Aluminum Extrusions From the People's Republic of China: Final Affirmative Countervailing Duty Determination, 18521-18524 [2011-7926]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 64 / Monday, April 4, 2011 / Notices
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[C–570–968]
Aluminum Extrusions From the
People’s Republic of China: Final
Affirmative Countervailing Duty
Determination
Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
The Department of Commerce
(the Department) determines that
countervailable subsidies are being
provided to producers and exporters of
aluminum extrusions from the People’s
Republic of China (the PRC). For
information on the estimated subsidy
rates, see the ‘‘Suspension of
Liquidation’’ section of this notice.
DATES: Effective Date: April 4, 2011.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John
Conniff, AD/CVD Operations, Office 3,
Import Administration, U.S. Department
of Commerce, Room 4014, 14th Street
and Constitution Avenue, NW.,
Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202)
482–1009.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
Emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES
Background
This investigation covers 58
programs. The mandatory respondents
in this investigation are: Liaoyang
Zhongwang Aluminum Profile Co. Ltd./
Liaoning Zhongwang Group
(collectively, the Zhongwang Group),
Miland Luck Limited, Dragonluxe
Limited, and the Government of the
PRC. The voluntary respondents in this
investigation are: Guang Ya Aluminum
Industries Co., Ltd., Foshan Guangcheng
Aluminum Co., Ltd., Guang Ya
Aluminum Industries Hong Kong, Kong
Ah International Company Limited, and
Yongji Guanghai Aluminum Industry
Co., Ltd. (collectively the Guang Ya
Companies), and Zhaoqing New
Zhongya Aluminum Co., Ltd., Zhongya
Shaped Aluminum HK Holding Ltd.,
and Karlton Aluminum Company Ltd.
(collectively the Zhongya Companies).
Period of Investigation
The period of investigation for which
we are measuring subsidies is January 1,
2009, through December 31, 2009,
which corresponds to the PRC’s most
recently completed fiscal year at the
time we initiated this investigation. See
19 CFR 351.204(b)(2).
Case History
The following events have occurred
since the Department published the
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:47 Apr 01, 2011
Jkt 223001
Preliminary Determination on
September 7, 2010. See Aluminum
Extrusions From the People’s Republic
of China: Preliminary Affirmative
Countervailing Duty Determination, 75
FR 54302 (September 7, 2010)
(Preliminary Determination). From
September 17, 2010, through November
2, 2010, the Department issued
supplemental questionnaires to the
Guang Ya Companies, the Zhongya
Companies, and the GOC, which, in
turn, submitted questionnaire responses
from October 13, 2010, through
November 12, 2010. On October 29,
2010, we issued a post-preliminary
decision memorandum addressing new
subsidy allegations submitted by
petitioners on July 13 and July 28,
2010.1 See Memorandum to Ronald K.
Lorentzen, Deputy Assistant Secretary
for Import Administration, ‘‘PostPreliminary Decision Memorandum’’
(October 29, 2010), a public document
on file in room 7046 of HCHB, the
Central Records Unit (CRU). We
conducted verification of the
questionnaire responses submitted by
the Guang Ya Companies, the Zhongya
Companies, and the GOC from
December 3 through December 17, 2010.
We issued verification reports from
January 20 through January 28, 2011.
Interested parties submitted case briefs
on February 9, 2011 and rebuttal briefs
on February 15, 2011. We conducted a
public hearing on March 3, 2011.
Scope Comments
Based on analysis of information and
arguments, the Department has
modified the scope of the antidumping
and countervailing duty investigations.
For a full discussion, see Comment 3,
‘‘Scope of the Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Investigations,’’ of
the Issues and Decision Memorandum
that accompanies the final
determination in the less-than-fair-value
investigation of aluminum extrusions
from the People’s Republic of China.
Scope of Investigation
The merchandise covered by this
investigation is aluminum extrusions
which are shapes and forms, produced
by an extrusion process, made from
aluminum alloys having metallic
1 Petitioners are the Aluminum Extrusion Fair
Trade Committee: Aerolite Extrusion Company;
Alexandria Extrusions Company; Beneda
Aluminum of Florida, Inc.; William L. Bonnell
Company, Inc.; Frontier Aluminum Corporation;
Futura Industries Corporation; Hydro Aluminum
North American Inc.; Kaiser Aluminum
Corporation; Profile Extrusion Company; Sapa
Extrusions, Inc.; Western Extrusions Corporation;
and the United Steel, Paper, and Forestry, Rubber,
Manufacturing, Energy, Allied Industrial and
Service Workers International Union.
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
18521
elements corresponding to the alloy
series designations published by The
Aluminum Association commencing
with the numbers 1, 3, and 6 (or
proprietary equivalents or other
certifying body equivalents).
Specifically, the subject merchandise
made from aluminum alloy with an
Aluminum Association series
designation commencing with the
number 1 contains not less than 99
percent aluminum by weight. The
subject merchandise made from
aluminum alloy with an Aluminum
Association series designation
commencing with the number 3
contains manganese as the major
alloying element, with manganese
accounting for not more than 3.0
percent of total materials by weight. The
subject merchandise is made from an
aluminum alloy with an Aluminum
Association series designation
commencing with the number 6
contains magnesium and silicon as the
major alloying elements, with
magnesium accounting for at least 0.1
percent but not more than 2.0 percent of
total materials by weight, and silicon
accounting for at least 0.1 percent but
not more than 3.0 percent of total
materials by weight. The subject
aluminum extrusions are properly
identified by a four-digit alloy series
without either a decimal point or
leading letter. Illustrative examples from
among the approximately 160 registered
alloys that may characterize the subject
merchandise are as follows: 1350, 3003,
and 6060.
Aluminum extrusions are produced
and imported in a wide variety of
shapes and forms, including, but not
limited to, hollow profiles, other solid
profiles, pipes, tubes, bars, and rods.
Aluminum extrusions that are drawn
subsequent to extrusion (‘‘drawn
aluminum’’) are also included in the
scope.
Aluminum extrusions are produced
and imported with a variety of finishes
(both coatings and surface treatments),
and types of fabrication. The types of
coatings and treatments applied to
subject aluminum extrusions include,
but are not limited to, extrusions that
are mill finished (i.e., without any
coating or further finishing), brushed,
buffed, polished, anodized (including
bright-dip anodized), liquid painted, or
powder coated. Aluminum extrusions
may also be fabricated, i.e., prepared for
assembly. Such operations would
include, but are not limited to,
extrusions that are cut-to-length,
machined, drilled, punched, notched,
bent, stretched, knurled, swedged,
mitered, chamfered, threaded, and spun.
The subject merchandise includes
E:\FR\FM\04APN1.SGM
04APN1
Emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES
18522
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 64 / Monday, April 4, 2011 / Notices
aluminum extrusions that are finished
(coated, painted, etc.), fabricated, or any
combination thereof.
Subject aluminum extrusions may be
described at the time of importation as
parts for final finished products that are
assembled after importation, including,
but not limited to, window frames, door
frames, solar panels, curtain walls, or
furniture. Such parts that otherwise
meet the definition of aluminum
extrusions are included in the scope.
The scope includes the aluminum
extrusion components that are attached
(e.g., by welding or fasteners) to form
subassemblies, i.e., partially assembled
merchandise unless imported as part of
the finished goods ‘kit’ defined further
below. The scope does not include the
non-aluminum extrusion components of
subassemblies or subject kits.
Subject extrusions may be identified
with reference to their end use, such as
fence posts, electrical conduits, heat
sinks, door thresholds, or carpet trim.
Such goods are subject merchandise if
they otherwise meet the scope
definition, regardless of whether they
are ready for use at the time of
importation.
The following aluminum extrusion
products are excluded: Aluminum
extrusions made from aluminum alloy
with an Aluminum Association series
designation commencing with the
number 2 and containing in excess of
1.5 percent copper by weight; aluminum
extrusions made from aluminum alloy
with an Aluminum Association series
designation commencing with the
number 5 and containing in excess of
1.0 percent magnesium by weight; and
aluminum extrusions made from
aluminum alloy with an Aluminum
Association series designation
commencing with the number 7 and
containing in excess of 2.0 percent zinc
by weight.
The scope also excludes finished
merchandise containing aluminum
extrusions as parts that are fully and
permanently assembled and completed
at the time of entry, such as finished
windows with glass, doors with glass or
vinyl, picture frames with glass pane
and backing material, and solar panels.
The scope also excludes finished goods
containing aluminum extrusions that
are entered unassembled in a ‘‘finished
goods kit.’’ A finished goods kit is
understood to mean a packaged
combination of parts that contains, at
the time of importation, all of the
necessary parts to fully assemble a final
finished good and requires no further
finishing or fabrication, such as cutting
or punching, and is assembled ‘as is’
into a finished product. An imported
product will not be considered a
‘finished goods kit’ and therefore
excluded from the scope of the
investigation merely by including
fasteners such as screws, bolts, etc. in
the packaging with an aluminum
extrusion product.
The scope also excludes aluminum
alloy sheet or plates produced by other
than the extrusion process, such as
aluminum products produced by a
method of casting. Cast aluminum
products are properly identified by four
digits with a decimal point between the
third and fourth digit. A letter may also
precede the four digits. The following
Aluminum Association designations are
representative of aluminum alloys for
casting: 208.0, 295.0, 308.0, 355.0,
C355.0, 356.0, A356.0, A357.0, 360.0,
366.0, 380.0, A380.0, 413.0, 443.0,
514.0, 518.1, and 712.0. The scope also
excludes pure, unwrought aluminum in
any form.
The scope also excludes collapsible
tubular containers composed of metallic
elements corresponding to alloy code
1080A as designated by the Aluminum
Association where the tubular container
(excluding the nozzle) meets each of the
following dimensional characteristics:
(1) Length of 37 mm or 62 mm, (2) outer
diameter of 11.0 mm or 12.7 mm, and
(3) wall thickness not exceeding 0.13
mm.
Imports of the subject merchandise
are provided for under the following
categories of the Harmonized Tariff
Schedule of the United States (‘‘HTS’’):
7604.21.0000, 7604.29.1000,
7604.29.3010, 7604.29.3050,
7604.29.5030, 7604.29.5060,
7608.20.0030, and 7608.20.0090. The
subject merchandise entered as parts of
other aluminum products may be
classifiable under the following
additional Chapter 76 subheadings:
7610.10, 7610.90, 7615.19, 7615.20, and
7616.99 as well as under other HTS
chapters. In addition, fin evaporator
coils may be classifiable under HTS
numbers: 8418.99.80.50 and
8418.99.80.60. While HTS subheadings
are provided for convenience and
customs purposes, the written
description of the scope in this
proceeding is dispositive.
Injury Test
Because the PRC is a ‘‘Subsidies
Agreement Country’’ within the meaning
of section 701(b) of the Tariff Act of
1930, as amended (the Act), the
International Trade Commission (the
ITC) is required to determine whether
imports of the subject merchandise from
the PRC materially injure, or threaten
material injury to, a U.S. industry. On
June 17, 2010, the ITC published its
preliminary determination finding that
there is a reasonable indication that an
industry in the United States is
threatened with material injury by
reason of imports of aluminum
extrusions from the PRC that are alleged
to be sold in the United States at less
than fair value and subsidized by the
GOC. See Certain Aluminum Extrusions
from China, 75 FR 34482 (June 17,
2010).
Analysis of Comments Received
All issues raised in the case and
rebuttal briefs by parties to this
investigation are addressed in the
Memorandum from Christian Marsh,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Operations, to Ronald K. Lorentzen,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import
Administration, entitled ‘‘Issues and
Decision Memorandum for the Final
Determination in the Countervailing
Duty Investigation of Aluminum
Extrusions from the People’s Republic
of China,’’ (March 28, 2011) (Decision
Memorandum), which is hereby
adopted by this notice. Attached to this
notice as an Appendix is a list of the
issues that parties raised and to which
we have responded in the Decision
Memorandum. Parties can find a
complete discussion of all issues raised
in this investigation and the
corresponding recommendations in this
public memorandum, which is on file in
the Department’s CRU. In addition, a
complete version of the Decision
Memorandum can be accessed directly
on the Internet at https://trade.gov/ia.
The paper copy and electronic version
of the Decision Memorandum are
identical in content.
Suspension of Liquidation
In accordance with section
705(c)(1)(B)(i) of the Act, we determine
the total estimated net countervailable
subsidy rates to be:
Company
Ad Valorem net subsidy rate
Guang Ya Aluminum Industries Co., Ltd., Foshan Guangcheng Aluminum Co., Ltd., Guang Ya Aluminum Industries Hong Kong, Kong Ah International Company Limited, and Yongji Guanghai Aluminum Industry Co., Ltd.
(collectively the Guang Ya Companies).
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:47 Apr 01, 2011
Jkt 223001
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\04APN1.SGM
04APN1
9.94 percent ad valorem
18523
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 64 / Monday, April 4, 2011 / Notices
Company
Ad Valorem net subsidy rate
Emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES
Zhaoqing New Zhongya Aluminum Co., Ltd., Zhongya Shaped Aluminum HK Holding Ltd., and Karlton Aluminum
Company Ltd. (collectively the Zhongya Companies).
Dragonluxe Limited ........................................................................................................................................................
Miland Luck Limited .......................................................................................................................................................
Liaoyang Zhongwang Aluminum Profile Co. Ltd./Liaoning Zhongwang Group (collectively, the Zhongwang Group)
All Others Rate ..............................................................................................................................................................
We note that section 705(c)(5)(A)(i) of
the Act states that for companies not
investigated, we will determine an allothers rate equal to be the weighted
average countervailable subsidy rates
established for exporters and producers
individually investigated, excluding any
zero and de minimis countervailable
subsidy rates, and any rates determined
entirely under section 776 of the Act.
However, as discussed in Comment 9 of
the Decision Memorandum, the
companies that participated in the
investigation are voluntary respondents.
The Department’s regulations state that
in calculating the all-others rate under
section 705(c)(5) of the Act, the
Department will exclude net subsidy
rates calculated for voluntary
respondents. See 19 CFR 351.204(d)(3).
See also Antidumping Duties;
Countervailing Duties, 62 FR 27296,
27310 (May 19, 1997).
Therefore, we have resorted to ‘‘any
reasonable method’’ to derive the allothers rate, as described under section
705(c)(5)(A)(ii) of the Act. We determine
that equating the all-others rate with the
total adverse facts available (AFA) rate
applied to the non-cooperating,
mandatory respondents constitutes a
‘‘reasonable method’’ under
705(c)(5)(A)(ii) of the Act. See, e.g.,
Certain Potassium Phosphate Salts
From the People’s Republic of China:
Final Affirmative Countervailing Duty
Determination and Termination of
Critical Circumstances Inquiry, 75 FR
30375 (June 1, 2010) (in an investigation
where all of the mandatory respondents
received a rate based on AFA, the
Department used the AFA rate assigned
to the mandatory respondents as the allothers rate).
As a result of our Preliminary
Determination and pursuant to section
703(d) of the Act, we instructed U.S.
Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to
suspend liquidation of all entries of
subject merchandise from the PRC
which were entered or withdrawn from
warehouse, for consumption on or after
September 7, 2010, the date of the
publication of the Preliminary
Determination in the Federal Register.
In accordance with section 703(d) of the
Act, we later issued instructions to CBP
to discontinue the suspension of
liquidation for countervailing duty
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:47 Apr 01, 2011
Jkt 223001
(CVD) purposes for subject merchandise
entered, or withdrawn from warehouse,
on or after January 6, 2011, but to
continue the suspension of liquidation
of all entries from September 7, 2010,
through January 5, 2011.
We will issue a CVD order and
reinstate the suspension of liquidation
under section 706(a) of the Act if the
ITC issues a final affirmative injury
determination, and will require a cash
deposit of estimated CVDs for such
entries of merchandise in the amounts
indicated above. If the ITC determines
that material injury, or threat of material
injury, does not exist, this proceeding
will be terminated and all estimated
duties deposited or securities posted as
a result of the suspension of liquidation
will be refunded or canceled.
ITC Notification
In accordance with section 705(d) of
the Act, we will notify the ITC of our
determination. In addition, we are
making available to the ITC all nonprivileged and non-proprietary
information related to this investigation.
We will allow the ITC access to all
privileged and business proprietary
information in our files, provided the
ITC confirms that it will not disclose
such information, either publicly or
under an administrative protective order
(APO), without the written consent of
the Assistant Secretary for Import
Administration.
Return or Destruction of Proprietary
Information
In the event that the ITC issues a final
negative injury determination, this
notice will serve as the only reminder
to parties subject to an APO of their
responsibility concerning the
destruction of proprietary information
disclosed under APO in accordance
with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely
written notification of the return/
destruction of APO materials or
conversion to judicial protective order is
hereby requested. Failure to comply
with the regulations and terms of an
APO is a violation which is subject to
sanction.
This determination is published
pursuant to sections 705(d) and 777(i) of
the Act.
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
8.02 percent ad valorem
374.15
374.15
374.15
374.15
percent
percent
percent
percent
ad
ad
ad
ad
valorem
valorem
valorem
valorem
Dated: March 28, 2011.
Ronald K. Lorentzen,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import
Administration.
Appendix
List of Comments and Issues in the Decision
Memorandum
Comment 1: Application of CVD Law to the
PRC
Comment 2: Whether Application of the CVD
Law to Imports from the PRC Violates the
Administrative Procedure Act (APA)
Comment 3: Double Counting
Comment 4: Cut-off Date for Identifying
Subsidies
Comment 5: Whether the Guang Ya
Companies Inaccurately Reported Their
Affiliates Thereby Warranting the
Application of Adverse Facts Available
(AFA)
Comment 6: Whether the Zhongya
Companies Failed to Report Their
Affiliates Thereby Warranting the
Application of AFA
Comment 7: Whether the AFA Calculation is
Accurate and Reasonable
Comment 8: Whether to Include Newly
Alleged and Self-Reported Programs in the
AFA Calculation
Comment 9: Whether the All Others Rate
Should Equal the Total AFA Rate
Comment 10: Whether the Department
Should Have Collected Information from
Firms Subject to the All Others Rate
Comment 11: Whether the Department
Should Have Selected Additional
Mandatory Respondents
Comment 12: Whether the Department
Should Retroactively Revise the All Others
Rate from the Preliminary Determination
Comment 13: Whether the Sale of Aluminum
Extrusions for More Than Adequate
Remuneration (MTAR) Program Was Used
by the Voluntary Respondents
Comment 14: Whether the Sale of Aluminum
Extrusions for MTAR Program Is Specific
Comment 15: Whether the Sale of Aluminum
Extrusions for MTAR Program Confers a
Benefit
Comment 16: Whether the Department
Improperly Rejected Data From The
Zhongya Companies Pertaining to the Sale
of Aluminum Extrusions For MTAR
Program
Comment 17: Whether the Ownership
Information of Respondents’ Customers
Was Complete and Fully Verified
Comment 18: Whether a Financial
Contribution Exists Under the Provision of
Primary Aluminum for Less Than
Adequate Remuneration (LTAR) Program
Comment 19: Whether the Provision of
Primary Aluminum for LTAR Program is
Specific
E:\FR\FM\04APN1.SGM
04APN1
18524
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 64 / Monday, April 4, 2011 / Notices
Comment 20: Whether the Benchmark Used
for the Provision of Primary Aluminum for
LTAR Program Should Include Import
Duties
Comment 21: Whether the Department
Should Use In-Country Benchmarks Under
the Provision of Primary Aluminum for
LTAR Program
Comment 22: Whether the Guang Ya
Companies Properly Reported Their
Purchases of Primary Aluminum and
Whether the Application of AFA is
Warranted
Comment 23: Whether the Land for LTAR
Program Constitutes a Financial
Contribution, Provides a Benefit, and is
Specific
Comment 24: Whether the Department
Should Revise the Benchmark Used Under
the Land for LTAR Program
Comment 25: Whether the Department Erred
in Rejecting Factual Information
Concerning the Benchmark Used Under the
Land for LTAR Program
Comment 26: Whether the Guang Ya
Companies Received an Additional
Subsidy in Connection With the GOC’s
Purchase of Land-Use Rights and Buildings
Comment 27: Whether PRC Commercial
Banks Are GOC Authorities That Provide a
Financial Contribution
Comment 28: Whether there is a Link
Between the Alleged Policy Lending
Program and Actual Loans Received by
Respondents
Comment 29: Whether the Derivation of the
Short-Term Benchmark Interest Rate is
Arbitrary
Comment 30: Whether the Derivation of the
Long-Term Benchmark Interest Rate is
Arbitrary
Comment 31: Whether the Department
Committed Ministerial Errors Concerning
the Famous Brands Program
Comment 32: Whether the Department
Should Provide an Entered Value
Adjustment to the Zhongya Companies to
Account for Price Mark-Ups Made by Their
Hong-Kong Affiliate
Comment 33: Whether the Department
Improperly Declined to Initiate an
Investigation of the GOC’s Alleged
Currency Undervaluation
[FR Doc. 2011–7926 Filed 4–1–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
Emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES
[A–570–967]
Aluminum Extrusions From the
People’s Republic of China: Final
Determination of Sales at Less Than
Fair Value
Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
DATES: Effective Date: April 4, 2011.
SUMMARY: On November 12, 2010, the
Department of Commerce
(‘‘Department’’) published its
AGENCY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:47 Apr 01, 2011
Jkt 223001
preliminary determination of sales at
less than fair value (‘‘LTFV’’) in the
antidumping investigation of aluminum
extrusions from the People’s Republic of
China (‘‘PRC’’).1 We invited interested
parties to comment on our preliminary
determination. Based on our analysis of
the comments we received, we have
made changes to our margin
calculations for the mandatory
respondents. The final dumping
margins for this investigation are listed
in the ‘‘Final Determination Margins’’
section below.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Paul
Stolz or Lori Apodaca, AD/CVD
Operations, Office 8, Import
Administration, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution
Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20230;
telephone: (202) 482–4474 or (202) 482–
4551, respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Case History
The Department published its
Preliminary Determination on
November 12, 2010. The Department
subsequently issued a ministerial error
memorandum, in which it agreed to
correct several ministerial errors.2 On
January 4, 2011, pursuant to the
correction of ministerial errors, the
Department published an Amended
Preliminary Determination.3
Between December 6, 2010, and
December 21, 2010, the Department
conducted verifications of Guang Ya
Aluminium Industries Co., Ltd. (‘‘Guang
Ya’’), Foshan Guangcheng Aluminium
Co., Ltd. (‘‘Guangcheng’’), Kong Ah
International Co., Ltd.(‘‘Kong Ah’’), and
Guang Ya Aluminium Industries (Hong
Kong) Ltd. (‘‘Guang Ya HK’’)
(collectively the ‘‘Guang Ya Group’’);
Zhaoqing New Zhongya Aluminum Co.,
Ltd. (‘‘ZNZ’’), Zhongya Shaped
Aluminium (HK) Holding Limited
(‘‘Shaped Aluminum’’) and Karlton
Aluminum Company Ltd. (‘‘Karlton’’)
(collectively ‘‘New Zhongya’’); and
Xinya Aluminum & Stainless Steel
1 See Aluminum Extrusions from the People’s
Republic of China: Notice of Preliminary
Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value,
and Preliminary Determination of Targeted
Dumping, 75 FR 69403 (November 12, 2010)
(‘‘Preliminary Determination’’).
2 See Memorandum entitled ‘‘Ministerial Error
Memorandum, Aluminum Extrusions from the
People’s Republic of China, Preliminary
Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value,’’
dated December 21, 2010, on file in the
Department’s Central Records Unit (‘‘CRU’’), Room
7046 of the main Department building.
3 See Aluminum Extrusions From the People’s
Republic of China: Notice of Amended Preliminary
Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value, 76
FR 323 (January 4, 2011) (‘‘Amended Preliminary
Determination’’).
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Product Co., Ltd. (‘‘Xinya’’) (all parties,
collectively ‘‘the Guang Ya Group/New
Zhongya/Xinya’’). The Department
released verification reports for each of
these companies on January 28,
2011.4 See the ‘‘Verification’’ section
below for additional information. On
December 12, 2010, Aavid Thermalloy,
Inc. (‘‘Aavid’’) submitted a request for a
scope hearing. On December 13, 2010,
The Aluminum Extrusions Fair Trade
Committee,5 and the United Steel, Paper
and Forestry, Rubber, Manufacturing,
Energy, Allied Industrial and Service
Workers International Union
(collectively, ‘‘Petitioners’’) and New
Zhongya submitted requests for a public
hearing. On February 9, 2011,
Petitioners submitted a request for a
closed session of the hearing. On March
2, 2011, the Department held a public
scope hearing for the antidumping duty
and countervailing duty investigations,
and both an open and a closed session
of the antidumping duty hearing.
New Zhongya and Petitioners
submitted surrogate value comments on
December 22, 2010. On February 9,
2011, case briefs were filed by the
Guang Ya Group, the Government of
China (‘‘GOC’’), Petitioners, and New
Zhongya. On February 14, 2011, the
Guang Ya Group, New Zhongya, and
Petitioners filed their rebuttal briefs.
Period of Investigation
The period of investigation (‘‘POI’’) is
July 1, 2009, through December 31,
2009. This period corresponds to the
two most recent fiscal quarters prior to
the month of the filing of the petition,
which was March 2009. See 19 CFR
351.204(b)(1).
Verification
As provided in section 782(i) of the
Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (‘‘Act’’),
we conducted verification of the
information submitted by the Guang Ya
Group/New Zhongya/Xinya for use in
our final determination.6 We used
standard verification procedures,
including the examination of relevant
accounting and production records, as
appropriate, as well as original source
documents provided by respondents.
4 See the Department’s verification reports on the
record of this investigation, all on file in the CRU.
5 The Aluminum Extrusions fair Trade Committee
is comprised of Aerolite Extrusion Company,
Alexandria Extrusion Company, Benada Aluminum
of Florida, Inc., William L. Bonnell Company, Inc.,
Frontier Aluminum Corporation, Futura Industries
Corporation, Hydro Aluminum North America, Inc.,
Kaiser Aluminum Corporation, Profile Extrusions
Company, Sapa Extrusions, Inc., and Western
Extrusions Corporation.
6 See the Department’s verification reports on the
record of this investigation in the CRU, with respect
to these entities.
E:\FR\FM\04APN1.SGM
04APN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 64 (Monday, April 4, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 18521-18524]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-7926]
[[Page 18521]]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[C-570-968]
Aluminum Extrusions From the People's Republic of China: Final
Affirmative Countervailing Duty Determination
AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (the Department) determines that
countervailable subsidies are being provided to producers and exporters
of aluminum extrusions from the People's Republic of China (the PRC).
For information on the estimated subsidy rates, see the ``Suspension of
Liquidation'' section of this notice.
DATES: Effective Date: April 4, 2011.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John Conniff, AD/CVD Operations,
Office 3, Import Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, Room
4014, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20230;
telephone: (202) 482-1009.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
This investigation covers 58 programs. The mandatory respondents in
this investigation are: Liaoyang Zhongwang Aluminum Profile Co. Ltd./
Liaoning Zhongwang Group (collectively, the Zhongwang Group), Miland
Luck Limited, Dragonluxe Limited, and the Government of the PRC. The
voluntary respondents in this investigation are: Guang Ya Aluminum
Industries Co., Ltd., Foshan Guangcheng Aluminum Co., Ltd., Guang Ya
Aluminum Industries Hong Kong, Kong Ah International Company Limited,
and Yongji Guanghai Aluminum Industry Co., Ltd. (collectively the Guang
Ya Companies), and Zhaoqing New Zhongya Aluminum Co., Ltd., Zhongya
Shaped Aluminum HK Holding Ltd., and Karlton Aluminum Company Ltd.
(collectively the Zhongya Companies).
Period of Investigation
The period of investigation for which we are measuring subsidies is
January 1, 2009, through December 31, 2009, which corresponds to the
PRC's most recently completed fiscal year at the time we initiated this
investigation. See 19 CFR 351.204(b)(2).
Case History
The following events have occurred since the Department published
the Preliminary Determination on September 7, 2010. See Aluminum
Extrusions From the People's Republic of China: Preliminary Affirmative
Countervailing Duty Determination, 75 FR 54302 (September 7, 2010)
(Preliminary Determination). From September 17, 2010, through November
2, 2010, the Department issued supplemental questionnaires to the Guang
Ya Companies, the Zhongya Companies, and the GOC, which, in turn,
submitted questionnaire responses from October 13, 2010, through
November 12, 2010. On October 29, 2010, we issued a post-preliminary
decision memorandum addressing new subsidy allegations submitted by
petitioners on July 13 and July 28, 2010.\1\ See Memorandum to Ronald
K. Lorentzen, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import Administration,
``Post-Preliminary Decision Memorandum'' (October 29, 2010), a public
document on file in room 7046 of HCHB, the Central Records Unit (CRU).
We conducted verification of the questionnaire responses submitted by
the Guang Ya Companies, the Zhongya Companies, and the GOC from
December 3 through December 17, 2010. We issued verification reports
from January 20 through January 28, 2011. Interested parties submitted
case briefs on February 9, 2011 and rebuttal briefs on February 15,
2011. We conducted a public hearing on March 3, 2011.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Petitioners are the Aluminum Extrusion Fair Trade Committee:
Aerolite Extrusion Company; Alexandria Extrusions Company; Beneda
Aluminum of Florida, Inc.; William L. Bonnell Company, Inc.;
Frontier Aluminum Corporation; Futura Industries Corporation; Hydro
Aluminum North American Inc.; Kaiser Aluminum Corporation; Profile
Extrusion Company; Sapa Extrusions, Inc.; Western Extrusions
Corporation; and the United Steel, Paper, and Forestry, Rubber,
Manufacturing, Energy, Allied Industrial and Service Workers
International Union.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Scope Comments
Based on analysis of information and arguments, the Department has
modified the scope of the antidumping and countervailing duty
investigations. For a full discussion, see Comment 3, ``Scope of the
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Investigations,'' of the Issues and
Decision Memorandum that accompanies the final determination in the
less-than-fair-value investigation of aluminum extrusions from the
People's Republic of China.
Scope of Investigation
The merchandise covered by this investigation is aluminum
extrusions which are shapes and forms, produced by an extrusion
process, made from aluminum alloys having metallic elements
corresponding to the alloy series designations published by The
Aluminum Association commencing with the numbers 1, 3, and 6 (or
proprietary equivalents or other certifying body equivalents).
Specifically, the subject merchandise made from aluminum alloy with an
Aluminum Association series designation commencing with the number 1
contains not less than 99 percent aluminum by weight. The subject
merchandise made from aluminum alloy with an Aluminum Association
series designation commencing with the number 3 contains manganese as
the major alloying element, with manganese accounting for not more than
3.0 percent of total materials by weight. The subject merchandise is
made from an aluminum alloy with an Aluminum Association series
designation commencing with the number 6 contains magnesium and silicon
as the major alloying elements, with magnesium accounting for at least
0.1 percent but not more than 2.0 percent of total materials by weight,
and silicon accounting for at least 0.1 percent but not more than 3.0
percent of total materials by weight. The subject aluminum extrusions
are properly identified by a four-digit alloy series without either a
decimal point or leading letter. Illustrative examples from among the
approximately 160 registered alloys that may characterize the subject
merchandise are as follows: 1350, 3003, and 6060.
Aluminum extrusions are produced and imported in a wide variety of
shapes and forms, including, but not limited to, hollow profiles, other
solid profiles, pipes, tubes, bars, and rods. Aluminum extrusions that
are drawn subsequent to extrusion (``drawn aluminum'') are also
included in the scope.
Aluminum extrusions are produced and imported with a variety of
finishes (both coatings and surface treatments), and types of
fabrication. The types of coatings and treatments applied to subject
aluminum extrusions include, but are not limited to, extrusions that
are mill finished (i.e., without any coating or further finishing),
brushed, buffed, polished, anodized (including bright-dip anodized),
liquid painted, or powder coated. Aluminum extrusions may also be
fabricated, i.e., prepared for assembly. Such operations would include,
but are not limited to, extrusions that are cut-to-length, machined,
drilled, punched, notched, bent, stretched, knurled, swedged, mitered,
chamfered, threaded, and spun. The subject merchandise includes
[[Page 18522]]
aluminum extrusions that are finished (coated, painted, etc.),
fabricated, or any combination thereof.
Subject aluminum extrusions may be described at the time of
importation as parts for final finished products that are assembled
after importation, including, but not limited to, window frames, door
frames, solar panels, curtain walls, or furniture. Such parts that
otherwise meet the definition of aluminum extrusions are included in
the scope. The scope includes the aluminum extrusion components that
are attached (e.g., by welding or fasteners) to form subassemblies,
i.e., partially assembled merchandise unless imported as part of the
finished goods `kit' defined further below. The scope does not include
the non-aluminum extrusion components of subassemblies or subject kits.
Subject extrusions may be identified with reference to their end
use, such as fence posts, electrical conduits, heat sinks, door
thresholds, or carpet trim. Such goods are subject merchandise if they
otherwise meet the scope definition, regardless of whether they are
ready for use at the time of importation.
The following aluminum extrusion products are excluded: Aluminum
extrusions made from aluminum alloy with an Aluminum Association series
designation commencing with the number 2 and containing in excess of
1.5 percent copper by weight; aluminum extrusions made from aluminum
alloy with an Aluminum Association series designation commencing with
the number 5 and containing in excess of 1.0 percent magnesium by
weight; and aluminum extrusions made from aluminum alloy with an
Aluminum Association series designation commencing with the number 7
and containing in excess of 2.0 percent zinc by weight.
The scope also excludes finished merchandise containing aluminum
extrusions as parts that are fully and permanently assembled and
completed at the time of entry, such as finished windows with glass,
doors with glass or vinyl, picture frames with glass pane and backing
material, and solar panels. The scope also excludes finished goods
containing aluminum extrusions that are entered unassembled in a
``finished goods kit.'' A finished goods kit is understood to mean a
packaged combination of parts that contains, at the time of
importation, all of the necessary parts to fully assemble a final
finished good and requires no further finishing or fabrication, such as
cutting or punching, and is assembled `as is' into a finished product.
An imported product will not be considered a `finished goods kit' and
therefore excluded from the scope of the investigation merely by
including fasteners such as screws, bolts, etc. in the packaging with
an aluminum extrusion product.
The scope also excludes aluminum alloy sheet or plates produced by
other than the extrusion process, such as aluminum products produced by
a method of casting. Cast aluminum products are properly identified by
four digits with a decimal point between the third and fourth digit. A
letter may also precede the four digits. The following Aluminum
Association designations are representative of aluminum alloys for
casting: 208.0, 295.0, 308.0, 355.0, C355.0, 356.0, A356.0, A357.0,
360.0, 366.0, 380.0, A380.0, 413.0, 443.0, 514.0, 518.1, and 712.0. The
scope also excludes pure, unwrought aluminum in any form.
The scope also excludes collapsible tubular containers composed of
metallic elements corresponding to alloy code 1080A as designated by
the Aluminum Association where the tubular container (excluding the
nozzle) meets each of the following dimensional characteristics: (1)
Length of 37 mm or 62 mm, (2) outer diameter of 11.0 mm or 12.7 mm, and
(3) wall thickness not exceeding 0.13 mm.
Imports of the subject merchandise are provided for under the
following categories of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United
States (``HTS''): 7604.21.0000, 7604.29.1000, 7604.29.3010,
7604.29.3050, 7604.29.5030, 7604.29.5060, 7608.20.0030, and
7608.20.0090. The subject merchandise entered as parts of other
aluminum products may be classifiable under the following additional
Chapter 76 subheadings: 7610.10, 7610.90, 7615.19, 7615.20, and 7616.99
as well as under other HTS chapters. In addition, fin evaporator coils
may be classifiable under HTS numbers: 8418.99.80.50 and 8418.99.80.60.
While HTS subheadings are provided for convenience and customs
purposes, the written description of the scope in this proceeding is
dispositive.
Injury Test
Because the PRC is a ``Subsidies Agreement Country'' within the
meaning of section 701(b) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the
Act), the International Trade Commission (the ITC) is required to
determine whether imports of the subject merchandise from the PRC
materially injure, or threaten material injury to, a U.S. industry. On
June 17, 2010, the ITC published its preliminary determination finding
that there is a reasonable indication that an industry in the United
States is threatened with material injury by reason of imports of
aluminum extrusions from the PRC that are alleged to be sold in the
United States at less than fair value and subsidized by the GOC. See
Certain Aluminum Extrusions from China, 75 FR 34482 (June 17, 2010).
Analysis of Comments Received
All issues raised in the case and rebuttal briefs by parties to
this investigation are addressed in the Memorandum from Christian
Marsh, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing
Duty Operations, to Ronald K. Lorentzen, Deputy Assistant Secretary for
Import Administration, entitled ``Issues and Decision Memorandum for
the Final Determination in the Countervailing Duty Investigation of
Aluminum Extrusions from the People's Republic of China,'' (March 28,
2011) (Decision Memorandum), which is hereby adopted by this notice.
Attached to this notice as an Appendix is a list of the issues that
parties raised and to which we have responded in the Decision
Memorandum. Parties can find a complete discussion of all issues raised
in this investigation and the corresponding recommendations in this
public memorandum, which is on file in the Department's CRU. In
addition, a complete version of the Decision Memorandum can be accessed
directly on the Internet at https://trade.gov/ia. The paper copy and
electronic version of the Decision Memorandum are identical in content.
Suspension of Liquidation
In accordance with section 705(c)(1)(B)(i) of the Act, we determine
the total estimated net countervailable subsidy rates to be:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Company Ad Valorem net subsidy rate
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Guang Ya Aluminum Industries 9.94 percent ad valorem
Co., Ltd., Foshan Guangcheng
Aluminum Co., Ltd., Guang Ya
Aluminum Industries Hong Kong,
Kong Ah International Company
Limited, and Yongji Guanghai
Aluminum Industry Co., Ltd.
(collectively the Guang Ya
Companies).
[[Page 18523]]
Zhaoqing New Zhongya Aluminum 8.02 percent ad valorem
Co., Ltd., Zhongya Shaped
Aluminum HK Holding Ltd., and
Karlton Aluminum Company Ltd.
(collectively the Zhongya
Companies).
Dragonluxe Limited.............. 374.15 percent ad valorem
Miland Luck Limited............. 374.15 percent ad valorem
Liaoyang Zhongwang Aluminum 374.15 percent ad valorem
Profile Co. Ltd./Liaoning
Zhongwang Group (collectively,
the Zhongwang Group).
All Others Rate................. 374.15 percent ad valorem
------------------------------------------------------------------------
We note that section 705(c)(5)(A)(i) of the Act states that for
companies not investigated, we will determine an all-others rate equal
to be the weighted average countervailable subsidy rates established
for exporters and producers individually investigated, excluding any
zero and de minimis countervailable subsidy rates, and any rates
determined entirely under section 776 of the Act. However, as discussed
in Comment 9 of the Decision Memorandum, the companies that
participated in the investigation are voluntary respondents. The
Department's regulations state that in calculating the all-others rate
under section 705(c)(5) of the Act, the Department will exclude net
subsidy rates calculated for voluntary respondents. See 19 CFR
351.204(d)(3). See also Antidumping Duties; Countervailing Duties, 62
FR 27296, 27310 (May 19, 1997).
Therefore, we have resorted to ``any reasonable method'' to derive
the all-others rate, as described under section 705(c)(5)(A)(ii) of the
Act. We determine that equating the all-others rate with the total
adverse facts available (AFA) rate applied to the non-cooperating,
mandatory respondents constitutes a ``reasonable method'' under
705(c)(5)(A)(ii) of the Act. See, e.g., Certain Potassium Phosphate
Salts From the People's Republic of China: Final Affirmative
Countervailing Duty Determination and Termination of Critical
Circumstances Inquiry, 75 FR 30375 (June 1, 2010) (in an investigation
where all of the mandatory respondents received a rate based on AFA,
the Department used the AFA rate assigned to the mandatory respondents
as the all-others rate).
As a result of our Preliminary Determination and pursuant to
section 703(d) of the Act, we instructed U.S. Customs and Border
Protection (CBP) to suspend liquidation of all entries of subject
merchandise from the PRC which were entered or withdrawn from
warehouse, for consumption on or after September 7, 2010, the date of
the publication of the Preliminary Determination in the Federal
Register. In accordance with section 703(d) of the Act, we later issued
instructions to CBP to discontinue the suspension of liquidation for
countervailing duty (CVD) purposes for subject merchandise entered, or
withdrawn from warehouse, on or after January 6, 2011, but to continue
the suspension of liquidation of all entries from September 7, 2010,
through January 5, 2011.
We will issue a CVD order and reinstate the suspension of
liquidation under section 706(a) of the Act if the ITC issues a final
affirmative injury determination, and will require a cash deposit of
estimated CVDs for such entries of merchandise in the amounts indicated
above. If the ITC determines that material injury, or threat of
material injury, does not exist, this proceeding will be terminated and
all estimated duties deposited or securities posted as a result of the
suspension of liquidation will be refunded or canceled.
ITC Notification
In accordance with section 705(d) of the Act, we will notify the
ITC of our determination. In addition, we are making available to the
ITC all non-privileged and non-proprietary information related to this
investigation. We will allow the ITC access to all privileged and
business proprietary information in our files, provided the ITC
confirms that it will not disclose such information, either publicly or
under an administrative protective order (APO), without the written
consent of the Assistant Secretary for Import Administration.
Return or Destruction of Proprietary Information
In the event that the ITC issues a final negative injury
determination, this notice will serve as the only reminder to parties
subject to an APO of their responsibility concerning the destruction of
proprietary information disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR
351.305(a)(3). Timely written notification of the return/destruction of
APO materials or conversion to judicial protective order is hereby
requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and terms of an APO
is a violation which is subject to sanction.
This determination is published pursuant to sections 705(d) and
777(i) of the Act.
Dated: March 28, 2011.
Ronald K. Lorentzen,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import Administration.
Appendix
List of Comments and Issues in the Decision Memorandum
Comment 1: Application of CVD Law to the PRC
Comment 2: Whether Application of the CVD Law to Imports from the
PRC Violates the Administrative Procedure Act (APA)
Comment 3: Double Counting
Comment 4: Cut-off Date for Identifying Subsidies
Comment 5: Whether the Guang Ya Companies Inaccurately Reported
Their Affiliates Thereby Warranting the Application of Adverse Facts
Available (AFA)
Comment 6: Whether the Zhongya Companies Failed to Report Their
Affiliates Thereby Warranting the Application of AFA
Comment 7: Whether the AFA Calculation is Accurate and Reasonable
Comment 8: Whether to Include Newly Alleged and Self-Reported
Programs in the AFA Calculation
Comment 9: Whether the All Others Rate Should Equal the Total AFA
Rate
Comment 10: Whether the Department Should Have Collected Information
from Firms Subject to the All Others Rate
Comment 11: Whether the Department Should Have Selected Additional
Mandatory Respondents
Comment 12: Whether the Department Should Retroactively Revise the
All Others Rate from the Preliminary Determination
Comment 13: Whether the Sale of Aluminum Extrusions for More Than
Adequate Remuneration (MTAR) Program Was Used by the Voluntary
Respondents
Comment 14: Whether the Sale of Aluminum Extrusions for MTAR Program
Is Specific
Comment 15: Whether the Sale of Aluminum Extrusions for MTAR Program
Confers a Benefit
Comment 16: Whether the Department Improperly Rejected Data From The
Zhongya Companies Pertaining to the Sale of Aluminum Extrusions For
MTAR Program
Comment 17: Whether the Ownership Information of Respondents'
Customers Was Complete and Fully Verified
Comment 18: Whether a Financial Contribution Exists Under the
Provision of Primary Aluminum for Less Than Adequate Remuneration
(LTAR) Program
Comment 19: Whether the Provision of Primary Aluminum for LTAR
Program is Specific
[[Page 18524]]
Comment 20: Whether the Benchmark Used for the Provision of Primary
Aluminum for LTAR Program Should Include Import Duties
Comment 21: Whether the Department Should Use In-Country Benchmarks
Under the Provision of Primary Aluminum for LTAR Program
Comment 22: Whether the Guang Ya Companies Properly Reported Their
Purchases of Primary Aluminum and Whether the Application of AFA is
Warranted
Comment 23: Whether the Land for LTAR Program Constitutes a
Financial Contribution, Provides a Benefit, and is Specific
Comment 24: Whether the Department Should Revise the Benchmark Used
Under the Land for LTAR Program
Comment 25: Whether the Department Erred in Rejecting Factual
Information Concerning the Benchmark Used Under the Land for LTAR
Program
Comment 26: Whether the Guang Ya Companies Received an Additional
Subsidy in Connection With the GOC's Purchase of Land-Use Rights and
Buildings
Comment 27: Whether PRC Commercial Banks Are GOC Authorities That
Provide a Financial Contribution
Comment 28: Whether there is a Link Between the Alleged Policy
Lending Program and Actual Loans Received by Respondents
Comment 29: Whether the Derivation of the Short-Term Benchmark
Interest Rate is Arbitrary
Comment 30: Whether the Derivation of the Long-Term Benchmark
Interest Rate is Arbitrary
Comment 31: Whether the Department Committed Ministerial Errors
Concerning the Famous Brands Program
Comment 32: Whether the Department Should Provide an Entered Value
Adjustment to the Zhongya Companies to Account for Price Mark-Ups
Made by Their Hong-Kong Affiliate
Comment 33: Whether the Department Improperly Declined to Initiate
an Investigation of the GOC's Alleged Currency Undervaluation
[FR Doc. 2011-7926 Filed 4-1-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P