Reorganization of Regulations on Control of Employment of Aliens, 16525-16526 [2011-6961]
Download as PDF
16525
Rules and Regulations
Federal Register
Vol. 76, No. 57
Thursday, March 24, 2011
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER
contains regulatory documents having general
applicability and legal effect, most of which
are keyed to and codified in the Code of
Federal Regulations, which is published under
50 titles pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 1510.
The Code of Federal Regulations is sold by
the Superintendent of Documents. Prices of
new books are listed in the first FEDERAL
REGISTER issue of each week.
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Executive Office for Immigration
Review
8 CFR Part 1274a
[EOIR No. 166F; AG Order No. 3260–2011]
RIN 1125–AA64
Reorganization of Regulations on
Control of Employment of Aliens
Executive Office for
Immigration Review, Department of
Justice.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
This final rule adopts without
change an interim rule with request for
comments published in the Federal
Register on January 15, 2009. The
interim rule amended regulations of the
Executive Office for Immigration
Review (EOIR), Department of Justice,
by deleting the unnecessary, duplicative
provisions in part 1274a of chapter V in
title 8 of the Code of Federal
Regulations (CFR) that are the
responsibility of the Department of
Homeland Security (DHS). This rule
also revised the remaining provisions in
part 1274a to reference the applicable
DHS regulations.
DATES: This rule is effective March 24,
2011.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Robin M. Stutman, General Counsel,
Executive Office for Immigration
Review, 5107 Leesburg Pike, Suite 2600,
Falls Church, Virginia 22041, telephone
(703) 305–0470 (not a toll-free call).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On
January 15, 2009, the Department of
Justice published an interim rule with
request for comments amending 8 CFR
part 1274a. Reorganization of
Regulations on Control of Employment
of Aliens, 74 FR 2337 (Jan. 15, 2009).
The Homeland Security Act of 2002, as
amended, transferred the functions of
jdjones on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with RULES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:49 Mar 23, 2011
Jkt 223001
the former Immigration and
Naturalization Service (INS) from the
Department of Justice to DHS; however,
it retained under the authority of the
Attorney General the functions of EOIR,
a separate agency within the
Department of Justice. As the existing
regulations often intermingled the
responsibilities of the former INS and
EOIR, this transfer required a
reorganization of title 8 of the CFR in
February 2003, including the
establishment of a new chapter V in 8
CFR pertaining to EOIR. As part of this
reorganization, a number of regulations
pertaining to the responsibilities of DHS
intentionally were duplicated in the
new chapter V because those regulations
also included provisions relating to the
responsibilities of EOIR. As explained
in the interim rule, the Department of
Justice has determined that most of the
duplicated regulations in part 1274a
pertain to functions that are DHS’s
responsibility and do not need to be
reproduced in EOIR’s regulations in
chapter V. The interim rule deleted the
unnecessary, duplicative regulations in
part 1274a and revised the remaining
EOIR provisions to reference the
applicable DHS regulations.
The Department of Justice provided
an opportunity for post-promulgation
comment even though this is a rule of
internal agency organization. The
comment period ended March 16, 2009.
Two comments were received,
including one from a legal service
provider and another from a member of
the public. The first comment proposed
adding a new document—proof of
asylee status—to the list of ‘‘Documents
that Establish Employment
Authorization’’ in 8 CFR 274a.2. The
Department notes that the two sections
mentioned by the commenter, 8 CFR
274a.2 and 274a.12, are DHS regulations
and are not part of the EOIR regulations.
This comment appears to be addressing
changes proposed by DHS in its interim
rule, Documents Acceptable for
Employment Eligibility Verification, 73
FR 76505 (Dec. 17, 2008). Furthermore,
the comment did not discuss EOIR’s
regulations or EOIR’s interim rule. The
second comment expressed a general
opinion about employment of aliens in
the United States and did not discuss
EOIR’s interim rule. As neither
comment addressed the changes set
forth in the interim rule, there is no
reason to revise the provisions of that
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
rule. Accordingly, the interim rule
amending 8 CFR part 1274a that was
published on January 15, 2009, is being
adopted as a final rule without change.
Regulatory Requirements
Administrative Procedure Act
The Department of Justice provided
an opportunity for post-promulgation
public comment under 5 U.S.C. 553,
even though compliance with the
requirements in 5 U.S.C. 553 with
regard to notice of proposed rulemaking
and delayed effective date is
unnecessary. Such compliance is
unnecessary because this rule makes
only technical amendments to the
organization, procedures, and practices
of the Department of Justice to improve
the organization of the Department
regulations, reflects the transfer of
functions contemplated by the
Homeland Security Act of 2002, and
recodifies existing regulations.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
As notice of proposed rulemaking is
not required for this rule under the
Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C.
553, the provisions of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601 et seq., do
not apply.
Paperwork Reduction Act
The provisions of the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995, Public Law 104–
13, 44 U.S.C. chapter 35, and its
implementing regulations, 5 CFR part
1320, do not apply to this interim rule
because there are no new or revised
recordkeeping or reporting
requirements.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
This rule will not result in the
expenditure by State, local, and Tribal
governments, in the aggregate, or by the
private sector, of $100 million or more
in any one year, and it will not
significantly or uniquely affect small
governments. Therefore, no actions were
deemed necessary under the provisions
of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995.
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996
This rule is not a major rule as
defined by section 251 of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996, (SBREFA), 5
U.S.C. 804. This rule will not result in
E:\FR\FM\24MRR1.SGM
24MRR1
16526
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 57 / Thursday, March 24, 2011 / Rules and Regulations
an annual effect on the economy of $100
million or more; a major increase in
costs or prices; or significant adverse
effects on competition, employment,
investment, productivity, innovation, or
on the ability of United States-based
companies to compete with foreignbased companies in domestic and
export markets.
Dated: March 18, 2011.
Eric H. Holder, Jr.,
Attorney General.
Congressional Review Act
Federal Aviation Administration
This action pertains to agency
organization, procedures, and practices
and does not substantially affect the
rights or obligations of non-agency
parties. Accordingly, it is not a ‘‘rule’’ as
that term is used by the Congressional
Review Act (Subtitle E, SBREFA).
Therefore, the reporting requirement of
5 U.S.C. 801 does not apply.
14 CFR Part 39
Executive Order 12866
This rule has been drafted and
reviewed in accordance with Executive
Order 12866, section 1(b), Principles of
Regulation. The Department of Justice
has determined that this rule is not a
‘‘significant regulatory action’’ under
section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866,
Regulatory Planning and Review.
Accordingly, this rule has not been
reviewed by the Office of Management
and Budget (OMB).
Executive Order 13132
This rule will not have substantial
direct effects on the States, on the
relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government. Therefore, in
accordance with section 6 of Executive
Order 13132, the Department of Justice
has determined that this rule does not
have sufficient federalism implications
to warrant a federalism summary impact
statement.
Executive Order 12988
This rule meets the applicable
standards set forth in sections 3(a) and
3(b)(2) of Executive Order 12988, Civil
Justice Reform.
List of Subjects in Part 1274a
jdjones on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with RULES
Administrative practice and
procedure, Immigration.
PART 1247a—[AMENDED]
Accordingly, the interim rule
amending 8 CFR part 1274a that was
published at 74 FR 2337 on January 15,
2009, is adopted as a final rule without
change.
■
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:49 Mar 23, 2011
Jkt 223001
availability of this material at the FAA,
call 781–238–7125.
[FR Doc. 2011–6961 Filed 3–23–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410–30–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
[Docket No. FAA–2010–0452; Directorate
Identifier 98–ANE–80–AD; Amendment 39–
16639; AD 2011–07–02]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Pratt &
Whitney JT8D–209, –217, –217A,
–217C, and –219 Series Turbofan
Engines
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
We are superseding an
existing airworthiness directive (AD) for
the products listed above. That AD
currently requires initial and repetitive
torque inspections of the 3rd stage and
4th stage low-pressure turbine (LPT)
blades for shroud notch wear and
replacement of the blade if wear limits
are exceeded. That AD also requires
replacing LPT-to-exhaust case bolts and
nuts with bolts and nuts made of
Tinidur material. This new AD requires
the same torque inspection, blade, and
Tinidur nut replacement actions, but
requires replacement of the LPT-toexhaust case bolts with longer bolts
made of Tinidur material. This AD also
requires installation of crushable sleeve
spacers on the bolts. This AD was
prompted by nine reports of failure of
Tinidur material LPT-to-exhaust case
bolts, as a result of blade failure, since
AD 2005–02–03 became effective. We
are issuing this AD to prevent turbine
blade failures that could result in
uncontained engine debris and damage
to the airplane.
DATES: This AD is effective April 28,
2011. The Director of the Federal
Register approved the incorporation by
reference of certain publications listed
in the AD as of April 28, 2011.
ADDRESSES: For service information
identified in this AD, contact Pratt &
Whitney, 400 Main St., East Hartford,
CT 06108; phone: (860) 565–8770, fax:
(860) 565–4503. You may review copies
of the referenced service information at
the FAA, Engine & Propeller Directorate,
12 New England Executive Park,
Burlington, MA. For information on the
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on
the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov; or in person at the
Docket Management Facility between
9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through
Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD
docket contains this AD, the regulatory
evaluation, any comments received, and
other information. The address for the
Docket Office (phone: 800–647–5527) is
Document Management Facility, U.S.
Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M–30, West Building
Ground Floor, Room W12–140, 1200
New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington,
DC 20590.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ian
Dargin, Aerospace Engineer, Engine
Certification Office, FAA, Engine and
Propeller Directorate, 12 New England
Executive Park; Burlington, MA 01803;
phone: 781–238–7178; fax: 781–238–
7199; e-mail: ian.dargin@faa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Discussion
We issued a notice of proposed
rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR
part 39 to supersede AD 2005–02–03,
Amendment 39–13948 (70 FR 3867,
January 27, 2005). That AD applies to
the specified products. The NPRM
published in the Federal Register on
July 1, 2010 (75 FR 38052). That NPRM
proposed the same torque inspection,
blade, and LPT-to-exhaust case retaining
nut replacement actions as the
superseded AD, but would also require
replacement of the LPT-to-exhaust case
bolts with longer bolts made of Tinidur
material. That NPRM also proposed to
require installation of crushable sleeve
spacers on the LPT-to-exhaust case
bolts.
Comments
We gave the public the opportunity to
participate in developing this AD. We
have considered the comments received.
Request to Include Other FAAApproved Methods
One commenter, American Airlines,
requested that paragraph (s) of the
proposed AD be revised to include other
FAA-approved methods not published
in the OEM’s engine manual.
We agree and changed paragraph (t) to
state: ‘‘For the purpose of this AD,
‘‘refurbished’’ is defined as restoration of
the shrouds and/or blade re-twist per
the JT8D–200 Engine Manual, Part No.
773128, or per an operator’s approved
manual system.’’
E:\FR\FM\24MRR1.SGM
24MRR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 57 (Thursday, March 24, 2011)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 16525-16526]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-6961]
========================================================================
Rules and Regulations
Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains regulatory documents
having general applicability and legal effect, most of which are keyed
to and codified in the Code of Federal Regulations, which is published
under 50 titles pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 1510.
The Code of Federal Regulations is sold by the Superintendent of Documents.
Prices of new books are listed in the first FEDERAL REGISTER issue of each
week.
========================================================================
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 57 / Thursday, March 24, 2011 / Rules
and Regulations
[[Page 16525]]
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Executive Office for Immigration Review
8 CFR Part 1274a
[EOIR No. 166F; AG Order No. 3260-2011]
RIN 1125-AA64
Reorganization of Regulations on Control of Employment of Aliens
AGENCY: Executive Office for Immigration Review, Department of Justice.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This final rule adopts without change an interim rule with
request for comments published in the Federal Register on January 15,
2009. The interim rule amended regulations of the Executive Office for
Immigration Review (EOIR), Department of Justice, by deleting the
unnecessary, duplicative provisions in part 1274a of chapter V in title
8 of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) that are the responsibility
of the Department of Homeland Security (DHS). This rule also revised
the remaining provisions in part 1274a to reference the applicable DHS
regulations.
DATES: This rule is effective March 24, 2011.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Robin M. Stutman, General Counsel,
Executive Office for Immigration Review, 5107 Leesburg Pike, Suite
2600, Falls Church, Virginia 22041, telephone (703) 305-0470 (not a
toll-free call).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On January 15, 2009, the Department of
Justice published an interim rule with request for comments amending 8
CFR part 1274a. Reorganization of Regulations on Control of Employment
of Aliens, 74 FR 2337 (Jan. 15, 2009). The Homeland Security Act of
2002, as amended, transferred the functions of the former Immigration
and Naturalization Service (INS) from the Department of Justice to DHS;
however, it retained under the authority of the Attorney General the
functions of EOIR, a separate agency within the Department of Justice.
As the existing regulations often intermingled the responsibilities of
the former INS and EOIR, this transfer required a reorganization of
title 8 of the CFR in February 2003, including the establishment of a
new chapter V in 8 CFR pertaining to EOIR. As part of this
reorganization, a number of regulations pertaining to the
responsibilities of DHS intentionally were duplicated in the new
chapter V because those regulations also included provisions relating
to the responsibilities of EOIR. As explained in the interim rule, the
Department of Justice has determined that most of the duplicated
regulations in part 1274a pertain to functions that are DHS's
responsibility and do not need to be reproduced in EOIR's regulations
in chapter V. The interim rule deleted the unnecessary, duplicative
regulations in part 1274a and revised the remaining EOIR provisions to
reference the applicable DHS regulations.
The Department of Justice provided an opportunity for post-
promulgation comment even though this is a rule of internal agency
organization. The comment period ended March 16, 2009. Two comments
were received, including one from a legal service provider and another
from a member of the public. The first comment proposed adding a new
document--proof of asylee status--to the list of ``Documents that
Establish Employment Authorization'' in 8 CFR 274a.2. The Department
notes that the two sections mentioned by the commenter, 8 CFR 274a.2
and 274a.12, are DHS regulations and are not part of the EOIR
regulations. This comment appears to be addressing changes proposed by
DHS in its interim rule, Documents Acceptable for Employment
Eligibility Verification, 73 FR 76505 (Dec. 17, 2008). Furthermore, the
comment did not discuss EOIR's regulations or EOIR's interim rule. The
second comment expressed a general opinion about employment of aliens
in the United States and did not discuss EOIR's interim rule. As
neither comment addressed the changes set forth in the interim rule,
there is no reason to revise the provisions of that rule. Accordingly,
the interim rule amending 8 CFR part 1274a that was published on
January 15, 2009, is being adopted as a final rule without change.
Regulatory Requirements
Administrative Procedure Act
The Department of Justice provided an opportunity for post-
promulgation public comment under 5 U.S.C. 553, even though compliance
with the requirements in 5 U.S.C. 553 with regard to notice of proposed
rulemaking and delayed effective date is unnecessary. Such compliance
is unnecessary because this rule makes only technical amendments to the
organization, procedures, and practices of the Department of Justice to
improve the organization of the Department regulations, reflects the
transfer of functions contemplated by the Homeland Security Act of
2002, and recodifies existing regulations.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
As notice of proposed rulemaking is not required for this rule
under the Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C. 553, the provisions of
the Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601 et seq., do not apply.
Paperwork Reduction Act
The provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, Public Law
104-13, 44 U.S.C. chapter 35, and its implementing regulations, 5 CFR
part 1320, do not apply to this interim rule because there are no new
or revised recordkeeping or reporting requirements.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
This rule will not result in the expenditure by State, local, and
Tribal governments, in the aggregate, or by the private sector, of $100
million or more in any one year, and it will not significantly or
uniquely affect small governments. Therefore, no actions were deemed
necessary under the provisions of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of
1995.
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996
This rule is not a major rule as defined by section 251 of the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, (SBREFA), 5
U.S.C. 804. This rule will not result in
[[Page 16526]]
an annual effect on the economy of $100 million or more; a major
increase in costs or prices; or significant adverse effects on
competition, employment, investment, productivity, innovation, or on
the ability of United States-based companies to compete with foreign-
based companies in domestic and export markets.
Congressional Review Act
This action pertains to agency organization, procedures, and
practices and does not substantially affect the rights or obligations
of non-agency parties. Accordingly, it is not a ``rule'' as that term
is used by the Congressional Review Act (Subtitle E, SBREFA).
Therefore, the reporting requirement of 5 U.S.C. 801 does not apply.
Executive Order 12866
This rule has been drafted and reviewed in accordance with
Executive Order 12866, section 1(b), Principles of Regulation. The
Department of Justice has determined that this rule is not a
``significant regulatory action'' under section 3(f) of Executive Order
12866, Regulatory Planning and Review. Accordingly, this rule has not
been reviewed by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB).
Executive Order 13132
This rule will not have substantial direct effects on the States,
on the relationship between the national government and the States, or
on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various
levels of government. Therefore, in accordance with section 6 of
Executive Order 13132, the Department of Justice has determined that
this rule does not have sufficient federalism implications to warrant a
federalism summary impact statement.
Executive Order 12988
This rule meets the applicable standards set forth in sections 3(a)
and 3(b)(2) of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform.
List of Subjects in Part 1274a
Administrative practice and procedure, Immigration.
PART 1247a--[AMENDED]
0
Accordingly, the interim rule amending 8 CFR part 1274a that was
published at 74 FR 2337 on January 15, 2009, is adopted as a final rule
without change.
Dated: March 18, 2011.
Eric H. Holder, Jr.,
Attorney General.
[FR Doc. 2011-6961 Filed 3-23-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-30-P