Australia's Meat Safety Enhancement Program; Notice of Affirmation of Equivalence Decision, 11752-11755 [2011-4902]
Download as PDF
11752
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 42 / Thursday, March 3, 2011 / Notices
averaging, the total annual burden hours
may not equal the product of the annual
number of responses multiplied by the
reporting burden per response.)
All responses to this notice will be
summarized and included in the request
for OMB approval. All comments will
also become a matter of public record.
Done in Washington, DC, this 25th day of
February 2011.
Kevin Shea,
Acting Administrator, Animal and Plant
Health Inspection Service.
[FR Doc. 2011–4767 Filed 3–2–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–34–P
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Food Safety and Inspection Service
[Docket No. FSIS–2009–0020]
Australia’s Meat Safety Enhancement
Program; Notice of Affirmation of
Equivalence Decision
Food Safety and Inspection
Service, USDA.
ACTION: Notice of affirmation of
equivalence decision.
AGENCY:
The Food Safety and
Inspection Service (FSIS) is affirming its
1999 decision that Australia’s Meat
Safety Enhancement Program (MSEP),
an alternative to the conventional meat
inspection system also maintained by
the Australian Government food
regulatory authority [Australia
Quarantine and Inspection Service
(AQIS)], is equivalent to the FSIS
domestic meat inspection system. MSEP
has been renamed the Australian Export
Meat Inspection System (AEMIS), but
the system itself will remain the same
as that determined to be equivalent by
FSIS in 1999 when FSIS announced that
slaughter inspection in MSEP
establishments meets all requirements
of U.S. law for the import of product to
the United States, and provides the
same level of public health protection as
U.S. domestic slaughter inspection. In
this notice, MSEP is used for events that
occurred under that name, MSEP/
AEMIS for unchanging features of the
program, and AEMIS for current and
projected activities. In January 2011,
Australia informed FSIS that AEMIS
will be progressively implemented in all
Australian beef, sheep, and goat
establishments eligible to export to the
United States.
DATES: The Agency must receive
comments by April 4, 2011.
ADDRESSES: FSIS invites comments on
this notice. Comments may be
submitted by either of the following
methods:
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:47 Mar 02, 2011
Jkt 223001
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: This
Web site provides the ability to type
short comments directly into the
comment field on this Web page or
attach a file for lengthier comments. Go
to https://www.regulations.gov. Follow
the online instructions at that site for
submitting comments.
• Mail, including floppy disks or CD–
ROMs, and hand- or courier-delivered
items: Send to Docket Clerk, USDA,
FSIS, Room 2–2127 George Washington
Carver Center, 5601 Sunnyside Avenue,
Mailstop 5272, Beltsville, MD 20705–
5272.
Instructions: All items submitted by
mail or electronic mail must include the
Agency name and docket number FSIS–
2009–0020. Comments received in
response to this docket will be made
available for public inspection and
posted without change, including any
personal information, to https://
www.regulations.gov.
Docket: All comments submitted in
response to this notice, as well as
research and background information
used by FSIS in developing this
document, will be available for public
inspection in the FSIS Docket Room at
the address listed above between 8 a.m.
and 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For
further information contact Dr. Ronald
K. Jones, Assistant Administrator, Office
of International Affairs, Food Safety and
Inspection Service, USDA, Room 3143–
S, 14th and Independence Avenue, SW.,
Washington, DC 20250–0070; telephone
(202) 720–3473, fax (202) 690–3856, email Ronald.Jones@fsis.usda.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
The Federal Meat Inspection Act
(FMIA) stipulates that no carcasses,
parts of carcasses, meat, or meat food
products shall be imported into the
United States unless the livestock from
which they were produced was
slaughtered and processed in
accordance with all provisions and
regulations applicable to such articles in
commerce within the United States (21
U.S.C. 620). These provisions and
regulations include standards for safety,
wholesomeness, and labeling accuracy.
Foreign countries wanting to export
meat to the United States must apply to
FSIS, following procedures set out in
§ 327.2 of Title 9 of the Code of Federal
Regulations (CFR). To be found eligible,
a foreign country’s national government
must operate an inspection system with
legal authority for the inspection
system. Its implementing regulations
and other implementing documentation
must be equivalent to those of the
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
United States. Specifically, the national
meat inspection system must impose
equivalent requirements with respect to:
(1) Ante-mortem and post-mortem
inspection; (2) official controls by the
national government over plant
construction, facilities, and equipment;
(3) direct and continuous supervision of
slaughter activities and product
preparation; (4) separation of
establishments certified to export from
those not certified; (5) maintenance of a
single standard of inspection and
sanitation throughout certified
establishments; (6) requirements for
sanitation at establishments certified to
export and for sanitary handling of
product; and (7) official controls over
condemned product.
In order to achieve equivalence
recognition, a foreign country must
submit its inspection system to an
evaluation by FSIS consisting of a
document review and an on-site review.
The document review is an evaluation
of the laws, regulations, and other
implementing documentation used by
the country to enact its inspection
program. The foreign country provides a
self-assessment of its national meat or
poultry inspection system, organized by
six components: Government oversight,
statutory authority and food safety
regulations, sanitation, Hazard Analysis
and Critical Control Point (HACCP)
systems, chemical residue testing
programs, and microbiological testing
programs. FSIS evaluates the
information submitted in these selfassessment documents and conducts an
on-site review to verify all aspects of the
country’s inspection program, including
laboratories and the foreign
government’s oversight of the individual
establishments within the country. This
comprehensive process is described
fully on the FSIS Web site at https://
www.fsis.usda.gov/
Regulations_&_Policies/
equivalence_process/index.asp.
If FSIS determines that a foreign
country’s inspection system is
equivalent, the Agency is required to
conduct a rulemaking to list the country
in the meat inspection regulations, at 9
CFR 327.2, as eligible to export meat
and meat products to the United States.
Once the rulemaking is final, the foreign
country certifies appropriate
establishments as having met required
standards for export. This certification
ensures that both establishments
producing meat for export to the United
States and the products of those
establishments comply with
requirements that are equivalent to
those of the FMIA and the regulations
that are promulgated under this
statutory authority. To verify that
E:\FR\FM\03MRN1.SGM
03MRN1
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 42 / Thursday, March 3, 2011 / Notices
products imported into the United
States are safe, wholesome, and
properly labeled and packaged, FSIS reinspects those products at ports-of-entry
(POEs) before they enter the United
States. FSIS re-inspects all shipments
for overall condition, foreign
government certification, and labeling
and then selects random lots of product
and assigns appropriate types of
inspections such as product
examination and microbiological and
residue testing for a more in-depth
examination.
Under the World Trade Organization
(WTO) Agreement on Sanitary and
Phytosanitary Measures (SPS), the
United States has international
obligations to respond to requests from
other nations to establish the
equivalence of meat and poultry
processing measures that differ from
those of the United States. In 1996,
Australia, which has long been eligible
to export meat to the United States
under its conventional meat inspection
system, approached FSIS with an
alternative meat slaughter inspection
program called ‘‘Project 2.’’ FSIS
announced in the Federal Register (62
FR 29326, May 30, 1997) that it was
making available an AQIS submission
on Project 2 and seeking public
comment in order to help in
determining whether the United States
should accept meat produced by
Australian establishments participating
in Project 2 trials.
After extensive review, FSIS
determined that Project 2 was not
equivalent because it did not provide
adequate government oversight. AQIS
modified the proposed program, and
FSIS announced the availability of a
new AQIS paper on the program,
renamed MSEP, in a Federal Register
Notice (64 FR 2621, January 15, 1999;
the MSEP paper is available on the FSIS
Web site with this notice at https://
www.fsis.usda.gov/
regulations_&_policies/
Federal_Register_Notices/index.asp).
The 1999 notice also announced a
public meeting on MSEP for February 3,
1999, to seek input from U.S. industry,
U.S. consumer groups, and other FSIS
stakeholders.
FSIS evaluated comments on the
AQIS paper and the public meeting and
determined that MSEP is equivalent to
the U.S. meat slaughter inspection
program. FSIS announced this decision
in a Federal Register Notice (64 FR
30299, June 7, 1999; MSEP
equivalence). The Agency added that it
would review its equivalence decision
once AQIS had conducted field trials
and submitted the results to FSIS and
would then publish its conclusions in a
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:47 Mar 02, 2011
Jkt 223001
Federal Register Notice. In the interim,
establishments participating in MSEP
field trials could export product to the
United States. At the time, AQIS
expected a beef establishment to
participate in MSEP field trials in the
near future. For various reasons,
however, it was not until 2006 that a
different beef slaughter establishment
volunteered for MSEP field trials. That
establishment is the one referenced in
this notice.
MSEP/AEMIS
MSEP/AEMIS is an alternative meat
slaughter inspection program in which
establishment employees perform
certain duties traditionally performed
by government inspectors. Under
MSEP/AEMIS, establishment employees
instead of government inspectors are
responsible for post-mortem
examination of the heads and viscera of
livestock. AQIS veterinarians are
responsible for performing ante-mortem
inspection, verifying post-mortem
inspection, verifying establishment
examination activities, providing final
disposition on animals and carcasses/
heads/viscera where there is evidence of
disease, verifying HACCP and SSOP
programs, and performing other food
safety activities. AQIS inspectors are
responsible for final inspection of each
carcass for food safety defects. It should
be noted that the establishment
employees who are responsible for the
initial examination of the heads and
viscera for referral to AQIS veterinarians
have completed the same training and
have the same qualifications as
established by AQIS for its government
inspectors.
An establishment wishing to
participate in MSEP/AEMIS must meet
entry conditions detailed in an
Approved Arrangement with AQIS. An
applicant establishment must be able to
demonstrate consistent performance
under the Meat Hygiene Assessment
(MHA) national plant performance
rating system administered by AQIS.
For the purposes of the beef
establishment trials, the current MSEP/
AEMIS beef standards are detailed in an
AQIS MSEP paper of March 2007, Meat
Safety Enhancement Program:
Establishing Performance Standards for
Beef Slaughter. This paper is available
on the FSIS Web site with this notice at
https://www.fsis.usda.gov/
regulations_&_policies/
Federal_Register_Notices/index.asp.
MSEP/AEMIS Performance Standards
The MSEP/AEMIS performance
standards for beef slaughter are based on
those used in the FSIS HACCP–Based
Inspection Models Project (HIMP) for
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
11753
swine, which were first published in
July 1998 (HIMP inspection models) and
later detailed in the Federal Register in
November 2000 (65 FR 65828–65829;
performance standards for HIMP
plants). Several HIMP market hog
establishments have been operating
since 2000. MSEP/AEMIS incorporates
the same food safety performance
standards as established by FSIS for
HIMP, which included a zero tolerance
for post-mortem infectious conditions,
fecal material, ingesta, milk, and antemortem conditions found in cattle, such
as neurological conditions, and
moribund, febrile, and non-ambulatory
cattle. The MSEP/AEMIS performance
standards also include the HIMP
performance attributes for
wholesomeness, i.e., non-infectious
conditions, such as post-mortem carcass
and offal pathology and general carcass
and offal contamination. In addition,
MSEP/AEMIS performance standards
include a performance standard for
Aerobic Plate Counts of 100 colony
forming units per square centimeter
(100 cfu/cm2).
In applying the MSEP/AEMIS
performance standards for the field
trials, AQIS compared MSEP results
against MHA data from eight Australian
beef slaughter establishments certified
to export to the United States under
conventional inspection. MHA records
establishment performance against food
safety standards established by AQIS for
all Australian establishments exporting
meat products to the United States and
other countries. AQIS selected these
eight establishments as the best
performers based on AQIS inspection
and compliance data and results of FSIS
audits of these establishments that had
occurred within the previous five years.
These establishments also represent
one-third of Australia’s annual total beef
production. For a close comparison,
data from these eight establishments
certified under conventional inspection
were gathered at the same time as at the
MSEP establishment. In addition, cattle
slaughtered at these eight
establishments were the same type of
cattle as slaughtered at the MSEP
establishment.
Microbiological Performance Standards
As part of the MSEP/AEMIS
performance standards, AQIS
established microbiological performance
standards for generic Escherichia coli
(E. coli) and Salmonella, which remain
the same under the new program name
of AEMIS. These MSEP/AEMIS
performance standards are equal to or
more stringent than the FSIS
performance standards for the same
organisms. For Australian
E:\FR\FM\03MRN1.SGM
03MRN1
11754
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 42 / Thursday, March 3, 2011 / Notices
establishments producing under MSEP/
AEMIS, no positives are allowed for
either Salmonella or generic E. coli. In
comparison, FSIS microbiological
performance standards allow for one
positive for Salmonella and one positive
for generic E. coli for steers and heifers
and two positives for generic E. coli for
cows and bulls. The MSEP test results
are discussed below.
MSEP Field Trial Proceedings
In January 2006, AQIS notified FSIS
that one Australian establishment was
interested in producing beef products
for export to the United States under
MSEP. This was Australia’s first interest
in exporting beef under MSEP since the
1999 equivalence determination.
Because of the extensive time between
the FSIS 1999 equivalence decision and
the request by Australia to export under
MSEP, AQIS submitted a revised MSEP
program for consideration by FSIS. The
revisions were minor and consisted of
clarification of the separation of duties
and responsibilities for AQIS and the
establishment and an increase in the
frequency of testing beef carcasses for
Salmonella.
The MSEP field trials for the
establishment consisted of two phases,
Phase 1 and Phase 2. As part of the 1999
equivalence decision, an Australian
MSEP establishment was required to
complete a 6-week field trial and would
be allowed to export beef products to
the United States while undergoing the
trial. This agreement was based,
however, on the MSEP establishment
already being certified by AQIS for
export to the United States. The
establishment that actually participated
in the field trial was not a certified
establishment. Therefore, AQIS added
an additional 6-week field trial study as
Phase 1.
MSEP Field Trial Results and
Discussion
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICES
Phase 1
The 6-week MSEP field trial at the
establishment under Phase 1 began on
November 13, 2006, and ended on
December 22, 2006. A total of 9,227
cattle were slaughtered and processed
during this period. Twenty-one percent,
or 1,903 carcasses of the 9,227, were
sampled with regard to meeting the
MSEP performance standards. The
establishment did not export to the
United States during Phase 1.
Ante-Mortem and Post-Mortem
Inspection
The Phase 1 results showed that the
establishment had exceeded the MSEP
standards although early non-
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:47 Mar 02, 2011
Jkt 223001
compliance was detected with regard to
controlling fecal, ingesta, or milk
contamination. As required by the
establishment’s HACCP plan,
establishment management took
corrective action, reassessed its
processes, and applied and maintained
adequate preventive measures to
address problems controlling fecal,
ingesta, or milk contamination. The data
also demonstrated that establishment
achieved results that were better than
the average results for the eight certified
Australian establishments used by AQIS
as a basis for comparison for MSEP
performance results. AQIS submitted 24
weeks of additional data (December 27,
2006–June 8, 2007), which showed that
the establishment exceeded the MSEP
performance standards. Overall, the
establishment demonstrated a high level
of compliance during Phase 1 and the
subsequent 24 weeks.
Microbiological Sampling
AQIS collected a total of 300 generic
E. coli samples and 300 Salmonella
samples during the six-week Phase 1
trial study. Test results indicated zero
(CFU/cm2) for generic E. coli and zero
percent positive for Salmonella.
Phase 2 of the MSEP Establishment
Field Trials
Phase 2 of the field trials at the
establishment began on April 28, 2008,
and ended on June 2, 2008. A total of
8,620 cattle were slaughtered and
processed during this six-week period.
Thirteen percent, or 1,122 carcasses of
the 8,620, were sampled with regards to
meeting the MSEP performance
standards. AQIS continued to collect
performance data from the
establishment between June 10 and
October 17, 2008, which is referred to as
post Phase 2. The establishment was
certified for export and exported raw
beef components for grinding to the
United States during Phase 2 and post
Phase 2.
Ante-Mortem and Post-Mortem
No non-compliance was detected
during ante-mortem inspection or postmortem inspection. There were two
occasions of non-compliance with
regard to zero tolerance for fecal,
ingesta, or milk contamination. As
required by the establishment HACCP
plan, establishment management took
corrective action, reassessed its
processes, and applied and maintained
adequate preventive measures. AQIS
verified the effectiveness of these
actions and stated that the primary
cause for zero tolerance detection was
dirty incoming cattle because of
inclement weather.
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Microbiological Sampling
AQIS collected a total of 280 generic
E. coli samples and 280 Salmonella
samples during Phase 2. During this sixweek period, no samples were positive
for Salmonella, and one sample was
positive for generic E. coli.
Post Phase 2, an additional 479
Salmonella samples and 522 generic E.
coli samples were taken during this 19week period. There were two instances
each of Salmonella and generic E. coli
detected during post phase 2. As
required by the establishment HACCP
plan, establishment management took
corrective action, reassessed its
processes, and applied and maintained
adequate preventive measures. While
the two positives for Salmonella
exceeded the MSEP microbiological
performance standard of zero percent
positive, the prevalence rate of 0.01
percent was within the Australian
export and U.S. performance standards
(1.0 percent for steers and heifers) and
below the prevalence rate of 0.12
percent for the eight conventional
inspection establishments tested over
the same period.
AQIS also took 280 samples for
Aerobic Plate Counts during Phase 2
and 532 samples during post Phase 2.
From a total of 812 samples, two counts
numbered above the performance
standard of 100 cfu/cm2. Therefore, data
showed 99.8 percent compliance with
the performance standard.
In December 2007, AQIS
implemented an E. coli O157:H7 control
program for Australian establishments
exporting raw beef components for
grinding to the United States. The MSEP
field trial establishment became part of
this program during Phase 2 and post
Phase 2. The establishment was subject
to E. coli O157:H7 testing during this
same period. A total of 65 samples were
taken for E. coli O157:H7 during Phase
2 and post Phase 2, with no positives
detected.
Complete MSEP field trial reports for
Phases 1 and 2 are available in the FSIS
docket room.
FSIS Audit Results
FSIS conducted three audits of this
establishment while it was operating
under the MSEP program. These audits
occurred August 29, 2007, May 14,
2008, and August 15, 2008. FSIS results
from the 2007 audit, before the
establishment was certified for export to
the United States, identified
shortcomings in process control and
HACCP procedures. The later audits
found that the establishment had
corrected these problems. The audits
indicated full compliance with the
E:\FR\FM\03MRN1.SGM
03MRN1
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 42 / Thursday, March 3, 2011 / Notices
MSEP requirements and no food safety
concerns.
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICES
FSIS Port-of-Entry Data
From June 25, 2008 through December
31, 2009, FSIS re-inspected 39 lots of
boneless beef from the establishment
with a total weight of approximately
588,000 pounds. FSIS re-inspection
activities for boneless beef included
boneless meat examination, chemical
residue testing, or testing for E. coli
O157:H7. Thirty-two of 39 lots received
re-inspection consisting of a boneless
meat examination, with all lots passing.
Two of 39 lots were tested for pesticides
or herbicides, with both tests negative.
Twelve of 39 lots were tested for E. coli
O157:H7, with all tests negative.
FSIS Conclusions
Australia’s meat inspection system is
equivalent to that of the U.S. Australia
has demonstrated that it provides an
appropriate level of oversight to AQIS
employees in establishments operating
under the conventional meat inspection
system and to AQIS employees in the
MSEP/AEMIS establishment. In
addition, in the establishment operating
under MSEP/AEMIS, FSIS has
concluded that Australia verifies that
establishment employees perform
necessary examination of heads and
viscera. Based on its review of the field
trial data and the establishment’s
performance, discussed above, FSIS is
affirming its 1999 equivalence decision
for MSEP/AEMIS.
AEMIS will be progressively
implemented in all Australian beef,
sheep and goat establishments eligible
to export to the United States. While the
Australian beef establishment discussed
above was undergoing the MSEP field
trials and exporting to the U.S., FSIS did
conduct enhanced port-of-entry reinspection of product from this
Australian establishment in addition to
conducting on-site audits of the
establishment. FSIS will initially
conduct similar enhanced procedures
for additional Australian establishments
operating under MSEP and exporting to
the U.S. FSIS will also conduct
continuing system audits, which
include data analyses and document
reviews, and port-of-entry re-inspection
to verify that Australia continues to
operate a meat inspection system
equivalent to the United States.
Additionally, FSIS will verify that
Australia continues to apply appropriate
performance measures and ensure that
establishment employees perform
necessary examination of heads and
viscera. This information, including
FSIS audit reports, will be made
available on the FSIS Web site.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:47 Mar 02, 2011
Jkt 223001
USDA Nondiscrimination Statement
11755
Through the Listserv and Web page,
FSIS is able to provide information to a
much broader, more diverse audience.
In addition, FSIS offers an e-mail
subscription service which provides an
automatic and customized notification
when popular pages are updated,
including Federal Register publications
and related documents. This service
allows FSIS customers to sign up for
subscription options across eight
categories. This service is available at
https://www.fsis.usda.gov/
News_&_Events/Email_Subscription/.
Options range from recalls to export
information to regulations, directives,
and notices. Customers can add or
delete subscriptions themselves and
have the option to protect their accounts
with passwords.
The U.S. Department of Agriculture
(USDA) prohibits discrimination in all
its programs and activities on the basis
of race, color, national origin, gender,
religion, age, disability, political beliefs,
sexual orientation, and marital or family
status. (Not all prohibited bases apply to
all programs.)
Persons with disabilities who require
alternative means for communication of
program information (Braille, large
print, audiotape, etc.) should contact
USDA’s Target Center at 202–720–2600
(voice and TTY).
To file a written complaint of
discrimination, write USDA, Office of
the Assistant Secretary for Civil Rights,
1400 Independence Avenue, SW.,
Washington, DC 20250–9410 or call
202–720–5964 (voice and TTY). USDA
is an equal opportunity provider and
employer.
Done at Washington, DC on March 1, 2011.
Alfred V. Almanza,
Administrator.
Additional Public Notification
[FR Doc. 2011–4902 Filed 3–1–11; 4:15 pm]
Public awareness of all segments of
rulemaking and policy development is
important. Consequently, in an effort to
ensure that minorities, women, and
persons with disabilities are aware of
this notice, FSIS will announce it online
through the FSIS Federal Register
Publications & Related Documents Web
page. View Notices by year for 2010.
The Regulations.gov Web site is the
central online rulemaking portal of the
United States government. It is being
offered as a public service to increase
participation in the Federal
government’s regulatory activities. FSIS
participates in Regulations.gov and will
accept comments on documents
published on the site. The site allows
visitors to search by keyword or
Department or Agency for rulemakings
that allow for public comment. Each
entry provides a quick link to a
comment form so that visitors can type
in their comments and submit them to
FSIS.
FSIS will also make copies of this
Federal Register publication available
through the FSIS Constituent Update,
which is used to provide information
regarding FSIS policies, procedures,
regulations, Federal Register notices,
FSIS public meetings, recalls, and other
types of information that could affect or
would be of interest to our constituents
and stakeholders. The update is
communicated via Listserv, a free e-mail
subscription service consisting of
industry, trade, and farm groups,
consumer interest groups, allied health
professionals, scientific professionals,
and other individuals who have
requested to be included. The update is
also available on the FSIS Web page.
BILLING CODE 3410–DM–P
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
COMMISSION ON CIVIL RIGHTS
Sunshine Act Notice
United States Commission on
Civil Rights.
ACTION: Notice of meeting.
AGENCY:
Friday, March 11, 2011;
9:30 a.m. EST.
PLACE: 624 Ninth Street, NW., Room
540, Washington, DC 20425.
DATE AND TIME:
Meeting Agenda
This meeting is open to the public.
Portions of This Meeting May Be Held in
Closed Session
I. Approval of Agenda.
II. White House Nominees for Chair,
Vice Chair and Staff Director.
III. Management and Operations:
• Staff Director’s report.
IV. Program Planning: Update and
discussion of projects.
• Consideration of new statutory
report topic for FY 2011.
• Consideration of briefing/hearing
topic(s) for FY 2011.
• Title IX—Sex Discrimination in
Liberal Arts College Admissions.
• English Only in the Workplace
Report.
• Healthcare Disparities Report.
V. State Advisory Committee Issues:
• Re-chartering the North Dakota
SAC.
• Re-chartering the Montana SAC.
VI. Approval of Feb. 11, 2011 Meeting
Minutes.
VII. Announcements.
E:\FR\FM\03MRN1.SGM
03MRN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 42 (Thursday, March 3, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 11752-11755]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-4902]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Food Safety and Inspection Service
[Docket No. FSIS-2009-0020]
Australia's Meat Safety Enhancement Program; Notice of
Affirmation of Equivalence Decision
AGENCY: Food Safety and Inspection Service, USDA.
ACTION: Notice of affirmation of equivalence decision.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Food Safety and Inspection Service (FSIS) is affirming its
1999 decision that Australia's Meat Safety Enhancement Program (MSEP),
an alternative to the conventional meat inspection system also
maintained by the Australian Government food regulatory authority
[Australia Quarantine and Inspection Service (AQIS)], is equivalent to
the FSIS domestic meat inspection system. MSEP has been renamed the
Australian Export Meat Inspection System (AEMIS), but the system itself
will remain the same as that determined to be equivalent by FSIS in
1999 when FSIS announced that slaughter inspection in MSEP
establishments meets all requirements of U.S. law for the import of
product to the United States, and provides the same level of public
health protection as U.S. domestic slaughter inspection. In this
notice, MSEP is used for events that occurred under that name, MSEP/
AEMIS for unchanging features of the program, and AEMIS for current and
projected activities. In January 2011, Australia informed FSIS that
AEMIS will be progressively implemented in all Australian beef, sheep,
and goat establishments eligible to export to the United States.
DATES: The Agency must receive comments by April 4, 2011.
ADDRESSES: FSIS invites comments on this notice. Comments may be
submitted by either of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: This Web site provides the
ability to type short comments directly into the comment field on this
Web page or attach a file for lengthier comments. Go to https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the online instructions at that site for
submitting comments.
Mail, including floppy disks or CD-ROMs, and hand- or
courier-delivered items: Send to Docket Clerk, USDA, FSIS, Room 2-2127
George Washington Carver Center, 5601 Sunnyside Avenue, Mailstop 5272,
Beltsville, MD 20705-5272.
Instructions: All items submitted by mail or electronic mail must
include the Agency name and docket number FSIS-2009-0020. Comments
received in response to this docket will be made available for public
inspection and posted without change, including any personal
information, to https://www.regulations.gov.
Docket: All comments submitted in response to this notice, as well
as research and background information used by FSIS in developing this
document, will be available for public inspection in the FSIS Docket
Room at the address listed above between 8 a.m. and 4:30 p.m., Monday
through Friday.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further information contact Dr.
Ronald K. Jones, Assistant Administrator, Office of International
Affairs, Food Safety and Inspection Service, USDA, Room 3143-S, 14th
and Independence Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20250-0070; telephone
(202) 720-3473, fax (202) 690-3856, e-mail Ronald.Jones@fsis.usda.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
The Federal Meat Inspection Act (FMIA) stipulates that no
carcasses, parts of carcasses, meat, or meat food products shall be
imported into the United States unless the livestock from which they
were produced was slaughtered and processed in accordance with all
provisions and regulations applicable to such articles in commerce
within the United States (21 U.S.C. 620). These provisions and
regulations include standards for safety, wholesomeness, and labeling
accuracy.
Foreign countries wanting to export meat to the United States must
apply to FSIS, following procedures set out in Sec. 327.2 of Title 9
of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR). To be found eligible, a
foreign country's national government must operate an inspection system
with legal authority for the inspection system. Its implementing
regulations and other implementing documentation must be equivalent to
those of the United States. Specifically, the national meat inspection
system must impose equivalent requirements with respect to: (1) Ante-
mortem and post-mortem inspection; (2) official controls by the
national government over plant construction, facilities, and equipment;
(3) direct and continuous supervision of slaughter activities and
product preparation; (4) separation of establishments certified to
export from those not certified; (5) maintenance of a single standard
of inspection and sanitation throughout certified establishments; (6)
requirements for sanitation at establishments certified to export and
for sanitary handling of product; and (7) official controls over
condemned product.
In order to achieve equivalence recognition, a foreign country must
submit its inspection system to an evaluation by FSIS consisting of a
document review and an on-site review. The document review is an
evaluation of the laws, regulations, and other implementing
documentation used by the country to enact its inspection program. The
foreign country provides a self-assessment of its national meat or
poultry inspection system, organized by six components: Government
oversight, statutory authority and food safety regulations, sanitation,
Hazard Analysis and Critical Control Point (HACCP) systems, chemical
residue testing programs, and microbiological testing programs. FSIS
evaluates the information submitted in these self-assessment documents
and conducts an on-site review to verify all aspects of the country's
inspection program, including laboratories and the foreign government's
oversight of the individual establishments within the country. This
comprehensive process is described fully on the FSIS Web site at https://www.fsis.usda.gov/Regulations_&_Policies/equivalence_process/index.asp.
If FSIS determines that a foreign country's inspection system is
equivalent, the Agency is required to conduct a rulemaking to list the
country in the meat inspection regulations, at 9 CFR 327.2, as eligible
to export meat and meat products to the United States. Once the
rulemaking is final, the foreign country certifies appropriate
establishments as having met required standards for export. This
certification ensures that both establishments producing meat for
export to the United States and the products of those establishments
comply with requirements that are equivalent to those of the FMIA and
the regulations that are promulgated under this statutory authority. To
verify that
[[Page 11753]]
products imported into the United States are safe, wholesome, and
properly labeled and packaged, FSIS re-inspects those products at
ports-of-entry (POEs) before they enter the United States. FSIS re-
inspects all shipments for overall condition, foreign government
certification, and labeling and then selects random lots of product and
assigns appropriate types of inspections such as product examination
and microbiological and residue testing for a more in-depth
examination.
Under the World Trade Organization (WTO) Agreement on Sanitary and
Phytosanitary Measures (SPS), the United States has international
obligations to respond to requests from other nations to establish the
equivalence of meat and poultry processing measures that differ from
those of the United States. In 1996, Australia, which has long been
eligible to export meat to the United States under its conventional
meat inspection system, approached FSIS with an alternative meat
slaughter inspection program called ``Project 2.'' FSIS announced in
the Federal Register (62 FR 29326, May 30, 1997) that it was making
available an AQIS submission on Project 2 and seeking public comment in
order to help in determining whether the United States should accept
meat produced by Australian establishments participating in Project 2
trials.
After extensive review, FSIS determined that Project 2 was not
equivalent because it did not provide adequate government oversight.
AQIS modified the proposed program, and FSIS announced the availability
of a new AQIS paper on the program, renamed MSEP, in a Federal Register
Notice (64 FR 2621, January 15, 1999; the MSEP paper is available on
the FSIS Web site with this notice at https://www.fsis.usda.gov/regulations_&_policies/Federal_Register_Notices/index.asp). The
1999 notice also announced a public meeting on MSEP for February 3,
1999, to seek input from U.S. industry, U.S. consumer groups, and other
FSIS stakeholders.
FSIS evaluated comments on the AQIS paper and the public meeting
and determined that MSEP is equivalent to the U.S. meat slaughter
inspection program. FSIS announced this decision in a Federal Register
Notice (64 FR 30299, June 7, 1999; MSEP equivalence). The Agency added
that it would review its equivalence decision once AQIS had conducted
field trials and submitted the results to FSIS and would then publish
its conclusions in a Federal Register Notice. In the interim,
establishments participating in MSEP field trials could export product
to the United States. At the time, AQIS expected a beef establishment
to participate in MSEP field trials in the near future. For various
reasons, however, it was not until 2006 that a different beef slaughter
establishment volunteered for MSEP field trials. That establishment is
the one referenced in this notice.
MSEP/AEMIS
MSEP/AEMIS is an alternative meat slaughter inspection program in
which establishment employees perform certain duties traditionally
performed by government inspectors. Under MSEP/AEMIS, establishment
employees instead of government inspectors are responsible for post-
mortem examination of the heads and viscera of livestock. AQIS
veterinarians are responsible for performing ante-mortem inspection,
verifying post-mortem inspection, verifying establishment examination
activities, providing final disposition on animals and carcasses/heads/
viscera where there is evidence of disease, verifying HACCP and SSOP
programs, and performing other food safety activities. AQIS inspectors
are responsible for final inspection of each carcass for food safety
defects. It should be noted that the establishment employees who are
responsible for the initial examination of the heads and viscera for
referral to AQIS veterinarians have completed the same training and
have the same qualifications as established by AQIS for its government
inspectors.
An establishment wishing to participate in MSEP/AEMIS must meet
entry conditions detailed in an Approved Arrangement with AQIS. An
applicant establishment must be able to demonstrate consistent
performance under the Meat Hygiene Assessment (MHA) national plant
performance rating system administered by AQIS. For the purposes of the
beef establishment trials, the current MSEP/AEMIS beef standards are
detailed in an AQIS MSEP paper of March 2007, Meat Safety Enhancement
Program: Establishing Performance Standards for Beef Slaughter. This
paper is available on the FSIS Web site with this notice at https://www.fsis.usda.gov/regulations_&_policies/Federal_Register_Notices/index.asp.
MSEP/AEMIS Performance Standards
The MSEP/AEMIS performance standards for beef slaughter are based
on those used in the FSIS HACCP-Based Inspection Models Project (HIMP)
for swine, which were first published in July 1998 (HIMP inspection
models) and later detailed in the Federal Register in November 2000 (65
FR 65828-65829; performance standards for HIMP plants). Several HIMP
market hog establishments have been operating since 2000. MSEP/AEMIS
incorporates the same food safety performance standards as established
by FSIS for HIMP, which included a zero tolerance for post-mortem
infectious conditions, fecal material, ingesta, milk, and ante-mortem
conditions found in cattle, such as neurological conditions, and
moribund, febrile, and non-ambulatory cattle. The MSEP/AEMIS
performance standards also include the HIMP performance attributes for
wholesomeness, i.e., non-infectious conditions, such as post-mortem
carcass and offal pathology and general carcass and offal
contamination. In addition, MSEP/AEMIS performance standards include a
performance standard for Aerobic Plate Counts of 100 colony forming
units per square centimeter (100 cfu/cm\2\).
In applying the MSEP/AEMIS performance standards for the field
trials, AQIS compared MSEP results against MHA data from eight
Australian beef slaughter establishments certified to export to the
United States under conventional inspection. MHA records establishment
performance against food safety standards established by AQIS for all
Australian establishments exporting meat products to the United States
and other countries. AQIS selected these eight establishments as the
best performers based on AQIS inspection and compliance data and
results of FSIS audits of these establishments that had occurred within
the previous five years. These establishments also represent one-third
of Australia's annual total beef production. For a close comparison,
data from these eight establishments certified under conventional
inspection were gathered at the same time as at the MSEP establishment.
In addition, cattle slaughtered at these eight establishments were the
same type of cattle as slaughtered at the MSEP establishment.
Microbiological Performance Standards
As part of the MSEP/AEMIS performance standards, AQIS established
microbiological performance standards for generic Escherichia coli (E.
coli) and Salmonella, which remain the same under the new program name
of AEMIS. These MSEP/AEMIS performance standards are equal to or more
stringent than the FSIS performance standards for the same organisms.
For Australian
[[Page 11754]]
establishments producing under MSEP/AEMIS, no positives are allowed for
either Salmonella or generic E. coli. In comparison, FSIS
microbiological performance standards allow for one positive for
Salmonella and one positive for generic E. coli for steers and heifers
and two positives for generic E. coli for cows and bulls. The MSEP test
results are discussed below.
MSEP Field Trial Proceedings
In January 2006, AQIS notified FSIS that one Australian
establishment was interested in producing beef products for export to
the United States under MSEP. This was Australia's first interest in
exporting beef under MSEP since the 1999 equivalence determination.
Because of the extensive time between the FSIS 1999 equivalence
decision and the request by Australia to export under MSEP, AQIS
submitted a revised MSEP program for consideration by FSIS. The
revisions were minor and consisted of clarification of the separation
of duties and responsibilities for AQIS and the establishment and an
increase in the frequency of testing beef carcasses for Salmonella.
The MSEP field trials for the establishment consisted of two
phases, Phase 1 and Phase 2. As part of the 1999 equivalence decision,
an Australian MSEP establishment was required to complete a 6-week
field trial and would be allowed to export beef products to the United
States while undergoing the trial. This agreement was based, however,
on the MSEP establishment already being certified by AQIS for export to
the United States. The establishment that actually participated in the
field trial was not a certified establishment. Therefore, AQIS added an
additional 6-week field trial study as Phase 1.
MSEP Field Trial Results and Discussion
Phase 1
The 6-week MSEP field trial at the establishment under Phase 1
began on November 13, 2006, and ended on December 22, 2006. A total of
9,227 cattle were slaughtered and processed during this period. Twenty-
one percent, or 1,903 carcasses of the 9,227, were sampled with regard
to meeting the MSEP performance standards. The establishment did not
export to the United States during Phase 1.
Ante-Mortem and Post-Mortem Inspection
The Phase 1 results showed that the establishment had exceeded the
MSEP standards although early non-compliance was detected with regard
to controlling fecal, ingesta, or milk contamination. As required by
the establishment's HACCP plan, establishment management took
corrective action, reassessed its processes, and applied and maintained
adequate preventive measures to address problems controlling fecal,
ingesta, or milk contamination. The data also demonstrated that
establishment achieved results that were better than the average
results for the eight certified Australian establishments used by AQIS
as a basis for comparison for MSEP performance results. AQIS submitted
24 weeks of additional data (December 27, 2006-June 8, 2007), which
showed that the establishment exceeded the MSEP performance standards.
Overall, the establishment demonstrated a high level of compliance
during Phase 1 and the subsequent 24 weeks.
Microbiological Sampling
AQIS collected a total of 300 generic E. coli samples and 300
Salmonella samples during the six-week Phase 1 trial study. Test
results indicated zero (CFU/cm\2\) for generic E. coli and zero percent
positive for Salmonella.
Phase 2 of the MSEP Establishment Field Trials
Phase 2 of the field trials at the establishment began on April 28,
2008, and ended on June 2, 2008. A total of 8,620 cattle were
slaughtered and processed during this six-week period. Thirteen
percent, or 1,122 carcasses of the 8,620, were sampled with regards to
meeting the MSEP performance standards. AQIS continued to collect
performance data from the establishment between June 10 and October 17,
2008, which is referred to as post Phase 2. The establishment was
certified for export and exported raw beef components for grinding to
the United States during Phase 2 and post Phase 2.
Ante-Mortem and Post-Mortem
No non-compliance was detected during ante-mortem inspection or
post-mortem inspection. There were two occasions of non-compliance with
regard to zero tolerance for fecal, ingesta, or milk contamination. As
required by the establishment HACCP plan, establishment management took
corrective action, reassessed its processes, and applied and maintained
adequate preventive measures. AQIS verified the effectiveness of these
actions and stated that the primary cause for zero tolerance detection
was dirty incoming cattle because of inclement weather.
Microbiological Sampling
AQIS collected a total of 280 generic E. coli samples and 280
Salmonella samples during Phase 2. During this six-week period, no
samples were positive for Salmonella, and one sample was positive for
generic E. coli.
Post Phase 2, an additional 479 Salmonella samples and 522 generic
E. coli samples were taken during this 19-week period. There were two
instances each of Salmonella and generic E. coli detected during post
phase 2. As required by the establishment HACCP plan, establishment
management took corrective action, reassessed its processes, and
applied and maintained adequate preventive measures. While the two
positives for Salmonella exceeded the MSEP microbiological performance
standard of zero percent positive, the prevalence rate of 0.01 percent
was within the Australian export and U.S. performance standards (1.0
percent for steers and heifers) and below the prevalence rate of 0.12
percent for the eight conventional inspection establishments tested
over the same period.
AQIS also took 280 samples for Aerobic Plate Counts during Phase 2
and 532 samples during post Phase 2. From a total of 812 samples, two
counts numbered above the performance standard of 100 cfu/cm\2\.
Therefore, data showed 99.8 percent compliance with the performance
standard.
In December 2007, AQIS implemented an E. coli O157:H7 control
program for Australian establishments exporting raw beef components for
grinding to the United States. The MSEP field trial establishment
became part of this program during Phase 2 and post Phase 2. The
establishment was subject to E. coli O157:H7 testing during this same
period. A total of 65 samples were taken for E. coli O157:H7 during
Phase 2 and post Phase 2, with no positives detected.
Complete MSEP field trial reports for Phases 1 and 2 are available
in the FSIS docket room.
FSIS Audit Results
FSIS conducted three audits of this establishment while it was
operating under the MSEP program. These audits occurred August 29,
2007, May 14, 2008, and August 15, 2008. FSIS results from the 2007
audit, before the establishment was certified for export to the United
States, identified shortcomings in process control and HACCP
procedures. The later audits found that the establishment had corrected
these problems. The audits indicated full compliance with the
[[Page 11755]]
MSEP requirements and no food safety concerns.
FSIS Port-of-Entry Data
From June 25, 2008 through December 31, 2009, FSIS re-inspected 39
lots of boneless beef from the establishment with a total weight of
approximately 588,000 pounds. FSIS re-inspection activities for
boneless beef included boneless meat examination, chemical residue
testing, or testing for E. coli O157:H7. Thirty-two of 39 lots received
re-inspection consisting of a boneless meat examination, with all lots
passing. Two of 39 lots were tested for pesticides or herbicides, with
both tests negative. Twelve of 39 lots were tested for E. coli O157:H7,
with all tests negative.
FSIS Conclusions
Australia's meat inspection system is equivalent to that of the
U.S. Australia has demonstrated that it provides an appropriate level
of oversight to AQIS employees in establishments operating under the
conventional meat inspection system and to AQIS employees in the MSEP/
AEMIS establishment. In addition, in the establishment operating under
MSEP/AEMIS, FSIS has concluded that Australia verifies that
establishment employees perform necessary examination of heads and
viscera. Based on its review of the field trial data and the
establishment's performance, discussed above, FSIS is affirming its
1999 equivalence decision for MSEP/AEMIS.
AEMIS will be progressively implemented in all Australian beef,
sheep and goat establishments eligible to export to the United States.
While the Australian beef establishment discussed above was undergoing
the MSEP field trials and exporting to the U.S., FSIS did conduct
enhanced port-of-entry re-inspection of product from this Australian
establishment in addition to conducting on-site audits of the
establishment. FSIS will initially conduct similar enhanced procedures
for additional Australian establishments operating under MSEP and
exporting to the U.S. FSIS will also conduct continuing system audits,
which include data analyses and document reviews, and port-of-entry re-
inspection to verify that Australia continues to operate a meat
inspection system equivalent to the United States. Additionally, FSIS
will verify that Australia continues to apply appropriate performance
measures and ensure that establishment employees perform necessary
examination of heads and viscera. This information, including FSIS
audit reports, will be made available on the FSIS Web site.
USDA Nondiscrimination Statement
The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination
in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color,
national origin, gender, religion, age, disability, political beliefs,
sexual orientation, and marital or family status. (Not all prohibited
bases apply to all programs.)
Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for
communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape,
etc.) should contact USDA's Target Center at 202-720-2600 (voice and
TTY).
To file a written complaint of discrimination, write USDA, Office
of the Assistant Secretary for Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue,
SW., Washington, DC 20250-9410 or call 202-720-5964 (voice and TTY).
USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer.
Additional Public Notification
Public awareness of all segments of rulemaking and policy
development is important. Consequently, in an effort to ensure that
minorities, women, and persons with disabilities are aware of this
notice, FSIS will announce it online through the FSIS Federal Register
Publications & Related Documents Web page. View Notices by year for
2010.
The Regulations.gov Web site is the central online rulemaking
portal of the United States government. It is being offered as a public
service to increase participation in the Federal government's
regulatory activities. FSIS participates in Regulations.gov and will
accept comments on documents published on the site. The site allows
visitors to search by keyword or Department or Agency for rulemakings
that allow for public comment. Each entry provides a quick link to a
comment form so that visitors can type in their comments and submit
them to FSIS.
FSIS will also make copies of this Federal Register publication
available through the FSIS Constituent Update, which is used to provide
information regarding FSIS policies, procedures, regulations, Federal
Register notices, FSIS public meetings, recalls, and other types of
information that could affect or would be of interest to our
constituents and stakeholders. The update is communicated via Listserv,
a free e-mail subscription service consisting of industry, trade, and
farm groups, consumer interest groups, allied health professionals,
scientific professionals, and other individuals who have requested to
be included. The update is also available on the FSIS Web page. Through
the Listserv and Web page, FSIS is able to provide information to a
much broader, more diverse audience.
In addition, FSIS offers an e-mail subscription service which
provides an automatic and customized notification when popular pages
are updated, including Federal Register publications and related
documents. This service allows FSIS customers to sign up for
subscription options across eight categories. This service is available
at https://www.fsis.usda.gov/News_&_Events/Email_Subscription/.
Options range from recalls to export information to regulations,
directives, and notices. Customers can add or delete subscriptions
themselves and have the option to protect their accounts with
passwords.
Done at Washington, DC on March 1, 2011.
Alfred V. Almanza,
Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2011-4902 Filed 3-1-11; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 3410-DM-P