Safety Zone; Big Rock Blue Marlin Air Show; Bogue Sound, Morehead City, NC, 18672-18674 [2011-7994]
Download as PDF
18672
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 65 / Tuesday, April 5, 2011 / Proposed Rules
VHF Marine Band Radio, channels 13
and 16.
(d) Enforcement. The U.S. Coast
Guard may be assisted in the patrol and
enforcement of the zone by Federal,
State, and local agencies.
(e) Enforcement period. This section
will be enforced from 10 a.m. to 4 p.m.
on June 30, 2011 unless cancelled
earlier by the Captain of the Port.
Dated: March 23, 2011.
A. Popiel,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the
Port North Carolina.
[FR Doc. 2011–8005 Filed 4–4–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
To avoid duplication, please use only
one of these four methods. See the
‘‘Public Participation and Request for
Comments’’ portion of the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section
below for instructions on submitting
comments.
If
you have questions on this proposed
rule, call or e-mail BOSN3 Joseph M.
Edge, Prevention Department, Coast
Guard Sector North Carolina; telephone
252–247–4525, e-mail
Joseph.M.Edge@uscg.mil. If you have
questions on viewing or submitting
material to the docket, call Renee V.
Wright, Program Manager, Docket
Operations, telephone 202–366–9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Public Participation and Request for
Comments
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket No. USCG–2011–0168]
RIN 1625–AA00
Safety Zone; Big Rock Blue Marlin Air
Show; Bogue Sound, Morehead City,
NC
We encourage you to participate in
this rulemaking by submitting
comments and related materials. All
comments received will be posted
without change to https://
www.regulations.gov and will include
any personal information you have
provided.
Submitting Comments
Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with PROPOSALS
AGENCY:
If you submit a comment, please
include the docket number for this
rulemaking (USCG–2011–0168),
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard proposes to
indicate the specific section of this
establish a temporary Safety Zone for
document to which each comment
the ‘‘Big Rock Blue Marlin Air Show’’, an applies, and provide a reason for each
aerial demonstration to be held over the suggestion or recommendation. You
waters of Bogue Sound, adjacent to
may submit your comments and
Morehead City, North Carolina. This
material online (via https://
Safety Zone is necessary to provide for
www.regulations.gov) or by fax, mail, or
the safety of life on navigable waters
hand delivery, but please use only one
during the event. This action is
of these means. If you submit a
intended to restrict vessel traffic on the
comment online via https://
Intracoastal Waterway from 7 p.m. until www.regulations.gov, it will be
8 p.m.
considered received by the Coast Guard
DATES: Comments and related material
when you successfully transmit the
must be received by the Coast Guard on comment. If you fax, hand deliver, or
or before May 5, 2011.
mail your comment, it will be
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
considered as having been received by
identified by docket number USCG–
the Coast Guard when it is received at
2011–0168 using any one of the
the Docket Management Facility. We
following methods:
recommend that you include your name
(1) Federal eRulemaking Portal:
and a mailing address, an e-mail
https://www.regulations.gov.
address, or a telephone number in the
(2) Fax: 202–493–2251.
body of your document so that we can
(3) Mail: Docket Management Facility contact you if we have questions
(M–30), U.S. Department of
regarding your submission.
To submit your comment online, go to
Transportation, West Building Ground
Floor, Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey https://www.regulations.gov, click on the
‘‘submit a comment’’ box, which will
Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590–
then become highlighted in blue. In the
0001.
‘‘Document Type’’ drop down menu
(4) Hand delivery: Same as mail
select ‘‘Proposed Rule’’ and insert
address above, between 9 a.m. and
‘‘USCG–2011–0168’’ in the ‘‘Keyword’’
5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays. The telephone number box. Click ‘‘Search’’ then click on the
balloon shape in the ‘‘Actions’’ column.
is 202–366–9329.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
13:08 Apr 04, 2011
Jkt 223001
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
If you submit your comments by mail or
hand delivery, submit them in an
unbound format, no larger than 81⁄2 by
11 inches, suitable for copying and
electronic filing. If you submit
comments by mail and would like to
know that they reached the Facility,
please enclose a stamped, self-addressed
postcard or envelope. We will consider
all comments and material received
during the comment period and may
change the rule based on your
comments.
Viewing Comments and Documents
To view comments, as well as
documents mentioned in this preamble
as being available in the docket, go to
https://www.regulations.gov, click on the
‘‘read comments’’ box, which will then
become highlighted in blue. In the
‘‘Keyword’’ box insert ‘‘USCG–2011–
0168’’ and click ‘‘Search.’’ Click the
‘‘Open Docket Folder’’ in the ‘‘Actions’’
column. You may also visit the Docket
Management Facility in Room W12–140
on the ground floor of the Department
of Transportation West Building, 1200
New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington,
DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. We have an agreement with
the Department of Transportation to use
the Docket Management Facility.
Privacy Act
Anyone can search the electronic
form of comments received into any of
our dockets by the name of the
individual submitting the comment (or
signing the comment, if submitted on
behalf of an association, business, labor
union, etc.). You may review a Privacy
Act notice regarding our public dockets
in the January 17, 2008, issue of the
Federal Register (73 FR 3316).
Public Meeting
We do not now plan to hold a public
meeting. But you may submit a request
for one using one of the four methods
specified under ADDRESSES. Please
explain why you believe a public
meeting would be beneficial. If we
determine that one would aid this
rulemaking, we will hold one at a time
and place announced by a later notice
in the Federal Register.
Basis and Purpose
On June 11, 2011 from 7 p.m. to
8 p.m., the Big Rock Blue Marlin
Tournament will sponsor the ‘‘Big Rock
Blue Marlin Air Show’’ consisting of an
aerial demonstration to take place
directly above the waters of Bogue
Sounds including the waters of the
Intracoastal Waterway adjacent to
Morehead City, North Carolina. To
E:\FR\FM\05APP1.SGM
05APP1
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 65 / Tuesday, April 5, 2011 / Proposed Rules
provide for the safety of the spectators
and other transiting vessels, the Coast
Guard will temporarily restrict vessel
traffic in the event area during this
event.
Discussion of Proposed Rule
The Coast Guard is proposing to
establish a temporary safety zone that
will restrict vessel movement for one
hour prior to the event on the specified
waters of Bogue Sound, Morehead City,
NC. During the enforcement period,
while the Aerial Event is taking place,
no vessel will be allowed to transit the
waterway unless the vessel is given
permission from the Patrol Commander
to transit. This safety zone will be
enforced from 7 p.m. to 8 p.m. on June
11, 2011.
Regulatory Analyses
We developed this proposed rule after
considering numerous statutes and
executive orders related to rulemaking.
Below we summarize our analyses
based on 13 of these statutes or
executive orders.
WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with PROPOSALS
Executive Order 12866 and Executive
Order 13563
This proposed rule is not a significant
regulatory action under section 3(f) of
Executive Order 12866, Regulatory
Planning and Review, as supplemented
by Executive Order 13563, and does not
require an assessment of potential costs
and benefits under section 6(a)(3) of that
Order. The Office of Management and
Budget has not reviewed it under that
Order. Although this regulation
prevents traffic from transiting waters of
Bogue Sound during the event, the
effect of this regulation will not be
significant due to the limited duration
that the regulated area will be in effect.
Extensive advance notification will be
made to the maritime community via
marine information broadcast and local
area newspapers so mariners can adjust
their plans accordingly. Vessel traffic
will be able to transit the regulated area
before and after the event, when the
Coast Guard Patrol Commander deems it
is safe to do so.
Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act
(5 U.S.C. 601–612), we have considered
whether this proposed rule would have
a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
The term ‘‘small entities’’ comprises
small businesses, not-for-profit
organizations that are independently
owned and operated and are not
dominant in their fields, and
governmental jurisdictions with
populations of less than 50,000.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
13:08 Apr 04, 2011
Jkt 223001
The Coast Guard certifies under 5
U.S.C. 605(b) that this proposed rule
would not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small
entities. This proposed rule would affect
the following entities, some of which
might be small entities: The owners of
operators of vessels intending to transit
this section of the Bogue Sound from
7 p.m. to 8 p.m. on June 11, 2011. This
safety zone would not have significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities for the
following reasons. This safety zone
would be activated, and this subject to
enforcement, for only 1 hour in the
evening. Vessel traffic will be able to
transit the area immediately prior to and
immediately following the enforcement
period. Before the activation of the zone,
we would issue maritime advisories
widely to users of the waterway.
If you think that your business,
organization, or governmental
jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity
and that this rule would have a
significant economic impact on it,
please submit a comment (see
ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it
qualifies and how and to what degree
this rule would economically affect it.
Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121),
we want to assist small entities in
understanding this proposed rule so that
they can better evaluate its effects on
them and participate in the rulemaking.
If the rule would affect your small
business, organization, or governmental
jurisdiction and you have questions
concerning its provisions or options for
compliance, please contact BOSN3
Joseph Edge, Prevention Department,
Sector North Carolina, 252–247–4525.
The Coast Guard will not retaliate
against small entities that question or
complain about this proposed rule or
any policy or action of the Coast Guard.
Collection of Information
This proposed rule would call for no
new collection of information under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3501–3520).
Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism
under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct
effect on State or local governments and
would either preempt State law or
impose a substantial direct cost of
compliance on them. We have analyzed
this proposed rule under that Order and
have determined that it does not have
implications for federalism.
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
18673
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
Federal agencies to assess the effects of
their discretionary regulatory actions. In
particular, the Act addresses actions
that may result in the expenditure by a
State, local, or tribal government, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector of
$100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or
more in any one year. Though this
proposed rule would not result in such
an expenditure, we do discuss the
effects of this rule elsewhere in this
preamble.
Taking of Private Property
This proposed rule would not cause a
taking of private property or otherwise
have taking implications under
Executive Order 12630, Governmental
Actions and Interference with
Constitutionally Protected Property
Rights.
Civil Justice Reform
This proposed rule meets applicable
standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of
Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice
Reform, to minimize litigation,
eliminate ambiguity, and reduce
burden.
Protection of Children
We have analyzed this proposed rule
under Executive Order 13045,
Protection of Children from
Environmental Health Risks and Safety
Risks. This rule is not an economically
significant rule and would not create an
environmental risk to health or risk to
safety that might disproportionately
affect children.
Indian Tribal Governments
This proposed rule does not have
tribal implications under Executive
Order 13175, Consultation and
Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments, because it would not have
a substantial direct effect on one or
more Indian tribes, on the relationship
between the Federal Government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes.
Energy Effects
We have analyzed this proposed rule
under Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have
determined that it is not a ‘‘significant
energy action’’ under that order because
it is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’
under Executive Order 12866 and is not
likely to have a significant adverse effect
on the supply, distribution, or use of
E:\FR\FM\05APP1.SGM
05APP1
18674
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 65 / Tuesday, April 5, 2011 / Proposed Rules
energy. The Administrator of the Office
of Information and Regulatory Affairs
has not designated it as a significant
energy action. Therefore, it does not
require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.
WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with PROPOSALS
Technical Standards
The National Technology Transfer
and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use
voluntary consensus standards in their
regulatory activities unless the agency
provides Congress, through the Office of
Management and Budget, with an
explanation of why using these
standards would be inconsistent with
applicable law or otherwise impractical.
Voluntary consensus standards are
technical standards (e.g., specifications
of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling
procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or
adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
This proposed rule does not use
technical standards. Therefore, we did
not consider the use of voluntary
consensus standards.
Environment
We have analyzed this proposed rule
under Department of Homeland
Security Management Directive 023–01
and Commandant Instruction
M16475.lD, which guide the Coast
Guard in complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and
have made a preliminary determination
that this action is one of a category of
actions that do not individually or
cumulatively have a significant effect on
the human environment. A preliminary
environmental analysis checklist
supporting this determination is
available in the docket where indicated
under ADDRESSES. This proposed rule is
categorically excluded, under figure 2–
1, paragraph (34)(g), of this instruction.
The special local regulation is necessary
to provide for the safety of the general
public and event participants from
potential hazards associated with
vessels present on or transiting upon
this waterway. We seek any comments
or information that may lead to the
discovery of a significant environmental
impact from this proposed rule.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation
(water), Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Security measures,
Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard proposes to
amend 33 CFR part 165 as follows:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
13:08 Apr 04, 2011
Jkt 223001
PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION
AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
1. The authority citation for part 165
continues to read as follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1226, 1231; 46 U.S.C.
Chapter 701, 3306, 3703; 50 U.S.C. 191, 195;
33 CFR 1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6, 160.5; Pub. L.
107–295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department of
Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1.
2. Add a temporary § 165–T05–0168
to read as follows:
165.T05–0168 Safety Zone: Big Rock Blue
Marlin Air Show, Bogue Sound, Morehead
City, NC.
(a) Regulated Area. The following area
is a safety zone: Specified waters of the
Captain of the Port Sector North
Carolina, as defined in 33 CFR 3.25–20,
in the navigable waters of Bogue Sound
within an area bound by a line drawn
from the following points: Latitude
34°43′09.9″ N, longitude 076°45′54.9″
W; thence east to latitude 34°43′09.75″
N, longitude 076°44′34.16″ W; thence
south to latitude 34°42′52.64″ N,
longitude 076°44′32.55″ W; thence west
to latitude 34°42′50.7″ N, longitude
076°45′48.5″ W; thence to the point of
origin, located approximately 400 yards
south of the shoreline of Morehead City.
(b) Definition: For the purposes of this
section, Captain of the Port means the
Commander, Sector North Carolina.
Representative means any U.S. Coast
Guard commissioned, warrant, or petty
officer who has been authorized by the
Captain of the Port, Sector North
Carolina to act on his behalf.
(c) Regulations: (1) In accordance with
the general regulations in 165.23 of this
part, entry into this zone is prohibited
unless authorized by the Captain of the
Port, Sector North Carolina or his
designated representatives.
(2) The operator of any vessel in the
immediate vicinity of this safety zone
shall: (i) Stop the vessel immediately
upon being directed to do so by any
commissioned, warrant or petty officer
on shore or on board a vessel that is
displaying a U.S. Coast Guard Ensign.
(ii) Proceed as directed by any
commissioned, warrant or petty officer
on shore or on board a vessel that is
displaying a U.S. Coast Guard Ensign.
(3) The Captain of the Port, Sector
North Carolina can be reached through
the Sector Duty Officer at Sector North
Carolina in Atlantic Beach, North
Carolina at telephone number (252)
247–4570.
(4) The Coast Guard Representatives
enforcing the safety zone can be
contacted on VHF–FM marine band
radio channel 13 (165.65 MHz) and
channel 16 (156.8 MHz).
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
(d) Enforcement Period. This section
will be enforced from 7 p.m. until 8
p.m. on June 11, 2011.
Dated: March 23, 2011.
Anthony Popiel,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the
Port North Carolina.
[FR Doc. 2011–7994 Filed 4–4–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket No. USCG–2010–0803]
RIN 1625–AA87
Security Zones; Sector Southeastern
New England Captain of the Port Zone
Coast Guard, DHS.
Notice of proposed rulemaking.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Coast Guard proposes a
permanent regulation that would create
security zones around cruise ships in
the Southeastern New England Captain
of the Port (COTP) Zone. These security
zones are nearly identical to security
zones currently put in place by a
temporary final rule. The proposed rule
would create a 100-yard radius security
zone encompassing all navigable waters
around any cruise ship anchored or
moored and 200-yard radius security
zone encompassing all navigable waters
around any cruise ship underway that is
being escorted by Coast Guard or law
enforcement agencies assisting the Coast
Guard. These zones are needed to
protect cruise ships and the public from
destruction, loss, or injury from
sabotage, subversive acts, or other
malicious acts of a similar nature.
Persons or vessels may not enter these
security zones without permission of
the COTP or a COTP designated
representative.
SUMMARY:
Comments and related material
must be received by the Coast Guard on
or before May 5, 2011. Requests for
public meetings must be received by the
Coast Guard on or before April 12, 2011.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
identified by docket number USCG–
2010–0803 using any one of the
following methods:
(1) Federal eRulemaking Portal:
https://www.regulations.gov.
(2) Fax: 202–493–2251.
(3) Mail: Docket Management Facility
(M–30), U.S. Department of
Transportation, West Building Ground
Floor, Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey
DATES:
E:\FR\FM\05APP1.SGM
05APP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 65 (Tuesday, April 5, 2011)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 18672-18674]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-7994]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket No. USCG-2011-0168]
RIN 1625-AA00
Safety Zone; Big Rock Blue Marlin Air Show; Bogue Sound, Morehead
City, NC
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard proposes to establish a temporary Safety Zone
for the ``Big Rock Blue Marlin Air Show'', an aerial demonstration to
be held over the waters of Bogue Sound, adjacent to Morehead City,
North Carolina. This Safety Zone is necessary to provide for the safety
of life on navigable waters during the event. This action is intended
to restrict vessel traffic on the Intracoastal Waterway from 7 p.m.
until 8 p.m.
DATES: Comments and related material must be received by the Coast
Guard on or before May 5, 2011.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments identified by docket number USCG-
2011-0168 using any one of the following methods:
(1) Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
(2) Fax: 202-493-2251.
(3) Mail: Docket Management Facility (M-30), U.S. Department of
Transportation, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590-0001.
(4) Hand delivery: Same as mail address above, between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The telephone
number is 202-366-9329.
To avoid duplication, please use only one of these four methods.
See the ``Public Participation and Request for Comments'' portion of
the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section below for instructions on
submitting comments.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this proposed
rule, call or e-mail BOSN3 Joseph M. Edge, Prevention Department, Coast
Guard Sector North Carolina; telephone 252-247-4525, e-mail
Joseph.M.Edge@uscg.mil. If you have questions on viewing or submitting
material to the docket, call Renee V. Wright, Program Manager, Docket
Operations, telephone 202-366-9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Public Participation and Request for Comments
We encourage you to participate in this rulemaking by submitting
comments and related materials. All comments received will be posted
without change to https://www.regulations.gov and will include any
personal information you have provided.
Submitting Comments
If you submit a comment, please include the docket number for this
rulemaking (USCG-2011-0168), indicate the specific section of this
document to which each comment applies, and provide a reason for each
suggestion or recommendation. You may submit your comments and material
online (via https://www.regulations.gov) or by fax, mail, or hand
delivery, but please use only one of these means. If you submit a
comment online via https://www.regulations.gov, it will be considered
received by the Coast Guard when you successfully transmit the comment.
If you fax, hand deliver, or mail your comment, it will be considered
as having been received by the Coast Guard when it is received at the
Docket Management Facility. We recommend that you include your name and
a mailing address, an e-mail address, or a telephone number in the body
of your document so that we can contact you if we have questions
regarding your submission.
To submit your comment online, go to https://www.regulations.gov,
click on the ``submit a comment'' box, which will then become
highlighted in blue. In the ``Document Type'' drop down menu select
``Proposed Rule'' and insert ``USCG-2011-0168'' in the ``Keyword'' box.
Click ``Search'' then click on the balloon shape in the ``Actions''
column. If you submit your comments by mail or hand delivery, submit
them in an unbound format, no larger than 8\1/2\ by 11 inches, suitable
for copying and electronic filing. If you submit comments by mail and
would like to know that they reached the Facility, please enclose a
stamped, self-addressed postcard or envelope. We will consider all
comments and material received during the comment period and may change
the rule based on your comments.
Viewing Comments and Documents
To view comments, as well as documents mentioned in this preamble
as being available in the docket, go to https://www.regulations.gov,
click on the ``read comments'' box, which will then become highlighted
in blue. In the ``Keyword'' box insert ``USCG-2011-0168'' and click
``Search.'' Click the ``Open Docket Folder'' in the ``Actions'' column.
You may also visit the Docket Management Facility in Room W12-140 on
the ground floor of the Department of Transportation West Building,
1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. We have an
agreement with the Department of Transportation to use the Docket
Management Facility.
Privacy Act
Anyone can search the electronic form of comments received into any
of our dockets by the name of the individual submitting the comment (or
signing the comment, if submitted on behalf of an association,
business, labor union, etc.). You may review a Privacy Act notice
regarding our public dockets in the January 17, 2008, issue of the
Federal Register (73 FR 3316).
Public Meeting
We do not now plan to hold a public meeting. But you may submit a
request for one using one of the four methods specified under
ADDRESSES. Please explain why you believe a public meeting would be
beneficial. If we determine that one would aid this rulemaking, we will
hold one at a time and place announced by a later notice in the Federal
Register.
Basis and Purpose
On June 11, 2011 from 7 p.m. to 8 p.m., the Big Rock Blue Marlin
Tournament will sponsor the ``Big Rock Blue Marlin Air Show''
consisting of an aerial demonstration to take place directly above the
waters of Bogue Sounds including the waters of the Intracoastal
Waterway adjacent to Morehead City, North Carolina. To
[[Page 18673]]
provide for the safety of the spectators and other transiting vessels,
the Coast Guard will temporarily restrict vessel traffic in the event
area during this event.
Discussion of Proposed Rule
The Coast Guard is proposing to establish a temporary safety zone
that will restrict vessel movement for one hour prior to the event on
the specified waters of Bogue Sound, Morehead City, NC. During the
enforcement period, while the Aerial Event is taking place, no vessel
will be allowed to transit the waterway unless the vessel is given
permission from the Patrol Commander to transit. This safety zone will
be enforced from 7 p.m. to 8 p.m. on June 11, 2011.
Regulatory Analyses
We developed this proposed rule after considering numerous statutes
and executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our
analyses based on 13 of these statutes or executive orders.
Executive Order 12866 and Executive Order 13563
This proposed rule is not a significant regulatory action under
section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review,
as supplemented by Executive Order 13563, and does not require an
assessment of potential costs and benefits under section 6(a)(3) of
that Order. The Office of Management and Budget has not reviewed it
under that Order. Although this regulation prevents traffic from
transiting waters of Bogue Sound during the event, the effect of this
regulation will not be significant due to the limited duration that the
regulated area will be in effect. Extensive advance notification will
be made to the maritime community via marine information broadcast and
local area newspapers so mariners can adjust their plans accordingly.
Vessel traffic will be able to transit the regulated area before and
after the event, when the Coast Guard Patrol Commander deems it is safe
to do so.
Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601-612), we have
considered whether this proposed rule would have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small entities. The term ``small
entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than
50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this proposed
rule would not have a significant economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities. This proposed rule would affect the following
entities, some of which might be small entities: The owners of
operators of vessels intending to transit this section of the Bogue
Sound from 7 p.m. to 8 p.m. on June 11, 2011. This safety zone would
not have significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
entities for the following reasons. This safety zone would be
activated, and this subject to enforcement, for only 1 hour in the
evening. Vessel traffic will be able to transit the area immediately
prior to and immediately following the enforcement period. Before the
activation of the zone, we would issue maritime advisories widely to
users of the waterway.
If you think that your business, organization, or governmental
jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity and that this rule would have
a significant economic impact on it, please submit a comment (see
ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it qualifies and how and to what
degree this rule would economically affect it.
Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small
entities in understanding this proposed rule so that they can better
evaluate its effects on them and participate in the rulemaking. If the
rule would affect your small business, organization, or governmental
jurisdiction and you have questions concerning its provisions or
options for compliance, please contact BOSN3 Joseph Edge, Prevention
Department, Sector North Carolina, 252-247-4525. The Coast Guard will
not retaliate against small entities that question or complain about
this proposed rule or any policy or action of the Coast Guard.
Collection of Information
This proposed rule would call for no new collection of information
under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).
Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on State or local
governments and would either preempt State law or impose a substantial
direct cost of compliance on them. We have analyzed this proposed rule
under that Order and have determined that it does not have implications
for federalism.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this proposed rule would not
result in such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule
elsewhere in this preamble.
Taking of Private Property
This proposed rule would not cause a taking of private property or
otherwise have taking implications under Executive Order 12630,
Governmental Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected
Property Rights.
Civil Justice Reform
This proposed rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and
3(b)(2) of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize
litigation, eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.
Protection of Children
We have analyzed this proposed rule under Executive Order 13045,
Protection of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety
Risks. This rule is not an economically significant rule and would not
create an environmental risk to health or risk to safety that might
disproportionately affect children.
Indian Tribal Governments
This proposed rule does not have tribal implications under
Executive Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments, because it would not have a substantial direct effect on
one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.
Energy Effects
We have analyzed this proposed rule under Executive Order 13211,
Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have determined that it is not a ``significant
energy action'' under that order because it is not a ``significant
regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866 and is not likely to
have a significant adverse effect on the supply, distribution, or use
of
[[Page 18674]]
energy. The Administrator of the Office of Information and Regulatory
Affairs has not designated it as a significant energy action.
Therefore, it does not require a Statement of Energy Effects under
Executive Order 13211.
Technical Standards
The National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use voluntary consensus standards
in their regulatory activities unless the agency provides Congress,
through the Office of Management and Budget, with an explanation of why
using these standards would be inconsistent with applicable law or
otherwise impractical. Voluntary consensus standards are technical
standards (e.g., specifications of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
This proposed rule does not use technical standards. Therefore, we
did not consider the use of voluntary consensus standards.
Environment
We have analyzed this proposed rule under Department of Homeland
Security Management Directive 023-01 and Commandant Instruction
M16475.lD, which guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and
have made a preliminary determination that this action is one of a
category of actions that do not individually or cumulatively have a
significant effect on the human environment. A preliminary
environmental analysis checklist supporting this determination is
available in the docket where indicated under ADDRESSES. This proposed
rule is categorically excluded, under figure 2-1, paragraph (34)(g), of
this instruction. The special local regulation is necessary to provide
for the safety of the general public and event participants from
potential hazards associated with vessels present on or transiting upon
this waterway. We seek any comments or information that may lead to the
discovery of a significant environmental impact from this proposed
rule.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard proposes
to amend 33 CFR part 165 as follows:
PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1226, 1231; 46 U.S.C. Chapter 701, 3306,
3703; 50 U.S.C. 191, 195; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-1, 6.04-6, 160.5; Pub.
L. 107-295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department of Homeland Security
Delegation No. 0170.1.
2. Add a temporary Sec. 165-T05-0168 to read as follows:
165.T05-0168 Safety Zone: Big Rock Blue Marlin Air Show, Bogue Sound,
Morehead City, NC.
(a) Regulated Area. The following area is a safety zone: Specified
waters of the Captain of the Port Sector North Carolina, as defined in
33 CFR 3.25-20, in the navigable waters of Bogue Sound within an area
bound by a line drawn from the following points: Latitude
34[deg]43'09.9'' N, longitude 076[deg]45'54.9'' W; thence east to
latitude 34[deg]43'09.75'' N, longitude 076[deg]44'34.16'' W; thence
south to latitude 34[deg]42'52.64'' N, longitude 076[deg]44'32.55'' W;
thence west to latitude 34[deg]42'50.7'' N, longitude 076[deg]45'48.5''
W; thence to the point of origin, located approximately 400 yards south
of the shoreline of Morehead City.
(b) Definition: For the purposes of this section, Captain of the
Port means the Commander, Sector North Carolina. Representative means
any U.S. Coast Guard commissioned, warrant, or petty officer who has
been authorized by the Captain of the Port, Sector North Carolina to
act on his behalf.
(c) Regulations: (1) In accordance with the general regulations in
165.23 of this part, entry into this zone is prohibited unless
authorized by the Captain of the Port, Sector North Carolina or his
designated representatives.
(2) The operator of any vessel in the immediate vicinity of this
safety zone shall: (i) Stop the vessel immediately upon being directed
to do so by any commissioned, warrant or petty officer on shore or on
board a vessel that is displaying a U.S. Coast Guard Ensign.
(ii) Proceed as directed by any commissioned, warrant or petty
officer on shore or on board a vessel that is displaying a U.S. Coast
Guard Ensign.
(3) The Captain of the Port, Sector North Carolina can be reached
through the Sector Duty Officer at Sector North Carolina in Atlantic
Beach, North Carolina at telephone number (252) 247-4570.
(4) The Coast Guard Representatives enforcing the safety zone can
be contacted on VHF-FM marine band radio channel 13 (165.65 MHz) and
channel 16 (156.8 MHz).
(d) Enforcement Period. This section will be enforced from 7 p.m.
until 8 p.m. on June 11, 2011.
Dated: March 23, 2011.
Anthony Popiel,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port North Carolina.
[FR Doc. 2011-7994 Filed 4-4-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P