Consumer Leasing, 18349-18354 [2011-7377]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 64 / Monday, April 4, 2011 / Rules and Regulations
DATES:
Effective on April 4, 2011.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
S. Brett Offutt, Director, Policy and
Litigation Division, P&SP, GIPSA, 1400
Independence Ave., SW., Washington,
DC 20250, (202) 720–7363,
s.brett.offutt@usda.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
List of Subjects in 9 CFR Part 201
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Measurement standards,
Trade practices.
Accordingly, 9 CFR part 201 is
corrected by making the following
correcting amendment:
PART 201—REGULATIONS UNDER
THE PACKERS AND STOCKYARDS
ACT
1. The authority citation for part 201
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 181–229c.
2. In § 201.72, revise the last sentence
of paragraph (a) to read as follows:
■
§ 201.72
Scales; testing of.
(a) * * * Except that if scales are
used on a limited seasonal basis (during
any continuous 6-month period) for
purposes of purchase, sale, acquisition,
payment or settlement, the stockyard
owner, swine contractor, market agency,
dealer, live poultry dealer, or packer
using such scales may use the scales
within a 6-month period following each
test.
*
*
*
*
*
Alan R. Christian,
Acting Administrator, Grain Inspection,
Packers and Stockyards Administration.
[FR Doc. 2011–7831 Filed 4–1–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–KD–P
FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM
12 CFR Part 213
[Regulation M; Docket No. R–1400]
RIN No. 7100–AD60
Consumer Leasing
Board of Governors of the
Federal Reserve System.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
Effective July 21, 2011, the
Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and
Consumer Protection Act (Dodd-Frank
Act) amends the Consumer Leasing Act
(CLA) by increasing the threshold for
exempt consumer leases from $25,000 to
$50,000. In addition, the Dodd-Frank
Act provides that, on or after December
sroberts on DSK69SOYB1PROD with RULES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:24 Apr 01, 2011
Jkt 223001
31, 2011, this threshold must be
adjusted annually by any annual
percentage increase in the Consumer
Price Index for Urban Wage Earners and
Clerical Workers. Accordingly, the
Board is making corresponding
amendments to Regulation M, which
implements the CLA, and to the
accompanying staff commentary.
Because the Dodd-Frank Act also
increases the Truth in Lending Act’s
threshold for exempt consumer credit
transactions from $25,000 to $50,000,
the Board is making similar
amendments to Regulation Z elsewhere
in today’s Federal Register.
DATES: Consistent with Sections 1062
and 1100H of the Dodd-Frank Act, this
final rule is effective on the transfer date
designated by the Secretary of the
Treasury, which is July 21, 2011.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Stephen Shin, Attorney, or Benjamin K.
Olson, Counsel, Division of Consumer
and Community Affairs, Board of
Governors of the Federal Reserve
System, at (202) 452–3667 or 452–2412;
for users of Telecommunications Device
for the Deaf (TDD) only, contact (202)
263–4869.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
The Consumer Leasing Act
The Consumer Leasing Act (CLA), 15
U.S.C. 1667–1667e, was enacted in 1976
as an amendment to the Truth in
Lending Act (TILA), 15 U.S.C. 1601 et
seq. The purpose of the CLA is to ensure
meaningful and accurate disclosure of
the terms of personal property leases for
personal, family, or household use. The
CLA is implemented by the Board’s
Regulation M (12 CFR part 213).
The CLA and Regulation M require
lessors to provide consumers with
uniform cost and other disclosures
about consumer lease transactions. The
statute and the regulation generally
apply to consumer leases for the use of
personal property in which the
contractual obligation has a term of
more than four months. An automobile
lease is the most common type of
consumer lease covered by the CLA and
Regulation M. Currently, however, if the
lessee’s total contractual obligation
under the lease exceeds $25,000, the
CLA and Regulation M do not apply.
See 15 U.S.C. 1667(1); 12 CFR 213.2(e).1
1 Specifically, the CLA currently defines a
consumer lease as ‘‘a contract in the form of a lease
or bailment for the use of personal property by a
natural person for a period of time exceeding four
months, and for a total contractual obligation not
exceeding $25,000, primarily for personal, family,
or household purposes, whether or not the lessee
has the option to purchase or otherwise become the
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
18349
The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and
Consumer Protection Act
This final rule implements Section
1100E of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street
Reform and Consumer Protection Act of
2010 (Dodd-Frank Act), which was
signed into law on July 21, 2010. Public
Law 111–203 § 1100E, 124 Stat. 1376
(2010). The Dodd-Frank Act raises the
CLA’s $25,000 exemption threshold to
$50,000. In addition, the Dodd-Frank
Act requires that, on or after December
31, 2011, the threshold shall be adjusted
annually for inflation by the annual
percentage increase in the Consumer
Price Index for Urban Wage Earners and
Clerical Workers (CPI–W), as published
by the Bureau of Labor Statistics.
Therefore, from July 21, 2011 to
December 31, 2011, the threshold dollar
amount will be $50,000. Effective
January 1, 2012, the $50,000 threshold
will be adjusted annually based on any
annual percentage increase in the
CPI–W.
In December 2010, the Board
proposed to amend § 213.2(e), the
accompanying commentary, and the
commentary to § 213.7(a) for
consistency with the amendments to the
CLA’s exemption threshold. See 75 FR
78632 (Dec. 16, 2010) (December 2010
Proposed Regulation M Rule). In
addition, because the Dodd-Frank Act
makes similar amendments to TILA’s
exemption threshold for consumer
credit transactions, the Board
simultaneously proposed to amend
Regulation Z, which implements the
provisions of TILA that do not address
consumer leases. See 75 FR 78636 (Dec.
16, 2010) (December 2010 Regulation Z
Proposed Rule).
The Board received only two
comments on the December 2010
Regulation M Proposed Rule. As
discussed below, the Board is generally
adopting the rule as proposed.
Elsewhere in today’s Federal Register,
the Board is also adopting a final rule
amending Regulation Z in order to
implement the amendments to TILA’s
exemption threshold for consumer
credit transactions.
II. Summary of Final Rule
Revisions to § 213.2
Consistent with the Dodd-Frank Act,
the Board’s final rule revises § 213.2 and
the accompanying staff commentary to
provide that, effective July 21, 2011, a
consumer lease is exempt from the
requirements of Regulation M if the
consumer’s total contractual obligation
owner of the property at expiration of the lease.
* * *’’ 15 U.S.C. 1667(1) (emphasis added).
Regulation M implements this definition in
§ 213.2(e).
E:\FR\FM\04APR1.SGM
04APR1
18350
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 64 / Monday, April 4, 2011 / Rules and Regulations
under the lease exceeds $50,000 when
the lease is consummated. This final
rule further provides that, beginning on
January 1, 2012, the $50,000 threshold
will be adjusted annually by any annual
percentage increase in the CPI–W.
sroberts on DSK69SOYB1PROD with RULES
Effective Date
Section 1100H of the Dodd-Frank Act
provides that Section 1100E will
become effective on the designated
transfer date, as defined by Section 1062
of that Act. Section 1062 of the DoddFrank Act requires, in relevant part, the
Secretary of the Treasury to designate a
single calendar date for the transfer of
certain functions from other agencies to
the Bureau of Consumer Financial
Protection. Pursuant to Section 1062(a)
of the Dodd-Frank Act, the Secretary of
the Treasury has determined that the
designated transfer date shall be July 21,
2011. See 75 FR 57252 (Sept. 20, 2010).
Accordingly, because Section 1100E
will become effective on July 21, 2011,
this final rule will be effective on that
date. However, if the Secretary of the
Treasury designates a later transfer date
pursuant to Section 1062, this final rule
will instead be effective on that date.
One industry commenter requested
that the Board delay the statutory
effective date by one year (i.e., until July
21, 2012). This commenter asserted
that—in light of the extensive regulatory
changes required by the Dodd-Frank Act
and other statutes—it would be
burdensome for small institutions to
comply with Regulation M for consumer
leases of $50,000 or less by July 21,
2011. However, the Board understands
that, as a general matter, institutions
that engage in consumer leasing already
have the systems in place to comply
with Regulation M. Thus, it should not
be unduly burdensome for these
institutions to comply with Regulation
M with respect to a larger population of
leases. Accordingly, in these
circumstances, it would not be
appropriate to deviate from the effective
date established by Congress.
III. Statutory Authority
The CLA authorizes the Board to
prescribe regulations to update and
clarify the requirements and definitions
applicable to lease disclosures and
contracts, and any other issues
specifically related to consumer leasing,
to the extent that the Board determines
such action to be necessary to carry out
the CLA, to prevent circumvention, or to
facilitate compliance. 15 U.S.C.
1667f(a). The CLA also provides that
any regulations prescribed by the Board
may contain classifications and
differentiations, and may provide for
adjustments and exceptions for any
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:24 Apr 01, 2011
Jkt 223001
class of transactions, as the Board
considers appropriate. Id. In addition,
the CLA is a part of TILA, which grants
similar authority to the Board. See 15
U.S.C. 1604(a) and (f). For the reasons
discussed below, the Board believes it is
necessary and appropriate to implement
Section 1100E of the Dodd-Frank Act by
revising Regulation M to effectuate the
purposes of the CLA and TILA, to
prevent circumvention, and to facilitate
compliance.
IV. Section-by-Section Analysis
Section 213.2—Definitions
2(e) Consumer Lease
Section 213.2(e) implements the
CLA’s definition of consumer lease.
Currently, § 213(e)(1) defines ‘‘consumer
lease’’ as ‘‘a contract in the form of a
bailment or lease for the use of personal
property by a natural person primarily
for personal, family, or household
purposes, for a period exceeding four
months and for a total contractual
obligation not exceeding $25,000,
whether or not the lessee has the option
to purchase or otherwise become the
owner of the property at the expiration
of the lease.’’ As discussed in existing
comment 2(e)–3, the total contractual
obligation under a lease includes the
total of payments as well as nonrefundable amounts the lessee is
contractually obligated to pay to the
lessor. However, comment 2(e)–3 also
clarifies that residual value amounts,
purchase-option prices, and amounts
collected by the lessor but paid to a
third party (such as taxes, licenses, and
registration fees) are excluded from the
total contractual amount.
In addition to increasing the threshold
for an exemption from $25,000 to
$50,000 effective July 21, 2011, Section
1100E of the Dodd-Frank Act provides
that, beginning in 2012, the $50,000
threshold will be further increased
annually to reflect any increases in the
CPI–W. Accordingly, whether the total
contractual obligation under a consumer
lease is sufficient to exempt that lease
from the CLA will depend on the
threshold amount in effect when the
lease is consummated. For that reason,
the Board proposed to amend
§ 213.2(e)(1) to provide that a consumer
lease is exempt if the total contractual
obligation exceeds ‘‘the applicable
threshold amount,’’ which would be
listed in the official staff commentary.
The Board further proposed to amend
§ 213.2(e)(1) to provide that the
threshold amount will be adjusted
annually to reflect increases in the CPI–
W (as applicable). The Board did not
receive any comment on these revisions,
which are adopted as proposed.
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
The Board also proposed to adopt a
new comment 2(e)–9 in order to clarify
the method for determining the
applicable threshold amount with
respect to a particular lease.
Specifically, this comment clarified that
a consumer lease is exempt from the
requirements of Regulation M if the total
contractual obligation exceeds the
threshold amount in effect at the time of
consummation.
Proposed comment 2(e)–9 further
clarified that the threshold amount in
effect during a particular period of time
is the amount stated in the comment for
that period. The proposed comment also
noted that the threshold amount would
be adjusted effective January 1 of each
year by any annual percentage increase
in the CPI–W that was in effect on the
preceding June 1. Once the annual
percentage increase in the CPI–W in
effect on June 1 becomes available, this
comment will be amended to provide
the threshold amount for the upcoming
year. The Board noted that this
approach is consistent with that
adopted by the Board in other
regulations that provide for annual
adjustments based on a consumer price
index. See, e.g., 12 CFR 226.32(a)(1)(ii)
and its accompanying commentary. The
Board believes this approach will
facilitate compliance by permitting the
publication of an increased threshold
amount sufficiently in advance of the
January 1 effective date.
In addition, proposed comment 2(e)–
9 clarified that any increase in the
threshold amount would be rounded to
the nearest $100 increment. For
example, if the annual percentage
increase in the CPI–W would result in
a $950 increase in the threshold
amount, the threshold amount will be
increased by $1,000. However, if the
annual percentage increase in the CPI–
W would result in a $949 increase in the
threshold amount, the threshold amount
will be increased by $900. This
approach is consistent with Section
1100E(b) of the Dodd-Frank Act, which
provides that annual CPI–W
adjustments should be ‘‘rounded to the
nearest multiple of $100, or $1,000, as
applicable.’’ The Board believes that
Congress did not intend for an annual
CPI–W adjustment to be rounded to the
nearest $100 in some circumstances but
to the nearest $1,000 in others, which
could lead to anomalous results.
Because $1,000 is itself a multiple of
$100, the Board believes that this
commentary clarifies the statutory
language in a manner consistent with
the intent of Section 1100E.
Finally, the proposed comment
clarified that, if a consumer lease is
exempt from the requirements of
E:\FR\FM\04APR1.SGM
04APR1
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 64 / Monday, April 4, 2011 / Rules and Regulations
Regulation M because the total
contractual obligation exceeds the
threshold amount in effect at the time of
consummation, the lease remains
exempt regardless of a subsequent
increase in the threshold amount. Thus,
for example, if a lease with a total
contractual obligation of $30,000 was
consummated in June 2011, that lease is
exempt based on the $25,000 threshold
in effect at that time and would remain
exempt after July 21, 2011,
notwithstanding the increase in the
threshold to $50,000. Similarly, if a
lease with a total contractual obligation
of $55,000 is consummated in August
2011, that lease would be exempt based
on the $50,000 threshold in effect at that
time and would remain exempt even if
the threshold were subsequently
increased to $56,000 based on an
increase in the CPI–W. This approach is
consistent with § 213.3(e), which
provides that events that occur after
consummation of a consumer lease
generally do not require the lessor to
provide additional Regulation M
disclosures. See comment 3(e)–2.
The Board received only one
comment regarding this proposed
guidance. A Member of Congress
suggested that consumer leases with
total contractual obligations above the
applicable threshold amount at
consummation should not be
permanently exempt from Regulation M.
Instead, this commenter suggested that,
if, at any point during the term of the
lease, the total amount of the
consumer’s remaining obligation is less
than the applicable threshold amount,
the lessor should begin to comply with
the regulation. However, the provisions
of the CLA and Regulation M generally
govern disclosures made at or prior to
consummation of a lease. Thus, it does
not appear that requiring lessors to
comply with Regulation M after
consummation would provide benefits
to consumers that would outweigh the
burden on lessors of continually
monitoring each lease to determine
when the remaining obligation falls
below the applicable threshold amount.
Accordingly, comment 2(e)–9 is adopted
as proposed.
sroberts on DSK69SOYB1PROD with RULES
Section 213.7—Advertising
7(a) General Rule
Section 213.7 imposes certain
requirements on advertisements for
consumer leases. In order to provide
guidance regarding the interaction
between § 213.7 and the definition of
‘‘consumer lease’’ in § 213.2(e), the
Board proposed to adopt a new
comment 7(a)–3. This comment clarified
that § 213.7 applies to advertisements
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:24 Apr 01, 2011
Jkt 223001
for consumer leases, as defined in
§ 213.2(e). As discussed above, a lease is
exempt from the requirements of
Regulation M (including § 213.7) if the
total contractual obligation exceeds the
threshold amount in effect at the time of
consummation. Accordingly, proposed
comment 7(a)–3 clarified that § 213.7
does not apply to an advertisement for
a specific consumer lease if the total
contractual obligation for that lease
exceeds the threshold amount in effect
when the advertisement is made. If a
lessor promotes multiple consumer
leases in a single advertisement, the
entire advertisement must comply with
§ 213.7 unless all of the advertised
leases are exempt under § 213.2(e). The
comment also provided illustrative
examples. The Board did not receive
any comment on this guidance, which is
adopted as proposed.
V. Regulatory Flexibility Act Analysis
The Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.) (RFA) requires an
agency to perform an initial and a final
regulatory flexibility analysis on the
impact a rule is expected to have on
small entities. However, under section
605(b) of the RFA, 5 U.S.C. 605(b), the
regulatory flexibility analysis otherwise
required under section 604 of the RFA
is not required if an agency certifies,
along with a statement providing the
factual basis for such certification, that
the rule will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities. Based on its
initial and final analyses and for the
reasons stated below, the Board believes
that this final rule will not have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
1. Statement of the need for, and
objectives of, the final rule. The final
rule implements Section 1100E of the
Dodd-Frank Act, which increases the
total contractual obligation necessary to
exempt a consumer lease from the
Consumer Leasing Act (CLA) from more
than $25,000 to more than $50,000,
effective July 21, 2010. Section 1100E
also provides that, beginning in 2012,
this amount shall be adjusted annually
to reflect any annual percentage
increase in the Consumer Price Index
for Urban Wage Earners and Clerical
Workers (CPI–W). The supplementary
information above describes in detail
the reasons, objectives, and legal basis
for the final rule.
2. Summary of the significant issues
raised by public comment on Board’s
initial analysis, the Board’s assessment
of such issues, and a statement of any
changes made as a result of such
comments. An industry group
representing credit unions requested
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
18351
that, in order to reduce regulatory
burden, the Board provide additional
guidance regarding the types of records
that institutions are required to retain in
order to demonstrate compliance with
Regulation M. Section 213.8 states that
lessors must retain ‘‘evidence of
compliance with the requirements
imposed by [Regulation M], other than
the advertising requirements under
section 213.7, for a period of not less
than two years after the disclosures are
required to be made or an action is
required to be taken.’’ Comment 8–1
clarifies that these records may be
retained ‘‘in paper form, on microfilm,
microfiche, or computer, or by any other
method designed to reproduce records
accurately’’ and that ‘‘[t]he lessor need
retain only enough information to
reconstruct the required disclosures or
other records.’’
Because the current regulation and
commentary provide lessors with
considerable flexibility regarding the
retention of records, the Board is
concerned that adopting a more specific
set of requirements (such as a list of
documents that lessors must retain)
could increase regulatory burden, rather
than reducing it. Furthermore, because
the Board did not propose any
amendments to the record retention
requirements in § 213.8, any revisions to
those requirements would not have the
benefit of input from the public,
including small institutions. Although
the commenter suggested that the Board
work with a focus group of institutions
to revise the record retention
requirements, it would not be possible
for the Board to do so and still issue a
final rule sufficiently in advance of the
July 21, 2010 statutory effective date.
Accordingly, the final rule does not alter
the requirements of § 213.8.
3. Small entities affected by the final
rule. Currently, Regulation M applies to
any person who regularly leases, offers
to lease, or arranges for the lease of
personal property primarily for
personal, family, or household
purposes, for a period exceeding four
months, and for a total contractual
obligation of $25,000 or less. 12 CFR
213.2(e) and (h). Consistent with
Section 1100E of the Dodd-Frank Act,
the final rule applies Regulation M,
beginning on July 21, 2011, to any
person who provides consumer leases
for a total contractual obligation of
$50,000 or less, adjusted annually to
reflect increases in the CPI–W.
Based on 2010 call report data, there
are no banks with assets of $175 million
or less that engage in consumer leasing.
There are, however, 306 thrifts and 92
credit unions with assets of $175
million or less that engage in consumer
E:\FR\FM\04APR1.SGM
04APR1
sroberts on DSK69SOYB1PROD with RULES
18352
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 64 / Monday, April 4, 2011 / Rules and Regulations
leasing. In addition, the Board’s 2005
Finance Company Survey indicates that
fewer than ten small finance companies
engage in consumer leasing.
Commenters did not provide any
information on the number of small
entities affected by the proposed rule.
Nevertheless, the Board acknowledges
that the total number of small entities
likely to be affected by the final rule is
unknown, in part because it is unclear
how many of the small entities currently
engaged in consumer leasing offer leases
with total contractual obligations of
more than $25,000 but not more than
$50,000.
4. Recordkeeping, reporting, and
compliance requirements. The final rule
does not impose any new reporting
requirements. However, the final rule
does impose new recordkeeping
requirements for small entities that offer
consumer leases with total contractual
obligations of more than $25,000 but not
more than $50,000. As noted above,
§ 213.8 requires lessors to retain
evidence of compliance with its
provisions (except the advertising
requirements in § 213.7) for a period of
not less than two years after the date the
disclosures are required to be made or
an action is required to be taken. Thus,
beginning on July 21, 2011, the final
rule requires lessors to retain records for
new consumer leases with total
contractual obligations not exceeding
$50,000, adjusted annually to reflect
increases in the CPI–W.
The final rule also imposes new
compliance requirements for consumer
leases with total contractual obligations
of more than $25,000 but not more than
$50,000. Specifically, for consumer
leases subject to Regulation M, the
lessor must provide certain disclosures
regarding payments, liability, and other
terms of the lease prior to
consummation (§§ 213.3 and 213.4) and
when the availability of consumer leases
on particular terms is advertised
(§ 213.7).
The Board understands that small
entities that offer consumer leases
generally have systems in place to
provide the disclosures required by
Regulation M and retain records of those
disclosures, even if some of their leases
are currently exempt. Thus, while the
precise costs to small entities to provide
disclosures and retain records for a
larger population of leases are difficult
to predict, the Board does not believe
that the final rule would have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
Except as already discussed above, the
Board did not receive any comments to
the contrary.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:24 Apr 01, 2011
Jkt 223001
5. Significant alternatives to the final
rule. The final rule implements Section
1100E of the Dodd-Frank Act, which
goes into effect on July 21, 2011. As
discussed in the supplementary
information, the final rule clarifies that,
if a consumer lease with a total
contractual obligation exceeding
$25,000 is consummated prior to July
21, 2011, that lease remains exempt,
notwithstanding subsequent increases
in the threshold amount. Except as
already discussed above, the Board did
not receive any comments suggesting
alternatives that would minimize the
impact of the rule on small entities and
would be consistent with Section 1100E
of the Dodd-Frank Act.
VI. Paperwork Reduction Act Analysis
In accordance with the Paperwork
Reduction Act (PRA) of 1995 (44 U.S.C.
3506; 5 CFR part 1320 Appendix A.1),
the Board reviewed the final rule under
the authority delegated to the Board by
the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB). In addition, as permitted by the
PRA, the Board is extending for three
years the current recordkeeping and
disclosure requirements in connection
with Regulation M. The collection of
information that is required by this rule
is found in 12 CFR Part 213. The Board
may not conduct or sponsor, and an
organization is not required to respond
to, this information collection unless it
displays a currently valid OMB control
number. The OMB control number is
7100–0202.
This information collection is
required to provide benefits for
consumers and is mandatory (15 U.S.C.
1601 et seq.). The respondents/
recordkeepers are lessors subject to
Regulation M, including for-profit
financial institutions and small
businesses. Sections 105(a) and 187 of
TILA (15 U.S.C. 1604(a) and 1667f)
authorize the Board to issue regulations
to carry out the provisions of the CLA.
The CLA and Regulation M are intended
to provide consumers with meaningful
disclosures about the costs and terms of
leases for personal property. The
disclosures enable consumers to
compare the terms for a particular lease
with those for other leases and, when
appropriate, to compare lease terms
with those for credit transactions. The
act and regulation also contain rules
about advertising consumer leases. The
information collection pursuant to
Regulation M is triggered by specific
events. All disclosures must be
provided to the lessee prior to the
consummation of the lease and when
the availability of consumer leases on
particular terms is advertised. This
information collection is mandatory.
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Since the Board does not collect any
information, no issue of confidentiality
normally arises. However, in the event
the Board were to retain records during
the course of an examination, the
information may be kept confidential
pursuant to section (b)(8) of the
Freedom of Information Act (5 U.S.C.
522(b)(8)).
Regulation M applies to all types of
lessors of personal property. The Board
accounts for the paperwork burden
associated with the regulation only for
Board-supervised institutions.
Appendix B of Regulation M defines the
Board-supervised institutions as: State
member banks, branches and agencies of
foreign banks (other than federal
branches, federal agencies, and insured
state branches of foreign banks),
commercial lending companies owned
or controlled by foreign banks, and
organizations operating under section
25 or 25A of the Federal Reserve Act.
Other federal agencies account for the
paperwork burden on other lessors for
which they have administrative
enforcement authority.
To ease the compliance cost
(particularly for small entities) model
forms are appended to the regulation.
Lessors are required to retain evidence
of compliance for 24 months, but the
regulation does not specify types of
records that must be retained.
The current annual burden to comply
with the provisions of Regulation M is
estimated to be 2 hours for each of the
4 State member banks 2 that engage in
consumer leasing. Thus, the current
total annual burden for all respondents
is 8 hours.
The Board estimates that the final rule
will impose a one-time increase in the
total annual burden under Regulation
M. The 4 respondents will take, on
average, 40 hours (one business week) to
update their systems to comply with the
requirements of the final rule. This onetime revision will increase the total
burden for all 4 respondents by 160
hours. On a continuing basis, the Board
estimates that the 4 respondents will
each take, on average, an additional 8
hours (one business day) annually to
comply with the requirements, which
will increase the ongoing total annual
burden for all 4 respondents by 32
hours. Therefore, the total annual
burden for all respondents is estimated
to increase by 192 hours (from 8 to 200
hours) during the first year after this
rule takes effect. Thereafter, the
2 Federal Financial Institutions Examination
Council Consolidated Reports of Condition and
Income (Call Reports) (FFIEC 031 & 041; OMB No.
7100–0036), Schedule RC–C, data item 10.a—Leases
to individuals for household, family, and other
personal expenditures.
E:\FR\FM\04APR1.SGM
04APR1
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 64 / Monday, April 4, 2011 / Rules and Regulations
sroberts on DSK69SOYB1PROD with RULES
estimated ongoing total annual burden
will be 40 hours.
The total burden increase represents
averages for all respondents regulated
by the Board. The Board expects that the
amount of time required to implement
each of the changes for a given financial
institution or entity may vary based on
the size and complexity of the
respondent. Furthermore, the Board
understands that many lessors
voluntarily comply with Regulation M
for leases that are currently exempt.
Thus, the estimated burden increase
likely overstates the actual increase in
burden for those lessors.
The other Federal financial agencies
are responsible for estimating and
reporting to OMB the total paperwork
burden for the institutions for which
they have administrative enforcement
authority.3 They may, but are not
required to, use the Board’s burden
estimates. There are approximately
16,200 depository institutions of which
the Board estimates that 58 depository
institutions 4 will be affected by this
collection of information and
considered respondents for purposes of
the PRA. Using the Board’s method, the
total estimated annual burden for all
financial institutions subject to
Regulation M is currently approximately
116 hours. The final rule will impose a
one-time increase in the estimated
annual burden for the estimated 58
institutions thought to engage in
consumer leasing by a total of 2,320
hours. On a continuing basis, the final
rule will impose an increase in the
estimated annual burden by a total of
464 hours. Thus, the total annual
burden for the 58 institutions is
estimated to increase by 2,784 hours
(from 116 to 2,900 hours) during the
first year after this rule takes effect.
Thereafter, the estimated ongoing total
annual burden will be 580 hours. The
3 Appendix B—Federal Enforcement Agencies—
of Regulation M lists those federal agencies that
enforce the regulation for particular classes of
business. The Federal financial agencies other than
the Federal Reserve include: The Office of the
Comptroller of the Currency (OCC), the Federal
Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC), the Office of
Thrift Supervision (OTS), and the National Credit
Union Administration (NCUA). The Federal nonfinancial agencies include: The Department of
Transportation, the Grain Inspection, Packers, and
Stockyards Administration (Department of
Agriculture), the Farm Credit Administration, and
the Federal Trade Commission.
4 Estimate is based on September 30, 2010,
consumer lease data filed by depository institutions
in their reports of condition and income: The
commercial bank Call Report; (FFIEC 031 & 041)
(Federal Reserve OMB No. 7100–0036), (OCC OMB
No. 1557–0081), and (FDIC OMB No. 3064–0052);
the thrift institution Thrift Financial Report (TFR;
form 1313) (OTS OMB No. 1500–0023); and the
credit union NCUA Call Reports (form 5300)
(NCUA OMB No. 3133–0004).
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:24 Apr 01, 2011
Jkt 223001
above estimates represent an average
across all respondents and reflect
variations between institutions based on
their size, complexity, and practices. In
addition, other institutions covered by
Regulation M, such as retailers and
finance companies potentially are
affected by this collection of
information, and thus are also
respondents for purposes of the PRA. As
noted above, the estimated burden
increase likely overstates the actual
increase in burden because many lessors
voluntarily comply with Regulation M
for exempt leases.
The Board did not receive any
comments specifically addressing the
foregoing estimates, which were
provided in the December 2010
Regulation M Proposed Rule. The Board
did receive one comment generally
addressing the burdens associated with
retaining records pursuant to § 213.8,
which is discussed above in the Board’s
final RFA analysis.
The Board has a continuing interest in
the public’s opinion on the collection of
information. Comments on the
collection of information should be sent
to Cynthia Ayouch, Acting Federal
Reserve Clearance Officer, Division of
Research and Statistics, Mail Stop 95–A,
Board of Governors of the Federal
Reserve System, Washington, DC 20551,
with copies of such comments sent to
the Office of Management and Budget,
Paperwork Reduction Project (7100–
0202), Washington, DC 20503.
List of Subjects in 12 CFR Part 213
Advertising, Federal Reserve System,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Truth in lending.
Text of Final Revisions
For the reasons set forth in the
preamble, the Board amends Regulation
M, 12 CFR part 213, as set forth below:
PART 213—CONSUMER LEASING
(REGULATION M)
1. The authority citation for part 213
is amended to read as follows:
■
Authority: 15 U.S.C. 1604 and 1667f; Pub.
L. 111–203 § 1100E, 124 Stat. 1376.
2. Section 213.2(e)(1) is revised to
read as follows:
■
§ 213.2
Definitions.
*
*
*
*
*
(e)(1) Consumer lease means a
contract in the form of a bailment or
lease for the use of personal property by
a natural person primarily for personal,
family, or household purposes, for a
period exceeding four months and for a
total contractual obligation not
exceeding the applicable threshold
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
18353
amount, whether or not the lessee has
the option to purchase or otherwise
become the owner of the property at the
expiration of the lease. The threshold
amount is adjusted annually to reflect
increases in the Consumer Price Index
for Urban Wage Earners and Clerical
Workers, as applicable. See the official
staff commentary to this paragraph (e)
for the threshold amount applicable to
a specific consumer lease. Unless the
context indicates otherwise, in this part
‘‘lease’’ means ‘‘consumer lease.’’
*
*
*
*
*
■ 3. In Supplement I to Part 213:
■ A. Under Section 213.2—Definitions,
under 2(e) Consumer Lease, paragraph
9. is added; and
■ B. Under Section 213.7—Advertising,
under 7(a) General Rule, paragraph 3. is
added to read as follows:
Supplement I to Part 213—Official Staff
Commentary to Regulation M
*
*
*
*
*
Section 213.2—Definitions
*
*
*
*
*
2(e) Consumer Lease.
*
*
*
*
*
9. Threshold amount. A consumer lease is
exempt from the requirements of this Part if
the total contractual obligation exceeds the
threshold amount in effect at the time of
consummation. The threshold amount in
effect during a particular time period is the
amount stated below for that period. The
threshold amount is adjusted effective
January 1 of each year by any annual
percentage increase in the Consumer Price
Index for Urban Wage Earners and Clerical
Workers (CPI–W) that was in effect on the
preceding June 1. This comment will be
amended to provide the threshold amount for
the upcoming year after the annual
percentage change in the CPI–W that was in
effect on June 1 becomes available. Any
increase in the threshold amount will be
rounded to the nearest $100 increment. For
example, if the annual percentage increase in
the CPI–W would result in a $950 increase
in the threshold amount, the threshold
amount will be increased by $1,000.
However, if the annual percentage increase in
the CPI–W would result in a $949 increase
in the threshold amount, the threshold
amount will be increased by $900. If a
consumer lease is exempt from the
requirements of this Part because the total
contractual obligation exceeds the threshold
amount in effect at the time of
consummation, the lease remains exempt
regardless of a subsequent increase in the
threshold amount.
i. Prior to July 21, 2011, the threshold
amount is $25,000.
ii. From July 21, 2011 through December
31, 2011, the threshold amount is $50,000.
*
*
*
*
*
Section 213.7—Advertising
7(a) General Rule.
*
E:\FR\FM\04APR1.SGM
*
*
04APR1
*
*
18354
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 64 / Monday, April 4, 2011 / Rules and Regulations
3. Total contractual obligation of
advertised lease. Section 213.7 applies to
advertisements for consumer leases, as
defined in § 213.2(e). Under § 213.2(e), a
consumer lease is exempt from the
requirements of this Part if the total
contractual obligation exceeds the threshold
amount in effect at the time of
consummation. See comment 2(e)–9.
Accordingly, § 213.7 does not apply to an
advertisement for a specific consumer lease
if the total contractual obligation for that
lease exceeds the threshold amount in effect
when the advertisement is made. If a lessor
promotes multiple consumer leases in a
single advertisement, the entire
advertisement must comply with § 213.7
unless all of the advertised leases are exempt
under § 213.2(e). For example:
A. Assume that, in an advertisement, a
lessor states that certain terms apply to a
consumer lease for a specific automobile. The
total contractual obligation of the advertised
lease exceeds the threshold amount in effect
when the advertisement is made. Although
the advertisement does not refer to any other
lease, some or all of the advertised terms for
the exempt lease also apply to other leases
offered by the lessor with total contractual
obligations that do not exceed the applicable
threshold amount. The advertisement is not
required to comply with § 213.7 because it
refers only to an exempt lease.
B. Assume that, in an advertisement, a
lessor states certain terms (such as the
amount due at lease signing) that will apply
to consumer leases for automobiles of a
particular brand. However, the advertisement
does not refer to a specific lease. The total
contractual obligations of the leases for some
of the automobiles will exceed the threshold
amount in effect when the advertisement is
made, but the total contractual obligations of
the leases for other automobiles will not
exceed the threshold. The entire
advertisement must comply with § 213.7
because it refers to terms for consumer leases
that are not exempt.
C. Assume that, in a single advertisement,
a lessor states that certain terms apply to
consumer leases for two different
automobiles. The total contractual obligation
of the lease for the first automobile exceeds
the threshold amount in effect when the
advertisement is made, but the total
contractual obligation of the lease for the
second automobile does not exceed the
threshold. The entire advertisement must
comply with § 213.7 because it refers to a
consumer lease that is not exempt.
sroberts on DSK69SOYB1PROD with RULES
*
*
*
*
*
By order of the Board of Governors of the
Federal Reserve System, March 24, 2011.
Jennifer J. Johnson,
Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 2011–7377 Filed 4–1–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210–01–P
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:24 Apr 01, 2011
Jkt 223001
FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM
12 CFR Part 226
[Regulation Z; Docket No. R–1399]
RIN No. 7100–AD59
Truth in Lending
Board of Governors of the
Federal Reserve System.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
Effective July 21, 2011, the
Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and
Consumer Protection Act (Dodd-Frank
Act) amends the Truth in Lending Act
(TILA) by increasing the threshold for
exempt consumer credit transactions
from $25,000 to $50,000. In addition,
the Dodd-Frank Act provides that, on or
after December 31, 2011, this threshold
must be adjusted annually by any
annual percentage increase in the
Consumer Price Index for Urban Wage
Earners and Clerical Workers.
Accordingly, the Board is making
corresponding amendments to
Regulation Z, which implements TILA,
and to the accompanying staff
commentary. Because the Dodd-Frank
Act also increases the Consumer Leasing
Act’s threshold for exempt consumer
leases from $25,000 to $50,000, the
Board is making similar amendments to
Regulation M elsewhere in today’s
Federal Register.
DATES: Consistent with Sections 1062
and 1100H of the Dodd-Frank Act, this
final rule is effective on the transfer date
designated by the Secretary of the
Treasury, which is July 21, 2011.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Stephen Shin, Attorney, or Benjamin K.
Olson, Counsel, Division of Consumer
and Community Affairs, Board of
Governors of the Federal Reserve
System, at (202) 452–3667 or 452–2412;
for users of Telecommunications Device
for the Deaf (TDD) only, contact (202)
263–4869.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
I. Background
The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and
Consumer Protection Act
This final rule implements Section
1100E of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street
Reform and Consumer Protection Act of
2010 (Dodd-Frank Act), which was
signed into law on July 21, 2010. Public
Law 111–203 § 1100E, 124 Stat. 1376
(2010). Section 1100E amends Section
104(3) of the Truth in Lending Act
(TILA) by establishing a new threshold
for exempt consumer credit
transactions. Currently, TILA Section
104(3) exempts ‘‘[c]redit transactions,
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
other than those in which a security
interest is or will be acquired in real
property, or in personal property used
or expected to be used as the principal
dwelling of the consumer, and other
than private education loans (as that
term is defined in section 140(a)), in
which the total amount financed
exceeds $25,000.’’ 15 U.S.C. 1603(3).
Regulation Z implements this
exemption in § 226.3(b).
Effective July 21, 2011, the DoddFrank Act raises TILA’s $25,000
exemption threshold to $50,000. In
addition, the Dodd-Frank Act provides
that, on or after December 31, 2011, this
threshold shall be adjusted annually for
inflation by the annual percentage
increase in the Consumer Price Index
for Urban Wage Earners and Clerical
Workers (CPI–W), as published by the
Bureau of Labor Statistics. Therefore,
from July 21, 2011 to December 31,
2011, the threshold dollar amount will
be $50,000. Effective January 1, 2012,
the $50,000 threshold will be adjusted
annually based on any annual
percentage increase in the CPI–W.
In December 2010, the Board
proposed to amend § 226.3(b) and the
accompanying commentary for
consistency with the amendments made
by the Dodd-Frank Act. See 75 FR 78636
(Dec. 16, 2010) (December 2010
Proposed Regulation Z Rule). In
addition, because the Dodd-Frank Act
makes similar amendments to the
exemption threshold in the Consumer
Leasing Act (which is part of TILA), the
Board simultaneously proposed to
amend Regulation M, which
implements the Consumer Leasing Act
(CLA). See 75 FR 78632 (Dec. 16, 2010)
(December 2010 Proposed Regulation M
Rule).
The Board received 10 comments on
the December 2010 Regulation Z
Proposed Rule. As discussed below, the
Board is adopting the rule largely as
proposed with some modifications to
facilitate compliance. Elsewhere in
today’s Federal Register, the Board is
also adopting a final rule amending
Regulation M in order to implement the
amendments to CLA’s exemption
threshold for consumer leases.
II. Summary of Final Rule
Revisions to § 226.3(b)
Consistent with the Dodd-Frank Act,
the Board’s final rule revises § 226.3(b)
and the accompanying staff commentary
to provide that, effective July 21, 2011,
a consumer credit account is exempt
from the requirements of Regulation Z
if: (1) The initial extension of credit on
the account exceeds $50,000; or (2) the
creditor makes a firm commitment at
E:\FR\FM\04APR1.SGM
04APR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 64 (Monday, April 4, 2011)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 18349-18354]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-7377]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM
12 CFR Part 213
[Regulation M; Docket No. R-1400]
RIN No. 7100-AD60
Consumer Leasing
AGENCY: Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: Effective July 21, 2011, the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and
Consumer Protection Act (Dodd-Frank Act) amends the Consumer Leasing
Act (CLA) by increasing the threshold for exempt consumer leases from
$25,000 to $50,000. In addition, the Dodd-Frank Act provides that, on
or after December 31, 2011, this threshold must be adjusted annually by
any annual percentage increase in the Consumer Price Index for Urban
Wage Earners and Clerical Workers. Accordingly, the Board is making
corresponding amendments to Regulation M, which implements the CLA, and
to the accompanying staff commentary. Because the Dodd-Frank Act also
increases the Truth in Lending Act's threshold for exempt consumer
credit transactions from $25,000 to $50,000, the Board is making
similar amendments to Regulation Z elsewhere in today's Federal
Register.
DATES: Consistent with Sections 1062 and 1100H of the Dodd-Frank Act,
this final rule is effective on the transfer date designated by the
Secretary of the Treasury, which is July 21, 2011.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Stephen Shin, Attorney, or Benjamin K.
Olson, Counsel, Division of Consumer and Community Affairs, Board of
Governors of the Federal Reserve System, at (202) 452-3667 or 452-2412;
for users of Telecommunications Device for the Deaf (TDD) only, contact
(202) 263-4869.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
The Consumer Leasing Act
The Consumer Leasing Act (CLA), 15 U.S.C. 1667-1667e, was enacted
in 1976 as an amendment to the Truth in Lending Act (TILA), 15 U.S.C.
1601 et seq. The purpose of the CLA is to ensure meaningful and
accurate disclosure of the terms of personal property leases for
personal, family, or household use. The CLA is implemented by the
Board's Regulation M (12 CFR part 213).
The CLA and Regulation M require lessors to provide consumers with
uniform cost and other disclosures about consumer lease transactions.
The statute and the regulation generally apply to consumer leases for
the use of personal property in which the contractual obligation has a
term of more than four months. An automobile lease is the most common
type of consumer lease covered by the CLA and Regulation M. Currently,
however, if the lessee's total contractual obligation under the lease
exceeds $25,000, the CLA and Regulation M do not apply. See 15 U.S.C.
1667(1); 12 CFR 213.2(e).\1\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Specifically, the CLA currently defines a consumer lease as
``a contract in the form of a lease or bailment for the use of
personal property by a natural person for a period of time exceeding
four months, and for a total contractual obligation not exceeding
$25,000, primarily for personal, family, or household purposes,
whether or not the lessee has the option to purchase or otherwise
become the owner of the property at expiration of the lease. * * *''
15 U.S.C. 1667(1) (emphasis added). Regulation M implements this
definition in Sec. 213.2(e).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act
This final rule implements Section 1100E of the Dodd-Frank Wall
Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010 (Dodd-Frank Act),
which was signed into law on July 21, 2010. Public Law 111-203 Sec.
1100E, 124 Stat. 1376 (2010). The Dodd-Frank Act raises the CLA's
$25,000 exemption threshold to $50,000. In addition, the Dodd-Frank Act
requires that, on or after December 31, 2011, the threshold shall be
adjusted annually for inflation by the annual percentage increase in
the Consumer Price Index for Urban Wage Earners and Clerical Workers
(CPI-W), as published by the Bureau of Labor Statistics. Therefore,
from July 21, 2011 to December 31, 2011, the threshold dollar amount
will be $50,000. Effective January 1, 2012, the $50,000 threshold will
be adjusted annually based on any annual percentage increase in the
CPI-W.
In December 2010, the Board proposed to amend Sec. 213.2(e), the
accompanying commentary, and the commentary to Sec. 213.7(a) for
consistency with the amendments to the CLA's exemption threshold. See
75 FR 78632 (Dec. 16, 2010) (December 2010 Proposed Regulation M Rule).
In addition, because the Dodd-Frank Act makes similar amendments to
TILA's exemption threshold for consumer credit transactions, the Board
simultaneously proposed to amend Regulation Z, which implements the
provisions of TILA that do not address consumer leases. See 75 FR 78636
(Dec. 16, 2010) (December 2010 Regulation Z Proposed Rule).
The Board received only two comments on the December 2010
Regulation M Proposed Rule. As discussed below, the Board is generally
adopting the rule as proposed. Elsewhere in today's Federal Register,
the Board is also adopting a final rule amending Regulation Z in order
to implement the amendments to TILA's exemption threshold for consumer
credit transactions.
II. Summary of Final Rule
Revisions to Sec. 213.2
Consistent with the Dodd-Frank Act, the Board's final rule revises
Sec. 213.2 and the accompanying staff commentary to provide that,
effective July 21, 2011, a consumer lease is exempt from the
requirements of Regulation M if the consumer's total contractual
obligation
[[Page 18350]]
under the lease exceeds $50,000 when the lease is consummated. This
final rule further provides that, beginning on January 1, 2012, the
$50,000 threshold will be adjusted annually by any annual percentage
increase in the CPI-W.
Effective Date
Section 1100H of the Dodd-Frank Act provides that Section 1100E
will become effective on the designated transfer date, as defined by
Section 1062 of that Act. Section 1062 of the Dodd-Frank Act requires,
in relevant part, the Secretary of the Treasury to designate a single
calendar date for the transfer of certain functions from other agencies
to the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection. Pursuant to Section
1062(a) of the Dodd-Frank Act, the Secretary of the Treasury has
determined that the designated transfer date shall be July 21, 2011.
See 75 FR 57252 (Sept. 20, 2010). Accordingly, because Section 1100E
will become effective on July 21, 2011, this final rule will be
effective on that date. However, if the Secretary of the Treasury
designates a later transfer date pursuant to Section 1062, this final
rule will instead be effective on that date.
One industry commenter requested that the Board delay the statutory
effective date by one year (i.e., until July 21, 2012). This commenter
asserted that--in light of the extensive regulatory changes required by
the Dodd-Frank Act and other statutes--it would be burdensome for small
institutions to comply with Regulation M for consumer leases of $50,000
or less by July 21, 2011. However, the Board understands that, as a
general matter, institutions that engage in consumer leasing already
have the systems in place to comply with Regulation M. Thus, it should
not be unduly burdensome for these institutions to comply with
Regulation M with respect to a larger population of leases.
Accordingly, in these circumstances, it would not be appropriate to
deviate from the effective date established by Congress.
III. Statutory Authority
The CLA authorizes the Board to prescribe regulations to update and
clarify the requirements and definitions applicable to lease
disclosures and contracts, and any other issues specifically related to
consumer leasing, to the extent that the Board determines such action
to be necessary to carry out the CLA, to prevent circumvention, or to
facilitate compliance. 15 U.S.C. 1667f(a). The CLA also provides that
any regulations prescribed by the Board may contain classifications and
differentiations, and may provide for adjustments and exceptions for
any class of transactions, as the Board considers appropriate. Id. In
addition, the CLA is a part of TILA, which grants similar authority to
the Board. See 15 U.S.C. 1604(a) and (f). For the reasons discussed
below, the Board believes it is necessary and appropriate to implement
Section 1100E of the Dodd-Frank Act by revising Regulation M to
effectuate the purposes of the CLA and TILA, to prevent circumvention,
and to facilitate compliance.
IV. Section-by-Section Analysis
Section 213.2--Definitions
2(e) Consumer Lease
Section 213.2(e) implements the CLA's definition of consumer lease.
Currently, Sec. 213(e)(1) defines ``consumer lease'' as ``a contract
in the form of a bailment or lease for the use of personal property by
a natural person primarily for personal, family, or household purposes,
for a period exceeding four months and for a total contractual
obligation not exceeding $25,000, whether or not the lessee has the
option to purchase or otherwise become the owner of the property at the
expiration of the lease.'' As discussed in existing comment 2(e)-3, the
total contractual obligation under a lease includes the total of
payments as well as non-refundable amounts the lessee is contractually
obligated to pay to the lessor. However, comment 2(e)-3 also clarifies
that residual value amounts, purchase-option prices, and amounts
collected by the lessor but paid to a third party (such as taxes,
licenses, and registration fees) are excluded from the total
contractual amount.
In addition to increasing the threshold for an exemption from
$25,000 to $50,000 effective July 21, 2011, Section 1100E of the Dodd-
Frank Act provides that, beginning in 2012, the $50,000 threshold will
be further increased annually to reflect any increases in the CPI-W.
Accordingly, whether the total contractual obligation under a consumer
lease is sufficient to exempt that lease from the CLA will depend on
the threshold amount in effect when the lease is consummated. For that
reason, the Board proposed to amend Sec. 213.2(e)(1) to provide that a
consumer lease is exempt if the total contractual obligation exceeds
``the applicable threshold amount,'' which would be listed in the
official staff commentary. The Board further proposed to amend Sec.
213.2(e)(1) to provide that the threshold amount will be adjusted
annually to reflect increases in the CPI-W (as applicable). The Board
did not receive any comment on these revisions, which are adopted as
proposed.
The Board also proposed to adopt a new comment 2(e)-9 in order to
clarify the method for determining the applicable threshold amount with
respect to a particular lease. Specifically, this comment clarified
that a consumer lease is exempt from the requirements of Regulation M
if the total contractual obligation exceeds the threshold amount in
effect at the time of consummation.
Proposed comment 2(e)-9 further clarified that the threshold amount
in effect during a particular period of time is the amount stated in
the comment for that period. The proposed comment also noted that the
threshold amount would be adjusted effective January 1 of each year by
any annual percentage increase in the CPI-W that was in effect on the
preceding June 1. Once the annual percentage increase in the CPI-W in
effect on June 1 becomes available, this comment will be amended to
provide the threshold amount for the upcoming year. The Board noted
that this approach is consistent with that adopted by the Board in
other regulations that provide for annual adjustments based on a
consumer price index. See, e.g., 12 CFR 226.32(a)(1)(ii) and its
accompanying commentary. The Board believes this approach will
facilitate compliance by permitting the publication of an increased
threshold amount sufficiently in advance of the January 1 effective
date.
In addition, proposed comment 2(e)-9 clarified that any increase in
the threshold amount would be rounded to the nearest $100 increment.
For example, if the annual percentage increase in the CPI-W would
result in a $950 increase in the threshold amount, the threshold amount
will be increased by $1,000. However, if the annual percentage increase
in the CPI-W would result in a $949 increase in the threshold amount,
the threshold amount will be increased by $900. This approach is
consistent with Section 1100E(b) of the Dodd-Frank Act, which provides
that annual CPI-W adjustments should be ``rounded to the nearest
multiple of $100, or $1,000, as applicable.'' The Board believes that
Congress did not intend for an annual CPI-W adjustment to be rounded to
the nearest $100 in some circumstances but to the nearest $1,000 in
others, which could lead to anomalous results. Because $1,000 is itself
a multiple of $100, the Board believes that this commentary clarifies
the statutory language in a manner consistent with the intent of
Section 1100E.
Finally, the proposed comment clarified that, if a consumer lease
is exempt from the requirements of
[[Page 18351]]
Regulation M because the total contractual obligation exceeds the
threshold amount in effect at the time of consummation, the lease
remains exempt regardless of a subsequent increase in the threshold
amount. Thus, for example, if a lease with a total contractual
obligation of $30,000 was consummated in June 2011, that lease is
exempt based on the $25,000 threshold in effect at that time and would
remain exempt after July 21, 2011, notwithstanding the increase in the
threshold to $50,000. Similarly, if a lease with a total contractual
obligation of $55,000 is consummated in August 2011, that lease would
be exempt based on the $50,000 threshold in effect at that time and
would remain exempt even if the threshold were subsequently increased
to $56,000 based on an increase in the CPI-W. This approach is
consistent with Sec. 213.3(e), which provides that events that occur
after consummation of a consumer lease generally do not require the
lessor to provide additional Regulation M disclosures. See comment
3(e)-2.
The Board received only one comment regarding this proposed
guidance. A Member of Congress suggested that consumer leases with
total contractual obligations above the applicable threshold amount at
consummation should not be permanently exempt from Regulation M.
Instead, this commenter suggested that, if, at any point during the
term of the lease, the total amount of the consumer's remaining
obligation is less than the applicable threshold amount, the lessor
should begin to comply with the regulation. However, the provisions of
the CLA and Regulation M generally govern disclosures made at or prior
to consummation of a lease. Thus, it does not appear that requiring
lessors to comply with Regulation M after consummation would provide
benefits to consumers that would outweigh the burden on lessors of
continually monitoring each lease to determine when the remaining
obligation falls below the applicable threshold amount. Accordingly,
comment 2(e)-9 is adopted as proposed.
Section 213.7--Advertising
7(a) General Rule
Section 213.7 imposes certain requirements on advertisements for
consumer leases. In order to provide guidance regarding the interaction
between Sec. 213.7 and the definition of ``consumer lease'' in Sec.
213.2(e), the Board proposed to adopt a new comment 7(a)-3. This
comment clarified that Sec. 213.7 applies to advertisements for
consumer leases, as defined in Sec. 213.2(e). As discussed above, a
lease is exempt from the requirements of Regulation M (including Sec.
213.7) if the total contractual obligation exceeds the threshold amount
in effect at the time of consummation. Accordingly, proposed comment
7(a)-3 clarified that Sec. 213.7 does not apply to an advertisement
for a specific consumer lease if the total contractual obligation for
that lease exceeds the threshold amount in effect when the
advertisement is made. If a lessor promotes multiple consumer leases in
a single advertisement, the entire advertisement must comply with Sec.
213.7 unless all of the advertised leases are exempt under Sec.
213.2(e). The comment also provided illustrative examples. The Board
did not receive any comment on this guidance, which is adopted as
proposed.
V. Regulatory Flexibility Act Analysis
The Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.) (RFA)
requires an agency to perform an initial and a final regulatory
flexibility analysis on the impact a rule is expected to have on small
entities. However, under section 605(b) of the RFA, 5 U.S.C. 605(b),
the regulatory flexibility analysis otherwise required under section
604 of the RFA is not required if an agency certifies, along with a
statement providing the factual basis for such certification, that the
rule will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities. Based on its initial and final analyses and
for the reasons stated below, the Board believes that this final rule
will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of
small entities.
1. Statement of the need for, and objectives of, the final rule.
The final rule implements Section 1100E of the Dodd-Frank Act, which
increases the total contractual obligation necessary to exempt a
consumer lease from the Consumer Leasing Act (CLA) from more than
$25,000 to more than $50,000, effective July 21, 2010. Section 1100E
also provides that, beginning in 2012, this amount shall be adjusted
annually to reflect any annual percentage increase in the Consumer
Price Index for Urban Wage Earners and Clerical Workers (CPI-W). The
supplementary information above describes in detail the reasons,
objectives, and legal basis for the final rule.
2. Summary of the significant issues raised by public comment on
Board's initial analysis, the Board's assessment of such issues, and a
statement of any changes made as a result of such comments. An industry
group representing credit unions requested that, in order to reduce
regulatory burden, the Board provide additional guidance regarding the
types of records that institutions are required to retain in order to
demonstrate compliance with Regulation M. Section 213.8 states that
lessors must retain ``evidence of compliance with the requirements
imposed by [Regulation M], other than the advertising requirements
under section 213.7, for a period of not less than two years after the
disclosures are required to be made or an action is required to be
taken.'' Comment 8-1 clarifies that these records may be retained ``in
paper form, on microfilm, microfiche, or computer, or by any other
method designed to reproduce records accurately'' and that ``[t]he
lessor need retain only enough information to reconstruct the required
disclosures or other records.''
Because the current regulation and commentary provide lessors with
considerable flexibility regarding the retention of records, the Board
is concerned that adopting a more specific set of requirements (such as
a list of documents that lessors must retain) could increase regulatory
burden, rather than reducing it. Furthermore, because the Board did not
propose any amendments to the record retention requirements in Sec.
213.8, any revisions to those requirements would not have the benefit
of input from the public, including small institutions. Although the
commenter suggested that the Board work with a focus group of
institutions to revise the record retention requirements, it would not
be possible for the Board to do so and still issue a final rule
sufficiently in advance of the July 21, 2010 statutory effective date.
Accordingly, the final rule does not alter the requirements of Sec.
213.8.
3. Small entities affected by the final rule. Currently, Regulation
M applies to any person who regularly leases, offers to lease, or
arranges for the lease of personal property primarily for personal,
family, or household purposes, for a period exceeding four months, and
for a total contractual obligation of $25,000 or less. 12 CFR 213.2(e)
and (h). Consistent with Section 1100E of the Dodd-Frank Act, the final
rule applies Regulation M, beginning on July 21, 2011, to any person
who provides consumer leases for a total contractual obligation of
$50,000 or less, adjusted annually to reflect increases in the CPI-W.
Based on 2010 call report data, there are no banks with assets of
$175 million or less that engage in consumer leasing. There are,
however, 306 thrifts and 92 credit unions with assets of $175 million
or less that engage in consumer
[[Page 18352]]
leasing. In addition, the Board's 2005 Finance Company Survey indicates
that fewer than ten small finance companies engage in consumer leasing.
Commenters did not provide any information on the number of small
entities affected by the proposed rule. Nevertheless, the Board
acknowledges that the total number of small entities likely to be
affected by the final rule is unknown, in part because it is unclear
how many of the small entities currently engaged in consumer leasing
offer leases with total contractual obligations of more than $25,000
but not more than $50,000.
4. Recordkeeping, reporting, and compliance requirements. The final
rule does not impose any new reporting requirements. However, the final
rule does impose new recordkeeping requirements for small entities that
offer consumer leases with total contractual obligations of more than
$25,000 but not more than $50,000. As noted above, Sec. 213.8 requires
lessors to retain evidence of compliance with its provisions (except
the advertising requirements in Sec. 213.7) for a period of not less
than two years after the date the disclosures are required to be made
or an action is required to be taken. Thus, beginning on July 21, 2011,
the final rule requires lessors to retain records for new consumer
leases with total contractual obligations not exceeding $50,000,
adjusted annually to reflect increases in the CPI-W.
The final rule also imposes new compliance requirements for
consumer leases with total contractual obligations of more than $25,000
but not more than $50,000. Specifically, for consumer leases subject to
Regulation M, the lessor must provide certain disclosures regarding
payments, liability, and other terms of the lease prior to consummation
(Sec. Sec. 213.3 and 213.4) and when the availability of consumer
leases on particular terms is advertised (Sec. 213.7).
The Board understands that small entities that offer consumer
leases generally have systems in place to provide the disclosures
required by Regulation M and retain records of those disclosures, even
if some of their leases are currently exempt. Thus, while the precise
costs to small entities to provide disclosures and retain records for a
larger population of leases are difficult to predict, the Board does
not believe that the final rule would have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small entities. Except as already
discussed above, the Board did not receive any comments to the
contrary.
5. Significant alternatives to the final rule. The final rule
implements Section 1100E of the Dodd-Frank Act, which goes into effect
on July 21, 2011. As discussed in the supplementary information, the
final rule clarifies that, if a consumer lease with a total contractual
obligation exceeding $25,000 is consummated prior to July 21, 2011,
that lease remains exempt, notwithstanding subsequent increases in the
threshold amount. Except as already discussed above, the Board did not
receive any comments suggesting alternatives that would minimize the
impact of the rule on small entities and would be consistent with
Section 1100E of the Dodd-Frank Act.
VI. Paperwork Reduction Act Analysis
In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3506; 5 CFR part 1320 Appendix A.1), the Board reviewed the
final rule under the authority delegated to the Board by the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB). In addition, as permitted by the PRA, the
Board is extending for three years the current recordkeeping and
disclosure requirements in connection with Regulation M. The collection
of information that is required by this rule is found in 12 CFR Part
213. The Board may not conduct or sponsor, and an organization is not
required to respond to, this information collection unless it displays
a currently valid OMB control number. The OMB control number is 7100-
0202.
This information collection is required to provide benefits for
consumers and is mandatory (15 U.S.C. 1601 et seq.). The respondents/
recordkeepers are lessors subject to Regulation M, including for-profit
financial institutions and small businesses. Sections 105(a) and 187 of
TILA (15 U.S.C. 1604(a) and 1667f) authorize the Board to issue
regulations to carry out the provisions of the CLA. The CLA and
Regulation M are intended to provide consumers with meaningful
disclosures about the costs and terms of leases for personal property.
The disclosures enable consumers to compare the terms for a particular
lease with those for other leases and, when appropriate, to compare
lease terms with those for credit transactions. The act and regulation
also contain rules about advertising consumer leases. The information
collection pursuant to Regulation M is triggered by specific events.
All disclosures must be provided to the lessee prior to the
consummation of the lease and when the availability of consumer leases
on particular terms is advertised. This information collection is
mandatory.
Since the Board does not collect any information, no issue of
confidentiality normally arises. However, in the event the Board were
to retain records during the course of an examination, the information
may be kept confidential pursuant to section (b)(8) of the Freedom of
Information Act (5 U.S.C. 522(b)(8)).
Regulation M applies to all types of lessors of personal property.
The Board accounts for the paperwork burden associated with the
regulation only for Board-supervised institutions. Appendix B of
Regulation M defines the Board-supervised institutions as: State member
banks, branches and agencies of foreign banks (other than federal
branches, federal agencies, and insured state branches of foreign
banks), commercial lending companies owned or controlled by foreign
banks, and organizations operating under section 25 or 25A of the
Federal Reserve Act. Other federal agencies account for the paperwork
burden on other lessors for which they have administrative enforcement
authority.
To ease the compliance cost (particularly for small entities) model
forms are appended to the regulation. Lessors are required to retain
evidence of compliance for 24 months, but the regulation does not
specify types of records that must be retained.
The current annual burden to comply with the provisions of
Regulation M is estimated to be 2 hours for each of the 4 State member
banks \2\ that engage in consumer leasing. Thus, the current total
annual burden for all respondents is 8 hours.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ Federal Financial Institutions Examination Council
Consolidated Reports of Condition and Income (Call Reports) (FFIEC
031 & 041; OMB No. 7100-0036), Schedule RC-C, data item 10.a--Leases
to individuals for household, family, and other personal
expenditures.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Board estimates that the final rule will impose a one-time
increase in the total annual burden under Regulation M. The 4
respondents will take, on average, 40 hours (one business week) to
update their systems to comply with the requirements of the final rule.
This one-time revision will increase the total burden for all 4
respondents by 160 hours. On a continuing basis, the Board estimates
that the 4 respondents will each take, on average, an additional 8
hours (one business day) annually to comply with the requirements,
which will increase the ongoing total annual burden for all 4
respondents by 32 hours. Therefore, the total annual burden for all
respondents is estimated to increase by 192 hours (from 8 to 200 hours)
during the first year after this rule takes effect. Thereafter, the
[[Page 18353]]
estimated ongoing total annual burden will be 40 hours.
The total burden increase represents averages for all respondents
regulated by the Board. The Board expects that the amount of time
required to implement each of the changes for a given financial
institution or entity may vary based on the size and complexity of the
respondent. Furthermore, the Board understands that many lessors
voluntarily comply with Regulation M for leases that are currently
exempt. Thus, the estimated burden increase likely overstates the
actual increase in burden for those lessors.
The other Federal financial agencies are responsible for estimating
and reporting to OMB the total paperwork burden for the institutions
for which they have administrative enforcement authority.\3\ They may,
but are not required to, use the Board's burden estimates. There are
approximately 16,200 depository institutions of which the Board
estimates that 58 depository institutions \4\ will be affected by this
collection of information and considered respondents for purposes of
the PRA. Using the Board's method, the total estimated annual burden
for all financial institutions subject to Regulation M is currently
approximately 116 hours. The final rule will impose a one-time increase
in the estimated annual burden for the estimated 58 institutions
thought to engage in consumer leasing by a total of 2,320 hours. On a
continuing basis, the final rule will impose an increase in the
estimated annual burden by a total of 464 hours. Thus, the total annual
burden for the 58 institutions is estimated to increase by 2,784 hours
(from 116 to 2,900 hours) during the first year after this rule takes
effect. Thereafter, the estimated ongoing total annual burden will be
580 hours. The above estimates represent an average across all
respondents and reflect variations between institutions based on their
size, complexity, and practices. In addition, other institutions
covered by Regulation M, such as retailers and finance companies
potentially are affected by this collection of information, and thus
are also respondents for purposes of the PRA. As noted above, the
estimated burden increase likely overstates the actual increase in
burden because many lessors voluntarily comply with Regulation M for
exempt leases.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ Appendix B--Federal Enforcement Agencies--of Regulation M
lists those federal agencies that enforce the regulation for
particular classes of business. The Federal financial agencies other
than the Federal Reserve include: The Office of the Comptroller of
the Currency (OCC), the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
(FDIC), the Office of Thrift Supervision (OTS), and the National
Credit Union Administration (NCUA). The Federal non-financial
agencies include: The Department of Transportation, the Grain
Inspection, Packers, and Stockyards Administration (Department of
Agriculture), the Farm Credit Administration, and the Federal Trade
Commission.
\4\ Estimate is based on September 30, 2010, consumer lease data
filed by depository institutions in their reports of condition and
income: The commercial bank Call Report; (FFIEC 031 & 041) (Federal
Reserve OMB No. 7100-0036), (OCC OMB No. 1557-0081), and (FDIC OMB
No. 3064-0052); the thrift institution Thrift Financial Report (TFR;
form 1313) (OTS OMB No. 1500-0023); and the credit union NCUA Call
Reports (form 5300) (NCUA OMB No. 3133-0004).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Board did not receive any comments specifically addressing the
foregoing estimates, which were provided in the December 2010
Regulation M Proposed Rule. The Board did receive one comment generally
addressing the burdens associated with retaining records pursuant to
Sec. 213.8, which is discussed above in the Board's final RFA
analysis.
The Board has a continuing interest in the public's opinion on the
collection of information. Comments on the collection of information
should be sent to Cynthia Ayouch, Acting Federal Reserve Clearance
Officer, Division of Research and Statistics, Mail Stop 95-A, Board of
Governors of the Federal Reserve System, Washington, DC 20551, with
copies of such comments sent to the Office of Management and Budget,
Paperwork Reduction Project (7100-0202), Washington, DC 20503.
List of Subjects in 12 CFR Part 213
Advertising, Federal Reserve System, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Truth in lending.
Text of Final Revisions
For the reasons set forth in the preamble, the Board amends
Regulation M, 12 CFR part 213, as set forth below:
PART 213--CONSUMER LEASING (REGULATION M)
0
1. The authority citation for part 213 is amended to read as follows:
Authority: 15 U.S.C. 1604 and 1667f; Pub. L. 111-203 Sec.
1100E, 124 Stat. 1376.
0
2. Section 213.2(e)(1) is revised to read as follows:
Sec. 213.2 Definitions.
* * * * *
(e)(1) Consumer lease means a contract in the form of a bailment or
lease for the use of personal property by a natural person primarily
for personal, family, or household purposes, for a period exceeding
four months and for a total contractual obligation not exceeding the
applicable threshold amount, whether or not the lessee has the option
to purchase or otherwise become the owner of the property at the
expiration of the lease. The threshold amount is adjusted annually to
reflect increases in the Consumer Price Index for Urban Wage Earners
and Clerical Workers, as applicable. See the official staff commentary
to this paragraph (e) for the threshold amount applicable to a specific
consumer lease. Unless the context indicates otherwise, in this part
``lease'' means ``consumer lease.''
* * * * *
0
3. In Supplement I to Part 213:
0
A. Under Section 213.2--Definitions, under 2(e) Consumer Lease,
paragraph 9. is added; and
0
B. Under Section 213.7--Advertising, under 7(a) General Rule, paragraph
3. is added to read as follows:
Supplement I to Part 213--Official Staff Commentary to Regulation M
* * * * *
Section 213.2--Definitions
* * * * *
2(e) Consumer Lease.
* * * * *
9. Threshold amount. A consumer lease is exempt from the
requirements of this Part if the total contractual obligation
exceeds the threshold amount in effect at the time of consummation.
The threshold amount in effect during a particular time period is
the amount stated below for that period. The threshold amount is
adjusted effective January 1 of each year by any annual percentage
increase in the Consumer Price Index for Urban Wage Earners and
Clerical Workers (CPI-W) that was in effect on the preceding June 1.
This comment will be amended to provide the threshold amount for the
upcoming year after the annual percentage change in the CPI-W that
was in effect on June 1 becomes available. Any increase in the
threshold amount will be rounded to the nearest $100 increment. For
example, if the annual percentage increase in the CPI-W would result
in a $950 increase in the threshold amount, the threshold amount
will be increased by $1,000. However, if the annual percentage
increase in the CPI-W would result in a $949 increase in the
threshold amount, the threshold amount will be increased by $900. If
a consumer lease is exempt from the requirements of this Part
because the total contractual obligation exceeds the threshold
amount in effect at the time of consummation, the lease remains
exempt regardless of a subsequent increase in the threshold amount.
i. Prior to July 21, 2011, the threshold amount is $25,000.
ii. From July 21, 2011 through December 31, 2011, the threshold
amount is $50,000.
* * * * *
Section 213.7--Advertising
7(a) General Rule.
* * * * *
[[Page 18354]]
3. Total contractual obligation of advertised lease. Section
213.7 applies to advertisements for consumer leases, as defined in
Sec. 213.2(e). Under Sec. 213.2(e), a consumer lease is exempt
from the requirements of this Part if the total contractual
obligation exceeds the threshold amount in effect at the time of
consummation. See comment 2(e)-9. Accordingly, Sec. 213.7 does not
apply to an advertisement for a specific consumer lease if the total
contractual obligation for that lease exceeds the threshold amount
in effect when the advertisement is made. If a lessor promotes
multiple consumer leases in a single advertisement, the entire
advertisement must comply with Sec. 213.7 unless all of the
advertised leases are exempt under Sec. 213.2(e). For example:
A. Assume that, in an advertisement, a lessor states that
certain terms apply to a consumer lease for a specific automobile.
The total contractual obligation of the advertised lease exceeds the
threshold amount in effect when the advertisement is made. Although
the advertisement does not refer to any other lease, some or all of
the advertised terms for the exempt lease also apply to other leases
offered by the lessor with total contractual obligations that do not
exceed the applicable threshold amount. The advertisement is not
required to comply with Sec. 213.7 because it refers only to an
exempt lease.
B. Assume that, in an advertisement, a lessor states certain
terms (such as the amount due at lease signing) that will apply to
consumer leases for automobiles of a particular brand. However, the
advertisement does not refer to a specific lease. The total
contractual obligations of the leases for some of the automobiles
will exceed the threshold amount in effect when the advertisement is
made, but the total contractual obligations of the leases for other
automobiles will not exceed the threshold. The entire advertisement
must comply with Sec. 213.7 because it refers to terms for consumer
leases that are not exempt.
C. Assume that, in a single advertisement, a lessor states that
certain terms apply to consumer leases for two different
automobiles. The total contractual obligation of the lease for the
first automobile exceeds the threshold amount in effect when the
advertisement is made, but the total contractual obligation of the
lease for the second automobile does not exceed the threshold. The
entire advertisement must comply with Sec. 213.7 because it refers
to a consumer lease that is not exempt.
* * * * *
By order of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve
System, March 24, 2011.
Jennifer J. Johnson,
Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 2011-7377 Filed 4-1-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-P