Agency Information Collection Activities: Proposed Collection; Comment Request-WIC Breastfeeding Peer Counseling Study, 13340-13342 [2011-5624]
Download as PDF
13340
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 48 / Friday, March 11, 2011 / Notices
• Validate the meal reimbursement
claims submitted by FDCHs for the
number of children who are CACFP
eligible and present in the FDCHs
during the time period(s) for which the
meals/snacks were claimed.
• Generate the data required for
developing an estimate of improper
payments, based on the meals claimed
for reimbursement by FDCHs, that meet
the requirements of the Improper
Payments Information Act of 2002.
• Be implemented nationwide in an
efficient and cost effective method.
A feasibility evaluation will be
conducted of the parent-recall data
collection methodology in validating
meal claims submitted for
reimbursement by FDCH providers.
Observations conducted on-site in the
homes of FDCH providers will be used
in the feasibility evaluation. The
methodology compares meal
reimbursement claims submitted by
FDCHs to their sponsors and data
collected through each of the following
two data collection methodologies:
• Recollections of parents/guardians
on their children’s attendance at the
FDCHs during the days and times of the
claims.
• Observations made during on site
visits to FDCHs during scheduled meal
times.
Based on the findings from the
feasibility evaluation, FNS will
determine the reliability of using parentrecall information in evaluating meal
claims submitted by FDCH providers. If
determined to be reliable, the parentrecall method of data collection shall be
tested at a national level, and FNS will
evaluate the feasibility of implementing
it nationwide to validate the meals
claimed for reimbursement.
Affected Public: 1,024 Individual/
Households; 16 State, Local & Tribal
Government and Business-for-profit (64
CACFP Sponsors and 256 FDCH
providers).
Respondent type identified: Parent/
guardian of each of the sampled
children attending a sample of FDCHs
will be contacted by telephone. Request
for child enrollment, sponsor agreement
Estimated
number of
respondents
Respondent
Responses
annually per
respondent
and meal claim information will be
requested of the sampled CACFP
sponsors and providers. In addition,
observations will be conducted in the
homes of the FDCH providers.
Estimated Number of Respondents:
The estimated number of respondents
included in the survey of parents is
1,024. Sixty-four sponsors in 16 States
and 256 FDCH providers will be
sampled and requested to provide
supporting program information.
Estimated Number of Responses per
Respondent: The number of responses
per set of parents/guardians for a
sampled child attending a FDCH is one.
The number of responses per State,
sponsor and FDCH provider is one.
Estimated Time per Response: The
estimated average time to respond to the
parent/guardian survey is 10.2 minutes
(.17/Hour). The estimated average times
for a State, sponsor and FDCH provider
to respond are 45 minutes (.75/Hour),
390 minutes (6.50/Hour), and 75
minutes (1.25/Hour) respectively. Nonresponses or attempted interviews are
estimated to take 6 minutes (0.10/hour).
Estimated
average number of hours
per response
Total annual
responses
Estimated total
annual hours
of response
burden
SFA Directors
States:
Completed interviews ...................................................
Attempted interviews ....................................................
Sponsors:
Completed interviews ...................................................
Attempted interviews ....................................................
FDCH Provider
Completed interviews ...................................................
Attempted interviews ....................................................
Parents:
Completed interviews ...................................................
Attempted interviews ....................................................
Total Responding burden .............................................
Estimated Total Annual Burden on
Respondents: 934.08000 hours.
Dated: March 4, 2011.
Julia Paradis,
Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2011–5620 Filed 3–10–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–30–P
16
0
1.00
1.00
16
0
0.7500
0.1000
12.00000
.00000
64
5
1.00
1.00
64
5
6.5000
0.1000
416.00000
0.50000
256
13
1.00
1.00
256
13
1.25
0.1000
320.00000
1.30000
1,024
102
1,480
1.00
1.00
........................
1,024
102
1,480
0.1700
0.1000
........................
174.08000
10.20000
934.08000
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Food and Nutrition Service
Agency Information Collection
Activities: Proposed Collection;
Comment Request—WIC
Breastfeeding Peer Counseling Study
Food and Nutrition Service
(FNS), USDA.
ACTION: Notice.
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICES
AGENCY:
In accordance with the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, this
notice invites the general public and
other public agencies to comment on the
proposed collection of data for the
second phase of the WIC Breastfeeding
Peer Counseling Study. The first phase
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:08 Mar 10, 2011
Jkt 223001
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
of this study examined the
implementation of the Loving Support
peer counseling program in State and
local WIC agencies across the country;
the final report on this first phase of the
study may be downloaded from https://
www.fns.usda.gov/ora/ (see ‘‘WIC
studies’’). This second phase is a
revision of a currently approved
collection which will assess the impact
of including in-person peer counseling
as part of the Loving Support program
on breastfeeding outcomes for WIC
participants.
DATES: Written comments should be
received on or before May 10, 2011 to
be assured of consideration.
ADDRESSES: Comments are invited on:
(a) Whether the proposed collection of
E:\FR\FM\11MRN1.SGM
11MRN1
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 48 / Friday, March 11, 2011 / Notices
information is necessary for the proper
performance of the functions of the
agency, including whether the
information shall have practical utility;
(b) the accuracy of the agency’s estimate
of the burden of the proposed collection
of information, including the validity of
the methodology and assumptions that
were used; (c) ways to enhance the
quality, utility, and clarity of the
information to be collected; and (d)
ways to minimize the burden of the
collection of information on those who
are to respond, including use of
appropriate automated, electronic,
mechanical, or other technological
collection techniques or other forms of
information technology.
Comments may be sent to: Steve
Carlson, Director, Office of Research and
Analysis, Food and Nutrition Service,
U.S. Department of Agriculture, 3101
Park Center Drive, Room 1014,
Alexandria, VA 22302. Comments may
also be submitted via fax to the attention
of Steve Carlson at 703–305–2576 or via
e-mail to Steve.Carlson@fns.usda.gov.
Comments will also be accepted through
the Federal eRulemaking Portal. Go to
https://www.regulations.gov, and follow
the online instructions for submitting
comments electronically.
All written comments will be open for
public inspection at the office of the
Food and Nutrition Service during
regular business hours (8:30 a.m. to
5 p.m., Monday through Friday) at, 3101
Park Center Drive, Room 1014,
Alexandria, Virginia 22302. All
electronic comments can be viewed
through https://www.regulations.gov.
All responses to this notice will be
summarized and included in the request
for OMB approval. All comments will
be a matter of public record.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Requests for additional information or
copies of this information collection
should be directed to Steve Carlson at
703–305–2017.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Title: WIC Breastfeeding Peer
Counseling Study.
OMB Approval Number: 0584–0548.
Expiration Date: 7/31/2011.
Type Of Request: Revision of a
currently approved collection.
Abstract: Beginning in Fiscal Year
(FY) 2004 and continuing through to the
present, Congress appropriated about
$15 million per year for States to
support breastfeeding peer counseling
in the Special Supplemental Nutrition
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:08 Mar 10, 2011
Jkt 223001
Program for Women, Infants and
Children (WIC); in FY2010 Congress
increased this amount to $80 million
per year. Prior research has suggested
that peer counseling may increase
breastfeeding duration rates and is
associated with positive outcomes in
groups that have proven difficult for
WIC to support in the initiation and
continuation of breastfeeding. The first
phase of the WIC Breastfeeding Peer
Counseling study, published in spring
2010, developed a comprehensive and
detailed picture of how the Loving
Support Peer Counseling Program was
implemented in States and local WIC
agencies (LWAs) throughout the
country. One important finding of this
first phase was that there is variation in
the implementation of the Loving
Support peer counseling program in
local WIC agencies, particularly
variation in the frequency, timing and
location of in-person peer counseling
offered to WIC participants pre- and
post-partum. The proposed second
phase of the study will examine how
specific variations in implementing peer
counseling using the Loving Support
model affect breastfeeding outcomes. Up
to eight local WIC agencies will be
invited to participate in this phase of
the study. From these eight local WIC
agencies, approximately 1,800 first-time
expectant mothers who certify for WIC
benefits and sign-up to receive peer
counseling will be randomly assigned to
one of two conditions: a control group
of 900 will receive their local WIC
agency’s regular Loving Support peer
counseling services; a treatment group
of 900 will be offered Loving Support
peer counseling services that more
strongly emphasizes in-person contact
with peer counselors than the agency’s
regular Loving Support program. In
particular, women in the treatment
group will be offered in-person peer
counseling during the first ten days after
giving birth.
Affected Public: Individual/
Household, State, Local and Tribal
Government. The proposed data
collection activities will require two
types of respondent groups: staff at the
participating local WIC agencies; and
individual WIC participants who
consent to participate in the study.
Multiple respondents from the
participating local WIC agencies may be
required to complete each data
collection instrument to be used with
local WIC agency staff. These
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
13341
respondents will include the local WIC
director, breastfeeding and peer
counseling coordinators, peer
counselors, and the local WIC agency
database manager, as well as individual
WIC participants who consent to
participate in the study.
Estimated Number of Respondents:
The maximum total estimated number
of respondents is 2,110. This total
includes eight local WIC Peer
Counseling Coordinators who will
participate in two interviews and
complete ten progress reporting forms,
one per month for ten months. The
Coordinators will be assisted by eight
local WIC directors, eight local WIC
breastfeeding coordinators, and eight
local WIC database managers. Up to 64
Peer Counselors (roughly eight per
participating local WIC agency) will
complete a background questionnaire
and participate in an individual
interview (or will complete the
interview as part of a focus group).
Finally, assuming a 100% response rate,
1,800 WIC participants will participate
in two telephone-administered
questionnaires.
Number of Responses per
Respondent: The local WIC Peer
Counseling Coordinators at each
participating WIC agency will
participate in two interviews, assisted
by their local WIC agency’s director,
breastfeeding coordinator, and database
manager. Each local WIC Peer
Counseling Coordinator will provide ten
responses on a progress reporting form
with the assistance of their local WIC
agency’s database manager. Up to 64
Peer Counselors (roughly eight per local
WIC site) will complete a background
questionnaire and participate in an
interview. Each WIC participant will
respond to two telephone-administered
questionnaires.
Estimated Total Annual Responses
per Respondent: 3,958.
Estimated Total Annual Burden on
Respondents: 1,648 hours.
Estimated Time per Response: 0.42 of
an hour or 25 minutes.
FNS estimates that a total reporting
and recordkeeping burden of 1,655
hours will result from activities to
implement the data collection
instruments. The estimated average
response time is 0.42 of an hour or 25
minutes. See Table 1 below for the
estimated total burden for each type of
respondent by instrument type.
E:\FR\FM\11MRN1.SGM
11MRN1
13342
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 48 / Friday, March 11, 2011 / Notices
TABLE 1
Number
respondents
Avg. number
responses
per
respondent
Total annual
responses
Interview ..........
8
2.00
16.00
0.50
8.00
Pre-screening ..
Interview ..........
2
8
1.00
2.00
2.00
16.00
0.0835
1.00
0.17
16.00
Interview ..........
Interview ..........
2
8
1.00
2.00
2.00
16.00
0.0835
2.00
0.17
32.00
Pre-screening ..
Progress Reporting Form.
Interview ..........
2
8
1.00
10.00
2.00
80.00
0.0835
3.00
0.17
240.00
8
1.00
8.00
0.50
4.00
Pre-screening ..
Progress Reporting Form.
Interview ..........
Pre-screening ..
Questionnaire ..
2
8
1.00
10.00
2.00
80.00
0.0835
0.50
0.17
40.00
64
6
64
1.00
1.00
1.00
64.00
6.00
64.00
1.50
0.0835
0.25
96.00
0.50
16.00
Affected public
Respondent type
Instrument
State, Local and Tribal Government.
Local WIC Agency Director ......
(non-response) ..........................
Local WIC Breastfeeding Coordinator.
(non-response) ..........................
Local Peer Counseling Coordinator.
(non-response) ..........................
Local Peer Counseling Coordinator.
Local WIC Agency Database
Manager.
(non-response) ..........................
Local WIC Agency Database
Manager.
Peer Counselor .........................
(non-response) ..........................
Peer Counselor .........................
Total SA Reporting burden
Hours per
response
Total burden
...................................................
.........................
110
3.25
358.00
1.22
436.67
Individual/Household ..................
WIC Participant .........................
(non-response) ..........................
Questionnaire ..
Pre-screening ..
1,800
200
2.00
1.00
3,600.00
200.00
0.334
0.0835
1,202.40
16.70
Total I/H Burden .................
...................................................
.........................
2,000.00
1.90
3,800.00
0.32
1,219.10
Total burden .................
...................................................
.........................
2,110.00
1.88
3,958.00
0.42
1,655.77
Dated: March 4, 2011.
Julia Paradis,
Administrator, Food and Nutrition Service.
[FR Doc. 2011–5624 Filed 3–10–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–30–P
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Food and Nutrition Service
Agency Information Collection
Activities: Proposed Collection;
Comment Request—National School
Lunch Program (NSLP) Direct
Certification Improvement Study
Food and Nutrition Service,
USDA.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
In accordance with the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, this
notice invites the general public and
other public agencies to comment on
this proposed information collection.
This collection for ‘‘National School
Lunch Program Direct Certification
Improvement Study’’ is a reinstatement
with change of a previously approved
data collection for ‘‘Feasibility of
Computer Matching in the National
School Lunch Program.’’ It builds on the
data collection for ‘‘Feasibility of
Computer Matching in the National
School Lunch Program.’’ This study will
collect information from State child
nutrition (CN) and education agencies,
as well as local education agencies
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:37 Mar 10, 2011
Jkt 223001
(LEAs). The information collection will
build on existing knowledge by
examining current methods of direct
certification used by State and local
agencies and the challenges facing
States and LEAs in attaining high
matching rates.
DATES: Written comments must be
received on or before May 10, 2011.
ADDRESSES: Comments are invited on
(1) whether the proposed collection of
information is necessary for the proper
performance of the functions of the
agency, including whether the
information shall have practical utility;
(2) the accuracy of the agency’s estimate
of the burden of the proposed collection
of information, including the validity of
the methodology and assumptions used;
and (3) ways to minimize the burden of
the collection of information on those
who are to respond, including use of
appropriate automated, electronic,
mechanical, or other technological
collection techniques or other forms of
information technology.
Comments may be sent to Steven
Carlson, Associate Administrator, Office
of Research, Analysis, Communications,
and Strategic Support, U.S. Department
of Agriculture, Food and Nutrition
Service, 3101 Park Center Drive, Room
1014, Alexandria, VA 22302. Comments
may also be submitted via fax to the
attention of Steve Carlson at 703–305–
2020 or via e-mail to
Steve.Carlson@fns.usda.gov. Comments
will also be accepted through the
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Federal eRulemaking Portal. Go to
https://www.regulations.gov, and follow
the online instructions for submitting
comments electronically.
All written comments will be open for
public inspection at the office of the
Food and Nutrition Service (FNS)
during regular business hours (8:30 a.m.
to 5 p.m. Monday through Friday) at
3101 Park Center Drive, Room 1014,
Alexandria, Virginia 22302.
All responses to this notice will be
summarized and included in the request
for Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) approval. All comments will be
a matter of public record.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Requests for additional information or
copies of the proposed information
collection forms should be directed to
Sheku Kamara at 703–305–2130.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Title: National School Lunch Program
Direct Certification Improvement Study,
which is an update to a previously
approved data collection for ‘‘Feasibility
of Computer Matching in the National
School Lunch Program.’’
OMB Number: 0584–0529.
Form Number: N/A.
Expiration Date: Not yet determined.
Type of Request: Reinstatement with
change of previously approved data
collection.
Abstract: Direct certification was
required of States and LEAs in the Child
Nutrition and WIC Reauthorization Act
of 2004. Direct certification enables
E:\FR\FM\11MRN1.SGM
11MRN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 48 (Friday, March 11, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 13340-13342]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-5624]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Food and Nutrition Service
Agency Information Collection Activities: Proposed Collection;
Comment Request--WIC Breastfeeding Peer Counseling Study
AGENCY: Food and Nutrition Service (FNS), USDA.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, this
notice invites the general public and other public agencies to comment
on the proposed collection of data for the second phase of the WIC
Breastfeeding Peer Counseling Study. The first phase of this study
examined the implementation of the Loving Support peer counseling
program in State and local WIC agencies across the country; the final
report on this first phase of the study may be downloaded from https://www.fns.usda.gov/ora/ (see ``WIC studies''). This second phase is a
revision of a currently approved collection which will assess the
impact of including in-person peer counseling as part of the Loving
Support program on breastfeeding outcomes for WIC participants.
DATES: Written comments should be received on or before May 10, 2011 to
be assured of consideration.
ADDRESSES: Comments are invited on: (a) Whether the proposed collection
of
[[Page 13341]]
information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of
the agency, including whether the information shall have practical
utility; (b) the accuracy of the agency's estimate of the burden of the
proposed collection of information, including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions that were used; (c) ways to enhance the
quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; and
(d) ways to minimize the burden of the collection of information on
those who are to respond, including use of appropriate automated,
electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection techniques or
other forms of information technology.
Comments may be sent to: Steve Carlson, Director, Office of
Research and Analysis, Food and Nutrition Service, U.S. Department of
Agriculture, 3101 Park Center Drive, Room 1014, Alexandria, VA 22302.
Comments may also be submitted via fax to the attention of Steve
Carlson at 703-305-2576 or via e-mail to Steve.Carlson@fns.usda.gov.
Comments will also be accepted through the Federal eRulemaking Portal.
Go to https://www.regulations.gov, and follow the online instructions
for submitting comments electronically.
All written comments will be open for public inspection at the
office of the Food and Nutrition Service during regular business hours
(8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m., Monday through Friday) at, 3101 Park Center
Drive, Room 1014, Alexandria, Virginia 22302. All electronic comments
can be viewed through https://www.regulations.gov.
All responses to this notice will be summarized and included in the
request for OMB approval. All comments will be a matter of public
record.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Requests for additional information or
copies of this information collection should be directed to Steve
Carlson at 703-305-2017.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Title: WIC Breastfeeding Peer Counseling Study.
OMB Approval Number: 0584-0548.
Expiration Date: 7/31/2011.
Type Of Request: Revision of a currently approved collection.
Abstract: Beginning in Fiscal Year (FY) 2004 and continuing through
to the present, Congress appropriated about $15 million per year for
States to support breastfeeding peer counseling in the Special
Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants and Children (WIC);
in FY2010 Congress increased this amount to $80 million per year. Prior
research has suggested that peer counseling may increase breastfeeding
duration rates and is associated with positive outcomes in groups that
have proven difficult for WIC to support in the initiation and
continuation of breastfeeding. The first phase of the WIC Breastfeeding
Peer Counseling study, published in spring 2010, developed a
comprehensive and detailed picture of how the Loving Support Peer
Counseling Program was implemented in States and local WIC agencies
(LWAs) throughout the country. One important finding of this first
phase was that there is variation in the implementation of the Loving
Support peer counseling program in local WIC agencies, particularly
variation in the frequency, timing and location of in-person peer
counseling offered to WIC participants pre- and post-partum. The
proposed second phase of the study will examine how specific variations
in implementing peer counseling using the Loving Support model affect
breastfeeding outcomes. Up to eight local WIC agencies will be invited
to participate in this phase of the study. From these eight local WIC
agencies, approximately 1,800 first-time expectant mothers who certify
for WIC benefits and sign-up to receive peer counseling will be
randomly assigned to one of two conditions: a control group of 900 will
receive their local WIC agency's regular Loving Support peer counseling
services; a treatment group of 900 will be offered Loving Support peer
counseling services that more strongly emphasizes in-person contact
with peer counselors than the agency's regular Loving Support program.
In particular, women in the treatment group will be offered in-person
peer counseling during the first ten days after giving birth.
Affected Public: Individual/Household, State, Local and Tribal
Government. The proposed data collection activities will require two
types of respondent groups: staff at the participating local WIC
agencies; and individual WIC participants who consent to participate in
the study. Multiple respondents from the participating local WIC
agencies may be required to complete each data collection instrument to
be used with local WIC agency staff. These respondents will include the
local WIC director, breastfeeding and peer counseling coordinators,
peer counselors, and the local WIC agency database manager, as well as
individual WIC participants who consent to participate in the study.
Estimated Number of Respondents: The maximum total estimated number
of respondents is 2,110. This total includes eight local WIC Peer
Counseling Coordinators who will participate in two interviews and
complete ten progress reporting forms, one per month for ten months.
The Coordinators will be assisted by eight local WIC directors, eight
local WIC breastfeeding coordinators, and eight local WIC database
managers. Up to 64 Peer Counselors (roughly eight per participating
local WIC agency) will complete a background questionnaire and
participate in an individual interview (or will complete the interview
as part of a focus group). Finally, assuming a 100% response rate,
1,800 WIC participants will participate in two telephone-administered
questionnaires.
Number of Responses per Respondent: The local WIC Peer Counseling
Coordinators at each participating WIC agency will participate in two
interviews, assisted by their local WIC agency's director,
breastfeeding coordinator, and database manager. Each local WIC Peer
Counseling Coordinator will provide ten responses on a progress
reporting form with the assistance of their local WIC agency's database
manager. Up to 64 Peer Counselors (roughly eight per local WIC site)
will complete a background questionnaire and participate in an
interview. Each WIC participant will respond to two telephone-
administered questionnaires.
Estimated Total Annual Responses per Respondent: 3,958.
Estimated Total Annual Burden on Respondents: 1,648 hours.
Estimated Time per Response: 0.42 of an hour or 25 minutes.
FNS estimates that a total reporting and recordkeeping burden of
1,655 hours will result from activities to implement the data
collection instruments. The estimated average response time is 0.42 of
an hour or 25 minutes. See Table 1 below for the estimated total burden
for each type of respondent by instrument type.
[[Page 13342]]
Table 1
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Avg. number
Number responses Total annual Hours per
Affected public Respondent type Instrument respondents per responses response Total burden
respondent
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
State, Local and Tribal Local WIC Agency Director Interview........... 8 2.00 16.00 0.50 8.00
Government.
(non-response)........... Pre-screening....... 2 1.00 2.00 0.0835 0.17
Local WIC Breastfeeding Interview........... 8 2.00 16.00 1.00 16.00
Coordinator.
(non-response)........... Interview........... 2 1.00 2.00 0.0835 0.17
Local Peer Counseling Interview........... 8 2.00 16.00 2.00 32.00
Coordinator.
(non-response)........... Pre-screening....... 2 1.00 2.00 0.0835 0.17
Local Peer Counseling Progress Reporting 8 10.00 80.00 3.00 240.00
Coordinator. Form.
Local WIC Agency Database Interview........... 8 1.00 8.00 0.50 4.00
Manager.
(non-response)........... Pre-screening....... 2 1.00 2.00 0.0835 0.17
Local WIC Agency Database Progress Reporting 8 10.00 80.00 0.50 40.00
Manager. Form.
Peer Counselor........... Interview........... 64 1.00 64.00 1.50 96.00
(non-response)........... Pre-screening....... 6 1.00 6.00 0.0835 0.50
Peer Counselor........... Questionnaire....... 64 1.00 64.00 0.25 16.00
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total SA Reporting burden.... ......................... .................... 110 3.25 358.00 1.22 436.67
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Individual/Household............. WIC Participant.......... Questionnaire....... 1,800 2.00 3,600.00 0.334 1,202.40
(non-response)........... Pre-screening....... 200 1.00 200.00 0.0835 16.70
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total I/H Burden............. ......................... .................... 2,000.00 1.90 3,800.00 0.32 1,219.10
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total burden............. ......................... .................... 2,110.00 1.88 3,958.00 0.42 1,655.77
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dated: March 4, 2011.
Julia Paradis,
Administrator, Food and Nutrition Service.
[FR Doc. 2011-5624 Filed 3-10-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-30-P