Fisheries of the Northeastern United States; Atlantic Mackerel, Squid, and Butterfish (MSB) Fishery; Revision of 2011 Butterfish Specifications, 13887-13889 [2011-5995]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 50 / Tuesday, March 15, 2011 / Rules and Regulations
Number
Date
Event
Sponsor
13887
Location
Coast Guard Sector Baltimore—COTP Zone
65 ................
April 2, 2011 ..............
Safety at Sea Seminar ..
U.S. Naval Academy .....
66 ................
May 24 and 25, 2011
Blue Angels Air Show ....
U.S. Naval Academy .....
67 ................
June 25, 2011 ...........
Maryland Swim for Life ..
District of Columbia
Aquatics Club.
68 ................
June 25 and 26, 2011
Thunder on the Narrows
Kent Narrows Racing
Association.
Dated: February 19, 2011.
Mark P. O’Malley,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the
Port Baltimore.
[FR Doc. 2011–5894 Filed 3–14–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
50 CFR Part 648
[Docket No. 110218149–1182–01]
RIN 0648–BA86
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with RULES
Fisheries of the Northeastern United
States; Atlantic Mackerel, Squid, and
Butterfish (MSB) Fishery; Revision of
2011 Butterfish Specifications
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Temporary rule; request for
comments.
AGENCY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
13:15 Mar 14, 2011
Jkt 223001
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
All waters of the Severn River from shoreline to
shoreline, bounded to the northwest by a line
drawn from the south shoreline at latitude
39°00′38.9″ N., longitude 076°31′05.2″ W.
thence to the north shoreline at latitude
39°00′54.7″ N., longitude 076°30′44.8″ W., this
line is approximately 1300 yards northwest of
the U.S. 50 fixed highway bridge. The regulated area is bounded to the southeast by a
line drawn from the Naval Academy Light at
latitude 38°58′39.5″ N., longitude 076°28′49″
W. thence southeast to a point 700 yards east
of Chinks Point, MD, at latitude 38°58′1.9″ N.,
longitude 076°28′1.7″ W. thence northeast to
Greenbury Point at latitude 38°58′29″ N., longitude 076°27′16″ W.
All waters of the Severn River from shoreline to
shoreline, bounded to the northwest by a line
drawn from the south shoreline at latitude
39°00′38.9″ N., longitude 076°31′05.2″ W.
thence to the north shoreline at latitude
39°00′54.7″ N., longitude 076°30′44.8″ W., this
line is approximately 1300 yards northwest of
the U.S. 50 fixed highway bridge. The regulated area is bounded to the southeast by a
line drawn from the Naval Academy Light at
latitude 38°58′39.5″ N., longitude 076°28′49″
W. thence southeast to a point 700 yards east
of Chinks Point, MD, at latitude 38°58′1.9″ N.,
longitude 076°28′1.7″ W. thence northeast to
Greenbury Point at latitude 38°58′29″ N., longitude 076°27′16″ W.
The waters of the Chester River from shoreline to
shoreline, bounded on the south by a line
drawn at latitude 39°10′16″ N., near the Chester River Channel Buoy 35 (LLN–26795) and
bounded on the north at latitude 39°12′30″ N.
by the Maryland S.R. 213 Highway Bridge.
All waters of Prospect Bay enclosed by the following points: Latitude 38°57′52.0″ N., longitude 076°14′48.0″ W., to latitude 38°58′02.0″
N., longitude 076°15′05.0″ W., to latitude
38°57′38.0″ N., longitude 076°15′29.0″ W., to
latitude 38°57′28.0″ N., longitude 076°15′23.0″
W., to latitude 38°57′52.0″ N., longitude
076°14′48.0″ W.
NMFS issues this temporary
rule pursuant to its authority to issue
emergency measures under the
Magnuson-Stevens Fishery
Conservation and Management Act
(Magnuson-Stevens Act). This
emergency action increases the
butterfish allowable biological catch
(ABC) for the 2011 fishing year from
1,500 mt to 1,811 mt, and applies the
increase to the butterfish mortality cap
in the Loligo squid fishery, based on the
most recent and best available scientific
information.
SUMMARY:
Effective March 15, 2011,
through September 12, 2011. Comments
must be received by April 14, 2011.
DATES:
The supplemental EA is
available by request from: Patricia
Kurkul, Regional Administrator,
ADDRESSES:
E:\FR\FM\15MRR1.SGM
15MRR1
13888
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 50 / Tuesday, March 15, 2011 / Rules and Regulations
National Marine Fisheries Service,
Northeast Region, 55 Great Republic
Drive, Gloucester, MA 01930–2276, or
via the Internet at https://
www.nero.noaa.gov.
You may submit comments, identified
by RIN 0648–BA86, by any one of the
following methods:
• Electronic Submissions: Submit all
electronic public comments via the
Federal e-Rulemaking portal https://
www.regulations.gov;
• Fax: (978) 281–9135, Attn: Aja
Peters-Mason;
• Mail to NMFS, Northeast Regional
Office, 55 Great Republic Dr, Gloucester,
MA 01930. Mark the outside of the
envelope ‘‘Comments on Emergency
Rule to Revise the Butterfish
Specifications.’’
Instructions: All comments received
are a part of the public record and will
generally be posted to https://
www.regulations.gov without change.
All Personal Identifying Information (for
example, name, address, etc.)
voluntarily submitted by the commenter
may be publicly accessible. Do not
submit Confidential Business
Information or otherwise sensitive or
protected information.
NMFS will accept anonymous
comments (enter N/A in the required
fields, if you wish to remain
anonymous). You may submit
attachments to electronic comments in
Microsoft Word, Excel, WordPerfect, or
Adobe PDF file formats only.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Aja
Peters-Mason, Fishery Policy Analyst,
(978) 281–9195, fax (978) 281–9135.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with RULES
Background
This temporary rule implements
emergency measures, authorized by
section 305(c) of the Magnuson-Stevens
Act, to increase the butterfish ABC for
the 2011 fishing year (FY) from 1,500 mt
to 1,811 mt, and applies the increase to
the butterfish mortality cap in the Loligo
squid fishery immediately. This action
revises the butterfish ABC in the Final
2011 Specifications for the MSB Fishery
Management Plan (FMP) (76 FR 8306;
February 14, 2011).
Butterfish catches have been
constrained to low levels since the ABC
was reduced to 4,545 mt in 2005, and
then to 1,500 mt in 2008. ABC
reductions were in response to the
results of the 38th Stock Assessment
Workshop (SAW 38) in 2004, which
determined the butterfish stock was
overfished. The Mid-Atlantic Fishery
Management Council (Council)
developed Amendment 10 to the FMP
in response to SAW 38; Amendment 10
VerDate Mar<15>2010
13:15 Mar 14, 2011
Jkt 223001
enacted a rebuilding program for
butterfish, as well as measures to reduce
butterfish bycatch in the Loligo squid
fishery. The most notable bycatch
reduction measure in Amendment 10 is
the butterfish mortality cap on the
Loligo squid fishery, which went into
effect on January 1, 2011. The cap is 75
percent of the butterfish ABC, and
closes the directed Loligo squid fishery
once it is attained.
The most recent butterfish
assessment, SAW 49 (January 2010),
determined that the status of the
butterfish stock is unknown. Though the
assessment was inconclusive, it did
verify that long-term declines in the
butterfish stock persisted even in the
absence of fishing pressure, which
suggests that fishing mortality may not
be a major factor impacting the stock.
The estimates of butterfish fishing
mortality and total biomass resulting
from SAW 49 were highly uncertain,
and the final assessment report stated
that it would be inappropriate to
compare the previous status
determination criteria from SAW 38
with the current assessment estimates of
spawning stock biomass and fishing
mortality, because measures of
population abundance in the current
assessment were scaled much higher
than those in the previous assessment.
In May 2010, the Council’s Scientific
and Statistical Committee (SSC)
reviewed the SAW 49 results and other
available information, including the
Northeast Fisheries Science Center’s
(NEFSC) Autumn 2009 trawl survey
indices for butterfish and, due to
uncertainty in the assessment,
recommended setting the butterfish
ABC at the status quo level of 1,500 mt
for FY 2011.
The Council used the SSC’s
recommended butterfish ABC as the
basis for 2011 specifications, and
submitted their recommendations and
supporting analysis to NMFS in July
2010. NMFS went on to recommend the
1,500-mt butterfish ABC in the proposed
rule for 2011 MSB Specifications in
November 2010. During public
comment on the proposed
specifications, industry members
expressed concern that the low
butterfish ABC would cause the directed
Loligo squid fishery to be closed before
the fleet was able to access much of the
Loligo squid quota. Commenters also
pointed to recent information from the
NEFSC Autumn 2009 and 2010 trawl
survey that showed butterfish catches
almost twice the average for the last
decade (6.41 kg/tow for 2009; 5.59 kg/
tow for 2010; average 3.4 kg/tow from
1999–2008). However, based on the
SSC’s recommended ABC, which was
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
adopted by the Council, NMFS
implemented the 1,500-mt ABC for
butterfish in the final MSB
specifications in February 2011.
Because the NEFSC Autumn 2010
trawl survey information was not
available during the SSC’s initial
deliberations in May 2010, the SSC met
on February 7, 2011, to consider
whether the new information warranted
an adjustment to their previous
recommended butterfish ABC for 2011.
The SSC reviewed inshore butterfish
survey data from the Northeast Area
Monitoring and Assessment Program
(NEAMAP), as well as landings
information for butterfish through 2010.
The SSC also reviewed the past
justification for the establishment of the
1,500-mt ABC.
The SSC noted the high uncertainty
about the scale of the current stock
biomass, which made it difficult to
assess the risk of the lower range of ABC
values for 2011 that were previously
considered in its May 2010
deliberations. It stated that, while
establishing an ABC based on average
landings over a given time period is
justifiable in some situations where
stock size is uncertain, it would be
inappropriate to continue to use this
method in the case of butterfish, given
the long-term declining trend in stock
abundance. However, the SSC went on
to recommend that the Council adjust
the 2011 butterfish ABC to 1,811 mt,
based on a revised method that
considers realized landings and discards
from 2002–2008, a time period during
which butterfish catch history was
dominated principally by discards. This
is in contrast to the method that was
initially used to set the ABC at 1,500 mt
in 2008, which relied on an estimated
level of discards associated with average
landings over a slightly different
timeframe. The SSC also noted that
butterfish catches in NEFSC Autumn
trawl surveys from 2002–2008 appeared
relatively stable.
Based on the SSC’s recommendation,
the Council requested at its February
2011 meeting that NMFS take an
emergency action to adjust the
butterfish ABC to 1,811 mt and apply
the increase to the mortality cap for the
Loligo squid fishery. The duration of
this action is limited by the MagnusonStevens Act to 180 days; however,
NMFS will re-evaluate the status of the
fishery at the end of 180 days and may
extend this action in order to make the
catch limits effective for the duration of
the FY (through December 31, 2011),
consistent with the authority in the
Magnuson-Stevens Act to extend
emergency actions for up to an
additional 186 days.
E:\FR\FM\15MRR1.SGM
15MRR1
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 50 / Tuesday, March 15, 2011 / Rules and Regulations
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with RULES
NMFS policy guidelines for the use of
emergency rules (62 FR 44421; August
21, 1997) specify the following three
criteria that define what an emergency
situation is, and justification for final
rulemaking: (1) The emergency results
from recent, unforeseen events or
recently discovered circumstances;
(2) the emergency presents serious
conservation or management problems
in the fishery; and (3) the emergency
can be addressed through emergency
regulations for which the immediate
benefits outweigh the value of advance
notice, public comment, and
deliberative consideration of the
impacts on participants to the same
extent as would be expected under the
normal rulemaking process. NMFS
policy guidelines further provide that
emergency action is justified for certain
situations where emergency action
would prevent significant direct
economic loss, or to preserve a
significant economic opportunity that
otherwise might be foregone.
The new information from the
Autumn 2010 survey and the more
recent NEAMAP survey results are
recently discovered circumstance and
represent the best available science. To
not take into account the new scientific
advice in a timely manner has the
potential to present serious management
problems in the Loligo fishery. The
Loligo squid fishery is particularly
active during the first Trimester of the
fishing year (January–April). Swift
implementation of the modified ABC,
consistent with the new SSC
recommendation, is critical to the Loligo
fleet due to the timing of fleet activity,
and the history of interactions between
Loligo squid and butterfish. It is
intended to provide the Loligo squid
fleet additional access to Loligo squid
quota during the FY. It would also
enable the Loligo squid fleet to optimize
Loligo squid harvest with reduced
concern that that fishery could be closed
due to the butterfish mortality cap.
Therefore, this emergency action will
reduce the likelihood of disruption to
the Loligo squid fishery that would be
caused by the existing butterfish cap.
Addressing this through Council action,
rather than through Secretarial
emergency authority, would take most
VerDate Mar<15>2010
13:15 Mar 14, 2011
Jkt 223001
of the year, and would likely result in
implementing measures well after the
existing butterfish cap could have
closed the Loligo squid fishery. The
benefit of increasing the butterfish ABC
and applying the increase to the
butterfish mortality cap through this
emergency action will be immediate to
the Loligo fleet, and therefore outweighs
the value of going through the normal
rulemaking process.
This emergency action increases the
butterfish ABC previously implemented
for the FY 2011 from 1,500 mt to 1,811
mt. Other specifications for butterfish,
specifically, initial optimum yield
(IOY), domestic annual harvest (DAH),
domestic annual processing (DAP), joint
venture processing (JVP), total allowable
level of foreign fishing (TALFF), and
research set-aside (RSA) are unchanged
from those set in the final 2011
specifications. Specifications for
Atlantic mackerel, Loligo squid, and
Illex squid also remain unchanged.
Amendment 10 specified that the
butterfish mortality cap is to be set
equal to 75 percent of the butterfish
ABC, with the remaining 25 percent of
the butterfish ABC allocated to account
for butterfish catch in other fisheries,
but noted that this apportionment may
be revised as necessary to accommodate
the Loligo squid fishery. The additional
311-mt ABC allotment implemented
through this action is entirely allocated
to the mortality cap. Under the current
2011 specifications, the butterfish
mortality cap is 1,125 mt (75 percent of
1,500 mt); this emergency action
increases the butterfish mortality cap to
1,436 mt.
Classification
NMFS has determined that this rule is
necessary to respond to an emergency
situation and is consistent with the
Magnuson-Stevens Act and other
applicable law.
The Assistant Administrator for
Fisheries, NOAA, finds good cause
under section 553(b)(B) of the
Administrative Procedure Act that it is
impracticable and contrary to the public
interest to provide for prior notice and
opportunity for the public to comment.
As more fully explained above, the
reasons justifying promulgation of this
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 9990
13889
rule on an emergency basis make
solicitation of public comment contrary
to the public interest. This action
provides the benefit of allowing the
Loligo fleet to optimize its harvest, with
less concern that the fishery could be
closed due to the butterfish mortality
cap. This action did not allow for prior
public comment because the scientific
review process and determination could
not have been completed any earlier,
due to the inherent time constraints
associated with the process and the fact
that the information on which this
action is based became available very
recently.
If this rulemaking were delayed to
allow for notice and comment, the
current butterfish mortality cap could be
reached, which would have the effect of
shutting down the directed Loligo
fishery for the remainder of Trimester 1
(January–April). The time necessary to
provide for prior notice, opportunity for
public comment, and delayed
effectiveness for this action could have
resulted in closing the Loligo fishery
due to the low limit of the current
butterfish mortality cap. In the interest
of receiving public input on this action,
the revised assessment upon which this
action was based is made available to
the public, and this action requests
public comments on that document and
the provisions in this rule.
For the reason above, the Assistant
Administrator for Fisheries finds good
cause under section 553(d) of the
Administrative Procedure Act to waive
the 30-day delay in effectiveness.
This emergency rule has been
determined to be not significant for
purposes of E.O. 12866.
This rule is exempt from the
procedures of the Regulatory Flexibility
Act to prepare a regulatory flexibility
analysis because the rule is issued
without opportunity for prior public
comment.
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.
Dated: March 10, 2011.
Samuel D. Rauch III,
Deputy Assistant Administrator for
Regulatory Programs, National Marine
Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 2011–5995 Filed 3–14–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–22–P
E:\FR\FM\15MRR1.SGM
15MRR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 50 (Tuesday, March 15, 2011)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 13887-13889]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-5995]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
50 CFR Part 648
[Docket No. 110218149-1182-01]
RIN 0648-BA86
Fisheries of the Northeastern United States; Atlantic Mackerel,
Squid, and Butterfish (MSB) Fishery; Revision of 2011 Butterfish
Specifications
AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.
ACTION: Temporary rule; request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: NMFS issues this temporary rule pursuant to its authority to
issue emergency measures under the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery
Conservation and Management Act (Magnuson-Stevens Act). This emergency
action increases the butterfish allowable biological catch (ABC) for
the 2011 fishing year from 1,500 mt to 1,811 mt, and applies the
increase to the butterfish mortality cap in the Loligo squid fishery,
based on the most recent and best available scientific information.
DATES: Effective March 15, 2011, through September 12, 2011. Comments
must be received by April 14, 2011.
ADDRESSES: The supplemental EA is available by request from: Patricia
Kurkul, Regional Administrator,
[[Page 13888]]
National Marine Fisheries Service, Northeast Region, 55 Great Republic
Drive, Gloucester, MA 01930-2276, or via the Internet at https://www.nero.noaa.gov.
You may submit comments, identified by RIN 0648-BA86, by any one of
the following methods:
Electronic Submissions: Submit all electronic public
comments via the Federal e-Rulemaking portal https://www.regulations.gov;
Fax: (978) 281-9135, Attn: Aja Peters-Mason;
Mail to NMFS, Northeast Regional Office, 55 Great Republic
Dr, Gloucester, MA 01930. Mark the outside of the envelope ``Comments
on Emergency Rule to Revise the Butterfish Specifications.''
Instructions: All comments received are a part of the public record
and will generally be posted to https://www.regulations.gov without
change. All Personal Identifying Information (for example, name,
address, etc.) voluntarily submitted by the commenter may be publicly
accessible. Do not submit Confidential Business Information or
otherwise sensitive or protected information.
NMFS will accept anonymous comments (enter N/A in the required
fields, if you wish to remain anonymous). You may submit attachments to
electronic comments in Microsoft Word, Excel, WordPerfect, or Adobe PDF
file formats only.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Aja Peters-Mason, Fishery Policy
Analyst, (978) 281-9195, fax (978) 281-9135.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
This temporary rule implements emergency measures, authorized by
section 305(c) of the Magnuson-Stevens Act, to increase the butterfish
ABC for the 2011 fishing year (FY) from 1,500 mt to 1,811 mt, and
applies the increase to the butterfish mortality cap in the Loligo
squid fishery immediately. This action revises the butterfish ABC in
the Final 2011 Specifications for the MSB Fishery Management Plan (FMP)
(76 FR 8306; February 14, 2011).
Butterfish catches have been constrained to low levels since the
ABC was reduced to 4,545 mt in 2005, and then to 1,500 mt in 2008. ABC
reductions were in response to the results of the 38th Stock Assessment
Workshop (SAW 38) in 2004, which determined the butterfish stock was
overfished. The Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management Council (Council)
developed Amendment 10 to the FMP in response to SAW 38; Amendment 10
enacted a rebuilding program for butterfish, as well as measures to
reduce butterfish bycatch in the Loligo squid fishery. The most notable
bycatch reduction measure in Amendment 10 is the butterfish mortality
cap on the Loligo squid fishery, which went into effect on January 1,
2011. The cap is 75 percent of the butterfish ABC, and closes the
directed Loligo squid fishery once it is attained.
The most recent butterfish assessment, SAW 49 (January 2010),
determined that the status of the butterfish stock is unknown. Though
the assessment was inconclusive, it did verify that long-term declines
in the butterfish stock persisted even in the absence of fishing
pressure, which suggests that fishing mortality may not be a major
factor impacting the stock. The estimates of butterfish fishing
mortality and total biomass resulting from SAW 49 were highly
uncertain, and the final assessment report stated that it would be
inappropriate to compare the previous status determination criteria
from SAW 38 with the current assessment estimates of spawning stock
biomass and fishing mortality, because measures of population abundance
in the current assessment were scaled much higher than those in the
previous assessment. In May 2010, the Council's Scientific and
Statistical Committee (SSC) reviewed the SAW 49 results and other
available information, including the Northeast Fisheries Science
Center's (NEFSC) Autumn 2009 trawl survey indices for butterfish and,
due to uncertainty in the assessment, recommended setting the
butterfish ABC at the status quo level of 1,500 mt for FY 2011.
The Council used the SSC's recommended butterfish ABC as the basis
for 2011 specifications, and submitted their recommendations and
supporting analysis to NMFS in July 2010. NMFS went on to recommend the
1,500-mt butterfish ABC in the proposed rule for 2011 MSB
Specifications in November 2010. During public comment on the proposed
specifications, industry members expressed concern that the low
butterfish ABC would cause the directed Loligo squid fishery to be
closed before the fleet was able to access much of the Loligo squid
quota. Commenters also pointed to recent information from the NEFSC
Autumn 2009 and 2010 trawl survey that showed butterfish catches almost
twice the average for the last decade (6.41 kg/tow for 2009; 5.59 kg/
tow for 2010; average 3.4 kg/tow from 1999-2008). However, based on the
SSC's recommended ABC, which was adopted by the Council, NMFS
implemented the 1,500-mt ABC for butterfish in the final MSB
specifications in February 2011.
Because the NEFSC Autumn 2010 trawl survey information was not
available during the SSC's initial deliberations in May 2010, the SSC
met on February 7, 2011, to consider whether the new information
warranted an adjustment to their previous recommended butterfish ABC
for 2011. The SSC reviewed inshore butterfish survey data from the
Northeast Area Monitoring and Assessment Program (NEAMAP), as well as
landings information for butterfish through 2010. The SSC also reviewed
the past justification for the establishment of the 1,500-mt ABC.
The SSC noted the high uncertainty about the scale of the current
stock biomass, which made it difficult to assess the risk of the lower
range of ABC values for 2011 that were previously considered in its May
2010 deliberations. It stated that, while establishing an ABC based on
average landings over a given time period is justifiable in some
situations where stock size is uncertain, it would be inappropriate to
continue to use this method in the case of butterfish, given the long-
term declining trend in stock abundance. However, the SSC went on to
recommend that the Council adjust the 2011 butterfish ABC to 1,811 mt,
based on a revised method that considers realized landings and discards
from 2002-2008, a time period during which butterfish catch history was
dominated principally by discards. This is in contrast to the method
that was initially used to set the ABC at 1,500 mt in 2008, which
relied on an estimated level of discards associated with average
landings over a slightly different timeframe. The SSC also noted that
butterfish catches in NEFSC Autumn trawl surveys from 2002-2008
appeared relatively stable.
Based on the SSC's recommendation, the Council requested at its
February 2011 meeting that NMFS take an emergency action to adjust the
butterfish ABC to 1,811 mt and apply the increase to the mortality cap
for the Loligo squid fishery. The duration of this action is limited by
the Magnuson-Stevens Act to 180 days; however, NMFS will re-evaluate
the status of the fishery at the end of 180 days and may extend this
action in order to make the catch limits effective for the duration of
the FY (through December 31, 2011), consistent with the authority in
the Magnuson-Stevens Act to extend emergency actions for up to an
additional 186 days.
[[Page 13889]]
NMFS policy guidelines for the use of emergency rules (62 FR 44421;
August 21, 1997) specify the following three criteria that define what
an emergency situation is, and justification for final rulemaking: (1)
The emergency results from recent, unforeseen events or recently
discovered circumstances; (2) the emergency presents serious
conservation or management problems in the fishery; and (3) the
emergency can be addressed through emergency regulations for which the
immediate benefits outweigh the value of advance notice, public
comment, and deliberative consideration of the impacts on participants
to the same extent as would be expected under the normal rulemaking
process. NMFS policy guidelines further provide that emergency action
is justified for certain situations where emergency action would
prevent significant direct economic loss, or to preserve a significant
economic opportunity that otherwise might be foregone.
The new information from the Autumn 2010 survey and the more recent
NEAMAP survey results are recently discovered circumstance and
represent the best available science. To not take into account the new
scientific advice in a timely manner has the potential to present
serious management problems in the Loligo fishery. The Loligo squid
fishery is particularly active during the first Trimester of the
fishing year (January-April). Swift implementation of the modified ABC,
consistent with the new SSC recommendation, is critical to the Loligo
fleet due to the timing of fleet activity, and the history of
interactions between Loligo squid and butterfish. It is intended to
provide the Loligo squid fleet additional access to Loligo squid quota
during the FY. It would also enable the Loligo squid fleet to optimize
Loligo squid harvest with reduced concern that that fishery could be
closed due to the butterfish mortality cap. Therefore, this emergency
action will reduce the likelihood of disruption to the Loligo squid
fishery that would be caused by the existing butterfish cap. Addressing
this through Council action, rather than through Secretarial emergency
authority, would take most of the year, and would likely result in
implementing measures well after the existing butterfish cap could have
closed the Loligo squid fishery. The benefit of increasing the
butterfish ABC and applying the increase to the butterfish mortality
cap through this emergency action will be immediate to the Loligo
fleet, and therefore outweighs the value of going through the normal
rulemaking process.
This emergency action increases the butterfish ABC previously
implemented for the FY 2011 from 1,500 mt to 1,811 mt. Other
specifications for butterfish, specifically, initial optimum yield
(IOY), domestic annual harvest (DAH), domestic annual processing (DAP),
joint venture processing (JVP), total allowable level of foreign
fishing (TALFF), and research set-aside (RSA) are unchanged from those
set in the final 2011 specifications. Specifications for Atlantic
mackerel, Loligo squid, and Illex squid also remain unchanged.
Amendment 10 specified that the butterfish mortality cap is to be
set equal to 75 percent of the butterfish ABC, with the remaining 25
percent of the butterfish ABC allocated to account for butterfish catch
in other fisheries, but noted that this apportionment may be revised as
necessary to accommodate the Loligo squid fishery. The additional 311-
mt ABC allotment implemented through this action is entirely allocated
to the mortality cap. Under the current 2011 specifications, the
butterfish mortality cap is 1,125 mt (75 percent of 1,500 mt); this
emergency action increases the butterfish mortality cap to 1,436 mt.
Classification
NMFS has determined that this rule is necessary to respond to an
emergency situation and is consistent with the Magnuson-Stevens Act and
other applicable law.
The Assistant Administrator for Fisheries, NOAA, finds good cause
under section 553(b)(B) of the Administrative Procedure Act that it is
impracticable and contrary to the public interest to provide for prior
notice and opportunity for the public to comment. As more fully
explained above, the reasons justifying promulgation of this rule on an
emergency basis make solicitation of public comment contrary to the
public interest. This action provides the benefit of allowing the
Loligo fleet to optimize its harvest, with less concern that the
fishery could be closed due to the butterfish mortality cap. This
action did not allow for prior public comment because the scientific
review process and determination could not have been completed any
earlier, due to the inherent time constraints associated with the
process and the fact that the information on which this action is based
became available very recently.
If this rulemaking were delayed to allow for notice and comment,
the current butterfish mortality cap could be reached, which would have
the effect of shutting down the directed Loligo fishery for the
remainder of Trimester 1 (January-April). The time necessary to provide
for prior notice, opportunity for public comment, and delayed
effectiveness for this action could have resulted in closing the Loligo
fishery due to the low limit of the current butterfish mortality cap.
In the interest of receiving public input on this action, the revised
assessment upon which this action was based is made available to the
public, and this action requests public comments on that document and
the provisions in this rule.
For the reason above, the Assistant Administrator for Fisheries
finds good cause under section 553(d) of the Administrative Procedure
Act to waive the 30-day delay in effectiveness.
This emergency rule has been determined to be not significant for
purposes of E.O. 12866.
This rule is exempt from the procedures of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act to prepare a regulatory flexibility analysis because
the rule is issued without opportunity for prior public comment.
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.
Dated: March 10, 2011.
Samuel D. Rauch III,
Deputy Assistant Administrator for Regulatory Programs, National Marine
Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 2011-5995 Filed 3-14-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-P