Non-Vessel-Operating Common Carrier Negotiated Rate Arrangements; Correction, 19706-19707 [2011-8467]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with RULES_PART 1
19706
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 68 / Friday, April 8, 2011 / Rules and Regulations
22, 2001) or Executive Order 13045,
entitled Protection of Children from
Environmental Health Risks and Safety
Risks (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997).
This final rule does not contain any
information collections subject to OMB
approval under the Paperwork
Reduction Act (PRA), 44 U.S.C. 3501 et
seq., nor does it require any special
considerations under Executive Order
12898, entitled Federal Actions to
Address Environmental Justice in
Minority Populations and Low-Income
Populations (59 FR 7629, February 16,
1994).
Since tolerances and exemptions that
are established on the basis of a petition
under section 408(d) of FFDCA, such as
the tolerance in this final rule, do not
require the issuance of a proposed rule,
the requirements of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (RFA) (5 U.S.C. 601 et
seq.) do not apply.
This final rule directly regulates
growers, food processors, food handlers,
and food retailers, not States or Tribes,
nor does this action alter the
relationships or distribution of power
and responsibilities established by
Congress in the preemption provisions
of section 408(n)(4) of FFDCA. As such,
the Agency has determined that this
action will not have a substantial direct
effect on States or Tribal governments,
on the relationship between the national
government and the States or Tribal
governments, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government or between
the Federal Government and Indian
Tribes. Thus, the Agency has
determined that Executive Order 13132,
entitled Federalism (64 FR 43255,
August 10, 1999) and Executive Order
13175, entitled Consultation and
Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments (65 FR 67249, November
9, 2000) do not apply to this final rule.
In addition, this final rule does not
impose any enforceable duty or contain
any unfunded mandate as described
under Title II of the Unfunded Mandates
Reform Act of 1995 (UMRA) (Pub. L.
104–4).
This action does not involve any
technical standards that would require
Agency consideration of voluntary
consensus standards pursuant to section
12(d) of the National Technology
Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995
(NTTAA), Public Law 104–113, section
12(d) (15 U.S.C. 272 note).
VII. Congressional Review Act
The Congressional Review Act, 5
U.S.C. 801 et seq., generally provides
that before a rule may take effect, the
agency promulgating the rule must
submit a rule report to each House of
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:58 Apr 07, 2011
Jkt 223001
the Congress and to the Comptroller
General of the United States. EPA will
submit a report containing this rule and
other required information to the U.S.
Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller
General of the United States prior to
publication of this final rule in the
Federal Register. This final rule is not
a ‘‘major rule’’ as defined by 5 U.S.C.
804(2).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 180
Environmental protection,
Administrative practice and procedure,
Agricultural commodities, Pesticides
and pests, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
(2) Tolerances are established for
residues of glyphosate, including its
metabolites and degradates, in or on the
commodities listed below resulting from
the application of glyphosate, the
isopropylamine salt of glyphosate, the
ethanolamine salt of glyphosate, the
dimethylamine salt of glyphosate, the
ammonium salt of glyphosate, and the
potassium salt of glyphosate.
Compliance with the following
tolerance levels is to be determined by
measuring only glyphosate (N(phosphonomethyl)glycine) and its
metabolite N-acetyl-glyphosate (Nacetyl-N-(phosphonomethyl)glycine;
calculated as the stoichiometric
equivalent of glyphosate).
Dated: March 29, 2011.
G. Jeffery Herndon,
Acting Director, Registration Division, Office
of Pesticide Programs.
Parts per
million
Commodity
*
*
*
*
Poultry, meat ............................
Therefore, 40 CFR chapter I is
amended as follows:
*
PART 180—[AMENDED]
*
1. The authority citation for part 180
continues to read as follows:
■
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
0.10
*
*
[FR Doc. 2011–8428 Filed 4–7–11; 8:45 am]
Authority: 21 U.S.C. 321(q), 346a and 371.
2. Section 180.364 is amended by:
i. Revising the introductory text in
paragraph (a)(1), and in the table, revise
the entry for corn, sweet, grain 0.1 ppm;
to corn, sweet, kernel plus cob with
husk removed at 3.5 ppm; and
ii. Revising the introductory text in
paragraph (a)(2), and in the table, revise
the entry for poultry, meat 4.0 ppm to
0.10 ppm. The revisions read as follows:
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
■
§ 180.364.
residues.
Glyphosate; tolerances for
46 CFR Parts 520 and 532
[Docket No. 10–03]
RIN 3072–AC38
Non-Vessel-Operating Common Carrier
Negotiated Rate Arrangements;
Correction
April 5, 2011.
(a) General. (1) Tolerances are
established for residues of glyphosate,
including its metabolites and
degradates, in or on the commodities
listed below resulting from the
application of glyphosate, the
isopropylamine salt of glyphosate, the
ethanolamine salt of glyphosate, the
dimethylamine salt of glyphosate, the
ammonium salt of glyphosate, and the
potassium salt of glyphosate.
Compliance with the following
tolerance levels is to be determined by
measuring only glyphosate (N(phosphonomethyl)glycine).
Parts per
million
Commodity
*
*
*
*
Corn, sweet, kernel plus cob
with husk removed ................
*
PO 00000
FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION
Frm 00024
*
*
Fmt 4700
*
Sfmt 4700
*
ACTION:
The Federal Maritime
Commission is correcting a final rule
that appeared in the Federal Register on
March 2, 2011, exempting licensed nonvessel-operating common carriers that
enter into negotiated rate arrangements
from the tariff rate publication
requirements of the Shipping Act of
1984. This correction clarifies that the
negotiated rate arrangement must be
agreed to prior to receipt of the cargo
and removes the requirement that nonvessel-operating common carriers
indicate their intention to move cargo
under negotiated rate arrangements on
their Form FMC–1 on file with the
Commission.
SUMMARY:
DATES:
3.5
*
Federal Maritime Commission.
Final rule; correction.
AGENCY:
Effective April 18, 2011.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Legal Information: Elisa Holland, 202–
523–5740, generalcounsel@fmc.gov;
E:\FR\FM\08APR1.SGM
08APR1
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 68 / Friday, April 8, 2011 / Rules and Regulations
the Federal Aviation Administration,
and to the Assistant Administrator for
Security and Hazardous Materials.
Technical Information: George A.
Quadrino, 202–523–5800; Gary G.
Kardian, 202–523–5856,
tradeanalysis@fmc.gov.
In FR Doc.
2011–4599 appearing in the Federal
Register of Wednesday, March 2, 2011
(76 FR 11351), the following corrections
are made:
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
§ 532.5
[Corrected]
1. On page 11361, in the first column,
in § 532.5 Requirements for NVOCC
negotiated rate arrangements, the word
‘‘contain’’ in paragraph (b) is capitalized
and, paragraph (c) is corrected to read
as follows:
‘‘(c) Be agreed to by both NRA shipper
and NVOCC, prior to receipt of cargo by
the common carrier or its agent
(including originating carriers in the
case of through transportation);’’
■
§ 532.6
[Corrected]
2. On page 11361, in the second
column, in § 532.6 Notices, the
paragraph designations are removed and
the text of the section is correctly
revised to read as follows:
‘‘An NVOCC wishing to invoke an
exemption pursuant to this part must
indicate that intention to the
Commission and to the public by a
prominent notice in its rules tariff and
bills of lading or equivalent shipping
documents.’’
■
By the Commission.
Karen V. Gregory,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2011–8467 Filed 4–7–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6730–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Office of the Secretary of
Transportation
49 CFR Part 8
[Docket No. DOT–OST–1999–6189]
RIN 9991–AA58
Classified Information: Classification/
Declassification/Access; Authority To
Classify Information
Office of the Secretary of
Transportation (OST), Department of
Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Final rule.
wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with RULES_PART 1
AGENCY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:58 Apr 07, 2011
Jkt 223001
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Brett Jortland, Attorney, Office of the
General Counsel, U.S. Department of
Transportation, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590, Email: brett.jortland@dot.gov, Telephone:
(202) 366–9314.
Executive
Order 13526 confers upon the Secretary
the authority to originally classify
information as SECRET or
CONFIDENTIAL, with further
authorization to designate this
authority. Title 49 of the Code of
Federal Regulations (CFR), Section
8.11(b)(3) delegates this authority to the
Administrator of the Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), and the Assistant
Administrator for Civil Aviation
Security. As a result of administrative
changes within the FAA, the position of
the Assistant Administrator for Civil
Aviation Security no longer exists. The
authority exercised by that position has
been transferred to the Assistant
Administrator for Security and
Hazardous Materials, thus necessitating
a change in the language of § 8.11(b)(3)
to reflect the proper office for
designation of this authority.
In addition, following the creation of
the Department of Homeland Security,
and the transfer of the United States
Coast Guard from DOT to the
Department of Homeland Security, the
delegation of authority from the
Secretary to the United States Coast
Guard is hereby removed and the
section is renumbered accordingly.
Since these amendments relate to
departmental management,
organization, procedure, and practice,
notice and comment are unnecessary
under 5 U.S.C. 553(b). Further, since
these amendments expedite DOT’s
ability to meet the statutory intent of the
applicable laws and regulations covered
by this delegation, the Secretary finds
good cause under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3) for
the final rule to be effective on the date
of publication in the Federal Register.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Regulatory Impact and Notices
A. Executive Order 12866 and DOT
Regulatory Policies and Procedures
This final rule delegates
various authorities vested in the
Secretary of Transportation (Secretary)
by Executive Order 13526 to originally
classify information as SECRET or
CONFIDENTIAL to the Administrator of
SUMMARY:
This final rule is effective April
8, 2011.
DATES:
The final rule is not considered a
significant regulatory action under
Executive Order 12866 and DOT
Regulatory Policies and Procedures. See
44 FR 11034, Feb. 26, 1979. There are
no costs associated with this rule.
PO 00000
Frm 00025
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
19707
B. Regulatory Flexibility Act and
Executive Order 13272
Because no notice of proposed
rulemaking is required for this rule
under the Administrative Procedure
Act, 5 U.S.C. 553, the provisions of the
Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601
et seq.) do not apply. We also do not
believe that this rule would impose any
costs on small entities because it simply
delegates authority from one official to
another. Therefore, I certify that this
final rule will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small businesses.
C. Paperwork Reduction Act
This rule contains no information
collection requirements under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, 44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.
D. Federalism Implications
This final rule has been analyzed in
accordance with the principles and
criteria contained in Executive Order
13132 (‘‘Federalism’’). This final rule
does not have a substantial direct effect
on, or sufficient federalism implications
for, the States, nor would it limit the
policymaking discretion of the States.
Therefore, the consultation
requirements of Executive Order 13132
do not apply.
E. Executive Order 13175
This final rule has been analyzed in
accordance with the principles and
criteria contained in Executive Order
13175 (‘‘Consultation and Coordination
with Indian Tribal Governments’’).
Because this final rule does not
significantly or uniquely affect the
communities of the Indian Tribal
governments and does not impose
substantial direct compliance costs, the
funding and consultation requirements
of Executive Order 13175 do not apply.
F. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of
1995
DOT has determined that the
requirements of title II of the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L.
104–4, 2 U.S.C. 1531) do not apply to
this rulemaking.
List of Subjects in 49 CFR Part 8
Classified Information (Government
agencies), Classification/
Declassification/Access (Government
agencies).
The Final Rule
For the reasons set forth in the
preamble, OST amends 49 CFR part 8 as
follows:
E:\FR\FM\08APR1.SGM
08APR1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 68 (Friday, April 8, 2011)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 19706-19707]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-8467]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION
46 CFR Parts 520 and 532
[Docket No. 10-03]
RIN 3072-AC38
Non-Vessel-Operating Common Carrier Negotiated Rate Arrangements;
Correction
April 5, 2011.
AGENCY: Federal Maritime Commission.
ACTION: Final rule; correction.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Federal Maritime Commission is correcting a final rule
that appeared in the Federal Register on March 2, 2011, exempting
licensed non-vessel-operating common carriers that enter into
negotiated rate arrangements from the tariff rate publication
requirements of the Shipping Act of 1984. This correction clarifies
that the negotiated rate arrangement must be agreed to prior to receipt
of the cargo and removes the requirement that non-vessel-operating
common carriers indicate their intention to move cargo under negotiated
rate arrangements on their Form FMC-1 on file with the Commission.
DATES: Effective April 18, 2011.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Legal Information: Elisa Holland, 202-
523-5740, generalcounsel@fmc.gov;
[[Page 19707]]
Technical Information: George A. Quadrino, 202-523-5800; Gary G.
Kardian, 202-523-5856, tradeanalysis@fmc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In FR Doc. 2011-4599 appearing in the
Federal Register of Wednesday, March 2, 2011 (76 FR 11351), the
following corrections are made:
Sec. 532.5 [Corrected]
0
1. On page 11361, in the first column, in Sec. 532.5 Requirements for
NVOCC negotiated rate arrangements, the word ``contain'' in paragraph
(b) is capitalized and, paragraph (c) is corrected to read as follows:
``(c) Be agreed to by both NRA shipper and NVOCC, prior to receipt
of cargo by the common carrier or its agent (including originating
carriers in the case of through transportation);''
Sec. 532.6 [Corrected]
0
2. On page 11361, in the second column, in Sec. 532.6 Notices, the
paragraph designations are removed and the text of the section is
correctly revised to read as follows:
``An NVOCC wishing to invoke an exemption pursuant to this part
must indicate that intention to the Commission and to the public by a
prominent notice in its rules tariff and bills of lading or equivalent
shipping documents.''
By the Commission.
Karen V. Gregory,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2011-8467 Filed 4-7-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6730-01-P
