Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request, 12315-12316 [2011-5005]
Download as PDF
12315
Notices
Federal Register
Vol. 76, No. 44
Monday, March 7, 2011
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER
contains documents other than rules or
proposed rules that are applicable to the
public. Notices of hearings and investigations,
committee meetings, agency decisions and
rulings, delegations of authority, filing of
petitions and applications and agency
statements of organization and functions are
examples of documents appearing in this
section.
ADMINISTRATIVE CONFERENCE OF
THE UNITED STATES
Committees on Collaborative
Governance, Regulation, Rulemaking,
Judicial Review, and Adjudication
ACTION:
Notice of public meetings.
Notice is hereby given of
public meetings of five committees of
the Assembly of the Administrative
Conference of the United States (ACUS).
Each committee will consider a research
report and will prepare
recommendations on the subject of the
report for consideration by the full
Conference. Complete details regarding
each committee’s meeting, related
research reports, how to attend
(including information about remote
access and obtaining special
accommodations for persons with
disabilities), and how to submit
comments to the committee can be
found in the ‘‘Research’’ section of the
ACUS Web site, https://www.acus.gov.
Comments may be submitted by email to Comments@acus.gov, with the
name of the relevant committee in the
subject line, or by postal mail to ‘‘[Name
of Committee] Comments’’ at the address
given below.
ADDRESSES: The meetings will be held at
1120 20th Street, NW., Suite 706 South,
Washington, DC 20036.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Designated Federal Officer for the
individual committee, ACUS, Suite 706
South, 1120 20th Street, NW.,
Washington, DC 20036; Telephone 202–
480–2080.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
Committee on Collaborative
Governance
The Committee on Collaborative
Governance will meet to consider a
report by Professor James T. O’Reilly of
the University of Cincinnati College of
Law concerning the ‘‘Federal Advisory
Committee Act in the 21st Century.’’ The
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:54 Mar 04, 2011
Jkt 223001
objective of this study is to consider
possible recommendations for
improvements of the Act, particularly in
light of technological and social
developments since its passage.
Date: Wednesday, March 23, 2011,
from 1 p.m. to 3:30 p.m.
Designated Federal Officer: David M.
Pritzker.
Dated: March 2, 2011.
Jonathan R. Siegel,
Director of Research & Policy.
Committee on Regulation
The Committee on Regulation will
consider a report dealing with the
timing, availability, confidentiality, and
impact of comments submitted during
agency rulemakings, as well as agencies’
duty to reply to such comments. The
consultant for this study is Professor
Steven J. Balla of The George
Washington University.
Date: Thursday, March 24, 2011, from
2 p.m. to 5 p.m.
Designated Federal Officer: Reeve T.
Bull.
Submission for OMB Review;
Comment Request
Committee on Rulemaking
The Committee on Rulemaking will
consider a report on the legal issues
agencies face in e-Rulemaking. The
report was prepared by ACUS staff
member Bridget C.E. Dooling.
Date: Friday, March 25, 2011, from 9
a.m. to 12 noon.
Designated Federal Officer: Emily F.
Schleicher.
Committee on Judicial Review
The Committee on Judicial Review
will consider a report dealing with
possible solutions to the procedural trap
posed by 28 U.S.C. 1500, a statute that
regulates the Court of Federal Claims’
jurisdiction over claims pending in
other courts. The report was prepared
by ACUS staff members Emily F.
Schleicher and Jonathan R. Siegel.
Date: Monday, March 28, 2011, from
2 p.m. to 5 p.m.
Designated Federal Officer: Reeve T.
Bull.
Committee on Adjudication
The Committee on Adjudication will
consider a report by ACUS staff member
Funmi E. Olorunnipa regarding the use
of video hearings by Federal agencies,
which examines the costs and benefits
of video hearings as they are currently
being used and the possibilities for
expansion of use by Federal agencies.
Date: Wednesday, March 30, 2011,
from 9 a.m. to 12 noon.
Designated Federal Officer: Funmi E.
Olorunnipa.
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
[FR Doc. 2011–5062 Filed 3–4–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6110–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
March 1, 2011.
The Department of Agriculture has
submitted the following information
collection requirement(s) to OMB for
review and clearance under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995,
Public Law 104–13. Comments
regarding (a) whether the collection of
information is necessary for the proper
performance of the functions of the
agency, including whether the
information will have practical utility;
(b) the accuracy of the agency’s estimate
of burden including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used; (c)
ways to enhance the quality, utility and
clarity of the information to be
collected; (d) ways to minimize the
burden of the collection of information
on those who are to respond, including
through the use of appropriate
automated, electronic, mechanical, or
other technological collection
techniques or other forms of information
technology should be addressed to: Desk
Officer for Agriculture, Office of
Information and Regulatory Affairs,
Office of Management and Budget
(OMB),
OIRA_Submission@OMB.EOP.GOV or
fax (202) 395–5806 and to Departmental
Clearance Office, USDA, OCIO, Mail
Stop 7602, Washington, DC 20250–
7602. Comments regarding these
information collections are best assured
of having their full effect if received
within 30 days of this notification.
Copies of the submission(s) may be
obtained by calling (202) 720–8958.
An agency may not conduct or
sponsor a collection of information
unless the collection of information
displays a currently valid OMB control
number and the agency informs
potential persons who are to respond to
the collection of information that such
persons are not required to respond to
the collection of information unless it
displays a currently valid OMB control
number.
E:\FR\FM\07MRN1.SGM
07MRN1
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICES
12316
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 44 / Monday, March 7, 2011 / Notices
Food and Nutrition Service
Title: In-depth Case Studies of
Advanced Modernization Initiatives.
OMB Control Number: 0584–0547.
Summary of Collection: The
Supplemental Nutrition Assistance
Program (SNAP) is a critical source of
support for many low-income families
and individuals. In recent years, states
have implemented new procedures and
policies in order to reduce SNAP
administrative costs while maintaining
or improving program access. These
changes often referred to as
modernization-incorporate technology,
administrative restructuring,
community partnering, and policy
simplification. Together, the Food,
Conservation, and Energy Act of 2008,
which amended Section 11 of the Food
and Nutrition Act of 2008, 7 U.S.C.
2020, and the Food Nutrition Act of
2008, which amended Section 17 of 7
U.S.C. 2026, authorizes the Food and
Nutrition Service (FNS) to develop
standards for identifying major
operational changes, require States to
provide any information required by the
U.S. Department of Agriculture, and
authorizes FNS to undertake research
that will help improve the
administration and effectiveness of
SNAP.
Need and Use of the Information:
Information for the In-depth Case
Studies will build on the findings from
a previous data collection effort,
Enhancing Food Stamp Certification:
Food Stamp Modernization Efforts. To
obtain a detailed and comprehensive
view of the implementation of SNAP
modernization initiatives, data will be
collected via in-person interviews, focus
group discussions, and through
administrative case records, application
statistics, performance data, and other
relevant materials. The project has
seven research objectives: (1) Update the
existing state profiles of modernization
efforts and identify the geographic and
caseload coverage affected by
modernization changes; (2) describe
how key certification, recertification,
and case management functions have
changed; (3) describe the current roles
and responsibilities of state and local
SNAP staff, vendors, and partners and
how they have changed; (4) document
the relationship between SNAP
modernization initiatives and
stakeholder satisfaction; (5) describe the
current performance of each state’s
modernization initiatives and the level
of outcome variability within each state;
(6) compare performance before, during,
and after modernization; and (7)
document the main takeaway points for
use by other states and for future study
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:54 Mar 04, 2011
Jkt 223001
consideration. Without the detailed case
study, FNS would need to rely on the
states’ general statements regarding
program operations and aggregate
statistics on modernization initiatives,
resulting in an incomplete
understanding of how modernization
has affected the implementation of
SNAP.
Description of Respondents:
Individual or households; not-for-profit
institutions; business or other for-profit;
State, Local or Tribal Government.
Number of Respondents: 1,353.
Frequency of Responses: Reporting:
Other (one time only)
Total Burden Hours: 1,802.
County Title II project matters to the
attention of the Committee may file
written statements with the Committee
staff before or after the meetings.
Dated: January 24, 2011.
Dave Martin,
District Ranger.
[FR Doc. 2011–5084 Filed 3–4–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–11–P
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Forest Service
El Dorado County Resource Advisory
Committee
Ruth Brown,
Departmental Information Collection
Clearance Officer.
AGENCY:
[FR Doc. 2011–5005 Filed 3–4–11; 8:45 am]
SUMMARY:
BILLING CODE 3410–30–P
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Forest Service
Madera County Resource Advisory
Committee
Forest Service, USDA.
Notice of meeting.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Madera County Resource
Advisory Committee will be meeting in
North Fork, California on March 9th and
March 16th, 2011. The purpose of these
meetings will be to discuss and approve
submitted proposals for funding as
authorized under the Secure Rural
Schools and Community SelfDetermination Act of 2000 (Pub. L. 110–
343) for expenditure of Payments to
States Madera County Title II funds.
DATES: The meetings will be held on
March 9th, and March 16th, 2011 from
6:30 p.m. to 8:30 p.m. in North Fork,
CA.
SUMMARY:
The meetings will be held at
the Bass Lake Ranger District, 57003
Road 225, North Fork, California, 93643.
Send written comments to Julie Roberts,
Madera County Resource Advisory
Committee Coordinator, c/o Sierra
National Forest, Bass Lake Ranger
District, at the above address, or
electronically to jaroberts@fs.fed.us.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Julie
Roberts, Madera County Resource
Advisory Committee Coordinator, (559)
877–2218 ext. 3159.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
meetings are open to the public.
Committee discussion is limited to
Forest Service staff and Committee
members. However, persons who wish
to bring Payments to States Madera
ADDRESSES:
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
ACTION:
Forest Service, USDA.
Notice of meeting.
The El Dorado County
Resource Advisory Committee will meet
in Placerville, California. The committee
is meeting as authorized under the
Secure Rural Schools and Community
Self-Determination Act (Pub. L. 110–
343) and in compliance with the Federal
Advisory Committee Act. The RAC will
deliberate and recommend projects for
the Forest Supervisor’s approval.
DATES: The meeting will be held on
March 21, 2011 beginning at 6 p.m.
ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at
the El Dorado Center of Folsom Lake
College, Community Room, 6699
Campus Drive, Placerville, CA 95667.
Written comments should be sent to
Frank Mosbacher; Forest Supervisor’s
Office; 100 Forni Road; Placerville, CA
95667. Comments may also be sent via
email to fmosbacher@fs.fed.us, or via
facsimile to 530–621–5297.
All comments, including names and
addresses when provided, are placed in
the record and are available for public
inspection and copying. The public may
inspect comments received at 100 Forni
Road; Placerville, CA 95667. Visitors are
encouraged to call ahead to 530–622–
5061 to facilitate entry into the building.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Frank Mosbacher, Public Affairs Officer,
Eldorado National Forest Supervisors
Office, (530) 621–5268. Individuals who
use telecommunication devices for the
deaf (TDD) may call the Federal
Information Relay Service (FIRS) at 1–
800–877–8339 between 8 a.m. and 8
p.m., Eastern Standard Time, Monday
through Friday.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
meeting is open to the public. The
following business will be conducted:
The RAC will deliberate and
recommend projects for the Forest
Supervisor’s approval. More
information will be posted on the
E:\FR\FM\07MRN1.SGM
07MRN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 44 (Monday, March 7, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 12315-12316]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-5005]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request
March 1, 2011.
The Department of Agriculture has submitted the following
information collection requirement(s) to OMB for review and clearance
under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, Public Law 104-13. Comments
regarding (a) whether the collection of information is necessary for
the proper performance of the functions of the agency, including
whether the information will have practical utility; (b) the accuracy
of the agency's estimate of burden including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used; (c) ways to enhance the quality,
utility and clarity of the information to be collected; (d) ways to
minimize the burden of the collection of information on those who are
to respond, including through the use of appropriate automated,
electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection techniques or
other forms of information technology should be addressed to: Desk
Officer for Agriculture, Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs,
Office of Management and Budget (OMB), OIRA_Submission@OMB.EOP.GOV or
fax (202) 395-5806 and to Departmental Clearance Office, USDA, OCIO,
Mail Stop 7602, Washington, DC 20250-7602. Comments regarding these
information collections are best assured of having their full effect if
received within 30 days of this notification. Copies of the
submission(s) may be obtained by calling (202) 720-8958.
An agency may not conduct or sponsor a collection of information
unless the collection of information displays a currently valid OMB
control number and the agency informs potential persons who are to
respond to the collection of information that such persons are not
required to respond to the collection of information unless it displays
a currently valid OMB control number.
[[Page 12316]]
Food and Nutrition Service
Title: In-depth Case Studies of Advanced Modernization Initiatives.
OMB Control Number: 0584-0547.
Summary of Collection: The Supplemental Nutrition Assistance
Program (SNAP) is a critical source of support for many low-income
families and individuals. In recent years, states have implemented new
procedures and policies in order to reduce SNAP administrative costs
while maintaining or improving program access. These changes often
referred to as modernization-incorporate technology, administrative
restructuring, community partnering, and policy simplification.
Together, the Food, Conservation, and Energy Act of 2008, which amended
Section 11 of the Food and Nutrition Act of 2008, 7 U.S.C. 2020, and
the Food Nutrition Act of 2008, which amended Section 17 of 7 U.S.C.
2026, authorizes the Food and Nutrition Service (FNS) to develop
standards for identifying major operational changes, require States to
provide any information required by the U.S. Department of Agriculture,
and authorizes FNS to undertake research that will help improve the
administration and effectiveness of SNAP.
Need and Use of the Information: Information for the In-depth Case
Studies will build on the findings from a previous data collection
effort, Enhancing Food Stamp Certification: Food Stamp Modernization
Efforts. To obtain a detailed and comprehensive view of the
implementation of SNAP modernization initiatives, data will be
collected via in-person interviews, focus group discussions, and
through administrative case records, application statistics,
performance data, and other relevant materials. The project has seven
research objectives: (1) Update the existing state profiles of
modernization efforts and identify the geographic and caseload coverage
affected by modernization changes; (2) describe how key certification,
recertification, and case management functions have changed; (3)
describe the current roles and responsibilities of state and local SNAP
staff, vendors, and partners and how they have changed; (4) document
the relationship between SNAP modernization initiatives and stakeholder
satisfaction; (5) describe the current performance of each state's
modernization initiatives and the level of outcome variability within
each state; (6) compare performance before, during, and after
modernization; and (7) document the main takeaway points for use by
other states and for future study consideration. Without the detailed
case study, FNS would need to rely on the states' general statements
regarding program operations and aggregate statistics on modernization
initiatives, resulting in an incomplete understanding of how
modernization has affected the implementation of SNAP.
Description of Respondents: Individual or households; not-for-
profit institutions; business or other for-profit; State, Local or
Tribal Government.
Number of Respondents: 1,353.
Frequency of Responses: Reporting: Other (one time only)
Total Burden Hours: 1,802.
Ruth Brown,
Departmental Information Collection Clearance Officer.
[FR Doc. 2011-5005 Filed 3-4-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-30-P