Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Model A300 B4-600, B4-600R, and F4-600R Series Airplanes, and Model C4-605R Variant F Airplanes (Collectively Called A300-600 Series Airplanes), 18960-18964 [2011-8198]
Download as PDF
18960
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 66 / Wednesday, April 6, 2011 / Proposed Rules
(2) Do a detailed inspection for cracks of
the joint extrusion of the upper and lower
transcowl assembly on the left and right
engines at the location of the joint piece. If
no cracks are found, close the cowlings on
the left and right engines.
(3) If any crack is found on one or more
transcowl assemblies during the inspection
required by paragraph (h)(2) of this AD,
before further flight, repair and reinforce the
cracked part(s) in accordance with paragraph
(i)(1) of this AD.
Note 1: Procedure-Part 3 of Task 05–51–
27–210–801 of Part 2, Volume 1, of the
Bombardier CRJ Series Regional Jet AMM,
CSP B–001, Revision 34, dated November 20,
2010, gives guidance for opening and closing
the cowling on the left and right engines.
(i) For transcowl assemblies identified in
paragraph (g)(2) of this AD: Except as
required by paragraph (h) of this AD, within
5,000 flight hours or 24 months after the
effective date of this AD, whichever comes
first, do a detailed inspection for cracking on
each transcowl assembly, in accordance with
the Accomplishment Instructions of
Bombardier Service Bulletin 670BA–78–008,
Revision B, dated December 22, 2010; or
Bombardier Service Bulletin 670SH–78–029,
Revision C, dated November 10, 2010.
Accomplishment of the actions specified in
paragraph (i)(1) or (i)(2) of this AD for all
transcowl assemblies identified in paragraph
(g)(2) of this AD terminates the requirements
of paragraph (h) of this AD.
(1) If any cracking of the joint extrusion is
found, before further flight, repair and
reinforce the joint extrusion on each
transcowl assembly, in accordance with the
Accomplishment Instructions of Bombardier
Service Bulletin 670BA–78–008, Revision B,
dated December 22, 2010; or Bombardier
Service Bulletin 670SH–78–029, Revision C,
dated November 10, 2010.
(2) If no cracking is found, before further
flight, reinforce the joint extrusion on each
transcowl assembly, in accordance with the
Accomplishment Instructions of Bombardier
Service Bulletin 670BA–78–008, Revision B,
dated December 22, 2010; or Bombardier
Service Bulletin 670SH–78–029, Revision C,
dated November 10, 2010.
Credit for Actions Accomplished in
Accordance with Previous Service
Information
(j) Inspections, repairs, and reinforcement
of the joint extrusion on each transcowl is
also acceptable for compliance with the
corresponding requirements of paragraph (i)
of this AD if done before the effective date
of this AD in accordance with the service
information listed in table 1 of this AD.
TABLE 1—SERVICE INFORMATION
Document
Bombardier
Bombardier
Bombardier
Bombardier
Bombardier
Service
Service
Service
Service
Service
Bulletin
Bulletin
Bulletin
Bulletin
Bulletin
670BA–78–008
670BA–78–008
670SH–78–029
670SH–78–029
670SH–78–029
Revision
.......................................................
.......................................................
.......................................................
.......................................................
.......................................................
Parts Installation
(k) As of the effective date of this AD, no
replacement or spare transcowl assembly
having P/N CN624–2001–XXX or KCN624–
2001–X (XXX and X mean various dash
numbers), with S/N SB0964 or lower, may be
installed on any airplane, except for a
transcowl assembly on which any repair
listed in paragraph 1.D. of Bombardier
Service Bulletin 670BA–78–008, Revision B,
dated December 22, 2010, or paragraph 1.A.
of Bombardier Service Bulletin 670SH–78–
029, Revision C, dated November 10, 2010,
has been done; and except for a transcowl
that has been inspected as specified in
paragraph (i) of this AD and all applicable
actions specified in paragraph (i)(1) or (i)(2)
of this AD, as applicable, have been done.
FAA AD Differences
Note 2: This AD differs from the MCAI
and/or service information as follows: No
differences.
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with PROPOSALS-1
Other FAA AD Provisions
(l) The following provisions also apply to
this AD:
(1) Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs): The Manager, New York Aircraft
Certification Office, ANE–170, FAA, has the
authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if
requested using the procedures found in 14
CFR 39.19. Send information to ATTN:
Program Manager, Continuing Operational
Safety, 1600 Stewart Avenue, Suite 40,
Westbury, N.Y. 11590; telephone 516–228–
7300; fax 516–794–5531. Before using any
approved AMOC, notify your appropriate
principal inspector, or lacking a principal
inspector, the manager of the local flight
standards district office/certificate holding
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:34 Apr 05, 2011
Jkt 223001
Date
Original ..................................................
A ............................................................
Original ..................................................
A ............................................................
B ............................................................
September 19, 2008.
July 10, 2009.
July 3, 2008.
June 30, 2009.
November 25, 2009.
district office. The AMOC approval letter
must specifically reference this AD.
(2) Airworthy Product: For any
requirement in this AD to obtain corrective
actions from a manufacturer or other source,
use these actions if they are FAA-approved.
Corrective actions are considered FAAapproved if they are approved by the State
of Design Authority (or their delegated
agent). You are required to assure the product
is airworthy before it is returned to service.
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2011–0264; Directorate
Identifier 2009–NM–244–AD]
RIN 2120–AA64
Related Information
(m) Refer to MCAI Canadian Airworthiness
Directive CF–2009–33, dated July 28, 2009;
Bombardier Service Bulletin 670BA–78–008,
Revision B, dated December 22, 2010; and
Bombardier Service Bulletin 670SH–78–029,
Revision C, dated November 10, 2010; for
related information.
Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Model
A300 B4–600, B4–600R, and F4–600R
Series Airplanes, and Model C4–605R
Variant F Airplanes (Collectively Called
A300–600 Series Airplanes)
AGENCY:
Issued in Renton, Washington, on March
24, 2011.
Ali Bahrami,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate,
Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2011–8197 Filed 4–5–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
PO 00000
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM).
We propose to adopt a new
airworthiness directive (AD) for the
products listed above that would
supersede an existing AD. This
proposed AD results from mandatory
continuing airworthiness information
(MCAI) originated by an aviation
authority of another country to identify
and correct an unsafe condition on an
aviation product. The MCAI describes
the unsafe condition as:
SUMMARY:
[T]he FAA has published SFAR 88 (Special
Federal Aviation Regulation 88). * * *
Under this regulation, all holders of type
certificates for passenger transport aeroplanes
* * * are required to conduct a design
review against explosion risks. The
replacement of some types of P-clips and
Frm 00007
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
E:\FR\FM\06APP1.SGM
06APP1
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 66 / Wednesday, April 6, 2011 / Proposed Rules
improvement of the electrical bonding of the
equipment in the fuel tanks [were] are
rendered mandatory * * *.
*
*
*
*
*
Subsequently, an internal review * * * led
* * * to * * * an additional check [for blue
coat] of the bonding points in the centre tank.
* * *
More recently, another internal review
[introduced] additional work [installing
bonding points] for aeroplanes under
Configuration 03 * * * and additional work
[bonding the fuel jettison system—blanking
plates] on the wing tanks for aeroplanes
under Configuration 07 * * *.
The unsafe condition is damage to
wiring in the wing, center, and trim fuel
tanks, due to failed P-clips used for
retaining the wiring and pipes, which
could result in a possible fuel ignition
source in the wing, center, or trim fuel
tanks. The proposed AD would require
actions that are intended to address the
unsafe condition described in the MCAI.
DATES: We must receive comments on
this proposed AD by May 23, 2011.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments by
any of the following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• Fax: (202) 493–2251.
• Mail: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M–
30, West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE.,
Washington, DC 20590.
• Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M–
30, West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12–40, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE.,
Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays.
For service information identified in
this proposed AD, contact Airbus SAS—
EAW (Airworthiness Office), 1 Rond
Point Maurice Bellonte, 31707 Blagnac
Cedex, France; telephone +33 5 61 93 36
96; fax +33 5 61 93 44 51; e-mail:
account.airworth-eas@airbus.com;
Internet https://www.airbus.com. You
may review copies of the referenced
service information at the FAA,
Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601
Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington.
For information on the availability of
this material at the FAA, call 425–227–
1221.
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with PROPOSALS-1
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on
the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov; or in person at the
Docket Operations office between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays. The AD docket
contains this proposed AD, the
regulatory evaluation, any comments
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:34 Apr 05, 2011
Jkt 223001
received, and other information. The
street address for the Docket Operations
office (telephone (800) 647–5527) is in
the ADDRESSES section. Comments will
be available in the AD docket shortly
after receipt.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dan
Rodina, Aerospace Engineer,
International Branch, ANM–116,
Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA,
1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton,
Washington 98057–3356; telephone
(425) 227–2125; fax (425) 227–1149.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
We invite you to send any written
relevant data, views, or arguments about
this proposed AD. Send your comments
to an address listed under the
ADDRESSES section. Include ‘‘Docket No.
FAA–2011–0264; Directorate Identifier
2009–NM–244–AD’’ at the beginning of
your comments. We specifically invite
comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy
aspects of this proposed AD. We will
consider all comments received by the
closing date and may amend this
proposed AD based on those comments.
We will post all comments we
receive, without change, to https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each
substantive verbal contact we receive
about this proposed AD.
Discussion
On January 18, 2008, we issued AD
2008–03–04, Amendment 39–15353 (73
FR 5731, January 31, 2008). That AD
required actions intended to address an
unsafe condition on the products listed
above.
Since we issued AD 2008–03–04,
internal reviews by the manufacturer
have shown that additional work is
necessary on the center and wing fuel
tanks. The European Aviation Safety
Agency (EASA), which is the Technical
Agent for the Member States of the
European Community, has issued EASA
Airworthiness Directive 2010–0074,
dated April 16, 2010 (referred to after
this as ‘‘the MCAI’’), to correct an unsafe
condition for the specified products.
The MCAI states:
[T]he FAA has published SFAR 88 (Special
Federal Aviation Regulation 88). In their
letters referenced 04/00/02/07/01–L296,
dated 04 March 2002, and 04/00/02/07/03–
L024, dated 03 February 2003, the JAA
recommended the application of a similar
regulation to the National Aviation
Authorities (NAA).
Under this regulation, all holders of type
certificates for passenger transport aeroplanes
with either a passenger capacity of 30 or
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
18961
more, or a payload capacity of 3,402 kg
(7,500 lbs) or more which have received their
certification since 01 January 1958, are
required to conduct a design review against
explosion risks. The replacement of some
types of P-clips and improvement of the
electrical bonding of the equipment in the
fuel tasks are rendered mandatory by this
AD.
Initially, EASA AD 2006–0325, which
addressed the same unsafe condition, also
applied to A300–600 aeroplanes. Airbus
subsequently introduced additional work at
Revision 1 of SB A300–28–6064 [dated April
3, 2007] applicable to A300–600 aeroplanes.
As a result, EASA AD 2006–0325 was revised
to remove A300–600 aeroplanes from the
applicability, and concurrently EASA AD
2007–0233 was issued, applicable to A300–
600 aeroplanes. Unfortunately, the
‘Applicability’ section of EASA AD 2007–
0233 was not correctly defined, erroneously
deleting one modification in the combination
that would exclude aeroplanes from having
to comply. Consequently, the AD 2007–0283
was issued, requiring the same actions as AD
2007–0233, which was superseded, but
expanded the group of aeroplanes to which
AD 2007–0283 applied [FAA AD 2008–03–04
corresponds with EASA AD 2007–0283].
Subsequently, an internal review of Airbus
SB A300–28–6064 led the manufacturer to
correct the figures of the SB. In particular, an
additional check [for blue coat] of the
bonding points in the centre tank was
introduced in Revision 03 of Airbus SB
A300–28–6064 [dated December 15, 2008],
prompting EASA to issue AD 2009–0143.
More recently, another internal review of
Airbus SB A300–28–6064 again resulted in
corrected figures in the SB. Additional work
on the center tank [installing bonding points]
for aeroplanes under Configuration 03 (as
defined in the SB [Service Bulletin A300–28–
6064, Revision 04, dated August 24, 2009])
and additional work [bonding the fuel
jettison system—blanking plates] on the wing
tanks for aeroplanes under Configuration 07
have been introduced in Revision 04 of
Airbus SB A300–28–6064 [dated August 24,
2009].
For the reason described above, this new
AD retains the requirements of EASA AD
2009–0143, which is superseded, and
requires the additional work introduced in
Revision 04 of Airbus SB A300–28–6064
[dated August 24, 2009].
The unsafe condition is damage to
wiring in the wing, center, and trim fuel
tanks, due to failed P-clips used for
retaining the wiring and pipes, which
could result in a possible fuel ignition
source in the wing, center, or trim fuel
tanks. The required actions also include
checking the electrical bonding points
of certain equipment in the center fuel
tank for the presence of a blue coat and
doing related investigative and
corrective actions if necessary. The
related investigative action is to
measure the electrical resistance
between the equipment and structure, if
a blue coat is not present. The corrective
action is to electrically bond the
E:\FR\FM\06APP1.SGM
06APP1
18962
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 66 / Wednesday, April 6, 2011 / Proposed Rules
equipment, if the measured resistance is
greater than 10 milliohms. You may
obtain further information by examining
the MCAI in the AD docket.
We have also revised paragraphs (f)(4)
and (f)(5) of AD 2008–03–04 (reidentified as paragraphs (g)(6) and (g)(7)
in this NPRM) by replacing the term
‘‘service bulletin’’ with the full service
bulletin citation.
Relevant Service Information
Airbus has issued Mandatory Service
Bulletins A300–28–6064, Revision 03,
dated December 15, 2008; and Revision
04, dated August 24, 2009. The actions
described in this service information are
intended to correct the unsafe condition
identified in the MCAI.
FAA’s Determination and Requirements
of This Proposed AD
This product has been approved by
the aviation authority of another
country, and is approved for operation
in the United States. Pursuant to our
bilateral agreement with the State of
Design Authority, we have been notified
of the unsafe condition described in the
MCAI and service information
referenced above. We are proposing this
AD because we evaluated all pertinent
information and determined an unsafe
condition exists and is likely to exist or
develop on other products of the same
type design.
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with PROPOSALS-1
Differences Between This AD and the
MCAI or Service Information
We have reviewed the MCAI and
related service information and, in
general, agree with their substance. But
we might have found it necessary to use
different words from those in the MCAI
to ensure the AD is clear for U.S.
operators and is enforceable. In making
these changes, we do not intend to differ
substantively from the information
provided in the MCAI and related
service information.
We might also have proposed
different actions in this AD from those
in the MCAI in order to follow FAA
policies. Any such differences are
highlighted in a Note within the
proposed AD.
Costs of Compliance
Based on the service information, we
estimate that this proposed AD would
affect about 125 products of U.S.
registry.
The actions that are required by AD
2008–03–04 and retained in this
proposed AD take about 632 work-hours
per product, at an average labor rate of
$85 per work hour. Required parts cost
about $6,870 per product. Based on
these figures, the estimated cost of the
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:34 Apr 05, 2011
Jkt 223001
currently required actions is $60,590 per
product.
We estimate that it would take about
9 work-hours per product to comply
with the new basic requirements of this
proposed AD. The average labor rate is
$85 per work-hour. Required parts
would cost about $100 per product.
Where the service information lists
required parts costs that are covered
under warranty, we have assumed that
there will be no charge for these costs.
As we do not control warranty coverage
for affected parties, some parties may
incur costs higher than estimated here.
Based on these figures, we estimate the
cost of the proposed AD on U.S.
operators to be $108,125, or $865 per
product.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code
specifies the FAA’s authority to issue
rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I,
section 106, describes the authority of
the FAA Administrator. ‘‘Subtitle VII:
Aviation Programs,’’ describes in more
detail the scope of the Agency’s
authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under
the authority described in ‘‘Subtitle VII,
Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701:
General requirements.’’ Under that
section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in
air commerce by prescribing regulations
for practices, methods, and procedures
the Administrator finds necessary for
safety in air commerce. This regulation
is within the scope of that authority
because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on
products identified in this rulemaking
action.
Regulatory Findings
We determined that this proposed AD
would not have federalism implications
under Executive Order 13132. This
proposed AD would not have a
substantial direct effect on the States, on
the relationship between the national
Government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I
certify this proposed regulation:
1. Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ under Executive Order 12866;
2. Is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under the
DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures
(44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and
3. Will not have a significant
economic impact, positive or negative,
on a substantial number of small entities
under the criteria of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act.
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
We prepared a regulatory evaluation
of the estimated costs to comply with
this proposed AD and placed it in the
AD docket.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation
safety, Incorporation by reference,
Safety.
The Proposed Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority
delegated to me by the Administrator,
the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part
39 as follows:
PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS
DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39
continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
§ 39.13
[Amended]
2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by
removing Amendment 39–15353 (73 FR
5731, January 31, 2008) and adding the
following new AD:
Airbus: Docket No. FAA–2011–0264;
Directorate Identifier 2009–NM–244–AD.
Comments Due Date
(a) We must receive comments by May 23,
2011.
Affected ADs
(b) This AD supersedes AD 2008–03–04,
Amendment 39–15353.
Applicability
(c) This AD applies to the airplanes
identified in paragraphs (c)(1) and (c)(2) of
this AD.
(1) Airbus Model A300 B4–601, B4–603,
B4–620, and B4–622 airplanes (without trim
tank), all serial numbers, certificated in any
category, except airplanes on which Airbus
Modifications 12226, 12365, 12490, and
12308 have been incorporated in production,
or Airbus Mandatory Service Bulletin A300–
28–6064, Revision 04, dated August 24, 2009;
and Airbus Service Bulletin A300–28–6068,
dated July 20, 2005; have been performed in
service.
(2) Airbus Model A300 B4–605R, B4–622R,
F4–605R, and F4–622R airplanes and A300
C4–605R Variant F airplanes (fitted with a
trim tank), all serial numbers, certificated in
any category, except airplanes on which
Airbus Modifications 12226, 12365, 12490,
12308, 12294, and 12476 have been
incorporated in production, or on which the
service bulletins listed in paragraphs (c)(2)(i),
(c)(2)(ii), and (c)(2)(iii) of this AD have been
performed in service.
(i) Airbus Mandatory Service Bulletin
A300–28–6064, Revision 03, dated December
15, 2008.
(ii) Airbus Service Bulletin A300–28–6068,
dated July 20, 2005.
(iii) Airbus Service Bulletin A300–28–
6077, dated July 25, 2005; or A300–28–6077,
Revision 01, dated October 26, 2006.
E:\FR\FM\06APP1.SGM
06APP1
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 66 / Wednesday, April 6, 2011 / Proposed Rules
Subject
(d) Air Transport Association (ATA) of
America Code 28: Fuel.
Reason
(e) The mandatory continuing
airworthiness information (MCAI) states:
[T]he FAA has published SFAR 88 (Special
Federal Aviation Regulation 88). * * *
Under this regulation, all holders of type
certificates for passenger transport aeroplanes
* * * are required to conduct a design
review against explosion risks. The
replacement of some types of P-clips and
improvement of the electrical bonding of the
equipment in the fuel tanks [were] are
rendered mandatory * * *.
*
*
*
*
*
Subsequently, an internal review * * * led
* * * to * * * an additional check [for blue
coat] of the bonding points in the centre tank.
* * *
More recently, another internal review
[introduced] additional work [installing
bonding points] for aeroplanes under
Configuration 03 * * * and additional work
[bonding the fuel jettison system—blanking
plates] on the wing tanks for aeroplanes
under Configuration 07 * * *.
The unsafe condition is damage to wiring
in the wing, center, and trim fuel tanks, due
to failed P-clips used for retaining the wiring
and pipes, which could result in a possible
fuel ignition source in the wing, center, or
trim fuel tanks.
Compliance
(f) You are responsible for having the
actions required by this AD performed within
the compliance times specified, unless the
actions have already been done.
Restatement of Requirements of AD 2008–
03–04 With Revised Service Information
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with PROPOSALS-1
Actions and Compliance
(g) For airplanes identified in paragraphs
(g)(1) and (g)(2) of this AD: Within 40 months
after March 6, 2008 (the effective date of AD
2008–03–04), unless already done, do the
applicable actions required by paragraphs
(g)(3), (g)(4), and (g)(5) of this AD.
(1) Airbus Model A300 B4–600 series
airplanes (without trim tank), all serial
numbers, except airplanes on which Airbus
Modifications 12226, 12365, 12490, and
12308 have been incorporated in production,
or Airbus Service Bulletins A300–28–6064,
Revision 01, dated April 3, 2007; and A300–
28–6068, dated July 20, 2005; have been
performed in service.
(2) Airbus Model A300 B4–600R, A300 C4–
600R, and A300 F4–600R series airplanes
(fitted with a trim tank), all serial numbers,
except airplanes on which Airbus
Modifications 12226, 12365, 12490, 12308,
12294, and 12476 have been incorporated in
production, or on which the service bulletins
listed in paragraphs (g)(2)(i), (g)(2)(ii), and
(g)(2)(iii) of this AD have been performed in
service.
(i) Airbus Service Bulletin A300–28–6064,
Revision 01, dated April 3, 2007.
(ii) Airbus Service Bulletin A300–28–6068,
dated July 20, 2005.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:34 Apr 05, 2011
Jkt 223001
(iii) Airbus Service Bulletin A300–28–
6077, dated July 25, 2005; or A300–28–6077,
Revision 01, dated October 26, 2006.
(3) Remove NSA5516–XXND or NSA5516–
XXNJ type P-clips, used in the wing and
center fuel tanks to retain wiring and pipes,
and replace them by NSA5516–XXNF type Pclips in accordance with the instructions of
Airbus Service Bulletin A300–28–6068,
dated July 20, 2005.
(4) Check the electrical bonding points in
the center tank and do all applicable related
investigative and corrective actions, and
install additional bonding leads and
electrical bonding points in the wing and
center fuel tanks in accordance with the
instructions of Airbus Service Bulletin A300–
28–6064, Revision 01, dated April 3, 2007;
Airbus Mandatory Service Bulletin A300–28–
6064, Revision 02, dated March 10, 2008;
Airbus Mandatory Service Bulletin A300–28–
6064, Revision 03, dated December 15, 2008;
or Airbus Mandatory Service Bulletin A300–
28–6064, Revision 04, dated August 24, 2009.
Do all applicable related investigative and
corrective actions before further flight. As of
the effective date of this AD, only use Airbus
Mandatory Service Bulletin A300–28–6064,
Revision 04, dated August 24, 2009.
(5) For airplanes fitted with a trim tank, in
addition to the actions defined in paragraphs
(g)(3) and (g)(4) of this AD, install bonding
leads and electrical bonding points in the
trim tanks, in accordance with the
instructions of Airbus Service Bulletin A300–
28–6077, Revision 01, dated October 26,
2006.
(6) Actions done before March 6, 2008, in
accordance with Airbus Service Bulletin
A300–28–6064, dated July 28, 2005, for
aircraft under configuration 05, as defined
Airbus Service Bulletin A300–28–6064,
dated July 28, 2005, are considered
acceptable for compliance with the
requirements of paragraph (g)(4) of this AD.
(7) Actions done before March 6, 2008, in
accordance with Airbus Service Bulletin
A300–28–6077, dated July 25, 2005, for
aircraft under configuration 05, as defined in
Airbus Service Bulletin A300–28–6077,
dated July 25, 2005, are considered
acceptable for compliance with the
requirements of paragraph (g)(5) of this AD.
New Requirments of This AD
Additional Actions
(h) Within 8 months after the effective date
of this AD, do the applicable actions required
by paragraphs (h)(1), (h)(2), and (h)(3) of this
AD.
(1) For airplanes that have been modified
before the effective date of this AD in
accordance with the Accomplishment
Instructions of Airbus Service Bulletin A300–
28–6064, dated July 28, 2005; Revision 01,
dated April 3, 2007; or Airbus Mandatory
Service Bulletin A300–28–6064, Revision 02,
dated March 10, 2008: Do the additional
work on the center tank specified in Airbus
Mandatory Service Bulletin A300–28–6064,
Revision 03, dated December 15, 2008, (i.e.,
a check for blue coat at additional bonding
points and all applicable related investigative
and corrective actions), in accordance with
the Accomplishment Instructions of Airbus
Mandatory Service Bulletin A300–28–6064,
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
18963
Revision 03, dated December 15, 2008; or
Revision 04, dated August 24, 2009. Do all
applicable related investigative and
corrective actions before further flight.
(2) For configuration 03 airplanes, as
defined in Airbus Mandatory Service
Bulletin A300–28–6064, Revision 04, dated
August 24, 2009, that have been modified
before the effective date of this AD in
accordance with the Accomplishment
Instructions of Airbus Service Bulletin A300–
28–6064, Revision 01, dated April 3, 2007; or
Airbus Mandatory Service Bulletin A300–28–
6064, Revision 02, dated March 10, 2008, or
Revision 03, dated December 15, 2008: Do
the additional work on the center tank (i.e.,
install bonding points), in accordance with
the Accomplishment Instructions of Airbus
Mandatory Service Bulletin A300–28–6064,
Revision 04, dated August 24, 2009.
(3) For configuration 07 airplanes, as
defined in Airbus Mandatory Service
Bulletin A300–28–6064, Revision 04, dated
August 24, 2009, that have been modified
before the effective date of this AD in
accordance with the Accomplishment
Instructions of Airbus Service Bulletin A300–
28–6064, dated July 28, 2005; Revision 01,
dated April 3, 2007; or Airbus Mandatory
Service Bulletin A300–28–6064, Revision 02,
dated March 10, 2008, or Revision 03, dated
December 15, 2008: Do the additional work
on the wing tanks (i.e., bond the fuel jettison
system—blanking plates), in accordance with
the Accomplishment Instructions of Airbus
Mandatory Service Bulletin A300–28–6064,
Revision 04, dated August 24, 2009.
FAA AD Differences
Note 1: This AD differs from the MCAI
and/or service information as follows: No
differences.
Other FAA AD Provisions
(i) The following provisions also apply to
this AD:
(1) Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs): The Manager, International
Branch, ANM–116, FAA, has the authority to
approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested
using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19.
Send information to ATTN: Dan Rodina,
Aerospace Engineer, International Branch,
ANM–116, Transport Airplane Directorate,
FAA, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton,
Washington 98057–3356; telephone (425)
227–2125; fax (425) 227–1149. Before using
any approved AMOC, notify your appropriate
principal inspector, or lacking a principal
inspector, the manager of the local flight
standards district office/certificate holding
district office. The AMOC approval letter
must specifically reference this AD. AMOCs
approved previously in accordance with AD
2008–03–04 are approved as AMOCs for the
corresponding provisions of this AD.
(2) Airworthy Product: For any
requirement in this AD to obtain corrective
actions from a manufacturer or other source,
use these actions if they are FAA-approved.
Corrective actions are considered FAAapproved if they are approved by the State
of Design Authority (or their delegated
agent). You are required to assure the product
is airworthy before it is returned to service.
E:\FR\FM\06APP1.SGM
06APP1
18964
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 66 / Wednesday, April 6, 2011 / Proposed Rules
Related Information
(j) Refer to MCAI EASA Airworthiness
Directive 2010–0074, dated April 16, 2010,
and the service information listed in Table 1
of this AD, for related information.
TABLE 1—SERVICE INFORMATION
Airbus service information
Airbus
Airbus
Airbus
Airbus
Mandatory Service Bulletin A300–28–6064 .............................................
Mandatory Service Bulletin A300–28–6064 .............................................
Service Bulletin A300–28–6068 ................................................................
Service Bulletin A300–28–6077 ................................................................
Issued in Renton, Washington, on March
23, 2011.
Kalene C. Yanamura,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane
Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2011–8198 Filed 4–5–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2011–0326; Directorate
Identifier 2011–CE–006–AD]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Costruzioni
Aeronautiche Tecnam srl Model
P2006T Airplanes
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM).
AGENCY:
We propose to adopt a new
airworthiness directive (AD) for the
products listed above. This proposed
AD results from mandatory continuing
airworthiness information (MCAI)
originated by an aviation authority of
another country to identify and correct
an unsafe condition on an aviation
product. The MCAI describes the unsafe
condition as:
SUMMARY:
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with PROPOSALS-1
Revision level
During Landing Gear retraction/extension
ground checks performed on the P2006T, a
loose Seeger ring was found on the nose
landing gear hydraulic actuator cap.
The manufacturer has identified the root
cause of this discrepancy in a design
deficiency of the hydraulic actuator caps.
This condition, if not corrected, could
determine uncommanded and improper
extension of the nose or main landing gear.
The proposed AD would require actions
that are intended to address the unsafe
condition described in the MCAI.
DATES: We must receive comments on
this proposed AD by May 23, 2011.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments by
any of the following methods:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:34 Apr 05, 2011
Jkt 223001
03 ..........................................................
04 ..........................................................
Original ..................................................
01 ..........................................................
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• Fax: (202) 493–2251.
• Mail: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations,
M–30, West Building Ground Floor,
Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590.
• Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations,
M–30, West Building Ground Floor,
Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590,
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
For service information identified in
this proposed AD, contact Costruzioni
Aeronautiche TECNAM Airworthiness
Office, Via Maiorise—81043 Capua (CE)
Italy; telephone: +39 0823 620134; fax:
+39 0823 622899; e-mail:
m.oliva@tecnam.com,
p.violetti@tecnam.com; Internet: https://
www.tecnam.com. You may review
copies of the referenced service
information at the FAA, Small Airplane
Directorate, 901 Locust, Kansas City,
Missouri 64106. For information on the
availability of this material at the FAA,
call 816–329–4148.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on
the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov; or in person at the
Docket Management Facility between
9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through
Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD
docket contains this proposed AD, the
regulatory evaluation, any comments
received, and other information. The
street address for the Docket Office
(telephone (800) 647–5527) is in the
ADDRESSES section. Comments will be
available in the AD docket shortly after
receipt.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Albert Mercado, Aerospace Engineer,
FAA, Small Airplane Directorate, 901
Locust, Room 301, Kansas City,
Missouri 64106; telephone: (816) 329–
4119; fax: (816) 329–4090.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Date
December 15, 2008.
August 24, 2009.
July 20, 2005.
October 26, 2006.
Comments Invited
We invite you to send any written
relevant data, views, or arguments about
this proposed AD. Send your comments
to an address listed under the
ADDRESSES section. Include ‘‘Docket No.
FAA–2011–0326; Directorate Identifier
2011–CE–006–AD’’ at the beginning of
your comments. We specifically invite
comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy
aspects of this proposed AD. We will
consider all comments received by the
closing date and may amend this
proposed AD because of those
comments.
We will post all comments we
receive, without change, to https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each
substantive verbal contact we receive
about this proposed AD.
Discussion
The European Aviation Safety Agency
(EASA), which is the Technical Agent
for the Member States of the European
Community, has issued EASA AD No.:
2011–0042, dated March 11, 2011
(referred to after this as ‘‘the MCAI’’), to
correct an unsafe condition for the
specified products. The MCAI states:
During Landing Gear retraction/extension
ground checks performed on the P2006T, a
loose Seeger ring was found on the nose
landing gear hydraulic actuator cap.
The manufacturer has identified the root
cause of this discrepancy in a design
deficiency of the hydraulic actuator caps.
This condition, if not corrected, could
determine uncommanded and improper
extension of the nose or main landing gear.
To prevent this condition, this AD requires
modifying each nose and main landing gear
hydraulic actuator by installing security
rings.
You may obtain further information
by examining the MCAI in the AD
docket.
Relevant Service Information
Costruzioni Aeronautiche Tecnam has
issued Service Bulletin No. SB 036–CS,
1st Edition, Rev 1, dated December 15,
2010. The actions described in this
E:\FR\FM\06APP1.SGM
06APP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 66 (Wednesday, April 6, 2011)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 18960-18964]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-8198]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA-2011-0264; Directorate Identifier 2009-NM-244-AD]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Model A300 B4-600, B4-600R, and
F4-600R Series Airplanes, and Model C4-605R Variant F Airplanes
(Collectively Called A300-600 Series Airplanes)
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We propose to adopt a new airworthiness directive (AD) for the
products listed above that would supersede an existing AD. This
proposed AD results from mandatory continuing airworthiness information
(MCAI) originated by an aviation authority of another country to
identify and correct an unsafe condition on an aviation product. The
MCAI describes the unsafe condition as:
[T]he FAA has published SFAR 88 (Special Federal Aviation
Regulation 88). * * *
Under this regulation, all holders of type certificates for
passenger transport aeroplanes * * * are required to conduct a
design review against explosion risks. The replacement of some types
of P-clips and
[[Page 18961]]
improvement of the electrical bonding of the equipment in the fuel
tanks [were] are rendered mandatory * * *.
* * * * *
Subsequently, an internal review * * * led * * * to * * * an
additional check [for blue coat] of the bonding points in the centre
tank. * * *
More recently, another internal review [introduced] additional
work [installing bonding points] for aeroplanes under Configuration
03 * * * and additional work [bonding the fuel jettison system--
blanking plates] on the wing tanks for aeroplanes under
Configuration 07 * * *.
The unsafe condition is damage to wiring in the wing, center, and
trim fuel tanks, due to failed P-clips used for retaining the wiring
and pipes, which could result in a possible fuel ignition source in the
wing, center, or trim fuel tanks. The proposed AD would require actions
that are intended to address the unsafe condition described in the
MCAI.
DATES: We must receive comments on this proposed AD by May 23, 2011.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments by any of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
Fax: (202) 493-2251.
Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590.
Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-40, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
For service information identified in this proposed AD, contact
Airbus SAS--EAW (Airworthiness Office), 1 Rond Point Maurice Bellonte,
31707 Blagnac Cedex, France; telephone +33 5 61 93 36 96; fax +33 5 61
93 44 51; e-mail: account.airworth-eas@airbus.com; Internet https://www.airbus.com. You may review copies of the referenced service
information at the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind
Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington. For information on the availability of
this material at the FAA, call 425-227-1221.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at https://www.regulations.gov; or in person at the Docket Operations office
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The AD docket contains this proposed AD, the regulatory
evaluation, any comments received, and other information. The street
address for the Docket Operations office (telephone (800) 647-5527) is
in the ADDRESSES section. Comments will be available in the AD docket
shortly after receipt.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dan Rodina, Aerospace Engineer,
International Branch, ANM-116, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA,
1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington 98057-3356; telephone (425)
227-2125; fax (425) 227-1149.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
We invite you to send any written relevant data, views, or
arguments about this proposed AD. Send your comments to an address
listed under the ADDRESSES section. Include ``Docket No. FAA-2011-0264;
Directorate Identifier 2009-NM-244-AD'' at the beginning of your
comments. We specifically invite comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy aspects of this proposed AD. We
will consider all comments received by the closing date and may amend
this proposed AD based on those comments.
We will post all comments we receive, without change, to https://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal contact we
receive about this proposed AD.
Discussion
On January 18, 2008, we issued AD 2008-03-04, Amendment 39-15353
(73 FR 5731, January 31, 2008). That AD required actions intended to
address an unsafe condition on the products listed above.
Since we issued AD 2008-03-04, internal reviews by the manufacturer
have shown that additional work is necessary on the center and wing
fuel tanks. The European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA), which is the
Technical Agent for the Member States of the European Community, has
issued EASA Airworthiness Directive 2010-0074, dated April 16, 2010
(referred to after this as ``the MCAI''), to correct an unsafe
condition for the specified products. The MCAI states:
[T]he FAA has published SFAR 88 (Special Federal Aviation
Regulation 88). In their letters referenced 04/00/02/07/01-L296,
dated 04 March 2002, and 04/00/02/07/03-L024, dated 03 February
2003, the JAA recommended the application of a similar regulation to
the National Aviation Authorities (NAA).
Under this regulation, all holders of type certificates for
passenger transport aeroplanes with either a passenger capacity of
30 or more, or a payload capacity of 3,402 kg (7,500 lbs) or more
which have received their certification since 01 January 1958, are
required to conduct a design review against explosion risks. The
replacement of some types of P-clips and improvement of the
electrical bonding of the equipment in the fuel tasks are rendered
mandatory by this AD.
Initially, EASA AD 2006-0325, which addressed the same unsafe
condition, also applied to A300-600 aeroplanes. Airbus subsequently
introduced additional work at Revision 1 of SB A300-28-6064 [dated
April 3, 2007] applicable to A300-600 aeroplanes. As a result, EASA
AD 2006-0325 was revised to remove A300-600 aeroplanes from the
applicability, and concurrently EASA AD 2007-0233 was issued,
applicable to A300-600 aeroplanes. Unfortunately, the
`Applicability' section of EASA AD 2007-0233 was not correctly
defined, erroneously deleting one modification in the combination
that would exclude aeroplanes from having to comply. Consequently,
the AD 2007-0283 was issued, requiring the same actions as AD 2007-
0233, which was superseded, but expanded the group of aeroplanes to
which AD 2007-0283 applied [FAA AD 2008-03-04 corresponds with EASA
AD 2007-0283].
Subsequently, an internal review of Airbus SB A300-28-6064 led
the manufacturer to correct the figures of the SB. In particular, an
additional check [for blue coat] of the bonding points in the centre
tank was introduced in Revision 03 of Airbus SB A300-28-6064 [dated
December 15, 2008], prompting EASA to issue AD 2009-0143.
More recently, another internal review of Airbus SB A300-28-6064
again resulted in corrected figures in the SB. Additional work on
the center tank [installing bonding points] for aeroplanes under
Configuration 03 (as defined in the SB [Service Bulletin A300-28-
6064, Revision 04, dated August 24, 2009]) and additional work
[bonding the fuel jettison system--blanking plates] on the wing
tanks for aeroplanes under Configuration 07 have been introduced in
Revision 04 of Airbus SB A300-28-6064 [dated August 24, 2009].
For the reason described above, this new AD retains the
requirements of EASA AD 2009-0143, which is superseded, and requires
the additional work introduced in Revision 04 of Airbus SB A300-28-
6064 [dated August 24, 2009].
The unsafe condition is damage to wiring in the wing, center, and
trim fuel tanks, due to failed P-clips used for retaining the wiring
and pipes, which could result in a possible fuel ignition source in the
wing, center, or trim fuel tanks. The required actions also include
checking the electrical bonding points of certain equipment in the
center fuel tank for the presence of a blue coat and doing related
investigative and corrective actions if necessary. The related
investigative action is to measure the electrical resistance between
the equipment and structure, if a blue coat is not present. The
corrective action is to electrically bond the
[[Page 18962]]
equipment, if the measured resistance is greater than 10 milliohms. You
may obtain further information by examining the MCAI in the AD docket.
We have also revised paragraphs (f)(4) and (f)(5) of AD 2008-03-04
(re-identified as paragraphs (g)(6) and (g)(7) in this NPRM) by
replacing the term ``service bulletin'' with the full service bulletin
citation.
Relevant Service Information
Airbus has issued Mandatory Service Bulletins A300-28-6064,
Revision 03, dated December 15, 2008; and Revision 04, dated August 24,
2009. The actions described in this service information are intended to
correct the unsafe condition identified in the MCAI.
FAA's Determination and Requirements of This Proposed AD
This product has been approved by the aviation authority of another
country, and is approved for operation in the United States. Pursuant
to our bilateral agreement with the State of Design Authority, we have
been notified of the unsafe condition described in the MCAI and service
information referenced above. We are proposing this AD because we
evaluated all pertinent information and determined an unsafe condition
exists and is likely to exist or develop on other products of the same
type design.
Differences Between This AD and the MCAI or Service Information
We have reviewed the MCAI and related service information and, in
general, agree with their substance. But we might have found it
necessary to use different words from those in the MCAI to ensure the
AD is clear for U.S. operators and is enforceable. In making these
changes, we do not intend to differ substantively from the information
provided in the MCAI and related service information.
We might also have proposed different actions in this AD from those
in the MCAI in order to follow FAA policies. Any such differences are
highlighted in a Note within the proposed AD.
Costs of Compliance
Based on the service information, we estimate that this proposed AD
would affect about 125 products of U.S. registry.
The actions that are required by AD 2008-03-04 and retained in this
proposed AD take about 632 work-hours per product, at an average labor
rate of $85 per work hour. Required parts cost about $6,870 per
product. Based on these figures, the estimated cost of the currently
required actions is $60,590 per product.
We estimate that it would take about 9 work-hours per product to
comply with the new basic requirements of this proposed AD. The average
labor rate is $85 per work-hour. Required parts would cost about $100
per product. Where the service information lists required parts costs
that are covered under warranty, we have assumed that there will be no
charge for these costs. As we do not control warranty coverage for
affected parties, some parties may incur costs higher than estimated
here. Based on these figures, we estimate the cost of the proposed AD
on U.S. operators to be $108,125, or $865 per product.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. ``Subtitle VII: Aviation
Programs,'' describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's
authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
``Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.
Regulatory Findings
We determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not
have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national Government and the States, or on the distribution
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify this proposed
regulation:
1. Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order
12866;
2. Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and
3. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
We prepared a regulatory evaluation of the estimated costs to
comply with this proposed AD and placed it in the AD docket.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.
The Proposed Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
2. The FAA amends Sec. 39.13 by removing Amendment 39-15353 (73 FR
5731, January 31, 2008) and adding the following new AD:
Airbus: Docket No. FAA-2011-0264; Directorate Identifier 2009-NM-
244-AD.
Comments Due Date
(a) We must receive comments by May 23, 2011.
Affected ADs
(b) This AD supersedes AD 2008-03-04, Amendment 39-15353.
Applicability
(c) This AD applies to the airplanes identified in paragraphs
(c)(1) and (c)(2) of this AD.
(1) Airbus Model A300 B4-601, B4-603, B4-620, and B4-622
airplanes (without trim tank), all serial numbers, certificated in
any category, except airplanes on which Airbus Modifications 12226,
12365, 12490, and 12308 have been incorporated in production, or
Airbus Mandatory Service Bulletin A300-28-6064, Revision 04, dated
August 24, 2009; and Airbus Service Bulletin A300-28-6068, dated
July 20, 2005; have been performed in service.
(2) Airbus Model A300 B4-605R, B4-622R, F4-605R, and F4-622R
airplanes and A300 C4-605R Variant F airplanes (fitted with a trim
tank), all serial numbers, certificated in any category, except
airplanes on which Airbus Modifications 12226, 12365, 12490, 12308,
12294, and 12476 have been incorporated in production, or on which
the service bulletins listed in paragraphs (c)(2)(i), (c)(2)(ii),
and (c)(2)(iii) of this AD have been performed in service.
(i) Airbus Mandatory Service Bulletin A300-28-6064, Revision 03,
dated December 15, 2008.
(ii) Airbus Service Bulletin A300-28-6068, dated July 20, 2005.
(iii) Airbus Service Bulletin A300-28-6077, dated July 25, 2005;
or A300-28-6077, Revision 01, dated October 26, 2006.
[[Page 18963]]
Subject
(d) Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 28: Fuel.
Reason
(e) The mandatory continuing airworthiness information (MCAI)
states:
[T]he FAA has published SFAR 88 (Special Federal Aviation
Regulation 88). * * *
Under this regulation, all holders of type certificates for
passenger transport aeroplanes * * * are required to conduct a
design review against explosion risks. The replacement of some types
of P-clips and improvement of the electrical bonding of the
equipment in the fuel tanks [were] are rendered mandatory * * *.
* * * * *
Subsequently, an internal review * * * led * * * to * * * an
additional check [for blue coat] of the bonding points in the centre
tank. * * *
More recently, another internal review [introduced] additional
work [installing bonding points] for aeroplanes under Configuration
03 * * * and additional work [bonding the fuel jettison system--
blanking plates] on the wing tanks for aeroplanes under
Configuration 07 * * *.
The unsafe condition is damage to wiring in the wing, center,
and trim fuel tanks, due to failed P-clips used for retaining the
wiring and pipes, which could result in a possible fuel ignition
source in the wing, center, or trim fuel tanks.
Compliance
(f) You are responsible for having the actions required by this
AD performed within the compliance times specified, unless the
actions have already been done.
Restatement of Requirements of AD 2008-03-04 With Revised Service
Information
Actions and Compliance
(g) For airplanes identified in paragraphs (g)(1) and (g)(2) of
this AD: Within 40 months after March 6, 2008 (the effective date of
AD 2008-03-04), unless already done, do the applicable actions
required by paragraphs (g)(3), (g)(4), and (g)(5) of this AD.
(1) Airbus Model A300 B4-600 series airplanes (without trim
tank), all serial numbers, except airplanes on which Airbus
Modifications 12226, 12365, 12490, and 12308 have been incorporated
in production, or Airbus Service Bulletins A300-28-6064, Revision
01, dated April 3, 2007; and A300-28-6068, dated July 20, 2005; have
been performed in service.
(2) Airbus Model A300 B4-600R, A300 C4-600R, and A300 F4-600R
series airplanes (fitted with a trim tank), all serial numbers,
except airplanes on which Airbus Modifications 12226, 12365, 12490,
12308, 12294, and 12476 have been incorporated in production, or on
which the service bulletins listed in paragraphs (g)(2)(i),
(g)(2)(ii), and (g)(2)(iii) of this AD have been performed in
service.
(i) Airbus Service Bulletin A300-28-6064, Revision 01, dated
April 3, 2007.
(ii) Airbus Service Bulletin A300-28-6068, dated July 20, 2005.
(iii) Airbus Service Bulletin A300-28-6077, dated July 25, 2005;
or A300-28-6077, Revision 01, dated October 26, 2006.
(3) Remove NSA5516-XXND or NSA5516-XXNJ type P-clips, used in
the wing and center fuel tanks to retain wiring and pipes, and
replace them by NSA5516-XXNF type P-clips in accordance with the
instructions of Airbus Service Bulletin A300-28-6068, dated July 20,
2005.
(4) Check the electrical bonding points in the center tank and
do all applicable related investigative and corrective actions, and
install additional bonding leads and electrical bonding points in
the wing and center fuel tanks in accordance with the instructions
of Airbus Service Bulletin A300-28-6064, Revision 01, dated April 3,
2007; Airbus Mandatory Service Bulletin A300-28-6064, Revision 02,
dated March 10, 2008; Airbus Mandatory Service Bulletin A300-28-
6064, Revision 03, dated December 15, 2008; or Airbus Mandatory
Service Bulletin A300-28-6064, Revision 04, dated August 24, 2009.
Do all applicable related investigative and corrective actions
before further flight. As of the effective date of this AD, only use
Airbus Mandatory Service Bulletin A300-28-6064, Revision 04, dated
August 24, 2009.
(5) For airplanes fitted with a trim tank, in addition to the
actions defined in paragraphs (g)(3) and (g)(4) of this AD, install
bonding leads and electrical bonding points in the trim tanks, in
accordance with the instructions of Airbus Service Bulletin A300-28-
6077, Revision 01, dated October 26, 2006.
(6) Actions done before March 6, 2008, in accordance with Airbus
Service Bulletin A300-28-6064, dated July 28, 2005, for aircraft
under configuration 05, as defined Airbus Service Bulletin A300-28-
6064, dated July 28, 2005, are considered acceptable for compliance
with the requirements of paragraph (g)(4) of this AD.
(7) Actions done before March 6, 2008, in accordance with Airbus
Service Bulletin A300-28-6077, dated July 25, 2005, for aircraft
under configuration 05, as defined in Airbus Service Bulletin A300-
28-6077, dated July 25, 2005, are considered acceptable for
compliance with the requirements of paragraph (g)(5) of this AD.
New Requirments of This AD
Additional Actions
(h) Within 8 months after the effective date of this AD, do the
applicable actions required by paragraphs (h)(1), (h)(2), and (h)(3)
of this AD.
(1) For airplanes that have been modified before the effective
date of this AD in accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions
of Airbus Service Bulletin A300-28-6064, dated July 28, 2005;
Revision 01, dated April 3, 2007; or Airbus Mandatory Service
Bulletin A300-28-6064, Revision 02, dated March 10, 2008: Do the
additional work on the center tank specified in Airbus Mandatory
Service Bulletin A300-28-6064, Revision 03, dated December 15, 2008,
(i.e., a check for blue coat at additional bonding points and all
applicable related investigative and corrective actions), in
accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of Airbus Mandatory
Service Bulletin A300-28-6064, Revision 03, dated December 15, 2008;
or Revision 04, dated August 24, 2009. Do all applicable related
investigative and corrective actions before further flight.
(2) For configuration 03 airplanes, as defined in Airbus
Mandatory Service Bulletin A300-28-6064, Revision 04, dated August
24, 2009, that have been modified before the effective date of this
AD in accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of Airbus
Service Bulletin A300-28-6064, Revision 01, dated April 3, 2007; or
Airbus Mandatory Service Bulletin A300-28-6064, Revision 02, dated
March 10, 2008, or Revision 03, dated December 15, 2008: Do the
additional work on the center tank (i.e., install bonding points),
in accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of Airbus
Mandatory Service Bulletin A300-28-6064, Revision 04, dated August
24, 2009.
(3) For configuration 07 airplanes, as defined in Airbus
Mandatory Service Bulletin A300-28-6064, Revision 04, dated August
24, 2009, that have been modified before the effective date of this
AD in accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of Airbus
Service Bulletin A300-28-6064, dated July 28, 2005; Revision 01,
dated April 3, 2007; or Airbus Mandatory Service Bulletin A300-28-
6064, Revision 02, dated March 10, 2008, or Revision 03, dated
December 15, 2008: Do the additional work on the wing tanks (i.e.,
bond the fuel jettison system--blanking plates), in accordance with
the Accomplishment Instructions of Airbus Mandatory Service Bulletin
A300-28-6064, Revision 04, dated August 24, 2009.
FAA AD Differences
Note 1: This AD differs from the MCAI and/or service
information as follows: No differences.
Other FAA AD Provisions
(i) The following provisions also apply to this AD:
(1) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs): The Manager,
International Branch, ANM-116, FAA, has the authority to approve
AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the procedures found in 14 CFR
39.19. Send information to ATTN: Dan Rodina, Aerospace Engineer,
International Branch, ANM-116, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA,
1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington 98057-3356; telephone
(425) 227-2125; fax (425) 227-1149. Before using any approved AMOC,
notify your appropriate principal inspector, or lacking a principal
inspector, the manager of the local flight standards district
office/certificate holding district office. The AMOC approval letter
must specifically reference this AD. AMOCs approved previously in
accordance with AD 2008-03-04 are approved as AMOCs for the
corresponding provisions of this AD.
(2) Airworthy Product: For any requirement in this AD to obtain
corrective actions from a manufacturer or other source, use these
actions if they are FAA-approved. Corrective actions are considered
FAA-approved if they are approved by the State of Design Authority
(or their delegated agent). You are required to assure the product
is airworthy before it is returned to service.
[[Page 18964]]
Related Information
(j) Refer to MCAI EASA Airworthiness Directive 2010-0074, dated
April 16, 2010, and the service information listed in Table 1 of
this AD, for related information.
Table 1--Service Information
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Airbus service information Revision level Date
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Airbus Mandatory Service Bulletin A300-28- 03.......................... December 15, 2008.
6064.
Airbus Mandatory Service Bulletin A300-28- 04.......................... August 24, 2009.
6064.
Airbus Service Bulletin A300-28-6068..... Original.................... July 20, 2005.
Airbus Service Bulletin A300-28-6077..... 01.......................... October 26, 2006.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Issued in Renton, Washington, on March 23, 2011.
Kalene C. Yanamura,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 2011-8198 Filed 4-5-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P