Notice of Availability of Environmental Assessment and Finding of No Significant Impact for License Amendment for the University of Alaska-Fairbanks, Fairbanks, AK, 19794-19795 [2011-8419]
Download as PDF
19794
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 68 / Friday, April 8, 2011 / Notices
activities on the polar research community,
to provide advice to the Director of OPP on
issues related to long-range planning.
Agenda: Staff presentations and discussion
on opportunities and challenges for polar
research, education and infrastructure;
discussion of OPP Strategic Vision
development; transformative research, ad hoc
proposals & program solicitations.
Dated: April 5, 2011.
Susanne Bolton,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 2011–8380 Filed 4–7–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555–01–P
NUCLEAR REGULATORY
COMMISSION
[Docket No. 030–01179; NRC–2011–0078]
Notice of Availability of Environmental
Assessment and Finding of No
Significant Impact for License
Amendment for the University of
Alaska-Fairbanks, Fairbanks, AK
Nuclear Regulatory
Commission.
ACTION: Notice of availability.
AGENCY:
Jack
E. Whitten, Chief, Nuclear Materials
Safety Branch B, Division of Nuclear
Materials Safety, Region IV Office, U.S.
Nuclear Regulatory Commission,
Arlington, Texas, 76011. Telephone:
817–860–8197; fax number: 817–860–
8188; e-mail: Jack.Whitten@nrc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICES
I. Introduction
The Nuclear Regulatory Commission
(NRC) is considering the issuance of a
license amendment to Material License
No. 50–02430–07, issued to the
University of Alaska-Fairbanks (the
licensee), to authorize the release of an
incinerator previously used at the Arctic
Health Research Building for
unrestricted use and for removal from
the license. The NRC has prepared an
Environmental Assessment (EA) in
support of this amendment in
accordance with the requirements of 10
CFR part 51. Based on the EA, the NRC
has concluded that a Finding of No
Significant Impact (FONSI) is
appropriate. The amendment will be
issued following the publication of this
Notice.
II. EA Summary
The purpose of the proposed
amendment is to allow for the release of
an incinerator previously used at the
Arctic Health Research Building,
University of Alaska-Fairbanks,
Fairbanks, Alaska, for unrestricted use
and removal from the license. The
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:41 Apr 07, 2011
Jkt 223001
licensee was authorized by the NRC on
June 28, 1982, to begin using an
incinerator to dispose of radioactive
wastes. The licensee has used this
incinerator to dispose of biologically
hazardous wastes containing low-level
radioactive materials. On July 30, 2008,
the licensee requested authorization to
decommission this incinerator. The
licensee stated that it had disposed of
wastes containing low levels of
hydrogen-3 (tritium) and carbon-14 by
incineration. The licensee also disposed
of wastes containing phosphorus-32,
sulfur-35, and iodine-125 via incinerator
after the radioisotopes were allowed to
decay in storage. The licensee’s
submittal included radiological survey
results for the incinerator, the area
around the incinerator, and accessible
areas of the discharge stack. The NRC
staff reviewed the licensee’s submittal
and requested additional information
about the proposed decommissioning
plan. The licensee responded with
additional information by letter dated
July 12, 2009. The licensee conducted
an historical assessment and concluded
that the incinerator had been used for 17
years. The licensee estimated that it had
disposed of wastes containing about 19
millicuries (0.7 gigabecquerels) of
hydrogen-3 (tritium) and about 13
millicuries (0.47 gigabecquerels) of
carbon-14. All other radionuclides that
were incinerated had short half-lives
(less than 88 days) and were allowed to
decay in storage prior to incineration.
The licensee included additional survey
measurements of the accessible areas of
the incinerator in its second submittal.
The NRC subsequently approved the
decommissioning plan by license
amendment dated August 12, 2009. The
licensee completed decommissioning
and submitted a final status survey
report to the NRC by letter dated
November 16, 2009. The final status
survey report included survey data for
the discharge stack, data collected from
areas that were inaccessible during
previous surveys.
The NRC staff conducted a technical
review of the licensee’s radiological
survey data. The licensee’s final status
survey results were well below the
NRC’s screening values for hydrogen-3
and carbon-14 as presented in NUREG–
1757, Volume 1, Revision 2,
‘‘Consolidated Decommissioning
Guidance: Decommissioning Process for
Materials Licensees,’’ Table B.1,
Acceptable License Termination
Screening Values of Common
Radionuclides for Building-Surface
Contamination.’’ The NRC staff also
compared the final status survey results
to the equipment release criteria
PO 00000
Frm 00055
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
provided in Regulatory Guide 1.86,
‘‘Termination of Operating Licenses for
Nuclear Reactors,’’ Table 1, Acceptable
Surface Contamination Levels. In
summary, the licensee conducted
radiological surveys of the incinerator
and provided sufficient information to
the NRC demonstrating that the
incinerator meets the license
termination criteria specified in Subpart
E to 10 CFR Part 20 for unrestricted
release of the incinerator. The staff has
prepared this EA in support of the
proposed license amendment.
This proposed license amendment
will allow the licensee to free-release
the decommissioned incinerator
without any radiological restrictions. In
accordance with the current license, the
licensee will continue to be authorized
to dispose of biologically hazardous
wastes containing limited quantities of
licensed radioactive material using a
different incinerator.
The staff has prepared this EA in
support of the proposed license
amendment to release the incinerator for
unrestricted use. The staff has found
that the radiological environmental
impacts from the proposed amendment
are bounded by the impacts evaluated
by the ‘‘Generic Environmental Impact
Statement in Support of Rulemaking on
Radiological Criteria for License
Termination of NRC-Licensed Facilities’’
(NUREG–1496). The staff has also found
that the non-radiological impacts are not
significant. The staff consulted with the
State of Alaska, and the State had no
comments on the proposed action.
III. Finding of No Significant Impact
On the basis of this EA, NRC has
concluded that there are no significant
environmental impacts from the
proposed amendment and has
determined not to prepare an
environmental impact statement.
IV. Further Information
Documents related to this action,
including the application for
amendment and supporting
documentation, are available
electronically at the NRC’s Electronic
Reading Room at https://www.nrc.gov/
reading-rm/adams.html. From this site,
you can access the NRC’s Agency Wide
Document Access and Management
System (ADAMS), which provides text
and image files of NRC’s public
documents. The ADAMS accession
numbers for the documents related to
this notice are:
1. NRC, ‘‘Generic Environmental Impact
Statement in Support of
Rulemaking on Radiological Criteria
for License Termination of NRCLicensed Nuclear Facilities,’’
E:\FR\FM\08APN1.SGM
08APN1
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 68 / Friday, April 8, 2011 / Notices
NUREG–1496, July 1997
(ML042310492, ML042320379, and
ML042330385).
2. Martinson, Tracey A., University of
Alaska-Fairbanks, Licensee letter
requesting release of incinerator,
July 30, 2008 (ML082420967).
3. NRC, Request for additional
information, June 4, 2009
(ML091560189).
4. Martinson, Tracey A., University of
Alaska-Fairbanks, Proposed
decommissioning plan, July 12,
2009 (ML110310647).
5. NRC, License amendment, August 12,
2009 (ML092240357).
6. Martinson, Tracey A., University of
Alaska-Fairbanks, Final status
survey report, November 16, 2009
(ML093641107).
If you do not have access to ADAMS
or if there are problems in accessing the
documents located in ADAMS, contact
the NRC Public Document Room (PDR)
Reference staff at 1–800–397–4209 or
301–415–4737 or by e-mail to
pdr.resource@nrc.gov.
These documents may also be viewed
electronically on the public computers
located at the NRC’s Public Document
Room (PDR), O–1F21, One White Flint
North, 11555 Rockville Pike, Rockville,
MD 20852. The PDR reproduction
contractor will copy documents for a
fee.
Dated at Arlington, Texas this 31st day of
March 2011.
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Jack E. Whitten,
Chief, Nuclear Materials Safety Branch B,
Division of Nuclear Materials Safety, Region
IV.
[FR Doc. 2011–8419 Filed 4–7–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590–01–P
NUCLEAR REGULATORY
COMMISSION
The facility consists of a boiling-water
reactor located in Ocean County, New
Jersey.
2.0
Request/Action
Title 10 of the Code of Federal
Regulations (10 CFR), part 50, Section
50.48 requires that nuclear power plants
that were licensed before January 1,
1979, must satisfy the requirements of
10 CFR part 50, Appendix R, Section
III.G, ‘‘Fire protection of safe shutdown
capability.’’ Oyster Creek was licensed
to operate prior to January 1, 1979. As
such, the licensee’s Fire Protection
Program (FPP) must provide the
established level of protection as
intended by Section III.G of 10 CFR part
50, Appendix R.
By letter dated March 3, 2009,
‘‘Request for Exemption from 10 CFR 50,
Appendix R, Section III.G, ‘Fire
Protection of Safe Shutdown Capability
(Phase 1)’ ’’ available at Agencywide
Documents Access and Management
System (ADAMS), Accession No.
ML090630132, and supplemented by
letter dated April 2, 2010, ‘‘Response to
Request for Additional Information
Request for Exemption from 10 CFR 50,
Appendix R, Section III.G, ‘Fire
Protection of Safe Shutdown
Capability’ ’’ (ML100920370), the
licensee requested an exemption for
Oyster Creek from certain technical
requirements of 10 CFR part 50,
Appendix R, Section III.G.2 (III.G.2) for
the use of operator manual actions
(OMAs) in lieu of meeting the circuit
separation and protection requirements
contained in III.G.2 for the following 21
plant Fire Areas: CW–FA–14, OB–FA–9,
OB–FZ–6A, OB–FZ–6B, OB–FZ–8A,
OB–FZ–8B, OB–FZ–8C, OB–FZ–10A,
RB–FZ–1D, RB–FZ–1E, RB–FZ–1F3,
RB–FZ–1F5, RB–FZ–1G, TB–FA–3A,
TB–FA–26, TB–FZ–11B, TB–FZ–11C,
TB–FZ–11D, TB–FZ–11E, TB–FZ–11F,
and TB–FZ–11H. These 21 plant areas
are the subject of this exemption.
[Docket No. 50–219; NRC–2010–0320]
3.0
Exelon Generation Company, LLC;
Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating
Station; Exemption
Pursuant to 10 CFR 50.12, the
Commission may, upon application by
any interested person or upon its own
initiative, grant exemptions from the
requirements of 10 CFR part 50 when:
(1) The exemptions are authorized by
law, will not present an undue risk to
public health or safety, and are
consistent with the common defense
and security; and (2) when special
circumstances are present. The licensee
has stated that special circumstances are
present in that the application of the
regulation in this particular
circumstance is not necessary to achieve
the underlying purpose of the rule,
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICES
1.0
Background
Exelon Generation Company, LLC
(Exelon or the licensee) is the holder of
Facility Operating License No. DPR–16
that authorizes operation of the Oyster
Creek Nuclear Generating Station
(Oyster Creek). The license provides,
among other things, that the facility is
subject to all rules, regulations, and
orders of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
Commission (NRC or the Commission)
now or hereafter in effect.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:41 Apr 07, 2011
Jkt 223001
PO 00000
Discussion
Frm 00056
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
19795
which is consistent with the language
included in 10 CFR 50.12(a)(2)(ii).
In their March 3, 2009, and April 2,
2010, letters, the licensee discussed
financial implications associated with
plant modifications that may be
necessary to comply with the regulation.
10 CFR 50.12(a)2(iii) states that if such
costs have been shown to be
significantly in excess of those
contemplated at the time the regulation
was adopted, or are significantly in
excess of those incurred by others
similarly situated, this may be
considered a basis for considering an
exemption request. However, financial
implications were not considered in the
regulatory review of their request since
no substantiation was provided
regarding such financial implications.
Even though no financial substantiation
was provided, the licensee did submit
sufficient regulatory basis to support a
technical review of their exemption
request in that the application of the
regulation in this particular
circumstance is not necessary to achieve
the underlying purpose of the rule.
In accordance with 10 CFR 50.48(b),
nuclear power plants licensed before
January 1, 1979, are required to meet
Section III.G of 10 CFR part 50,
Appendix R. The underlying purpose of
Section III.G of 10 CFR part 50,
Appendix R, is to ensure that the ability
to achieve and maintain safe shutdown
is preserved following a fire event. The
regulation intends for licensees to
accomplish this by extending the
concept of defense-in-depth to:
(1) Prevent fires from starting;
(2) Rapidly detect, control, and
extinguish promptly those fires that do
occur;
(3) Provide protection for structures,
systems, and components important to
safety so that a fire that is not promptly
extinguished by the fire suppression
activities will not prevent the safe
shutdown of the plant.
The stated purpose of 10 CFR part 50,
Appendix R, Section III.G.2 (III.G.2) is to
ensure that one of the redundant trains
necessary to achieve and maintain hot
shutdown conditions remains free of
fire damage in the event of a fire. III.G.2
requires one of the following means to
ensure that a redundant train of safe
shutdown cables and equipment is free
of fire damage, where redundant trains
are located in the same fire area outside
of primary containment:
a. Separation of cables and equipment
by a fire barrier having a 3-hour rating;
b. Separation of cables and equipment
by a horizontal distance of more than 20
feet with no intervening combustibles or
fire hazards and with fire detectors and
E:\FR\FM\08APN1.SGM
08APN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 68 (Friday, April 8, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 19794-19795]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-8419]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
[Docket No. 030-01179; NRC-2011-0078]
Notice of Availability of Environmental Assessment and Finding of
No Significant Impact for License Amendment for the University of
Alaska-Fairbanks, Fairbanks, AK
AGENCY: Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
ACTION: Notice of availability.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jack E. Whitten, Chief, Nuclear
Materials Safety Branch B, Division of Nuclear Materials Safety, Region
IV Office, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Arlington, Texas, 76011.
Telephone: 817-860-8197; fax number: 817-860-8188; e-mail:
Jack.Whitten@nrc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Introduction
The Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is considering the issuance
of a license amendment to Material License No. 50-02430-07, issued to
the University of Alaska-Fairbanks (the licensee), to authorize the
release of an incinerator previously used at the Arctic Health Research
Building for unrestricted use and for removal from the license. The NRC
has prepared an Environmental Assessment (EA) in support of this
amendment in accordance with the requirements of 10 CFR part 51. Based
on the EA, the NRC has concluded that a Finding of No Significant
Impact (FONSI) is appropriate. The amendment will be issued following
the publication of this Notice.
II. EA Summary
The purpose of the proposed amendment is to allow for the release
of an incinerator previously used at the Arctic Health Research
Building, University of Alaska-Fairbanks, Fairbanks, Alaska, for
unrestricted use and removal from the license. The licensee was
authorized by the NRC on June 28, 1982, to begin using an incinerator
to dispose of radioactive wastes. The licensee has used this
incinerator to dispose of biologically hazardous wastes containing low-
level radioactive materials. On July 30, 2008, the licensee requested
authorization to decommission this incinerator. The licensee stated
that it had disposed of wastes containing low levels of hydrogen-3
(tritium) and carbon-14 by incineration. The licensee also disposed of
wastes containing phosphorus-32, sulfur-35, and iodine-125 via
incinerator after the radioisotopes were allowed to decay in storage.
The licensee's submittal included radiological survey results for the
incinerator, the area around the incinerator, and accessible areas of
the discharge stack. The NRC staff reviewed the licensee's submittal
and requested additional information about the proposed decommissioning
plan. The licensee responded with additional information by letter
dated July 12, 2009. The licensee conducted an historical assessment
and concluded that the incinerator had been used for 17 years. The
licensee estimated that it had disposed of wastes containing about 19
millicuries (0.7 gigabecquerels) of hydrogen-3 (tritium) and about 13
millicuries (0.47 gigabecquerels) of carbon-14. All other radionuclides
that were incinerated had short half-lives (less than 88 days) and were
allowed to decay in storage prior to incineration. The licensee
included additional survey measurements of the accessible areas of the
incinerator in its second submittal. The NRC subsequently approved the
decommissioning plan by license amendment dated August 12, 2009. The
licensee completed decommissioning and submitted a final status survey
report to the NRC by letter dated November 16, 2009. The final status
survey report included survey data for the discharge stack, data
collected from areas that were inaccessible during previous surveys.
The NRC staff conducted a technical review of the licensee's
radiological survey data. The licensee's final status survey results
were well below the NRC's screening values for hydrogen-3 and carbon-14
as presented in NUREG-1757, Volume 1, Revision 2, ``Consolidated
Decommissioning Guidance: Decommissioning Process for Materials
Licensees,'' Table B.1, Acceptable License Termination Screening Values
of Common Radionuclides for Building-Surface Contamination.'' The NRC
staff also compared the final status survey results to the equipment
release criteria provided in Regulatory Guide 1.86, ``Termination of
Operating Licenses for Nuclear Reactors,'' Table 1, Acceptable Surface
Contamination Levels. In summary, the licensee conducted radiological
surveys of the incinerator and provided sufficient information to the
NRC demonstrating that the incinerator meets the license termination
criteria specified in Subpart E to 10 CFR Part 20 for unrestricted
release of the incinerator. The staff has prepared this EA in support
of the proposed license amendment.
This proposed license amendment will allow the licensee to free-
release the decommissioned incinerator without any radiological
restrictions. In accordance with the current license, the licensee will
continue to be authorized to dispose of biologically hazardous wastes
containing limited quantities of licensed radioactive material using a
different incinerator.
The staff has prepared this EA in support of the proposed license
amendment to release the incinerator for unrestricted use. The staff
has found that the radiological environmental impacts from the proposed
amendment are bounded by the impacts evaluated by the ``Generic
Environmental Impact Statement in Support of Rulemaking on Radiological
Criteria for License Termination of NRC-Licensed Facilities'' (NUREG-
1496). The staff has also found that the non-radiological impacts are
not significant. The staff consulted with the State of Alaska, and the
State had no comments on the proposed action.
III. Finding of No Significant Impact
On the basis of this EA, NRC has concluded that there are no
significant environmental impacts from the proposed amendment and has
determined not to prepare an environmental impact statement.
IV. Further Information
Documents related to this action, including the application for
amendment and supporting documentation, are available electronically at
the NRC's Electronic Reading Room at https://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html. From this site, you can access the NRC's Agency Wide
Document Access and Management System (ADAMS), which provides text and
image files of NRC's public documents. The ADAMS accession numbers for
the documents related to this notice are:
1. NRC, ``Generic Environmental Impact Statement in Support of
Rulemaking on Radiological Criteria for License Termination of NRC-
Licensed Nuclear Facilities,''
[[Page 19795]]
NUREG-1496, July 1997 (ML042310492, ML042320379, and ML042330385).
2. Martinson, Tracey A., University of Alaska-Fairbanks, Licensee
letter requesting release of incinerator, July 30, 2008 (ML082420967).
3. NRC, Request for additional information, June 4, 2009 (ML091560189).
4. Martinson, Tracey A., University of Alaska-Fairbanks, Proposed
decommissioning plan, July 12, 2009 (ML110310647).
5. NRC, License amendment, August 12, 2009 (ML092240357).
6. Martinson, Tracey A., University of Alaska-Fairbanks, Final status
survey report, November 16, 2009 (ML093641107).
If you do not have access to ADAMS or if there are problems in
accessing the documents located in ADAMS, contact the NRC Public
Document Room (PDR) Reference staff at 1-800-397-4209 or 301-415-4737
or by e-mail to pdr.resource@nrc.gov.
These documents may also be viewed electronically on the public
computers located at the NRC's Public Document Room (PDR), O-1F21, One
White Flint North, 11555 Rockville Pike, Rockville, MD 20852. The PDR
reproduction contractor will copy documents for a fee.
Dated at Arlington, Texas this 31st day of March 2011.
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Jack E. Whitten,
Chief, Nuclear Materials Safety Branch B, Division of Nuclear Materials
Safety, Region IV.
[FR Doc. 2011-8419 Filed 4-7-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-P