Safety Advisory 2011-01, 19518-19519 [2011-8232]
Download as PDF
19518
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 67 / Thursday, April 7, 2011 / Notices
during this period. In making a waiver
determination, the FAA will consider a
significant number of cancellations
during those periods because of weather
at a destination airport.
FAA Decision
In consideration of the foregoing,
ATA’s request for a grant of waiver is
DENIED. Carriers who were uniquely
affected by winter weather during
January and February 2011 may request
a limited grant of waiver. However, any
request must detail the hardship caused
by the snowstorms and demonstrate that
hardship was not caused or exacerbated
by underutilization of allocated slots.
The FAA will carefully consider these
individual requests for waiver.
Issued in Washington, DC on March 28,
2011.
J. David Grizzle,
Chief Counsel.
[FR Doc. 2011–8281 Filed 4–6–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
Notice of Intent to Rule on Request To
Release Airport Property at the
Northeast Philadelphia Airport (PNE),
Philadelphia, PA
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of request to release
airport property.
AGENCY:
The FAA proposes to rule and
invite public comment on the release of
land at the Northeast Philadelphia
Airport, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
under the provisions of Section 47125(a)
of Title 49 United States Code (U.S.C.).
DATES: Comments must be received on
or before May 9, 2011.
ADDRESSES: Comments on this
application may be mailed or delivered
to the following address: Joseph F.
Messina, Divisional Deputy City
Solicitor, City of Philadelphia Law
Department, Transportation Division,
One Parkway, 1515 Arch Street,
Philadelphia, PA 19102–1595 and at the
FAA Harrisburg Airports District Office:
Lori K. Pagnanelli, Manager, Harrisburg
Airports District Office, 3905 Hartzdale
Dr., Suite 508, Camp Hill, PA 17011.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Lori
Ledebohm, Community Planner,
Harrisburg Airports District Office
location listed above.
The request to release property may
be reviewed in person at this same
location.
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
19:53 Apr 06, 2011
Jkt 223001
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
railroad and railroad employees of the
importance of compliance with Federal
regulations and railroad operating rules
regarding rolling equipment being left in
a location that is clear of any adjacent
tracks. This safety advisory contains
various recommendations to railroads to
ensure that this issue is addressed by
appropriate policies and procedures,
and receives employee compliance.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ron
Hynes, Director, Office of Safety
Assurance and Compliance, Office of
Railroad Safety, FRA, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590,
telephone (202) 493–6404; or Joseph St.
Peter, Trial Attorney, Office of Chief
Counsel, FRA, 1200 New Jersey Avenue,
SE., Washington, DC 20590, telephone
(202) 493–6047.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
overall safety of railroad operations in
the area of equipment securement and
protection has improved in recent years.
However, two recent fatal incidents
highlight the need to review and adhere
to existing Federal regulations and
railroad operating rules pertaining to
rolling equipment being left in a
location that is clear of any adjacent
tracks.
On May 18, 2005, the Railroad Safety
Advisory Committee (RSAC) authorized
the RSAC Operating Rules Working
Group to address eight human factors
(HF) train accident report cause codes
that were attributed to nearly half (47
percent) of all HF-caused train accidents
nationwide. On February 13, 2008, FRA
published a final rule addressing those
HF causes, which was codified at Title
49 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR)
Part 218, Subpart F (Subpart F). Two of
those eight HF cause codes, H301 and
H302, were designated for rolling
equipment left out to foul. From 2005 to
2010, HF-caused train accidents,
attributed to these two cause codes,
were reduced by 66 percent.
Unfortunately, despite that overall
improvement, the rail industry
experienced two recent railroad
employee fatalities that appear to have
been related to equipment being left in
a location where it fouled an adjacent
track.
Federal Railroad Administration
Recent Incidents
The FAA
invites public comment on the request
to release property at the Northeast
Philadelphia Airport under the
provisions of Section 47125(a) of Title
49 U.S.C. On March 28, 2011, the FAA
determined that the request to release
property at the Northeast Philadelphia
Airport submitted by the City of
Philadelphia (City) met the procedural
requirements.
The following is a brief overview of
the request:
The City requests the release of real
property, totaling 3.5 acres, of
aeronautical airport property, to Biagio
DeSimone. The land was originally
purchased with City funds in 1945. The
purpose of the release is to sell the land
that was airport property to Biagio
DeSimone, the current tenant. The
property is located at 11295 E. Roosevelt
Boulevard. The Parcel is currently
leased to a tenant operating as a
dealership and is improved with a 6,225
square foot building being used by the
tenant in the operation of its automobile
dealership and a gravel parking lot for
customers of the dealership. The Parcel
is not contiguous to the area being
operated as the Northeast Philadelphia
Airport. The subject land does not serve
an aeronautical purpose and is not
needed for airport development, as
shown on the Airport Layout Plan. All
proceeds from the sale of property are
to be used for the capital development
of the airport. Fair Market Value (FMV)
will be obtained from the land sale and
reinvested back in the airport.
Any person may inspect the request
by appointment at the FAA office
address listed above. Interested persons
are invited to comment on the proposed
release from obligations. All comments
will be considered by the FAA to the
extent practicable.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Issued in Camp Hill, Pennsylvania, April 1,
2011.
Lori K. Pagnanelli,
Manager, Harrisburg Airports District Office.
[FR Doc. 2011–8268 Filed 4–6–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
Safety Advisory 2011–01
Federal Railroad
Administration (FRA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Notice of Safety Advisory;
equipment fouling adjacent tracks.
AGENCY:
FRA is issuing Safety
Advisory 2011–01 to remind each
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00212
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
The following is a discussion of the
circumstances surrounding two recent
fatal incidents, and is based only on
FRA’s preliminary investigations. The
incidents are still under investigation by
FRA. The causes and contributing
factors, if any, have not yet been
established. Therefore, nothing in this
safety advisory is intended to attribute
a cause to the incidents or place
E:\FR\FM\07APN1.SGM
07APN1
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 67 / Thursday, April 7, 2011 / Notices
responsibility for the incidents on the
acts or omissions of any person or
entity.
Two railroad employees, while each
riding the side of rolling equipment to
protect a shoving movement, were
fatally injured (in separate incidents)
when the equipment they were riding
struck other equipment that was left out
to foul. A common factor in both
accidents was that the equipment was
left in a location where it fouled an
adjacent track by the very employees
who were involved in the incidents.
The first incident occurred on
September 2, 2010, in Bridgeport, New
Jersey, when a conventional two-person
switching crew was shoving rolling
equipment into an industrial facility.
The locomotive engineer was in the
locomotive control compartment and
the conductor was positioned on the
leading end of a tank car directing the
shoving move. The conductor had one
foot on the end platform and the other
on the side ladder tread as he began to
pass a tank car that he had spotted at
that location the previous day.
Unfortunately, the car had been left in
the foul of the adjacent track and the
cars struck each other; the conductor
sustained fatal injuries.
The second incident occurred on
February 8, 2011, in Kankakee, Illinois.
A conventional switching crew that
consisted of a conductor, engineer, and
a conductor-in-training was switching
cars on a switching lead track and using
various other yard tracks. The crew had
left a car on one of the yard tracks in
a location where it was in the foul of an
adjacent track. Shortly thereafter, the
conductor and conductor-in-training
boarded opposite sides of the leading
end of a gondola car and began a
shoving movement. Subsequently, the
side of the gondola on which the
conductor was riding struck the car that
was previously left in the foul of the
adjacent track. The conductor was
crushed between the two cars and
sustained fatal injuries.
Although the preponderance of
incidents involving equipment that is
left in the foul of an adjacent track
fortunately only result in railroad
property damage, the potential for
injury or death in such instances is
always present. By issuing this safety
advisory, FRA is reminding all
stakeholders of the importance of
situational awareness and compliance
with all applicable operating and safety
rules, particularly those related to
leaving rolling equipment in a location
that is clear of adjacent tracks.
FRA Action: Despite the significant
reduction in train accidents caused by
equipment being left in the foul of an
VerDate Mar<15>2010
19:53 Apr 06, 2011
Jkt 223001
adjacent track, a review of FRA’s
inspection data relative to 49 CFR
218.101 indicates a disturbing trend.
From calendar year (CY) 2009 to CY
2010, violations of 49 CFR 218.101
recommended for prosecution by FRA
inspectors increased 124 percent. Based
on the results of inspection data for the
first 2 months of 2011, if trends
continue, violations recommended for
prosecution in 2011 versus 2010 would
increase by an additional 81 percent.
Whether the increase in violations is
due to greater vigilance by FRA or is
due to an actual increase in the number
of instances where equipment is being
left in such locations, FRA intends to
ensure that railroads take necessary
steps to prevent and reduce the
potential trend indicated by the
statistics noted above.
Over the next several months, FRA
intends to increase its inspection
activity to focus on compliance with
railroad operating rules that address all
of the requirements contained in
Subpart F. Particular emphasis will be
placed on the requirements contained in
49 CFR 218.101. FRA will also focus its
inspection efforts on railroad
operational testing activity, particularly
as it relates to Subpart F. FRA strongly
encourages railroad industry members
to reemphasize the importance of
leaving equipment in the clear as
frequently as possible, and to take such
other actions as may help ensure safety
on the Nation’s railroads.
Recommended Railroad Action: In
light of the recent accidents discussed
above, and in an effort to maintain the
safety of railroad employees on the
Nation’s rail system, FRA recommends
that railroads:
(1) Review with employees the
circumstances of the two most recent
fatal incidents;
(2) Reinstruct supervisors and
employees on the operating and safety
rules applicable to leaving rolling
equipment in a location that is clear of
adjacent tracks. Particular emphasis
should be placed on the procedures that
enable employees to identify clearance
points and the means to identify
locations where clearance points will
not permit a person to safely ride on the
side of a car;
(3) Increase operational testing on
those operating and safety rules that
pertain to leaving rolling equipment in
a location that is clear of adjacent tracks;
and
(4) Review current job briefing
procedures among coworkers and
determine if the procedures are
sufficient to encourage more effective
communication regarding switching
activities, specifically as the procedures
PO 00000
Frm 00213
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
19519
relate to the positioning of rolling
equipment so that the equipment is in
a location that is clear of adjacent tracks.
FRA encourages railroad industry
members to take action that is consistent
with the preceding recommendations
and to take other actions to help ensure
the safety of the Nation’s railroad
employees. FRA may modify this Safety
Advisory 2011–01, issue additional
safety advisories, or take other
appropriate action necessary to ensure
the highest level of safety on the
Nation’s railroads, including pursing
other corrective measures under its rail
safety authority.
Issued in Washington, DC, on April 1,
2011.
Jo Strang,
Associate Administrator for Railroad Safety/
Chief Safety Officer.
[FR Doc. 2011–8232 Filed 4–6–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–06–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Transit Administration
Intent To Prepare an Environmental
Impact Statement for the Downtown
San Francisco Ferry Terminal
Expansion Project in the City and
County of San Francisco, CA
Federal Transit Administration
(FTA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of intent to prepare an
environmental impact statement (EIS).
AGENCY:
The FTA, as the lead Federal
agency, and the San Francisco Bay Area
Water Emergency Transportation
Authority (WETA) are planning to
prepare an EIS for the proposed
expansion and improvements to the
Downtown San Francisco Ferry
Terminal at the Port of San Francisco
Ferry Building. The proposed project
would serve commuters, visitors, and
recreational users desiring an alternative
way to cross San Francisco Bay, and
reach nearby employment,
entertainment, and recreational
destinations in San Francisco. The
project expands the number of ferry
gates and improves ferry patron
circulation, boarding, and wayfinding in
and around the Ferry Building. In
addition, the project enhances
emergency response capabilities to
evacuate people from San Francisco
and/or mobilize first responders to San
Francisco via ferries if a catastrophic
event occurs. The EIS will be prepared
in accordance with Section 102(2)C of
the National Environmental Policy Act
of 1969 (NEPA) and pursuant to the
Council on the Environmental Quality’s
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\07APN1.SGM
07APN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 67 (Thursday, April 7, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 19518-19519]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-8232]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Railroad Administration
Safety Advisory 2011-01
AGENCY: Federal Railroad Administration (FRA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Notice of Safety Advisory; equipment fouling adjacent tracks.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: FRA is issuing Safety Advisory 2011-01 to remind each railroad
and railroad employees of the importance of compliance with Federal
regulations and railroad operating rules regarding rolling equipment
being left in a location that is clear of any adjacent tracks. This
safety advisory contains various recommendations to railroads to ensure
that this issue is addressed by appropriate policies and procedures,
and receives employee compliance.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ron Hynes, Director, Office of Safety
Assurance and Compliance, Office of Railroad Safety, FRA, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590, telephone (202) 493-6404; or
Joseph St. Peter, Trial Attorney, Office of Chief Counsel, FRA, 1200
New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590, telephone (202) 493-6047.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The overall safety of railroad operations in
the area of equipment securement and protection has improved in recent
years. However, two recent fatal incidents highlight the need to review
and adhere to existing Federal regulations and railroad operating rules
pertaining to rolling equipment being left in a location that is clear
of any adjacent tracks.
On May 18, 2005, the Railroad Safety Advisory Committee (RSAC)
authorized the RSAC Operating Rules Working Group to address eight
human factors (HF) train accident report cause codes that were
attributed to nearly half (47 percent) of all HF-caused train accidents
nationwide. On February 13, 2008, FRA published a final rule addressing
those HF causes, which was codified at Title 49 Code of Federal
Regulations (CFR) Part 218, Subpart F (Subpart F). Two of those eight
HF cause codes, H301 and H302, were designated for rolling equipment
left out to foul. From 2005 to 2010, HF-caused train accidents,
attributed to these two cause codes, were reduced by 66 percent.
Unfortunately, despite that overall improvement, the rail industry
experienced two recent railroad employee fatalities that appear to have
been related to equipment being left in a location where it fouled an
adjacent track.
Recent Incidents
The following is a discussion of the circumstances surrounding two
recent fatal incidents, and is based only on FRA's preliminary
investigations. The incidents are still under investigation by FRA. The
causes and contributing factors, if any, have not yet been established.
Therefore, nothing in this safety advisory is intended to attribute a
cause to the incidents or place
[[Page 19519]]
responsibility for the incidents on the acts or omissions of any person
or entity.
Two railroad employees, while each riding the side of rolling
equipment to protect a shoving movement, were fatally injured (in
separate incidents) when the equipment they were riding struck other
equipment that was left out to foul. A common factor in both accidents
was that the equipment was left in a location where it fouled an
adjacent track by the very employees who were involved in the
incidents.
The first incident occurred on September 2, 2010, in Bridgeport,
New Jersey, when a conventional two-person switching crew was shoving
rolling equipment into an industrial facility. The locomotive engineer
was in the locomotive control compartment and the conductor was
positioned on the leading end of a tank car directing the shoving move.
The conductor had one foot on the end platform and the other on the
side ladder tread as he began to pass a tank car that he had spotted at
that location the previous day. Unfortunately, the car had been left in
the foul of the adjacent track and the cars struck each other; the
conductor sustained fatal injuries.
The second incident occurred on February 8, 2011, in Kankakee,
Illinois. A conventional switching crew that consisted of a conductor,
engineer, and a conductor-in-training was switching cars on a switching
lead track and using various other yard tracks. The crew had left a car
on one of the yard tracks in a location where it was in the foul of an
adjacent track. Shortly thereafter, the conductor and conductor-in-
training boarded opposite sides of the leading end of a gondola car and
began a shoving movement. Subsequently, the side of the gondola on
which the conductor was riding struck the car that was previously left
in the foul of the adjacent track. The conductor was crushed between
the two cars and sustained fatal injuries.
Although the preponderance of incidents involving equipment that is
left in the foul of an adjacent track fortunately only result in
railroad property damage, the potential for injury or death in such
instances is always present. By issuing this safety advisory, FRA is
reminding all stakeholders of the importance of situational awareness
and compliance with all applicable operating and safety rules,
particularly those related to leaving rolling equipment in a location
that is clear of adjacent tracks.
FRA Action: Despite the significant reduction in train accidents
caused by equipment being left in the foul of an adjacent track, a
review of FRA's inspection data relative to 49 CFR 218.101 indicates a
disturbing trend. From calendar year (CY) 2009 to CY 2010, violations
of 49 CFR 218.101 recommended for prosecution by FRA inspectors
increased 124 percent. Based on the results of inspection data for the
first 2 months of 2011, if trends continue, violations recommended for
prosecution in 2011 versus 2010 would increase by an additional 81
percent. Whether the increase in violations is due to greater vigilance
by FRA or is due to an actual increase in the number of instances where
equipment is being left in such locations, FRA intends to ensure that
railroads take necessary steps to prevent and reduce the potential
trend indicated by the statistics noted above.
Over the next several months, FRA intends to increase its
inspection activity to focus on compliance with railroad operating
rules that address all of the requirements contained in Subpart F.
Particular emphasis will be placed on the requirements contained in 49
CFR 218.101. FRA will also focus its inspection efforts on railroad
operational testing activity, particularly as it relates to Subpart F.
FRA strongly encourages railroad industry members to reemphasize the
importance of leaving equipment in the clear as frequently as possible,
and to take such other actions as may help ensure safety on the
Nation's railroads.
Recommended Railroad Action: In light of the recent accidents
discussed above, and in an effort to maintain the safety of railroad
employees on the Nation's rail system, FRA recommends that railroads:
(1) Review with employees the circumstances of the two most recent
fatal incidents;
(2) Reinstruct supervisors and employees on the operating and
safety rules applicable to leaving rolling equipment in a location that
is clear of adjacent tracks. Particular emphasis should be placed on
the procedures that enable employees to identify clearance points and
the means to identify locations where clearance points will not permit
a person to safely ride on the side of a car;
(3) Increase operational testing on those operating and safety
rules that pertain to leaving rolling equipment in a location that is
clear of adjacent tracks; and
(4) Review current job briefing procedures among coworkers and
determine if the procedures are sufficient to encourage more effective
communication regarding switching activities, specifically as the
procedures relate to the positioning of rolling equipment so that the
equipment is in a location that is clear of adjacent tracks.
FRA encourages railroad industry members to take action that is
consistent with the preceding recommendations and to take other actions
to help ensure the safety of the Nation's railroad employees. FRA may
modify this Safety Advisory 2011-01, issue additional safety
advisories, or take other appropriate action necessary to ensure the
highest level of safety on the Nation's railroads, including pursing
other corrective measures under its rail safety authority.
Issued in Washington, DC, on April 1, 2011.
Jo Strang,
Associate Administrator for Railroad Safety/Chief Safety Officer.
[FR Doc. 2011-8232 Filed 4-6-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-06-P