List of Approved Spent Fuel Storage Casks: HI-STORM Flood/Wind Addition, 17019-17022 [2011-7102]
Download as PDF
17019
Rules and Regulations
Federal Register
Vol. 76, No. 59
Monday, March 28, 2011
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER
contains regulatory documents having general
applicability and legal effect, most of which
are keyed to and codified in the Code of
Federal Regulations, which is published under
50 titles pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 1510.
The Code of Federal Regulations is sold by
the Superintendent of Documents. Prices of
new books are listed in the first FEDERAL
REGISTER issue of each week.
NUCLEAR REGULATORY
COMMISSION
10 CFR Part 72
[NRC–2011–0007]
RIN 3150–AI90
List of Approved Spent Fuel Storage
Casks: HI–STORM Flood/Wind
Addition
Nuclear Regulatory
Commission.
ACTION: Direct final rule.
AGENCY:
The U. S. Nuclear Regulatory
Commission (NRC or the Commission)
is amending its regulations to add the
HI–STORM Flood/Wind cask system to
the ‘‘List of Approved Spent Fuel
Storage Casks.’’ This direct final rule
allows the holders of power reactor
operating licenses to store spent fuel in
this approved cask system under a
general license.
DATES: The final rule is effective June
13, 2011, unless significant adverse
comments are received by April 27,
2011. A significant adverse comment is
a comment where the commenter
explains why the rule would be
inappropriate, including challenges to
the rule’s underlying premise or
approach, or would be ineffective or
unacceptable without a change. If the
rule is withdrawn, timely notice will be
published in the Federal Register.
ADDRESSES: You can access publicly
available documents related to this
document using the following methods:
Federal e-Rulemaking Portal: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov and search
for documents filed under Docket ID
[NRC–2011–0007]. Address questions
about NRC dockets to Carol Gallagher
301–492–3668; e-mail
Carol.Gallagher@nrc.gov.
NRC’s Public Document Room (PDR):
The public may examine and have
copied for a fee publicly available
jdjones on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with RULES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:20 Mar 25, 2011
Jkt 223001
documents at the NRC’s PDR, Room O–
1F21, One White Flint North, 11555
Rockville Pike, Rockville, Maryland.
NRC’s Agencywide Documents Access
and Management System (ADAMS):
Publicly available documents created or
received at the NRC are available
electronically at the NRC’s Electronic
Reading Room at https://www.nrc.gov/
reading-rm/adams.html. From this page,
the public can gain entry into ADAMS,
which provides text and image files of
NRC’s public documents. If you do not
have access to ADAMS or if there are
problems in accessing the documents
located in ADAMS, contact the NRC’s
PDR Reference staff at 1–800–397–4209,
301–415–4737, or by e-mail to
pdr.resource@nrc.gov. An electronic
copy of the proposed Certificate of
Compliance (CoC), Technical
Specifications (TS), and preliminary
safety evaluation report (SER) can be
found under ADAMS Package
Accession Number ML103020135. The
ADAMS Accession Number for the
Holtec international, Inc. (Holtec)
application, dated September 18, 2009,
is ML092650747.
CoC No. 1032, the TS, the preliminary
SER, and the environmental assessment
are available for inspection at the NRC’s
PDR, Room O–1F21, One White Flint
North, 11555 Rockville Pike, Rockville,
Maryland. Single copies of these
documents may be obtained from
Gregory Trussell, Office of Federal and
State Materials and Environmental
Management Programs, U.S. Nuclear
Regulatory Commission, Washington,
DC 20555–0001, telephone 301–415–
6445, e-mail Gregory.Trussell@nrc.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Gregory Trussell, Office of Federal and
State Materials and Environmental
Management Programs, U.S. Nuclear
Regulatory Commission, Washington,
DC 20555–0001, telephone 301–415–
6445, e-mail Gregory.Trussell@nrc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
Section 218(a) of the Nuclear Waste
Policy Act (NWPA) of 1982, as
amended, requires that ‘‘the Secretary
[of the U.S. Department of Energy
(DOE)] shall establish a demonstration
program, in cooperation with the private
sector, for the dry storage of spent
nuclear fuel at civilian nuclear power
reactor sites, with the objective of
establishing one or more technologies
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
that the [Nuclear Regulatory]
Commission may, by rule, approve for
use at the sites of civilian nuclear power
reactors without, to the maximum
extent practicable, the need for
additional site-specific approvals by the
Commission.’’ Section 133 of the NWPA
states, in part, that ‘‘the Commission
shall, by rule, establish procedures for
the licensing of any technology
approved by the Commission under
Section 218(a) for use at the site of any
civilian nuclear power reactor.’’
To implement this mandate, the NRC
approved dry storage of spent nuclear
fuel in NRC-approved casks under a
general license by publishing a final
rule in Title 10 of the Code of Federal
Regulations (10 CFR) part 72, which
added a new Subpart K within 10 CFR
part 72, entitled ‘‘General License for
Storage of Spent Fuel at Power Reactor
Sites’’ (55 FR 29181; July 18, 1990). This
rule also established a new Subpart L
within 10 CFR part 72, entitled
‘‘Approval of Spent Fuel Storage Casks,’’
which contains procedures and criteria
for obtaining NRC approval of spent fuel
storage cask designs.
Discussion
This rule will add the Holtec HI–
STORM Flood/Wind (FW) cask system
to the list of approved spent fuel storage
casks in 10 CFR 72.214. Following the
procedures specified in 10 CFR 72.230
of Subpart L, Holtec submitted an
application for NRC approval, together
with the Safety Analysis Report (SAR)
entitled ‘‘Safety Analysis Report on the
HI–STORM FW System.’’ The NRC
evaluated the Holtec submittal and
issued a preliminary SER and a
proposed CoC for the HI–STORM FW
System.
The HI–STORM FW System provides
the following: (1) The ability to store
and transport Boiling Water Reactor
(BWR) fuel with high initial enrichment
(up to 4.8 weight percent uranium-235
planer average) without reliance on
burnup or gadolinium credit; (2) the
ability to load and store spent nuclear
fuel from the longest to the shortest
currently, and expected to be produced,
in the United States without requiring
site crane upgrades; (3) a reduction in
the 10 CFR part 71 burnup credit
requirement for the Pressurized Water
Reactor (PWR) basket allowing
transportation of 5 weight percent
uranium-235 fuel with moderate
E:\FR\FM\28MRR1.SGM
28MRR1
17020
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 59 / Monday, March 28, 2011 / Rules and Regulations
burnup; (4) enlarged storage cell
opening sizes in both PWR and BWR
multipurpose canisters (MPC) to ensure
distorted irradiated fuel will fit without
difficulty and to permit canisterized fuel
to be stored in certain designated
locations; (5) greater heat rejection
capacity with lower peak fuel cladding
temperature than the HI–STORM 100
cask system, CoC No. 1014; and (6) a
variable weight (HI–TRAC VW) transfer
cask that will allow use of the full
capacity of a facility’s cask crane. The
HI–STORM FW System consists of the
following major components: HI–
STORM FW Overpack, PWR MPC–37,
BWR MPC–89, and HI–TRAC VW
Transfer Cask.
The NRC finds that the HI–STORM
FW System, as designed and when
fabricated and used under the
conditions specified in its CoC, meets
the requirements of 10 CFR part 72.
Thus, use of the HI–STORM FW
System, as approved by the NRC, will
provide adequate protection of public
health and safety. With this final rule,
the NRC is approving the use of the HI–
STORM FW System under the general
license in 10 CFR part 72, subpart K, by
holders of power reactor operating
licenses under 10 CFR part 50.
Simultaneously, the NRC is issuing a
final SER and CoC that will be effective
on June 13, 2011. Single copies of the
CoC and SER are available for public
inspection and/or copying for a fee at
the NRC’s Public Document Room,
Room O–1F21, One White Flint North,
11555 Rockville Pike, Rockville,
Maryland.
This direct final rule amends 10 CFR
72.214 by adding CoC No. 1032 to the
list of approved spent fuel storage casks.
The HI–STORM FW System, when
used under the conditions specified in
CoC No. 1032, the TS, and NRC
regulations, will meet the requirements
of part 72; thus, adequate protection of
public health and safety will continue to
be ensured.
Discussion of Amendments by Section
§ 72.214 List of Approved Spent Fuel
Storage Casks
CoC No. 1032 is added to the list of
approved spent fuel storage casks.
jdjones on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with RULES
Procedural Background
The NRC is using the ‘‘direct final rule
procedure’’ to add CoC No. 1032 to the
list of approved storage casks because
the Holtec HI–STORM FW cask system
is considered to be similar to other
previously approved storage casks and,
therefore, is expected to be
noncontroversial. Adequate protection
of public health and safety continues to
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:20 Mar 25, 2011
Jkt 223001
be ensured. The amendment to the rule
will become effective on June 13, 2011.
However, if the NRC receives significant
adverse comments on this direct final
rule by April 27, 2011, then the NRC
will publish a document that withdraws
this action and will subsequently
address the comments received in a
final rule as a response to the
companion proposed rule published
elsewhere in this issue of the Federal
Register. Absent significant
modifications to the proposed revisions
requiring republication, the NRC will
not initiate a second comment period on
this action.
A significant adverse comment is a
comment where the commenter
explains why the rule would be
inappropriate, including challenges to
the rule’s underlying premise or
approach, or would be ineffective or
unacceptable without a change. A
comment is adverse and significant if:
(1) The comment opposes the rule and
provides a reason sufficient to require a
substantive response in a notice-andcomment process. For example, a
substantive response is required when:
(a) The comment causes the NRC staff
to reevaluate (or reconsider) its position
or conduct additional analysis;
(b) The comment raises an issue
serious enough to warrant a substantive
response to clarify or complete the
record; or
(c) The comment raises a relevant
issue that was not previously addressed
or considered by the NRC staff.
(2) The comment proposes a change
or an addition to the rule, and it is
apparent that the rule would be
ineffective or unacceptable without
incorporation of the change or addition.
(3) The comment causes the NRC staff
to make a change (other than editorial)
to the rule, CoC, or TS.
For detailed instructions on filing
comments, please see the companion
proposed rule published elsewhere in
this issue of the Federal Register.
Voluntary Consensus Standards
The National Technology Transfer
and Advancement Act of 1995 (Pub. L.
104–113) requires that Federal agencies
use technical standards that are
developed or adopted by voluntary
consensus standards bodies unless the
use of such a standard is inconsistent
with applicable law or otherwise
impractical. In this direct final rule, the
NRC is adding the HI–STORM FW
System to the list of NRC-approved cask
systems for spent fuel storage in 10 CFR
72.214. This action does not constitute
the establishment of a standard that
contains generally applicable
requirements.
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Agreement State Compatibility
Under the ‘‘Policy Statement on
Adequacy and Compatibility of
Agreement State Programs’’ approved by
the Commission on June 30, 1997, and
published in the Federal Register on
September 3, 1997 (62 FR 46517), this
rule is classified as Compatibility
Category ‘‘NRC.’’ Compatibility is not
required for Category ‘‘NRC’’ regulations.
The NRC program elements in this
category are those that relate directly to
areas of regulation reserved to the NRC
by the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as
amended, or the provisions of Title 10
of the Code of Federal Regulations.
Although an Agreement State may not
adopt program elements reserved to
NRC, it may wish to inform its licensees
of certain requirements via a mechanism
that is consistent with the particular
State’s administrative procedure laws
but does not confer regulatory authority
on the State.
Plain Language
The Presidential Memorandum,
‘‘Plain Language in Government
Writing,’’ published June 10, 1998 (63
FR 31883), directed that the
Government’s documents be in clear
and accessible language. The NRC
requests comments on this direct final
rule specifically with respect to the
clarity and effectiveness of the language
used. Comments should be sent to the
address listed under the heading
ADDRESSES, above.
Finding of No Significant
Environmental Impact: Availability
Under the National Environmental
Policy Act of 1969, as amended, and the
NRC regulations in Subpart A of 10 CFR
part 51, the NRC has determined that
this rule, if adopted, would not be a
major Federal action significantly
affecting the quality of the human
environment and, therefore, an
environmental impact statement is not
required. The NRC has prepared an
environmental assessment and, on the
basis of this environmental assessment,
has made a finding of no significant
impact. The rule will add the CoC for
the HI–STORM FW System, CoC No.
1032, to the list of approved spent fuel
storage casks that power reactor
licensees can use to store spent fuel at
reactor sites under a general license.
The HI–STORM FW System provides
the following: (1) The ability to store
and transport BWR fuel with high initial
enrichment (up to 4.8 weight percent
uranium-235 planer average) without
reliance on burnup or gadolinium
credit; (2) the ability to load and store
spent nuclear fuel from the longest to
E:\FR\FM\28MRR1.SGM
28MRR1
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 59 / Monday, March 28, 2011 / Rules and Regulations
the shortest currently, and expected to
be produced, in the United States
without requiring site crane upgrades;
(3) a reduction in the 10 CFR part 71
burnup credit requirement for the PWR
basket allowing transportation of 5
weight percent uranium-235 fuel with
moderate burnup; (4) enlarged storage
cell opening sizes in both PWR and
BWR MPCs to ensure distorted
irradiated fuel will fit without difficulty
and to permit canisterized fuel to be
stored in certain designated locations;
(5) greater heat rejection capacity with
lower peak fuel cladding temperature
than the HI–STORM 100 cask system,
CoC No. 1014; and (6) a variable weight
(HI–TRAC VW) transfer cask that will
allow use of the full capacity of a
facility’s cask crane. The HI–STORM
FW System consists of the following
major components: HI–STORM FW
Overpack, PWR MPC–37, BWR MPC–
89, and HI–TRAC VW Transfer Cask.
The environmental assessment and
finding of no significant impact on
which this determination is based are
available for inspection at the NRC
Public Document Room, Room O–1F21,
One White Flint North, 11555 Rockville
Pike, Rockville, Maryland. Single copies
of the environmental assessment and
finding of no significant impact are
available from Gregory Trussell, Office
of Federal and State Materials and
Environmental Management Programs,
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission,
Washington, DC 20555–0001, telephone:
301–415–6445, e-mail:
Gregory.Trussell@nrc.gov.
Paperwork Reduction Act Statement
This rule does not contain any
information collection requirements
and, therefore, is not subject to the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.). Existing
requirements were approved by the
Office of Management and Budget
(OMB), Approval Number 3150–0132.
jdjones on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with RULES
Public Protection Notification
The NRC may not conduct or sponsor,
and a person is not required to respond
to, a request for information or an
information collection requirement
unless the requesting document
displays a currently valid OMB control
number.
Regulatory Analysis
On July 18, 1990 (55 FR 29181), the
Commission issued an amendment to 10
CFR part 72. The amendment provided
for the storage of spent nuclear fuel in
cask systems with designs approved by
the NRC under a general license. Any
nuclear power reactor licensee can use
cask systems with designs approved by
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:20 Mar 25, 2011
Jkt 223001
the NRC to store spent nuclear fuel if it
notifies the NRC in advance, the spent
fuel is stored under the conditions
specified in the cask’s CoC, and the
conditions of the general license are
met. In that rule, four spent fuel storage
casks were approved for use at reactor
sites and were listed in 10 CFR 72.214.
That rule envisioned that storage casks
certified in the future could be routinely
added to the listing in 10 CFR 72.214
through the rulemaking process.
Procedures and criteria for obtaining
NRC approval of new spent fuel storage
cask designs were provided in 10 CFR
part 72, subpart L.
The alternative to this action is to
withhold approval of this new design
and issue a site-specific license to each
utility that proposes to use the casks.
This alternative would cost both the
NRC and utilities more time and money
for each site-specific license.
Conducting site-specific reviews would
ignore the procedures and criteria
currently in place for the addition of
new cask designs that can be used under
a general license, and would be in
conflict with NWPA direction to the
Commission to approve technologies for
the use of spent fuel storage at the sites
of civilian nuclear power reactors
without, to the maximum extent
practicable, the need for additional site
reviews. This alternative also would
tend to exclude new vendors from the
business market without cause and
would arbitrarily limit the choice of
cask designs available to power reactor
licensees. This final rule will eliminate
the above problems and is consistent
with previous Commission actions.
Further, the rule will have no adverse
effect on public health and safety.
The benefit of this rule to nuclear
power reactor licensees is to make
available a greater choice of spent fuel
storage cask designs that can be used
under a 10 CFR part 50 general license.
The new cask vendors with casks to be
listed in 10 CFR 72.214 benefit by
having to obtain NRC certificates only
once for a design that can then be used
by more than one power reactor
licensee. The NRC also benefits because
it will need to certify a cask design only
once for use by multiple licensees.
Casks approved through rulemaking are
to be suitable for use under a range of
environmental conditions sufficiently
broad to encompass multiple nuclear
power plants in the United States
without the need for further site-specific
approval by NRC. Vendors with cask
designs already listed may be adversely
impacted because power reactor
licensees may choose a newly listed
design over an existing one. However,
the NRC is required by its regulations
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
17021
and NWPA direction to certify and list
approved casks. This rule has no
significant identifiable impact or benefit
on other Government agencies.
Based on the above discussion of the
benefits and impacts of the alternatives,
the NRC concludes that the
requirements of the final rule are
commensurate with the Commission’s
responsibilities for public health and
safety and the common defense and
security. No other available alternative
is believed to be as satisfactory, and
thus, this action is recommended.
Regulatory Flexibility Certification
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act
of 1980 (5 U.S.C. 605(b)), the NRC
certifies that this rule will not, if issued,
have a significant economic impact on
a substantial number of small entities.
This direct final rule affects only
nuclear power plant licensees and
Holtec. These entities do not fall within
the scope of the definition of ‘‘small
entities’’ set forth in the Regulatory
Flexibility Act or the size standards
established by the NRC (10 CFR 2.810).
Backfit Analysis
The NRC has determined that the
backfit rule (10 CFR 72.62) does not
apply to this direct final rule because
this amendment does not involve any
provisions that would impose backfits
as defined in 10 CFR Chapter 1.
Therefore, a backfit analysis is not
required.
Congressional Review Act
Under the Congressional Review Act
of 1996, the NRC has determined that
this action is not a major rule and has
verified this determination with the
Office of Information and Regulatory
Affairs, Office of Management and
Budget.
List of Subjects in 10 CFR Part 72
Administrative practice and
procedure, Hazardous waste, Nuclear
materials, Occupational safety and
health, Radiation protection, Reporting
and recordkeeping requirements,
Security measures, Spent fuel, Whistle
blowing.
For the reasons set out in the
preamble and under the authority of the
Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended;
the Energy Reorganization Act of 1974,
as amended; the Nuclear Waste Policy
Act of 1982, as amended; and 5 U.S.C.
552 and 553; the NRC is adopting the
following amendments to 10 CFR part
72.
E:\FR\FM\28MRR1.SGM
28MRR1
17022
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 59 / Monday, March 28, 2011 / Rules and Regulations
PART 72—LICENSING
REQUIREMENTS FOR THE
INDEPENDENT STORAGE OF SPENT
NUCLEAR FUEL, HIGH-LEVEL
RADIOACTIVE WASTE, AND
REACTOR-RELATED GREATER THAN
CLASS C WASTE
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
R.W. Borchardt,
Executive Director for Operations.
[FR Doc. 2011–7102 Filed 3–25–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
1. The authority citation for part 72
continues to read as follows:
■
Federal Aviation Administration
Authority: Secs. 51, 53, 57, 62, 63, 65, 69,
81, 161, 182, 183, 184, 186, 187, 189, 68 Stat.
929, 930, 932, 933, 934, 935, 948, 953, 954,
955, as amended, sec. 234, 83 Stat. 444, as
amended (42 U.S.C. 2071, 2073, 2077, 2092,
2093, 2095, 2099, 2111, 2201, 2232, 2233,
2234, 2236, 2237, 2238, 2282); sec. 274, Pub.
L. 86–373, 73 Stat. 688, as amended (42
U.S.C. 2021); sec. 201, as amended, 202, 206,
88 Stat. 1242, as amended, 1244, 1246 (42
U.S.C. 5841, 5842, 5846); Pub. L. 95–601, sec.
10, 92 Stat. 2951 as amended by Pub. L. 102–
486, sec. 7902, 106 Stat. 3123 (42 U.S.C.
5851); sec. 102, Pub. L. 91–190, 83 Stat. 853
(42 U.S.C. 4332); secs. 131, 132, 133, 135,
137, 141, Pub. L. 97–425, 96 Stat. 2229, 2230,
2232, 2241, sec. 148, Pub. L. 100–203, 101
Stat. 1330–235 (42 U.S.C. 10151, 10152,
10153, 10155, 10157, 10161, 10168); sec.
1704, 112 Stat. 2750 (44 U.S.C. 3504 note);
sec. 651(e), Pub. L. 109–58, 119 Stat. 806–10
(42 U.S.C. 2014, 2021, 2021b, 2111).
Section 72.44(g) also issued under secs.
142(b) and 148(c), (d), Pub. L. 100–203, 101
Stat. 1330–232, 1330–236 (42 U.S.C.
10162(b), 10168(c),(d)). Section 72.46 also
issued under sec. 189, 68 Stat. 955 (42 U.S.C.
2239); sec. 134, Pub. L. 97–425, 96 Stat. 2230
(42 U.S.C. 10154). Section 72.96(d) also
issued under sec. 145(g), Pub. L. 100–203,
101 Stat. 1330–235 (42 U.S.C. 10165(g)).
Subpart J also issued under secs. 2(2), 2(15),
2(19), 117(a), 141(h), Pub. L. 97–425, 96 Stat.
2202, 2203, 2204, 2222, 2244 (42 U.S.C.
10101, 10137(a), 10161(h)). Subparts K and L
are also issued under sec. 133, 98 Stat. 2230
(42 U.S.C. 10153) and sec. 218(a), 96 Stat.
2252 (42 U.S.C. 10198).
2. In § 72.214, Certificate of
Compliance 1032 is added to read as
follows:
■
jdjones on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with RULES
§ 72.214 List of approved spent fuel
storage casks.
*
*
*
*
*
Certificate Number: 1032.
Initial Certificate Effective Date: June 13,
2011.
SAR Submitted by: Holtec International,
Inc.
SAR Title: Safety Analysis Report on the
HI–STORM FW System.
Docket Number: 72–1032.
Certificate Expiration Date: June 13,
2031.
Model Numbers: MPC–37, MPC–89.
Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 8th day
of February 2011.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:20 Mar 25, 2011
Jkt 223001
14 CFR Part 25
[Docket No. NM438 Special Conditions No.
25–423–SC]
Special Conditions: Gulfstream Model
GVI Airplane; High Incidence
Protection
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Final special conditions.
AGENCY:
These special conditions are
issued for the Gulfstream GVI airplane.
This airplane will have novel or
unusual design features when compared
to the state of technology envisioned in
the airworthiness standards for
transport category airplanes associated
with the use of high incidence
protection. The applicable airworthiness
regulations do not contain adequate or
appropriate safety standards for these
design features. These special
conditions contain the additional safety
standards that the Administrator
considers necessary to establish a level
of safety equivalent to that established
by the existing airworthiness standards.
DATES: Effective Date: April 27, 2011.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Joe
Jacobsen, FAA, Airplane and Flight
Crew Interface Branch, ANM–111,
Transport Standards Staff, Transport
Airplane Directorate, Aircraft
Certification Service, 1601 Lind
Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington
98057–3356; telephone (425) 227–2011;
facsimile (425) 227–1320.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
Background
On March 29, 2005, Gulfstream
Aerospace Corporation (hereafter
referred to as ‘‘Gulfstream’’) applied for
an FAA type certificate for its new
Gulfstream Model GVI passenger
airplane. Gulfstream later applied for,
and was granted, an extension of time
for the type certificate, which changed
the effective application date to
September 28, 2006. The Gulfstream
Model GVI airplane will be an all-new,
two-engine jet transport airplane with
an executive cabin interior. The
maximum takeoff weight will be 99,600
pounds, with a maximum passenger
count of 19 passengers.
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Type Certification Basis
Under provisions of Title 14 Code of
Federal Regulations (14 CFR) 21.17,
Gulfstream must show that the
Gulfstream Model GVI airplane
(hereafter referred to as ‘‘the GVI’’) meets
the applicable provisions of 14 CFR part
25, as amended by Amendments 25–1
through 25–119, 25–122 and 25–124. If
the Administrator finds that the
applicable airworthiness regulations
(i.e., 14 CFR part 25) do not contain
adequate or appropriate safety standards
for the GVI because of a novel or
unusual design feature, special
conditions are prescribed under the
provisions of § 21.16.
Special conditions are initially
applicable to the model for which they
are issued. Should the type certificate
for that model be amended later to
include any other model that
incorporates the same novel or unusual
design features, the special conditions
would also apply to the other model
under the provisions of § 21.101.
In addition to complying with the
applicable airworthiness regulations
and special conditions, the GVI must
comply with the fuel vent and exhaust
emission requirements of 14 CFR part
34 and the noise certification
requirements of 14 CFR part 36. The
FAA must also issue a finding of
regulatory adequacy pursuant to section
611 of Public Law 92–574, the ‘‘Noise
Control Act of 1972.’’
The FAA issues special conditions, as
defined in 14 CFR 11.19, in accordance
with § 11.38, and they become part of
the type certification basis under
§ 21.17(a)(2).
Novel or Unusual Design Features
The GVI is equipped with a novel or
unusual design feature: A high
incidence protection system that
replaces the stall warning system during
normal operating conditions, prohibits
the airplane from stalling, limits the
angle of attack at which the airplane can
be flown during normal low speed
operation, and cannot be overridden by
the flight crew. The system’s application
of this angle of attack limit impacts the
stall speed determination, the stall
characteristics, the stall warning
demonstration, and the longitudinal
airplane handling characteristics. The
current regulations, including §§ 25.103,
25.145, 25.201, 25.203, 25.207 and
25.1323, do not address this type of
protection feature.
Discussion
These special conditions, which
include airplane performance
requirements, will establish a level of
E:\FR\FM\28MRR1.SGM
28MRR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 59 (Monday, March 28, 2011)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 17019-17022]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-7102]
========================================================================
Rules and Regulations
Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains regulatory documents
having general applicability and legal effect, most of which are keyed
to and codified in the Code of Federal Regulations, which is published
under 50 titles pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 1510.
The Code of Federal Regulations is sold by the Superintendent of Documents.
Prices of new books are listed in the first FEDERAL REGISTER issue of each
week.
========================================================================
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 59 / Monday, March 28, 2011 / Rules
and Regulations
[[Page 17019]]
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
10 CFR Part 72
[NRC-2011-0007]
RIN 3150-AI90
List of Approved Spent Fuel Storage Casks: HI-STORM Flood/Wind
Addition
AGENCY: Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
ACTION: Direct final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC or the
Commission) is amending its regulations to add the HI-STORM Flood/Wind
cask system to the ``List of Approved Spent Fuel Storage Casks.'' This
direct final rule allows the holders of power reactor operating
licenses to store spent fuel in this approved cask system under a
general license.
DATES: The final rule is effective June 13, 2011, unless significant
adverse comments are received by April 27, 2011. A significant adverse
comment is a comment where the commenter explains why the rule would be
inappropriate, including challenges to the rule's underlying premise or
approach, or would be ineffective or unacceptable without a change. If
the rule is withdrawn, timely notice will be published in the Federal
Register.
ADDRESSES: You can access publicly available documents related to this
document using the following methods:
Federal e-Rulemaking Portal: Go to https://www.regulations.gov and
search for documents filed under Docket ID [NRC-2011-0007]. Address
questions about NRC dockets to Carol Gallagher 301-492-3668; e-mail
Carol.Gallagher@nrc.gov.
NRC's Public Document Room (PDR): The public may examine and have
copied for a fee publicly available documents at the NRC's PDR, Room O-
1F21, One White Flint North, 11555 Rockville Pike, Rockville, Maryland.
NRC's Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS):
Publicly available documents created or received at the NRC are
available electronically at the NRC's Electronic Reading Room at https://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html. From this page, the public can gain
entry into ADAMS, which provides text and image files of NRC's public
documents. If you do not have access to ADAMS or if there are problems
in accessing the documents located in ADAMS, contact the NRC's PDR
Reference staff at 1-800-397-4209, 301-415-4737, or by e-mail to
pdr.resource@nrc.gov. An electronic copy of the proposed Certificate of
Compliance (CoC), Technical Specifications (TS), and preliminary safety
evaluation report (SER) can be found under ADAMS Package Accession
Number ML103020135. The ADAMS Accession Number for the Holtec
international, Inc. (Holtec) application, dated September 18, 2009, is
ML092650747.
CoC No. 1032, the TS, the preliminary SER, and the environmental
assessment are available for inspection at the NRC's PDR, Room O-1F21,
One White Flint North, 11555 Rockville Pike, Rockville, Maryland.
Single copies of these documents may be obtained from Gregory Trussell,
Office of Federal and State Materials and Environmental Management
Programs, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-
0001, telephone 301-415-6445, e-mail Gregory.Trussell@nrc.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Gregory Trussell, Office of Federal
and State Materials and Environmental Management Programs, U.S. Nuclear
Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001, telephone 301-415-
6445, e-mail Gregory.Trussell@nrc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
Section 218(a) of the Nuclear Waste Policy Act (NWPA) of 1982, as
amended, requires that ``the Secretary [of the U.S. Department of
Energy (DOE)] shall establish a demonstration program, in cooperation
with the private sector, for the dry storage of spent nuclear fuel at
civilian nuclear power reactor sites, with the objective of
establishing one or more technologies that the [Nuclear Regulatory]
Commission may, by rule, approve for use at the sites of civilian
nuclear power reactors without, to the maximum extent practicable, the
need for additional site-specific approvals by the Commission.''
Section 133 of the NWPA states, in part, that ``the Commission shall,
by rule, establish procedures for the licensing of any technology
approved by the Commission under Section 218(a) for use at the site of
any civilian nuclear power reactor.''
To implement this mandate, the NRC approved dry storage of spent
nuclear fuel in NRC-approved casks under a general license by
publishing a final rule in Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations
(10 CFR) part 72, which added a new Subpart K within 10 CFR part 72,
entitled ``General License for Storage of Spent Fuel at Power Reactor
Sites'' (55 FR 29181; July 18, 1990). This rule also established a new
Subpart L within 10 CFR part 72, entitled ``Approval of Spent Fuel
Storage Casks,'' which contains procedures and criteria for obtaining
NRC approval of spent fuel storage cask designs.
Discussion
This rule will add the Holtec HI-STORM Flood/Wind (FW) cask system
to the list of approved spent fuel storage casks in 10 CFR 72.214.
Following the procedures specified in 10 CFR 72.230 of Subpart L,
Holtec submitted an application for NRC approval, together with the
Safety Analysis Report (SAR) entitled ``Safety Analysis Report on the
HI-STORM FW System.'' The NRC evaluated the Holtec submittal and issued
a preliminary SER and a proposed CoC for the HI-STORM FW System.
The HI-STORM FW System provides the following: (1) The ability to
store and transport Boiling Water Reactor (BWR) fuel with high initial
enrichment (up to 4.8 weight percent uranium-235 planer average)
without reliance on burnup or gadolinium credit; (2) the ability to
load and store spent nuclear fuel from the longest to the shortest
currently, and expected to be produced, in the United States without
requiring site crane upgrades; (3) a reduction in the 10 CFR part 71
burnup credit requirement for the Pressurized Water Reactor (PWR)
basket allowing transportation of 5 weight percent uranium-235 fuel
with moderate
[[Page 17020]]
burnup; (4) enlarged storage cell opening sizes in both PWR and BWR
multipurpose canisters (MPC) to ensure distorted irradiated fuel will
fit without difficulty and to permit canisterized fuel to be stored in
certain designated locations; (5) greater heat rejection capacity with
lower peak fuel cladding temperature than the HI-STORM 100 cask system,
CoC No. 1014; and (6) a variable weight (HI-TRAC VW) transfer cask that
will allow use of the full capacity of a facility's cask crane. The HI-
STORM FW System consists of the following major components: HI-STORM FW
Overpack, PWR MPC-37, BWR MPC-89, and HI-TRAC VW Transfer Cask.
The NRC finds that the HI-STORM FW System, as designed and when
fabricated and used under the conditions specified in its CoC, meets
the requirements of 10 CFR part 72. Thus, use of the HI-STORM FW
System, as approved by the NRC, will provide adequate protection of
public health and safety. With this final rule, the NRC is approving
the use of the HI-STORM FW System under the general license in 10 CFR
part 72, subpart K, by holders of power reactor operating licenses
under 10 CFR part 50. Simultaneously, the NRC is issuing a final SER
and CoC that will be effective on June 13, 2011. Single copies of the
CoC and SER are available for public inspection and/or copying for a
fee at the NRC's Public Document Room, Room O-1F21, One White Flint
North, 11555 Rockville Pike, Rockville, Maryland.
This direct final rule amends 10 CFR 72.214 by adding CoC No. 1032
to the list of approved spent fuel storage casks.
The HI-STORM FW System, when used under the conditions specified in
CoC No. 1032, the TS, and NRC regulations, will meet the requirements
of part 72; thus, adequate protection of public health and safety will
continue to be ensured.
Discussion of Amendments by Section
Sec. 72.214 List of Approved Spent Fuel Storage Casks
CoC No. 1032 is added to the list of approved spent fuel storage
casks.
Procedural Background
The NRC is using the ``direct final rule procedure'' to add CoC No.
1032 to the list of approved storage casks because the Holtec HI-STORM
FW cask system is considered to be similar to other previously approved
storage casks and, therefore, is expected to be noncontroversial.
Adequate protection of public health and safety continues to be
ensured. The amendment to the rule will become effective on June 13,
2011. However, if the NRC receives significant adverse comments on this
direct final rule by April 27, 2011, then the NRC will publish a
document that withdraws this action and will subsequently address the
comments received in a final rule as a response to the companion
proposed rule published elsewhere in this issue of the Federal
Register. Absent significant modifications to the proposed revisions
requiring republication, the NRC will not initiate a second comment
period on this action.
A significant adverse comment is a comment where the commenter
explains why the rule would be inappropriate, including challenges to
the rule's underlying premise or approach, or would be ineffective or
unacceptable without a change. A comment is adverse and significant if:
(1) The comment opposes the rule and provides a reason sufficient
to require a substantive response in a notice-and-comment process. For
example, a substantive response is required when:
(a) The comment causes the NRC staff to reevaluate (or reconsider)
its position or conduct additional analysis;
(b) The comment raises an issue serious enough to warrant a
substantive response to clarify or complete the record; or
(c) The comment raises a relevant issue that was not previously
addressed or considered by the NRC staff.
(2) The comment proposes a change or an addition to the rule, and
it is apparent that the rule would be ineffective or unacceptable
without incorporation of the change or addition.
(3) The comment causes the NRC staff to make a change (other than
editorial) to the rule, CoC, or TS.
For detailed instructions on filing comments, please see the
companion proposed rule published elsewhere in this issue of the
Federal Register.
Voluntary Consensus Standards
The National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (Pub.
L. 104-113) requires that Federal agencies use technical standards that
are developed or adopted by voluntary consensus standards bodies unless
the use of such a standard is inconsistent with applicable law or
otherwise impractical. In this direct final rule, the NRC is adding the
HI-STORM FW System to the list of NRC-approved cask systems for spent
fuel storage in 10 CFR 72.214. This action does not constitute the
establishment of a standard that contains generally applicable
requirements.
Agreement State Compatibility
Under the ``Policy Statement on Adequacy and Compatibility of
Agreement State Programs'' approved by the Commission on June 30, 1997,
and published in the Federal Register on September 3, 1997 (62 FR
46517), this rule is classified as Compatibility Category ``NRC.''
Compatibility is not required for Category ``NRC'' regulations. The NRC
program elements in this category are those that relate directly to
areas of regulation reserved to the NRC by the Atomic Energy Act of
1954, as amended, or the provisions of Title 10 of the Code of Federal
Regulations. Although an Agreement State may not adopt program elements
reserved to NRC, it may wish to inform its licensees of certain
requirements via a mechanism that is consistent with the particular
State's administrative procedure laws but does not confer regulatory
authority on the State.
Plain Language
The Presidential Memorandum, ``Plain Language in Government
Writing,'' published June 10, 1998 (63 FR 31883), directed that the
Government's documents be in clear and accessible language. The NRC
requests comments on this direct final rule specifically with respect
to the clarity and effectiveness of the language used. Comments should
be sent to the address listed under the heading ADDRESSES, above.
Finding of No Significant Environmental Impact: Availability
Under the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969, as amended,
and the NRC regulations in Subpart A of 10 CFR part 51, the NRC has
determined that this rule, if adopted, would not be a major Federal
action significantly affecting the quality of the human environment
and, therefore, an environmental impact statement is not required. The
NRC has prepared an environmental assessment and, on the basis of this
environmental assessment, has made a finding of no significant impact.
The rule will add the CoC for the HI-STORM FW System, CoC No. 1032, to
the list of approved spent fuel storage casks that power reactor
licensees can use to store spent fuel at reactor sites under a general
license. The HI-STORM FW System provides the following: (1) The ability
to store and transport BWR fuel with high initial enrichment (up to 4.8
weight percent uranium-235 planer average) without reliance on burnup
or gadolinium credit; (2) the ability to load and store spent nuclear
fuel from the longest to
[[Page 17021]]
the shortest currently, and expected to be produced, in the United
States without requiring site crane upgrades; (3) a reduction in the 10
CFR part 71 burnup credit requirement for the PWR basket allowing
transportation of 5 weight percent uranium-235 fuel with moderate
burnup; (4) enlarged storage cell opening sizes in both PWR and BWR
MPCs to ensure distorted irradiated fuel will fit without difficulty
and to permit canisterized fuel to be stored in certain designated
locations; (5) greater heat rejection capacity with lower peak fuel
cladding temperature than the HI-STORM 100 cask system, CoC No. 1014;
and (6) a variable weight (HI-TRAC VW) transfer cask that will allow
use of the full capacity of a facility's cask crane. The HI-STORM FW
System consists of the following major components: HI-STORM FW
Overpack, PWR MPC-37, BWR MPC-89, and HI-TRAC VW Transfer Cask.
The environmental assessment and finding of no significant impact
on which this determination is based are available for inspection at
the NRC Public Document Room, Room O-1F21, One White Flint North, 11555
Rockville Pike, Rockville, Maryland. Single copies of the environmental
assessment and finding of no significant impact are available from
Gregory Trussell, Office of Federal and State Materials and
Environmental Management Programs, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission,
Washington, DC 20555-0001, telephone: 301-415-6445, e-mail:
Gregory.Trussell@nrc.gov.
Paperwork Reduction Act Statement
This rule does not contain any information collection requirements
and, therefore, is not subject to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.). Existing requirements were approved by the
Office of Management and Budget (OMB), Approval Number 3150-0132.
Public Protection Notification
The NRC may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to
respond to, a request for information or an information collection
requirement unless the requesting document displays a currently valid
OMB control number.
Regulatory Analysis
On July 18, 1990 (55 FR 29181), the Commission issued an amendment
to 10 CFR part 72. The amendment provided for the storage of spent
nuclear fuel in cask systems with designs approved by the NRC under a
general license. Any nuclear power reactor licensee can use cask
systems with designs approved by the NRC to store spent nuclear fuel if
it notifies the NRC in advance, the spent fuel is stored under the
conditions specified in the cask's CoC, and the conditions of the
general license are met. In that rule, four spent fuel storage casks
were approved for use at reactor sites and were listed in 10 CFR
72.214. That rule envisioned that storage casks certified in the future
could be routinely added to the listing in 10 CFR 72.214 through the
rulemaking process. Procedures and criteria for obtaining NRC approval
of new spent fuel storage cask designs were provided in 10 CFR part 72,
subpart L.
The alternative to this action is to withhold approval of this new
design and issue a site-specific license to each utility that proposes
to use the casks. This alternative would cost both the NRC and
utilities more time and money for each site-specific license.
Conducting site-specific reviews would ignore the procedures and
criteria currently in place for the addition of new cask designs that
can be used under a general license, and would be in conflict with NWPA
direction to the Commission to approve technologies for the use of
spent fuel storage at the sites of civilian nuclear power reactors
without, to the maximum extent practicable, the need for additional
site reviews. This alternative also would tend to exclude new vendors
from the business market without cause and would arbitrarily limit the
choice of cask designs available to power reactor licensees. This final
rule will eliminate the above problems and is consistent with previous
Commission actions. Further, the rule will have no adverse effect on
public health and safety.
The benefit of this rule to nuclear power reactor licensees is to
make available a greater choice of spent fuel storage cask designs that
can be used under a 10 CFR part 50 general license. The new cask
vendors with casks to be listed in 10 CFR 72.214 benefit by having to
obtain NRC certificates only once for a design that can then be used by
more than one power reactor licensee. The NRC also benefits because it
will need to certify a cask design only once for use by multiple
licensees. Casks approved through rulemaking are to be suitable for use
under a range of environmental conditions sufficiently broad to
encompass multiple nuclear power plants in the United States without
the need for further site-specific approval by NRC. Vendors with cask
designs already listed may be adversely impacted because power reactor
licensees may choose a newly listed design over an existing one.
However, the NRC is required by its regulations and NWPA direction to
certify and list approved casks. This rule has no significant
identifiable impact or benefit on other Government agencies.
Based on the above discussion of the benefits and impacts of the
alternatives, the NRC concludes that the requirements of the final rule
are commensurate with the Commission's responsibilities for public
health and safety and the common defense and security. No other
available alternative is believed to be as satisfactory, and thus, this
action is recommended.
Regulatory Flexibility Certification
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980 (5 U.S.C. 605(b)), the
NRC certifies that this rule will not, if issued, have a significant
economic impact on a substantial number of small entities. This direct
final rule affects only nuclear power plant licensees and Holtec. These
entities do not fall within the scope of the definition of ``small
entities'' set forth in the Regulatory Flexibility Act or the size
standards established by the NRC (10 CFR 2.810).
Backfit Analysis
The NRC has determined that the backfit rule (10 CFR 72.62) does
not apply to this direct final rule because this amendment does not
involve any provisions that would impose backfits as defined in 10 CFR
Chapter 1. Therefore, a backfit analysis is not required.
Congressional Review Act
Under the Congressional Review Act of 1996, the NRC has determined
that this action is not a major rule and has verified this
determination with the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs,
Office of Management and Budget.
List of Subjects in 10 CFR Part 72
Administrative practice and procedure, Hazardous waste, Nuclear
materials, Occupational safety and health, Radiation protection,
Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, Spent
fuel, Whistle blowing.
For the reasons set out in the preamble and under the authority of
the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended; the Energy Reorganization
Act of 1974, as amended; the Nuclear Waste Policy Act of 1982, as
amended; and 5 U.S.C. 552 and 553; the NRC is adopting the following
amendments to 10 CFR part 72.
[[Page 17022]]
PART 72--LICENSING REQUIREMENTS FOR THE INDEPENDENT STORAGE OF
SPENT NUCLEAR FUEL, HIGH-LEVEL RADIOACTIVE WASTE, AND REACTOR-
RELATED GREATER THAN CLASS C WASTE
0
1. The authority citation for part 72 continues to read as follows:
Authority: Secs. 51, 53, 57, 62, 63, 65, 69, 81, 161, 182, 183,
184, 186, 187, 189, 68 Stat. 929, 930, 932, 933, 934, 935, 948, 953,
954, 955, as amended, sec. 234, 83 Stat. 444, as amended (42 U.S.C.
2071, 2073, 2077, 2092, 2093, 2095, 2099, 2111, 2201, 2232, 2233,
2234, 2236, 2237, 2238, 2282); sec. 274, Pub. L. 86-373, 73 Stat.
688, as amended (42 U.S.C. 2021); sec. 201, as amended, 202, 206, 88
Stat. 1242, as amended, 1244, 1246 (42 U.S.C. 5841, 5842, 5846);
Pub. L. 95-601, sec. 10, 92 Stat. 2951 as amended by Pub. L. 102-
486, sec. 7902, 106 Stat. 3123 (42 U.S.C. 5851); sec. 102, Pub. L.
91-190, 83 Stat. 853 (42 U.S.C. 4332); secs. 131, 132, 133, 135,
137, 141, Pub. L. 97-425, 96 Stat. 2229, 2230, 2232, 2241, sec. 148,
Pub. L. 100-203, 101 Stat. 1330-235 (42 U.S.C. 10151, 10152, 10153,
10155, 10157, 10161, 10168); sec. 1704, 112 Stat. 2750 (44 U.S.C.
3504 note); sec. 651(e), Pub. L. 109-58, 119 Stat. 806-10 (42 U.S.C.
2014, 2021, 2021b, 2111).
Section 72.44(g) also issued under secs. 142(b) and 148(c), (d),
Pub. L. 100-203, 101 Stat. 1330-232, 1330-236 (42 U.S.C. 10162(b),
10168(c),(d)). Section 72.46 also issued under sec. 189, 68 Stat.
955 (42 U.S.C. 2239); sec. 134, Pub. L. 97-425, 96 Stat. 2230 (42
U.S.C. 10154). Section 72.96(d) also issued under sec. 145(g), Pub.
L. 100-203, 101 Stat. 1330-235 (42 U.S.C. 10165(g)). Subpart J also
issued under secs. 2(2), 2(15), 2(19), 117(a), 141(h), Pub. L. 97-
425, 96 Stat. 2202, 2203, 2204, 2222, 2244 (42 U.S.C. 10101,
10137(a), 10161(h)). Subparts K and L are also issued under sec.
133, 98 Stat. 2230 (42 U.S.C. 10153) and sec. 218(a), 96 Stat. 2252
(42 U.S.C. 10198).
0
2. In Sec. 72.214, Certificate of Compliance 1032 is added to read as
follows:
Sec. 72.214 List of approved spent fuel storage casks.
* * * * *
Certificate Number: 1032.
Initial Certificate Effective Date: June 13, 2011.
SAR Submitted by: Holtec International, Inc.
SAR Title: Safety Analysis Report on the HI-STORM FW System.
Docket Number: 72-1032.
Certificate Expiration Date: June 13, 2031.
Model Numbers: MPC-37, MPC-89.
Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 8th day of February 2011.
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
R.W. Borchardt,
Executive Director for Operations.
[FR Doc. 2011-7102 Filed 3-25-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-P