Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs (ECA) Request for Grant Proposals: American Music Abroad, 13256-13263 [2011-5371]
Download as PDF
13256
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 47 / Thursday, March 10, 2011 / Notices
Submit comments to the Office
of Management and Budget (OMB) for
up to 30 days from March 10, 2011.
ADDRESSES: Direct comments to the
Department of State Desk Officer in the
Office of Information and Regulatory
Affairs at the Office of Management and
Budget (OMB). You may submit
comments by the following methods:
• E-mail:
oira_submission@omb.eop.gov. You
must include the DS form number,
information collection title, and OMB
control number in the subject line of
your message.
• Fax: 202–395–5806. Attention: Desk
Officer for Department of State.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: To
request additional information, please
contact: Raymond Ciupek, Department
of State, Office of Directives
Management, 1800 G St., NW., Suite
2400, Washington, DC 20522–2202, who
may be reached at ciupekra@state.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Title: Generic Clearance for the
Collection of Qualitative Feedback on
Agency Service Delivery.
Abstract: The information collection
activity will garner qualitative customer
and stakeholder feedback in an efficient,
timely manner, in accordance with the
Administration’s commitment to
improving service delivery. By
qualitative feedback we mean
information that provides useful
insights on perceptions and opinions,
but are not statistical surveys that yield
quantitative results that can be
generalized to the population of study.
This feedback will provide insights into
customer or stakeholder perceptions,
experiences and expectations, provide
an early warning of issues with service,
or focus attention on areas where
communication, training or changes in
operations might improve delivery of
products or services. These collections
will allow for ongoing, collaborative and
actionable communications between the
Agency and its customers and
stakeholders. It will also allow feedback
to contribute directly to the
improvement of program management.
Feedback collected under this generic
clearance will provide useful
information, but it will not yield data
that can be generalized to the overall
population. This type of generic
clearance for qualitative information
will not be used for quantitative
information collections that are
designed to yield reliably actionable
results, such as monitoring trends over
time or documenting program
performance. Such data uses require
more rigorous designs that address: the
target population to which
jdjones on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with NOTICES
DATES:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:43 Mar 09, 2011
Jkt 223001
generalizations will be made, the
sampling frame, the sample design
(including stratification and clustering),
the precision requirements or power
calculations that justify the proposed
sample size, the expected response rate,
methods for assessing potential nonresponse bias, the protocols for data
collection, and any testing procedures
that were or will be undertaken prior
fielding the study. Depending on the
degree of influence the results are likely
to have, such collections may still be
eligible for submission for other generic
mechanisms that are designed to yield
quantitative results.
Below we provide the Department of
State projected average estimates for the
next three years:
Current Actions: New collection of
information.
Type of Review: New Collection.
Affected Public: Individuals and
Households, Businesses and
Organizations, State, Local or Tribal
Government.
Average Expected Annual Number of
activities: 50.
Respondents: Individuals responding
to Department of State customer
services evaluation requests.
Average Number of Respondents per
Activity: 500.
Annual responses: 25,000.
Frequency of Response: Once per
request.
Average minutes per response: 15
minutes.
Burden hours: 6,250.
An agency may not conduct or
sponsor, and a person is not required to
respond to, a collection of information
unless it displays a currently valid
Office of Management and Budget
control number.
Dated: March 3, 2011.
T.J. Furlong,
Director, Office of Directives Management,
Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2011–5372 Filed 3–9–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710–24–P
DEPARTMENT OF STATE
[Public Notice 7360]
Bureau of Educational and Cultural
Affairs (ECA) Request for Grant
Proposals: American Music Abroad
Announcement Type: New
Cooperative Agreement.
Funding Opportunity Number: ECA/
PE/C/CU–11–09.
Catalog of Federal Domestic
Assistance Number: 19.415.
Key Dates:
Application Deadline: April 29, 2011.
PO 00000
Frm 00133
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Executive Summary: The Cultural
Programs Division in the Office of
Citizen Exchanges in the Bureau of
Educational and Cultural Affairs (ECA)
announces an open competition for a
cooperative agreement to administer the
American Music Abroad program. The
program will consist of approximately
ten tours for a select number of
professional American artists in a wide
range of uniquely American musical
genres. The program is designed to
broadly represent the excellence and
diversity of traditional American music.
Some examples of American music
genres include, but are not be limited to,
contemporary urban music, hip hop,
rock and roll, jazz and American roots
music genres like country and western,
bluegrass, zydeco, Cajun, and folk. The
musicians selected for this program
must demonstrate high artistic ability,
evidence a strong commitment to
education and exchange activities, and
reflect the diversity of America and
American music. They must be
conversant with the broader aspects of
contemporary American society and
culture. International tours will include
workshops, master classes, and outreach
activities, in addition to performances.
U.S. public and non-profit
organizations meeting the provisions
described in Internal Revenue code
section 26 U.S.C. 501(c)(3) may submit
proposals that support the goals of the
American Music Abroad program: to
promote mutual understanding between
the people of the United States and
other countries, and cross-cultural
awareness. The tours accomplish this by
providing an opportunity for
international audiences to experience
American musical life, highlighting the
contemporary music scene as well as
our country’s cultural history, and
allowing American performers to learn
about life and culture in the foreign host
countries.
The Bureau is particularly interested
in proposals for the administration of
tours by American musicians
representing diverse American music
genres to countries with significant
underserved populations that may not
otherwise have access to American art
forms, and countries with significant
youth populations. The Bureau is also
interested in proposals for projects that
reach indigenous populations. No
guarantee is made or implied that a
grant will be awarded for tours to any
particular region or that tours will be
organized to any particular region.
To be eligible for this competition, all
organizations must demonstrate a
minimum of five years’ experience
successfully conducting international
performing arts exchange programs in
E:\FR\FM\10MRN1.SGM
10MRN1
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 47 / Thursday, March 10, 2011 / Notices
jdjones on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with NOTICES
the music field. The organization must
have experience administering programs
in multiple musical genres.
I. Funding Opportunity Description
Authority: Overall grant making
authority for this program is contained
in the Mutual Educational and Cultural
Exchange Act of 1961, Public Law 87–
256, as amended, also known as the
Fulbright-Hays Act. The purpose of the
Act is ‘‘to enable the Government of the
United States to increase mutual
understanding between the people of
the United States and the people of
other countries * * *; to strengthen the
ties which unite us with other nations
by demonstrating the educational and
cultural interests, developments, and
achievements of the people of the
United States and other nations * * *
and thus to assist in the development of
friendly, sympathetic and peaceful
relations between the United States and
the other countries of the world.’’ The
funding authority for the program above
is provided through legislation.
Purpose: The Bureau seeks proposals
to engage people and audiences
overseas that do not normally have
access to American cultural
performances or American artists by
presenting at least ten tours of musical
groups representing a wide range of
American musical genres.
Specific terms for the selection of the
musical groups will be developed in
collaboration with ECA, and subject to
ECA approval. Significantly, proposals
should describe application and
selection plans that seek to represent the
broadest possible diversity of American
musical genres. In general, of the 10
selected American Music Abroad
musical groups, no more than two
groups may be repeat or alumni groups
that have participated in past American
Music Abroad programs and no single
group may participate in the program
more than twice. Performances are only
one aspect of an exchange program
focusing on people-to-people
interactions. American Music Abroad
musicians will be expected to conduct
or participate in master classes, lectures,
workshops with people from varied age
groups and musical backgrounds,
impromptu musical sessions, radio and
TV appearances, and other activities
with local cultural institutions,
musicians, media and students.
Therefore it is important that the
proposal include plans for identifying
groups who can conduct exchange
activities as well as perform.
Participating musicians must be U.S.
citizens who are at least 21 years old;
demonstrate the highest artistic,
performance and teaching abilities; be
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:43 Mar 09, 2011
Jkt 223001
dedicated to interactive educational
activities targeting various age-groups
and musical abilities; have a strong
interest in intercultural exchange; be
conversant with broader aspects of
contemporary American society and
culture; be adaptable to rigorous touring
through regions of the world where
travel and performance situations may
be difficult; and represent the diversity
of America and American Music.
The search, adjudication and
selection process of the musicians must
consist of an open call to U.S. musicians
with clear and transparent selection
criteria and mechanism approved by
ECA, geared to final competitive
selection by an independent panel that
includes an ECA representative and
culminating in a diverse cadre of
musicians.
Auditions should be held in two cities
(one on the East Coast and one on the
West Coast) and selected in consultation
with ECA. A panel of judges should be
assembled in consultation with ECA.
Any pre-screening of applicant
musicians prior to the auditions (such
as blind musical screenings) must be
agreed to in consultation with ECA.
The selected musicians
(approximately 10 ensembles of varying
size, possibly including trios, quartets,
and quintets) must represent the
diversity of America and American
music and be able to use musical
expression to convey to international
audiences and workshop participants
ideas about American culture, history
and society. ECA will provide
additional guidance during selection
process to ensure that the diversity of
American music is properly
represented. For example, at least five
musical genres are represented among
the final 10 groups, with no more than
2 groups from each genre. Successful
applicants will have a clearly developed
strategy for attracting applications
nationwide to encourage regional and
musical diversity from musicians
representing urban, rock, jazz and
American roots music styles.
To ensure that the program continues
to recruit new diversity and talent,
American Music Abroad musicians may
only participate in the program twice,
and only 2 of the final 10 groups may
be American Music Abroad alumni
groups. Performances are only one
aspect of an exchange program focusing
on people-to-people interactions.
American Music Abroad participants
will be expected to conduct or
participate in master classes, lectures,
workshops, impromptu jam sessions,
radio and TV appearances, and other
activities with local cultural
PO 00000
Frm 00134
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
13257
institutions, musicians, media and
students.
Applicants should describe their
project team’s capacity for successfully
planning recruitment and selection and
provide a detailed sample program to
illustrate planning capacity and ability
to achieve program objectives.
Proposals should reflect a practical
understanding of global issues, and
demonstrate sensitivity to cultural,
political, economic and social
differences in regions where tour groups
may perform. Special attention should
be given to describing the applicant
organization’s experience with planning
and implementing complex and
unpredictable logistical undertakings
overseas. Applicants should describe
their project team’s capacity for
successfully planning projects of this
nature and provide a detailed sample
program (to include itineraries) to
illustrate planning capacity and ability
to achieve program objectives.
Applicants must identify all U.S.
partner organizations and venues with
whom they are proposing to collaborate
and describe previous cooperative
projects in the section on ‘‘Institutional
Capacity.’’ Applicants must include in
their proposal supporting materials or
documentation that demonstrates a
minimum of five years experience in
conducting global exchanges in the
music field. The organization must also
demonstrate it has experience dealing
with multiple musical genres.
The successful applicant will
incorporate social media and innovative
technologies into a well-developed
public relations and outreach strategy.
Proposals must include specific
information regarding online
educational materials to supplement the
international tour activities. Proposals
must include references with name and
contact information for other assistance
awards the applicant has received so the
Bureau may contact them directly.
Requirements of the Award Recipient:
ECA intends to give one assistance
award to a qualified institution or
organization to administer the American
Music Abroad program globally.
Activities funded through this
cooperative agreement support the
organization and implementation of
approximately ten (10) international
tours, and must include, but are not
limited to:
1. Designing, organizing, and
implementing a transparent, open,
national competition process to select
approximately ten (10) U.S. musical
groups. Musical genres should be
representative of the diversity of U.S.
society and culture and should include,
E:\FR\FM\10MRN1.SGM
10MRN1
jdjones on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with NOTICES
13258
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 47 / Thursday, March 10, 2011 / Notices
among others, American roots, hip-hop,
rock and roll, and jazz.
2. Programming musical, educational,
and media tour activities in consultation
with U.S. embassies and ECA. For each
overseas location, the award recipient
will be required to coordinate closely
with staff at U.S. embassies and
consulates abroad to help advance their
public diplomacy objectives, as well as
find and secure appropriate venues for
performances and workshops and
manage a broad range of logistics issues.
3. Assisting musicians with passport,
visa, immunizations, and other pre-tour
preparations.
4. Making all international travel
arrangements and coordinating with
posts on all in-country overseas travel;
5. Making all financial and
administrative arrangements with the
musicians.
6. Organizing orientation sessions and
pre-travel briefings that provide
participants with media training,
cultural briefings about the countries on
the tour, and specific information
regarding the context for their mission
as cultural ambassadors.
7. Scheduling a pre-tour briefing
session for each ensemble with State
Department regional experts and ECA
program officers in attendance. This
event should be scheduled in
coordination with a Washington, DC,
public performance.
8. Scheduling an associated event as
part of the annual American Music
Abroad program.
9. Scheduling public performance
dates in Washington, DC, for each
ensemble. Applicants may schedule
public performances in the audition city
as well.
10. Developing outreach to
international and U.S. media as part of
a comprehensive media and public
relations strategy developed by the
awardee in consultation with and
approved by ECA. The successful
applicant will incorporate social media
and innovative technologies into their
outreach strategy.
11. Producing press and educational
materials appropriate for foreign
audiences who may not be familiar with
the U.S. and/or American music
(including, as needed, translation of
materials). The successful applicant will
include an online education component
to enhance international touring
activities.
12. Shipping performance and
education materials.
13. Regularly providing ongoing and
detailed information to the Program
Office regarding tour schedules, venues
and program activities, performance and
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:43 Mar 09, 2011
Jkt 223001
workshop results, tour highlights, and
media coverage.
14. Assisting ensembles and U.S.
embassies with follow-on program
development.
15. Evaluating program activities.
16. Reporting on tour activities,
including audience and participant
numbers and outreach efforts, to ECA.
Applicants must have experience in
global exchange planning and
implementation, and should address the
above elements in the proposal. The
grantee must be highly responsive and
able to work in close consultation with
ECA and the Public Affairs Sections of
the participating U.S. embassies.
ECA Responsibilities: In a cooperative
agreement, ECA/PE/C/CU is
substantially involved in program
activities above and beyond routine
monitoring. ECA/PE/C/CU activities and
responsibilities for this program are as
follows:
1. Approval of audition cities,
recruitment and selection process, and
judges and judging criteria;
2. Participation in the selection of
musicians, orientation and debriefing
activities;
3. Identification of four to six
countries for each tour. Countries will
be those of importance to the
Department of State’s public diplomacy
mission to build mutual understanding
in the following world regions: Middle
East, East Asia and the Pacific, Africa,
South and Central Asia, Europe and/or
South/Central America;
4. Arrangement of participation by
Department of State officers in pre-tour
briefings and any debriefings that might
take place;
5. Approval of media and public
relations strategies and arrangements for
a showcase event;
6. Approval of all tour arrangements,
including daily program schedules.
II. Award Information
Type of Award: Cooperative
Agreement. ECA’s level of involvement
in this program is listed under number
I above.
Fiscal Year Funds: FY–2011.
Approximate Total Funding:
$1,500,000.
Approximate Number of Awards: 1.
Approximate Average Award:
$1,500,000.
Ceiling of Award Range: $1,500,000.
Anticipated Award Date: June 1, 2011,
Pending availability of funds.
Anticipated Project Completion Date:
February 28, 2013.
Additional Information: Pending
successful implementation of this
program and the availability of funds in
subsequent fiscal years, it is ECA’s
PO 00000
Frm 00135
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
intent to renew this cooperative
agreement for two additional fiscal years
before openly competing it again.
III. Eligibility Information
III.1. Eligible applicants: Applications
may be submitted by public and private
non-profit organizations meeting the
provisions described in Internal
Revenue Code section 26 U.S.C.
501(c)(3).
III.2. Cost Sharing or Matching Funds:
There is no minimum or maximum
percentage required for this
competition. However, the Bureau
encourages applicants to provide
maximum levels of cost sharing and
funding in support of its programs.
When cost sharing is offered, it is
understood and agreed that the
applicant must provide the amount of
cost sharing as stipulated in its proposal
and later included in an approved grant
agreement. Cost sharing may be in the
form of allowable direct or indirect
costs. For accountability, you must
maintain written records to support all
costs which are claimed as your
contribution, as well as costs to be paid
by the Federal government. Such
records are subject to audit. The basis
for determining the value of cash and
in-kind contributions must be in
accordance with OMB Circular A–110,
(Revised), Subpart C.23—Cost Sharing
and Matching. In the event you do not
provide the minimum amount of cost
sharing as stipulated in the approved
budget, ECA’s contribution will be
reduced in like proportion.
III.3. Other Eligibility Requirements:
(a) Bureau grant guidelines require
that organizations with less than four
years experience in conducting
international exchanges be limited to
$60,000 in Bureau funding. ECA
anticipates making one award, in an
amount up to $1,500,000 to support
program and administrative costs
required to implement this exchange
program. Therefore, organizations with
less than four years experience in
conducting international exchanges are
ineligible to apply under this
competition. The Bureau encourages
applicants to provide maximum levels
of cost sharing and funding in support
of its programs.
(b) Technical Eligibility: All proposals
must comply with the following:
(1) Full adherence to the guidelines
stated herein and in the Solicitation
Package;
(2) Proposal submission deadline
date;
(3) Non-profit organization status; and
(4) For purposes of this competition,
at least five years of demonstrated
experience in programming globally in
E:\FR\FM\10MRN1.SGM
10MRN1
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 47 / Thursday, March 10, 2011 / Notices
the music field, or your proposal will be
declared technically ineligible and
given no further consideration in the
review process. Please see III.3.b.4
below regarding the eligibility
requirements of additional experience
from prospective applicants.
IV. Application and Submission
Information
jdjones on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with NOTICES
Note: Please read the complete
announcement before sending inquiries or
submitting proposals. Once the RFGP
deadline has passed, Bureau staff may not
discuss this competition with applicants
until the proposal review process has been
completed.
IV.1. Contact Information to Request
an Application Package: Please contact
the Cultural Programs Division (ECA/
PE/C/CU) in the Office of Citizen
Exchanges, U.S. Department of State,
SA–5, 2200 C Street, NW., Washington,
DC 20037, 202–632–6412, fax 202/632–
9355; e-mail JarrettMA@state.gov to
request a Solicitation Package. Please
refer to the Funding Opportunity
Number ECA/PE/C/CU–11–09 located at
the top of this announcement when
making your request.
Alternatively, an electronic
application package may be obtained
from grants.gov. Please see section IV.3f
for further information.
The Solicitation Package contains the
Proposal Submission Instructions (PSI)
document which consists of required
application forms, and standard
guidelines for proposal preparation.
Please specify Melissa Jarrett and refer
to the Funding Opportunity Number
ECA/PE/C/CU–11–09 located at the top
of this announcement on all other
inquiries and correspondence.
IV.2. To Download a Solicitation
Package Via the Internet: The entire
Solicitation Package may be
downloaded from the Bureau’s Web site
at https://exchanges.state.gov/education/
rfgps/menu.htm, or from the Grants.gov
Web site at https://www.grants.gov.
Please read all information before
downloading.
IV.3. Content and Form of
Submission: Applicants must follow all
instructions in the Solicitation Package.
The original and 10 copies (11 proposals
total) of the application should be
submitted per the instructions under
IV.3f. Application Deadline and
Methods of Submission section below.
IV.3a. You are required to have a
Dunn and Bradstreet Data Universal
Numbering System (DUNS) number to
apply for a grant or cooperative
agreement from the U.S. Government.
This number is a nine-digit
identification number, which uniquely
identifies business entities. Obtaining a
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:43 Mar 09, 2011
Jkt 223001
DUNS number is easy and there is no
charge. To obtain a DUNS number,
access https://
www.dunandbradstreet.com/ or call 1–
866–705–5711. Please ensure that your
DUNS number is included in the
appropriate box of the SF–424 which is
part of the formal application package.
IV.3b. All proposals must contain an
executive summary, proposal narrative
and budget.
Please Refer to the Solicitation
Package. It contains the mandatory
Proposal Submission Instructions (PSI)
document for additional formatting and
technical requirements.
IV.3c. All federal award recipients
and sub-recipients must maintain
current registrations in the Central
Contractor Registration (CCR) database
and have a Dun and Bradstreet Data
Universal Numbering System (DUNS)
number. Recipients and sub-recipients
must maintain accurate and up-to-date
information in the CCR until all
program and financial activity and
reporting have been completed. All
entities must review and update the
information at least annually after the
initial registration and more frequently
if required information changes or
another award is granted.
You must have nonprofit status with
the IRS at the time of application. Please
note: Effective January 7, 2009, all
applicants for ECA federal assistance
awards must include in their
application the names of directors and/
or senior executives (current officers,
trustees, and key employees, regardless
of amount of compensation). In
fulfilling this requirement, applicants
must submit information in one of the
following ways:
(1) Those who file Internal Revenue
Service Form 990, ‘‘Return of
Organization Exempt From Income
Tax,’’ must include a copy of relevant
portions of this form.
(2) Those who do not file IRS Form
990 must submit information above in
the format of their choice.
In addition to final program reporting
requirements, award recipients will also
be required to submit a one-page
document, derived from their program
reports, listing and describing their
grant activities. For award recipients,
the names of directors and/or senior
executives (current officers, trustees,
and key employees), as well as the onepage description of grant activities, will
be transmitted by the State Department
to OMB, along with other information
required by the Federal Funding
Accountability and Transparency Act
(FFATA), and will be made available to
the public by the Office of Management
and Budget on its USASpending.gov
PO 00000
Frm 00136
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
13259
Web site as part of ECA’s FFATA
reporting requirements.
If your organization is a private
nonprofit which has not received a grant
or cooperative agreement from ECA in
the past three years, or if your
organization received nonprofit status
from the IRS within the past four years,
you must submit the necessary
documentation to verify nonprofit status
as directed in the PSI document. Failure
to do so will cause your proposal to be
declared technically ineligible.
IV.3d. Please take into consideration
the following information when
preparing your proposal narrative:
IV.3d.1. Adherence to All Regulations
Governing the J Visa: The Bureau of
Educational and Cultural Affairs places
critically important emphases on the
secure and proper administration of
Exchange Visitor (J visa) Programs and
adherence by recipient organizations
and program participants to all
regulations governing the J visa program
status.
A copy of the complete regulations
governing the administration of
Exchange Visitor (J) programs is
available at https://exchanges.state.gov
or from: Office of Designation, Private
Sector Programs Division, U.S.
Department of State, ECA/EC/D/PS, SA–
5, 5th Floor, 2200 C Street, NW.,
Washington, DC 20037.
Please refer to Solicitation Package for
further information.
IV.3d.2. Diversity, Freedom and
Democracy Guidelines: Pursuant to the
Bureau’s authorizing legislation,
programs must maintain a non-political
character and should be balanced and
representative of the diversity of
American political, social, and cultural
life. ‘‘Diversity’’ should be interpreted in
the broadest sense and encompass
differences including, but not limited to
ethnicity, race, gender, religion,
geographic location, socio-economic
status, and disabilities. Applicants are
strongly encouraged to adhere to the
advancement of this principle both in
program administration and in program
content. Please refer to the review
criteria under the ‘Support for Diversity’
section for specific suggestions on
incorporating diversity into your
proposal. Public Law 104–319 provides
that ‘‘in carrying out programs of
educational and cultural exchange in
countries whose people do not fully
enjoy freedom and democracy,’’ the
Bureau ‘‘shall take appropriate steps to
provide opportunities for participation
in such programs to human rights and
democracy leaders of such countries.’’
Public Law 106–113 requires that the
governments of the countries described
above do not have inappropriate
E:\FR\FM\10MRN1.SGM
10MRN1
jdjones on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with NOTICES
13260
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 47 / Thursday, March 10, 2011 / Notices
influence in the selection process.
Proposals should reflect advancement of
these goals in their program contents, to
the full extent deemed feasible.
IV.3d.3. Program Monitoring and
Evaluation: Proposals must include a
plan to monitor and evaluate the
project’s success, both as the activities
unfold and at the end of the program.
The Bureau recommends that your
proposal include a draft survey
questionnaire or other technique plus a
description of a methodology to use to
link outcomes to original project
objectives. The Bureau expects that the
recipient organization will track
participants or partners and be able to
respond to key evaluation questions,
including satisfaction with the program,
learning as a result of the program,
changes in behavior as a result of the
program, and effects of the program on
institutions (institutions in which
participants work or partner
institutions). The evaluation plan
should include indicators that measure
gains in mutual understanding as well
as substantive knowledge.
Successful monitoring and evaluation
depend heavily on setting clear goals
and outcomes at the outset of a program.
Your evaluation plan should include a
description of your project’s objectives,
your anticipated project outcomes, and
how and when you intend to measure
these outcomes (performance
indicators). The more that outcomes are
‘‘smart’’ (specific, measurable, attainable,
results-oriented, and placed in a
reasonable time frame), the easier it will
be to conduct the evaluation. You
should also show how your project
objectives link to the goals of the
program described in this RFGP.
Your monitoring and evaluation plan
should clearly distinguish between
program outputs and outcomes. Outputs
are products and services delivered,
often stated as an amount. Output
information is important to show the
scope or size of project activities, but it
cannot substitute for information about
progress towards outcomes or the
results achieved. Examples of outputs
include the number of people trained or
the number of seminars conducted.
Outcomes, in contrast, represent
specific results a project is intended to
achieve and is usually measured as an
extent of change. Findings on outputs
and outcomes should both be reported,
but the focus should be on outcomes.
We encourage you to assess the
following four levels of outcomes, as
they relate to the program goals set out
in the RFGP (listed here in increasing
order of importance):
1. Participant satisfaction with the
program and exchange experience.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:43 Mar 09, 2011
Jkt 223001
2. Participant learning, such as
increased knowledge, aptitude, skills,
and changed understanding and
attitude. Learning includes both
substantive (subject-specific) learning
and mutual understanding.
3. Participant behavior, concrete
actions to apply knowledge in work or
community; greater participation and
responsibility in civic organizations;
interpretation and explanation of
experiences and new knowledge gained;
continued contacts between
participants, community members, and
others.
4. Institutional changes, such as
increased collaboration and
partnerships, policy reforms, new
programming, and organizational
improvements.
Please note: Consideration should be
given to the appropriate timing of data
collection for each level of outcome. For
example, satisfaction is usually
captured as a short-term outcome,
whereas behavior and institutional
changes are normally considered longerterm outcomes.
Overall, the quality of your
monitoring and evaluation plan will be
judged on how well it (1) specifies
intended outcomes; (2) gives clear
descriptions of how each outcome will
be measured; (3) identifies when
particular outcomes will be measured;
and (4) provides a clear description of
the data collection strategies for each
outcome (i.e., surveys, interviews, or
focus groups). (Please note that
evaluation plans that deal only with the
first level of outcomes [satisfaction] will
be deemed less competitive under the
present evaluation criteria.)
Recipient organizations will be
required to provide reports analyzing
their evaluation findings to the Bureau
in their regular program reports. All
data collected, including survey
responses and contact information, must
be maintained for a minimum of three
years and provided to the Bureau upon
request.
IV.3e. Please take the following
information into consideration when
preparing your budget:
IV.3e.1. Applicants must submit SF–
424A—‘‘Budget Information—NonConstruction Programs’’ along with a
comprehensive budget for the entire
program. The award may not exceed
$1,500,000. There must be a summary
budget as well as breakdowns reflecting
both administrative and program
budgets. Applicants may provide
separate sub-budgets for each program
component, phase, location, or activity
to provide clarification.
IV.3e.2. For budgeting purposes,
applicants should estimate costs based
PO 00000
Frm 00137
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
approximately ten musical groups (e.g.
trios, quartets, and quintets) traveling
for four (4) weeks to six (6) destinations
in the following regions: Africa, East
Asia, Eurasia, Central Europe and the
Balkans, the Near East/North Africa,
Latin America, and South Asia. Final
determination of participating regions
and countries will be made by ECA in
collaboration with U.S. embassies and
the successful applicant after the
assistance award has been given.
IV.3e.3. Allowable costs for the
program include the following:
(1) Program Expenses, including but
not limited to: domestic and
international travel for the selected
ensembles (per The Fly America Act);
visas and immunizations; airport taxes
and country entrance fees; honoraria;
educational materials and presentation
items; excess and overweight baggage
fees; trip itinerary booklets; press kits
and promotional materials; follow-on
activities; monitoring and evaluation;
international travel for program
implementation and/or evaluation
purposes; and other justifiable expenses
related to program activities.
The following guidelines may be
helpful in developing a proposed
budget:
A. Travel Costs. International and
domestic airfares. (per The Fly America
Act), transit costs, ground
transportation, and visas for the
American Music Abroad participants to
travel to the tour destinations. Travel
costs should also include airfare for
selected finalists to travel to the nearest
audition city.
B. Per Diem: Domestic Per Diem
should be estimated for selected
finalists attending auditions in the
nearest audition city. For the
Washington, DC portion of the tour,
organizations should use the published
Federal per diem rates, and estimate per
diems based on a two-night stay per
ensemble member. The Public Affairs
Sections of the participating U.S.
embassies and consulates generally are
responsible for per diem abroad.
Domestic per diem rates may be
accessed at: https://www.gsa.gov/Portal/
gsa/ep/contentView.do?contentId=
17943&contentType=GSA_BASIC%20.
C. Sub-grantees and Consultants. Subgrantee organizations may be used, in
which case the written agreement
between the prospective grantee and
sub-grantee should be included in the
proposal. Sub-grants must be itemized
in the budget under General Program
Expenses. Consultants may be used to
provide specialized expertise. Daily
honoraria cannot exceed $250 per day,
and applicants are strongly encouraged
E:\FR\FM\10MRN1.SGM
10MRN1
jdjones on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 47 / Thursday, March 10, 2011 / Notices
to use organizational resources, and to
cost share heavily in this area.
D. Health Insurance. Each American
Music Abroad participant will be
covered under the terms of the ECAsponsored COINS health insurance
policy. The cost for international travel
insurance for staff travel may be
included in the proposal budget.
E. Honoraria for American Music
Abroad musicians. Daily honorarium is
$200 per day for each performer,
including rest and travel days.
F. Educational and Promotional Items.
Ensemble members may use these funds
for individual purchases or they may
pool funds for joint purposes. ECA
funds for educational and promotional
items (e.g. CDs, guitar strings, lapel
pins, etc.) should not exceed $500 per
ensemble.
G. Excess Baggage. Excess baggage
costs are based on the size and weight
of the instrument. Excess baggage
estimates may be subject to change once
actual tour itineraries are scheduled;
however for proposal budget purposes,
costs should be estimated at $3,500 per
ensemble.
H. Immunizations/Visas. For purposes
of a proposed budget, line items for
immunizations should be estimated at
$400 per musician, and visas/visa
photos should be estimated at $600 per
musician.
I. Press/Outreach Kits. Each relevant
U.S. embassy should receive
appropriate contents for press kits.
Items may be sent electronically with
the understanding that in some cases,
embassies may not be able to access
large files or attachments. This line item
may include funds for shooting and
duplicating black and white publicity
photos and duplicating CDs, as well as
creating banners or other backdrops for
display at performances.
J. Translation of outreach and/or
educational materials.
K. Staff Travel. Allowable costs
include domestic staff travel for one
staff member to attend recruitment/
selection events in two U.S. cities and
to pre-tour briefings and performances
in Washington, DC. International staff
travel will be allowable, especially if
associated with monitoring and
evaluation, as long as costs for a full
four-to-six week tour for each ensemble
are completely covered. Cost-sharing for
staff travel is strongly encouraged.
L. Travel, Per Diem, and equipment
costs related to scheduling an associated
domestic event as part of the annual
American Music Abroad program.
M. Other justifiable expenses directly
related to supporting program activities.
For purposes of this competition,
please use the following program as a
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:43 Mar 09, 2011
Jkt 223001
model: One musical ensemble
consisting of four musicians travels to
Cyprus, Turkey, Egypt, Lebanon and
Syria over the course of four weeks.
2. Administrative Costs. Costs
necessary for the effective
administration of the program may
include salaries for grantee organization
employees, benefits, and other direct
and indirect costs per detailed
instructions in the Solicitation Package.
While there is no rigid ratio of
administrative to program costs,
proposals in which the administrative
costs do not exceed 25% of the total
requested from ECA grant funds will be
more competitive on cost effectiveness.
Please refer to the Solicitation Package
for complete budget guidelines and
formatting instructions.
Please refer to the Solicitation
Package for complete budget guidelines
and formatting instructions.
IV.3f. Application Deadline and
Methods of Submission:
Application Deadline Date: April 29,
2011.
Reference Number: ECA/PE/C/CU–
11–09.
Methods of Submission: Applications
may be submitted in one of two ways:
(1) In hard-copy, via a nationally
recognized overnight delivery service
(i.e., DHL, Federal Express, UPS,
Airborne Express, or U.S. Postal Service
Express Overnight Mail, etc.), or (2)
electronically through https://
www.grants.gov/.
Along with the Project Title, all
applicants must enter the above
Reference Number in Box 11 on the SF–
424 contained in the mandatory
Proposal Submission Instructions (PSI)
of the solicitation document.
IV.3f.1. Submitting Printed
Applications: Applications must be
shipped no later than the above
deadline. Delivery services used by
applicants must have in-place,
centralized shipping identification and
tracking systems that may be accessed
via the Internet and delivery people
who are identifiable by commonly
recognized uniforms and delivery
vehicles. Proposals shipped on or before
the above deadline but received at ECA
more than seven days after the deadline
will be ineligible for further
consideration under this competition.
Proposals shipped after the established
deadlines are ineligible for
consideration under this competition.
ECA will not notify you upon receipt of
application. It is each applicant’s
responsibility to ensure that each
package is marked with a legible
tracking number and to monitor/confirm
delivery to ECA via the Internet.
Delivery of proposal packages may not
PO 00000
Frm 00138
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
13261
be made via local courier service or in
person for this competition. Faxed
documents will not be accepted at any
time. Only proposals submitted as
stated above will be considered.
Important note: When preparing your
submission please make sure to include one
extra copy of the completed SF–424 form and
place it in an envelope addressed to ECA/EX/
PM.
The original and 10 copies of the
application should be sent to: Program
Management Division, ECA–IIP/EX/PM,
Ref.: ECA/PE/C/CU–11–09, SA–5, Floor
4, Department of State, 2200 C Street,
NW., Washington, DC 20037.
Applicants submitting hard-copy
applications must also submit the
‘‘Executive Summary’’ and ‘‘Proposal
Narrative’’ sections of the proposal in
text (.txt) or Microsoft Word format on
CD–ROM. As appropriate, the Bureau
will provide these files electronically to
the appropriate Public Affairs Section(s)
at the U.S. embassies for their review.
IV.3f.2. Submitting Electronic
Applications: Applicants have the
option of submitting proposals
electronically through Grants.gov
(https://www.grants.gov/). Complete
solicitation packages are available at
Grants.gov in the ‘‘Find’’ portion of the
system.
PLEASE NOTE: ECA bears no
responsibility for applicant timeliness of
submission or data errors resulting from
transmission or conversion processes for
proposals submitted via Grants.gov.
Please follow the instructions
available in the ‘Get Started’ portion of
the site (https://www.grants.gov/
GetStarted).
Several of the steps in the Grants.gov
registration process could take several
weeks. Therefore, applicants should
check with appropriate staff within their
organizations immediately after
reviewing this RFGP to confirm or
determine their registration status with
Grants.gov. Once registered, the amount
of time it can take to upload an
application will vary depending on a
variety of factors including the size of
the application and the speed of your
Internet connection. In addition,
validation of an electronic submission
via Grants.gov can take up to two
business days.
Therefore, we strongly recommend
that you not wait until the application
deadline to begin the submission
process through Grants.gov.
The Grants.gov Web site includes
extensive information on all phases/
aspects of the Grants.gov process,
including an extensive section on
frequently asked questions, located
under the ‘‘For Applicants’’ section of
E:\FR\FM\10MRN1.SGM
10MRN1
13262
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 47 / Thursday, March 10, 2011 / Notices
the Web site. ECA strongly recommends
that all potential applicants review
thoroughly the Grants.gov Web site,
well in advance of submitting a
proposal through the Grants.gov system.
ECA bears no responsibility for data
errors resulting from transmission or
conversion processes.
Direct all questions regarding
Grants.gov registration and submission
to: Grants.gov Customer Support,
Contact Center Phone: 800–518–4726,
Business Hours: Monday–Friday,
7 a.m.–9 p.m. Eastern Time, E-mail:
support@grants.gov.
Applicants have until midnight
(12 a.m.), Washington, DC, time of the
closing date to ensure that their entire
application has been uploaded to the
Grants.gov site. There are no exceptions
to the above deadline. Applications
uploaded to the site after midnight of
the application deadline date will be
automatically rejected by the grants.gov
system, and will be technically
ineligible.
Please refer to the Grants.gov Web
site, for definitions of various
‘‘application statuses’’ and the difference
between a submission receipt and a
submission validation. Applicants will
receive a validation e-mail from
grants.gov upon the successful
submission of an application. Again,
validation of an electronic submission
via Grants.gov can take up to two
business days. Therefore, we strongly
recommend that you not wait until the
application deadline to begin the
submission process through Grants.gov.
ECA will not notify you upon receipt of
electronic applications.
It is the responsibility of all
applicants submitting proposals via the
Grants.gov web portal to ensure that
proposals have been received by
Grants.gov in their entirety, and ECA
bears no responsibility for data errors
resulting from transmission or
conversion processes.
IV.3g. Intergovernmental Review of
Applications: Executive Order 12372
does not apply to this program.
V. Application Review Information
jdjones on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with NOTICES
V.1. Review Process
The Bureau will review all proposals
for technical eligibility. Proposals will
be deemed ineligible if they do not fully
adhere to the guidelines stated herein
and in the Solicitation Package. All
eligible proposals will be reviewed by
the program office, as well as the Public
Diplomacy section overseas, where
appropriate. Eligible proposals will be
subject to compliance with Federal and
Bureau regulations and guidelines and
forwarded to Bureau grant panels for
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:43 Mar 09, 2011
Jkt 223001
advisory review. Proposals may also be
reviewed by the Office of the Legal
Adviser or by other Department
elements. Final funding decisions are at
the discretion of the Department of
State’s Assistant Secretary for
Educational and Cultural Affairs. Final
technical authority for cooperative
agreements resides with the Bureau’s
Grants Officer.
Review Criteria
Technically eligible applications will
be competitively reviewed according to
the criteria stated below. These criteria
are not rank ordered and all carry equal
weight in the proposal evaluation:
1. Program Planning and Ability to
Achieve Objectives: Detailed agenda and
relevant work plan should demonstrate
substantive undertakings and logistical
capacity. Agenda and plan should
adhere to the program overview and
guidelines described above. Proposals
should clearly demonstrate how the
institution will meet the program’s
objectives and plan.
2. Multiplier Effect/Impact: Proposed
programs should strengthen long-term
mutual understanding, including
maximum sharing of information and
establishment of long-term institutional
and individual linkages.
3. Support of Diversity: Proposals
should demonstrate substantive support
of the Bureau’s policy on diversity.
Achievable and relevant features should
be cited in both program administration
(selection of participants, program
venue and program evaluation) and
program content (orientation and wrapup sessions, program meetings, resource
materials and follow-up activities).
4. Institutional Capacity: Proposals
should include (1) the institution’s
mission and date of establishment; (2)
an outline of prior awards—U.S.
government and/or private support
received for tours abroad; (3)
descriptions of experienced staff
members who will be part of the team
implementing the program; and (4) all
other documentation requested herein.
Proposed personnel and institutional
resources should be adequate and
appropriate to achieve the program or
project’s goals. The proposal should
reflect the institution’s expertise in the
music management arena and
knowledge of the conditions in the
regions abroad.
5. Institution’s Record/Ability:
Proposals should demonstrate an
institutional record of at least five years
of international music management
planning and implementation,
including responsible fiscal
management and full compliance with
all reporting requirements for past
PO 00000
Frm 00139
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Bureau grants as determined by Bureau
Grants Staff. The Bureau will consider
the past performance of prior recipients
and the demonstrated potential of new
applicants.
6. Follow-on Activities: Proposals
should provide a plan for continued
follow-on activity (without Bureau
support) ensuring that Bureau
supported programs are not isolated
events.
7. Project Evaluation: Proposals
should include a plan to evaluate the
program’s success, both as the activities
unfold and at the end of the program. A
draft survey questionnaire or other
technique plus description of a
methodology to use to link outcomes to
original project objectives is
recommended.
8. Cost-effectiveness and Cost-sharing:
The overhead and administrative
components of the proposal, including
salaries and honoraria, should be kept
as low as possible. All other items
should be necessary and appropriate.
Proposals should maximize cost-sharing
through other private sector support as
well as institutional direct funding
contributions.
VI. Award Administration Information
VI.1a. Award Notices: Final awards
cannot be made until funds have been
appropriated by Congress, allocated and
committed through internal Bureau
procedures. Successful applicants will
receive an Federal Assistance Award
(FAA) from the Bureau’s Grants Office.
The FAA and the original proposal with
subsequent modifications (if applicable)
shall be the only binding authorizing
document between the recipient and the
U.S. Government. The FAA will be
signed by an authorized Grants Officer,
and mailed to the recipient’s
responsible officer identified in the
application.
Unsuccessful applicants will receive
notification of the results of the
application review from the ECA
program office coordinating this
competition.
VI.1b. The following additional
requirements apply to this project:
Special Provision for Performance in a
Designated Combat Area (Currently Iraq
and Afghanistan) (December 2008)
All Recipient personnel deploying to
areas of combat operations, as
designated by the Secretary of Defense
(currently Iraq and Afghanistan), under
assistance awards over $100,000 or
performance over 14 days must register
in the Department of Defense
maintained Synchronized Predeployment and Operational Tracker
(SPOT) system. Recipients of federal
E:\FR\FM\10MRN1.SGM
10MRN1
jdjones on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 47 / Thursday, March 10, 2011 / Notices
assistance awards shall register in SPOT
before deployment, or if already in the
designated operational area, register
upon becoming an employee under the
assistance award, and maintain current
data in SPOT. Information on how to
register in SPOT will be available from
your Grants Officer or Grants Officer
Representative during the final
negotiation and approval stages in the
federal assistance awards process.
Recipients of federal assistance awards
are advised that adherence to this policy
and procedure will be a requirement of
all final federal assistance awards issued
by ECA.
Recipient performance may require
the use of armed private security
personnel. To the extent that such
private security contractors (PSCs) are
required, grantees are required to ensure
they adhere to Chief of Mission (COM)
policies and procedures regarding the
operation, oversight, and accountability
of PSCs.
VI.2. Administrative and National
Policy Requirements: Terms and
Conditions for the Administration of
ECA agreements include the following:
Office of Management and Budget
Circular A–122, ‘‘Cost Principles for
Nonprofit Organizations.’’
Office of Management and Budget
Circular A–21, ‘‘Cost Principles for
Educational Institutions.’’
OMB Circular A–87, ‘‘Cost Principles for
State, Local and Indian Governments’’.
OMB Circular No. A–110 (Revised),
Uniform Administrative
Requirements for Grants and
Agreements with Institutions of
Higher Education, Hospitals, and
other Nonprofit Organizations.
OMB Circular No. A–102, Uniform
Administrative Requirements for
Grants-in-Aid to State and Local
Governments.
OMB Circular No. A–133, Audits of
States, Local Government, and Nonprofit Organizations.
Please reference the following Web
sites for additional information:
https://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/
grants.
https://exchanges.state.gov/education/
grantsdiv/terms.htm#articleI.
VI.3. Reporting Requirements: You
must provide ECA with a hard copy
original plus two copies of the following
reports:
(1) A final program and financial
report no more than 90 days after the
expiration of the award;
(2) A concise, one-page final program
report summarizing program outcomes
no more than 90 days after the
expiration of the award. This one-page
report will be transmitted to OMB, and
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:43 Mar 09, 2011
Jkt 223001
be made available to the public via
OMB’s USAspending.gov Web site—as
part of ECA’s Federal Funding
Accountability and Transparency Act
(FFATA) reporting requirements.
(3) A SF–PPR, ‘‘Performance Progress
Report’’ Cover Sheet with all program
reports.
(4) Quarterly program and financial
reports showing activities carried out
and expenses incurred in the calendar
quarter.
(5) Quarterly press updates, including
any articles or publicity regarding the
program and an updated
communications calendar.
Award recipients will be required to
provide reports analyzing their
evaluation findings to the Bureau in
their regular program reports. (Please
refer to IV. Application and Submission
Instructions (IV.3.d.3) above for Program
Monitoring and Evaluation
information).
All data collected, including survey
responses and contact information, must
be maintained for a minimum of three
years and provided to the Bureau upon
request.
All reports must be sent to the ECA
Grants Officer and ECA Program Officer
listed in the final assistance award
document.
VII. Agency Contacts
For questions about this
announcement, contact: Melissa Jarrett,
U.S. Department of State, Cultural
Programs, ECA/PE/C/CU, SA–5, Floor 3,
ECA/PE/C/CU–11–09 L–16, 2200 C
Street, NW., Washington, DC 20520,
202–632–2412, fax 202–632–9355;
JarrettMA@state.gov.
All correspondence with the Bureau
concerning this RFGP should reference
the above title and number ECA/PE/C/
CU–11–09.
Please read the complete
announcement before sending inquiries
or submitting proposals. Once the RFGP
deadline has passed, Bureau staff may
not discuss this competition with
applicants until the proposal review
process has been completed.
VIII. Other Information
Notice: The terms and conditions
published in this RFGP are binding and may
not be modified by any Bureau
representative. Explanatory information
provided by the Bureau that contradicts
published language will not be binding.
Issuance of the RFGP does not constitute an
award commitment on the part of the
Government. The Bureau reserves the right to
reduce, revise, or increase proposal budgets
in accordance with the needs of the program
and the availability of funds. Awards made
will be subject to periodic reporting and
PO 00000
Frm 00140
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
13263
evaluation requirements per section VI.3
above.
Dated: March 2, 2011.
Ann Stock,
Assistant Secretary for Educational and
Cultural Affairs Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2011–5371 Filed 3–9–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710–05–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
Agency Information Collection
Activities: Requests for Comments;
Clearance of Renewed Approval of
Information Collection: FAA Entry
Point Filing Form—International
Registry
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice and request for
comments.
AGENCY:
In accordance with the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, FAA
invites public comments about our
intention to request the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB)
approval to renew an information
collection. The respondents supply
information through the AC 8050–135 to
the FAA Civil Aviation Registry’s
Aircraft Registration Branch in order to
obtain an authorization code for access
to the International Registry.
DATES: Written comments should be
submitted by May 9, 2011.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Carla Scott on (202) 267–9895, or by
e-mail at: Carla.Scott@faa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
OMB Control Number: 2120–0697.
Title: FAA Entry Point Filing Form—
International Registry.
Form Numbers: AC Form 8050–135.
Type of Review: Renewal of an
information collection.
Background: The information
collected is necessary to obtain an
authorization code for transmission of
information to the International
Registry. To transmit certain types of
interests or prospective interests to the
International Registry, interested parties
must file a completed FAA Entry Point
Filing Form—International Registry, AC
Form 8050–135, with the FAA Civil
Aviation Registry. Upon receipt of the
completed form, the FAA Civil Aviation
Registry will issue the unique
authorization code.
Respondents: Approximately 12,750
applicants.
Frequency: Information is collected
on occasion.
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\10MRN1.SGM
10MRN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 47 (Thursday, March 10, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 13256-13263]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-5371]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF STATE
[Public Notice 7360]
Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs (ECA) Request for
Grant Proposals: American Music Abroad
Announcement Type: New Cooperative Agreement.
Funding Opportunity Number: ECA/PE/C/CU-11-09.
Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number: 19.415.
Key Dates:
Application Deadline: April 29, 2011.
Executive Summary: The Cultural Programs Division in the Office of
Citizen Exchanges in the Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs
(ECA) announces an open competition for a cooperative agreement to
administer the American Music Abroad program. The program will consist
of approximately ten tours for a select number of professional American
artists in a wide range of uniquely American musical genres. The
program is designed to broadly represent the excellence and diversity
of traditional American music. Some examples of American music genres
include, but are not be limited to, contemporary urban music, hip hop,
rock and roll, jazz and American roots music genres like country and
western, bluegrass, zydeco, Cajun, and folk. The musicians selected for
this program must demonstrate high artistic ability, evidence a strong
commitment to education and exchange activities, and reflect the
diversity of America and American music. They must be conversant with
the broader aspects of contemporary American society and culture.
International tours will include workshops, master classes, and
outreach activities, in addition to performances.
U.S. public and non-profit organizations meeting the provisions
described in Internal Revenue code section 26 U.S.C. 501(c)(3) may
submit proposals that support the goals of the American Music Abroad
program: to promote mutual understanding between the people of the
United States and other countries, and cross-cultural awareness. The
tours accomplish this by providing an opportunity for international
audiences to experience American musical life, highlighting the
contemporary music scene as well as our country's cultural history, and
allowing American performers to learn about life and culture in the
foreign host countries.
The Bureau is particularly interested in proposals for the
administration of tours by American musicians representing diverse
American music genres to countries with significant underserved
populations that may not otherwise have access to American art forms,
and countries with significant youth populations. The Bureau is also
interested in proposals for projects that reach indigenous populations.
No guarantee is made or implied that a grant will be awarded for tours
to any particular region or that tours will be organized to any
particular region.
To be eligible for this competition, all organizations must
demonstrate a minimum of five years' experience successfully conducting
international performing arts exchange programs in
[[Page 13257]]
the music field. The organization must have experience administering
programs in multiple musical genres.
I. Funding Opportunity Description
Authority: Overall grant making authority for this program is
contained in the Mutual Educational and Cultural Exchange Act of 1961,
Public Law 87-256, as amended, also known as the Fulbright-Hays Act.
The purpose of the Act is ``to enable the Government of the United
States to increase mutual understanding between the people of the
United States and the people of other countries * * *; to strengthen
the ties which unite us with other nations by demonstrating the
educational and cultural interests, developments, and achievements of
the people of the United States and other nations * * * and thus to
assist in the development of friendly, sympathetic and peaceful
relations between the United States and the other countries of the
world.'' The funding authority for the program above is provided
through legislation.
Purpose: The Bureau seeks proposals to engage people and audiences
overseas that do not normally have access to American cultural
performances or American artists by presenting at least ten tours of
musical groups representing a wide range of American musical genres.
Specific terms for the selection of the musical groups will be
developed in collaboration with ECA, and subject to ECA approval.
Significantly, proposals should describe application and selection
plans that seek to represent the broadest possible diversity of
American musical genres. In general, of the 10 selected American Music
Abroad musical groups, no more than two groups may be repeat or alumni
groups that have participated in past American Music Abroad programs
and no single group may participate in the program more than twice.
Performances are only one aspect of an exchange program focusing on
people-to-people interactions. American Music Abroad musicians will be
expected to conduct or participate in master classes, lectures,
workshops with people from varied age groups and musical backgrounds,
impromptu musical sessions, radio and TV appearances, and other
activities with local cultural institutions, musicians, media and
students. Therefore it is important that the proposal include plans for
identifying groups who can conduct exchange activities as well as
perform.
Participating musicians must be U.S. citizens who are at least 21
years old; demonstrate the highest artistic, performance and teaching
abilities; be dedicated to interactive educational activities targeting
various age-groups and musical abilities; have a strong interest in
intercultural exchange; be conversant with broader aspects of
contemporary American society and culture; be adaptable to rigorous
touring through regions of the world where travel and performance
situations may be difficult; and represent the diversity of America and
American Music.
The search, adjudication and selection process of the musicians
must consist of an open call to U.S. musicians with clear and
transparent selection criteria and mechanism approved by ECA, geared to
final competitive selection by an independent panel that includes an
ECA representative and culminating in a diverse cadre of musicians.
Auditions should be held in two cities (one on the East Coast and
one on the West Coast) and selected in consultation with ECA. A panel
of judges should be assembled in consultation with ECA. Any pre-
screening of applicant musicians prior to the auditions (such as blind
musical screenings) must be agreed to in consultation with ECA.
The selected musicians (approximately 10 ensembles of varying size,
possibly including trios, quartets, and quintets) must represent the
diversity of America and American music and be able to use musical
expression to convey to international audiences and workshop
participants ideas about American culture, history and society. ECA
will provide additional guidance during selection process to ensure
that the diversity of American music is properly represented. For
example, at least five musical genres are represented among the final
10 groups, with no more than 2 groups from each genre. Successful
applicants will have a clearly developed strategy for attracting
applications nationwide to encourage regional and musical diversity
from musicians representing urban, rock, jazz and American roots music
styles.
To ensure that the program continues to recruit new diversity and
talent, American Music Abroad musicians may only participate in the
program twice, and only 2 of the final 10 groups may be American Music
Abroad alumni groups. Performances are only one aspect of an exchange
program focusing on people-to-people interactions. American Music
Abroad participants will be expected to conduct or participate in
master classes, lectures, workshops, impromptu jam sessions, radio and
TV appearances, and other activities with local cultural institutions,
musicians, media and students.
Applicants should describe their project team's capacity for
successfully planning recruitment and selection and provide a detailed
sample program to illustrate planning capacity and ability to achieve
program objectives.
Proposals should reflect a practical understanding of global
issues, and demonstrate sensitivity to cultural, political, economic
and social differences in regions where tour groups may perform.
Special attention should be given to describing the applicant
organization's experience with planning and implementing complex and
unpredictable logistical undertakings overseas. Applicants should
describe their project team's capacity for successfully planning
projects of this nature and provide a detailed sample program (to
include itineraries) to illustrate planning capacity and ability to
achieve program objectives.
Applicants must identify all U.S. partner organizations and venues
with whom they are proposing to collaborate and describe previous
cooperative projects in the section on ``Institutional Capacity.''
Applicants must include in their proposal supporting materials or
documentation that demonstrates a minimum of five years experience in
conducting global exchanges in the music field. The organization must
also demonstrate it has experience dealing with multiple musical
genres.
The successful applicant will incorporate social media and
innovative technologies into a well-developed public relations and
outreach strategy. Proposals must include specific information
regarding online educational materials to supplement the international
tour activities. Proposals must include references with name and
contact information for other assistance awards the applicant has
received so the Bureau may contact them directly.
Requirements of the Award Recipient: ECA intends to give one
assistance award to a qualified institution or organization to
administer the American Music Abroad program globally. Activities
funded through this cooperative agreement support the organization and
implementation of approximately ten (10) international tours, and must
include, but are not limited to:
1. Designing, organizing, and implementing a transparent, open,
national competition process to select approximately ten (10) U.S.
musical groups. Musical genres should be representative of the
diversity of U.S. society and culture and should include,
[[Page 13258]]
among others, American roots, hip-hop, rock and roll, and jazz.
2. Programming musical, educational, and media tour activities in
consultation with U.S. embassies and ECA. For each overseas location,
the award recipient will be required to coordinate closely with staff
at U.S. embassies and consulates abroad to help advance their public
diplomacy objectives, as well as find and secure appropriate venues for
performances and workshops and manage a broad range of logistics
issues.
3. Assisting musicians with passport, visa, immunizations, and
other pre-tour preparations.
4. Making all international travel arrangements and coordinating
with posts on all in-country overseas travel;
5. Making all financial and administrative arrangements with the
musicians.
6. Organizing orientation sessions and pre-travel briefings that
provide participants with media training, cultural briefings about the
countries on the tour, and specific information regarding the context
for their mission as cultural ambassadors.
7. Scheduling a pre-tour briefing session for each ensemble with
State Department regional experts and ECA program officers in
attendance. This event should be scheduled in coordination with a
Washington, DC, public performance.
8. Scheduling an associated event as part of the annual American
Music Abroad program.
9. Scheduling public performance dates in Washington, DC, for each
ensemble. Applicants may schedule public performances in the audition
city as well.
10. Developing outreach to international and U.S. media as part of
a comprehensive media and public relations strategy developed by the
awardee in consultation with and approved by ECA. The successful
applicant will incorporate social media and innovative technologies
into their outreach strategy.
11. Producing press and educational materials appropriate for
foreign audiences who may not be familiar with the U.S. and/or American
music (including, as needed, translation of materials). The successful
applicant will include an online education component to enhance
international touring activities.
12. Shipping performance and education materials.
13. Regularly providing ongoing and detailed information to the
Program Office regarding tour schedules, venues and program activities,
performance and workshop results, tour highlights, and media coverage.
14. Assisting ensembles and U.S. embassies with follow-on program
development.
15. Evaluating program activities.
16. Reporting on tour activities, including audience and
participant numbers and outreach efforts, to ECA.
Applicants must have experience in global exchange planning and
implementation, and should address the above elements in the proposal.
The grantee must be highly responsive and able to work in close
consultation with ECA and the Public Affairs Sections of the
participating U.S. embassies.
ECA Responsibilities: In a cooperative agreement, ECA/PE/C/CU is
substantially involved in program activities above and beyond routine
monitoring. ECA/PE/C/CU activities and responsibilities for this
program are as follows:
1. Approval of audition cities, recruitment and selection process,
and judges and judging criteria;
2. Participation in the selection of musicians, orientation and
debriefing activities;
3. Identification of four to six countries for each tour. Countries
will be those of importance to the Department of State's public
diplomacy mission to build mutual understanding in the following world
regions: Middle East, East Asia and the Pacific, Africa, South and
Central Asia, Europe and/or South/Central America;
4. Arrangement of participation by Department of State officers in
pre-tour briefings and any debriefings that might take place;
5. Approval of media and public relations strategies and
arrangements for a showcase event;
6. Approval of all tour arrangements, including daily program
schedules.
II. Award Information
Type of Award: Cooperative Agreement. ECA's level of involvement in
this program is listed under number I above.
Fiscal Year Funds: FY-2011.
Approximate Total Funding: $1,500,000.
Approximate Number of Awards: 1.
Approximate Average Award: $1,500,000.
Ceiling of Award Range: $1,500,000.
Anticipated Award Date: June 1, 2011, Pending availability of
funds.
Anticipated Project Completion Date: February 28, 2013.
Additional Information: Pending successful implementation of this
program and the availability of funds in subsequent fiscal years, it is
ECA's intent to renew this cooperative agreement for two additional
fiscal years before openly competing it again.
III. Eligibility Information
III.1. Eligible applicants: Applications may be submitted by public
and private non-profit organizations meeting the provisions described
in Internal Revenue Code section 26 U.S.C. 501(c)(3).
III.2. Cost Sharing or Matching Funds: There is no minimum or
maximum percentage required for this competition. However, the Bureau
encourages applicants to provide maximum levels of cost sharing and
funding in support of its programs.
When cost sharing is offered, it is understood and agreed that the
applicant must provide the amount of cost sharing as stipulated in its
proposal and later included in an approved grant agreement. Cost
sharing may be in the form of allowable direct or indirect costs. For
accountability, you must maintain written records to support all costs
which are claimed as your contribution, as well as costs to be paid by
the Federal government. Such records are subject to audit. The basis
for determining the value of cash and in-kind contributions must be in
accordance with OMB Circular A-110, (Revised), Subpart C.23--Cost
Sharing and Matching. In the event you do not provide the minimum
amount of cost sharing as stipulated in the approved budget, ECA's
contribution will be reduced in like proportion.
III.3. Other Eligibility Requirements:
(a) Bureau grant guidelines require that organizations with less
than four years experience in conducting international exchanges be
limited to $60,000 in Bureau funding. ECA anticipates making one award,
in an amount up to $1,500,000 to support program and administrative
costs required to implement this exchange program. Therefore,
organizations with less than four years experience in conducting
international exchanges are ineligible to apply under this competition.
The Bureau encourages applicants to provide maximum levels of cost
sharing and funding in support of its programs.
(b) Technical Eligibility: All proposals must comply with the
following:
(1) Full adherence to the guidelines stated herein and in the
Solicitation Package;
(2) Proposal submission deadline date;
(3) Non-profit organization status; and
(4) For purposes of this competition, at least five years of
demonstrated experience in programming globally in
[[Page 13259]]
the music field, or your proposal will be declared technically
ineligible and given no further consideration in the review process.
Please see III.3.b.4 below regarding the eligibility requirements of
additional experience from prospective applicants.
IV. Application and Submission Information
Note: Please read the complete announcement before sending
inquiries or submitting proposals. Once the RFGP deadline has
passed, Bureau staff may not discuss this competition with
applicants until the proposal review process has been completed.
IV.1. Contact Information to Request an Application Package: Please
contact the Cultural Programs Division (ECA/PE/C/CU) in the Office of
Citizen Exchanges, U.S. Department of State, SA-5, 2200 C Street, NW.,
Washington, DC 20037, 202-632-6412, fax 202/632-9355; e-mail
JarrettMA@state.gov to request a Solicitation Package. Please refer to
the Funding Opportunity Number ECA/PE/C/CU-11-09 located at the top of
this announcement when making your request.
Alternatively, an electronic application package may be obtained
from grants.gov. Please see section IV.3f for further information.
The Solicitation Package contains the Proposal Submission
Instructions (PSI) document which consists of required application
forms, and standard guidelines for proposal preparation.
Please specify Melissa Jarrett and refer to the Funding Opportunity
Number ECA/PE/C/CU-11-09 located at the top of this announcement on all
other inquiries and correspondence.
IV.2. To Download a Solicitation Package Via the Internet: The
entire Solicitation Package may be downloaded from the Bureau's Web
site at https://exchanges.state.gov/education/rfgps/menu.htm, or from
the Grants.gov Web site at https://www.grants.gov. Please read all
information before downloading.
IV.3. Content and Form of Submission: Applicants must follow all
instructions in the Solicitation Package. The original and 10 copies
(11 proposals total) of the application should be submitted per the
instructions under IV.3f. Application Deadline and Methods of
Submission section below.
IV.3a. You are required to have a Dunn and Bradstreet Data
Universal Numbering System (DUNS) number to apply for a grant or
cooperative agreement from the U.S. Government. This number is a nine-
digit identification number, which uniquely identifies business
entities. Obtaining a DUNS number is easy and there is no charge. To
obtain a DUNS number, access https://www.dunandbradstreet.com/ or call
1-866-705-5711. Please ensure that your DUNS number is included in the
appropriate box of the SF-424 which is part of the formal application
package.
IV.3b. All proposals must contain an executive summary, proposal
narrative and budget.
Please Refer to the Solicitation Package. It contains the mandatory
Proposal Submission Instructions (PSI) document for additional
formatting and technical requirements.
IV.3c. All federal award recipients and sub-recipients must
maintain current registrations in the Central Contractor Registration
(CCR) database and have a Dun and Bradstreet Data Universal Numbering
System (DUNS) number. Recipients and sub-recipients must maintain
accurate and up-to-date information in the CCR until all program and
financial activity and reporting have been completed. All entities must
review and update the information at least annually after the initial
registration and more frequently if required information changes or
another award is granted.
You must have nonprofit status with the IRS at the time of
application. Please note: Effective January 7, 2009, all applicants for
ECA federal assistance awards must include in their application the
names of directors and/or senior executives (current officers,
trustees, and key employees, regardless of amount of compensation). In
fulfilling this requirement, applicants must submit information in one
of the following ways:
(1) Those who file Internal Revenue Service Form 990, ``Return of
Organization Exempt From Income Tax,'' must include a copy of relevant
portions of this form.
(2) Those who do not file IRS Form 990 must submit information
above in the format of their choice.
In addition to final program reporting requirements, award
recipients will also be required to submit a one-page document, derived
from their program reports, listing and describing their grant
activities. For award recipients, the names of directors and/or senior
executives (current officers, trustees, and key employees), as well as
the one- page description of grant activities, will be transmitted by
the State Department to OMB, along with other information required by
the Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act (FFATA), and
will be made available to the public by the Office of Management and
Budget on its USASpending.gov Web site as part of ECA's FFATA reporting
requirements.
If your organization is a private nonprofit which has not received
a grant or cooperative agreement from ECA in the past three years, or
if your organization received nonprofit status from the IRS within the
past four years, you must submit the necessary documentation to verify
nonprofit status as directed in the PSI document. Failure to do so will
cause your proposal to be declared technically ineligible.
IV.3d. Please take into consideration the following information
when preparing your proposal narrative:
IV.3d.1. Adherence to All Regulations Governing the J Visa: The
Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs places critically important
emphases on the secure and proper administration of Exchange Visitor (J
visa) Programs and adherence by recipient organizations and program
participants to all regulations governing the J visa program status.
A copy of the complete regulations governing the administration of
Exchange Visitor (J) programs is available at https://exchanges.state.gov or from: Office of Designation, Private Sector
Programs Division, U.S. Department of State, ECA/EC/D/PS, SA-5, 5th
Floor, 2200 C Street, NW., Washington, DC 20037.
Please refer to Solicitation Package for further information.
IV.3d.2. Diversity, Freedom and Democracy Guidelines: Pursuant to
the Bureau's authorizing legislation, programs must maintain a non-
political character and should be balanced and representative of the
diversity of American political, social, and cultural life.
``Diversity'' should be interpreted in the broadest sense and encompass
differences including, but not limited to ethnicity, race, gender,
religion, geographic location, socio-economic status, and disabilities.
Applicants are strongly encouraged to adhere to the advancement of this
principle both in program administration and in program content. Please
refer to the review criteria under the `Support for Diversity' section
for specific suggestions on incorporating diversity into your proposal.
Public Law 104-319 provides that ``in carrying out programs of
educational and cultural exchange in countries whose people do not
fully enjoy freedom and democracy,'' the Bureau ``shall take
appropriate steps to provide opportunities for participation in such
programs to human rights and democracy leaders of such countries.''
Public Law 106-113 requires that the governments of the countries
described above do not have inappropriate
[[Page 13260]]
influence in the selection process. Proposals should reflect
advancement of these goals in their program contents, to the full
extent deemed feasible.
IV.3d.3. Program Monitoring and Evaluation: Proposals must include
a plan to monitor and evaluate the project's success, both as the
activities unfold and at the end of the program. The Bureau recommends
that your proposal include a draft survey questionnaire or other
technique plus a description of a methodology to use to link outcomes
to original project objectives. The Bureau expects that the recipient
organization will track participants or partners and be able to respond
to key evaluation questions, including satisfaction with the program,
learning as a result of the program, changes in behavior as a result of
the program, and effects of the program on institutions (institutions
in which participants work or partner institutions). The evaluation
plan should include indicators that measure gains in mutual
understanding as well as substantive knowledge.
Successful monitoring and evaluation depend heavily on setting
clear goals and outcomes at the outset of a program. Your evaluation
plan should include a description of your project's objectives, your
anticipated project outcomes, and how and when you intend to measure
these outcomes (performance indicators). The more that outcomes are
``smart'' (specific, measurable, attainable, results-oriented, and
placed in a reasonable time frame), the easier it will be to conduct
the evaluation. You should also show how your project objectives link
to the goals of the program described in this RFGP.
Your monitoring and evaluation plan should clearly distinguish
between program outputs and outcomes. Outputs are products and services
delivered, often stated as an amount. Output information is important
to show the scope or size of project activities, but it cannot
substitute for information about progress towards outcomes or the
results achieved. Examples of outputs include the number of people
trained or the number of seminars conducted. Outcomes, in contrast,
represent specific results a project is intended to achieve and is
usually measured as an extent of change. Findings on outputs and
outcomes should both be reported, but the focus should be on outcomes.
We encourage you to assess the following four levels of outcomes,
as they relate to the program goals set out in the RFGP (listed here in
increasing order of importance):
1. Participant satisfaction with the program and exchange
experience.
2. Participant learning, such as increased knowledge, aptitude,
skills, and changed understanding and attitude. Learning includes both
substantive (subject-specific) learning and mutual understanding.
3. Participant behavior, concrete actions to apply knowledge in
work or community; greater participation and responsibility in civic
organizations; interpretation and explanation of experiences and new
knowledge gained; continued contacts between participants, community
members, and others.
4. Institutional changes, such as increased collaboration and
partnerships, policy reforms, new programming, and organizational
improvements.
Please note: Consideration should be given to the appropriate
timing of data collection for each level of outcome. For example,
satisfaction is usually captured as a short-term outcome, whereas
behavior and institutional changes are normally considered longer-term
outcomes.
Overall, the quality of your monitoring and evaluation plan will be
judged on how well it (1) specifies intended outcomes; (2) gives clear
descriptions of how each outcome will be measured; (3) identifies when
particular outcomes will be measured; and (4) provides a clear
description of the data collection strategies for each outcome (i.e.,
surveys, interviews, or focus groups). (Please note that evaluation
plans that deal only with the first level of outcomes [satisfaction]
will be deemed less competitive under the present evaluation criteria.)
Recipient organizations will be required to provide reports
analyzing their evaluation findings to the Bureau in their regular
program reports. All data collected, including survey responses and
contact information, must be maintained for a minimum of three years
and provided to the Bureau upon request.
IV.3e. Please take the following information into consideration
when preparing your budget:
IV.3e.1. Applicants must submit SF-424A--``Budget Information--Non-
Construction Programs'' along with a comprehensive budget for the
entire program. The award may not exceed $1,500,000. There must be a
summary budget as well as breakdowns reflecting both administrative and
program budgets. Applicants may provide separate sub-budgets for each
program component, phase, location, or activity to provide
clarification.
IV.3e.2. For budgeting purposes, applicants should estimate costs
based approximately ten musical groups (e.g. trios, quartets, and
quintets) traveling for four (4) weeks to six (6) destinations in the
following regions: Africa, East Asia, Eurasia, Central Europe and the
Balkans, the Near East/North Africa, Latin America, and South Asia.
Final determination of participating regions and countries will be made
by ECA in collaboration with U.S. embassies and the successful
applicant after the assistance award has been given.
IV.3e.3. Allowable costs for the program include the following:
(1) Program Expenses, including but not limited to: domestic and
international travel for the selected ensembles (per The Fly America
Act); visas and immunizations; airport taxes and country entrance fees;
honoraria; educational materials and presentation items; excess and
overweight baggage fees; trip itinerary booklets; press kits and
promotional materials; follow-on activities; monitoring and evaluation;
international travel for program implementation and/or evaluation
purposes; and other justifiable expenses related to program activities.
The following guidelines may be helpful in developing a proposed
budget:
A. Travel Costs. International and domestic airfares. (per The Fly
America Act), transit costs, ground transportation, and visas for the
American Music Abroad participants to travel to the tour destinations.
Travel costs should also include airfare for selected finalists to
travel to the nearest audition city.
B. Per Diem: Domestic Per Diem should be estimated for selected
finalists attending auditions in the nearest audition city. For the
Washington, DC portion of the tour, organizations should use the
published Federal per diem rates, and estimate per diems based on a
two-night stay per ensemble member. The Public Affairs Sections of the
participating U.S. embassies and consulates generally are responsible
for per diem abroad. Domestic per diem rates may be accessed at: https://www.gsa.gov/Portal/gsa/ep/contentView.do?contentId=17943&contentType=GSA_BASIC%20.
C. Sub-grantees and Consultants. Sub-grantee organizations may be
used, in which case the written agreement between the prospective
grantee and sub-grantee should be included in the proposal. Sub-grants
must be itemized in the budget under General Program Expenses.
Consultants may be used to provide specialized expertise. Daily
honoraria cannot exceed $250 per day, and applicants are strongly
encouraged
[[Page 13261]]
to use organizational resources, and to cost share heavily in this
area.
D. Health Insurance. Each American Music Abroad participant will be
covered under the terms of the ECA-sponsored COINS health insurance
policy. The cost for international travel insurance for staff travel
may be included in the proposal budget.
E. Honoraria for American Music Abroad musicians. Daily honorarium
is $200 per day for each performer, including rest and travel days.
F. Educational and Promotional Items. Ensemble members may use
these funds for individual purchases or they may pool funds for joint
purposes. ECA funds for educational and promotional items (e.g. CDs,
guitar strings, lapel pins, etc.) should not exceed $500 per ensemble.
G. Excess Baggage. Excess baggage costs are based on the size and
weight of the instrument. Excess baggage estimates may be subject to
change once actual tour itineraries are scheduled; however for proposal
budget purposes, costs should be estimated at $3,500 per ensemble.
H. Immunizations/Visas. For purposes of a proposed budget, line
items for immunizations should be estimated at $400 per musician, and
visas/visa photos should be estimated at $600 per musician.
I. Press/Outreach Kits. Each relevant U.S. embassy should receive
appropriate contents for press kits. Items may be sent electronically
with the understanding that in some cases, embassies may not be able to
access large files or attachments. This line item may include funds for
shooting and duplicating black and white publicity photos and
duplicating CDs, as well as creating banners or other backdrops for
display at performances.
J. Translation of outreach and/or educational materials.
K. Staff Travel. Allowable costs include domestic staff travel for
one staff member to attend recruitment/selection events in two U.S.
cities and to pre-tour briefings and performances in Washington, DC.
International staff travel will be allowable, especially if associated
with monitoring and evaluation, as long as costs for a full four-to-six
week tour for each ensemble are completely covered. Cost-sharing for
staff travel is strongly encouraged.
L. Travel, Per Diem, and equipment costs related to scheduling an
associated domestic event as part of the annual American Music Abroad
program.
M. Other justifiable expenses directly related to supporting
program activities.
For purposes of this competition, please use the following program
as a model: One musical ensemble consisting of four musicians travels
to Cyprus, Turkey, Egypt, Lebanon and Syria over the course of four
weeks.
2. Administrative Costs. Costs necessary for the effective
administration of the program may include salaries for grantee
organization employees, benefits, and other direct and indirect costs
per detailed instructions in the Solicitation Package. While there is
no rigid ratio of administrative to program costs, proposals in which
the administrative costs do not exceed 25% of the total requested from
ECA grant funds will be more competitive on cost effectiveness. Please
refer to the Solicitation Package for complete budget guidelines and
formatting instructions.
Please refer to the Solicitation Package for complete budget
guidelines and formatting instructions.
IV.3f. Application Deadline and Methods of Submission:
Application Deadline Date: April 29, 2011.
Reference Number: ECA/PE/C/CU-11-09.
Methods of Submission: Applications may be submitted in one of two
ways:
(1) In hard-copy, via a nationally recognized overnight delivery
service (i.e., DHL, Federal Express, UPS, Airborne Express, or U.S.
Postal Service Express Overnight Mail, etc.), or (2) electronically
through https://www.grants.gov/.
Along with the Project Title, all applicants must enter the above
Reference Number in Box 11 on the SF-424 contained in the mandatory
Proposal Submission Instructions (PSI) of the solicitation document.
IV.3f.1. Submitting Printed Applications: Applications must be
shipped no later than the above deadline. Delivery services used by
applicants must have in-place, centralized shipping identification and
tracking systems that may be accessed via the Internet and delivery
people who are identifiable by commonly recognized uniforms and
delivery vehicles. Proposals shipped on or before the above deadline
but received at ECA more than seven days after the deadline will be
ineligible for further consideration under this competition. Proposals
shipped after the established deadlines are ineligible for
consideration under this competition. ECA will not notify you upon
receipt of application. It is each applicant's responsibility to ensure
that each package is marked with a legible tracking number and to
monitor/confirm delivery to ECA via the Internet. Delivery of proposal
packages may not be made via local courier service or in person for
this competition. Faxed documents will not be accepted at any time.
Only proposals submitted as stated above will be considered.
Important note: When preparing your submission please make sure
to include one extra copy of the completed SF-424 form and place it
in an envelope addressed to ECA/EX/PM.
The original and 10 copies of the application should be sent to:
Program Management Division, ECA-IIP/EX/PM, Ref.: ECA/PE/C/CU-11-09,
SA-5, Floor 4, Department of State, 2200 C Street, NW., Washington, DC
20037.
Applicants submitting hard-copy applications must also submit the
``Executive Summary'' and ``Proposal Narrative'' sections of the
proposal in text (.txt) or Microsoft Word format on CD-ROM. As
appropriate, the Bureau will provide these files electronically to the
appropriate Public Affairs Section(s) at the U.S. embassies for their
review.
IV.3f.2. Submitting Electronic Applications: Applicants have the
option of submitting proposals electronically through Grants.gov
(https://www.grants.gov/). Complete solicitation packages are available
at Grants.gov in the ``Find'' portion of the system.
PLEASE NOTE: ECA bears no responsibility for applicant timeliness
of submission or data errors resulting from transmission or conversion
processes for proposals submitted via Grants.gov.
Please follow the instructions available in the `Get Started'
portion of the site (https://www.grants.gov/GetStarted).
Several of the steps in the Grants.gov registration process could
take several weeks. Therefore, applicants should check with appropriate
staff within their organizations immediately after reviewing this RFGP
to confirm or determine their registration status with Grants.gov. Once
registered, the amount of time it can take to upload an application
will vary depending on a variety of factors including the size of the
application and the speed of your Internet connection. In addition,
validation of an electronic submission via Grants.gov can take up to
two business days.
Therefore, we strongly recommend that you not wait until the
application deadline to begin the submission process through
Grants.gov.
The Grants.gov Web site includes extensive information on all
phases/aspects of the Grants.gov process, including an extensive
section on frequently asked questions, located under the ``For
Applicants'' section of
[[Page 13262]]
the Web site. ECA strongly recommends that all potential applicants
review thoroughly the Grants.gov Web site, well in advance of
submitting a proposal through the Grants.gov system. ECA bears no
responsibility for data errors resulting from transmission or
conversion processes.
Direct all questions regarding Grants.gov registration and
submission to: Grants.gov Customer Support, Contact Center Phone: 800-
518-4726, Business Hours: Monday-Friday, 7 a.m.-9 p.m. Eastern Time, E-
mail: grants.gov">support@grants.gov.
Applicants have until midnight (12 a.m.), Washington, DC, time of
the closing date to ensure that their entire application has been
uploaded to the Grants.gov site. There are no exceptions to the above
deadline. Applications uploaded to the site after midnight of the
application deadline date will be automatically rejected by the
grants.gov system, and will be technically ineligible.
Please refer to the Grants.gov Web site, for definitions of various
``application statuses'' and the difference between a submission
receipt and a submission validation. Applicants will receive a
validation e-mail from grants.gov upon the successful submission of an
application. Again, validation of an electronic submission via
Grants.gov can take up to two business days. Therefore, we strongly
recommend that you not wait until the application deadline to begin the
submission process through Grants.gov. ECA will not notify you upon
receipt of electronic applications.
It is the responsibility of all applicants submitting proposals via
the Grants.gov web portal to ensure that proposals have been received
by Grants.gov in their entirety, and ECA bears no responsibility for
data errors resulting from transmission or conversion processes.
IV.3g. Intergovernmental Review of Applications: Executive Order
12372 does not apply to this program.
V. Application Review Information
V.1. Review Process
The Bureau will review all proposals for technical eligibility.
Proposals will be deemed ineligible if they do not fully adhere to the
guidelines stated herein and in the Solicitation Package. All eligible
proposals will be reviewed by the program office, as well as the Public
Diplomacy section overseas, where appropriate. Eligible proposals will
be subject to compliance with Federal and Bureau regulations and
guidelines and forwarded to Bureau grant panels for advisory review.
Proposals may also be reviewed by the Office of the Legal Adviser or by
other Department elements. Final funding decisions are at the
discretion of the Department of State's Assistant Secretary for
Educational and Cultural Affairs. Final technical authority for
cooperative agreements resides with the Bureau's Grants Officer.
Review Criteria
Technically eligible applications will be competitively reviewed
according to the criteria stated below. These criteria are not rank
ordered and all carry equal weight in the proposal evaluation:
1. Program Planning and Ability to Achieve Objectives: Detailed
agenda and relevant work plan should demonstrate substantive
undertakings and logistical capacity. Agenda and plan should adhere to
the program overview and guidelines described above. Proposals should
clearly demonstrate how the institution will meet the program's
objectives and plan.
2. Multiplier Effect/Impact: Proposed programs should strengthen
long-term mutual understanding, including maximum sharing of
information and establishment of long-term institutional and individual
linkages.
3. Support of Diversity: Proposals should demonstrate substantive
support of the Bureau's policy on diversity. Achievable and relevant
features should be cited in both program administration (selection of
participants, program venue and program evaluation) and program content
(orientation and wrap-up sessions, program meetings, resource materials
and follow-up activities).
4. Institutional Capacity: Proposals should include (1) the
institution's mission and date of establishment; (2) an outline of
prior awards--U.S. government and/or private support received for tours
abroad; (3) descriptions of experienced staff members who will be part
of the team implementing the program; and (4) all other documentation
requested herein. Proposed personnel and institutional resources should
be adequate and appropriate to achieve the program or project's goals.
The proposal should reflect the institution's expertise in the music
management arena and knowledge of the conditions in the regions abroad.
5. Institution's Record/Ability: Proposals should demonstrate an
institutional record of at least five years of international music
management planning and implementation, including responsible fiscal
management and full compliance with all reporting requirements for past
Bureau grants as determined by Bureau Grants Staff. The Bureau will
consider the past performance of prior recipients and the demonstrated
potential of new applicants.
6. Follow-on Activities: Proposals should provide a plan for
continued follow-on activity (without Bureau support) ensuring that
Bureau supported programs are not isolated events.
7. Project Evaluation: Proposals should include a plan to evaluate
the program's success, both as the activities unfold and at the end of
the program. A draft survey questionnaire or other technique plus
description of a methodology to use to link outcomes to original
project objectives is recommended.
8. Cost-effectiveness and Cost-sharing: The overhead and
administrative components of the proposal, including salaries and
honoraria, should be kept as low as possible. All other items should be
necessary and appropriate. Proposals should maximize cost-sharing
through other private sector support as well as institutional direct
funding contributions.
VI. Award Administration Information
VI.1a. Award Notices: Final awards cannot be made until funds have
been appropriated by Congress, allocated and committed through internal
Bureau procedures. Successful applicants will receive an Federal
Assistance Award (FAA) from the Bureau's Grants Office. The FAA and the
original proposal with subsequent modifications (if applicable) shall
be the only binding authorizing document between the recipient and the
U.S. Government. The FAA will be signed by an authorized Grants
Officer, and mailed to the recipient's responsible officer identified
in the application.
Unsuccessful applicants will receive notification of the results of
the application review from the ECA program office coordinating this
competition.
VI.1b. The following additional requirements apply to this project:
Special Provision for Performance in a Designated Combat Area
(Currently Iraq and Afghanistan) (December 2008)
All Recipient personnel deploying to areas of combat operations, as
designated by the Secretary of Defense (currently Iraq and
Afghanistan), under assistance awards over $100,000 or performance over
14 days must register in the Department of Defense maintained
Synchronized Pre-deployment and Operational Tracker (SPOT) system.
Recipients of federal
[[Page 13263]]
assistance awards shall register in SPOT before deployment, or if
already in the designated operational area, register upon becoming an
employee under the assistance award, and maintain current data in SPOT.
Information on how to register in SPOT will be available from your
Grants Officer or Grants Officer Representative during the final
negotiation and approval stages in the federal assistance awards
process. Recipients of federal assistance awards are advised that
adherence to this policy and procedure will be a requirement of all
final federal assistance awards issued by ECA.
Recipient performance may require the use of armed private security
personnel. To the extent that such private security contractors (PSCs)
are required, grantees are required to ensure they adhere to Chief of
Mission (COM) policies and procedures regarding the operation,
oversight, and accountability of PSCs.
VI.2. Administrative and National Policy Requirements: Terms and
Conditions for the Administration of ECA agreements include the
following:
Office of Management and Budget Circular A-122, ``Cost Principles for
Nonprofit Organizations.''
Office of Management and Budget Circular A-21, ``Cost Principles for
Educational Institutions.''
OMB Circular A-87, ``Cost Principles for State, Local and Indian
Governments''.
OMB Circular No. A-110 (Revised), Uniform Administrative Requirements
for Grants and Agreements with Institutions of Higher Education,
Hospitals, and other Nonprofit Organizations.
OMB Circular No. A-102, Uniform Administrative Requirements for Grants-
in-Aid to State and Local Governments.
OMB Circular No. A-133, Audits of States, Local Government, and Non-
profit Organizations.
Please reference the following Web sites for additional
information:
https://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/grants.
https://exchanges.state.gov/education/grantsdiv/terms.htm#articleI.
VI.3. Reporting Requirements: You must provide ECA with a hard copy
original plus two copies of the following reports:
(1) A final program and financial report no more than 90 days after
the expiration of the award;
(2) A concise, one-page final program report summarizing program
outcomes no more than 90 days after the expiration of the award. This
one-page report will be transmitted to OMB, and be made available to
the public via OMB's USAspending.gov Web site--as part of ECA's Federal
Funding Accountability and Transparency Act (FFATA) reporting
requirements.
(3) A SF-PPR, ``Performance Progress Report'' Cover Sheet with all
program reports.
(4) Quarterly program and financial reports showing activities
carried out and expenses incurred in the calendar quarter.
(5) Quarterly press updates, including any articles or publicity
regarding the program and an updated communications calendar.
Award recipients will be required to provide reports analyzing
their evaluation findings to the Bureau in their regular program
reports. (Please refer to IV. Application and Submission Instructions
(IV.3.d.3) above for Program Monitoring and Evaluation information).
All data collected, including survey responses and contact
information, must be maintained for a minimum of three years and
provided to the Bureau upon request.
All reports must be sent to the ECA Grants Officer and ECA Program
Officer listed in the final assistance award document.
VII. Agency Contacts
For questions about this announcement, contact: Melissa Jarrett,
U.S. Department of State, Cultural Programs, ECA/PE/C/CU, SA-5, Floor
3, ECA/PE/C/CU-11-09 L-16, 2200 C Street, NW., Washington, DC 20520,
202-632-2412, fax 202-632-9355; JarrettMA@state.gov.
All correspondence with the Bureau concerning this RFGP should
reference the above title and number ECA/PE/C/CU-11-09.
Please read the complete announcement before sending inquiries or
submitting proposals. Once the RFGP deadline has passed, Bureau staff
may not discuss this competition with applicants until the proposal
review process has been completed.
VIII. Other Information
Notice: The terms and conditions published in this RFGP are
binding and may not be modified by any Bureau representative.
Explanatory information provided by the Bureau that contradicts
published language will not be binding. Issuance of the RFGP does
not constitute an award commitment on the part of the Government.
The Bureau reserves the right to reduce, revise, or increase
proposal budgets in accordance with the needs of the program and the
availability of funds. Awards made will be subject to periodic
reporting and evaluation requirements per section VI.3 above.
Dated: March 2, 2011.
Ann Stock,
Assistant Secretary for Educational and Cultural Affairs Department of
State.
[FR Doc. 2011-5371 Filed 3-9-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-05-P