Food Labeling; Calorie Labeling of Articles of Food in Vending Machines, 19238-19255 [2011-8037]
Download as PDF
19238
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 66 / Wednesday, April 6, 2011 / Proposed Rules
Electronic Submissions
Submit electronic comments in the
following way:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
21 CFR Parts 11 and 101
[Docket No. FDA–2011–F–0171]
RIN 0910–AG56
Food Labeling; Calorie Labeling of
Articles of Food in Vending Machines
AGENCY:
Food and Drug Administration,
HHS.
ACTION:
Proposed rule.
To implement the vending
machine labeling provisions of the
Patient Protection and Affordable Care
Act of 2010 (Affordable Care Act), the
Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is
proposing requirements for providing
calorie information for certain articles of
food sold from vending machines. The
Affordable Care Act, in part, amended
the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic
Act (FD&C Act) to, among other things,
require that for an article of food sold
from a vending machine that does not
permit a prospective purchaser to
examine the Nutrition Facts Panel
before purchasing the article, or does
not otherwise provide visible nutrition
information at the point of purchase,
and is operated by a person engaged in
the business of owning or operating 20
or more vending machines, the vending
machine operator must disclose the
number of calories for the article of
food. Vending machine operators not
subject to the requirements of the
Affordable Care Act may elect to be
subject to the Federal requirements by
registering with FDA. Providing calorie
disclosures for food sold from vending
machines would assist consumers in
making healthier dietary choices.
DATES: Submit either written or
electronic comments on the proposed
rule by July 5, 2011. Submit comments
on the information collection issues
under the Paperwork Reduction Act of
1995 by May 6, 2011, (see the
‘‘Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995’’
section of this document).
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments,
identified by Docket No. FDA–2011–F–
0171 and/or RIN 0910–AG56, by any of
the following methods, except that
comments on information collection
issues under the Paperwork Reduction
Act of 1995 must be submitted to the
Office of Regulatory Affairs, Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) (see the
‘‘Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995’’
section of this document).
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with PROPOSALS3
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:23 Apr 05, 2011
Jkt 223001
Written Submissions
Submit written submissions in the
following ways:
FAX: 301–827–6870.
Mail/Hand delivery/Courier (for
paper, disk, or CD–ROM submissions):
Division of Dockets Management (HFA–
305), Food and Drug Administration,
5630 Fishers Lane, rm. 1061, Rockville,
MD 20852.
Instructions: All submissions received
must include the Agency name and
docket number and Regulatory
Information Number (RIN) for this
rulemaking. All comments received may
be posted without change to https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information provided. For
additional information on submitting
comments, see the ‘‘Comments’’ heading
of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION
section of this document.
Docket: For access to the docket to
read background documents or
comments received, go to https://
www.regulations.gov and insert the
docket number, found in brackets in the
heading of this document, into the
‘‘Search’’ box and follow the prompts
and/or go to the Division of Dockets
Management, 5630 Fishers Lane, rm.
1061, Rockville, MD 20852.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Daniel Y. Reese, Center for Food Safety
and Applied Nutrition (HFS–820), Food
and Drug Administration, 5100 Paint
Branch Pkwy., College Park, MD 20740,
301–436–2371.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
A. Nutrition Labeling Requirements
That Currently Apply to Packaged
Foods
The Nutrition Labeling and Education
Act of 1990 (NLEA) amended the FD&C
Act, in part, by adding section 403(q)
(21 U.S.C. 343(q)), which specifies, in
pertinent part and with certain
exceptions, that a food is considered to
be misbranded unless its label or
labeling bears nutrition information. See
21 U.S.C. 343(q)(1). When a food is in
package form, the required nutrition
information generally must appear on
the label of the food. FDA’s final
regulations establishing nutrition
labeling requirements were published in
1993 (58 FR 2079, January 6, 1993) and
are found at Title 21 of the Code of
Federal Regulations (21 CFR) section
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
101.9. Regulations implementing the
NLEA require nutrition information for
a food product intended for human
consumption and offered for sale unless
an exemption is provided for the
product (§ 101.9(a)). The declaration of
nutrition information on the label and
labeling of food generally must include
information about the following
nutrients: Total calories, calories from
fat (unless the product contains less
than 0.5 g of fat), total fat, saturated fat,
trans fat, cholesterol, sodium, total
carbohydrate, dietary fiber, sugars,
protein, and certain vitamins and
minerals (§ 101.9).
The NLEA amendments to the FD&C
Act included an exemption from
nutrition labeling for food that is served
in restaurants or other establishments in
which food is served for immediate
human consumption or sold for sale or
use in such establishments (21 U.S.C.
343 (q)(5)(A)(i)). The NLEA
amendments to the FD&C Act also
included an exemption from nutrition
labeling for food that is processed and
prepared primarily in a retail
establishment, ready for human
consumption, of the type of food
described in section 403(q)(5)(A)(i) of
the FD&C Act, offered for sale to
consumers but not for immediate
human consumption in such
establishment, and not offered for sale
outside such establishment (21 U.S.C.
343(q)(5)(A)(ii)). However, these
exemptions were contingent on there
being no nutrient content claims or
health claims made on the label or
labeling, or in the advertising, for the
food. In our regulations implementing
these exemptions, we included vending
machines among the examples of
establishments in which food is served
for immediate human consumption that
generally are exempt from nutrition
labeling requirements because like the
other examples, vending machines offer
food products that are generally
consumed immediately where
purchased or while the consumer is
walking away. See § 101.9(j)(2).
B. Requirements of Section 4205 of the
Affordable Care Act
On March 23, 2010, the Affordable
Care Act (Pub. L. 111–148) was signed
into law. Section 4205 of the Affordable
Care Act (section 4205), amends section
403(q) of the FD&C Act, which governs
nutrition labeling requirements, and
section 403A of the FD&C Act (21 U.S.C.
343–1), which governs Federal
preemption of State and local food
labeling requirements. The Affordable
Care Act requires FDA to issue proposed
regulations to carry out section
403(q)(5)(H) of the FD&C Act no later
E:\FR\FM\06APP3.SGM
06APP3
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 66 / Wednesday, April 6, 2011 / Proposed Rules
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with PROPOSALS3
than one year from the date of
enactment. As amended, section
403(q)(5)(H)(viii) of the FD&C Act
requires that if an article of food is sold
from a vending machine that does not
permit a prospective purchaser to
examine the Nutrition Facts Panel
before purchasing the food or does not
otherwise provide visible nutrition
information at the point of purchase and
the vending machine is operated by a
person who is engaged in the business
of owning or operating 20 or more
vending machines, the vending machine
operator must provide calorie
information for the food. Specifically,
the vending machine operator must
‘‘provide a sign in close proximity to
each article of food or the selection
button that includes a clear and
conspicuous statement disclosing the
number of calories contained in the
article.’’
Section 403(q)(5)(H)(ix) of the FD&C
Act allows vending machine operators
not subject to the requirements of
section 4205 of the Affordable Care Act
to voluntarily register with FDA to
become subject to the Federal
requirements. In the Federal Register of
July 23, 2010, (75 FR 43182), FDA
published a notice in the Federal
Register specifying the terms and
conditions for implementation of
voluntary registration, pending
promulgation of final regulations. See
75 FR 43182.
C. FDA Activities Related to
Implementation of Section 4205 of the
Affordable Care Act
Section 4205 of the Affordable Care
Act also requires certain restaurants and
similar retail food establishments to
provide calorie and other nutrition
information for standard menu items,
including food on display and selfservice food. Elsewhere in this issue of
the Federal Register, FDA is proposing
requirements to implement the menu
labeling provisions of section 4205. As
discussed in that proposal, FDA has
published in the Federal Register a
number of documents concerning
section 4205. On July 7, 2010, FDA
published a notice entitled ‘‘Disclosure
of Nutrient Content Information for
Standard Menu Items Offered for Sale at
Chain Restaurants or Similar Retail
Food Establishments and for Articles of
Food Sold from Vending Machines’’
(‘‘docket notice’’) (75 FR 39026, July 7,
2010) to solicit comments and
suggestions on the new law. In response
to this notice, FDA received
approximately 875 letters and e-mails.
Of those, approximately 60 contained
one or more comments pertaining to
vending machine calorie labeling. Many
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:23 Apr 05, 2011
Jkt 223001
of these comments were general
comments on the law itself and either
supported or opposed the requirement
in section 403(q)(5)(H)(viii) of the FD&C
Act that calorie information be provided
for foods sold from vending machines.
Comments in opposition stated that
providing calorie information for foods
sold from vending machines would be
overly burdensome to the industry. FDA
describes these comments in more detail
and responds to those comments in this
proposal.
On July 23, 2010, FDA published the
Federal Register notice entitled
‘‘Voluntary Registration by Authorized
Officials of Non-Covered Retail Food
Establishments and Vending Machine
Operators Electing to be Subject to the
Menu and Vending Machine Labeling
Requirements Established by Section
4205 of the Patient Protection and
Affordable Care Act of 2010’’
(‘‘registration notice’’) (75 FR 43182).
FDA issued this registration notice to
provide assistance for voluntary
registration for restaurants, similar retail
establishments, and vending machine
operators that are not subject to the
nutrition labeling requirements of
section 4205 (e.g., restaurants and
similar retail food establishments with
fewer than 20 locations, and vending
machine operators with fewer than 20
machines). In the registration notice,
FDA specified the terms and conditions
for implementation of voluntary
registration, pending promulgation of
regulations. In response to the notice,
FDA received 7 comments, none of
which addressed registration.
On August 25, 2010, FDA published
a ‘‘Guidance for Industry: Questions and
Answers Regarding the Effect of Section
4205 of the Patient Protection and
Affordable Care Act of 2010 on State
and Local Menu and Vending Machine
Labeling Laws’’ (‘‘preemption guidance’’)
(75 FR 52427, August 25, 2010). The
preemption guidance discusses the
preemptive effect of section 4205 and
identifies the provisions of amended
section 403(q) of the FD&C Act that
became requirements upon enactment.
Our current thinking on the preemptive
effect of section 4205 is set out in
section VII of this document.
Also on August 25, 2010, FDA
published a ‘‘Draft Guidance for
Industry: Questions and Answers
Regarding the Menu Labeling Provisions
of Section 4205 of the Patient Protection
and Affordable Care Act of 2010;
Availability’’ (‘‘draft implementation
guidance’’) (75 FR 52426, August 25,
2010). This draft guidance addressed
only the menu labeling provisions of
section 4205. It did not address the
calorie labeling requirements for
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
19239
vending machine operators in section
4205. FDA subsequently withdrew the
draft implementation guidance (76 FR
4360, January 25, 2011).
II. Legal Authority
As stated in section I.C. of this
document, on March 23, 2010, the
Affordable Care Act was signed into
law. Section 4205 of the Affordable Care
Act amended 403(q)(5) of the FD&C Act
(21 U.S.C. 343(q)(5)) by amending
section 403(q)(5)(A) and by creating new
clause (H) to require, in relevant part,
that vending machine operators provide
calorie information for certain articles of
food sold from vending machines.
Under section 403(a)(1), such
information must be truthful and
nonmisleading. Food to which these
requirements apply is deemed
misbranded if these requirements are
not met. In addition, under section
201(n) of the FD&C Act (21 U.S.C.
321(n)), the labeling of food is
misleading if it fails to reveal facts that
are material in light of representations
actually made in the labeling. Section
403(q)(5)(H)(x) requires the Secretary of
Health and Human Services (Secretary)
to issue proposed regulations no later
than 1 year after enactment . Thus, FDA
has the authority to issue this proposed
rule under sections 201(n), 403(a)(1),
and 403(q)(5)(H), as well as under
section 701(a) of the FD&C Act (21
U.S.C. 371(a)), which vests the Secretary
with the authority to issue regulations
for the efficient enforcement of the
FD&C Act.
FDA is proposing requirements that
vending machine operators provide
calorie information for certain articles of
food sold from vending machines. FDA
is also proposing the terms and
conditions for voluntary registration by
vending machine operators not subject
to the requirements of section 4205 of
the Affordable Care Act that elect to
become subject the requirements. FDA
is proposing to set out these provisions
in new § 101.8.
III. The Proposal
A. Definitions
We are proposing in the introductory
paragraph of § 101.8(a) that the terms
defined in section 201 of the FD&C Act
are applicable when these terms are
used. Additional terms are defined
alphabetically in the proposed codified
and are discussed in alphabetical order
in this section. ‘‘Act’’ is defined as the
Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act.
E:\FR\FM\06APP3.SGM
06APP3
19240
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 66 / Wednesday, April 6, 2011 / Proposed Rules
1. Authorized Official of a Vending
Machine Operator
We are proposing in § 101.8(a) that
the term ‘‘authorized official of a
vending machine operator’’ means the
owner, operator, or agent in charge of a
vending machine, or any other person
authorized by a vending machine
operator not subject to the requirements
of section 4205 of the Affordable Care
Act to voluntarily register the vending
machine operator with FDA to become
subject to the requirements. For the
purposes of this definition, the agent in
charge would not be the person who is
only in charge or in control of the
location where the vending machine is
located.
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with PROPOSALS3
2. Vending Machine Operator
We are proposing in § 101.8(a) that
the term ‘‘vending machine operator’’
means a person that controls or directs
the function of the vending machine,
including deciding which articles of
food are sold from the vending machine
or the placement of the articles of food
within the vending machine, and is
compensated for the control or direction
of the function of the vending machine.
Section 201(e) of the FD&C Act defines
‘‘person’’ to include an individual,
partnership, corporation, and
association. For example, a vending
machine operator could be a corporation
that manufacturers beverages and sells
these products in its machines. A
vending machine operator also could be
an individual or a business that only
operates and stocks vending machines,
such as a private company with onsite
vending machines.
3. Vending Machine
Section 403(q)(5)(H)(viii) of the FD&C
Act sets forth labeling requirements for
certain vending machine food but does
not define the term ‘‘vending machine.’’
We are proposing in § 101.8(a) that the
term ‘‘vending machine’’ means a selfservice device that, upon insertion of a
coin, paper currency, token, card, or
key, or by optional manual operation,
dispenses servings of food in bulk, in
packages, or prepared by the machine,
without the necessity of replenishing
the device between each vending
operation. This definition is almost
identical to the definition of ‘‘vending
machine’’ in the FDA Food Code 2009.1
1 FDA regularly publishes the Food Code, which
provides guidance on food safety, sanitation, and
fair dealing that can be uniformly adopted by State
and local governments for the retail segment of the
food industry. The Food Code provisions are not
Federal requirements; however, they are designed
to be consistent with Federal food laws and
regulations. The 2009 Food Code defined the term
‘‘vending machine’’ to mean a ‘‘self-service device
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:23 Apr 05, 2011
Jkt 223001
Examples of food dispensed from
vending machines may include
prepackaged foods (e.g., candy, snacks,
gum, bottled or canned soft drinks),
unpackaged bulk foods (e.g., handful of
gum, candy, or mixed nuts), prepared
foods (e.g., sandwiches or fresh fruit),
multi-serving foods (e.g., gallon of milk),
or foods prepared in the machine and
dispensed in bulk (e.g., coffee, soup, or
popcorn).
B. Who Must Comply With This Rule
Section 4205 of the Affordable Care
Act provides that ‘‘in the case of an
article of food sold from a vending
machine that does not permit a
prospective purchaser to examine the
Nutrition Facts Panel before purchasing
the article, or does not otherwise
provide visible nutrition information at
the point of purchase, and is operated
by a person engaged in the business of
owning or operating 20 or more vending
machines, the vending machine
operator shall provide a sign in close
proximity to each article of food or the
selection button that includes a clear
and conspicuous statement disclosing
the number of calories contained in the
article of food.’’ Consistent with the
requirements of section 4205, all
vending machine operators with 20 or
more vending machines, as defined in
section III.A.3. of this document, will be
subject to these requirements. Therefore,
FDA is proposing in § 101.8(c)(1)(i)(A)
and (B) that the labeling requirements of
this proposed rule apply to vending
machine operators that own or operate
20 or more vending machines that do
not allow a prospective purchaser to
examine the Nutrition Facts Panel prior
to purchase or do not otherwise provide
visible nutrition information at the
point of purchase. As discussed in
below in section III.D. of this document,
vending machine operators that are not
subject to the requirements of the law
may elect to be subject to the Federal
requirements by voluntarily registering
with FDA.
Several comments requested that FDA
apply the small business nutrition
labeling exemption (§ 101.9(j)(1)) to
vending machine operators. The
comments said that: (1) 90–95 percent of
vending machine operators have 20 or
that, upon insertion of a coin, paper currency,
token, card, or key, or by optional manual
operation, dispenses unit servings of food in bulk
or in packages without the necessity of replenishing
the device between each vending operation.’’ (U.S.
Public Health Service, FDA, 2009 Food Code, U.S.
Department of Health and Human Services, Public
Health Service, Food and Drug Administration,
College Park, MD 20740, chapter 1, section 1–201.)
https://www.fda.gov/Food/FoodSafety/RetailFood
Protection/FoodCode/FoodCode2009/
ucm186464.htm.
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
more machines, and therefore, would be
covered by section 403(q)(5)(H) of the
FD&C Act and (2) 70 percent of vending
machine operators have three or fewer
employees, and would likely be
generating sales less than $500,000.
FDA is not proposing an exemption
from the vending machine nutrition
labeling requirements for small
businesses. FDA notes that section
403(q)(5)(H) of the FD&C Act does not
include an exemption from the vending
machine nutrition labeling requirements
for small businesses. Section
403(q)(5)(D) includes an exemption
from the nutrition labeling requirements
in sections 403(q)(1) through (q)(4) for
small businesses. The requirement that
vending machine operators disclose
calories for covered vending machine
food is not found in sections 403(q)(1)
through (q)(4); instead, it is found in
section 403(q)(5)(H)(viii). Therefore, the
small business exemption in
403(q)(5)(D) does not apply. We believe
that the proposed rule provides
adequate flexibility to allow these small
businesses to comply with the proposed
requirements in a cost-effective and
equitable way. For example, the
proposed requirements allow vending
machine operators to choose from
various approaches for compliance,
including adopting less expensive
measures as discussed below in section
III.E. and section IV. of this document.
We request comment on additional
ways that FDA can make the
requirements of this rule less
burdensome on small businesses, while
still meeting the requirements of section
403(q)(5)(H).
The Agency also received comments
regarding operators of vending
machines who are blind and operate
vending machines through the Vending
Facility Program operated by the U.S.
Department of Education under the
Randolph-Sheppard Act of 1936, 20
U.S.C. 107 et seq. These comments
suggested that regardless of the number
of machines that were operated by an
operator, all operators of vending
machines under the Randolph-Sheppard
Act would be covered.
The Agency wishes to clarify its
interpretation of the applicability of
section 4205 of the Affordable Care Act
to vending machine operators who fall
under the Randolph-Sheppard Act.
Section 403(q)(5)(H)(viii) of the FD&C
Act sets forth requirements for vending
machine operators based on the number
of machines that they operate. Thus, as
with other operators, RandolphSheppard Act operators would only be
covered by the disclosure requirements
if they operate 20 or more vending
E:\FR\FM\06APP3.SGM
06APP3
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 66 / Wednesday, April 6, 2011 / Proposed Rules
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with PROPOSALS3
machines that dispense food or if they
voluntarily register to be covered.
These comments also stated that
operators of vending machines who are
blind ‘‘may place different products in
the same row due to limited visual
recognition and the similarity of
product packaging.’’ These comments
requested flexibility for posting calorie
information. Specifically, the comments
requested that the calorie disclosure
requirements permit the ‘‘stacking of
multiple products in the same coil.’’
FDA is proposing requirements that
provide flexibility for vending machine
operators to comply with the labeling
requirements for covered vending
machine food. As discussed later in this
document, the required calorie
information may be posted on a sign
adjacent to the vending machine, so
long as the sign is visible to the
prospective purchaser at the same time
as the food, its description, or its
selection button is visible.
C. Who Is Not Required to Comply With
This Rule
FDA is aware that many vending
machine operators operate machines
that dispense a variety of articles other
than articles of food. For example, some
vending machines may dispense
detergent, compact discs, gift cards or
toiletries. If a vending machine operator
operated a total of 50 vending machines,
only 15 of which sell articles of food,
the vending machine operator would
not be subject to the requirements of
403(q)(5)(H)(viii) of the FD&C Act
because the vending machine operator
operates fewer than 20 vending
machines that sell articles of food.
Further, FDA tentatively concludes
that vending machines that may
dispense food as part of a game or other
non-food related activity are not covered
by 403(q)(5)(H) of the FD&C Act. For
example, a vending machine may
contain a variety of items ranging from
small toys, coins, or individually
wrapped candies that can be picked up
by maneuvering a large claw arm. In this
instance, the vending machine does not
sell articles of food, even though in the
course of maneuvering the arm, candies
could be dispensed. The vending
machine is selling the opportunity to
play the game. FDA seeks comment on
this tentative conclusion.
Bulk vending machines dispense
unpackaged articles of food in
preselected amounts (e.g. gumball
machines, mixed nut machines). FDA
received a few comments suggesting
that bulk vending machines are different
from ‘‘more modern types of vending
machines,’’ and therefore should be
exempt from these disclosure
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:23 Apr 05, 2011
Jkt 223001
requirements. The comments argued
that bulk vending machines should be
distinguished from other vending
machines for three reasons. First, they
noted that these machines do not have
selection buttons, and as a result a
vending machine operator could not
place a sign ‘‘in close proximity to * * *
the selection button’’ that includes the
calorie information required by section
403(a)(5)(H)(viii)(I) of the FD&C Act.
Second, they argued that food sold from
bulk vending machines represents only
a small fraction of overall market sales
of the vending machine industry.
Finally, the comments stated that there
is no reported association between foods
sold from bulk vending machines and
obesity.
FDA notes that section
403(q)(5)(H)(viii) of the FD&C Act does
not limit its applicability to vending
machines for which there has been a
reported association between the food
vended by the machine and obesity.
However, section 403(q)(5)(H)(viii)
provides that for covered vending
machine food, the vending machine
operator must provide a sign disclosing
the number of calories contained in the
food ‘‘in close proximity to each article
of food or the selection button.’’ FDA
tentatively concludes that the reference
to ‘‘selection button’’ in the statute can
be read to mean that the types of
vending machines subject to
requirements in section
403(q)(5)(H)(viii) are those with
selection buttons. FDA is not aware of
vending machines without selection
buttons other than bulk vending
machines that dispense, by use of a
crank, single types of unpackaged
articles of food in preselected amounts
(e.g., a single piece of gum or a handful
of candy or nuts). FDA tentatively
concludes that vending machines,
including bulk vending machines,
without any type of selection button are
not covered by section 403(q)(5)(H)(viii).
However, FDA tentatively concludes
that a bulk vending machine that has a
selection button, regardless of the type
of food it dispenses, e.g., unpackaged
articles of food such as soup, popcorn,
or hot or cold beverages, is covered
under section 403(q)(5)(H)(viii), if it
meets the other statutory criteria. FDA
is proposing in § 101.8(c)(1)(i)(C) that
the nutrition labeling requirements of
§ 101.8 apply to an article of food sold
from a vending machine that, among
other things, has a selection button.
FDA seeks comment on these tentative
conclusions. FDA is also interested in
comments demonstrating any
unintended adverse effect resulting from
the exclusion of vending machines
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
19241
without selection buttons from the
calorie labeling requirements.
D. Voluntary Registration by a Vending
Machine Operator That Is Not Subject to
the Requirements of Section 4205 of the
Affordable Care Act That Elects To Be
Subject to the Requirements
Section 4205 of the Affordable Care
Act provides that vending machine
operators not subject to the
requirements of section
403(q)(5)(H)(viii) 2 of the FD&C Act may
elect to become subject to the
requirements by registering ‘‘biannually’’
with FDA (21 U.S.C. 343(q)(5)(H)(ix)).
As discussed below, operators that
choose to be subject to the Federal
requirements would not be subject to
non-identical state or local nutrition
labeling laws for food sold from vending
machines. In the proposed rule entitled:
Food Labeling; Nutrition Labeling of
Standard Menu Items in Restaurants
and Similar Retail Food Establishments,
published elsewhere in this issue of the
Federal Register, FDA explains that
‘‘biannual’’ can be defined as occurring
twice every year or as occurring every
other year. (Ref. 1). FDA tentatively
concludes that registration every other
year is a more reasonable interpretation,
because it does not seem warranted or
necessary for a vending machine
operator to tell FDA every 6 months that
the operator wants to be subject to
Federal requirements. FDA began
accepting registrations on July 21, 2010,
and will continue to accept them on a
continuous basis. FDA is proposing in
§ 101.8(d) that an authorized official for
a vending machine operator that is not
subject to the Federal requirements may
register with FDA every other year by
providing FDA the following
information:
• The contact information (including
name, address, phone number, e-mail
address), for the vending machine
operator;
• The address of the location of each
vending machine owned or operated by
the vending machine operator that is
being registered;
• Preferred mailing address (if
different from the vending machine
operator address), for purposes of
receiving correspondence; and
• Certification that the information
submitted is true and accurate, that the
person or firm submitting it is
authorized to do so, and that each
registered vending machine will be
subject to the requirements of § 101.8.
2 As discussed in section I.B. of this document,
vending machine operators that own or operate
fewer than 20 vending machines could elect to be
subject to the requirements of 403(q)(5)(H)(viii) of
the FD&C Act by voluntarily registering with FDA.
E:\FR\FM\06APP3.SGM
06APP3
19242
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 66 / Wednesday, April 6, 2011 / Proposed Rules
An authorized official of a vending
machine operator who elects to be
subject to the Federal requirements can
register by visiting https://www.fda.gov/
menulabeling. FDA has created a form
that contains fields requesting the
information in § 101.8(d) and made the
form available at this Web site.
Registrants must use this form to ensure
that complete information is submitted.
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with PROPOSALS3
E. Requirements for Vending Machine
Operators Subject to This Rule and
Operators That Elect To Be Subject to
the Rule When Calorie Declarations Are
Required
Calorie Declaration for a Covered
Vending Machine Food
a. Calorie declaration. Section
403(q)(5)(H)(viii) of the FD&C Act
provides that, for a covered vending
machine food, the vending machine
operator must ‘‘provide a sign in close
proximity to the article of food or the
selection button that includes a clear
and conspicuous statement disclosing
the number of calories contained in the
article.’’ FDA is proposing in
§ 101.8(c)(2)(i)(A) to require that for a
covered vending machine food, the
statement of the number of calories in
the food must be expressed to the
nearest 5-calorie increment up to and
including 50 calories, and 10-calorie
increment above 50 calories. For a
covered vending machine food that has
fewer than 5 calories, the calorie
declaration may be expressed as zero.
These rounding rules are consistent
with the declaration of calories for
packaged foods as provided in
§ 101.9(c)(1).
In addition, FDA tentatively
concludes that the number of calories
must be accompanied by a term, e.g.,
‘‘calories,’’ to make clear what that
number refers to. Consequently, FDA is
proposing in § 101.8(c)(2)(i)(B) that the
term ‘‘Calories’’ or ‘‘Cal’’ must appear
adjacent to the number of calories for
the covered vending machine food. This
is the ‘‘calorie declaration.’’ We
tentatively conclude that permitting the
use of the abbreviation ‘‘Cal’’ will
provide flexibility for vending machine
operators, especially those that have
limited space on their machines, in
meeting the proposed requirements.
Because section 403(q)(5)(H)(viii) of
the FD&C Act refers to ‘‘an article of
food sold from a vending machine,’’
FDA tentatively concludes that calorie
information must include the total
calories present in the covered vending
machine food as it is vended. For
example, if a covered vending machine
food, such as a sandwich, is dispensed
with a single serving unit of a
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:23 Apr 05, 2011
Jkt 223001
condiment, such as mayonnaise, the
calorie declaration must include the
number of calories contained in the
sandwich and the package of
mayonnaise. FDA also tentatively
concludes that the number of calories
declared for the article of food must be
identical to the number of calories that
are declared in the Nutrition Facts, if
present. If the food contains multiple
servings and bears a Nutrition Facts
Panel, FDA tentatively concludes that
the number of calories declared must be
equal to the total number of calories
contained in the food item as dispensed.
The total number of calories can be
determined by multiplying the number
of calories per serving by the number of
servings in the package. For example, if
the Nutrition Facts states 80 calories per
serving and 3 servings per container, the
total number of calories in the entire
package would be 240 calories. FDA
tentatively concludes that for a covered
vending machine food that contains
multiple servings, a vending machine
operator may voluntarily disclose
calories per serving in addition to total
calories for the food.
Several comments requested that FDA
permit the use of calorie ranges, similar
to those provided for restaurants and
similar retail food establishments under
section 403(q)(5)(H)(v) of the FD&C Act,
in declaring calorie information for
covered vending machine foods that
come in different flavors and varieties,
e.g., coffee which comes in different
flavors, brew strength, serving size,
sweeteners or different types of
sandwiches or fruit. The comments
discussed the need for flexibility to
provide calorie ranges for such items.
FDA acknowledges that some articles
of food sold from vending machines
come in varieties, such as different
flavors and types of hot beverages (e.g.,
coffee or hot chocolate). For some of
these varieties, there could be a large
range for calories. For example, calories
for coffee could range from zero calories
for a plain brewed coffee to over 400
calories for a large mocha coffee with
whole milk and whipped cream. We
point out, however, that a vending
machine operator could post a calorie
declaration in close proximity to the
selection button for a food that comes in
different varieties and flavors that is
sold in a vending machine that has
selection buttons corresponding to the
different options. For example, if there
is a button to select cream for a coffee,
a vending machine operator would be
able to post a calorie declaration for that
cream item in close proximity to the
selection button. FDA has considered
vending machines that typically
dispense fresh sandwiches and fruit
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
(often these machines are turnstile
type). FDA believes that such machines
do not present a unique situation where
the proposed options for declaring
calorie information would not be
appropriate. FDA tentatively concludes,
therefore, that calorie ranges are not
necessary within the context of vending
machines because a vending machine
operator would be able to disclose
calorie information under other options,
as explained below (e.g., use of signs
including posters).
b. Determination of calorie content. If
a covered vending machine food does
not bear Nutrition Facts, FDA
anticipates that the manufacturer or
supplier of the food may provide the
number of total calories for the food to
the vending machine operator so that
the operator has the necessary calorie
information to meet the calorie
disclosure requirements of section
403(q)(5)(H)(viii) of the FD&C Act. FDA
notes that covered vending machine
operators must ensure that the calorie
declaration is truthful and not
misleading in accordance with section
403(a)(1) of the FD&C Act. In the event
the calorie information is not available
from the manufacturer of the food, FDA
seeks comments on whether a vending
machine operator may use nutrient
databases, cookbooks, laboratory
analyses, and other reasonable means.
FDA notes that such flexibility is
provided in § 101.10 and section
403(q)(5)(H)(iv). Further, FDA seeks
comment on whether vending machine
operators should be required to provide
FDA the information on which they
relied to determine the total calories
posted for the vending machine food.
c. Placement and prominence of
calorie declarations. Section
403(q)(5)(H)(viii) of the FD&C Act
provides that for a covered vending
machine food, the vending machine
operator must provide a sign in close
proximity to the article of food or the
selection button that includes a clear
and conspicuous statement disclosing
the number of calories contained in the
food. FDA is interpreting the
requirement that a sign be placed in
close proximity to the article to mean
that the sign is placed either in or on the
vending machine itself or adjacent to
the vending machine and near the food,
its price, its selection number, or its
selection button.
Section 403(q)(5)(H)(viii) also requires
that the calorie declaration be clear and
conspicuous. FDA notes that to be clear
and conspicuous the calorie declaration
must be in a font size large enough to
be seen and easily readable. However,
FDA recognizes that vending machines
come in a variety of sizes, shapes, and
E:\FR\FM\06APP3.SGM
06APP3
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with PROPOSALS3
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 66 / Wednesday, April 6, 2011 / Proposed Rules
styles. We also understand that vending
machines will often have limited space.
We think that it is important to provide
businesses with flexibility while, at the
same time, fulfilling the requirements of
the statute. Therefore, we think it would
not be appropriate to require one
specific type size and font for calorie
declarations for all covered vending
machine food. Generally, if a calorie
declaration is in a similar color as and
a type size no smaller than the name 3
of the food, price of the food, or the
selection number (e.g., A9 or E4),
consumers should be able to read the
calories in the same manner as they read
the name and price of the food item.
Therefore, FDA is proposing in
§ 101.8(c)(2)(i)(C) that if the calorie
declaration is in or on the vending
machine itself, the calorie declaration
for a covered vending machine food
must be in a type size no smaller than
the name, selection number, or price of
the food as displayed on the vending
machine, whichever is smallest. In
addition, to help ensure that the calorie
declaration is clear and conspicuous,
FDA is proposing in § 101.8(c)(2)(i)(B)
and § 101.8(c)(2)(i)(C) that the calorie
declaration be made in the same color,
or in a color at least as conspicuous, as
the color of the name, price, or selection
number of the food. Further, FDA
proposes that the calorie declaration on
the machine must have the same
contrasting background as the name or
price or selection number it is in closest
proximity to. FDA notes that if a calorie
declaration is presented in a color that
is not sufficiently contrasted with its
background or the declaration is in a
type size that is too small to be read by
a prospective purchaser, FDA
tentatively concludes that the calorie
declaration for a covered vending
machine food is not disclosed in a clear
and conspicuous manner, and the
declaration would not be in compliance
with the requirements of section
403(q)(5)(H)(viii)(I). FDA requests
comment on whether these
requirements meet the conditions for
‘‘clear and conspicuous’’ or whether the
requirements should be more or less
prescriptive.
A number of comments suggested that
calorie information be provided on a
poster or sign near the machine, such as
for a bank of several vending machines
that may use a common singular
payment acceptor. However, several
comments noted a concern that calorie
information would not be read by the
3 Here the discussion of ‘‘name’’ refers to the name
of the food on or in the vending machine and not
the name of the food on the label of the food
package.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:23 Apr 05, 2011
Jkt 223001
consumer unless the calorie information
were posted immediately next to each
food item. The comments stated that
‘‘vending menus’’ (such as a menu poster
for a bank of vending machines) would
not provide the buyer with easy access
to the calorie information.
FDA agrees with the comments that a
sign that is a poster may be an
appropriate medium to convey the
required calorie declarations, so long as
the sign is in close proximity to the
covered vending machine food or
selection button. The Agency tentatively
concludes that ‘‘close proximity’’ could
mean adjacent to the vending machine,
but not necessarily attached, so long as
the sign adjacent to the machine is clear
and conspicuous at the same time as the
food, its name, or its selection button or
selection number is visible. The Agency
requests comments on this tentative
conclusion. FDA is also proposing in
§ 101.8(c)(2)(ii)(B) that if the sign
required by section 403(q)(5)(H)(viii) of
the FD&C Act is placed adjacent to the
vending machine, the calorie
declaration must be in type that is all
black or one color printed on a white or
other neutral background that contrasts
with the type color. The Agency is not
proposing a minimum type size for the
calorie declaration, but we request
comment on this tentative decision.
Comments should provide a rationale
supporting their position and any
supporting data, including consumer
research. Where the vending machine
only displays a vignette (i.e., picture of
the food) or name of the food item, FDA
is proposing in § 101.8(c)(2)(ii)(D) that
the calorie disclosure sign must be in
close proximity to the vignette or name
or in close proximity to the selection
button.
For electronic vending machines (e.g.,
machines with digital or electronic or
liquid crystal display (LCD) displays),
FDA tentatively concludes that the
calorie disclosure sign required by the
statute may be displayed when the
selection numbers are entered but before
the selection is confirmed, as proposed
in § 101.8(c)(2)(ii)(E).
FDA tentatively concludes, that for
certain types of vending machines with
a limited number of selections, (e.g.,
popcorn with or without added butter),
the sign with the statement of calories
may appear anywhere on the front (or
face) of the vending machine. A sign
may consist of a handwritten sticker in
permanent marking that is affixed to the
machine, provided that the statement is
prominent, not crowded by other
labeling on the machine and in a type
size reasonably related to the largest
print on the vending machine.
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
19243
F. When Calorie Declaration Is Not
Required
1. Examination of the Nutrition Facts
Panel
If the Nutrition Facts Panel of an
article of food sold from a vending
machine may be examined by a
prospective purchaser before purchasing
the article, the vending machine
operator is not required to provide the
calorie information. FDA is interpreting
the term ‘‘Nutrition Facts Panel’’ to mean
the nutrition information in the format
required in § 101.9(c) and (d) on the
label of the food. FDA tentatively
concludes in order for the Nutrition
Facts Panel to be examined, it must be
visible in full, without obstruction,
before purchase. For example, a vending
machine’s automatic dispensing coil
that holds the food in place or the
placement of the package in the
machine must not obscure, cover, or
cause to be covered any portion of the
Nutrition Facts Panel. To enable the
prospective buyer to obtain the total
number of calories of the article of food,
the information that would be required
to be made available on a sign by the
vending machine operator if the
provisions of section
403(q)(5)(H)(viii)(I)(aa) are not met, the
agency notes that, in most cases, the
prospective purchaser must use several
parts of the panel to determine the total
number of calories for the article of
food. This is one reason that it is critical
that no portion of the Nutrition Facts
Panel be obscured.
In addition, the Nutrition Facts Panel
must be in a size that permits the
prospective purchaser to easily read the
nutrition information while the food is
in the vending machine. FDA
regulations allow certain foods to bear
Nutrition Facts in a modified or smaller
format based on the composition of the
food, the size of the food package or
other factors (see § 101.9(d), (e), (f), (h)
and (j)). Where the Nutrition Facts Panel
is in a smaller format consistent with
the regulations, a prospective purchaser
is unlikely to be able to easily read it on
the label of the article of food in the
vending machine prior to purchase. In
such cases, the Agency tentatively
concludes that the prospective
purchaser is not able to examine the
Nutrition Facts Panel prior to purchase.
FDA requests comment on these
tentative conclusions.
FDA recognizes that ordinarily the
vending machine operator is not
responsible for the printing of the
Nutrition Facts Panel. Nor is the
vending machine operator required by
section 403(q)(5)(H)(viii)(I) to make
examination of the Nutrition Facts
E:\FR\FM\06APP3.SGM
06APP3
19244
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 66 / Wednesday, April 6, 2011 / Proposed Rules
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with PROPOSALS3
possible by the prospective purchaser
prior to purchase. However, food
manufacturers may have an incentive to
work with vending machine operators to
find ways to have their packaged food
displayed with the Nutrition Facts
easily readable in the vending machine.
In this way, potential purchasers would
have more information about the
manufacturers’ food than just calories.
2. Visible Nutrition Information at the
Point of Purchase
The second prong of section
403(q)(5)(H)(viii)(I)(aa) specifies that if a
vending machine ‘‘otherwise provide[s]
visible nutrition information at the
point of purchase’’ for an article of food
sold from the machine, the vending
machine operator is not required to
provide the calorie information. As with
the Nutrition Facts Panel this alternative
means of satisfying the requirement of
section 403(q)(5)(H)(viii) is optional for
vending machine operators.
The terms ‘‘visible nutrition
information’’ and ‘‘point of purchase’’ in
section 403(q)(5)(H)(viii)(I)(aa) are not
defined in the statute. FDA sees two
possible ways to understand and apply
the terms. One approach is to conclude
that (1) ‘‘nutrition information’’ in this
context means total calories in the
article of food, because this is the
information that the vending machine
operator must provide by sign if the
provisions in section
403(q)(5)(H)(viii)(I)(aa) are not met; and
(2) ‘‘otherwise provide[d] * * * at the
point of purchase’’ suggests, in the
context of the provision as a whole, that
the information, like the Nutrition Facts
Panel, should be on the article of food
itself. FDA proposes this approach in
proposed § 101.8(b).
FDA received several comments
supporting the use of ‘‘front of package’’
nutrition information contained on the
food label as a means of ‘‘providing
visible nutrition information at the
point of purchase.’’ For example, some
packaged food manufacturers
voluntarily place certain nutrition
information on the principal display
panel that includes calorie and other
nutrition information about the product.
This type of nutrition information is
sometimes referred to as ‘‘front of
package’’ by industry, whereas Nutrition
Facts typically appear on the
information panel of a food label. FDA
tentatively concludes that ‘‘front of
package’’ nutrition information could be
a way to provide visible nutrition
information, so long as the criteria for
color, font and type size are met and
total calories in the article of food are
included. If a nutrient content claim or
a health claim for the article of food also
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:23 Apr 05, 2011
Jkt 223001
is included on the front of the package,
the claim must comply with relevant
FDA regulations authorizing nutrient
content claims (a claim on food labeling
regarding the level of a nutrient, e.g.,
low fat) or health claims (a claim on
food labeling regarding the relationship
between a substance and a disease, e.g.,
calcium and osteoporosis), as
applicable.
FDA also received a few comments
stating that the Nutrition Facts Panel
and any ‘‘front of package’’ nutrition
information may be small and difficult
to read in a vending machine. FDA
recognizes that a consumer may not be
able to easily read some nutrition
information in a vending machine and
therefore this information may not
inform the consumer about the number
of total calories in the article of food.
Section 101.8(b) of this proposed rule
sets out the provisions regarding ‘‘visible
nutrition information at the point of
purchase’’ discussed above.
Under proposed § 101.8(b), for the
nutrition information on the label to be
considered ‘‘visible,’’ it must be clear
and conspicuous. To ensure that it is
clear and conspicuous, it must be both
(1) in a type size easily readable from
the distance between the prospective
purchaser and the label and (2) in print
with sufficient color and contrasting
background to be readily
distinguishable from other types of
information on the label. FDA
tentatively concludes that the visible
nutrition information presented on the
label of the food at the point of purchase
must be in a type size reasonably related
to the most prominent printed matter on
the label and in a color that sufficiently
contrasts with the background, such that
a prospective purchaser is able to notice
and read the information. Generally,
FDA has considered ‘‘reasonably
related’’ to mean a type size that is at
least 50 percent of the size of the largest
print on the label. (Ref. 2).
The alternative approach is to
interpret the words ‘‘otherwise provide
visible nutrition information at the
point of purchase’’ by concluding that
(1) ‘‘nutrition information’’ means
something more than total calories, and
(2) ‘‘point of purchase’’ means something
more than on the package of the food
itself. Under this interpretation, the
non-Nutrition Facts Panel option in the
statute would include information in
addition to total calories because the
broader term ‘‘nutrition information’’
was used instead of ‘‘calories.’’ Just as
the Nutrition Facts Panel contains more
than calorie information, so too, would
‘‘visible nutrition information at the
point of purchase.’’ This could include,
in addition to total calories in the food,
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
information such as serving size
information or information on the
nutrients that are required to be
disclosed in the Nutrition Facts as
described in § 101.9 or 21 U.S.C.
343(q)(1)(D) and (E). FDA seeks
comment on what other nutrition
information, if any, should be required
if this alternative interpretation were
adopted. FDA also notes that under this
alternative interpretation, the vending
machine operator could rely on any
‘‘visible nutrition information at the
point of purchase’’ that included total
calories in addition to other nutrition
information regardless of what entity
supplied the information.
Likewise, under the alternative
approach, ‘‘point of purchase’’ would be
read to mean that the ‘‘visible nutrition
information’’ could be provided in
places other than on the package of the
food in the vending machine, such as on
the vending machine itself.
In the case of the alternative
interpretation, in which the ‘‘visible
nutrition information at the point of
purchase’’ appears other than on the
label of the article of food, there are also
the questions of where and through
what means the information may be
provided. The agency specifically
requests comment on whether, under
this alternative interpretation, signs
(including posters) or booklets would be
sufficient in providing ‘‘otherwise
visible nutrition information at the
point of purchase’’ and we especially
request any consumer studies or social
scientific data on this issue.
Regardless of the precise location or
means of providing the nutrition
information, under the alternative
interpretation there would also be a
question of ensuring that the
information is adequately ‘‘visible.’’ At a
minimum, the nutrition information
should be clear and conspicuous and
noticeable at the point of purchase, in
the context of the surroundings. One
way to ensure this visibility if the
nutrition information is not on the label
of the article of food would be to
provide the information in type that is
all black or one color, printed on a
white or other neutral background that
contrasts with the type color. Another
way would be to also provide the
information using a minimum type size.
The agency requests comments on these
and other ways to determine if the
information is ‘‘visible.’’
Another aspect of whether
information that is not on the food itself
is visible to the consumer is where the
information is placed relative to the
‘‘point of purchase.’’ FDA requests
comment on the meaning of ‘‘the point
of purchase’’ in this context and on all
E:\FR\FM\06APP3.SGM
06APP3
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 66 / Wednesday, April 6, 2011 / Proposed Rules
aspects of the alternative interpretation
of ‘‘visible nutrition information at the
point of purchase.’’
FDA seeks comment on the
alternative approaches to interpreting
and applying ‘‘otherwise provide visible
nutrition information at the point of
purchase.’’
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with PROPOSALS3
G. Conforming Amendment
FDA is proposing to exempt
electronic signatures submitted to
satisfy the requirements of this
proposed section from the requirement
to comply with Part 11—Electronic
Records; Electronic Signatures (21 CFR
part 11) and proposing to amend part 11
to reflect this exemption. We expect this
exemption to facilitate the registration
process for those vending machine
operators who voluntarily choose to
register under section 403(q)(5)(H)(ix) of
the FD&C Act.
H. Effective Date
FDA received a few comments
regarding the effective date of the final
rule that would issue based on this
proposal. These comments suggested
that vending machine operators would
need 2 years to implement the
requirements for calorie labeling for
vending machines due to the costs of
producing posters and driving to each
site to post the information.
FDA is proposing that the final rule
become effective one year from the date
of its publication. Because FDA is
proposing flexibility for compliance,
i.e., the use of signs in, on, or adjacent
to vending machines, vending machine
operators would be able to choose
among a wide variety of less expensive
avenues to achieve compliance,
depending on their situation. Many
foods sold from vending machines are
packaged and have Nutrition Facts.
Therefore, vending machine operators
have the opportunity of orienting the
food in the vending machine such that
the prospective customer may examine
the Nutrition Facts Panel. In this case,
the operators would not need to provide
calorie information required by
403(q)(5)(H)(viii)(I) of the FD&C Act. If
the operator chooses not to orient the
food such that the prospective customer
may examine the Nutrition Facts Panel,
or if it is not practicable to do so
because the vending machine is not of
the type where the food is visible, the
operator may obtain the calorie
information from the Nutrition Facts to
place on the signs. Further, the
proposed rule, if finalized, does not
require any particular manner of
obtaining calorie information. As
discussed above in this document, FDA
anticipates that, if a covered vending
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:23 Apr 05, 2011
Jkt 223001
machine food does not bear Nutrition
Facts because it falls under an
exemption, the manufacturer or supplier
of the food may provide the number of
total calories for the food to the vending
machine operator so that the operator
has the necessary calorie information to
meet the calorie disclosure requirements
of section 403(q)(5)(H)(viii)(I). Because
of the flexibility provided in this
proposed rule, the Agency finds that it
is reasonable to make the requirements
effective in 1 year. Based on the
comments and on what vending
machine operators will need to do to
come into compliance, the Agency
tentatively finds that making the final
rule effective 1 year after publication is
practicable. The Agency seeks comment
on the appropriateness of this
timeframe.
IV. Summary Preliminary Regulatory
Impact Analysis
The summary analysis of benefits and
costs included in this document is
drawn from the detailed Preliminary
Regulatory Impact Analysis which is
available at https://www.regulations.gov,
Docket No. FDA–2011–F–0171, and is
also available on FDA’s Web site at
https://www.fda.gov/Food/Labeling
Nutrition/ucm217762.htm.
A. Introduction
FDA has examined the impacts of the
proposed rule under Executive Orders
13563 and 12866, the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601–612), and
the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of
1995 (Pub. L. 104–4). Executive Orders
13563 and 12866 direct agencies to
assess all costs and benefits of available
regulatory alternatives and, if regulation
is necessary, to select regulatory
approaches that maximize net benefits
(including potential economic,
environmental, public health and safety
effects, distributive impacts, and
equity). Executive Order 13563
emphasizes the importance of
quantifying both costs and benefits, of
reducing costs, of harmonizing rules,
and of promoting flexibility. This
proposed rule has been designated an
‘‘economically’’ significant rule, under
section 3(f)(1) of Executive Order 12866.
Accordingly, the proposed rule has been
reviewed by the Office of Management
and Budget (OMB).
The Regulatory Flexibility Act
requires agencies to analyze regulatory
options that would minimize any
significant impact of a rule on small
entities. Using the Small Business
Administration (SBA) definition of
small vending machine operators as
classified by the North American
Industry Classification System (NAICS
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
19245
45421), FDA estimates that a significant
number of operators impacted by this
proposed rule are small businesses. As
directed by statute, the requirements of
the proposed rule only apply to vending
machine operators that own or operate
20 or more vending machines. However,
according to data from the Vending
Times Census and from the National
Automatic Merchandising Association
(NAMA), the average annual revenue
per machine is less than $7,000 (Refs. 3
and 4). An operator with only 20
machines may have vending machine
revenue of less than $140,000. In order
to exceed the SBA’s definition of a small
vending machine operator, a firm would
need at least $10 million in annual
revenue (Ref. 5). This suggests that a
firm with revenue exclusively from
vending machine sales would need
more than 1,400 machines to exceed the
definition of small business. Based on
the latest available U.S. Economic
Census data that breaks down
establishments by revenue, we project
that 97 percent of firms selling covered
vending machine food, as that term is
used in this document, that identify
primarily as vending machine operators
that are engaged in the business of
owning or operating 20 or more vending
machines would be small businesses as
defined by SBA. Therefore, the Agency
believes that the proposed rule would
have a significant economic impact on
a substantial number of small entities.
This impact is discussed further in
section V of this document.
Section 202(a) of the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 requires
that agencies prepare a written
statement, which includes an
assessment of anticipated costs and
benefits, before proposing ‘‘any rule that
includes any Federal mandate that may
result in the expenditure by State, local,
and tribal governments, in the aggregate,
or by the private sector, of $100,000,000
or more (adjusted annually for inflation)
in any one year.’’ The current threshold
after adjustment for inflation is $135
million, using the most current (2009)
Implicit Price Deflator for the Gross
Domestic Product. FDA does not expect
this proposed rule to result in any 1year expenditure that would meet or
exceed this amount.
B. Need for This Regulation
This proposed rule is necessary to
implement section 4205 of the
Affordable Care Act, which principally
amends sections 403 and 403A of the
FD&C Act, and requires operators of 20
or more vending machines to disclose
calorie information for covered vending
machine food. The provision of calorie
information for covered vending
E:\FR\FM\06APP3.SGM
06APP3
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with PROPOSALS3
19246
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 66 / Wednesday, April 6, 2011 / Proposed Rules
machine food may help consumers
make better informed dietary choices.
Economic justifications for regulatory
interventions in private markets rely on
the presence of some market failure. In
the case of food sold from a vending
machine, the private market is
particularly robust and competitive.
Thousands of individual firms vie for
consumer dollars in millions of vending
machines across the United States (Ref.
3). Low entry costs for firms and low
switching costs for customers suggest
that if a sizable fraction of consumers
were willing to pay for—and
discriminate based on—the visible
calorie information at the point of
purchase then the industry would
provide it to them. In fact, some vending
machine operators are voluntarily
providing more healthful choices and
additional information on machines
(Refs. 4 and 6).
Although many of the usual market
failures that justify regulatory action,
such as the existence of market power
or of ill-defined property rights, do not
apply here (Refs. 7 and 8), the primary
support for regulatory intervention is
that there are systematic biases in how
consumers process information and
weigh current benefits (from consuming
higher calorie foods) against future costs
(higher probability of obesity and its
comorbidities).
The bias is more directly related to
the requirements of this proposed rule:
Consumer demand for calorie
information does not create incentives
for the provision of calorie information
at the vending machine. This market
failure occurs because at the time of
purchase, consumers do not value
calorie information as much as they do
later, when the effects of excess calorie
consumption are evident. Studies have
shown that consumers have presentbased preferences, meaning that they are
continually optimistic about the
healthfulness of their future choices
(Ref. 9, 10 and 11).
These studies suggest that calorie
information often lacks salience, or
relevance, for consumers at the time of
purchase and consumption, even
though they may experience regret
about their decisions at a later date. This
tendency may explain why consumers
have not generally demanded calorie
and other nutrition information for food
sold from vending machines before, or
at, the point of purchase, even if they
may, at a later point in time, value that
information. Because of competition for
consumer time and attention vending
machine operators have limited time
and space in which to convey
information to consumers. These limits
mean that there is a substantial
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:23 Apr 05, 2011
Jkt 223001
opportunity cost to the operator of
providing calorie information. That is,
just as an operator may have to decide
which possible foods to leave out of a
vending machine with limited space
(thus giving up the opportunity to sell
those items), it must choose which
pieces of information about its foods it
wants to convey. Adding an additional
piece of information means that an
operator may need to downplay or
remove some other piece of information.
This opportunity cost of information
holds true whether the calorie
information is displayed on the machine
or, as with an increasing number of
packaged foods, on the principal display
panel of the package.
The proposed requirements mitigate
the apparent market failure in
information provision stemming from
present-biased preferences, although not
necessarily the tendency of consumers
to underutilize that information.
Specifically, for a covered vending
machine food, this proposed rule
requires that the vending machine
operator provide a sign in close
proximity to the food or the selection
button, i.e. in, on, or adjacent to the
vending machine, but not necessarily
attached to the vending machine, so
long as the sign is visible at the same
time as the food, its name, price, or
selection number. This information
must be presented in a color that is
sufficiently contrasted with the
background, must be in close proximity
to the vignette or name or in close
proximity to the selection button when
a name or vignette is displayed, and, for
electronic vending machines, the calorie
information may be displayed when the
selection numbers are entered but before
the selection is confirmed. These
requirements are designed so that the
calorie information is made available to
consumers before they purchase such
food. Providing the information will
likely increase consumer awareness
regarding the calorie content in covered
vending machine food and increase the
perceived relevance of that information
to their decision making. Providing the
information may serve to highlight the
potential future costs of additional
calorie consumption. This increased
attention to the caloric content of
covered vending machine food may
then result in an increased availability
of lower calorie options, and an
increased demand for these options.
C. Summary of Costs and Benefits of the
Proposed Requirements and Regulatory
Options
In this section FDA describes the
bases of benefits and costs of the
proposed requirements and summarizes
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
the results of the detailed Preliminary
Regulatory Impact Analysis (PRIA).
Benefits in response to the proposed
requirements Obesity is a major public
health concern in the United States and
one of the top leading health indicators
addressed by the United States Healthy
People 2020 goals. Nationally
representative data indicate an increase
in the prevalence of obesity over the
past three decades (Ref. 12). The 2007–
2008 National Health and Nutrition
Examination Survey (NHANES) data
showed that 34 percent of the adult U.S.
population is obese and 34 percent are
overweight (Ref. 13).
Excess body weight has many health
(Ref. 14), social (Refs. 15 and 16),
psychological (Refs. 17 and 18), and
economic consequences (Ref. 19) for the
affected individuals. Lower life
expectancy, elevated risk of diabetes,
hypertension, stroke and other
cardiovascular diseases have been
documented to rise simultaneously with
the increased prevalence of obesity (Ref.
14). The economic impact is especially
evident in health-care costs in terms of
greater health-care utilization and
higher medical expenditures (Ref. 20).
More specifically, medical expenditures
attributable to overweight and obesity
accounted for more than 9 percent of the
total U.S. medical expenditures in 1998,
or between $85.7 billion and $147
billion (Ref. 20). Researchers have
proposed various factors to explain this
dramatic rise in obesity including
declining food prices and physical
requirements of labor (Refs. 21 and 22),
declining time costs of food preparation
(Ref. 23), fast-food restaurant density
(Ref. 24) and social interactions (Refs.
25).
Although the relationship between
obesity and poor dietary choices is
multi-faceted, there is a general
agreement in the literature that
reduction in excess calories is helpful in
preventing or delaying the onset of
excess weight gain (Ref. 26). Vending
machines are a likely source of highcalorie snack or discretionary foods, as
well as some high-calorie meal items.
Industry data indicate that there is
approximately one vending machine for
every 40 adults in the United States, and
that up to 5 percent of the money
consumers spend on food away from
home is spent on vending machine food
(Ref. 27). This suggests that providing
calorie information for covered vending
machine food to consumers may have a
significant effect on calorie intake, the
prevalence of obesity, and thus the cost
of health care and lost productivity.
To the extent that the proposed
requirements mitigate the increase in
the prevalence of obesity and the
E:\FR\FM\06APP3.SGM
06APP3
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with PROPOSALS3
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 66 / Wednesday, April 6, 2011 / Proposed Rules
prevalence of these costly comorbidities such as hypertension and
diabetes, society gains the opportunity
cost of the averted medical expenditures
and an increase in productivity from
averted debilitation and death. In
addition to educating consumers about
calorie content, major predicted
elements of the consumer and industry
response to this proposed rule are:
1. Increased awareness regarding the
caloric content in covered vending
machine foods, and the perceived
relevance of that information to decision
making, which may help reduce the
present-bias in preferences, and thus
encourage the consumption of lower
calorie options.
2. Increased consumer interest in
lower calorie options, and greater
transparency in the caloric content of
foods sold in vending machines, which
may give manufacturers an incentive to:
a. Reduce the calorie content of foods
sold in vending machines through
reformulation or by decreasing portion
size.
b. Provide additional items with
lower calorie formulations.
These changes may reduce
consumers’ caloric intake from food
sold in vending machines. Note that any
reduction in calorie intake in these
settings may be at least partially offset
by increases in calorie intake during
other meals or snacks. Because FDA
lacks data on how consumers will
substitute among caloric sources, the
benefit estimations given here may be
higher or lower than those that will be
realized if the rule is finalized as
proposed.
Coverage of the proposed rule and
industry overview. The proposed rule
covers certain vending machine
operators that are engaged in the
business of owning or operating 20 or
more vending machines and those
vending machine operators that
voluntarily register with FDA to become
subject to the Federal requirements. The
proposed rule does not cover vending
machines without a selection button,
including bulk vending machines that
dispense gum, candy and nuts. Vending
machines are operated both by food
service firms and by firms in other
businesses that operate machines for the
benefit of their customers or employees
and do not identify as vending machine
operators. Because this latter group
cannot be accurately counted, published
estimates of the number of vending
machine operators will generally
undercount the number of covered
operators under the proposed rule. For
the purposes of this preliminary
regulatory impact analysis, we will use
the term ‘‘covered operators’’ or ‘‘covered
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:23 Apr 05, 2011
Jkt 223001
vending machines’’ to refer to operators
or machines that sell covered vending
machine foods. According to the
NAMA, there are approximately 13,500
companies that operate vending
machines in the United States (Ref. 4).
Other estimates put the total closer to
10,000 (Ref. 3). This total includes 5,000
firms whose primary business
identification is as vending machine
operators (NAICS 4542), plus a variety
of other firms that operate vending
machines, but do not primarily identify
as such. These other companies include,
for example, beverage manufacturers
and food service contractors. Because of
the difficulty in determining which
firms are covered, and because FDA has
no data on the potentially significant
number of covered vending machine
operators that self-identify as businesses
outside the food industry, we take
NAMA’s higher estimate of 13,500 firms
as the number of covered firms.
FDA estimates that 97 percent of firms
selling covered vending machine food
that identify primarily as vending
machine operators that are engaged in
the business of owning or operating 20
or more vending machines are small
businesses as defined by the SBA. Other
estimates indicate that more than 90
percent of the firms covered by the
proposed rule are defined as small
businesses (Ref. 3). This percentage may
be lower for firms that have primary
business identification other than as
vending machine operators, but the
majority of covered businesses will
likely still be defined as small
businesses. Because very small,
informal businesses that are not
captured by economic census data
might operate 20 or more machines,
these figures may underestimate the
number of affected small businesses.
Conversely, approximately 72 percent of
industry revenue—and thus a
comparably large fraction of
consumption—comes from firms with
more than $10 million in annual sales,
and 85 percent comes from firms with
more than $5 million in revenue
(Ref. 3).
Vending machine operators together
operate an estimated 5 to 7 million
machines (Refs. 3 and 4) in at least 1.5
million locations (Ref. 3).
Approximately 70 percent of these
machines sell packaged food, including
beverages, that are required to bear
nutrition labeling under section
403(q)(1) of the FD&C Act and FDA
regulations at § 101.9, and thus have
Nutrition Facts. This 70 percent is
comprised mostly of packaged beverage
machines, which account for more than
50 percent of all vending machines,
with the remainder—approximately 20
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
19247
percent of all machines—selling
packaged confections or snacks. Ten
percent sell a variety of hot and cold
cup beverages, frozen or fresh food
products and miscellaneous other food
products. The final 20 percent of
machines are bulk candy, nut or gum
machines that are not covered by
section 403(q)(5)(H)(viii) and the
proposed requirements because they
lack selection buttons. While these bulk
machines form a large percentage of
vending machines, they account for less
than 0.5 percent of vending machine
sales (Ref. 4).
Summary of costs and benefits of the
proposed rule and regulatory options In
this section we briefly summarize the
costs and benefits of the proposed rule
that are analyzed in the detailed PRIA.
These estimates are collected in table 1.
Costs of complying with the proposed
requirements have been estimated for
three major areas: Cost of nutrition
analysis, cost of new signs, including
posters, and labor costs. In the case of
the proposed rule, FDA estimates that
there would be approximately 10,800
operators under the proposed
requirements, controlling between 4
million and 5.6 million machines that
sell covered vending machine foods.
The initial mean estimated cost of
complying with the proposed
requirements is $25.8 million, with an
estimated mean ongoing cost of $24.0
million. Mean annualized costs are
$24.5 million at a 7 percent discount
rate, and $24.2 million at 3 percent
discount rate. Per operator costs are
estimated to be $2,400. FDA estimates
that average per machine costs are less
than $10 annually.
FDA has not estimated the actual
benefits associated with proposed
requirements. Food choice and
consumption decisions are complex and
FDA is unaware of any comprehensive
data allowing accurate predictions of
the effect of the proposed requirements
on consumer choice and vended foods.
Therefore, FDA has constructed a
plausible individual effect of the
proposed rule, and has conducted a
break-even analysis in order to
determine the proportion of the U.S.
obese adult population that would need
to attain this minimal response in order
for the proposed requirement to yield a
positive net benefit. Using a 100 calorie
per week reduction in intake as the
benchmark effect, FDA estimates that at
least 0.02 percent of the adult obese
population would need to reach this
benchmark in order for the rule to break
even on the initial total cost. On an
ongoing basis, again, at least 0.02
percent of the adult obese population
would need to reach this benchmark in
E:\FR\FM\06APP3.SGM
06APP3
19248
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 66 / Wednesday, April 6, 2011 / Proposed Rules
order for the rule to break even on the
recurring annual costs. These effects are
summarized in table 1 of this document.
Finally, although registration by firms
wishing to register with FDA in order to
come under the proposed requirements
registration constitutes a collection of
information under the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995. Therefore, FDA
has also estimated the burden associated
with this collection of information in
the detailed analysis.
and the associated preemption from
State or local regulations is voluntary,
and will only occur to the extent that
the costs of registration and compliance
with Federal regulation is lower than
that of State or local laws, this
TABLE 1—ACCOUNTING STATEMENT: ANNUALIZED COST AND BREAK-EVEN BENEFIT POINT FOR THE PROPOSED
REQUIREMENTS
Primary
estimate
Low
estimate
High
estimate
Year
dollar
Discount
rate
Period
covered
Benefits
Annualized Monetized ($millions/year) ............................
Not Quantified
Annualized Quantified:
Qualitative: FDA estimates that at least 0.02 percent of the adult obese population would need to reduce caloric intake by at least 100 calories
per week in order for benefits from the proposed requirements to reach a break even point on annualized costs (at either 3% or 7%)
Costs
Annualized Monetized ($millions/year) ............................
Regulatory Options In addition to a
baseline, FDA has identified four
regulatory options for this proposed
rule. The costs and benefits of these
options are summarized in table 2 of
this document.
(0) Baseline for the purpose of
analysis—No new Federal regulatory
action.
(1) Option 1, the proposed rule,
allowing a sign in close proximity to the
article of food or selection button, i.e. in,
$24.5
24.2
$12.5
12.1
$39.8
39.6
on, or adjacent to the vending machine,
but not necessarily attached to the
vending machine, so long as the sign is
visible at the same time as the food, its
name, price, or selection number, and
with an effective date of 1 year after
publication of the final rule.
(2) Option 2, similar to the proposed
rule, but requiring that calorie
declarations be immediately adjacent to
the article of food or selection button for
all calorie disclosures. For this option,
2009
2009
7%
3%
10
10
FDA estimates the cost of individual
signs for each article of food or selection
button.
(3) Option 3, Similar to the proposed
rule, but with an additional year in
compliance period for vendors with less
than $500,000 in annual revenue from
vending machines.
(4) Option 4, similar to the proposed
rule, but with coverage extended to bulk
vending machines without selection
buttons.
TABLE 2—SUMMARY OF ESTIMATED ANNUALIZED COMPLIANCE COSTS FOR EACH OPTION
Primary
estimate
(in millions)
Summary of options
(Baseline) .................................................
Option 1: the Proposed Rule ...................
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with PROPOSALS3
N/A
0.0%
0.0%
+229.2%
0.0%
FDA estimates that Option 2, which
would require individual signs or labels
for each covered vended food, has a tenyear annualized costs of between $36.1
million per year and $140.4 million per
year at a 3 percent discount rate, with
a primary estimate of $81.8 million.
N/A
$12.1
12.5
36.1
36.6
N/A
$39.6
39.8
140.4
141.1
N/A
3%
7%
3%
7%
12.1
12.5
39.6
39.8
3%
7%
0.0%
0.0%
30.2
31.0
Option 4: Extended Scope to Include
Bulk Machines ......................................
Jkt 223001
Percent
discount rate
(10 year
horizon)
24.2
24.5
Option 3: Longer Compliance Time for
Small Businesses .................................
17:23 Apr 05, 2011
High estimate
(in millions)
Proportional
dollar sales of
restaurant
food relative to
primary estimate of the
proposed
requirements
N/A
$24.2
24.5
81.8
82.5
Option 2: Individual Signs ........................
VerDate Mar<15>2010
Low estimate
(in millions)
Proportional
cost relative to
primary
estimate of the
proposed
requirements
15.1
15.8
49.4
50.3
3%
7%
+25.6%
+0.5%
Averaged over primary, low and high
estimates, the costs of Option 2 are
229.2 percent higher than those of the
proposed requirements. These changes
are discussed more fully in the detailed
analysis.
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
Option 3 which considers a longer
compliance time for small businesses
represents only a delay in the costs.
This delay has a small positive impact
on the annualized cost, but one that
does not change the (rounded) estimate
of costs for Option 3 from the estimate,
E:\FR\FM\06APP3.SGM
06APP3
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 66 / Wednesday, April 6, 2011 / Proposed Rules
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with PROPOSALS3
of costs for Option 1. Option 4, expands
the scope of the requirements to include
foods in bulk vending machines without
selection buttons, has costs that are 25.6
percent higher than the proposed
option, and covers an additional 0.5
percent of sales of vended foods.
For full documentation and
discussion of these estimated costs and
benefits see the detailed Preliminary
Regulatory Impact Analysis, available at
https://www.regulations.gov, Docket No.
FDA–2011–F–0171, and is also available
on FDA’s Web site at https://www.
fda.gov/Food/LabelingNutrition/
ucm217762.htm.
V. Initial Regulatory Flexibility
Analysis
FDA has examined the economic
implications of this proposed rule as
required by the Regulatory Flexibility
Act (5 U.S.C. 601–612). If a rule has a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities, the
Regulatory Flexibility Act requires
agencies to analyze regulatory options
that would lessen the economic effect of
the rule on small entities consistent
with statutory objectives. FDA
tentatively concludes that this proposed
rule will have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small
entities.
However, FDA has built flexibility
into the proposed rule. The proposed
rule does not mandate a particular
method for determining calorie
disclosure; instead, the proposed rule
provides options for how vending
machine operators can determine
calorie information for covered vending
machine food. Further, the proposed
rule does not prescribe the materials
that may be used by vending machine
operators in disclosing calorie
information; instead, the proposed rule
provides options for how vending
machine operators can disclose calorie
information for covered vending
machine food. Therefore, vending
machine operators may choose among a
wide variety of less, or more, expensive
avenues to achieve compliance,
depending on their situation. Because
no particular method for compliance is
mandated, the proposed rule gives small
businesses the leeway to use cheaper
solutions that meet the requirements of
the proposed rule (e.g., stickers).
A general way to add flexibility for
small firms during a rulemaking is to
lengthen the time for these firms to
comply with the rule. An example of a
delayed compliance time for small
businesses applied to this proposed rule
is the option for vendors with less than
$500,000 in annual revenue from
vending machine food sales to have an
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:23 Apr 05, 2011
Jkt 223001
additional year to comply. Generally,
FDA uses the SBA’s definition of ‘‘small
business’’ as it applies to the relevant
economic sector, in this case, NAICS
4542. However, as noted in the detailed
Preliminary Regulatory Impact Analysis,
available at https://www.regulations.gov,
Docket No. FDA–2011–F–0171, and is
also available on FDA’s Web site at
https://www.fda.gov/Food/Labeling
Nutrition/ucm217762.htm, SBA defines
a small vending machine operator as
one with annual revenue less than $10
million, and this definition would cover
at least 97 percent of the industry.
Adding flexibility—such as a longer
time to come into compliance—
specifically for small firms would mean
that most vending machine operators
would be given that added flexibility.
Therefore FDA has taken the approach
of building substantial flexibility into
the proposed rule for most vending
machine operators in order to give the
entire industry the opportunity to
comply in the most cost-effective way.
VI. Paperwork Reduction Act
This proposed rule contains
information collection provisions that
are subject to review by the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) under
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(44 U.S.C. 3501–3520). A description of
these provisions is given in the
following paragraphs with an estimate
of the annual reporting and
recordkeeping burden. Included in the
estimate is the time for reviewing
instructions, searching existing data
sources, gathering and maintaining the
data needed, and completing and
reviewing each collection of
information.
The information collection provisions
for all provisions of this proposed rule
have been submitted to OMB for review
as revisions of collections approved
under OMB control numbers 0910–0664
and 0910–0665. Interested persons are
requested to fax comments regarding
information collection by May 6, 2011,
to the Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs, OMB. To ensure that
comments on information collection are
received, OMB recommends that written
comments be faxed to the Office of
Information and Regulatory Affairs,
OMB, Attn: FDA Desk Officer, FAX:
202–395–5806.
FDA invites comments on: (1)
Whether the proposed collection of
information is necessary for the proper
performance of FDA’s functions,
including whether the information will
have practical utility; (2) the accuracy of
FDA’s estimate of the burden of the
proposed collection of information,
including the validity of the
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
19249
methodology and assumptions used; (3)
ways to enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be
collected; and (4) ways to minimize the
burden of the collection of information
on respondents, including through the
use of automated collection techniques,
when appropriate, and other forms of
information technology.
Vending Machine Labeling:
Recordkeeping and Mandatory Third
Party Disclosure Under Section 4205 of
the Patient Protection and Affordable
Care Act of 2010—(OMB Control
Number 0910–0665)—Revision
Section 4205 of the Affordable Care
Act, which amends sections 403(q)(5)
and 403A of the FD&C Act, requires
disclosure of calorie and other nutrition
information by restaurants and vending
machine operators. Section 4205
became effective on the date the law
was signed, March 23, 2010. Restaurants
and vending machine operators not
subject to the requirements of section
403(q)(5)(H) may elect to become subject
to the requirements of section
403(q)(5)(H) by registering biannually
with FDA. Section 4205 required FDA
to publish a notice in the Federal
Register within 120 days of the date of
enactment of section 4205, providing
information on the terms and conditions
for persons who voluntarily elect to be
subject to nutrition disclosure
requirements specified in the law.
A. Statutory Compliance
To comply with the PRA and with the
statutory deadline under the provisions
of section 4205 for publication of
registration information, FDA initially
obtained a 6-month OMB approval of
the collection of information
requirements under the emergency
processing provisions of the PRA. With
OMB approval of the collection of
information requirements of section
4205, FDA took several actions: (1)
Developed an electronic form, ‘‘Menu
And Vending Machine Labeling
Voluntary Registration,’’ Form FDA
3757, (2) as required by section 4205,
published a notice in the Federal
Register of July 23, 2010 (75 FR 43182)
(the July 23, 2010, notice) to explain
how retail food establishments and
vending machine operators not
otherwise subject to the provisions of
section 4205 may voluntarily elect to
become subject to them, and (3)
developed and implemented the
guidance entitled, ‘‘Guidance for
Industry: Questions and Answers
Regarding the Effect of Section 4205 of
the Patient Protection and Affordable
Care Act of 2010 on State and Local
Menu and Vending Machine Labeling
E:\FR\FM\06APP3.SGM
06APP3
19250
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 66 / Wednesday, April 6, 2011 / Proposed Rules
Laws.’’ This guidance among other
things clarified section 4205’s effect on
State and local menu and vending
machine labeling laws, to ensure that
industry and State and local government
understood the immediate effects of the
law. FDA’s current thinking on the
preemptive effects of section 4205 is set
out in the Federalism sections of the
preamble to the proposed rule
implementing menu labeling and this
proposed rule.
FDA has requested a 3-year approval
of the information collection
requirements under the same assigned
OMB Control Nos. 0910–0664 and
0910–0665. In the Federal Register of
January 31, 2011, FDA published two
notices announcing the submission to
OMB of the information collection
requests for No. 0910–0664 (76 FR 5384)
and No. 0910–0665 (76 FR 5380).
Elsewhere in this Federal Register, FDA
published a proposed rule entitled
‘‘Food Labeling; Nutrition labeling of
standard menu items in restaurants and
similar retail food establishments’’ (the
Menu Labeling proposed rule). As
noted, the information collection
requests previously submitted sought
OMB approval of the reporting,
recordkeeping, and third party
disclosure burdens of section 4205, not
the provisions of the Menu Labeling
proposed rule. With that proposed rule,
FDA submitted a revised information
collection request seeking OMB
approval of the changes caused by the
Menu Labeling proposed rule to the
collections approved under OMB
Control Nos. 0910–0664 and 0910–0665.
This proposed rule seeks further
revision of those information collections
with regard to the recordkeeping and
third party disclosure burdens for
vending machine operators caused by
this proposed rule.
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with PROPOSALS3
B. Revision of OMB Control No. 0910–
0665 by the Proposed Rule
These estimated annual
recordkeeping burdens have changed
from the burdens estimated for the OMB
control number 0910–0665 30 day
notice (76 FR 5380, January 31, 2011).
Total initial hours have risen by 1,920
due to an increase in the estimated
number of recordkeepers from 600 to
915 and an increase in the number of
hours per record from 2 hours to 4
hours. The estimated burden of
recurring hours increased by 8 hours to
128 hours. This estimate of third party
disclosure hours has decreased by
approximately 13.2 million hours, from
the 14 million hours estimate given in
the 30-day notice.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:23 Apr 05, 2011
Jkt 223001
C. Consolidation of OMB Control No.
0910–0664 Under 0910–0665
The Menu Labeling proposed rule
contains a revision request in which the
burden hours for the information
collection request under OMB control
number 0910–0664, ‘‘Restaurant Menu
and Vending Machine Labeling:
Registration for Small Chains Under
Section 4205 of the Patient Protection
and Affordable Care Act of 2010’’ are
being consolidated under the
information collection request assigned
OMB control number 0910–
0665,’’Restaurant Menu and Vending
Machine Labeling: Recordkeeping and
Mandatory Third Party Disclosure
Under Section 4205 of the Patient
Protection and Affordable Care Act of
2010.’’ In addition, this proposed rule is
a revision request in which these two
information collection requests will be
further revised with regard to the
estimated burden of the proposed rule
on vending machine operators. The
revised information collection request
for 0910–0665 will be renamed
‘‘Restaurant Menu and Vending Machine
Labeling: Registration, Recordkeeping
and Mandatory Third Party Disclosure
Under Section 4205 of the Patient
Protection and Affordable Care Act of
2010.’’ Upon approval of this revision
request, the information collection
request for OMB control number 0910–
0664 will be discontinued.
D. Analysis of Changes in Burden
Estimates Caused by the Proposed Rule
Description of Respondents: The
likely respondents to this information
collection are operators of 20 or more
vending machines. The following
analysis provides FDA’s estimate of the
changes caused by this proposed rule to
the previously approved recordkeeping
and third party disclosure burdens for
vending machine operators. The
analysis of burden included in this
document is drawn from the detailed
Preliminary Regulatory Impact Analysis
which is available at https://
www.regulations.gov, Docket No. FDA–
2011–F–0171, and is also available on
FDA’s Web site at https://www.fda.gov/
Food/LabelingNutrition/
ucm217762.htm.
Most food sold from vending
machines is subject to nutrition labeling
requirements under section 403(q) of the
FD&C Act and § 101.9, which means
that calorie content is already collected.
A likely scenario in response to vending
machine labeling is that food
manufacturers will include a set of
calorie label stickers in each case of
product. This would be efficient both
because most manufacturers will
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
already have the calorie information
available, and because economies of
scale exist for the manufacturer. In this
case, vending machine operators will
not need to keep a record of calorie
content. Instead, the burden for most
operators will be limited to that of
creating records and passing the existing
information on to consumers.
FDA estimates that there is an average
of 600,000 machines that sell
unpackaged products. FDA tentatively
estimates that between 5 and 10 percent
of all operators of vending machines
with covered vending machine food, or
an average of 810 operators, will need
to acquire nutrition information for at
least some covered vending machine
food. FDA tentatively estimates that
there are between 5 to 10 covered
vending machine foods that do not
include nutrition information per
operator, so that the average number of
possible new calorie analyses would be
6,480 (8 items/firm x 810 firms). FDA
requests comment on these estimates.
Based on data from FDA’s
Recordkeeping Cost Model (Ref. 28), we
estimate approximately 4 hours as the
time per covered vending machine food
for creating the record of nutritional
information. Although the proposed
rule does not mandate recordkeeping,
vending machine operators will likely
need to be able to ensure that calorie
disclosures for covered vending
machine foods are accurate and
consistent without needing to re-analyze
these foods. The estimated number of
hours required for new calorie analysis
in the first year is then 25,920 hours.
This number is displayed in the first
row of table 3 of this document.
FDA believes that the subgroup of
covered vending machine foods sold in
these vending machines is
approximately constant. If there is 0.5
percent growth or turnover in the
number of firms providing these
unpackaged foods, then approximately
four new firms will become subject to
section 4205 of the Affordable Care Act
and the proposed requirements in a
given year. The burden associated with
these firms would be 128 hours (4 firms
× 8 items/firm × 4 hours/item). This
amount is given in second row of table
7 of this document.
These estimated annual
recordkeeping burdens have changed
from the burdens estimated for the OMB
control number 0910–0665 30-day
notice (76 FR 5380, January 31, 2011).
Total initial hours have risen by 1,920
due to an increase in the estimated
number of recordkeepers from 600 to
915 and an increase in the number of
hours per record from 2 hours to
4 hours. The estimated burden of
E:\FR\FM\06APP3.SGM
06APP3
19251
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 66 / Wednesday, April 6, 2011 / Proposed Rules
recurring hours increased by 8 hours to
128 hours. This change is due to an
increase in the estimated number of new
operators (which stems from the
increase in the number of initial
recordkeepers), and the increase in the
number of hours per record. These
changes are due to additional data and
analysis that FDA was able to collect in
the interim.
TABLE 3—ESTIMATED ANNUAL RECORDKEEPING BURDEN: CALORIE ANALYSIS AND RECORDING
Number of
recordkeepers
Type of response
Number of
records per
recordkeeper
Total annual
records
Average
burden per
recordkeeping
(in hours)
Total hours
Initial hours for vending operators ........
Recurring hours for vending operators
810
4
8
8
6,480
32
4
4
25,920
128
Total ...............................................
........................
........................
........................
........................
Total capital
costs for
recordkeeping
26,048
1 There
$1.3 million.
$6,400.
are no operating and maintenance costs associated with this collection of information.
The third party disclosure burden for
vending machine operators is the time
necessary to install calorie displays on
their vending machines. In the PRIA,
FDA estimates an average, recurring
hourly burden of 0.17 hours per
machine per year to install and maintain
the displays. FDA estimates an average
of 4.8 million machines are serviced by
10,800 operators, for an average number
of machines per operator of 444
machines. The estimated recurring
hours needed for third party disclosure
is then 816,000 hours (10,800 firms ×
444 machines/firm × 0.17 hours/
display). This amount is recurring in
every year, and is given in table 4 of this
document.
These estimated annual third party
disclosure burdens have changed from
the burdens estimated for the OMB
Control Number 0910–0665 30-day
notice (76 FR 5380, (Jan. 31, 2011)). This
estimate of third party disclosure hours
has decreased by approximately 13.2
million hours, from the 14 million hours
estimate given in the 30-day notice. In
addition, we no longer estimate any
growth in the number of hours, given
that data shows no significant increase
in the number of vending machines over
the last several years. These changes are
due to additional data and analysis that
FDA was able to collect in the interim.
TABLE 4—ESTIMATED ANNUAL THIRD PARTY DISCLOSURE BURDEN: CALORIE CONTENT
Type of respondent
Number of
respondents
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with PROPOSALS3
Recurring burden
for vending operators.
Number of
disclosures
per
respondent
10,800
444
The current total reporting burden for
menu labeling and vending machine
operator registration as required by
section 4205, now under review at OMB
under No. 0910–0664, is 820 hours. The
estimated reporting burden under the
Menu Labeling proposed rule is 2,190
hours, an increase of 1,370 hours. As
described in the paperwork analysis in
that proposed rule, this increase is due
to an increase in the estimated number
of respondents. This proposed rule does
not further revise those estimates.
In compliance with the PRA, the
agency has submitted the information
collection provisions of this proposed
rule to OMB for review. Interested
persons are requested to send comments
regarding the information collection to
OMB (see DATES and ADDRESSES sections
of this document).
VII. Federalism
FDA has analyzed this proposed rule
in accordance with the principles set
forth in Executive Order 13132. Section
4(a) of the Executive order requires
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:23 Apr 05, 2011
Jkt 223001
Total annual
disclosures
Average
burden per
disclosure
(in hours)
4,800,000
0.17
agencies to ‘‘construe * * * a Federal
statute to preempt State law only where
the statute contains an express
preemption provision or there is some
other clear evidence that the Congress
intended preemption of State law, or
where the exercise of State authority
conflicts with the exercise of Federal
authority under the Federal statute.’’
Federal law includes an express
preemption provision that preempts
‘‘any requirement for nutrition labeling
of food that is not identical to the
requirement of section [21 U.S.C.
343(q)]’’ (21 U.S.C. 343–1(a)(4)), except
that this provision does not apply ‘‘to
food that is offered for sale in a
restaurant or similar retail food
establishment that is not part of a chain
with 20 or more locations doing
business under the same name
(regardless of the type of ownership of
the locations) and offering for sale
substantially the same menu items
unless such restaurant or similar retail
food establishment complies with the
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
Total capital
costs
Total hours
816,000
$4.8 million .......
Total operating
costs
$19.2 million.
voluntary provision of nutrition
information requirements under [21
U.S.C. 343(q)(5)(H)(ix)].’’ (21 U.S.C. 343–
1(a)(4)). If this proposed rule is made
final, the final rule would create
requirements for nutrition labeling of
food under 21 U.S.C. 343(q) that would
preempt certain non-identical State and
local nutrition labeling requirements.
Section 4205 of the Affordable Care
Act also included a Rule of Construction
providing that ‘‘Nothing in the
amendments made by [section 4205]
shall be construed—(1) to preempt any
provision of State or local law, unless
such provision establishes or continues
into effect nutrient content disclosures
of the type required under section
403(q)(5)(H) of the Federal Food, Drug,
and Cosmetic Act [21 U.S.C.
343(q)(5)(H)] (as added by subsection(b))
and is expressly preempted under
subsection (a)(4) of such section; (2) to
apply to any State or local requirement
respecting a statement in the labeling of
food that provides for a warning
concerning the safety of the food or
E:\FR\FM\06APP3.SGM
06APP3
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with PROPOSALS3
19252
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 66 / Wednesday, April 6, 2011 / Proposed Rules
component of the food; or (3) except as
provided in section 403(q)(5)(H)(ix) of
the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic
Act [21 U.S.C. 343(q)(5)(H)(ix)] (as
added by subsection (b)), to apply to any
restaurant or similar retail food
establishment other than a restaurant or
similar retail food establishment
described in section 403(q)(5)(H)(i) of
such Act [21 U.S.C. 343(q)(5)(H)(i)].’’
(Pub. L. 111–148, § 4205(d), 124 Stat.
119, 576 (2010)0.
FDA interprets the provisions of
Section 4205 of the Affordable Care Act
related to preemption to mean that
States and local governments may not
impose nutrition labeling requirements
for food sold in vending machines that
must comply with the Federal
requirements of 21 U.S.C. 343(q)(5)(H),
unless the State or local requirements
are identical to the Federal
requirements. In other words, States and
localities cannot have additional or
different nutrition labeling requirements
for food sold either (1) from vending
machines that are operated by a person
engaged in the business of owning or
operating 20 or more vending machines
subject to the requirements of 21 U.S.C.
343(q)(5)(H)(viii) or (2) from vending
machines operated by a person not
subject to the requirements of 21 U.S.C.
343(q)(5)(H)(viii) who voluntarily elects
to be subject to those requirements by
registering biannually under 21 U.S.C.
343(q)(5)(H)(ix).
Otherwise, for food sold from vending
machines not subject to the nutrition
labeling requirements of 21 U.S.C.
343(q)(5)(H)(viiii), States and localities
may impose nutrition labeling
requirements. Under FDA’s
interpretation of the Rule of
Construction in section 4205(d)(1) of the
Affordable Care Act, nutrition labeling
for food sold from these vending
machines would not be ‘‘nutrient
content disclosures of the type required
under [21 U.S.C. 343(q)(5)(H)]’’ and,
therefore, would not be preempted.
Under this interpretation, States and
localities would be able to continue to
require nutrition labeling for food sold
from vending machines which are
exempt from nutrition labeling under 21
U.S.C. 343(q)(5). This interpretation is
consistent with the fact that Congress
included vending machine operators in
the voluntary registration provision of
21 U.S.C. 343(q)(5)(H)(ix). There would
have been no need to include vending
machine operators in the provision that
allows opting into the Federal
requirements if States and localities
could not otherwise require nonidentical nutrition labeling for food sold
from any vending machines.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:23 Apr 05, 2011
Jkt 223001
An alternative to FDA’s interpretation
of the provisions of section 4205 of the
Affordable Care Act related to
preemption could leave less room for
States and localities to require nutrition
labeling for food sold from vending
machines. Under this alternative
interpretation, State or local nutrition
labeling requirements for food sold from
vending machines would be preempted
because such nutrition labeling
requirements would be ‘‘nutrition
content disclosures of the type required
under [21 U.S.C. 343(q)(5)(H)]’’ and
would not fall within the exception to
preemption in 21 U.S.C. 343–1(a)(4)
(‘‘except that this paragraph does not
apply to food that is offered for sale in
a restaurant or similar retail food
establishment that is not part of a chain
with 20 or more locations * * *’’).
Under this alternative interpretation,
States and localities could not have
nutrition labeling requirements for
vending machines that were not
identical to the Federal requirements,
unless they successfully petitioned
FDA. The position that no State or
locality may have a vending machine
nutrition labeling requirement not
identical to the Federal requirements,
regardless of how many vending
machines the operator owns or operates,
was the position in the guidance issued
by FDA on August 25, 2010 (‘‘Guidance
for Industry: Questions and Answers
Regarding the Effect of Section 4205 of
the Patient Protection and Affordable
Care Act of 2010 on State and Local
Menu and Vending Machine Labeling
Laws’’ (75 FR 52427)). Federal law
provides that, upon petition, FDA may
exempt State or local requirements from
the express preemption provisions of 21
U.S.C. 343–1(a) under certain
conditions. 21 U.S.C. 343–1(b). FDA has
promulgated regulations at 21 CFR
100.1 describing the petition process
that is available to State and local
governments to request such
exemptions from preemption. Under the
interpretation being proposed by FDA,
for food sold from vending machines
that is not subject to the nutrition
labeling requirements of 21 U.S.C.
343(q)(5)(H), States and localities may
establish or continue to impose
nutrition labeling requirements. Under
the alternative interpretation described
above, there would be vending
machines for which the Federal
government has not required nutrition
labeling and for which States and
localities would also be precluded from
establishing such labeling requirements
unless they successfully petitioned FDA
and a rulemaking was completed. This
approach would risk creating a
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
regulatory gap that would be
inconsistent with the purposes of
section 4205. It would also impose a
restriction and burden on the States and
localities that is inconsistent with the
Federalism principles expressed in
Executive Order 13132, as well as a
substantial administrative burden on
FDA in the event states petition for
exemption.
FDA requests comments on the
Agency’s interpretation of the
provisions of section 4205 of the
Affordable Care Act related to
preemption, as well as on the alternative
interpretation described in the
Federalism section. FDA also requests
comments on the use of the petition
process in the context. In addition, the
Agency requests comments on other
potential interpretations that interested
persons identify as appropriate given
both the preemption-related language of
section 4205 and the statutory goals.
In addition, the express preemption
provisions of 21 U.S.C. 343–1(a)(4) do
not preempt any State or local
requirement respecting a statement in
the labeling of food that provides for a
warning concerning the safety of the
food or component of the food. This is
clear from both the literal language of 21
U.S.C. 343–1(a)(4) with respect to the
scope of preemption and from the Rule
of Construction at section 4205(d)(2) of
the Affordable Care Act.
VIII. Environmental Impact
The Agency has determined under 21
CFR 25.30(k) that this action is of a type
that does not individually or
cumulatively have a significant effect on
the human environment. Therefore,
neither an environmental assessment
nor an environmental impact statement
is required.
IX. Comments
Interested persons may submit to the
Division of Dockets Management (see
ADDRESSES) either electronic or written
comments regarding this document. It is
only necessary to send one set of
comments. It is no longer necessary to
send two copies of mailed comments.
Identify comments with the docket
number found in brackets in the
heading of this document. Received
comments may be seen in the Division
of Dockets Management between 9 a.m.
and 4 p.m., Monday through Friday.
X. References
The following references have been
placed on display in the Division of
Dockets Management (see ADDRESSES)
and may be seen by interested persons
between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday
through Friday. (FDA has verified the
E:\FR\FM\06APP3.SGM
06APP3
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 66 / Wednesday, April 6, 2011 / Proposed Rules
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with PROPOSALS3
Web site addresses, but FDA is not
responsible for any subsequent changes
to the Web sites after this document
publishes in the Federal Register.)
1. Merriam Webster Collegiate Dictionary,
Tenth Edition, 1993.
2. Food and Drug Administration, Food
Labeling Guide, pg. 7, 2009.
https://www.fda.gov/FoodLabelingGuide/
accessed, March 28, 2011.
3. Automatic Merchandiser. ‘‘2010 State of
the Vending Industry Report.’’ https://
www.vendingmarketwatch.com/content/
reports/ accessed, November 09, 2010.
4. National Automatic Merchandising
Association. ‘‘Comments of: The National
Automatic Merchandising Association.’’
Docket No. FDA–2010–N–0298 2010.
5. U.S. Small Business Administration.
‘‘Table of Small Business Size Standards
Matched to North American Industry
Classification System Codes,’’ Effective
November 5, 2010. https://www.sba.gov/
idc/groups/public/documents/sba_
homepage/serv_sstd_tablepdf.pdf,
accessed 12/10/2010.
6. Jed, E. ‘‘Operators Find Today’s Patrons
Favor ‘Better-For-You’ Food Selections
In Vending,’’ Vending Times, 41:8, 2001.
7. Finkelstein, E.A. and K.L. Strombotne.
‘‘The Economics of Obesity.’’ American
Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 91(5):
1520S–1524S, May 2010.
8. Philipson, T. and R. Posner. ‘‘Is the Obesity
Epidemic a Public Health Problem? A
Decade of Research on the Economics of
Obesity.’’ NBER Working Paper Series,
14010, May 2008.
9. Downs, J.S., G. Loewenstein and J.
Wisdom. ‘‘Strategies for Promoting
Healthier Food Choices.’’ American
Economic Review: Papers and
Proceedings, 99(2): 1–10, 2009.
10. O’Donoghue, T. and M. Rabin. ‘‘The
Economics of Immediate Gratification.’’
Journal of Behavioral Decision Making,
13(2): 233–250, 2000.
11. O’Donoghue, T. and M. Rabin. ‘‘Doing it
Now or Later.’’ American Economic
Review, 89(1): 103–124, 1999.
12. Wang, Y., M.A. Beydoun, L. Liang, B.
Cabellero and S.K. Kumanyika, ‘‘Will all
Americans Become Overweight or
Obese? Estimating the Progression and
Cost of the US Obesity Epidemic.’’
Obesity, 16(10): 2323–2330, 2008.
13. Ogden, C.L. and M.D. Carroll. ‘‘Prevalence
of Overweight, Obesity, and Extreme
Obesity Among Adults: United States,
Trends 1976–1980 Through 2007–2008.’’
National Center for Health Statistics,
June 2010.
14. Sullivan, P.W., V. Ghusheyan, and R.H.
Ben-Joseph. ‘‘The Effect of Obesity and
Cardiometabolic Risk Factor on
Expenditures and Productivity in the
US.’’ Obesity, 16: 2155–2162, 2008.
15. Ali, M.M., A. Amialchuk, and F. Renna.
‘‘Social Network and Weight
Misperception Among Adolescents’’.
Southern Economic Journal,
Forthcoming, (2010a).
16. Cawley, J., K. Joyner, and J. Sobal. ‘‘Size
Matters: The Influence of Adolescent’s
Weight and Height on Dating and Sex.’’
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:23 Apr 05, 2011
Jkt 223001
Rationality and Society, 18(1): 67–94,
2006.
17. Ali, M.M., H. Fang, and J. Rizzo. (2010b).
‘‘Body Weight, Self-Perception and
Mental Health among Adolescents.’’
Journal of Mental Health Policy and
Economics, 13(2): 53–63 (2010b).
18. Puhl, R., and K.D. Brownell. ‘‘Bias,
Discrimination, and Obesity.’’ Obesity
Research, 9(12): 788–805, 2001.
19. Cawley, J. ‘‘The Impact of Obesity on
Wages.’’ Journal of Human Resources,
39(2): 451–474, 2004.
20. Finkelstein, E.A., J.G. Trogdon, J.W.
Cohen and W. Dietz. ‘‘Annual Medical
Spending Attributable to Obesity: Payerand Service-Specific Estimates.’’ Health
Affairs, 28(5): w822–w831, 2009.
21. Lakdawalla, D. and T.J. Philipson. ‘‘The
Growth of Obesity and Technological
Change: A Theoretical and Empirical
Examination,’’ NBER Working Paper No.
8946, 2002.
22. Philipson, T.J. and R.A. Posner, ‘‘The
Long-Run Growth in Obesity as a
Function of Technological Change.’’
NBER Working Paper No. 7423, 1999.
23. Cutler, D.M., E.L. Glaeser, and J.M.
Shapiro, ‘‘Why Have Americans Become
More Obese?’’ Journal of Economic
Perspectives, 17: 93–118, 2003.
24. Chou, S-Y., M. Grossman, and H. Saffer.
‘‘An Economic Analysis of Adult
Obesity: Results from the Behavioral
Risk Factor Surveillance System.’’
Journal of Health Economics, 23: 565–
587, 2004.
25. Burke, M. and F. Heiland. ‘‘Social
Dynamics of Obesity.’’ Economic Inquiry,
45(3), 571–591, 2007.
26. French, S.A., R.W. Jeffery, M. Story, P.
Hannan, and P. Snyder. ‘‘A Pricing
Strategy to Promote Low-Fat Snack
Choices through Vending Machines’’.
American Journal of Public Health, 87:
849–851, 1997.
27. U.S. Department of Agriculture Economic
Research Service. ‘‘Table 15: Sales of
meals and snacks away from home by
type of outlet.’’ Food CPI and
Expenditures: Food Expenditure Tables.
https://www.ers.usda.gov/Briefing/
CPIFoodAndExpenditures/Data/
Accessed 10/8/2010.
28. Eastern Research Group, Inc. ‘‘Evaluation
of Recordkeeping Costs for Food
Manufacturers, Final Report.’’ Prepared
for Andy Estrin and Cristina McLaughlin
of FDA’s Center for Food Safety and
Applied Nutrition. Prepared by Aylin
Sertkaya, Ayesha Berlind and Seda
Erdem. Contract No. 223–01–2461, Task
Order Number 5, February 2007.
List of Subjects
21 CFR Part 11
Administrative practice and
procedure, Computer technology,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
21 CFR Part 101
Food labeling, Nutrition, Reporting
and recordkeeping requirements.
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
19253
Therefore, under the Federal Food,
Drug, and Cosmetic Act and under
authority delegated to the Commissioner
of Food and Drugs, it is proposed that
21 CFR parts 11 and 101 be amended as
follows:
PART 11—ELECTRONIC RECORDS;
ELECTRONIC SIGNATURES
1. The authority citation for 21 CFR
part 11 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 21 U.S.C. 321–393; 42 U.S.C.
262.
2. Section 11.1 is amended by adding
paragraph (h) to read as follows:
§ 11.1
Scope.
*
*
*
*
*
(h) This part does not apply to
electronic signatures obtained under
§ 101.8(d) of this chapter.
PART 101—FOOD LABELING
3. The authority citation for 21 CFR
part 101 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 15 U.S.C. 1453, 1454, 1455; 21
U.S.C. 321, 331, 342, 343, 348, 371; 42 U.S.C.
243, 264, 271.
4. Section 101.8 is added to subpart
A to read as follows:
§ 101.8
Vending machines.
(a) Definitions. The definitions of
terms in section 201 of the Federal
Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act apply to
such terms when used in this section. In
addition, for the purposes of this
section:
Authorized official of a vending
machine operator means the owner,
operator, or agent in charge or any other
person authorized by the vending
machine operator to register the vending
machine operator, which is not
otherwise subject to the requirements of
section 403(q)(5)(H) of the Federal Food,
Drug, and Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C.
343(q)(5)(H)) with FDA for purposes of
paragraph (d) of this section.
Vending machine means a self-service
device that, upon insertion of a coin,
paper currency, token, card, or key, or
by optional manual operation, dispenses
servings of food in bulk or in packages,
or prepared by the machine, without the
necessity of replenishing the device
between each vending operation.
Vending machine operator means a
person(s) or entity that controls or
directs the function of the vending
machine, including deciding which
articles of food are sold from the
machine or the placement of the articles
of food within the vending machine,
and is compensated for the control or
direction of the function of the vending
machine.
E:\FR\FM\06APP3.SGM
06APP3
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with PROPOSALS3
19254
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 66 / Wednesday, April 6, 2011 / Proposed Rules
(b) Articles of food not covered.
Articles of food dispensed from a
vending machine are not covered
vending machine food if:
(1) The prospective purchaser can
view the entire Nutrition Facts Panel on
the label of the vended food without an
obstruction. The Nutrition Facts Panel
must be the information in the format
required in § 101.9(c) and (d). The
Nutrition Facts Panel must be in a size
that permits the prospective purchaser
to be able to easily read the nutrition
information contained in the Nutrition
Facts Panel on the label of the article of
food in the vending machine. Smaller
formats allowed for nutrition facts for
certain food labeling under FDA
regulation at § 101.9 are not considered
to be a size that a prospective purchaser
is able to easily read.
(2) An article of food sold from a
vending machine provides visible
nutrition information at the point of
purchase. The visible nutrition
information at the point of purchase
includes the total number of calories for
the article of food, as dispensed, at the
point of purchase. This visible nutrition
information must appear on the food
label itself. This visible nutrition
information must be clear and
conspicuous and easily read on the
article of food while in the vending
machine, in a type size reasonably
related to the largest printed matter on
the label and with sufficient color and
contrasting background to other print on
the label to permit the prospective
purchaser to clearly distinguish the
information.
(c) Requirements for calorie labeling
for certain food sold from vending
machines.
(1) Applicability; covered vending
machine food. For the purposes of this
section, the term ‘‘covered vending
machine food’’ means an article of food
that is:
(i) Sold from a vending machine that:
(A) Does not permit the consumer to
examine the Nutrition Facts Panel prior
to purchase as provided in paragraph (b)
of this section, or otherwise provide
visible nutrition information at the
point of purchase as provided in
paragraph (b);
(B) Is operated by a person engaged in
the business of owning or operating 20
or more vending machines; and
(C) Is a vending machine with a
selection button; or
(ii) Sold from a vending machine that
is operated by a vending machine
operator that has voluntarily elected to
be subject to the requirements of this
section by registering with the FDA
under the provisions of paragraph (d) of
this section.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:23 Apr 05, 2011
Jkt 223001
(2) Calorie declaration. (i) The
number of calories must be clear and
conspicuous for a covered vending
machine food and declared in the
following manner:
(A) To the nearest 5-calorie increment
up to and including 50 calories and 10calorie increment above 50 calories,
except that amounts less than 5 calories
may be expressed as zero.
(B) The term ‘‘Calories’’ or ‘‘Cal’’ must
appear adjacent to the caloric content
value for each food in the vending
machine.
(C) For calorie declarations in or on
the vending machine, the declaration of
calories must be in a type size no
smaller than the name of the food on the
machine, not the label, selection
number, or price of the food as
displayed on the vending machine,
whichever is smallest, with the same
prominence, i.e., the same color, or in a
color at least as conspicuous, as the
color of the name, if applicable, or price
of the food or selection number, and the
same contrasting background, as the
item it is in closest proximity to, i.e.,
name, selection number, or price of the
food item as displayed on the machine.
(D) The number of calories for singleserving packaged food declared on the
sign must be identical to the number of
calories that are declared in the
Nutrition Facts, if applicable.
(E) The number of calories for
packaged foods that contain multiple
servings must include the total calories
present in the covered vending machine
food. The vending machine operator
may voluntarily disclose calories per
serving in addition to the total calories
for the food.
(ii) Calorie information for covered
vending machine food must be placed
prominently in the following manner:
(A) This calorie information may be
placed on a sign in close proximity to
the article of food or selection button,
i.e., in, on, or adjacent to the vending
machine, but not necessarily attached to
the vending machine, so long as the sign
is visible at the same time as the food,
its name, price, or selection button or
selection number is visible.
(B) When the calorie information is in
or on the vending machine, the calorie
declaration must be in the same color or
a color at least as conspicuous as the
color of the name or the price of the
food or selection number.
(C) When the calorie information is
declared on a sign adjacent to the
vending machine, the calorie
declaration must be in type that is all
black or one color printed on a white or
other neutral background that contrasts
with the type color.
PO 00000
Frm 00018
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
(D) Where the vending machine only
displays a vignette or name of the food
item, the calorie information must be in
close proximity to the vignette or name
or in close proximity to the selection
button.
(E) For electronic vending machines
(e.g., machines with digital or electronic
or liquid crystal display (LCD) displays),
the calorie information may be
displayed when the selection numbers
are entered but before the selection is
confirmed.
(F) For vending machines with
limited choices, e.g., popcorn, the
declaration of calories may appear on
the face of the machine so long as the
declaration is prominent, not crowded
by other labeling on the machine, and
the type size is reasonably related to the
largest print on the vending machine.
(d) Voluntary provision of calorie
labeling for foods sold from vending
machines.
(1) Applicability. An authorized
official of a vending machine operator
that is not subject to the requirements of
section 403(q)(5)(H)(viii) of the Federal
Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act may
voluntarily register with FDA to be
subject to the requirements established
in paragraph (c)(2) of this section. An
authorized official of a vending machine
operator that voluntarily registers
cannot be subject to any State or local
nutrition labeling requirements that are
not identical to the requirements in
403(q)(5)(H) of the Federal Food, Drug,
and Cosmetic Act.
(2) Who may register? A vending
machine operator that is not otherwise
subject to the requirements of section
403(q)(5)(H) of the Federal Food, Drug,
and Cosmetic Act may register with
FDA.
(3) What information is required? The
vending machine operator must provide
FDA with the following information:
(i) The contact information (including
name, address, phone number, e-mail
address), for the vending machine
operator;
(ii) The address of the location of each
vending machine owned or operated by
the vending machine operator that is
being registered.
(iii) Preferred mailing address (if
different from the vending machine
operator address), for purposes of
receiving correspondence; and
(iv) Certification that the information
submitted is true and accurate, that the
person or firm submitting it is
authorized to do so, and that each
registered vending machine will be
subject to the requirements of this
section.
(v) Information should be submitted
by e-mail by typing complete
E:\FR\FM\06APP3.SGM
06APP3
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 66 / Wednesday, April 6, 2011 / Proposed Rules
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with PROPOSALS3
information into the portable document
format (PDF) form, saving it on the
registrant’s computer, and sending it by
e-mail to menulawregistration@fda.hhs.
If e-mail is not available, the registrant
can either fill in the PDF form and print
it out (or print out the blank PDF and
fill in the information by hand or
typewriter), and either fax the
completed form to 301–436–2804 or
mail it to FDA, White Oak Building 22,
Rm. 0209, 10903 New Hampshire Ave.,
Silver Spring, MD 20993.
(vi) Authorized officials of a vending
machine operator who elects to be
subject to the Federal requirements can
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:23 Apr 05, 2011
Jkt 223001
register by visiting https://www.fda.gov/
menulabeling. FDA has created a form
that contains fields requesting the
information in paragraph (d) of this
section and made the form available at
this Web site. Registrants must use this
form to ensure that complete
information is submitted.
(vii) To keep the establishment’s
registration active, the authorized
official of the vending machine operator
must register every other year within 60
days prior to the expiration of the
vending machine operator’s current
registration with FDA. Registration will
automatically expire if not renewed.
PO 00000
Frm 00019
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 9990
19255
(e) Signatures. Signatures obtained
under paragraph (d) of this section that
meet the definition of electronic
signatures in § 11.3(b)(7) of this chapter
are exempt from the requirements of
part 11 of this chapter.
Dated: March 28, 2011.
Margaret A. Hamburg,
Commissioner of Food and Drugs.
Kathleen Sebelius,
Secretary of Health and Human Services.
[FR Doc. 2011–8037 Filed 4–1–11; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 4160–01–P
E:\FR\FM\06APP3.SGM
06APP3
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 66 (Wednesday, April 6, 2011)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 19238-19255]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-8037]
[[Page 19237]]
Vol. 76
Wednesday,
No. 66
April 6, 2011
Part III
Department of Health and Human Services
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Food and Drug Administration
21 CFR Parts 11 and 101
Food Labeling; Calorie Labeling of Articles of Food in Vending
Machines; Proposed Rule
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 66 / Wednesday, April 6, 2011 /
Proposed Rules
[[Page 19238]]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
21 CFR Parts 11 and 101
[Docket No. FDA-2011-F-0171]
RIN 0910-AG56
Food Labeling; Calorie Labeling of Articles of Food in Vending
Machines
AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: To implement the vending machine labeling provisions of the
Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010 (Affordable Care
Act), the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is proposing requirements
for providing calorie information for certain articles of food sold
from vending machines. The Affordable Care Act, in part, amended the
Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act (FD&C Act) to, among other things,
require that for an article of food sold from a vending machine that
does not permit a prospective purchaser to examine the Nutrition Facts
Panel before purchasing the article, or does not otherwise provide
visible nutrition information at the point of purchase, and is operated
by a person engaged in the business of owning or operating 20 or more
vending machines, the vending machine operator must disclose the number
of calories for the article of food. Vending machine operators not
subject to the requirements of the Affordable Care Act may elect to be
subject to the Federal requirements by registering with FDA. Providing
calorie disclosures for food sold from vending machines would assist
consumers in making healthier dietary choices.
DATES: Submit either written or electronic comments on the proposed
rule by July 5, 2011. Submit comments on the information collection
issues under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 by May 6, 2011, (see
the ``Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995'' section of this document).
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, identified by Docket No. FDA-2011-
F-0171 and/or RIN 0910-AG56, by any of the following methods, except
that comments on information collection issues under the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 must be submitted to the Office of Regulatory
Affairs, Office of Management and Budget (OMB) (see the ``Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995'' section of this document).
Electronic Submissions
Submit electronic comments in the following way:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
Written Submissions
Submit written submissions in the following ways:
FAX: 301-827-6870.
Mail/Hand delivery/Courier (for paper, disk, or CD-ROM
submissions): Division of Dockets Management (HFA-305), Food and Drug
Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane, rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852.
Instructions: All submissions received must include the Agency name
and docket number and Regulatory Information Number (RIN) for this
rulemaking. All comments received may be posted without change to
https://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information
provided. For additional information on submitting comments, see the
``Comments'' heading of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section of this
document.
Docket: For access to the docket to read background documents or
comments received, go to https://www.regulations.gov and insert the
docket number, found in brackets in the heading of this document, into
the ``Search'' box and follow the prompts and/or go to the Division of
Dockets Management, 5630 Fishers Lane, rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Daniel Y. Reese, Center for Food
Safety and Applied Nutrition (HFS-820), Food and Drug Administration,
5100 Paint Branch Pkwy., College Park, MD 20740, 301-436-2371.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
A. Nutrition Labeling Requirements That Currently Apply to Packaged
Foods
The Nutrition Labeling and Education Act of 1990 (NLEA) amended the
FD&C Act, in part, by adding section 403(q) (21 U.S.C. 343(q)), which
specifies, in pertinent part and with certain exceptions, that a food
is considered to be misbranded unless its label or labeling bears
nutrition information. See 21 U.S.C. 343(q)(1). When a food is in
package form, the required nutrition information generally must appear
on the label of the food. FDA's final regulations establishing
nutrition labeling requirements were published in 1993 (58 FR 2079,
January 6, 1993) and are found at Title 21 of the Code of Federal
Regulations (21 CFR) section 101.9. Regulations implementing the NLEA
require nutrition information for a food product intended for human
consumption and offered for sale unless an exemption is provided for
the product (Sec. 101.9(a)). The declaration of nutrition information
on the label and labeling of food generally must include information
about the following nutrients: Total calories, calories from fat
(unless the product contains less than 0.5 g of fat), total fat,
saturated fat, trans fat, cholesterol, sodium, total carbohydrate,
dietary fiber, sugars, protein, and certain vitamins and minerals
(Sec. 101.9).
The NLEA amendments to the FD&C Act included an exemption from
nutrition labeling for food that is served in restaurants or other
establishments in which food is served for immediate human consumption
or sold for sale or use in such establishments (21 U.S.C. 343
(q)(5)(A)(i)). The NLEA amendments to the FD&C Act also included an
exemption from nutrition labeling for food that is processed and
prepared primarily in a retail establishment, ready for human
consumption, of the type of food described in section 403(q)(5)(A)(i)
of the FD&C Act, offered for sale to consumers but not for immediate
human consumption in such establishment, and not offered for sale
outside such establishment (21 U.S.C. 343(q)(5)(A)(ii)). However, these
exemptions were contingent on there being no nutrient content claims or
health claims made on the label or labeling, or in the advertising, for
the food. In our regulations implementing these exemptions, we included
vending machines among the examples of establishments in which food is
served for immediate human consumption that generally are exempt from
nutrition labeling requirements because like the other examples,
vending machines offer food products that are generally consumed
immediately where purchased or while the consumer is walking away. See
Sec. 101.9(j)(2).
B. Requirements of Section 4205 of the Affordable Care Act
On March 23, 2010, the Affordable Care Act (Pub. L. 111-148) was
signed into law. Section 4205 of the Affordable Care Act (section
4205), amends section 403(q) of the FD&C Act, which governs nutrition
labeling requirements, and section 403A of the FD&C Act (21 U.S.C. 343-
1), which governs Federal preemption of State and local food labeling
requirements. The Affordable Care Act requires FDA to issue proposed
regulations to carry out section 403(q)(5)(H) of the FD&C Act no later
[[Page 19239]]
than one year from the date of enactment. As amended, section
403(q)(5)(H)(viii) of the FD&C Act requires that if an article of food
is sold from a vending machine that does not permit a prospective
purchaser to examine the Nutrition Facts Panel before purchasing the
food or does not otherwise provide visible nutrition information at the
point of purchase and the vending machine is operated by a person who
is engaged in the business of owning or operating 20 or more vending
machines, the vending machine operator must provide calorie information
for the food. Specifically, the vending machine operator must ``provide
a sign in close proximity to each article of food or the selection
button that includes a clear and conspicuous statement disclosing the
number of calories contained in the article.''
Section 403(q)(5)(H)(ix) of the FD&C Act allows vending machine
operators not subject to the requirements of section 4205 of the
Affordable Care Act to voluntarily register with FDA to become subject
to the Federal requirements. In the Federal Register of July 23, 2010,
(75 FR 43182), FDA published a notice in the Federal Register
specifying the terms and conditions for implementation of voluntary
registration, pending promulgation of final regulations. See 75 FR
43182.
C. FDA Activities Related to Implementation of Section 4205 of the
Affordable Care Act
Section 4205 of the Affordable Care Act also requires certain
restaurants and similar retail food establishments to provide calorie
and other nutrition information for standard menu items, including food
on display and self-service food. Elsewhere in this issue of the
Federal Register, FDA is proposing requirements to implement the menu
labeling provisions of section 4205. As discussed in that proposal, FDA
has published in the Federal Register a number of documents concerning
section 4205. On July 7, 2010, FDA published a notice entitled
``Disclosure of Nutrient Content Information for Standard Menu Items
Offered for Sale at Chain Restaurants or Similar Retail Food
Establishments and for Articles of Food Sold from Vending Machines''
(``docket notice'') (75 FR 39026, July 7, 2010) to solicit comments and
suggestions on the new law. In response to this notice, FDA received
approximately 875 letters and e-mails. Of those, approximately 60
contained one or more comments pertaining to vending machine calorie
labeling. Many of these comments were general comments on the law
itself and either supported or opposed the requirement in section
403(q)(5)(H)(viii) of the FD&C Act that calorie information be provided
for foods sold from vending machines. Comments in opposition stated
that providing calorie information for foods sold from vending machines
would be overly burdensome to the industry. FDA describes these
comments in more detail and responds to those comments in this
proposal.
On July 23, 2010, FDA published the Federal Register notice
entitled ``Voluntary Registration by Authorized Officials of Non-
Covered Retail Food Establishments and Vending Machine Operators
Electing to be Subject to the Menu and Vending Machine Labeling
Requirements Established by Section 4205 of the Patient Protection and
Affordable Care Act of 2010'' (``registration notice'') (75 FR 43182).
FDA issued this registration notice to provide assistance for voluntary
registration for restaurants, similar retail establishments, and
vending machine operators that are not subject to the nutrition
labeling requirements of section 4205 (e.g., restaurants and similar
retail food establishments with fewer than 20 locations, and vending
machine operators with fewer than 20 machines). In the registration
notice, FDA specified the terms and conditions for implementation of
voluntary registration, pending promulgation of regulations. In
response to the notice, FDA received 7 comments, none of which
addressed registration.
On August 25, 2010, FDA published a ``Guidance for Industry:
Questions and Answers Regarding the Effect of Section 4205 of the
Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010 on State and Local
Menu and Vending Machine Labeling Laws'' (``preemption guidance'') (75
FR 52427, August 25, 2010). The preemption guidance discusses the
preemptive effect of section 4205 and identifies the provisions of
amended section 403(q) of the FD&C Act that became requirements upon
enactment. Our current thinking on the preemptive effect of section
4205 is set out in section VII of this document.
Also on August 25, 2010, FDA published a ``Draft Guidance for
Industry: Questions and Answers Regarding the Menu Labeling Provisions
of Section 4205 of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of
2010; Availability'' (``draft implementation guidance'') (75 FR 52426,
August 25, 2010). This draft guidance addressed only the menu labeling
provisions of section 4205. It did not address the calorie labeling
requirements for vending machine operators in section 4205. FDA
subsequently withdrew the draft implementation guidance (76 FR 4360,
January 25, 2011).
II. Legal Authority
As stated in section I.C. of this document, on March 23, 2010, the
Affordable Care Act was signed into law. Section 4205 of the Affordable
Care Act amended 403(q)(5) of the FD&C Act (21 U.S.C. 343(q)(5)) by
amending section 403(q)(5)(A) and by creating new clause (H) to
require, in relevant part, that vending machine operators provide
calorie information for certain articles of food sold from vending
machines. Under section 403(a)(1), such information must be truthful
and nonmisleading. Food to which these requirements apply is deemed
misbranded if these requirements are not met. In addition, under
section 201(n) of the FD&C Act (21 U.S.C. 321(n)), the labeling of food
is misleading if it fails to reveal facts that are material in light of
representations actually made in the labeling. Section 403(q)(5)(H)(x)
requires the Secretary of Health and Human Services (Secretary) to
issue proposed regulations no later than 1 year after enactment . Thus,
FDA has the authority to issue this proposed rule under sections
201(n), 403(a)(1), and 403(q)(5)(H), as well as under section 701(a) of
the FD&C Act (21 U.S.C. 371(a)), which vests the Secretary with the
authority to issue regulations for the efficient enforcement of the
FD&C Act.
FDA is proposing requirements that vending machine operators
provide calorie information for certain articles of food sold from
vending machines. FDA is also proposing the terms and conditions for
voluntary registration by vending machine operators not subject to the
requirements of section 4205 of the Affordable Care Act that elect to
become subject the requirements. FDA is proposing to set out these
provisions in new Sec. 101.8.
III. The Proposal
A. Definitions
We are proposing in the introductory paragraph of Sec. 101.8(a)
that the terms defined in section 201 of the FD&C Act are applicable
when these terms are used. Additional terms are defined alphabetically
in the proposed codified and are discussed in alphabetical order in
this section. ``Act'' is defined as the Federal Food, Drug, and
Cosmetic Act.
[[Page 19240]]
1. Authorized Official of a Vending Machine Operator
We are proposing in Sec. 101.8(a) that the term ``authorized
official of a vending machine operator'' means the owner, operator, or
agent in charge of a vending machine, or any other person authorized by
a vending machine operator not subject to the requirements of section
4205 of the Affordable Care Act to voluntarily register the vending
machine operator with FDA to become subject to the requirements. For
the purposes of this definition, the agent in charge would not be the
person who is only in charge or in control of the location where the
vending machine is located.
2. Vending Machine Operator
We are proposing in Sec. 101.8(a) that the term ``vending machine
operator'' means a person that controls or directs the function of the
vending machine, including deciding which articles of food are sold
from the vending machine or the placement of the articles of food
within the vending machine, and is compensated for the control or
direction of the function of the vending machine. Section 201(e) of the
FD&C Act defines ``person'' to include an individual, partnership,
corporation, and association. For example, a vending machine operator
could be a corporation that manufacturers beverages and sells these
products in its machines. A vending machine operator also could be an
individual or a business that only operates and stocks vending
machines, such as a private company with onsite vending machines.
3. Vending Machine
Section 403(q)(5)(H)(viii) of the FD&C Act sets forth labeling
requirements for certain vending machine food but does not define the
term ``vending machine.'' We are proposing in Sec. 101.8(a) that the
term ``vending machine'' means a self-service device that, upon
insertion of a coin, paper currency, token, card, or key, or by
optional manual operation, dispenses servings of food in bulk, in
packages, or prepared by the machine, without the necessity of
replenishing the device between each vending operation. This definition
is almost identical to the definition of ``vending machine'' in the FDA
Food Code 2009.\1\ Examples of food dispensed from vending machines may
include prepackaged foods (e.g., candy, snacks, gum, bottled or canned
soft drinks), unpackaged bulk foods (e.g., handful of gum, candy, or
mixed nuts), prepared foods (e.g., sandwiches or fresh fruit), multi-
serving foods (e.g., gallon of milk), or foods prepared in the machine
and dispensed in bulk (e.g., coffee, soup, or popcorn).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ FDA regularly publishes the Food Code, which provides
guidance on food safety, sanitation, and fair dealing that can be
uniformly adopted by State and local governments for the retail
segment of the food industry. The Food Code provisions are not
Federal requirements; however, they are designed to be consistent
with Federal food laws and regulations. The 2009 Food Code defined
the term ``vending machine'' to mean a ``self-service device that,
upon insertion of a coin, paper currency, token, card, or key, or by
optional manual operation, dispenses unit servings of food in bulk
or in packages without the necessity of replenishing the device
between each vending operation.'' (U.S. Public Health Service, FDA,
2009 Food Code, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public
Health Service, Food and Drug Administration, College Park, MD
20740, chapter 1, section 1-201.) https://www.fda.gov/Food/FoodSafety/RetailFoodProtection/FoodCode/FoodCode2009/ucm186464.htm.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
B. Who Must Comply With This Rule
Section 4205 of the Affordable Care Act provides that ``in the case
of an article of food sold from a vending machine that does not permit
a prospective purchaser to examine the Nutrition Facts Panel before
purchasing the article, or does not otherwise provide visible nutrition
information at the point of purchase, and is operated by a person
engaged in the business of owning or operating 20 or more vending
machines, the vending machine operator shall provide a sign in close
proximity to each article of food or the selection button that includes
a clear and conspicuous statement disclosing the number of calories
contained in the article of food.'' Consistent with the requirements of
section 4205, all vending machine operators with 20 or more vending
machines, as defined in section III.A.3. of this document, will be
subject to these requirements. Therefore, FDA is proposing in Sec.
101.8(c)(1)(i)(A) and (B) that the labeling requirements of this
proposed rule apply to vending machine operators that own or operate 20
or more vending machines that do not allow a prospective purchaser to
examine the Nutrition Facts Panel prior to purchase or do not otherwise
provide visible nutrition information at the point of purchase. As
discussed in below in section III.D. of this document, vending machine
operators that are not subject to the requirements of the law may elect
to be subject to the Federal requirements by voluntarily registering
with FDA.
Several comments requested that FDA apply the small business
nutrition labeling exemption (Sec. 101.9(j)(1)) to vending machine
operators. The comments said that: (1) 90-95 percent of vending machine
operators have 20 or more machines, and therefore, would be covered by
section 403(q)(5)(H) of the FD&C Act and (2) 70 percent of vending
machine operators have three or fewer employees, and would likely be
generating sales less than $500,000.
FDA is not proposing an exemption from the vending machine
nutrition labeling requirements for small businesses. FDA notes that
section 403(q)(5)(H) of the FD&C Act does not include an exemption from
the vending machine nutrition labeling requirements for small
businesses. Section 403(q)(5)(D) includes an exemption from the
nutrition labeling requirements in sections 403(q)(1) through (q)(4)
for small businesses. The requirement that vending machine operators
disclose calories for covered vending machine food is not found in
sections 403(q)(1) through (q)(4); instead, it is found in section
403(q)(5)(H)(viii). Therefore, the small business exemption in
403(q)(5)(D) does not apply. We believe that the proposed rule provides
adequate flexibility to allow these small businesses to comply with the
proposed requirements in a cost-effective and equitable way. For
example, the proposed requirements allow vending machine operators to
choose from various approaches for compliance, including adopting less
expensive measures as discussed below in section III.E. and section IV.
of this document. We request comment on additional ways that FDA can
make the requirements of this rule less burdensome on small businesses,
while still meeting the requirements of section 403(q)(5)(H).
The Agency also received comments regarding operators of vending
machines who are blind and operate vending machines through the Vending
Facility Program operated by the U.S. Department of Education under the
Randolph-Sheppard Act of 1936, 20 U.S.C. 107 et seq. These comments
suggested that regardless of the number of machines that were operated
by an operator, all operators of vending machines under the Randolph-
Sheppard Act would be covered.
The Agency wishes to clarify its interpretation of the
applicability of section 4205 of the Affordable Care Act to vending
machine operators who fall under the Randolph-Sheppard Act. Section
403(q)(5)(H)(viii) of the FD&C Act sets forth requirements for vending
machine operators based on the number of machines that they operate.
Thus, as with other operators, Randolph-Sheppard Act operators would
only be covered by the disclosure requirements if they operate 20 or
more vending
[[Page 19241]]
machines that dispense food or if they voluntarily register to be
covered.
These comments also stated that operators of vending machines who
are blind ``may place different products in the same row due to limited
visual recognition and the similarity of product packaging.'' These
comments requested flexibility for posting calorie information.
Specifically, the comments requested that the calorie disclosure
requirements permit the ``stacking of multiple products in the same
coil.''
FDA is proposing requirements that provide flexibility for vending
machine operators to comply with the labeling requirements for covered
vending machine food. As discussed later in this document, the required
calorie information may be posted on a sign adjacent to the vending
machine, so long as the sign is visible to the prospective purchaser at
the same time as the food, its description, or its selection button is
visible.
C. Who Is Not Required to Comply With This Rule
FDA is aware that many vending machine operators operate machines
that dispense a variety of articles other than articles of food. For
example, some vending machines may dispense detergent, compact discs,
gift cards or toiletries. If a vending machine operator operated a
total of 50 vending machines, only 15 of which sell articles of food,
the vending machine operator would not be subject to the requirements
of 403(q)(5)(H)(viii) of the FD&C Act because the vending machine
operator operates fewer than 20 vending machines that sell articles of
food.
Further, FDA tentatively concludes that vending machines that may
dispense food as part of a game or other non-food related activity are
not covered by 403(q)(5)(H) of the FD&C Act. For example, a vending
machine may contain a variety of items ranging from small toys, coins,
or individually wrapped candies that can be picked up by maneuvering a
large claw arm. In this instance, the vending machine does not sell
articles of food, even though in the course of maneuvering the arm,
candies could be dispensed. The vending machine is selling the
opportunity to play the game. FDA seeks comment on this tentative
conclusion.
Bulk vending machines dispense unpackaged articles of food in
preselected amounts (e.g. gumball machines, mixed nut machines). FDA
received a few comments suggesting that bulk vending machines are
different from ``more modern types of vending machines,'' and therefore
should be exempt from these disclosure requirements. The comments
argued that bulk vending machines should be distinguished from other
vending machines for three reasons. First, they noted that these
machines do not have selection buttons, and as a result a vending
machine operator could not place a sign ``in close proximity to * * *
the selection button'' that includes the calorie information required
by section 403(a)(5)(H)(viii)(I) of the FD&C Act. Second, they argued
that food sold from bulk vending machines represents only a small
fraction of overall market sales of the vending machine industry.
Finally, the comments stated that there is no reported association
between foods sold from bulk vending machines and obesity.
FDA notes that section 403(q)(5)(H)(viii) of the FD&C Act does not
limit its applicability to vending machines for which there has been a
reported association between the food vended by the machine and
obesity. However, section 403(q)(5)(H)(viii) provides that for covered
vending machine food, the vending machine operator must provide a sign
disclosing the number of calories contained in the food ``in close
proximity to each article of food or the selection button.'' FDA
tentatively concludes that the reference to ``selection button'' in the
statute can be read to mean that the types of vending machines subject
to requirements in section 403(q)(5)(H)(viii) are those with selection
buttons. FDA is not aware of vending machines without selection buttons
other than bulk vending machines that dispense, by use of a crank,
single types of unpackaged articles of food in preselected amounts
(e.g., a single piece of gum or a handful of candy or nuts). FDA
tentatively concludes that vending machines, including bulk vending
machines, without any type of selection button are not covered by
section 403(q)(5)(H)(viii). However, FDA tentatively concludes that a
bulk vending machine that has a selection button, regardless of the
type of food it dispenses, e.g., unpackaged articles of food such as
soup, popcorn, or hot or cold beverages, is covered under section
403(q)(5)(H)(viii), if it meets the other statutory criteria. FDA is
proposing in Sec. 101.8(c)(1)(i)(C) that the nutrition labeling
requirements of Sec. 101.8 apply to an article of food sold from a
vending machine that, among other things, has a selection button. FDA
seeks comment on these tentative conclusions. FDA is also interested in
comments demonstrating any unintended adverse effect resulting from the
exclusion of vending machines without selection buttons from the
calorie labeling requirements.
D. Voluntary Registration by a Vending Machine Operator That Is Not
Subject to the Requirements of Section 4205 of the Affordable Care Act
That Elects To Be Subject to the Requirements
Section 4205 of the Affordable Care Act provides that vending
machine operators not subject to the requirements of section
403(q)(5)(H)(viii) \2\ of the FD&C Act may elect to become subject to
the requirements by registering ``biannually'' with FDA (21 U.S.C.
343(q)(5)(H)(ix)). As discussed below, operators that choose to be
subject to the Federal requirements would not be subject to non-
identical state or local nutrition labeling laws for food sold from
vending machines. In the proposed rule entitled: Food Labeling;
Nutrition Labeling of Standard Menu Items in Restaurants and Similar
Retail Food Establishments, published elsewhere in this issue of the
Federal Register, FDA explains that ``biannual'' can be defined as
occurring twice every year or as occurring every other year. (Ref. 1).
FDA tentatively concludes that registration every other year is a more
reasonable interpretation, because it does not seem warranted or
necessary for a vending machine operator to tell FDA every 6 months
that the operator wants to be subject to Federal requirements. FDA
began accepting registrations on July 21, 2010, and will continue to
accept them on a continuous basis. FDA is proposing in Sec. 101.8(d)
that an authorized official for a vending machine operator that is not
subject to the Federal requirements may register with FDA every other
year by providing FDA the following information:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ As discussed in section I.B. of this document, vending
machine operators that own or operate fewer than 20 vending machines
could elect to be subject to the requirements of 403(q)(5)(H)(viii)
of the FD&C Act by voluntarily registering with FDA.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The contact information (including name, address, phone
number, e-mail address), for the vending machine operator;
The address of the location of each vending machine owned
or operated by the vending machine operator that is being registered;
Preferred mailing address (if different from the vending
machine operator address), for purposes of receiving correspondence;
and
Certification that the information submitted is true and
accurate, that the person or firm submitting it is authorized to do so,
and that each registered vending machine will be subject to the
requirements of Sec. 101.8.
[[Page 19242]]
An authorized official of a vending machine operator who elects to
be subject to the Federal requirements can register by visiting https://www.fda.gov/menulabeling. FDA has created a form that contains fields
requesting the information in Sec. 101.8(d) and made the form
available at this Web site. Registrants must use this form to ensure
that complete information is submitted.
E. Requirements for Vending Machine Operators Subject to This Rule and
Operators That Elect To Be Subject to the Rule When Calorie
Declarations Are Required
Calorie Declaration for a Covered Vending Machine Food
a. Calorie declaration. Section 403(q)(5)(H)(viii) of the FD&C Act
provides that, for a covered vending machine food, the vending machine
operator must ``provide a sign in close proximity to the article of
food or the selection button that includes a clear and conspicuous
statement disclosing the number of calories contained in the article.''
FDA is proposing in Sec. 101.8(c)(2)(i)(A) to require that for a
covered vending machine food, the statement of the number of calories
in the food must be expressed to the nearest 5-calorie increment up to
and including 50 calories, and 10-calorie increment above 50 calories.
For a covered vending machine food that has fewer than 5 calories, the
calorie declaration may be expressed as zero. These rounding rules are
consistent with the declaration of calories for packaged foods as
provided in Sec. 101.9(c)(1).
In addition, FDA tentatively concludes that the number of calories
must be accompanied by a term, e.g., ``calories,'' to make clear what
that number refers to. Consequently, FDA is proposing in Sec.
101.8(c)(2)(i)(B) that the term ``Calories'' or ``Cal'' must appear
adjacent to the number of calories for the covered vending machine
food. This is the ``calorie declaration.'' We tentatively conclude that
permitting the use of the abbreviation ``Cal'' will provide flexibility
for vending machine operators, especially those that have limited space
on their machines, in meeting the proposed requirements.
Because section 403(q)(5)(H)(viii) of the FD&C Act refers to ``an
article of food sold from a vending machine,'' FDA tentatively
concludes that calorie information must include the total calories
present in the covered vending machine food as it is vended. For
example, if a covered vending machine food, such as a sandwich, is
dispensed with a single serving unit of a condiment, such as
mayonnaise, the calorie declaration must include the number of calories
contained in the sandwich and the package of mayonnaise. FDA also
tentatively concludes that the number of calories declared for the
article of food must be identical to the number of calories that are
declared in the Nutrition Facts, if present. If the food contains
multiple servings and bears a Nutrition Facts Panel, FDA tentatively
concludes that the number of calories declared must be equal to the
total number of calories contained in the food item as dispensed. The
total number of calories can be determined by multiplying the number of
calories per serving by the number of servings in the package. For
example, if the Nutrition Facts states 80 calories per serving and 3
servings per container, the total number of calories in the entire
package would be 240 calories. FDA tentatively concludes that for a
covered vending machine food that contains multiple servings, a vending
machine operator may voluntarily disclose calories per serving in
addition to total calories for the food.
Several comments requested that FDA permit the use of calorie
ranges, similar to those provided for restaurants and similar retail
food establishments under section 403(q)(5)(H)(v) of the FD&C Act, in
declaring calorie information for covered vending machine foods that
come in different flavors and varieties, e.g., coffee which comes in
different flavors, brew strength, serving size, sweeteners or different
types of sandwiches or fruit. The comments discussed the need for
flexibility to provide calorie ranges for such items.
FDA acknowledges that some articles of food sold from vending
machines come in varieties, such as different flavors and types of hot
beverages (e.g., coffee or hot chocolate). For some of these varieties,
there could be a large range for calories. For example, calories for
coffee could range from zero calories for a plain brewed coffee to over
400 calories for a large mocha coffee with whole milk and whipped
cream. We point out, however, that a vending machine operator could
post a calorie declaration in close proximity to the selection button
for a food that comes in different varieties and flavors that is sold
in a vending machine that has selection buttons corresponding to the
different options. For example, if there is a button to select cream
for a coffee, a vending machine operator would be able to post a
calorie declaration for that cream item in close proximity to the
selection button. FDA has considered vending machines that typically
dispense fresh sandwiches and fruit (often these machines are turnstile
type). FDA believes that such machines do not present a unique
situation where the proposed options for declaring calorie information
would not be appropriate. FDA tentatively concludes, therefore, that
calorie ranges are not necessary within the context of vending machines
because a vending machine operator would be able to disclose calorie
information under other options, as explained below (e.g., use of signs
including posters).
b. Determination of calorie content. If a covered vending machine
food does not bear Nutrition Facts, FDA anticipates that the
manufacturer or supplier of the food may provide the number of total
calories for the food to the vending machine operator so that the
operator has the necessary calorie information to meet the calorie
disclosure requirements of section 403(q)(5)(H)(viii) of the FD&C Act.
FDA notes that covered vending machine operators must ensure that the
calorie declaration is truthful and not misleading in accordance with
section 403(a)(1) of the FD&C Act. In the event the calorie information
is not available from the manufacturer of the food, FDA seeks comments
on whether a vending machine operator may use nutrient databases,
cookbooks, laboratory analyses, and other reasonable means. FDA notes
that such flexibility is provided in Sec. 101.10 and section
403(q)(5)(H)(iv). Further, FDA seeks comment on whether vending machine
operators should be required to provide FDA the information on which
they relied to determine the total calories posted for the vending
machine food.
c. Placement and prominence of calorie declarations. Section
403(q)(5)(H)(viii) of the FD&C Act provides that for a covered vending
machine food, the vending machine operator must provide a sign in close
proximity to the article of food or the selection button that includes
a clear and conspicuous statement disclosing the number of calories
contained in the food. FDA is interpreting the requirement that a sign
be placed in close proximity to the article to mean that the sign is
placed either in or on the vending machine itself or adjacent to the
vending machine and near the food, its price, its selection number, or
its selection button.
Section 403(q)(5)(H)(viii) also requires that the calorie
declaration be clear and conspicuous. FDA notes that to be clear and
conspicuous the calorie declaration must be in a font size large enough
to be seen and easily readable. However, FDA recognizes that vending
machines come in a variety of sizes, shapes, and
[[Page 19243]]
styles. We also understand that vending machines will often have
limited space. We think that it is important to provide businesses with
flexibility while, at the same time, fulfilling the requirements of the
statute. Therefore, we think it would not be appropriate to require one
specific type size and font for calorie declarations for all covered
vending machine food. Generally, if a calorie declaration is in a
similar color as and a type size no smaller than the name \3\ of the
food, price of the food, or the selection number (e.g., A9 or E4),
consumers should be able to read the calories in the same manner as
they read the name and price of the food item. Therefore, FDA is
proposing in Sec. 101.8(c)(2)(i)(C) that if the calorie declaration is
in or on the vending machine itself, the calorie declaration for a
covered vending machine food must be in a type size no smaller than the
name, selection number, or price of the food as displayed on the
vending machine, whichever is smallest. In addition, to help ensure
that the calorie declaration is clear and conspicuous, FDA is proposing
in Sec. 101.8(c)(2)(i)(B) and Sec. 101.8(c)(2)(i)(C) that the calorie
declaration be made in the same color, or in a color at least as
conspicuous, as the color of the name, price, or selection number of
the food. Further, FDA proposes that the calorie declaration on the
machine must have the same contrasting background as the name or price
or selection number it is in closest proximity to. FDA notes that if a
calorie declaration is presented in a color that is not sufficiently
contrasted with its background or the declaration is in a type size
that is too small to be read by a prospective purchaser, FDA
tentatively concludes that the calorie declaration for a covered
vending machine food is not disclosed in a clear and conspicuous
manner, and the declaration would not be in compliance with the
requirements of section 403(q)(5)(H)(viii)(I). FDA requests comment on
whether these requirements meet the conditions for ``clear and
conspicuous'' or whether the requirements should be more or less
prescriptive.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ Here the discussion of ``name'' refers to the name of the
food on or in the vending machine and not the name of the food on
the label of the food package.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
A number of comments suggested that calorie information be provided
on a poster or sign near the machine, such as for a bank of several
vending machines that may use a common singular payment acceptor.
However, several comments noted a concern that calorie information
would not be read by the consumer unless the calorie information were
posted immediately next to each food item. The comments stated that
``vending menus'' (such as a menu poster for a bank of vending
machines) would not provide the buyer with easy access to the calorie
information.
FDA agrees with the comments that a sign that is a poster may be an
appropriate medium to convey the required calorie declarations, so long
as the sign is in close proximity to the covered vending machine food
or selection button. The Agency tentatively concludes that ``close
proximity'' could mean adjacent to the vending machine, but not
necessarily attached, so long as the sign adjacent to the machine is
clear and conspicuous at the same time as the food, its name, or its
selection button or selection number is visible. The Agency requests
comments on this tentative conclusion. FDA is also proposing in Sec.
101.8(c)(2)(ii)(B) that if the sign required by section
403(q)(5)(H)(viii) of the FD&C Act is placed adjacent to the vending
machine, the calorie declaration must be in type that is all black or
one color printed on a white or other neutral background that contrasts
with the type color. The Agency is not proposing a minimum type size
for the calorie declaration, but we request comment on this tentative
decision. Comments should provide a rationale supporting their position
and any supporting data, including consumer research. Where the vending
machine only displays a vignette (i.e., picture of the food) or name of
the food item, FDA is proposing in Sec. 101.8(c)(2)(ii)(D) that the
calorie disclosure sign must be in close proximity to the vignette or
name or in close proximity to the selection button.
For electronic vending machines (e.g., machines with digital or
electronic or liquid crystal display (LCD) displays), FDA tentatively
concludes that the calorie disclosure sign required by the statute may
be displayed when the selection numbers are entered but before the
selection is confirmed, as proposed in Sec. 101.8(c)(2)(ii)(E).
FDA tentatively concludes, that for certain types of vending
machines with a limited number of selections, (e.g., popcorn with or
without added butter), the sign with the statement of calories may
appear anywhere on the front (or face) of the vending machine. A sign
may consist of a handwritten sticker in permanent marking that is
affixed to the machine, provided that the statement is prominent, not
crowded by other labeling on the machine and in a type size reasonably
related to the largest print on the vending machine.
F. When Calorie Declaration Is Not Required
1. Examination of the Nutrition Facts Panel
If the Nutrition Facts Panel of an article of food sold from a
vending machine may be examined by a prospective purchaser before
purchasing the article, the vending machine operator is not required to
provide the calorie information. FDA is interpreting the term
``Nutrition Facts Panel'' to mean the nutrition information in the
format required in Sec. 101.9(c) and (d) on the label of the food. FDA
tentatively concludes in order for the Nutrition Facts Panel to be
examined, it must be visible in full, without obstruction, before
purchase. For example, a vending machine's automatic dispensing coil
that holds the food in place or the placement of the package in the
machine must not obscure, cover, or cause to be covered any portion of
the Nutrition Facts Panel. To enable the prospective buyer to obtain
the total number of calories of the article of food, the information
that would be required to be made available on a sign by the vending
machine operator if the provisions of section 403(q)(5)(H)(viii)(I)(aa)
are not met, the agency notes that, in most cases, the prospective
purchaser must use several parts of the panel to determine the total
number of calories for the article of food. This is one reason that it
is critical that no portion of the Nutrition Facts Panel be obscured.
In addition, the Nutrition Facts Panel must be in a size that
permits the prospective purchaser to easily read the nutrition
information while the food is in the vending machine. FDA regulations
allow certain foods to bear Nutrition Facts in a modified or smaller
format based on the composition of the food, the size of the food
package or other factors (see Sec. 101.9(d), (e), (f), (h) and (j)).
Where the Nutrition Facts Panel is in a smaller format consistent with
the regulations, a prospective purchaser is unlikely to be able to
easily read it on the label of the article of food in the vending
machine prior to purchase. In such cases, the Agency tentatively
concludes that the prospective purchaser is not able to examine the
Nutrition Facts Panel prior to purchase. FDA requests comment on these
tentative conclusions.
FDA recognizes that ordinarily the vending machine operator is not
responsible for the printing of the Nutrition Facts Panel. Nor is the
vending machine operator required by section 403(q)(5)(H)(viii)(I) to
make examination of the Nutrition Facts
[[Page 19244]]
possible by the prospective purchaser prior to purchase. However, food
manufacturers may have an incentive to work with vending machine
operators to find ways to have their packaged food displayed with the
Nutrition Facts easily readable in the vending machine. In this way,
potential purchasers would have more information about the
manufacturers' food than just calories.
2. Visible Nutrition Information at the Point of Purchase
The second prong of section 403(q)(5)(H)(viii)(I)(aa) specifies
that if a vending machine ``otherwise provide[s] visible nutrition
information at the point of purchase'' for an article of food sold from
the machine, the vending machine operator is not required to provide
the calorie information. As with the Nutrition Facts Panel this
alternative means of satisfying the requirement of section
403(q)(5)(H)(viii) is optional for vending machine operators.
The terms ``visible nutrition information'' and ``point of
purchase'' in section 403(q)(5)(H)(viii)(I)(aa) are not defined in the
statute. FDA sees two possible ways to understand and apply the terms.
One approach is to conclude that (1) ``nutrition information'' in this
context means total calories in the article of food, because this is
the information that the vending machine operator must provide by sign
if the provisions in section 403(q)(5)(H)(viii)(I)(aa) are not met; and
(2) ``otherwise provide[d] * * * at the point of purchase'' suggests,
in the context of the provision as a whole, that the information, like
the Nutrition Facts Panel, should be on the article of food itself. FDA
proposes this approach in proposed Sec. 101.8(b).
FDA received several comments supporting the use of ``front of
package'' nutrition information contained on the food label as a means
of ``providing visible nutrition information at the point of
purchase.'' For example, some packaged food manufacturers voluntarily
place certain nutrition information on the principal display panel that
includes calorie and other nutrition information about the product.
This type of nutrition information is sometimes referred to as ``front
of package'' by industry, whereas Nutrition Facts typically appear on
the information panel of a food label. FDA tentatively concludes that
``front of package'' nutrition information could be a way to provide
visible nutrition information, so long as the criteria for color, font
and type size are met and total calories in the article of food are
included. If a nutrient content claim or a health claim for the article
of food also is included on the front of the package, the claim must
comply with relevant FDA regulations authorizing nutrient content
claims (a claim on food labeling regarding the level of a nutrient,
e.g., low fat) or health claims (a claim on food labeling regarding the
relationship between a substance and a disease, e.g., calcium and
osteoporosis), as applicable.
FDA also received a few comments stating that the Nutrition Facts
Panel and any ``front of package'' nutrition information may be small
and difficult to read in a vending machine. FDA recognizes that a
consumer may not be able to easily read some nutrition information in a
vending machine and therefore this information may not inform the
consumer about the number of total calories in the article of food.
Section 101.8(b) of this proposed rule sets out the provisions
regarding ``visible nutrition information at the point of purchase''
discussed above.
Under proposed Sec. 101.8(b), for the nutrition information on the
label to be considered ``visible,'' it must be clear and conspicuous.
To ensure that it is clear and conspicuous, it must be both (1) in a
type size easily readable from the distance between the prospective
purchaser and the label and (2) in print with sufficient color and
contrasting background to be readily distinguishable from other types
of information on the label. FDA tentatively concludes that the visible
nutrition information presented on the label of the food at the point
of purchase must be in a type size reasonably related to the most
prominent printed matter on the label and in a color that sufficiently
contrasts with the background, such that a prospective purchaser is
able to notice and read the information. Generally, FDA has considered
``reasonably related'' to mean a type size that is at least 50 percent
of the size of the largest print on the label. (Ref. 2).
The alternative approach is to interpret the words ``otherwise
provide visible nutrition information at the point of purchase'' by
concluding that (1) ``nutrition information'' means something more than
total calories, and (2) ``point of purchase'' means something more than
on the package of the food itself. Under this interpretation, the non-
Nutrition Facts Panel option in the statute would include information
in addition to total calories because the broader term ``nutrition
information'' was used instead of ``calories.'' Just as the Nutrition
Facts Panel contains more than calorie information, so too, would
``visible nutrition information at the point of purchase.'' This could
include, in addition to total calories in the food, information such as
serving size information or information on the nutrients that are
required to be disclosed in the Nutrition Facts as described in Sec.
101.9 or 21 U.S.C. 343(q)(1)(D) and (E). FDA seeks comment on what
other nutrition information, if any, should be required if this
alternative interpretation were adopted. FDA also notes that under this
alternative interpretation, the vending machine operator could rely on
any ``visible nutrition information at the point of purchase'' that
included total calories in addition to other nutrition information
regardless of what entity supplied the information.
Likewise, under the alternative approach, ``point of purchase''
would be read to mean that the ``visible nutrition information'' could
be provided in places other than on the package of the food in the
vending machine, such as on the vending machine itself.
In the case of the alternative interpretation, in which the
``visible nutrition information at the point of purchase'' appears
other than on the label of the article of food, there are also the
questions of where and through what means the information may be
provided. The agency specifically requests comment on whether, under
this alternative interpretation, signs (including posters) or booklets
would be sufficient in providing ``otherwise visible nutrition
information at the point of purchase'' and we especially request any
consumer studies or social scientific data on this issue.
Regardless of the precise location or means of providing the
nutrition information, under the alternative interpretation there would
also be a question of ensuring that the information is adequately
``visible.'' At a minimum, the nutrition information should be clear
and conspicuous and noticeable at the point of purchase, in the context
of the surroundings. One way to ensure this visibility if the nutrition
information is not on the label of the article of food would be to
provide the information in type that is all black or one color, printed
on a white or other neutral background that contrasts with the type
color. Another way would be to also provide the information using a
minimum type size. The agency requests comments on these and other ways
to determine if the information is ``visible.''
Another aspect of whether information that is not on the food
itself is visible to the consumer is where the information is placed
relative to the ``point of purchase.'' FDA requests comment on the
meaning of ``the point of purchase'' in this context and on all
[[Page 19245]]
aspects of the alternative interpretation of ``visible nutrition
information at the point of purchase.''
FDA seeks comment on the alternative approaches to interpreting and
applying ``otherwise provide visible nutrition information at the point
of purchase.''
G. Conforming Amendment
FDA is proposing to exempt electronic signatures submitted to
satisfy the requirements of this proposed section from the requirement
to comply with Part 11--Electronic Records; Electronic Signatures (21
CFR part 11) and proposing to amend part 11 to reflect this exemption.
We expect this exemption to facilitate the registration process for
those vending machine operators who voluntarily choose to register
under section 403(q)(5)(H)(ix) of the FD&C Act.
H. Effective Date
FDA received a few comments regarding the effective date of the
final rule that would issue based on this proposal. These comments
suggested that vending machine operators would need 2 years to
implement the requirements for calorie labeling for vending machines
due to the costs of producing posters and driving to each site to post
the information.
FDA is proposing that the final rule become effective one year from
the date of its publication. Because FDA is proposing flexibility for
compliance, i.e., the use of signs in, on, or adjacent to vending
machines, vending machine operators would be able to choose among a
wide variety of less expensive avenues to achieve compliance, depending
on their situation. Many foods sold from vending machines are packaged
and have Nutrition Facts. Therefore, vending machine operators have the
opportunity of orienting the food in the vending machine such that the
prospective customer may examine the Nutrition Facts Panel. In this
case, the operators would not need to provide calorie information
required by 403(q)(5)(H)(viii)(I) of the FD&C Act. If the operator
chooses not to orient the food such that the prospective customer may
examine the Nutrition Facts Panel, or if it is not practicable to do so
because the vending machine is not of the type where the food is
visible, the operator may obtain the calorie information from the
Nutrition Facts to place on the signs. Further, the proposed rule, if
finalized, does not require any particular manner of obtaining calorie
information. As discussed above in this document, FDA anticipates that,
if a covered vending machine food does not bear Nutrition Facts because
it falls under an exemption, the manufacturer or supplier of the food
may provide the number of total calories for the food to the vending
machine operator so that the operator has the necessary calorie
information to meet the calorie disclosure requirements of section
403(q)(5)(H)(viii)(I). Because of the flexibility provided in this
proposed rule, the Agency finds that it is reasonable to make the
requirements effective in 1 year. Based on the comments and on what
vending machine operators will need to do to come into compliance, the
Agency tentatively finds that making the final rule effective 1 year
after publication is practicable. The Agency seeks comment on the
appropriateness of this timeframe.
IV. Summary Preliminary Regulatory Impact Analysis
The summary analysis of benefits and costs included in this
document is drawn from the detailed Preliminary Regulatory Impact
Analysis which is available at https://www.regulations.gov, Docket No.
FDA-2011-F-0171, and is also available on FDA's Web site at https://www.fda.gov/Food/LabelingNutrition/ucm217762.htm.
A. Introduction
FDA has examined the impacts of the proposed rule under Executive
Orders 13563 and 12866, the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601-
612), and the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4).
Executive Orders 13563 and 12866 direct agencies to assess all costs
and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if regulation is
necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize net benefits
(including potential economic, environmental, public health and safety
effects, distributive impacts, and equity). Executive Order 13563
emphasizes the importance of quantifying both costs and benefits, of
reducing costs, of harmonizing rules, and of promoting flexibility.
This proposed rule has been designated an ``economically'' significant
rule, under section 3(f)(1) of Executive Order 12866. Accordingly, the
proposed rule has been reviewed by the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB).
The Regulatory Flexibility Act requires agencies to analyze
regulatory options that would minimize any significant impact of a rule
on small entities. Using the Small Business Administration (SBA)
definition of small vending machine operators as classified by the
North American Industry Classification System (NAICS 45421), FDA
estimates that a significant number of operators impacted by this
proposed rule are small businesses. As directed by statute, the
requirements of the proposed rule only apply to vending machine
operators that own or operate 20 or more vending machines. However,
according to data from the Vending Times Census and from the National
Automatic Merchandising Association (NAMA), the average annual revenue
per machine is less than $7,000 (Refs. 3 and 4). An operator with only
20 machines may have vending machine revenue of less than $140,000. In
order to exceed the SBA's definition of a small vending machine
operator, a firm would need at least $10 million in annual revenue
(Ref. 5). This suggests that a firm with revenue exclusively from
vending machine sales would need more than 1,400 machines to exceed the
definition of small business. Based on the latest available U.S.
Economic Census data that breaks down establishments by revenue, we
project that 97 percent of firms selling covered vending machine food,
as that term is used in this document, that identify primarily as
vending machine operators that are engaged in the business of owning or
operating 20 or more vending machines would be small businesses as
defined by SBA. Therefore, the Agency believes that the proposed rule
would have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of
small entities. This impact is discussed further in section V of this
document.
Section 202(a) of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 requires
that agencies prepare a written statement, which includes an assessment
of anticipated costs and benefits, before proposing ``any rule that
includes any Federal mandate that may result in the expenditure by
State, local, and tribal governments, in the aggregate, or by the
private sector, of $100,000,000 or more (adjusted annually for
inflation) in any one year.'' The current threshold after adjustment
for inflation is $135 million, using the most current (2009) Implicit
Price Deflator for the Gross Domestic Product. FDA does not expect this
proposed rule to result in any 1-year expenditure that would meet or
exceed this amount.
B. Need for This Regulation
This proposed rule is necessary to implement section 4205 of the
Affordable Care Act, which principally amends sections 403 and 403A of
the FD&C Act, and requires operators of 20 or more vending machines to
disclose calorie information for covered vending machine food. The
provision of calorie information for covered vending
[[Page 19246]]
machine food may help consumers make better informed dietary choices.
Economic justifications for regulatory interventions in private
markets rely on the presence of some market failure. In the case of
food sold from a vending machine, the private market is particularly
robust and competitive. Thousands of individual firms vie for consumer
dollars in millions of vending machines across the United States (Ref.
3). Low entry costs for firms and low switching costs for customers
suggest that if a sizable fraction of consumers were willing to pay
for--and discriminate based on--the visible calorie information at the
point of purchase then the industry would provide it to them. In fact,
some vending machine operators are voluntarily providing more healthful
choices and additional information on machines (Refs. 4 and 6).
Although many of the usual market failures that justify regulatory
action, such as the existence of market power or of ill-defined
property rights, do not apply here (Refs. 7 and 8), the primary support
for regulatory intervention is that there are systematic biases in how
consumers process information and weigh current benefits (from
consuming higher calorie foods) against future costs (higher
probability of obesity and its comorbidities).
The bias is more directly related to the requirements of this
proposed rule: Consumer demand for calorie information does not create
incentives for the provision of calorie information at the vending
machine. This market failure occurs because at the time of purchase,
consumers do not value calorie information as much as they do later,
when the effects of excess calorie consumption are evident. Studies
have shown that consumers have present-based preferences, meaning that
they are continually optimistic about the healthfulness of their future
choices (Ref. 9, 10 and 11).
These studies suggest that calorie information often lacks
salience, or relevance, for consumers at the time of purchase and
consumption, even though they may experience regret about their
decisions at a later date. This tendency may explain why consumers have
not generally demanded calorie and other nutrition information for food
sold from vending machines before, or at, the point of purchase, even
if they may, at a later point in time, value that information. Because
of competition for consumer time and attention vending machine
operators have limited time and space in which to convey information to
consumers. These limits mean that there is a substantial opportunity
cost to the operator of providing calorie information. That is, just as
an operator may have to decide which possible foods to leave out of a
vending machine with limited space (thus giving up the opportunity to
sell those items), it must choose which pieces of information about its
foods it wants to convey. Adding an additional piece of information
means that an operator may need to downplay or remove some other piece
of information. This opportunity cost of information holds true whether
the calorie information is displayed on the machine or, as with an
increasing number of packaged foods, on the principal display panel of
the package.
The proposed requirements mitigate the apparent market failure in
information provision stemming from present-biase