide
increased opportunities for citizen
access to Government information and
services, and for other purposes.
A proposed rule concerning this
action was published in the Federal
Register on February 9, 2011 (76 FR
7119).
Copies of the proposed rule were also
mailed or sent via facsimile to all grape
handlers. Finally, the proposal was
made available through the Internet by
USDA and the Office of the Federal
Register. A 30-day comment period
ending March 11, 2011, was provided
for interested persons to respond to the
proposal. No comments were received.
A small business guide on complying
with fruit, vegetable, and specialty crop
marketing agreements and orders may
be viewed at: https://www.ams.usda.gov/
MarketingOrdersSmallBusinessGuide.
Any questions about the compliance
guide should be sent to Antoinette
Carter at the previously-mentioned
address in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section.
After consideration of all relevant
material presented, including the
information and recommendation
submitted by the Committee and other
available information, it is hereby found
that this rule, as hereinafter set forth,
will tend to effectuate the declared
policy of the Act.
Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 553, it also found
and determined that good cause exists
for not postponing the effective date of
this rule until 30 days after publication
in the Federal Register because: (1) The
2011 fiscal period began on January 1,
2011, and the marketing order requires
that the rate of assessment for each
fiscal period apply to all assessable
grapes handled during the fiscal period;
(2) the Committee needs to have
sufficient funds to meet its expenses
which are on a continuous basis; and (3)
handlers are aware of this action, which
was recommended by the Committee at
a public meeting. Also, a 30-day
comment period was provided for in the
proposed rule.
List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 925
Grapes, Marketing agreements,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
For the reasons set forth in the
preamble, 7 CFR part 925 is amended as
follows:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:17 Apr 15, 2011
Jkt 223001
PART 925—GRAPES GROWN IN A
DESIGNATED AREA OF
SOUTHEASTERN CALIFORNIA
1. The authority citation for 7 CFR
part 925 continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 601–674.
2. Section 925.215 is revised to read
as follows:
■
§ 925.215
Assessment rate.
On and after January 1, 2011, an
assessment rate of $0.0125 per 18-pound
lug is established for grapes grown in a
designated area of southeastern
California.
Dated: April 12, 2011.
David R. Shipman,
Associate Administrator, Agricultural
Marketing Service.
[FR Doc. 2011–9307 Filed 4–15–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–02–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 95
[Docket No. 30778; Amdt. No. 493]
IFR Altitudes; Miscellaneous
Amendments
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
This amendment adopts
miscellaneous amendments to the
required IFR (instrument flight rules)
altitudes and changeover points for
certain Federal airways, jet routes, or
direct routes for which a minimum or
maximum en route authorized IFR
altitude is prescribed. This regulatory
action is needed because of changes
occurring in the National Airspace
System. These changes are designed to
provide for the safe and efficient use of
the navigable airspace under instrument
conditions in the affected areas.
DATES: Effective Date: 0901 UTC, May 5,
2011.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Harry Hodges, Flight Procedure
Standards Branch (AMCAFS–420),
Flight Technologies and Programs
Division, Flight Standards Service,
Federal Aviation Administration, Mike
Monroney Aeronautical Center, 6500
South MacArthur Blvd. Oklahoma City,
OK. 73169 (Mail Address: P.O. Box
25082 Oklahoma City, OK 73125)
telephone: (405) 954–4164.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This
amendment to part 95 of the Federal
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 95)
amends, suspends, or revokes IFR
altitudes governing the operation of all
aircraft in flight over a specified route
or any portion of that route, as well as
the changeover points (COPs) for
Federal airways, jet routes, or direct
routes as prescribed in part 95.
The Rule
The specified IFR altitudes, when
used in conjunction with the prescribed
changeover points for those routes,
ensure navigation aid coverage that is
adequate for safe flight operations and
free of frequency interference. The
reasons and circumstances that create
the need for this amendment involve
matters of flight safety and operational
efficiency in the National Airspace
System, are related to published
aeronautical charts that are essential to
the user, and provide for the safe and
efficient use of the navigable airspace.
In addition, those various reasons or
circumstances require making this
amendment effective before the next
scheduled charting and publication date
of the flight information to assure its
timely availability to the user. The
effective date of this amendment reflects
those considerations. In view of the
close and immediate relationship
between these regulatory changes and
safety in air commerce, I find that notice
and public procedure before adopting
this amendment are impracticable and
contrary to the public interest and that
good cause exists for making the
amendment effective in less than 30
days.
Conclusion
The FAA has determined that this
regulation only involves an established
body of technical regulations for which
frequent and routine amendments are
necessary to keep them operationally
current. It, therefore—(1) is not a
‘‘significant regulatory action’’ under
Executive Order 12866; (2) is not a
‘‘significant rule’’ under DOT Regulatory
Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034;
February 26, 1979); and (3) does not
warrant preparation of a regulatory
evaluation as the anticipated impact is
so minimal. For the same reason, the
FAA certifies that this amendment will
not have a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities
under the criteria of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 95
Airspace, Navigation (air).
E:\FR\FM\18APR1.SGM
18APR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 74 (Monday, April 18, 2011)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 21620-21622]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-9307]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Agricultural Marketing Service
7 CFR Part 925
[Doc. No. AMS-FV-10-0104; FV11-925-1 FR]
Grapes Grown in Designated Area of Southeastern California;
Increased Assessment Rate
AGENCY: Agricultural Marketing Service, USDA.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This rule increases the assessment rate established for the
California Desert Grape Administrative Committee (Committee) for the
2011 and subsequent fiscal periods from $0.01 to $0.0125 per 18-pound
lug of grapes handled. The Committee locally administers the marketing
order, which regulates the handling of grapes grown in a designated
area of southeastern California. Assessments upon grape handlers are
used by the Committee to fund reasonable and necessary expenses of the
program. The fiscal period began January 1 and ends December 31. The
assessment rate will remain in effect indefinitely unless modified,
suspended or terminated.
DATES: Effective Date: April 19, 2011.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jerry L. Simmons, Marketing
Specialist, or Kurt J. Kimmel, Regional Manager, California Marketing
Field Office, Marketing Order Administration Branch, Fruit and
Vegetable Programs, AMS, USDA; Telephone: (559) 487-5901, Fax: (559)
487-5906, or E-mail: Jerry.Simmons@ams.usda.gov or
Kurt.Kimmel@ams.usda.gov.
Small businesses may request information on complying with this
regulation by contacting Antoinette Carter, Marketing Order
Administration Branch, Fruit and Vegetable Programs, AMS, USDA, 1400
Independence Ave., SW., STOP 0237, Washington, DC 20250-0237;
Telephone: (202) 720-2491, Fax: (202) 720-8938, or E-mail:
Antoinette.Carter@ams.usda.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This rule is issued under Marketing Order
No. 925, as amended (7 CFR part 925), regulating the handling of grapes
grown in a designated area of southeastern California, hereinafter
referred to as the ``order.'' The order is effective under the
Agricultural Marketing Agreement Act of 1937, as amended (7 U.S.C. 601-
674), hereinafter referred to as the ``Act.''
The Department of Agriculture (USDA) is issuing this rule in
conformance with Executive Order 12866.
This rule has been reviewed under Executive Order 12988, Civil
Justice Reform. Under the marketing order now in effect, grape handlers
in a designated area of southeastern California are subject to
assessments. Funds to administer the order are derived from such
assessments. It is intended that the assessment rate as issued herein
will be applicable to all assessable grapes beginning on January 1,
2011, and continue until amended, suspended, or terminated.
The Act provides that administrative proceedings must be exhausted
before parties may file suit in court. Under section 608c(15)(A) of the
Act, any handler subject to an order may file with USDA a petition
stating that the order, any provision of the order, or any obligation
imposed in connection with the order is not in accordance with law and
request a modification of the order or to be exempted therefrom. Such
handler is afforded the opportunity for a hearing on the petition.
After the hearing, USDA would rule on the petition. The Act provides
that the district court of the United States in any district in which
the handler is an inhabitant, or has his or her principal place of
business, has jurisdiction to review USDA's ruling on the petition,
provided an action is filed not later than 20 days after the date of
the entry of the ruling.
This rule increases the assessment rate established for the
Committee for the 2011 and subsequent fiscal periods from $0.01 to
$0.0125 per 18-pound lug of grapes.
The grape order provides authority for the Committee, with the
approval of USDA, to formulate an annual budget of expenses and collect
assessments from handlers to administer the program. The members of the
Committee are producers and handlers of grapes grown in a designated
area of southeastern California. They are familiar with the Committee's
needs and with the costs for goods and services in their local area and
are thus in a position to formulate an appropriate budget and
assessment rate. The assessment rate is formulated and discussed in a
public meeting. Thus, all directly affected persons have an opportunity
to participate and provide input.
For the 2009 and subsequent fiscal periods, the Committee
recommended, and the USDA approved, an assessment rate that would
continue in effect from fiscal period to fiscal period unless modified,
suspended, or terminated by USDA upon recommendation and information
submitted by the Committee or other information available to USDA.
The Committee met on October 21, 2010, and unanimously recommended
2011 expenditures of $89,616 and an assessment rate of $0.0125 per 18-
pound lug of grapes handled. In comparison, last year's budgeted
expenditures were $73,666. The assessment rate of $0.0125 is $0.0025
higher than the rate currently in effect. The Committee recommended a
higher assessment rate to offset the 2011 budget increases in research,
general office expenses, management and compliance expenses, as well as
a decreased crop estimate. The Committee estimated a decreased 2011
crop of 6,000,000 18-pound lugs of grapes handled, which is about
604,951 18-pound lugs fewer than the 6,604,951 18-pound lugs handled
during the 2010 fiscal period. Based on increases in expenses and a
decreased crop estimate, the Committee unanimously recommended that the
assessment rate of $0.01 currently in effect be increased by $0.0025.
Income derived from handler assessments, along with funds from the
Committee's authorized reserve, should be adequate to cover budgeted
expenses.
The major expenditures recommended by the Committee for the 2011
fiscal period include $10,000 for research, $15,616 for general office
expenses, and $64,000 for management and compliance expenses. The
$10,000 research project is a for a new vine study proposed by the
University of California Riverside. In comparison, major expenditures
for the 2010 fiscal period included no funds for research, $13,666 for
general office expenses, and
[[Page 21621]]
$60,000 management and compliance expenses.
The assessment rate recommended by the Committee was derived by the
following formula: Anticipated 2011 expenses ($89,616) plus the desired
2011 ending reserve ($88,384), minus the 2011 beginning reserve
($103,000), divided by the estimated 2011 shipments (6,000,000 18-pound
lugs) equals $0.0125 per lug.
Income generated through the $0.0125 assessment ($75,000) plus
carry-in reserve funds ($103,000) should be sufficient to meet
anticipated expenses ($89,616). Reserve funds by the end of 2011 are
projected at $88,384 or about one fiscal period's expenses. Section
925.41 of the order permits the Committee to maintain about one fiscal
period's expenses in reserve.
The assessment rate established in this rule will continue in
effect indefinitely unless modified, suspended, or terminated by USDA
upon recommendation and information submitted by the Committee or other
available information.
Although this assessment rate will be in effect for an indefinite
period, the Committee will continue to meet prior to or during each
fiscal period to recommend a budget of expenses and consider
recommendations for modification of the assessment rate. The dates and
times of Committee meetings are available from the Committee or USDA.
Committee meetings are open to the public and interested persons may
express their views at these meetings. USDA will evaluate the Committee
recommendations and other available information to determine whether
modification of the assessment rate is needed. Further rulemaking will
be undertaken as necessary. The Committee's 2011 budget and those for
subsequent fiscal periods would be reviewed and, as appropriate,
approved by USDA.
Final Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Pursuant to requirements set forth in the Regulatory Flexibility
Act (RFA) (5 U.S.C. 601-612), the Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS)
has considered the economic impact of this rule on small entities.
Accordingly, AMS has prepared this final regulatory flexibility
analysis.
The purpose of the RFA is to fit regulatory actions to the scale of
business subject to such actions in order that small businesses will
not be unduly or disproportionately burdened. Marketing orders issued
pursuant to the Act, and the rules issued thereunder, are unique in
that they are brought about through group action of essentially small
entities acting on their own behalf.
There are approximately 14 handlers of southeastern California
grapes who are subject to regulation under the order and about 50 grape
producers in the production area. Small agricultural service firms are
defined by the Small Business Administration (13 CFR 121.201) as those
having annual receipts of less than $7,000,000, and small agricultural
producers are defined as those whose annual receipts are less than
$750,000. Nine of the 14 handlers subject to regulation have annual
grape sales of less than $7 million. Based on data from the National
Agricultural Statistics Service and the Committee, the crop value for
the 2010 season was about $38,139,629. Dividing this figure by the
number of producers (50) yields an average annual producer revenue
estimate of about $762,793. However, according to the Committee, at
least ten of 50 producers would be considered small businesses under
the Small Business Administration threshold of $750,000. Based on the
foregoing, it may be concluded that a majority of grape handlers and at
least ten of the producers could be classified as small entities.
This rule increases the assessment rate established for the
Committee and collected from handlers for the 2011 and subsequent
fiscal periods from $0.01 to $0.0125 per 18-pound lug of grapes. The
Committee unanimously recommended 2011 expenditures of $89,616 and an
assessment rate of $0.0125 per 18-pound lug of grapes handled. The
assessment rate of $0.0125 is $0.0025 higher than the 2010 rate
currently in effect. The Committee recommended the higher assessment
rate of $0.0125 to offset the 2011 budget increases in research,
general office expenses, management and compliance expenses, and a
decreased crop estimate. The number of assessable grapes is estimated
at 6 million 18-pound lugs of grapes. Thus, income generated through
the $0.0125 assessment ($75,000) plus reserve funds ($103,000) should
be sufficient to meet anticipated expenses ($89,616). Reserve funds by
the end of 2011 are projected at $88,384 or about one fiscal period's
expenses.
The major expenditures recommended by the Committee for the 2011
fiscal period include $10,000 for research, $15,616 for general office
expenses, and $64,000 for management and compliance expenses. The
$10,000 research project is for a new vine study proposed by the
University of California Riverside. In comparison, major expenditures
for the 2010 fiscal period included no funds for research, $13,666 for
general office expenses, and $60,000 management and compliance
expenses.
The assessment rate recommended by the Committee was derived based
on the Committee's estimates of the available beginning reserve
($103,000), projected decreased crop size (6 million 18-pound lugs),
anticipated assessment income ($75,000), anticipated expenses
($89,616), and the ending 2011 reserve ($88,384).
The Committee reviewed and unanimously recommended 2011
expenditures of $89,616, which included increases in research, general
office expenses, and management and compliance expenses. Prior to
arriving at this budget, the Committee considered alternative
expenditures and assessment rates, to include not increasing the $0.01
assessment rate currently in effect. Based on a decreased 2011 estimate
crop of 6 million 18-pound lugs, the Committee ultimately determined
that increasing the assessment rate to $0.0125 combined with funds
available from the reserve would adequately cover increased expenses
and provide an adequate 2011 ending financial reserve.
A review of historical crop and price information, as well as
preliminary information pertaining to the upcoming fiscal period
indicates that the 2011 producer price for California grapes could
average about $5.77 per 18-pound lug. With an assessment rate of
$0.0125 per 18-pound lug of grapes for the 2011 season, the assessment
revenue as a percentage of grower revenue would be 0.217 percent, or
well below one percent.
This action increases the assessment obligation imposed on
handlers. While assessments impose some additional costs on handlers,
the costs are minimal and uniform on all handlers. Some of the
additional costs may be passed on to producers. However, these costs
are offset by the benefits derived by the operation of the order. In
addition, the Committee's meeting was widely publicized throughout the
grape production area and all interested persons were invited to attend
and participate in Committee deliberations on all issues. Like all
Committee meetings, the October 21, 2010, meeting was a public meeting
and all entities, both large and small, were able to express views on
this issue.
This rule imposes no additional reporting or recordkeeping
requirements on either small or large California grape handlers. As
with all Federal marketing order programs, reports and forms are
periodically reviewed to reduce information requirements and
duplication by industry and public
[[Page 21622]]
sector agencies. As noted in the initial regulatory flexibility
analysis, USDA has not identified any relevant Federal rules that
duplicate, overlap, or conflict with this final rule.
AMS is committed to complying with the E-Government Act, to promote
the use of the Internet and other information technologies to provide
increased opportunities for citizen access to Government information
and services, and for other purposes.
A proposed rule concerning this action was published in the Federal
Register on February 9, 2011 (76 FR 7119).
Copies of the proposed rule were also mailed or sent via facsimile
to all grape handlers. Finally, the proposal was made available through
the Internet by USDA and the Office of the Federal Register. A 30-day
comment period ending March 11, 2011, was provided for interested
persons to respond to the proposal. No comments were received.
A small business guide on complying with fruit, vegetable, and
specialty crop marketing agreements and orders may be viewed at: https://www.ams.usda.gov/MarketingOrdersSmallBusinessGuide. Any questions
about the compliance guide should be sent to Antoinette Carter at the
previously-mentioned address in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section.
After consideration of all relevant material presented, including
the information and recommendation submitted by the Committee and other
available information, it is hereby found that this rule, as
hereinafter set forth, will tend to effectuate the declared policy of
the Act.
Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 553, it also found and determined that good
cause exists for not postponing the effective date of this rule until
30 days after publication in the Federal Register because: (1) The 2011
fiscal period began on January 1, 2011, and the marketing order
requires that the rate of assessment for each fiscal period apply to
all assessable grapes handled during the fiscal period; (2) the
Committee needs to have sufficient funds to meet its expenses which are
on a continuous basis; and (3) handlers are aware of this action, which
was recommended by the Committee at a public meeting. Also, a 30-day
comment period was provided for in the proposed rule.
List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 925
Grapes, Marketing agreements, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
For the reasons set forth in the preamble, 7 CFR part 925 is
amended as follows:
PART 925--GRAPES GROWN IN A DESIGNATED AREA OF SOUTHEASTERN
CALIFORNIA
0
1. The authority citation for 7 CFR part 925 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 601-674.
0
2. Section 925.215 is revised to read as follows:
Sec. 925.215 Assessment rate.
On and after January 1, 2011, an assessment rate of $0.0125 per 18-
pound lug is established for grapes grown in a designated area of
southeastern California.
Dated: April 12, 2011.
David R. Shipman,
Associate Administrator, Agricultural Marketing Service.
[FR Doc. 2011-9307 Filed 4-15-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-02-P