Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993-DVD Copy Control Association, 20010 [2011-8366]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
20010
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 69 / Monday, April 11, 2011 / Notices
ATF utilizes the services of contract
investigators to conduct security/
suitability investigations on prospective
or current employees, as well as those
contractors and consultants doing
business with ATF. Persons interviewed
by contract investigators will be
randomly selected to voluntarily
complete a questionnaire regarding the
investigator’s degree of professionalism.
(5) An estimate of the total number of
respondents and the amount of time
estimated for an average respondent to
respond: It is estimated that 2,500
respondents will complete a 5 minute
form.
(6) An estimate of the total public
burden (in hours) associated with the
collection: There are an estimated 250
annual total burden hours associated
with this collection.
If additional information is required
contact: Lynn Murray, Department
Clearance Officer, Policy and Planning
Staff, Justice Management Division,
United States Department of Justice,
Two Constitution Square, 145 N Street,
NE., Room 2E–808, Washington, DC
20530.
Also, Dongguan Qisheng Electronic
Industrial Co., Ltd., Dongguan City,
Guangdong, PEOPLE’S REPUBLIC OF
CHINA; Global Publishing Inc.,
Fremont, CA; Inventec Corporation,
Taipei, TAIWAN; and Marvell
International Ltd., Hamilton,
BERMUDA, have withdrawn as parties
to this venture.
No other changes have been made in
either the membership or planned
activity of the group research project.
Membership in this group research
project remains open, and DVD CCA
intends to file additional written
notifications disclosing all changes in
membership.
On April 11, 2001, DVD CCA filed its
original notification pursuant to Section
6(a) of the Act. The Department of
Justice published a notice in the Federal
Register pursuant to Section 6(b) of the
Act on August 3, 2001 (66 FR 40727).
The last notification was filed with
the Department on December 9, 2010. A
notice was published in the Federal
Register pursuant to Section 6(b) of the
Act January 10, 2011 (76 FR 1460).
Dated: April 5, 2011.
Lynn Murray,
Department Clearance Officer, PRA,
Department of Justice.
Patricia A. Brink,
Director of Civil Enforcement, Antitrust
Division.
[FR Doc. 2011–8486 Filed 4–8–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE M
[FR Doc. 2011–8366 Filed 4–8–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410–FY–P
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Drug Enforcement Administration
Antitrust Division
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICES
Notice Pursuant to the National
Cooperative Research and Production
Act of 1993—DVD Copy Control
Association
Notice is hereby given that, on March
9, 2011, pursuant to Section 6(a) of the
National Cooperative Research and
Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301
et seq. (‘‘the Act’’), DVD Copy Control
Association (‘‘DVD CCA’’) has filed
written notifications simultaneously
with the Attorney General and the
Federal Trade Commission disclosing
changes in its membership. The
notifications were filed for the purpose
of extending the Act’s provisions
limiting the recovery of antitrust
plaintiffs to actual damages under
specified circumstances. Specifically,
Behavior Tech Computer Corp., Taipei,
TAIWAN; Dongguan ChuDong
Electronic Technology Co., Ltd.,
Dongguan City, Guangdong, PEOPLE’S
REPUBLIC OF CHINA; and Wistron
Corporation, Taipei Hsien, TAIWAN,
have been added as parties to this
venture.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:49 Apr 08, 2011
Jkt 223001
Layfe Robert Anthony, M.D.; Denial of
Application
On December 3, 2009, the Deputy
Assistant Administrator, Office of
Diversion Control, Drug Enforcement
Administration, issued an Order to
Show Cause to Layfe Robert Anthony,
M.D. (Respondent), of Salt Lake City,
Utah. The Show Cause Order proposed
the revocation of Respondent’s DEA
Certificate of Registration, BA8835449,
and the denial of any pending
applications to renew or modify the
registration, on the ground that because
of actions taken by the Utah Division of
Occupational and Professional
Licensing, he lacks ‘‘authority to
practice medicine or handle controlled
substances in the State of Utah,’’ the
State in which he is registered. Show
Cause Order at 1 (citing 21 U.S.C.
824(a)(3)). The Show Cause Order also
notified Respondent of his right to
request a hearing or to submit a written
statement in lieu of a hearing, the
procedures for doing so, and the
consequences for his failing to do so. Id.
at 2 (citing 21 CFR 1301.43 & 1316.47).
PO 00000
Frm 00060
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
On December 14, 2009, the Show
Cause Order was served on Respondent
by certified mail addressed to him at his
registered location. Since that date,
more than thirty days have passed and
neither Respondent, nor anyone
purporting to represent him, has
requested a hearing or submitted a
written statement. 21 CFR 1301.43(b) &
(c). Accordingly, I conclude that
Respondent has waived his right to a
hearing and issue this Final Order based
on the evidence contained in the
investigative record. 21 CFR 1301.43(d)
& (e).
Respondent held DEA registration,
BA8835449, which authorized him to
dispense controlled substances in
schedules II through V as a practitioner.
According to the Agency’s registration
records, Respondent’s registration
expired on June 30, 2007, and
Respondent did not submit his renewal
application until July 2, 2007. Moreover,
the Agency did not automatically renew
his registration.
Under 5 U.S.C. 558(c), ‘‘[w]hen the
licensee has made timely and sufficient
application for a renewal or a new
license in accordance with agency rules,
a license with reference to an activity of
a continuing nature does not expire
until the application has been finally
determined by the agency.’’ Based on
this provision, the Government
maintains that his registration has
continued in effect.1 It has not.
However, an application remains
pending before the Agency.
On January 28, 2009, the Utah
Department of Commerce, Division of
Occupational and Professional
Licensing (DOPL), revoked his ‘‘licenses
to practice as a physician/surgeon and
to administer and prescribe controlled
substances.’’ Order, In re Layfe Robert
Anthony, M.D., No. DOPL–OSC–2001–
70 (Utah Div. Occ. & Prof. Lic. Jan. 28,
2009).2 Accordingly, Respondent lacks
1 The Government did not explain the basis for its
position that an application filed after a registration
expires is nonetheless timely.
2 The Order was based on a recommended
decision of a three-member panel designated by the
Director of the DOPL to act as the presiding officer
in the proceeding. The panel’s findings included,
inter alia, that: 1) Respondent had ‘‘stored
controlled substances [Versed and Provigil] * * *
in his personal vehicle,’’ as well as ‘‘41 prescription
pads which contained multiple blank prescriptions
that had been presigned by other physicians’’ at a
clinic he was no longer affiliated with, id. at 9, 11–
12, 16–17; that he had failed to comply with a
previous state order that he ‘‘submit a triplicate
copy’’ of a controlled substance prescription (for
testosterone, a schedule III steroid) for review by
the Division, id. at 21–22; that he had committed
unprofessional conduct when he advised A.S. to
administer to her son a controlled substance
(Klonopin) which he had prescribed to her, id. at
21, 23–24; and that he had violated section 58–37–
6(7)(o) of the Utah Controlled Substances Act by
E:\FR\FM\11APN1.SGM
11APN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 69 (Monday, April 11, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 20010]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-8366]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Antitrust Division
Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and
Production Act of 1993--DVD Copy Control Association
Notice is hereby given that, on March 9, 2011, pursuant to Section
6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993,
15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), DVD Copy Control Association
(``DVD CCA'') has filed written notifications simultaneously with the
Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing changes in
its membership. The notifications were filed for the purpose of
extending the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust
plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances.
Specifically, Behavior Tech Computer Corp., Taipei, TAIWAN; Dongguan
ChuDong Electronic Technology Co., Ltd., Dongguan City, Guangdong,
PEOPLE'S REPUBLIC OF CHINA; and Wistron Corporation, Taipei Hsien,
TAIWAN, have been added as parties to this venture.
Also, Dongguan Qisheng Electronic Industrial Co., Ltd., Dongguan
City, Guangdong, PEOPLE'S REPUBLIC OF CHINA; Global Publishing Inc.,
Fremont, CA; Inventec Corporation, Taipei, TAIWAN; and Marvell
International Ltd., Hamilton, BERMUDA, have withdrawn as parties to
this venture.
No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned
activity of the group research project. Membership in this group
research project remains open, and DVD CCA intends to file additional
written notifications disclosing all changes in membership.
On April 11, 2001, DVD CCA filed its original notification pursuant
to Section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice published a
notice in the Federal Register pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act on
August 3, 2001 (66 FR 40727).
The last notification was filed with the Department on December 9,
2010. A notice was published in the Federal Register pursuant to
Section 6(b) of the Act January 10, 2011 (76 FR 1460).
Patricia A. Brink,
Director of Civil Enforcement, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 2011-8366 Filed 4-8-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE M
