Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; Washington: Correction, 16365-16367 [2011-6872]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 56 / Wednesday, March 23, 2011 / Proposed Rules
section 23–23–5 of the RIGL which
provides for the RI DEM Director ‘‘to
advise, consult, and cooperate with the
cities and towns and other agencies of
the State, Federal government, and other
states and interstate agencies * * *’’
Connecticut, Maine, New Hampshire
and Rhode Island all meet the
requirements for Section 110(a)(2)(M)
for the 1997 8-hour ozone standard.
jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS
IV. Proposed Action
EPA is proposing to find that the
current SIPs for the States of
Connecticut, Maine, New Hampshire
and Rhode Island meet the
infrastructure elements and the
corresponding subsection of the CAA
listed below for the 1997 8-hour ozone
standard:
Emission limits and other control
measures (110(a)(2)(A));
Ambient air quality monitoring/data
system (110(a)(2)(B));
Program for enforcement of control
measures (110(a)(2)(C));
Interstate Transport (110(a)(2)(D)(ii));
Adequate resources (110(a)(2)(E));
Stationary source monitoring system
(110(a)(2)(F));
Emergency power (110(a)(2)(G));
Future SIP revisions (110(a)(2)(H));
Consultation with government
officials (110(a)(2)(J));
Public notification (110(a)(2)(J));
Prevention of significant deterioration
(110(a)(2)(J));
Air quality modeling data
(110(a)(2)(K));
Permitting fees (110(a)(2)(L)); and
Consultation/participation by affected
local entities (110(a)(2)(M)).
EPA is soliciting public comments on
the issues discussed in this proposal or
on other relevant matters. These
comments will be considered before
EPA takes final action. Interested parties
may participate in the Federal
rulemaking procedure by submitting
written comments to the EPA New
England Regional Office listed in the
ADDRESSES section of this Federal
Register, or by submitting comments
electronically, by mail, or through hand
delivery/courier following the
directions in the ADDRESSES section of
this Federal Register.
Please note that if EPA receives
adverse comment on an amendment,
paragraph, or section of this action and
if that provision may be severed from
the remainder of the action, EPA may
adopt as final those provisions that are
not the subject of an adverse comment.
In addition, EPA may take final action
on one or more of these state’s
submittals separately, depending on the
circumstances involved with each
state’s submittal.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:59 Mar 22, 2011
Jkt 223001
16365
IV. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
costs on tribal governments or preempt
tribal law.
Under the Clean Air Act, the
Administrator is required to approve a
SIP submission that complies with the
provisions of the Act and applicable
Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k);
40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in reviewing SIP
submissions, EPA’s role is to approve
state choices, provided that they meet
the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
Accordingly, this proposed action
merely approves state law as meeting
Federal requirements and does not
impose additional requirements beyond
those imposed by state law. For that
reason, this proposed action:
• Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ subject to review by the Office
of Management and Budget under
Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735,
October 4, 1993);
• Does not impose an information
collection burden under the provisions
of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
• Is certified as not having a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act
(5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
• Does not contain any unfunded
mandate or significantly or uniquely
affect small governments, as described
in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4);
• Does not have Federalism
implications as specified in Executive
Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10,
1999);
• Is not an economically significant
regulatory action based on health or
safety risks subject to Executive Order
13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997);
• Is not a significant regulatory action
subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR
28355, May 22, 2001);
• Is not subject to requirements of
Section 12(d) of the National
Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because
application of those requirements would
be inconsistent with the Clean Air Act;
and
• Does not provide EPA with the
discretionary authority to address, as
appropriate, disproportionate human
health or environmental effects, using
practicable and legally permissible
methods, under Executive Order 12898
(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
In addition, this rule does not have
tribal implications as specified by
Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249,
November 9, 2000), because the SIP is
not approved to apply in Indian country
located in the state, and EPA notes that
it will not impose substantial direct
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
PO 00000
Frm 00045
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Carbon monoxide,
Incorporation by reference,
Intergovernmental relations, Lead,
Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, Particulate
matter, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Sulfur oxides, Volatile
organic compounds.
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Dated: March 15, 2011.
Ira W. Leighton,
Acting Regional Administrator, EPA New
England.
[FR Doc. 2011–6870 Filed 3–22–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R10–OAR–2011–0315, FRL–9285–6]
Approval and Promulgation of
Implementation Plans; Washington:
Correction
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
EPA is proposing to correct
errors in the State Implementation Plan
(SIP) for the State of Washington
regarding the scope of certain
regulations incorporated by reference
into the SIP. This correction would limit
the applicability of certain regulations
to pollutants for which National
Ambient Air Quality Standards
(NAAQS) have been established and
precursors to those NAAQS pollutants.
It would thus ensure that these
regulations are reasonably related to
attainment or maintenance of the
NAAQS in Washington.
DATES: Comments must be received on
or before April 22, 2011.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R10–
OAR–2011–0315, by any of the
following methods:
• https://www.regulations.gov: Follow
the on-line instructions for submitting
comments.
• E-mail: R10Public_Comments@epa.gov.
• Mail: Kristin Hall, EPA Region 10,
Office of Air, Waste and Toxics (AWT–
107), 1200 Sixth Avenue, Suite 900,
Seattle, WA 98101.
• Hand Delivery/Courier: EPA Region
10, 1200 Sixth Avenue, Suite 900,
Seattle, WA 98101. Attention: Kristin
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\23MRP1.SGM
23MRP1
jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS
16366
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 56 / Wednesday, March 23, 2011 / Proposed Rules
Hall, Office of Air, Waste and Toxics,
AWT–107. Such deliveries are only
accepted during normal hours of
operation, and special arrangements
should be made for deliveries of boxed
information.
Instructions: Direct your comments to
Docket ID No. EPA–R10–OAR–2011–
0315. EPA’s policy is that all comments
received will be included in the public
docket without change and may be
made available online at https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information provided, unless
the comment includes information
claimed to be Confidential Business
Information (CBI) or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Do not submit information that you
consider to be CBI or otherwise
protected through https://
www.regulations.gov or e-mail. The
https://www.regulations.gov Web site is
an ‘‘anonymous access’’ system, which
means EPA will not know your identity
or contact information unless you
provide it in the body of your comment.
If you send an e-mail comment directly
to EPA without going through https://
www.regulations.gov your e-mail
address will be automatically captured
and included as part of the comment
that is placed in the public docket and
made available on the Internet. If you
submit an electronic comment, EPA
recommends that you include your
name and other contact information in
the body of your comment and with any
disk or CD–ROM you submit. If EPA
cannot read your comment due to
technical difficulties and cannot contact
you for clarification, EPA may not be
able to consider your comment.
Electronic files should avoid the use of
special characters, any form of
encryption, and be free of any defects or
viruses.
Docket: All documents in the docket
are listed in the https://
www.regulations.gov index. Although
listed in the index, some information is
not publicly available, e.g., CBI or other
information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Certain other
material, such as copyrighted material,
is not placed on the Internet and will be
publicly available only in hard copy.
Publicly available docket materials are
available either electronically in https://
www.regulations.gov or in hard copy
during normal business hours at the
Office of Air, Waste and Toxics, EPA
Region 10, 1200 Sixth Avenue, Seattle,
WA 98101.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Kristin Hall at telephone number: (206)
553–6357, e-mail address:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:59 Mar 22, 2011
Jkt 223001
hall.kristin@epa.gov, or the above EPA,
Region 10 address.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Throughout this document wherever
‘‘we’’, ‘‘us’’ or ‘‘our’’ are used, we mean
EPA. Information is organized as
follows:
Table of Contents
I. What action is EPA proposing?
II. What is the basis for the action that EPA
is proposing?
III. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
I. What action is EPA proposing?
Section 109 of the Clean Air Act
(CAA) requires EPA to promulgate
regulations establishing national
ambient air quality standards (NAAQS)
for those air pollutants for which air
quality criteria have been issued
pursuant to Section 108 of the CAA
(referred to as criteria or NAAQS
pollutants). EPA has set NAAQS for six
pollutants: sulfur dioxide, particulate
matter, nitrogen dioxide, carbon
monoxide, ozone and lead at 40 CFR
part 50. EPA has identified ammonia,
volatile organic compounds, nitrogen
oxides, and sulfur dioxide as precursors
to one or more of these NAAQS
pollutants. See CAA 302(g); 40 CFR
51.1000. Section 110 of the CAA
requires States to adopt and submit to
EPA for approval State Implementation
Plans (SIPs) to implement, maintain,
and enforce the NAAQS. In general,
State and local regulations approved by
EPA into the SIP under Section 110 of
the CAA must reasonably relate to
attainment and maintenance of the
NAAQS. See generally CAA 110; see
also Memorandum from Michael A.
James, EPA, to Regional Counsels, Re:
Status of State/Local Air Pollution
Control Measures Not Related to
NAAQS, dated February 7, 1979
(‘‘measures to control non-criteria
pollutants [pollutants that are not
NAAQS pollutants or their precursors]
may not legally be made part of a
SIP.’’).1
In several instances in the past, EPA
has approved into the Washington SIP
general air pollution regulations that
cover a broader range of air pollutants
than NAAQS pollutants or their
precursors. To the extent EPA’s prior
approvals of these general provisions
did not distinguish between those
pollutants that reasonably relate to
attainment and maintenance of the
NAAQS (that is, NAAQS pollutants and
their precursors), such approvals were
1 Of course, SIP approved Prevention of
Significant Deterioration programs must cover any
‘‘regulated NSR pollutant,’’ see 40 CFR 52.21(b)(50),
which definition includes more than NAAQS
pollutants and NAAQS precursors.
PO 00000
Frm 00046
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
overly broad, approved in error, and
should be corrected.
EPA is therefore proposing to correct
its previous approval of the following
provisions of the Washington SIP to
make clear that EPA’s approval of such
regulations is limited to application of
these requirements to air pollutants that
are NAAQS pollutants or precursors to
a NAAQS pollutant:
Department of Ecology (Ecology):
WAC 173–400–040 (except WAC 173–
400–040(1)(c), (1)(d), (2), (4) and the
second paragraph of (6) 2) (state effective
9/20/93; EPA effective 6/2/95);
Energy Facility Site Evaluation
Council (EFSEC): WAC 463–39–005(1)
(EFSEC’s incorporation by reference of
WAC 173–400–040, except for WAC
173–400–040(1)(c), (1)(d), (2), (4) and
the second paragraph of (6)) (state
effective 9/21/95; EPA effective 7/22/
96);
Northwest Clean Air Authority
(NWCAA): NWCAA Sec. 104.1
(NWCAA’s incorporation by reference of
WAC 173–400–040 except for WAC
173–400–040(1)(c), (1)(d), (2), (4) and
the second paragraph of (6)) (state
effective 11/13/94; EPA effective 12/26/
95);
Puget Sound Clean Air Agency
(PSCAA): PSCAA Reg. I, Sec. 304
(except for Reg. 1, Sec. 304(e)) (state
effective 3/11/99; EPA effective 9/30/
04);
Southwest Clean Air Agency
(SWCAA): SWCAA Sec. 400–040
(except SWCAA Sec. 400–040(1)(c),
(1)(d), (2), (4), and (6)(a)) (state effective
9/21/95; EPA effective 4/28/97);
Yakima Regional Clean Air Authority
(YRCAA): YRCAA Article V, Section
5.06 (state effective 12/15/95; EPA
effective 3/4/98); Section 5.12 (state
effective 12/15/95; EPA effective 3/4/
98); Section 12.01 (YRCAA’s
incorporation by reference of WAC 173–
400–040 except WAC 173–400–
040(1)(c), (1)(d), (2), (4) and the second
paragraph of (6)) (state effective 12/15/
95; EPA effective 3/4/98).
In a letter dated March 10, 2011,
Ecology and SWCAA stated their
support of EPA’s approval of this
correction and narrowing of the
Washington SIP.
II. What is the basis for the action that
EPA is proposing?
Under section 110(k)(6) of the CAA,
whenever EPA determines that its
action approving, disapproving, or
promulgating any plan or plan revision
(or part thereof), area designation,
2 The excepted provisions have not been
approved into the Washington SIP for any air
pollutant.
E:\FR\FM\23MRP1.SGM
23MRP1
jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 56 / Wednesday, March 23, 2011 / Proposed Rules
redesignation, classification, or
reclassification was in error, EPA may
in the same manner as the approval,
disapproval, or promulgation revise
such action as appropriate without
requiring any further submission from
the State. Such determination and the
basis thereof shall be provided to the
State and public.
Pursuant to section 110(k)(6), EPA is
proposing to find that its approval of
these State and local provisions was in
error, and to clarify and, as necessary,
narrow its approval of certain
regulations in the Washington SIP so
that EPA’s approval of those regulations
as part of the Washington SIP is limited
to their application to those pollutants
that are reasonably related to attainment
or maintenance of the NAAQS, that is,
NAAQS pollutants and their precursors.
EPA has previously similarly relied on
section 110(k)(6) of the CAA to remove
from other States’ SIPs provisions that
do not relate to attainment or
maintenance of the NAAQS or to
narrow SIP provisions consistent with
CAA requirements. See, e.g., 75 FR 2440
(January 15, 2010) (removing from
Kentucky SIP rule regulating hazardous
air pollutants); 74 FR 27442 (June 10,
2009) (removing from the Indiana SIP
provisions relating to hazardous air
pollutants); 73 FR 21546 (April 22,
2008) (removing the word ‘‘odor’’ from
the definition of air contaminant in the
New York SIP); 70 FR 58311 (October 6,
2005) (removing from the Idaho SIP a
cross-reference to toxic air pollutants);
66 FR 57391 (November 15, 2001)
(removing from the Missoula CityCounty portion of the Montana SIP
provisions relating to, among other
things, fluoride emission standards); see
also Limitation of Approval of
Prevention of Significant Deterioration
Provisions Concerning Greenhouse Gas
Emitting-Sources in State
Implementation Plans; Final Rule, 75 FR
82536, 82543–44 (Dec. 30, 2010)
(relying on the authority of CAA
110(k)(6) to narrow the scope of Federal
approval of State Prevention of
Significant Deterioration (PSD) SIP
provisions to ensure that federally
enforceable requirements of the PSD
programs of these States did not apply
at lower thresholds for greenhouse gases
than those under Federal PSD
requirements in the Tailoring Rule).
Narrowing EPA’s approval of these
regulations to NAAQS pollutants and
their precursors will have no affect on
Washington’s ability to demonstrate
attainment and maintenance of the
NAAQS or to meet any other
requirement of the CAA.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:59 Mar 22, 2011
Jkt 223001
III. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
Under the CAA, the Administrator is
required to approve a SIP submission
that complies with the provisions of the
Act and applicable Federal regulations.
42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a).
Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions,
EPA’s role is to approve State choices,
provided that they meet the criteria of
the CAA. Accordingly, this proposed
action merely corrects EPA’s prior SIP
approvals to be consistent with Federal
requirements and does not impose
additional requirements beyond those
imposed by the State’s law. For that
reason, this proposed action:
• Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ subject to review by the Office
of Management and Budget under
Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735,
October 4, 1993);
• Does not impose an information
collection burden under the provisions
of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
• Is certified as not having a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act
(5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
• Does not contain any unfunded
mandate or significantly or uniquely
affect small governments, as described
in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4);
• Does not have Federalism
implications as specified in Executive
Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10,
1999);
• Is not an economically significant
regulatory action based on health or
safety risks subject to Executive Order
13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997);
• Is not a significant regulatory action
subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR
28355, May 22, 2001);
• Is not subject to requirements of
Section 12(d) of the National
Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because
application of those requirements would
be inconsistent with the CAA; and
• Does not provide EPA with the
discretionary authority to address, as
appropriate, disproportionate human
health or environmental effects, using
practicable and legally permissible
methods, under Executive Order 12898
(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
In addition, this rule does not have
Tribal implications as specified by
Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249,
November 9, 2000), because the SIP is
not approved to apply in Indian country
located in Washington,3 and EPA notes
3 The one exception is within the exterior
boundaries of the Puyallup Indian Reservation, also
PO 00000
Frm 00047
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
16367
that it will not impose substantial direct
costs on Tribal governments or preempt
Tribal law.
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Intergovernmental relations,
and Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Dated: March 16, 2011.
Dennis J. McLerran,
Regional Administrator, Region 10.
[FR Doc. 2011–6872 Filed 3–22–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS
COMMISSION
47 CFR Parts 1 and 64
[WC Docket No. 11–39; FCC 11–41]
Implementation of the Truth in Caller
ID Act of 2009
Federal Communications
Commission.
ACTION: Proposed rules.
AGENCY:
In this Notice of Proposed
Rulemaking (NPRM), the Commission
proposes rules to implement the Truth
in Caller ID Act of 2009. The proposed
rules prohibit caller ID spoofing done
with the intent to defraud, cause harm,
or wrongfully obtain anything of value.
The Commission also seeks comments
that will assist the Commission in
preparing a statutorily required report to
Congress on whether additional
legislation is necessary to prohibit the
provision of inaccurate caller
identification information in
technologies that are successor or
replacement technologies to
telecommunications services or IPenabled voice services.
DATES: Comments are due on or before
April 18, 2011 and reply comments are
due on or before May 3, 2011.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments,
identified by WC Docket No. 11–39, by
any of the following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• Federal Communications
Commission’s Web Site: https://
fjallfoss.fcc.gov/ecfs2/. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
SUMMARY:
known as the 1873 Survey Area. Under the
Puyallup Tribe of Indians Settlement Act of 1989,
25 U.S.C. 1773, Congress explicitly provided State
and local agencies in Washington authority over
activities on non-trust lands within the 1873 Survey
Area.
E:\FR\FM\23MRP1.SGM
23MRP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 56 (Wednesday, March 23, 2011)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 16365-16367]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-6872]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA-R10-OAR-2011-0315, FRL-9285-6]
Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; Washington:
Correction
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: EPA is proposing to correct errors in the State Implementation
Plan (SIP) for the State of Washington regarding the scope of certain
regulations incorporated by reference into the SIP. This correction
would limit the applicability of certain regulations to pollutants for
which National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) have been
established and precursors to those NAAQS pollutants. It would thus
ensure that these regulations are reasonably related to attainment or
maintenance of the NAAQS in Washington.
DATES: Comments must be received on or before April 22, 2011.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-R10-
OAR-2011-0315, by any of the following methods:
https://www.regulations.gov: Follow the on-line
instructions for submitting comments.
E-mail: R10-Public_Comments@epa.gov.
Mail: Kristin Hall, EPA Region 10, Office of Air, Waste
and Toxics (AWT-107), 1200 Sixth Avenue, Suite 900, Seattle, WA 98101.
Hand Delivery/Courier: EPA Region 10, 1200 Sixth Avenue,
Suite 900, Seattle, WA 98101. Attention: Kristin
[[Page 16366]]
Hall, Office of Air, Waste and Toxics, AWT-107. Such deliveries are
only accepted during normal hours of operation, and special
arrangements should be made for deliveries of boxed information.
Instructions: Direct your comments to Docket ID No. EPA-R10-OAR-
2011-0315. EPA's policy is that all comments received will be included
in the public docket without change and may be made available online at
https://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information
provided, unless the comment includes information claimed to be
Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information whose
disclosure is restricted by statute. Do not submit information that you
consider to be CBI or otherwise protected through https://www.regulations.gov or e-mail. The https://www.regulations.gov Web site
is an ``anonymous access'' system, which means EPA will not know your
identity or contact information unless you provide it in the body of
your comment. If you send an e-mail comment directly to EPA without
going through https://www.regulations.gov your e-mail address will be
automatically captured and included as part of the comment that is
placed in the public docket and made available on the Internet. If you
submit an electronic comment, EPA recommends that you include your name
and other contact information in the body of your comment and with any
disk or CD-ROM you submit. If EPA cannot read your comment due to
technical difficulties and cannot contact you for clarification, EPA
may not be able to consider your comment. Electronic files should avoid
the use of special characters, any form of encryption, and be free of
any defects or viruses.
Docket: All documents in the docket are listed in the https://www.regulations.gov index. Although listed in the index, some
information is not publicly available, e.g., CBI or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain other material, such
as copyrighted material, is not placed on the Internet and will be
publicly available only in hard copy. Publicly available docket
materials are available either electronically in https://www.regulations.gov or in hard copy during normal business hours at the
Office of Air, Waste and Toxics, EPA Region 10, 1200 Sixth Avenue,
Seattle, WA 98101.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kristin Hall at telephone number:
(206) 553-6357, e-mail address: hall.kristin@epa.gov, or the above EPA,
Region 10 address.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document wherever ``we'',
``us'' or ``our'' are used, we mean EPA. Information is organized as
follows:
Table of Contents
I. What action is EPA proposing?
II. What is the basis for the action that EPA is proposing?
III. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
I. What action is EPA proposing?
Section 109 of the Clean Air Act (CAA) requires EPA to promulgate
regulations establishing national ambient air quality standards (NAAQS)
for those air pollutants for which air quality criteria have been
issued pursuant to Section 108 of the CAA (referred to as criteria or
NAAQS pollutants). EPA has set NAAQS for six pollutants: sulfur
dioxide, particulate matter, nitrogen dioxide, carbon monoxide, ozone
and lead at 40 CFR part 50. EPA has identified ammonia, volatile
organic compounds, nitrogen oxides, and sulfur dioxide as precursors to
one or more of these NAAQS pollutants. See CAA 302(g); 40 CFR 51.1000.
Section 110 of the CAA requires States to adopt and submit to EPA for
approval State Implementation Plans (SIPs) to implement, maintain, and
enforce the NAAQS. In general, State and local regulations approved by
EPA into the SIP under Section 110 of the CAA must reasonably relate to
attainment and maintenance of the NAAQS. See generally CAA 110; see
also Memorandum from Michael A. James, EPA, to Regional Counsels, Re:
Status of State/Local Air Pollution Control Measures Not Related to
NAAQS, dated February 7, 1979 (``measures to control non-criteria
pollutants [pollutants that are not NAAQS pollutants or their
precursors] may not legally be made part of a SIP.'').\1\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Of course, SIP approved Prevention of Significant
Deterioration programs must cover any ``regulated NSR pollutant,''
see 40 CFR 52.21(b)(50), which definition includes more than NAAQS
pollutants and NAAQS precursors.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In several instances in the past, EPA has approved into the
Washington SIP general air pollution regulations that cover a broader
range of air pollutants than NAAQS pollutants or their precursors. To
the extent EPA's prior approvals of these general provisions did not
distinguish between those pollutants that reasonably relate to
attainment and maintenance of the NAAQS (that is, NAAQS pollutants and
their precursors), such approvals were overly broad, approved in error,
and should be corrected.
EPA is therefore proposing to correct its previous approval of the
following provisions of the Washington SIP to make clear that EPA's
approval of such regulations is limited to application of these
requirements to air pollutants that are NAAQS pollutants or precursors
to a NAAQS pollutant:
Department of Ecology (Ecology): WAC 173-400-040 (except WAC 173-
400-040(1)(c), (1)(d), (2), (4) and the second paragraph of (6) \2\)
(state effective 9/20/93; EPA effective 6/2/95);
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ The excepted provisions have not been approved into the
Washington SIP for any air pollutant.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Energy Facility Site Evaluation Council (EFSEC): WAC 463-39-005(1)
(EFSEC's incorporation by reference of WAC 173-400-040, except for WAC
173-400-040(1)(c), (1)(d), (2), (4) and the second paragraph of (6))
(state effective 9/21/95; EPA effective 7/22/96);
Northwest Clean Air Authority (NWCAA): NWCAA Sec. 104.1 (NWCAA's
incorporation by reference of WAC 173-400-040 except for WAC 173-400-
040(1)(c), (1)(d), (2), (4) and the second paragraph of (6)) (state
effective 11/13/94; EPA effective 12/26/95);
Puget Sound Clean Air Agency (PSCAA): PSCAA Reg. I, Sec. 304
(except for Reg. 1, Sec. 304(e)) (state effective 3/11/99; EPA
effective 9/30/04);
Southwest Clean Air Agency (SWCAA): SWCAA Sec. 400-040 (except
SWCAA Sec. 400-040(1)(c), (1)(d), (2), (4), and (6)(a)) (state
effective 9/21/95; EPA effective 4/28/97);
Yakima Regional Clean Air Authority (YRCAA): YRCAA Article V,
Section 5.06 (state effective 12/15/95; EPA effective 3/4/98); Section
5.12 (state effective 12/15/95; EPA effective 3/4/98); Section 12.01
(YRCAA's incorporation by reference of WAC 173-400-040 except WAC 173-
400-040(1)(c), (1)(d), (2), (4) and the second paragraph of (6)) (state
effective 12/15/95; EPA effective 3/4/98).
In a letter dated March 10, 2011, Ecology and SWCAA stated their
support of EPA's approval of this correction and narrowing of the
Washington SIP.
II. What is the basis for the action that EPA is proposing?
Under section 110(k)(6) of the CAA, whenever EPA determines that
its action approving, disapproving, or promulgating any plan or plan
revision (or part thereof), area designation,
[[Page 16367]]
redesignation, classification, or reclassification was in error, EPA
may in the same manner as the approval, disapproval, or promulgation
revise such action as appropriate without requiring any further
submission from the State. Such determination and the basis thereof
shall be provided to the State and public.
Pursuant to section 110(k)(6), EPA is proposing to find that its
approval of these State and local provisions was in error, and to
clarify and, as necessary, narrow its approval of certain regulations
in the Washington SIP so that EPA's approval of those regulations as
part of the Washington SIP is limited to their application to those
pollutants that are reasonably related to attainment or maintenance of
the NAAQS, that is, NAAQS pollutants and their precursors. EPA has
previously similarly relied on section 110(k)(6) of the CAA to remove
from other States' SIPs provisions that do not relate to attainment or
maintenance of the NAAQS or to narrow SIP provisions consistent with
CAA requirements. See, e.g., 75 FR 2440 (January 15, 2010) (removing
from Kentucky SIP rule regulating hazardous air pollutants); 74 FR
27442 (June 10, 2009) (removing from the Indiana SIP provisions
relating to hazardous air pollutants); 73 FR 21546 (April 22, 2008)
(removing the word ``odor'' from the definition of air contaminant in
the New York SIP); 70 FR 58311 (October 6, 2005) (removing from the
Idaho SIP a cross-reference to toxic air pollutants); 66 FR 57391
(November 15, 2001) (removing from the Missoula City-County portion of
the Montana SIP provisions relating to, among other things, fluoride
emission standards); see also Limitation of Approval of Prevention of
Significant Deterioration Provisions Concerning Greenhouse Gas
Emitting-Sources in State Implementation Plans; Final Rule, 75 FR
82536, 82543-44 (Dec. 30, 2010) (relying on the authority of CAA
110(k)(6) to narrow the scope of Federal approval of State Prevention
of Significant Deterioration (PSD) SIP provisions to ensure that
federally enforceable requirements of the PSD programs of these States
did not apply at lower thresholds for greenhouse gases than those under
Federal PSD requirements in the Tailoring Rule).
Narrowing EPA's approval of these regulations to NAAQS pollutants
and their precursors will have no affect on Washington's ability to
demonstrate attainment and maintenance of the NAAQS or to meet any
other requirement of the CAA.
III. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
Under the CAA, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP
submission that complies with the provisions of the Act and applicable
Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in
reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve State choices,
provided that they meet the criteria of the CAA. Accordingly, this
proposed action merely corrects EPA's prior SIP approvals to be
consistent with Federal requirements and does not impose additional
requirements beyond those imposed by the State's law. For that reason,
this proposed action:
Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' subject to
review by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Order
12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993);
Does not impose an information collection burden under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
Is certified as not having a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
Does not have Federalism implications as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
Is not an economically significant regulatory action based
on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997);
Is not a significant regulatory action subject to
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
Is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272
note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent
with the CAA; and
Does not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to
address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental
effects, using practicable and legally permissible methods, under
Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
In addition, this rule does not have Tribal implications as
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000),
because the SIP is not approved to apply in Indian country located in
Washington,\3\ and EPA notes that it will not impose substantial direct
costs on Tribal governments or preempt Tribal law.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ The one exception is within the exterior boundaries of the
Puyallup Indian Reservation, also known as the 1873 Survey Area.
Under the Puyallup Tribe of Indians Settlement Act of 1989, 25
U.S.C. 1773, Congress explicitly provided State and local agencies
in Washington authority over activities on non-trust lands within
the 1873 Survey Area.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Intergovernmental relations, and Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Dated: March 16, 2011.
Dennis J. McLerran,
Regional Administrator, Region 10.
[FR Doc. 2011-6872 Filed 3-22-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P