Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; Designation of Areas for Air Quality Planning Purposes; State of California; PM-10; Technical Amendment, 15219-15221 [2011-6559]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 54 / Monday, March 21, 2011 / Rules and Regulations
will govern proceedings docketed on or
after March 30, 2011.
List of Subjects in 39 CFR Part 965
Administrative practice and
procedure, Mail disputes, Postal
Service.
Accordingly, the Postal Service
adopts amendments to 39 CFR part 965
as set forth below.
PART 965—RULES OF PRACTICE IN
PROCEEDINGS RELATIVE TO MAIL
DISPUTES
1. The authority citation for part 965
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 39 U.S.C. 204, 401.
§ 965.6
§ 965.8
Authority for rules.
These rules of practice are issued by
the Judicial Officer of the U.S. Postal
Service pursuant to authority delegated
by the Postmaster General.
3. Section 965.2 is revised to read as
follows:
■
Scope of rules.
The rules in this part shall be
applicable to mail dispute cases
forwarded to the Judicial Officer
pursuant to Postal Operations Manual
section 616.21.
Hearings.
(a) Generally, mail dispute cases are
resolved based on written submissions.
However, in the discretion of the
presiding officer an oral hearing may be
conducted where in the opinion of the
presiding officer, the case cannot be
resolved by a review of the documentary
evidence.
*
*
*
*
*
§ 965.9
[Amended]
9. Section 965.9 is amended by
removing paragraph (c).
■
10. Section 965.12 is revised to read
as follows:
4. Section 965.3 is revised to read as
follows:
■
§ 965.3
§ 965.12
■
Notice to parties.
Upon receipt of a mail dispute case,
the Recorder, Office of the Judicial
Officer, United States Postal Service,
2101 Wilson Boulevard, Suite 600,
Arlington, VA 22201–3078, will send a
notice of docketing and submission due
date to the parties together with a copy
of these rules.
■ 5. Section 965.4 is amended by
revising paragraph (b)(2) to read as
follows:
§ 965.4
Presiding officers.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) * * *
(2) Render an initial decision, if the
presiding officer is not the Judicial
Officer; or if the presiding officer is the
Judicial Officer, issue a tentative or a
final decision or order.
6. Section 965.5 is revised to read as
follows:
■
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with RULES
Comments by parties.
Within 10 days of receipt of the other
party’s initial submission under § 965.5,
each party may file with the Recorder an
additional statement or rebuttal
argument setting forth in detail its
disagreements, if any, with its
opponent’s initial submission. Such
rebuttal may include any additional
documents relevant to the dispute.
8. Section 965.8 is amended by
revising paragraph (a) to read as follows:
2. Section 965.1 is revised to read as
follows:
§ 965.2
7. Section 965.6 is revised to read as
follows:
■
■
■
§ 965.1
of the mail together with a copy of each
document on which it relies in making
such claim, and any arguments
supporting its claim.
§ 965.5
11. Section 965.14 is revised to read
as follows:
■
Initial submissions by parties.
Within 15 days after receipt of the
Recorder’s notice, each party shall file
with the Recorder a sworn statement of
the facts supporting its claim to receipt
VerDate Mar<15>2010
12:38 Mar 18, 2011
Jkt 223001
Appeal.
Within 10 days after receipt by the
parties of the initial or tentative
decision, either party may file an appeal
to the Judicial Officer. The Judicial
Officer, or by delegation the Associate
Judicial Officer, in his or her sole
discretion, also may review the initial or
tentative decision on his or her own
initiative. If an appeal is denied, the
initial or tentative decision becomes the
final agency decision upon the issuance
of such denial. If an appeal is not filed
and the Judicial Officer, or by delegation
the Associate Judicial Officer does not
review the initial or tentative decision
on his or her own initiative, a final
order will be issued. The Judicial
Officer’s decision on appeal or his or
her final order is the final agency
decision with no further agency review
or appeal rights.
§ 965.14
Public information.
The Librarian of the Postal Service
maintains for public inspection in the
Library copies of all initial, tentative,
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
15219
and final agency decisions and orders.
Copies of decisions also are available on
the Judicial Officer’s section of the
official Web site of the U.S. Postal
Service. The Recorder maintains the
complete official record of every
proceeding.
Stanley F. Mires,
Chief Counsel, Legislative.
[FR Doc. 2011–6332 Filed 3–18–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710–12–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 81
[EPA–R09–OAR–2008–0306; FRL–9284–3]
Approval and Promulgation of
Implementation Plans; Designation of
Areas for Air Quality Planning
Purposes; State of California; PM–10;
Technical Amendment
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule; technical
amendment.
AGENCY:
EPA is making a technical
amendment to the Code of Federal
Regulations to reflect the final actions
published by the Agency on November
12, 2008 in connection with the
designations of the San Joaquin Valley
Air Basin and East Kern areas for
particulate matter of ten microns or less
(PM–10).
DATES: This technical amendment is
effective on March 21, 2011.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Doris Lo, EPA Region IX, (415) 972–
3959, lo.doris@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On
November 12, 2008, among other
actions, EPA approved the State of
California’s request under the Clean Air
Act (CAA or the Act) to revise the
designation for the San Joaquin Valley
serious nonattainment area for
particulate matter of ten microns or less
(PM–10) by splitting the area into two
separate nonattainment areas: The San
Joaquin Valley Air Basin (SJVAB)
serious nonattainment area and the East
Kern serious nonattainment area. See 73
FR 66759 (November 12, 2008). In the
November 12, 2008 final rule, EPA also
redesignated the SJVAB to attainment
for the PM–10 national ambient air
quality standard (NAAQS).
In relevant part, the amendatory
language on page 66773 of the
November 12, 2008 final rule states: ‘‘In
§ 81.305 the ‘‘California—PM–10’’ table
is amended under Fresno, Kern, Kings,
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\21MRR1.SGM
21MRR1
15220
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 54 / Monday, March 21, 2011 / Rules and Regulations
Madera, Merced, San Joaquin,
Stanislaus, Tulare Counties by revising
the entry for the ‘‘San Joaquin Valley
planning area’’ to read as follows.’’
Following this amendatory language, in
the PM–10 table itself, the final rule
retains the entry for the Indian Wells
Valley planning area (which was
unaffected by EPA’s November 12, 2008
final rule) by use of asterisks and
identifies the two areas, East Kern and
San Joaquin Valley Air Basin, and their
respective designations and
classifications for the PM–10 NAAQS
consistent with the final Agency actions
published in the November 12, 2008
final rule, that EPA intended as a
replacement for the then-existing entry
for the ‘‘San Joaquin Valley planning
area.’’
With one exception, the descriptions
of the areas and their designations and
classifications are correct as set forth in
the final rule; however, the amendatory
language introducing the change to part
81 and referring to a revision of the
entry for the ‘‘San Joaquin Valley
planning area’’ was unclear to the Office
of the Federal Register, and as a result,
the electronic version of the CFR (‘‘eCFR’’) and hard-copy publication of
‘‘Parts 81 and 84’’ of title 40 in years
2009 and 2010 do not identify East Kern
as a PM–10 nonttainment area.1 EPA is
today issuing a technical amendment to
reconcile the CFR with the Agency’s
November 12, 2008 final rule, and to do
so, EPA is adding East Kern as a PM–
10 area under the entry ‘‘Fresno, Kern,
Kings, Madera, Merced, San Joaquin,
Stanislaus, Tulare Counties’’ in the
‘‘California—PM–10’’ table in 40 CFR
81.305. Today’s technical amendment
makes no changes to the substance of
the November 12, 2008 final rule.
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 81
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, National parks,
Wilderness areas.
Dated: March 11, 2011.
Jared Blumenfeld,
Regional Administrator, Region IX.
Part 81, Chapter I, Title 40 of the Code
of Federal Regulations is amended as
follows:
PART 81—[AMENDED]
1. The authority citation for part 81
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
2. Section 81.305 of the ‘‘CaliforniaPM–10’’ table is amended under Fresno,
Kern, Kings, Madera, Merced, San
Joaquin, Stanislaus, Tulare Counties by
revising the entries for ‘‘Indian Wells
Valley planning’’ and ‘‘San Joaquin
Valley Air Basin’’ and by adding ‘‘East
Kern’’ to read as follows:
■
§ 81.305
*
*
California.
*
*
*
CALIFORNIA—PM–10
Designation
Classification
Designated Area
Date
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with RULES
*
*
*
*
*
Fresno, Kern, Kings, Madera, Merced, San Joaquin, Stanislaus, Tulare Counties:
Indian Wells Valley planning area: That portion of Kern County contained within Hydrologic Unit #18090205.
San Joaquin Valley Air Basin; Fresno County, Kings County, Madera County, Merced
County, San Joaquin County, Stanislaus County, Tulare County, and that portion of
Kern County which lies west and north of a line described as follows: Beginning at the
Kern-Los Angeles County boundary and running north and east along the northwest
boundary of the Rancho La Libre Land Grant to the point of intersection with the range
line common to R. 16 W. and R. 17 W., San Bernardino Base and Meridian; north
along the range line to the point of intersection with the Rancho El Tejon Land Grant
boundary; then southeast, northeast, and northwest along the boundary of the Rancho
El Tejon Land Grant to the northwest corner of S. 3, T. 11 N., R. 17 W.; then west 1.2
miles; then north to the Rancho El Tejon Land Grant boundary; then northwest along
the Rancho El Tejon line to the southeast corner of S. 34, T. 32 S., R. 30 E., Mount
Diablo Base and Meridian; then north to the northwest corner of S. 35, T. 31 S., R. 30
E.; then northeast along the boundary of the Rancho El Tejon Land Grant to the southwest corner of S. 18, T. 31 S., R. 31 E.; then east to the southeast corner of S. 13, T.
31 S., R. 31 E.; then north along the range line common to R. 31 E. and R. 32 E.,
Mount Diablo Base and Meridian, to the northwest corner of S. 6, T. 29 S., R. 32 E.;
then east to the southwest corner of S. 31, T. 28 S., R. 32 E.; then north along the
range line common to R. 31 E. and R. 32 E. to the northwest corner of S. 6, T. 28 S.,
R. 32 E., then west to the southeast corner of S. 36, T. 27 S., R. 31 E., then north
along the range line common to R. 31 E. and R. 32 E. to the Kern-Tulare County
boundary.
East Kern: That portion of Kern County which lies between the following two lines (with
the exception of that portion in Hydrologic Unit Number 18090205—the Indian Wells
Valley):
1 The one exception is the entry of ‘‘11/15/90’’ as
the date for East Kern’s classification as a ‘‘serious’’
PM–10 nonattainment area. 73 FR 66759, at 66774
VerDate Mar<15>2010
12:38 Mar 18, 2011
Jkt 223001
(November 12, 2008). The correct date is ‘‘02/08/
93.’’ See 58 FR 3334 (January 8, 1993). Today’s
technical amendment includes the correct date for
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Type
Date
*
6/6/03
Attainment
11/15/90
Nonattainment
*
Attainment
12/12/08
Type
02/08/93
Serious.
East Kern’s classification as a ‘‘serious’’ PM–10
nonattainment.
E:\FR\FM\21MRR1.SGM
21MRR1
15221
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 54 / Monday, March 21, 2011 / Rules and Regulations
CALIFORNIA—PM–10—Continued
Designation
Classification
Designated Area
Date
Type
Date
Type
(1) West and north of a line described as follows: Beginning at the southwest corner
of section 31, T. 10 N 16 W and running east to the northwest boundary of the
Rancho La Liebre Land Grant; then running north and east along the northwest
boundary of the Rancho La Liebre Land Grant to the point of intersection with the
range line common to R. 15 W. and R. 16 W., San Bernardino Base and Meridian;
then north along the range line to the northwest corner of section 2, T. 32 S., R. 32
E., Mount Diablo Base and Meridian; then east along the township line common to
T. 32 S. and T. 31 S.; then north along the range line common to R. 35 E. and R.
34 E.; then east along the township line common to T. 29 S. and T. 28 S.; then
north along the range line common to R. 36 E. and R. 35 E.; then east along the
township line common to T. 28 S. and T. 27 S.; then north along the range line
common to R. 37 E. and R. 36 E. to the Kern-Tulare County boundary.
(2) East and south of a line of a line described as follows: Beginning at the southwest corner of section 31, T. 10 N 16 W and running north along the range line
common to R. 16 W. and R. 17 W., San Bernardino Base and Meridian; north
along the range line to the point of intersection with the Rancho El Tejon Land
Grant boundary; then southeast, northeast, and northwest along the boundary of
the Rancho El Tejon Land Grant to the northwest corner of S. 3, T. 11 N., R. 17
W.; then west 1.2 miles; then north to the Rancho El Tejon Land Grant boundary;
then northwest along the Rancho El Tejon line to the southeast corner of S. 34, T.
32 S., R. 30 E., Mount Diablo Base and Meridian; then north to the northwest corner of S. 35, T. 31 S., R. 30 E.; then northeast along the boundary of the Rancho
El Tejon Land Grant to the southwest corner of S. 18, T. 31 S., R. 31 E.; then east
to the southeast corner of S. 13, T. 31 S., R. 31 E.; then north along the range line
common to R. 31 E. and R. 32 E., Mount Diablo Base and Meridian, to the northwest corner of S. 6, T. 29 S., R. 32 E.; then east to the southwest corner of S. 31,
T. 28 S., R. 32 E.; then north along the range line common to R. 31 E. and R. 32
E. to the northwest corner of S. 6, T. 28 S., R. 32 E., then west to the southeast
corner of S. 36, T. 27 S., R. 31 E., then north along the range line common to R.
31 E. and R. 32 E. to the Kern-Tulare County boundary.
*
*
*
*
*
Jortland in the Office of the General
Counsel at (202) 366–9314.
[FR Doc. 2011–6559 Filed 3–18–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
On
December 19, 2007, the Act was signed
into law. Title 49 of the Code of Federal
Regulations (CFR) 1.59 delegates to the
Assistant Secretary for Administration
the authority to carry out various
functions and activities related to the
mission of the agency vested in or
delegated to the Secretary. The
Secretary has determined that certain
authority vested in the Secretary under
the Act concerning DOT fleet
management activities should be
delegated to the Assistant Secretary for
Administration. This rulemaking adds
subparagraph (a)(7) to § 1.59 to reflect
these delegations.
Since this amendment relates to
departmental management,
organization, procedure, and practice,
notice and comment are unnecessary
under 5 U.S.C. 553(b). Further, since the
amendment expedites the Department’s
ability to meet the statutory intent of the
applicable laws and regulations covered
by this delegation, the Secretary finds
good cause under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3) for
the final rule to be effective on the date
of publication in the Federal Register.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
49 CFR Part 1
[Docket No. DOT–OST–1999–6189]
RIN 9991–AA56
Organization and Delegation of Powers
and Duties; Assistant Secretary for
Administration
Office of the Secretary of
Transportation.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
This rule delegates authorities
vested in the Secretary of
Transportation (Secretary) by the Energy
Independence and Security Act of 2007
(Act) (Pub. L. 110–140; December 19,
2007) to the Assistant Secretary for
Administration.
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with RULES
SUMMARY:
DATES:
This rule is effective March 21,
2011.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Eugene Tumblin in the Office of
Facilities, Information, and Asset
Management at (202) 366–0266 or Brett
VerDate Mar<15>2010
12:38 Mar 18, 2011
Jkt 223001
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
*
*
Regulatory Analyses and Notices
A. Executive Order 12866 and DOT
Regulatory Policies and Procedures
The final rule is not considered a
significant regulatory action under
Executive Order 12866 and DOT
Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44
FR 11034). There are no costs associated
with this rule.
B. Executive Order 13132
This final rule has been analyzed in
accordance with the principles and
criteria contained in Executive Order
13132 (‘‘Federalism’’). This final rule
does not have a substantial direct effect
on, or sufficient federalism implications
for, the States, nor would it limit the
policymaking discretion of the States.
Therefore, the consultation
requirements of Executive Order 13132
do not apply.
C. Executive Order 13175
This final rule has been analyzed in
accordance with the principles and
criteria contained in Executive Order
13175 (‘‘Consultation and Coordination
with Indian Tribal Governments’’).
Because this final rule does not
significantly or uniquely affect the
E:\FR\FM\21MRR1.SGM
21MRR1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 54 (Monday, March 21, 2011)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 15219-15221]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-6559]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 81
[EPA-R09-OAR-2008-0306; FRL-9284-3]
Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; Designation of
Areas for Air Quality Planning Purposes; State of California; PM-10;
Technical Amendment
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule; technical amendment.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: EPA is making a technical amendment to the Code of Federal
Regulations to reflect the final actions published by the Agency on
November 12, 2008 in connection with the designations of the San
Joaquin Valley Air Basin and East Kern areas for particulate matter of
ten microns or less (PM-10).
DATES: This technical amendment is effective on March 21, 2011.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Doris Lo, EPA Region IX, (415) 972-
3959, lo.doris@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On November 12, 2008, among other actions,
EPA approved the State of California's request under the Clean Air Act
(CAA or the Act) to revise the designation for the San Joaquin Valley
serious nonattainment area for particulate matter of ten microns or
less (PM-10) by splitting the area into two separate nonattainment
areas: The San Joaquin Valley Air Basin (SJVAB) serious nonattainment
area and the East Kern serious nonattainment area. See 73 FR 66759
(November 12, 2008). In the November 12, 2008 final rule, EPA also
redesignated the SJVAB to attainment for the PM-10 national ambient air
quality standard (NAAQS).
In relevant part, the amendatory language on page 66773 of the
November 12, 2008 final rule states: ``In Sec. 81.305 the
``California--PM-10'' table is amended under Fresno, Kern, Kings,
[[Page 15220]]
Madera, Merced, San Joaquin, Stanislaus, Tulare Counties by revising
the entry for the ``San Joaquin Valley planning area'' to read as
follows.'' Following this amendatory language, in the PM-10 table
itself, the final rule retains the entry for the Indian Wells Valley
planning area (which was unaffected by EPA's November 12, 2008 final
rule) by use of asterisks and identifies the two areas, East Kern and
San Joaquin Valley Air Basin, and their respective designations and
classifications for the PM-10 NAAQS consistent with the final Agency
actions published in the November 12, 2008 final rule, that EPA
intended as a replacement for the then-existing entry for the ``San
Joaquin Valley planning area.''
With one exception, the descriptions of the areas and their
designations and classifications are correct as set forth in the final
rule; however, the amendatory language introducing the change to part
81 and referring to a revision of the entry for the ``San Joaquin
Valley planning area'' was unclear to the Office of the Federal
Register, and as a result, the electronic version of the CFR (``e-
CFR'') and hard-copy publication of ``Parts 81 and 84'' of title 40 in
years 2009 and 2010 do not identify East Kern as a PM-10 nonttainment
area.\1\ EPA is today issuing a technical amendment to reconcile the
CFR with the Agency's November 12, 2008 final rule, and to do so, EPA
is adding East Kern as a PM-10 area under the entry ``Fresno, Kern,
Kings, Madera, Merced, San Joaquin, Stanislaus, Tulare Counties'' in
the ``California--PM-10'' table in 40 CFR 81.305. Today's technical
amendment makes no changes to the substance of the November 12, 2008
final rule.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ The one exception is the entry of ``11/15/90'' as the date
for East Kern's classification as a ``serious'' PM-10 nonattainment
area. 73 FR 66759, at 66774 (November 12, 2008). The correct date is
``02/08/93.'' See 58 FR 3334 (January 8, 1993). Today's technical
amendment includes the correct date for East Kern's classification
as a ``serious'' PM-10 nonattainment.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 81
Environmental protection, Air pollution control, National parks,
Wilderness areas.
Dated: March 11, 2011.
Jared Blumenfeld,
Regional Administrator, Region IX.
Part 81, Chapter I, Title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations is
amended as follows:
PART 81--[AMENDED]
0
1. The authority citation for part 81 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
0
2. Section 81.305 of the ``California-PM-10'' table is amended under
Fresno, Kern, Kings, Madera, Merced, San Joaquin, Stanislaus, Tulare
Counties by revising the entries for ``Indian Wells Valley planning''
and ``San Joaquin Valley Air Basin'' and by adding ``East Kern'' to
read as follows:
Sec. 81.305 California.
* * * * *
California--PM-10
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Designation Classification
Designated Area ------------------------------------------------------------------
Date Type Date Type
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
Fresno, Kern, Kings, Madera, Merced, San
Joaquin, Stanislaus, Tulare Counties:
Indian Wells Valley planning area: That 6/6/03 Attainment
portion of Kern County contained within
Hydrologic Unit 18090205.
San Joaquin Valley Air Basin; Fresno 12/12/08 Attainment
County, Kings County, Madera County,
Merced County, San Joaquin County,
Stanislaus County, Tulare County, and
that portion of Kern County which lies
west and north of a line described as
follows: Beginning at the Kern-Los
Angeles County boundary and running
north and east along the northwest
boundary of the Rancho La Libre Land
Grant to the point of intersection with
the range line common to R. 16 W. and R.
17 W., San Bernardino Base and Meridian;
north along the range line to the point
of intersection with the Rancho El Tejon
Land Grant boundary; then southeast,
northeast, and northwest along the
boundary of the Rancho El Tejon Land
Grant to the northwest corner of S. 3,
T. 11 N., R. 17 W.; then west 1.2 miles;
then north to the Rancho El Tejon Land
Grant boundary; then northwest along the
Rancho El Tejon line to the southeast
corner of S. 34, T. 32 S., R. 30 E.,
Mount Diablo Base and Meridian; then
north to the northwest corner of S. 35,
T. 31 S., R. 30 E.; then northeast along
the boundary of the Rancho El Tejon Land
Grant to the southwest corner of S. 18,
T. 31 S., R. 31 E.; then east to the
southeast corner of S. 13, T. 31 S., R.
31 E.; then north along the range line
common to R. 31 E. and R. 32 E., Mount
Diablo Base and Meridian, to the
northwest corner of S. 6, T. 29 S., R.
32 E.; then east to the southwest corner
of S. 31, T. 28 S., R. 32 E.; then north
along the range line common to R. 31 E.
and R. 32 E. to the northwest corner of
S. 6, T. 28 S., R. 32 E., then west to
the southeast corner of S. 36, T. 27 S.,
R. 31 E., then north along the range
line common to R. 31 E. and R. 32 E. to
the Kern-Tulare County boundary.
East Kern: That portion of Kern County 11/15/90 Nonattainment...................... 02/08/93 Serious.
which lies between the following two
lines (with the exception of that
portion in Hydrologic Unit Number
18090205--the Indian Wells Valley):
[[Page 15221]]
(1) West and north of a line
described as follows: Beginning at
the southwest corner of section 31,
T. 10 N 16 W and running east to the
northwest boundary of the Rancho La
Liebre Land Grant; then running
north and east along the northwest
boundary of the Rancho La Liebre
Land Grant to the point of
intersection with the range line
common to R. 15 W. and R. 16 W., San
Bernardino Base and Meridian; then
north along the range line to the
northwest corner of section 2, T. 32
S., R. 32 E., Mount Diablo Base and
Meridian; then east along the
township line common to T. 32 S. and
T. 31 S.; then north along the range
line common to R. 35 E. and R. 34
E.; then east along the township
line common to T. 29 S. and T. 28
S.; then north along the range line
common to R. 36 E. and R. 35 E.;
then east along the township line
common to T. 28 S. and T. 27 S.;
then north along the range line
common to R. 37 E. and R. 36 E. to
the Kern-Tulare County boundary.
(2) East and south of a line of a
line described as follows: Beginning
at the southwest corner of section
31, T. 10 N 16 W and running north
along the range line common to R. 16
W. and R. 17 W., San Bernardino Base
and Meridian; north along the range
line to the point of intersection
with the Rancho El Tejon Land Grant
boundary; then southeast, northeast,
and northwest along the boundary of
the Rancho El Tejon Land Grant to
the northwest corner of S. 3, T. 11
N., R. 17 W.; then west 1.2 miles;
then north to the Rancho El Tejon
Land Grant boundary; then northwest
along the Rancho El Tejon line to
the southeast corner of S. 34, T. 32
S., R. 30 E., Mount Diablo Base and
Meridian; then north to the
northwest corner of S. 35, T. 31 S.,
R. 30 E.; then northeast along the
boundary of the Rancho El Tejon Land
Grant to the southwest corner of S.
18, T. 31 S., R. 31 E.; then east to
the southeast corner of S. 13, T. 31
S., R. 31 E.; then north along the
range line common to R. 31 E. and R.
32 E., Mount Diablo Base and
Meridian, to the northwest corner of
S. 6, T. 29 S., R. 32 E.; then east
to the southwest corner of S. 31, T.
28 S., R. 32 E.; then north along
the range line common to R. 31 E.
and R. 32 E. to the northwest corner
of S. 6, T. 28 S., R. 32 E., then
west to the southeast corner of S.
36, T. 27 S., R. 31 E., then north
along the range line common to R. 31
E. and R. 32 E. to the Kern-Tulare
County boundary.
* * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[FR Doc. 2011-6559 Filed 3-18-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
