Head Start Program, 14841-14855 [2011-6326]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 53 / Friday, March 18, 2011 / Proposed Rules
Electronic files should avoid the use of
special characters, any form of
encryption, and be free of any defects or
viruses. For additional instructions on
submitting comments, go to Section II of
the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section
of this document.
Docket: All documents in the docket
are listed in the https://
www.regulations.gov index. Although
listed in the index, some information is
not publicly available, e.g., CBI or other
information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Certain other
material, such as copyrighted material,
will be publicly available only in hard
copy. Publicly available docket
materials are available either
electronically in https://
www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at
the Improving Regulations Docket, EPA/
DC, EPA West, Room 3334, 1301
Constitution Ave., NW., Washington,
DC. The Public Reading Room is open
from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday
through Friday, excluding legal
holidays. The telephone number for the
Public Reading Room is (202) 566–1744,
and the telephone number for the
Improving Regulations Docket is (202)
566–1752.
2. Environmental Justice/Children’s
Health/Elderly
For
further information on this document,
please contact Stuart Miles-McLean,
Office of Regulatory Policy and
Management (1803A), Environmental
Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania
Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20460;
telephone number: 202–564–6581; fax
number: 202–564–7322; e-mail address:
ImprovingRegulations.
SuggestionBox@epa.gov.
7. Small Business
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
3. Science/Obsolete/Technology
Outdated
Submit a comment on ‘‘Improving
Regulations: Science/Obsolete/
Technology Outdated’’ at docket # EPA–
HQ–OA–2011–0162.
4. State, Local and Tribal Governments
Submit a comment related to
‘‘Improving Regulations: State, Local
and Tribal governments’’ at docket #
EPA–HQ–OA–2011–0163.
5. Least Burdensome/Flexible
Approaches
Provide comment on ‘‘Improving
Regulations: Least Burden/Flexible
Approaches’’ at docket # EPA–HQ–OA–
2011–0165.
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Submit a comment related to
‘‘Improving Regulations: Small
Business’’ at docket # EPA–HQ–OA–
2011–0164.
Administration for Children and
Families
8. Compliance
RIN 0970–AC46
Submit a comment related to
‘‘Improving Regulations: Compliance’’ at
docket # EPA–HQ–OA–2011–0166.
Head Start Program
9. Economic Conditions/Market
13. Program Area: Waste
Submit a comment on ‘‘Improving
Regulations: Integration and Innovation’’
at docket # EPA–HQ–OA–2011–0161.
Submit a comment about ‘‘Improving
Regulations: Waste’’ at docket # EPA–
HQ–OA–2011–0160.
Jkt 223001
Dated: March 15, 2011.
Michael Goo,
Associate Administrator, Office of Policy.
[FR Doc. 2011–6413 Filed 3–17–11; 8:45 am]
1. Integration and Innovation
15:53 Mar 17, 2011
15. Use the ‘‘Improving Regulations:
General’’ docket # EPA–
HQ–OA–2011–0156 to submit an idea
for how best to promote retrospective
analysis of rules. This docket may also
be used for any comment that:
• Pertains to more than one issue/
impact and/or program area.
• Doesn’t relate to any of the other
docket categories listed in this section.
EPA welcomes comment and
feedback from all parties on the issues
listed herein. The Agency is collecting
this information for its planning
purposes and is not bound to further
action or response. All submissions will
be made publically available on https://
www.regulations.gov.
Submit a comment related to benefits
and costs in ‘‘Improving Regulations:
Benefits and Costs’’ at docket # EPA–
HQ–OA–2011–0158.
Submit a comment about ‘‘Improving
Regulations: Economic Conditions/
Market’’ at docket # EPA–HQ–OA–
2011–0167.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14. Program Area: Water
Submit a comment about ‘‘Improving
Regulations: Water’’ at docket
# EPA–HQ–OA–2011–0154.
6. Benefits and Costs
EPA
extending its comment period for
feedback on the design of its
retrospective review plan under
Executive Order 13563 to April 4, 2011.
To assist you in focusing your
comments or recommendations, EPA
has provided various categories relating
to issue/impact, program area, or a
multipurpose general area. These
categories are not intended to restrict
the issues that you may wish to address.
The following list provides the category
of each docket. If you wish to submit
comments, please select one of the
appropriate dockets listed below or send
by mail as described in the ADDRESSES
section above.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS
Submit a comment related to
‘‘Improving Regulations: EJ, Children &
Elderly’’ at docket # EPA–HQ–OA–
2011–0168.
14841
10. Program Area: Air
Submit a comment about ‘‘Improving
Regulations: Air’’ at docket # EPA–HQ–
OA–2011–0155.
11. Program Area: Pesticides
Submit a comment about ‘‘Improving
Regulations: Pesticides’’ at docket #
EPA–HQ–OA–2011–0157.
12. Program Area: Toxic Substances
Submit a comment about ‘‘Improving
Regulations: Toxic Substances’’ at
docket # EPA–HQ–OA–2011–0159.
PO 00000
Frm 00023
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
45 CFR Part 1305
Office of Head Start (OHS),
Administration for Children and
Families (ACF), Department of Health
and Human Services (HHS).
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
AGENCY:
This proposed rule would
amend Head Start program regulations
to codify statutory eligibility
requirements for Head Start and Early
Head Start program enrollment and
strengthen procedures to determine,
verify, certify, and maintain records
regarding eligibility for Head Start and
Early Head Start program enrollment. It
also proposes to create new
requirements for the person seeking
services to certify in a signed and dated
statement that the documents and
information that the person provided
concerning eligibility are accurate to the
best of the person’s knowledge, as well
as new requirements for program staff
who make the eligibility determination
to certify in a signed and dated
statement that the information on
eligibility in the file is accurate to the
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\18MRP1.SGM
18MRP1
14842
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 53 / Friday, March 18, 2011 / Proposed Rules
jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS
best of the person’s knowledge, and
based on that information, the person
has determined the pregnant woman or
child to be eligible for services. In
addition, it proposes to create a new
requirement for agencies to establish
policies and procedures describing the
actions that will be taken against staff
who violate eligibility determination
requirements and requires agencies to
provide training related to eligibility
requirements and the legal
consequences of committing fraud. The
intent of this rule is to reduce
substantially the risk that children or
pregnant women who are ineligible for
participation in Head Start or Early
Head Start programs are enrolled in
these programs.
DATES: In order to be considered,
comments on this proposed rule must
be received on or before April 18, 2011.
ADDRESSES: Interested persons are
invited to submit comments to the
Office of Head Start, 1250 Maryland
Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20024,
Attention: Colleen Rathgeb, Office of
Head Start, or electronically via the
Internet at https://www.regulations.gov.
If you submit a comment, please include
your name and address, identify the
docket number for this rulemaking
(ACF–2010–XXXXX), indicate the
specific section of this document to
which each comment applies, and give
the reason for each comment. You may
submit your comments and material by
electronic means, mail, or delivery to
the address above, but please submit
your comments and material by only
one means. A copy of this Notice of
Proposed Rulemaking may be
downloaded from https://
www.regulations.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Colleen Rathgeb, Office of Head Start,
202–205–7378 (not a toll-free call). Deaf
and hearing impaired individuals may
call the Federal Dual Party Relay
Service at 1–800–877–8339 between 8
a.m. and 7 p.m. Eastern Time.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Statutory Authority
This Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
is published under the authority granted
to the Secretary of Health and Human
Services by section 644(c) of the Head
Start Act, as amended by the Improving
Head Start for School Readiness Act of
2007, as well as sections 645(a)(1)(A)
and 645A(c) of the Act.
II. Comment Procedures
The Head Start Act provides for a
period of at least 30 days for public
comment. In making any modifications
to this Notice of Proposed Rulemaking,
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:53 Mar 17, 2011
Jkt 223001
we will not consider comments received
beyond the 30-day comment period. To
make sure your comments are fully
addressed, we suggest the following:
• Be specific rather than general;
• Address only issues raised by the
proposed rule;
• Explain reasons for any objections
or recommended changes;
• Propose specific alternative
language, as appropriate; and
• Reference the specific section of the
proposed rule being addressed.
III. Background
The Head Start program is a national
program that promotes school readiness
of low-income children by enhancing
their cognitive, social, and emotional
development through the provision of
health, educational, nutritional, social,
and other services that are determined,
based on family needs assessments, to
be necessary.
The Head Start program provides
grants to local public and private nonprofit and for-profit agencies to provide
comprehensive child development
services to economically disadvantaged
children and families, with a special
focus on helping preschoolers develop
the skills they need to be successful in
school. In FY 1995, the Early Head Start
program was established to serve
families of economically disadvantaged
children from birth to three years of age
and pregnant women from such families
in recognition of the mounting evidence
that the earliest years matter a great deal
to children’s growth and development.
On December 12, 2007, the President
signed the Improving Head Start for
School Readiness Act of 2007, Public
Law 110–134. The law reauthorized the
Head Start program through September
30, 2012, and built on the program’s
many successes. The reauthorization
addressed the needs of children and
families by focusing efforts on building
increased systems of accountability,
improving quality, and expanding
program access. The 2007
reauthorization also made several
changes to the eligibility criteria and
related policies for participation in
Head Start and Early Head Start
programs described in Section 645 and
645A of the Act. The Act included
homeless children as a category of
individuals who are deemed to be from
low-income families and therefore
categorically eligible for enrollment in
Head Start and Early Head Start, but
who were not included explicitly in the
previous version of the Act. Homeless
children are among the most
disadvantaged children in the country.
Since the reauthorization, grantees have
been informed of these changes through
PO 00000
Frm 00024
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
a Program Instruction and various
policy clarifications related to categories
of individuals that are categorically
eligible and the definition of homeless
child to be used to determine eligibility.
However, the current regulations do not
specify how agencies are required to
verify or certify that a child is homeless.
The proposed revisions to 45 CFR
1305.2 and 1305.4 directly respond to
the findings of a recent investigation by
the Government Accountability Office
(GAO) that the Head Start program is at
risk of having over-income children
enrolled while legitimate under-income
and categorically eligible children are
put on wait lists. GAO presented its
preliminary results about its ongoing
investigation in testimony entitled,
‘‘Head Start: Undercover Testing Finds
Fraud and Abuse at Selected Head Start
Centers’’ before the House Education
and Labor Committee on May 18, 2010,
which is available at: https://
www.gao.gov/new.items/d10733t.pdf.
GAO published its final report on
September 28, 2010, which reiterated
many of the findings disclosed in the
May testimony and discussed new
findings related to specific fraud
allegations at two Head Start grantees.
This report is available at: ;https://
www.gao.gov/products/GAO-10-1049.
Specifically, in its investigation, GAO
followed up on received allegations of
fraud and abuse involving two Head
Start grantees, including that Head Start
centers allegedly manipulated recorded
income to make over-income applicants
appear under-income; encouraged
families to report that they were
homeless when they were not; enrolled
more than 10 percent of over-income
children allowed by the Head Start Act;
and counted children as enrolled in
more than one center at a time. In its
final report, GAO states that it was able
to substantiate that ‘‘children were
enrolled in both the grantee and
delegate sites,’’ indicating that the
grantee did not comply with the Head
Start requirement to report an
unduplicated count of its funded
enrollment numbers. After further
investigation of the programs alleged to
have enrolled ineligible children by
designating them as ‘‘homeless,’’ GAO
was unable to substantiate the fraud
claim because not all of the records
reviewed contained sufficient
information to determine whether a
given family was homeless. However,
GAO noted that the lack of requirements
related to verifying and documenting a
child’s homeless status raised concerns
about the risk of fraud in the Head Start
program.
In order to ascertain if this type of
fraud was occurring at other Head Start
E:\FR\FM\18MRP1.SGM
18MRP1
jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 53 / Friday, March 18, 2011 / Proposed Rules
centers, GAO attempted to register
fictitious children as part of 15
undercover test scenarios at centers in
six States and the District of Columbia.
GAO found that in eight instances, staff
at the Head Start centers fraudulently
misrepresented information, including
disregarding part of the families’ income
to register over-income children into
under-income slots. The undercover
tests revealed that seven Head Start
employees lied about applicants’
employment status or misrepresented
their earnings. GAO concluded that
‘‘this leaves Head Start at risk that overincome children may be enrolled while
legitimate under-income children are
put on wait lists.’’ GAO also noted that
‘‘at no point during our registrations was
information submitted by GAO’s
fictitious parents verified, leaving the
program at risk that dishonest persons
could falsify earnings statements and
other documents in order to qualify.’’
Upon learning of GAO’s investigation,
we immediately took numerous actions
within our statutory and regulatory
authority to respond to GAO’s findings
and to bolster program integrity efforts
across the Head Start and Early Head
Start programs; prevent future fraud and
mismanagement; and ensure that every
slot is reserved for an eligible child. For
example, ACF issued a Program
Instruction on May 10, 2010, entitled,
‘‘Income Eligibility for Enrollment’’
(ACF–PI–HS–10–01), which reminds
grantees of their legal obligations to
verify the eligibility of each child served
and determine eligibility in accordance
with the Head Start statute and
regulations, as well as the serious
consequences for falsifying eligibility
determinations. The Program
Instruction is available at: https://
eclkc.ohs.acf.hhs.gov/hslc/
Program%20Design%
20and%20Management/
Head%20Start%20Requirements/PIs/
2010/resour_pri_002_051010.html. On
May 17, 2010, the Secretary of HHS,
Kathleen Sebelius, sent a letter to every
Head Start and Early Head Start grantee
in the country to underscore the serious
nature of GAO’s allegations and notify
them that HHS is intensifying its
oversight and enforcement actions. This
letter is available at: https://
www.hhs.gov/news/press/2010pres/05/
head_start_letter.html. We also have
begun to conduct more unannounced
monitoring visits to Head Start grantees;
have created a Web-based ‘‘hotline’’ that
will allow those with information of
impropriety of any kind to report
directly to the Secretary of HHS; have
begun to increase oversight and reviews
of programs with identified risk factors;
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:53 Mar 17, 2011
Jkt 223001
and will continue to use our authority
to suspend or terminate grantees where
pervasive fraud or misuse of funds is
found.
However, we believe GAO’s findings
necessitate the implementation of new
enrollment procedures, as proposed by
this regulation, in order to reiterate and
strengthen the requirements. Therefore,
we are proposing new requirements for
Head Start and Early Head Start agency
staff regarding verification,
documentation, and certification of the
information submitted by the applicants
prior to determining if a pregnant
woman or child is eligible for
participation in a Head Start or Early
Head Start program. This proposed
regulation will ensure that taxpayer
dollars are spent in conformance with
the purpose and requirements of the
Head Start Act and that the neediest
children and families in our country
benefit from the program’s services. The
purpose of the program, as stated in
section 636 of the Head Start Act, is to
‘‘promote the school readiness of lowincome children’’ and provide ‘‘lowincome children and their families of
health, educational, nutritional, social,
and other services that are determined,
based on family needs assessments, to
be necessary.’’ As stated in sections 645
and 645A of the Head Start Act and Part
1305 of the current Head Start
regulations, the eligibility requirements
of the program require that, with limited
exceptions, participants must be either
‘‘income eligible,’’ meaning the pregnant
woman or family’s income is equal to,
or less than, the income guidelines (the
‘‘official poverty line’’) or ‘‘categorically
eligible,’’ meaning that the individuals
are eligible for participation in a Head
Start or Early Head Start program even
if the income of the pregnant woman or
family exceeds the income guidelines
due to being a member of one of the
specific categories of individuals
authorized under the Act and current
regulations—being eligible for public
assistance; being a homeless child; or
being a child in foster care. While the
Head Start Act provides authority for
grantees to enroll a certain portion of
pregnant women and children who are
not income or categorically eligible, the
statute nonetheless makes clear that the
primary target populations for the Head
Start and Early Head Start programs are
low-income and categorically eligible
children and their families, and, in the
case of Early Head Start, low-income
pregnant women. Therefore, most of the
enrollment slots are reserved for
pregnant women and children who are
income or categorically eligible.
In particular, we believe GAO’s
findings regarding the apparent
PO 00000
Frm 00025
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
14843
fraudulent enrollment of ineligible
children in Head Start slots that are
reserved for children who are income
and categorically eligible necessitate the
implementation of new enrollment
procedures to ensure eligible children
receive Head Start services in a timely
fashion and to prevent harm resulting
from being denied access to these
services. In the case of Head Start, if an
eligible child misses all or a part of the
year of Head Start services because an
ineligible child is enrolled in a slot
intended for the eligible child, the
eligible child suffers real harm by being
deprived of an essential educational
experience needed to prepare him or her
for success in elementary school. In the
case of Early Head Start, if an eligible
infant or toddler misses all or a part of
the year of Early Head Start services, the
child suffers harm by being denied
participation in a program that has been
shown by research to help children
perform significantly better on a range
of measures of cognitive, language, and
social-emotional development than
those in a randomly assigned control
group and potentially to reduce the risk
of poor cognitive, language, and school
outcomes later on in life.
GAO identified the lack of verification
requirements as a concern related to
enrollment fraud as they found evidence
that ‘‘Head Start staff encouraged
parents to report that they were
homeless when they were not in order
to qualify them for the program.’’
Therefore, we believe it is essential to
issue this proposed rule to prevent cases
of fraud in which staff intentionally
enroll children based on being
homeless, despite knowing they are
ineligible. Specifically, this proposed
regulation reflects the status of homeless
children as categorically eligible for
participation in Head Start and Early
Head Start in order to conform to the
Head Start Act and specifies how
agency staff must verify, certify, and
document in a child’s record how they
explored a claim by a child’s parent,
guardian, or other person(s) seeking
services for the child who has
knowledge of the family’s situation that
the child is homeless.
We note that since GAO’s findings
were released, we have kept the Head
Start grantee community, Congress, and
the general public apprised of our
increased focus on program integrity
and our planned changes in operating
procedures. In addition, these proposed
requirements would place a minimal
burden on grantees. For example, this
proposed regulation would add a
requirement for grantees to maintain
source documents in each child and
pregnant woman’s record; grantees
E:\FR\FM\18MRP1.SGM
18MRP1
14844
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 53 / Friday, March 18, 2011 / Proposed Rules
already are required to review these
source documents for the purposes of
income eligibility determination, so the
proposed new requirement would be to
review source documents for categorical
eligibility, as well as maintain copies of
all source documents used to determine
eligibility in each pregnant woman and
child’s eligibility determination record.
jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS
IV. Discussion of Regulatory Provisions
As discussed, the findings of a recent
investigation by GAO identified
weaknesses in existing eligibility
verification and documentation
requirements that allegedly resulted in
the enrollment of ineligible children.
The proposed revisions to § 1305.2 and
§ 1305.4 are intended to reiterate and
strengthen Head Start and Early Head
Start agency procedures for determining
eligibility for program enrollment,
including procedures to verify, certify,
and document such eligibility, and
eliminate such weaknesses. In addition,
the regulation proposes to create a new
requirement for pregnant women and
parents, guardians, or other person(s)
seeking services for the child who have
knowledge of the family’s situation to
certify that they have submitted factual
and accurate documents to be used to
verify their eligibility. The regulation
proposes to create new requirements for
program staff who make the eligibility
determination to certify that the
information relied on in making the
decision is accurate to the best of his or
her knowledge. The regulation proposes
to initiate new requirements for
agencies to establish policies describing
the actions that will be taken against
agency staff who intentionally violate
Federal and agency eligibility
determination regulations, policies, and
procedures. The regulation also
proposes new requirements for agencies
to provide training related to eligibility
requirements and the legal
consequences of committing fraud. The
proposed revisions also change the
definitions of ‘‘Head Start eligible,’’
‘‘income guidelines,’’ and ‘‘low-income
family’’ and add a definition of
‘‘homeless children’’ to conform to
statutory requirements and provisions.
Note that we use the term ‘‘we’’
throughout the regulatory text and
preamble. The term ‘‘we’’ means the
Secretary of the Department of Health
and Human Services in consultation
with the Assistant Secretary for
Children and Families and other
officials within the Department.
Likewise, the term ‘‘Act’’ refers to the
Head Start Act, as amended.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:53 Mar 17, 2011
Jkt 223001
Section 1305.2—Definitions
This regulation proposes to modify
the definitions of ‘‘Head Start eligible,’’
‘‘income guidelines,’’ and ‘‘low-income
family’’ to comply with statutory
requirements and provisions. The
current definitions contain outdated
information regarding eligibility
guidelines and/or incorrect statutory
citations that we believe must be
updated in order to ensure all grantees
have correct and clear information
related to participant eligibility and
enrollment. Otherwise, the Head Start
program will be vulnerable to incorrect
eligibility and enrollment
determinations. To provide clarification
for grantees, we also propose to add the
definition of ‘‘homeless children’’ as
paragraph (i) from section 725(2) of the
McKinney-Vento Homeless Assistance
Act (42 U.S.C. 11434a(2)), which was
added as a definition in section 637(11)
of the Head Start Act in the 2007
reauthorization, and to redesignate the
subsequent definitions accordingly.
The current definition of ‘‘Head Start
eligible’’ states that: ‘‘A child that meets
the requirements for age and family
income as established in this regulation
or, if applicable, as established by
grantees that meet the requirements of
section 645(a)(2) of the Head Start Act.
Up to 10 percent of the children
enrolled may be from families that
exceed the low-income guidelines.
Indian Tribes meeting the conditions
specified in 45 CFR 1305.4(b)(3) are
excepted from this limitation.’’ This
definition does not reflect current
statutory eligibility requirements. For
example, the rule that ‘‘up to 10 percent
of the children enrolled may be from
families that exceed the low-income
guidelines’’ was changed when the 2007
reauthorization created several other
eligibility provisions. In addition, the
definition does not include ‘‘Early Head
Start’’ in the lead-in language. Therefore,
the new definition of ‘‘Head Start and
Early Head Start eligible’’ at § 1305.2(g)
is proposed to read as follows: ‘‘Head
Start or Early Head Start eligible means
a pregnant woman or child who meets
the requirements for age and family
income or categorical eligibility or, if
applicable, the requirements established
by a grantee under section 645(a)(2) of
the Head Start Act or by a Head Start
program operated by an Indian Tribe
under 45 CFR § 1305.4(d).’’
As indicated, we propose to add a
definition in § 1305.2 of ‘‘homeless
children.’’ The 2007 reauthorization
expanded eligibility to include
homeless children as categorically
eligible for participation in Head Start.
The definition of ‘‘homeless children’’
PO 00000
Frm 00026
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
also was added to section 637(11) of the
Head Start Act, which states that ‘‘[t]he
term ‘‘homeless children’’ has the
meaning given the term ‘‘homeless
children and youth’’ in section 725(2) of
the McKinney-Vento Homeless
Assistance Act (42 U.S.C. 11434a(2)).’’
To improve clarity for grantees and
enable them to have the necessary
references related to eligibility
determination in one regulation, we
propose to include a definition of
‘‘homeless children’’ based on the
McKinney-Vento Homeless Assistance
Act as § 1305.2(i) to mean individuals
who lack a fixed, regular, and adequate
nighttime residence (within the
meaning of 42 U.S.C. 11302(a)(1)); and
include (i) children and youths who are
sharing the housing of other persons
due to loss of housing, economic
hardship, or a similar reason; are living
in motels, hotels, trailer parks, or
camping grounds due to the lack of
alternative adequate accommodations;
are living in emergency or transitional
shelters; are abandoned in hospitals; or
are awaiting foster care placement;
(ii) children and youths who have a
primary nighttime residence that is a
public or private place not designed for
or ordinarily used as a regular sleeping
accommodation for human beings
(within the meaning of 42 U.S.C.
11302(a)(2)(C)); (iii) children and youths
who are living in cars, parks, public
spaces, abandoned buildings,
substandard housing, bus or train
stations, or similar settings; and (iv)
migratory children (as such term is
defined in 20 U.S.C. 6399) who qualify
as homeless for the purposes of this part
because the children are living in
circumstances described in paragraphs
(i) through (iii).
The current definition of ‘‘income
guidelines’’ at § 1305.2(j) references an
outdated section of the Head Start Act.
The current definition defines ‘‘income
guidelines’’ as ‘‘the official poverty line
specified in section 652 of the Head
Start Act.’’ However, the official poverty
line in the Act now is referenced in the
definitions section (section 637(19)) of
the Head Start Act. Therefore, we
propose to update § 1305.2(j) to
reference the correct Head Start Act
citation and to redesignate it as
paragraph (k). The proposed new
definition of income guidelines at
§ 1305.2(k) means the official poverty
line specified in section 637(19) of the
Head Start Act. The U.S. Department of
Health and Human Services publishes
the income guidelines each year in the
Federal Register; they also are available
at https://aspe.hhs.gov/poverty/.
The current definition of ‘‘low-income
family’’ at § 1305.2(l) states that low-
E:\FR\FM\18MRP1.SGM
18MRP1
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 53 / Friday, March 18, 2011 / Proposed Rules
jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS
income family means a family whose
total annual income before taxes is
equal to, or less than, the income
guidelines. The definition also states
that, for the purpose of eligibility, a
child from a family that is eligible for
public assistance or a child in foster
care is eligible even if the family income
exceeds the income guidelines. Public
assistance and foster care, as well as
being a homeless child, are classified as
the three types of ‘‘categorical
eligibility’’ that are authorized by
current statute and regulations and
further specified in this regulation. We
propose to remove the public assistance
and foster care categories of recipients
currently included in the definition of
‘‘low-income family’’ to prevent
confusion and mistakes because
agencies are not required to verify
family income in these cases. We also
propose to redesignate paragraph (l) as
paragraph (m). The proposed definition
of ‘‘low-income family’’ at § 1305.2(m)
only refers to eligibility based on the
income guidelines and reads as follows:
‘‘Low-income family means a family
whose total income before taxes is equal
to, or less than, the income guidelines.’’
Section 1305.4—Determining, Verifying,
and Documenting Eligibility
In order to update and strengthen the
content of § 1305.4 related to
determining, verifying, and
documenting Head Start and Early Head
Start program eligibility consistent with
the changes made through the 2007
reauthorization of the Head Start Act,
we propose to revise the heading of
§ 1305.4, ‘‘Age of child and family
income eligibility’’ to read ‘‘Determining,
verifying, and documenting eligibility.’’
Because the current regulations
regarding eligibility were updated last
on March 16, 1998, prior to the 2007
reauthorization of the Head Start Act,
these proposed revisions represent the
full scope of actions Head Start and
Early Head Start agencies are required
now by statute to undertake related to
determining participant eligibility. We
propose to revise § 1305.4 to incorporate
the new income eligibility criteria
added in the 2007 reauthorization.
These proposed determination
requirements are described in
paragraphs (a) through (d). We believe
that the lack of updated and accurate
descriptions of eligibility criteria in the
current regulations otherwise would
contribute to confusion and enrollment
determination errors by Head Start and
Early Head Start programs.
The current regulations require
programs to verify family income
(§ 1305.4(c)); identify which documents
should be reviewed (§ 1305.4(d)); and
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:53 Mar 17, 2011
Jkt 223001
establish rules under which an agency
must maintain a signed statement by an
employee that identifies which
documents were examined and stating
the child is eligible (§ 1305.4(e)). The
current regulations only specify that
income eligibility based on having
income below the Federal poverty line,
has to be verified and do not require
that copies of documentation be
maintained in the agency records. We
believe that the lack of clear up-to-date
rules governing eligibility
determination, verification,
certification, and documentation
requirements in the current regulations
exposes the Head Start and Early Head
Start programs to an unacceptable risk
of fraud, as revealed by GAO’s
investigation.
Therefore, as detailed later in this
preamble, in paragraphs (e) to (g), we
describe proposed requirements for
agency staff to verify income and
categorical eligibility and propose
specific instructions about the required
certification and documentation steps
program staff must take. In paragraph
(g), the regulation proposes new
requirements for pregnant women and
person(s) seeking services for individual
children to certify that the documents
and information that they provided
concerning eligibility are accurate to the
best of their knowledge, as well as a
new requirement for the program staff
persons who made the eligibility
determination also to certify that the
information on eligibility in the file is
accurate to the best of their knowledge.
Paragraph (g) also proposes to add new
requirements related to documentation
to ensure that agency staff maintains
eligibility determination records for
each pregnant woman or child,
including copies of all documents
submitted by a pregnant woman or
persons seeking services on behalf of a
child to the program relating to the
pregnant woman’s or child’s eligibility
for services and any staff member’s
notes recording any other information
related to eligibility received from any
source; documentation establishing that
an agency staff member verified the
accuracy of the information on
eligibility; a record of the category
under which the pregnant woman or
child was determined eligible; and the
required beneficiary and staff
certifications. Additionally, paragraph
(g) explains the retention and access
requirements related to eligibility
determination records.
In paragraph (h) we propose a new
requirement that all Head Start and
Early Head Start agencies must establish
policies and procedures describing the
actions that will be taken against agency
PO 00000
Frm 00027
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
14845
staff who commit intentional violations
of Federal and agency eligibility
determination requirements, including
enrolling pregnant women and children
who staff have not documented as
eligible to participate in the program.
In paragraph (i), we propose to extend
current regulatory training requirements
at § 1304.52(l) to specify that such
training for all governing body, policy
council, management and those staff
members who have the responsibility to
make eligibility determinations must
include an explanation of the legal
consequences of committing fraud and
information on methods for obtaining
facts necessary for complete and
accurate eligibility determinations.
Specifically, proposed paragraph (a)
reflects the statutory requirements at
section 638 of the Act regarding age
eligibility for participation in the Head
Start program. Following the statute, we
begin paragraph (a) by noting the
exception stated in section 645(a)(2) of
the Head Start Act, which authorizes
qualifying communities to develop their
own eligibility criteria within statutory
limits. Section 645(a)(2) applies to a
Head Start program that is operated in
a community with a population of 1,000
or less individuals and the following
conditions apply: There is no other
preschool program in the community;
the community is located in a medically
underserved area, as designated by the
Secretary pursuant to section 330(b)(3)
of the Public Health Service Act [42
U.S.C. 254c(b)(3)], and is located in a
health professional shortage area, as
designated by the Secretary pursuant to
section 332(a)(1) of such Act [42 U.S.C.
254e(a)(1)]; the community is in a
location which, by reason of
remoteness, does not permit reasonable
access to preschool and medical
services; and not less than 50 percent of
the families to be served in the
community are eligible under the
eligibility criteria established by the
Secretary under paragraph in section
645(a)(1) of the Act. A Head Start
program in such a locality is required to
establish the eligibility criteria to be
used, except that no child residing in
such community whose family is
eligible under such eligibility criteria
shall, by virtue of regular eligibility
criteria, be denied an opportunity to
participate in such program.
Section 645A(c) of the Act provides
that to be eligible for participation in
Early Head Start programs, an
individual must be a pregnant woman
or a child under the age of three. Section
645(a)(5)(A) of the Act provides that
children who are at least three years old
through the age of compulsory school
attendance are age eligible for
E:\FR\FM\18MRP1.SGM
18MRP1
jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS
14846
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 53 / Friday, March 18, 2011 / Proposed Rules
participation in Head Start programs.
The current regulations at § 1305.4(a)
describe age eligibility requirements as
follows: ‘‘To be eligible for Head Start
services, a child must be at least three
years old by the date used to determine
eligibility for public school in the
community in which the Head Start
program is located, except in cases
where the Head Start program’s
approved grant provides specific
authority to serve younger children.
Examples of such exceptions are
programs serving children of migrant
families and Early Head Start programs.’’
However, the paragraph is outdated and
needs to be changed in order to reflect
current statutory provisions. We believe
the lack of thorough and clear
descriptions of age eligibility criteria
could contribute to confusion and
enrollment mistakes by Head Start and
Early Head Start programs as they
respond to the new verification
procedures proposed through this
regulation. In addition, in order to
clarify which age eligibility
requirements apply to Early Head Start
participation versus those that apply to
Head Start participation, we propose to
create two paragraphs to distinguish the
different age eligibility requirements for
each program.
Since the current paragraph (a) does
not refer to the specific age eligibility
requirements for Early Head Start
programs, we propose in paragraph
(a)(1)(i) that to be eligible for Early Head
Start services, ‘‘a child must be an infant
or toddler between the ages of zero and
three years old.’’ Current paragraph (a)
also does not refer to the age eligibility
of pregnant women. Therefore, we
propose to add a provision in (a)(1)(ii)
to specify that a pregnant woman may
be any age in order to be eligible for
enrollment in an Early Head Start
program.
In proposed paragraph (a)(2), we
primarily state the same eligibility
requirements currently found in
paragraph (a). Specifically, proposed
(a)(2) states that ‘‘To be age eligible for
Head Start services, a child must be at
least three years old by the date used to
determine eligibility for public school in
the community in which the Head Start
program is located and not older than
the age of required school attendance,
except in cases where the Head Start
program’s approved grant provides
specific authority to serve younger
children. Examples of such exceptions
are programs serving children of
migrant and seasonal farmworker
families.’’ The date to be used for age
determination remains the same as the
current regulation. We propose to
remove the current exception of Early
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:53 Mar 17, 2011
Jkt 223001
Head Start programs since we now
explain the Early Head Start
requirements separately in proposed
paragraph (a)(1). We also propose to add
reference to ‘‘seasonal farmworker
families’’ to reflect statutory
terminology.
Under proposed paragraph (b)(1), we
describe the statutory income eligibility
requirements found in section 645(a)(1)
of the Act. As described above with
regard to paragraph (a), we begin
proposed paragraph (b) with the
exception stated in section 645(a)(2) of
the Head Start Act, which authorizes
qualifying communities to develop their
own eligibility criteria. Proposed
paragraph (b)(1) reflects the
requirements for Head Start and Early
Head Start eligibility that pregnant
women and age eligible children from
low-income families shall be eligible for
participation in Head Start and Early
Head Start programs.
Proposed paragraph (b)(2) reflects the
new statutory authority at section
645(a)(1)(B)(iii)(I) established by the
2007 reauthorization of the Head Start
Act. This paragraph explains that to a
reasonable extent, but not to exceed 10
percent of participants, participants may
include age eligible children and
pregnant women in the area served who
would benefit from Head Start or Early
Head Start programs, but who are not
eligible under paragraphs (b)(1) or (c)
[income or categorically eligible]. In
order to conform to the new statutory
authority that was provided in section
645(a)(1)(B)(iii)(I) through the 2007
reauthorization, we reiterate in
proposed paragraph (b) that programs
may enroll pregnant women or children
from over-income families ‘‘in the area
served who would benefit from such
programs.’’
Proposed paragraph (b)(3) reflects the
new statutory authority at section
645(a)(1)(B)(iii)(II) established by the
2007 reauthorization of the Head Start
Act. This paragraph explains that from
the area served, programs may enroll an
additional 35 percent of participants
beyond the 10 percent eligible under
proposed paragraph (b)(2) that are
pregnant women and age eligible
children whose families have incomes
over 100 percent but below 130 percent
of the income guidelines, who do not
satisfy the eligibility requirements
described under paragraphs (b)(1) or (c)
[income or categorically eligible]. We
are reiterating the provision in this
proposed rule to conform to the new
statutory authority that was provided
through the 2007 reauthorization.
Proposed paragraph (b)(3)(i) specifies
that agencies that choose to serve
individuals eligible under this
PO 00000
Frm 00028
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
paragraph must establish and
implement outreach, prioritization, and
enrollment policies and procedures that
ensure they are meeting the needs of
children and pregnant women eligible
based on being a member of a lowincome family, as defined in this
proposed rule, and enrolling at least
10 percent of children with disabilities
who are eligible under proposed
paragraph (b)(2), prior to serving the
pregnant women and children from
families with incomes over 100 percent
to 130 percent of the income guidelines.
In order to align the Head Start
regulations with the Act, proposed
paragraph (b)(3)(ii) also references the
annual reporting requirements stated in
section 645(a)(1)(B)(iv) of the Act for
agencies that choose to serve additional
children and pregnant women per the
authority granted at section
645(a)(1)(B)(iii)(II) of the Act. The 2007
reauthorization added the reporting
requirement under section
645(a)(1)(B)(iv) for all Head Start and
Early Head Start agencies that serve
additional pregnant women and
children under section
645(a)(1)(B)(iii)(II) to document how the
grantees enrolling additional overincome children are meeting the needs
of children from low-income families,
homeless children, children in foster
care, and pregnant women and children
from families eligible for public
assistance, as well as to document that
they have implemented outreach and
enrollment policies and procedures that
ensure the agency is enrolling at least 10
percent of children with disabilities
prior to serving children from families
with incomes over 100 percent and
under 130 percent of the income
guidelines.
Proposed paragraph (c) describes the
three types of categorical eligibility for
Head Start and Early Head Start based
on section 645(a)(1)(B)(i) and (ii) of the
Act and 45 CFR 1305.4(l).
The first proposed type of categorical
eligibility reiterates the eligibility
condition stated in section
645(a)(1)(B)(i) of the Act that a child is
eligible if the child’s family is ‘‘eligible
or, in the absence of child care, would
potentially be eligible for public
assistance.’’ In addition, children and
pregnant women are eligible under the
proposed regulation for Early Head Start
based on section 645A(c) of the Head
Start Act, which makes the eligibility
criteria in section 645(a)(1) of the Act
applicable to the enrollment of children
and pregnant women in Early Head
Start programs. As provided in policy
guidance, TANF and SSI are the only
two programs that are considered as
E:\FR\FM\18MRP1.SGM
18MRP1
jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 53 / Friday, March 18, 2011 / Proposed Rules
public assistance for determining Head
Start Eligibility.
The second proposed type of
categorical eligibility specifies that a
homeless child is eligible for
participation, as stated in section
645(a)(1)(B)(ii) of the Act. Section
645A(c) of the Head Start Act makes the
eligibility criteria in section 645(a)(1) of
the Act applicable to the enrollment of
children and pregnant women in Early
Head Start programs. As described
earlier, the 2007 reauthorization added
the provision stating that homeless
children are categorically eligible for
participation in Head Start. The
definition of ‘‘homeless children’’ also
was added to section 637(11) of the
Head Start Act, which states that ‘‘[t]he
term ‘‘homeless children’’ has the
meaning given the term ‘‘homeless
children and youth’’ in section 725(2) of
the McKinney-Vento Homeless
Assistance Act (42 U.S.C. 11434a(2)).’’
As stated previously, we propose to add
this definition of ‘‘homeless children’’ to
§ 1305.2(i) to improve clarity for
grantees.
The third type of categorical
eligibility proposes that children in
foster care are eligible for participation,
which already is specified in the current
definition of ‘‘low-income family’’ in
§ 1305.2(l) (proposed to be redesignated
as § 1305.2(m)). It has been longstanding
Head Start policy for foster children to
be eligible for participation in Head
Start, without regard to their foster
family’s income. We propose in
paragraph (c) to add a reference to the
regulatory definition of foster care used
for Federal child welfare programs to
this Head Start rule to enable grantees
to conduct the eligibility determination
process accurately and consistently. We
propose to reference 45 CFR 1355.20(a),
which defines foster care to mean ‘‘24hour substitute care for children placed
away from their parents or guardians
and for whom the State agency has
placement and care responsibility. This
includes, but is not limited to,
placements in foster family homes,
foster homes of relatives, group homes,
emergency shelters, residential
facilities, child care institutions, and
preadoptive homes. A child is in foster
care in accordance with this definition
regardless of whether the foster care
facility is licensed and payments are
made by the State or local agency for the
care of the child, whether adoption
subsidy payments are being made prior
to the finalization of an adoption, or
whether there is Federal matching of
any payments that are made.’’
In summary, proposed paragraph (c)
provides that pregnant women and age
eligible children are categorically
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:53 Mar 17, 2011
Jkt 223001
eligible for enrollment in Head Start and
Early Head Start if: (1) The pregnant
woman or the child’s family is eligible
or, in the absence of child care, would
potentially be eligible for public
assistance; (2) the child is homeless, as
defined in § 1305.2(i); or (3) the child is
in foster care.
In proposed paragraph (d), we move
the requirements and procedures related
to the special income eligibility rules
governing Indian Tribes that are
reflected currently in § 1305.4(b)(3) and
(4) to proposed paragraph (d)(1) through
(5). The current paragraph only includes
references to income eligibility based on
the low-income guidelines, but does not
include references to categorical
eligibility. Therefore, we also propose to
update this paragraph to conform to the
statutory authority.
Under the proposed paragraph, a
Head Start or Early Head Start program
operated by an Indian Tribe may enroll
more than 10 percent of its children
from families whose incomes exceed the
low-income guidelines or are not
categorically eligible when:
• All children from Indian and nonIndian families living on the reservation
that meet the low-income guidelines or
are categorically eligible who wish to be
enrolled in the program are served by
the program;
• All children from income-eligible or
categorically-eligible Indian families
native to the reservation living in nonreservation areas, approved as part of
the Tribe’s service area, who wish to be
enrolled in the program are served by
the program. In those instances in
which the non-reservation area is not
served by another Head Start or Early
Head Start program, the Tribe must
serve all of the income-eligible and
categorically-eligible Indian and nonIndian children whose families wish to
enroll them in the program prior to
serving over-income children;
• The Tribe has the resources within
its grant or from other non-Federal
sources to enroll children from families
whose incomes exceed the low-income
guidelines or are not categorically
eligible without using additional funds
from HHS intended to expand Head
Start or Early Head Start services; and
• At least 51 percent of the children
to be served by the program are from
families that meet the income-eligibility
guidelines or are categorically eligible.
Proposed paragraph (d)(5) maintains
the content from current § 1305.4(b)(4),
but updates the reference in this
provision from paragraph (b)(3) to
paragraph (d). The paragraph proposes
that programs which meet the
conditions of paragraph (d) must
annually set criteria that are approved
PO 00000
Frm 00029
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
14847
by the Policy Council and the Tribal
Council for selecting over-income
children who would benefit from such
a program.
Proposed paragraph (e) would
establish requirements for family
income to be verified before a child or
pregnant woman is determined to be
eligible for Head Start or Early Head
Start participation based on being a
member of a low-income family. We
propose adding these income
verification requirements to respond to
GAO’s findings and concerns related to
the lack of requirements in many
programs to verify, document, and
maintain records. This proposed income
verification process would reduce the
risk GAO cited whereby ‘‘dishonest
persons could falsify earnings
statements and other documents in
order to qualify.’’ This responds directly
to GAO’s recommendation that we
establish ‘‘more stringent income
verification requirements,
documentation requirements, or both by
Head Start employees responsible for
certifying family eligibility, such as
maintaining income documentation
provided by the applicant (e.g., pay
stubs or W–2s).’’ Moreover, we have
communicated to the public and to
grantees on several occasions that we
would be addressing GAO’s findings by
strengthening our verification
requirements. For example, Secretary
Sebelius provided notice to all grantees
through her May 17, 2010 letter that we
would be developing new regulations
‘‘that will address verification
requirements.’’
Proposed paragraph (e) incorporates
the current regulatory requirement
related to income verification in
§ 1305.4(c), which requires that family
income must be verified by the Head
Start or Early Head Start program before
determining that a child is eligible
based on income guidelines. We
propose to continue the longstanding
requirement that family income must be
verified prior to determining eligibility
for enrollment in a Head Start or Early
Head Start program. As defined in
proposed § 1305.2(b), the term
‘‘enrollment’’ means ‘‘the official
acceptance of a family by a Head Start
program and the completion of all
procedures necessary for a child and
family to begin receiving services.’’
Paragraph (e) proposes a new
requirement related to a pregnant
woman’s or family’s declaration that the
pregnant woman or family has no
income. Currently, there are no
regulations that specify what actions
agencies should take when a pregnant
woman or a child’s parent, guardian, or
other person(s) seeking services for the
E:\FR\FM\18MRP1.SGM
18MRP1
jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS
14848
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 53 / Friday, March 18, 2011 / Proposed Rules
child who has knowledge of the family’s
finances states that the pregnant woman
or family has no income to report. We
recognize the difficulty Head Start and
Early Head Start agencies face in
obtaining documentation supporting a
declaration that an individual has no
income. Therefore, in such cases when
a pregnant woman or family reports
having no income and submits no
documentation proving that the
pregnant woman or family has no
income, proposed paragraph (e) would
require agency staff to document that
they explored a pregnant woman or
family’s declaration that they have no
income. For example, programs should
gather as much relevant information as
possible about the pregnant woman or
family; i.e., the location, living
arrangements, employment situation,
etc. of the pregnant woman or family to
make as informed a judgment as
possible about the pregnant woman or
family’s eligibility status. Agencies may
examine and maintain documentation
representing relevant evidence of a
pregnant woman or family’s low-income
status, such as receipt of Supplemental
Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) or
Medicaid benefits, or any other
evidence of public or private assistance
by which a family with children is
meeting its ongoing needs for food,
housing, and health care.
Accordingly, under proposed
paragraph (e), before a child or pregnant
woman is determined to be eligible on
the basis of family income, the pregnant
woman or the child’s parent, guardian,
or other person(s) seeking services for
the child who has knowledge of the
family’s finances must submit
information to the program concerning
the family’s income. Under the
proposed rule, verification must include
examination of documents, such as
individual income tax forms, W–2
forms, pay stubs, pay envelopes, or
written statements from employers (if
individual income tax forms, W–2
forms, pay stubs, or pay envelopes are
not available). Income would be
required to be compared to the poverty
guidelines for the appropriate size of
family, and program staff would need to
document whether a pregnant woman or
child’s family qualifies as a low-income
family under the income guidelines for
the appropriate size of family. Under the
proposed rule, when appropriate, in
cases in which no documentation
regarding the income eligibility of the
pregnant woman or child has been
received by the agency, or when it is
either more efficient or reliable to do so
rather than to search for eligibility
documentation, programs could seek
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:53 Mar 17, 2011
Jkt 223001
information from third parties who have
first-hand knowledge about the pregnant
woman’s or child’s eligibility, and
document the names, titles, and
relationship to the applicant in the
participant’s record. Programs also
could seek third party information in
cases where documents are not
submitted to prove a claim that a
pregnant woman or family has no
income. We believe all applicants must
be given the opportunity to withhold
consent related to each third party the
program would like to contact.
Therefore, we propose that if programs
plan to seek third party verification
from one or more entities regarding an
applicant’s eligibility, staff must inform
the applicant about each entity that they
intend to contact and have the applicant
sign a consent form permitting the
program to contact each of the specified
third parties; this would provide
applicants the opportunity to withhold
their consent for third party verification
from one or more entities. If applicants
do not sign the consent form, the Head
Start program would not be allowed to
contact that entity and the applicant
would remain responsible for providing
appropriate documentation. We also
propose that when programs contact
third parties, they should limit the
information discussed and questions
posed to the third party to the
information necessary to obtain the
required eligibility information.
Programs should be especially sensitive
to any potential domestic violence
issues prior to seeking verification of the
required eligibility information.
In paragraph (f), we propose to require
agencies to verify and document
categorical eligibility before a pregnant
woman or child is determined to be
eligible for Head Start or Early Head
Start participation. We propose to
require the pregnant woman or the
child’s parent, guardian or other
person(s) seeking services for the child
who has knowledge of the family’s
situation to submit information to the
program concerning the family’s
categorical eligibility. As proposed,
verification of categorical eligibility by
the program must include examination
of the relevant documents submitted by
the pregnant woman or family for the
relevant type of categorical eligibility, as
described below. If a pregnant woman
or child could qualify for Head Start or
Early Head Start participation based on
more than one eligibility criterion, then
the program should enroll the child
under the criterion that is easiest to
verify and document; it would not be
necessary to verify and document
multiple eligibility criteria.
PO 00000
Frm 00030
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
The first requirement in proposed
paragraph (f)(1) addresses categorical
eligibility based on eligibility for public
assistance. This proposal aligns with the
requirement currently at § 1305.4(d),
which specifies that verification of
family income ‘‘must include
examination of * * * documentation
showing current status as recipients of
public assistance.’’ Under proposed
paragraph (f)(1), we require agency staff
to examine any official documents
submitted for the purpose of
demonstrating that the pregnant woman,
the child, or child’s parent or guardian,
is eligible or, in the absence of child
care, would potentially be eligible for
public assistance. Based on Federal
Head Start grantee monitoring
experience, we are aware that some
agencies already have developed
policies and procedures, or practices,
for verifying public assistance eligibility
or receipt status. Since the substance of
this proposed requirement is based on
current practice by many grantees, we
do not believe this would impose a large
burden.
Under proposed paragraph (f), in
cases in which a child is in foster care,
we add a new requirement for agency
staff to review a copy of a court order,
other legal or government-issued
document, or a statement of a State,
Tribal, or local child welfare official
demonstrating the child is in foster care.
The current regulations do not require
agencies to verify or document foster
care status. Based on Federal Head Start
grantee monitoring experience, we are
aware that some agencies already have
developed policies and procedures, or
practices, for verifying foster care status
through their collaborations with local
child welfare agencies. Since the
substance of this requirement is based
on current practice by many grantees,
we do not believe this proposed
requirement would impose a large
burden.
Proposed paragraph (f) also adds a
new provision to address cases when
documents are not submitted to provide
evidence of a child’s status as homeless.
Under proposed paragraph (f)(3), in lieu
of other source documents, the program
could substitute a written statement of
a program staff member certifying that
he or she has made reasonable effort to
confirm a declaration by the parent,
guardian, or other person(s) seeking
services for the child that the child is a
‘‘homeless child,’’ as defined in
§ 1305.2(i). As stated previously, the
2007 reauthorization added homeless
children as a category of individuals
that are categorically eligible for
enrollment. The current regulations do
not specify how agencies should verify
E:\FR\FM\18MRP1.SGM
18MRP1
jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 53 / Friday, March 18, 2011 / Proposed Rules
that a child is homeless. We believe it
is essential for program integrity,
especially in light of GAO’s recent
investigation into allegations that
grantees enrolled children who were
known by agency staff not to be
homeless, to require that homelessness
must be verified, and documentation
must be maintained in the agency’s files
(as described in proposed paragraph
(g)), in order to prevent cases of fraud
in which staff intentionally enroll
children based on being homeless
despite knowing they are not. We
recognize that obtaining verification and
documentation of the circumstances
that fall within the Federal definition of
homeless children can present unique
challenges to Head Start and Early Head
Start agencies and to vulnerable
families. We would encourage agencies
to enroll homeless children based on the
families’ description of their living
situation, if that description meets the
definition and documentation is not
readily available. Statements that
describe the living situation also could
be accepted from family members and
other individuals that are cohabitating
temporarily with the family. As
proposed, verification of circumstances
and collection of documents should be
obtained within a reasonable timeframe.
In order to verify homelessness, we
would encourage grantees to conduct
the following types of efforts: Engage
their school district homeless liaisons,
private and public shelter providers,
HUD Continuums of Care, and other
homeless service agencies in their
service area to assist in the verification
and documentation process. We also
would urge agencies to exercise care to
ensure that their verification activities
do not increase the risk that families
may be evicted or suffer other resulting
adverse consequences. In addition, we
would urge agencies to ensure that these
efforts do not impose barriers to the
enrollment and participation of
homeless children in Head Start
programs, an important goal expressed
in the Head Start Act.
Paragraph (f) proposes that, before a
child or pregnant woman is determined
to be eligible on the basis of categorical
eligibility, the pregnant woman or the
child’s parent, guardian, or other
person(s) seeking services for the child
who has knowledge of the family’s
situation must provide the program
with: (1) A copy of official documents
demonstrating current eligibility or
receipt of public assistance benefits or
services by the pregnant woman’s or the
child’s family; (2) a copy of the court
order or other legal or governmentissued document or statement of
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:53 Mar 17, 2011
Jkt 223001
government child welfare official
demonstrating the child is in foster care;
or (3) a copy of any other source
document that establishes categorical
eligibility. Under the proposal, in place
of the foregoing documents, the program
could substitute a written statement of
a program staff member certifying that
the staff member has made reasonable
efforts to confirm a child is homeless, as
defined in proposed § 1305.2(i). The
lack of documentation of homelessness
should not be a barrier to enrollment.
Under the proposal, when appropriate,
in cases in which no documentation
regarding the income eligibility of the
pregnant woman or child has been
received by the agency, or when it is
either more efficient or reliable to do so
rather than to search for eligibility
documentation, programs could seek
information from third parties who have
first-hand knowledge about the pregnant
woman’s or child’s eligibility, and
document the names, titles, and
relationship to the applicant in the
participant’s record. As proposed,
programs also could seek third party
information in cases where documents
are not submitted to prove a claim that
a pregnant woman or family has no
income. We propose that if programs
plan to seek third party verification
from one or more entities regarding an
applicant’s eligibility, staff must inform
the applicant about each entity that they
intend to contact. In addition, the
applicant would be required to sign a
consent form permitting the program to
contact specified third parties; this
would provide applicants the
opportunity to withhold their consent
for third party verification from one or
more entities. An applicant must be
given the opportunity to withhold
consent related to each entity the
program would like to contact. If
applicants do not sign the consent form
the Head Start program could not
contact that entity and the applicant
would remain responsible for providing
appropriate documentation. We propose
that when programs contact third
parties, they should limit the
information discussed and questions
posed to the third party to the
information necessary to obtain the
required eligibility information.
Programs should be especially sensitive
to any potential domestic violence
issues prior to seeking verification of the
required eligibility information.
In proposed paragraph (g), we
strengthen and supplement current
regulatory requirements related to
eligibility certification and
documentation to respond to GAO’s
finding that ‘‘the lack of documentation
PO 00000
Frm 00031
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
14849
made it virtually impossible to
determine whether only under-income
children were enrolled in spots reserved
for under-income children’’ and its
recommendations that we establish
‘‘more stringent income verification
requirements, documentation
requirements, or both by Head Start
employees responsible for certifying
family eligibility, such as maintaining
income documentation provided by the
applicant (e.g., pay stubs or W–2s).’’ As
previously mentioned, current
regulations require a signed statement
by an employee of the Head Start
program, identifying which documents
were examined and stating that the
child is eligible to participate in the
program, but do not require staff to
maintain copies of the documents.
First, this proposed paragraph
requires all Head Start and Early Head
Start programs to keep an eligibility
determination record for each child or
pregnant woman as part of the record
maintained by the agency on that
individual. Proposed paragraph (g)(1)
requires this record to include copies of
all documents submitted by a pregnant
woman or persons seeking services on
behalf of a child to the program by such
persons or other persons relating to the
pregnant woman’s or child’s eligibility
for services and any staff member’s
notes recording any other information
related to eligibility received from any
source.
Proposed paragraph (g)(2) requires the
record to include a copy of the
statements and documents required
under proposed paragraphs (e) and (f)
(related to income and categorical
eligibility). Based on Federal Head Start
grantee monitoring experience, we are
aware that some agencies already have
developed policies and procedures, or
practices, for maintaining copies of
documents verified during eligibility
determination. Since the substance of
this requirement is based on current
practice by some grantees, we do not
believe this proposed requirement
would impose a large burden.
Proposed paragraph (g)(3) requires
that the record also includes a signed
and dated statement by the person
seeking services, i.e., the pregnant
woman or the child’s parent, guardian,
or other person seeking services for the
child who has knowledge of the family’s
situation that ‘‘the documents and
information that the person provided
concerning eligibility are accurate to the
best of the person’s knowledge.’’
Proposed paragraph (g)(4) requires the
record to include documentation
establishing that an agency staff member
has sought to verify the accuracy of the
information on eligibility provided to
E:\FR\FM\18MRP1.SGM
18MRP1
jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS
14850
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 53 / Friday, March 18, 2011 / Proposed Rules
the agency by: (i) Conducting an inperson interview with the pregnant
woman or the child’s parent, guardian,
or other person seeking services for the
child who has knowledge of the family’s
situation; and (ii) when appropriate, in
cases in which no documentation
regarding the income eligibility of the
pregnant woman or the child’s family or
regarding the categorical eligibility of
the child based on being homeless has
been received by the agency, or when it
is either more efficient or reliable to do
so rather than to search for eligibility
documentation, seeking information
from third parties who have first-hand
knowledge about the pregnant woman’s
or child’s eligibility, whose names,
titles, and affiliations would be recorded
in the record. If programs seek third
party verification regarding an
applicant’s eligibility, the record would
be required to include the applicant’s
signed consent form permitting the
program to contact each particular third
party, as required under proposed
paragraphs (e) and (f).
Proposed paragraph (g)(5) requires the
eligibility determination record to
include documentation of the specific
eligibility criterion under which the
child or pregnant woman was
determined eligible for participation. As
stated above, under the proposed rule,
if a pregnant woman or child could
qualify for Head Start or Early Head
Start participation based on more than
one eligibility criterion, then the
program should enroll the child under
the criterion that is easiest to verify and
document; it would not be necessary to
verify and document multiple eligibility
criteria. This includes a record of the
income level or relevant eligibility
category, as addressed in proposed
paragraphs (b) and (c). The first criterion
under which the child or pregnant
woman could be determined eligible is
based on having income below the
income guideline for the family size,
with the family size used documented,
as described in proposed paragraph (b).
The second criterion under which the
child or pregnant woman could be
determined eligible is whether the
child’s family or pregnant woman is
eligible or, in the absence of child care,
would potentially be eligible for public
assistance, as described in proposed
paragraph (c)(1). The third criterion, as
stated in proposed paragraph (c)(2), is
based on being a homeless child, as
defined in proposed § 1305.2(i). The
record also would need to include the
provision of proposed § 1305.2(i) under
which the child was determined to be
homeless. The fourth criterion is
whether the child is in foster care, as
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:53 Mar 17, 2011
Jkt 223001
proposed in paragraph (c)(3). The fifth
criterion, as proposed in paragraph
(b)(2), is being a pregnant woman or
child in the area served who would
benefit from such programs but who is
not eligible otherwise for services (total
enrollment in this category not to
exceed 10 percent of the enrollment
slots). The sixth criterion under which
the pregnant woman or child could be
determined eligible, which is described
in proposed paragraph (b)(3), is whether
the pregnant woman or child’s family
has income over 100 percent to 130
percent of the income guidelines (total
enrollment in this category not to
exceed 35 percent of the enrollment
slots, in addition to any slots filled
under paragraph (b)(2)). The final
proposed criterion under which the
pregnant woman or child could be
determined eligible is whether the
pregnant woman or child meets
alternative eligibility criteria as
permitted under § 1305.4(d) or section
645(a)(2) of the Act.
Proposed paragraph (g)(6) also adds a
new Head Start staff certification
requirement in direct response to GAO’s
aforementioned recommendation to
establish ‘‘more stringent income
verification requirements,
documentation requirements, or both by
Head Start employees responsible for
certifying family eligibility.’’ The
proposed paragraph requires the record
to include a signed and dated statement
by the program staff person who made
the eligibility determination certifying
that the information on eligibility in the
file is accurate to the best of the person’s
knowledge, and based on that
information, the person has determined
the pregnant woman or child to be
eligible for services.
Finally, proposed paragraph (g)(7)
specifies the record retention and access
requirements for the documents and
certifications maintained in each child
and pregnant woman’s record under this
paragraph. These record retention and
access practices must be consistent with
section 647 of the Head Start Act and
the uniform administrative requirement
regulations regarding HHS grant awards
implemented at 45 CFR 74.53 for
awards and subawards to institutions of
higher education, hospitals, other
nonprofit organizations, and
commercial organizations and 45 CFR
92.42 for grants and cooperative
agreements to State, local, and Tribal
governments. Among other
requirements, Section 647 states that all
grant recipients to ‘‘keep such records as
the Secretary shall prescribe’’ and
provide ‘‘access for the purpose of audit
and examination to any books,
documents, papers, and records of the
PO 00000
Frm 00032
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
recipients that are pertinent to the
financial assistance received’’ under the
Head Start Act. A key requirement
explained in both 45 CFR 74.53 and
92.42 is that documents shall be
retained for a period of three years.
Additionally, both of these sections
state requirements related to the right of
access by the HHS awarding agency, the
U.S. Comptroller General, or any of their
authorized representatives, to any
pertinent books, documents, papers, or
other records of recipients in order to
make audits, examinations, excerpts,
transcripts and copies of such
documents. We have included a
reference to these longstanding
Departmental policies in order to
respond to GAO’s concerns that
agencies were not required to maintain
documents related to enrollment. This
requirement will ensure that documents
and certifications required to be
maintained under this paragraph are
retained for the appropriate amount of
time and are accessible to the Office of
Head Start and other Federal agencies,
such as the HHS Inspector General and
the GAO, as needed for monitoring,
audit, investigative, and other purposes.
Proposed paragraph (h) addresses the
establishment of agency policies
regarding violation of eligibility
determination regulations, policies, and
procedures. Under this paragraph, we
propose that all Head Start and Early
Head Start agencies must establish
policies and procedures describing the
actions that will be taken against agency
staff who commit intentional violations
of Federal and agency eligibility
determination regulations, policies and
procedures including enrolling children
and pregnant women who staff have not
documented as eligible to participate in
the program. We believe this proposed
requirement is necessary in order to
prevent future incidents of fraud like
those found in the GAO investigation
and to make clear to all agency staff the
legal consequences of intentionally
committing enrollment fraud.
Proposed paragraph (i), ‘‘Training,’’
requires that all Head Start and Early
Head Start agencies train all governing
body, policy council, management and
those staff members who have the
responsibility to make participant
eligibility determinations on Federal
and agency eligibility regulations,
policies, and procedures, including
verification, certification, and
documentation requirements. The
requirements in proposed paragraph (i)
are an extension of current requirements
stated at § 1304.50(g)(1) that grantee and
delegate agencies must have written
policies that define the roles and
responsibilities of the governing body
E:\FR\FM\18MRP1.SGM
18MRP1
14851
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 53 / Friday, March 18, 2011 / Proposed Rules
members and inform them of the
management procedures and functions
necessary to implement a high-quality
program. They also would expand on
current requirements stated at
§ 1304.52(l) that the training and
development requirements that grantee
and delegate agencies must implement,
including to provide an orientation to
new staff, consultants, and volunteers;
provide training or orientation to Head
Start and Early Head Start governing
body members; and provide orientation
and ongoing training to Head Start and
Early Head Start Policy Council and
Policy Committee members to enable
them to carry out their program
governance responsibilities effectively.
We have communicated to the public
and to grantees on several occasions that
we would be addressing GAO’s findings
by strengthening our training
requirements. For example, we told
GAO after it shared its investigation
findings that we would ‘‘make sure that
grantee staff received training regarding
the proper way to validate income
documentation;’’ this assurance was
documented and shared publicly in
GAO’s May 18, 2010 testimony in the
section entitled ‘‘Corrective Action
Briefing.’’ In addition, Secretary
Sebelius provided notice to all grantees
through her May 17, 2010 letter that we
would be developing new regulations to
address ‘‘staff training on eligibility
criteria and procedures.’’
Proposed paragraph (i) specifies that
the training must be conducted within
30 days following the effective date of
this final rule, and within 30 days of
hiring or beginning of tenure of new
governing body, policy council,
management and those staff members
who have the responsibility to make
participant eligibility determinations.
We propose to require agencies to
develop policies regarding how often
such training would be provided after
the initial training to ensure that
governing body, policy council,
management and those staff members
who have the responsibility to make
participant eligibility determinations are
aware of all current eligibility
determination regulations, policies and
procedures. The National Center on
Program Management and Fiscal
Operations will be developing training
assistance on this topic to assist
grantees.
We propose to require the training to
include explanations of the legal
consequences for individuals and
agencies that commit fraud related to
eligibility determinations, including by
intentionally enrolling children or
pregnant women that they know are
ineligible. Examples of legal
consequences to be explained during
training include the disallowance of the
Requirement
Respondents
10
1,600
§ 1305.4(g) .......................................................................
jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS
§ 1305.4(b)(3)(ii) ..............................................................
§ 1305.4(e) and (f) ...........................................................
1,600
We estimate the costs of
implementing these proposed
requirements would be approximately
$132,188 annually. We calculated this
estimate by multiplying the average
hourly salary for family services
coordinators ($20.59) by the estimated
total burden hours (6,420).
With respect to these provisions, the
Administration for Children and
Families will consider comment by the
public on this collection of information
in the following areas:
• Evaluating whether the proposed
collection is necessary for the proper
performance of the functions of ACF,
including whether the information will
have practical utility;
• Evaluating the accuracy of ACF’s
estimate of the proposed collection of
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:53 Mar 17, 2011
Jkt 223001
Frm 00033
Fmt 4702
V. Paperwork Reduction Act
This proposed rule establishes new
information collection requirements in
§ 1305.4(b), (e), (f), and (g). As required
by the Paperwork Reduction Act of
1995, codified at 44 U.S.C. 3507, the
Administration for Children and
Families will submit a copy of these
sections to the Office of Management
and Budget (OMB) for review and they
will not be effective until they have
been approved and assigned a clearance
number.
Average
burden per
respondent
(hours)
Annual
1 .....................................................
(should reflect info collections for
each applicant).
(should reflect info collections for
each applicant).
information, including the validity of
the methodology and the assumptions
used;
• Enhancing the quality, usefulness,
and clarity of the information to be
collected; and
• Minimizing the burden of the
collection of information on those who
are to respond, including through the
use of appropriate automated,
electronic, mechanical, or other
technology, e.g., permitting electronic
submission of responses.
OMB is required to make a decision
concerning the collection of information
contained in this proposed regulation
between 30 and 60 days after
publication of this document in the
Federal Register. Therefore, a comment
is best assured of having its full effect
PO 00000
agency’s Head Start or Early Head Start
funds; the determination of deficiencies
through the monitoring review process;
the suspension or termination of the
grant; or individual consequences for
the staff involved who intentionally
commit fraud. We also would require
such training to address methods and
strategies for obtaining facts necessary
for complete and accurate eligibility
determinations. These methods and
strategies would need to address
treating families with dignity and
respect and give due regard for possible
issues of domestic violence, stigma, and
privacy. We propose to require all
agencies to maintain ongoing records of
training sessions. Examples of
information that would need to be
documented include: The dates sessions
were conducted, instructor names and
titles, and attendee names.
Sfmt 4702
Total burden
hours
2
2
20
3,200
2
3,200
if OMB receives it within 30 days of
publication. This does not affect the
deadline for the public to comment to
the Department on the regulations.
Written comments to OMB for the
proposed information collection should
be sent directly to the following: Office
of Management and Budget, either by
fax to 202–395–6974 or by e-mail to
OIRA at submission@omb.eop.gov.
Please mark faxes and e-mails to the
attention of the desk officer for ACF.
VI. Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Secretary certifies that, under
5 U.S.C. 605(b), as enacted by the
Regulatory Flexibility Act (Pub. L. 96–
354), this proposed rule will not result
in a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
E:\FR\FM\18MRP1.SGM
18MRP1
14852
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 53 / Friday, March 18, 2011 / Proposed Rules
jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS
This proposed rule primarily is
intended to ensure accountability for
Federal funds consistent with the
purposes of the Head Start Act and is
not duplicative of other requirements.
We believe this proposed rule
implements the aims of the Head Start
Act, as amended, to improve the
effectiveness of Head Start programs
while preserving the ability of Head
Start grantees to continue using
creativity and innovation to promote the
school readiness of low-income
children.
Specifically, as noted under the
Paperwork Reduction Act section of this
preamble, we estimate the cost of
implementing the proposed new
reporting requirements would be
approximately $132,188 annually,
which when applied to all 1,600
grantees nationally, results in a cost per
grantee of less than $85. In developing
this estimate, we assumed that each of
the 1,600 Head Start and Early Head
Start grantees would spend an
additional four hours beyond what they
spend currently to conduct the
proposed new eligibility verification,
certification, and documentation
procedures, as required by paragraphs
(e) through (g). Included in our
estimated annual costs are the minimal
costs incurred by those grantees that
choose to serve additional pregnant
women and children per the authority
granted at section 645(a)(1)(B)(iii)(II) of
the Head Start Act, and therefore would
be required to comply with the annual
reporting requirements described in
section 645(a)(1)(B)(iv) of the Head Start
Act and paragraph (b)(3)(ii) of this
proposed rule. Since no grantees have
taken the opportunity to serve
additional pregnant women and
children per the authority granted at
section 645(a)(1)(B)(iii)(II) of the Head
Start Act to date, our reasonable
expectation is that approximately 10
grantees per year might choose to use
this authority in the future, at a total
estimated cost of $412 per year.
We request public comments on
whether we have adequately considered
all costs for small entities.
VII. Regulatory Impact Analysis
Executive Order 12866 requires that
regulations be reviewed to ensure that
they are consistent with the priorities
and principles set forth in the Executive
Order. The Department has determined
that this Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
is consistent with these priorities and
principles. These regulations
incorporate statutory changes to the
Head Start program enacted in the
Improving Head Start for School
Readiness Act of 2007 and strengthen
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:53 Mar 17, 2011
Jkt 223001
procedures to determine, verify, certify,
and maintain records regarding
eligibility for Head Start and Early Head
Start program enrollment. We have
consulted with the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) and
determined that these proposed rules
meet the criteria for a significant
regulatory action under E.O. 12866.
ACF does not believe there would be
a significant economic impact from this
proposed regulatory action. Based on
our estimate described under the
Paperwork Reduction Act section of this
preamble, the total cost would fall well
below the $100 million threshold. The
estimated total cost of implementation
of these rules for all grantees is
approximately $132,188 annually.
VIII. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995
Section 202 of the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 requires
that a covered agency prepare a
budgetary impact statement before
promulgating a rule that includes any
Federal mandate that may result in the
expenditure by State, local, and Tribal
governments, in the aggregate, or by the
private sector, of $100 million or more
in any one year. If an agency must
prepare a budgetary impact statement,
section 205 requires that it select the
most cost-effective and least
burdensome alternative that achieves
the objectives of the rule consistent with
the statutory requirements. Section 203
requires a plan for informing and
advising any small government that may
be significantly or uniquely impacted.
The Department has determined that
this proposed rule would not impose a
mandate that will result in the
expenditure by State, local, and Tribal
governments, in the aggregate, or by the
private sector, of more than $100
million in any one year.
IX. Congressional Review
This regulation is not a major rule as
defined in 5 U.S.C. Chapter 8.
X. Executive Order 13132
Executive Order 13132, Federalism,
requires that Federal agencies consult
with State and local government
officials in the development of
regulatory policies with federalism
implications. This proposed rule will
not have substantial direct impact on
the States, on the relationship between
the National Government and the States,
or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government. Therefore, in
accordance with section 6 of Executive
Order 13132, it is determined that this
proposed rule does not have sufficient
PO 00000
Frm 00034
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
federalism implications to warrant the
preparation of a federalism summary
impact statement.
XI. Treasury and General Government
Appropriations Act of 1999
Section 654 of the Treasury and
General Government Appropriations
Act of 1999 (Pub. L. 105–277) requires
Federal agencies to issue a Family
Policymaking Assessment for any rule
that may affect family well-being. This
proposed rule would not have any
impact on the autonomy or integrity of
the family as an institution.
Accordingly, HHS has concluded that it
is not necessary to prepare a Family
Policymaking Assessment.
List of Subjects in 45 CFR Part 1305
Education of disadvantaged, Grant
programs/social programs, Individuals
with disabilities.
(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance
Program Number 93.600, Project Head Start)
Dated: September 14, 2010.
David A. Hansell,
Acting Assistant Secretary for Children and
Families.
Approved: December 22, 2010.
Kathleen Sebelius,
Secretary.
For the reasons set forth in the
preamble, we propose to amend Part
1305 of 45 CFR Chapter XIII as follows:
PART 1305—ELIGIBILITY,
RECRUITMENT, SELECTION,
ENROLLMENT, AND ATTENDANCE IN
HEAD START
1. The authority citation for part 1305
is revised to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 9801 et seq., 5 U.S.C.
553(b).
2. Amend § 1305.2 by:
a. Revising paragraph (g)
b. Redesignating paragraphs (i)
through (s) as paragraphs (j) through (t);
b. Adding a new paragraph (i); and
c. Revising newly redesignated
paragraphs (k) and (m).
The revisions and addition read as
follows:
§ 1305.2
Definitions.
*
*
*
*
*
(g) Head Start or Early Head Start
eligible means a child or pregnant
woman who meets the requirements for
age and family income or categorical
eligibility or, if applicable, the
requirements established by a grantee
under section 645(a)(2) of the Head Start
Act or by a Head Start program operated
by an Indian Tribe under 45 CFR
1305.4(d).
*
*
*
*
*
E:\FR\FM\18MRP1.SGM
18MRP1
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 53 / Friday, March 18, 2011 / Proposed Rules
(i) Homeless children:
(1) Means individuals who lack a
fixed, regular, and adequate nighttime
residence (within the meaning of 42
U.S.C. 11302(a)(1)); and
(2) Includes—
(i) Children and youths who are
sharing the housing of other persons
due to loss of housing, economic
hardship, or a similar reason; are living
in motels, hotels, trailer parks, or
camping grounds due to the lack of
alternative adequate accommodations;
are living in emergency or transitional
shelters; are abandoned in hospitals; or
are awaiting foster care placement;
(ii) Children and youths who have a
primary nighttime residence that is a
public or private place not designed for
or ordinarily used as a regular sleeping
accommodation for human beings
(within the meaning of 42 U.S.C.
11302(a)(2)(C));
(iii) Children and youths who are
living in cars, parks, public spaces,
abandoned buildings, substandard
housing, bus or train stations, or similar
settings; and
(iv) Migratory children (as such term
is defined in 20 U.S.C. 6399) who
qualify as homeless for the purposes of
this part because the children are living
in circumstances described in
paragraphs (i)(2)(i) through (iii) of this
section.
*
*
*
*
*
(k) Income guidelines means the
official poverty line specified in section
637(19) of the Head Start Act.
*
*
*
*
*
(m) Low-income family means a
family whose total income before taxes
is equal to, or less than, the income
guidelines.
*
*
*
*
*
3. Revise § 1305.4 to read as follows:
jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS
§ 1305.4 Determining, verifying, and
documenting eligibility.
(a) Age eligibility. Except as provided
in section 645(a)(2) of the Head Start
Act:
(1) To be age eligible for Early Head
Start services:
(i) A child must be an infant or
toddler between the ages of zero and
three years old.
(ii) A pregnant woman may be any
age.
(2) To be age eligible for Head Start
services, a child must be at least three
years old by the date used to determine
eligibility for public school in the
community in which the Head Start
program is located and not older than
the age of required school attendance,
except in cases where the Head Start
program’s approved grant provides
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:53 Mar 17, 2011
Jkt 223001
specific authority to serve younger
children. Examples of such exceptions
are programs serving children of
migrant and seasonal farmworker
families.
(b) Income eligibility. Except as
provided in section 645(a)(2) of the
Head Start Act:
(1) Age eligible children and pregnant
women from low-income families shall
be eligible for participation in Head
Start and Early Head programs.
(2) To a reasonable extent, but not to
exceed 10 percent of participants,
participants may include age eligible
children and pregnant women in the
area served who would benefit from
Head Start or Early Head Start programs,
who are not eligible under paragraphs
(b)(1) or (c) of this section.
(3) From the area served, an
additional 35 percent of participants
may include pregnant women and age
eligible children whose families have
incomes over 100 percent but below 130
percent of the income guidelines who
also are not eligible under paragraphs
(b)(1) or (c) of this section, if:
(i) Prior to serving the children and
pregnant women eligible under
paragraph (b)(3) of this section, the
agency involved establishes and
implements outreach, prioritization, and
enrollment policies and procedures that
ensure such agency is meeting the needs
of children and pregnant women
eligible under paragraphs (b)(1) or (c) of
this section and children with
disabilities eligible under paragraph
(b)(2) of this section; and
(ii) Any agency serving additional
children and pregnant women under
this paragraph must report annually to
the Secretary the information required
at section 645(a)(1)(B)(iv) of the Head
Start Act.
(c) Categorical eligibility. Pregnant
women and age eligible children are
categorically eligible for enrollment in
Head Start and Early Head Start if:
(1) The pregnant woman or the child’s
family is eligible or, in the absence of
child care, would potentially be eligible
for public assistance;
(2) The child is homeless, as defined
in § 1305.2(i); or
(3) The child is in foster care, as
defined in § 1355.20(a).
(d) Special rule for Indian Tribes.
Notwithstanding paragraph (b)(2) of this
section, a Head Start or Early Head Start
program operated by an Indian Tribe
may enroll more than 10 percent of its
children from families whose incomes
exceed the low-income guidelines or are
not categorically eligible when the
following conditions are met:
(1) All children from Indian and nonIndian families living on the reservation
PO 00000
Frm 00035
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
14853
that meet the low-income guidelines or
are categorically eligible who wish to be
enrolled in the program are served by
the program;
(2) All children from income-eligible
or categorically-eligible Indian families
native to the reservation living in nonreservation areas, approved as part of
the Tribe’s service area, who wish to be
enrolled in the program are served by
the program. In those instances in
which the non-reservation area is not
served by another Head Start or Early
Head Start program, the Tribe must
serve all of the income-eligible and
categorically-eligible Indian and nonIndian children whose families wish to
enroll them in the program prior to
serving over-income children.
(3) The Tribe has the resources within
its grant or from other non-Federal
sources to enroll children from families
whose incomes exceed the low-income
guidelines or are not categorically
eligible without using additional funds
from HHS intended to expand Head
Start or Early Head Start services; and
(4) At least 51 percent of the children
to be served by the program are from
families that meet the income-eligibility
guidelines or are categorically eligible.
(5) Programs which meet the
conditions of this paragraph (d) must
annually set criteria that are approved
by the Policy Council and the Tribal
Council for selecting over-income
children who would benefit from such
a program.
(e) Income verification. Before a
pregnant woman or child is determined
to be eligible on the basis of family
income, the pregnant woman or the
child’s parent, guardian or other
person(s) seeking services for the child
who has knowledge of the family’s
finances must submit information to the
program concerning the family’s
income. Verification must include
examination of documents such as
individual income tax forms, W–2
forms, pay stubs, pay envelopes, or
written statements from employers (if
Individual Income Tax Forms, W–2
forms, pay stubs, or pay envelopes are
not available). Income must be
compared to the poverty guidelines for
the appropriate size of family, and
program staff must document whether a
pregnant woman or child’s family
qualifies as a low-income family under
the income guidelines for the
appropriate size of family. When
appropriate, in cases in which no
documentation regarding the income
eligibility of the pregnant woman or
child has been received by the agency,
or when it is either more efficient or
reliable to do so rather than to search for
eligibility documentation, programs
E:\FR\FM\18MRP1.SGM
18MRP1
jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS
14854
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 53 / Friday, March 18, 2011 / Proposed Rules
may seek information from third parties
who have first-hand knowledge about
the pregnant woman’s or child’s
eligibility, and document the names,
titles, and relationship to the applicant
in the participant’s record. Programs
also may seek third party information in
cases where documents are not
submitted to prove a claim that a
pregnant woman or family has no
income. If programs plan to seek third
party verification from one or more
entities regarding an applicant’s
eligibility, staff must inform the
applicant about each entity that they
intend to contact. In addition, the
applicant must sign a consent form
permitting the program to contact
specified third parties; this provides
applicants the opportunity to withhold
their consent for third party verification
from one or more entities. An applicant
must be given the opportunity to
withhold consent related to each entity
the program would like to contact. If
applicants do not sign the consent form
the Head Start program may not contact
that entity and the applicant remains
responsible for providing appropriate
documentation. When programs contact
third parties, they should limit the
information discussed and questions
posed to the third party to the
information necessary to obtain the
required eligibility information.
Programs should be especially sensitive
to any potential domestic violence
issues prior to seeking verification of the
required eligibility information.
(f) Verification of categorical
eligibility. (1) Before a pregnant woman
or child is determined to be eligible on
the basis of categorical eligibility, the
pregnant woman or the child’s parent,
guardian, or other person(s) seeking
services for the child who has
knowledge of the family’s situation
must submit information to the program
concerning the family’s categorical
eligibility. Verification of categorical
eligibility by the program must include
examination of the following
documents:
(i) A copy of official documents
demonstrating that the pregnant woman
or the child, child’s parent, or guardian,
is eligible, or in the absence of child
care, would potentially be eligible for
public assistance;
(ii) A copy of the court order or other
legal or government-issued document or
statement of a government child welfare
official demonstrating the child is in
foster care; or
(iii) A copy of any other source
document that establishes categorical
eligibility.
(2) In place of the foregoing
documents, the program can substitute
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:53 Mar 17, 2011
Jkt 223001
a written statement of a program staff
member certifying that the staff member
has made reasonable efforts to confirm
a child is homeless, as defined in
§ 1305.2(i). The lack of documentation
of homelessness should not be a barrier
to enrollment. When appropriate, in
cases in which no documentation
regarding the eligibility of the pregnant
woman or child has been received by
the agency, or when it is either more
efficient or reliable to do so rather than
to search for eligibility documentation,
programs may seek information from
third parties who have first-hand
knowledge about the pregnant woman’s
or child’s eligibility, and document the
names, titles, and relationship to the
applicant in the participant’s record.
Programs also may seek third party
information in cases where documents
are not submitted to prove a claim that
a pregnant woman or family has no
income. If programs plan to seek third
party verification from one or more
entities regarding an applicant’s
eligibility, staff must inform the
applicant about each entity that they
intend to contact and the applicant must
sign a consent form permitting the
program to contact each of the specified
third parties; this provides applicants
the opportunity to withhold their
consent for third party verification
related to each entity the program
would like to contact. If applicants do
not sign the consent form the Head Start
program may not contact that entity and
the applicant remains responsible for
providing appropriate documentation.
When programs contact third parties,
they should limit the information
discussed and questions posed to the
third party to the information necessary
to obtain the required eligibility
information. Programs should be
especially sensitive to any potential
domestic violence issues prior to
seeking verification of the required
eligibility information.
(g) Records and Certification. A Head
Start or Early Head Start program must
keep an eligibility determination record
for each pregnant woman or child as
part of the record maintained by the
agency on that individual, which must
include:
(1) Copies of all documents submitted
by a pregnant woman or persons seeking
services on behalf of a child to the
program by such persons or other
persons relating to the pregnant
woman’s or child’s eligibility for
services and any staff member’s notes
recording any other information related
to eligibility received from any source;
(2) A copy of the statements and
documents required under paragraphs
(e) and (f) of this section;
PO 00000
Frm 00036
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
(3) A signed and dated statement by
the person seeking services certifying
that the documents and information that
the person provided concerning
eligibility are accurate to the best of the
person’s knowledge;
(4) Documentation establishing that
an agency staff member has sought to
verify the accuracy of the information
on eligibility provided to the agency by:
(i) Conducting an in-person interview
with the pregnant woman or the child’s
parent, guardian, or other person(s),
seeking services for the child who has
knowledge of the family’s situation; and
(ii) When appropriate, in cases in
which no documentation regarding the
income eligibility of the pregnant
woman or the child’s family or
regarding the categorical eligibility of
the pregnant woman or child has been
received by the agency, or when it is
either more efficient or reliable to do so
rather than to search for eligibility
documentation, seeking information
from third parties who have first-hand
knowledge about the pregnant woman’s
or child’s eligibility, whose names,
titles, and affiliations will be
documented in the record, and the
applicant’s signed consent form
permitting the program to contact each
particular third party, as required under
paragraphs (e) and (f) of this section;
(5) A record of the eligibility criterion
under which the pregnant woman or
child was determined eligible as:
(i) Having income below the income
guideline for the family size, with the
family size used documented;
(ii) Being eligible or, in the absence of
child care, being potentially eligible for
public assistance;
(iii) Being a homeless child, including
the specific provision of § 1305.2(i)
under which the child was determined
to be homeless;
(iv) Being a child in foster care;
(v) Being a pregnant woman or child
in the area served who would benefit
from such programs but who is not
otherwise eligible for services (total
enrollment in this category not to
exceed 10 percent of the enrollment
slots);
(vi) Being a pregnant woman or child
from a family with income over 100
percent but below 130 percent of the
income guidelines (total enrollment in
this category not to exceed 35 percent of
the enrollment slots, in addition to any
slots filled under paragraph (b)(2) of this
section; or
(vii) Meeting alternative eligibility
criteria as permitted under paragraph
(d) of this section or section 645(a)(2) of
the Head Start Act; and
(6) A signed and dated statement by
the program staff person who made the
E:\FR\FM\18MRP1.SGM
18MRP1
jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 53 / Friday, March 18, 2011 / Proposed Rules
eligibility determination certifying that
the information on eligibility in the file
is accurate to the best of the person’s
knowledge, and based on that
information, the person has determined
the pregnant woman or child to be
eligible for services.
(7) Retention and access practices for
the eligibility determination record for
each pregnant woman or child
described under this paragraph must be
consistent with section 647 of the Head
Start Act and the uniform
administrative requirement regulations
regarding HHS grant awards
implemented at 45 CFR 74.53 for
awards and subawards to institutions of
higher education, hospitals, other
nonprofit organizations, and
commercial organizations and 45 CFR
92.42 for grants and cooperative
agreements to State, local, and Tribal
governments.
(h) Establishment of agency policies
regarding violation of eligibility
determination regulations, policies and
procedures. All Head Start and Early
Head Start agencies must establish
policies and procedures describing the
actions that will be taken against agency
staff who commit intentional violations
of Federal and agency eligibility
determination regulations, policies and
procedures, including enrolling
pregnant women and children who staff
have not documented as eligible to
participate in the program.
(i) Training. Head Start and Early
Head Start agencies must train all
governing body, policy council,
management and those staff members
who have the responsibility to make
participant eligibility determinations on
Federal and agency eligibility
determination regulations, policies and
procedures, including verification,
certification, and documentation
requirements within 30 days following
the effective date of this rule, and
within 30 days of hiring or beginning of
tenure of new governing body, policy
council, management and those staff
members who have the responsibility to
make participant eligibility
determinations. Agencies must develop
policies regarding how often such
training will be provided after the initial
training is conducted to ensure that
governing body, policy council,
management and those staff members
who have the responsibility to make
participant eligibility determinations are
aware of all current eligibility
determination regulations, policies and
procedures. Agencies shall maintain
ongoing records of training. The training
must include:
(1) Explanation of the legal
consequences for individuals and
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:53 Mar 17, 2011
Jkt 223001
agencies that commit fraud related to
eligibility determination; and
(2) Information on methods and
strategies for obtaining facts necessary
for complete and accurate eligibility
determinations. Such methods and
strategies must address treating families
with dignity and respect and give due
regard for possible issues of domestic
violence, stigma, and privacy.
[FR Doc. 2011–6326 Filed 3–17–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS
COMMISSION
47 CFR Part 73
[MB Docket No. 11–29, RM–11622; DA 11–
335]
Television Broadcasting Services;
Nashville, TN
Federal Communications
Commission.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
The Commission has before it
a petition for rulemaking filed by
NewsChannel 5 Network, LLC, the
licensee of station WTVF(TV), channel
5, Nashville, Tennessee, requesting the
substitution of channel 25 for channel 5
at Nashville. NewsChannel 5 lost
service to many of its analog viewers
when the station transitioned to digital
operations and now requests this
channel substitution in order to
permanently resume service to these
viewers.
DATES: Comments must be filed on or
before April 18, 2011, and reply
comments on or before May 2, 2011.
ADDRESSES: Federal Communications
Commission, Office of the Secretary,
445 12th Street, SW., Washington, DC
20554. In addition to filing comments
with the FCC, interested parties should
serve counsel for petitioner as follows:
Christopher G. Tygh, Esq., Covington &
Burling LLP, 1201 Pennsylvania
Avenue, Washington, DC 20004–2401.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Joyce L. Bernstein,
joyce.bernstein@fcc.gov, Media Bureau,
(202) 418–1600.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a
synopsis of the Commission’s Notice of
Proposed Rule Making, MB Docket No.
11–29, adopted February 18, 2011, and
released February 23, 2011. The full text
of this document is available for public
inspection and copying during normal
business hours in the FCC’s Reference
Information Center at Portals II, CY–
A257, 445 12th Street, SW.,
Washington, DC, 20554. This document
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00037
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
14855
will also be available via ECFS (https://
www.fcc.gov/cgb/ecfs/). (Documents
will be available electronically in ASCII,
Word 97, and/or Adobe Acrobat.) This
document may be purchased from the
Commission’s duplicating contractor,
Best Copy and Printing, Inc., 445 12th
Street, SW., Room CY–B402,
Washington, DC 20554, telephone
1–800–478–3160 or via e-mail https://
www.BCPIWEB.com. To request this
document in accessible formats
(computer diskettes, large print, audio
recording, and Braille), send an e-mail
to fcc504@fcc.gov or call the
Commission’s Consumer and
Governmental Affairs Bureau at (202)
418–0530 (voice), (202) 418–0432
(TTY). This document does not contain
proposed information collection
requirements subject to the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995, Public Law 104–
13. In addition, therefore, it does not
contain any proposed information
collection burden ‘‘for small business
concerns with fewer than 25
employees,’’ pursuant to the Small
Business Paperwork Relief Act of 2002,
Public Law 107–198, see 44 U.S.C.
3506(c)(4).
Provisions of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act of 1980 do not apply to
this proceeding. Members of the public
should note that from the time a Notice
of Proposed Rule Making is issued until
the matter is no longer subject to
Commission consideration or court
review, all ex parte contacts (other than
ex parte presentations exempt under 47
CFR 1.1204(a)) are prohibited in
Commission proceedings, such as this
one, which involve channel allotments.
See 47 CFR 1.1208 for rules governing
restricted proceedings.
For information regarding proper
filing procedures for comments, see 47
CFR 1.415 and 1.420.
List of Subjects in 47 CFR Part 73
Television, Television broadcasting.
Federal Communications Commission.
Kevin R. Harding,
Associate Chief, Video Division, Media
Bureau.
Proposed Rules
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Federal Communications
Commission proposes to amend 47 CFR
part 73 as follows:
PART 73—RADIO BROADCAST
SERVICES
1. The authority citation for part 73
continues to read as follows:
Authority: 47 U.S.C. 154, 303, 334, 336,
and 339.
E:\FR\FM\18MRP1.SGM
18MRP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 53 (Friday, March 18, 2011)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 14841-14855]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-6326]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Administration for Children and Families
45 CFR Part 1305
RIN 0970-AC46
Head Start Program
AGENCY: Office of Head Start (OHS), Administration for Children and
Families (ACF), Department of Health and Human Services (HHS).
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This proposed rule would amend Head Start program regulations
to codify statutory eligibility requirements for Head Start and Early
Head Start program enrollment and strengthen procedures to determine,
verify, certify, and maintain records regarding eligibility for Head
Start and Early Head Start program enrollment. It also proposes to
create new requirements for the person seeking services to certify in a
signed and dated statement that the documents and information that the
person provided concerning eligibility are accurate to the best of the
person's knowledge, as well as new requirements for program staff who
make the eligibility determination to certify in a signed and dated
statement that the information on eligibility in the file is accurate
to the
[[Page 14842]]
best of the person's knowledge, and based on that information, the
person has determined the pregnant woman or child to be eligible for
services. In addition, it proposes to create a new requirement for
agencies to establish policies and procedures describing the actions
that will be taken against staff who violate eligibility determination
requirements and requires agencies to provide training related to
eligibility requirements and the legal consequences of committing
fraud. The intent of this rule is to reduce substantially the risk that
children or pregnant women who are ineligible for participation in Head
Start or Early Head Start programs are enrolled in these programs.
DATES: In order to be considered, comments on this proposed rule must
be received on or before April 18, 2011.
ADDRESSES: Interested persons are invited to submit comments to the
Office of Head Start, 1250 Maryland Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20024,
Attention: Colleen Rathgeb, Office of Head Start, or electronically via
the Internet at https://www.regulations.gov. If you submit a comment,
please include your name and address, identify the docket number for
this rulemaking (ACF-2010-XXXXX), indicate the specific section of this
document to which each comment applies, and give the reason for each
comment. You may submit your comments and material by electronic means,
mail, or delivery to the address above, but please submit your comments
and material by only one means. A copy of this Notice of Proposed
Rulemaking may be downloaded from https://www.regulations.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Colleen Rathgeb, Office of Head Start,
202-205-7378 (not a toll-free call). Deaf and hearing impaired
individuals may call the Federal Dual Party Relay Service at 1-800-877-
8339 between 8 a.m. and 7 p.m. Eastern Time.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Statutory Authority
This Notice of Proposed Rulemaking is published under the authority
granted to the Secretary of Health and Human Services by section 644(c)
of the Head Start Act, as amended by the Improving Head Start for
School Readiness Act of 2007, as well as sections 645(a)(1)(A) and
645A(c) of the Act.
II. Comment Procedures
The Head Start Act provides for a period of at least 30 days for
public comment. In making any modifications to this Notice of Proposed
Rulemaking, we will not consider comments received beyond the 30-day
comment period. To make sure your comments are fully addressed, we
suggest the following:
Be specific rather than general;
Address only issues raised by the proposed rule;
Explain reasons for any objections or recommended changes;
Propose specific alternative language, as appropriate; and
Reference the specific section of the proposed rule being
addressed.
III. Background
The Head Start program is a national program that promotes school
readiness of low-income children by enhancing their cognitive, social,
and emotional development through the provision of health, educational,
nutritional, social, and other services that are determined, based on
family needs assessments, to be necessary.
The Head Start program provides grants to local public and private
non-profit and for-profit agencies to provide comprehensive child
development services to economically disadvantaged children and
families, with a special focus on helping preschoolers develop the
skills they need to be successful in school. In FY 1995, the Early Head
Start program was established to serve families of economically
disadvantaged children from birth to three years of age and pregnant
women from such families in recognition of the mounting evidence that
the earliest years matter a great deal to children's growth and
development.
On December 12, 2007, the President signed the Improving Head Start
for School Readiness Act of 2007, Public Law 110-134. The law
reauthorized the Head Start program through September 30, 2012, and
built on the program's many successes. The reauthorization addressed
the needs of children and families by focusing efforts on building
increased systems of accountability, improving quality, and expanding
program access. The 2007 reauthorization also made several changes to
the eligibility criteria and related policies for participation in Head
Start and Early Head Start programs described in Section 645 and 645A
of the Act. The Act included homeless children as a category of
individuals who are deemed to be from low-income families and therefore
categorically eligible for enrollment in Head Start and Early Head
Start, but who were not included explicitly in the previous version of
the Act. Homeless children are among the most disadvantaged children in
the country. Since the reauthorization, grantees have been informed of
these changes through a Program Instruction and various policy
clarifications related to categories of individuals that are
categorically eligible and the definition of homeless child to be used
to determine eligibility. However, the current regulations do not
specify how agencies are required to verify or certify that a child is
homeless.
The proposed revisions to 45 CFR 1305.2 and 1305.4 directly respond
to the findings of a recent investigation by the Government
Accountability Office (GAO) that the Head Start program is at risk of
having over-income children enrolled while legitimate under-income and
categorically eligible children are put on wait lists. GAO presented
its preliminary results about its ongoing investigation in testimony
entitled, ``Head Start: Undercover Testing Finds Fraud and Abuse at
Selected Head Start Centers'' before the House Education and Labor
Committee on May 18, 2010, which is available at: https://www.gao.gov/new.items/d10733t.pdf. GAO published its final report on September 28,
2010, which reiterated many of the findings disclosed in the May
testimony and discussed new findings related to specific fraud
allegations at two Head Start grantees. This report is available at:
;https://www.gao.gov/products/GAO-10-1049.
Specifically, in its investigation, GAO followed up on received
allegations of fraud and abuse involving two Head Start grantees,
including that Head Start centers allegedly manipulated recorded income
to make over-income applicants appear under-income; encouraged families
to report that they were homeless when they were not; enrolled more
than 10 percent of over-income children allowed by the Head Start Act;
and counted children as enrolled in more than one center at a time. In
its final report, GAO states that it was able to substantiate that
``children were enrolled in both the grantee and delegate sites,''
indicating that the grantee did not comply with the Head Start
requirement to report an unduplicated count of its funded enrollment
numbers. After further investigation of the programs alleged to have
enrolled ineligible children by designating them as ``homeless,'' GAO
was unable to substantiate the fraud claim because not all of the
records reviewed contained sufficient information to determine whether
a given family was homeless. However, GAO noted that the lack of
requirements related to verifying and documenting a child's homeless
status raised concerns about the risk of fraud in the Head Start
program.
In order to ascertain if this type of fraud was occurring at other
Head Start
[[Page 14843]]
centers, GAO attempted to register fictitious children as part of 15
undercover test scenarios at centers in six States and the District of
Columbia. GAO found that in eight instances, staff at the Head Start
centers fraudulently misrepresented information, including disregarding
part of the families' income to register over-income children into
under-income slots. The undercover tests revealed that seven Head Start
employees lied about applicants' employment status or misrepresented
their earnings. GAO concluded that ``this leaves Head Start at risk
that over-income children may be enrolled while legitimate under-income
children are put on wait lists.'' GAO also noted that ``at no point
during our registrations was information submitted by GAO's fictitious
parents verified, leaving the program at risk that dishonest persons
could falsify earnings statements and other documents in order to
qualify.''
Upon learning of GAO's investigation, we immediately took numerous
actions within our statutory and regulatory authority to respond to
GAO's findings and to bolster program integrity efforts across the Head
Start and Early Head Start programs; prevent future fraud and
mismanagement; and ensure that every slot is reserved for an eligible
child. For example, ACF issued a Program Instruction on May 10, 2010,
entitled, ``Income Eligibility for Enrollment'' (ACF-PI-HS-10-01),
which reminds grantees of their legal obligations to verify the
eligibility of each child served and determine eligibility in
accordance with the Head Start statute and regulations, as well as the
serious consequences for falsifying eligibility determinations. The
Program Instruction is available at: https://eclkc.ohs.acf.hhs.gov/hslc/Program%20Design%20and%20Management/Head%20Start%20Requirements/PIs/2010/resour_pri_002_051010.html. On May 17, 2010, the Secretary of
HHS, Kathleen Sebelius, sent a letter to every Head Start and Early
Head Start grantee in the country to underscore the serious nature of
GAO's allegations and notify them that HHS is intensifying its
oversight and enforcement actions. This letter is available at: https://www.hhs.gov/news/press/2010pres/05/head_start_letter.html. We also
have begun to conduct more unannounced monitoring visits to Head Start
grantees; have created a Web-based ``hotline'' that will allow those
with information of impropriety of any kind to report directly to the
Secretary of HHS; have begun to increase oversight and reviews of
programs with identified risk factors; and will continue to use our
authority to suspend or terminate grantees where pervasive fraud or
misuse of funds is found.
However, we believe GAO's findings necessitate the implementation
of new enrollment procedures, as proposed by this regulation, in order
to reiterate and strengthen the requirements. Therefore, we are
proposing new requirements for Head Start and Early Head Start agency
staff regarding verification, documentation, and certification of the
information submitted by the applicants prior to determining if a
pregnant woman or child is eligible for participation in a Head Start
or Early Head Start program. This proposed regulation will ensure that
taxpayer dollars are spent in conformance with the purpose and
requirements of the Head Start Act and that the neediest children and
families in our country benefit from the program's services. The
purpose of the program, as stated in section 636 of the Head Start Act,
is to ``promote the school readiness of low-income children'' and
provide ``low-income children and their families of health,
educational, nutritional, social, and other services that are
determined, based on family needs assessments, to be necessary.'' As
stated in sections 645 and 645A of the Head Start Act and Part 1305 of
the current Head Start regulations, the eligibility requirements of the
program require that, with limited exceptions, participants must be
either ``income eligible,'' meaning the pregnant woman or family's
income is equal to, or less than, the income guidelines (the ``official
poverty line'') or ``categorically eligible,'' meaning that the
individuals are eligible for participation in a Head Start or Early
Head Start program even if the income of the pregnant woman or family
exceeds the income guidelines due to being a member of one of the
specific categories of individuals authorized under the Act and current
regulations--being eligible for public assistance; being a homeless
child; or being a child in foster care. While the Head Start Act
provides authority for grantees to enroll a certain portion of pregnant
women and children who are not income or categorically eligible, the
statute nonetheless makes clear that the primary target populations for
the Head Start and Early Head Start programs are low-income and
categorically eligible children and their families, and, in the case of
Early Head Start, low-income pregnant women. Therefore, most of the
enrollment slots are reserved for pregnant women and children who are
income or categorically eligible.
In particular, we believe GAO's findings regarding the apparent
fraudulent enrollment of ineligible children in Head Start slots that
are reserved for children who are income and categorically eligible
necessitate the implementation of new enrollment procedures to ensure
eligible children receive Head Start services in a timely fashion and
to prevent harm resulting from being denied access to these services.
In the case of Head Start, if an eligible child misses all or a part of
the year of Head Start services because an ineligible child is enrolled
in a slot intended for the eligible child, the eligible child suffers
real harm by being deprived of an essential educational experience
needed to prepare him or her for success in elementary school. In the
case of Early Head Start, if an eligible infant or toddler misses all
or a part of the year of Early Head Start services, the child suffers
harm by being denied participation in a program that has been shown by
research to help children perform significantly better on a range of
measures of cognitive, language, and social-emotional development than
those in a randomly assigned control group and potentially to reduce
the risk of poor cognitive, language, and school outcomes later on in
life.
GAO identified the lack of verification requirements as a concern
related to enrollment fraud as they found evidence that ``Head Start
staff encouraged parents to report that they were homeless when they
were not in order to qualify them for the program.'' Therefore, we
believe it is essential to issue this proposed rule to prevent cases of
fraud in which staff intentionally enroll children based on being
homeless, despite knowing they are ineligible. Specifically, this
proposed regulation reflects the status of homeless children as
categorically eligible for participation in Head Start and Early Head
Start in order to conform to the Head Start Act and specifies how
agency staff must verify, certify, and document in a child's record how
they explored a claim by a child's parent, guardian, or other person(s)
seeking services for the child who has knowledge of the family's
situation that the child is homeless.
We note that since GAO's findings were released, we have kept the
Head Start grantee community, Congress, and the general public apprised
of our increased focus on program integrity and our planned changes in
operating procedures. In addition, these proposed requirements would
place a minimal burden on grantees. For example, this proposed
regulation would add a requirement for grantees to maintain source
documents in each child and pregnant woman's record; grantees
[[Page 14844]]
already are required to review these source documents for the purposes
of income eligibility determination, so the proposed new requirement
would be to review source documents for categorical eligibility, as
well as maintain copies of all source documents used to determine
eligibility in each pregnant woman and child's eligibility
determination record.
IV. Discussion of Regulatory Provisions
As discussed, the findings of a recent investigation by GAO
identified weaknesses in existing eligibility verification and
documentation requirements that allegedly resulted in the enrollment of
ineligible children. The proposed revisions to Sec. 1305.2 and Sec.
1305.4 are intended to reiterate and strengthen Head Start and Early
Head Start agency procedures for determining eligibility for program
enrollment, including procedures to verify, certify, and document such
eligibility, and eliminate such weaknesses. In addition, the regulation
proposes to create a new requirement for pregnant women and parents,
guardians, or other person(s) seeking services for the child who have
knowledge of the family's situation to certify that they have submitted
factual and accurate documents to be used to verify their eligibility.
The regulation proposes to create new requirements for program staff
who make the eligibility determination to certify that the information
relied on in making the decision is accurate to the best of his or her
knowledge. The regulation proposes to initiate new requirements for
agencies to establish policies describing the actions that will be
taken against agency staff who intentionally violate Federal and agency
eligibility determination regulations, policies, and procedures. The
regulation also proposes new requirements for agencies to provide
training related to eligibility requirements and the legal consequences
of committing fraud. The proposed revisions also change the definitions
of ``Head Start eligible,'' ``income guidelines,'' and ``low-income
family'' and add a definition of ``homeless children'' to conform to
statutory requirements and provisions.
Note that we use the term ``we'' throughout the regulatory text and
preamble. The term ``we'' means the Secretary of the Department of
Health and Human Services in consultation with the Assistant Secretary
for Children and Families and other officials within the Department.
Likewise, the term ``Act'' refers to the Head Start Act, as amended.
Section 1305.2--Definitions
This regulation proposes to modify the definitions of ``Head Start
eligible,'' ``income guidelines,'' and ``low-income family'' to comply
with statutory requirements and provisions. The current definitions
contain outdated information regarding eligibility guidelines and/or
incorrect statutory citations that we believe must be updated in order
to ensure all grantees have correct and clear information related to
participant eligibility and enrollment. Otherwise, the Head Start
program will be vulnerable to incorrect eligibility and enrollment
determinations. To provide clarification for grantees, we also propose
to add the definition of ``homeless children'' as paragraph (i) from
section 725(2) of the McKinney-Vento Homeless Assistance Act (42 U.S.C.
11434a(2)), which was added as a definition in section 637(11) of the
Head Start Act in the 2007 reauthorization, and to redesignate the
subsequent definitions accordingly.
The current definition of ``Head Start eligible'' states that: ``A
child that meets the requirements for age and family income as
established in this regulation or, if applicable, as established by
grantees that meet the requirements of section 645(a)(2) of the Head
Start Act. Up to 10 percent of the children enrolled may be from
families that exceed the low-income guidelines. Indian Tribes meeting
the conditions specified in 45 CFR 1305.4(b)(3) are excepted from this
limitation.'' This definition does not reflect current statutory
eligibility requirements. For example, the rule that ``up to 10 percent
of the children enrolled may be from families that exceed the low-
income guidelines'' was changed when the 2007 reauthorization created
several other eligibility provisions. In addition, the definition does
not include ``Early Head Start'' in the lead-in language. Therefore,
the new definition of ``Head Start and Early Head Start eligible'' at
Sec. 1305.2(g) is proposed to read as follows: ``Head Start or Early
Head Start eligible means a pregnant woman or child who meets the
requirements for age and family income or categorical eligibility or,
if applicable, the requirements established by a grantee under section
645(a)(2) of the Head Start Act or by a Head Start program operated by
an Indian Tribe under 45 CFR Sec. 1305.4(d).''
As indicated, we propose to add a definition in Sec. 1305.2 of
``homeless children.'' The 2007 reauthorization expanded eligibility to
include homeless children as categorically eligible for participation
in Head Start. The definition of ``homeless children'' also was added
to section 637(11) of the Head Start Act, which states that ``[t]he
term ``homeless children'' has the meaning given the term ``homeless
children and youth'' in section 725(2) of the McKinney-Vento Homeless
Assistance Act (42 U.S.C. 11434a(2)).'' To improve clarity for grantees
and enable them to have the necessary references related to eligibility
determination in one regulation, we propose to include a definition of
``homeless children'' based on the McKinney-Vento Homeless Assistance
Act as Sec. 1305.2(i) to mean individuals who lack a fixed, regular,
and adequate nighttime residence (within the meaning of 42 U.S.C.
11302(a)(1)); and include (i) children and youths who are sharing the
housing of other persons due to loss of housing, economic hardship, or
a similar reason; are living in motels, hotels, trailer parks, or
camping grounds due to the lack of alternative adequate accommodations;
are living in emergency or transitional shelters; are abandoned in
hospitals; or are awaiting foster care placement; (ii) children and
youths who have a primary nighttime residence that is a public or
private place not designed for or ordinarily used as a regular sleeping
accommodation for human beings (within the meaning of 42 U.S.C.
11302(a)(2)(C)); (iii) children and youths who are living in cars,
parks, public spaces, abandoned buildings, substandard housing, bus or
train stations, or similar settings; and (iv) migratory children (as
such term is defined in 20 U.S.C. 6399) who qualify as homeless for the
purposes of this part because the children are living in circumstances
described in paragraphs (i) through (iii).
The current definition of ``income guidelines'' at Sec. 1305.2(j)
references an outdated section of the Head Start Act. The current
definition defines ``income guidelines'' as ``the official poverty line
specified in section 652 of the Head Start Act.'' However, the official
poverty line in the Act now is referenced in the definitions section
(section 637(19)) of the Head Start Act. Therefore, we propose to
update Sec. 1305.2(j) to reference the correct Head Start Act citation
and to redesignate it as paragraph (k). The proposed new definition of
income guidelines at Sec. 1305.2(k) means the official poverty line
specified in section 637(19) of the Head Start Act. The U.S. Department
of Health and Human Services publishes the income guidelines each year
in the Federal Register; they also are available at https://aspe.hhs.gov/poverty/.
The current definition of ``low-income family'' at Sec. 1305.2(l)
states that low-
[[Page 14845]]
income family means a family whose total annual income before taxes is
equal to, or less than, the income guidelines. The definition also
states that, for the purpose of eligibility, a child from a family that
is eligible for public assistance or a child in foster care is eligible
even if the family income exceeds the income guidelines. Public
assistance and foster care, as well as being a homeless child, are
classified as the three types of ``categorical eligibility'' that are
authorized by current statute and regulations and further specified in
this regulation. We propose to remove the public assistance and foster
care categories of recipients currently included in the definition of
``low-income family'' to prevent confusion and mistakes because
agencies are not required to verify family income in these cases. We
also propose to redesignate paragraph (l) as paragraph (m). The
proposed definition of ``low-income family'' at Sec. 1305.2(m) only
refers to eligibility based on the income guidelines and reads as
follows: ``Low-income family means a family whose total income before
taxes is equal to, or less than, the income guidelines.''
Section 1305.4--Determining, Verifying, and Documenting Eligibility
In order to update and strengthen the content of Sec. 1305.4
related to determining, verifying, and documenting Head Start and Early
Head Start program eligibility consistent with the changes made through
the 2007 reauthorization of the Head Start Act, we propose to revise
the heading of Sec. 1305.4, ``Age of child and family income
eligibility'' to read ``Determining, verifying, and documenting
eligibility.''
Because the current regulations regarding eligibility were updated
last on March 16, 1998, prior to the 2007 reauthorization of the Head
Start Act, these proposed revisions represent the full scope of actions
Head Start and Early Head Start agencies are required now by statute to
undertake related to determining participant eligibility. We propose to
revise Sec. 1305.4 to incorporate the new income eligibility criteria
added in the 2007 reauthorization. These proposed determination
requirements are described in paragraphs (a) through (d). We believe
that the lack of updated and accurate descriptions of eligibility
criteria in the current regulations otherwise would contribute to
confusion and enrollment determination errors by Head Start and Early
Head Start programs.
The current regulations require programs to verify family income
(Sec. 1305.4(c)); identify which documents should be reviewed (Sec.
1305.4(d)); and establish rules under which an agency must maintain a
signed statement by an employee that identifies which documents were
examined and stating the child is eligible (Sec. 1305.4(e)). The
current regulations only specify that income eligibility based on
having income below the Federal poverty line, has to be verified and do
not require that copies of documentation be maintained in the agency
records. We believe that the lack of clear up-to-date rules governing
eligibility determination, verification, certification, and
documentation requirements in the current regulations exposes the Head
Start and Early Head Start programs to an unacceptable risk of fraud,
as revealed by GAO's investigation.
Therefore, as detailed later in this preamble, in paragraphs (e) to
(g), we describe proposed requirements for agency staff to verify
income and categorical eligibility and propose specific instructions
about the required certification and documentation steps program staff
must take. In paragraph (g), the regulation proposes new requirements
for pregnant women and person(s) seeking services for individual
children to certify that the documents and information that they
provided concerning eligibility are accurate to the best of their
knowledge, as well as a new requirement for the program staff persons
who made the eligibility determination also to certify that the
information on eligibility in the file is accurate to the best of their
knowledge. Paragraph (g) also proposes to add new requirements related
to documentation to ensure that agency staff maintains eligibility
determination records for each pregnant woman or child, including
copies of all documents submitted by a pregnant woman or persons
seeking services on behalf of a child to the program relating to the
pregnant woman's or child's eligibility for services and any staff
member's notes recording any other information related to eligibility
received from any source; documentation establishing that an agency
staff member verified the accuracy of the information on eligibility; a
record of the category under which the pregnant woman or child was
determined eligible; and the required beneficiary and staff
certifications. Additionally, paragraph (g) explains the retention and
access requirements related to eligibility determination records.
In paragraph (h) we propose a new requirement that all Head Start
and Early Head Start agencies must establish policies and procedures
describing the actions that will be taken against agency staff who
commit intentional violations of Federal and agency eligibility
determination requirements, including enrolling pregnant women and
children who staff have not documented as eligible to participate in
the program.
In paragraph (i), we propose to extend current regulatory training
requirements at Sec. 1304.52(l) to specify that such training for all
governing body, policy council, management and those staff members who
have the responsibility to make eligibility determinations must include
an explanation of the legal consequences of committing fraud and
information on methods for obtaining facts necessary for complete and
accurate eligibility determinations.
Specifically, proposed paragraph (a) reflects the statutory
requirements at section 638 of the Act regarding age eligibility for
participation in the Head Start program. Following the statute, we
begin paragraph (a) by noting the exception stated in section 645(a)(2)
of the Head Start Act, which authorizes qualifying communities to
develop their own eligibility criteria within statutory limits. Section
645(a)(2) applies to a Head Start program that is operated in a
community with a population of 1,000 or less individuals and the
following conditions apply: There is no other preschool program in the
community; the community is located in a medically underserved area, as
designated by the Secretary pursuant to section 330(b)(3) of the Public
Health Service Act [42 U.S.C. 254c(b)(3)], and is located in a health
professional shortage area, as designated by the Secretary pursuant to
section 332(a)(1) of such Act [42 U.S.C. 254e(a)(1)]; the community is
in a location which, by reason of remoteness, does not permit
reasonable access to preschool and medical services; and not less than
50 percent of the families to be served in the community are eligible
under the eligibility criteria established by the Secretary under
paragraph in section 645(a)(1) of the Act. A Head Start program in such
a locality is required to establish the eligibility criteria to be
used, except that no child residing in such community whose family is
eligible under such eligibility criteria shall, by virtue of regular
eligibility criteria, be denied an opportunity to participate in such
program.
Section 645A(c) of the Act provides that to be eligible for
participation in Early Head Start programs, an individual must be a
pregnant woman or a child under the age of three. Section 645(a)(5)(A)
of the Act provides that children who are at least three years old
through the age of compulsory school attendance are age eligible for
[[Page 14846]]
participation in Head Start programs. The current regulations at Sec.
1305.4(a) describe age eligibility requirements as follows: ``To be
eligible for Head Start services, a child must be at least three years
old by the date used to determine eligibility for public school in the
community in which the Head Start program is located, except in cases
where the Head Start program's approved grant provides specific
authority to serve younger children. Examples of such exceptions are
programs serving children of migrant families and Early Head Start
programs.'' However, the paragraph is outdated and needs to be changed
in order to reflect current statutory provisions. We believe the lack
of thorough and clear descriptions of age eligibility criteria could
contribute to confusion and enrollment mistakes by Head Start and Early
Head Start programs as they respond to the new verification procedures
proposed through this regulation. In addition, in order to clarify
which age eligibility requirements apply to Early Head Start
participation versus those that apply to Head Start participation, we
propose to create two paragraphs to distinguish the different age
eligibility requirements for each program.
Since the current paragraph (a) does not refer to the specific age
eligibility requirements for Early Head Start programs, we propose in
paragraph (a)(1)(i) that to be eligible for Early Head Start services,
``a child must be an infant or toddler between the ages of zero and
three years old.'' Current paragraph (a) also does not refer to the age
eligibility of pregnant women. Therefore, we propose to add a provision
in (a)(1)(ii) to specify that a pregnant woman may be any age in order
to be eligible for enrollment in an Early Head Start program.
In proposed paragraph (a)(2), we primarily state the same
eligibility requirements currently found in paragraph (a).
Specifically, proposed (a)(2) states that ``To be age eligible for Head
Start services, a child must be at least three years old by the date
used to determine eligibility for public school in the community in
which the Head Start program is located and not older than the age of
required school attendance, except in cases where the Head Start
program's approved grant provides specific authority to serve younger
children. Examples of such exceptions are programs serving children of
migrant and seasonal farmworker families.'' The date to be used for age
determination remains the same as the current regulation. We propose to
remove the current exception of Early Head Start programs since we now
explain the Early Head Start requirements separately in proposed
paragraph (a)(1). We also propose to add reference to ``seasonal
farmworker families'' to reflect statutory terminology.
Under proposed paragraph (b)(1), we describe the statutory income
eligibility requirements found in section 645(a)(1) of the Act. As
described above with regard to paragraph (a), we begin proposed
paragraph (b) with the exception stated in section 645(a)(2) of the
Head Start Act, which authorizes qualifying communities to develop
their own eligibility criteria. Proposed paragraph (b)(1) reflects the
requirements for Head Start and Early Head Start eligibility that
pregnant women and age eligible children from low-income families shall
be eligible for participation in Head Start and Early Head Start
programs.
Proposed paragraph (b)(2) reflects the new statutory authority at
section 645(a)(1)(B)(iii)(I) established by the 2007 reauthorization of
the Head Start Act. This paragraph explains that to a reasonable
extent, but not to exceed 10 percent of participants, participants may
include age eligible children and pregnant women in the area served who
would benefit from Head Start or Early Head Start programs, but who are
not eligible under paragraphs (b)(1) or (c) [income or categorically
eligible]. In order to conform to the new statutory authority that was
provided in section 645(a)(1)(B)(iii)(I) through the 2007
reauthorization, we reiterate in proposed paragraph (b) that programs
may enroll pregnant women or children from over-income families ``in
the area served who would benefit from such programs.''
Proposed paragraph (b)(3) reflects the new statutory authority at
section 645(a)(1)(B)(iii)(II) established by the 2007 reauthorization
of the Head Start Act. This paragraph explains that from the area
served, programs may enroll an additional 35 percent of participants
beyond the 10 percent eligible under proposed paragraph (b)(2) that are
pregnant women and age eligible children whose families have incomes
over 100 percent but below 130 percent of the income guidelines, who do
not satisfy the eligibility requirements described under paragraphs
(b)(1) or (c) [income or categorically eligible]. We are reiterating
the provision in this proposed rule to conform to the new statutory
authority that was provided through the 2007 reauthorization.
Proposed paragraph (b)(3)(i) specifies that agencies that choose to
serve individuals eligible under this paragraph must establish and
implement outreach, prioritization, and enrollment policies and
procedures that ensure they are meeting the needs of children and
pregnant women eligible based on being a member of a low-income family,
as defined in this proposed rule, and enrolling at least 10 percent of
children with disabilities who are eligible under proposed paragraph
(b)(2), prior to serving the pregnant women and children from families
with incomes over 100 percent to 130 percent of the income guidelines.
In order to align the Head Start regulations with the Act, proposed
paragraph (b)(3)(ii) also references the annual reporting requirements
stated in section 645(a)(1)(B)(iv) of the Act for agencies that choose
to serve additional children and pregnant women per the authority
granted at section 645(a)(1)(B)(iii)(II) of the Act. The 2007
reauthorization added the reporting requirement under section
645(a)(1)(B)(iv) for all Head Start and Early Head Start agencies that
serve additional pregnant women and children under section
645(a)(1)(B)(iii)(II) to document how the grantees enrolling additional
over-income children are meeting the needs of children from low-income
families, homeless children, children in foster care, and pregnant
women and children from families eligible for public assistance, as
well as to document that they have implemented outreach and enrollment
policies and procedures that ensure the agency is enrolling at least 10
percent of children with disabilities prior to serving children from
families with incomes over 100 percent and under 130 percent of the
income guidelines.
Proposed paragraph (c) describes the three types of categorical
eligibility for Head Start and Early Head Start based on section
645(a)(1)(B)(i) and (ii) of the Act and 45 CFR 1305.4(l).
The first proposed type of categorical eligibility reiterates the
eligibility condition stated in section 645(a)(1)(B)(i) of the Act that
a child is eligible if the child's family is ``eligible or, in the
absence of child care, would potentially be eligible for public
assistance.'' In addition, children and pregnant women are eligible
under the proposed regulation for Early Head Start based on section
645A(c) of the Head Start Act, which makes the eligibility criteria in
section 645(a)(1) of the Act applicable to the enrollment of children
and pregnant women in Early Head Start programs. As provided in policy
guidance, TANF and SSI are the only two programs that are considered as
[[Page 14847]]
public assistance for determining Head Start Eligibility.
The second proposed type of categorical eligibility specifies that
a homeless child is eligible for participation, as stated in section
645(a)(1)(B)(ii) of the Act. Section 645A(c) of the Head Start Act
makes the eligibility criteria in section 645(a)(1) of the Act
applicable to the enrollment of children and pregnant women in Early
Head Start programs. As described earlier, the 2007 reauthorization
added the provision stating that homeless children are categorically
eligible for participation in Head Start. The definition of ``homeless
children'' also was added to section 637(11) of the Head Start Act,
which states that ``[t]he term ``homeless children'' has the meaning
given the term ``homeless children and youth'' in section 725(2) of the
McKinney-Vento Homeless Assistance Act (42 U.S.C. 11434a(2)).'' As
stated previously, we propose to add this definition of ``homeless
children'' to Sec. 1305.2(i) to improve clarity for grantees.
The third type of categorical eligibility proposes that children in
foster care are eligible for participation, which already is specified
in the current definition of ``low-income family'' in Sec. 1305.2(l)
(proposed to be redesignated as Sec. 1305.2(m)). It has been
longstanding Head Start policy for foster children to be eligible for
participation in Head Start, without regard to their foster family's
income. We propose in paragraph (c) to add a reference to the
regulatory definition of foster care used for Federal child welfare
programs to this Head Start rule to enable grantees to conduct the
eligibility determination process accurately and consistently. We
propose to reference 45 CFR 1355.20(a), which defines foster care to
mean ``24-hour substitute care for children placed away from their
parents or guardians and for whom the State agency has placement and
care responsibility. This includes, but is not limited to, placements
in foster family homes, foster homes of relatives, group homes,
emergency shelters, residential facilities, child care institutions,
and preadoptive homes. A child is in foster care in accordance with
this definition regardless of whether the foster care facility is
licensed and payments are made by the State or local agency for the
care of the child, whether adoption subsidy payments are being made
prior to the finalization of an adoption, or whether there is Federal
matching of any payments that are made.''
In summary, proposed paragraph (c) provides that pregnant women and
age eligible children are categorically eligible for enrollment in Head
Start and Early Head Start if: (1) The pregnant woman or the child's
family is eligible or, in the absence of child care, would potentially
be eligible for public assistance; (2) the child is homeless, as
defined in Sec. 1305.2(i); or (3) the child is in foster care.
In proposed paragraph (d), we move the requirements and procedures
related to the special income eligibility rules governing Indian Tribes
that are reflected currently in Sec. 1305.4(b)(3) and (4) to proposed
paragraph (d)(1) through (5). The current paragraph only includes
references to income eligibility based on the low-income guidelines,
but does not include references to categorical eligibility. Therefore,
we also propose to update this paragraph to conform to the statutory
authority.
Under the proposed paragraph, a Head Start or Early Head Start
program operated by an Indian Tribe may enroll more than 10 percent of
its children from families whose incomes exceed the low-income
guidelines or are not categorically eligible when:
All children from Indian and non-Indian families living on
the reservation that meet the low-income guidelines or are
categorically eligible who wish to be enrolled in the program are
served by the program;
All children from income-eligible or categorically-
eligible Indian families native to the reservation living in non-
reservation areas, approved as part of the Tribe's service area, who
wish to be enrolled in the program are served by the program. In those
instances in which the non-reservation area is not served by another
Head Start or Early Head Start program, the Tribe must serve all of the
income-eligible and categorically-eligible Indian and non-Indian
children whose families wish to enroll them in the program prior to
serving over-income children;
The Tribe has the resources within its grant or from other
non-Federal sources to enroll children from families whose incomes
exceed the low-income guidelines or are not categorically eligible
without using additional funds from HHS intended to expand Head Start
or Early Head Start services; and
At least 51 percent of the children to be served by the
program are from families that meet the income-eligibility guidelines
or are categorically eligible.
Proposed paragraph (d)(5) maintains the content from current Sec.
1305.4(b)(4), but updates the reference in this provision from
paragraph (b)(3) to paragraph (d). The paragraph proposes that programs
which meet the conditions of paragraph (d) must annually set criteria
that are approved by the Policy Council and the Tribal Council for
selecting over-income children who would benefit from such a program.
Proposed paragraph (e) would establish requirements for family
income to be verified before a child or pregnant woman is determined to
be eligible for Head Start or Early Head Start participation based on
being a member of a low-income family. We propose adding these income
verification requirements to respond to GAO's findings and concerns
related to the lack of requirements in many programs to verify,
document, and maintain records. This proposed income verification
process would reduce the risk GAO cited whereby ``dishonest persons
could falsify earnings statements and other documents in order to
qualify.'' This responds directly to GAO's recommendation that we
establish ``more stringent income verification requirements,
documentation requirements, or both by Head Start employees responsible
for certifying family eligibility, such as maintaining income
documentation provided by the applicant (e.g., pay stubs or W-2s).''
Moreover, we have communicated to the public and to grantees on several
occasions that we would be addressing GAO's findings by strengthening
our verification requirements. For example, Secretary Sebelius provided
notice to all grantees through her May 17, 2010 letter that we would be
developing new regulations ``that will address verification
requirements.''
Proposed paragraph (e) incorporates the current regulatory
requirement related to income verification in Sec. 1305.4(c), which
requires that family income must be verified by the Head Start or Early
Head Start program before determining that a child is eligible based on
income guidelines. We propose to continue the longstanding requirement
that family income must be verified prior to determining eligibility
for enrollment in a Head Start or Early Head Start program. As defined
in proposed Sec. 1305.2(b), the term ``enrollment'' means ``the
official acceptance of a family by a Head Start program and the
completion of all procedures necessary for a child and family to begin
receiving services.''
Paragraph (e) proposes a new requirement related to a pregnant
woman's or family's declaration that the pregnant woman or family has
no income. Currently, there are no regulations that specify what
actions agencies should take when a pregnant woman or a child's parent,
guardian, or other person(s) seeking services for the
[[Page 14848]]
child who has knowledge of the family's finances states that the
pregnant woman or family has no income to report. We recognize the
difficulty Head Start and Early Head Start agencies face in obtaining
documentation supporting a declaration that an individual has no
income. Therefore, in such cases when a pregnant woman or family
reports having no income and submits no documentation proving that the
pregnant woman or family has no income, proposed paragraph (e) would
require agency staff to document that they explored a pregnant woman or
family's declaration that they have no income. For example, programs
should gather as much relevant information as possible about the
pregnant woman or family; i.e., the location, living arrangements,
employment situation, etc. of the pregnant woman or family to make as
informed a judgment as possible about the pregnant woman or family's
eligibility status. Agencies may examine and maintain documentation
representing relevant evidence of a pregnant woman or family's low-
income status, such as receipt of Supplemental Nutrition Assistance
Program (SNAP) or Medicaid benefits, or any other evidence of public or
private assistance by which a family with children is meeting its
ongoing needs for food, housing, and health care.
Accordingly, under proposed paragraph (e), before a child or
pregnant woman is determined to be eligible on the basis of family
income, the pregnant woman or the child's parent, guardian, or other
person(s) seeking services for the child who has knowledge of the
family's finances must submit information to the program concerning the
family's income. Under the proposed rule, verification must include
examination of documents, such as individual income tax forms, W-2
forms, pay stubs, pay envelopes, or written statements from employers
(if individual income tax forms, W-2 forms, pay stubs, or pay envelopes
are not available). Income would be required to be compared to the
poverty guidelines for the appropriate size of family, and program
staff would need to document whether a pregnant woman or child's family
qualifies as a low-income family under the income guidelines for the
appropriate size of family. Under the proposed rule, when appropriate,
in cases in which no documentation regarding the income eligibility of
the pregnant woman or child has been received by the agency, or when it
is either more efficient or reliable to do so rather than to search for
eligibility documentation, programs could seek information from third
parties who have first-hand knowledge about the pregnant woman's or
child's eligibility, and document the names, titles, and relationship
to the applicant in the participant's record. Programs also could seek
third party information in cases where documents are not submitted to
prove a claim that a pregnant woman or family has no income. We believe
all applicants must be given the opportunity to withhold consent
related to each third party the program would like to contact.
Therefore, we propose that if programs plan to seek third party
verification from one or more entities regarding an applicant's
eligibility, staff must inform the applicant about each entity that
they intend to contact and have the applicant sign a consent form
permitting the program to contact each of the specified third parties;
this would provide applicants the opportunity to withhold their consent
for third party verification from one or more entities. If applicants
do not sign the consent form, the Head Start program would not be
allowed to contact that entity and the applicant would remain
responsible for providing appropriate documentation. We also propose
that when programs contact third parties, they should limit the
information discussed and questions posed to the third party to the
information necessary to obtain the required eligibility information.
Programs should be especially sensitive to any potential domestic
violence issues prior to seeking verification of the required
eligibility information.
In paragraph (f), we propose to require agencies to verify and
document categorical eligibility before a pregnant woman or child is
determined to be eligible for Head Start or Early Head Start
participation. We propose to require the pregnant woman or the child's
parent, guardian or other person(s) seeking services for the child who
has knowledge of the family's situation to submit information to the
program concerning the family's categorical eligibility. As proposed,
verification of categorical eligibility by the program must include
examination of the relevant documents submitted by the pregnant woman
or family for the relevant type of categorical eligibility, as
described below. If a pregnant woman or child could qualify for Head
Start or Early Head Start participation based on more than one
eligibility criterion, then the program should enroll the child under
the criterion that is easiest to verify and document; it would not be
necessary to verify and document multiple eligibility criteria.
The first requirement in proposed paragraph (f)(1) addresses
categorical eligibility based on eligibility for public assistance.
This proposal aligns with the requirement currently at Sec. 1305.4(d),
which specifies that verification of family income ``must include
examination of * * * documentation showing current status as recipients
of public assistance.'' Under proposed paragraph (f)(1), we require
agency staff to examine any official documents submitted for the
purpose of demonstrating that the pregnant woman, the child, or child's
parent or guardian, is eligible or, in the absence of child care, would
potentially be eligible for public assistance. Based on Federal Head
Start grantee monitoring experience, we are aware that some agencies
already have developed policies and procedures, or practices, for
verifying public assistance eligibility or receipt status. Since the
substance of this proposed requirement is based on current practice by
many grantees, we do not believe this would impose a large burden.
Under proposed paragraph (f), in cases in which a child is in
foster care, we add a new requirement for agency staff to review a copy
of a court order, other legal or government-issued document, or a
statement of a State, Tribal, or local child welfare official
demonstrating the child is in foster care. The current regulations do
not require agencies to verify or document foster care status. Based on
Federal Head Start grantee monitoring experience, we are aware that
some agencies already have developed policies and procedures, or
practices, for verifying foster care status through their
collaborations with local child welfare agencies. Since the substance
of this requirement is based on current practice by many grantees, we
do not believe this proposed requirement would impose a large burden.
Proposed paragraph (f) also adds a new provision to address cases
when documents are not submitted to provide evidence of a child's
status as homeless. Under proposed paragraph (f)(3), in lieu of other
source documents, the program could substitute a written statement of a
program staff member certifying that he or she has made reasonable
effort to confirm a declaration by the parent, guardian, or other
person(s) seeking services for the child that the child is a ``homeless
child,'' as defined in Sec. 1305.2(i). As stated previously, the 2007
reauthorization added homeless children as a category of individuals
that are categorically eligible for enrollment. The current regulations
do not specify how agencies should verify
[[Page 14849]]
that a child is homeless. We believe it is essential for program
integrity, especially in light of GAO's recent investigation into
allegations that grantees enrolled children who were known by agency
staff not to be homeless, to require that homelessness must be
verified, and documentation must be maintained in the agency's files
(as described in proposed paragraph (g)), in order to prevent cases of
fraud in which staff intentionally enroll children based on being
homeless despite knowing they are not. We recognize that obtaining
verification and documentation of the circumstances that fall within
the Federal definition of homeless children can present unique
challenges to Head Start and Early Head Start agencies and to
vulnerable families. We would encourage agencies to enroll homeless
children based on the families' description of their living situation,
if that description meets the definition and documentation is not
readily available. Statements that describe the living situation also
could be accepted from family members and other individuals that are
cohabitating temporarily with the family. As proposed, verification of
circumstances and collection of documents should be obtained within a
reasonable timeframe. In order to verify homelessness, we would
encourage grantees to conduct the following types of efforts: Engage
their school district homeless liaisons, private and public shelter
providers, HUD Continuums of Care, and other homeless service agencies
in their service area to assist in the verification and documentation
process. We also would urge agencies to exercise care to ensure that
their verification activities do not increase the risk that families
may be evicted or suffer other resulting adverse consequences. In
addition, we would urge agencies to ensure that these efforts do not
impose barriers to the enrollment and participation of homeless
children in Head Start programs, an important goal expressed in the
Head Start Act.
Paragraph (f) proposes that, before a child or pregnant woman is
determined to be eligible on the basis of categorical eligibility, the
pregnant woman or the child's parent, guardian, or other person(s)
seeking services for the child who has knowledge of the family's
situation must provide the program with: (1) A copy of official
documents demonstrating current eligibility or receipt of public
assistance benefits or services by the pregnant woman's or the child's
family; (2) a copy of the court order or other legal or government-
issued document or statement of government child welfare official
demonstrating the child is in foster care; or (3) a copy of any other
source document that establishes categorical eligibility. Under the
proposal, in place of the foregoing documents, the program could
substitute a written statement of a program staff member certifying
that the staff member has made reasonable efforts to confirm a child is
homeless, as defined in proposed Sec. 1305.2(i). The lack of
documentation of homelessness should not be a barrier to enrollment.
Under the proposal, when appropriate, in cases in which no
documentation regarding the income eligibility of the pregnant woman or
child has been received by the agency, or when it is either more
efficient or reliable to do so rather than to search for eligibility
documentation, programs could seek information from third parties who
have first-hand knowledge about the pregnant woman's or child's
eligibility, and document the names, titles, and relationship to the
applicant in the participant's record. As proposed, programs also could
seek third party information in cases where documents are not submitted
to prove a claim that a pregnant woman or family has no income. We
propose that if programs plan to seek third party verification from one
or more entities regarding an applicant's eligibility, staff must
inform the applicant about each entity that they intend to contact. In
addition, the applicant would be required to sign a consent form
permitting the program to contact specified third parties; this would
provide applicants the opportunity to withhold their consent for third
party verification from one or more entities. An applicant must be
given the opportunity to withhold consent related to each entity the
program would like to contact. If applicants do not sign the consent
form the Head Start program could not contact that entity and the
applicant would remain responsible for providing appropriate
documentation. We propose that when programs contact third parties,
they should limit the information discussed and questions posed to the
third party to the information necessary to obtain the required
eligibility information. Programs should be especially sensitive to any
potential domestic violence issues prior to seeking verification of the
required eligibility information.
In proposed paragraph (g), we strengthen and supplement current
regulatory requirements related to eligibility certification and
documentation to respond to GAO's finding that ``the lack of
documentation made it virtually impossible to determine whether only
under-income children were enrolled in spots reserved for under-income
children'' and its recommendations that we establish ``more stringent
income verification requirements, documentation requirements, or both
by Head Start employees responsible for certifying family eligibility,
such as maintaining income documentation provided by the applicant
(e.g., pay stubs or W-2s).'' As previously mentioned, current
regulations require a signed statement by an employee of the Head Start
program, identifying which documents were examined and stating that the
child is eligible to participate in the program, but do not require
staff to maintain copies of the documents.
First, this proposed paragraph requires all Head Start and Early
Head Start programs to keep an eligibility determination record for
each child or pregnant woman as part of the record maintained by the
agency on that individual. Proposed paragraph (g)(1) requires this
record to include copies of all documents submitted by a pregnant woman
or persons seeking services on behalf of a child to the program by such
persons or other persons relating to the pregnant woman's or child's
eligibility for services and any staff member's notes recording any
other information related to eligibility received from any source.
Proposed paragraph (g)(2) requires the record to include a copy of
the statements and documents required under proposed paragraphs (e) and
(f) (related to income and categorical eligibility). Based on Federal
Head Start grantee monitoring experience, we are aware that some
agencies already have developed policies and procedures, or practices,
for maintaining copies of documents verified during eligibility
determination. Since the substance of this requirement is based on
current practice by some grantees, we do not believe this proposed
requirement would impose a large burden.
Proposed paragraph (g)(3) requires that the record also includes a
signed and dated statement by the person seeking services, i.e., the
pregnant woman or the child's parent, guardian, or other person seeking
services for the child who has knowledge of the family's situation that
``the documents and information that the person provided concerning
eligibility are accurate to the best of the person's knowledge.''
Proposed paragraph (g)(4) requires the record to include
documentation establishing that an agency staff member has sought to
verify the accuracy of the information on eligibility provided to
[[Page 14850]]
the agency by: (i) Conducting an in-person interview with the pregnant
woman or the child's parent, guardian, or other person seeking services
for the child who has knowledge of the family's situation; and (ii)
when appropriate, in cases in which no documentation regarding the
income eligibility of the pregnant woman or the child's family or
regarding the categorical eligibility of the child based on being
homeless has been received by the agency, or when it is either more
efficient or reliable to do so rather than to search for eligibility
documentation, seeking information from third parties who have first-
hand knowledge about the pregnant woman's or child's eligibility, whose
names, titles, and affiliations would be recorded in the record. If
programs seek third party verification regarding an applicant's
eligibility, the record would be required to include the applicant's
signed consent form permitting the program to contact each particular
third party, as required under proposed paragraphs (e) and (f).
Proposed paragraph (g)(5) requires the eligibility determination
record to include documentation of the specific eligibility criterion
under which the child or pregnant woman was determined eligible for
participation. As stated above, under the proposed rule, if a pregnant
woman or child could qualify for Head Start or Early Head Start
participation based on more than one eligibility criter