Airworthiness Directives; Empresa Brasileira de Aeronautica S.A. (EMBRAER) Model ERJ 190 Airplanes, 13539-13541 [2011-5723]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 49 / Monday, March 14, 2011 / Proposed Rules
Issued in Renton, Washington, on March 4,
2011.
Kalene C. Yanamura,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane
Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2011–5722 Filed 3–11–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2011–0216; Directorate
Identifier 2010–NM–197–AD]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Empresa
Brasileira de Aeronautica S.A.
(EMBRAER) Model ERJ 190 Airplanes
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM).
AGENCY:
We propose to adopt a new
airworthiness directive (AD) for the
products listed above. This proposed
AD results from mandatory continuing
airworthiness information (MCAI)
originated by an aviation authority of
another country to identify and correct
an unsafe condition on an aviation
product. The MCAI describes the unsafe
condition as:
SUMMARY:
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with PROPOSALS-1
* * * The pylon internal shear pin was
found cracked during a regular check.
Further investigation revealed that the failure
occurred due to hydrogen embrittlement. The
ˆ
ANAC [Agencia Nacional de Aviacao Civil]
¸˜
is issuing this AD to prevent insufficient
strength of the pylon to wing attachment,
which in combination with an engine
imbalance caused by a fan blade out could
cause pylon to wing attachment failure and
consequent engine separation.
*
*
*
*
*
The proposed AD would require actions
that are intended to address the unsafe
condition described in the MCAI.
DATES: We must receive comments on
this proposed AD by April 28, 2011.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments by
any of the following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• Fax: (202) 493–2251.
• Mail: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M–
30, West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE.,
Washington, DC 20590.
• Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M–
30, West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12–40, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE.,
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:53 Mar 11, 2011
Jkt 223001
13539
Discussion
Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays.
For service information identified in
this proposed AD, contact Empresa
Brasileira de Aeronautica S.A.
(EMBRAER), Technical Publications
Section (PC 060), Av. Brigadeiro Faria
˜
Lima, 2170—Putim—12227–901 Sao
Jose dos Campos—SP—BRASIL;
telephone +55 12 3927–5852 or +55 12
3309–0732; fax +55 12 3927–7546; email distrib@embraer.com.br; Internet
https://www.flyembraer.com. You may
review copies of the referenced service
information at the FAA, Transport
Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind
Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington. For
information on the availability of this
material at the FAA, call 425–227–1221.
* * * The pylon internal shear pin was
found cracked during a regular check.
Further investigation revealed that the failure
occurred due to hydrogen embrittlement. The
ˆ
ANAC [Agencia Nacional de Aviacao Civil]
¸˜
is issuing this AD to prevent insufficient
strength of the pylon to wing attachment,
which in combination with an engine
imbalance caused by a fan blade out could
cause pylon to wing attachment failure and
consequent engine separation.
Examining the AD Docket
*
You may examine the AD docket on
the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov; or in person at the
Docket Operations office between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays. The AD docket
contains this proposed AD, the
regulatory evaluation, any comments
received, and other information. The
street address for the Docket Operations
office (telephone (800) 647–5527) is in
the ADDRESSES section. Comments will
be available in the AD docket shortly
after receipt.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Cindy Ashforth, Aerospace Engineer,
International Branch, ANM–116,
Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA,
1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton,
Washington 98057–3356; phone: 425–
227–2768; fax: 425–227–1149; e-mail:
cindy.ashforth@faa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
We invite you to send any written
relevant data, views, or arguments about
this proposed AD. Send your comments
to an address listed under the
ADDRESSES section. Include ‘‘Docket No.
FAA–2011–0216; Directorate Identifier
2010–NM–197–AD’’ at the beginning of
your comments. We specifically invite
comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy
aspects of this proposed AD. We will
consider all comments received by the
closing date and may amend this
proposed AD based on those comments.
We will post all comments we
receive, without change, to https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each
substantive verbal contact we receive
about this proposed AD.
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
ˆ
The Agencia Nacional de Aviacao
¸˜
Civil (ANAC), which is the aviation
authority for Brazil, has issued Brazilian
Airworthiness Directive 2010–08–02,
dated September 20, 2010 (referred to
after this as ‘‘the MCAI’’), to correct an
unsafe condition for the specified
products. The MCAI states:
*
*
*
*
Required actions include replacing
pylon shear pins in the rear outboard
and inboard shear pin assembly in the
right- and left-hand pylons with new
parts. You may obtain further
information by examining the MCAI in
the AD docket.
Relevant Service Information
EMBRAER has issued Service
Bulletins 190–54–0010, dated May 19,
2010; and 190LIN–54–0001, dated June
21, 2010. The actions described in this
service information are intended to
correct the unsafe condition identified
in the MCAI.
FAA’s Determination and Requirements
of This Proposed AD
This product has been approved by
the aviation authority of another
country, and is approved for operation
in the United States. Pursuant to our
bilateral agreement with the State of
Design Authority, we have been notified
of the unsafe condition described in the
MCAI and service information
referenced above. We are proposing this
AD because we evaluated all pertinent
information and determined an unsafe
condition exists and is likely to exist or
develop on other products of the same
type design.
Differences Between This AD and the
MCAI or Service Information
We have reviewed the MCAI and
related service information and, in
general, agree with their substance. But
we might have found it necessary to use
different words from those in the MCAI
to ensure the AD is clear for U.S.
operators and is enforceable. In making
these changes, we do not intend to differ
substantively from the information
provided in the MCAI and related
service information.
E:\FR\FM\14MRP1.SGM
14MRP1
13540
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 49 / Monday, March 14, 2011 / Proposed Rules
We might also have proposed
different actions in this AD from those
in the MCAI in order to follow FAA
policies. Any such differences are
highlighted in a Note within the
proposed AD.
Costs of Compliance
Based on the service information, we
estimate that this proposed AD would
affect about 73 products of U.S. registry.
We also estimate that it would take
about 10 work-hours per product to
comply with the basic requirements of
this proposed AD. The average labor
rate is $85 per work-hour. Required
parts would cost about $2,360 per
product. Where the service information
lists required parts costs that are
covered under warranty, we have
assumed that there will be no charge for
these costs. As we do not control
warranty coverage for affected parties,
some parties may incur costs higher
than estimated here. Based on these
figures, we estimate the cost of the
proposed AD on U.S. operators to be
$234,330, or $3,210 per product.
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with PROPOSALS-1
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code
specifies the FAA’s authority to issue
rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I,
section 106, describes the authority of
the FAA Administrator. ‘‘Subtitle VII:
Aviation Programs,’’ describes in more
detail the scope of the Agency’s
authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under
the authority described in ‘‘Subtitle VII,
Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701:
General requirements.’’ Under that
section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in
air commerce by prescribing regulations
for practices, methods, and procedures
the Administrator finds necessary for
safety in air commerce. This regulation
is within the scope of that authority
because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on
products identified in this rulemaking
action.
Regulatory Findings
We determined that this proposed AD
would not have federalism implications
under Executive Order 13132. This
proposed AD would not have a
substantial direct effect on the States, on
the relationship between the national
Government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I
certify this proposed regulation:
1. Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ under Executive Order 12866;
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:53 Mar 11, 2011
Jkt 223001
2. Is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under the
DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures
(44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and
3. Will not have a significant
economic impact, positive or negative,
on a substantial number of small entities
under the criteria of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act.
We prepared a regulatory evaluation
of the estimated costs to comply with
this proposed AD and placed it in the
AD docket.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation
safety, Incorporation by reference,
Safety.
The Proposed Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority
delegated to me by the Administrator,
the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part
39 as follows:
PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS
DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39
continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
§ 39.13
[Amended]
2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by adding
the following new AD:
Empresa Brasileira de Aeronautica S.A.
(EMBRAER): Docket No. FAA–2011–
0216; Directorate Identifier 2010–NM–
197–AD.
Comments Due Date
(a) We must receive comments by April 28,
2011.
Affected ADs
(b) None.
Applicability
(c) This AD applies to Empresa Brasileira
de Aeronautica S.A. (EMBRAER) Model ERJ
190–100 STD, –100 LR, –100 ECJ, and –100
IGW airplanes; and Model ERJ 190–200 STD,
–200 LR, and –200 IGW airplanes;
certificated in any category.
Subject
(d) Air Transport Association (ATA) of
America Code 54: Nacelles/Pylons.
Reason
(e) The mandatory continuing
airworthiness information (MCAI) states:
* * * The pylon internal shear pin was
found cracked during a regular check.
Further investigation revealed that the failure
occurred due to hydrogen embrittlement. The
ˆ
ANAC [Agencia Nacional de Aviacao Civil]
¸˜
is issuing this AD to prevent insufficient
strength of the pylon to wing attachment,
which in combination with an engine
imbalance caused by a fan blade out could
cause pylon to wing attachment failure and
consequent engine separation.
*
PO 00000
*
*
Frm 00015
*
Fmt 4702
*
Sfmt 4702
Compliance
(f) You are responsible for having the
actions required by this AD performed within
the compliance times specified, unless the
actions have already been done.
Replace Shear Pins
(g) For Model ERJ 190–100 STD, –100 LR,
–100 IGW; and ERJ 190–200 STD, –200 LR,
and –200 IGW airplanes: Within 3,000 flight
hours after the effective date of this AD,
replace the shear pins having part number (P/
N) 190–15178–003 and P/N 190–15181–003
in the rear outboard and inboard shear pin
assembly in the right- and left-hand pylons,
with new shear pins having P/N 190–15178–
005 and P/N 190–15181–005, respectively, in
accordance with the Accomplishment
Instructions of EMBRAER Service Bulletin
190–54–0010, dated May 19, 2010.
(h) For Model ERJ 190–100 ECJ airplanes:
Within 3,000 flight hours or within 12
months after the effective date of this AD,
whichever occurs first, replace the shear pins
having P/N 190–15178–003 and P/N 190–
15181–003, in the rear outboard and inboard
shear pin assembly in the right- and left-hand
pylons, with new shear pins having P/N 190–
15178–005 and P/N 190–15181–005,
respectively, in accordance with the
Accomplishment Instructions of EMBRAER
Service Bulletin 190LIN–54–0001, dated June
21, 2010.
FAA AD Differences
Note 1: This AD differs from the MCAI
and/or service information as follows: The
MCAI allows credit for previous installation
of internal shear pins in accordance with
EMBRAER 190 Aircraft Maintenance Manual
Task 54–50–00–400, Revision 19, dated July
15, 2010. This AD does not allow credit for
this task; however, under the provisions of
paragraph (i) of this AD, we will consider
requests for an alternative method of
compliance.
Other FAA AD Provisions
(i) The following provisions also apply to
this AD:
(1) Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs): The Manager, International
Branch, ANM–116, Transport Airplane
Directorate, FAA, has the authority to
approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested
using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19.
In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19, send your
request to your principal inspector or local
Flight Standards District Office, as
appropriate. If sending information directly
to the International Branch, send it to Attn:
Cindy Ashforth, Aerospace Engineer,
International Branch, ANM–116, Transport
Airplane Directorate, FAA, 1601 Lind
Avenue SW., Renton, Washington 98057–
3356; telephone (425) 227–2768; fax (425)
227–1149. Information may be e-mailed to:
9–ANM–116–AMOC–REQUESTS@faa.gov.
Before using any approved AMOC, notify
your appropriate principal inspector, or
lacking a principal inspector, the manager of
the local flight standards district office/
certificate holding district office. The AMOC
approval letter must specifically reference
this AD.
E:\FR\FM\14MRP1.SGM
14MRP1
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 49 / Monday, March 14, 2011 / Proposed Rules
(2) Airworthy Product: For any requirement
in this AD to obtain corrective actions from
a manufacturer or other source, use these
actions if they are FAA-approved. Corrective
actions are considered FAA-approved if they
are approved by the State of Design Authority
(or their delegated agent). You are required
to assure the product is airworthy before it
is returned to service.
Related Information
ˆ
(j) Refer to MCAI Agencia Nacional de
Aviacao Civil (ANAC) Airworthiness
¸˜
Directive 2010–08–02, dated September 20,
2010; and EMBRAER Service Bulletins 190–
54–0010, dated May 19, 2010, and 190LIN–
54–001, dated June 21, 2010; for related
information.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on March 4,
2011.
Kalene C. Yanamura,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane
Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2011–5723 Filed 3–11–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2011–0219; Directorate
Identifier 2010–NM–228–AD]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; The Boeing
Company Model 757–200, –200CB, and
–300 Series Airplanes
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM).
AGENCY:
We propose to adopt a new
airworthiness directive (AD) for the
products listed above. This proposed
AD would require modifying the door
latch fittings and witness mark placards
of the off-wing escape slide systems;
and for certain airplanes, replacing the
bearings and lockbase retainer in the
door latch assembly, relocating and
adjusting of the sensor target and the
sensor proximity switch, and testing to
ensure positive door locking and
corrective action if necessary. For
certain airplanes, this proposed AD
would also require installing a bumper
assembly and placards. This proposed
AD was prompted by reports of in-flight
loss of the off-wing escape slide. We are
proposing this AD to prevent in-flight
loss of the off-wing escape slide, which
could result in the unavailability of the
escape slide during a time-critical
evacuation. Additionally, the departed
slide could cause damage to the
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with PROPOSALS-1
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:53 Mar 11, 2011
Jkt 223001
fuselage, wing, flaps, or stabilizer,
which could degrade flight control.
DATES: We must receive comments on
this proposed AD by April 28, 2011.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments by
any of the following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• Fax: 202–493–2251.
• Mail: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M–
30, West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE.,
Washington, DC 20590.
• Hand Delivery: Deliver to Mail
address above between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays.
For service information identified in
this proposed AD, contact Boeing
Commercial Airplanes, Attention: Data
& Services Management, P. O. Box 3707,
MC 2H–65, Seattle, Washington 98124–
2207; phone: 206–544–5000, extension
1; fax: 206–766–5680; e-mail:
me.boecom@boeing.com; Internet:
ttps://
www.myboeingfleet.com. You may
review copies of the referenced service
information at the FAA, Transport
Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind
Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington. For
information on the availability of this
material at the FAA, call 425–227–1221.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on
the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov; or in person at the
Docket Management Facility between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through
Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD
docket contains this proposed AD, the
regulatory evaluation, any comments
received, and other information. The
street address for the Docket Office
(phone: 800–647–5527) is in the
ADDRESSES section. Comments will be
available in the AD docket shortly after
receipt.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Kimberly DeVoe, Aerospace Engineer,
Cabin Safety and Environmental
Systems Branch, ANM–150S, Seattle
Aircraft Certification Office (ACO),
FAA, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton,
Washington 98057–3356; phone: 425–
917–6495; fax: 425–917–6590; e-mail:
Kimberly.Devoe@faa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
We invite you to send any written
relevant data, views, or arguments about
this proposal. Send your comments to
an address listed under the ADDRESSES
section. Include ‘‘Docket No. FAA–
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
13541
2011–0219; Directorate Identifier 2010–
NM–228–AD’’ at the beginning of your
comments. We specifically invite
comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy
aspects of this proposed AD. We will
consider all comments received by the
closing date and may amend this
proposed AD because of those
comments.
We will post all comments we
receive, without change, to https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each
substantive verbal contact we receive
about this proposed AD.
Discussion
Since May 2005, four operators have
reported seven events of in-flight loss of
the off-wing escape slides. The off-wing
escape slides did not inflate in flight.
Due to latching failures of the
compartment doors for the off-wing
escape slides, in-flight maneuvering
resulted in the departure of the slides
from the airplane. The loss of the offwing escape slide could result in the
unavailability of the escape slide during
a time-critical evacuation. Additionally,
the departed slide could cause damage
to the fuselage, wing, flaps, or stabilizer,
which could degrade flight control.
Related Rulemaking
To address the in-flight loss of the offwing escape slide we issued AD 99–17–
20, Amendment 39–11266 (64 FR
45436, August 20, 1999), which was
based on Boeing Service Bulletin 757–
25–0182, Revision 1, dated June 12,
1997; and Boeing Service Bulletin 757–
25–0200, dated January 21, 1999. AD
99–17–20 requires modification of the
door latch system on the off-wing
escape slide compartment and
installation of a bumper assembly on the
bottom of the off-wing escape slide
carriers on certain Model 757–200 and
–300 series airplanes. However, it has
been shown through service history that
more corrective actions, in addition to
AD 99–17–20, are needed to correct the
unsafe condition.
Relevant Service Information
We reviewed Boeing Special
Attention Service Bulletin 757–25–
0298, dated October 16, 2008. This
service bulletin describes procedures for
modifying the forward and aft door
latch fittings for the left and right offwing escape slide systems and
modifying the witness mark placards on
the maintenance access door frames for
the left and right off-wing escape slide
systems. Additionally, this service
bulletin specifies that the following
E:\FR\FM\14MRP1.SGM
14MRP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 49 (Monday, March 14, 2011)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 13539-13541]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-5723]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA-2011-0216; Directorate Identifier 2010-NM-197-AD]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Empresa Brasileira de Aeronautica S.A.
(EMBRAER) Model ERJ 190 Airplanes
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We propose to adopt a new airworthiness directive (AD) for the
products listed above. This proposed AD results from mandatory
continuing airworthiness information (MCAI) originated by an aviation
authority of another country to identify and correct an unsafe
condition on an aviation product. The MCAI describes the unsafe
condition as:
* * * The pylon internal shear pin was found cracked during a
regular check. Further investigation revealed that the failure
occurred due to hydrogen embrittlement. The ANAC [Ag[ecirc]ncia
Nacional de Avia[ccedil][atilde]o Civil] is issuing this AD to
prevent insufficient strength of the pylon to wing attachment, which
in combination with an engine imbalance caused by a fan blade out
could cause pylon to wing attachment failure and consequent engine
separation.
* * * * *
The proposed AD would require actions that are intended to address the
unsafe condition described in the MCAI.
DATES: We must receive comments on this proposed AD by April 28, 2011.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments by any of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
Fax: (202) 493-2251.
Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590.
Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-40, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
For service information identified in this proposed AD, contact
Empresa Brasileira de Aeronautica S.A. (EMBRAER), Technical
Publications Section (PC 060), Av. Brigadeiro Faria Lima, 2170--Putim--
12227-901 S[atilde]o Jose dos Campos--SP--BRASIL; telephone +55 12
3927-5852 or +55 12 3309-0732; fax +55 12 3927-7546; e-mail
distrib@embraer.com.br; Internet https://www.flyembraer.com. You may
review copies of the referenced service information at the FAA,
Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton,
Washington. For information on the availability of this material at the
FAA, call 425-227-1221.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at https://www.regulations.gov; or in person at the Docket Operations office
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The AD docket contains this proposed AD, the regulatory
evaluation, any comments received, and other information. The street
address for the Docket Operations office (telephone (800) 647-5527) is
in the ADDRESSES section. Comments will be available in the AD docket
shortly after receipt.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Cindy Ashforth, Aerospace Engineer,
International Branch, ANM-116, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA,
1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington 98057-3356; phone: 425-227-
2768; fax: 425-227-1149; e-mail: cindy.ashforth@faa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
We invite you to send any written relevant data, views, or
arguments about this proposed AD. Send your comments to an address
listed under the ADDRESSES section. Include ``Docket No. FAA-2011-0216;
Directorate Identifier 2010-NM-197-AD'' at the beginning of your
comments. We specifically invite comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy aspects of this proposed AD. We
will consider all comments received by the closing date and may amend
this proposed AD based on those comments.
We will post all comments we receive, without change, to https://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal contact we
receive about this proposed AD.
Discussion
The Ag[ecirc]ncia Nacional de Avia[ccedil][atilde]o Civil (ANAC),
which is the aviation authority for Brazil, has issued Brazilian
Airworthiness Directive 2010-08-02, dated September 20, 2010 (referred
to after this as ``the MCAI''), to correct an unsafe condition for the
specified products. The MCAI states:
* * * The pylon internal shear pin was found cracked during a
regular check. Further investigation revealed that the failure
occurred due to hydrogen embrittlement. The ANAC [Ag[ecirc]ncia
Nacional de Avia[ccedil][atilde]o Civil] is issuing this AD to
prevent insufficient strength of the pylon to wing attachment, which
in combination with an engine imbalance caused by a fan blade out
could cause pylon to wing attachment failure and consequent engine
separation.
* * * * *
Required actions include replacing pylon shear pins in the rear
outboard and inboard shear pin assembly in the right- and left-hand
pylons with new parts. You may obtain further information by examining
the MCAI in the AD docket.
Relevant Service Information
EMBRAER has issued Service Bulletins 190-54-0010, dated May 19,
2010; and 190LIN-54-0001, dated June 21, 2010. The actions described in
this service information are intended to correct the unsafe condition
identified in the MCAI.
FAA's Determination and Requirements of This Proposed AD
This product has been approved by the aviation authority of another
country, and is approved for operation in the United States. Pursuant
to our bilateral agreement with the State of Design Authority, we have
been notified of the unsafe condition described in the MCAI and service
information referenced above. We are proposing this AD because we
evaluated all pertinent information and determined an unsafe condition
exists and is likely to exist or develop on other products of the same
type design.
Differences Between This AD and the MCAI or Service Information
We have reviewed the MCAI and related service information and, in
general, agree with their substance. But we might have found it
necessary to use different words from those in the MCAI to ensure the
AD is clear for U.S. operators and is enforceable. In making these
changes, we do not intend to differ substantively from the information
provided in the MCAI and related service information.
[[Page 13540]]
We might also have proposed different actions in this AD from those
in the MCAI in order to follow FAA policies. Any such differences are
highlighted in a Note within the proposed AD.
Costs of Compliance
Based on the service information, we estimate that this proposed AD
would affect about 73 products of U.S. registry. We also estimate that
it would take about 10 work-hours per product to comply with the basic
requirements of this proposed AD. The average labor rate is $85 per
work-hour. Required parts would cost about $2,360 per product. Where
the service information lists required parts costs that are covered
under warranty, we have assumed that there will be no charge for these
costs. As we do not control warranty coverage for affected parties,
some parties may incur costs higher than estimated here. Based on these
figures, we estimate the cost of the proposed AD on U.S. operators to
be $234,330, or $3,210 per product.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. ``Subtitle VII: Aviation
Programs,'' describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's
authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
``Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.
Regulatory Findings
We determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not
have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national Government and the States, or on the distribution
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify this proposed
regulation:
1. Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order
12866;
2. Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and
3. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
We prepared a regulatory evaluation of the estimated costs to
comply with this proposed AD and placed it in the AD docket.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.
The Proposed Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
2. The FAA amends Sec. 39.13 by adding the following new AD:
Empresa Brasileira de Aeronautica S.A. (EMBRAER): Docket No. FAA-
2011-0216; Directorate Identifier 2010-NM-197-AD.
Comments Due Date
(a) We must receive comments by April 28, 2011.
Affected ADs
(b) None.
Applicability
(c) This AD applies to Empresa Brasileira de Aeronautica S.A.
(EMBRAER) Model ERJ 190-100 STD, -100 LR, -100 ECJ, and -100 IGW
airplanes; and Model ERJ 190-200 STD, -200 LR, and -200 IGW
airplanes; certificated in any category.
Subject
(d) Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 54:
Nacelles/Pylons.
Reason
(e) The mandatory continuing airworthiness information (MCAI)
states:
* * * The pylon internal shear pin was found cracked during a
regular check. Further investigation revealed that the failure
occurred due to hydrogen embrittlement. The ANAC [Ag[ecirc]ncia
Nacional de Avia[ccedil][atilde]o Civil] is issuing this AD to
prevent insufficient strength of the pylon to wing attachment, which
in combination with an engine imbalance caused by a fan blade out
could cause pylon to wing attachment failure and consequent engine
separation.
* * * * *
Compliance
(f) You are responsible for having the actions required by this
AD performed within the compliance times specified, unless the
actions have already been done.
Replace Shear Pins
(g) For Model ERJ 190-100 STD, -100 LR, -100 IGW; and ERJ 190-
200 STD, -200 LR, and -200 IGW airplanes: Within 3,000 flight hours
after the effective date of this AD, replace the shear pins having
part number (P/N) 190-15178-003 and P/N 190-15181-003 in the rear
outboard and inboard shear pin assembly in the right- and left-hand
pylons, with new shear pins having P/N 190-15178-005 and P/N 190-
15181-005, respectively, in accordance with the Accomplishment
Instructions of EMBRAER Service Bulletin 190-54-0010, dated May 19,
2010.
(h) For Model ERJ 190-100 ECJ airplanes: Within 3,000 flight
hours or within 12 months after the effective date of this AD,
whichever occurs first, replace the shear pins having P/N 190-15178-
003 and P/N 190-15181-003, in the rear outboard and inboard shear
pin assembly in the right- and left-hand pylons, with new shear pins
having P/N 190-15178-005 and P/N 190-15181-005, respectively, in
accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of EMBRAER Service
Bulletin 190LIN-54-0001, dated June 21, 2010.
FAA AD Differences
Note 1: This AD differs from the MCAI and/or service information
as follows: The MCAI allows credit for previous installation of
internal shear pins in accordance with EMBRAER 190 Aircraft
Maintenance Manual Task 54-50-00-400, Revision 19, dated July 15,
2010. This AD does not allow credit for this task; however, under
the provisions of paragraph (i) of this AD, we will consider
requests for an alternative method of compliance.
Other FAA AD Provisions
(i) The following provisions also apply to this AD:
(1) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs): The Manager,
International Branch, ANM-116, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA,
has the authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested using
the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR
39.19, send your request to your principal inspector or local Flight
Standards District Office, as appropriate. If sending information
directly to the International Branch, send it to Attn: Cindy
Ashforth, Aerospace Engineer, International Branch, ANM-116,
Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton,
Washington 98057-3356; telephone (425) 227-2768; fax (425) 227-1149.
Information may be e-mailed to: 9-ANM-116-AMOC-REQUESTS@faa.gov.
Before using any approved AMOC, notify your appropriate principal
inspector, or lacking a principal inspector, the manager of the
local flight standards district office/certificate holding district
office. The AMOC approval letter must specifically reference this
AD.
[[Page 13541]]
(2) Airworthy Product: For any requirement in this AD to obtain
corrective actions from a manufacturer or other source, use these
actions if they are FAA-approved. Corrective actions are considered
FAA-approved if they are approved by the State of Design Authority
(or their delegated agent). You are required to assure the product
is airworthy before it is returned to service.
Related Information
(j) Refer to MCAI Ag[ecirc]ncia Nacional de
Avia[ccedil][atilde]o Civil (ANAC) Airworthiness Directive 2010-08-
02, dated September 20, 2010; and EMBRAER Service Bulletins 190-54-
0010, dated May 19, 2010, and 190LIN-54-001, dated June 21, 2010;
for related information.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on March 4, 2011.
Kalene C. Yanamura,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 2011-5723 Filed 3-11-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P