Kentucky Regulatory Program, 12849-12852 [2011-5386]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 46 / Wednesday, March 9, 2011 / Rules and Regulations
taking implications under Executive
Order 12630, Governmental Actions and
Interference with Constitutionally
Protected Property Rights.
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Executive Order 13211 (Energy Effects)
30 CFR Part 917
This final rule has been analyzed
under Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. The FHWA has
determined that it is not a significant
energy action under that order because
it is not a significant regulatory action
under Executive Order 12866 and this
final rule is not likely to have a
significant adverse effect on the supply,
distribution, or use of energy.
[KY–252–FOR; OSM–2009–0011]
Regulation Identification Number
A regulation identification number
(RIN) is assigned to each regulatory
action listed in the Unified Agenda of
Federal Regulations. The Regulatory
Information Service Center publishes
the Unified Agenda in April and
October of each year. The RINs
contained in the heading of this
document can be used to cross reference
this action with the Unified Agenda.
Effective Date: March 9, 2011.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
In consideration of the foregoing, 23
CFR part 460 is amended as set forth
below.
PART 460—PUBLIC ROAD MILEAGE
FOR APPORTIONMENT OF HIGHWAY
SAFETY FUNDS
1. The authority citation for part 460
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 23 U.S.C. 315, 402(c); 49 CFR
1.48.
2. Amend § 460.2 by revising
paragraph (e) to read as follows:
■
Definitions.
*
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with RULES
We are approving an
amendment to the Kentucky regulatory
program (hereinafter, the ‘‘Kentucky
program’’) under the Surface Mining
Control and Reclamation Act of 1977
(SMCRA or the Act). Kentucky
submitted revisions to its administrative
regulations pertaining to the disposal of
coal mine waste. Kentucky revised its
program to be consistent with the
corresponding Federal regulations and
SMCRA. We are also correcting a
codification error which occurred in
2002.
SUMMARY:
Joseph L. Blackburn, Telephone: (859)
260–3900. E-mail:
jblackburn@osmre.gov.
Issued on: February 18, 2011.
Victor M. Mendez,
Administrator.
*
*
*
*
(e) State means any one of the 50
States, the District of Columbia, Puerto
Rico, the Virgin Islands, Guam,
American Samoa, and the
Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana
Islands. For the purpose of the
application of 23 U.S.C. 402 on Indian
reservations, State and Governor of a
State include the Secretary of the
Interior.
[FR Doc. 2011–5410 Filed 3–8–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–22–P
15:00 Mar 08, 2011
Office of Surface Mining
Reclamation and Enforcement (OSM),
Interior.
ACTION: Final rule; approval of
amendment.
AGENCY:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Grant programs—transportation,
Highway safety, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
Kentucky Regulatory Program
DATES:
List of Subjects in 23 CFR Part 460
§ 460.2
Office of Surface Mining Reclamation
and Enforcement
Jkt 223001
I. Background on the Kentucky Program
II. Description of the Amendment
III. OSM’s Findings
IV. Summary and Disposition of Comments
V. OSM’s Decision
VI. Procedural Determinations
I. Background on the Kentucky
Program
Section 503(a) of the Act permits a
State to assume primacy for the
regulation of surface coal mining and
reclamation operations on non-Federal
and non-Indian lands within its borders
by demonstrating that its program
includes, among other things, ‘‘a State
law which provides for the regulation of
surface coal mining and reclamation
operations in accordance with the
requirements of this Act * * * and
rules and regulations consistent with
regulations issued by the Secretary
pursuant to this Act.’’ See 30 U.S.C.
1253(a)(1) and (7). On the basis of these
criteria, the Secretary of the Interior
conditionally approved the Kentucky
program on May 18, 1982. You can find
background information on the
Kentucky program, including the
Secretary’s findings, the disposition of
comments, and conditions of approval
of the Kentucky program in the May 18,
PO 00000
Frm 00025
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
12849
1982, Federal Register (47 FR 21434).
You can also find later actions
concerning Kentucky’s program and
program amendments at 30 CFR 917.11,
917.12, 917.13, 917.15, 917.16, and
917.17.
II. Description of the Proposed
Amendment
By letter dated September 14, 2009,
Kentucky submitted an amendment to
its program (Administrative Record No.
1659), under SMCRA (30 U.S.C. 1201 et
seq.). Kentucky sent the amendment in
response to a May 27, 1997, letter
(Administrative Record No. KY–1400)
that we sent in accordance with 30 CFR
732.17(c) requesting that changes be
made in order to be consistent with the
Federal regulations. The provisions of
Kentucky rules that Kentucky proposed
to revise are: Kentucky Administrative
Regulations (KAR) No. 405 KAR 16:140
and 405 KAR 18:140 with respect to the
disposal of coal mine waste.
We announced receipt of the
proposed amendment in the November
27, 2009, Federal Register (74 FR
62266). In the same document, we
opened the public comment period and
provided an opportunity for a public
hearing or meeting (Administrative
Record No. KY–1661). We did not hold
a public hearing or meeting because no
one requested one. The public comment
period ended on December 14, 2009. We
did not receive any comments.
III. OSM’s Findings
Kentucky sent the amendment in
response to a May 27, 1997, letter that
we sent in accordance with 30 CFR
732.17(c) requesting that changes be
made in order to be consistent with the
Federal regulations. In that letter, OSM
referred to its revised regulations at 30
CFR 816.81 (Surface Mining—Coal mine
waste: General Requirements) and
817.81 (Underground Mining—Coal
mine waste: General requirements) that
required that coal mine waste be
‘‘hauled or conveyed’’ instead of just
requiring that it be ‘‘placed.’’ In addition,
Kentucky also made changes at its own
initiative.
Kentucky proposed to make
substantially identical changes to
administrative regulations pertaining to
surface and underground mining: 405
KAR 16:140 Disposal of Coal Mine
Waste (surface mining) and 405 KAR
18:140 Disposal of Coal Mine Waste
(underground mining). The text of the
Kentucky regulations can be found in
the administrative record and online at
Regulations.gov
Following are the findings we made
concerning the amendment under
SMCRA and the Federal regulations at
E:\FR\FM\09MRR1.SGM
09MRR1
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with RULES
12850
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 46 / Wednesday, March 9, 2011 / Rules and Regulations
30 CFR 732.15 and 732.17. We are
approving the amendment. Any
revisions that we do not specifically
discuss below concern nonsubstantive
wording or editorial changes.
The Federal regulations at 30 CFR
816.81(a) and 817.81(a) state in part that
‘‘coal mine waste shall be hauled or
conveyed and placed for final
placement in a controlled manner.’’ In
405 KAR 16:140 Section 1 (1) and
18:140 Section 1(1), the phrase
‘‘transported and placed,’’ as it refers to
coal mine waste, is replaced by ‘‘hauled
and conveyed in a controlled (manner)’’
so that the first sentence of Section 1 of
these Kentucky regulations now reads
that ‘‘All coal mine waste shall be
hauled and conveyed in a controlled
manner approved by the cabinet in
disposal areas approved by the cabinet
for this purpose.’’
Kentucky’s existing regulations at 405
KAR 16:140 Section 1 (1)(a) and 18:140
Section 1 (1)(a) also require that the coal
waste disposal area shall be designed,
constructed, and maintained in
accordance with 405 KAR 16:130
Sections 1 and 2 and 18:130 Sections 1
and 2, respectively. Section 1 of both
405 KAR 16:130 and 18:130 requires
among other things that excess spoil,
which by definition includes coal mine
waste, ‘‘shall be placed in designated
disposal areas within a permit area, in
a controlled manner.’’ We find that the
amended language at 405 KAR 16:140
Section 1 (1) and 18:140 Section 1 (1)
read in conjunction with existing
language 405 KAR 16:140 Section 1
(1)(a) and 18:140 Section 1 (1)(a) and
405 KAR 16:130 Section 1 (1) and
18:130 Section 1 (1) is no less effective
than the counterpart Federal regulations
at 30 CFR 816.81(a) and 817.81(a)
pertaining to coal mine waste disposal.
This constitutes satisfaction of the last
coal mine waste issue found in the May
27, 1997, 732 letter.
In Section 2 of 405 KAR 16:140 and
18:140 the Kentucky rules require that
either a qualified professional engineer
or other qualified person under the
direct supervision of the responsible
professional engineer must inspect all
coal mine waste banks. Kentucky
replaced the term ‘‘registered
professional engineer’’ with
‘‘professional engineer.’’ Kentucky
Revised Statute (KRS) section 322.010
defines ‘‘professional engineer’’ to mean
‘‘a person who is a licensed professional
engineer by the board.’’ The board is the
State Board of Licensure for Professional
Engineers and Land Surveyors. In 1999,
Kentucky changed its registration
procedures to licensing procedures. See,
KRS section 322.015. Kentucky
prohibits the practice of engineering or
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:00 Mar 08, 2011
Jkt 223001
land surveying without a license. KRS
322.020. The Federal regulations at 30
CFR 816.83(d) (Surface Mining—Coal
mine waste: Refuse Piles) and 817.83(d)
(Underground Mining—Coal mine
waste: Refuse Piles) require that a
qualified registered professional
engineer or other qualified professional
specialist under the direction of the
professional engineer shall inspect the
refuse pile during construction. Both the
Federal and Kentucky rules require
inspection by an engineer that is
approved by an appropriate regulatory
body as qualified to be an engineer.
Accordingly, we find that the proposed
changes to Kentucky regulations are no
less effective than the Federal
regulations at 30 CFR 816.83(d) and
817.83(d).
Section 6 of 405 KAR 16:140 and
18:140 requires that a qualified
professional engineer must prepare a
plan for the removal of any burned coal
mine waste or other material from the
permitted disposal area. Kentucky
replaced the term ‘‘registered
professional engineer’’ with
‘‘professional engineer.’’ As cited above,
KRS section 322.010 defines
‘‘professional engineer’’ to mean ‘‘a
person who is a licensed professional
engineer by the board.’’ The Federal
regulations at 30 CFR 780.14(c) (Surface
Mining—Operation plan: Maps and
plans) and 784.23(c) (Underground
Mining—Operation plan: Maps and
plans) require that cross sections, maps,
and plans shall be prepared, by or under
the direction of, and certified by a
qualified registered professional
engineer, a professional geologist, etc.
Both the Federal and Kentucky rules
require plan preparation by an engineer
that is approved by an appropriate
regulatory body as qualified to be an
engineer. Accordingly, we find that the
proposed changes to Kentucky
regulations are consistent with the
Federal regulations at 30 CFR 780.14(c)
and 784.23(c).
Throughout the Kentucky regulations,
the term ‘‘coal processing waste’’ is
replaced by ‘‘coal mine waste.’’ The
Federal definition of ‘‘coal mine waste’’
at 30 CFR 701.5 (Definitions) means
‘‘coal processing waste and underground
development waste.’’ The Kentucky
definitions of coal mine waste at 405
KAR 16:001 (18) and 18:001 (19) define
‘‘coal mine waste’’ as ‘‘coal processing
waste and underground development
waste.’’ The Federal regulations at 30
CFR 816.81, 817.81, 816.83, and 817.83
use the term ‘‘coal mine waste.’’
Kentucky’s regulations at 405 KAR
16:140 and 18:140 also use this term.
Since Kentucky defines the term the
same as the Federal regulations and
PO 00000
Frm 00026
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
appropriately uses the term ‘‘coal mine
waste’’ at 405 KAR 16:140 and 18:140,
we find the Kentucky proposed
language is no less effective than the
Federal regulations at 30 CFR 816.81
and 817.81 and 816.83 and 817.83.
We are also revising section 917.16
(Kentucky—Required regulatory
program amendments) to correct a
codification error which occurred in
2002. The required amendment at 405
KAR 20.060 section 3 (3)(b) was
submitted by the State and the OSM
approval was published on June 19,
2002, at 67 FR 41622, 41625, but the
requirement was not removed from 30
CFR 917.16(d)(5) as it should have been.
We are now removing 30 CFR
917.16(d)(5).
IV. Summary and Disposition of
Comments
Public Comments
We asked for public comments on the
amendment (Administrative Record No.
1661), but did not receive any.
Federal Agency Comments
Under 30 CFR 732.17(h)(11)(i) and
section 503(b) of SMCRA, we requested
comments on the amendment from
various Federal agencies with an actual
or potential interest in the Kentucky
program (KY–1662). No comments were
received.
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)
Concurrence and Comments
Under 30 CFR 732.17(h)(11)(i) and
(ii), we are required to get a written
concurrence from EPA for those
provisions of the program amendment
that relate to air or water quality
standards issued under the authority of
the Clean Water Act (33 U.S.C. 1251 et
seq.) or the Clean Air Act (42 U.S.C.
7401 et seq.).
None of the provisions that Kentucky
proposed to make in this amendment
pertain to air or water quality standards.
Therefore, we did not ask EPA to concur
on the amendment.
V. OSM’s Decision
Based on the above findings, we
approve the amendment Kentucky sent
to us on September 14, 2009. To
implement this decision, we are
amending the Federal regulations at 30
CFR part 917 which codify decisions
concerning the Kentucky program.
Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), an
agency may, upon a showing of good
cause, waive the 30 day delay of the
effective date of a substantive rule
following publication in the Federal
Register, thereby making the final rule
effective immediately.
E:\FR\FM\09MRR1.SGM
09MRR1
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 46 / Wednesday, March 9, 2011 / Rules and Regulations
We find that good cause exists under
5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3) to make this final rule
effective immediately. Because Section
503(a) of SMCRA requires that the
State’s program demonstrate that the
State has the capability of carrying out
the provisions of the Act and meeting its
purposes, making this regulation
effective immediately will expedite that
process.
VI. Procedural Determinations
Executive Order 12630—Takings
This rule does not have takings
implications. This determination is
based on the analysis performed for the
counterpart Federal regulation.
Executive Order 12866—Regulatory
Planning and Review
This rule is exempted from review by
the Office of Management and Budget
under Executive Order 12866.
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with RULES
Executive Order 12988—Civil Justice
Reform
The Department of the Interior has
conducted the reviews required by
Section 3 of Executive Order 12988 and
has determined that this rule meets the
applicable standards of Subsections (a)
and (b) of that section. However, these
standards are not applicable to the
actual language of State regulatory
programs and program amendments
because each program is drafted and
promulgated by a specific State, not by
OSM. Under Sections 503 and 505 of
SMCRA (30 U.S.C. 1253 and 1255) and
the Federal regulations at 30 CFR
730.11, 732.15, and 732.17(h)(10),
decisions on proposed State regulatory
programs and program amendments
submitted by the States must be based
solely on a determination of whether the
submittal is consistent with SMCRA and
its implementing Federal regulations
and whether the other requirements of
30 CFR parts 730, 731, and 732 have
been met.
Executive Order 13132—Federalism
This rule does not have Federalism
implications. SMCRA delineates the
roles of the Federal and State
governments with regard to the
regulation of surface coal mining and
reclamation operations. One of the
purposes of SMCRA is to ‘‘establish a
nationwide program to protect society
and the environment from the adverse
effects of surface coal mining
operations.’’ Section 503(a)(1) of SMCRA
requires that State laws regulating
surface coal mining and reclamation
operations be ‘‘in accordance with’’ the
requirements of SMCRA, and Section
503(a)(7) requires that State programs
contain rules and regulations
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:00 Mar 08, 2011
Jkt 223001
‘‘consistent with’’ regulations issued by
the Secretary pursuant to SMCRA.
Executive Order 13175—Consultation
and Coordination With Indian Tribal
Government
In accordance with Executive Order
13175, we have evaluated the potential
effects of this rule on Federallyrecognized Indian tribes and have
determined that the rule does not have
substantial direct effects on one or more
Indian tribes, on the relationship
between the Federal Government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes.
The basis for this determination is that
our decision is on a State Regulatory
program and does not involve a Federal
Regulation involving Indian Lands.
Executive Order 13211—Regulations
That Significantly Affect the Supply,
Distribution, or Use of Energy
On May 18, 2001, the President issued
Executive Order 13211 which requires
agencies to prepare a Statement of
Energy Effects for a rule that is (1)
considered significant under Executive
Order 12866, and (2) likely to have a
significant adverse effect on the supply,
distribution, or use of energy. Because
this rule is exempt from review under
Executive Order 12866 and is not
expected to have a significant adverse
effect on the supply, distribution, or use
of energy, a Statement of Energy Effects
is not required.
National Environmental Policy Act
This rule does not require an
environmental impact statement
because Section 702(d) of SMCRA (30
U.S.C. 1292(d)) provides that agency
decisions on proposed State regulatory
program provisions do not constitute
major Federal actions within the
meaning of Section 102(2)(C) of the
National Environmental Policy Act (42
U.S.C. 4332(2)(C)).
Paperwork Reduction Act
This rule does not contain
information collection requirements that
require approval by OMB under the
Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C.
3507 et seq.).
Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Department of the Interior
certifies that this rule will not have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.). The State submittal,
which is the subject of this rule, is based
upon counterpart Federal regulations for
which an economic analysis was
PO 00000
Frm 00027
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
12851
prepared and certification made that
such regulations would not have a
significant economic effect upon a
substantial number of small entities. In
making the determination as to whether
this rule would have a significant
economic impact, the Department relied
upon data and assumptions for the
counterpart Federal regulations.
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act
This rule is not a major rule under
5 U.S.C. 804(2), the Small Business
Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act.
This rule: (a) Does not have an annual
effect on the economy of $100 million;
(b) will not cause a major increase in
costs or prices for consumers,
individual industries, Federal, State, or
local government agencies, or
geographic regions; and (c) does not
have significant adverse effects on
competition, employment, investment,
productivity, innovation, or the ability
of U.S.-based enterprises to compete
with foreign-based enterprises. This
determination is based upon the fact
that the Kentucky submittal, which is
the subject of this rule, is based upon
counterpart Federal regulations for
which an analysis was prepared and a
determination made that the Federal
regulation was not considered a major
rule.
Unfunded Mandates
This rule will not impose an
unfunded mandate on State, local, or
tribal governments or the private sector
of $100 million or more in any given
year. This determination is based upon
the fact that the Kentucky submittal,
which is the subject of this rule, is based
upon counterpart Federal regulations for
which an analysis was prepared and a
determination made that the Federal
regulation did not impose an unfunded
mandate.
List of Subjects in 30 CFR Part 917
Intergovernmental relations, Surface
mining, Underground mining.
Dated: November 22, 2010.
Thomas D. Shope,
Regional Director, Appalachian Region.
For the reasons set out in the
preamble, 30 CFR part 917 is amended
as set forth below:
PART 917—KENTUCKY
1. The authority citation for part 917
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 30 U.S.C. 1201 et seq.
2. Section 917.15 is amended by
adding a new entry to the table in
■
E:\FR\FM\09MRR1.SGM
09MRR1
12852
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 46 / Wednesday, March 9, 2011 / Rules and Regulations
§ 917.15 Approval of Kentucky regulatory
program amendments.
chronological order by ‘‘Date of final
publication’’ to read as follows:
*
Original amendment submission
date
*
*
September 14, 2009 ......................
§ 917.16
[Amended]
[FR Doc. 2011–5386 Filed 3–8–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–05–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Office of Surface Mining Reclamation
and Enforcement
30 CFR Part 918
[SATS No. LA–023–FOR; Docket No. OSM–
2010–0005]
Louisiana Regulatory Program/
Abandoned Mine Land Reclamation
Plan
Office of Surface Mining
Reclamation and Enforcement, Interior.
ACTION: Final rule; approval of
amendment.
AGENCY:
We, the Office of Surface
Mining Reclamation and Enforcement
(OSM), are approving an amendment to
the Louisiana regulatory program and
abandoned mine land reclamation plan
under the Surface Mining Control and
Reclamation Act of 1977. Louisiana
proposed revisions to its regulations
regarding: Definitions; lands eligible for
remining; general provisions for review
of permit application information and
entry of information into Applicant
Violator System (AVS); review of
applicant, operator, and ownership and
control information; review of permit
history; review of compliance history;
permit eligibility determination;
unanticipated events or conditions at
remining sites; eligibility for
provisionally issued permits; written
findings for permit application
approval; initial review and finding
requirements for improvidently issued
permits; suspension or rescission
requirements for improvidently issued
permits; who may challenge ownership
or control listings and findings; how to
challenge an ownership or control
listing or finding; burden of proof for
ownership or control challenges; written
SUMMARY:
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with RULES
*
*
Citation/description
*
*
*
*
March 9, 2011 ................................ 405 KAR 16:140, Disposal of coal mine waste.
405 KAR 18:140, Disposal of coal mine waste.
3. Section 917.16 is amended by
removing and reserving paragraph
(d)(5).
15:00 Mar 08, 2011
*
Date of final
publication
■
VerDate Mar<15>2010
*
Jkt 223001
agency decision on challenges to
ownership or control listings or
findings; post-permit issuance
requirements for regulatory authorities
and other actions based on ownership,
control, and violation information; postpermit issuance information
requirements for permittees; transfer,
assignment, or sale of permit rights;
certifying and updating existing permit
application information; providing
applicant and operator information;
providing permit history information;
providing violation information;
backfilling and grading: previously
mined areas; cessation orders; and
contractor eligibility. Louisiana revised
its regulatory program to be no less
effective than the corresponding Federal
regulations, and its abandoned mine
land reclamation plan to be consistent
with the Federal regulations.
DATES: Effective Date: March 9, 2011.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Sherry Wilson, Director, Birmingham
Field Office. Telephone: (205) 290–
7282. E-mail: swilson@osmre.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background on the Louisiana Program
II. Submission of the Amendment
III. OSM’s Findings
IV. Summary and Disposition of Comments
V. OSM’s Decision
VI. Procedural Determinations
I. Background on the Louisiana
Program
Section 503(a) of the Act permits a
State to assume primacy for the
regulation of surface coal mining and
reclamation operations on non-Federal
and non-Indian lands within its borders
by demonstrating that its program
includes, among other things, ‘‘a State
law which provides for the regulation of
surface coal mining and reclamation
operations in accordance with the
requirements of this Act * * *; and
rules and regulations consistent with
regulations issued by the Secretary
pursuant to this Act.’’ See 30 U.S.C.
1253(a)(1) and (7). On the basis of these
criteria, the Secretary of the Interior
conditionally approved the Louisiana
program effective October 10, 1980. You
can find background information on the
PO 00000
Frm 00028
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
*
Louisiana program, including the
Secretary’s findings, the disposition of
comments, and the conditions of
approval of the Louisiana program in
the October 10, 1980, Federal Register
(45 FR 67340). You can also find later
actions concerning the Louisiana
program and program amendments at 30
CFR 918.10, 918.15 and 918.16.
The Abandoned Mine Land
Reclamation Program was established
by Title IV of the Act in response to
concerns over extensive environmental
damage caused by past coal mining
activities. The program is funded by a
reclamation fee collected on each ton of
coal that is produced. The money
collected is used to finance the
reclamation of abandoned coal mines
and for other authorized activities.
Section 405 of the Act allows States and
Indian Tribes to assume exclusive
responsibility for reclamation activity
within the State or on Indian lands if
they develop and submit to the
Secretary of the Interior for approval, a
program (often referred to as a plan) for
the reclamation of abandoned coal
mines. On the basis of these criteria, the
Secretary of the Interior approved the
Louisiana plan on November 10, 1986.
You can find background information
on the Louisiana plan, including the
Secretary’s findings, the disposition of
comments, and the approval of the plan
in the November 10, 1986, Federal
Register (51 FR 40795). You can find
later actions concerning the Louisiana
plan and amendments to the plan at 30
CFR 918.25.
II. Submission of the Amendment
By letter dated March 4, 2010
(Administrative Record No. LA–369),
Louisiana sent us an amendment to its
program under SMCRA (30 U.S.C. 1201
et seq.). Louisiana submitted its
proposed amendment in response to a
September 30, 2009, letter
(Administrative Record No. LA–368)
that OSM sent to Louisiana in
accordance with 30 CFR 732.17(c).
Louisiana proposed revisions to the
Louisiana Surface Mining Regulations
found in the Louisiana Administrative
Code, Title 43, Part XV (LAC)
E:\FR\FM\09MRR1.SGM
09MRR1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 46 (Wednesday, March 9, 2011)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 12849-12852]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-5386]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement
30 CFR Part 917
[KY-252-FOR; OSM-2009-0011]
Kentucky Regulatory Program
AGENCY: Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement (OSM),
Interior.
ACTION: Final rule; approval of amendment.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We are approving an amendment to the Kentucky regulatory
program (hereinafter, the ``Kentucky program'') under the Surface
Mining Control and Reclamation Act of 1977 (SMCRA or the Act). Kentucky
submitted revisions to its administrative regulations pertaining to the
disposal of coal mine waste. Kentucky revised its program to be
consistent with the corresponding Federal regulations and SMCRA. We are
also correcting a codification error which occurred in 2002.
DATES: Effective Date: March 9, 2011.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Joseph L. Blackburn, Telephone: (859)
260-3900. E-mail: jblackburn@osmre.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background on the Kentucky Program
II. Description of the Amendment
III. OSM's Findings
IV. Summary and Disposition of Comments
V. OSM's Decision
VI. Procedural Determinations
I. Background on the Kentucky Program
Section 503(a) of the Act permits a State to assume primacy for the
regulation of surface coal mining and reclamation operations on non-
Federal and non-Indian lands within its borders by demonstrating that
its program includes, among other things, ``a State law which provides
for the regulation of surface coal mining and reclamation operations in
accordance with the requirements of this Act * * * and rules and
regulations consistent with regulations issued by the Secretary
pursuant to this Act.'' See 30 U.S.C. 1253(a)(1) and (7). On the basis
of these criteria, the Secretary of the Interior conditionally approved
the Kentucky program on May 18, 1982. You can find background
information on the Kentucky program, including the Secretary's
findings, the disposition of comments, and conditions of approval of
the Kentucky program in the May 18, 1982, Federal Register (47 FR
21434). You can also find later actions concerning Kentucky's program
and program amendments at 30 CFR 917.11, 917.12, 917.13, 917.15,
917.16, and 917.17.
II. Description of the Proposed Amendment
By letter dated September 14, 2009, Kentucky submitted an amendment
to its program (Administrative Record No. 1659), under SMCRA (30 U.S.C.
1201 et seq.). Kentucky sent the amendment in response to a May 27,
1997, letter (Administrative Record No. KY-1400) that we sent in
accordance with 30 CFR 732.17(c) requesting that changes be made in
order to be consistent with the Federal regulations. The provisions of
Kentucky rules that Kentucky proposed to revise are: Kentucky
Administrative Regulations (KAR) No. 405 KAR 16:140 and 405 KAR 18:140
with respect to the disposal of coal mine waste.
We announced receipt of the proposed amendment in the November 27,
2009, Federal Register (74 FR 62266). In the same document, we opened
the public comment period and provided an opportunity for a public
hearing or meeting (Administrative Record No. KY-1661). We did not hold
a public hearing or meeting because no one requested one. The public
comment period ended on December 14, 2009. We did not receive any
comments.
III. OSM's Findings
Kentucky sent the amendment in response to a May 27, 1997, letter
that we sent in accordance with 30 CFR 732.17(c) requesting that
changes be made in order to be consistent with the Federal regulations.
In that letter, OSM referred to its revised regulations at 30 CFR
816.81 (Surface Mining--Coal mine waste: General Requirements) and
817.81 (Underground Mining--Coal mine waste: General requirements) that
required that coal mine waste be ``hauled or conveyed'' instead of just
requiring that it be ``placed.'' In addition, Kentucky also made
changes at its own initiative.
Kentucky proposed to make substantially identical changes to
administrative regulations pertaining to surface and underground
mining: 405 KAR 16:140 Disposal of Coal Mine Waste (surface mining) and
405 KAR 18:140 Disposal of Coal Mine Waste (underground mining). The
text of the Kentucky regulations can be found in the administrative
record and online at Regulations.gov
Following are the findings we made concerning the amendment under
SMCRA and the Federal regulations at
[[Page 12850]]
30 CFR 732.15 and 732.17. We are approving the amendment. Any revisions
that we do not specifically discuss below concern nonsubstantive
wording or editorial changes.
The Federal regulations at 30 CFR 816.81(a) and 817.81(a) state in
part that ``coal mine waste shall be hauled or conveyed and placed for
final placement in a controlled manner.'' In 405 KAR 16:140 Section 1
(1) and 18:140 Section 1(1), the phrase ``transported and placed,'' as
it refers to coal mine waste, is replaced by ``hauled and conveyed in a
controlled (manner)'' so that the first sentence of Section 1 of these
Kentucky regulations now reads that ``All coal mine waste shall be
hauled and conveyed in a controlled manner approved by the cabinet in
disposal areas approved by the cabinet for this purpose.''
Kentucky's existing regulations at 405 KAR 16:140 Section 1 (1)(a)
and 18:140 Section 1 (1)(a) also require that the coal waste disposal
area shall be designed, constructed, and maintained in accordance with
405 KAR 16:130 Sections 1 and 2 and 18:130 Sections 1 and 2,
respectively. Section 1 of both 405 KAR 16:130 and 18:130 requires
among other things that excess spoil, which by definition includes coal
mine waste, ``shall be placed in designated disposal areas within a
permit area, in a controlled manner.'' We find that the amended
language at 405 KAR 16:140 Section 1 (1) and 18:140 Section 1 (1) read
in conjunction with existing language 405 KAR 16:140 Section 1 (1)(a)
and 18:140 Section 1 (1)(a) and 405 KAR 16:130 Section 1 (1) and 18:130
Section 1 (1) is no less effective than the counterpart Federal
regulations at 30 CFR 816.81(a) and 817.81(a) pertaining to coal mine
waste disposal. This constitutes satisfaction of the last coal mine
waste issue found in the May 27, 1997, 732 letter.
In Section 2 of 405 KAR 16:140 and 18:140 the Kentucky rules
require that either a qualified professional engineer or other
qualified person under the direct supervision of the responsible
professional engineer must inspect all coal mine waste banks. Kentucky
replaced the term ``registered professional engineer'' with
``professional engineer.'' Kentucky Revised Statute (KRS) section
322.010 defines ``professional engineer'' to mean ``a person who is a
licensed professional engineer by the board.'' The board is the State
Board of Licensure for Professional Engineers and Land Surveyors. In
1999, Kentucky changed its registration procedures to licensing
procedures. See, KRS section 322.015. Kentucky prohibits the practice
of engineering or land surveying without a license. KRS 322.020. The
Federal regulations at 30 CFR 816.83(d) (Surface Mining--Coal mine
waste: Refuse Piles) and 817.83(d) (Underground Mining--Coal mine
waste: Refuse Piles) require that a qualified registered professional
engineer or other qualified professional specialist under the direction
of the professional engineer shall inspect the refuse pile during
construction. Both the Federal and Kentucky rules require inspection by
an engineer that is approved by an appropriate regulatory body as
qualified to be an engineer. Accordingly, we find that the proposed
changes to Kentucky regulations are no less effective than the Federal
regulations at 30 CFR 816.83(d) and 817.83(d).
Section 6 of 405 KAR 16:140 and 18:140 requires that a qualified
professional engineer must prepare a plan for the removal of any burned
coal mine waste or other material from the permitted disposal area.
Kentucky replaced the term ``registered professional engineer'' with
``professional engineer.'' As cited above, KRS section 322.010 defines
``professional engineer'' to mean ``a person who is a licensed
professional engineer by the board.'' The Federal regulations at 30 CFR
780.14(c) (Surface Mining--Operation plan: Maps and plans) and
784.23(c) (Underground Mining--Operation plan: Maps and plans) require
that cross sections, maps, and plans shall be prepared, by or under the
direction of, and certified by a qualified registered professional
engineer, a professional geologist, etc. Both the Federal and Kentucky
rules require plan preparation by an engineer that is approved by an
appropriate regulatory body as qualified to be an engineer.
Accordingly, we find that the proposed changes to Kentucky regulations
are consistent with the Federal regulations at 30 CFR 780.14(c) and
784.23(c).
Throughout the Kentucky regulations, the term ``coal processing
waste'' is replaced by ``coal mine waste.'' The Federal definition of
``coal mine waste'' at 30 CFR 701.5 (Definitions) means ``coal
processing waste and underground development waste.'' The Kentucky
definitions of coal mine waste at 405 KAR 16:001 (18) and 18:001 (19)
define ``coal mine waste'' as ``coal processing waste and underground
development waste.'' The Federal regulations at 30 CFR 816.81, 817.81,
816.83, and 817.83 use the term ``coal mine waste.'' Kentucky's
regulations at 405 KAR 16:140 and 18:140 also use this term. Since
Kentucky defines the term the same as the Federal regulations and
appropriately uses the term ``coal mine waste'' at 405 KAR 16:140 and
18:140, we find the Kentucky proposed language is no less effective
than the Federal regulations at 30 CFR 816.81 and 817.81 and 816.83 and
817.83.
We are also revising section 917.16 (Kentucky--Required regulatory
program amendments) to correct a codification error which occurred in
2002. The required amendment at 405 KAR 20.060 section 3 (3)(b) was
submitted by the State and the OSM approval was published on June 19,
2002, at 67 FR 41622, 41625, but the requirement was not removed from
30 CFR 917.16(d)(5) as it should have been. We are now removing 30 CFR
917.16(d)(5).
IV. Summary and Disposition of Comments
Public Comments
We asked for public comments on the amendment (Administrative
Record No. 1661), but did not receive any.
Federal Agency Comments
Under 30 CFR 732.17(h)(11)(i) and section 503(b) of SMCRA, we
requested comments on the amendment from various Federal agencies with
an actual or potential interest in the Kentucky program (KY-1662). No
comments were received.
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Concurrence and Comments
Under 30 CFR 732.17(h)(11)(i) and (ii), we are required to get a
written concurrence from EPA for those provisions of the program
amendment that relate to air or water quality standards issued under
the authority of the Clean Water Act (33 U.S.C. 1251 et seq.) or the
Clean Air Act (42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.).
None of the provisions that Kentucky proposed to make in this
amendment pertain to air or water quality standards. Therefore, we did
not ask EPA to concur on the amendment.
V. OSM's Decision
Based on the above findings, we approve the amendment Kentucky sent
to us on September 14, 2009. To implement this decision, we are
amending the Federal regulations at 30 CFR part 917 which codify
decisions concerning the Kentucky program. Pursuant to 5 U.S.C.
553(d)(3), an agency may, upon a showing of good cause, waive the 30
day delay of the effective date of a substantive rule following
publication in the Federal Register, thereby making the final rule
effective immediately.
[[Page 12851]]
We find that good cause exists under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3) to make
this final rule effective immediately. Because Section 503(a) of SMCRA
requires that the State's program demonstrate that the State has the
capability of carrying out the provisions of the Act and meeting its
purposes, making this regulation effective immediately will expedite
that process.
VI. Procedural Determinations
Executive Order 12630--Takings
This rule does not have takings implications. This determination is
based on the analysis performed for the counterpart Federal regulation.
Executive Order 12866--Regulatory Planning and Review
This rule is exempted from review by the Office of Management and
Budget under Executive Order 12866.
Executive Order 12988--Civil Justice Reform
The Department of the Interior has conducted the reviews required
by Section 3 of Executive Order 12988 and has determined that this rule
meets the applicable standards of Subsections (a) and (b) of that
section. However, these standards are not applicable to the actual
language of State regulatory programs and program amendments because
each program is drafted and promulgated by a specific State, not by
OSM. Under Sections 503 and 505 of SMCRA (30 U.S.C. 1253 and 1255) and
the Federal regulations at 30 CFR 730.11, 732.15, and 732.17(h)(10),
decisions on proposed State regulatory programs and program amendments
submitted by the States must be based solely on a determination of
whether the submittal is consistent with SMCRA and its implementing
Federal regulations and whether the other requirements of 30 CFR parts
730, 731, and 732 have been met.
Executive Order 13132--Federalism
This rule does not have Federalism implications. SMCRA delineates
the roles of the Federal and State governments with regard to the
regulation of surface coal mining and reclamation operations. One of
the purposes of SMCRA is to ``establish a nationwide program to protect
society and the environment from the adverse effects of surface coal
mining operations.'' Section 503(a)(1) of SMCRA requires that State
laws regulating surface coal mining and reclamation operations be ``in
accordance with'' the requirements of SMCRA, and Section 503(a)(7)
requires that State programs contain rules and regulations ``consistent
with'' regulations issued by the Secretary pursuant to SMCRA.
Executive Order 13175--Consultation and Coordination With Indian Tribal
Government
In accordance with Executive Order 13175, we have evaluated the
potential effects of this rule on Federally-recognized Indian tribes
and have determined that the rule does not have substantial direct
effects on one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power
and responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.
The basis for this determination is that our decision is on a State
Regulatory program and does not involve a Federal Regulation involving
Indian Lands.
Executive Order 13211--Regulations That Significantly Affect the
Supply, Distribution, or Use of Energy
On May 18, 2001, the President issued Executive Order 13211 which
requires agencies to prepare a Statement of Energy Effects for a rule
that is (1) considered significant under Executive Order 12866, and (2)
likely to have a significant adverse effect on the supply,
distribution, or use of energy. Because this rule is exempt from review
under Executive Order 12866 and is not expected to have a significant
adverse effect on the supply, distribution, or use of energy, a
Statement of Energy Effects is not required.
National Environmental Policy Act
This rule does not require an environmental impact statement
because Section 702(d) of SMCRA (30 U.S.C. 1292(d)) provides that
agency decisions on proposed State regulatory program provisions do not
constitute major Federal actions within the meaning of Section
102(2)(C) of the National Environmental Policy Act (42 U.S.C.
4332(2)(C)).
Paperwork Reduction Act
This rule does not contain information collection requirements that
require approval by OMB under the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C.
3507 et seq.).
Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Department of the Interior certifies that this rule will not
have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
entities under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.).
The State submittal, which is the subject of this rule, is based upon
counterpart Federal regulations for which an economic analysis was
prepared and certification made that such regulations would not have a
significant economic effect upon a substantial number of small
entities. In making the determination as to whether this rule would
have a significant economic impact, the Department relied upon data and
assumptions for the counterpart Federal regulations.
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act
This rule is not a major rule under 5 U.S.C. 804(2), the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act. This rule: (a) Does not
have an annual effect on the economy of $100 million; (b) will not
cause a major increase in costs or prices for consumers, individual
industries, Federal, State, or local government agencies, or geographic
regions; and (c) does not have significant adverse effects on
competition, employment, investment, productivity, innovation, or the
ability of U.S.-based enterprises to compete with foreign-based
enterprises. This determination is based upon the fact that the
Kentucky submittal, which is the subject of this rule, is based upon
counterpart Federal regulations for which an analysis was prepared and
a determination made that the Federal regulation was not considered a
major rule.
Unfunded Mandates
This rule will not impose an unfunded mandate on State, local, or
tribal governments or the private sector of $100 million or more in any
given year. This determination is based upon the fact that the Kentucky
submittal, which is the subject of this rule, is based upon counterpart
Federal regulations for which an analysis was prepared and a
determination made that the Federal regulation did not impose an
unfunded mandate.
List of Subjects in 30 CFR Part 917
Intergovernmental relations, Surface mining, Underground mining.
Dated: November 22, 2010.
Thomas D. Shope,
Regional Director, Appalachian Region.
For the reasons set out in the preamble, 30 CFR part 917 is amended
as set forth below:
PART 917--KENTUCKY
0
1. The authority citation for part 917 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 30 U.S.C. 1201 et seq.
0
2. Section 917.15 is amended by adding a new entry to the table in
[[Page 12852]]
chronological order by ``Date of final publication'' to read as
follows:
Sec. 917.15 Approval of Kentucky regulatory program amendments.
* * * * *
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Original amendment submission Date of final
date publication Citation/description
------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
September 14, 2009............ March 9, 2011.... 405 KAR 16:140,
Disposal of coal
mine waste.
405 KAR 18:140,
Disposal of coal
mine waste.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sec. 917.16 [Amended]
0
3. Section 917.16 is amended by removing and reserving paragraph
(d)(5).
[FR Doc. 2011-5386 Filed 3-8-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-05-P
