Rules of Practice in Proceedings Relative to Mail Disputes, 15218-15219 [2011-6332]
Download as PDF
15218
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 54 / Monday, March 21, 2011 / Rules and Regulations
Federal Government and Indian tribes,
or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes.
Energy Effects
We have analyzed this rule under
Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have
determined that it is not a ‘‘significant
energy action’’ under that order because
it is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’
under Executive Order 12866 and is not
likely to have a significant adverse effect
on the supply, distribution, or use of
energy. The Administrator of the Office
of Information and Regulatory Affairs
has not designated it as a significant
energy action. Therefore, it does not
require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with RULES
Technical Standards
The National Technology Transfer
and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use
voluntary consensus standards in their
regulatory activities unless the agency
provides Congress, through the Office of
Management and Budget, with an
explanation of why using these
standards would be inconsistent with
applicable law or otherwise impractical.
Voluntary consensus standards are
technical standards (e.g., specifications
of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling
procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or
adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
This rule does not use technical
standards. Therefore, we did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus
standards.
Environment
We have analyzed this proposed rule
under Department of Homeland
Security Management Directive 023–01
and Commandant Instruction
M16475.lD, which guide the Coast
Guard in complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and
have made a determination that this
action is one of a category of actions that
do not individually or cumulatively
have a significant effect on the human
environment. This rule is categorically
excluded, under figure 2–1, paragraph
(34)(g), of the Instruction. This rule
involves amending a security zone
regulation by removing the reference to
shore area in security zones for moored
cruise ships. An environmental analysis
checklist and a categorical exclusion
VerDate Mar<15>2010
12:38 Mar 18, 2011
Jkt 223001
determination are available in the
docket where indicated under
ADDRESSES.
POSTAL SERVICE
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Rules of Practice in Proceedings
Relative to Mail Disputes
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation
(water), Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Security measures,
Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
CFR part 165 as follows:
PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION
AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
1. The authority citation for part 165
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 46 U.S.C.
Chapter 701, 3306, 3703; 50 U.S.C. 191, 195;
33 CFR 1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6, and 160.5;
Pub. L. 107–295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department
of Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1.
2. In § 165.1108, reinstate temporarily
suspended paragraph (b)(2), and then
revise paragraphs (b) and (c) to read as
follows:
■
§ 165.1108 Security Zones; Moored Cruise
Ships, Port of San Diego, California.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) Location. The following areas are
security zones: All navigable waters,
extending from the surface to the sea
floor, within a 100-yard radius around
any cruise ship that is located within
the San Diego port area landward of the
sea buoys bounding the Port of San
Diego.
(c) Regulations. Under regulations in
33 CFR part 165, subpart D, a person or
vessel may not enter into or remain in
the security zones created by this
section unless authorized by the Coast
Guard Captain of the Port, San Diego
(COTP) or a COTP designated
representative. Persons desiring to
transit these security zones may contact
the COTP at telephone number (619)
278–7033 or on VHF–FM channel 16
(156.8 MHz) to seek permission to
transit the area. If permission is granted,
all persons and vessels must comply
with the instructions of the Captain of
the Port or his or her designated
representative.
*
*
*
*
*
§ 165.T11–386
■
[Removed]
3. Remove § 165.T11–386.
Dated: March 7, 2011.
T.H. Farris,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the
Port San Diego.
[FR Doc. 2011–6579 Filed 3–16–11; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
39 CFR Part 965
Postal Service.
Final rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Postal Service is
amending the rules of practice of the
Office of the Judicial Officer to clarify
that parties may submit arguments as
well as sworn statements in support of
their claims to disputed mail. In
addition, the rules are being amended to
clarify some provisions and update
obsolete language.
DATES: Effective Date: March 30, 2011.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Administrative Judge Gary E. Shapiro,
(703) 812–1910.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Supporting statements. The rules
governing proceedings relative to mail
disputes are found in 39 CFR part 965.
Formerly, § 965.5 provided that each
party shall file a sworn statement of the
facts supporting its claim to the
disputed mail together with a copy of
each document on which it relies in
making such claim. The revised rule
clarifies that the submission also may
include argument as to why the factual
statement and supporting documents
should result in that party’s claim to the
disputed mail being accepted. The
change concerning inclusion of
argument in the parties’ mail dispute
submissions is intended to reflect
longstanding practice to that effect.
Clarifying this matter should avoid
confusion from unclear wording that
could, and in one recent case did lead
a disputant to believe that only factual
presentation and not argument is
permitted by the rules. Corresponding
changes are made to section 965.6.
Editorial changes. Several other
changes are made to various sections of
the rules for the purpose of clarifying
the rules, updating the rules, or
conforming the rules to current practice.
None of the changes affects the
substantive rights of disputants.
Changes in sections 965.1, 965.2, 965.3,
965.4(b)(2), 965.8(a), and 965.14 reflect
current practice and eliminate reference
to obsolete language. Section 965.9(c) is
eliminated as unnecessary.
Effective date. These revisions are
changes in agency rules of practice
before the Judicial Officer and do not
substantially affect any rights or
obligations of private parties. Therefore,
it is appropriate for their adoption by
the Postal Service to become effective at
an early date; and these revised rules
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\21MRR1.SGM
21MRR1
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 54 / Monday, March 21, 2011 / Rules and Regulations
will govern proceedings docketed on or
after March 30, 2011.
List of Subjects in 39 CFR Part 965
Administrative practice and
procedure, Mail disputes, Postal
Service.
Accordingly, the Postal Service
adopts amendments to 39 CFR part 965
as set forth below.
PART 965—RULES OF PRACTICE IN
PROCEEDINGS RELATIVE TO MAIL
DISPUTES
1. The authority citation for part 965
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 39 U.S.C. 204, 401.
§ 965.6
§ 965.8
Authority for rules.
These rules of practice are issued by
the Judicial Officer of the U.S. Postal
Service pursuant to authority delegated
by the Postmaster General.
3. Section 965.2 is revised to read as
follows:
■
Scope of rules.
The rules in this part shall be
applicable to mail dispute cases
forwarded to the Judicial Officer
pursuant to Postal Operations Manual
section 616.21.
Hearings.
(a) Generally, mail dispute cases are
resolved based on written submissions.
However, in the discretion of the
presiding officer an oral hearing may be
conducted where in the opinion of the
presiding officer, the case cannot be
resolved by a review of the documentary
evidence.
*
*
*
*
*
§ 965.9
[Amended]
9. Section 965.9 is amended by
removing paragraph (c).
■
10. Section 965.12 is revised to read
as follows:
4. Section 965.3 is revised to read as
follows:
■
§ 965.3
§ 965.12
■
Notice to parties.
Upon receipt of a mail dispute case,
the Recorder, Office of the Judicial
Officer, United States Postal Service,
2101 Wilson Boulevard, Suite 600,
Arlington, VA 22201–3078, will send a
notice of docketing and submission due
date to the parties together with a copy
of these rules.
■ 5. Section 965.4 is amended by
revising paragraph (b)(2) to read as
follows:
§ 965.4
Presiding officers.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) * * *
(2) Render an initial decision, if the
presiding officer is not the Judicial
Officer; or if the presiding officer is the
Judicial Officer, issue a tentative or a
final decision or order.
6. Section 965.5 is revised to read as
follows:
■
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with RULES
Comments by parties.
Within 10 days of receipt of the other
party’s initial submission under § 965.5,
each party may file with the Recorder an
additional statement or rebuttal
argument setting forth in detail its
disagreements, if any, with its
opponent’s initial submission. Such
rebuttal may include any additional
documents relevant to the dispute.
8. Section 965.8 is amended by
revising paragraph (a) to read as follows:
2. Section 965.1 is revised to read as
follows:
§ 965.2
7. Section 965.6 is revised to read as
follows:
■
■
■
§ 965.1
of the mail together with a copy of each
document on which it relies in making
such claim, and any arguments
supporting its claim.
§ 965.5
11. Section 965.14 is revised to read
as follows:
■
Initial submissions by parties.
Within 15 days after receipt of the
Recorder’s notice, each party shall file
with the Recorder a sworn statement of
the facts supporting its claim to receipt
VerDate Mar<15>2010
12:38 Mar 18, 2011
Jkt 223001
Appeal.
Within 10 days after receipt by the
parties of the initial or tentative
decision, either party may file an appeal
to the Judicial Officer. The Judicial
Officer, or by delegation the Associate
Judicial Officer, in his or her sole
discretion, also may review the initial or
tentative decision on his or her own
initiative. If an appeal is denied, the
initial or tentative decision becomes the
final agency decision upon the issuance
of such denial. If an appeal is not filed
and the Judicial Officer, or by delegation
the Associate Judicial Officer does not
review the initial or tentative decision
on his or her own initiative, a final
order will be issued. The Judicial
Officer’s decision on appeal or his or
her final order is the final agency
decision with no further agency review
or appeal rights.
§ 965.14
Public information.
The Librarian of the Postal Service
maintains for public inspection in the
Library copies of all initial, tentative,
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
15219
and final agency decisions and orders.
Copies of decisions also are available on
the Judicial Officer’s section of the
official Web site of the U.S. Postal
Service. The Recorder maintains the
complete official record of every
proceeding.
Stanley F. Mires,
Chief Counsel, Legislative.
[FR Doc. 2011–6332 Filed 3–18–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710–12–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 81
[EPA–R09–OAR–2008–0306; FRL–9284–3]
Approval and Promulgation of
Implementation Plans; Designation of
Areas for Air Quality Planning
Purposes; State of California; PM–10;
Technical Amendment
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule; technical
amendment.
AGENCY:
EPA is making a technical
amendment to the Code of Federal
Regulations to reflect the final actions
published by the Agency on November
12, 2008 in connection with the
designations of the San Joaquin Valley
Air Basin and East Kern areas for
particulate matter of ten microns or less
(PM–10).
DATES: This technical amendment is
effective on March 21, 2011.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Doris Lo, EPA Region IX, (415) 972–
3959, lo.doris@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On
November 12, 2008, among other
actions, EPA approved the State of
California’s request under the Clean Air
Act (CAA or the Act) to revise the
designation for the San Joaquin Valley
serious nonattainment area for
particulate matter of ten microns or less
(PM–10) by splitting the area into two
separate nonattainment areas: The San
Joaquin Valley Air Basin (SJVAB)
serious nonattainment area and the East
Kern serious nonattainment area. See 73
FR 66759 (November 12, 2008). In the
November 12, 2008 final rule, EPA also
redesignated the SJVAB to attainment
for the PM–10 national ambient air
quality standard (NAAQS).
In relevant part, the amendatory
language on page 66773 of the
November 12, 2008 final rule states: ‘‘In
§ 81.305 the ‘‘California—PM–10’’ table
is amended under Fresno, Kern, Kings,
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\21MRR1.SGM
21MRR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 54 (Monday, March 21, 2011)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 15218-15219]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-6332]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
POSTAL SERVICE
39 CFR Part 965
Rules of Practice in Proceedings Relative to Mail Disputes
AGENCY: Postal Service.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Postal Service is amending the rules of practice of the
Office of the Judicial Officer to clarify that parties may submit
arguments as well as sworn statements in support of their claims to
disputed mail. In addition, the rules are being amended to clarify some
provisions and update obsolete language.
DATES: Effective Date: March 30, 2011.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Administrative Judge Gary E. Shapiro,
(703) 812-1910.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Supporting statements. The rules governing proceedings relative to
mail disputes are found in 39 CFR part 965. Formerly, Sec. 965.5
provided that each party shall file a sworn statement of the facts
supporting its claim to the disputed mail together with a copy of each
document on which it relies in making such claim. The revised rule
clarifies that the submission also may include argument as to why the
factual statement and supporting documents should result in that
party's claim to the disputed mail being accepted. The change
concerning inclusion of argument in the parties' mail dispute
submissions is intended to reflect longstanding practice to that
effect. Clarifying this matter should avoid confusion from unclear
wording that could, and in one recent case did lead a disputant to
believe that only factual presentation and not argument is permitted by
the rules. Corresponding changes are made to section 965.6.
Editorial changes. Several other changes are made to various
sections of the rules for the purpose of clarifying the rules, updating
the rules, or conforming the rules to current practice. None of the
changes affects the substantive rights of disputants. Changes in
sections 965.1, 965.2, 965.3, 965.4(b)(2), 965.8(a), and 965.14 reflect
current practice and eliminate reference to obsolete language. Section
965.9(c) is eliminated as unnecessary.
Effective date. These revisions are changes in agency rules of
practice before the Judicial Officer and do not substantially affect
any rights or obligations of private parties. Therefore, it is
appropriate for their adoption by the Postal Service to become
effective at an early date; and these revised rules
[[Page 15219]]
will govern proceedings docketed on or after March 30, 2011.
List of Subjects in 39 CFR Part 965
Administrative practice and procedure, Mail disputes, Postal
Service.
Accordingly, the Postal Service adopts amendments to 39 CFR part
965 as set forth below.
PART 965--RULES OF PRACTICE IN PROCEEDINGS RELATIVE TO MAIL
DISPUTES
0
1. The authority citation for part 965 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 39 U.S.C. 204, 401.
0
2. Section 965.1 is revised to read as follows:
Sec. 965.1 Authority for rules.
These rules of practice are issued by the Judicial Officer of the
U.S. Postal Service pursuant to authority delegated by the Postmaster
General.
0
3. Section 965.2 is revised to read as follows:
Sec. 965.2 Scope of rules.
The rules in this part shall be applicable to mail dispute cases
forwarded to the Judicial Officer pursuant to Postal Operations Manual
section 616.21.
0
4. Section 965.3 is revised to read as follows:
Sec. 965.3 Notice to parties.
Upon receipt of a mail dispute case, the Recorder, Office of the
Judicial Officer, United States Postal Service, 2101 Wilson Boulevard,
Suite 600, Arlington, VA 22201-3078, will send a notice of docketing
and submission due date to the parties together with a copy of these
rules.
0
5. Section 965.4 is amended by revising paragraph (b)(2) to read as
follows:
Sec. 965.4 Presiding officers.
* * * * *
(b) * * *
(2) Render an initial decision, if the presiding officer is not the
Judicial Officer; or if the presiding officer is the Judicial Officer,
issue a tentative or a final decision or order.
0
6. Section 965.5 is revised to read as follows:
Sec. 965.5 Initial submissions by parties.
Within 15 days after receipt of the Recorder's notice, each party
shall file with the Recorder a sworn statement of the facts supporting
its claim to receipt of the mail together with a copy of each document
on which it relies in making such claim, and any arguments supporting
its claim.
0
7. Section 965.6 is revised to read as follows:
Sec. 965.6 Comments by parties.
Within 10 days of receipt of the other party's initial submission
under Sec. 965.5, each party may file with the Recorder an additional
statement or rebuttal argument setting forth in detail its
disagreements, if any, with its opponent's initial submission. Such
rebuttal may include any additional documents relevant to the dispute.
0
8. Section 965.8 is amended by revising paragraph (a) to read as
follows:
Sec. 965.8 Hearings.
(a) Generally, mail dispute cases are resolved based on written
submissions. However, in the discretion of the presiding officer an
oral hearing may be conducted where in the opinion of the presiding
officer, the case cannot be resolved by a review of the documentary
evidence.
* * * * *
Sec. 965.9 [Amended]
0
9. Section 965.9 is amended by removing paragraph (c).
0
10. Section 965.12 is revised to read as follows:
Sec. 965.12 Appeal.
Within 10 days after receipt by the parties of the initial or
tentative decision, either party may file an appeal to the Judicial
Officer. The Judicial Officer, or by delegation the Associate Judicial
Officer, in his or her sole discretion, also may review the initial or
tentative decision on his or her own initiative. If an appeal is
denied, the initial or tentative decision becomes the final agency
decision upon the issuance of such denial. If an appeal is not filed
and the Judicial Officer, or by delegation the Associate Judicial
Officer does not review the initial or tentative decision on his or her
own initiative, a final order will be issued. The Judicial Officer's
decision on appeal or his or her final order is the final agency
decision with no further agency review or appeal rights.
0
11. Section 965.14 is revised to read as follows:
Sec. 965.14 Public information.
The Librarian of the Postal Service maintains for public inspection
in the Library copies of all initial, tentative, and final agency
decisions and orders. Copies of decisions also are available on the
Judicial Officer's section of the official Web site of the U.S. Postal
Service. The Recorder maintains the complete official record of every
proceeding.
Stanley F. Mires,
Chief Counsel, Legislative.
[FR Doc. 2011-6332 Filed 3-18-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P