Airworthiness Directives; British Aerospace Regional Aircraft Model HP.137 Jetstream Mk.1, Jetstream Series 200, Jetstream Series 3101, and Jetstream Model 3201 Airplanes, 14349-14351 [2011-6097]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 51 / Wednesday, March 16, 2011 / Proposed Rules
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2011–0230; Directorate
Identifier 2011–CE–004–AD]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; British
Aerospace Regional Aircraft Model
HP.137 Jetstream Mk.1, Jetstream
Series 200, Jetstream Series 3101, and
Jetstream Model 3201 Airplanes
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM).
AGENCY:
We propose to adopt a new
airworthiness directive (AD) for the
products listed above. This proposed
AD results from mandatory continuing
airworthiness information (MCAI)
originated by an aviation authority of
another country to identify and correct
an unsafe condition on an aviation
product. The MCAI describes the unsafe
condition as:
SUMMARY:
jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS
As a result of fatigue-testing programme on
Jetstream aeroplanes, cracks have been found
on the main landing gear (MLG) fittings that
embody modifications JM5218 or JM8003.
This condition, if not detected and
corrected, could lead to a MLG collapse on
the ground or during landing, possibly
resulting in a fuel tank rupture, consequent
damage to the aeroplane or injury to the
occupants.
The proposed AD would require actions
that are intended to address the unsafe
condition described in the MCAI.
DATES: We must receive comments on
this proposed AD by May 2, 2011.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments by
any of the following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• Fax: (202) 493–2251.
• Mail: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M–
30, West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE.,
Washington, DC 20590.
• Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M–
30, West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE.,
Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays.
For service information identified in
this proposed AD, contact BAE Systems
(Operations) Ltd, Customer Information
Department, Prestwick International
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:06 Mar 15, 2011
Jkt 223001
Airport, Ayrshire, KA9 2RW, Scotland,
United Kingdom; phone: +44 1292
675207, fax: +44 1292 675704; e-mail:
RApublications@baesystems.com. You
may review copies of the referenced
service information at the FAA, Small
Airplane Directorate, 901 Locust,
Kansas City, Missouri 64106. For
information on the availability of this
material at the FAA, call 816–329–4148.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on
the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov; or in person at the
Docket Management Facility between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through
Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD
docket contains this proposed AD, the
regulatory evaluation, any comments
received, and other information. The
street address for the Docket Office
(telephone (800) 647–5527) is in the
ADDRESSES section. Comments will be
available in the AD docket shortly after
receipt.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Taylor Martin, Aerospace Engineer,
FAA, Small Airplane Directorate, 901
Locust, Room 301, Kansas City,
Missouri 64106; telephone: (816) 329–
4138; fax: (816) 329–4090.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
We invite you to send any written
relevant data, views, or arguments about
this proposed AD. Send your comments
to an address listed under the
ADDRESSES section. Include ‘‘Docket No.
FAA–2011–0230; Directorate Identifier
2011–CE–004–AD’’ at the beginning of
your comments. We specifically invite
comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy
aspects of this proposed AD. We will
consider all comments received by the
closing date and may amend this
proposed AD because of those
comments.
We will post all comments we
receive, without change, to https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each
substantive verbal contact we receive
about this proposed AD.
Discussion
The European Aviation Safety Agency
(EASA), which is the Technical Agent
for the Member States of the European
Community, has issued AD No. 2011–
0016, dated February 1, 2011 (referred
to after this as ‘‘the MCAI’’), to correct
an unsafe condition for the specified
products.. The MCAI states:
As a result of fatigue-testing programme on
Jetstream aeroplanes, cracks have been found
PO 00000
Frm 00030
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
14349
on the main landing gear (MLG) fittings that
embody modifications JM5218 or JM8003.
This condition, if not detected and
corrected, could lead to a MLG collapse on
the ground or during landing, possibly
resulting in a fuel tank rupture, consequent
damage to the aeroplane or injury to the
occupants.
Analysis of this failure indicates that an
inspection regime has to be implemented in
order to ensure the safe operation of the MLG
beyond the accumulation of 41,000 Flight
Cycles (FC).
For the reasons described above, this AD
requires initial and repetitive eddy current
inspections, and depending on findings,
accomplishment of corrective actions.
The MCAI requires replacing or
repairing any cracked MLG fitting found
during the initial and repetitive
inspections. You may obtain further
information by examining the MCAI in
the AD docket.
Relevant Service Information
BAE Systems has issued British
Aerospace Jetstream Series 3100 & 3200
Service Bulletin 32–JA090240, Revision
1, dated January 18, 2010. The actions
described in this service information are
intended to correct the unsafe condition
identified in the MCAI.
FAA’s Determination and Requirements
of the Proposed AD
This product has been approved by
the aviation authority of another
country, and is approved for operation
in the United States. Pursuant to our
bilateral agreement with this State of
Design Authority, they have notified us
of the unsafe condition described in the
MCAI and service information
referenced above. We are proposing this
AD because we evaluated all
information and determined the unsafe
condition exists and is likely to exist or
develop on other products of the same
type design.
Differences Between This Proposed AD
and the MCAI or Service Information
We have reviewed the MCAI and
related service information and, in
general, agree with their substance. But
we might have found it necessary to use
different words from those in the MCAI
to ensure the AD is clear for U.S.
operators and is enforceable. In making
these changes, we do not intend to differ
substantively from the information
provided in the MCAI and related
service information.
We might also have proposed
different actions in this AD from those
in the MCAI in order to follow FAA
policies. Any such differences are
highlighted in a NOTE within the
proposed AD.
E:\FR\FM\16MRP1.SGM
16MRP1
14350
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 51 / Wednesday, March 16, 2011 / Proposed Rules
Costs of Compliance
We estimate that this proposed AD
will affect 190 products of U.S. registry.
We also estimate that it would take
about 20 work-hours per product to
comply with the basic requirements of
this proposed AD. The average labor
rate is $85 per work-hour.
Based on these figures, we estimate
the cost of the proposed AD on U.S.
operators to be $323,000 or $1,700 per
product.
In addition, we estimate that any
necessary follow-on actions would take
about 4 work-hours and require parts
costing $8,000, for a cost of $8,340 per
product. We have no way of
determining the number of products
that may need these actions.
Authority for This Rulemaking
jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS
Regulatory Findings
We determined that this proposed AD
would not have federalism implications
under Executive Order 13132. This
proposed AD would not have a
substantial direct effect on the States, on
the relationship between the national
Government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I
certify this proposed regulation:
1. Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ under Executive Order 12866;
2. Is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under the
DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures
(44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and
3. Will not have a significant
economic impact, positive or negative,
on a substantial number of small entities
under the criteria of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act.
16:06 Mar 15, 2011
Jkt 223001
The MCAI requires replacing or repairing any
cracked MLG fitting found during the initial
and repetitive inspections. You may obtain
further information by examining the MCAI
in the AD docket.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation
safety, Incorporation by reference,
Safety.
Actions and Compliance
(f) Unless already done, do the following
actions:
(1) Upon accumulating 41,000 flight cycles
(landings) on the MLG since first installation
or within the next 2,000 flight cycles
(landings) on the MLG after the effective date
of this AD, whichever occurs later, eddy
current inspect all the MLG leg pivot beam
fastener bores for cracks. Do the inspections
following British Aerospace Jetstream Series
3100 & 3200 Service Bulletin 32–JA090240,
Revision 1, dated January 18, 2010.
(2) Before further flight after any inspection
required in paragraphs (f)(1), (f)(2)(i), and
(f)(2)(ii) of this AD in which cracks are found,
replace the MLG fitting or repair any cracks.
Cracks are defined in paragraph 2.D.(4) of
British Aerospace Jetstream Series 3100 &
3200 Service Bulletin 32–JA090240, Revision
1, dated January 18, 2010. Replace or repair
the MLG fitting following British Aerospace
Jetstream Series 3100 & 3200 Service Bulletin
32–JA090240, Revision 1, dated January 18,
2010. Any time the MLG fitting is repaired
or replaced, do the following actions as
applicable:
(i) MLG fitting is replaced with a new MLG
fitting as specified in paragraph (f)(2) of this
AD: Upon accumulating 41,000 flight cycles
(landings) after replacement, eddy current
inspect all the MLG leg pivot beam fastener
bores for cracks. Do the inspections following
British Aerospace Jetstream Series 3100 &
3200 Service Bulletin 32–JA090240, Revision
1, dated January 18, 2010.
(ii) MGL fitting is repaired as specified in
paragraph (f)(2) of this AD: Upon
accumulating 27,000 flight cycles (landings)
after the last repair and repetitively thereafter
at intervals not to exceed 27,000 flight cycles
(landings), eddy current inspect all the MLG
leg pivot beam fastener bores for cracks. Do
the inspections following British Aerospace
Jetstream Series 3100 & 3200 Service Bulletin
32–JA090240, Revision 1, dated January 18,
2010.
(3) If no cracks are found during any
inspection required in paragraph (f)(1),
(f)(2)(i), or (f)(2)(ii) of this AD, repetitively
thereafter upon accumulating 27,000 flight
cycles (landings) after the last inspection,
eddy current inspect all the MLG leg pivot
beam fastener bores for cracks.
(4) As of the effective date of this AD, only
install a MLG fitting specified in paragraph
(c)(1) of this AD that has been eddy current
inspected and found free of cracks following
British Aerospace Jetstream Series 3100 &
3200 Service Bulletin 32–JA090240, Revision
1, dated January 18, 2010.
(5) The compliance times of this AD are
presented in flight cycles (landings). If the
total flight cycles have not been kept,
multiply the total number of airplane hours
time-in-service by 0.75. For the purposes of
this AD:
(1) 75 cycles equals 100 hours TIS; and
(2) 750 cycles equals 1,000 hours TIS.
Note 1: Credit will be given for the
inspection required in paragraph (f)(1) of this
The Proposed Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority
delegated to me by the Administrator,
the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part
39 as follows:
PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS
DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39
continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Title 49 of the United States Code
specifies the FAA’s authority to issue
rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I,
section 106, describes the authority of
the FAA Administrator. ‘‘Subtitle VII:
Aviation Programs,’’ describes in more
detail the scope of the Agency’s
authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under
the authority described in ‘‘Subtitle VII,
Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701:
General requirements.’’ Under that
section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in
air commerce by prescribing regulations
for practices, methods, and procedures
the Administrator finds necessary for
safety in air commerce. This regulation
is within the scope of that authority
because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on
products identified in this rulemaking
action.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
We prepared a regulatory evaluation
of the estimated costs to comply with
this proposed AD and placed it in the
AD docket.
§ 39.13
[Amended]
2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by adding
the following new AD:
British Aerospace Regional Aircraft: Docket
No. FAA–2011–0230; Directorate
Identifier 2011–CE–004–AD.
Comments Due Date
(a) We must receive comments by May 2,
2011.
Affected ADs
(b) None.
Applicability
(c) This AD applies to British Aerospace
Regional Aircraft Model HP.137 Jetstream
Mk.1, Jetstream Series 200, Jetstream Series
3101, and Jetstream Model 3201 airplanes, all
serial numbers, that are:
(1) Equipped with main landing gear
(MLG) fittings, part number (P/N)
1379133B1/B2/B3/B4 that incorporate
Modifications JM5218 or JM8003; and
(2) certificated in any category.
Subject
(d) Air Transport Association of America
(ATA) Code 32: Landing Gear.
Reason
(e) The mandatory continuing
airworthiness information (MCAI) states:
As a result of fatigue-testing programme on
Jetstream aeroplanes, cracks have been found
on the main landing gear (MLG) fittings that
embody modifications JM5218 or JM8003.
This condition, if not detected and
corrected, could lead to a MLG collapse on
the ground or during landing, possibly
resulting in a fuel tank rupture, consequent
damage to the aeroplane or injury to the
occupants.
Analysis of this failure indicates that an
inspection regime has to be implemented in
order to ensure the safe operation of the MLG
beyond the accumulation of 41,000 Flight
Cycles (FC).
For the reasons described above, this AD
requires initial and repetitive eddy current
inspections, and depending on findings,
accomplishment of corrective actions.
PO 00000
Frm 00031
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
E:\FR\FM\16MRP1.SGM
16MRP1
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 51 / Wednesday, March 16, 2011 / Proposed Rules
AD and the corrective action required in
paragraph (f)(2) of this AD if already done
before the effective date of this AD following
British Aerospace Jetstream Series 3100 &
3200 Service Bulletin 32–JA090240, original
issue dated April 29, 2009; and BEA Systems
All Operator Message: Ref 09–014J–1, issue 1,
dated July 31, 2009.
FAA AD Differences
Note 2: This AD differs from the MCAI
and/or service information as follows: No
differences.
jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS
Other FAA AD Provisions
(g) The following provisions also apply to
this AD:
(1) Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs): The Manager, Standards Office,
FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs
for this AD, if requested using the procedures
found in 14 CFR 39.19. Send information to
Attn: Taylor Martin, Aerospace Engineer,
FAA, Small Airplane Directorate, 901 Locust,
Room 301, Kansas City, Missouri 64106;
telephone: (816) 329–4138; fax: (816) 329–
4090. Before using any approved AMOC on
any airplane to which the AMOC applies,
notify your appropriate principal inspector
(PI) in the FAA Flight Standards District
Office (FSDO), or lacking a PI, your local
FSDO.
(2) Airworthy Product: For any requirement
in this AD to obtain corrective actions from
a manufacturer or other source, use these
actions if they are FAA-approved. Corrective
actions are considered FAA-approved if they
are approved by the State of Design Authority
(or their delegated agent). You are required
to assure the product is airworthy before it
is returned to service.
(3) Reporting Requirements: For any
reporting requirement in this AD, a federal
agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a
person is not required to respond to, nor
shall a person be subject to a penalty for
failure to comply with a collection of
information subject to the requirements of
the Paperwork Reduction Act unless that
collection of information displays a current
valid OMB Control Number. The OMB
Control Number for this information
collection is 2120–0056. Public reporting for
this collection of information is estimated to
be approximately 5 minutes per response,
including the time for reviewing instructions,
completing and reviewing the collection of
information. All responses to this collection
of information are mandatory. Comments
concerning the accuracy of this burden and
suggestions for reducing the burden should
be directed to the FAA at: 800 Independence
Ave. SW., Washington, DC 20591, Attn:
Information Collection Clearance Officer,
AES–200.
Related Information
(h) Refer to MCAI European Aviation
Safety Agency (EASA) AD No. 2011–0016,
dated February 1, 2011; British Aerospace
Jetstream Series 3100 & 3200 Service Bulletin
32–JA090240, original issue dated April 29,
2009; British Aerospace Jetstream Series 3100
& 3200 Service Bulletin 32–JA090240,
Revision 1, dated January 18, 2010; and BAE
Systems All Operator Message: Ref 09–014J–
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:06 Mar 15, 2011
Jkt 223001
1, issue 1 dated July 31, 2009, for related
information. For service information related
to this AD, contact BAE Systems (Operations)
Ltd, Customer Information Department,
Prestwick International Airport, Ayrshire,
KA9 2RW, Scotland, United Kingdom;
telephone: +44 1292 675207, fax: +44 1292
675704; e-mail:
RApublications@baesystems.com. You may
review copies of the referenced service
information at the FAA, Small Airplane
Directorate, 901 Locust, Kansas City,
Missouri 64106. For information on the
availability of this material at the FAA, call
816–329–4148.
Issued in Kansas City, Missouri, on March
10, 2011.
Earl Lawrence,
Manager, Small Airplane Directorate, Aircraft
Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2011–6097 Filed 3–15–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 132
[EPA–HQ–OW–2010–0492; FRL–9279–6]
RIN 2040–AF23
Proposed Withdrawal of Certain
Federal Aquatic Life Water Quality
Criteria Applicable to Wisconsin
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
EPA is proposing to withdraw
Federal aquatic life water quality
criteria for chronic and acute copper
and nickel, and chronic endrin and
selenium applicable to certain waters of
the Great Lakes in Wisconsin.
Wisconsin’s revised and EPA-approved
criteria adequately protect all waters of
the State designated for aquatic life use
at a level consistent with the Federal
requirements. Once finalized, the
withdrawal will enable Wisconsin to
implement its EPA-approved aquatic
life criteria.
DATES: Written comments must be
received by April 15, 2011.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
identified by Docket ID No. EPA–HQ–
OW–2010–0492, by one of the following
methods:
• https://www.regulations.gov: Follow
the on-line instructions for submitting
comments.
• E-mail: ow-docket@epa.gov.
• Mail to either: Water Docket,
USEPA, Mailcode: 2822T, 1200
Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington,
DC 20460 or Francine Norling, Proposed
Withdrawal of Certain Federal Aquatic
Life Water Quality Criteria Applicable
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00032
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
14351
to Wisconsin, U.S. EPA, Region 5, 77
West Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, IL
60604, Attention Docket ID No. EPA–
HQ–OW–2010–0492.
• Hand Delivery: EPA Docket Center,
EPA West Room 3334, 1301
Constitution Ave., NW., Washington,
DC 20229 or Francine Norling, Proposed
Withdrawal of Certain Federal Aquatic
Life Water Quality Criteria Applicable
to Wisconsin, U.S. EPA, Region 5, 77
West Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, IL
60604, Attention Docket ID No. EPA–
HQ–OW–2010–0492. Such deliveries
are only accepted during the Docket’s
normal hours of operation, and special
arrangements should be made for
deliveries of boxed information.
Instructions: Direct your comments to
Docket ID No. EPA–HQ–OW–2010–
0492. EPA’s policy is that all comments
received will be included in the public
docket without change and may be
made available online at https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information provided, unless
the comment includes information
claimed to be Confidential Business
Information (CBI) or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Do not submit information that you
consider to be CBI or otherwise
protected through https://
www.regulations.gov or e-mail. The
https://www.regulations.gov Web site is
an ‘‘anonymous access’’ system, which
means EPA will not know your identity
or contact information unless you
provide it in the body of your comment.
If you send an e-mail comment directly
to EPA without going through https://
www.regulations.gov your e-mail
address will be automatically captured
and included as part of the comment
that is placed in the public docket and
made available on the Internet. If you
submit an electronic comment, EPA
recommends that you include your
name and other contact information in
the body of your comment and with any
disk or CD–ROM you submit. If EPA
cannot read your comment due to
technical difficulties and cannot contact
you for clarification, EPA may not be
able to consider your comment.
Electronic files should avoid the use of
special characters, any form of
encryption, and be free of any defects or
viruses. For additional information
about EPA’s public docket visit the EPA
Docket Center homepage at https://
www.epa.gov/epahome/dockets.htm.
Docket: All documents in the docket
are listed in the https://
www.regulations.gov index. Although
listed in the index, some information is
not publicly available, e.g., CBI or other
information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Certain other
E:\FR\FM\16MRP1.SGM
16MRP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 51 (Wednesday, March 16, 2011)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 14349-14351]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-6097]
[[Page 14349]]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA-2011-0230; Directorate Identifier 2011-CE-004-AD]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; British Aerospace Regional Aircraft
Model HP.137 Jetstream Mk.1, Jetstream Series 200, Jetstream Series
3101, and Jetstream Model 3201 Airplanes
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We propose to adopt a new airworthiness directive (AD) for the
products listed above. This proposed AD results from mandatory
continuing airworthiness information (MCAI) originated by an aviation
authority of another country to identify and correct an unsafe
condition on an aviation product. The MCAI describes the unsafe
condition as:
As a result of fatigue-testing programme on Jetstream
aeroplanes, cracks have been found on the main landing gear (MLG)
fittings that embody modifications JM5218 or JM8003.
This condition, if not detected and corrected, could lead to a
MLG collapse on the ground or during landing, possibly resulting in
a fuel tank rupture, consequent damage to the aeroplane or injury to
the occupants.
The proposed AD would require actions that are intended to address the
unsafe condition described in the MCAI.
DATES: We must receive comments on this proposed AD by May 2, 2011.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments by any of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
Fax: (202) 493-2251.
Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590.
Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
For service information identified in this proposed AD, contact BAE
Systems (Operations) Ltd, Customer Information Department, Prestwick
International Airport, Ayrshire, KA9 2RW, Scotland, United Kingdom;
phone: +44 1292 675207, fax: +44 1292 675704; e-mail:
RApublications@baesystems.com. You may review copies of the referenced
service information at the FAA, Small Airplane Directorate, 901 Locust,
Kansas City, Missouri 64106. For information on the availability of
this material at the FAA, call 816-329-4148.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at https://www.regulations.gov; or in person at the Docket Management Facility
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The AD docket contains this proposed AD, the regulatory
evaluation, any comments received, and other information. The street
address for the Docket Office (telephone (800) 647-5527) is in the
ADDRESSES section. Comments will be available in the AD docket shortly
after receipt.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Taylor Martin, Aerospace Engineer,
FAA, Small Airplane Directorate, 901 Locust, Room 301, Kansas City,
Missouri 64106; telephone: (816) 329-4138; fax: (816) 329-4090.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
We invite you to send any written relevant data, views, or
arguments about this proposed AD. Send your comments to an address
listed under the ADDRESSES section. Include ``Docket No. FAA-2011-0230;
Directorate Identifier 2011-CE-004-AD'' at the beginning of your
comments. We specifically invite comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy aspects of this proposed AD. We
will consider all comments received by the closing date and may amend
this proposed AD because of those comments.
We will post all comments we receive, without change, to https://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal contact we
receive about this proposed AD.
Discussion
The European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA), which is the Technical
Agent for the Member States of the European Community, has issued AD
No. 2011-0016, dated February 1, 2011 (referred to after this as ``the
MCAI''), to correct an unsafe condition for the specified products..
The MCAI states:
As a result of fatigue-testing programme on Jetstream
aeroplanes, cracks have been found on the main landing gear (MLG)
fittings that embody modifications JM5218 or JM8003.
This condition, if not detected and corrected, could lead to a
MLG collapse on the ground or during landing, possibly resulting in
a fuel tank rupture, consequent damage to the aeroplane or injury to
the occupants.
Analysis of this failure indicates that an inspection regime has
to be implemented in order to ensure the safe operation of the MLG
beyond the accumulation of 41,000 Flight Cycles (FC).
For the reasons described above, this AD requires initial and
repetitive eddy current inspections, and depending on findings,
accomplishment of corrective actions.
The MCAI requires replacing or repairing any cracked MLG fitting found
during the initial and repetitive inspections. You may obtain further
information by examining the MCAI in the AD docket.
Relevant Service Information
BAE Systems has issued British Aerospace Jetstream Series 3100 &
3200 Service Bulletin 32-JA090240, Revision 1, dated January 18, 2010.
The actions described in this service information are intended to
correct the unsafe condition identified in the MCAI.
FAA's Determination and Requirements of the Proposed AD
This product has been approved by the aviation authority of another
country, and is approved for operation in the United States. Pursuant
to our bilateral agreement with this State of Design Authority, they
have notified us of the unsafe condition described in the MCAI and
service information referenced above. We are proposing this AD because
we evaluated all information and determined the unsafe condition exists
and is likely to exist or develop on other products of the same type
design.
Differences Between This Proposed AD and the MCAI or Service
Information
We have reviewed the MCAI and related service information and, in
general, agree with their substance. But we might have found it
necessary to use different words from those in the MCAI to ensure the
AD is clear for U.S. operators and is enforceable. In making these
changes, we do not intend to differ substantively from the information
provided in the MCAI and related service information.
We might also have proposed different actions in this AD from those
in the MCAI in order to follow FAA policies. Any such differences are
highlighted in a NOTE within the proposed AD.
[[Page 14350]]
Costs of Compliance
We estimate that this proposed AD will affect 190 products of U.S.
registry. We also estimate that it would take about 20 work-hours per
product to comply with the basic requirements of this proposed AD. The
average labor rate is $85 per work-hour.
Based on these figures, we estimate the cost of the proposed AD on
U.S. operators to be $323,000 or $1,700 per product.
In addition, we estimate that any necessary follow-on actions would
take about 4 work-hours and require parts costing $8,000, for a cost of
$8,340 per product. We have no way of determining the number of
products that may need these actions.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. ``Subtitle VII: Aviation
Programs,'' describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's
authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
``Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.
Regulatory Findings
We determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not
have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national Government and the States, or on the distribution
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify this proposed
regulation:
1. Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order
12866;
2. Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and
3. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
We prepared a regulatory evaluation of the estimated costs to
comply with this proposed AD and placed it in the AD docket.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.
The Proposed Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
2. The FAA amends Sec. 39.13 by adding the following new AD:
British Aerospace Regional Aircraft: Docket No. FAA-2011-0230;
Directorate Identifier 2011-CE-004-AD.
Comments Due Date
(a) We must receive comments by May 2, 2011.
Affected ADs
(b) None.
Applicability
(c) This AD applies to British Aerospace Regional Aircraft Model
HP.137 Jetstream Mk.1, Jetstream Series 200, Jetstream Series 3101,
and Jetstream Model 3201 airplanes, all serial numbers, that are:
(1) Equipped with main landing gear (MLG) fittings, part number
(P/N) 1379133B1/B2/B3/B4 that incorporate Modifications JM5218 or
JM8003; and
(2) certificated in any category.
Subject
(d) Air Transport Association of America (ATA) Code 32: Landing
Gear.
Reason
(e) The mandatory continuing airworthiness information (MCAI)
states:
As a result of fatigue-testing programme on Jetstream
aeroplanes, cracks have been found on the main landing gear (MLG)
fittings that embody modifications JM5218 or JM8003.
This condition, if not detected and corrected, could lead to a
MLG collapse on the ground or during landing, possibly resulting in
a fuel tank rupture, consequent damage to the aeroplane or injury to
the occupants.
Analysis of this failure indicates that an inspection regime has
to be implemented in order to ensure the safe operation of the MLG
beyond the accumulation of 41,000 Flight Cycles (FC).
For the reasons described above, this AD requires initial and
repetitive eddy current inspections, and depending on findings,
accomplishment of corrective actions.
The MCAI requires replacing or repairing any cracked MLG fitting
found during the initial and repetitive inspections. You may obtain
further information by examining the MCAI in the AD docket.
Actions and Compliance
(f) Unless already done, do the following actions:
(1) Upon accumulating 41,000 flight cycles (landings) on the MLG
since first installation or within the next 2,000 flight cycles
(landings) on the MLG after the effective date of this AD, whichever
occurs later, eddy current inspect all the MLG leg pivot beam
fastener bores for cracks. Do the inspections following British
Aerospace Jetstream Series 3100 & 3200 Service Bulletin 32-JA090240,
Revision 1, dated January 18, 2010.
(2) Before further flight after any inspection required in
paragraphs (f)(1), (f)(2)(i), and (f)(2)(ii) of this AD in which
cracks are found, replace the MLG fitting or repair any cracks.
Cracks are defined in paragraph 2.D.(4) of British Aerospace
Jetstream Series 3100 & 3200 Service Bulletin 32-JA090240, Revision
1, dated January 18, 2010. Replace or repair the MLG fitting
following British Aerospace Jetstream Series 3100 & 3200 Service
Bulletin 32-JA090240, Revision 1, dated January 18, 2010. Any time
the MLG fitting is repaired or replaced, do the following actions as
applicable:
(i) MLG fitting is replaced with a new MLG fitting as specified
in paragraph (f)(2) of this AD: Upon accumulating 41,000 flight
cycles (landings) after replacement, eddy current inspect all the
MLG leg pivot beam fastener bores for cracks. Do the inspections
following British Aerospace Jetstream Series 3100 & 3200 Service
Bulletin 32-JA090240, Revision 1, dated January 18, 2010.
(ii) MGL fitting is repaired as specified in paragraph (f)(2) of
this AD: Upon accumulating 27,000 flight cycles (landings) after the
last repair and repetitively thereafter at intervals not to exceed
27,000 flight cycles (landings), eddy current inspect all the MLG
leg pivot beam fastener bores for cracks. Do the inspections
following British Aerospace Jetstream Series 3100 & 3200 Service
Bulletin 32-JA090240, Revision 1, dated January 18, 2010.
(3) If no cracks are found during any inspection required in
paragraph (f)(1), (f)(2)(i), or (f)(2)(ii) of this AD, repetitively
thereafter upon accumulating 27,000 flight cycles (landings) after
the last inspection, eddy current inspect all the MLG leg pivot beam
fastener bores for cracks.
(4) As of the effective date of this AD, only install a MLG
fitting specified in paragraph (c)(1) of this AD that has been eddy
current inspected and found free of cracks following British
Aerospace Jetstream Series 3100 & 3200 Service Bulletin 32-JA090240,
Revision 1, dated January 18, 2010.
(5) The compliance times of this AD are presented in flight
cycles (landings). If the total flight cycles have not been kept,
multiply the total number of airplane hours time-in-service by 0.75.
For the purposes of this AD:
(1) 75 cycles equals 100 hours TIS; and
(2) 750 cycles equals 1,000 hours TIS.
Note 1: Credit will be given for the inspection required in
paragraph (f)(1) of this
[[Page 14351]]
AD and the corrective action required in paragraph (f)(2) of this AD
if already done before the effective date of this AD following
British Aerospace Jetstream Series 3100 & 3200 Service Bulletin 32-
JA090240, original issue dated April 29, 2009; and BEA Systems All
Operator Message: Ref 09-014J-1, issue 1, dated July 31, 2009.
FAA AD Differences
Note 2: This AD differs from the MCAI and/or service information
as follows: No differences.
Other FAA AD Provisions
(g) The following provisions also apply to this AD:
(1) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs): The Manager,
Standards Office, FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs for this
AD, if requested using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. Send
information to Attn: Taylor Martin, Aerospace Engineer, FAA, Small
Airplane Directorate, 901 Locust, Room 301, Kansas City, Missouri
64106; telephone: (816) 329-4138; fax: (816) 329-4090. Before using
any approved AMOC on any airplane to which the AMOC applies, notify
your appropriate principal inspector (PI) in the FAA Flight
Standards District Office (FSDO), or lacking a PI, your local FSDO.
(2) Airworthy Product: For any requirement in this AD to obtain
corrective actions from a manufacturer or other source, use these
actions if they are FAA-approved. Corrective actions are considered
FAA-approved if they are approved by the State of Design Authority
(or their delegated agent). You are required to assure the product
is airworthy before it is returned to service.
(3) Reporting Requirements: For any reporting requirement in
this AD, a federal agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person
is not required to respond to, nor shall a person be subject to a
penalty for failure to comply with a collection of information
subject to the requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act unless
that collection of information displays a current valid OMB Control
Number. The OMB Control Number for this information collection is
2120-0056. Public reporting for this collection of information is
estimated to be approximately 5 minutes per response, including the
time for reviewing instructions, completing and reviewing the
collection of information. All responses to this collection of
information are mandatory. Comments concerning the accuracy of this
burden and suggestions for reducing the burden should be directed to
the FAA at: 800 Independence Ave. SW., Washington, DC 20591, Attn:
Information Collection Clearance Officer, AES-200.
Related Information
(h) Refer to MCAI European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) AD No.
2011-0016, dated February 1, 2011; British Aerospace Jetstream
Series 3100 & 3200 Service Bulletin 32-JA090240, original issue
dated April 29, 2009; British Aerospace Jetstream Series 3100 & 3200
Service Bulletin 32-JA090240, Revision 1, dated January 18, 2010;
and BAE Systems All Operator Message: Ref 09-014J-1, issue 1 dated
July 31, 2009, for related information. For service information
related to this AD, contact BAE Systems (Operations) Ltd, Customer
Information Department, Prestwick International Airport, Ayrshire,
KA9 2RW, Scotland, United Kingdom; telephone: +44 1292 675207, fax:
+44 1292 675704; e-mail: RApublications@baesystems.com. You may
review copies of the referenced service information at the FAA,
Small Airplane Directorate, 901 Locust, Kansas City, Missouri 64106.
For information on the availability of this material at the FAA,
call 816-329-4148.
Issued in Kansas City, Missouri, on March 10, 2011.
Earl Lawrence,
Manager, Small Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2011-6097 Filed 3-15-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P