Special Local Regulation; Hydroplane Races Within the Captain of the Port Puget Sound Area of Responsibility, 17339-17341 [2011-7284]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 60 / Tuesday, March 29, 2011 / Rules and Regulations
PART 529—CERTAIN OTHER DOSAGE
FORM NEW ANIMAL DRUGS
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
21. The authority citation for 21 CFR
part 529 continues to read as follows:
Coast Guard
■
33 CFR Part 100
Authority: 21 U.S.C. 360b.
§ 529.50 [Redesignated as § 529.56 and
Amended]
[Docket No. USCG–2009–0996]
22. Redesignate § 529.50 as § 529.56
and revise it to read as follows:
RIN 1625–AA08
■
§ 529.56
Amikacin.
(a) Specifications. Each milliliter (mL)
of solution contains 250 milligrams of
amikacin as amikacin sulfate.
(b) Sponsors. See Nos. 000856 and
059130 in § 510.600(c) of this chapter.
(c) Conditions of use in horses—(1)
Amount. Administer 2 grams (8 mL)
diluted with 200 mL of sterile
physiological saline by intrauterine
infusion daily for 3 consecutive days.
(2) Indications for use. For treating
genital tract infections (endometritis,
metritis, and pyometra) in mares caused
by susceptible organisms including
Escherichia coli, Pseudomonas spp.,
and Klebsiella spp.
(3) Limitations. Do not use in horses
intended for human consumption.
Federal law restricts this drug to use by
or on the order of a licensed
veterinarian.
23. In § 529.1030, revise paragraphs
(d)(1)(i) and (d)(1)(iv) to read as follows:
■
§ 529.1030
Formalin.
wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with RULES_PART 1
*
*
*
*
*
(d) * * *
(1) * * *
(i) Select finfish. For control of
external protozoa Ichthyophthirius spp.,
Chilodonella spp., Ichthyobodo spp.,
Ambiphrya spp., Epistylis spp., and
Trichodina spp., and monogenetic
trematodes Cleidodiscus spp.,
Gyrodactylus spp., and Dactylogyrus
spp., on salmon, trout, catfish,
largemouth bass, and bluegill.
*
*
*
*
*
(iv) All finfish. For control of external
protozoa Ichthyophthirius spp.,
Chilodonella spp., Ichthyobodo spp.,
Ambiphrya spp., Epistylis spp., and
Trichodina spp., and monogenetic
trematodes Cleidodiscus spp.,
Gyrodactylus spp., and Dactylogyrus
spp.
*
*
*
*
*
Dated: March 23, 2011.
Leslie Kux,
Acting Assistant Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2011–7313 Filed 3–28–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160–01–P
VerDate Mar<15>2010
13:46 Mar 28, 2011
Jkt 223001
Special Local Regulation; Hydroplane
Races Within the Captain of the Port
Puget Sound Area of Responsibility
Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
The Coast Guard is
establishing a special local regulation to
restrict vessel movement in designated
permanent hydroplane race areas in
Dyes Inlet, Lake Washington and Lake
Sammamish, WA during permitted
hydroplane race events. When this
special local regulation is activated, and
thus subject to enforcement, this rule
will limit the movement of nonparticipating vessels within the
regulated race areas immediately prior
to, during and immediately following
the conclusion of permitted hydroplane
marine events. This rule is needed to
provide effective control over these
events while ensuring the safety of the
maritime public.
DATES: This rule is effective March 29,
2011.
ADDRESSES: Comments and material
received from the public, as well as
documents mentioned in this preamble
as being available in the docket, are part
of docket USCG–2009–0996 and are
available online by going to https://
www.regulations.gov, inserting USCG–
2009–0996 in the ‘‘Keyword’’ box, and
then clicking ‘‘Search.’’ This material is
also available for inspection or copying
at the Docket Management Facility (M–
30), U.S. Department of Transportation,
West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE.,
Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have questions on this rule, call or
e-mail LTJG Ashley M. Wanzer,
Waterways Management, Sector Puget
Sound, Coast Guard; telephone 206–
217–6175, e-mail
SectorPugetSoundWWM@uscg.mil. If
you have questions on viewing the
docket, call Renee V. Wright, Program
Manager, Docket Operations, telephone
202–366–9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
17339
Regulatory Information
On Tuesday, January 19, 2010, we
published a notice of proposed
rulemaking (NPRM) entitled Safety
Zone Regulation; Hydroplane Races
within the Captain of the Port Puget
Sound Area of Responsibility in the
Federal Register (75 FR 2833). On
Wednesday, January 19, 2011, we
published a supplemental notice of
proposed rulemaking (SNPRM), revising
the rulemaking to create a special local
regulation designating three permanent
hydroplane race areas under 33 CFR
part 100 in the Federal Register (76 FR
3057). We did not receive any
comments on the NPRM or SNPRM and
did not receive any requests for a public
meeting. A public meeting was not held.
Under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast
Guard finds that good cause exists for
making this rule effective less than 30
days after publication in the Federal
Register. Immediate action is necessary
to protect life, property and the
environment; therefore, a 30-day notice
is impracticable. Delaying the effective
date would be contrary to the intended
objective of promoting safety during
these permitted events because the
ULHRA Spring Training takes place on
21 April 2011 in the Lake Washington
designated race area and this is less than
30 days after publication in the Federal
Register.
Basis and Purpose
The U.S. Coast Guard is establishing
special local regulations to establish
three permanent designated hydroplane
race areas in Dyes Inlet, Lake
Washington, and Lake Sammamish, WA
within the Captain of the Port, Puget
Sound Area of Responsibility. This
action is necessary in order to restrict
vessel movement in the vicinity of the
race courses thereby promoting safety
on navigable waters during these events.
Background
The Coast Guard receives numerous
marine event permits for hydroplane
races taking place on the waterways of
Dyes Inlet, Lake Washington, and Lake
Sammamish, WA. This rule establishes
a special local regulation to restrict
vessel movement in designated
hydroplane race areas during permitted
hydroplane marine events. This rule
enables event sponsors and the Coast
Guard to adequately provide safety in
support of these marine events.
Initial Enforcement
The Coast Guard will enforce the
special local regulation for Lake
Washington in 33 CFR 100.1308 from
10 a.m. until 4 p.m. on April 21, 2011.
E:\FR\FM\29MRR1.SGM
29MRR1
17340
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 60 / Tuesday, March 29, 2011 / Rules and Regulations
Discussion of Comments and Changes
The notice of proposed rulemaking
and supplemental notice of proposed
rulemaking for this rule did not receive
any comments.
Regulatory Analyses
We developed this rule after
considering numerous statutes and
executive orders related to rulemaking.
Below we summarize our analyses
based on 13 of these statutes or
executive orders.
Regulatory Planning and Review
This rule is not a significant
regulatory action under section 3(f) of
Executive Order 12866, Regulatory
Planning and Review, and does not
require an assessment of potential costs
and benefits under section 6(a)(3) of that
Order. The Office of Management and
Budget has not reviewed it under that
Order.
wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with RULES_PART 1
Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act
(5 U.S.C. 601–612), we have considered
whether this rule would have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
The term ‘‘small entities’’ comprises
small businesses, not-for-profit
organizations that are independently
owned and operated and are not
dominant in their fields, and
governmental jurisdictions with
populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5
U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule will not have
a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
This rule will affect the following
small entities: The owners or operators
of vessels intending to transit or anchor
within these designated hydroplane race
areas while enforced on the waters of
northern Dyes Inlet, Lake Washington,
and Lake Sammamish, Washington.
This proposed rule will not have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
because it is small in size and short in
duration. The only vessels likely to be
impacted will be recreational boaters.
Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121),
in the NPRM we offered to assist small
entities in understanding the rule so
that they could better evaluate its effects
on them and participate in the
rulemaking process.
Small businesses may send comments
on the actions of Federal employees
who enforce, or otherwise determine
compliance with, Federal regulations to
VerDate Mar<15>2010
13:46 Mar 28, 2011
Jkt 223001
the Small Business and Agriculture
Regulatory Enforcement Ombudsman
and the Regional Small Business
Regulatory Fairness Boards. The
Ombudsman evaluates these actions
annually and rates each agency’s
responsiveness to small business. If you
wish to comment on actions by
employees of the Coast Guard, call
1–888–REG–FAIR (1–888–734–3247).
The Coast Guard will not retaliate
against small entities that question or
complain about this rule or any policy
or action of the Coast Guard.
Collection of Information
This rule calls for no new collection
of information under the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501–
3520).
Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism
under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct
effect on State or local governments and
would either preempt State law or
impose a substantial direct cost of
compliance on them. We have analyzed
this rule under that Order and have
determined that it does not have
implications for federalism.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
Federal agencies to assess the effects of
their discretionary regulatory actions. In
particular, the Act addresses actions
that may result in the expenditure by a
State, local, or Tribal government, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector of
$100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or
more in any one year. Though this rule
will not result in such an expenditure,
we do discuss the effects of this rule
elsewhere in this preamble.
Taking of Private Property
This rule will not cause a taking of
private property or otherwise have
taking implications under Executive
Order 12630, Governmental Actions and
Interference with Constitutionally
Protected Property Rights.
Civil Justice Reform
This rule meets applicable standards
in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of Executive
Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to
minimize litigation, eliminate
ambiguity, and reduce burden.
Protection of Children
We have analyzed this rule under
Executive Order 13045, Protection of
Children from Environmental Health
Risks and Safety Risks. This rule is not
an economically significant rule and
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
does not create an environmental risk to
health or risk to safety that may
disproportionately affect children.
Indian Tribal Governments
This rule does not have Tribal
implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination
with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it does not have a substantial
direct effect on one or more Indian
Tribes, on the relationship between the
Federal Government and Indian Tribes,
or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian Tribes.
Energy Effects
We have analyzed this rule under
Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have
determined that it is not a ‘‘significant
energy action’’ under that order because
it is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’
under Executive Order 12866 and is not
likely to have a significant adverse effect
on the supply, distribution, or use of
energy. The Administrator of the Office
of Information and Regulatory Affairs
has not designated it as a significant
energy action. Therefore, it does not
require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.
Technical Standards
The National Technology Transfer
and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use
voluntary consensus standards in their
regulatory activities unless the agency
provides Congress, through the Office of
Management and Budget, with an
explanation of why using these
standards would be inconsistent with
applicable law or otherwise impractical.
Voluntary consensus standards are
technical standards (e.g., specifications
of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling
procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or
adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
This rule does not use technical
standards. Therefore, we did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus
standards.
Environment
We have analyzed this rule under
Department of Homeland Security
Management Directive 023–01 and
Commandant Instruction M16475.lD,
which guide the Coast Guard in
complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and
E:\FR\FM\29MRR1.SGM
29MRR1
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 60 / Tuesday, March 29, 2011 / Rules and Regulations
have concluded this action is one of a
category of actions that do not
individually or cumulatively have a
significant effect on the human
environment. This rule is categorically
excluded, under figure 2–1, paragraph
(34)(h), of the Instruction. This rule
involves a special local regulation to
establish vessel movement restrictions
in designated race areas immediately
prior to, during and immediately
following permitted hydroplane race
events. An environmental analysis
checklist and a categorical exclusion
determination are available in the
docket where indicated under
ADDRESSES.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 100
Marine safety, Navigation (water).
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
CFR part 100 as follows:
PART 100—REGATTAS AND MARINE
PARADES
1. The authority citation for Part 100
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1233.
■
2. Add § 100.1308 to read as follows:
wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with RULES_PART 1
§ 100.1308 Special Local Regulation;
Hydroplane Races within the Captain of the
Port Puget Sound Area of Responsibility.
(a) Location. The following areas are
designated race areas for the purpose of
reoccurring hydroplane races:
(1) Dyes Inlet. West of Port Orchard,
WA to include all waters north to land
from a line connecting the following
points 47°37.36′ N, 122°42.29′ W and
47°37.74′ N, 122°40.64′ W (NAD 1983).
(2) Lake Washington. South of the
Interstate 90 bridge and north of
Andrew’s Bay to include all waters east
of the shoreline within the following
points: 47°34.15′ N, 122°16.40′ W;
47°34.31′ N, 122°15.96′ W; 47°35.18′ N,
122°16.31′ W; 47°35.00′ N, 122°16.71′ W
(NAD 1983).
(3) Lake Sammamish. South to land
from a line connecting the following
points 47°33.810′ N, 122°04.810′ W and
47°33.810′ N, 122° 03.674′ W (NAD
1983).
(b) Notice of enforcement or
suspension of enforcement. This special
local regulation will be activated and
thus subject to enforcement, under the
following conditions: the Coast Guard
must receive and approve a marine
event permit for each hydroplane event
in accordance with 33 CFR 100. The
Captain of the Port will provide notice
of the enforcement of this special local
regulation by all appropriate means to
ensure the widest dissemination among
the affected segments of the public, as
VerDate Mar<15>2010
13:46 Mar 28, 2011
Jkt 223001
practicable; such means of notification
may include but are not limited to,
Broadcast Notice to Mariners or Local
Notice to Mariners.
(c) Regulations. (1) When this special
local regulation is enforced, nonparticipant vessels are prohibited from
entering the designated race areas
unless authorized by the designated onscene Patrol Commander. Spectator craft
may remain in designated spectator
areas but must follow the directions of
the designated on-scene Patrol
Commander. The event sponsor may
also function as the designated on-scene
Patrol Commander. Spectator craft
entering, exiting or moving within the
spectator area must operate at speeds
which will create a minimum wake.
(2) Emergency signaling. A succession
of sharp, short signals by whistle or
horn from vessels patrolling the areas
under the discretion of the designated
on-scene Patrol Commander shall serve
as a signal to stop. Vessels signaled shall
stop and shall comply with the orders
of the patrol vessel. Failure to do so may
result in expulsion from the area,
citation for failure to comply, or both.
Dated: March 3, 2011.
A.T. Ewalt,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Acting District
Commander, Thirteenth Coast Guard District.
[FR Doc. 2011–7284 Filed 3–28–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 117
Drawbridge Operation Regulations;
Columbia River, OR
CFR Correction
In Title 33 of the Code of Federal
Regulations, Parts 1 to 124, revised as of
July 1, 2010, on page 624, in § 117.869,
paragraph (d) is removed.
[FR Doc. 2011–7441 Filed 3–28–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 1505–01–D
Forest Service
36 CFR Part 294
Idaho Roadless Rule
Forest Service, USDA.
Final administrative correction.
AGENCY:
The Forest Service, U.S.
Department of Agriculture (USDA), is
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4700
issuing administrative corrections
affecting Big Creek Fringe, French
Creek, Placer Creek, Secesh, and Smith
Creek Idaho Roadless Areas on the
Payette National Forest. These
corrections remedy clerical errors
relating to regulatory classifications
involving two Forest Plan Special Areas
(Big Creek and French Creek) and a
mapping error. These corrections are
made pursuant to 36 CFR 294.27(a).
DATES: This correction is effective
March 29, 2011.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Idaho Roadless Coordinator Joan
Dickerson at 406–329–3314. Additional
information concerning these
administrative corrections, including
the corrected maps, may be obtained on
the Internet at https://roadless.fs.fed.us.
Individuals who use telecommunication
devices for the deaf (TDD) may call the
Federal Information Relay Service
(FIRS) at 1–800–877–8339 between
8 a.m. and 8 p.m., Eastern Standard
Time, Monday through Friday.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Idaho
Roadless Rule authorizes administrative
corrections to the maps of lands
identified in 36 CFR 294.22(c),
including but not limited to, adjustment
that remedy clerical errors,
typographical errors, mapping errors, or
improvements in mapping technology.
The Chief may issue administrative
corrections after a 30-day public notice
and opportunity to comment.
The Agency presented the corrections
to the State of Idaho’s Roadless Rule
Advisory Commission on September 28,
2010. The Commission recommended to
the Governor of Idaho that the
corrections be made and that the
Agency contact the Valley County
Commissioners. The Valley County
Commissioners supported the
corrections.
The Agency requested comment and/
or met with the Shoshone-Paiute Tribes
of Duck Valley, the Shoshone-Bannock
Tribes of Fort Hall, and the Nez Perce
Tribe. No comments or concerns from
the Tribes were received.
Consideration of Comments
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
ACTION:
17341
Sfmt 4700
The Chief provided a 30-day public
notice and opportunity to comment (75
FR 54542). A total of 13 comments were
received from 9 individuals.
Two respondents were concerned
about the original classification of lands
in the Big Creek Fringe, Placer Creek,
Secesh and French Creek Roadless
Areas. In addition these respondents
were concerned about the original
mapping of these roadless areas and felt
the boundaries of the roadless areas
should be modified to exclude existing
E:\FR\FM\29MRR1.SGM
29MRR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 60 (Tuesday, March 29, 2011)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 17339-17341]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-7284]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 100
[Docket No. USCG-2009-0996]
RIN 1625-AA08
Special Local Regulation; Hydroplane Races Within the Captain of
the Port Puget Sound Area of Responsibility
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is establishing a special local regulation to
restrict vessel movement in designated permanent hydroplane race areas
in Dyes Inlet, Lake Washington and Lake Sammamish, WA during permitted
hydroplane race events. When this special local regulation is
activated, and thus subject to enforcement, this rule will limit the
movement of non-participating vessels within the regulated race areas
immediately prior to, during and immediately following the conclusion
of permitted hydroplane marine events. This rule is needed to provide
effective control over these events while ensuring the safety of the
maritime public.
DATES: This rule is effective March 29, 2011.
ADDRESSES: Comments and material received from the public, as well as
documents mentioned in this preamble as being available in the docket,
are part of docket USCG-2009-0996 and are available online by going to
https://www.regulations.gov, inserting USCG-2009-0996 in the ``Keyword''
box, and then clicking ``Search.'' This material is also available for
inspection or copying at the Docket Management Facility (M-30), U.S.
Department of Transportation, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140,
1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this rule,
call or e-mail LTJG Ashley M. Wanzer, Waterways Management, Sector
Puget Sound, Coast Guard; telephone 206-217-6175, e-mail
SectorPugetSoundWWM@uscg.mil. If you have questions on viewing the
docket, call Renee V. Wright, Program Manager, Docket Operations,
telephone 202-366-9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Regulatory Information
On Tuesday, January 19, 2010, we published a notice of proposed
rulemaking (NPRM) entitled Safety Zone Regulation; Hydroplane Races
within the Captain of the Port Puget Sound Area of Responsibility in
the Federal Register (75 FR 2833). On Wednesday, January 19, 2011, we
published a supplemental notice of proposed rulemaking (SNPRM),
revising the rulemaking to create a special local regulation
designating three permanent hydroplane race areas under 33 CFR part 100
in the Federal Register (76 FR 3057). We did not receive any comments
on the NPRM or SNPRM and did not receive any requests for a public
meeting. A public meeting was not held.
Under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast Guard finds that good cause
exists for making this rule effective less than 30 days after
publication in the Federal Register. Immediate action is necessary to
protect life, property and the environment; therefore, a 30-day notice
is impracticable. Delaying the effective date would be contrary to the
intended objective of promoting safety during these permitted events
because the ULHRA Spring Training takes place on 21 April 2011 in the
Lake Washington designated race area and this is less than 30 days
after publication in the Federal Register.
Basis and Purpose
The U.S. Coast Guard is establishing special local regulations to
establish three permanent designated hydroplane race areas in Dyes
Inlet, Lake Washington, and Lake Sammamish, WA within the Captain of
the Port, Puget Sound Area of Responsibility. This action is necessary
in order to restrict vessel movement in the vicinity of the race
courses thereby promoting safety on navigable waters during these
events.
Background
The Coast Guard receives numerous marine event permits for
hydroplane races taking place on the waterways of Dyes Inlet, Lake
Washington, and Lake Sammamish, WA. This rule establishes a special
local regulation to restrict vessel movement in designated hydroplane
race areas during permitted hydroplane marine events. This rule enables
event sponsors and the Coast Guard to adequately provide safety in
support of these marine events.
Initial Enforcement
The Coast Guard will enforce the special local regulation for Lake
Washington in 33 CFR 100.1308 from 10 a.m. until 4 p.m. on April 21,
2011.
[[Page 17340]]
Discussion of Comments and Changes
The notice of proposed rulemaking and supplemental notice of
proposed rulemaking for this rule did not receive any comments.
Regulatory Analyses
We developed this rule after considering numerous statutes and
executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our analyses
based on 13 of these statutes or executive orders.
Regulatory Planning and Review
This rule is not a significant regulatory action under section 3(f)
of Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review, and does not
require an assessment of potential costs and benefits under section
6(a)(3) of that Order. The Office of Management and Budget has not
reviewed it under that Order.
Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601-612), we have
considered whether this rule would have a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities. The term ``small entities''
comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations that are
independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their fields,
and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule will
not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
entities.
This rule will affect the following small entities: The owners or
operators of vessels intending to transit or anchor within these
designated hydroplane race areas while enforced on the waters of
northern Dyes Inlet, Lake Washington, and Lake Sammamish, Washington.
This proposed rule will not have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities because it is small in size and
short in duration. The only vessels likely to be impacted will be
recreational boaters.
Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), in the NPRM we offered to
assist small entities in understanding the rule so that they could
better evaluate its effects on them and participate in the rulemaking
process.
Small businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal
employees who enforce, or otherwise determine compliance with, Federal
regulations to the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory
Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small Business Regulatory
Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these actions annually and
rates each agency's responsiveness to small business. If you wish to
comment on actions by employees of the Coast Guard, call 1-888-REG-FAIR
(1-888-734-3247). The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small
entities that question or complain about this rule or any policy or
action of the Coast Guard.
Collection of Information
This rule calls for no new collection of information under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).
Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on State or local
governments and would either preempt State law or impose a substantial
direct cost of compliance on them. We have analyzed this rule under
that Order and have determined that it does not have implications for
federalism.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or Tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this rule will not result in
such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere
in this preamble.
Taking of Private Property
This rule will not cause a taking of private property or otherwise
have taking implications under Executive Order 12630, Governmental
Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected Property
Rights.
Civil Justice Reform
This rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2)
of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize litigation,
eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.
Protection of Children
We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13045, Protection
of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks. This rule
is not an economically significant rule and does not create an
environmental risk to health or risk to safety that may
disproportionately affect children.
Indian Tribal Governments
This rule does not have Tribal implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it does not have a substantial direct effect on one or more
Indian Tribes, on the relationship between the Federal Government and
Indian Tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities
between the Federal Government and Indian Tribes.
Energy Effects
We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have determined that it is not a ``significant
energy action'' under that order because it is not a ``significant
regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866 and is not likely to
have a significant adverse effect on the supply, distribution, or use
of energy. The Administrator of the Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs has not designated it as a significant energy
action. Therefore, it does not require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.
Technical Standards
The National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use voluntary consensus standards
in their regulatory activities unless the agency provides Congress,
through the Office of Management and Budget, with an explanation of why
using these standards would be inconsistent with applicable law or
otherwise impractical. Voluntary consensus standards are technical
standards (e.g., specifications of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
This rule does not use technical standards. Therefore, we did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus standards.
Environment
We have analyzed this rule under Department of Homeland Security
Management Directive 023-01 and Commandant Instruction M16475.lD, which
guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National Environmental
Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and
[[Page 17341]]
have concluded this action is one of a category of actions that do not
individually or cumulatively have a significant effect on the human
environment. This rule is categorically excluded, under figure 2-1,
paragraph (34)(h), of the Instruction. This rule involves a special
local regulation to establish vessel movement restrictions in
designated race areas immediately prior to, during and immediately
following permitted hydroplane race events. An environmental analysis
checklist and a categorical exclusion determination are available in
the docket where indicated under ADDRESSES.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 100
Marine safety, Navigation (water).
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends
33 CFR part 100 as follows:
PART 100--REGATTAS AND MARINE PARADES
0
1. The authority citation for Part 100 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1233.
0
2. Add Sec. 100.1308 to read as follows:
Sec. 100.1308 Special Local Regulation; Hydroplane Races within the
Captain of the Port Puget Sound Area of Responsibility.
(a) Location. The following areas are designated race areas for the
purpose of reoccurring hydroplane races:
(1) Dyes Inlet. West of Port Orchard, WA to include all waters
north to land from a line connecting the following points 47[deg]37.36'
N, 122[deg]42.29' W and 47[deg]37.74' N, 122[deg]40.64' W (NAD 1983).
(2) Lake Washington. South of the Interstate 90 bridge and north of
Andrew's Bay to include all waters east of the shoreline within the
following points: 47[deg]34.15' N, 122[deg]16.40' W; 47[deg]34.31' N,
122[deg]15.96' W; 47[deg]35.18' N, 122[deg]16.31' W; 47[deg]35.00' N,
122[deg]16.71' W (NAD 1983).
(3) Lake Sammamish. South to land from a line connecting the
following points 47[deg]33.810' N, 122[deg]04.810' W and 47[deg]33.810'
N, 122[deg] 03.674' W (NAD 1983).
(b) Notice of enforcement or suspension of enforcement. This
special local regulation will be activated and thus subject to
enforcement, under the following conditions: the Coast Guard must
receive and approve a marine event permit for each hydroplane event in
accordance with 33 CFR 100. The Captain of the Port will provide notice
of the enforcement of this special local regulation by all appropriate
means to ensure the widest dissemination among the affected segments of
the public, as practicable; such means of notification may include but
are not limited to, Broadcast Notice to Mariners or Local Notice to
Mariners.
(c) Regulations. (1) When this special local regulation is
enforced, non-participant vessels are prohibited from entering the
designated race areas unless authorized by the designated on-scene
Patrol Commander. Spectator craft may remain in designated spectator
areas but must follow the directions of the designated on-scene Patrol
Commander. The event sponsor may also function as the designated on-
scene Patrol Commander. Spectator craft entering, exiting or moving
within the spectator area must operate at speeds which will create a
minimum wake.
(2) Emergency signaling. A succession of sharp, short signals by
whistle or horn from vessels patrolling the areas under the discretion
of the designated on-scene Patrol Commander shall serve as a signal to
stop. Vessels signaled shall stop and shall comply with the orders of
the patrol vessel. Failure to do so may result in expulsion from the
area, citation for failure to comply, or both.
Dated: March 3, 2011.
A.T. Ewalt,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Acting District Commander, Thirteenth Coast
Guard District.
[FR Doc. 2011-7284 Filed 3-28-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P