Pennsylvania Regulatory Program, 18467-18472 [2011-7907]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 64 / Monday, April 4, 2011 / Proposed Rules
The Commission recognizes the
concern expressed in comments
regarding the use of TACs. Additionally,
the Commission also recognizes the
potential benefit of a TAC, particularly
when addressing a complex or technical
regulation. While the Commission
agrees with those comments suggesting
a regulation may not be necessary, the
Commission will consider drafting a
policy guiding the development of a
TAC, member selection, and meeting
rules. The Commission anticipates that
a TAC policy will be developed during
2011. The process for developing a TAC
policy will be consistent with the
NIGC’s Tribal Consultation policy.
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with PROPOSALS
B. Communication Policy
The NOI asked whether the NIGC
should consider developing a regulation
or include as part of a regulation a
process for determining how it
communicates with Tribes. The NOI
noted that NIGC communicates directly
with the Tribal Gaming Regulatory
Agency (TGRA) or Tribal Gaming
Commission (TGC) as well as directly
with the tribal government. The NOI
asked whether the NIGC should
consider promulgating a regulation or
policy establishing a default method of
communication unless otherwise
directed by tribal resolution.
Many comments recommended that
the Commission should not consider
adopting a universal standard for
communicating with Tribes. Tribes
noted the variety in government
structures and methods used by Tribes
when taking official action. However,
Tribes also noted the need for more
effective communication with all
affected parties, including the elected
government officials, TGC, TGRA and
the gaming operation. While the
Commission agrees with those
comments suggesting a regulation may
not be necessary, the Commission will
consider drafting a policy guiding how
the Commission communicates with
Tribes, their gaming regulatory bodies,
and the gaming operation. This
Commission anticipates that a policy
will be developed over the course of the
regulatory review process outlined
above. The process for developing a
Communication policy will be
consistent with NIGC’s Tribal
Consultation policy.
C. Other Regulations
During this review process, the
Commission attempted to identify those
regulations identified by Tribes and/or
the Commission in most need of review.
However, the Commission reserves the
right to review other regulations if
needed throughout this review process.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:37 Apr 01, 2011
Jkt 223001
Review of regulations not specifically
identified in this Notice will be
reviewed utilizing the process described
in Section IIB of this Notice.
Authority: 25 U.S.C. 2706(b)(10); E.O.
13175.
Dated: March 30, 2011, Washington, DC.
Tracie L. Stevens,
Chairwoman.
Steffani A. Cochran,
Vice-Chairwoman.
Daniel J. Little,
Associate Commissioner.
[FR Doc. 2011–7912 Filed 4–1–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7565–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Mine Safety and Health Administration
30 CFR Part 104
RIN 1219–AB73
Pattern of Violations
Mine Safety and Health
Administration, Labor.
ACTION: Proposed rule; extension of
comment period.
AGENCY:
The Mine Safety and Health
Administration (MSHA) is extending
the comment period on the proposed
rule addressing Pattern of Violations
(POV). This extension gives commenters
additional time to review and comment
on the proposed rule.
DATES: All comments must be received
or postmarked by midnight Eastern
Daylight Savings Time on April 18,
2011.
ADDRESSES: Submit comments by any of
the following methods. Comments must
be identified with ‘‘RIN 1219–AB73’’ in
the subject line of the message.
• Federal e-Rulemaking Portal:
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
on-line instructions for submitting
comments.
• Electronic mail: zzMSHAcomments@dol.gov.
• Facsimile: 202–693–9441.
• Regular Mail or Courier: MSHA,
Office of Standards, Regulations, and
Variances, 1100 Wilson Boulevard,
Room 2350, Arlington, Virginia 22209–
3939. Courier must sign in at the
receptionist’s desk on the 21st floor.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Roslyn B. Fontaine, Chief, Regulatory
Development Division, Office of
Standards, Regulations, and Variances,
MSHA, at fontaine.roslyn@dol.gov (email); 202–693–9440 (voice); or 202–
693–9441 (facsimile).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00049
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
18467
Availability of Information
View Public Comments: MSHA will
post all comments on the Internet
without change, including any personal
information provided. Access comments
electronically at https://www.msha.gov/
REGS/Comments/2011-2255/POV.asp or
at https://www.regulations.gov. Review
comments in person at MSHA, Office of
Standards, Regulations, and Variances,
at the address in the ADDRESSES section
above.
E-mail notification: To subscribe to
receive e-mail notification when the
Agency publishes rulemaking
documents in the Federal Register, go
to: https://www.msha.gov/subscriptions/
subscribe.aspx.
Extension of Comment Period and
Request for Comments
On February 2, 2011 (76 FR 5719),
MSHA published a proposed rule on
Pattern of Violations (POV). In response
to requests from interested parties,
MSHA is extending the comment period
from April 4, 2011, to April 18, 2011.
MSHA solicits comments from the
mining community on all aspects of the
proposed rule. The proposed rule is
available on MSHA’s Web site at
https://www.msha.gov/REGS/FEDREG/
PROPOSED/2011PROP/2011-2255.pdf.
Dated: March 30, 2011.
Joseph A. Main,
Assistant Secretary of Labor for Mine Safety
and Health.
[FR Doc. 2011–7975 Filed 4–1–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–43–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Office of Surface Mining Reclamation
and Enforcement
30 CFR Part 938
[SATS No. PA–156–FOR; Docket ID: OSM
2010–0004]
Pennsylvania Regulatory Program
Office of Surface Mining
Reclamation and Enforcement (OSM),
Interior.
ACTION: Proposed rule; reopening of the
public comment period.
AGENCY:
We are reopening the public
comment period related to an
amendment to the Pennsylvania
regulatory program (the ‘‘Pennsylvania
program’’) under the Surface Mining
Control and Reclamation Act of 1977
(SMCRA or the Act). The amendment is
in response to fourteen required
program amendments and the remining
financial guarantee program. The
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\04APP1.SGM
04APP1
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with PROPOSALS
18468
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 64 / Monday, April 4, 2011 / Proposed Rules
comment period is being extended to
incorporate subsequent information that
we received on two occasions from
Pennsylvania. Taken together, the
submissions specifically address fifteen
required program amendments and the
remining financial guarantee program.
Pennsylvania intends to revise its
program to be consistent with the
corresponding Federal regulations. This
document gives the times and locations
that the Pennsylvania program and this
submittal are available for your
inspection, the comment period during
which you may submit written
comments, and the procedures that we
will follow for the public hearing, if one
is requested.
DATES: We will accept written
comments until 4 p.m., local time May
4, 2011. If requested, we will hold a
public hearing on April 29, 2011. We
will accept requests to speak until
4 p.m., local time on April 19, 2011.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments,
identified by ‘‘PA–156–FOR; Docket ID:
OSM–2010–0004’’ by either of the
following two methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. The proposed rule
has been assigned Docket ID: OSM–
2010–0004. If you would like to submit
comments through the Federal
eRulemaking Portal, go to https://
www.regulations.gov and follow the
instructions.
Mail/Hand Delivery/Courier: Mr.
George Rieger, Chief, Pittsburgh Field
Division, Office of Surface Mining
Reclamation and Enforcement,
Harrisburg Transportation Center, 415
Market St., Suite 304, Harrisburg,
Pennsylvania 17101.
Instructions: For detailed instructions
on submitting comments and additional
information on the rulemaking process,
see the Public Comment Procedures
heading of the SUPPLEMENTARY
INFORMATION section of this document.
Docket: In addition to obtaining
copies of documents at https://
www.regulations.gov, information may
also be obtained at the addresses listed
below during normal business hours,
Monday through Friday, excluding
holidays. You may receive one free copy
of the amendment by contacting OSM’s
Pittsburgh Field Division Office.
George Rieger, Chief, Pittsburgh Field
Division, Office of Surface Mining
Reclamation and Enforcement,
Harrisburg Transportation Center, 415
Market St., Suite 304, Harrisburg,
Pennsylvania 17101, Telephone: (717)
782– 4036, E-mail: grieger@osmre.gov.
Thomas Callaghan, P.G., Director,
Bureau of Mining and Reclamation,
Pennsylvania Department of
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:37 Apr 01, 2011
Jkt 223001
Environmental Protection, Rachel
Carson State Office Building, P.O. Box
8461, Harrisburg, Pennsylvania
17105–8461, Telephone: (717) 787–
5015, E-mail: tcallaghan@state.pa.us.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
George Rieger, Telephone: (717) 782–
4036. E-mail: grieger@osmre.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background on the Pennsylvania Program
II. Description of the Amendment
III. Public Comment Procedures
IV. Procedural Determinations
I. Background on the Pennsylvania
Program
Section 503(a) of the Act permits a
State to assume primacy for the
regulation of surface coal mining and
reclamation operations on non-Federal
and non-Indian lands within its borders
by demonstrating that its program
includes, among other things, ‘‘a State
law which provides for the regulation of
surface coal mining and reclamation
operations in accordance with the
requirements of this Act * * * and
rules and regulations consistent with
regulations issued by the Secretary
pursuant to this Act.’’ See 30 U.S.C.
1253(a)(1) and (7). On the basis of these
criteria, the Secretary of the Interior
conditionally approved the
Pennsylvania program on July 30, 1982.
You can find background information
on the Pennsylvania program, including
the Secretary’s findings, the disposition
of comments, and conditions of
approval of the Pennsylvania program
in the July 30, 1982, Federal Register
(47 FR 33050). You can also find later
actions concerning the Pennsylvania
program and program amendments at 30
CFR 938.11, 938.12, 938.13, 938.15, and
938.16.
II. Description of the Amendment
Original Submission: By letter dated
March 17, 2010, Administrative Record
Number 888.00, Pennsylvania sent us an
amendment to its program, under
SMCRA (30 U.S.C. 1201 et seq.).
Pennsylvania’s submittal, consisting of
proposed regulatory/rule changes, was
intended to address fourteen required
amendments found at 30 CFR 938.16(rr),
(tt), (uu), (vv), (ww), (xx), (zz), (aaa),
(ccc), (iii), (jjj), (nnn), (ppp), and (ttt). It
was also intended to address a partial
disapproval of a 1998 submission that
included regulations about remining
financial guarantees. The disapproval is
codified at 30 CFR 938.12(c)(3).
First Subsequent Submission: By
letter dated September 14, 2010,
Administrative Record Number 844.23,
Pennsylvania sent us an amendment to
its program under SMCRA that included
PO 00000
Frm 00050
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
an ‘‘effective as’’ demonstration for:
(1) eight of the required amendments
mentioned above—30 CFR 938.16(rr)
(tt), (uu), (vv), (ww), (xx), (zz), and (aaa);
and (2) one required amendment not
previously addressed (yy). It also
included revised guidance documents
related to compliance/enforcement
procedures, alternate enforcement, and
coal and industrial mineral mining
inspections. Reference documents were
also included but are not part of this
amendment. We are now incorporating
this submission into this amendment.
Second Subsequent Submission: By
letter dated November 16, 2010,
Administrative Record No. 888.07,
Pennsylvania sent us an amendment to
its program under SMCRA to include
the final-form rulemaking language that
addressed the fourteen amendments
mentioned above.
The full text of the program
amendment is available for you to read
at the locations listed above under
ADDRESSES. A summary of the
submission follows.
Required Amendments at 30 CFR
938.16: The 15 required amendments at
30 CFR 938.16 require Pennsylvania to
submit proposed amendments to:
(rr) Section 86.36(c) to require permit
denial for unabated violations of any
Federal or State program under SMCRA,
without the three-year limitation.
(tt) Section 86.37(a)(10) to require that
all violations of the Federal SMCRA and
all programs approved under SMCRA be
considered in determining whether
there is a demonstrated pattern of
willful violations.
(uu) Section 86.37(a) to require that
the criteria upon which the regulatory
authority bases its decision to approve
or deny a permit application are based
on all information available to the
regulatory authority.
(vv) Section 86.37(a) to include
language that would prohibit permit
approval if the applicant or anyone
linked to the applicant through the
definition of ‘‘owned or controlled’’ or
‘‘owns or controls’’ has forfeited a bond
and the violation upon which the
forfeiture was based remains unabated.
(ww) Sections 86.37(a)(9) and (a)(16)
to require denial of a permit if it finds
that those linked to the applicant
through the definition of ‘‘owned or
controlled’’ or ‘‘owns or controls’’ are
delinquent in payment of abandoned
mine reclamation fees or delinquent in
the payment of State and Federal final
civil penalty assessments.
(xx) Section 86.37(c) to require that
the regulatory authority’s
reconsideration of its decision to
approve the permit include a review of
information, updated for the period
E:\FR\FM\04APP1.SGM
04APP1
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 64 / Monday, April 4, 2011 / Proposed Rules
from permit approval to permit
issuance, pertaining to the payment of
abandoned mine reclamation fees and
civil penalty fees and the status of
unabated violations upon which a bond
forfeiture was based.
(yy) Section 86.43 to require the
regulatory authority to review the
circumstances under which a permit
was issued whenever it has reason to
believe that the permit may have been
improvidently issued.
(zz) Section 86.62(b)(2)(ii) to correct
the cross-reference to section 86.63 with
a reference to section 86.212(c).
(aaa) Sections 86.62(c) and 87.14(3) to
include the requirement that the
application include the address for each
permit held by a related entity or
company, and identification of the
regulatory authority for such permit.
(ccc) Section 86.133(f) to require that
exploration on areas designated as
unsuitable for mining shall be subject to
permitting requirements no less
effective than the Federal regulations at
30 CFR 772.12.
(iii) Section 87.112(c) and 89.111(c) to
require a seismic safety factor of at least
1.2 for all impoundments that meet the
criteria of 30 CFR 77.216(a) or are
located where failure could cause loss of
life or serious property damage.
(jjj) Section 90.112(c)(2) to require
that all impounding structures that meet
the criteria of 30 CFR 77.216(a) and are
either constructed of coal mine waste or
intended to impound coal mine waste
have sufficient spillway capacity and/or
storage capacity to safely pass or control
the runoff from the 6-hour PMP or
greater precipitation event.
(nnn) Section 86.159(1)(2) to require
two officer signatures for each corporate
indemnitor, an affidavit from the
corporation(s) certifying that entering
into the indemnity agreement is valid
under all applicable Federal and State
laws, and documents that evidence the
authority of the signatories to bind the
corporation and an authorization by the
parent corporation to enter into the
indemnity agreement.
(ppp) Section 86.5(m), or otherwise
amend its program, to provide for
notification of the operator and any
intervenors of a decision not to revoke
an exemption.
(ttt) Sections 88.321 and 90.133, or
otherwise amend its program to require
that no noncoal waste be deposited in
a coal refuse pile or impounding
structure.
Pennsylvania Response to Required
Amendments at 30 CFR 938.16:
Pennsylvania submitted revised
regulatory provisions for approval and
an ‘‘effective as’’ demonstration to
address the required amendments. The
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:37 Apr 01, 2011
Jkt 223001
State also submitted some proposed
regulatory changes that are not intended
to address any of the required
amendments.
Regulatory Changes: The provisions
of the Pennsylvania rules that
Pennsylvania proposes to revise and/or
add are found at 25 Pennsylvania Code.
The following is a summary of the
regulatory changes being proposed to
address program deficiencies noted at
30 CFR 938.16.
Section 86.1, Definitions
The Noncoal Surface Mining and
Reclamation Act (NSMRA) is being
added to the list for the definition of
Acts. When Chapter 86 was
promulgated in 1983, noncoal mining
was regulated under the authority of the
Pennsylvania Surface Mining
Conservation and Reclamation Act
(PASMCRA). In 1984, the NSMRA was
enacted, superseding the role of
PASMCRA for noncoal mining. In order
to comply with Federal program
requirements (and to have an effective
regulatory program) relating to
incidental extraction of coal under
noncoal mining permits, Pennsylvania
states that it is necessary to include
NSMRA in the applicable Acts. This
amendment is intended to address the
requirement set forth at 30 CFR
938.16(tt).
Pennsylvania also states that
PASMCRA Section 1396.3a(d) includes
a reference to Federal SMCRA. This
meets the requirement and makes the
Pennsylvania program no less effective
than the Federal requirements. The text
of Section 1396.3a(d) is available online
at Regulations.gov.
Pennsylvania states that the standard
in Section 86.37 (a)(10) is the ‘‘lack of
ability or intention to comply with the
acts * * *’’ This inability or
unwillingness to comply would be
shown through violations of Federal
SMCRA or in other states. If the
language was that ‘‘the applicant did not
comply with the acts,’’ then that would
be more limiting than the existing
language. The existing language allows
Pennsylvania to include any violations
in determining the ‘‘lack of ability or
intention to comply with the acts * * *’’
In addition, the regulation submitted as
program amendment PA–156–FOR in
March 2010 includes a revision adding
the State NSMRA to the definition of
‘‘acts’’ in Section 86.1.
The definition of ‘‘owned or
controlled’’ and ‘‘owns or controls’’ is
being corrected to include the current
reference to the Federal regulations
relating to definitions. This addresses
Federal regulation revisions that
resulted in the definition being placed
PO 00000
Frm 00051
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
18469
in a different section of the State
program.
Section 86.5, Extraction of Coal
Incidental to Noncoal Surface Mining
Section 86.5(m) is amended to add the
requirement for the Department to
notify interested parties in the case that
the Department decides not to revoke an
exemption from the coal permitting
requirements. This amendment is
intended to address the requirement set
forth at 30 CFR 938.16(ppp).
Section 86.36, Review of Permit
Applications
Section 86.36 is amended to delete
the three-year time limitation for the
review of an outstanding Federal
violation. This amendment is intended
to address the requirement set forth at
30 CFR 938.16(rr).
Section 86.37, Criteria for Permit
Approval or Denial
Section 86.37(a)(8) is amended to
include a reference to the Federal
definition of a violation. This
amendment was required by the Federal
requirement set forth at 30 CFR
938.16(ww). This amendment is also
intended to address the deficiencies set
forth at 30 CFR 938.16(uu), (vv), and
(xx).
Section 86.62, Identification of Interests
Section 86.62(b)(2)(ii) is being
amended to correct the reference to the
Federal minimum enforcement action.
This amendment is intended to address
the requirement set forth at 30 CFR
938.16(zz).
Section 86.62(c) is being amended to
include the permittee name and address
as required information relating to
permits for related entities and to clarify
that issued permits must be reported as
part of an application. This amendment
is intended to address the requirement
set forth at 30 CFR 938.16(aaa).
Section 86.103(g), Procedure; Section
86.129, Coal Exploration on Areas
Designated as Unsuitable for Surface
Mining Operations; and Section 86.133,
General Requirements
Section 86.103(g) is being added to
require that the procedures for
processing an assertion of Valid Existing
Rights (VER) follow the Federal
requirements by incorporating the
Federal procedural requirements by
reference.
Section 86.129(b) is being amended to
provide specific procedures and
requirements for permit applications for
exploration activities on lands
designated as unsuitable for mining.
The detailed requirements mirror the
E:\FR\FM\04APP1.SGM
04APP1
18470
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 64 / Monday, April 4, 2011 / Proposed Rules
Federal procedures and standards for
approval. This amendment also results
in the renumbering of current
subsections 86.129(b)(1) and
86.129(b)(2).
Section 86.133(f) is being amended to
clarify that a permit is required for
exploration activities on lands
designated as unsuitable for mining.
The amendments to 86.129(b) and
86.133(f) are intended to address the
requirements set forth at 30 CFR
938.16(ccc).
Required Amendment 30 CFR
938.16(yy): ‘‘Effective As’’ Demonstration
There are no proposed regulation
changes being made to sections 86.43,
Improvidently Issued Permits and 86.44,
Rescission of Improvidently Issued
Permits. Instead, Pennsylvania submits
that its existing regulations are
sufficient to render its program no less
effective than the Federal regulations.
The submission provides
Pennsylvania’s reasoning for this
assertion as follows:
Section 86.159, Self-Bonding
The difference between the Federal
requirement and Pennsylvania’s regulations
is related to the phrase ‘reason to believe’ in
the CFR and ‘found’ in Pennsylvania’s
regulations. The Federal regulation does not
describe how one would have a ‘reason to
believe.’
An example may help illustrate how this
regulation is applied in Pennsylvania. In a
case where a permit has been issued based
on the presumption that a violation is in the
process of being corrected, Pennsylvania uses
eFACTS to track the status of the violation.
In this example, the permit is conditionally
issued, based upon continued compliance.
The eFACTS database has functionality
where the permit record is linked to the
enforcement record for the violation that is
in satisfactory progress. If the status of the
enforcement record is changed indicating
noncompliance, then the permit is
automatically flagged for rescission. Another
example is a case where a prohibited party
may be participating in the mining activities.
If Pennsylvania finds (usually through a site
inspection) that a forfeited operator is in a
position of ownership or control at a mining
operation, an investigation is initiated.
Pennsylvania has relied on the investigative
expertise of the OSM Applicant/Violator
System (AVS) investigative staff in many of
these cases. If the investigation demonstrates
a link, then the permit rescission will ensue.
While having a ‘reason to believe’ would
most likely occur sooner in the process than
having a ‘finding’ and there is an implication
of something more formal with a finding,
both regulations require the regulatory
authority to take an affirmative action to
pursue rescission if it is necessary.
Section 86.159(l)(1) is amended to
incorporate the language in the Federal
regulations regarding the
indemnification of self-bonds in the
case of a corporate applicant that has a
parent company. This amendment is
intended to address the requirement set
forth at 30 CFR 938.16(nnn).
Section 87.112, Hydrologic Balance:
Dams, Ponds, Embankments and
Impoundments—Design, Construction
and Maintenance and Section 89.111,
Large impoundments
Section 87.112(c) is amended to add
a requirement to protect miners or the
public. Section 87.112(c)(1) is amended
to add the required seismic safety factor.
Section 89.111(c) is amended to add
a requirement to protect miners or the
public. Section 89.11(c)(1) is amended
to add the required seismic safety factor.
These amendments are intended to
address the requirement set forth at 30
CFR 938.16(iii).
Section 88.321, Disposal of Noncoal
Wastes and Section 90.133, Disposal of
Noncoal Wastes
Section 88.321 is amended to include
all noncoal wastes and to apply the
prohibition to impoundments.
Section 90.133 is amended to include
all noncoal wastes and to apply the
prohibition to impoundments.
These amendments are intended to
address the requirements set forth at 30
CFR 938.16(ttt).
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with PROPOSALS
Section 90.112, Hydrologic Balance:
Dams, Ponds, Embankments and
Impoundments—Design, Construction
and Maintenance
Section 90.112(c) is amended to add
a requirement to protect miners or the
public. Section 90.112(c)(2) is amended
to match the language in the Federal
regulations regarding spillway capacity
for large impoundments at coal refuse
disposal sites. These amendments are
intended to address the requirements set
forth at 30 CFR 938.16(jjj).
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:37 Apr 01, 2011
Jkt 223001
Pennsylvania requests that this
required amendment be removed based
on this assertion.
Remining Financial Guarantees—OSM
Partial Disapproval of 1998 Regulatory
Amendment found at 30 CFR
938.12(c)(3)
We did not approve a provision of a
proposed program amendment that
Pennsylvania submitted on December
18, 1998, regarding 25 Pa Code
86.281(e). The last sentence, which
stated, ‘‘If the actual cost of reclamation
by the Department exceeds the amount
reserved, additional funds from the
Remining Financial Assurance Fund
will be used to complete reclamation’’
was not approved.
PO 00000
Frm 00052
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Pennsylvania’s Response to the OSM
Disapproval at 30 CFR 938.12(c)(3)
In its submission of March 17, 2010,
Pennsylvania indicates that the
following regulatory changes are being
made to the remining financial
guarantee program to address the
portion of 25 Pa Code 86.281(e) that was
not approved as documented at 30 CFR
938.12(c)(3).
Section 86.165, Failure To Maintain
Proper Bond
Section 86.165(a) is amended to add
that an operator’s obligation to maintain
a proper bond includes the payments
required under the Remining Financial
Guarantee program. This amendment
will allow the enforcement of the
payment requirement using consistent
procedures.
Section 86.281, Financial Guarantees To
Insure Reclamation—General
Section 86.281(c) is amended to
provide that the Department will
designate a specified amount in the
financial guarantees special account as
financial assurance for the reclamation
obligation of a permit with an approved
remining area, rather than reserving a
portion of those funds. This change is
necessary in light of the conversion to
a conventional bonding program. Under
conventional bonding, the total
reclamation cost is accounted for when
determining the bond amount, thus
enabling the Department to calculate
more precisely the amount of funds that
may need to be used to reclaim an
approved remining area covered by a
remining financial guarantee.
Section 86.281(e) is amended in
conjunction with the revision in Section
86.281(c) and to clarify that all of the
bonds forfeited (including the Remining
Financial Guarantee) on a permit are to
be used for reclamation of the mine site
(including the remining area). It also is
amended to allow, rather than require,
the use of additional funds from the
Remining Financial Assurance Fund if
they are needed to complete the
reclamation of the mine site. This
change is based primarily on the
concept that under conventional
bonding, the bond amount posted is the
amount required to complete the
reclamation. In addition, it provides the
Department with flexibility to use
money from the Remining Financial
Assurance Fund to pay for the necessary
reclamation.
Section 86.282, Participation
Requirements
Section 86.282(a)(2) is being revised
to delete the option of using the ability
to obtain a letter of credit as a
E:\FR\FM\04APP1.SGM
04APP1
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 64 / Monday, April 4, 2011 / Proposed Rules
demonstration of financial
responsibility. Experience in
implementing the Remining Financial
Guarantee program has shown that the
ability to obtain a letter of credit from
a bank is not a good test of financial
responsibility.
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with PROPOSALS
Section 86.283, Procedures
Section 86.283(a)(1) is amended to
change the way the amount of the
payment is determined as a result of the
change to conventional bonding. The
deleted language is based on the peracre bond rate system. The proposed
wording is based on the amount of the
Remining Financial Guarantee.
Section 86.283(d) is amended to
clarify how financial guarantee funds
are allocated.
Section 86.283(e) is amended to
delete language relating to the process of
‘‘bond rollover’’ that was allowed under
the Alternative Bonding System (ABS).
The concept of ‘‘bond rollover’’ is not
pertinent to conventional bonding.
Section 86.283(f) is being added to
reduce the potential risk of insolvency
of the Remining Financial Assurance
Fund by requiring the replacement of a
Remining Financial Guarantee in the
event a pollutional discharge occurs at
a mine site bonded with a Remining
Financial Guarantee.
Section 86.284, Forfeiture
Sections 86.284(a) and (c) are
amended to be consistent with the
changes made in Sections 86.281(c)
and (e).
Guidance Documents: Pennsylvania is
seeking to amend its program to include
three program directives that will
replace a policy statement initially
amended into the Pennsylvania program
on March 20, 1984, and subsequently
revised by program amendments
approved on May 15, 1984, July 3, 1984,
September 8, 1986, and October 27,
1988. The original policy statement
described Pennsylvania’s policies
regarding Departmental inspections
conducted at permitted coal mine
operations; citing and enforcing
violations found at the permitted
operations; and alternative enforcement
actions available to the Department in
the event violations are not abated in a
timely manner. These topics have now
been separated and addressed in three
Directives identified as 562–4100–301
Compliance/Enforcement Procedures,
562–4100–307 Alternative Enforcement,
and 562–3000–102 Coal and Industrial
Mineral Mining Inspections. With
respect to 562–3000–102, regarding the
type and frequency of inspections at
coal mine permit sites, only Sections I
and II.A, II.B, and II.F are being
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:37 Apr 01, 2011
Jkt 223001
submitted for inclusion in
Pennsylvania’s approved coal mining
regulatory program. There are no major
changes in Departmental policy
regarding these three new Directives.
The policies are being reorganized,
updated, and placed into the
Departmental Directives format.
Supporting Documentation: In
addition to the documents mentioned
above, the State has submitted the
following documents for reference
purposes only: Guidance Documents
562–3000–802 Coal Mining Applicant
Violator System (AVS) Compliance
Manual, 562–2000–703 Changes to
Licenses, Bonds and Permits, 563–
2000–001 Government Financed
Construction Contracts, and 562–3000–
110 Applicant Violator System (AVS)
Inspections; 5600–PM–MR0025,
Application Form—Mining License,
Contract Operator Approval and
Ownership and Control Registration;
Sample Permit suspension letter; and,
‘‘As Effective As’’ demonstration for the
Inspection Program.
III. Public Comment Procedures
Under the provisions of 30 CFR
732.17(h), we are seeking your
comments on whether the submission
satisfies the applicable program
approval criteria of 30 CFR 732.15. If we
approve the amendment, it will become
part of the Pennsylvania program.
18471
to withhold your personal identifying
information from public review, we
cannot guarantee that we will be able to
do so. We will not consider anonymous
comments.
Public Hearing
If you wish to speak at the public
hearing, contact the person listed under
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT by
4 p.m., local time April 19, 2011. If you
are disabled and need reasonable
accommodations to attend a public
hearing, contact the person listed under
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT. We
will arrange the location and time of the
hearing with those persons requesting
the hearing. If no one requests an
opportunity to speak, we will not hold
the hearing.
To assist the transcriber and ensure an
accurate record, we request, if possible,
that each person who speaks at a public
hearing provide us with a written copy
of his or her comments. The public
hearing will continue on the specified
date until everyone scheduled to speak
has been given an opportunity to be
heard. If you are in the audience and
have not been scheduled to speak and
wish to do so, you will be allowed to
speak after those who have been
scheduled. We will end the hearing after
everyone scheduled to speak and others
present in the audience who wish to
speak, have been heard.
Electronic or Written Comments
If you submit written comments, they
should be specific, confined to issues
pertinent to the proposed regulations,
and explain the reason for any
recommended change(s). We appreciate
any and all comments, but those most
useful and likely to influence decisions
on the final regulations will be those
that either involve personal experience
or include citations to and analyses of
SMCRA, its legislative history, its
implementing regulations, case law,
other pertinent Tribal or Federal laws or
regulations, technical literature, or other
relevant publications. We cannot ensure
that comments received after the close
of the comment period (see DATES) or
sent to an address other than those
listed above (see ADDRESSES) will be
included in the docket for this
rulemaking and considered.
Public Meeting
If there is only limited interest in
participating in a public hearing, we
may hold a public meeting rather than
a public hearing. If you wish to meet
with us to discuss the submission,
please request a meeting by contacting
the person listed under FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT. All such meetings
are open to the public and, if possible,
we will post notices of meetings at the
locations listed under ADDRESSES. We
will make a written summary of each
meeting a part of the administrative
record.
Public Availability of Comments
Before including your address, phone
number, e-mail address, or other
personal identifying information in your
comment, you should be aware that
your entire comment—including your
personal identifying information—may
be made publicly available at any time.
While you may ask us in your comment
Other Laws and Executive Orders
Affecting Rulemaking
When a State submits a program
amendment to OSM for review, our
regulations at 30 CFR 732.17(h) require
us to publish a notice in the Federal
Register indicating receipt of the
proposed amendment, its text or a
summary of its terms, and an
PO 00000
Frm 00053
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
IV. Procedural Determinations
Executive Order 12866—Regulatory
Planning and Review
This rule is exempted from review by
the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) under Executive Order 12866.
E:\FR\FM\04APP1.SGM
04APP1
18472
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 64 / Monday, April 4, 2011 / Proposed Rules
opportunity for public comment. We
conclude our review of the proposed
amendment after the close of the public
comment period and determine whether
the amendment should be approved,
approved in part, or not approved. At
that time, we will also make the
determinations and certifications
required by the various laws and
executive orders governing the
rulemaking process and include them in
the final rule.
List of Subjects in 30 CFR Part 938
Intergovernmental relations, Surface
mining, Underground mining.
Dated: February 18, 2011.
Thomas D. Shope,
Regional Director, Appalachian Region.
[FR Doc. 2011–7907 Filed 4–1–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–05–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid
Services
42 CFR Part 424
[CMS–6036–P2]
RIN 0938–AQ57
Medicare Program; Revisions to the
Durable Medical Equipment,
Prosthetics, Orthotics, and Supplies
(DMEPOS) Suppliers Safeguards
Centers for Medicare &
Medicaid Services (CMS), HHS.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
This proposed rule would
remove the definition of and modify
requirements regarding ‘‘direct
solicitation;’’ allow DMEPOS suppliers,
including DMEPOS competitive bidding
program contract suppliers, to contract
with licensed agents to provide
DMEPOS supplies unless prohibited by
State law; remove the requirement for
compliance with local zoning laws; and
modify certain State licensing
requirement exceptions.
DATES: To be assured consideration,
comments must be received at one of
the addresses provided below, no later
than 5 p.m. on June 3, 2011.
ADDRESSES: In commenting, please refer
to file code CMS–6036–P2. Because of
staff and resource limitations, we cannot
accept comments by facsimile (FAX)
transmission.
You may submit comments in one of
four ways (please choose only one of the
ways listed):
1. Electronically. You may submit
electronic comments on this regulation
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with PROPOSALS
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:37 Apr 01, 2011
Jkt 223001
to https://www.regulations.gov. Follow
the ‘‘Submit a comment’’ instructions.
2. By regular mail. You may mail
written comments to the following
address ONLY: Centers for Medicare &
Medicaid Services, Department of
Health and Human Services, Attention:
CMS–6036–P2, P.O. Box 8013,
Baltimore, MD 21244–8013.
Please allow sufficient time for mailed
comments to be received before the
close of the comment period.
3. By express or overnight mail. You
may send written comments to the
following address ONLY: Centers for
Medicare & Medicaid Services,
Department of Health and Human
Services, Attention: CMS–6036–P2,
Mail Stop C4–26–05, 7500 Security
Boulevard, Baltimore, MD 21244–1850.
4. By hand or courier. If you prefer,
you may deliver (by hand or courier)
your written comments before the close
of the comment period to either of the
following addresses:
a. For delivery in Washington, DC—
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid
Services, Department of Health and
Human Services, Room 445–G, Hubert
H. Humphrey Building, 200
Independence Avenue, SW.,
Washington, DC 20201.
(Because access to the interior of the
Hubert H. Humphrey Building is not
readily available to persons without
Federal government identification,
commenters are encouraged to leave
their comments in the CMS drop slots
located in the main lobby of the
building. A stamp-in clock is available
for persons wishing to retain a proof of
filing by stamping in and retaining an
extra copy of the comments being filed.)
b. For delivery in Baltimore, MD—
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid
Services, Department of Health and
Human Services, 7500 Security
Boulevard, Baltimore, MD 21244–1850.
If you intend to deliver your
comments to the Baltimore address,
please call telephone number (410) 786–
9994 in advance to schedule your
arrival with one of our staff members.
Comments mailed to the addresses
indicated as appropriate for hand or
courier delivery may be delayed and
received after the comment period.
For information on viewing public
comments, see the beginning of the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Katie Mucklow Lehman, (410) 786–
0537.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Inspection of Public Comments: All
comments received before the close of
the comment period are available for
viewing by the public, including any
PO 00000
Frm 00054
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
personally identifiable or confidential
business information that is included in
a comment. We post all comments
received before the close of the
comment period on the following Web
site as soon as possible after they have
been received: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the search
instructions on that Web site to view
public comments.
Comments received timely will also
be available for public inspection as
they are received, generally beginning
approximately 3 weeks after publication
of a document, at the headquarters of
the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid
Services, 7500 Security Boulevard,
Baltimore, Maryland 21244, Monday
through Friday of each week from
8:30 a.m. to 4 p.m. To schedule an
appointment to view public comments,
phone 1–800–743–3951.
I. Background
A. General Overview
Medicare services are furnished by
two types of entities, providers, and
suppliers. At § 400.202, the term
‘‘provider’’ is defined as a hospital, a
critical access hospital (CAH), a skilled
nursing facility (SNF), a comprehensive
outpatient rehabilitation facility (CORF),
a home health agency (HHA), or a
hospice that has in effect an agreement
to participate in Medicare, or a clinic, a
rehabilitation agency, or a public health
agency that has in effect a similar
agreement but only to furnish outpatient
physical therapy or speech pathology
services, or a community mental health
center that has in effect a similar
agreement but only to furnish partial
hospitalization services. The term
‘‘provider’’ is also defined in sections
1861(u) and 1866(e) of the Social
Security Act (the Act).
For purposes of the durable medical
equipment, prosthetics, orthotics, and
supplies (DMEPOS) supplier standards,
the term ‘‘supplier’’ is defined in
§ 424.57(a) as an entity or individual,
including a physician or Part A
provider, that sells or rents Part B
covered DMEPOS items to Medicare
beneficiaries that meet the DMEPOS
supplier standards. A supplier that
furnishes DMEPOS is one category of
supplier. Other supplier categories may
include, for example, physicians, nurse
practitioners, and physical therapists. If
a supplier, such as a physician or
physical therapist, also furnishes
DMEPOS to a patient, then the supplier
is also considered to be a DMEPOS
supplier. The term ‘‘DMEPOS’’
encompasses the types of items
included in the definition of medical
E:\FR\FM\04APP1.SGM
04APP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 64 (Monday, April 4, 2011)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 18467-18472]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-7907]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement
30 CFR Part 938
[SATS No. PA-156-FOR; Docket ID: OSM 2010-0004]
Pennsylvania Regulatory Program
AGENCY: Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement (OSM),
Interior.
ACTION: Proposed rule; reopening of the public comment period.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We are reopening the public comment period related to an
amendment to the Pennsylvania regulatory program (the ``Pennsylvania
program'') under the Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act of 1977
(SMCRA or the Act). The amendment is in response to fourteen required
program amendments and the remining financial guarantee program. The
[[Page 18468]]
comment period is being extended to incorporate subsequent information
that we received on two occasions from Pennsylvania. Taken together,
the submissions specifically address fifteen required program
amendments and the remining financial guarantee program. Pennsylvania
intends to revise its program to be consistent with the corresponding
Federal regulations. This document gives the times and locations that
the Pennsylvania program and this submittal are available for your
inspection, the comment period during which you may submit written
comments, and the procedures that we will follow for the public
hearing, if one is requested.
DATES: We will accept written comments until 4 p.m., local time May 4,
2011. If requested, we will hold a public hearing on April 29, 2011. We
will accept requests to speak until 4 p.m., local time on April 19,
2011.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, identified by ``PA-156-FOR; Docket
ID: OSM-2010-0004'' by either of the following two methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov. The
proposed rule has been assigned Docket ID: OSM-2010-0004. If you would
like to submit comments through the Federal eRulemaking Portal, go to
https://www.regulations.gov and follow the instructions.
Mail/Hand Delivery/Courier: Mr. George Rieger, Chief, Pittsburgh
Field Division, Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement,
Harrisburg Transportation Center, 415 Market St., Suite 304,
Harrisburg, Pennsylvania 17101.
Instructions: For detailed instructions on submitting comments and
additional information on the rulemaking process, see the Public
Comment Procedures heading of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section of
this document.
Docket: In addition to obtaining copies of documents at https://www.regulations.gov, information may also be obtained at the addresses
listed below during normal business hours, Monday through Friday,
excluding holidays. You may receive one free copy of the amendment by
contacting OSM's Pittsburgh Field Division Office.
George Rieger, Chief, Pittsburgh Field Division, Office of Surface
Mining Reclamation and Enforcement, Harrisburg Transportation Center,
415 Market St., Suite 304, Harrisburg, Pennsylvania 17101, Telephone:
(717) 782- 4036, E-mail: grieger@osmre.gov.
Thomas Callaghan, P.G., Director, Bureau of Mining and Reclamation,
Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection, Rachel Carson
State Office Building, P.O. Box 8461, Harrisburg, Pennsylvania 17105-
8461, Telephone: (717) 787-5015, E-mail: tcallaghan@state.pa.us.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: George Rieger, Telephone: (717) 782-
4036. E-mail: grieger@osmre.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background on the Pennsylvania Program
II. Description of the Amendment
III. Public Comment Procedures
IV. Procedural Determinations
I. Background on the Pennsylvania Program
Section 503(a) of the Act permits a State to assume primacy for the
regulation of surface coal mining and reclamation operations on non-
Federal and non-Indian lands within its borders by demonstrating that
its program includes, among other things, ``a State law which provides
for the regulation of surface coal mining and reclamation operations in
accordance with the requirements of this Act * * * and rules and
regulations consistent with regulations issued by the Secretary
pursuant to this Act.'' See 30 U.S.C. 1253(a)(1) and (7). On the basis
of these criteria, the Secretary of the Interior conditionally approved
the Pennsylvania program on July 30, 1982. You can find background
information on the Pennsylvania program, including the Secretary's
findings, the disposition of comments, and conditions of approval of
the Pennsylvania program in the July 30, 1982, Federal Register (47 FR
33050). You can also find later actions concerning the Pennsylvania
program and program amendments at 30 CFR 938.11, 938.12, 938.13,
938.15, and 938.16.
II. Description of the Amendment
Original Submission: By letter dated March 17, 2010, Administrative
Record Number 888.00, Pennsylvania sent us an amendment to its program,
under SMCRA (30 U.S.C. 1201 et seq.). Pennsylvania's submittal,
consisting of proposed regulatory/rule changes, was intended to address
fourteen required amendments found at 30 CFR 938.16(rr), (tt), (uu),
(vv), (ww), (xx), (zz), (aaa), (ccc), (iii), (jjj), (nnn), (ppp), and
(ttt). It was also intended to address a partial disapproval of a 1998
submission that included regulations about remining financial
guarantees. The disapproval is codified at 30 CFR 938.12(c)(3).
First Subsequent Submission: By letter dated September 14, 2010,
Administrative Record Number 844.23, Pennsylvania sent us an amendment
to its program under SMCRA that included an ``effective as''
demonstration for: (1) eight of the required amendments mentioned
above--30 CFR 938.16(rr) (tt), (uu), (vv), (ww), (xx), (zz), and (aaa);
and (2) one required amendment not previously addressed (yy). It also
included revised guidance documents related to compliance/enforcement
procedures, alternate enforcement, and coal and industrial mineral
mining inspections. Reference documents were also included but are not
part of this amendment. We are now incorporating this submission into
this amendment.
Second Subsequent Submission: By letter dated November 16, 2010,
Administrative Record No. 888.07, Pennsylvania sent us an amendment to
its program under SMCRA to include the final-form rulemaking language
that addressed the fourteen amendments mentioned above.
The full text of the program amendment is available for you to read
at the locations listed above under ADDRESSES. A summary of the
submission follows.
Required Amendments at 30 CFR 938.16: The 15 required amendments at
30 CFR 938.16 require Pennsylvania to submit proposed amendments to:
(rr) Section 86.36(c) to require permit denial for unabated
violations of any Federal or State program under SMCRA, without the
three-year limitation.
(tt) Section 86.37(a)(10) to require that all violations of the
Federal SMCRA and all programs approved under SMCRA be considered in
determining whether there is a demonstrated pattern of willful
violations.
(uu) Section 86.37(a) to require that the criteria upon which the
regulatory authority bases its decision to approve or deny a permit
application are based on all information available to the regulatory
authority.
(vv) Section 86.37(a) to include language that would prohibit
permit approval if the applicant or anyone linked to the applicant
through the definition of ``owned or controlled'' or ``owns or
controls'' has forfeited a bond and the violation upon which the
forfeiture was based remains unabated.
(ww) Sections 86.37(a)(9) and (a)(16) to require denial of a permit
if it finds that those linked to the applicant through the definition
of ``owned or controlled'' or ``owns or controls'' are delinquent in
payment of abandoned mine reclamation fees or delinquent in the payment
of State and Federal final civil penalty assessments.
(xx) Section 86.37(c) to require that the regulatory authority's
reconsideration of its decision to approve the permit include a review
of information, updated for the period
[[Page 18469]]
from permit approval to permit issuance, pertaining to the payment of
abandoned mine reclamation fees and civil penalty fees and the status
of unabated violations upon which a bond forfeiture was based.
(yy) Section 86.43 to require the regulatory authority to review
the circumstances under which a permit was issued whenever it has
reason to believe that the permit may have been improvidently issued.
(zz) Section 86.62(b)(2)(ii) to correct the cross-reference to
section 86.63 with a reference to section 86.212(c).
(aaa) Sections 86.62(c) and 87.14(3) to include the requirement
that the application include the address for each permit held by a
related entity or company, and identification of the regulatory
authority for such permit.
(ccc) Section 86.133(f) to require that exploration on areas
designated as unsuitable for mining shall be subject to permitting
requirements no less effective than the Federal regulations at 30 CFR
772.12.
(iii) Section 87.112(c) and 89.111(c) to require a seismic safety
factor of at least 1.2 for all impoundments that meet the criteria of
30 CFR 77.216(a) or are located where failure could cause loss of life
or serious property damage.
(jjj) Section 90.112(c)(2) to require that all impounding
structures that meet the criteria of 30 CFR 77.216(a) and are either
constructed of coal mine waste or intended to impound coal mine waste
have sufficient spillway capacity and/or storage capacity to safely
pass or control the runoff from the 6-hour PMP or greater precipitation
event.
(nnn) Section 86.159(1)(2) to require two officer signatures for
each corporate indemnitor, an affidavit from the corporation(s)
certifying that entering into the indemnity agreement is valid under
all applicable Federal and State laws, and documents that evidence the
authority of the signatories to bind the corporation and an
authorization by the parent corporation to enter into the indemnity
agreement.
(ppp) Section 86.5(m), or otherwise amend its program, to provide
for notification of the operator and any intervenors of a decision not
to revoke an exemption.
(ttt) Sections 88.321 and 90.133, or otherwise amend its program to
require that no noncoal waste be deposited in a coal refuse pile or
impounding structure.
Pennsylvania Response to Required Amendments at 30 CFR 938.16:
Pennsylvania submitted revised regulatory provisions for approval and
an ``effective as'' demonstration to address the required amendments.
The State also submitted some proposed regulatory changes that are not
intended to address any of the required amendments.
Regulatory Changes: The provisions of the Pennsylvania rules that
Pennsylvania proposes to revise and/or add are found at 25 Pennsylvania
Code. The following is a summary of the regulatory changes being
proposed to address program deficiencies noted at 30 CFR 938.16.
Section 86.1, Definitions
The Noncoal Surface Mining and Reclamation Act (NSMRA) is being
added to the list for the definition of Acts. When Chapter 86 was
promulgated in 1983, noncoal mining was regulated under the authority
of the Pennsylvania Surface Mining Conservation and Reclamation Act
(PASMCRA). In 1984, the NSMRA was enacted, superseding the role of
PASMCRA for noncoal mining. In order to comply with Federal program
requirements (and to have an effective regulatory program) relating to
incidental extraction of coal under noncoal mining permits,
Pennsylvania states that it is necessary to include NSMRA in the
applicable Acts. This amendment is intended to address the requirement
set forth at 30 CFR 938.16(tt).
Pennsylvania also states that PASMCRA Section 1396.3a(d) includes a
reference to Federal SMCRA. This meets the requirement and makes the
Pennsylvania program no less effective than the Federal requirements.
The text of Section 1396.3a(d) is available online at Regulations.gov.
Pennsylvania states that the standard in Section 86.37 (a)(10) is
the ``lack of ability or intention to comply with the acts * * *'' This
inability or unwillingness to comply would be shown through violations
of Federal SMCRA or in other states. If the language was that ``the
applicant did not comply with the acts,'' then that would be more
limiting than the existing language. The existing language allows
Pennsylvania to include any violations in determining the ``lack of
ability or intention to comply with the acts * * *'' In addition, the
regulation submitted as program amendment PA-156-FOR in March 2010
includes a revision adding the State NSMRA to the definition of
``acts'' in Section 86.1.
The definition of ``owned or controlled'' and ``owns or controls''
is being corrected to include the current reference to the Federal
regulations relating to definitions. This addresses Federal regulation
revisions that resulted in the definition being placed in a different
section of the State program.
Section 86.5, Extraction of Coal Incidental to Noncoal Surface Mining
Section 86.5(m) is amended to add the requirement for the
Department to notify interested parties in the case that the Department
decides not to revoke an exemption from the coal permitting
requirements. This amendment is intended to address the requirement set
forth at 30 CFR 938.16(ppp).
Section 86.36, Review of Permit Applications
Section 86.36 is amended to delete the three-year time limitation
for the review of an outstanding Federal violation. This amendment is
intended to address the requirement set forth at 30 CFR 938.16(rr).
Section 86.37, Criteria for Permit Approval or Denial
Section 86.37(a)(8) is amended to include a reference to the
Federal definition of a violation. This amendment was required by the
Federal requirement set forth at 30 CFR 938.16(ww). This amendment is
also intended to address the deficiencies set forth at 30 CFR
938.16(uu), (vv), and (xx).
Section 86.62, Identification of Interests
Section 86.62(b)(2)(ii) is being amended to correct the reference
to the Federal minimum enforcement action. This amendment is intended
to address the requirement set forth at 30 CFR 938.16(zz).
Section 86.62(c) is being amended to include the permittee name and
address as required information relating to permits for related
entities and to clarify that issued permits must be reported as part of
an application. This amendment is intended to address the requirement
set forth at 30 CFR 938.16(aaa).
Section 86.103(g), Procedure; Section 86.129, Coal Exploration on Areas
Designated as Unsuitable for Surface Mining Operations; and Section
86.133, General Requirements
Section 86.103(g) is being added to require that the procedures for
processing an assertion of Valid Existing Rights (VER) follow the
Federal requirements by incorporating the Federal procedural
requirements by reference.
Section 86.129(b) is being amended to provide specific procedures
and requirements for permit applications for exploration activities on
lands designated as unsuitable for mining. The detailed requirements
mirror the
[[Page 18470]]
Federal procedures and standards for approval. This amendment also
results in the renumbering of current subsections 86.129(b)(1) and
86.129(b)(2).
Section 86.133(f) is being amended to clarify that a permit is
required for exploration activities on lands designated as unsuitable
for mining.
The amendments to 86.129(b) and 86.133(f) are intended to address
the requirements set forth at 30 CFR 938.16(ccc).
Section 86.159, Self-Bonding
Section 86.159(l)(1) is amended to incorporate the language in the
Federal regulations regarding the indemnification of self-bonds in the
case of a corporate applicant that has a parent company. This amendment
is intended to address the requirement set forth at 30 CFR 938.16(nnn).
Section 87.112, Hydrologic Balance: Dams, Ponds, Embankments and
Impoundments--Design, Construction and Maintenance and Section 89.111,
Large impoundments
Section 87.112(c) is amended to add a requirement to protect miners
or the public. Section 87.112(c)(1) is amended to add the required
seismic safety factor.
Section 89.111(c) is amended to add a requirement to protect miners
or the public. Section 89.11(c)(1) is amended to add the required
seismic safety factor.
These amendments are intended to address the requirement set forth
at 30 CFR 938.16(iii).
Section 88.321, Disposal of Noncoal Wastes and Section 90.133, Disposal
of Noncoal Wastes
Section 88.321 is amended to include all noncoal wastes and to
apply the prohibition to impoundments.
Section 90.133 is amended to include all noncoal wastes and to
apply the prohibition to impoundments.
These amendments are intended to address the requirements set forth
at 30 CFR 938.16(ttt).
Section 90.112, Hydrologic Balance: Dams, Ponds, Embankments and
Impoundments--Design, Construction and Maintenance
Section 90.112(c) is amended to add a requirement to protect miners
or the public. Section 90.112(c)(2) is amended to match the language in
the Federal regulations regarding spillway capacity for large
impoundments at coal refuse disposal sites. These amendments are
intended to address the requirements set forth at 30 CFR 938.16(jjj).
Required Amendment 30 CFR 938.16(yy): ``Effective As'' Demonstration
There are no proposed regulation changes being made to sections
86.43, Improvidently Issued Permits and 86.44, Rescission of
Improvidently Issued Permits. Instead, Pennsylvania submits that its
existing regulations are sufficient to render its program no less
effective than the Federal regulations. The submission provides
Pennsylvania's reasoning for this assertion as follows:
The difference between the Federal requirement and
Pennsylvania's regulations is related to the phrase `reason to
believe' in the CFR and `found' in Pennsylvania's regulations. The
Federal regulation does not describe how one would have a `reason to
believe.'
An example may help illustrate how this regulation is applied in
Pennsylvania. In a case where a permit has been issued based on the
presumption that a violation is in the process of being corrected,
Pennsylvania uses eFACTS to track the status of the violation. In
this example, the permit is conditionally issued, based upon
continued compliance. The eFACTS database has functionality where
the permit record is linked to the enforcement record for the
violation that is in satisfactory progress. If the status of the
enforcement record is changed indicating noncompliance, then the
permit is automatically flagged for rescission. Another example is a
case where a prohibited party may be participating in the mining
activities. If Pennsylvania finds (usually through a site
inspection) that a forfeited operator is in a position of ownership
or control at a mining operation, an investigation is initiated.
Pennsylvania has relied on the investigative expertise of the OSM
Applicant/Violator System (AVS) investigative staff in many of these
cases. If the investigation demonstrates a link, then the permit
rescission will ensue.
While having a `reason to believe' would most likely occur
sooner in the process than having a `finding' and there is an
implication of something more formal with a finding, both
regulations require the regulatory authority to take an affirmative
action to pursue rescission if it is necessary.
Pennsylvania requests that this required amendment be removed based
on this assertion.
Remining Financial Guarantees--OSM Partial Disapproval of 1998
Regulatory Amendment found at 30 CFR 938.12(c)(3)
We did not approve a provision of a proposed program amendment that
Pennsylvania submitted on December 18, 1998, regarding 25 Pa Code
86.281(e). The last sentence, which stated, ``If the actual cost of
reclamation by the Department exceeds the amount reserved, additional
funds from the Remining Financial Assurance Fund will be used to
complete reclamation'' was not approved.
Pennsylvania's Response to the OSM Disapproval at 30 CFR 938.12(c)(3)
In its submission of March 17, 2010, Pennsylvania indicates that
the following regulatory changes are being made to the remining
financial guarantee program to address the portion of 25 Pa Code
86.281(e) that was not approved as documented at 30 CFR 938.12(c)(3).
Section 86.165, Failure To Maintain Proper Bond
Section 86.165(a) is amended to add that an operator's obligation
to maintain a proper bond includes the payments required under the
Remining Financial Guarantee program. This amendment will allow the
enforcement of the payment requirement using consistent procedures.
Section 86.281, Financial Guarantees To Insure Reclamation--General
Section 86.281(c) is amended to provide that the Department will
designate a specified amount in the financial guarantees special
account as financial assurance for the reclamation obligation of a
permit with an approved remining area, rather than reserving a portion
of those funds. This change is necessary in light of the conversion to
a conventional bonding program. Under conventional bonding, the total
reclamation cost is accounted for when determining the bond amount,
thus enabling the Department to calculate more precisely the amount of
funds that may need to be used to reclaim an approved remining area
covered by a remining financial guarantee.
Section 86.281(e) is amended in conjunction with the revision in
Section 86.281(c) and to clarify that all of the bonds forfeited
(including the Remining Financial Guarantee) on a permit are to be used
for reclamation of the mine site (including the remining area). It also
is amended to allow, rather than require, the use of additional funds
from the Remining Financial Assurance Fund if they are needed to
complete the reclamation of the mine site. This change is based
primarily on the concept that under conventional bonding, the bond
amount posted is the amount required to complete the reclamation. In
addition, it provides the Department with flexibility to use money from
the Remining Financial Assurance Fund to pay for the necessary
reclamation.
Section 86.282, Participation Requirements
Section 86.282(a)(2) is being revised to delete the option of using
the ability to obtain a letter of credit as a
[[Page 18471]]
demonstration of financial responsibility. Experience in implementing
the Remining Financial Guarantee program has shown that the ability to
obtain a letter of credit from a bank is not a good test of financial
responsibility.
Section 86.283, Procedures
Section 86.283(a)(1) is amended to change the way the amount of the
payment is determined as a result of the change to conventional
bonding. The deleted language is based on the per-acre bond rate
system. The proposed wording is based on the amount of the Remining
Financial Guarantee.
Section 86.283(d) is amended to clarify how financial guarantee
funds are allocated.
Section 86.283(e) is amended to delete language relating to the
process of ``bond rollover'' that was allowed under the Alternative
Bonding System (ABS). The concept of ``bond rollover'' is not pertinent
to conventional bonding.
Section 86.283(f) is being added to reduce the potential risk of
insolvency of the Remining Financial Assurance Fund by requiring the
replacement of a Remining Financial Guarantee in the event a
pollutional discharge occurs at a mine site bonded with a Remining
Financial Guarantee.
Section 86.284, Forfeiture
Sections 86.284(a) and (c) are amended to be consistent with the
changes made in Sections 86.281(c) and (e).
Guidance Documents: Pennsylvania is seeking to amend its program to
include three program directives that will replace a policy statement
initially amended into the Pennsylvania program on March 20, 1984, and
subsequently revised by program amendments approved on May 15, 1984,
July 3, 1984, September 8, 1986, and October 27, 1988. The original
policy statement described Pennsylvania's policies regarding
Departmental inspections conducted at permitted coal mine operations;
citing and enforcing violations found at the permitted operations; and
alternative enforcement actions available to the Department in the
event violations are not abated in a timely manner. These topics have
now been separated and addressed in three Directives identified as 562-
4100-301 Compliance/Enforcement Procedures, 562-4100-307 Alternative
Enforcement, and 562-3000-102 Coal and Industrial Mineral Mining
Inspections. With respect to 562-3000-102, regarding the type and
frequency of inspections at coal mine permit sites, only Sections I and
II.A, II.B, and II.F are being submitted for inclusion in
Pennsylvania's approved coal mining regulatory program. There are no
major changes in Departmental policy regarding these three new
Directives. The policies are being reorganized, updated, and placed
into the Departmental Directives format.
Supporting Documentation: In addition to the documents mentioned
above, the State has submitted the following documents for reference
purposes only: Guidance Documents 562-3000-802 Coal Mining Applicant
Violator System (AVS) Compliance Manual, 562-2000-703 Changes to
Licenses, Bonds and Permits, 563-2000-001 Government Financed
Construction Contracts, and 562-3000-110 Applicant Violator System
(AVS) Inspections; 5600-PM-MR0025, Application Form--Mining License,
Contract Operator Approval and Ownership and Control Registration;
Sample Permit suspension letter; and, ``As Effective As'' demonstration
for the Inspection Program.
III. Public Comment Procedures
Under the provisions of 30 CFR 732.17(h), we are seeking your
comments on whether the submission satisfies the applicable program
approval criteria of 30 CFR 732.15. If we approve the amendment, it
will become part of the Pennsylvania program.
Electronic or Written Comments
If you submit written comments, they should be specific, confined
to issues pertinent to the proposed regulations, and explain the reason
for any recommended change(s). We appreciate any and all comments, but
those most useful and likely to influence decisions on the final
regulations will be those that either involve personal experience or
include citations to and analyses of SMCRA, its legislative history,
its implementing regulations, case law, other pertinent Tribal or
Federal laws or regulations, technical literature, or other relevant
publications. We cannot ensure that comments received after the close
of the comment period (see DATES) or sent to an address other than
those listed above (see ADDRESSES) will be included in the docket for
this rulemaking and considered.
Public Availability of Comments
Before including your address, phone number, e-mail address, or
other personal identifying information in your comment, you should be
aware that your entire comment--including your personal identifying
information--may be made publicly available at any time. While you may
ask us in your comment to withhold your personal identifying
information from public review, we cannot guarantee that we will be
able to do so. We will not consider anonymous comments.
Public Hearing
If you wish to speak at the public hearing, contact the person
listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT by 4 p.m., local time
April 19, 2011. If you are disabled and need reasonable accommodations
to attend a public hearing, contact the person listed under FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT. We will arrange the location and time of the
hearing with those persons requesting the hearing. If no one requests
an opportunity to speak, we will not hold the hearing.
To assist the transcriber and ensure an accurate record, we
request, if possible, that each person who speaks at a public hearing
provide us with a written copy of his or her comments. The public
hearing will continue on the specified date until everyone scheduled to
speak has been given an opportunity to be heard. If you are in the
audience and have not been scheduled to speak and wish to do so, you
will be allowed to speak after those who have been scheduled. We will
end the hearing after everyone scheduled to speak and others present in
the audience who wish to speak, have been heard.
Public Meeting
If there is only limited interest in participating in a public
hearing, we may hold a public meeting rather than a public hearing. If
you wish to meet with us to discuss the submission, please request a
meeting by contacting the person listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT. All such meetings are open to the public and, if possible, we
will post notices of meetings at the locations listed under ADDRESSES.
We will make a written summary of each meeting a part of the
administrative record.
IV. Procedural Determinations
Executive Order 12866--Regulatory Planning and Review
This rule is exempted from review by the Office of Management and
Budget (OMB) under Executive Order 12866.
Other Laws and Executive Orders Affecting Rulemaking
When a State submits a program amendment to OSM for review, our
regulations at 30 CFR 732.17(h) require us to publish a notice in the
Federal Register indicating receipt of the proposed amendment, its text
or a summary of its terms, and an
[[Page 18472]]
opportunity for public comment. We conclude our review of the proposed
amendment after the close of the public comment period and determine
whether the amendment should be approved, approved in part, or not
approved. At that time, we will also make the determinations and
certifications required by the various laws and executive orders
governing the rulemaking process and include them in the final rule.
List of Subjects in 30 CFR Part 938
Intergovernmental relations, Surface mining, Underground mining.
Dated: February 18, 2011.
Thomas D. Shope,
Regional Director, Appalachian Region.
[FR Doc. 2011-7907 Filed 4-1-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-05-P