Troy Mine, Incorporated, Troy Mine Revised Reclamation Plan, Kootenai National Forest, Lincoln County, MT, 20940-20942 [2011-9086]
Download as PDF
20940
Notices
Federal Register
Vol. 76, No. 72
Thursday, April 14, 2011
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER
contains documents other than rules or
proposed rules that are applicable to the
public. Notices of hearings and investigations,
committee meetings, agency decisions and
rulings, delegations of authority, filing of
petitions and applications and agency
statements of organization and functions are
examples of documents appearing in this
section.
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Forest Service
Troy Mine, Incorporated, Troy Mine
Revised Reclamation Plan, Kootenai
National Forest, Lincoln County, MT
Forest Service, USDA.
Notice of intent to prepare an
environmental impact statement.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The U.S. Department of
Agriculture, Forest Service, Kootenai
National Forest (KNF), in conjunction
with Montana Department of
Environmental Quality (DEQ), will
prepare an environmental impact
statement (EIS) to document the
analysis and disclose the environmental
impacts of the proposed action and
alternatives to reclaim facilities, safely
close the underground mine, and
protect water quality at the Troy Mine,
located in Lincoln County, Montana.
The mine is located on public and
private lands approximately 15 miles
south of Troy, Montana. Genesis
Incorporated (Genesis), a wholly owned
subsidiary of Revett Silver Company,
submitted the Troy Mine Revised
Reclamation Plan (Revised Reclamation
Plan or Proposed Action) on February
27, 2006, pursuant to U.S. Forest
Service (USFS) locatable mineral
regulations, 36 Code of Federal
Regulations (CFR) 228, Subpart A, and
the State of Montana Metal Mine
Reclamation Act, 82–4–301 et seq.,
Montana Codes Annotated. On
December 30, 2010 Genesis
Incorporated changed their name to
Troy Mine, Incorporated. A single EIS,
evaluating all components of the
proposed reclamation project will be
prepared.
DATES: The public involvement process
for the Revised Reclamation Plan began
with a press release that was published
in area newspapers and announced on
local TV and radio stations on October
11, 2007. Advertisements were also
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:34 Apr 13, 2011
Jkt 223001
published in four area newspapers
October 21, 2007 through October 25,
2007. The comment period was
extended from October 11, 2007 through
December 28, 2007. There is no
additional formal scoping period for this
proposed action. The agencies
completed an initial analysis in
December 2010. Based on the analysis
and potential water quality issues, the
agencies decided to prepare a draft EIS.
The draft EIS is expected to be available
for review and public comment in May
2011. The comment period for the Draft
EIS will be 45 days from the date the
Environmental Protection Agency
publishes the notice of availability in
the Federal Register. The final EIS is
expected to be released in December
2011.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Bobbie Lacklen, Project Coordinator,
Kootenai National Forest, 31374 U.S.
Hwy 2, Libby, MT 59923. Phone (406)
283–7681, or e-mail at
blacklen@fs.fed.us, or consult https://
www.fs.usda.gov/goto/kootenai/projects.
Individuals who use telecommunication
devices for the deaf (TDD) may call the
Federal Information Relay Service
(FIRS) at 1–800–877–8339 between
8 a.m. and 8 p.m., Eastern Time,
Monday through Friday.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Troy
Mine is located about 15 miles south of
Troy, Montana, in Lincoln County. The
nearest towns to Troy are Libby,
Montana, located 18 miles to the east
and Bonners Ferry, Idaho, located 33
miles to the west. The Troy Mine is
accessible from Montana Highway 56
and National Forest System Road 4626,
both of which are paved. Approximately
57 percent of the project area is on
private land, and the other 43 percent is
on the KNF. The project area lies within
the KNF immediately west and north of
Bull Lake and encompasses a major
portion of the Stanley Creek drainage
and a portion of the Lake Creek
drainage.
The American Smelting and Refining
Company, (ASARCO) permitted the
Troy Mine in 1978 with the USFS and
State of Montana as an 8,500 ton-perday underground copper/silver mine.
The ore is mined using the ‘‘room-andpillar method.’’ The mine permit area
covers 2,782 acres of public and private
land. The Troy Mine is comprised of 24
patented lode-mining claims and 188
unpatented lode-mining claims that are
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
situated on National Forest System
Lands managed by KNF. Patented lodemining claims owned by Troy Mine,
Inc. were acquired from ASARCO in
September of 1999. The existing
facilities at the Troy Mine consist of an
underground mine, surface mill, office
facilities; tailings and reclaim water
pipelines; a power line; a tailings
impoundment; and associated support
facilities. Production stopped in 1993
and reinitiated in 2005 and is projected
to continue for 3–5 years until the
approved ore body is depleted. Troy
Mine Inc. posted a 12.9 million dollar
bond for the project that covers the
existing reclamation plan. The final
draft of the Revised Reclamation Plan is
the subject of this environmental impact
statement.
Purpose and Need for Action: The
purpose of the proposed reclamation
plan is to return lands disturbed by
mining to a condition appropriate for
subsequent use of the area. The need for
the Revised Reclamation Plan stems
from several objectives that need to be
met after closure:
• The approved (1978) reclamation
plan does not meet State or Federal
requirements for mine adit water
discharge;
• Protection of surface and
groundwater quality;
• Protection of public health and
safety;
• Minimization of environmental
risk; and Restoration of productive land
use.
Proposed Action: The Revised
Reclamation Plan, which is the
Proposed Action, was submitted to the
agencies in March 2006. Troy Mine, Inc.
proposes to reclaim lands disturbed by
mining activities with the following
reclamation elements:
• Removal of buildings, structures,
and selected roads;
• Non-hydraulic plugging
(backfilling) of the adits and
recontouring the slope of the South
Portal patio;
• Limited regrading of slopes and
benches to fit with the surrounding
natural environment;
• Revegetation of most of the
disturbed areas;
• Mine water disposal to the tailings
impoundment decant ponds by using
the existing tailings pipelines and
reclaim water line until the water meets
water quality standards; and
E:\FR\FM\14APN1.SGM
14APN1
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 72 / Thursday, April 14, 2011 / Notices
• Monitoring of surface water bodies
and tailings embankment stability.
Under the Proposed Action, the
proposed reclamation would be
accomplished in three phases: Preclosure, closure, and post-closure. Preclosure tasks include on-going
monitoring, testing, and evaluations
necessary to complete design of
reclamation elements that include a
short-term water management plan and
engineering design of the adit. Closure
tasks would take place two years after
final cessation of mining and would
include facility removal, regrading,
revegetation, and maintenance of shortterm components of the water
management plan. Adit plugs would be
installed during the closure period.
Post-closure tasks would include longterm management of mine water flowing
through pipelines, maintenance of
pipelines and monitoring of water
quality and surface/groundwater. Under
the Proposed Action, the post-closure
phase is estimated to last two to five
years after mining ends, but post-closure
water management facilities would be
maintained until mine water meets
water quality standards.
No Action Alternative: The No Action
Alternative consists of the 1978
Reclamation Plan and includes the
reclamation activities that have already
been completed at the existing Troy
Mine site. This reclamation plan was
first analyzed and approved by the
agencies in 1978.
Agency-Mitigated Alternative: The
Agency-Mitigated Alternative is based
upon the Proposed Action, but includes
additional mitigation measures and
monitoring requirements that address
major issues identified during the
earlier scoping and review process. The
Agency-Mitigated Alternative includes
the following major modifications to the
Proposed Action:
• Hydraulic plugs would not be used
at the Service and Conveyor adits.
Concrete structures would be
constructed to capture mine water and
route it to the tailings impoundment for
long-term passive treatment and
disposal.
• A new water pipeline would be
built to transport water from the mine
to the decant ponds rather than using
the 30+ year-old tailings lines.
• Additional monitoring of seeps and
springs would be required to verify that
State of Montana water quality
standards were met.
Lead and Cooperating Agencies: The
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest
Service, Kootenai National Forest, and
the Montana Department of
Environmental Quality are joint lead
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:34 Apr 13, 2011
Jkt 223001
agencies for preparing this
environmental impact statement.
Issues: Issues were identified during
the scoping and review from
interdisciplinary specialists. The key
issues identified primarily relate to adit
closure, mine water distribution, mine
water treatment and disposal, longevity
and success of copper attenuation
mechanisms, disposition of building
materials, subsidence, and the source of
reclamation materials.
Nature of Decision To Be Made: The
nature of the decisions to be made is to
select an action that meets the legal
rights of the proponent, while protecting
the environment in compliance with
applicable laws, regulations, and
policies. The Forest Supervisor will use
the EIS process to develop the necessary
information to make an informed
decision as required by 36 CFR 228
subpart A. The Director of DEQ will use
the EIS process in a similar fashion to
make informed decisions on a number
of State permits and permit
modifications according to State laws
and regulations. Based on the analysis
and alternatives developed in the EIS,
the following decisions are possible:
(1) Approval of the Troy Mine
Revised Reclamation Plan as submitted;
(2) Approval of the Troy Mine
Revised Reclamation Plan modified by
the incorporation of agency mitigations
and stipulations to meet the mandates of
applicable laws, regulations, and
policies;
(3) Approval of an Agency-Mitigated
Alternative developed during the
analysis process; or
(4) Approval of the No Action
Alternative or rather denial of the
Proposed Action such that reclamation
would follow the existing approved
plan and details contained in the
approved reclamation bond calculations
and specifications.
Permits or Licenses Required and
Disposition: Various permits and
licenses have been in effect during mine
operations and may need to be
modified. In some cases, new permits or
licenses would be needed prior to
implementation of the Revised
Reclamation Plan. The major permits or
licenses required or needing
modification for this Proposed Action
and the issuing agencies are:
• A Revised Reclamation Plan
modifying the approved Troy Mine Plan
of Operations and State Operating
Permit #00093 approved by the KNF,
and DEQ.
• A revised Storm Water Permit and
a new Montana Pollution Discharge
Elimination System (MPDES) Permit
from DEQ.
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
20941
• A 310 Permit from the Montana
Department of Fish, Wildlife and Parks
and Lincoln County Conservation
District.
Draft Environmental Impact
Statement: A draft EIS will be prepared
for comment. The comment period on
the draft EIS ends 45 days from the date
the Environmental Protection Agency
publishes the notice of availability in
the Federal Register. The USFS
believes, at this early stage, it is
important to give reviewers notice of
several court rulings related to public
participation in the environmental
review process. First, reviewers of a
draft EIS must structure their
participation in the environmental
review of the proposal so that it is
meaningful and alerts an agency to the
reviewer’s position and contentions.
Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corp. v.
NRDC, 435 U.S. 519, 553 (1978). Also,
environmental objections that could be
raised at the draft EIS stage but that are
not raised until after completion of the
final EIS may be waived or dismissed by
the courts. City of Angoon v. Hodel, 803
F.2d 1016, 1022 (9th Cir. 1986) and
Wisconsin Heritages, Inc. v. Harris, 490
F. Supp. 1334, 1338 (E.D. Wis. 1980).
Because of these court rulings, it is very
important that those interested in this
Proposed Action participate by the close
of the 45-day comment period so that
substantive comments and objections
are made available to the USFS and
DEQ at a time when the agencies can
meaningfully consider and respond to
them in the final EIS. To assist the USFS
and DEQ in identifying and considering
issues and concerns on the Proposed
Action, comments on the draft EIS
should be as specific as possible. It is
also helpful if comments refer to
specific pages or chapters of the draft
EIS. Comments may also address the
adequacy of the draft EIS or the merits
of the alternatives formulated and
discussed in the draft EIS. Reviewers
may wish to refer to the Council on
Environmental Quality Regulations for
implementing the procedural provisions
of the National Environmental Policy
Act at 40 CFR 1503.3 in addressing
these points.
Comments received, including the
names and addresses of those who
comment, will be considered part of the
public record on this proposal, and will
be available for public inspection.
Authority: 40 CFR 1501.7 and 1508.22;
Forest Service Handbook 1909.15, Section
21.
Responsible Officials: Paul Bradford,
Forest Supervisor, Kootenai National
Forest, 31374 U.S. Hwy 2, Libby, MT
59923 and Richard Opper, Director,
E:\FR\FM\14APN1.SGM
14APN1
20942
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 72 / Thursday, April 14, 2011 / Notices
Montana Department of Environmental
Quality, Director’s Office, 1520 E 6th
Ave., Helena, MT 59620–9601, will be
jointly responsible for the EIS. These
two officials will make decisions
regarding this proposal after considering
comments and responses pertaining to
environmental consequences discussed
in the final EIS and all applicable laws,
regulations, and policies. The decisions
of a selected alternative, permits,
licenses, approvals, and rationale will
be documented in a joint Record of
Decisions.
Dated: April 7, 2011.
Maggie Pittman,
Acting Forest Supervisor, Kootenai National
Forest.
between 8 a.m. and 8 p.m., Eastern
Standard Time, Monday through Friday.
Meetings
are open to the public. The following
business will be conducted: establishing
goals and objectives for the committee,
discussing timelines and procedures,
and a broad discussion on project
proposals. Persons who wish to bring
matters to the attention of the
Committee may file written statements
with the Committee staff before or after
the meeting.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Dated: April 7, 2011.
Craig Bobzien,
Forest Supervisor.
[FR Doc. 2011–9090 Filed 4–13–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–11–P
[FR Doc. 2011–9086 Filed 4–13–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–11–P
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Forest Service
Forest Service
Pennington County Resource Advisory
Committee
Forest Service, USDA.
ACTION: Notice of meeting.
AGENCY:
The Pennington County
Resource Advisory will meet in Rapid
City, SD. The committee is meeting as
authorized under the Secure Rural
Schools and Community SelfDetermination Act (Pub. L 110–343) and
in compliance with the Federal
Advisory Committee Act. The purpose
of the meetings is to begin formation of
the Resource Advisory Committee.
DATES: The meetings will be held May
3, May 10, and May 17, 2011, at 5 p.m.
ADDRESSES: The meetings will be held at
the Mystic Ranger District Office at 8221
South Highway 16. Written comments
should be sent to Robert J. Thompson,
8221 South Highway 16, Rapid City, SD
57702. Comments may also be sent via
e-mail to rjthompson@fs.fed.us, or via
facsimile to 605–343–7134.
All comments, including names and
addresses when provided, are placed in
the record and are available for public
inspection and copying. The public may
inspect comments received at the
Mystic Ranger District office. Visitors
are encouraged to call ahead at 605–
343–1567 to facilitate entry into the
building.
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Robert J. Thompson, District Ranger,
Mystic Ranger District, 605–343–1567.
Individuals who use
telecommunication devices for the deaf
(TDD) may call the Federal Information
Relay Service (FIRS) at 1–800–877–8339
18:34 Apr 13, 2011
Jkt 223001
AGENCY:
ACTION:
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
Elko County Resource Advisory
Committee (RAC)
Forest Service, USDA.
Notice of meeting.
The Elko County Resource
Advisory Committee (RAC) will hold its
first meeting.
SUMMARY:
The meeting will be held on
Friday, April 29th, 2011 and will begin
at 10 a.m.
DATES:
The meeting will be held in
the Forest Service office at 2035 Last
Chance Road, Elko, NV 89801.
ADDRESSES:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Doug Clarke, RAC Coordinator, USDA,
Humboldt-Toiyabe National Forest,
Mountain City Ranger District, 2035
Last Chance Road, Elko, NV 89801 (775)
778–6127; e-mail: dclarke@fs.fed.us.
Agenda
items include: (1) Remarks by Forest
Supervisor and Mountain City District
Ranger; (2) Review of Secure Rural
Schools and Community SelfDetermination Act; (3) Role of RAC
committee members; (4) Selection of
RAC Committee Chairman; (5) Overview
of project selection process; and (6)
Public Comment. The meeting is open
to the public. Public input opportunity
will be provided and individuals will
have the opportunity to address the
Committee at that time.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Dated: April 8, 2011.
Jeanne M. Higgins,
Forest Supervisor.
[FR Doc. 2011–9098 Filed 4–13–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–11–P
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Forest Service
Humboldt (NV) Resource Advisory
Committee
Forest Service, USDA.
Notice of meeting.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Humboldt (NV) Resource
Advisory Committee will meet in
Winnemucca, Nevada. The committee is
meeting as authorized under the Secure
Rural Schools and Community SelfDetermination Act (Pub. L. 110–343)
and in compliance with the Federal
Advisory Committee Act. The purpose
is to hold the first meeting of the newly
formed committee.
DATES: The meeting will be held May
21, 2011 from 9:30 a.m. to 5:30 p.m.
ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at
the Humboldt County Court House
Room 201, 50 West 5th Street,
Winnemucca, Nevada. Written
comments should be sent to USDA
Forest Service, 1500 E. Winnemucca
Blvd., Winnemucca, NV 89445.
Comments may also be sent via e-mail
to sjingram@fs.fed.us, or via facsimile to
775–625–1200.
All comments, including names and
addresses when provided, are placed in
the record and are available for public
inspection and copying. The public may
inspect comments received at https://
fs.usda.gov/goto/htnf/rac.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Shonna Ingram, RAC Coordinator, Santa
Rosa Ranger District Humboldt-Toiyabe
National Forest, 775–623–5025 Ext 117.
Individuals who use
telecommunication devices for the deaf
(TDD) may call the Federal Information
Relay Service (FIRS) at 1–800–877–8339
between 8 a.m. and 8 p.m., Eastern
Standard Time, Monday through Friday.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
meeting is open to the public. The
following business will be conducted:
(1) Introductions of all committee
members and Forest Service personnel;
(2) orientation to the process of
considering and recommending Title II
projects; (3) committee members to
select a chairperson; (4) committee
members to establish RAC operating
guidelines; and (5) public Comment.
Persons who wish to bring related
matters to the attention of the
Committee may file written statements
with the Committee staff before or after
the meeting. Public input sessions will
be provided and individuals who made
written requests by May 13, 2011 will
have the opportunity to address the
Committee at those sessions.
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\14APN1.SGM
14APN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 72 (Thursday, April 14, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 20940-20942]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-9086]
========================================================================
Notices
Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains documents other than rules
or proposed rules that are applicable to the public. Notices of hearings
and investigations, committee meetings, agency decisions and rulings,
delegations of authority, filing of petitions and applications and agency
statements of organization and functions are examples of documents
appearing in this section.
========================================================================
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 72 / Thursday, April 14, 2011 /
Notices
[[Page 20940]]
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Forest Service
Troy Mine, Incorporated, Troy Mine Revised Reclamation Plan,
Kootenai National Forest, Lincoln County, MT
AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA.
ACTION: Notice of intent to prepare an environmental impact statement.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Kootenai
National Forest (KNF), in conjunction with Montana Department of
Environmental Quality (DEQ), will prepare an environmental impact
statement (EIS) to document the analysis and disclose the environmental
impacts of the proposed action and alternatives to reclaim facilities,
safely close the underground mine, and protect water quality at the
Troy Mine, located in Lincoln County, Montana. The mine is located on
public and private lands approximately 15 miles south of Troy, Montana.
Genesis Incorporated (Genesis), a wholly owned subsidiary of Revett
Silver Company, submitted the Troy Mine Revised Reclamation Plan
(Revised Reclamation Plan or Proposed Action) on February 27, 2006,
pursuant to U.S. Forest Service (USFS) locatable mineral regulations,
36 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) 228, Subpart A, and the State of
Montana Metal Mine Reclamation Act, 82-4-301 et seq., Montana Codes
Annotated. On December 30, 2010 Genesis Incorporated changed their name
to Troy Mine, Incorporated. A single EIS, evaluating all components of
the proposed reclamation project will be prepared.
DATES: The public involvement process for the Revised Reclamation Plan
began with a press release that was published in area newspapers and
announced on local TV and radio stations on October 11, 2007.
Advertisements were also published in four area newspapers October 21,
2007 through October 25, 2007. The comment period was extended from
October 11, 2007 through December 28, 2007. There is no additional
formal scoping period for this proposed action. The agencies completed
an initial analysis in December 2010. Based on the analysis and
potential water quality issues, the agencies decided to prepare a draft
EIS. The draft EIS is expected to be available for review and public
comment in May 2011. The comment period for the Draft EIS will be 45
days from the date the Environmental Protection Agency publishes the
notice of availability in the Federal Register. The final EIS is
expected to be released in December 2011.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Bobbie Lacklen, Project Coordinator,
Kootenai National Forest, 31374 U.S. Hwy 2, Libby, MT 59923. Phone
(406) 283-7681, or e-mail at blacklen@fs.fed.us, or consult https://www.fs.usda.gov/goto/kootenai/projects. Individuals who use
telecommunication devices for the deaf (TDD) may call the Federal
Information Relay Service (FIRS) at 1-800-877-8339 between 8 a.m. and 8
p.m., Eastern Time, Monday through Friday.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Troy Mine is located about 15 miles
south of Troy, Montana, in Lincoln County. The nearest towns to Troy
are Libby, Montana, located 18 miles to the east and Bonners Ferry,
Idaho, located 33 miles to the west. The Troy Mine is accessible from
Montana Highway 56 and National Forest System Road 4626, both of which
are paved. Approximately 57 percent of the project area is on private
land, and the other 43 percent is on the KNF. The project area lies
within the KNF immediately west and north of Bull Lake and encompasses
a major portion of the Stanley Creek drainage and a portion of the Lake
Creek drainage.
The American Smelting and Refining Company, (ASARCO) permitted the
Troy Mine in 1978 with the USFS and State of Montana as an 8,500 ton-
per-day underground copper/silver mine. The ore is mined using the
``room-and-pillar method.'' The mine permit area covers 2,782 acres of
public and private land. The Troy Mine is comprised of 24 patented
lode-mining claims and 188 unpatented lode-mining claims that are
situated on National Forest System Lands managed by KNF. Patented lode-
mining claims owned by Troy Mine, Inc. were acquired from ASARCO in
September of 1999. The existing facilities at the Troy Mine consist of
an underground mine, surface mill, office facilities; tailings and
reclaim water pipelines; a power line; a tailings impoundment; and
associated support facilities. Production stopped in 1993 and
reinitiated in 2005 and is projected to continue for 3-5 years until
the approved ore body is depleted. Troy Mine Inc. posted a 12.9 million
dollar bond for the project that covers the existing reclamation plan.
The final draft of the Revised Reclamation Plan is the subject of this
environmental impact statement.
Purpose and Need for Action: The purpose of the proposed
reclamation plan is to return lands disturbed by mining to a condition
appropriate for subsequent use of the area. The need for the Revised
Reclamation Plan stems from several objectives that need to be met
after closure:
The approved (1978) reclamation plan does not meet State
or Federal requirements for mine adit water discharge;
Protection of surface and groundwater quality;
Protection of public health and safety;
Minimization of environmental risk; and Restoration of
productive land use.
Proposed Action: The Revised Reclamation Plan, which is the
Proposed Action, was submitted to the agencies in March 2006. Troy
Mine, Inc. proposes to reclaim lands disturbed by mining activities
with the following reclamation elements:
Removal of buildings, structures, and selected roads;
Non-hydraulic plugging (backfilling) of the adits and
recontouring the slope of the South Portal patio;
Limited regrading of slopes and benches to fit with the
surrounding natural environment;
Revegetation of most of the disturbed areas;
Mine water disposal to the tailings impoundment decant
ponds by using the existing tailings pipelines and reclaim water line
until the water meets water quality standards; and
[[Page 20941]]
Monitoring of surface water bodies and tailings embankment
stability.
Under the Proposed Action, the proposed reclamation would be
accomplished in three phases: Pre-closure, closure, and post-closure.
Pre-closure tasks include on-going monitoring, testing, and evaluations
necessary to complete design of reclamation elements that include a
short-term water management plan and engineering design of the adit.
Closure tasks would take place two years after final cessation of
mining and would include facility removal, regrading, revegetation, and
maintenance of short-term components of the water management plan. Adit
plugs would be installed during the closure period. Post-closure tasks
would include long-term management of mine water flowing through
pipelines, maintenance of pipelines and monitoring of water quality and
surface/groundwater. Under the Proposed Action, the post-closure phase
is estimated to last two to five years after mining ends, but post-
closure water management facilities would be maintained until mine
water meets water quality standards.
No Action Alternative: The No Action Alternative consists of the
1978 Reclamation Plan and includes the reclamation activities that have
already been completed at the existing Troy Mine site. This reclamation
plan was first analyzed and approved by the agencies in 1978.
Agency-Mitigated Alternative: The Agency-Mitigated Alternative is
based upon the Proposed Action, but includes additional mitigation
measures and monitoring requirements that address major issues
identified during the earlier scoping and review process. The Agency-
Mitigated Alternative includes the following major modifications to the
Proposed Action:
Hydraulic plugs would not be used at the Service and
Conveyor adits. Concrete structures would be constructed to capture
mine water and route it to the tailings impoundment for long-term
passive treatment and disposal.
A new water pipeline would be built to transport water
from the mine to the decant ponds rather than using the 30+ year-old
tailings lines.
Additional monitoring of seeps and springs would be
required to verify that State of Montana water quality standards were
met.
Lead and Cooperating Agencies: The U.S. Department of Agriculture,
Forest Service, Kootenai National Forest, and the Montana Department of
Environmental Quality are joint lead agencies for preparing this
environmental impact statement.
Issues: Issues were identified during the scoping and review from
interdisciplinary specialists. The key issues identified primarily
relate to adit closure, mine water distribution, mine water treatment
and disposal, longevity and success of copper attenuation mechanisms,
disposition of building materials, subsidence, and the source of
reclamation materials.
Nature of Decision To Be Made: The nature of the decisions to be
made is to select an action that meets the legal rights of the
proponent, while protecting the environment in compliance with
applicable laws, regulations, and policies. The Forest Supervisor will
use the EIS process to develop the necessary information to make an
informed decision as required by 36 CFR 228 subpart A. The Director of
DEQ will use the EIS process in a similar fashion to make informed
decisions on a number of State permits and permit modifications
according to State laws and regulations. Based on the analysis and
alternatives developed in the EIS, the following decisions are
possible:
(1) Approval of the Troy Mine Revised Reclamation Plan as
submitted;
(2) Approval of the Troy Mine Revised Reclamation Plan modified by
the incorporation of agency mitigations and stipulations to meet the
mandates of applicable laws, regulations, and policies;
(3) Approval of an Agency-Mitigated Alternative developed during
the analysis process; or
(4) Approval of the No Action Alternative or rather denial of the
Proposed Action such that reclamation would follow the existing
approved plan and details contained in the approved reclamation bond
calculations and specifications.
Permits or Licenses Required and Disposition: Various permits and
licenses have been in effect during mine operations and may need to be
modified. In some cases, new permits or licenses would be needed prior
to implementation of the Revised Reclamation Plan. The major permits or
licenses required or needing modification for this Proposed Action and
the issuing agencies are:
A Revised Reclamation Plan modifying the approved Troy
Mine Plan of Operations and State Operating Permit 00093
approved by the KNF, and DEQ.
A revised Storm Water Permit and a new Montana Pollution
Discharge Elimination System (MPDES) Permit from DEQ.
A 310 Permit from the Montana Department of Fish, Wildlife
and Parks and Lincoln County Conservation District.
Draft Environmental Impact Statement: A draft EIS will be prepared
for comment. The comment period on the draft EIS ends 45 days from the
date the Environmental Protection Agency publishes the notice of
availability in the Federal Register. The USFS believes, at this early
stage, it is important to give reviewers notice of several court
rulings related to public participation in the environmental review
process. First, reviewers of a draft EIS must structure their
participation in the environmental review of the proposal so that it is
meaningful and alerts an agency to the reviewer's position and
contentions. Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corp. v. NRDC, 435 U.S. 519,
553 (1978). Also, environmental objections that could be raised at the
draft EIS stage but that are not raised until after completion of the
final EIS may be waived or dismissed by the courts. City of Angoon v.
Hodel, 803 F.2d 1016, 1022 (9th Cir. 1986) and Wisconsin Heritages,
Inc. v. Harris, 490 F. Supp. 1334, 1338 (E.D. Wis. 1980). Because of
these court rulings, it is very important that those interested in this
Proposed Action participate by the close of the 45-day comment period
so that substantive comments and objections are made available to the
USFS and DEQ at a time when the agencies can meaningfully consider and
respond to them in the final EIS. To assist the USFS and DEQ in
identifying and considering issues and concerns on the Proposed Action,
comments on the draft EIS should be as specific as possible. It is also
helpful if comments refer to specific pages or chapters of the draft
EIS. Comments may also address the adequacy of the draft EIS or the
merits of the alternatives formulated and discussed in the draft EIS.
Reviewers may wish to refer to the Council on Environmental Quality
Regulations for implementing the procedural provisions of the National
Environmental Policy Act at 40 CFR 1503.3 in addressing these points.
Comments received, including the names and addresses of those who
comment, will be considered part of the public record on this proposal,
and will be available for public inspection.
Authority: 40 CFR 1501.7 and 1508.22; Forest Service Handbook
1909.15, Section 21.
Responsible Officials: Paul Bradford, Forest Supervisor, Kootenai
National Forest, 31374 U.S. Hwy 2, Libby, MT 59923 and Richard Opper,
Director,
[[Page 20942]]
Montana Department of Environmental Quality, Director's Office, 1520 E
6th Ave., Helena, MT 59620-9601, will be jointly responsible for the
EIS. These two officials will make decisions regarding this proposal
after considering comments and responses pertaining to environmental
consequences discussed in the final EIS and all applicable laws,
regulations, and policies. The decisions of a selected alternative,
permits, licenses, approvals, and rationale will be documented in a
joint Record of Decisions.
Dated: April 7, 2011.
Maggie Pittman,
Acting Forest Supervisor, Kootenai National Forest.
[FR Doc. 2011-9086 Filed 4-13-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-11-P