Proposed Flood Elevation Determinations, 13569-13570 [2011-5818]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 49 / Monday, March 14, 2011 / Proposed Rules
CTG for flat wood paneling surface
coating processes does not have tribal
implications as specified by Executive
Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9,
2000), because the SIP is not approved
to apply in Indian country located in the
state, and EPA notes that it will not
impose substantial direct costs on tribal
governments or preempt tribal law.
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Ozone, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Volatile
organic compounds.
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Dated: March 1, 2011.
W.C. Early,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region III.
[FR Doc. 2011–5796 Filed 3–11–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R03–OAR–2010–0903; FRL–9278–6]
Approval and Promulgation of Air
Quality Implementation Plans; Virginia;
Revisions to the Open Burning
Regulations
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
EPA proposes to approve the
State Implementation Plan (SIP)
revision submitted by the
Commonwealth of Virginia. The
revisions recodify the open burning
regulations which are currently in the
Virginia SIP. There are no substantive
changes to the rule. In the Final Rules
section of this Federal Register, EPA is
approving Virginia’s SIP submittal as a
direct final rule without prior proposal
because the Agency views this as a
noncontroversial submittal and
anticipates no adverse comments. A
detailed rationale for the approval is set
forth in the direct final rule. If no
adverse comments are received in
response to this action, no further
activity is contemplated. If EPA receives
adverse comments, the direct final rule
will be withdrawn and all public
comments received will be addressed in
a subsequent final rule based on this
proposed rule. EPA will not institute a
second comment period. Any parties
interested in commenting on this action
should do so at this time.
DATES: Comments must be received in
writing by April 13, 2011.
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with PROPOSALS-1
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:53 Mar 11, 2011
Jkt 223001
Submit your comments,
identified by Docket ID Number EPA–
R03–OAR–2010–0903 by one of the
following methods:
A. https://www.regulations.gov. Follow
the on-line instructions for submitting
comments.
B. E-mail: frankford.harold@epa.gov.
C. Mail: EPA–R03–OAR–2010–0902,
Harold A. Frankford, Air Protection
Division, Mailcode 3AP00, U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency,
Region III, 1650 Arch Street,
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103.
D. Hand Delivery: At the previouslylisted EPA Region III address. Such
deliveries are only accepted during the
Docket’s normal hours of operation, and
special arrangements should be made
for deliveries of boxed information.
Instructions: Direct your comments to
Docket ID No. EPA–R03–OAR–2010–
0903. EPA’s policy is that all comments
received will be included in the public
docket without change, and may be
made available online at https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information provided, unless
the comment includes information
claimed to be Confidential Business
Information (CBI) or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Do not submit information that you
consider to be CBI or otherwise
protected through https://
www.regulations.gov or e-mail. The
https://www.regulations.gov Web site is
an ‘‘anonymous access’’ system, which
means EPA will not know your identity
or contact information unless you
provide it in the body of your comment.
If you send an e-mail comment directly
to EPA without going through https://
www.regulations.gov, your e-mail
address will be automatically captured
and included as part of the comment
that is placed in the public docket and
made available on the Internet. If you
submit an electronic comment, EPA
recommends that you include your
name and other contact information in
the body of your comment and with any
disk or CD–ROM you submit. If EPA
cannot read your comment due to
technical difficulties and cannot contact
you for clarification, EPA may not be
able to consider your comment.
Electronic files should avoid the use of
special characters, any form of
encryption, and be free of any defects or
viruses.
Docket: All documents in the
electronic docket are listed in the
https://www.regulations.gov index.
Although listed in the index, some
information is not publicly available,
i.e., CBI or other information whose
disclosure is restricted by statute.
Certain other material, such as
ADDRESSES:
PO 00000
Frm 00044
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
13569
copyrighted material, is not placed on
the Internet and will be publicly
available only in hard copy form.
Publicly available docket materials are
available either electronically in https://
www.regulations.gov or in hard copy
during normal business hours at the Air
Protection Division, U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, Region III, 1650
Arch Street, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
19103. Copies of the State submittal are
available at the Virginia Department of
Environmental Quality, 629 East Main
Street, Richmond, Virginia 23219.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Harold A. Frankford, (215) 814–2108, or
by e-mail at frankford.harold@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: For
further information, please see the
information provided in the direct final
action, with the same title, that is
located in the ‘‘Rules and Regulations’’
section of this Federal Register
publication. Please note that if EPA
receives adverse comment on an
amendment, paragraph, or section of
this rule and if that provision may be
severed from the remainder of the rule,
EPA may adopt as final those provisions
of the rule that are not the subject of an
adverse comment.
Dated: March 1, 2011.
W.C. Early,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region III.
[FR Doc. 2011–5621 Filed 3–11–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Federal Emergency Management
Agency
44 CFR Part 67
[Docket ID FEMA–2010–0003; Internal
Agency Docket No. FEMA–B–1155]
Proposed Flood Elevation
Determinations
Federal Emergency
Management Agency, DHS.
ACTION: Proposed rule; correction.
AGENCY:
On November 9, 2010, FEMA
published in the Federal Register a
proposed rule that included erroneous
Base Flood Elevation (BFE) location
descriptions for the Cartecay River in
Gilmer County, Georgia. The location
description for the proposed BFE of
1,290 feet, referenced to the North
American Vertical Datum of 1988,
should have located the proposed BFE
as being approximately 1.12 miles
upstream of Holt Bridge Road; and the
location description for the proposed
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\14MRP1.SGM
14MRP1
13570
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 49 / Monday, March 14, 2011 / Proposed Rules
BFE of 1,519 feet, referenced to the
North American Vertical Datum of 1988,
should have located the proposed BFE
as being approximately 0.24 mile
upstream of the Owltown Creek
confluence.
Comments pertaining to the
location descriptions for the Cartecay
River BFEs are to be submitted on or
before June 13, 2011.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments,
identified by Docket No. FEMA–B–
1155, to Luis Rodriguez, Chief,
Engineering Management Branch,
Federal Insurance and Mitigation
Administration, Federal Emergency
Management Agency, 500 C Street SW.,
Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646–4064
or (e-mail) luis.rodriguez1@dhs.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Luis
Rodriguez, Chief, Engineering
Management Branch, Federal Insurance
and Mitigation Administration, Federal
Emergency Management Agency, 500 C
Street SW., Washington, DC 20472,
(202) 646–4064 or (e-mail)
luis.rodriguez1@dhs.gov.
DATES:
The
Federal Emergency Management Agency
(FEMA) publishes proposed
determinations of Base (1% annualchance) Flood Elevations (BFEs) and
modified BFEs for communities
participating in the National Flood
Insurance Program (NFIP), in
accordance with section 110 of the
Flood Disaster Protection Act of 1973,
42 U.S.C. 4104, and 44 CFR 67.4(a).
These proposed BFEs and modified
BFEs, together with the floodplain
management criteria required by 44 CFR
60.3, are minimum requirements. They
should not be construed to mean that
the community must change any
existing ordinances that are more
stringent in their floodplain
management requirements. The
community may at any time enact
stricter requirements of its own or
pursuant to policies established by other
Federal, State, or regional entities.
These proposed elevations are used to
meet the floodplain management
requirements of the NFIP and also are
used to calculate the appropriate flood
insurance premium rates for new
buildings built after these elevations are
made final, and for the contents in those
buildings.
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with PROPOSALS-1
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Correction
In the proposed rule published at 75
FR 68744, in the November 9, 2010,
issue of the Federal Register, FEMA
published a table under the authority of
44 CFR 67.4. The table, entitled ‘‘Gilmer
County, Georgia, and Incorporated
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:53 Mar 11, 2011
Jkt 223001
Areas’’ addressed the flooding source
Cartecay River.
The proposed rule listed the location
description for the proposed BFE of
1,290 feet, referenced to the North
American Vertical Datum of 1988, as
being approximately 0.24 mile upstream
of the confluence with Owltown Creek.
The correct location of this proposed
BFE is approximately 1.12 miles
upstream of Holt Bridge Road. The
proposed rule also listed the location
description for the proposed BFE of
1,519 feet, referenced to the North
American Vertical Datum of 1988, as
being approximately 1.12 miles
upstream of Holt Bridge Road. The
correct location of this proposed BFE is
approximately 0.24 mile upstream of the
Owltown Creek confluence.
This proposed rule correction is
reopening the comment period for the
Cartecay River, for the locations of the
proposed BFEs of 1,290 feet and 1,519
feet, both referenced to the North
American Vertical Datum of 1988, due
to the error in listing the location
descriptions for these BFEs in the
previously published proposed rule at
75 FR 68744.
AGENCY:
affected for Sanpete County, Utah, and
Incorporated Areas. Specifically, it
addresses the flooding source South
Creek.
DATES: Comments are to be submitted
on or before June 13, 2011.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments,
identified by Docket No. FEMA–B–
1069, to Luis Rodriguez, Chief,
Engineering Management Branch,
Federal Insurance and Mitigation
Administration, Federal Emergency
Management Agency, 500 C Street SW.,
Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646–4064
or (e-mail) luis.rodriguez1@dhs.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Luis
Rodriguez, Chief, Engineering
Management Branch, Federal Insurance
and Mitigation Administration, Federal
Emergency Management Agency, 500 C
Street SW., Washington, DC 20472,
(202) 646–4064 or (e-mail)
luis.rodriguez1@dhs.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
Federal Emergency Management Agency
(FEMA) publishes proposed
determinations of Base (1% annualchance) Flood Elevations (BFEs) and
modified BFEs for communities
participating in the National Flood
Insurance Program (NFIP), in
accordance with section 110 of the
Flood Disaster Protection Act of 1973,
42 U.S.C. 4104, and 44 CFR 67.4(a).
These proposed BFEs and modified
BFEs, together with the floodplain
management criteria required by 44 CFR
60.3, are minimum requirements. They
should not be construed to mean that
the community must change any
existing ordinances that are more
stringent in their floodplain
management requirements. The
community may at any time enact
stricter requirements of its own or
pursuant to policies established by other
Federal, State, or regional entities.
These proposed elevations are used to
meet the floodplain management
requirements of the NFIP and also are
used to calculate the appropriate flood
insurance premium rates for new
buildings built after these elevations are
made final, and for the contents in those
buildings.
On September 15, 2009,
FEMA published in the Federal Register
a proposed rule that contained an
erroneous table. This notice provides
corrections to that table, to be used in
lieu of the information published at 74
FR 47169. The table provided here
represents the flooding sources, location
of referenced elevations, effective and
modified elevations, and communities
Correction
In the proposed rule published at 74
FR 47169, in the September 15, 2009,
issue of the Federal Register, FEMA
published a table under the authority of
44 CFR 67.4. The table, entitled
‘‘Sanpete County, Utah, and
Incorporated Areas’’ addressed the
flooding source South Creek. That table
contained inaccurate information as to
the location of referenced elevation,
effective and modified elevation in feet,
(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance No.
97.022, ‘‘Flood Insurance.’’)
Dated: March 4, 2011.
Sandra K. Knight,
Deputy Federal Insurance and Mitigation
Administrator, Mitigation, Department of
Homeland Security, Federal Emergency
Management Agency.
[FR Doc. 2011–5818 Filed 3–11–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–12–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Federal Emergency Management
Agency
44 CFR Part 67
[Docket ID FEMA–2008–0020; Internal
Agency Docket No. FEMA–B–1069]
Proposed Flood Elevation
Determinations
Federal Emergency
Management Agency, DHS.
ACTION: Proposed rule; correction.
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00045
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
E:\FR\FM\14MRP1.SGM
14MRP1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 49 (Monday, March 14, 2011)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 13569-13570]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-5818]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Federal Emergency Management Agency
44 CFR Part 67
[Docket ID FEMA-2010-0003; Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-B-1155]
Proposed Flood Elevation Determinations
AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.
ACTION: Proposed rule; correction.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: On November 9, 2010, FEMA published in the Federal Register a
proposed rule that included erroneous Base Flood Elevation (BFE)
location descriptions for the Cartecay River in Gilmer County, Georgia.
The location description for the proposed BFE of 1,290 feet, referenced
to the North American Vertical Datum of 1988, should have located the
proposed BFE as being approximately 1.12 miles upstream of Holt Bridge
Road; and the location description for the proposed
[[Page 13570]]
BFE of 1,519 feet, referenced to the North American Vertical Datum of
1988, should have located the proposed BFE as being approximately 0.24
mile upstream of the Owltown Creek confluence.
DATES: Comments pertaining to the location descriptions for the
Cartecay River BFEs are to be submitted on or before June 13, 2011.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, identified by Docket No. FEMA-B-
1155, to Luis Rodriguez, Chief, Engineering Management Branch, Federal
Insurance and Mitigation Administration, Federal Emergency Management
Agency, 500 C Street SW., Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-4064 or (e-
mail) luis.rodriguez1@dhs.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Luis Rodriguez, Chief, Engineering
Management Branch, Federal Insurance and Mitigation Administration,
Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street SW., Washington, DC
20472, (202) 646-4064 or (e-mail) luis.rodriguez1@dhs.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Federal Emergency Management Agency
(FEMA) publishes proposed determinations of Base (1% annual-chance)
Flood Elevations (BFEs) and modified BFEs for communities participating
in the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP), in accordance with
section 110 of the Flood Disaster Protection Act of 1973, 42 U.S.C.
4104, and 44 CFR 67.4(a).
These proposed BFEs and modified BFEs, together with the floodplain
management criteria required by 44 CFR 60.3, are minimum requirements.
They should not be construed to mean that the community must change any
existing ordinances that are more stringent in their floodplain
management requirements. The community may at any time enact stricter
requirements of its own or pursuant to policies established by other
Federal, State, or regional entities. These proposed elevations are
used to meet the floodplain management requirements of the NFIP and
also are used to calculate the appropriate flood insurance premium
rates for new buildings built after these elevations are made final,
and for the contents in those buildings.
Correction
In the proposed rule published at 75 FR 68744, in the November 9,
2010, issue of the Federal Register, FEMA published a table under the
authority of 44 CFR 67.4. The table, entitled ``Gilmer County, Georgia,
and Incorporated Areas'' addressed the flooding source Cartecay River.
The proposed rule listed the location description for the proposed
BFE of 1,290 feet, referenced to the North American Vertical Datum of
1988, as being approximately 0.24 mile upstream of the confluence with
Owltown Creek. The correct location of this proposed BFE is
approximately 1.12 miles upstream of Holt Bridge Road. The proposed
rule also listed the location description for the proposed BFE of 1,519
feet, referenced to the North American Vertical Datum of 1988, as being
approximately 1.12 miles upstream of Holt Bridge Road. The correct
location of this proposed BFE is approximately 0.24 mile upstream of
the Owltown Creek confluence.
This proposed rule correction is reopening the comment period for
the Cartecay River, for the locations of the proposed BFEs of 1,290
feet and 1,519 feet, both referenced to the North American Vertical
Datum of 1988, due to the error in listing the location descriptions
for these BFEs in the previously published proposed rule at 75 FR
68744.
(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance No. 97.022, ``Flood
Insurance.'')
Dated: March 4, 2011.
Sandra K. Knight,
Deputy Federal Insurance and Mitigation Administrator, Mitigation,
Department of Homeland Security, Federal Emergency Management Agency.
[FR Doc. 2011-5818 Filed 3-11-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-12-P
