Safety Zone; Todd Pacific Shipyards Vessel Roll-Out, West Duwamish Waterway, Seattle, WA, 14279-14281 [2011-6070]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 51 / Wednesday, March 16, 2011 / Rules and Regulations
approved previously by the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) and
assigned OMB No. 0581—NEW.
Termination of the reporting
requirements will reduce the reporting
burden on producers by about 11 hours.
There are no Federal rules that
duplicate, overlap, or conflict with this
rule.
Executive Order 12988
This rule has been reviewed under
Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice
Reform. It is not intended to have
retroactive effect.
Section 524 of the Act provides that
the Act shall not affect or preempt any
other Federal or State law authorizing
promotion or research relating to an
agricultural commodity.
Under Section 519 of the Act, a
person subject to an order may file a
petition with USDA stating that an
order, any provision of an order, or any
obligation imposed in connection with
an order, is not established in
accordance with the law, and requesting
a modification of an order or an
exemption from an order. Any petition
filed challenging an order, any
provision of an order, or any obligation
imposed in connection with an order,
shall be filed within two years after the
effective date of an order, provision or
obligation subject to challenge in the
petition. The petitioner will have the
opportunity for a hearing on the
petition. Thereafter, USDA will issue a
ruling on the petition. The Act provides
that the district court of the United
States for any district in which the
petitioner resides or conducts business
shall be the jurisdiction to review a final
ruling on the petition, if the petitioner
files a complaint for that purpose not
later than 20 days after the date of entry
of USDA’s final ruling.
List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 1245
Administrative practice and
procedure, Advertising, Consumer
Education, U.S. Honey, Marketing
agreements, Promotion, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
Accordingly, under the authority of
7 U.S.C. 7411–7425; 7 CFR part 1245 is
removed.
ebenthall on DSK69SOYB1PROD with RULES
PART 1245—[Removed]
Dated: March 9, 2011.
David R. Shipman,
Acting Administrator, Agricultural Marketing
Service.
[FR Doc. 2011–6043 Filed 3–15–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–02–P
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:52 Mar 15, 2011
Jkt 223001
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 117
[Docket No. USCG–2011–0080]
Drawbridge Operation Regulation;
Grassy Sound Channel, Middle
Township, NJ
Coast Guard, DHS.
Notice of temporary deviation
from regulations.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Commander, Fifth Coast
Guard District, has issued a temporary
deviation from the regulations
governing the operation of the Grassy
Sound Channel Bridge across the Grassy
Sound Channel, mile 1.0, at Middle
Township, NJ. The deviation is
necessary to facilitate the cleaning and
painting of the structure. This deviation
allows the bridge to remain closed for
the entirety of the deviation period.
DATES: This deviation is effective from
5 a.m. on March 1, 2011 to 5 p.m. on
April 30, 2011.
ADDRESSES: Documents mentioned in
this preamble as being available in the
docket are part of docket USCG–2011–
0080 and are available online by going
to https://www.regulations.gov, inserting
USCG–2011–0080 in the ‘‘Keyword’’ box
and then clicking ‘‘Search’’. They are
also available for inspection or copying
at the Docket Management Facility (M–
30), U.S. Department of Transportation,
West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE.,
Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have questions on this rule, call or
e-mail Mr. Terrance A. Knowles,
Environmental Protection Specialist,
Fifth District; Coast Guard; telephone
757–398–6587, e-mail
Terrance.A.Knowles@uscg.mil. If you
have questions on viewing the docket,
call Renee V. Wright, Program Manager,
Docket Operations, telephone 202–366–
9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Cape
May County Bridge Commission
(CMCBC), who owns and operates this
bascule drawbridge, has requested a
temporary deviation from the current
operating schedule to facilitate the
cleaning and painting of the bridge
structure. Under the regular operating
schedule required by 33 CFR 117.721,
the draw of the bridge shall open on
signal from 6 a.m. to 8 p.m., from May
15 through September 30. From 9:15
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
14279
a.m. to 2:30 p.m. on the fourth Sunday
in March of every year, the draw need
not open for vessels. If the fourth
Sunday falls on a religious holiday, the
draw need not open from 9:15 a.m. to
2:30 p.m. on the third Sunday of March
of every year. Two hours advance notice
is required for all other openings by
calling (609) 368–4591.
The Grassy Sound Channel Bridge,
mile 1.0, in Middle Township NJ, has a
vertical clearance in the closed position
of 15 feet above mean high water.
Vessels that can transit under the bridge
without an opening may do so at any
time. Under this temporary deviation,
CMCBC will maintain the bridge in the
closed position to vessels beginning at
5 a.m. on March 1, 2011 through 5 p.m.
on April 30, 2011.
Historically, in the last two years, the
bridge has not opened during the
months of March and April.
The Coast Guard will inform users of
the waterway through our Local and
Broadcast Notices to Mariners of the
closure periods for the bridge so that
vessels can arrange their transits to
minimize any impact caused by the
temporary deviation.
The drawbridge will open in the event
of an emergency. Vessels that can pass
under the bridge without a bridge
opening may do so at all times. Vessels
have an alternate route by transiting
through the nearby Great Channel
drawbridge, a detour of approximately
two miles.
In accordance with 33 CFR 117.35(e),
the drawbridge must return to its regular
operating schedule immediately at the
end of the designated time period. This
deviation from the operating regulations
is authorized under 33 CFR 117.35.
Dated: March 3, 2011.
Waverly W. Gregory, Jr.,
Chief, Bridge Administration Branch, Fifth
Coast Guard District.
[FR Doc. 2011–6072 Filed 3–15–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket No. USCG–2011–0117]
RIN 1625–AA00
Safety Zone; Todd Pacific Shipyards
Vessel Roll-Out, West Duwamish
Waterway, Seattle, WA
Coast Guard, DHS.
Temporary final rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
E:\FR\FM\16MRR1.SGM
16MRR1
14280
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 51 / Wednesday, March 16, 2011 / Rules and Regulations
The Coast Guard is
establishing a temporary safety zone in
the West Duwamish Waterway in
Seattle, Washington for a vessel roll-out
at Todd Pacific Shipyards. The safety
zone is necessary to ensure the safety of
the maritime public as well as the
workers involved in the roll-out and
will do so by prohibiting any person or
vessel from entering or remaining in the
safety zone unless authorized by the
Captain of the Port or a Designated
Representative.
DATES: This rule is effective on April 1,
2011 from 12 p.m. until 7 p.m.
ADDRESSES: Documents indicated in this
preamble as being available in the
docket are part of docket USCG–2011–
0117 and are available online by going
to https://www.regulations.gov, inserting
USCG–2011–0117 in the ‘‘Keyword’’
box, and then clicking ‘‘Search.’’ They
are also available for inspection or
copying at the Docket Management
Facility (M–30), U.S. Department of
Transportation, West Building Ground
Floor, Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590,
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have questions on this temporary
rule, call or e-mail Ensign Anthony P.
LaBoy, Waterways Management
Division, Coast Guard Sector Puget
Sound; Coast Guard; telephone 206–
217–6323, e-mail
SecotPugetSoundWWM@uscg.mil. If you
have questions on viewing the docket,
call Renee V. Wright, Program Manager,
Docket Operations, telephone 202–366–
9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
ebenthall on DSK69SOYB1PROD with RULES
SUMMARY:
Regulatory Information
The Coast Guard is issuing this
temporary final rule without prior
notice and opportunity to comment
pursuant to authority under section 4(a)
of the Administrative Procedure Act
(APA) (5 U.S.C. 553(b)). This provision
authorizes an agency to issue a rule
without prior notice and opportunity to
comment when the agency for good
cause finds that those procedures are
‘‘impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary
to the public interest.’’ Under 5 U.S.C.
553(b)(B), the Coast Guard finds that
good cause exists for not publishing a
notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM)
with respect to this rule because it
would be contrary to the public interest
since the event requiring the
establishment of this safety zone would
be over before a comment period would
end and a Final Rule could be
published. In addition, given the
dangers involved with a large slow
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:52 Mar 15, 2011
Jkt 223001
moving dry dock maneuvering close to
the shore, a delay in enacting this safety
zone would be contrary to the public
interest.
Under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast
Guard finds that good cause exists for
making this rule effective less than 30
days after publication in the Federal
Register, as the event requiring the
establishment of this safety zone would
be over before the temporary final rule
could be published. Due to the dangers
involved with a large slow moving dry
dock maneuvering close to the shore,
delaying the effective date of this rule
would be contrary to the public interest.
Background and Purpose
Todd Pacific Shipyards is conducting
a vessel roll-out in the West Duwamish
Waterway in Seattle, Washington on
April 1, 2011. Due to the dangers
involved with a large slow moving dry
dock that will be maneuvering close to
the shore, the Coast Guard is
establishing a temporary safety zone to
ensure the safety of the workers
involved as well as the maritime public.
Discussion of Rule
The safety zone is being created to
ensure the public’s safety during a
vessel roll out that will take place on
April 1, 2011 in the waters of the West
Duwamish Waterway. The safety zone
created by this rule encompasses all
waters of the West Duwamish Waterway
in Seattle, Washington within the area
created by connecting the following
points: 47°35″ 04″ N, 122°21″ 30″ W
thence westerly to 47°35″ 04″ N,
122°21″ 50″ W thence northerly to
47°35″ 19″ N, 122°21″ 50″ W thence
easterly to 47°35″ 19″ N, 122°21″ 30″ W
thence southerly to 47°35″ 04″ N,
122°21″ 30″ W. All persons and vessels
will be prohibited from entering or
remaining in the safety zone. The safety
zone will be effective on April 1, 2011
from 12 p.m. to 7 p.m. unless cancelled
sooner by the Captain of the Port or his
Designated Representative.
The safety zone will be enforced by
the U.S. Coast Guard. The Captain of the
Port may also be assisted in the
enforcement of this safety zone by other
Federal, State, or local agencies.
Regulatory Analyses
We developed this rule after
considering numerous statutes and
executive orders related to rulemaking.
Below we summarize our analyses
based on 13 of these statutes or
executive orders.
Regulatory Planning and Review
This rule is not a significant
regulatory action under section 3(f) of
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Executive Order 12866, Regulatory
Planning and Review, and does not
require an assessment of potential costs
and benefits under section 6(a)(3) of that
Order. The Office of Management and
Budget has not reviewed it under that
Order. The Coast Guard has made this
finding based on the fact that the safety
zone is enforced for only seven hours on
one day, and maritime traffic may be
able to transit through the safety zone
with permission of the Captain of the
Port or his Designated Representative.
Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act
(5 U.S.C. 601–612), we have considered
whether this rule would have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
The term ‘‘small entities’’ comprises
small businesses, not-for-profit
organizations that are independently
owned and operated and are not
dominant in their fields, and
governmental jurisdictions with
populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5
U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule will not have
a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
This rule will affect the following
entities, some of which may be small
entities: The owners or operators of
vessels intending to transit through the
safety zone created by this rule. This
rule will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities, although the
safety zone will apply to the entire
width of the waterway, the zone is
enforced for only seven hours on one
day, and vessel traffic will be allowed
to pass through the safety zone with the
permission of the Captain of the Port or
his Designated Representative.
Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L.104–121),
in the NPRM we offered to assist small
entities in understanding the rule so
that they could better evaluate its effects
on them and participate in the
rulemaking process.
Small businesses may send comments
on the actions of Federal employees
who enforce, or otherwise determine
compliance with, Federal regulations to
the Small Business and Agriculture
Regulatory Enforcement Ombudsman
and the Regional Small Business
Regulatory Fairness Boards. The
Ombudsman evaluates these actions
annually and rates each agency’s
responsiveness to small business. If you
wish to comment on actions by
employees of the Coast Guard, call 1–
E:\FR\FM\16MRR1.SGM
16MRR1
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 51 / Wednesday, March 16, 2011 / Rules and Regulations
888–REG–FAIR (1–888–734–3247). The
Coast Guard will not retaliate against
small entities that question or complain
about this rule or any policy or action
of the Coast Guard.
Collection of Information
This rule calls for no new collection
of information under the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501–
3520).
Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism
under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct
effect on State or local governments and
would either preempt State law or
impose a substantial direct cost of
compliance on them. We have analyzed
this rule under that Order and have
determined that it does not have
implications for federalism.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
Federal agencies to assess the effects of
their discretionary regulatory actions. In
particular, the Act addresses actions
that may result in the expenditure by a
State, local, or Tribal government, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector of
$100,000,000 or more in any one year.
Though this rule will not result in such
an expenditure, we do discuss the
effects of this rule elsewhere in this
preamble
Taking of Private Property
This rule will not effect a taking of
private property or otherwise have
taking implications under Executive
Order 12630, Governmental Actions and
Interference with Constitutionally
Protected Property Rights.
Civil Justice Reform
This rule meets applicable standards
in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of Executive
Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to
minimize litigation, eliminate
ambiguity, and reduce burden.
ebenthall on DSK69SOYB1PROD with RULES
Protection of Children
We have analyzed this rule under
Executive Order 13045, Protection of
Children from Environmental Health
Risks and Safety Risks. This rule is not
an economically significant rule and
does not create an environmental risk to
health or risk to safety that may
disproportionately affect children.
Indian Tribal Governments
This rule does not have Tribal
implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination
with Indian Tribal Governments,
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:52 Mar 15, 2011
Jkt 223001
because it does not have a substantial
direct effect on one or more Indian
Tribes, on the relationship between the
Federal Government and Indian Tribes,
or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian Tribes.
Energy Effects
We have analyzed this rule under
Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have
determined that it is not a ‘‘significant
energy action’’ under that order because
it is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’
under Executive Order 12866 and is not
likely to have a significant adverse effect
on the supply, distribution, or use of
energy. The Administrator of the Office
of Information and Regulatory Affairs
has not designated it as a significant
energy action. Therefore, it does not
require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.
Technical Standards
The National Technology Transfer
and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use
voluntary consensus standards in their
regulatory activities unless the agency
provides Congress, through the Office of
Management and Budget, with an
explanation of why using these
standards would be inconsistent with
applicable law or otherwise impractical.
Voluntary consensus standards are
technical standards (e.g., specifications
of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling
procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or
adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
This rule does not use technical
standards. Therefore, we did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus
standards.
Environment
We have analyzed this rule under
Department of Homeland Security
Management Directive 023–01 and
Commandant Instruction M16475.lD,
which guide the Coast Guard in
complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(NEPA)(42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and
have concluded this action is one of a
category of actions which do not
individually or cumulatively have a
significant effect on the human
environment. This rule is categorically
excluded, under figure 2–1, paragraph
(34)(g), of the Instruction. This rule
involves the establishment of a
temporary safety zone. An
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 9990
14281
environmental analysis checklist and a
categorical exclusion determination will
be available in the docket where
indicated under ADDRESSES.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation
(water), Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Security measures,
Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
CFR part 165 as follows:
PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION
AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
1. The authority citation for part 165
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1226, 1231; 46 U.S.C.
Chapter 701, 3306, 3703; 50 U.S.C. 191, 195;
33 CFR 1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6, 160.5; Pub. L.
107–295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department of
Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1.
2. Section 165.T13–176 is added to
read as follows:
■
§ 165.T13–176 Safety Zone; Todd Pacific
Shipyards Vessel Roll-Out, West Duwamish
Waterway, Seattle, WA.
(a) Location. The following area is a
safety zone: All waters of the West
Duwamish Waterway in Seattle, WA
encompassed within the area created by
connecting the following points:
47°35′04″ N, 122°21′30″ W thence
westerly to 47°35′04″ N, 122°21′50″ W
thence northerly to 47°35′19″ N,
122°21′50″ W thence easterly to
47°35′19″ N, 122°21′30″ W thence
southerly to 47°35′04″ N, 122°21′30″ W.
(b) Regulations. In accordance with
the general regulations in 33 CFR part
165, Subpart C, no person may enter or
remain in the safety zone created in this
rule unless authorized by the Captain of
the Port or his Designated
Representative. See 33 CFR part 165,
Subpart C, for additional information
and requirements. Vessel operators
wishing to enter the zone during the
enforcement period must request
permission for entry by contacting
Vessel Traffic Service Puget Sound on
VHF channel 14, or the Sector Puget
Sound Joint Harbor Operations Center at
(206) 217–6001.
(c) Enforcement Period. The safety
zone created in this rule is enforced
from 12 p.m. to 7 p.m. on April 1, 2011
unless cancelled sooner by the Captain
of the Port.
Dated: March 1, 2011.
S.J. Ferguson,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the
Port, Puget Sound.
[FR Doc. 2011–6070 Filed 3–15–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
E:\FR\FM\16MRR1.SGM
16MRR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 51 (Wednesday, March 16, 2011)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 14279-14281]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-6070]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket No. USCG-2011-0117]
RIN 1625-AA00
Safety Zone; Todd Pacific Shipyards Vessel Roll-Out, West
Duwamish Waterway, Seattle, WA
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Temporary final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 14280]]
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is establishing a temporary safety zone in the
West Duwamish Waterway in Seattle, Washington for a vessel roll-out at
Todd Pacific Shipyards. The safety zone is necessary to ensure the
safety of the maritime public as well as the workers involved in the
roll-out and will do so by prohibiting any person or vessel from
entering or remaining in the safety zone unless authorized by the
Captain of the Port or a Designated Representative.
DATES: This rule is effective on April 1, 2011 from 12 p.m. until 7
p.m.
ADDRESSES: Documents indicated in this preamble as being available in
the docket are part of docket USCG-2011-0117 and are available online
by going to https://www.regulations.gov, inserting USCG-2011-0117 in the
``Keyword'' box, and then clicking ``Search.'' They are also available
for inspection or copying at the Docket Management Facility (M-30),
U.S. Department of Transportation, West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590, between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this
temporary rule, call or e-mail Ensign Anthony P. LaBoy, Waterways
Management Division, Coast Guard Sector Puget Sound; Coast Guard;
telephone 206-217-6323, e-mail SecotPugetSoundWWM@uscg.mil. If you have
questions on viewing the docket, call Renee V. Wright, Program Manager,
Docket Operations, telephone 202-366-9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Regulatory Information
The Coast Guard is issuing this temporary final rule without prior
notice and opportunity to comment pursuant to authority under section
4(a) of the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) (5 U.S.C. 553(b)). This
provision authorizes an agency to issue a rule without prior notice and
opportunity to comment when the agency for good cause finds that those
procedures are ``impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary to the public
interest.'' Under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B), the Coast Guard finds that good
cause exists for not publishing a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM)
with respect to this rule because it would be contrary to the public
interest since the event requiring the establishment of this safety
zone would be over before a comment period would end and a Final Rule
could be published. In addition, given the dangers involved with a
large slow moving dry dock maneuvering close to the shore, a delay in
enacting this safety zone would be contrary to the public interest.
Under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast Guard finds that good cause
exists for making this rule effective less than 30 days after
publication in the Federal Register, as the event requiring the
establishment of this safety zone would be over before the temporary
final rule could be published. Due to the dangers involved with a large
slow moving dry dock maneuvering close to the shore, delaying the
effective date of this rule would be contrary to the public interest.
Background and Purpose
Todd Pacific Shipyards is conducting a vessel roll-out in the West
Duwamish Waterway in Seattle, Washington on April 1, 2011. Due to the
dangers involved with a large slow moving dry dock that will be
maneuvering close to the shore, the Coast Guard is establishing a
temporary safety zone to ensure the safety of the workers involved as
well as the maritime public.
Discussion of Rule
The safety zone is being created to ensure the public's safety
during a vessel roll out that will take place on April 1, 2011 in the
waters of the West Duwamish Waterway. The safety zone created by this
rule encompasses all waters of the West Duwamish Waterway in Seattle,
Washington within the area created by connecting the following points:
47[deg]35'' 04'' N, 122[deg]21'' 30'' W thence westerly to 47[deg]35''
04'' N, 122[deg]21'' 50'' W thence northerly to 47[deg]35'' 19'' N,
122[deg]21'' 50'' W thence easterly to 47[deg]35'' 19'' N, 122[deg]21''
30'' W thence southerly to 47[deg]35'' 04'' N, 122[deg]21'' 30'' W. All
persons and vessels will be prohibited from entering or remaining in
the safety zone. The safety zone will be effective on April 1, 2011
from 12 p.m. to 7 p.m. unless cancelled sooner by the Captain of the
Port or his Designated Representative.
The safety zone will be enforced by the U.S. Coast Guard. The
Captain of the Port may also be assisted in the enforcement of this
safety zone by other Federal, State, or local agencies.
Regulatory Analyses
We developed this rule after considering numerous statutes and
executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our analyses
based on 13 of these statutes or executive orders.
Regulatory Planning and Review
This rule is not a significant regulatory action under section 3(f)
of Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review, and does not
require an assessment of potential costs and benefits under section
6(a)(3) of that Order. The Office of Management and Budget has not
reviewed it under that Order. The Coast Guard has made this finding
based on the fact that the safety zone is enforced for only seven hours
on one day, and maritime traffic may be able to transit through the
safety zone with permission of the Captain of the Port or his
Designated Representative.
Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601-612), we have
considered whether this rule would have a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities. The term ``small entities''
comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations that are
independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their fields,
and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule will
not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
entities. This rule will affect the following entities, some of which
may be small entities: The owners or operators of vessels intending to
transit through the safety zone created by this rule. This rule will
not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
entities, although the safety zone will apply to the entire width of
the waterway, the zone is enforced for only seven hours on one day, and
vessel traffic will be allowed to pass through the safety zone with the
permission of the Captain of the Port or his Designated Representative.
Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L.104-121), in the NPRM we offered to assist
small entities in understanding the rule so that they could better
evaluate its effects on them and participate in the rulemaking process.
Small businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal
employees who enforce, or otherwise determine compliance with, Federal
regulations to the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory
Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small Business Regulatory
Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these actions annually and
rates each agency's responsiveness to small business. If you wish to
comment on actions by employees of the Coast Guard, call 1-
[[Page 14281]]
888-REG-FAIR (1-888-734-3247). The Coast Guard will not retaliate
against small entities that question or complain about this rule or any
policy or action of the Coast Guard.
Collection of Information
This rule calls for no new collection of information under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).
Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on State or local
governments and would either preempt State law or impose a substantial
direct cost of compliance on them. We have analyzed this rule under
that Order and have determined that it does not have implications for
federalism.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or Tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 or more in any
one year. Though this rule will not result in such an expenditure, we
do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere in this preamble
Taking of Private Property
This rule will not effect a taking of private property or otherwise
have taking implications under Executive Order 12630, Governmental
Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected Property
Rights.
Civil Justice Reform
This rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2)
of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize litigation,
eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.
Protection of Children
We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13045, Protection
of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks. This rule
is not an economically significant rule and does not create an
environmental risk to health or risk to safety that may
disproportionately affect children.
Indian Tribal Governments
This rule does not have Tribal implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it does not have a substantial direct effect on one or more
Indian Tribes, on the relationship between the Federal Government and
Indian Tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities
between the Federal Government and Indian Tribes.
Energy Effects
We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have determined that it is not a ``significant
energy action'' under that order because it is not a ``significant
regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866 and is not likely to
have a significant adverse effect on the supply, distribution, or use
of energy. The Administrator of the Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs has not designated it as a significant energy
action. Therefore, it does not require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.
Technical Standards
The National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use voluntary consensus standards
in their regulatory activities unless the agency provides Congress,
through the Office of Management and Budget, with an explanation of why
using these standards would be inconsistent with applicable law or
otherwise impractical. Voluntary consensus standards are technical
standards (e.g., specifications of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
This rule does not use technical standards. Therefore, we did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus standards.
Environment
We have analyzed this rule under Department of Homeland Security
Management Directive 023-01 and Commandant Instruction M16475.lD, which
guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National Environmental
Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA)(42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have concluded
this action is one of a category of actions which do not individually
or cumulatively have a significant effect on the human environment.
This rule is categorically excluded, under figure 2-1, paragraph
(34)(g), of the Instruction. This rule involves the establishment of a
temporary safety zone. An environmental analysis checklist and a
categorical exclusion determination will be available in the docket
where indicated under ADDRESSES.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends
33 CFR part 165 as follows:
PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
0
1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1226, 1231; 46 U.S.C. Chapter 701, 3306,
3703; 50 U.S.C. 191, 195; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-1, 6.04-6, 160.5; Pub.
L. 107-295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department of Homeland Security
Delegation No. 0170.1.
0
2. Section 165.T13-176 is added to read as follows:
Sec. 165.T13-176 Safety Zone; Todd Pacific Shipyards Vessel Roll-Out,
West Duwamish Waterway, Seattle, WA.
(a) Location. The following area is a safety zone: All waters of
the West Duwamish Waterway in Seattle, WA encompassed within the area
created by connecting the following points: 47[deg]35'04'' N,
122[deg]21'30'' W thence westerly to 47[deg]35'04'' N, 122[deg]21'50''
W thence northerly to 47[deg]35'19'' N, 122[deg]21'50'' W thence
easterly to 47[deg]35'19'' N, 122[deg]21'30'' W thence southerly to
47[deg]35'04'' N, 122[deg]21'30'' W.
(b) Regulations. In accordance with the general regulations in 33
CFR part 165, Subpart C, no person may enter or remain in the safety
zone created in this rule unless authorized by the Captain of the Port
or his Designated Representative. See 33 CFR part 165, Subpart C, for
additional information and requirements. Vessel operators wishing to
enter the zone during the enforcement period must request permission
for entry by contacting Vessel Traffic Service Puget Sound on VHF
channel 14, or the Sector Puget Sound Joint Harbor Operations Center at
(206) 217-6001.
(c) Enforcement Period. The safety zone created in this rule is
enforced from 12 p.m. to 7 p.m. on April 1, 2011 unless cancelled
sooner by the Captain of the Port.
Dated: March 1, 2011.
S.J. Ferguson,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port, Puget Sound.
[FR Doc. 2011-6070 Filed 3-15-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P