Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans; Indiana; Stage I Vapor Recovery Rule, 20850-20853 [2011-8874]
Download as PDF
20850
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 72 / Thursday, April 14, 2011 / Rules and Regulations
EPA-APPROVED INDIANA REGULATIONS—Continued
Indiana citation
Indiana
effective date
Subject
EPA approval date
Notes
Rule 4.1. Lake County Sulfur Dioxide Emission Limitations
7–4.1–1 .............
7–4.1–2 .............
7–4.1–3 .............
7–4.1–4 .............
7–4.1–5 .............
7–4.1–6 .............
7–4.1–7 .............
7–4.1–8 .............
7–4.1–9 .............
7–4.1–10 ...........
7–4.1–11 ...........
7–4.1–12 ...........
7–4.1–13 ...........
7–4.1–14 ...........
7–4.1–15 ...........
7–4.1–16 ...........
7–4.1–17 ...........
7–4.1–18 ...........
7–4.1–19 ...........
7–4.1–20 ...........
7–4.1–21 ...........
Lake County sulfur dioxide emission limitations ................
Sampling and analysis protocol ..........................................
BP Products North America Inc. sulfur dioxide emission
limitations.
Bucko Construction sulfur dioxide emission limitations .....
Cargill, Inc. sulfur dioxide emission limitations ...................
Carmeuse Lime sulfur dioxide emission limitations ...........
Cokenergy Inc. sulfur dioxide emission limitations ............
Indiana Harbor Coke Company sulfur dioxide emission
limitations.
Ironside Energy, LLC sulfur dioxide emission limitations ...
ISG Indiana Harbor Inc. sulfur dioxide emission limitations
Ispat Inland Inc. sulfur dioxide emission limitations ...........
Methodist Hospital sulfur dioxide emission limitations .......
National Recovery Systems sulfur dioxide emission limitations.
NIPSCO Dean H. Mitchell Generating Station sulfur dioxide emission limitations.
Rhodia sulfur dioxide emission limitations .........................
Safety-Kleen Oil Recovery Company sulfur dioxide emission limitations.
SCA Tissue North America LLC sulfur dioxide emission
limitations.
State Line Energy, LLC sulfur dioxide emission limitations
Unilever HPC USA sulfur dioxide emission limitations ......
U.S. Steel—Gary Works sulfur dioxide emission limitations.
Walsh and Kelly sulfur dioxide emission limitations ...........
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
[FR Doc. 2011–8867 Filed 4–13–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R05–OAR–2010–0545; FRL–9295–1]
Approval and Promulgation of Air
Quality Implementation Plans; Indiana;
Stage I Vapor Recovery Rule
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Direct final rule.
AGENCY:
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with RULES
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:30 Apr 13, 2011
Jkt 223001
6/24/2005
11/19/2010
6/24/2005
6/24/2005
6/24/2005
6/24/2005
6/24/2005
6/24/2005
6/24/2005
6/24/2005
9/26/2005,
9/26/2005,
9/26/2005,
9/26/2005,
9/26/2005,
6/24/2005
9/26/2005, 70 FR 56129.
6/24/2005
6/24/2005
9/26/2005, 70 FR 56129.
9/26/2005, 70 FR 56129.
6/24/2005
9/26/2005, 70 FR 56129.
6/24/2005
6/24/2005
6/24/2005
9/26/2005, 70 FR 56129.
9/26/2005, 70 FR 56129.
9/26/2005, 70 FR 56129.
6/24/2005
9/26/2005, 70 FR 56129.
*
making the rule applicable to smaller
tanks and revising the requirements for
newer submerged fill pipes. These new
State requirements update the SIP
consistent with new Federal
requirements from January 10, 2008 area
source National Emissions Standards for
Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAPs)
for gasoline dispensing facilities. The
revisions also delete references to
compliance dates which have passed.
The rules are approvable because they
are consistent with the Clean Air Act
(Act) and EPA regulations, and should
result in additional emission reductions
of VOCs throughout Indiana.
This direct final rule will be
effective June 13, 2011, unless EPA
receives adverse comments by May 16,
2011. If adverse comments are received,
EPA will publish a timely withdrawal of
the direct final rule in the Federal
Register informing the public that the
rule will not take effect.
Submit your comments,
identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R05–
OAR–2010–0545, by one of the
following methods:
ADDRESSES:
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4700
9/26/2005, 70 FR 56129.
9/26/2005, 70 FR 56129.
9/26/2005, 70 FR 56129.
9/26/2005, 70 FR 56129.
4/14/2011, [Insert page number where the document
begins].
9/26/2005, 70 FR 56129.
9/26/2005, 70 FR 56129.
9/26/2005, 70 FR 56129.
DATES:
EPA is approving into the
Indiana State Implementation Plan
(SIP), amendments to the stage I vapor
recovery rule and administrative
changes to stage II vapor recovery rule
submitted by the Indiana Department of
Environmental Management on June 11,
2010. These rule revisions made volatile
organic compounds (VOC) emission
control requirements for filling at
gasoline dispensing facilities more
stringent by applying them statewide,
SUMMARY:
*
6/24/2005
6/24/2005
6/24/2005
Sfmt 4700
70
70
70
70
70
FR
FR
FR
FR
FR
*
56129.
56129.
56129.
56129.
56129.
*
1. https://www.regulations.gov: Follow
the on-line instructions for submitting
comments.
2. E-mail: aburano.douglas@epa.gov.
3. Fax: (312) 408–2279.
4. Mail: Doug Aburano, Chief, Control
Strategies Section, Air Programs Branch
(AR–18J), U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, 77 West Jackson
Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois 60604.
5. Hand Delivery: Doug Aburano,
Chief, Control Strategies Section, Air
Programs Branch (AR–18J), U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency, 77
West Jackson Boulevard, Chicago,
Illinois 60604. Such deliveries are only
accepted during the Regional Office
normal hours of operation, and special
arrangements should be made for
deliveries of boxed information. The
Regional Office official hours of
business are Monday through Friday,
8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., excluding
Federal holidays.
Instructions: Direct your comments to
Docket ID No. EPA–R05–OAR–2010–
0545. EPA’s policy is that all comments
received will be included in the public
docket without change and may be
made available online at https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
E:\FR\FM\14APR1.SGM
14APR1
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 72 / Thursday, April 14, 2011 / Rules and Regulations
personal information provided, unless
the comment includes information
claimed to be Confidential Business
Information (CBI) or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Do not submit information that you
consider to be CBI or otherwise
protected through https://
www.regulations.gov or e-mail. The
https://www.regulations.gov Web site is
an ‘‘anonymous access’’ system, which
means EPA will not know your identity
or contact information unless you
provide it in the body of your comment.
If you send an e-mail comment directly
to EPA without going through https://
www.regulations.gov your e-mail
address will be automatically captured
and included as part of the comment
that is placed in the public docket and
made available on the Internet. If you
submit an electronic comment, EPA
recommends that you include your
name and other contact information in
the body of your comment and with any
disk or CD–ROM you submit. If EPA
cannot read your comment due to
technical difficulties and cannot contact
you for clarification, EPA may not be
able to consider your comment.
Electronic files should avoid the use of
special characters, any form of
encryption, and be free of any defects or
viruses.
Docket: All documents in the docket
are listed in the https://
www.regulations.gov index. Although
listed in the index, some information is
not publicly available, e.g., CBI or other
information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Certain other
material, such as copyrighted material,
will be publicly available only in hard
copy. Publicly available docket
materials are available either
electronically in https://
www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at
the Environmental Protection Agency,
Region 5, Air and Radiation Division, 77
West Jackson Boulevard, Chicago,
Illinois 60604. This Facility is open
from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday
through Friday, excluding Federal
holidays. We recommend that you
telephone Carolyn Persoon,
Environmental Engineer, at (312) 353–
8290, before visiting the Region 5 office.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Carolyn Persoon, Environmental
Engineer, Control Strategies Section, Air
Programs Branch (AR–18J),
Environmental Protection Agency,
Region 5, 77 West Jackson Boulevard,
Chicago, Illinois 60604, (312) 353–8290,
persoon.carolyn@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Throughout this document whenever
‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us,’’ or ‘‘our’’ is used, we mean
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:30 Apr 13, 2011
Jkt 223001
EPA. This supplementary information
section is arranged as follows:
I. What should I consider as I prepare my
comments for EPA?
II. What is the background of the rule
revisions?
III. What is EPA’s analysis of the rule
revisions?
IV. What action is EPA taking?
V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
I. What should I consider as I prepare
my comments for EPA?
1. Identify the rulemaking by docket
number and other identifying
information (subject heading, Federal
Register date and page number).
2. Follow directions—The EPA may
ask you to respond to specific questions
or organize comments by referencing a
Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) part
or section number.
3. Explain why you agree or disagree;
suggest alternatives and substitute
language for your requested changes.
4. Describe any assumptions and
provide any technical information and/
or data that you used.
5. If you estimate potential costs or
burdens, explain how you arrived at
your estimate in sufficient detail to
allow for it to be reproduced.
6. Provide specific examples to
illustrate your concerns, and suggest
alternatives.
7. Explain your views as clearly as
possible, avoiding the use of profanity
or personal threats.
8. Make sure to submit your
comments by the comment period
deadline identified.
II. What is the background of the rule
revisions?
On January 10, 2008, EPA issued new,
more stringent National Regulations for
Gasoline Dispensing Facilities at 40 CFR
part 63, subpart CCCCCC, (73 FR 1945),
promulgated under section 112 of the
Act. The gasoline dispensing standards
in that rule apply nationwide to subject
sources of hazardous air pollutants
identified in 40 CFR 63.11111.
Indiana adopted new requirements to
reflect the revised Federal regulations.
These revisions: (1) Remove past
compliance dates (326 IAC 8–1–3);
(2) extend applicability of the rules to
facilities statewide with a through-put
of ten thousand (10,000) gallons per
month or greater (326 IAC 8–4–1); and
(3) add new requirements for filling
gasoline storage tanks (326 IAC 8–4–6).
Indiana placed notices for public
comment periods in the Indiana Register
first on June 27, 2007 and the second
notice on June 3, 2009. Indiana placed
notices of public hearing dates in four
newspapers on July 31, 2009. Indiana
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
20851
then held a public hearing on the
proposed rule on September 2, 2009.
There were no comments. The proposed
rule was published in the Indiana
Register on September 23, 2009, and no
comments were received. A second
notice of hearing was published in the
Indiana Register on September 23, 2009
and a second public hearing was held
on November 4, 2009. No comments
were received. The final rule was
adopted on November 4, 2009.
III. What is EPA’s analysis of the rule
revisions?
The revisions to Indiana’s stage I
vapor recovery rule, 326 IAC 8–1–3, 326
IAC 8–4–1 and 326 IAC 8–4–6, are
approvable because they are consistent
with the Act and applicable EPA
regulations, and should result in
additional VOC emission reductions. A
description of the rule revisions follows:
326 IAC 8–1–3 Compliance
schedules—This section deletes
subsections 8–1–3 (d) and (e), which
had allowed for compliance date
extensions, because the applicable dates
have long past.
326 IAC 8–4–1 Applicability—This
section expands the applicability to all
gasoline storage tanks at a gasoline
dispensing facility with a through-put of
ten thousand (10,000) gallons per month
or greater.
326 IAC 8–4–6 Gasoline dispensing
facilities—Section 6(a)(8) decreases the
tank cut off size required to meet the
regulatory standards for fueling from
two thousand, one hundred seventy six
(2,176) to nine hundred forty-six (946)
liters (575 to 250 gallons). Section
6(b)(1) revises the requirements for
submerged fill pipes for existing and
newer tanks. Fill pipes installed before
November 9, 2006 must be no more than
twelve (12) inches from the bottom of
the tank, and those installed after
November 9, 2006 must be no more than
six (6) inches from the bottom of the
tank.
The expanded applicability and more
stringent submerged fill requirements
will result in additional VOC
reductions.
IV. What action is EPA taking?
EPA is approving into the Indiana SIP
revisions the entire stage I and stage II
vapor recovery rule. Although the only
amendments to the rule affected are
sections 326 IAC 8–1–3, 326 IAC 8–4–
1, and 326 IAC 8–4–6, concerning stage
I vapor recovery, and administrative
changes to stage II vapor recovery rule,
we are approving the entire rule for
clarity and consistency.
We are publishing this action without
prior proposal because we view this as
E:\FR\FM\14APR1.SGM
14APR1
20852
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 72 / Thursday, April 14, 2011 / Rules and Regulations
a noncontroversial amendment and
anticipate no adverse comments.
However, in the proposed rules section
of this Federal Register publication, we
are publishing a separate document that
will serve as the proposal to approve the
State plan if relevant adverse written
comments are filed. This rule will be
effective June 13, 2011 without further
notice unless we receive relevant
adverse written comments by May 16,
2011. If we receive such comments, we
will withdraw this action before the
effective date by publishing a
subsequent document that will
withdraw the final action. All public
comments received will then be
addressed in a subsequent final rule
based on the proposed action. The EPA
will not institute a second comment
period. Any parties interested in
commenting on this action should do so
at this time. Please note that if EPA
receives adverse comment on an
amendment, paragraph, or section of
this rule and if that provision may be
severed from the remainder of the rule,
EPA may adopt as final those provisions
of the rule that are not the subject of an
adverse comment. If we do not receive
any comments, this action will be
effective June 13, 2011.
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with RULES
V. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
Under the Act, the Administrator is
required to approve a SIP submission
that complies with the provisions of the
Act and applicable Federal regulations.
42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a).
Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions,
EPA’s role is to approve State choices,
provided that they meet the criteria of
the Act. Accordingly, this action merely
approves State law as meeting Federal
requirements and does not impose
additional requirements beyond those
imposed by State law. For that reason,
this action:
• Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ subject to review by the Office
of Management and Budget under
Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735,
October 4, 1993);
• Does not impose an information
collection burden under the provisions
of the Paperwork Reduction Act
(44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
• Is certified as not having a
significant economic impact on a
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:30 Apr 13, 2011
Jkt 223001
substantial number of small entities
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act
(5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
• Does not contain any unfunded
mandate or significantly or uniquely
affect small governments, as described
in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4);
• Does not have Federalism
implications as specified in Executive
Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10,
1999);
• Is not an economically significant
regulatory action based on health or
safety risks subject to Executive Order
13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997);
• Is not a significant regulatory action
subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR
28355, May 22, 2001);
• Is not subject to requirements of
Section 12(d) of the National
Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because
application of those requirements would
be inconsistent with the Act; and
• Does not provide EPA with the
discretionary authority to address, as
appropriate, disproportionate human
health or environmental effects, using
practicable and legally permissible
methods, under Executive Order 12898
(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
In addition, this rule does not have
Tribal implications as specified by
Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249,
November 9, 2000), because the SIP is
not approved to apply in Indian country
located in the State, and EPA notes that
it will not impose substantial direct
costs on Tribal governments or preempt
Tribal law.
The Congressional Review Act, 5
U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides
that before a rule may take effect, the
agency promulgating the rule must
submit a rule report, which includes a
copy of the rule, to each House of the
Congress and to the Comptroller General
of the United States. EPA will submit a
report containing this action and other
required information to the U.S. Senate,
the U.S. House of Representatives, and
the Comptroller General of the United
States prior to publication of the rule in
the Federal Register. A major rule
cannot take effect until 60 days after it
is published in the Federal Register.
PO 00000
Frm 00018
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
This action is not a ‘‘major rule’’ as
defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
Under section 307(b)(1) of the Act,
petitions for judicial review of this
action must be filed in the United States
Court of Appeals for the appropriate
circuit by June 13, 2011. Filing a
petition for reconsideration by the
Administrator of this final rule does not
affect the finality of this action for the
purposes of judicial review nor does it
extend the time within which a petition
for judicial review may be filed, and
shall not postpone the effectiveness of
such rule or action. Parties with
objections to this direct final rule are
encouraged to file a comment in
response to the parallel notice of
proposed rulemaking for this action
published in the proposed rules section
of today’s Federal Register, rather than
file an immediate petition for judicial
review of this direct final rule, so that
EPA can withdraw this direct final rule
and address the comment in the
proposed rulemaking. This action may
not be challenged later in proceedings to
enforce its requirements. (See section
307(b)(2).)
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Intergovernmental relations,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Volatile organic
compounds.
Dated: March 30, 2011.
Susan Hedman,
Regional Administrator, Region 5.
40 CFR part 52 is amended as follows:
PART 52—[AMENDED]
1. The authority citation for part 52
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart P—Indiana
2. In § 52.770 the table in paragraph
(c) is amended by revising the entries
under Article 8 for ‘‘8–1 General
Provisions’’ and ‘‘8–4 Petroleum
Sources’’ to read as follows:
■
§ 52.770
*
Identification of plan.
*
*
(c) * * *
E:\FR\FM\14APR1.SGM
14APR1
*
*
20853
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 72 / Thursday, April 14, 2011 / Rules and Regulations
EPA-APPROVED INDIANA REGULATIONS
Indiana citation
Indiana
effective date
Subject
*
*
*
*
EPA approval
date
*
*
Notes
*
Article 8. Volatile Organic Compound Rules
8–1 ....................
8–1–0.5 .............
8–1–1 ................
8–1–2 ................
8–1–3 ................
General Provisions.
Definitions ...........................................................................
Applicability .........................................................................
Compliance methods ..........................................................
Compliance schedules ........................................................
8–1–4 ................
8–1–5 ................
*
8–4 ....................
8–4–1 ................
Testing procedures .............................................................
Petition for site-specific reasonably available control technology (RACT) plan.
New facilities; general reduction requirements ..................
Military specifications ..........................................................
General record keeping and reporting requirements .........
Compliance certification, record keeping, and reporting
requirements for certain coating facilities using compliant coatings.
Compliance certification, record keeping, and reporting
requirements for certain coating facilities using daily–
weighted averaging.
Compliance certification, record keeping, and reporting
requirements for certain coating facilities using control
devices.
*
*
*
Petroleum Sources.
Applicability .........................................................................
8–4–2
8–4–3
8–4–4
8–4–5
8–4–6
................
................
................
................
................
Petroleum refineries ............................................................
Petroleum liquid storage facilities .......................................
Bulk gasoline terminals .......................................................
Bulk gasoline plants ............................................................
Gasoline dispensing facilities .............................................
........................
........................
........................
........................
5/15/2010
8-4-7 ..................
8–4–8 ................
8–4–9 ................
Gasoline transports .............................................................
Leaks from petroleum refineries; monitoring; reports ........
Leaks from transports and vapor collection systems;
records.
*
*
*
11/5/1999
6/5/1991
11/5/1999
8–1–6 ................
8–1–7 ................
8–1–9 ................
8–1–10 ..............
8–1–11 ..............
8–1–12 ..............
*
*
*
*
*
*
[FR Doc. 2011–8874 Filed 4–13–11; 8:45 am]
10/18/1995
6/5/1991
12/15/2002
5/15/2010
7/15/2001
11/10/1988
6/24/2006
........................
5/22/1997
5/22/1997
6/29/1998, 63 FR 35141.
5/22/1997
6/29/1998, 63 FR 35141.
*
5/15/2010
40 CFR Part 52
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with RULES
[EPA–R04–OAR–2007–1186–201114; FRL–
9295–9]
Approval and Promulgation of Air
Quality Implementation Plans;
Kentucky; Approval of Section
110(a)(1) Maintenance Plans for the
1997 8-Hour Ozone Standards for the
Edmonson County, KY; Greenup
County Portion of the HuntingtonAshland, WV–KY; Lexington-Fayette,
KY; and Owensboro, KY
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
AGENCY:
17:30 Apr 13, 2011
Jkt 223001
PO 00000
Final rule.
Frm 00019
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
*
*
4/14/2011, [Insert page number where the document
begins].
1/18/1983, 48 FR 2127.
2/10/1986, 51 FR 4912.
1/18/1983, 48 FR 2127.
1/18/1983, 48 FR 2127.
4/14/2011, [Insert page number where the document
begins].
5/31/2002, 67 FR 38006.
3/6/1992, 57 FR 8082.
5/31/2002, 67 FR 38006.
*
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
VerDate Mar<15>2010
6/13/2007, 72 FR 32531.
10/27/1982, 47 FR 20586.
6/29/1998, 63 FR 35141.
6/29/1998, 63 FR 35141.
5/22/1997
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
ACTION:
11/3/1999, 64 FR 59642.
3/6/1992, 57 FR 8082.
5/5/2003, 68 FR 23604.
4/14/2011, [Insert page number where the document
begins].
9/11/2002, 67 FR 57515.
9/6/1990, 55 FR 36635.
*
*
EPA is taking final action to
approve revisions to the Kentucky State
Implementation Plan (SIP) that include
maintenance plans addressing the 1997
8-hour ozone national ambient air
quality standards (NAAQS or standards)
for the following four Kentucky
attainment areas: Edmonson County
(hereafter referred to as the ‘‘Edmonson
County Area’’); the portion of Greenup
County that was previously a part of the
Huntington-Ashland, West VirginiaKentucky 1-hour ozone maintenance
area (hereafter referred to as the
‘‘Greenup County Area’’); Fayette and
Scott Counties (hereafter referred to as
the ‘‘Lexington Area’’); and Hancock
County and the portion of Daviess
County that was previously a part of the
Owensboro 1-hour ozone maintenance
area (hereafter referred to as the
‘‘Owensboro Area’’)—collectively, these
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\14APR1.SGM
14APR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 72 (Thursday, April 14, 2011)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 20850-20853]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-8874]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA-R05-OAR-2010-0545; FRL-9295-1]
Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans;
Indiana; Stage I Vapor Recovery Rule
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Direct final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: EPA is approving into the Indiana State Implementation Plan
(SIP), amendments to the stage I vapor recovery rule and administrative
changes to stage II vapor recovery rule submitted by the Indiana
Department of Environmental Management on June 11, 2010. These rule
revisions made volatile organic compounds (VOC) emission control
requirements for filling at gasoline dispensing facilities more
stringent by applying them statewide, making the rule applicable to
smaller tanks and revising the requirements for newer submerged fill
pipes. These new State requirements update the SIP consistent with new
Federal requirements from January 10, 2008 area source National
Emissions Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAPs) for gasoline
dispensing facilities. The revisions also delete references to
compliance dates which have passed. The rules are approvable because
they are consistent with the Clean Air Act (Act) and EPA regulations,
and should result in additional emission reductions of VOCs throughout
Indiana.
DATES: This direct final rule will be effective June 13, 2011, unless
EPA receives adverse comments by May 16, 2011. If adverse comments are
received, EPA will publish a timely withdrawal of the direct final rule
in the Federal Register informing the public that the rule will not
take effect.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-R05-
OAR-2010-0545, by one of the following methods:
1. https://www.regulations.gov: Follow the on-line instructions for
submitting comments.
2. E-mail: aburano.douglas@epa.gov.
3. Fax: (312) 408-2279.
4. Mail: Doug Aburano, Chief, Control Strategies Section, Air
Programs Branch (AR-18J), U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 77 West
Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois 60604.
5. Hand Delivery: Doug Aburano, Chief, Control Strategies Section,
Air Programs Branch (AR-18J), U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 77
West Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois 60604. Such deliveries are
only accepted during the Regional Office normal hours of operation, and
special arrangements should be made for deliveries of boxed
information. The Regional Office official hours of business are Monday
through Friday, 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., excluding Federal holidays.
Instructions: Direct your comments to Docket ID No. EPA-R05-OAR-
2010-0545. EPA's policy is that all comments received will be included
in the public docket without change and may be made available online at
https://www.regulations.gov, including any
[[Page 20851]]
personal information provided, unless the comment includes information
claimed to be Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other
information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Do not submit
information that you consider to be CBI or otherwise protected through
https://www.regulations.gov or e-mail. The https://www.regulations.gov
Web site is an ``anonymous access'' system, which means EPA will not
know your identity or contact information unless you provide it in the
body of your comment. If you send an e-mail comment directly to EPA
without going through https://www.regulations.gov your e-mail address
will be automatically captured and included as part of the comment that
is placed in the public docket and made available on the Internet. If
you submit an electronic comment, EPA recommends that you include your
name and other contact information in the body of your comment and with
any disk or CD-ROM you submit. If EPA cannot read your comment due to
technical difficulties and cannot contact you for clarification, EPA
may not be able to consider your comment. Electronic files should avoid
the use of special characters, any form of encryption, and be free of
any defects or viruses.
Docket: All documents in the docket are listed in the https://www.regulations.gov index. Although listed in the index, some
information is not publicly available, e.g., CBI or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain other material, such
as copyrighted material, will be publicly available only in hard copy.
Publicly available docket materials are available either electronically
in https://www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at the Environmental
Protection Agency, Region 5, Air and Radiation Division, 77 West
Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois 60604. This Facility is open from
8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding Federal
holidays. We recommend that you telephone Carolyn Persoon,
Environmental Engineer, at (312) 353-8290, before visiting the Region 5
office.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Carolyn Persoon, Environmental
Engineer, Control Strategies Section, Air Programs Branch (AR-18J),
Environmental Protection Agency, Region 5, 77 West Jackson Boulevard,
Chicago, Illinois 60604, (312) 353-8290, persoon.carolyn@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document whenever ``we,''
``us,'' or ``our'' is used, we mean EPA. This supplementary information
section is arranged as follows:
I. What should I consider as I prepare my comments for EPA?
II. What is the background of the rule revisions?
III. What is EPA's analysis of the rule revisions?
IV. What action is EPA taking?
V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
I. What should I consider as I prepare my comments for EPA?
1. Identify the rulemaking by docket number and other identifying
information (subject heading, Federal Register date and page number).
2. Follow directions--The EPA may ask you to respond to specific
questions or organize comments by referencing a Code of Federal
Regulations (CFR) part or section number.
3. Explain why you agree or disagree; suggest alternatives and
substitute language for your requested changes.
4. Describe any assumptions and provide any technical information
and/or data that you used.
5. If you estimate potential costs or burdens, explain how you
arrived at your estimate in sufficient detail to allow for it to be
reproduced.
6. Provide specific examples to illustrate your concerns, and
suggest alternatives.
7. Explain your views as clearly as possible, avoiding the use of
profanity or personal threats.
8. Make sure to submit your comments by the comment period deadline
identified.
II. What is the background of the rule revisions?
On January 10, 2008, EPA issued new, more stringent National
Regulations for Gasoline Dispensing Facilities at 40 CFR part 63,
subpart CCCCCC, (73 FR 1945), promulgated under section 112 of the Act.
The gasoline dispensing standards in that rule apply nationwide to
subject sources of hazardous air pollutants identified in 40 CFR
63.11111.
Indiana adopted new requirements to reflect the revised Federal
regulations. These revisions: (1) Remove past compliance dates (326 IAC
8-1-3); (2) extend applicability of the rules to facilities statewide
with a through-put of ten thousand (10,000) gallons per month or
greater (326 IAC 8-4-1); and (3) add new requirements for filling
gasoline storage tanks (326 IAC 8-4-6).
Indiana placed notices for public comment periods in the Indiana
Register first on June 27, 2007 and the second notice on June 3, 2009.
Indiana placed notices of public hearing dates in four newspapers on
July 31, 2009. Indiana then held a public hearing on the proposed rule
on September 2, 2009. There were no comments. The proposed rule was
published in the Indiana Register on September 23, 2009, and no
comments were received. A second notice of hearing was published in the
Indiana Register on September 23, 2009 and a second public hearing was
held on November 4, 2009. No comments were received. The final rule was
adopted on November 4, 2009.
III. What is EPA's analysis of the rule revisions?
The revisions to Indiana's stage I vapor recovery rule, 326 IAC 8-
1-3, 326 IAC 8-4-1 and 326 IAC 8-4-6, are approvable because they are
consistent with the Act and applicable EPA regulations, and should
result in additional VOC emission reductions. A description of the rule
revisions follows:
326 IAC 8-1-3 Compliance schedules--This section deletes
subsections 8-1-3 (d) and (e), which had allowed for compliance date
extensions, because the applicable dates have long past.
326 IAC 8-4-1 Applicability--This section expands the applicability
to all gasoline storage tanks at a gasoline dispensing facility with a
through-put of ten thousand (10,000) gallons per month or greater.
326 IAC 8-4-6 Gasoline dispensing facilities--Section 6(a)(8)
decreases the tank cut off size required to meet the regulatory
standards for fueling from two thousand, one hundred seventy six
(2,176) to nine hundred forty-six (946) liters (575 to 250 gallons).
Section 6(b)(1) revises the requirements for submerged fill pipes for
existing and newer tanks. Fill pipes installed before November 9, 2006
must be no more than twelve (12) inches from the bottom of the tank,
and those installed after November 9, 2006 must be no more than six (6)
inches from the bottom of the tank.
The expanded applicability and more stringent submerged fill
requirements will result in additional VOC reductions.
IV. What action is EPA taking?
EPA is approving into the Indiana SIP revisions the entire stage I
and stage II vapor recovery rule. Although the only amendments to the
rule affected are sections 326 IAC 8-1-3, 326 IAC 8-4-1, and 326 IAC 8-
4-6, concerning stage I vapor recovery, and administrative changes to
stage II vapor recovery rule, we are approving the entire rule for
clarity and consistency.
We are publishing this action without prior proposal because we
view this as
[[Page 20852]]
a noncontroversial amendment and anticipate no adverse comments.
However, in the proposed rules section of this Federal Register
publication, we are publishing a separate document that will serve as
the proposal to approve the State plan if relevant adverse written
comments are filed. This rule will be effective June 13, 2011 without
further notice unless we receive relevant adverse written comments by
May 16, 2011. If we receive such comments, we will withdraw this action
before the effective date by publishing a subsequent document that will
withdraw the final action. All public comments received will then be
addressed in a subsequent final rule based on the proposed action. The
EPA will not institute a second comment period. Any parties interested
in commenting on this action should do so at this time. Please note
that if EPA receives adverse comment on an amendment, paragraph, or
section of this rule and if that provision may be severed from the
remainder of the rule, EPA may adopt as final those provisions of the
rule that are not the subject of an adverse comment. If we do not
receive any comments, this action will be effective June 13, 2011.
V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
Under the Act, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP
submission that complies with the provisions of the Act and applicable
Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in
reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve State choices,
provided that they meet the criteria of the Act. Accordingly, this
action merely approves State law as meeting Federal requirements and
does not impose additional requirements beyond those imposed by State
law. For that reason, this action:
Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' subject to
review by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Order
12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993);
Does not impose an information collection burden under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
Is certified as not having a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
Does not have Federalism implications as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
Is not an economically significant regulatory action based
on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997);
Is not a significant regulatory action subject to
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
Is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272
note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent
with the Act; and
Does not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to
address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental
effects, using practicable and legally permissible methods, under
Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
In addition, this rule does not have Tribal implications as
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000),
because the SIP is not approved to apply in Indian country located in
the State, and EPA notes that it will not impose substantial direct
costs on Tribal governments or preempt Tribal law.
The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating
the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule,
to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the
United States. EPA will submit a report containing this action and
other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior
to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot
take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal
Register. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C.
804(2).
Under section 307(b)(1) of the Act, petitions for judicial review
of this action must be filed in the United States Court of Appeals for
the appropriate circuit by June 13, 2011. Filing a petition for
reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule does not affect
the finality of this action for the purposes of judicial review nor
does it extend the time within which a petition for judicial review may
be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such rule or
action. Parties with objections to this direct final rule are
encouraged to file a comment in response to the parallel notice of
proposed rulemaking for this action published in the proposed rules
section of today's Federal Register, rather than file an immediate
petition for judicial review of this direct final rule, so that EPA can
withdraw this direct final rule and address the comment in the proposed
rulemaking. This action may not be challenged later in proceedings to
enforce its requirements. (See section 307(b)(2).)
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Intergovernmental relations, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Volatile organic compounds.
Dated: March 30, 2011.
Susan Hedman,
Regional Administrator, Region 5.
40 CFR part 52 is amended as follows:
PART 52--[AMENDED]
0
1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart P--Indiana
0
2. In Sec. 52.770 the table in paragraph (c) is amended by revising
the entries under Article 8 for ``8-1 General Provisions'' and ``8-4
Petroleum Sources'' to read as follows:
Sec. 52.770 Identification of plan.
* * * * *
(c) * * *
[[Page 20853]]
EPA-Approved Indiana Regulations
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Indiana
Indiana citation Subject effective date EPA approval date Notes
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Article 8. Volatile Organic Compound Rules
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
8-1..................... General Provisions......
8-1-0.5................. Definitions............. 10/18/1995 11/3/1999, 64 FR
59642.
8-1-1................... Applicability........... 6/5/1991 3/6/1992, 57 FR
8082.
8-1-2................... Compliance methods...... 12/15/2002 5/5/2003, 68 FR
23604.
8-1-3................... Compliance schedules.... 5/15/2010 4/14/2011, [Insert
page number where
the document
begins].
8-1-4................... Testing procedures...... 7/15/2001 9/11/2002, 67 FR
57515.
8-1-5................... Petition for 11/10/1988 9/6/1990, 55 FR
site[dash]specific 36635.
reasonably available
control technology
(RACT) plan.
8-1-6................... New facilities; general 6/24/2006 6/13/2007, 72 FR
reduction requirements. 32531.
8-1-7................... Military specifications. .............. 10/27/1982, 47 FR
20586.
8-1-9................... General record keeping 5/22/1997 6/29/1998, 63 FR
and reporting 35141.
requirements.
8-1-10.................. Compliance 5/22/1997 6/29/1998, 63 FR
certification, record 35141.
keeping, and reporting
requirements for
certain coating
facilities using
compliant coatings.
8-1-11.................. Compliance 5/22/1997 6/29/1998, 63 FR
certification, record 35141.
keeping, and reporting
requirements for
certain coating
facilities using daily-
weighted averaging.
8-1-12.................. Compliance 5/22/1997 6/29/1998, 63 FR
certification, record 35141.
keeping, and reporting
requirements for
certain coating
facilities using
control devices.
* * * * * * *
8-4..................... Petroleum Sources.
8-4-1................... Applicability........... 5/15/2010 4/14/2011, [Insert
page number where
the document
begins].
8-4-2................... Petroleum refineries.... .............. 1/18/1983, 48 FR
2127.
8-4-3................... Petroleum liquid storage .............. 2/10/1986, 51 FR
facilities. 4912.
8-4-4................... Bulk gasoline terminals. .............. 1/18/1983, 48 FR
2127.
8-4-5................... Bulk gasoline plants.... .............. 1/18/1983, 48 FR
2127.
8-4-6................... Gasoline dispensing 5/15/2010 4/14/2011, [Insert
facilities. page number where
the document
begins].
8[dash]4[dash]7......... Gasoline transports..... 11/5/1999 5/31/2002, 67 FR
38006.
8-4-8................... Leaks from petroleum 6/5/1991 3/6/1992, 57 FR
refineries; monitoring; 8082.
reports.
8-4-9................... Leaks from transports 11/5/1999 5/31/2002, 67 FR
and vapor collection 38006.
systems; records.
* * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * *
[FR Doc. 2011-8874 Filed 4-13-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P