Small Business Jobs Act Tour: Selected Provisions Having an Effect on Government Contracting, 16703-16707 [2011-7135]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 58 / Friday, March 25, 2011 / Proposed Rules
exceed 8 centimeters in length and 8.5
millimeters in diameter.
(c) Commercial consignments. French
beans and runner beans must be
imported as commercial consignments
only.
(d) Phytosanitary certificate. Each
consignment of French beans or runner
beans must be accompanied by a
phytosanitary certificate issued by
Kenya’s NPPO attesting that the
conditions of this section have been met
and that the consignment has been
inspected and found free of the pests
listed in this section.
Done in Washington, DC, this 21st day of
March 2011.
Kevin Shea,
Acting Administrator, Animal and Plant
Health Inspection Service.
[FR Doc. 2011–7088 Filed 3–24–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–34–P
SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION
13 CFR Parts 121, 124, 125, 126, and
127
[Docket No. SBA–2011–0006]
Small Business Jobs Act Tour:
Selected Provisions Having an Effect
on Government Contracting
U.S. Small Business
Administration.
ACTION: Notice of Public Meetings.
AGENCY:
The U.S. Small Business
Administration’s (SBA) Office of
Government Contracting and Business
Development (GC/BD) is tasked with
implementing several provisions of the
Small Business Jobs Act of 2010 (SBJA).
On Monday, March 7, 2011, SBA
announced a series of public meetings
on its implementation of these
provisions. The dates, times and
locations, as well as registration
information, are set forth below. SBA is
providing this supplementary
information on the government
contracting provisions of the SBJA to
provide background and focus input.
SUMMARY:
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with PROPOSALS
9 to 10 am ..........................
10 to 10:15 am ...................
10:15 to 11:30 am ..............
11:30 am to 12:45 pm ........
VerDate Mar<15>2010
The meetings will be held on the
dates and times specified in the Event
Information section of the
Supplementary Information below. It is
recommended that all attendees register
at least one week prior to the scheduled
meeting date. In addition, comments to
SBA docket number SBA–2011–0006
must be received on or before April 16,
2011.
ADDRESSES: The meetings will be held at
the locations specified in the Event
Information section of the
Supplementary Information below.
Parties interested in attending a meeting
must register by providing the requested
registration information at https://
www.sba.gov/jobsacttour. In addition,
you may submit comments, identified
by SBA docket number SBA–2011–0006
by any of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
Mail: Small Business Jobs Act Tour—
Office of Government Contracting and
Business Development, U.S. Small
Business Administration, 409 Third
Street, SW., Suite 8000, Washington, DC
20416.
Hand Delivery/Courier: Richard L.
Miller, Small Business Jobs Act Tour—
Office of Government Contracting and
Business Development, 409 Third
Street, SW., Washington, DC 20416.
SBA will post all comments on https://
www.regulations.gov. If you wish to
submit confidential business
information (CBI) as defined in the User
Notice at https://www.regulations.gov,
please submit the information to Mr.
Miller, address above. Highlight the
information that you consider to be CBI
and explain why you believe SBA
should hold this information as
confidential. SBA will review the
information and make the final
determination whether it will publish
the information.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Richard L. Miller, Small Business Job’s
Act Tour—Office of Government
Contracting and Business Development,
409 Third Street, SW., Washington, DC
DATES:
16703
20416, at (202) 205–6895; Fax: (202)
481–4291; e-mail:
richard.miller@sba.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION
I. Background
On September 27, 2010, President
Obama signed the SBJA, which makes
many significant small business
program improvements. The new law
provides critical resources to help small
businesses continue to drive economic
recovery and create jobs. The new law
extended the successful SBA enhanced
loan provisions while offering billions
more in lending support, tax cuts, and
other opportunities for entrepreneurs
and small business owners. The new
law also contained numerous provisions
to help enhance small businesses ability
to compete in government contracting
and subcontracting. For example, the
law addresses small business set-asides
on multiple award contracts, contract
consolidation, and timely payments to
small business subcontractors. The
contracting provisions also dovetail
with recommendations released by the
Interagency Task Force on Small
Business Contracting in September
(https://www.sba.gov/content/
interagency-task-force-federalcontracting-opportunities-smallbusinesses). The Task Force was
established by the President in April
2010 to identify ways in which to
increase small business participation in
the federal marketplace so that agencies
meet and exceed their small business
contracting goals.
Accordingly, SBA will conduct a
Small Business Jobs Act Tour that will
cover 13 cities. The objective of the tour
is to provide information on SBJA
provisions and to receive input on key
SBJA provisions.
II. Topics and Agenda
While the agenda may vary from city
to city, a typical agenda is below. Please
visit https://www.sba.gov/jobsacttour for
updates on each location’s agenda.
Opening Keynote & Overview of Small Business Jobs Act.
Break.
Room 1—CONTRACTING
Discussion and intake session surrounding key Jobs Act provisions: multiple-award set-asides, bundling, consoli´ ´
dation of requirements, subcontracting, mentor-protege programs, presumption of loss and misrepresentation
issues, and annual certification issues.
Room 2—LENDER ROUNDTABLE
Discussion for current and prospective SBA lenders: new efforts to simplify/streamline, enhance customer service
in areas such as lending policy, processing, and oversight.
Room 3—EXPORTING
Discussion of new exporting tools: increased loan sizes, the Export Express program, state-level STEP grants, and
additional efforts under the National Export Initiative.
Room 1—CONTRACTING (session above continues)
Room 2—LENDER ROUNDTABLE (session above continues)
14:52 Mar 24, 2011
Jkt 223001
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
E:\FR\FM\25MRP1.SGM
25MRP1
16704
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 58 / Friday, March 25, 2011 / Proposed Rules
12:45 to 1:45 pm ................
1:45 to 3 pm .......................
3 to 4:15 pm .......................
Room 3—COUNSELING
Discussion of counseling and training resources: Jobs Act support for Small Business Development Centers, enhanced efforts to support export counseling.
Break for Lunch.
Room 1—CONTRACTING
Discussion of Size Standards: basics of SBA’s small business size standards, current comprehensive review of
size standards including methodology, other policy issues.
Room 2—CAPITAL
Discussion of opportunities in accessing capital: how SBA loan programs can help small business owners.
Room 3—EXPORTING (repeat)
Discussion of new exporting tools: Increased loan sizes, the Export Express program, state-level STEP grants,
and additional efforts under the National Export Initiative.
Room 1—CONTRACTING
Discussion of local/regional contracting environment and resources: ‘‘meet-and-greet’’ with representatives such as
regional/local SBA officials, 8(a) experts, and resource partners.
Room 2—CAPITAL
Discussion of new SBA loan programs and initiatives: Advantage loans, 504 re-financing (Jobs Act), the Dealer
Floor Plan pilot (Jobs Act), and more.
Room 3—COUNSELING (repeat)
Discussion of counseling and training resources: Jobs Act support for Small Business Development Centers, enhanced efforts to support export counseling.
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with PROPOSALS
A. Putting More Capital in the Hands of
Small Business Owners
SBA loans continue to be a critical
tool for helping small businesses get the
capital they need to grow and create
jobs. The Small Business Jobs Act made
permanent enhancements to SBA loan
programs, such as raising the maximum
loan sizes of the 7(a) and 504 programs.
In addition, temporary provisions in the
new law include a Dealer Floor Plan
financing pilot as well as a program that
allows some owner-occupied businesses
to refinance their commercial real estate
mortgages using an SBA loan. Beyond
the SBJA, SBA is taking several steps to
better serve its lending partners and
borrowers, to simplify and streamline
loan programs, and to improve oversight
of SBA lending. Small business owners,
prospective and current SBA lenders are
especially encouraged to attend, share
their ideas with the SBA, and learn
more about new tools being offered.
B. Expanding Resources for Counseling
and Training
SBA has at least one District Office in
each state, as well as about 14,000
affiliated counselors at Small Business
Development Centers, Women’s
Business Centers and SCORE chapters.
The Small Business Jobs Act is helping
support these groups in a number of
ways. For example, $50 million more is
being provided to support the network
of about 900 Small Business
Development Centers throughout the
country. Also, SBA is working with a
broad group of counselors to equip them
with more tools and information to help
small firms start or increase exporting.
All small business owners are
encouraged to attend and learn more
about the knowledge, tools, and contacts
that SBA affiliated counselors can help
provide.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:52 Mar 24, 2011
Jkt 223001
C. Expanding Exporting Opportunities
for Small Business
Small businesses looking for new
opportunities to increase sales and
profit, and take advantage of increased
demand for high-quality U.S. goods and
services, should consider exporting. The
Small Business Jobs Act includes
exporting resources to help small
businesses by making the SBA Export
Express pilot loan program permanent,
increasing maximum sizes for SBA’s
three export loan programs, and creating
a new State Trade and Export Promotion
(STEP) grants pilot program which will
provide funds to states to assist small
business interested in exporting. See
Notice of Grant Opportunities to States:
STEP Grant Program, 76 FR 10082 (Feb.
23, 2011). These expanded
opportunities also help build upon the
goal of doubling exports in the next five
years via the National Export Initiative.
Small business owners with a current or
prospective interest in exporting are
especially encouraged to attend.
D. Strengthening Small Businesses’
Ability To Compete for and Win Federal
Contracts
The federal government awards
hundreds of billions of dollars each year
in federal contracts, nearly one-fourth of
which goes to small firms. The Small
Business Jobs Act contained 19
provisions that will help small
businesses compete more effectively for
federal contracts and subcontracts. SBA
is rolling out these provisions that will
help ensure more fairness, more
opportunities, and more tools to help
match federal agencies with small
businesses that provide high-quality
products and services. SBA wants to
hear from interested parties about how
it can effectively roll out new
provisions, such as those relating to
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Multiple Award Contract set asides,
´ ´
subcontracting, Mentor Protege
Programs, and, at select events, its size
process. Small business contractors are
encouraged to attend, learn more about
these new tools, and share their
thoughts on improving the environment
for small business contracting. In
addition, SBA seeks input and
suggestions on the following specific
SBJA government contracting
provisions:
E. Multiple Award Contract Set-Asides
(Pub. L. 111–240 §§ 1311 1331)
Section 1311 of the SBJA defines the
term ‘‘multiple award contract.’’ In
addition, § 1331 of the SBJA requires the
Administrator of SBA and the
Administrator for Federal Procurement
Policy, in consultation with the
Administrator of the General Services
Administration (GSA) to issue
regulations under which ‘‘Federal
agencies may, at their discretion—(1)
Set aside part or parts of a multiple
award contract for small business
concerns, including the subcategories of
small business concerns * * * (2)
notwithstanding the fair opportunity
requirements under section 2304c(b) of
title 10, United States Code, and section
303J(b) of the Federal Property and
Administrative Services act of 1949 (41
U.S.C. 253j(b)), set aside orders placed
against multiple award contracts for
small business concerns, including the
subcategories of small business
concerns * * * and (3) reserve one or
more contract awards for small business
concerns under full and open multiple
award procurements, including the
subcategories of small business
concerns.’’ In reviewing these
provisions, the SBA would like input
and suggestions on the following
questions:
E:\FR\FM\25MRP1.SGM
25MRP1
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 58 / Friday, March 25, 2011 / Proposed Rules
1. How should guidance differentiate
between a total set-aside, a partial setaside, and a procurement otherwise
‘‘reserved’’ for small businesses When it
is appropriate for each to be used?
When would it be inappropriate for
each to be used? What types of
‘‘reserves’’ might be effective in a full
and open competition for a task and
delivery order contract to facilitate
access to small businesses (e.g.,
designating a certain number of the
multiple awards for award to small
businesses or subcategories of small
business, or permitting a small business
to receive a multiple award contract to
compete for only a specified subset of
functions on the task or delivery orders
issued against the contract)? Should
small businesses compete solely against
other small businesses for contracts that
are ‘‘reserved’’ for small business?
2. Should set-asides be authorized
under GSA’s Multiple Award Schedule
(MAS) contracts? Should they be
required under certain circumstances?
Why or why not? What additional steps
might be considered to increase small
business participation on the
Schedules? (Note: GSA has created a
new section of its GSA MAS Web site
focused on small business contracting at
https://www.gsa.gov/portal/content/
202261. Readers are encouraged to
review this site in considering their
response to this question).
3. Will small business utilization
under ‘‘multiple award contracts’’
including GSA MAS contracts be
increased through mandatory or
discretionary use of set-asides?
4. If small business set-asides are
mandated either at the contract level or
ordering level, how will it affect a
procuring agency’s use of ‘‘multiple
award contracts’’ including MAS
contracts?
5. If set-asides are applied to
‘‘multiple award contracts’’ including
GSA MAS contracts at the order level,
what are some of the potential benefits
or drawbacks?
6. At what time should small business
size be determined for a multiple-award
contract—at the time of (1) submission
of a proposal for the contract, (2)
submission of a quotation for the order,
or some combination? What affect
would requiring size determinations at
the order level have on the procurement
process for multiple award contracts?
7. How should the small business
requirements (e.g., limitation on
subcontracting; non-manufacturer rule)
apply to orders set aside for small
business?
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:52 Mar 24, 2011
Jkt 223001
F. Bundling Accountability,
Consolidation of Contracts
Requirements (Pub. L. 111–240 §§ 1312–
1313)
Section 1313 of the SBJA provide that
an agency may not conduct an
acquisition involving contract
requirements with a total value of more
than $2,000,000, unless the senior
procurement executive or Chief
Acquisition Officer for the Federal
agency, before carrying out the
acquisition strategy—(A) Conducts
market research; (B) identifies any
alternative contracting approaches that
would involve a lesser degree of
consolidation of contract requirements;
(C) makes a written determination that
the consolidation of contract
requirements is necessary and justified;
(D) identifies any negative impact by the
acquisition strategy on contracting with
small business concerns; and (E)
certifies to the head of the Federal
agency that steps will be taken to
include small business concerns in the
acquisition strategy. In addition, § 1312
of the SBJA requires agencies to post
their rationale for a bundled
requirement. In reviewing these
provisions, the SBA would like input
and suggestions on the following
questions:
1. If you are a small business, do you
frequently form teams (i.e., when small
businesses joint venture or form a prime
and subcontractor relationship) for
bundled contracts? Do you ever enter
into any other types of arrangements
besides joint ventures or prime/
subcontract relationships to compete for
bundled contracts? If so, please describe
these arrangements.
G. Subcontracting; Misrepresentations,
Plan Improvements, and Timeliness of
Payment (Pub. L. 111–240 §§ 1321,
1322, 1334)
The SBJA requires the Administrator
to establish a policy on small business
subcontracting compliance, including
assignment of periodic oversight and
review responsibilities between
contracting offices, small business
offices, and program offices (see § 1321).
It further provides that for contracts
requiring subcontracting plans, a large
business contractor must notify the
contracting officer in writing when the
prime fails to use a small business
concern in contract performance that
the prime used in preparing the bid or
offer (see § 1322). In addition, the SBJA
provides that for contracts requiring
subcontracting plans, a large business
contractor must notify the contracting
officer in writing when the prime has
been paid, the subcontractor has
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
16705
performed, and the prime’s payment to
the subcontractor is 90 days past due, or
the prime has paid the subcontractor a
reduced amount. Finally, the SBJA
further provides that a contracting
officer may record the identity of a
contractor with a history of unjustified,
untimely payments in the Federal
Awardee Performance and Integrity
System (see § 1334). In reviewing these
provisions, SBA would like input and
suggestions on the following questions:
1. With respect to Section 1321, who
is currently responsible for monitoring
small business subcontracting plan
compliance and performance? Is there a
function or office that can better
monitor performance and compliance?
2. In implementing sections 1322 and
1334, what factors should SBA take into
account to ensure the provision
facilitates opportunities for small
businesses in a manner that is
consistent with economy and efficiency
in federal contracting? For example,
should the contracting officer be
responsible for determining whether a
prime contractor used a particular
subcontractor in creating a bid or
proposal? Should the contracting officer
be responsible for determining whether
the subcontractor has satisfactorily
completed performance? How should
the prime contractor report to the
contracting officer? How should the
contracting officer use the reported
information? Are subcontractors able to
report to the contracting officer when a
prime contractor fails to utilize a
subcontractor or fails to pay a
subcontractor, or do prime contractors
restrict subcontractors’ ability to contact
the contacting officer?
3. With respect to section 1334, what,
if any, consequences should a prime
contractor’s late or reduced payment to
a small business subcontractor have on
that contractor’s future ability to receive
federal contracts?
´ ´
H. Mentor Protege Programs for WOSB,
HUBZONE, and SDVOSB (Pub. L. 111–
240 §§ 1331–1343)
The SBA’s 8(a) Business Development
Program currently authorizes a Mentor´ ´
Protege Program as a tool to aid small
Participant firms gain needed business
development assistance, including
expertise within their specific industries
to successfully compete in the
marketplace. The SBJA authorizes SBA
´ ´
to implement a Mentor-Protege Program
for HUBZone small businesses, service
disabled veteran owned (SDVO) small
businesses, and women-owned small
businesses (WOSB) similar in structure
´ ´
to the current SBA 8(a) Mentor-Protege
Program. SBA is seeking input and
suggestions on the following questions:
E:\FR\FM\25MRP1.SGM
25MRP1
16706
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 58 / Friday, March 25, 2011 / Proposed Rules
1. If SBA implements a Government´ ´
wide Mentor-Protege program for
HUBZone small businesses, SDVO small
businesses and WOSBs, how should
these government-wide programs
´ ´
interact with Mentor-Protege programs
sponsored by individual agencies?
´ ´
Should agency-specific Mentor-Protege
programs of other agencies be
maintained? What, if any, challenges
might this pose?
´ ´
2. Should the Mentor-Protege
programs be identical for each of the
programs (HUBZone, SDVO, WOSB) or
should current differences contained in
the programs be continued (e.g.,
HUBZone program regulations currently
allow joint ventures for HUBZone
contracts only between 2 or more
certified HUBZone firms; if continued, a
mentor that is not a HUBZone firm
could not perform a HUBZone contract
as a joint venture with its HUBZone
´ ´
protege firm)?
3. Are there specific industry sectors
where small business development
´ ´
through Mentor-Protege programs
should be focused?
4. What types of incentives should be
considered to encourage the formation
´ ´
of Mentor-Protege relationships? Are
there examples of incentives used by
´ ´
other agencies in their Mentor-Protege
programs (other than those requiring
additional outlays of funds) that would
benefit SBA’s program?
5. What metrics should be considered
´ ´
to gauge a successful Mentor Protege
relationship?
6. What controls should be considered
to mitigate potential fraud, waste, and
´ ´
abuse in the Mentor-Protege
relationship?
7. Would small businesses be better
served if created a Government-wide
´ ´
Mentor-Protege program to provide
oversight and offer best practices, or
would small businesses prefer Mentor´ ´
Protege programs for each individual
socioeconomic group?
I. Presumption of Loss/
Misrepresentation and Annual
Certification of Size (Pub. L. 111–240
§§ 1341–1343)
Section 1341 of the SBJA provides
that there shall be a presumption of loss
equal to the value of the contract,
subcontract, grant, cooperative
agreement or cooperative research and
development agreement set aside or
intended for award to a small business
when a concern willfully sought and
received the award by
misrepresentation. Section 1341 also
provides that the submission of a bid or
proposal for a contract, subcontract,
grant, cooperative agreement or
cooperative research and development
set aside for small business concerns
shall be deemed an affirmative, willful
and intentional certification of size or
status. Section 1341 further provides
that an offer or application for a
contract, subcontract or grant shall
contain a certification of size or status
signed by an authorized official on the
same page containing the certification.
Finally, Section 1341 also provides that
SBA shall promulgate regulations to
protect concerns from liability for
misrepresentations in the case of
unintentional errors, technical
malfunctions and other situations.
Section 1342 of the SBJA provides that
concerns shall update their size or
status in federal procurement databases
at least annually, and firms that fail to
update its status shall no longer be
identified as small or some other status
in the database. SBA is seeking input
and suggestions on the following
questions:
1. How does the deemed certification
provision interact or relate to the
requirement to provide a signature in
connection with a size or status
representation or certification?
2. How can an individual or firm
claim a misrepresentation was
unintentional or a technical malfunction
when the individual signed a
certification that contained the precise
size or status being claimed?
3. What effect will the requirement to
update size or status in federal
procurement databases annually have
on multi-year contracts?
III. Event Information
Location
Date
Address
Columbus, OH .................................
March 28, 2011, Begins 9 a.m.,
Ends 4:15 p.m.
March 28, 2011, Begins 9 a.m.,
Ends 4:15 p.m.
March 30, 2011, Begins 9 a.m.,
Ends 4:15 p.m.
March 30, 2011, Begins 9:30 a.m.,
Ends 4:45 p.m.
April 1, 2011, Begins 9 a.m., Ends
4:15 p.m.
April 1, 2011, Begins 9 a.m., Ends
4:15 p.m.
April 11, 2011, Begins 9 a.m.,
Ends 4:15 p.m.
April 11, 2011, Begins 9 a.m.,
Ends 4:15 p.m.
April 13, 2011, Begins 9 a.m.,
Ends 4:15 p.m.
April 13, 2011, Begins 9 a.m.,
Ends 4:15 p.m.
April 15, 2011, Begins 9 a.m.,
Ends 4:15 p.m.
April 15, 2011, Begins 9 a.m.,
Ends 4:15 p.m.
TBD ................................................
The Ohio State University, Ohio Union, 1739 N. High St., Columbus,
OH 43210.
Miami Dade College, Wolfson Campus, Chapman Center (Building
3), 300 NE., 2nd Avenue, Miami, FL 33132.
26 Federal Plaza, 6th Floor Conference Room A/B, New York, NY
10278.
Loudermilk Center, 40 Courtland Street, NE., Atlanta, 30303.
Miami, FL ........................................
New York, NY .................................
Atlanta, GA ......................................
Boston, MA ......................................
San Antonio, TX ..............................
Albuquerque, NM ............................
San Diego, CA ................................
Denver, CO .....................................
Seattle, WA .....................................
Huntsville, AL ..................................
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with PROPOSALS
Chicago, IL ......................................
Washington, DC ..............................
IV. Registration and Oral Presentation
Any individual interested in
attending and making an oral
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:52 Mar 24, 2011
Jkt 223001
O’Neill Federal Building, 10 Causeway Street, Boston, MA 02222.
The Norris Conference Center, 4522 Fredericksburg Road, San Antonio, TX 78201.
Embassy Suites Albuquerque, 1000 Woodward Place, NE., Albuquerque, NM 87102.
County Health Services Complex, 3851 Rosecrans St., San Diego,
CA 92110.
Lowry Conference Center, 1061 Akron Wy. Bldg. 697, Denver, CO
80230.
Holiday Inn, Seattle-SeaTac International Airport, 17338 International
Blvd., Seattle, WA 98188.
Chan Auditorium, College of Business, 801 Sparkman Drive, Huntsville, AL 35899.
Citigroup Center Building, 500 West Madison Street, Suite 1150, Chicago, IL 60661.
TBD.
presentation shall pre-register in
advance with SBA. Oral presentations
may consist of comments on existing
rules and procedures, general questions,
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
or new ideas for the SBA to consider.
Presentations will be made in the
breakout sessions, pursuant to the
format of each session. Based on the
E:\FR\FM\25MRP1.SGM
25MRP1
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 58 / Friday, March 25, 2011 / Proposed Rules
number of registrants it may be
necessary to impose time limits to
ensure that everyone who wishes to
speak has the opportunity to do so.
Please refer to https://www.sba.gov/
jobsacttour for registration information.
SBA will attempt to accommodate all
interested parties.
V. Information on Service for
Individuals With Disabilities
Reasonable accommodations will be
provided to those who request
assistance at least one week in advance
of the meeting for which assistance is
being requested. For a complete list of
meeting dates, locations and points of
contact please visit https://www.sba.gov/
jobsacttour.
is less than $25; and add to Rule 17Ad–
17 a provision clarifying that the written
notification requirements shall have no
effect on State escheatment laws. The
amendment also requires the
Commission to ‘‘adopt such rules,
regulations, and orders necessary to
implement this subsection no later than
1 year after the date of enactment of this
subsection.’’ The Commission is
publishing for comment proposed
amendments to Rule 17Ad–17 to
implement the statutory requirements.
DATES: Comments should be received on
or before May 9, 2011.
ADDRESSES: Comments may be
submitted by any of the following
methods:
Electronic Comments
Authority: Pub. L. 111–240.
[Release No. 34–64099; File No. S7–11–11]
• Use the Commission’s Internet
comment form (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/proposed.shtml);
• Send an e-mail to rulecomments@sec.gov and include File
Number S7–11–11 on the subject line;
or
• Use the Federal eRulemaking Portal
(https://www.regulations.gov) and follow
the instructions for submitting
comments.
RIN 3235–AL11
Paper Comments
Ana Ma,
Chief of Staff.
[FR Doc. 2011–7135 Filed 3–24–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
17 CFR Part 240
Rule 17Ad–17; Transfer Agents’,
Brokers’, and Dealers’ Obligation To
Search for Lost Securityholders;
Paying Agents’ Obligation To Search
for Missing Securityholders
Securities and Exchange
Commission.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
The Dodd-Frank Wall Street
Reform and Consumer Protection Act
(‘‘Dodd-Frank Act’’) amended the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(‘‘Exchange Act’’) by adding a subsection
entitled, ‘‘Due Diligence for the Delivery
of Dividends, Interest, and Other
Valuable Property Rights.’’ The
amendment directs the Securities and
Exchange Commission (‘‘Commission’’)
to revise Exchange Act Rule 17Ad–17,
‘‘Transfer Agents’ Obligation to Search
for Lost Securityholders’’ to: extend to
brokers and dealers the requirement of
Rule 17Ad–17 to search for lost
securityholders; add to Rule 17Ad–17 a
requirement that ‘‘paying agents’’ notify
‘‘missing security holders’’ in writing
that the paying agent has sent the
missing security holder a check that has
not yet been negotiated; add to Rule
17Ad–17 an exclusion for paying agents
from the notification requirements when
the value of the not yet negotiated check
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with PROPOSALS
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:52 Mar 24, 2011
Jkt 223001
• Send paper comments in triplicate
to Elizabeth M. Murphy, Secretary,
Securities and Exchange Commission,
100 F Street, NE., Washington, DC
20549–1090.
All submissions should refer to File
Number S7–11–11. To help us process
and review your comments more
efficiently, please use only one method.
The Commission will post all comments
on the Commission’s Internet Web site
(https://www.sec.gov/rules/
proposed.shtml). Comments are also
available for Web site viewing and
printing in the Commission’s Public
Reference Room, 100 F Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20549, on official
business days between the hours of
10 a.m. and 3 p.m. All comments
received will be posted without change;
the Commission does not edit personal
identifying information from
submissions. You should submit only
information that you wish to make
publicly available.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jerry
W. Carpenter, Assistant Director, or
Thomas C. Etter, Jr., Special Counsel, at
(202) 551–5710, Division of Trading and
Markets, Securities and Exchange
Commission, 100 F Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20549–7010.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
16707
I. Introduction
On July 21, 2010, the President signed
the Dodd-Frank Act into law.1 The
Dodd-Frank Act was enacted to, among
other things, promote the financial
stability of the United States by
improving accountability and
transparency in the financial system.2
Title IX of the Dodd-Frank Act provides
the Commission with new tools to
protect investors and improve the
regulation of securities.3
Section 929W of the Dodd-Frank Act
added subsection (g) to Section 17A of
the Exchange Act (‘‘Section 17A(g)’’),
which requires the Commission to
revise Rule 17Ad–17 under the
Exchange Act (‘‘Rule 17Ad–17’’) 4 to
extend the rule’s requirement that
transfer agents search for ‘‘lost
securityholders’’ to brokers and dealers.5
Section 17A(g) further directs the
Commission to revise Rule 17Ad–17 to
provide a requirement that the ‘‘paying
agent provide a single written
notification to each missing security
holder that the missing security holder
has been sent a check that has not yet
been negotiated.’’ 6 Under Section
17A(g), written notification must be sent
to a missing security holder no later
than seven months after the sending of
the not yet negotiated check.7
Section 17A(g)(1)(D)(ii) defines
‘‘paying agent’’ to include ‘‘any issuer,
1 Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer
Protection Act, Pub. L. 111–203, 124 Stat. 1376
(2010).
2 See id. at Preamble.
3 See id. § 901 (‘‘This section may be cited as the
‘Investor Protection and Securities Reform Act of
2010’.’’); Title IX (‘‘Investor Protections and
Improvements to the Regulation of Securities’’).
4 17 CFR 240.17Ad–17.
5 Rule 17Ad–17(b)(2) defines a ‘‘lost
securityholder’’ to mean ‘‘a securityholder: (i) To
whom an item of correspondence that was sent to
the securityholder at the address contained in the
transfer agent’s master securityholder file has been
returned as undeliverable; provided, however, that
if such item is re-sent within one month to the lost
securityholder, the transfer agent may deem the
securityholder to be a lost securityholder as of the
day the resent item is returned as undeliverable;
and (ii) for whom the transfer agent has not
received information regarding the securityholder’s
new address.’’
6 Section 17A(g)(1)(A), 15 U.S.C. 78q–1(g)(1)(A).
We note that Congress, in drafting Exchange Act
Section 17A(g), used a two-word formulation of the
term ‘‘security holder.’’ In Rule 17Ad–17, however,
there is a one-word formulation of the term
‘‘securityholder.’’ For the sake of consistency within
Rule 17Ad–17, we are proposing to use the term
‘‘missing securityholder’’ in Rule 17Ad–17.
Throughout this release, we have used the term
‘‘securityholder’’ when discussing Rule 17Ad–17,
and we have used the term ‘‘security holder’’ when
discussing Section 929W of the Dodd-Frank Act or
Section 17A(g) of the Exchange Act.
7 Id. Section 17A(g) provides that written
notification may be sent along with a check or other
mailing subsequently sent to the missing security
holder.
E:\FR\FM\25MRP1.SGM
25MRP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 58 (Friday, March 25, 2011)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 16703-16707]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-7135]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION
13 CFR Parts 121, 124, 125, 126, and 127
[Docket No. SBA-2011-0006]
Small Business Jobs Act Tour: Selected Provisions Having an
Effect on Government Contracting
AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.
ACTION: Notice of Public Meetings.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The U.S. Small Business Administration's (SBA) Office of
Government Contracting and Business Development (GC/BD) is tasked with
implementing several provisions of the Small Business Jobs Act of 2010
(SBJA). On Monday, March 7, 2011, SBA announced a series of public
meetings on its implementation of these provisions. The dates, times
and locations, as well as registration information, are set forth
below. SBA is providing this supplementary information on the
government contracting provisions of the SBJA to provide background and
focus input.
DATES: The meetings will be held on the dates and times specified in
the Event Information section of the Supplementary Information below.
It is recommended that all attendees register at least one week prior
to the scheduled meeting date. In addition, comments to SBA docket
number SBA-2011-0006 must be received on or before April 16, 2011.
ADDRESSES: The meetings will be held at the locations specified in the
Event Information section of the Supplementary Information below.
Parties interested in attending a meeting must register by providing
the requested registration information at https://www.sba.gov/jobsacttour. In addition, you may submit comments, identified by SBA
docket number SBA-2011-0006 by any of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
Mail: Small Business Jobs Act Tour--Office of Government
Contracting and Business Development, U.S. Small Business
Administration, 409 Third Street, SW., Suite 8000, Washington, DC
20416.
Hand Delivery/Courier: Richard L. Miller, Small Business Jobs Act
Tour--Office of Government Contracting and Business Development, 409
Third Street, SW., Washington, DC 20416.
SBA will post all comments on https://www.regulations.gov. If you
wish to submit confidential business information (CBI) as defined in
the User Notice at https://www.regulations.gov, please submit the
information to Mr. Miller, address above. Highlight the information
that you consider to be CBI and explain why you believe SBA should hold
this information as confidential. SBA will review the information and
make the final determination whether it will publish the information.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Richard L. Miller, Small Business
Job's Act Tour--Office of Government Contracting and Business
Development, 409 Third Street, SW., Washington, DC 20416, at (202) 205-
6895; Fax: (202) 481-4291; e-mail: richard.miller@sba.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION
I. Background
On September 27, 2010, President Obama signed the SBJA, which makes
many significant small business program improvements. The new law
provides critical resources to help small businesses continue to drive
economic recovery and create jobs. The new law extended the successful
SBA enhanced loan provisions while offering billions more in lending
support, tax cuts, and other opportunities for entrepreneurs and small
business owners. The new law also contained numerous provisions to help
enhance small businesses ability to compete in government contracting
and subcontracting. For example, the law addresses small business set-
asides on multiple award contracts, contract consolidation, and timely
payments to small business subcontractors. The contracting provisions
also dovetail with recommendations released by the Interagency Task
Force on Small Business Contracting in September (https://www.sba.gov/content/interagency-task-force-federal-contracting-opportunities-small-businesses). The Task Force was established by the President in April
2010 to identify ways in which to increase small business participation
in the federal marketplace so that agencies meet and exceed their small
business contracting goals.
Accordingly, SBA will conduct a Small Business Jobs Act Tour that
will cover 13 cities. The objective of the tour is to provide
information on SBJA provisions and to receive input on key SBJA
provisions.
II. Topics and Agenda
While the agenda may vary from city to city, a typical agenda is
below. Please visit https://www.sba.gov/jobsacttour for updates on each
location's agenda.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------
9 to 10 am................................ Opening Keynote & Overview
of Small Business Jobs Act.
10 to 10:15 am............................ Break.
10:15 to 11:30 am......................... Room 1--CONTRACTING
Discussion and intake
session surrounding key
Jobs Act provisions:
multiple-award set-asides,
bundling, consolidation of
requirements,
subcontracting, mentor-
prot[eacute]g[eacute]
programs, presumption of
loss and misrepresentation
issues, and annual
certification issues.
Room 2--LENDER ROUNDTABLE
Discussion for current and
prospective SBA lenders:
new efforts to simplify/
streamline, enhance
customer service in areas
such as lending policy,
processing, and oversight.
Room 3--EXPORTING
Discussion of new exporting
tools: increased loan
sizes, the Export Express
program, state-level STEP
grants, and additional
efforts under the National
Export Initiative.
11:30 am to 12:45 pm...................... Room 1--CONTRACTING (session
above continues)
Room 2--LENDER ROUNDTABLE
(session above continues)
[[Page 16704]]
Room 3--COUNSELING
Discussion of counseling and
training resources: Jobs
Act support for Small
Business Development
Centers, enhanced efforts
to support export
counseling.
12:45 to 1:45 pm.......................... Break for Lunch.
1:45 to 3 pm.............................. Room 1--CONTRACTING
Discussion of Size
Standards: basics of SBA's
small business size
standards, current
comprehensive review of
size standards including
methodology, other policy
issues.
Room 2--CAPITAL
Discussion of opportunities
in accessing capital: how
SBA loan programs can help
small business owners.
Room 3--EXPORTING (repeat)
Discussion of new exporting
tools: Increased loan
sizes, the Export Express
program, state-level STEP
grants, and additional
efforts under the National
Export Initiative.
3 to 4:15 pm.............................. Room 1--CONTRACTING
Discussion of local/regional
contracting environment and
resources: ``meet-and-
greet'' with
representatives such as
regional/local SBA
officials, 8(a) experts,
and resource partners.
Room 2--CAPITAL
Discussion of new SBA loan
programs and initiatives:
Advantage loans, 504 re-
financing (Jobs Act), the
Dealer Floor Plan pilot
(Jobs Act), and more.
Room 3--COUNSELING (repeat)
Discussion of counseling and
training resources: Jobs
Act support for Small
Business Development
Centers, enhanced efforts
to support export
counseling.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
A. Putting More Capital in the Hands of Small Business Owners
SBA loans continue to be a critical tool for helping small
businesses get the capital they need to grow and create jobs. The Small
Business Jobs Act made permanent enhancements to SBA loan programs,
such as raising the maximum loan sizes of the 7(a) and 504 programs. In
addition, temporary provisions in the new law include a Dealer Floor
Plan financing pilot as well as a program that allows some owner-
occupied businesses to refinance their commercial real estate mortgages
using an SBA loan. Beyond the SBJA, SBA is taking several steps to
better serve its lending partners and borrowers, to simplify and
streamline loan programs, and to improve oversight of SBA lending.
Small business owners, prospective and current SBA lenders are
especially encouraged to attend, share their ideas with the SBA, and
learn more about new tools being offered.
B. Expanding Resources for Counseling and Training
SBA has at least one District Office in each state, as well as
about 14,000 affiliated counselors at Small Business Development
Centers, Women's Business Centers and SCORE chapters. The Small
Business Jobs Act is helping support these groups in a number of ways.
For example, $50 million more is being provided to support the network
of about 900 Small Business Development Centers throughout the country.
Also, SBA is working with a broad group of counselors to equip them
with more tools and information to help small firms start or increase
exporting. All small business owners are encouraged to attend and learn
more about the knowledge, tools, and contacts that SBA affiliated
counselors can help provide.
C. Expanding Exporting Opportunities for Small Business
Small businesses looking for new opportunities to increase sales
and profit, and take advantage of increased demand for high-quality
U.S. goods and services, should consider exporting. The Small Business
Jobs Act includes exporting resources to help small businesses by
making the SBA Export Express pilot loan program permanent, increasing
maximum sizes for SBA's three export loan programs, and creating a new
State Trade and Export Promotion (STEP) grants pilot program which will
provide funds to states to assist small business interested in
exporting. See Notice of Grant Opportunities to States: STEP Grant
Program, 76 FR 10082 (Feb. 23, 2011). These expanded opportunities also
help build upon the goal of doubling exports in the next five years via
the National Export Initiative. Small business owners with a current or
prospective interest in exporting are especially encouraged to attend.
D. Strengthening Small Businesses' Ability To Compete for and Win
Federal Contracts
The federal government awards hundreds of billions of dollars each
year in federal contracts, nearly one-fourth of which goes to small
firms. The Small Business Jobs Act contained 19 provisions that will
help small businesses compete more effectively for federal contracts
and subcontracts. SBA is rolling out these provisions that will help
ensure more fairness, more opportunities, and more tools to help match
federal agencies with small businesses that provide high-quality
products and services. SBA wants to hear from interested parties about
how it can effectively roll out new provisions, such as those relating
to Multiple Award Contract set asides, subcontracting, Mentor
Prot[eacute]g[eacute] Programs, and, at select events, its size
process. Small business contractors are encouraged to attend, learn
more about these new tools, and share their thoughts on improving the
environment for small business contracting. In addition, SBA seeks
input and suggestions on the following specific SBJA government
contracting provisions:
E. Multiple Award Contract Set-Asides (Pub. L. 111-240 Sec. Sec. 1311
1331)
Section 1311 of the SBJA defines the term ``multiple award
contract.'' In addition, Sec. 1331 of the SBJA requires the
Administrator of SBA and the Administrator for Federal Procurement
Policy, in consultation with the Administrator of the General Services
Administration (GSA) to issue regulations under which ``Federal
agencies may, at their discretion--(1) Set aside part or parts of a
multiple award contract for small business concerns, including the
subcategories of small business concerns * * * (2) notwithstanding the
fair opportunity requirements under section 2304c(b) of title 10,
United States Code, and section 303J(b) of the Federal Property and
Administrative Services act of 1949 (41 U.S.C. 253j(b)), set aside
orders placed against multiple award contracts for small business
concerns, including the subcategories of small business concerns * * *
and (3) reserve one or more contract awards for small business concerns
under full and open multiple award procurements, including the
subcategories of small business concerns.'' In reviewing these
provisions, the SBA would like input and suggestions on the following
questions:
[[Page 16705]]
1. How should guidance differentiate between a total set-aside, a
partial set-aside, and a procurement otherwise ``reserved'' for small
businesses When it is appropriate for each to be used? When would it be
inappropriate for each to be used? What types of ``reserves'' might be
effective in a full and open competition for a task and delivery order
contract to facilitate access to small businesses (e.g., designating a
certain number of the multiple awards for award to small businesses or
subcategories of small business, or permitting a small business to
receive a multiple award contract to compete for only a specified
subset of functions on the task or delivery orders issued against the
contract)? Should small businesses compete solely against other small
businesses for contracts that are ``reserved'' for small business?
2. Should set-asides be authorized under GSA's Multiple Award
Schedule (MAS) contracts? Should they be required under certain
circumstances? Why or why not? What additional steps might be
considered to increase small business participation on the Schedules?
(Note: GSA has created a new section of its GSA MAS Web site focused on
small business contracting at https://www.gsa.gov/portal/content/202261.
Readers are encouraged to review this site in considering their
response to this question).
3. Will small business utilization under ``multiple award
contracts'' including GSA MAS contracts be increased through mandatory
or discretionary use of set-asides?
4. If small business set-asides are mandated either at the contract
level or ordering level, how will it affect a procuring agency's use of
``multiple award contracts'' including MAS contracts?
5. If set-asides are applied to ``multiple award contracts''
including GSA MAS contracts at the order level, what are some of the
potential benefits or drawbacks?
6. At what time should small business size be determined for a
multiple-award contract--at the time of (1) submission of a proposal
for the contract, (2) submission of a quotation for the order, or some
combination? What affect would requiring size determinations at the
order level have on the procurement process for multiple award
contracts?
7. How should the small business requirements (e.g., limitation on
subcontracting; non-manufacturer rule) apply to orders set aside for
small business?
F. Bundling Accountability, Consolidation of Contracts Requirements
(Pub. L. 111-240 Sec. Sec. 1312-1313)
Section 1313 of the SBJA provide that an agency may not conduct an
acquisition involving contract requirements with a total value of more
than $2,000,000, unless the senior procurement executive or Chief
Acquisition Officer for the Federal agency, before carrying out the
acquisition strategy--(A) Conducts market research; (B) identifies any
alternative contracting approaches that would involve a lesser degree
of consolidation of contract requirements; (C) makes a written
determination that the consolidation of contract requirements is
necessary and justified; (D) identifies any negative impact by the
acquisition strategy on contracting with small business concerns; and
(E) certifies to the head of the Federal agency that steps will be
taken to include small business concerns in the acquisition strategy.
In addition, Sec. 1312 of the SBJA requires agencies to post their
rationale for a bundled requirement. In reviewing these provisions, the
SBA would like input and suggestions on the following questions:
1. If you are a small business, do you frequently form teams (i.e.,
when small businesses joint venture or form a prime and subcontractor
relationship) for bundled contracts? Do you ever enter into any other
types of arrangements besides joint ventures or prime/subcontract
relationships to compete for bundled contracts? If so, please describe
these arrangements.
G. Subcontracting; Misrepresentations, Plan Improvements, and
Timeliness of Payment (Pub. L. 111-240 Sec. Sec. 1321, 1322, 1334)
The SBJA requires the Administrator to establish a policy on small
business subcontracting compliance, including assignment of periodic
oversight and review responsibilities between contracting offices,
small business offices, and program offices (see Sec. 1321). It
further provides that for contracts requiring subcontracting plans, a
large business contractor must notify the contracting officer in
writing when the prime fails to use a small business concern in
contract performance that the prime used in preparing the bid or offer
(see Sec. 1322). In addition, the SBJA provides that for contracts
requiring subcontracting plans, a large business contractor must notify
the contracting officer in writing when the prime has been paid, the
subcontractor has performed, and the prime's payment to the
subcontractor is 90 days past due, or the prime has paid the
subcontractor a reduced amount. Finally, the SBJA further provides that
a contracting officer may record the identity of a contractor with a
history of unjustified, untimely payments in the Federal Awardee
Performance and Integrity System (see Sec. 1334). In reviewing these
provisions, SBA would like input and suggestions on the following
questions:
1. With respect to Section 1321, who is currently responsible for
monitoring small business subcontracting plan compliance and
performance? Is there a function or office that can better monitor
performance and compliance?
2. In implementing sections 1322 and 1334, what factors should SBA
take into account to ensure the provision facilitates opportunities for
small businesses in a manner that is consistent with economy and
efficiency in federal contracting? For example, should the contracting
officer be responsible for determining whether a prime contractor used
a particular subcontractor in creating a bid or proposal? Should the
contracting officer be responsible for determining whether the
subcontractor has satisfactorily completed performance? How should the
prime contractor report to the contracting officer? How should the
contracting officer use the reported information? Are subcontractors
able to report to the contracting officer when a prime contractor fails
to utilize a subcontractor or fails to pay a subcontractor, or do prime
contractors restrict subcontractors' ability to contact the contacting
officer?
3. With respect to section 1334, what, if any, consequences should
a prime contractor's late or reduced payment to a small business
subcontractor have on that contractor's future ability to receive
federal contracts?
H. Mentor Prot[eacute]g[eacute] Programs for WOSB, HUBZONE, and SDVOSB
(Pub. L. 111-240 Sec. Sec. 1331-1343)
The SBA's 8(a) Business Development Program currently authorizes a
Mentor-Prot[eacute]g[eacute] Program as a tool to aid small Participant
firms gain needed business development assistance, including expertise
within their specific industries to successfully compete in the
marketplace. The SBJA authorizes SBA to implement a Mentor-
Prot[eacute]g[eacute] Program for HUBZone small businesses, service
disabled veteran owned (SDVO) small businesses, and women-owned small
businesses (WOSB) similar in structure to the current SBA 8(a) Mentor-
Prot[eacute]g[eacute] Program. SBA is seeking input and suggestions on
the following questions:
[[Page 16706]]
1. If SBA implements a Government-wide Mentor-Prot[eacute]g[eacute]
program for HUBZone small businesses, SDVO small businesses and WOSBs,
how should these government-wide programs interact with Mentor-
Prot[eacute]g[eacute] programs sponsored by individual agencies? Should
agency-specific Mentor-Prot[eacute]g[eacute] programs of other agencies
be maintained? What, if any, challenges might this pose?
2. Should the Mentor-Prot[eacute]g[eacute] programs be identical
for each of the programs (HUBZone, SDVO, WOSB) or should current
differences contained in the programs be continued (e.g., HUBZone
program regulations currently allow joint ventures for HUBZone
contracts only between 2 or more certified HUBZone firms; if continued,
a mentor that is not a HUBZone firm could not perform a HUBZone
contract as a joint venture with its HUBZone prot[eacute]g[eacute]
firm)?
3. Are there specific industry sectors where small business
development through Mentor-Prot[eacute]g[eacute] programs should be
focused?
4. What types of incentives should be considered to encourage the
formation of Mentor-Prot[eacute]g[eacute] relationships? Are there
examples of incentives used by other agencies in their Mentor-
Prot[eacute]g[eacute] programs (other than those requiring additional
outlays of funds) that would benefit SBA's program?
5. What metrics should be considered to gauge a successful Mentor
Prot[eacute]g[eacute] relationship?
6. What controls should be considered to mitigate potential fraud,
waste, and abuse in the Mentor-Prot[eacute]g[eacute] relationship?
7. Would small businesses be better served if created a Government-
wide Mentor-Prot[eacute]g[eacute] program to provide oversight and
offer best practices, or would small businesses prefer Mentor-
Prot[eacute]g[eacute] programs for each individual socioeconomic group?
I. Presumption of Loss/Misrepresentation and Annual Certification of
Size (Pub. L. 111-240 Sec. Sec. 1341-1343)
Section 1341 of the SBJA provides that there shall be a presumption
of loss equal to the value of the contract, subcontract, grant,
cooperative agreement or cooperative research and development agreement
set aside or intended for award to a small business when a concern
willfully sought and received the award by misrepresentation. Section
1341 also provides that the submission of a bid or proposal for a
contract, subcontract, grant, cooperative agreement or cooperative
research and development set aside for small business concerns shall be
deemed an affirmative, willful and intentional certification of size or
status. Section 1341 further provides that an offer or application for
a contract, subcontract or grant shall contain a certification of size
or status signed by an authorized official on the same page containing
the certification. Finally, Section 1341 also provides that SBA shall
promulgate regulations to protect concerns from liability for
misrepresentations in the case of unintentional errors, technical
malfunctions and other situations. Section 1342 of the SBJA provides
that concerns shall update their size or status in federal procurement
databases at least annually, and firms that fail to update its status
shall no longer be identified as small or some other status in the
database. SBA is seeking input and suggestions on the following
questions:
1. How does the deemed certification provision interact or relate
to the requirement to provide a signature in connection with a size or
status representation or certification?
2. How can an individual or firm claim a misrepresentation was
unintentional or a technical malfunction when the individual signed a
certification that contained the precise size or status being claimed?
3. What effect will the requirement to update size or status in
federal procurement databases annually have on multi-year contracts?
III. Event Information
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Location Date Address
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Columbus, OH.................. March 28, 2011, The Ohio State
Begins 9 a.m., University, Ohio
Ends 4:15 p.m. Union, 1739 N. High
St., Columbus, OH
43210.
Miami, FL..................... March 28, 2011, Miami Dade College,
Begins 9 a.m., Wolfson Campus,
Ends 4:15 p.m. Chapman Center
(Building 3), 300
NE., 2nd Avenue,
Miami, FL 33132.
New York, NY.................. March 30, 2011, 26 Federal Plaza, 6th
Begins 9 a.m., Floor Conference
Ends 4:15 p.m. Room A/B, New York,
NY 10278.
Atlanta, GA................... March 30, 2011, Loudermilk Center, 40
Begins 9:30 Courtland Street,
a.m., Ends 4:45 NE., Atlanta, 30303.
p.m.
Boston, MA.................... April 1, 2011, O'Neill Federal
Begins 9 a.m., Building, 10
Ends 4:15 p.m. Causeway Street,
Boston, MA 02222.
San Antonio, TX............... April 1, 2011, The Norris Conference
Begins 9 a.m., Center, 4522
Ends 4:15 p.m. Fredericksburg Road,
San Antonio, TX
78201.
Albuquerque, NM............... April 11, 2011, Embassy Suites
Begins 9 a.m., Albuquerque, 1000
Ends 4:15 p.m. Woodward Place, NE.,
Albuquerque, NM
87102.
San Diego, CA................. April 11, 2011, County Health
Begins 9 a.m., Services Complex,
Ends 4:15 p.m. 3851 Rosecrans St.,
San Diego, CA 92110.
Denver, CO.................... April 13, 2011, Lowry Conference
Begins 9 a.m., Center, 1061 Akron
Ends 4:15 p.m. Wy. Bldg. 697,
Denver, CO 80230.
Seattle, WA................... April 13, 2011, Holiday Inn, Seattle-
Begins 9 a.m., SeaTac International
Ends 4:15 p.m. Airport, 17338
International Blvd.,
Seattle, WA 98188.
Huntsville, AL................ April 15, 2011, Chan Auditorium,
Begins 9 a.m., College of Business,
Ends 4:15 p.m. 801 Sparkman Drive,
Huntsville, AL
35899.
Chicago, IL................... April 15, 2011, Citigroup Center
Begins 9 a.m., Building, 500 West
Ends 4:15 p.m. Madison Street,
Suite 1150, Chicago,
IL 60661.
Washington, DC................ TBD.............. TBD.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
IV. Registration and Oral Presentation
Any individual interested in attending and making an oral
presentation shall pre-register in advance with SBA. Oral presentations
may consist of comments on existing rules and procedures, general
questions, or new ideas for the SBA to consider. Presentations will be
made in the breakout sessions, pursuant to the format of each session.
Based on the
[[Page 16707]]
number of registrants it may be necessary to impose time limits to
ensure that everyone who wishes to speak has the opportunity to do so.
Please refer to https://www.sba.gov/jobsacttour for registration
information. SBA will attempt to accommodate all interested parties.
V. Information on Service for Individuals With Disabilities
Reasonable accommodations will be provided to those who request
assistance at least one week in advance of the meeting for which
assistance is being requested. For a complete list of meeting dates,
locations and points of contact please visit https://www.sba.gov/jobsacttour.
Authority: Pub. L. 111-240.
Ana Ma,
Chief of Staff.
[FR Doc. 2011-7135 Filed 3-24-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-P