Airworthiness Directives; BAE SYSTEMS (Operations) Limited Model 4101 Airplanes, 19716-19719 [2011-8410]
Download as PDF
19716
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 68 / Friday, April 8, 2011 / Proposed Rules
under the criteria of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act.
We prepared a regulatory evaluation
of the estimated costs to comply with
this proposed AD and placed it in the
AD docket.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation
safety, Incorporation by reference,
Safety.
The Proposed Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority
delegated to me by the Administrator,
the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part
39 as follows:
PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS
DIRECTIVES
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Airbus: Docket No. FAA–2011–0305;
Directorate Identifier 2010–NM–186–AD.
Comments Due Date
(a) We must receive comments by May 23,
2011.
Affected ADs
(b) None.
Applicability
(c) This AD applies to Airbus Model A320–
214, -232, and -233 airplanes, all
manufacturer serial numbers on which
Airbus modification 38310 has been
accomplished in production; certificated in
any category.
Subject
(d) Air Transport Association (ATA) of
America Code 27: Flight Controls.
Reason
(e) The mandatory continuing
airworthiness information (MCAI) states:
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with PROPOSALS
*
*
*
*
Results from a design review done by
AIRBUS for documentation update have
revealed that, on post-mod 38310 A320
aeroplanes only, in case of emergency
electrical configuration combined with a
Green and Yellow hydraulic system loss,
during landing phase (nose landing gear
extended), the roll control would only be
provided by the left aileron.
This condition, if not corrected, could lead
to an asymmetrical landing configuration,
resulting in reduced control of the aeroplane.
*
*
*
*
*
Compliance
(f) You are responsible for having the
actions required by this AD performed within
the compliance times specified, unless the
actions have already been done.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
Credit for Actions Accomplished in
Accordance With Previous Service
Information
(h) Modifications done before the effective
date of this AD in accordance with Airbus
Service Bulletin A320–27–1199, Revision 01,
dated March 4, 2010, are acceptable for
compliance with the requirements of
paragraph (g) of this AD.
Note 1: This AD differs from the MCAI
and/or service information as follows: No
differences.
Other FAA AD Provisions
[Amended]
2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by adding
the following new AD:
*
(g) Within 24 months after the effective
date of this AD, modify the electrical
installation of the elevator aileron computer
and trimmable horizontal stabilizer motor 1
power supply, in accordance with the
Accomplishment Instructions of Airbus
Mandatory Service Bulletin A320–27–1199,
Revision 02, dated September 20, 2010.
FAA AD Differences
1. The authority citation for part 39
continues to read as follows:
§ 39.13
Actions
16:32 Apr 07, 2011
Jkt 223001
(i) The following provisions also apply to
this AD:
(1) Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs): The Manager, International
Branch, ANM–116, Transport Airplane
Directorate, FAA, has the authority to
approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested
using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19.
In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19, send your
request to your principal inspector or local
Flight Standards District Office, as
appropriate. If sending information directly
to the International Branch, sent it to ATTN:
Sanjay Ralhan, Aerospace Engineer,
International Branch, ANM–116, Transport
Airplane Directorate, FAA, 1601 Lind
Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington 98057–
3356; telephone (425) 227–1405; fax (425)
227–1149. Information may be e-mailed to:
9-ANM-116-AMOC-REQUESTS@faa.gov.
Before using any approved AMOC, notify
your appropriate principal inspector, or
lacking a principal inspector, the manager of
the local flight standards district office/
certificate holding district office. The AMOC
approval letter must specifically reference
this AD.
(2) Airworthy Product: For any requirement
in this AD to obtain corrective actions from
a manufacturer or other source, use these
actions if they are FAA-approved. Corrective
actions are considered FAA-approved if they
are approved by the State of Design Authority
(or their delegated agent). You are required
to assure the product is airworthy before it
is returned to service.
Related Information
(j) Refer to MCAI European Aviation Safety
Agency (EASA) Airworthiness Directive
2010–0149, dated July 21, 2010; and Airbus
Mandatory Service Bulletin A320–27–1199,
Revision 02, dated September 20, 2010; for
related information.
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Issued in Renton, Washington, on March
25, 2011.
Ali Bahrami,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate,
Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2011–8409 Filed 4–7–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2011–0306; Directorate
Identifier 2010–NM–176–AD]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; BAE
SYSTEMS (Operations) Limited Model
4101 Airplanes
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM).
AGENCY:
We propose to adopt a new
airworthiness directive (AD) for the
products listed above that would
supersede an existing AD. This
proposed AD results from mandatory
continuing airworthiness information
(MCAI) originated by an aviation
authority of another country to identify
and correct an unsafe condition on an
aviation product. The MCAI describes
the unsafe condition as:
SUMMARY:
* * * BAE Systems (Operations) Ltd has
issued Revision 33 of the AMM [airplane
maintenance manual] to amend Chapter 05–
10–10 by adding one new Structurally
Significant Item (SSI) and increasing the
repeat inspection period on another SSI.
Failure to comply with this revision
constitutes an unsafe condition.
The unsafe condition is failure of
certain structurally significant items,
including the main landing gear and the
nose landing gear, which could result in
reduced structural integrity of the
airplane; and fuel vapor ignition
sources, which could result in a fuel
tank explosion and consequent loss of
the airplane. The proposed AD would
require actions that are intended to
address the unsafe condition described
in the MCAI.
DATES: We must receive comments on
this proposed AD by May 23, 2011.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments by
any of the following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• Fax: (202) 493–2251.
• Mail: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M–
E:\FR\FM\08APP1.SGM
08APP1
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 68 / Friday, April 8, 2011 / Proposed Rules
30, West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE.,
Washington, DC 20590.
• Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations,
M–30, West Building Ground Floor,
Room W12–40, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue, SE., Washington, DC, between
9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through
Friday, except Federal holidays.
For service information identified in
this proposed AD, contact BAE
SYSTEMS (Operations) Limited,
Customer Information Department,
Prestwick International Airport,
Ayrshire, KA9 2RW, Scotland, United
Kingdom; telephone +44 1292 675207;
fax +44 1292 675704; e-mail
RApublications@baesystems.com;
Internet https://www.baesystems.com/
Businesses/RegionalAircraft/index.htm.
You may review copies of the
referenced service information at the
FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate,
1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton,
Washington. For information on the
availability of this material at the FAA,
call 425–227–1221.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on
the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov; or in person at the
Docket Operations office between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays. The AD docket
contains this proposed AD, the
regulatory evaluation, any comments
received, and other information. The
street address for the Docket Operations
office (telephone (800) 647–5527) is in
the ADDRESSES section. Comments will
be available in the AD docket shortly
after receipt.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Todd Thompson, Aerospace Engineer,
International Branch, ANM–116,
Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA,
1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton,
Washington 98057–3356; telephone
(425) 227–1175; fax (425) 227–1149.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with PROPOSALS
Comments Invited
We invite you to send any written
relevant data, views, or arguments about
this proposed AD. Send your comments
to an address listed under the
ADDRESSES section. Include ‘‘Docket No.
FAA–2011–0306; Directorate Identifier
2010–NM–176–AD’’ at the beginning of
your comments. We specifically invite
comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy
aspects of this proposed AD. We will
consider all comments received by the
closing date and may amend this
proposed AD based on those comments.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:32 Apr 07, 2011
Jkt 223001
We will post all comments we
receive, without change, to https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each
substantive verbal contact we receive
about this proposed AD.
Discussion
On April 27, 2009, we issued AD
2009–10–02, Amendment 39–15897 (74
FR 21246, May 7, 2009). That AD
required actions intended to address an
unsafe condition on the products listed
above.
Since we issued AD 2009–10–02, we
have determined that new or more
restrictive limitations are necessary to
adequately address the identified unsafe
condition.
The European Aviation Safety Agency
(EASA), which is the Technical Agent
for the Member States of the European
Community, has issued Airworthiness
Directive 2010–0098, dated May 27,
2010 (referred to after this as ‘‘the
MCAI’’), to correct an unsafe condition
for the specified products. The MCAI
states:
The Jetstream J41 Aircraft Maintenance
Manual (AMM), includes the following
chapters:
—05–10–10 ‘‘Airworthiness Limitations’’,
—05–10–20 ‘‘Certification Maintenance
Requirements’’, and,
—05–10–30 ‘‘Critical Design Configuration
Control Limitations (CDCCL)—Fuel
System’’
Compliance with these chapters has been
identified as mandatory actions for continued
airworthiness and EASA AD 2009–0052 was
issued to require operators to comply with
those instructions.
Since the issuance of that AD, BAE
Systems (Operations) Ltd has issued Revision
33 of the AMM to amend Chapter 05–10–10
by adding one new Structurally Significant
Item (SSI) and increasing the repeat
inspection period on another SSI. Failure to
comply with this revision constitutes an
unsafe condition.
For the reasons described above, this
[EASA] AD, which supersedes EASA AD
2009–0052, requires the implementation of
the new or more restrictive maintenance
requirements and/or airworthiness
limitations as specified in the defined parts
of Chapter 05 of the AMM at Revision 33.
The unsafe condition is failure of
certain structurally significant items,
including the main landing gear and the
nose landing gear, which could result in
reduced structural integrity of the
airplane; and fuel vapor ignition
sources, which could result in a fuel
tank explosion and consequent loss of
the airplane. You may obtain further
information by examining the MCAI in
the AD docket.
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
19717
Relevant Service Information
BAE SYSTEMS (Operations) Limited
has issued Subjects 05–10–00, 05–10–
10, 05–10–20, and 05–10–30 of Chapter
05 of Jetstream Series 4100 Aircraft
Maintenance Manual, Revision 33,
dated February 15, 2010. The actions
described in this service information are
intended to correct the unsafe condition
identified in the MCAI.
FAA’s Determination and Requirements
of This Proposed AD
This product has been approved by
the aviation authority of another
country, and is approved for operation
in the United States. Pursuant to our
bilateral agreement with the State of
Design Authority, we have been notified
of the unsafe condition described in the
MCAI and service information
referenced above. We are proposing this
AD because we evaluated all pertinent
information and determined an unsafe
condition exists and is likely to exist or
develop on other products of the same
type design.
Differences Between This AD and the
MCAI or Service Information
We have reviewed the MCAI and
related service information and, in
general, agree with their substance. But
we might have found it necessary to use
different words from those in the MCAI
to ensure the AD is clear for U.S.
operators and is enforceable. In making
these changes, we do not intend to differ
substantively from the information
provided in the MCAI and related
service information.
We might also have proposed
different actions in this AD from those
in the MCAI in order to follow FAA
policies. Any such differences are
highlighted in a NOTE within the
proposed AD.
Costs of Compliance
Based on the service information, we
estimate that this proposed AD would
affect about 3 products of U.S. registry.
The actions that are required by AD
2009–10–02 and retained in this
proposed AD take about 1 work-hour
per product, at an average labor rate of
$85 per work hour. Based on these
figures, the estimated cost of the
currently required actions is $85 per
product.
We estimate that it would take about
1 additional work-hour per product to
comply with the new basic
requirements of this proposed AD. The
average labor rate is $85 per work-hour.
Based on these figures, we estimate the
cost of the proposed AD on U.S.
operators to be $255, or $85 per product.
E:\FR\FM\08APP1.SGM
08APP1
19718
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 68 / Friday, April 8, 2011 / Proposed Rules
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code
specifies the FAA’s authority to issue
rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I,
section 106, describes the authority of
the FAA Administrator. ‘‘Subtitle VII:
Aviation Programs,’’ describes in more
detail the scope of the Agency’s
authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under
the authority described in ‘‘Subtitle VII,
Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701:
General requirements.’’ Under that
section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in
air commerce by prescribing regulations
for practices, methods, and procedures
the Administrator finds necessary for
safety in air commerce. This regulation
is within the scope of that authority
because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on
products identified in this rulemaking
action.
Regulatory Findings
We determined that this proposed AD
would not have federalism implications
under Executive Order 13132. This
proposed AD would not have a
substantial direct effect on the States, on
the relationship between the national
Government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I
certify this proposed regulation:
1. Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ under Executive Order 12866;
2. Is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under the
DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures
(44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and
3. Will not have a significant
economic impact, positive or negative,
on a substantial number of small entities
under the criteria of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act.
We prepared a regulatory evaluation
of the estimated costs to comply with
this proposed AD and placed it in the
AD docket.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation
safety, Incorporation by reference,
Safety.
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with PROPOSALS
The Proposed Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority
delegated to me by the Administrator,
the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part
39 as follows:
PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS
DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39
continues to read as follows:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:32 Apr 07, 2011
Jkt 223001
§ 39.13
[Amended]
2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by
removing Amendment 39–15897 (74 FR
21246, May 7, 2009) and adding the
following new AD:
BAE SYSTEMS (Operations) Limited: Docket
No. FAA–2011–0306; Directorate
Identifier 2010–NM–176–AD.
Comments Due Date
(a) We must receive comments by May 23,
2011.
Affected ADs
(b) This AD supersedes AD 2009–10–02,
Amendment 39–15897.
Applicability
(c) This AD applies to all BAE SYSTEMS
(Operations) Limited Model 4101 airplanes,
certificated in any category.
Note 1: This AD requires revisions to
certain operator maintenance documents to
include new actions (e.g., inspections) and/
or Critical Design Configuration Control
Limitations (CDCCLs). Compliance with
these actions and/or CDCCLs is required by
14 CFR 91.403(c). For airplanes that have
been previously modified, altered, or
repaired in the areas addressed by this AD,
the operator may not be able to accomplish
the actions described in the revisions. In this
situation, to comply with 14 CFR 91.403(c),
the operator must request approval of an
alternative method of compliance (AMOC)
according to paragraph (k) of this AD. The
request should include a description of
changes to the required actions that will
ensure the continued operational safety of
the airplane.
Subject
(d) Air Transport Association (ATA) of
America Code 05.
Reason
(e) The mandatory continuing
airworthiness information (MCAI) states:
* * * BAE Systems (Operations) Ltd has
issued Revision 33 of the AMM [airplane
maintenance manual] to amend Chapter 05–
10–10 by adding one new Structurally
Significant Item (SSI) and increasing the
repeat inspection period on another SSI.
Failure to comply with this revision
constitutes an unsafe condition.
The unsafe condition is failure of certain
structurally significant items, including the
main landing gear and the nose landing gear,
which could result in reduced structural
integrity of the airplane; and fuel vapor
ignition sources, which could result in a fuel
tank explosion and consequent loss of the
airplane.
Compliance
(f) You are responsible for having the
actions required by this AD performed within
the compliance times specified, unless the
actions have already been done.
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Restatement of Requirements of AD 2009–
10–02
Revise Airworthiness Limitations Section
(AWL) of Instructions for Continued
Airworthiness
(g) Within 90 days after June 11, 2009 (the
effective date of AD 2009–10–02): Revise the
AWL section of the Instructions for
Continued Airworthiness by incorporating
the instructions of Subjects 05–10–10,
‘‘Airworthiness Limitations,’’ 05–10–20,
‘‘Certification Maintenance Requirements,’’
and 05–10–30, ‘‘Critical Design Configuration
Control Limitations (CDCCL)—Fuel System,’’
of the BAE Systems (Operations) Limited
Jetstream Series 4100 Airplane Maintenance
Manual (AMM), Revision 31, dated February
15, 2009. Thereafter, except as provided in
paragraph (k) of this AD, no alternative
replacement times or inspection intervals
may be approved for any affected component.
Doing the actions required by paragraph (i)
of this AD terminates the requirements of this
paragraph.
(h) Where paragraph 2.A.(2) of Subject 05–
10–10 of the BAE Systems (Operations)
Limited Jetstream Series 4100 AMM,
Revision 31, dated February 15, 2009,
specifies that certain landing gear units ‘‘must
be removed before 31st March 2008,’’ this AD
requires compliance within 60 days after
June 11, 2009.
New Requirements of This AD
Maintenance Program Revision
(i) Within 90 days after the effective date
of this AD: Revise the maintenance program
by incorporating Subject 05–10–10,
‘‘Airworthiness Limitations Description and
Operation’’; Subject 05–10–20, ‘‘Certification
Maintenance Requirements Description and
Operation’’; and Subject 05–10–30, ‘‘Critical
Design Configuration Control Limitations
(CDCCL)—Fuel System Description and
Operation’’; of Chapter 05 of the BAE Systems
(Operations) Limited Jetstream Series 4100
AMM, Revision 33, dated February 15, 2010.
Doing the actions required by this paragraph
terminates the requirements of paragraph (g)
of this AD. The initial compliance times for
the tasks are at the applicable times specified
in paragraphs (i)(1), (i)(2), and (i)(3) of this
AD.
(1) For replacement tasks of life limited
parts specified in Subject 05–10–10,
‘‘Airworthiness Limitations Description and
Operation,’’ of Chapter 05 of the BAE Systems
(Operations) Limited Jetstream Series 4100
AMM, Revision 33, dated February 15, 2010:
Prior to the applicable flight cycles (landings)
or flight hours (flying hours) on the part
specified in the ‘‘Mandatory Life Limits’’
column in Subject 05–10–10, or within 90
days after the effective date of this AD,
whichever occurs later.
(2) For structurally significant item tasks
specified in Subject 05–10–10,
‘‘Airworthiness Limitations Description and
Operation,’’ of Chapter 05 of the BAE Systems
(Operations) Limited Jetstream Series 4100
AMM, Revision 33, dated February 15, 2010:
Prior to the accumulation of the applicable
flight cycles specified in the ‘‘Initial
Inspection’’ column in Subject 05–10–10, or
within 90 days after the effective date of this
AD, whichever occurs later.
E:\FR\FM\08APP1.SGM
08APP1
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 68 / Friday, April 8, 2011 / Proposed Rules
(3) For certification maintenance
requirements tasks specified in Subject 05–
10–20, ‘‘Certification Maintenance
Requirements Description and Operation,’’ of
Chapter 05 of the BAE Systems (Operations)
Limited Jetstream Series 4100 AMM,
Revision 33, dated February 15, 2010: Prior
to the accumulation of the applicable flight
hours specified in the ‘‘Time Between
Checks’’ column in Subject 05–10–20, or
within 90 days after the effective date of this
AD, whichever occurs later; except for tasks
that specify ‘‘first flight of the day’’ in the
‘‘Time Between Checks’’ column in Subject
05–10–20, the initial compliance time is the
first flight of the next day after doing the
revision required by paragraph (i) of this AD,
or within 90 days after the effective date of
this AD, whichever occurs later.
No Alternative Actions, Intervals, and/or
Critical Design Configuration Control
Limitations (CDCCLs)
(j) After accomplishing the revision
required by paragraph (i) of this AD, no
alternative actions (e.g., inspections),
intervals, and/or CDCCLs may be used unless
the actions, intervals, and/or CDCCLs are
approved as an alternative method of
compliance (AMOC) in accordance with the
procedures specified in paragraph (k) of this
AD.
FAA AD Differences
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with PROPOSALS
Note 2: This AD differs from the MCAI
and/or service information as follows:
Although EASA Airworthiness Directive
2010–0098, dated May 27, 2010, specifies
both revising the maintenance program to
include limitations, and doing certain
repetitive actions (e.g., inspections) and/or
maintaining Critical Design Configuration
Control Limitations (CDCCLs), this AD only
requires the revision. Requiring a revision of
the maintenance program, rather than
requiring individual repetitive actions and/or
maintaining CDCCLs, requires operators to
record AD compliance only at the time the
revision is made. Repetitive actions and/or
maintaining CDCCLs specified in the
airworthiness limitations must be complied
with in accordance with 14 CFR 91.403(c).
Other FAA AD Provisions
(k) The following provisions also apply to
this AD:
(1) Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs): The Manager, International
Branch, ANM–116, FAA, has the authority to
approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested
using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19.
In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19, send your
request to your principal inspector or local
Flight Standards District Office, as
appropriate. If sending information directly
to the International Branch, send it to ATTN:
Todd Thompson, Aerospace Engineer,
International Branch, ANM–116, Transport
Airplane Directorate, FAA, 1601 Lind
Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington 98057–
3356; telephone (425) 227–1175; fax (425)
227–1149. Before using any approved AMOC,
notify your appropriate principal inspector,
or lacking a principal inspector, the manager
of the local flight standards district office/
certificate holding district office. The AMOC
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:32 Apr 07, 2011
Jkt 223001
approval letter must specifically reference
this AD.
(2) Airworthy Product: For any requirement
in this AD to obtain corrective actions from
a manufacturer or other source, use these
actions if they are FAA-approved. Corrective
actions are considered FAA-approved if they
are approved by the State of Design Authority
(or their delegated agent). You are required
to assure the product is airworthy before it
is returned to service.
Related Information
(l) Refer to Mandatory Continuing
Airworthiness Information (MCAI) European
Aviation Safety Agency (EASA)
Airworthiness Directive 2010–0098, dated
May 27, 2010; Subjects 05–10–10,
‘‘Airworthiness Limitations,’’ 05–10–20,
‘‘Certification Maintenance Requirements,’’
and 05–10–30, ‘‘Critical Design Configuration
Control Limitations (CDCCL)—Fuel System,’’
of the BAE Systems (Operations) Limited
Jetstream Series 4100 AMM, Revision 31,
dated February 15, 2009; and Subjects 05–
10–00, ‘‘Time Limits Description and
Operation,’’ 05–10–10, ‘‘Airworthiness
Limitations Description and Operation,’’ 05–
10–20, ‘‘Certification Maintenance
Requirements Description and Operation,’’
and 05–10–30, ‘‘Critical Design Configuration
Control Limitations (CDCCL)—Fuel System
Description and Operation,’’ of Chapter 05 of
the BAE Systems (Operations) Limited
Jetstream Series 4100 AMM, Revision 33,
dated February 15, 2010; for related
information.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on March
30, 2011.
Kalene C. Yanamura,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane
Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2011–8410 Filed 4–7–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2011–0307; Directorate
Identifier 2010–NM–111–AD]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Saab AB,
Saab Aerosystems Model SAAB 2000
Airplanes
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM).
AGENCY:
We propose to adopt a new
airworthiness directive (AD) for the
products listed above. This proposed
AD results from mandatory continuing
airworthiness information (MCAI)
originated by an aviation authority of
another country to identify and correct
an unsafe condition on an aviation
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
19719
product. The MCAI describes the unsafe
condition as:
*
*
*
*
*
A report has been received of an incident
where one of the two bolts attaching the
actuator mounting bracket to the MLG [main
landing gear] Shock Strut was found loose,
leading to failure of the other attachment
bolt, subsequently resulting in failure of the
bracket.
This condition, if not detected and
corrected, could prevent the MLG to extend
to the full down-and-locked position,
possibly resulting in MLG collapse upon
landing or during roll-out, with consequent
damage to the aeroplane and injury to the
occupants.
*
*
*
*
*
The proposed AD would require
actions that are intended to address the
unsafe condition described in the MCAI.
DATES: We must receive comments on
this proposed AD by May 23, 2011.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments by
any of the following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• Fax: (202) 493–2251.
• Mail: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations,
M–30, West Building Ground Floor,
Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590.
• Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations,
M–30, West Building Ground Floor,
Room W12–40, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue, SE., Washington, DC, between
9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through
Friday, except Federal holidays.
For service information identified in
this proposed AD, contact Saab AB,
Saab Aerosystems, SE–581 88,
¨
Linkoping, Sweden; telephone +46 13
18 5591; fax +46 13 18 4874; e-mail
saab2000.techsupport@saabgroup.com;
Internet https://www.saabgroup.com.
You may review copies of the
referenced service information at the
FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate,
1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton,
Washington. For information on the
availability of this material at the FAA,
call 425–227–1221.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on
the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov; or in person at the
Docket Operations office between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays. The AD docket
contains this proposed AD, the
regulatory evaluation, any comments
received, and other information. The
street address for the Docket Operations
office (telephone (800) 647–5527) is in
the ADDRESSES section. Comments will
E:\FR\FM\08APP1.SGM
08APP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 68 (Friday, April 8, 2011)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 19716-19719]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-8410]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA-2011-0306; Directorate Identifier 2010-NM-176-AD]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; BAE SYSTEMS (Operations) Limited Model
4101 Airplanes
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We propose to adopt a new airworthiness directive (AD) for the
products listed above that would supersede an existing AD. This
proposed AD results from mandatory continuing airworthiness information
(MCAI) originated by an aviation authority of another country to
identify and correct an unsafe condition on an aviation product. The
MCAI describes the unsafe condition as:
* * * BAE Systems (Operations) Ltd has issued Revision 33 of the
AMM [airplane maintenance manual] to amend Chapter 05-10-10 by
adding one new Structurally Significant Item (SSI) and increasing
the repeat inspection period on another SSI. Failure to comply with
this revision constitutes an unsafe condition.
The unsafe condition is failure of certain structurally significant
items, including the main landing gear and the nose landing gear, which
could result in reduced structural integrity of the airplane; and fuel
vapor ignition sources, which could result in a fuel tank explosion and
consequent loss of the airplane. The proposed AD would require actions
that are intended to address the unsafe condition described in the
MCAI.
DATES: We must receive comments on this proposed AD by May 23, 2011.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments by any of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
Fax: (202) 493-2251.
Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-
[[Page 19717]]
30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue,
SE., Washington, DC 20590.
Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-40, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
For service information identified in this proposed AD, contact BAE
SYSTEMS (Operations) Limited, Customer Information Department,
Prestwick International Airport, Ayrshire, KA9 2RW, Scotland, United
Kingdom; telephone +44 1292 675207; fax +44 1292 675704; e-mail
RApublications@baesystems.com; Internet https://www.baesystems.com/Businesses/RegionalAircraft/index.htm. You may review copies of the
referenced service information at the FAA, Transport Airplane
Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington. For information
on the availability of this material at the FAA, call 425-227-1221.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at https://www.regulations.gov; or in person at the Docket Operations office
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The AD docket contains this proposed AD, the regulatory
evaluation, any comments received, and other information. The street
address for the Docket Operations office (telephone (800) 647-5527) is
in the ADDRESSES section. Comments will be available in the AD docket
shortly after receipt.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Todd Thompson, Aerospace Engineer,
International Branch, ANM-116, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA,
1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington 98057-3356; telephone (425)
227-1175; fax (425) 227-1149.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
We invite you to send any written relevant data, views, or
arguments about this proposed AD. Send your comments to an address
listed under the ADDRESSES section. Include ``Docket No. FAA-2011-0306;
Directorate Identifier 2010-NM-176-AD'' at the beginning of your
comments. We specifically invite comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy aspects of this proposed AD. We
will consider all comments received by the closing date and may amend
this proposed AD based on those comments.
We will post all comments we receive, without change, to https://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal contact we
receive about this proposed AD.
Discussion
On April 27, 2009, we issued AD 2009-10-02, Amendment 39-15897 (74
FR 21246, May 7, 2009). That AD required actions intended to address an
unsafe condition on the products listed above.
Since we issued AD 2009-10-02, we have determined that new or more
restrictive limitations are necessary to adequately address the
identified unsafe condition.
The European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA), which is the Technical
Agent for the Member States of the European Community, has issued
Airworthiness Directive 2010-0098, dated May 27, 2010 (referred to
after this as ``the MCAI''), to correct an unsafe condition for the
specified products. The MCAI states:
The Jetstream J41 Aircraft Maintenance Manual (AMM), includes
the following chapters:
--05-10-10 ``Airworthiness Limitations'',
--05-10-20 ``Certification Maintenance Requirements'', and,
--05-10-30 ``Critical Design Configuration Control Limitations
(CDCCL)--Fuel System''
Compliance with these chapters has been identified as mandatory
actions for continued airworthiness and EASA AD 2009-0052 was issued
to require operators to comply with those instructions.
Since the issuance of that AD, BAE Systems (Operations) Ltd has
issued Revision 33 of the AMM to amend Chapter 05-10-10 by adding
one new Structurally Significant Item (SSI) and increasing the
repeat inspection period on another SSI. Failure to comply with this
revision constitutes an unsafe condition.
For the reasons described above, this [EASA] AD, which
supersedes EASA AD 2009-0052, requires the implementation of the new
or more restrictive maintenance requirements and/or airworthiness
limitations as specified in the defined parts of Chapter 05 of the
AMM at Revision 33.
The unsafe condition is failure of certain structurally significant
items, including the main landing gear and the nose landing gear, which
could result in reduced structural integrity of the airplane; and fuel
vapor ignition sources, which could result in a fuel tank explosion and
consequent loss of the airplane. You may obtain further information by
examining the MCAI in the AD docket.
Relevant Service Information
BAE SYSTEMS (Operations) Limited has issued Subjects 05-10-00, 05-
10-10, 05-10-20, and 05-10-30 of Chapter 05 of Jetstream Series 4100
Aircraft Maintenance Manual, Revision 33, dated February 15, 2010. The
actions described in this service information are intended to correct
the unsafe condition identified in the MCAI.
FAA's Determination and Requirements of This Proposed AD
This product has been approved by the aviation authority of another
country, and is approved for operation in the United States. Pursuant
to our bilateral agreement with the State of Design Authority, we have
been notified of the unsafe condition described in the MCAI and service
information referenced above. We are proposing this AD because we
evaluated all pertinent information and determined an unsafe condition
exists and is likely to exist or develop on other products of the same
type design.
Differences Between This AD and the MCAI or Service Information
We have reviewed the MCAI and related service information and, in
general, agree with their substance. But we might have found it
necessary to use different words from those in the MCAI to ensure the
AD is clear for U.S. operators and is enforceable. In making these
changes, we do not intend to differ substantively from the information
provided in the MCAI and related service information.
We might also have proposed different actions in this AD from those
in the MCAI in order to follow FAA policies. Any such differences are
highlighted in a NOTE within the proposed AD.
Costs of Compliance
Based on the service information, we estimate that this proposed AD
would affect about 3 products of U.S. registry.
The actions that are required by AD 2009-10-02 and retained in this
proposed AD take about 1 work-hour per product, at an average labor
rate of $85 per work hour. Based on these figures, the estimated cost
of the currently required actions is $85 per product.
We estimate that it would take about 1 additional work-hour per
product to comply with the new basic requirements of this proposed AD.
The average labor rate is $85 per work-hour. Based on these figures, we
estimate the cost of the proposed AD on U.S. operators to be $255, or
$85 per product.
[[Page 19718]]
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. ``Subtitle VII: Aviation
Programs,'' describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's
authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
``Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.
Regulatory Findings
We determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not
have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national Government and the States, or on the distribution
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify this proposed
regulation:
1. Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order
12866;
2. Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and
3. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
We prepared a regulatory evaluation of the estimated costs to
comply with this proposed AD and placed it in the AD docket.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.
The Proposed Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
2. The FAA amends Sec. 39.13 by removing Amendment 39-15897 (74 FR
21246, May 7, 2009) and adding the following new AD:
BAE SYSTEMS (Operations) Limited: Docket No. FAA-2011-0306;
Directorate Identifier 2010-NM-176-AD.
Comments Due Date
(a) We must receive comments by May 23, 2011.
Affected ADs
(b) This AD supersedes AD 2009-10-02, Amendment 39-15897.
Applicability
(c) This AD applies to all BAE SYSTEMS (Operations) Limited
Model 4101 airplanes, certificated in any category.
Note 1: This AD requires revisions to certain operator
maintenance documents to include new actions (e.g., inspections)
and/or Critical Design Configuration Control Limitations (CDCCLs).
Compliance with these actions and/or CDCCLs is required by 14 CFR
91.403(c). For airplanes that have been previously modified,
altered, or repaired in the areas addressed by this AD, the operator
may not be able to accomplish the actions described in the
revisions. In this situation, to comply with 14 CFR 91.403(c), the
operator must request approval of an alternative method of
compliance (AMOC) according to paragraph (k) of this AD. The request
should include a description of changes to the required actions that
will ensure the continued operational safety of the airplane.
Subject
(d) Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 05.
Reason
(e) The mandatory continuing airworthiness information (MCAI)
states:
* * * BAE Systems (Operations) Ltd has issued Revision 33 of the
AMM [airplane maintenance manual] to amend Chapter 05-10-10 by
adding one new Structurally Significant Item (SSI) and increasing
the repeat inspection period on another SSI. Failure to comply with
this revision constitutes an unsafe condition.
The unsafe condition is failure of certain structurally significant
items, including the main landing gear and the nose landing gear,
which could result in reduced structural integrity of the airplane;
and fuel vapor ignition sources, which could result in a fuel tank
explosion and consequent loss of the airplane.
Compliance
(f) You are responsible for having the actions required by this
AD performed within the compliance times specified, unless the
actions have already been done.
Restatement of Requirements of AD 2009-10-02
Revise Airworthiness Limitations Section (AWL) of Instructions for
Continued Airworthiness
(g) Within 90 days after June 11, 2009 (the effective date of AD
2009-10-02): Revise the AWL section of the Instructions for
Continued Airworthiness by incorporating the instructions of
Subjects 05-10-10, ``Airworthiness Limitations,'' 05-10-20,
``Certification Maintenance Requirements,'' and 05-10-30, ``Critical
Design Configuration Control Limitations (CDCCL)--Fuel System,'' of
the BAE Systems (Operations) Limited Jetstream Series 4100 Airplane
Maintenance Manual (AMM), Revision 31, dated February 15, 2009.
Thereafter, except as provided in paragraph (k) of this AD, no
alternative replacement times or inspection intervals may be
approved for any affected component. Doing the actions required by
paragraph (i) of this AD terminates the requirements of this
paragraph.
(h) Where paragraph 2.A.(2) of Subject 05-10-10 of the BAE
Systems (Operations) Limited Jetstream Series 4100 AMM, Revision 31,
dated February 15, 2009, specifies that certain landing gear units
``must be removed before 31st March 2008,'' this AD requires
compliance within 60 days after June 11, 2009.
New Requirements of This AD
Maintenance Program Revision
(i) Within 90 days after the effective date of this AD: Revise
the maintenance program by incorporating Subject 05-10-10,
``Airworthiness Limitations Description and Operation''; Subject 05-
10-20, ``Certification Maintenance Requirements Description and
Operation''; and Subject 05-10-30, ``Critical Design Configuration
Control Limitations (CDCCL)--Fuel System Description and
Operation''; of Chapter 05 of the BAE Systems (Operations) Limited
Jetstream Series 4100 AMM, Revision 33, dated February 15, 2010.
Doing the actions required by this paragraph terminates the
requirements of paragraph (g) of this AD. The initial compliance
times for the tasks are at the applicable times specified in
paragraphs (i)(1), (i)(2), and (i)(3) of this AD.
(1) For replacement tasks of life limited parts specified in
Subject 05-10-10, ``Airworthiness Limitations Description and
Operation,'' of Chapter 05 of the BAE Systems (Operations) Limited
Jetstream Series 4100 AMM, Revision 33, dated February 15, 2010:
Prior to the applicable flight cycles (landings) or flight hours
(flying hours) on the part specified in the ``Mandatory Life
Limits'' column in Subject 05-10-10, or within 90 days after the
effective date of this AD, whichever occurs later.
(2) For structurally significant item tasks specified in Subject
05-10-10, ``Airworthiness Limitations Description and Operation,''
of Chapter 05 of the BAE Systems (Operations) Limited Jetstream
Series 4100 AMM, Revision 33, dated February 15, 2010: Prior to the
accumulation of the applicable flight cycles specified in the
``Initial Inspection'' column in Subject 05-10-10, or within 90 days
after the effective date of this AD, whichever occurs later.
[[Page 19719]]
(3) For certification maintenance requirements tasks specified
in Subject 05-10-20, ``Certification Maintenance Requirements
Description and Operation,'' of Chapter 05 of the BAE Systems
(Operations) Limited Jetstream Series 4100 AMM, Revision 33, dated
February 15, 2010: Prior to the accumulation of the applicable
flight hours specified in the ``Time Between Checks'' column in
Subject 05-10-20, or within 90 days after the effective date of this
AD, whichever occurs later; except for tasks that specify ``first
flight of the day'' in the ``Time Between Checks'' column in Subject
05-10-20, the initial compliance time is the first flight of the
next day after doing the revision required by paragraph (i) of this
AD, or within 90 days after the effective date of this AD, whichever
occurs later.
No Alternative Actions, Intervals, and/or Critical Design Configuration
Control Limitations (CDCCLs)
(j) After accomplishing the revision required by paragraph (i)
of this AD, no alternative actions (e.g., inspections), intervals,
and/or CDCCLs may be used unless the actions, intervals, and/or
CDCCLs are approved as an alternative method of compliance (AMOC) in
accordance with the procedures specified in paragraph (k) of this
AD.
FAA AD Differences
Note 2: This AD differs from the MCAI and/or service information
as follows: Although EASA Airworthiness Directive 2010-0098, dated
May 27, 2010, specifies both revising the maintenance program to
include limitations, and doing certain repetitive actions (e.g.,
inspections) and/or maintaining Critical Design Configuration
Control Limitations (CDCCLs), this AD only requires the revision.
Requiring a revision of the maintenance program, rather than
requiring individual repetitive actions and/or maintaining CDCCLs,
requires operators to record AD compliance only at the time the
revision is made. Repetitive actions and/or maintaining CDCCLs
specified in the airworthiness limitations must be complied with in
accordance with 14 CFR 91.403(c).
Other FAA AD Provisions
(k) The following provisions also apply to this AD:
(1) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs): The Manager,
International Branch, ANM-116, FAA, has the authority to approve
AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the procedures found in 14 CFR
39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19, send your request to your
principal inspector or local Flight Standards District Office, as
appropriate. If sending information directly to the International
Branch, send it to ATTN: Todd Thompson, Aerospace Engineer,
International Branch, ANM-116, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA,
1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington 98057-3356; telephone
(425) 227-1175; fax (425) 227-1149. Before using any approved AMOC,
notify your appropriate principal inspector, or lacking a principal
inspector, the manager of the local flight standards district
office/certificate holding district office. The AMOC approval letter
must specifically reference this AD.
(2) Airworthy Product: For any requirement in this AD to obtain
corrective actions from a manufacturer or other source, use these
actions if they are FAA-approved. Corrective actions are considered
FAA-approved if they are approved by the State of Design Authority
(or their delegated agent). You are required to assure the product
is airworthy before it is returned to service.
Related Information
(l) Refer to Mandatory Continuing Airworthiness Information
(MCAI) European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) Airworthiness
Directive 2010-0098, dated May 27, 2010; Subjects 05-10-10,
``Airworthiness Limitations,'' 05-10-20, ``Certification Maintenance
Requirements,'' and 05-10-30, ``Critical Design Configuration
Control Limitations (CDCCL)--Fuel System,'' of the BAE Systems
(Operations) Limited Jetstream Series 4100 AMM, Revision 31, dated
February 15, 2009; and Subjects 05-10-00, ``Time Limits Description
and Operation,'' 05-10-10, ``Airworthiness Limitations Description
and Operation,'' 05-10-20, ``Certification Maintenance Requirements
Description and Operation,'' and 05-10-30, ``Critical Design
Configuration Control Limitations (CDCCL)--Fuel System Description
and Operation,'' of Chapter 05 of the BAE Systems (Operations)
Limited Jetstream Series 4100 AMM, Revision 33, dated February 15,
2010; for related information.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on March 30, 2011.
Kalene C. Yanamura,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 2011-8410 Filed 4-7-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P