Commission Information Collection Activities (FERC-725B); Comment Request; Submitted for OMB Review, 19333-19334 [2011-8248]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 67 / Thursday, April 7, 2011 / Notices
Title of Collection: Evaluation of the
Education for Homeless Children and
Youth Program.
OMB Control Number: Pending.
Agency Form Number(s): N/A.
Frequency of Responses: Once.
Affected Public: State, Local, or Tribal
Government, State Educational
Agencies or Local Educational Agencies.
Total Estimated Number of Annual
Responses: 256.
Total Estimated Number of Annual
Burden Hours: 151.
Abstract: The evaluation will survey
state coordinators and district liaisons
for Education for Homeless Children
and Youth (EHCY) Program. The
evaluation addresses research questions
in the following areas of program
implementation: (1) The collection and
use of data on homeless children and
youth; (2) the expenditure of EHCY
Program funds; (3) the policies and
services provided by local educational
agencies (LEAs) to remove barriers that
prevent homeless children and youth
from accessing a free, appropriate public
education; and (4) the coordination of
such efforts at the local level.
Copies of the proposed information
collection request may be accessed from
https://edicsweb.ed.gov, by selecting the
‘‘Browse Pending Collections’’ link and
by clicking on link number 4559. When
you access the information collection,
click on ‘‘Download Attachments’’ to
view. Written requests for information
should be addressed to U.S. Department
of Education, 400 Maryland Avenue,
SW., LBJ, Washington, DC 20202–4537.
Requests may also be electronically
mailed to ICDocketMgr@ed.gov or faxed
to 202–401–0920. Please specify the
complete title of the information
collection and OMB Control Number
when making your request.
Individuals who use a
telecommunications device for the deaf
(TDD) may call the Federal Information
Relay Service (FIRS) at 1–800–877–
8339.
[FR Doc. 2011–8332 Filed 4–6–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4000–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES
[Docket No. IC11–725B–001]
Commission Information Collection
Activities (FERC–725B); Comment
Request; Submitted for OMB Review
Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission, DOE.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
19:53 Apr 06, 2011
Jkt 223001
In compliance with the
requirements of section 3507 of the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, 44
U.S.C. 3507, the Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission (Commission or
FERC) has submitted the information
collection described below to the Office
of Management and Budget (OMB) for
review of the information collection
requirements. Any interested person
may file comments directly with OMB
and should address a copy of those
comments to the Commission as
explained below. The Commission
issued a Notice in the Federal Register
(75 FR 65618, 10/26/2010) requesting
public comments. FERC received no
comments on the FERC–725B and has
made this notation in its submission to
OMB. OMB only makes a decision after
the 30-day comment period for this
notice has expired.
DATES: Comments on the collection of
information are due by May 9, 2011.
ADDRESSES: Address comments on the
collection of information to the Office of
Management and Budget, Office of
Information and Regulatory Affairs,
Attention: Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission Desk Officer. Comments to
OMB should be filed electronically, c/o
oira__submission@omb.eop.gov and
include OMB Control Number 1902–
0248 for reference. The Desk Officer
may be reached by telephone at 202–
395–4638.
A copy of the comments should also
be sent to: Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission, Secretary of the
Commission, 888 First Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20426. Comments may
be filed either on paper or on CD/DVD,
and should refer to Docket No. IC11–
725B–001. Documents must be prepared
in an acceptable filing format and in
compliance with Commission
submission guidelines at https://
www.ferc.gov/help/submissionguide.asp. eFiling and eSubscription are
not available for Docket No. IC11–725B–
001, due to a system issue.
All comments may be viewed, printed
or downloaded remotely via the Internet
through FERC’s homepage using the
‘‘eLibrary’’ link. For user assistance,
contact ferconlinesupport@ferc.gov or
toll-free at (866) 208–3676, or for TTY,
contact (202) 502–8659.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Ellen Brown may be reached by e-mail
at DataClearance@FERC.gov, by
telephone at (202) 502–8663, and by fax
at (202) 273–0873.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
information collected by the FERC–
725B, Reliability Standards for Critical
Infrastructure Protection (OMB Control
No. 1902–0248), is required to
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00027
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
19333
implement the statutory provisions of
section 215 of the Federal Power Act
(FPA) (16 U.S.C. 824o). On January 18,
2008, the Commission issued order 706,
approving eight Critical Infrastructure
Protection (CIP) Reliability Standards
submitted by the North American
Electric Reliability Corporation (NERC)
for Commission approval.1
The CIP Reliability Standards require
certain users, owners, and operators of
the Bulk-Power System to comply with
specific requirements to safeguard
critical cyber assets.2 These standards
help protect the nation’s Bulk-Power
System against potential disruptions
from cyber attacks.3 The CIP Reliability
Standards include one actual reporting
requirement and several recordkeeping
requirements. Specifically, CIP–008–1
requires responsible entities to report
cyber security incidents to the
Electricity Sector-Information Sharing
and Analysis Center (ES–ISAC). In
addition, the eight CIP Reliability
Standards require responsible entities to
develop various policies, plans,
programs, and procedures.4
The CIP Reliability Standards do not
require a responsible entity to report to
the Commission, ERO or Regional
Entities, the various policies, plans,
programs and procedures. However, a
showing of the documented policies,
plans, programs and procedures is
required to demonstrate compliance
with the CIP Reliability Standards.
Action: The Commission is requesting
a three-year extension of the existing
collection with no changes to the
requirements.
Burden Statement: The extent of the
reporting burden is influenced by the
number of identified critical assets and
related critical cyber assets pursuant to
CIP–002. An entity identifying one or
more critical cyber assets, including
assets located at remote locations, will
likely require more resources to
demonstrate compliance with the CIP
Reliability Standards compared to an
entity that identifies no critical assets.
The Commission has developed
1 CIP–002–1, CIP–003–1, CIP–004–1, CIP–005–1,
CIP–006–1, CIP–007–1, CIP–008–1, and CIP–009–1.
2 In addition, in accordance with section
215(d)(5) of the FPA, the Commission proposed to
direct NERC to develop modifications to the CIP
Reliability Standards to address specific concerns
identified by the Commission.
3 For a description of the CIP Reliability
Standards, see the Critical Infrastructure Protection
Section on NERC’s Web site at https://
www.nerc.com/page.php?cid=2«20.
4 The October notice issued in this docket
contains more information on the reporting
requirements and can be found at https://elibrary.
ferc.gov/idmws/File_list.asp?document_id=
13857625. The full text of the standards can be
found on NERC’s Web site at https://www.nerc.com/
page.php?cid=2«20.
E:\FR\FM\07APN1.SGM
07APN1
19334
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 67 / Thursday, April 7, 2011 / Notices
estimates using data from NERC’s
compliance registry as well as a 2009
survey that was conducted by NERC to
asses the number of entities reporting
Critical Cyber Assets.
Data collection
Number of
respondents 5
Average
number of
responses per
respondent
Average
number of
burden hours
per response 6
Total annual
hours
(1)
(2)
(3)
(1) x (2) x (3)
FERC–725B:
Estimate of U.S. Entities that have identified Critical Cyber Assets ........
Estimate of U.S. Entities that have not identified Critical Cyber Assets ..
New U.S. Entities that have to come into compliance with the CIP
Standards 7 ............................................................................................
345
1,156
1
1
320
8
110,400
9,248
*6
1
1,176
7,056
Totals .................................................................................................
1,501
126,704
* not included in the 1,501 total because it is assumed that on average, six entities per year will no longer have to comply with the CIP
standards.
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES
The total estimated annual cost
burden to respondents is:
• Entities that have identified Critical
Assets = 110,400 hours@$96 =
$10,598,400.
• Entities that have not identified
Critical Assets = 9,248 hours@$96 =
$887,808.
• Storage Costs for Entities that have
identified Critical Assets 8 = 315
Entities@$15.25 = $4,804.
The hourly rate of $96 is the average
cost of legal services ($230 per hour),
technical employees ($40 per hour) and
administrative support ($18 per hour),
based on hourly rates from the Bureau
of Labor Statistics (BLS) and the 2009
5 The NERC Compliance Registry as of 9/28/2010
indicated that 2079 entities were registered for
NERC’s compliance program. Of these, 2057 were
identified as being U.S. entities. Staff concluded
that of the 2057 U.S. entities, only 1501 were
registered for at least one CIP related function.
According to an April 7, 2009 memo to industry,
NERC’s VP and Chief Security officer noted that
only 31% of entities responded to an earlier survey
and reported that they had at least one Critical
Asset, and only 23% reported having a Critical
Cyber Asset. Staff applied the 23% reporting to the
1501 figure to obtain an estimate. The 6 new
entities listed here are assumed to match a similar
set of 6 entities that would drop out in an existing
year. Thus, the net estimate of respondents remains
at 1501 per year.
6 This figure relates to NERC’s audit schedule
which requires NERC to engage in a compliance
Audit once every 3 to 5 years. For simplicity, staff
has divided the total number of hours by 3 to reflect
the amount of time annually spent preparing
documents. Staff assumed that each CIP audit or
spot check would require four individuals 6 weeks
to prepare and demonstrate compliance with CIP
standards for entities that have identified Critical
Cyber Assets. Staff estimated that entities that do
not have Critical Cyber Assets would still be
required to demonstrate compliance with CIP–002,
which would require one individual approximately
three days to execute.
7 This category of respondents (with the
corresponding burden) was not included in the 60day public notice due to an oversight by
Commission staff.
8 This cost category was not included in the 60day public notice due to an oversight by
Commission staff.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
19:53 Apr 06, 2011
Jkt 223001
Billing Rates and Practices Survey
Report.9 The $15.25 rate for storage
costs for each entity is an estimate based
on the average costs to service and store
1 GB of data to demonstrate compliance
with the CIP standards.10
The reporting burden includes the
total time, effort, or financial resources
expended to generate, maintain, retain,
disclose, or provide the information
including: (1) Reviewing instructions;
(2) developing, acquiring, installing, and
utilizing technology and systems for the
purposes of collecting, validating,
verifying, processing, maintaining,
disclosing and providing information;
(3) adjusting the existing ways to
comply with any previously applicable
instructions and requirements; (4)
training personnel to respond to a
collection of information; (5) searching
data sources; (6) completing and
reviewing the collection of information;
and (7) transmitting, or otherwise
disclosing the information.
Comments are invited on: (1) Whether
the proposed collection of information
is necessary for the proper performance
of the functions of the Commission,
including whether the information will
have practical utility; (2) the accuracy of
the agency’s estimates of the burden of
the proposed collection of information,
including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used; (3)
ways to enhance the quality, utility and
clarity of the information to be
collected; and (4) ways to minimize the
9 Bureau of Labor Statistics figures were obtained
from https://www.bls.gov/oes/current/naics2_
22.htm, and 2009 Billing Rates figure were obtained
from https://www.marylandlawyerblog.com/2009/
07/average_hourly_rate_for_lawyer.html. Legal
services were based on the national average billing
rate (contracting out) from the above report and BLS
hourly earnings (in-house personnel). It is assumed
that 25% of respondents have in-house legal
personnel.
10 Based on the aggregate cost of an IBM advanced
data protection server.
PO 00000
Frm 00028
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
burden of the collections of information
on those who are to respond, including
the use of appropriate automated,
electronic, mechanical, or other
technological collection techniques or
other forms of information technology,
e.g. permitting electronic submission of
responses.
Dated: March 31, 2011.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2011–8248 Filed 4–6–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission
[Project No. 2479–011]
Pacific Gas and Electric Company;
Notice of Application Accepted for
Filing, Soliciting Motions To Intervene
and Protests, Ready for Environmental
Analysis, and Soliciting Comments,
Recommendations, and Preliminary
Terms and Conditions
Take notice that the following
hydroelectric application has been filed
with the Commission and is available
for public inspection.
a. Type of Application: Subsequent
License—Transmission Line Only.
b. Project No.: P–2479–011.
c. Date filed: February 22, 2011.
d. Applicant: Pacific Gas and Electric
Company.
e. Name of Project: French Meadows
Transmission Line Project.
f. Location: The French Meadows
Transmission Line Project is located in
Placer County, California, within the
boundaries of the Eldorado and Tahoe
National Forests.
g. Filed Pursuant to: Federal Power
Act 16 U.S.C. 791(a)–825(r).
E:\FR\FM\07APN1.SGM
07APN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 67 (Thursday, April 7, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 19333-19334]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-8248]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. IC11-725B-001]
Commission Information Collection Activities (FERC-725B); Comment
Request; Submitted for OMB Review
AGENCY: Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, DOE.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: In compliance with the requirements of section 3507 of the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, 44 U.S.C. 3507, the Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission (Commission or FERC) has submitted the
information collection described below to the Office of Management and
Budget (OMB) for review of the information collection requirements. Any
interested person may file comments directly with OMB and should
address a copy of those comments to the Commission as explained below.
The Commission issued a Notice in the Federal Register (75 FR 65618,
10/26/https://www.nerc.com/page.php?cid=2|2010) requesting public comments. FERC received no comments on
the FERC-725B and has made this notation in its submission to OMB. OMB
only makes a decision after the 30-day comment period for this notice
has expired.
DATES: Comments on the collection of information are due by May 9,https://www.nerc.com/page.php?cid=2|20 2011.
ADDRESSES: Address comments on the collection of information to the
Office of Management and Budget, Office of Information and Regulatory
Affairs, Attention: Federal Energy Regulatory Commission Desk Officer.
Comments to OMB should be filed electronically, c/o oira__submission@omb.eop.gov and include OMB Control Number 1902-0248 for
reference. The Desk Officer may be reached by telephone athttps://www.nerc.com/page.php?cid=2|20 202-395-
4638.
A copy of the comments should also be sent to: Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission, Secretary of the Commission, 888 First Street,
NE., Washington, DChttps://www.nerc.com/page.php?cid=2|20 20426. Comments may be filed either on paper or on
CD/DVD, and should refer to Docket No. IC11-725B-001. Documents must be
prepared in an acceptable filing format and in compliance with
Commission submission guidelines at https://www.ferc.gov/help/submission-guide.asp. eFiling and eSubscription are not available for
Docket No. IC11-725B-001, due to a system issue.
All comments may be viewed, printed or downloaded remotely via the
Internet through FERC's homepage using the ``eLibrary'' link. For user
assistance, contact ferconlinesupport@ferc.gov or toll-free at (866)https://www.nerc.com/page.php?cid=2|20 208-3676, or for TTY, contact (https://www.nerc.com/page.php?cid=2|202) 502-8659.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ellen Brown may be reached by e-mail
at DataClearance@FERC.gov, by telephone at (https://www.nerc.com/page.php?cid=2|202) 502-8663, and by fax
at (https://www.nerc.com/page.php?cid=2|202) 273-0873.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The information collected by the FERC-725B,
Reliability Standards for Critical Infrastructure Protection (OMB
Control No. 1902-0248), is required to implement the statutory
provisions of section 215 of the Federal Power Act (FPA) (16 U.S.C.
824o). On January 18,https://www.nerc.com/page.php?cid=2|20 2008, the Commission issued order 706, approving
eight Critical Infrastructure Protection (CIP) Reliability Standards
submitted by the North American Electric Reliability Corporation (NERC)
for Commission approval.\1\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ CIP-002-1, CIP-003-1, CIP-004-1, CIP-005-1, CIP-006-1, CIP-
007-1, CIP-008-1, and CIP-009-1.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The CIP Reliability Standards require certain users, owners, and
operators of the Bulk-Power System to comply with specific requirements
to safeguard critical cyber assets.\2\ These standards help protect the
nation's Bulk-Power System against potential disruptions from cyber
attacks.\3\ The CIP Reliability Standards include one actual reporting
requirement and several recordkeeping requirements. Specifically, CIP-
008-1 requires responsible entities to report cyber security incidents
to the Electricity Sector-Information Sharing and Analysis Center (ES-
ISAC). In addition, the eight CIP Reliability Standards require
responsible entities to develop various policies, plans, programs, and
procedures.\4\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ In addition, in accordance with section 215(d)(5) of the
FPA, the Commission proposed to direct NERC to develop modifications
to the CIP Reliability Standards to address specific concerns
identified by the Commission.
\3\ For a description of the CIP Reliability Standards, see the
Critical Infrastructure Protection Section on NERC's Web site at
https://www.nerc.com/page.php?cid=2|20[verbarrm]https://www.nerc.com/page.php?cid=2|20.
\4\ The October notice issued in this docket contains more
information on the reporting requirements and can be found at https://elibrary.ferc.gov/idmws/File_list.asp?document_id=13857625. The
full text of the standards can be found on NERC's Web site at https://www.nerc.com/page.php?cid=2|20[verbarrm]https://www.nerc.com/page.php?cid=2|20.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The CIP Reliability Standards do not require a responsible entity
to report to the Commission, ERO or Regional Entities, the various
policies, plans, programs and procedures. However, a showing of the
documented policies, plans, programs and procedures is required to
demonstrate compliance with the CIP Reliability Standards.
Action: The Commission is requesting a three-year extension of the
existing collection with no changes to the requirements.
Burden Statement: The extent of the reporting burden is influenced
by the number of identified critical assets and related critical cyber
assets pursuant to CIP-002. An entity identifying one or more critical
cyber assets, including assets located at remote locations, will likely
require more resources to demonstrate compliance with the CIP
Reliability Standards compared to an entity that identifies no critical
assets. The Commission has developed
[[Page 19334]]
estimates using data from NERC's compliance registry as well as ahttps://www.nerc.com/page.php?cid=2|20 2009
survey that was conducted by NERC to asses the number of entities
reporting Critical Cyber Assets.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Average
Number of Average number of
Data collection respondents number of burden hours Total annual
\5\ responses per per response hours
respondent \6\
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(1) (2) (3) (1) x (2) x
(3)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FERC-725B:
Estimate of U.S. Entities that have 345 1 3https://www.nerc.com/page.php?cid=2|20 110,400
identified Critical Cyber Assets...........
Estimate of U.S. Entities that have not 1,156 1 8 9,248
identified Critical Cyber Assets...........
New U.S. Entities that have to come into *6 1 1,176 7,056
compliance with the CIP Standards \7\......
---------------------------------------------------------------
Totals.................................. 1,501 .............. .............. 126,704
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* not included in the 1,501 total because it is assumed that on average, six entities per year will no longer
have to comply with the CIP standards.
The total estimated annual cost burden to respondents is:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ The NERC Compliance Registry as of 9/28/https://www.nerc.com/page.php?cid=2|2010 indicated thathttps://www.nerc.com/page.php?cid=2|20 2079 entities were registered for NERC's compliance program. Of
these,https://www.nerc.com/page.php?cid=2|20 2057 were identified as being U.S. entities. Staff concluded
that of thehttps://www.nerc.com/page.php?cid=2|20 2057 U.S. entities, only 1501 were registered for at
least one CIP related function. According to an April 7,https://www.nerc.com/page.php?cid=2|20 2009 memo
to industry, NERC's VP and Chief Security officer noted that only
31% of entities responded to an earlier survey and reported that
they had at least one Critical Asset, and only 23% reported having a
Critical Cyber Asset. Staff applied the 23% reporting to the 1501
figure to obtain an estimate. The 6 new entities listed here are
assumed to match a similar set of 6 entities that would drop out in
an existing year. Thus, the net estimate of respondents remains at
1501 per year.
\6\ This figure relates to NERC's audit schedule which requires
NERC to engage in a compliance Audit once every 3 to 5 years. For
simplicity, staff has divided the total number of hours by 3 to
reflect the amount of time annually spent preparing documents. Staff
assumed that each CIP audit or spot check would require four
individuals 6 weeks to prepare and demonstrate compliance with CIP
standards for entities that have identified Critical Cyber Assets.
Staff estimated that entities that do not have Critical Cyber Assets
would still be required to demonstrate compliance with CIP-002,
which would require one individual approximately three days to
execute.
\7\ This category of respondents (with the corresponding burden)
was not included in the 60-day public notice due to an oversight by
Commission staff.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Entities that have identified Critical Assets = 110,400
hours@$96 = $10,598,400.
Entities that have not identified Critical Assets = 9,248
hours@$96 = $887,808.
Storage Costs for Entities that have identified Critical
Assets \8\ = 315 Entities@$15.25 = $4,804.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ This cost category was not included in the 60-day public
notice due to an oversight by Commission staff.
The hourly rate of $96 is the average cost of legal services ($230 per
hour), technical employees ($40 per hour) and administrative support
($18 per hour), based on hourly rates from the Bureau of Labor
Statistics (BLS) and thehttps://www.nerc.com/page.php?cid=2|20 2009 Billing Rates and Practices Survey
Report.\9\ The $15.25 rate for storage costs for each entity is an
estimate based on the average costs to service and store 1 GB of data
to demonstrate compliance with the CIP standards.\10\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\9\ Bureau of Labor Statistics figures were obtained from https://www.bls.gov/oes/current/naics2_22.htm, andhttps://www.nerc.com/page.php?cid=2|20 2009 Billing Rates
figure were obtained from https://www.nerc.com/page.php?cid=2|2009/07/average_hourly_rate_for_lawyer.html">https://www.marylandlawyerblog.com/https://www.nerc.com/page.php?cid=2|2009/07/average_hourly_rate_for_lawyer.html. Legal services were based
on the national average billing rate (contracting out) from the
above report and BLS hourly earnings (in-house personnel). It is
assumed that 25% of respondents have in-house legal personnel.
\10\ Based on the aggregate cost of an IBM advanced data
protection server.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The reporting burden includes the total time, effort, or financial
resources expended to generate, maintain, retain, disclose, or provide
the information including: (1) Reviewing instructions; (2) developing,
acquiring, installing, and utilizing technology and systems for the
purposes of collecting, validating, verifying, processing, maintaining,
disclosing and providing information; (3) adjusting the existing ways
to comply with any previously applicable instructions and requirements;
(4) training personnel to respond to a collection of information; (5)
searching data sources; (6) completing and reviewing the collection of
information; and (7) transmitting, or otherwise disclosing the
information.
Comments are invited on: (1) Whether the proposed collection of
information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of
the Commission, including whether the information will have practical
utility; (2) the accuracy of the agency's estimates of the burden of
the proposed collection of information, including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used; (3) ways to enhance the quality,
utility and clarity of the information to be collected; and (4) ways to
minimize the burden of the collections of information on those who are
to respond, including the use of appropriate automated, electronic,
mechanical, or other technological collection techniques or other forms
of information technology, e.g. permitting electronic submission of
responses.
Dated: March 31,https://www.nerc.com/page.php?cid=2|20 2011.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc.https://www.nerc.com/page.php?cid=2|20 2011-8248 Filed 4-6-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
