Federal Acquisition Regulation; Additional Requirements for Market Research, 14562-14565 [2011-5555]
Download as PDF
14562
6.303–1
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 51 / Wednesday, March 16, 2011 / Rules and Regulations
Requirements.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) The contracting officer shall not
award a sole-source contract under the
8(a) authority (15 U.S.C. 637(a)) for an
amount exceeding $20 million unless—
(1) The contracting officer justifies the
use of a sole-source contract in writing
in accordance with 6.303–2;
(2) The justification is approved by
the appropriate official designated at
6.304; and
(3) The justification and related
information are made public after award
in accordance with 6.305.
*
*
*
*
*
5. Amend section 6.303–2 by—
a. Redesignating paragraphs (a) and
(b) as paragraphs (b) and (c),
respectively;
■ b. Adding a new paragraph (a);
■ c. Revising newly redesignated
paragraph (b) introductory text; and
■ d. Adding a new paragraph (d).
The added and revised text reads as
follows:
■
jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with RULES2
6. Amend section 6.304 by removing
from paragraph (a)(1) ‘‘6.303–2(a)(12)’’
and adding ‘‘6.303–2(b)(12)’’ in its place.
18:19 Mar 15, 2011
Jkt 223001
8. Amend section 19.808–1 by
redesignating paragraphs (a) and (b) as
paragraphs (b) and (c), respectively; and
adding a new paragraph (a) to read as
follows:
■
19.808–1
Sole source.
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
[Amended]
VerDate Mar<15>2010
PART 19—SMALL BUSINESS
PROGRAMS
BILLING CODE 6820–EP–P
Content.
■
[Amended]
7. Amend section 15.607 by removing
from paragraph (b)(2) ‘‘6.303–2(b)’’ and
adding ‘‘6.303–2(c)’’ in its place.
■
[FR Doc. 2011–5554 Filed 3–15–11; 8:45 am]
(a) Each justification shall contain
sufficient facts and rationale to justify
the use of the specific authority cited.
(b) As a minimum, each justification,
except those for sole-source 8(a)
contracts over $20 million (see
paragraph (d) of this section), shall
include the following information:
*
*
*
*
*
(d) As a minimum, each justification
for a sole-source 8(a) contract over $20
million shall include the following
information:
(1) A description of the needs of the
agency concerned for the matters
covered by the contract.
(2) A specification of the statutory
provision providing the exception from
the requirement to use competitive
procedures in entering into the contract
(see 19.805–1).
(3) A determination that the use of a
sole-source contract is in the best
interest of the agency concerned.
(4) A determination that the
anticipated cost of the contract will be
fair and reasonable.
(5) Such other matters as the head of
the agency concerned shall specify for
purposes of this section.
6.304
15.607
(a) The SBA may not accept for
negotiation a sole-source 8(a) contract
that exceeds $20 million unless the
requesting agency has completed a
justification in accordance with the
requirements of 6.303.
*
*
*
*
*
■
6.303–2
PART 15—CONTRACTING BY
NEGOTIATION
GENERAL SERVICES
ADMINISTRATION
NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND
SPACE ADMINISTRATION
48 CFR Parts 10, 16, 44, and 52
[FAC 2005–50; FAR Case 2008–007; Item
IV; Docket 2010–0086, Sequence 1]
RIN 9000–AL50
Federal Acquisition Regulation;
Additional Requirements for Market
Research
Department of Defense (DoD),
General Services Administration (GSA),
and National Aeronautics and Space
Administration (NASA).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
DoD, GSA, and NASA have
adopted as final, with changes, the
interim rule amending the Federal
Acquisition Regulation (FAR) to
implement section 826, Market
Research, of the National Defense
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008.
Section 826 requires the head of an
agency to take appropriate steps to
ensure that any prime contractor of a
contract (or task order or delivery order)
in an amount in excess of $5 million for
the procurement of items other than
commercial items engages in market
research as necessary before making
purchases.
DATES: Effective Date: April 15, 2011.
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00022
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
Ms.
Lori Sakalos, Procurement Analyst, at
(202) 208–0498, for clarification of
content. For information pertaining to
status or publication schedules, contact
the Regulatory Secretariat at (202) 501–
4755. Please cite FAC 2005–50, FAR
Case 2008–007.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
I. Background
DoD, GSA, and NASA published an
interim rule in the Federal Register at
75 FR 34277 on June 16, 2010, to
implement section 826, Market
Research, of the National Defense
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008
(Pub. L. 110–181). Section 826
establishes additional requirements in
subsection (c) of 10 U.S.C. 2377. As a
matter of policy, these requirements are
extended to all executive agencies.
Specifically, the head of the agency
must conduct market research before
issuing an indefinite-delivery indefinitequantity task or delivery order for a
noncommercial item in excess of the
simplified acquisition threshold. In
addition, a prime contractor with a
contract in excess of $5 million for the
procurement of items other than
commercial items is required to conduct
market research before making
purchases that exceed the simplified
acquisition threshold for or on behalf of
the Government. Three respondents
submitted 16 comments on the interim
rule.
II. Discussion/Analysis
Public Comments: A discussion of the
comments and the changes made to the
rule as a result of those comments are
provided as follows:
A. Purpose
1. Comment: One respondent stated
that the guidance does not appear to
explain the end purpose of the market
research. Another respondent, however,
concluded that the FAR states the
purpose of the market research twice, in
FAR 44.402(b) and 10.001(a)(3). The
second respondent stated that the
purpose for conducting market research
is ‘‘clearly described in Part 10 and there
is no reason to repeat that same
language elsewhere in the FAR.’’
Response: The Defense Acquisition
Regulations Council and the Civilian
Agency Acquisition Council (the
Councils) agree with the second
respondent. FAR part 10 ‘‘prescribes
policies and procedures for conducting
market research to arrive at the most
suitable approach to acquiring,
distributing, and supporting supplies
and services’’ (FAR 10.000). FAR
10.001(a)(3) lists the ways in which the
E:\FR\FM\16MRR2.SGM
16MRR2
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 51 / Wednesday, March 16, 2011 / Rules and Regulations
jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with RULES2
results of the market research may be
used. We believe that the end purpose
of market research is exhaustively
covered in FAR part 10. We also agree
that there is no need to repeat this
material in FAR subpart 44.4, and the
final rule removes the redundant
material.
2. Comment: A respondent noted that
competitively awarded indefinitedelivery indefinite-quantity contracts
are priced as a result of market forces.
Conducting market research prior to the
award of individual task orders ‘‘will
only be looking at the scope of Task
Order* * * (and) is redundant to the
market research already required by
FAR for the (indefinite-delivery
indefinite-quantity) contract.’’ It is
unlikely to result in more competition
or better pricing, according to the
respondent.
Response: The Councils note that the
purpose of market research is to
effectively identify, on an on-going
basis, the capabilities of small
businesses and new entrants into
Federal contracting that are available in
the marketplace for meeting the
requirements of the agency. The
Councils disagree with the respondent’s
contention that more competition or
better pricing are unlikely to result.
(Also see responses at II.F., Burden.)
B. Location in FAR
1. Comment: A respondent noted that,
while FAR part 10 contains scant detail
on market research, there are existing
market research techniques and
information embedded in chapter 2 of
the DoD Commercial Item (CI)
Handbook at https://www.acq.osd.mil/
dpap/Docs/cihandbook.pdf. The
respondent stated that the Handbook
might be instructive for executive
agencies to use as part of any training
requirements.
Response: This comment is outside
the scope of the FAR case. However, it
has been forwarded to both the Defense
Acquisition University and the Federal
Acquisition Institute for their
consideration. The current Commercial
Item Handbook (version 1.0) was
published November 2001 and is
currently in revision.
2. Comment: A respondent stated its
conclusion that the section 826
requirement for contractors with
contracts exceeding $5 million to
perform market research for ‘‘other than
commercial items’’ is misplaced because
the title of FAR subpart 44.4 is
‘‘Subcontracts for Commercial Items and
Commercial Components.’’ The
respondent suggested that a better
location for the statutory requirement
would be at FAR 44.303.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:19 Mar 15, 2011
Jkt 223001
Response: The Councils agree that the
requirement was misplaced in FAR
subpart 44.4 and have relocated the
clause prescription to FAR part 10,
Market Research (rather than FAR
subpart 44.3, as suggested by the
respondent). The statute and policy
require contractors to conduct market
research in certain circumstances (when
the contract is over $5 million for the
procurement of items other than
commercial items); whether the
subcontract is for commercial or other
than commercial items is immaterial to
the contractor’s requirement to conduct
market research. The statute encourages
contractors and subcontractors to use
commercial items. The FAR is amended
to delete the subject of market research
from subpart 44.4, and the ‘‘Scope of
subpart’’ section, FAR 44.400, is being
revised accordingly. The Councils
believe that the coverage is better
located in FAR part 10 rather than FAR
subpart 44.3, as the respondent
suggested, because the latter subpart is
exclusive to Contractors’ Purchasing
Systems Reviews.
3. Comment: A respondent stated that
FAR 52.244–6 is intended to limit the
clauses that a FAR part 15 prime
contractor is required to flow down to
a subcontractor selling commercial
items. The respondent stated its belief
that the new Alternate I to the clause is
unnecessary. The respondent also
concluded that the existing FAR part 10
market research language should not be
restated there. Last, the respondent
questioned the need for the added
language about ‘‘procuring commercial
items,’’ when the focus of section 826 is
on procurement of ‘‘other than
commercial items.’’
Response: The Councils agree that
Alternate I to FAR 52.244–6 is
unnecessary and not relevant to
subcontracts for commercial items. By
removing discussion of market research
from FAR subpart 44.4, there will no
longer be a redundant discussion of
FAR part 10 material in FAR subpart
44.4. The Councils agree with the
respondent that the focus of section 826
is on the procurement of other than
commercial items. Relocating the
requirement for contractors to conduct
market research to FAR part 10 better
aligns the FAR coverage with the
statute. The Councils have retained the
requirement, at section 826(a) (10 U.S.C.
2377(c)(4)), for a contractor with a
contract over $5 million for the
procurement of other than commercial
items to conduct market research.
However, the Councils have added the
requirement as a new FAR clause,
52.210–1, Market Research, prescribed
at FAR 10.003, Contract clause. Because
PO 00000
Frm 00023
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
14563
the statute requires the conduct of
market research by a contractor awarded
task orders or delivery orders over $5
million for items other than commercial
items, we have added a cross-reference
to the requirement to FAR subpart 16.5.
C. Clarification of FAR Language
1. Comment: A respondent concluded
that the interim rule confuses the prime
contractor’s role in procuring supplies
and services to support its deliverable to
the Government, i.e., subcontracting,
with the unique and completely distinct
role of a prime contractor holding a
contract to operate a Government
facility and act in the place of the
Government in procuring supplies and
services solely to support the activities
at the Government facility, i.e., acting as
an agent of the Government.
Response: The Councils eliminated
the ‘‘purchasing agent’’ language by
deleting the Alternate I to FAR 52.244–
6. The Councils also created a new FAR
clause 52.210–1, Market Research.
2. Comment: A respondent noted that
there is a significant difference between
the section 826 requirement to conduct
market research ‘‘as may be necessary’’
and the FAR 44.402(b) requirement to
conduct market research ‘‘to the
maximum extent practicable.’’ The
respondent requested that the language
from section 826 be used so that
contractors will have the ability to tailor
their market research as necessary to
reflect their knowledge and experience
of the supplies and services being
procured.
Response: The Councils do not agree
with the respondent. The Government
has interpreted ‘‘as may be necessary’’ to
mean ‘‘to the maximum extent
practicable.’’ In any case, the term ‘‘to
the maximum extent practicable’’ has
been removed from the case, as the
coverage for FAR 44.402(b) has been
deleted from the rule.
D. Application
1. Comment: According to the
respondent, mixing the discussion of a
contractor’s possible roles of
subcontracting and acting as the
Government’s agent has created a lower
standard for ‘‘agents.’’ As written, the
respondent stated, the language requires
contractors to perform the necessary
market research whenever procuring
other than commercial items, but
purchasing agents are only required to
perform market research when
procuring other-than-commercial items
with a value over the simplified
acquisition threshold. The respondent
questioned the need for this distinction.
Response: The Councils agree that
there need not be any distinction
E:\FR\FM\16MRR2.SGM
16MRR2
14564
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 51 / Wednesday, March 16, 2011 / Rules and Regulations
between the contractor acting as a
subcontractor and the contractor ‘‘acting
as a purchasing agent.’’ The language
has been removed from FAR subpart
44.4.
2. Comment: A respondent
recommended requiring the conduct of
market research prior to the award of
each task order issued under an
indefinite-delivery indefinite-quantity
contract that was awarded on a solesource basis.
Response: The Councils disagree with
the respondent because the clear
language of the statute, section 826(c),
establishes a requirement for the
conduct of market research appropriate
to the circumstances prior to awarding
a task order or delivery order in excess
of the simplified acquisition threshold
for the procurement of items other than
commercial items. The statute does not
limit the market research requirements
to task orders or delivery orders
awarded against sole-source indefinitedelivery contracts. Although this is
mandatory for DoD and not for civilian
agencies, the language was applied to
civilian agencies for uniformity across
the Government. See also the response
to the second comment at II.A., Purpose,
and the responses at II.E., Exceptions.
jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with RULES2
E. Exceptions
1. Comment: One respondent stated
that the addition of a new paragraph (d)
at FAR 10.001, Policy, only applies to
‘‘(A) contingency operation or defense
against or recovery from nuclear,
biological, chemical, or radiological
attack; and (B) disaster relief * * *’’. For
that reason, the respondent believes that
the same applicability should be added
to FAR 44.402, as paragraph (d)
outlines. The respondent noted that,
without this change, there would be a
negative impact on indefinite-delivery
indefinite-quantity contracts.
Response: The respondent’s
assumptions about the applicability are
not correct. The requirement for
agencies to conduct market research for
disaster relief and contingency
operations already existed at FAR
10.001(a)(2).
2. Comment: A respondent claimed
that indefinite-quantity contracts set
aside for Small Business Administration
(SBA) categories, such as the 8(a)
program and small disadvantaged
business, should be exempt from market
research requirements because the
intent is to facilitate the SBA in
supporting these ‘‘specialty market
segments.’’ The respondent notes that
this market segment historically is very
committed and can be relied upon to
self-police.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:19 Mar 15, 2011
Jkt 223001
Response: The SBA’s current
socioeconomic programs offering
eligible program participants
contractual opportunities are the section
8(a) program, HUBZone program, and
the service-disabled veteran-owned
small business concern program. The
SBA has finalized the regulations that
will provide guidance for the womenowned small business Federal contract
program. The rule was published in the
Federal Register on October 7, 2010
(75 FR 66258). The SBA does not have
a small and disadvantaged business
(SDB) program offering SDB set-asides.
However, the SBA’s 8(a) firms may
represent themselves as SDBs for
Federal contracts and subcontracts to
include task- and delivery-orders under
indefinite-delivery contracts.
Performing market research for taskand delivery-orders will not diminish
opportunities for agencies to establish
set-asides for small-business concerns
or, when appropriate, award sole-source
contracts for indefinite-delivery
contracts. Market research performed by
prime contractors will also enhance
subcontracting opportunities for smallbusiness concerns. Careful attention to
market-research strategies is an effective
method for creating contract
opportunities for small-business
concerns. It provides them with an
awareness of forthcoming procurements.
In turn, the market research provides a
vehicle for the small-business concern
to market its capabilities to the
Government and its contractors. FAR
part 10 currently supports market
research for small business concerns
and requires agencies to take advantage
of commercially available market
research methods in order to effectively
identify the capabilities of small
businesses. The final rule will not limit
an entity’s ability to utilize the SBA’s
small business programs.
F. Burden
1. Comment: A respondent noted that
at least one agency uses multiple-award
contracts for construction. Each task
order is competed, which the
respondent stated ensures that ‘‘the full
force of the marketplace is apparent in
the pricing of competitiveness of each
award.’’ In addition, each prime
contractor is continually reviewing the
performance and prices of all its
subcontractors. The respondent stated
that having the Government perform
additional market research in this
market segment is a waste of time and
money.
Response: The Councils do not agree
with the respondent. Given the
continuously changing circumstances
and entry of new businesses, on-going
PO 00000
Frm 00024
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
market research is not a waste of
manpower and taxpayers’ money.
Further, the respondent addresses the
Government’s performance of additional
market research, but the statute also
places the on-going market research
requirement on the prime contractor in
these circumstances. There is no reason
why a multiple-award construction
contract should be treated any
differently than any multiple-award
contract.
2. Comment: A respondent expressed
concern about the negative impact
caused by the time and effort required
for each market survey. Fiscal year-end
solicitations and awards may be slowed
to the point of making awards
impossible.
Response: The Councils cannot waive
statutory requirements simply because
compliance will take time. In an effort
to enhance uniformity and consistency,
the DoD statutory mandate was
intentionally extended to all executive
agencies, consistent with
Governmentwide applications being
sought in other competition matters by
the Office of Federal Procurement
Policy. The Councils also point the
respondent to FAR 10.002(b)(1), which
notes that the ‘‘extent of market research
will vary, depending on such factors as
urgency, estimated dollar value,
complexity, and past experience.’’
Further, the Councils note that FAR
10.002(b)(1) clearly states that the
market research effort for a new task
order or delivery order need not be de
novo in every case; the ‘‘contracting
officer may use market research
conducted within 18 months before the
award of any task or delivery order if
the information is still current, accurate,
and relevant’’ (emphasis added).
3. Comment: The respondent stated
that the requirement for market research
will greatly impede the award of task
orders, slowing fiscal year-end awards
to the point of impossibility and
negatively impacting Base Operating
Support/Service (BOS) contracts. The
respondent noted that BOS contracts
have performance-based elements that
ensure the contractor has incentives for
efficiencies that will result in
substantive savings in cost and
schedule. Time has proven that having
a single contractor responsible for the
full scope of a contract effort enables
tradeoffs by the contractor that result in
better overall performance and savings,
according to the respondent, than would
intermittent market research.
Response: Whatever the respondent’s
experience with BOS contracts
containing performance-based elements,
the Councils note that the statute
requires the conduct of market research
E:\FR\FM\16MRR2.SGM
16MRR2
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 51 / Wednesday, March 16, 2011 / Rules and Regulations
for both single-award and multipleaward indefinite-delivery contracts. The
point of having contractors conduct
market research, as stated in the law, is
to identify commercial or
nondevelopmental items that may be
available to meet the agency’s needs, not
to identify efficiency trade-offs within
the contractor’s operations. Both efforts
can proceed in tandem.
Finally, this final rule makes several
conforming changes and technical
corrections as a result of public
comments received:
1. The language added to FAR
52.244–6 (Alternate I) is relocated to a
new FAR clause 52.210–1, Market
Research;
2. A prescription for the new clause
is added at FAR 10.003, Contract clause;
and
3. A cross-reference for the clause is
added at FAR 16.506(h) when the
contract is over $5 million for the
procurement of items other than
commercial items.
jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with RULES2
III. Executive Order 12866
This is a significant regulatory action
and, therefore, was subject to review
under Section 6(b) of Executive Order
12866, Regulatory Planning and Review,
dated September 30, 1993. This rule is
not a major rule under 5 U.S.C. 804.
IV. Regulatory Flexibility Act
DoD, GSA, and NASA certify that this
final rule will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities within the
meaning of the Regulatory Flexibility
Act, 5 U.S.C. 601, et seq., because of the
high dollar threshold, non-applicability
to contracts for commercial items
(including commercial items that are
services), and non-applicability to
subcontracts for commercial items
(including commercial items that are
services). DoD, GSA, and NASA
anticipate that the required market
research is likely to increase the number
of small businesses identified as able to
provide commercial or
nondevelopmental items as
subcontractors. Any impact to small
businesses is positive because their
commercial and nondevelopmental
items are more likely to be discovered
as a result of these market research
requirements. No comments were
received from small entities in response
to the invitation to do so included in the
interim rule.
V. Paperwork Reduction Act
The final rule does not contain any
information collection requirements that
require the approval of the Office of
Management and Budget under the
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:19 Mar 15, 2011
Jkt 223001
Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C.
chapter 35).
List of Subjects in 48 CFR Parts 10, 16,
44, and 52
Government procurement.
Dated: March 4, 2011.
Millisa Gary,
Acting Director, Office of Governmentwide
Acquisition Policy.
Interim Rule Adopted as Final With
Changes
Accordingly, the interim rule
amending 48 CFR parts 10, 16, 44, and
52, which was published in the Federal
Register at 75 FR 34277, June 16, 2010,
is adopted as final with the following
changes:
■ 1. The authority citation for 48 CFR
parts 10, 16, 44, 52 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 40 U.S.C. 121(c); 10 U.S.C.
chapter 137; and 42 U.S.C. 2473(c).
PART 10—MARKET RESEARCH
1. Amend section 10.001 by revising
paragraph (d) to read as follows:
■
10.001
Policy.
*
*
*
*
*
(d) See 10.003 for the requirement for
a prime contractor to perform market
research in contracts in excess of $5
million for the procurement of items
other than commercial items in
accordance with section 826 of Public
Law 110–181.
2. Add section 10.003 to read as
follows:
■
10.003
Contract clause.
The contracting officer shall insert the
clause at 52.210–1, Market Research, in
solicitations and contracts over $5
million for the procurement of items
other than commercial items.
PART 16—TYPES OF CONTRACTS
3. Amend section 16.506 by adding
paragraph (h) to read as follows:
■
16.506 Solicitation provisions and
contract clauses.
*
*
*
*
*
(h) See 10.001(d) for insertion of the
clause at 52.210–1, Market Research,
when the contract is over $5 million for
the procurement of items other than
commercial items.
PART 44—SUBCONTRACTING
POLICIES AND PROCEDURES
4. Revise section 44.400 to read as
follows:
■
PO 00000
Frm 00025
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 9990
44.400
14565
Scope of subpart.
This subpart prescribes the policies
limiting the contract clauses a
contractor may be required to apply to
any subcontractors that are furnishing
commercial items or commercial
components in accordance with section
8002(b)(2) of Public Law 103–355.
44.402
[Amended]
5. Amend section 44.402 by removing
paragraph (b) and redesignating
paragraphs (c) and (d) as paragraphs (b)
and (c), respectively.
■
6. Revise section 44.403 to read as
follows:
■
44.403
Contract clause.
The contracting officer shall insert the
clause at 52.244–6, Subcontracts for
Commercial Items, in solicitations and
contracts other than those for
commercial items.
PART 52—SOLICITATION PROVISIONS
AND CONTRACT CLAUSES
7. Add section 52.210–1 to read as
follows:
■
52.210–1
Market Research.
As prescribed in 10.003, insert the
following clause:
Market Research (APR 2011)
(a) Definition. As used in this clause—
Commercial item and nondevelopmental
item have the meaning contained in Federal
Acquisition Regulation 2.101.
(b) Before awarding subcontracts over the
simplified acquisition threshold for items
other than commercial items, the Contractor
shall conduct market research to—
(1) Determine if commercial items or, to
the extent commercial items suitable to meet
the agency’s needs are not available,
nondevelopmental items are available that—
(i) Meet the agency’s requirements;
(ii) Could be modified to meet the agency’s
requirements; or
(iii) Could meet the agency’s requirements
if those requirements were modified to a
reasonable extent; and
(2) Determine the extent to which
commercial items or nondevelopmental
items could be incorporated at the
component level.
(End of clause)
52.244–6
[Amended]
8. Amend section 52.244–6 by
removing from the introductory text
‘‘44.403(a),’’ and adding ‘‘44.403,’’ in its
place; and removing Alternate I.
■
[FR Doc. 2011–5555 Filed 3–15–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6820–EP–P
E:\FR\FM\16MRR2.SGM
16MRR2
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 51 (Wednesday, March 16, 2011)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 14562-14565]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-5555]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION
NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION
48 CFR Parts 10, 16, 44, and 52
[FAC 2005-50; FAR Case 2008-007; Item IV; Docket 2010-0086, Sequence 1]
RIN 9000-AL50
Federal Acquisition Regulation; Additional Requirements for
Market Research
AGENCY: Department of Defense (DoD), General Services Administration
(GSA), and National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA).
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: DoD, GSA, and NASA have adopted as final, with changes, the
interim rule amending the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) to
implement section 826, Market Research, of the National Defense
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008. Section 826 requires the head
of an agency to take appropriate steps to ensure that any prime
contractor of a contract (or task order or delivery order) in an amount
in excess of $5 million for the procurement of items other than
commercial items engages in market research as necessary before making
purchases.
DATES: Effective Date: April 15, 2011.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Lori Sakalos, Procurement Analyst,
at (202) 208-0498, for clarification of content. For information
pertaining to status or publication schedules, contact the Regulatory
Secretariat at (202) 501-4755. Please cite FAC 2005-50, FAR Case 2008-
007.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
DoD, GSA, and NASA published an interim rule in the Federal
Register at 75 FR 34277 on June 16, 2010, to implement section 826,
Market Research, of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal
Year 2008 (Pub. L. 110-181). Section 826 establishes additional
requirements in subsection (c) of 10 U.S.C. 2377. As a matter of
policy, these requirements are extended to all executive agencies.
Specifically, the head of the agency must conduct market research
before issuing an indefinite-delivery indefinite-quantity task or
delivery order for a noncommercial item in excess of the simplified
acquisition threshold. In addition, a prime contractor with a contract
in excess of $5 million for the procurement of items other than
commercial items is required to conduct market research before making
purchases that exceed the simplified acquisition threshold for or on
behalf of the Government. Three respondents submitted 16 comments on
the interim rule.
II. Discussion/Analysis
Public Comments: A discussion of the comments and the changes made
to the rule as a result of those comments are provided as follows:
A. Purpose
1. Comment: One respondent stated that the guidance does not appear
to explain the end purpose of the market research. Another respondent,
however, concluded that the FAR states the purpose of the market
research twice, in FAR 44.402(b) and 10.001(a)(3). The second
respondent stated that the purpose for conducting market research is
``clearly described in Part 10 and there is no reason to repeat that
same language elsewhere in the FAR.''
Response: The Defense Acquisition Regulations Council and the
Civilian Agency Acquisition Council (the Councils) agree with the
second respondent. FAR part 10 ``prescribes policies and procedures for
conducting market research to arrive at the most suitable approach to
acquiring, distributing, and supporting supplies and services'' (FAR
10.000). FAR 10.001(a)(3) lists the ways in which the
[[Page 14563]]
results of the market research may be used. We believe that the end
purpose of market research is exhaustively covered in FAR part 10. We
also agree that there is no need to repeat this material in FAR subpart
44.4, and the final rule removes the redundant material.
2. Comment: A respondent noted that competitively awarded
indefinite-delivery indefinite-quantity contracts are priced as a
result of market forces. Conducting market research prior to the award
of individual task orders ``will only be looking at the scope of Task
Order* * * (and) is redundant to the market research already required
by FAR for the (indefinite-delivery indefinite-quantity) contract.'' It
is unlikely to result in more competition or better pricing, according
to the respondent.
Response: The Councils note that the purpose of market research is
to effectively identify, on an on-going basis, the capabilities of
small businesses and new entrants into Federal contracting that are
available in the marketplace for meeting the requirements of the
agency. The Councils disagree with the respondent's contention that
more competition or better pricing are unlikely to result. (Also see
responses at II.F., Burden.)
B. Location in FAR
1. Comment: A respondent noted that, while FAR part 10 contains
scant detail on market research, there are existing market research
techniques and information embedded in chapter 2 of the DoD Commercial
Item (CI) Handbook at https://www.acq.osd.mil/dpap/Docs/cihandbook.pdf.
The respondent stated that the Handbook might be instructive for
executive agencies to use as part of any training requirements.
Response: This comment is outside the scope of the FAR case.
However, it has been forwarded to both the Defense Acquisition
University and the Federal Acquisition Institute for their
consideration. The current Commercial Item Handbook (version 1.0) was
published November 2001 and is currently in revision.
2. Comment: A respondent stated its conclusion that the section 826
requirement for contractors with contracts exceeding $5 million to
perform market research for ``other than commercial items'' is
misplaced because the title of FAR subpart 44.4 is ``Subcontracts for
Commercial Items and Commercial Components.'' The respondent suggested
that a better location for the statutory requirement would be at FAR
44.303.
Response: The Councils agree that the requirement was misplaced in
FAR subpart 44.4 and have relocated the clause prescription to FAR part
10, Market Research (rather than FAR subpart 44.3, as suggested by the
respondent). The statute and policy require contractors to conduct
market research in certain circumstances (when the contract is over $5
million for the procurement of items other than commercial items);
whether the subcontract is for commercial or other than commercial
items is immaterial to the contractor's requirement to conduct market
research. The statute encourages contractors and subcontractors to use
commercial items. The FAR is amended to delete the subject of market
research from subpart 44.4, and the ``Scope of subpart'' section, FAR
44.400, is being revised accordingly. The Councils believe that the
coverage is better located in FAR part 10 rather than FAR subpart 44.3,
as the respondent suggested, because the latter subpart is exclusive to
Contractors' Purchasing Systems Reviews.
3. Comment: A respondent stated that FAR 52.244-6 is intended to
limit the clauses that a FAR part 15 prime contractor is required to
flow down to a subcontractor selling commercial items. The respondent
stated its belief that the new Alternate I to the clause is
unnecessary. The respondent also concluded that the existing FAR part
10 market research language should not be restated there. Last, the
respondent questioned the need for the added language about ``procuring
commercial items,'' when the focus of section 826 is on procurement of
``other than commercial items.''
Response: The Councils agree that Alternate I to FAR 52.244-6 is
unnecessary and not relevant to subcontracts for commercial items. By
removing discussion of market research from FAR subpart 44.4, there
will no longer be a redundant discussion of FAR part 10 material in FAR
subpart 44.4. The Councils agree with the respondent that the focus of
section 826 is on the procurement of other than commercial items.
Relocating the requirement for contractors to conduct market research
to FAR part 10 better aligns the FAR coverage with the statute. The
Councils have retained the requirement, at section 826(a) (10 U.S.C.
2377(c)(4)), for a contractor with a contract over $5 million for the
procurement of other than commercial items to conduct market research.
However, the Councils have added the requirement as a new FAR clause,
52.210-1, Market Research, prescribed at FAR 10.003, Contract clause.
Because the statute requires the conduct of market research by a
contractor awarded task orders or delivery orders over $5 million for
items other than commercial items, we have added a cross-reference to
the requirement to FAR subpart 16.5.
C. Clarification of FAR Language
1. Comment: A respondent concluded that the interim rule confuses
the prime contractor's role in procuring supplies and services to
support its deliverable to the Government, i.e., subcontracting, with
the unique and completely distinct role of a prime contractor holding a
contract to operate a Government facility and act in the place of the
Government in procuring supplies and services solely to support the
activities at the Government facility, i.e., acting as an agent of the
Government.
Response: The Councils eliminated the ``purchasing agent'' language
by deleting the Alternate I to FAR 52.244-6. The Councils also created
a new FAR clause 52.210-1, Market Research.
2. Comment: A respondent noted that there is a significant
difference between the section 826 requirement to conduct market
research ``as may be necessary'' and the FAR 44.402(b) requirement to
conduct market research ``to the maximum extent practicable.'' The
respondent requested that the language from section 826 be used so that
contractors will have the ability to tailor their market research as
necessary to reflect their knowledge and experience of the supplies and
services being procured.
Response: The Councils do not agree with the respondent. The
Government has interpreted ``as may be necessary'' to mean ``to the
maximum extent practicable.'' In any case, the term ``to the maximum
extent practicable'' has been removed from the case, as the coverage
for FAR 44.402(b) has been deleted from the rule.
D. Application
1. Comment: According to the respondent, mixing the discussion of a
contractor's possible roles of subcontracting and acting as the
Government's agent has created a lower standard for ``agents.'' As
written, the respondent stated, the language requires contractors to
perform the necessary market research whenever procuring other than
commercial items, but purchasing agents are only required to perform
market research when procuring other-than-commercial items with a value
over the simplified acquisition threshold. The respondent questioned
the need for this distinction.
Response: The Councils agree that there need not be any distinction
[[Page 14564]]
between the contractor acting as a subcontractor and the contractor
``acting as a purchasing agent.'' The language has been removed from
FAR subpart 44.4.
2. Comment: A respondent recommended requiring the conduct of
market research prior to the award of each task order issued under an
indefinite-delivery indefinite-quantity contract that was awarded on a
sole-source basis.
Response: The Councils disagree with the respondent because the
clear language of the statute, section 826(c), establishes a
requirement for the conduct of market research appropriate to the
circumstances prior to awarding a task order or delivery order in
excess of the simplified acquisition threshold for the procurement of
items other than commercial items. The statute does not limit the
market research requirements to task orders or delivery orders awarded
against sole-source indefinite-delivery contracts. Although this is
mandatory for DoD and not for civilian agencies, the language was
applied to civilian agencies for uniformity across the Government. See
also the response to the second comment at II.A., Purpose, and the
responses at II.E., Exceptions.
E. Exceptions
1. Comment: One respondent stated that the addition of a new
paragraph (d) at FAR 10.001, Policy, only applies to ``(A) contingency
operation or defense against or recovery from nuclear, biological,
chemical, or radiological attack; and (B) disaster relief * * *''. For
that reason, the respondent believes that the same applicability should
be added to FAR 44.402, as paragraph (d) outlines. The respondent noted
that, without this change, there would be a negative impact on
indefinite-delivery indefinite-quantity contracts.
Response: The respondent's assumptions about the applicability are
not correct. The requirement for agencies to conduct market research
for disaster relief and contingency operations already existed at FAR
10.001(a)(2).
2. Comment: A respondent claimed that indefinite-quantity contracts
set aside for Small Business Administration (SBA) categories, such as
the 8(a) program and small disadvantaged business, should be exempt
from market research requirements because the intent is to facilitate
the SBA in supporting these ``specialty market segments.'' The
respondent notes that this market segment historically is very
committed and can be relied upon to self-police.
Response: The SBA's current socioeconomic programs offering
eligible program participants contractual opportunities are the section
8(a) program, HUBZone program, and the service-disabled veteran-owned
small business concern program. The SBA has finalized the regulations
that will provide guidance for the women-owned small business Federal
contract program. The rule was published in the Federal Register on
October 7, 2010 (75 FR 66258). The SBA does not have a small and
disadvantaged business (SDB) program offering SDB set-asides. However,
the SBA's 8(a) firms may represent themselves as SDBs for Federal
contracts and subcontracts to include task- and delivery-orders under
indefinite-delivery contracts.
Performing market research for task- and delivery-orders will not
diminish opportunities for agencies to establish set-asides for small-
business concerns or, when appropriate, award sole-source contracts for
indefinite-delivery contracts. Market research performed by prime
contractors will also enhance subcontracting opportunities for small-
business concerns. Careful attention to market-research strategies is
an effective method for creating contract opportunities for small-
business concerns. It provides them with an awareness of forthcoming
procurements. In turn, the market research provides a vehicle for the
small-business concern to market its capabilities to the Government and
its contractors. FAR part 10 currently supports market research for
small business concerns and requires agencies to take advantage of
commercially available market research methods in order to effectively
identify the capabilities of small businesses. The final rule will not
limit an entity's ability to utilize the SBA's small business programs.
F. Burden
1. Comment: A respondent noted that at least one agency uses
multiple-award contracts for construction. Each task order is competed,
which the respondent stated ensures that ``the full force of the
marketplace is apparent in the pricing of competitiveness of each
award.'' In addition, each prime contractor is continually reviewing
the performance and prices of all its subcontractors. The respondent
stated that having the Government perform additional market research in
this market segment is a waste of time and money.
Response: The Councils do not agree with the respondent. Given the
continuously changing circumstances and entry of new businesses, on-
going market research is not a waste of manpower and taxpayers' money.
Further, the respondent addresses the Government's performance of
additional market research, but the statute also places the on-going
market research requirement on the prime contractor in these
circumstances. There is no reason why a multiple-award construction
contract should be treated any differently than any multiple-award
contract.
2. Comment: A respondent expressed concern about the negative
impact caused by the time and effort required for each market survey.
Fiscal year-end solicitations and awards may be slowed to the point of
making awards impossible.
Response: The Councils cannot waive statutory requirements simply
because compliance will take time. In an effort to enhance uniformity
and consistency, the DoD statutory mandate was intentionally extended
to all executive agencies, consistent with Governmentwide applications
being sought in other competition matters by the Office of Federal
Procurement Policy. The Councils also point the respondent to FAR
10.002(b)(1), which notes that the ``extent of market research will
vary, depending on such factors as urgency, estimated dollar value,
complexity, and past experience.'' Further, the Councils note that FAR
10.002(b)(1) clearly states that the market research effort for a new
task order or delivery order need not be de novo in every case; the
``contracting officer may use market research conducted within 18
months before the award of any task or delivery order if the
information is still current, accurate, and relevant'' (emphasis
added).
3. Comment: The respondent stated that the requirement for market
research will greatly impede the award of task orders, slowing fiscal
year-end awards to the point of impossibility and negatively impacting
Base Operating Support/Service (BOS) contracts. The respondent noted
that BOS contracts have performance-based elements that ensure the
contractor has incentives for efficiencies that will result in
substantive savings in cost and schedule. Time has proven that having a
single contractor responsible for the full scope of a contract effort
enables tradeoffs by the contractor that result in better overall
performance and savings, according to the respondent, than would
intermittent market research.
Response: Whatever the respondent's experience with BOS contracts
containing performance-based elements, the Councils note that the
statute requires the conduct of market research
[[Page 14565]]
for both single-award and multiple-award indefinite-delivery contracts.
The point of having contractors conduct market research, as stated in
the law, is to identify commercial or nondevelopmental items that may
be available to meet the agency's needs, not to identify efficiency
trade-offs within the contractor's operations. Both efforts can proceed
in tandem.
Finally, this final rule makes several conforming changes and
technical corrections as a result of public comments received:
1. The language added to FAR 52.244-6 (Alternate I) is relocated to
a new FAR clause 52.210-1, Market Research;
2. A prescription for the new clause is added at FAR 10.003,
Contract clause; and
3. A cross-reference for the clause is added at FAR 16.506(h) when
the contract is over $5 million for the procurement of items other than
commercial items.
III. Executive Order 12866
This is a significant regulatory action and, therefore, was subject
to review under Section 6(b) of Executive Order 12866, Regulatory
Planning and Review, dated September 30, 1993. This rule is not a major
rule under 5 U.S.C. 804.
IV. Regulatory Flexibility Act
DoD, GSA, and NASA certify that this final rule will not have a
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities
within the meaning of the Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601, et
seq., because of the high dollar threshold, non-applicability to
contracts for commercial items (including commercial items that are
services), and non-applicability to subcontracts for commercial items
(including commercial items that are services). DoD, GSA, and NASA
anticipate that the required market research is likely to increase the
number of small businesses identified as able to provide commercial or
nondevelopmental items as subcontractors. Any impact to small
businesses is positive because their commercial and nondevelopmental
items are more likely to be discovered as a result of these market
research requirements. No comments were received from small entities in
response to the invitation to do so included in the interim rule.
V. Paperwork Reduction Act
The final rule does not contain any information collection
requirements that require the approval of the Office of Management and
Budget under the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. chapter 35).
List of Subjects in 48 CFR Parts 10, 16, 44, and 52
Government procurement.
Dated: March 4, 2011.
Millisa Gary,
Acting Director, Office of Governmentwide Acquisition Policy.
Interim Rule Adopted as Final With Changes
Accordingly, the interim rule amending 48 CFR parts 10, 16, 44, and
52, which was published in the Federal Register at 75 FR 34277, June
16, 2010, is adopted as final with the following changes:
0
1. The authority citation for 48 CFR parts 10, 16, 44, 52 continues to
read as follows:
Authority: 40 U.S.C. 121(c); 10 U.S.C. chapter 137; and 42
U.S.C. 2473(c).
PART 10--MARKET RESEARCH
0
1. Amend section 10.001 by revising paragraph (d) to read as follows:
10.001 Policy.
* * * * *
(d) See 10.003 for the requirement for a prime contractor to
perform market research in contracts in excess of $5 million for the
procurement of items other than commercial items in accordance with
section 826 of Public Law 110-181.
0
2. Add section 10.003 to read as follows:
10.003 Contract clause.
The contracting officer shall insert the clause at 52.210-1, Market
Research, in solicitations and contracts over $5 million for the
procurement of items other than commercial items.
PART 16--TYPES OF CONTRACTS
0
3. Amend section 16.506 by adding paragraph (h) to read as follows:
16.506 Solicitation provisions and contract clauses.
* * * * *
(h) See 10.001(d) for insertion of the clause at 52.210-1, Market
Research, when the contract is over $5 million for the procurement of
items other than commercial items.
PART 44--SUBCONTRACTING POLICIES AND PROCEDURES
0
4. Revise section 44.400 to read as follows:
44.400 Scope of subpart.
This subpart prescribes the policies limiting the contract clauses
a contractor may be required to apply to any subcontractors that are
furnishing commercial items or commercial components in accordance with
section 8002(b)(2) of Public Law 103-355.
44.402 [Amended]
0
5. Amend section 44.402 by removing paragraph (b) and redesignating
paragraphs (c) and (d) as paragraphs (b) and (c), respectively.
0
6. Revise section 44.403 to read as follows:
44.403 Contract clause.
The contracting officer shall insert the clause at 52.244-6,
Subcontracts for Commercial Items, in solicitations and contracts other
than those for commercial items.
PART 52--SOLICITATION PROVISIONS AND CONTRACT CLAUSES
0
7. Add section 52.210-1 to read as follows:
52.210-1 Market Research.
As prescribed in 10.003, insert the following clause:
Market Research (APR 2011)
(a) Definition. As used in this clause--
Commercial item and nondevelopmental item have the meaning
contained in Federal Acquisition Regulation 2.101.
(b) Before awarding subcontracts over the simplified acquisition
threshold for items other than commercial items, the Contractor
shall conduct market research to--
(1) Determine if commercial items or, to the extent commercial
items suitable to meet the agency's needs are not available,
nondevelopmental items are available that--
(i) Meet the agency's requirements;
(ii) Could be modified to meet the agency's requirements; or
(iii) Could meet the agency's requirements if those requirements
were modified to a reasonable extent; and
(2) Determine the extent to which commercial items or
nondevelopmental items could be incorporated at the component level.
(End of clause)
52.244-6 [Amended]
0
8. Amend section 52.244-6 by removing from the introductory text
``44.403(a),'' and adding ``44.403,'' in its place; and removing
Alternate I.
[FR Doc. 2011-5555 Filed 3-15-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6820-EP-P